Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 20 :: one page |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1241
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 19:37:00 -
[331] - Quote
XxRTEKxX wrote:Tara Read wrote:XxRTEKxX wrote:Maybe a couple dreads. Or several battleships. Whatever, as long as the guns can be destroyed if this gate gun change is something ccp is hell bent on doing. At least if the guns have the same ehp as pos guns. Or....just do as we do now and refrain from using capital period? Looks like ccp doesn't want it as it is now. They seem to what they want and compromise after. Just use supercarriers and titans.
Waiting for the devblog about the need for gate guns to threaten a titan within 5 minutes. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Dimitri Zaitsev
Tellurium Fighters
4
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 20:26:00 -
[332] - Quote
/ signed.
Not a lowsec roamer but this is really stupid.
CCP likes to change rules during the game match just to make things easier to the new players.
If you want a safe space, just stay in hisec and do something against those sweet water pirates camping hisec stations with logistics support.
But losec is losec. If you don't know how to survive there, just don't go there. |

Lin-Young Borovskova
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
622
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 20:29:00 -
[333] - Quote
Keep Gate/Station camping, go ahead do it, smartbomb everything blahblahblah. This is how low sec is supposed to be (in some people's mind) brb |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
2327
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 20:31:00 -
[334] - Quote
This simply puts a time limit on how long you can sit on the gates after drawing sentry gun attention, it even allows you the use of frigates to get the inital tackle long enough for tankier ships to get a point.
If you are worried about picking up the wrecks afterwards simply put your looting alt into a deep space transport. It should be able to tank the guns with ease for more than long enough, although if your wrecks are scattered you may have to warp out and then back in to get the next one.
Again, as far as I know, a low security status has nothing to do with this. To carve a successful niche for yourself in EVE you need to be able to out sell, out produce, out fight,-á out run, or out wit your competitors. If you can do none of the above, your only option is to complain on the forums that somehow you are at a disadvantage using the exact same tool set-áas the rest of the player base. |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1241
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 20:42:00 -
[335] - Quote
Tara Read wrote:Takeshi Yamato wrote:If capitals on gates is a problem (personally I've never seen any capitals camping lowsec gates) then the most logical step would be to add citadel torpedo launchers that only target capitals. I've only seen a Moros once off a Low Sec gate and we just about killed it. No serious Pirate is going to risk a capital off a gate with titan bridge's and the like around. Officer smartbombing titans ahoy. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Yabba Addict
Red Shift Enterprises
32
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 21:08:00 -
[336] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:Sure, I'll make a note to have another look at this and get some more player feedback when we start finalizing the designs.
Been totally reassured that what you're doing isn't a huge fuckup. Totally. |

Tara Read
The Generic Pirate Corporation Fusion.
119
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 21:19:00 -
[337] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Tara Read wrote:Takeshi Yamato wrote:If capitals on gates is a problem (personally I've never seen any capitals camping lowsec gates) then the most logical step would be to add citadel torpedo launchers that only target capitals. I've only seen a Moros once off a Low Sec gate and we just about killed it. No serious Pirate is going to risk a capital off a gate with titan bridge's and the like around. Officer smartbombing titans ahoy.
Get out of my Low Sec.... Damned kids with your Titans and loud music... |

Tara Read
The Generic Pirate Corporation Fusion.
119
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 21:20:00 -
[338] - Quote
XxRTEKxX wrote:Tara Read wrote:XxRTEKxX wrote:Alavaria Fera wrote:XxRTEKxX wrote:At least if we had the ability to destroy the gate guns with a big enough fleet and they just respawn after DT. So 5 titans to clear the gate for easy camping action? Maybe a couple dreads. Or several battleships. Whatever, as long as the guns can be destroyed if this gate gun change is something ccp is hell bent on doing. At least if the guns have the same ehp as pos guns. Or....just do as we do now and refrain from using capital period? Looks like ccp doesn't want it as it is now. They seem to what they want and compromise after. Look at the inventory window. I liked how it was before. Most said they didn't want change but ccp did it anyways. Its only after they change something that they make any compromise.
That's fine. Guild Wars 2 is on my agenda anyways. |

Johan Civire
Dirty Curse inc.
69
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 22:17:00 -
[339] - Quote
Tara Read wrote:Alright I normally don't get involved in the gripe fests that surround game mechanics. Personally I've played Eve off and on since 2004 with a few breaks here and there and seen many changes come to New Eden. Some for the better some for worse, but overall I must hand it to CCP they've kept me coming back for more with new opportunities and changes.
Eve to me has always basically been be whatever you want. Want to fight for a faction? Done. Want to make billions or risk losing it all in a Wormhole? Done. Research? Done. Be part of some conglomerate of null sec knuckleheads (grin) Done.
Myself Piracy has always been a dark lust. Preying upon those fool enough to step into the depths of unlawful space has been one of the main reasons why I love this game. Low sec to me has always been home. It's also where I have made some very good friends and seen some of the brightest players in Eve come and go over the years.
Yet today the announcement by CCP Greyscale stating Sentry Gun changes has me more than worried. This move could potentially destroy what is left of any activity in Low Sec. We all know the saying: Low Sec is dead. Why do you ask? Much of the traffic that was coming into low sec was due profit that was still viable a few years back.
Now with the major null sec alliances keeping a vice grip on any and everything it has shown that low sec is nothing but old news except sadly for systems you pass through on your way to null or back into high sec. For those of us still around it's still home.
Here is what was quoted by CCP Greyscale in the minutes released yesterday:
CSM minutes wrote: CCP Greyscale moves on to explain his work on sentry guns. Sentry guns will now shoot anyone with a criminal flag, suspect or otherwise. Sentry guns will also start with smaller amounts of damage, and ramp up with time. Ideal tuning will be to where triage carriers will die at around 4 1/2 minutes. This way, if you want to use triage carriers in lowsec on gates you can, but you must commit to the cycle for a length of time before starting your reps, if you want to deactivate triage before the sentry guns kill you and jump out. CCP Greyscale also points out that another goal is to make it so that the first couple of hits won't kill an interceptor immediately, enabling a quick tackle, and then a warp out.
What does this mean? Essentially it is led up to interpretation but anyone "suspect" hence anyone with negative sec status will essentially be fired upon in low sec. GCC no longer becomes applicable and fights on gates now will be reduced to under 5 minutes or until all aggressor's are destroyed.
This also means that while traveling through Low Sec even without GCC someone would potentially be fired upon. This also means that Sentries will simply be untankable even with different persons sharing the aggression during a fight.
It effectively stops any combat after 5 minutes for the aggressor and further kills any sort of decent fight that may be had off a gate except for a quick gank and run which really isn't a decent fight anyways,
I personally feel this is a tremendous mistake not only due to Sentry mechanics, but how such mechanics will force players OUT of Low Sec permanently to either high sec or for many of us the unappealing systems in Null.
I understand some here may only see this in terms of Gatecamps. However it not only effects camps but the very combat mechanics that will now have to be dealt with in Low Sec putting anyone with low security status at a dismal disadvantage during a fight which would eventually end in a loss after 4 to 5 minutes regardless.
With such mechanics in place it has already been discussed by myself and others in my alliance that if such changes were indeed implemented we'd have no desire to move out to Null to conform and would most likely unsubscribe.
Many of us who live in Low Sec have played this game for far too long to see the last bit of what makes this game fun to us essentially twisted and contorted into a region that will now truly be "dead".
I beseech CCP Greyscale and others to rethink these mechanics not only for the players who call Low Sec home, but also in regards to the future limited combat in Low Sec which would thus make it truly unfavorable and unwanted.
If these changes do go into effect I for one will be unsubscribing all three of my accounts and simply moving on. It's not worth my time and money to be forced into regions of Eve I feel are hardly fun or appealing.
Please sign below if you agree.
And a other QQ post about this USING your alt is a scaring act off a noob. Get over it. I can also say i played sinds orginal beta close beta and play the 2D game at start.... This is not trusting thats just ignoring like a troll. |

Tara Read
The Generic Pirate Corporation Fusion.
120
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 22:40:00 -
[340] - Quote
Johan Civire wrote:Tara Read wrote:Alright I normally don't get involved in the gripe fests that surround game mechanics. Personally I've played Eve off and on since 2004 with a few breaks here and there and seen many changes come to New Eden. Some for the better some for worse, but overall I must hand it to CCP they've kept me coming back for more with new opportunities and changes.
Eve to me has always basically been be whatever you want. Want to fight for a faction? Done. Want to make billions or risk losing it all in a Wormhole? Done. Research? Done. Be part of some conglomerate of null sec knuckleheads (grin) Done.
Myself Piracy has always been a dark lust. Preying upon those fool enough to step into the depths of unlawful space has been one of the main reasons why I love this game. Low sec to me has always been home. It's also where I have made some very good friends and seen some of the brightest players in Eve come and go over the years.
Yet today the announcement by CCP Greyscale stating Sentry Gun changes has me more than worried. This move could potentially destroy what is left of any activity in Low Sec. We all know the saying: Low Sec is dead. Why do you ask? Much of the traffic that was coming into low sec was due profit that was still viable a few years back.
Now with the major null sec alliances keeping a vice grip on any and everything it has shown that low sec is nothing but old news except sadly for systems you pass through on your way to null or back into high sec. For those of us still around it's still home.
Here is what was quoted by CCP Greyscale in the minutes released yesterday:
CSM minutes wrote: CCP Greyscale moves on to explain his work on sentry guns. Sentry guns will now shoot anyone with a criminal flag, suspect or otherwise. Sentry guns will also start with smaller amounts of damage, and ramp up with time. Ideal tuning will be to where triage carriers will die at around 4 1/2 minutes. This way, if you want to use triage carriers in lowsec on gates you can, but you must commit to the cycle for a length of time before starting your reps, if you want to deactivate triage before the sentry guns kill you and jump out. CCP Greyscale also points out that another goal is to make it so that the first couple of hits won't kill an interceptor immediately, enabling a quick tackle, and then a warp out.
What does this mean? Essentially it is led up to interpretation but anyone "suspect" hence anyone with negative sec status will essentially be fired upon in low sec. GCC no longer becomes applicable and fights on gates now will be reduced to under 5 minutes or until all aggressor's are destroyed.
This also means that while traveling through Low Sec even without GCC someone would potentially be fired upon. This also means that Sentries will simply be untankable even with different persons sharing the aggression during a fight.
It effectively stops any combat after 5 minutes for the aggressor and further kills any sort of decent fight that may be had off a gate except for a quick gank and run which really isn't a decent fight anyways,
I personally feel this is a tremendous mistake not only due to Sentry mechanics, but how such mechanics will force players OUT of Low Sec permanently to either high sec or for many of us the unappealing systems in Null.
I understand some here may only see this in terms of Gatecamps. However it not only effects camps but the very combat mechanics that will now have to be dealt with in Low Sec putting anyone with low security status at a dismal disadvantage during a fight which would eventually end in a loss after 4 to 5 minutes regardless.
With such mechanics in place it has already been discussed by myself and others in my alliance that if such changes were indeed implemented we'd have no desire to move out to Null to conform and would most likely unsubscribe.
Many of us who live in Low Sec have played this game for far too long to see the last bit of what makes this game fun to us essentially twisted and contorted into a region that will now truly be "dead".
I beseech CCP Greyscale and others to rethink these mechanics not only for the players who call Low Sec home, but also in regards to the future limited combat in Low Sec which would thus make it truly unfavorable and unwanted.
If these changes do go into effect I for one will be unsubscribing all three of my accounts and simply moving on. It's not worth my time and money to be forced into regions of Eve I feel are hardly fun or appealing.
Please sign below if you agree. And a other QQ post about this USING your alt is a scaring act off a noob. Get over it. I can also say i played sinds orginal beta close beta and play the 2D game at start.... This is not trusting thats just ignoring like a troll.
Proper English and sentence structure goes a LONG way...
|

Homo Jesus
The LGBT Last Supper
32
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 22:49:00 -
[341] - Quote
Johan Civire wrote: And a other QQ post about this USING your alt is a scaring act off a noob. Get over it. I can also say i played sinds orginal beta close beta and play the 2D game at start.... This is not trusting thats just ignoring like a troll.
Proper English? How about just English because I have no idea what that is supposed to mean. Maybe smoke signals would work better next time. |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
2328
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 23:41:00 -
[342] - Quote
Still waiting to see the part that I apparently missed that says that a low sec status has anything at all to do with being "Suspect". To carve a successful niche for yourself in EVE you need to be able to out sell, out produce, out fight,-á out run, or out wit your competitors. If you can do none of the above, your only option is to complain on the forums that somehow you are at a disadvantage using the exact same tool set-áas the rest of the player base. |

Homo Jesus
The LGBT Last Supper
32
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 23:48:00 -
[343] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:Still waiting to see the part that I apparently missed that says that a low sec status has anything at all to do with being "Suspect".
"Sentry guns will now shoot anyone with a criminal flag, suspect or otherwise"
That do it for ya? Criminal flag as in outlaw or gcc is his problem to clear up which I think he did. |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
2328
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 23:57:00 -
[344] - Quote
Homo Jesus wrote:Ranger 1 wrote:Still waiting to see the part that I apparently missed that says that a low sec status has anything at all to do with being "Suspect". "Sentry guns will now shoot anyone with a criminal flag, suspect or otherwise" That do it for ya? Criminal flag as in outlaw or gcc is his problem to clear up which I think he did. And now would come the part I asked for... source PLEASE!
Edit: Never mind, I found it. Wow boys, you really need to learn to take things in context.
You actually think that what he is saying is that in Low Sec, if you have a bad sec status, the Sentries will fire on you?
           To carve a successful niche for yourself in EVE you need to be able to out sell, out produce, out fight,-á out run, or out wit your competitors. If you can do none of the above, your only option is to complain on the forums that somehow you are at a disadvantage using the exact same tool set-áas the rest of the player base. |

Tara Read
The Generic Pirate Corporation Fusion.
121
|
Posted - 2012.08.07 00:01:00 -
[345] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:Homo Jesus wrote:Ranger 1 wrote:Still waiting to see the part that I apparently missed that says that a low sec status has anything at all to do with being "Suspect". "Sentry guns will now shoot anyone with a criminal flag, suspect or otherwise" That do it for ya? Criminal flag as in outlaw or gcc is his problem to clear up which I think he did. And now would come the part I asked for... source PLEASE!
It's already been quoted by CCP Greyscale in the CSM minutes. |

Tara Read
The Generic Pirate Corporation Fusion.
121
|
Posted - 2012.08.07 00:03:00 -
[346] - Quote
Sigh.... Have you not read over fifteen pages worth of information? It could be put into that context however the MAIN concern is the gate guns being able to wipe even a Triage Carrier off the field within a mere five minutes of agression thus ending any prolonged engagements.
FYI that little tidbit was also in the minutes. |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
2328
|
Posted - 2012.08.07 00:03:00 -
[347] - Quote
Tara Read wrote:Ranger 1 wrote:Homo Jesus wrote:Ranger 1 wrote:Still waiting to see the part that I apparently missed that says that a low sec status has anything at all to do with being "Suspect". "Sentry guns will now shoot anyone with a criminal flag, suspect or otherwise" That do it for ya? Criminal flag as in outlaw or gcc is his problem to clear up which I think he did. And now would come the part I asked for... source PLEASE! It's already been quoted by CCP Greyscale in the CSM minutes.
Sorry Tara, I edited my post as you were responding. To carve a successful niche for yourself in EVE you need to be able to out sell, out produce, out fight,-á out run, or out wit your competitors. If you can do none of the above, your only option is to complain on the forums that somehow you are at a disadvantage using the exact same tool set-áas the rest of the player base. |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
2328
|
Posted - 2012.08.07 00:05:00 -
[348] - Quote
Tara Read wrote:Sigh.... Have you not read over fifteen pages worth of information? It could be put into that context however the MAIN concern is the gate guns being able to wipe even a Triage Carrier off the field within a mere five minutes of agression thus ending any prolonged engagements. FYI that little tidbit was also in the minutes.
That's not the thrust of the original post... and frankly being able to tank the gate guns in any area indefinitely is a poor mechanic to begin with.
You will get little sympathy from any "pirate" worth his salt, or anyone else for that matter.
To carve a successful niche for yourself in EVE you need to be able to out sell, out produce, out fight,-á out run, or out wit your competitors. If you can do none of the above, your only option is to complain on the forums that somehow you are at a disadvantage using the exact same tool set-áas the rest of the player base. |

Tara Read
The Generic Pirate Corporation Fusion.
121
|
Posted - 2012.08.07 00:08:00 -
[349] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:Tara Read wrote:Sigh.... Have you not read over fifteen pages worth of information? It could be put into that context however the MAIN concern is the gate guns being able to wipe even a Triage Carrier off the field within a mere five minutes of agression thus ending any prolonged engagements. FYI that little tidbit was also in the minutes. That's not the thrust of the original post... and frankly being able to tank the gate guns in any area indefinitely is a poor mechanic to begin with. You will get little sympathy from any "pirate" worth his salt, or anyone else for that matter.
Oh Jesus.... gate guns already are "untankable" to single ships unless multiple persons share aggression... And yes that IS the thrust of the original post. The original post was clearly stating a negative change to small gang engagements off gates.
And don't give me this "pirate worth his salt etc etc" tripe. You've had multiple pirates from all backgrounds comment and agree with the points I originally outlined. |

Nerf Burger
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
24
|
Posted - 2012.08.07 00:08:00 -
[350] - Quote
Tara Read wrote:[
No it'll make you think Sentries will hold your hand through each jump through low sec. "Livening up" low sec does not mean making it easier for you to pass through the system to your destination.
This quote highlights just how stupid some gate campers really are. Anyone that can actually think logically knows that if low sec is more accessible, it will increase traffic.
PVP in this game is skilless enough as it is. Oh-no, the game got a little bit harder, better cry on the forums.
Great job with this change CCP. More tears from the easymode pvp crowd please. |

Tara Read
The Generic Pirate Corporation Fusion.
121
|
Posted - 2012.08.07 00:13:00 -
[351] - Quote
Nerf Burger wrote:Tara Read wrote:[
No it'll make you think Sentries will hold your hand through each jump through low sec. "Livening up" low sec does not mean making it easier for you to pass through the system to your destination. This quote highlights just how stupid some gate campers really are. Anyone that can actually think logically knows that if low sec is more accessible it will increase traffic. More lazy, stupid EVE "pvper" tears please.
You really should try to use more than 5% of that grey matter rattling around inside your head. If you had read any of the points outlined and reiterated it has little to nothing to do with "camps." If anything it would be a detriment and would encourage even more cheap tactics for others to catch prey quickly then leave.
If all you desire is sniping fleets with fast interceptor tackle to snag targets and have zero true committed engagements be my guest. You clearly are talking out your ass. |

Yabba Addict
Red Shift Enterprises
32
|
Posted - 2012.08.07 00:15:00 -
[352] - Quote
And having sebo boosted inties that can insta lock and have a good chance of locking blockade runners is gonna increase traffic? |

Homo Jesus
The LGBT Last Supper
32
|
Posted - 2012.08.07 00:16:00 -
[353] - Quote
Nerf Burger wrote:Tara Read wrote:[
No it'll make you think Sentries will hold your hand through each jump through low sec. "Livening up" low sec does not mean making it easier for you to pass through the system to your destination. This quote highlights just how stupid some gate campers really are. Anyone that can actually think logically knows that if low sec is more accessible it will increase traffic. More lazy, stupid EVE "pvper" tears please.
An example of an activity this increased traffic will partake in now that the gates and stations are all magically cleared? |

Nerf Burger
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
24
|
Posted - 2012.08.07 00:18:00 -
[354] - Quote
Tara Read wrote:Nerf Burger wrote:Tara Read wrote:[
No it'll make you think Sentries will hold your hand through each jump through low sec. "Livening up" low sec does not mean making it easier for you to pass through the system to your destination. This quote highlights just how stupid some gate campers really are. Anyone that can actually think logically knows that if low sec is more accessible it will increase traffic. More lazy, stupid EVE "pvper" tears please. You really should try to use more than 5% of that grey matter rattling around inside your head. If you had read any of the points outlined and reiterated it has little to nothing to do with "camps." If anything it would be a detriment and would encourage even more cheap tactics for others to catch prey quickly then leave. If all you desire is sniping fleets with fast interceptor tackle to snag targets and have zero true committed engagements be my guest. You clearly are talking out your ass.
oh, i did read your incredibly one-side and narrow minded perspective. Listen to you, defending gatecamping and crying about cheap tactics emerging. LOL. 
eve "pvpers" really are the dumbest of all mmorpg pvpers. Driven from games that require actual skill. About time CCP shat on you and took away your easymode kills. In other pvp games, players actually have to work for their kills, they dont just sit around waiting for victims and merely have to click 2-3 buttons with their mouse FTW. |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1244
|
Posted - 2012.08.07 00:23:00 -
[355] - Quote
Homo Jesus wrote: An example of an activity this increased traffic will partake in now that the gates and stations are all magically cleared? Station trading and manufacturing capitals, doubtless. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Tara Read
The Generic Pirate Corporation Fusion.
121
|
Posted - 2012.08.07 00:30:00 -
[356] - Quote
Nerf Burger wrote:Tara Read wrote:Nerf Burger wrote:Tara Read wrote:[
No it'll make you think Sentries will hold your hand through each jump through low sec. "Livening up" low sec does not mean making it easier for you to pass through the system to your destination. This quote highlights just how stupid some gate campers really are. Anyone that can actually think logically knows that if low sec is more accessible it will increase traffic. More lazy, stupid EVE "pvper" tears please. You really should try to use more than 5% of that grey matter rattling around inside your head. If you had read any of the points outlined and reiterated it has little to nothing to do with "camps." If anything it would be a detriment and would encourage even more cheap tactics for others to catch prey quickly then leave. If all you desire is sniping fleets with fast interceptor tackle to snag targets and have zero true committed engagements be my guest. You clearly are talking out your ass. oh, i did read your incredibly one-side and narrow minded perspective. Listen to you, defending gatecamping and crying about cheap tactics emerging. LOL.  eve "pvpers" really are the dumbest of all mmorpg pvpers. Driven from games that require actual skill. About time CCP shat on you and took away your easymode kills. In other pvp games, players actually have to work for their kills, they dont just sit around waiting for victims and merely have to click 2-3 buttons with their mouse FTW.
I'll just sit back and see the other responses to your post. What happened did you get pissy when you were taunted in local for being an absolute idiot? I would assume as much. No need to pick apart how terrible your opinion is on the subject others can see it for themselves. |

Nerf Burger
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
24
|
Posted - 2012.08.07 00:34:00 -
[357] - Quote
Homo Jesus wrote:Nerf Burger wrote:Tara Read wrote:[
No it'll make you think Sentries will hold your hand through each jump through low sec. "Livening up" low sec does not mean making it easier for you to pass through the system to your destination. This quote highlights just how stupid some gate campers really are. Anyone that can actually think logically knows that if low sec is more accessible it will increase traffic. More lazy, stupid EVE "pvper" tears please. An example of an activity this increased traffic will partake in now that the gates and stations are all magically cleared?
I won't even go through a gate if I know its camped. With this change, my chances of getting through are greatly improved. Yea, i know you derpish crytard theorycrafters claim its gonna be easier now for u to catch me with your interceptor. Good luck with that. |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1244
|
Posted - 2012.08.07 00:42:00 -
[358] - Quote
Nerf Burger wrote:I won't even go through a gate if I know its camped. With this change, my chances of getting through are greatly improved. Sad that it even needs explaining. Yea, i know you derpish crytard theorycrafters are trying to say its a buff to gatecamping and claim its gonna be somehow easier now because its possible for you to catch me with your interceptor. Good luck with that. Hmm, for co-ordinated groups perhaps. But if the campers are used to just sitting on gate with their sensor boosters running, guns pre-fired and rushing to target anyone non-friendly that jumps through ... Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Homo Jesus
The LGBT Last Supper
32
|
Posted - 2012.08.07 00:46:00 -
[359] - Quote
Nerf Burger wrote:
eve "pvpers" really are the dumbest of all mmorpg pvpers. Driven from games that require actual skill. About time CCP shat on you and took away your easymode kills. In other pvp games, players actually have to work for their kills, they dont just sit around waiting for victims and merely have to click 2-3 buttons with their mouse FTW.
That's funny man.....way to stir the turd. 
And by you passing through the gates easily from A to B low sec will be revived? Cepters can't catch ya? You do know a drone or can cloud to decloak is within the rules as long as it doesn't cause lag...right? |

Ludi Burek
The Player Haters Corp
137
|
Posted - 2012.08.07 00:58:00 -
[360] - Quote
Nerf Burger wrote:Tara Read wrote:[
No it'll make you think Sentries will hold your hand through each jump through low sec. "Livening up" low sec does not mean making it easier for you to pass through the system to your destination. This quote highlights just how stupid some gate campers really are. Anyone that can actually think logically knows that if low sec is more accessible, it will increase traffic. PVP in this game is skilless enough as it is. Oh-no, the game got a little bit harder, better cry on the forums. Great job with this change CCP. More tears from the easymode pvp crowd please.
I will totally ignore the fact that this makes catching people on gates even easier but since you are clearly above my intellect, please explain to me the following:
If there is more traffic in low sec because it may become harder to stop people on gates, wouldn't the only thing this would achieve is to increase "traffic" (as in gate to gate)? Traffic that can't be interrupted. And what benefit to the game exactly would be achieved by this? 
There's no point debating the original post any more as it's beaten to death, but please break down your logic for me regarding your claim above. |
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 20 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |