Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 20 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Tatakai no Tenshi
Good Fights
1
|
Posted - 2012.09.27 02:35:00 -
[61] - Quote
My corporation has just applied, and will be joining the alliance in 24 hours. Until CCP decides to nerf this, I am planning use of all the targets provided here to wreak havoc.
The doors are open for everyone. Mains, alts, you name it. Just drop and app into 'Good Fights'. The corp will be in the alliance within the next 24h, so keep that in mind if you have ships to move. The corp will be basing out of Jita 4-4.
Feel free to contact me if you have any questions. -TnT |

Gerard Gendri
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
64
|
Posted - 2012.09.27 03:57:00 -
[62] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:They don't all bail. Only about 20% of our victims have bailed. And since we'll continue to accumulate them, the choice of highsec targets we're holding captive will only get better. Some entities will never be able to escape or disband like the nullsec alliances. If any of them are foolish enough to declare wars they'll end up screwed.
You actually think that a wardec makes any impact at all on a nullsec alliance? |

Iam Widdershins
Project Nemesis
735
|
Posted - 2012.09.27 04:27:00 -
[63] - Quote
Gerard Gendri wrote:The Zerg Overmind wrote:They don't all bail. Only about 20% of our victims have bailed. And since we'll continue to accumulate them, the choice of highsec targets we're holding captive will only get better. Some entities will never be able to escape or disband like the nullsec alliances. If any of them are foolish enough to declare wars they'll end up screwed. You actually think that a wardec makes any impact at all on a nullsec alliance? Clearly you weren't paying much attention when Privateers, The 0rphanage, and Moar Tears roamed the land. Lobbying for your right to delete your signature |

Adolf Hilmar
Strange Energy Gentlemen's Agreement
89
|
Posted - 2012.09.27 05:18:00 -
[64] - Quote
Gerard Gendri wrote:You actually think that a wardec makes any impact at all on a nullsec alliance?
Yes, because they won't be able to recruit new corps into their alliance. |

Tarryn Nightstorm
Hellstar Towing and Recovery
643
|
Posted - 2012.09.27 05:46:00 -
[65] - Quote
Gerard Gendri wrote:
You actually think that a wardec makes any impact at all on a nullsec alliance?
Look out, everybody:
WE GOT US A REAL BADASS HERE!!
For ****'s sake...
Meta-gaming for carebears:
Whine on the forums like a little ***** until CCP gets sick of you and hands you everything you ask for just to shut you up. |

Pipa Porto
1057
|
Posted - 2012.09.27 06:46:00 -
[66] - Quote
Adolf Hilmar wrote:Gerard Gendri wrote:You actually think that a wardec makes any impact at all on a nullsec alliance? Yes, because they won't be able to recruit new corps into their alliance.
Why would that be? EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
203
|
Posted - 2012.09.27 07:36:00 -
[67] - Quote
Gerard Gendri wrote:You actually think that a wardec makes any impact at all on a nullsec alliance? Yes, I'm quite positive that wardecs have massive effects on nullsec alliances. Moar Tears demonstrated this over and over again by killing dozens of jump freighters every month that belonged to nullsec alliances. Nullsec alliances don't have military arms in highsec, thus their lowbies get picked off regularily.
Fine you say, so they deserve that. But these aren't just normal wars we're holding over them, these are outgoing wars. And alliance with an outgoing war CANNOT recruit another corporation to the alliance, ever again. If any corporations ever leave that alliance, they'll also have outgoing wars. A corporation with an outgoing war CANNOT join an alliance, ever again.
So yes, there are consequences, and they are brutal, even if you don't care about the loss of your assets to highsec pirates. And the worst insult of it all is that you can blame yourselves for having made the outgoing war to begin with. So let's not pretend there are no consequences to us trapping you, because there will be, until such time CCP stops me.
PS, I have extended aid to TEST alliance for your wars, but I don't expect you'll let us absorb your wars Burn Highsec Griefers |

Pipa Porto
1060
|
Posted - 2012.09.27 07:37:00 -
[68] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:But these aren't just normal wars we're holding over them, these are outgoing wars. And alliance with an outgoing war CANNOT recruit another corporation to the alliance, ever again. If any corporations ever leave that alliance, they'll also have outgoing wars. A corporation with an outgoing war CANNOT join an alliance, ever again.
Wait, seriously?
Jesus Christ CCP. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Karah Serrigan
The Hatchery Team Liquid
70
|
Posted - 2012.09.27 09:10:00 -
[69] - Quote
Gerard Gendri wrote:The Zerg Overmind wrote:They don't all bail. Only about 20% of our victims have bailed. And since we'll continue to accumulate them, the choice of highsec targets we're holding captive will only get better. Some entities will never be able to escape or disband like the nullsec alliances. If any of them are foolish enough to declare wars they'll end up screwed. You actually think that a wardec makes any impact at all on a nullsec alliance? Hey was it before or after the change that forced the highsec corps to drop the wardecs on goons, that they started to suicide gank in niarja with their mains???? |

Pipa Porto
1062
|
Posted - 2012.09.27 09:42:00 -
[70] - Quote
Karah Serrigan wrote:Gerard Gendri wrote:The Zerg Overmind wrote:They don't all bail. Only about 20% of our victims have bailed. And since we'll continue to accumulate them, the choice of highsec targets we're holding captive will only get better. Some entities will never be able to escape or disband like the nullsec alliances. If any of them are foolish enough to declare wars they'll end up screwed. You actually think that a wardec makes any impact at all on a nullsec alliance? Hey was it before or after the change that forced the highsec corps to drop the wardecs on goons, that they started to suicide gank in niarja with their mains????
During that Wardec, weren't they too busy with HAG suicide ganking Hulks? EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |
|

flakeys
Angels of Anarchy Interstellar Confederation
375
|
Posted - 2012.09.27 15:14:00 -
[71] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Karah Serrigan wrote:Gerard Gendri wrote:The Zerg Overmind wrote:They don't all bail. Only about 20% of our victims have bailed. And since we'll continue to accumulate them, the choice of highsec targets we're holding captive will only get better. Some entities will never be able to escape or disband like the nullsec alliances. If any of them are foolish enough to declare wars they'll end up screwed. You actually think that a wardec makes any impact at all on a nullsec alliance? Hey was it before or after the change that forced the highsec corps to drop the wardecs on goons, that they started to suicide gank in niarja with their mains???? During that Wardec, weren't they too busy with HAG suicide ganking Hulks?
And i'm sure current war price wasn't placed as one big gift into their hands ... The surest way to remain poor is to be an honest man ...-á |

Reppyk
The Black Shell
178
|
Posted - 2012.09.27 15:28:00 -
[72] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:Fine you say, so they deserve that. But these aren't just normal wars we're holding over them, these are outgoing wars. And alliance with an outgoing war CANNOT recruit another corporation to the alliance, ever again. If any corporations ever leave that alliance, they'll also have outgoing wars. A corporation with an outgoing war CANNOT join an alliance, ever again. RIP C0ven.
EDIT : ZO, will you make your maths ? You can beat Privateer's wardec record !  |

Karah Serrigan
The Hatchery Team Liquid
70
|
Posted - 2012.09.27 15:32:00 -
[73] - Quote
Reppyk wrote:The Zerg Overmind wrote:Fine you say, so they deserve that. But these aren't just normal wars we're holding over them, these are outgoing wars. And alliance with an outgoing war CANNOT recruit another corporation to the alliance, ever again. If any corporations ever leave that alliance, they'll also have outgoing wars. A corporation with an outgoing war CANNOT join an alliance, ever again. RIP C0ven. EDIT : ZO, will you make your maths ? You can beat Privateer's wardec record !  If an alliance with outgoing wars cant accept new corporation, how are corporations able to join Dec Shield and spread new wars then?
Pipa Porto wrote: During that Wardec, weren't they too busy with HAG suicide ganking Hulks?
You mean because there was only a short time frame of 2 months before the patch when this was possible rather than ALL the years when they were wardecced? |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
203
|
Posted - 2012.09.27 15:42:00 -
[74] - Quote
Karah Serrigan wrote: If an alliance with outgoing wars cant accept new corporation, how are corporations able to join Dec Shield and spread new wars then?
Dec Shield is only experiencing INCOMING wars, thus we can recruit as many corps as we want without consequence.
Reppyk wrote:EDIT : ZO, will you make your maths ? You can beat Privateer's wardec record !  What's their wardec record? We're pretty high ourselves Burn Highsec Griefers |

Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
672
|
Posted - 2012.09.27 15:44:00 -
[75] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:The Zerg Overmind wrote:But these aren't just normal wars we're holding over them, these are outgoing wars. And alliance with an outgoing war CANNOT recruit another corporation to the alliance, ever again. If any corporations ever leave that alliance, they'll also have outgoing wars. A corporation with an outgoing war CANNOT join an alliance, ever again. Wait, seriously? Jesus Christ CCP.
Just answered FuzzWork Enterprises http://www.fuzzwork.co.uk/
Blueprint calculator, invention chance calculator, isk/m3 Ore chart-á and other 'useful' utilities. |

Pipa Porto
1064
|
Posted - 2012.09.27 19:08:00 -
[76] - Quote
Karah Serrigan wrote:Pipa Porto wrote: During that Wardec, weren't they too busy with HAG suicide ganking Hulks?
You mean because there was only a short time frame of 2 months before the patch when this was possible rather than ALL the years when they were wardecced?
Whe?
I was responding to the claim that suicide ganking freighters was only possible because they weren't wardecced. I pointed out that, during the last big wardec they weren't suicide ganking freighters because they were too busy suicide ganking exhumers.
As a big old bonus, being wardecced would not affect their suicide gank strategies with Freighters either (from what I understand, they spend most of their time logged off to avoid ze faction Popo, only logging in once the target is picked and bumped off the gate). EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Karah Serrigan
The Hatchery Team Liquid
70
|
Posted - 2012.09.27 19:26:00 -
[77] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Karah Serrigan wrote:Pipa Porto wrote: During that Wardec, weren't they too busy with HAG suicide ganking Hulks?
You mean because there was only a short time frame of 2 months before the patch when this was possible rather than ALL the years when they were wardecced? Whe? I was responding to the claim that suicide ganking freighters was only possible because they weren't wardecced. I pointed out that, during the last big wardec they weren't suicide ganking freighters because they were too busy suicide ganking exhumers. As a big old bonus, being wardecced would not affect their suicide gank strategies with Freighters either (from what I understand, they spend most of their time logged off to avoid ze faction Popo, only logging in once the target is picked and bumped off the gate). Yes and i made the claim because they arent doing by alpha strikes. They are using the cheapest hull they can get, catalysts, brutixes, and bump things offgate to get as much time as possible. If they were wardecced, they would have to switch to arty ships and get one shot off on the gate, or do it with alts out of alliance. But they, being goonswarm, crave for attention, so doing it in alt characters is out of the questions and we wouldnt have a 20 pages long "goon freighter suicide gank" thread.
As to the hulkageddon thing, it wasnt an operation in one system, you cant hunt catalysts in whole eve. But you can camp a single system and wait for their freighter ganking squad. And they were constantly and repeatedly wardecced by different highsec griefing corps/alliances, probably for longer than 5 hulkageddon durations combined. |

Pipa Porto
1064
|
Posted - 2012.09.27 19:44:00 -
[78] - Quote
Karah Serrigan wrote: Yes and i made the claim because they arent doing by alpha strikes. They are using the cheapest hull they can get, catalysts, brutixes, and bump things offgate to get as much time as possible. If they were wardecced, they would have to switch to arty ships and get one shot off on the gate, or do it with alts out of alliance. But they, being goonswarm, crave for attention, so doing it in alt characters is out of the questions and we wouldnt have a 20 pages long "goon freighter suicide gank" thread.
As to the hulkageddon thing, it wasnt an operation in one system, you cant hunt catalysts in whole eve. But you can camp a single system and wait for their freighter ganking squad. And they were constantly and repeatedly wardecced by different highsec griefing corps/alliances, probably for longer than 5 hulkageddon durations combined.
If they were wardecced, they'd simply keep bumping until the WT gets bored and stops following them, or they'd have an alt gank squad set up for when WTs are around. Or they'd just gank the WTs.
Or, they'd switch to Arty and either alpha through the WTs before ganking the freighter or alpha the freighter. What's that fleet composition that they were using to take large swaths of space? The Alpha doctrine? I wonder what principle it operates on... EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Chicken Pizza
Penumbra Institute
69
|
Posted - 2012.09.27 22:39:00 -
[79] - Quote
Gerard Gendri wrote:The Zerg Overmind wrote:They don't all bail. Only about 20% of our victims have bailed. And since we'll continue to accumulate them, the choice of highsec targets we're holding captive will only get better. Some entities will never be able to escape or disband like the nullsec alliances. If any of them are foolish enough to declare wars they'll end up screwed. You actually think that a wardec makes any impact at all on a nullsec alliance?
Learn the game you're playing before you make stupid implications. |

Tolene
Rave Technologies Inc. C0VEN
0
|
Posted - 2012.09.28 18:17:00 -
[80] - Quote
Despite some people expectations c0ven will not die because of a perma war in Hisek. Hisek warriors must realize that people who live in null sec spend 99% of their game time in null sec where they can shoot anyone they please. Our pubies are brought to null sec within 24/48 hours after they join up. We have no use for people who refuse to live in null sec. Only logistics must venture into hisek on regular basis but they can easily avoid wardecs.
The Zerg Overmind wrote: Yes, I'm quite positive that wardecs have massive effects on nullsec alliances. Moar Tears demonstrated this over and over again by killing dozens of jump freighters every month that belonged to nullsec alliances. Nullsec alliances don't have military arms in highsec, thus their lowbies get picked off regularily.
From a null sec perspective a hisek war usually generates loses in the first 24-48 hours of fighting. Mostly people that die are people who did not read the war notification or thought that they will be lucky. In null sec alliances 95% of the logistics are done by NPC corp alts therefore susceptible only to ganks. Method may be bothersome but works just fine. For example not a single c0ven logistic ship were lost to war targets since our perma war with Penumbra started.
The Zerg Overmind wrote: Fine you say, so they deserve that. But these aren't just normal wars we're holding over them, these are outgoing wars. And alliance with an outgoing war CANNOT recruit another corporation to the alliance, ever again. If any corporations ever leave that alliance, they'll also have outgoing wars. A corporation with an outgoing war CANNOT join an alliance, ever again.
This is the only real drawback of a perma war. But it can be easily bypassed by creating a sacrificial corp and joining it in order to join null sec ally. After you get bored you can just disband the corp and join your old one as wars don't follow players.
On the other hand c0ven can now wardec their null sec enemies without any remorse. Our war with tribal band was a nice change of pace. We had tons of fun and can now say that null sec is a lot better place for pvp 
On the topic of mechanics one simple change would solve the issue and made the wardecs work as intended. In case of mutual war both sides should be flagged as aggressors. Both the aggressor and defender have to make a conscious decision about declaring war on each other. Only way to get out of war would be surrender or disband for both sides of the conflict which in my opinion would make the system fair. |
|

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
207
|
Posted - 2012.09.28 23:37:00 -
[81] - Quote
Everything Tolene said is true, and I agree with you. We will try to get the matter resolved asap. In the mean time I just needed victims to point to and say "Look, your game mechanics are allowing me to do completely unfair things to these people". CCP responds faster when they have public pressure on them to perform. Burn Highsec Griefers |

Kc Decartes
Syndicate Holdings
55
|
Posted - 2012.09.29 04:07:00 -
[82] - Quote
Good Day Nublitz,
I am KcD, and you have deced me, so we are deced together, for now and all time, which is grand, and good. I felt I should wave my hand as/in a gesture that represents the fun we will no doubt have together. It makes me happy, and my belly tickle, just in anticipation of the inevitable pleasure we will induce from ourselves, based on the experience we encounter via this hoopla.
I look forward to working with you, and yours, and the crew of misfits you believe make your organization dreamy.
With warm regards,
KcD D.F.C.S.
no TRUST in mankind no confidence IN government there will never be enduring FREEDOM. |

VegasMirage
The Scope Gallente Federation
113
|
Posted - 2012.09.29 11:48:00 -
[83] - Quote
Iam Widdershins wrote:Meh, we're more likely to end up at war with you guys. It's not going to be a huge difference either way tbh. We joined DS last time around and didn't see jack **** for like 3 weeks.
Widders you did it wrong cuz my crew got like 20 bill in kills with Dec Shield (we had this convo already)
and yes this "tarp" Zerg set up can easily be translated into an infinite source of tears
combined with my corp jumping tactics this can be a devastating strategy
|

Iam Widdershins
Project Nemesis
736
|
Posted - 2012.09.29 12:55:00 -
[84] - Quote
VegasMirage wrote:Iam Widdershins wrote:Meh, we're more likely to end up at war with you guys. It's not going to be a huge difference either way tbh. We joined DS last time around and didn't see jack **** for like 3 weeks. Widders you did it wrong cuz my crew got like 20 bill in kills with Dec Shield (we had this convo already) and yes this "tarp" Zerg set up can easily be translated into an infinite source of tears combined with my corp jumping tactics this can be a devastating strategy edit: inb4 here are the reasons why you and your crew didn't kill anything when in Dec Shield editedit: inb4 Jita camping isn't an option (l33tsauce do it differently) You inb4'd me... so why do you even ask :P Not trying to be elitist about the Jita thing, our guys just can't stand it most of the time.
P.S. your machariel fakemail is gone now \o/ Lobbying for your right to delete your signature |

Karah Serrigan
The Hatchery Team Liquid
70
|
Posted - 2012.09.29 13:32:00 -
[85] - Quote
Tolene wrote:The Zerg Overmind wrote: Fine you say, so they deserve that. But these aren't just normal wars we're holding over them, these are outgoing wars. And alliance with an outgoing war CANNOT recruit another corporation to the alliance, ever again. If any corporations ever leave that alliance, they'll also have outgoing wars. A corporation with an outgoing war CANNOT join an alliance, ever again.
This is the only real drawback of a perma war. But it can be easily bypassed by creating a sacrificial corp and joining it in order to join null sec ally. After you get bored you can just disband the corp and join your old one as wars don't follow players. On the other hand c0ven can now wardec their null sec enemies without any remorse. Our war with tribal band was a nice change of pace. We had tons of fun and can now say that null sec is a lot better place for pvp  On the topic of mechanics one simple change would solve the issue and made the wardecs work as intended. In case of mutual war both sides should be flagged as aggressors. Both the aggressor and defender have to make a conscious decision about declaring war on each other. Only way to get out of war would be surrender or disband for both sides of the conflict which in my opinion would make the system fair. Have to correct one thing: Alliances with outgoing wars can still accept corporations. Ive tested this the last 2 days. However, corps with outgoing wars cant apply to alliances. I support the change, that in a mutual war both sides should be counted aggressors though.
And here you see the OCD plagued part of me whining that all these wardecs make the war history look bad, even with no interactions in those wars :((( |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
211
|
Posted - 2012.09.29 23:45:00 -
[86] - Quote
Karah Serrigan wrote:Tolene wrote:The Zerg Overmind wrote: Fine you say, so they deserve that. But these aren't just normal wars we're holding over them, these are outgoing wars. And alliance with an outgoing war CANNOT recruit another corporation to the alliance, ever again. If any corporations ever leave that alliance, they'll also have outgoing wars. A corporation with an outgoing war CANNOT join an alliance, ever again.
This is the only real drawback of a perma war. But it can be easily bypassed by creating a sacrificial corp and joining it in order to join null sec ally. After you get bored you can just disband the corp and join your old one as wars don't follow players. On the other hand c0ven can now wardec their null sec enemies without any remorse. Our war with tribal band was a nice change of pace. We had tons of fun and can now say that null sec is a lot better place for pvp  On the topic of mechanics one simple change would solve the issue and made the wardecs work as intended. In case of mutual war both sides should be flagged as aggressors. Both the aggressor and defender have to make a conscious decision about declaring war on each other. Only way to get out of war would be surrender or disband for both sides of the conflict which in my opinion would make the system fair. Have to correct one thing: Alliances with outgoing wars can still accept corporations. Ive tested this the last 2 days. However, corps with outgoing wars cant apply to alliances. I support the change, that in a mutual war both sides should be counted aggressors though. And here you see the OCD plagued part of me whining that all these wardecs make the war history look bad, even with no interactions in those wars :((( I stand corrected. I just tested this myself, and yes an alliance with outgoing wardecs can accept corporations. I'm not sure when this changed, or if I was always crazy. I'm updating information to reflect this new understanding
Burn Highsec Griefers |

Alx Warlord
Security Task Force
169
|
Posted - 2012.09.30 03:59:00 -
[87] - Quote
Well, if this is a know issue, and some people are abusing it, ( Despite the fact that this is really fun) , there should be some disciplinary actions over the abusers sooner or latter... maybe some acc bans? and tears? [Discussion] - New POS system ( Construction Block Built - Starbasecraft) <<< Please CCP read this! |

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
935
|
Posted - 2012.09.30 04:10:00 -
[88] - Quote
Alx Warlord wrote:Well, if this is a know issue, and some people are abusing it, ( Despite the fact that this is really fun) , there should be some disciplinary actions over the abusers sooner or latter... maybe some acc bans? and tears? Account bans for literally pressing a button that was created and implemented by CCP for the sole purpose of being pressed?
Also, this "feature" is completely intentional. It's a high-sec pvp nerf at its core, and therefore has been on CCP's agenda for the past couple of years. The only thing that will change anything in this case is public outcry, but I'm not holding out hope, considering that they haven't even budged from their proposed Crimewatch designs. (USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST) |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
217
|
Posted - 2012.10.01 21:59:00 -
[89] - Quote
Apparently if you've got too many wardecs the UI breaks and you can't scroll to the bottom of the menu to accept the corp: http://dl.eve-files.com/media/1210/2012.10.01.21.14.23.jpg
luckily you can still use the keyboard to blindly hit accept :) Burn Highsec Griefers |

Emerald Decartes
Syndicate Holdings
29
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 02:28:00 -
[90] - Quote
Sff, cool story bro.
Maybe if you had something more productive to do with your time, instead of investing your time into this joke organization, which as far as I can tell employees tactics that only involve spam mailing people as a deterrent to a war dec... which is ofc ineffective... you'd be much more happy not only in eve, but no doubt in rl as well...
I for one enjoy the daily mails from "dec shield ambassador 1-5." It lets me know that you're still trying... very hard.
Thank you for allowing us to become involved in the plotted down fall of your lame idea, practice, and ofc existence.
Cya around and kind regards,
ED D.F.C.S. no TRUST in mankind no confidence IN goverment there will never be enduring FREEDOM. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 20 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |