Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 19 .. 19 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Aruken Marr
BSC LEGION Tactical Narcotics Team
313
|
Posted - 2012.09.01 16:30:00 -
[361] - Quote
Suqq Madiq wrote:Aruken Marr wrote:Suqq Madiq wrote:Aruken Marr wrote:I dont care so much about skill training times now as I usually just use +3s. I worry more about it presenting a problem to newer players who think that you need to have +5s to be level with everyone else. If the noobs you hang around with think they need +5s then you're doing a terrible job of educating them. A pair of +3 implants costs, at most, 20 million ISK. If they can't afford that or can't figure out how to install a jump clone they don't deserve implants. What do you think is the first thing I tell noobies who complain about the price of +5s? I dont know Aruken? What do you tell them? HTFU? Stop crying? Go back to highsec? Steal mommy's credit card and buy some PLEX? How should I know what terrible advice you're offering to the idiots you hang around with?
I suggest you read something about rhetoric. I tell them +5s aren't necessary. I also tell them about jump clones. But that's obviously easy to say once you've already got all those lengthy support skills done. Then we roll back to the learning skills argument as the same could be said for those. They weren't needed to train skills but I'm pretty damn sure it was the first thing everybody bothered training. |
Brooks Puuntai
Nomadic Asylum Still Censored
694
|
Posted - 2012.09.01 16:31:00 -
[362] - Quote
Aruken Marr wrote:Brooks Puuntai wrote:It's all about progression. Newbies shouldn't be flying around in +4/+5s when they could barely afford them in the first place. Stick +1s up to +3s in depending on what you can afford to replace and move up to the higher level implants when you can afford to replace them. Change your mentality about implants, not the mechanic. Why should newbies be punished for being new? I get it. You're gonna say "In that case why not just let them hop straight into a BS?!" It's not the same. Being new doesnt restrict their ability to pvp (as they can do it in a frigate) but implants prevent them from training skills at peak rates where as a point on a frigate stops a ship warping off as good as any other ship. This is like the learning skills argument all over again. Its like saying you need to earn a certain amount of isk for +4s so that you can start training skills like everyone else. It's become that much of a necessity these days it prevents some players from venturing out of hisec. It's not so much about their risk aversion but more about bad habits and a poor mentality acquired during the first few months of playing. I dont care so much about skill training times now as I usually just use +3s but I remember it was an issue as a low sp player because sp/hr was all important. I worry more about it presenting a problem to newer players who think that you need to have +5s to be level with everyone else.
Its a progression thing. You don't want newbies to rush to a BS who don't know how to properly fly it nor afford to lose it, that's why you go through the paces. Eve isn't about instant gratification, its not about streamlining to the top. You work your way up. Having newbies think that they NEED to be inline with players who are 5-6 year vets is a poor mentality and argument. That's usually where most fail and end up quitting. They see everyone else in a T3 or BS and rush too it, get it blown up then they are broke. That's not a game mechanic problem that's a mentality issue. Same goes for implants.
Once again if you do bump attributes up +5 and remove learning implants, then people will just look at that as baseline and want more ways to speed it up. So look at non implant speed as normal and any increase is a bonus, not mandatory.
|
Suqq Madiq
Amarr Empire
329
|
Posted - 2012.09.01 16:31:00 -
[363] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:Suqq Madiq wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:I love it when highsec/lowsec chars say "I PVP in +5s/5% hardwirings all the time, maybe you just suck at PVP".
Yeah, let me know when that becomes relevant to the discussion. Nobody said that. Let us know when you're done being an idiot. Someone probably has - they have in other threads. If not, they were bound to.
Right, when you're a brain dead Goon-pet, it's much easier just to make **** up than to actually come prepared to a discussion with silly things like facts or verifiable quotes. |
James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation RAZOR Alliance
595
|
Posted - 2012.09.01 16:32:00 -
[364] - Quote
Suqq Madiq wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:Suqq Madiq wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:I love it when highsec/lowsec chars say "I PVP in +5s/5% hardwirings all the time, maybe you just suck at PVP".
Yeah, let me know when that becomes relevant to the discussion. Nobody said that. Let us know when you're done being an idiot. Someone probably has - they have in other threads. If not, they were bound to. Right, when you're a brain dead Goon-pet, it's much easier just to make **** up than to actually come prepared to a discussion with silly things like facts or verifiable quotes. Seems all you brought is rhetoric. http://themittani.com/features/local-problem
A simple fix to the local intel problem |
Lord Zim
1202
|
Posted - 2012.09.01 16:38:00 -
[365] - Quote
Suqq Madiq wrote:Lord Zim wrote:Suqq Madiq wrote:Aruken Marr wrote:I dont care so much about skill training times now as I usually just use +3s. I worry more about it presenting a problem to newer players who think that you need to have +5s to be level with everyone else. If the noobs you hang around with think they need +5s then you're doing a terrible job of educating them. A pair of +3 implants costs, at most, 20 million ISK. If they can't afford that or can't figure out how to install a jump clone they don't deserve implants. So in other words, what you're saying is that people who PVP where they can be podded should be punished for it by either having to buy new +5s all the time, train SP slower than people who sit in hisec and do nothing but grind missions or rocks, or have to forego the occasional PVP because their jumpclone is still on cooldown. So, what you're saying is, people who intentionally PVP where they put their pods in greater danger than the rest of EVE should have the mechanics of the entire game changed to suit their playstyle and diminish the risks they take every time they undock or waddle out of range of the POS shields? COOOoooool. So, what you're saying is, you don't want to even listen to ideas such as "remove learning implants, boost base stats" or "be able to unplug implants" because oh god it was suggested by people from nullsec.
Okay, then. |
Suqq Madiq
Amarr Empire
329
|
Posted - 2012.09.01 16:40:00 -
[366] - Quote
Andski wrote:Suqq Madiq wrote:Right, when you're a brain dead Goon-pet, it's much easier just to make **** up than to actually come prepared to a discussion with silly things like facts or verifiable quotes. razor's far higher on the totem pole than npc corps, though now, do you have something valuable to add to the discussion other than dismissing it as some kind of "null agenda?" what, you don't?
Razor is barely higher on your fictional totem pole than NPC corps, and you goddamn well know it. Stop pandering.
I've added much value to this discussion, you just don't agree with it. And, it's clearly a nullsec agenda since the people who would benefit most from removing the risk of losing learning implants while pvping are those who pvp in nullsec. |
James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation RAZOR Alliance
595
|
Posted - 2012.09.01 16:43:00 -
[367] - Quote
Suqq Madiq wrote:Razor is barely higher on your fictional totem pole than NPC corps, and you goddamn well know it. Stop pandering. Well luckily our actual standing has nothing to do with the baseless opinion of some random pubbie.
Suqq Madiq wrote:I've added much value to this discussion, you just don't agree with it. And, it's clearly a nullsec agenda since the people who would benefit most from removing the risk of losing learning implants while pvping are those who pvp in nullsec. Naturally, seeing as you don't have warp disruption fields anywhere else in the game. http://themittani.com/features/local-problem
A simple fix to the local intel problem |
Suqq Madiq
Amarr Empire
329
|
Posted - 2012.09.01 16:43:00 -
[368] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:So, what you're saying is, you don't want to even listen to ideas such as "remove learning implants, boost base stats" or "be able to unplug implants" because oh god it was suggested by people from nullsec.
Okay, then.
No, I listened to it alright. I just think it's a terrible idea, for many obvious reasons. Not because it was proposed by somebody from nullsec, it's just terrible in it's own right. That it benefits nullsec more than the rest of EVE is self-evident. That nullsec residents are crying for nerfs to all of EVE to benefit their style of gaming really isn't surprising as you do it all the time. That's not me being biased against nullsec, that's me being unbiased. Unlike, you know, the rag that this terrible idea came from. |
Aruken Marr
BSC LEGION Tactical Narcotics Team
313
|
Posted - 2012.09.01 16:43:00 -
[369] - Quote
Brooks Puuntai wrote:Its a progression thing. You don't want newbies to rush to a BS who don't know how to properly fly it nor afford to lose it, that's why you go through the paces. Eve isn't about instant gratification, its not about streamlining to the top. You work your way up. Having newbies think that they NEED to be inline with players who are 5-6 year vets is a poor mentality and argument. That's usually where most fail and end up quitting. They see everyone else in a T3 or BS and rush too it, get it blown up then they are broke. That's not a game mechanic problem that's a mentality issue. Same goes for implants.
Once again if you do bump attributes up +5 and remove learning implants, then people will just look at that as baseline and want more ways to speed it up, it would be a endless cycle. So look at non implant speed as normal and any increase is a bonus, not mandatory.
You're right. It is bad attitude, hence I pointed it out as one. It's something becomes easier to get over the longer you play because you begin acquire the skills you need. I understand where you're coming from with gradual progression. I understand that, that is part of the purpose of implants.
Gradual progression applies well to pvp as you can still perform an effective role at one thing as newbie and as you progress you more options open up to you. All implants do is provide a means to train a skill faster (skills that new players are already lacking.) I just feel that it's an necessary handicap to new players and adds nothing to the game other than reward the risk averse. |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4511
|
Posted - 2012.09.01 16:44:00 -
[370] - Quote
Suqq Madiq wrote:Razor is barely higher on your fictional totem pole than NPC corps, and you goddamn well know it. Stop pandering. I've added much value to this discussion, you just don't agree with it. And, it's clearly a nullsec agenda since the people who would benefit most from removing the risk of losing learning implants while pvping are those who pvp in nullsec.
So let's say that this would ONLY benefit nullsec PvPers and nobody else (which is blatantly untrue anyway) - who would it punish, assuming that anybody with a huge stockpile in implants is getting some form of compensation?
That argument would be reasonable if this idea only benefited one group while punishing another - sound familiar? please leave |
|
Lord Zim
1202
|
Posted - 2012.09.01 16:45:00 -
[371] - Quote
Suqq Madiq wrote:I just think it's a terrible idea, for many obvious reasons. And what are these "obvious reasons"? |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4511
|
Posted - 2012.09.01 16:45:00 -
[372] - Quote
Suqq Madiq wrote:Lord Zim wrote:So, what you're saying is, you don't want to even listen to ideas such as "remove learning implants, boost base stats" or "be able to unplug implants" because oh god it was suggested by people from nullsec.
Okay, then. No, I listened to it alright. I just think it's a terrible idea, for many obvious reasons. Not because it was proposed by somebody from nullsec, it's just terrible in it's own right. That it benefits nullsec more than the rest of EVE is self-evident. That nullsec residents are crying for nerfs to all of EVE to benefit their style of gaming really isn't surprising as you do it all the time. That's not me being biased against nullsec, that's me being unbiased. Unlike, you know, the rag that this terrible idea came from.
Glad you have to resort to calling me a "rag" to make your point. Am I supposed to be offended somehow? please leave |
Suqq Madiq
Amarr Empire
329
|
Posted - 2012.09.01 16:45:00 -
[373] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:Suqq Madiq wrote:Razor is barely higher on your fictional totem pole than NPC corps, and you goddamn well know it. Stop pandering. Well luckily our actual standing has nothing to do with the baseless opinion of some random pubbie. Suqq Madiq wrote:I've added much value to this discussion, you just don't agree with it. And, it's clearly a nullsec agenda since the people who would benefit most from removing the risk of losing learning implants while pvping are those who pvp in nullsec. Naturally, seeing as you don't have warp disruption fields anywhere else in the game.
WAIT! HOLD UP! Are you trying to tell me that there are mechanics in nullsec that dont exist elsewhere in EVE and that those mechanics both make nullsec unique and increase the risk of existing in nullsec? HOLY ****! Somebody get CCP on the phone right now, we need to address this injustice. |
Suqq Madiq
Amarr Empire
329
|
Posted - 2012.09.01 16:46:00 -
[374] - Quote
Andski wrote:Suqq Madiq wrote:Lord Zim wrote:So, what you're saying is, you don't want to even listen to ideas such as "remove learning implants, boost base stats" or "be able to unplug implants" because oh god it was suggested by people from nullsec.
Okay, then. No, I listened to it alright. I just think it's a terrible idea, for many obvious reasons. Not because it was proposed by somebody from nullsec, it's just terrible in it's own right. That it benefits nullsec more than the rest of EVE is self-evident. That nullsec residents are crying for nerfs to all of EVE to benefit their style of gaming really isn't surprising as you do it all the time. That's not me being biased against nullsec, that's me being unbiased. Unlike, you know, the rag that this terrible idea came from. Glad you have to resort to calling me a "rag" to make your point.
LOL. I'm not calling you a rag. Rag is another word for a newspaper or, in this case, a news website. Man it's funny when people make stupid mistakes like the one you just made. |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4511
|
Posted - 2012.09.01 16:48:00 -
[375] - Quote
Suqq Madiq wrote:LOL. I'm not calling you a rag. Rag is another word for a newspaper or, in this case, a news website. Man it's funny when people make stupid mistakes like the one you just made.
It's funny that the idea didn't come from TheMittani.com, nor did it come from me. The idea predates the site and even my time in this game.
Look at you making a mistake! l0l please leave |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4511
|
Posted - 2012.09.01 16:48:00 -
[376] - Quote
Anything else? please leave |
James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation RAZOR Alliance
595
|
Posted - 2012.09.01 16:49:00 -
[377] - Quote
Suqq Madiq wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:Suqq Madiq wrote:Razor is barely higher on your fictional totem pole than NPC corps, and you goddamn well know it. Stop pandering. Well luckily our actual standing has nothing to do with the baseless opinion of some random pubbie. Suqq Madiq wrote:I've added much value to this discussion, you just don't agree with it. And, it's clearly a nullsec agenda since the people who would benefit most from removing the risk of losing learning implants while pvping are those who pvp in nullsec. Naturally, seeing as you don't have warp disruption fields anywhere else in the game. WAIT! HOLD UP! Are you trying to tell me that there are mechanics in nullsec that dont exist elsewhere in EVE and that those mechanics both make nullsec unique and increase the risk of existing in nullsec? HOLY ****! Somebody get CCP on the phone right now, we need to address this injustice. Don't play dumb. You seem to think there's some magical reason beyond that why we believe the current situation needs to be fixed regarding implants.
Risk is fine and all, we like risk - after all why would we be in nullsec? The problem lies in the sacrifice of training time we typically have to make. Jump clones don't really help with this issue, what with the timers and all. http://themittani.com/features/local-problem
A simple fix to the local intel problem |
Brooks Puuntai
Nomadic Asylum Still Censored
694
|
Posted - 2012.09.01 16:49:00 -
[378] - Quote
As I stated in the 2nd part. Implants allow those who wish to spend the money to get a advantage over the norm, and since this is Eve there is risk attached to said advantage. You remove that and people who want that advantage and those who like to min/max **** will be asking for it again. Having implants the way it is, is a good balance for those who want a advantage and those who want to destroy that advantage. |
Suqq Madiq
Amarr Empire
329
|
Posted - 2012.09.01 16:50:00 -
[379] - Quote
Andski wrote:Suqq Madiq wrote:Razor is barely higher on your fictional totem pole than NPC corps, and you goddamn well know it. Stop pandering. I've added much value to this discussion, you just don't agree with it. And, it's clearly a nullsec agenda since the people who would benefit most from removing the risk of losing learning implants while pvping are those who pvp in nullsec. So let's say that this would ONLY benefit nullsec PvPers and nobody else (which is blatantly untrue anyway) - who would it punish, assuming that anybody with a huge stockpile in implants is getting some form of compensation? That argument would be reasonable if this idea only benefited one group while punishing another - sound familiar?
Who said this would ONLY benefit nullsec pvp? I certainly didn't. Was it you? I might have missed it. Lord Zim maybe? No, he just puppets whatever you say. I'm so lost. |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4511
|
Posted - 2012.09.01 16:51:00 -
[380] - Quote
Suqq Madiq wrote:WAIT! HOLD UP! Are you trying to tell me that there are mechanics in nullsec that dont exist elsewhere in EVE and that those mechanics both make nullsec unique and increase the risk of existing in nullsec? HOLY ****! Somebody get CCP on the phone right now, we need to address this injustice.
You're right, so naturally this discussion would lead to nerfing hisec rewards. There's literally no disadvantage to living in hisec these days. please leave |
|
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4511
|
Posted - 2012.09.01 16:51:00 -
[381] - Quote
Suqq Madiq wrote:Who said this would ONLY benefit nullsec pvp? I certainly didn't. Was it you? I might have missed it. Lord Zim maybe? No, he just puppets whatever you say. I'm so lost.
Actually, you did. please leave |
James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation RAZOR Alliance
595
|
Posted - 2012.09.01 16:51:00 -
[382] - Quote
Suqq Madiq wrote:Andski wrote:Suqq Madiq wrote:Razor is barely higher on your fictional totem pole than NPC corps, and you goddamn well know it. Stop pandering. I've added much value to this discussion, you just don't agree with it. And, it's clearly a nullsec agenda since the people who would benefit most from removing the risk of losing learning implants while pvping are those who pvp in nullsec. So let's say that this would ONLY benefit nullsec PvPers and nobody else (which is blatantly untrue anyway) - who would it punish, assuming that anybody with a huge stockpile in implants is getting some form of compensation? That argument would be reasonable if this idea only benefited one group while punishing another - sound familiar? Who said this would ONLY benefit nullsec pvp? I certainly didn't. Was it you? I might have missed it. Lord Zim maybe? No, he just puppets whatever you say. I'm so lost. Reading comprehension fail. http://themittani.com/features/local-problem
A simple fix to the local intel problem |
Suqq Madiq
Amarr Empire
329
|
Posted - 2012.09.01 16:53:00 -
[383] - Quote
Andski wrote:Suqq Madiq wrote:Who said this would ONLY benefit nullsec pvp? I certainly didn't. Was it you? I might have missed it. Lord Zim maybe? No, he just puppets whatever you say. I'm so lost. Actually, you did
Where did I say that? I didn't once say that. Stop making **** up, it makes you look stupid.
|
Suqq Madiq
Amarr Empire
329
|
Posted - 2012.09.01 16:55:00 -
[384] - Quote
Andski wrote:Suqq Madiq wrote:Who said this would ONLY benefit nullsec pvp? I certainly didn't. Was it you? I might have missed it. Lord Zim maybe? No, he just puppets whatever you say. I'm so lost. Nobody did, I'm just asking you who this would punish even if the extreme I stated was true. Thankfully, posting with a sockpuppet alt means that you can shitpost to your heart's content without it reflecting on you!
WTF is going on? First you say I did say it, now you're saying i didnt. Then youre saying im a sockpuppet. Make up your goddamn mind. |
Lord Zim
1202
|
Posted - 2012.09.01 16:55:00 -
[385] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Suqq Madiq wrote:I just think it's a terrible idea, for many obvious reasons. And what are these "obvious reasons"? Still waiting. |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4511
|
Posted - 2012.09.01 16:59:00 -
[386] - Quote
Suqq Madiq wrote:Andski wrote:Suqq Madiq wrote:Who said this would ONLY benefit nullsec pvp? I certainly didn't. Was it you? I might have missed it. Lord Zim maybe? No, he just puppets whatever you say. I'm so lost. Nobody did, I'm just asking you who this would punish even if the extreme I stated was true. Thankfully, posting with a sockpuppet alt means that you can shitpost to your heart's content without it reflecting on you! WTF is going on?
I'm just asking you a question. Don't freak out. please leave |
Suqq Madiq
Amarr Empire
329
|
Posted - 2012.09.01 17:02:00 -
[387] - Quote
Andski wrote:Suqq Madiq wrote:Andski wrote:Suqq Madiq wrote:Who said this would ONLY benefit nullsec pvp? I certainly didn't. Was it you? I might have missed it. Lord Zim maybe? No, he just puppets whatever you say. I'm so lost. Nobody did, I'm just asking you who this would punish even if the extreme I stated was true. Thankfully, posting with a sockpuppet alt means that you can shitpost to your heart's content without it reflecting on you! WTF is going on? I'm just asking you a question. Don't freak out.
LOL, who's freaking out? You're the one who can't make up your mind about who or what I am. First I'm just an NPC alt. Then you claim I did say somehting, then you recant and say I didn't. Then you accuse me of sockpuppeting. Make up your mind. |
Suqq Madiq
Amarr Empire
329
|
Posted - 2012.09.01 17:02:00 -
[388] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Lord Zim wrote:Suqq Madiq wrote:I just think it's a terrible idea, for many obvious reasons. And what are these "obvious reasons"? Still waiting.
Terrible movie. |
Lord Zim
1202
|
Posted - 2012.09.01 17:03:00 -
[389] - Quote
Suqq Madiq wrote:Lord Zim wrote:Lord Zim wrote:Suqq Madiq wrote:I just think it's a terrible idea, for many obvious reasons. And what are these "obvious reasons"? Still waiting. Terrible movie. So these "obvious reasons" aren't so obvious that you can list them? |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4511
|
Posted - 2012.09.01 17:04:00 -
[390] - Quote
Suqq Madiq wrote:LOL, who's freaking out? You're the one who can't make up your mind about who or what I am. First I'm just an NPC alt. Then you claim I did say somehting, then you recant and say I didn't. Then you accuse me of sockpuppeting. Make up your mind.
So you're saying that the character you post with isn't an posting NPC sockpuppet alt?
That sure is strange, since it's pretty obvious given the name, content of your posts and your NPC corp "affiliation."
Now, tell me who this proposal would punish. please leave |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 19 .. 19 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |