| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 [19] [19]:: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
813
   |
Posted - 2012.09.09 06:06:00 -
[541] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Minmatar Citizen 76959458561 wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:Minmatar Citizen 76959458561 wrote:So o.o guys dnt like useing +5s coz of bubbles tough **** its were they choose to live to try remove somthing somthing becouse o.o players afraid of loseing is just stupid
i live losec cant use bubbles do us losec guys av a case for removing bubbles?
What about all the billions isk ppl have tied up in +5s traders and users alike
nobodys stoping null sec guys useing implants if they choose not to becouse risk thats up to them but please dnt cry about it like a *** Try making a coherent post and maybe your points will be worth paying attention to. Try sucking my left nut like i give a fu#k wot some smart ar5e thinks my typeing lol NPC corp: check Incoherent english: check Swear filter evasion: check Status: Shitposter.
As has been mentioned on this forum thousands of times EvE is not safe..Anywhere it is all an illusions, as well shown by burn Jita.
So it comes back to risk Vs. reward. If you are not willing to risk learning implants, why should you get the reward of the SP?
Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|
James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation
RAZOR Alliance
649
|
Posted - 2012.09.09 09:32:00 -
[542] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:So it comes back to risk Vs. reward. If you are not willing to risk learning implants, why should you get the reward of the SP?
Because people who don't risk their implants still get the SP. That's exactly the point.
http://themittani.com/features/local-problem
A simple fix to the local intel problem |
Sabrina Solette
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
94
|
Posted - 2012.09.09 09:43:00 -
[543] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:Frying Doom wrote:So it comes back to risk Vs. reward. If you are not willing to risk learning implants, why should you get the reward of the SP? Because people who don't risk their implants still get the SP. That's exactly the point.
Well, just get rid of learning implants, increase the attributes base from 17 to 22 and problem solved it's then fair to everyone even PvPers. |
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
815
|
Posted - 2012.09.09 09:44:00 -
[544] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:Frying Doom wrote:So it comes back to risk Vs. reward. If you are not willing to risk learning implants, why should you get the reward of the SP? Because people who don't risk their implants still get the SP. That's exactly the point.
Yes but people sitting in stations are not even playing the same game.
Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|
Lord Zim
1343
|
Posted - 2012.09.09 10:12:00 -
[545] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:Frying Doom wrote:So it comes back to risk Vs. reward. If you are not willing to risk learning implants, why should you get the reward of the SP? Because people who don't risk their implants still get the SP. That's exactly the point. Yes but people sitting in stations are not even playing the same game.
It's almost as if it hasn't been stated, multiple times, that the reasoning for either removing (or as was my suggestion, being able to unplug) implants wasn't to get people to play more, because they wouldn't have that "I don't want to lose my learning implants" inhibitor.
Almost. |
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
815
|
Posted - 2012.09.09 10:18:00 -
[546] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Frying Doom wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:Frying Doom wrote:So it comes back to risk Vs. reward. If you are not willing to risk learning implants, why should you get the reward of the SP? Because people who don't risk their implants still get the SP. That's exactly the point. Yes but people sitting in stations are not even playing the same game. It's almost as if it hasn't been stated, multiple times, that the reasoning for either removing (or as was my suggestion, being able to unplug) implants wasn't to get people to play more, because they wouldn't have that "I don't want to lose my learning implants" inhibitor. Almost.
But if that was a real problem we would have people complaining about "I don't want to loose my ship" or I don't want to be podded". Whats newt free Battleships and clones as well because they might stop people PvPing.
You choose to PvP it is not a mandatory part of the game but every one is susceptible to it, so you choose to PvP and Choose not to use implants, then you choose not to be rewarded for fear of their loss.
Why should others lose one of there advantages to industry and manufacturing just because you chose PvP.
Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|
baltec1
Bat Country
2098
|
Posted - 2012.09.09 10:20:00 -
[547] - Quote
Because of this thread I bought myself learning implants for the first time in over 6 years.
Never realised they were so cheap |
Lord Zim
1343
|
Posted - 2012.09.09 10:20:00 -
[548] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Lord Zim wrote:Frying Doom wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:Frying Doom wrote:So it comes back to risk Vs. reward. If you are not willing to risk learning implants, why should you get the reward of the SP? Because people who don't risk their implants still get the SP. That's exactly the point. Yes but people sitting in stations are not even playing the same game. It's almost as if it hasn't been stated, multiple times, that the reasoning for either removing (or as was my suggestion, being able to unplug) implants wasn't to get people to play more, because they wouldn't have that "I don't want to lose my learning implants" inhibitor. Almost. But if that was a real problem we would have people complaining about "I don't want to loose my ship" or I don't want to be podded". Whats newt free Battleships and clones as well because they might stop people PvPing. You choose to PvP it is not a mandatory part of the game but every one is susceptible to it, so you choose to PvP and Choose not to use implants, then you choose not to be rewarded for fear of their loss. Why should others lose one of there advantages to industry and manufacturing just because you chose PvP.
*woosh*
That's the sound of the point going straight over your head. |
Sabrina Solette
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
94
|
Posted - 2012.09.09 10:30:00 -
[549] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Why should others lose one of there advantages to industry and manufacturing just because you chose PvP.
Why should PvPers lose out just because they want to PvP. They can't afford to keep losing +5 implants everytime they get podded whereas a trader can stay in a station with +5s with no fear of losing them.
Get rid of learning implants that way nobody loses out based on what they want to do ingame. |
Brooks Puuntai
Red Federation
RvB - RED Federation
728
|
Posted - 2012.09.09 10:34:00 -
[550] - Quote
This thread has become redundant. The same arguments and counter arguments have been used through out 25 pages. |
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
816
|
Posted - 2012.09.09 10:57:00 -
[551] - Quote
Sabrina Solette wrote:Frying Doom wrote:Why should others lose one of there advantages to industry and manufacturing just because you chose PvP. Why should PvPers lose out just because they want to PvP. They can't afford to keep losing +5 implants everytime they get podded whereas a trader can stay in a station with +5s with no fear of losing them. Get rid of learning implants that way nobody loses out based on what they want to do ingame.
Industrialists and traders loose the difference in amount to what they have now. So do most miners. You chose PvP and this is part of the entry fee.
Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
816
|
Posted - 2012.09.09 10:58:00 -
[552] - Quote
Brooks Puuntai wrote:This thread has become redundant. The same arguments and counter arguments have been used through out 25 pages.
Yeah rather a lot, the number of times it made it to the second page and someone has necro'd it is insane.
Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|
baltec1
Bat Country
2098
|
Posted - 2012.09.09 10:58:00 -
[553] - Quote
Sabrina Solette wrote:Frying Doom wrote:Why should others lose one of there advantages to industry and manufacturing just because you chose PvP. Why should PvPers lose out just because they want to PvP. They can't afford to keep losing +5 implants everytime they get podded whereas a trader can stay in a station with +5s with no fear of losing them. Get rid of learning implants that way nobody loses out based on what they want to do ingame.
So get +4s if you don't like the risk. |
|
ISD Suvetar
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
40
|
Posted - 2012.09.09 11:41:00 -
[554] - Quote
Hi,
I've locked this topic at the request of it's original poster.
Thanks and fly safe!
ISD Suvetar
Captain
Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)
Interstellar Services Department |
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 [19] [19]:: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |