Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 20 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
154
|
Posted - 2012.09.22 22:08:00 -
[1] - Quote
Dec Shield is back once again to abuse wardec mechanics to inflict grief upon your enemies.
The Plan: Due to current wardec mechanics, if a defending corp sets the war mutual, the aggressing corp CANNOT retract the war without the defender agreeing to it. This means the defender can permanently trap the aggressing corp into a war. This will allow corporations to join Dec Shield, then we absorb your wars, we set the wars to mutual, and then you leave alliance. In this way Dec Shield will gain infinite length wars against every aggressive corp in highsec. We will then take on pvp corps that will murder the people who hunted your corp. The hunters will become the prey.
How to permanently burn your enemy's corp: 1.) Apply to join "Dec Shield" with your corporation. 2.) I accept your application 3.) 24-25hrs later your corp is in the alliance 4.) I set your wars mutual and boot you from the alliance 5.) You set your absorbed wars to non-mutual so our victims have to pay if they're not paying attention 6.) The aggressing corp is turned into a whining victim
Notes: This is a completely free service as always. I promise nothing about protecting your corp or helping you escape your aggressors. The only goal here is to render their corporation trapped in a permanent war so they can be hunted forever. If you want to burn your enemy's corp then join Dec Shield.
FAQ:
- Only corporations with no outgoing wardecs may apply to join an alliance.
- To join an allliance, the CEO must go to Corporation -> Alliances -> Rankings -> Show All -> Find "Dec Shield" -> Right click, apply to join
- If you're a pvp corp looking to grief the lowest form of life in highsec please email me and we'll discuss permanent applications
Free Wardec Removal |

Surfin's PlunderBunny
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
2279
|
Posted - 2012.09.22 22:11:00 -
[2] - Quote
I approve of this service and/or idea "A genius throws a Molotov cocktail and soon realizes that he's going to die choking in a maze of smoke and flame. A hero drinks a Molotov cocktail and soon realizes that if he does a split in midair, he can hit twice as many zombies per kick. Drunk hero wins again, wusses." ~Cracked.com |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1507
|
Posted - 2012.09.22 22:36:00 -
[3] - Quote
I cannot help but applaud the way you make "creative" use of the highsec wardec mechanics. Keep it up! Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Bienator II
madmen of the skies
901
|
Posted - 2012.09.22 23:13:00 -
[4] - Quote
don't call it dec shield. call it "its a trap" or "ackbar foundation" a eve-style bounty system https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=359105 You fail you fail you fail you fail you fail you fail you fail to jump because you are cloaked |

Garven Dreis
Kicking Smurfs The Marmite Collective
72
|
Posted - 2012.09.23 00:00:00 -
[5] - Quote
Amazing work, as always! In Manticore we Trust |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
159
|
Posted - 2012.09.23 00:26:00 -
[6] - Quote
Bienator II wrote:don't call it dec shield. call it "its a trap" or "ackbar foundation" lol good names, but Dec Shield is what we have, notorious and evil. We've just acquired our first war with a sov holding nullsec alliance. I'm sure they'll be most displeased tomorrow when they learn that they're permanently screwed. The tears of our enemies will sustain us.
By the time we're through with the game, the act of declaring war will be so hideous and unthinkable that wardecs will stop entirely. CCP will once again be forced to change wardec mechanics to stop us. Start the countdown. Burn Highsec Griefers |

Herping yourDerp
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
769
|
Posted - 2012.09.23 06:44:00 -
[7] - Quote
hope they never fix this. highsec wars have always been BS and dec shield is the best shield. |

Iam Widdershins
Project Nemesis
728
|
Posted - 2012.09.23 08:10:00 -
[8] - Quote
Everyone, highsec PVPers and CCP alike, has been aware for some time that the current mechanics surrounding allies, joining/leaving alliances, and the defender's freedom to toggle the "make mutual" mechanic at will are in sore need of reform. Nobody's expecting this to go on for very much longer I'm sure.
Highsec wars will always exist, but good for you in finding yet another broken element of CCP's latest revision of the rules and mechanics. Lobbying for your right to delete your signature |

Nerath Naaris
Pink Winged Unicorns for Peace Love and Anarchy
162
|
Posted - 2012.09.23 08:15:00 -
[9] - Quote
I find your lack of profit disturbing, though.  Forum-unbanned since 2011.10.20. |

Eugene Kerner
TunDraGon
124
|
Posted - 2012.09.23 08:50:00 -
[10] - Quote
You are a great help for all the small corps out there! Keep it up! |
|

Pipa Porto
995
|
Posted - 2012.09.23 09:11:00 -
[11] - Quote
Herping yourDerp wrote:hope they never fix this. highsec wars have always been BS and dec shield is the best shield.
This solves the opposite problem than the one Wardecs actually have (namely, the ease by which defenders can escape*).
But it amuses me, so I approve wholeheartedly.
*Especially since WarDecs are now officially "paying for targets," those targets ability to freely disband and reform their corp is a significant problem. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Iam Widdershins
Project Nemesis
729
|
Posted - 2012.09.23 11:18:00 -
[12] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Herping yourDerp wrote:hope they never fix this. highsec wars have always been BS and dec shield is the best shield. This solves the opposite problem than the one Wardecs actually have (namely, the ease by which defenders can escape*). But it amuses me, so I approve wholeheartedly. *Especially since WarDecs are now officially "paying for targets," those targets ability to freely disband and reform their corp is a significant problem. And that's only scratching the surface of the horrible shenanigans that can occur when things really get down to business. Lobbying for your right to delete your signature |

Reppyk
The Black Shell
176
|
Posted - 2012.09.23 18:38:00 -
[13] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote: We've just acquired our first war with a sov holding nullsec alliance. Who ? I tried to find it but the interface is unreadable.
You may want to update the alliance description btw.
|

Vaju Enki
Secular Wisdom
208
|
Posted - 2012.09.23 20:23:00 -
[14] - Quote
Hope they fix this soon. If you want instant gratification, go stimulate your genitals. EvE is Hard, deal with it. |

Piugattuk
CLOROFLORFILAPLANKTONPLATES
61
|
Posted - 2012.09.23 21:06:00 -
[15] - Quote
forever dec'ed!!! Holy Veldspar! |

bufnitza calatoare
Snap Crackle Pop. AAA Citizens
0
|
Posted - 2012.09.24 04:24:00 -
[16] - Quote
oh thast easy to get around.
once you boot the "wardecced" corp from alliance they cannot rejoin for a week .
so redec the corp. and collect easy kills from dec shield like before.
|

Pipa Porto
1004
|
Posted - 2012.09.24 04:31:00 -
[17] - Quote
bufnitza calatoare wrote:oh thast easy to get around.
once you boot the "wardecced" corp from alliance they cannot rejoin for a week .
so redec the corp. and collect easy kills from dec shield like before.
You might consider reading the OP before pooh-poohing it.
DecShield 2.0 isn't about shedding decs, it's about trapping the attacker into a permadec with the Alliance and the various PvP people who might join it. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Kalel Nimrott
EG CORP Talocan United
54
|
Posted - 2012.09.24 05:19:00 -
[18] - Quote
This is so devious... |

Karimson Safehold
EVE University Ivy League
0
|
Posted - 2012.09.24 09:03:00 -
[19] - Quote
This is more like a Dec Spear than a shield.
|

bufnitza calatoare
Snap Crackle Pop. AAA Citizens
1
|
Posted - 2012.09.24 10:01:00 -
[20] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:bufnitza calatoare wrote:oh thast easy to get around.
once you boot the "wardecced" corp from alliance they cannot rejoin for a week .
so redec the corp. and collect easy kills from dec shield like before. You might consider reading the OP before pooh-poohing it. DecShield 2.0 isn't about shedding decs, it's about trapping the attacker into a permadec with the Alliance and the various PvP people who might join it.
yeah and??? mutal war decs are free. I know of a few corps that got some phat kills from dec shield b4 ccp "changed" how war decs work.
end of the day any good pvp corp will redec that corp that left your alliance so will bad ones lol.. |
|

Tora Bushido
EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective
78
|
Posted - 2012.09.24 10:02:00 -
[21] - Quote
Unless you have enough players inside dec shield it will be useless. The number of merc alliances, griefers, one corps, etc etc etc are way bigger in numbers then the guys who will be inside decshield.
So good idea, cuz its shows the dec mechanism fails. But be careful who you 'trap'  My resists to bad posts are 78-89-83-90 ....... The metal head plate increased it by 5%.
|

Iam Widdershins
Project Nemesis
732
|
Posted - 2012.09.24 10:53:00 -
[22] - Quote
Kalel Nimrott wrote:This is so devious... No, it really isn't. I've considered doing this for a while but don't really have the time nor the visibility to make anything out of it. Lobbying for your right to delete your signature |

Vladimir Norkoff
Income Redistribution Service
56
|
Posted - 2012.09.24 11:11:00 -
[23] - Quote
Lovely... Best part is, this tactic was brought up when CCP was asking for pre-implementation feedback. Working as intended.
Almost makes the Crimewatch ideas palatable. At least that only lasts for 15 minutes.... Maybe... maybe they planned it this way all along.... *tinfoil hat* |

Ristlin Wakefield
Wanderers of the Eternal Darkness Eternal Pretorian Alliance
96
|
Posted - 2012.09.24 13:56:00 -
[24] - Quote
Iam Widdershins wrote:Kalel Nimrott wrote:This is so devious... No, it really isn't. I've considered doing this for a while but don't really have the time nor the visibility to make anything out of it.
I considered doing this since last year! I have a lover, her name is EVE. I see her every night and all she asks in return is that I have a pilot's license. |

Jessa Leone
Perkone Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.09.24 16:42:00 -
[25] - Quote
Now what happens to the corps once they drop from Dec Shield. Do they now get a copy of all mutual wars against dec shield? |

Anya Klibor
Gods Asunder Those Bloody Red Bastards
139
|
Posted - 2012.09.24 16:52:00 -
[26] - Quote
Jessa Leone wrote:Now what happens to the corps once they drop from Dec Shield. Do they now get a copy of all mutual wars against dec shield?
Yes, they do. All wars transfer also to the corporation that leaves the alliance, and remain active until the war runs it's natural duration, at which time the corporation/alliance that has initiated conflict can decide to pay the upkeep fee for 50,000,000 ISK instead of whatever it would normally be. We've used this previously to continue wars, and we'd like to thank alliances for keeping it going for us!
(Note: I don't know if making it mutual will do anything.) |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
179
|
Posted - 2012.09.24 21:37:00 -
[27] - Quote
Iam Widdershins wrote: No, it really isn't. I've considered doing this for a while but don't really have the time nor the visibility to make anything out of it.
Ristlin Wakefield wrote:I considered doing this since last year! You are both welcome to join Dec Shield at your leisure to siphon off our wars and bring them back to your own corps/alliances. Since you can get exact copies of our wars, we can continue to spread these wars between countless entities in the game, never allowing any to escape.
Last night we trapped C0VEN alliance into a permanent wardec from which they'll never escape. We also had 'Bridgeburnners' disband to avoid being permanently trapped. They reformed into Rock Hard Innovations, when they start another war we'll have them again. We're also getting continuous surrender offers from VR Corp, P I R A T, Die Wildgaense, etc etc. I've been deleting notifications because there are too many. The tears must flow. Burn Highsec Griefers |

Iam Widdershins
Project Nemesis
732
|
Posted - 2012.09.24 21:54:00 -
[28] - Quote
Meh, we're more likely to end up at war with you guys. It's not going to be a huge difference either way tbh. We joined DS last time around and didn't see jack **** for like 3 weeks. Lobbying for your right to delete your signature |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
179
|
Posted - 2012.09.24 21:57:00 -
[29] - Quote
Ya, a lot of our current wars have stagnated, or people transferred out of the corps. It'll probably be a few weeks before we pick up enough live wardecs to present targets. But you're right, you'll probably get sucked into a permawar with us sooner or later. Right now we're sitting at 58 wars, with another 4-5 in the next 24hrs. Burn Highsec Griefers |

jimmyjam
Deadspace Exploration Conglomerate Clockwork Pineapple
61
|
Posted - 2012.09.25 00:02:00 -
[30] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:Ya, a lot of our current wars have stagnated, or people transferred out of the corps. It'll probably be a few weeks before we pick up enough live wardecs to present targets. But you're right, you'll probably get sucked into a permawar with us sooner or later. Right now we're sitting at 58 wars, with another 4-5 in the next 24hrs. What,s the point the if everyone just bails out when the realize the permanence of the dec. |
|

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
179
|
Posted - 2012.09.25 00:12:00 -
[31] - Quote
They don't all bail. Only about 20% of our victims have bailed. And since we'll continue to accumulate them, the choice of highsec targets we're holding captive will only get better. Some entities will never be able to escape or disband like the nullsec alliances. If any of them are foolish enough to declare wars they'll end up screwed. Burn Highsec Griefers |

Tolene
Rave Technologies Inc. C0VEN
0
|
Posted - 2012.09.25 00:55:00 -
[32] - Quote
Wardec mechanics are like swiss cheese - full of holes 
Nothing really changes for c0ven as we did not expect to escape the mutual war with Penumbra Institute anyway. But the idea is funny. |

Chicken Pizza
Penumbra Institute
63
|
Posted - 2012.09.25 11:29:00 -
[33] - Quote
Tolene wrote:Wardec mechanics are like swiss cheese - full of holes  Nothing really changes for c0ven as we did not expect to escape the mutual war with Penumbra Institute anyway. But the idea is funny.
Pleasure doing business. |

Chicken Pizza
Penumbra Institute
63
|
Posted - 2012.09.25 11:31:00 -
[34] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:Iam Widdershins wrote: No, it really isn't. I've considered doing this for a while but don't really have the time nor the visibility to make anything out of it.
Ristlin Wakefield wrote:I considered doing this since last year! You are both welcome to join Dec Shield at your leisure to siphon off our wars and bring them back to your own corps/alliances. Since you can get exact copies of our wars, we can continue to spread these wars between countless entities in the game, never allowing any to escape. Last night we trapped C0VEN alliance into a permanent wardec from which they'll never escape. We also had 'Bridgeburnners' disband to avoid being permanently trapped. They reformed into Rock Hard Innovations, when they start another war we'll have them again. We're also getting continuous surrender offers from VR Corp, P I R A T, Die Wildgaense, etc etc. I've been deleting notifications because there are too many. The tears must flow.
Pleasure doing business! :) |

Ristlin Wakefield
Wanderers of the Eternal Darkness Eternal Pretorian Alliance
96
|
Posted - 2012.09.25 13:35:00 -
[35] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:Iam Widdershins wrote: No, it really isn't. I've considered doing this for a while but don't really have the time nor the visibility to make anything out of it.
Ristlin Wakefield wrote:I considered doing this since last year! You are both welcome to join Dec Shield at your leisure to siphon off our wars and bring them back to your own corps/alliances. Since you can get exact copies of our wars, we can continue to spread these wars between countless entities in the game, never allowing any to escape. Last night we trapped C0VEN alliance into a permanent wardec from which they'll never escape. We also had 'Bridgeburnners' disband to avoid being permanently trapped. They reformed into Rock Hard Innovations, when they start another war we'll have them again. We're also getting continuous surrender offers from VR Corp, P I R A T, Die Wildgaense, etc etc. I've been deleting notifications because there are too many. The tears must flow.
I'm afraid if I join I'll wake up one day with you standing over me with that look on your face. I have a lover, her name is EVE. I see her every night and all she asks in return is that I have a pilot's license. |

Maldad Asesino
Mentally Assured Destruction
0
|
Posted - 2012.09.25 16:31:00 -
[36] - Quote
Ristlin Wakefield wrote: I'm afraid if I join I'll wake up one day with you standing over me with that look on your face.
lol!
|

Jint Hikaru
OffWorld Exploration Inc
315
|
Posted - 2012.09.25 16:44:00 -
[37] - Quote
Looks like you managed to pick up some tears on the Suggestions forum.....
Waaaa Mum, make the game change to suit me.
Jint Hikaru - Miner / Salvager / Explorer / SpaceBum In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move. |

Zeus Maximo
Mentally Assured Destruction
3
|
Posted - 2012.09.25 19:18:00 -
[38] - Quote
Go Dec Shield! |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
184
|
Posted - 2012.09.25 21:31:00 -
[39] - Quote
Ristlin Wakefield wrote:I'm afraid if I join I'll wake up one day with you standing over me with that look on your face. People tell me I have a trustworthy face Burn Highsec Griefers |

Pipa Porto
1032
|
Posted - 2012.09.25 21:35:00 -
[40] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:Ristlin Wakefield wrote:I'm afraid if I join I'll wake up one day with you standing over me with that look on your face. People tell me I have a trustworthy face
I trust you to do something...
Problem is, I don't want that thing to happen. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |
|

Reppyk
The Black Shell
177
|
Posted - 2012.09.25 22:10:00 -
[41] - Quote
"Unlimited" mutual wardecs will get patched, sooner or later.
|

Lyrrashae
Crushed Ambitions Reckless Ambition
352
|
Posted - 2012.09.26 02:37:00 -
[42] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:I cannot help but applaud the way you make "creative" use of the highsec wardec mechanics. Keep it up!
^^That.^^
This makes meh haz a non-sad
There is a fine and proper artistry to wielding verbal scalpels, such that the crap-poster you've slashed doesn't even know they've been cut. But verbal bludgeons -- Those are just fun. |

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
928
|
Posted - 2012.09.26 09:10:00 -
[43] - Quote
I understand why you're doing this, and I support your efforts, even though we're likely to get trapped in a war with Dec Shield sooner rather than later.
I do lament for the state of empire pvp, however. After having been here for so long, it really bums me out to know that it will only get worse and worse as time goes on. It's ridiculous that CCP considers being stuck in a blanket war "risk" while affording the defenders full control over their own and the aggressors' movements.
I can swallow being stuck in a permanent war, but why exactly should the original targets be allowed to leave an alliance that sets the war mutual? This mechanic, along with corp-hopping, provides defenders with total immunity. If the defenders time their actions just right, then it's impossible to even have a time window in which they can be aggressed. Between hopping alliances and remaking corporations, it's impossible to even have a chance of shooting your targets, despite paying by the person (CCP's words, not mine) to do so.
Will this particular "feature" be addressed at some point in the future? Yeah, I'm pretty sure it will. The real question is, at the expense of what? (USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST) |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
185
|
Posted - 2012.09.26 09:24:00 -
[44] - Quote
Destiny Corrupted wrote:I understand why you're doing this, and I support your efforts, even though we're likely to get trapped in a war with Dec Shield sooner rather than later.
I do lament for the state of empire pvp, however. After having been here for so long, it really bums me out to know that it will only get worse and worse as time goes on. It's ridiculous that CCP considers being stuck in a blanket war "risk" while affording the defenders full control over their own and the aggressors' movements.
I can swallow being stuck in a permanent war, but why exactly should the original targets be allowed to leave an alliance that sets the war mutual? This mechanic, along with corp-hopping, provides defenders with total immunity. If the defenders time their actions just right, then it's impossible to even have a time window in which they can be aggressed. Between hopping alliances and remaking corporations, it's impossible to even have a chance of shooting your targets, despite paying by the person (CCP's words, not mine) to do so.
Will this particular "feature" be addressed at some point in the future? Yeah, I'm pretty sure it will. The real question is, at the expense of what? I can probably expedite your being trapped in a war with us if you want. And I totally sympathize, because it's absolutely not fair. And I find it hard to believe that this was the intended mechanic. It makes me sad that I left Dec Shield alone for multiple months under the assumption that wardecs had been fixed.
I've made this thread to illustrate the abuse and hopefully to speed change along: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1969901
It's truly sad to see how fast we can spread these wars. C0VEN was at war with Penumbra Institute (a 13 man corp that was harassing them), and C0VEN wanted to pursue them into highsec for vengeance. Now C0VEN is trapped in 7 wars, and that number will only escalate. Any corporations that drop out of C0VEN I believe will remain in permanent outgoing wardecs, and never be able to join an alliance again (corps with outgoing wars can't join alliances).
Burn Highsec Griefers |

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
928
|
Posted - 2012.09.26 10:32:00 -
[45] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:Any corporations that drop out of C0VEN I believe will remain in permanent outgoing wardecs, and never be able to join an alliance again (corps with outgoing wars can't join alliances). What the ****, are you for real? Is that the way it actually works? I'm not into alliance stuff, so I don't have firsthand experience, but is this the way it works now?
How is this even a thing? :\ (USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST) |

Samoth Egnoled
EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective
54
|
Posted - 2012.09.26 10:39:00 -
[46] - Quote
Sounds like a challenge to me. |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
186
|
Posted - 2012.09.26 10:42:00 -
[47] - Quote
Destiny Corrupted wrote:The Zerg Overmind wrote:Any corporations that drop out of C0VEN I believe will remain in permanent outgoing wardecs, and never be able to join an alliance again (corps with outgoing wars can't join alliances). What the ****, are you for real? Is that the way it actually works? I'm not into alliance stuff, so I don't have firsthand experience, but is this the way it works now? How is this even a thing? :\ I'm pretty sure that's how it works, but I haven't explicitly tested it yet. The more ways I carve it, the more ways I find our victims are screwed. Burn Highsec Griefers |

Arth Lawing
Penumbra Institute
13
|
Posted - 2012.09.26 12:18:00 -
[48] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:
It's truly sad to see how fast we can spread these wars. C0VEN was at war with Penumbra Institute (a 13 man corp that was harassing them), and C0VEN wanted to pursue them into highsec for vengeance. Now C0VEN is trapped in 7 wars, and that number will only escalate. Any corporations that drop out of C0VEN I believe will remain in permanent outgoing wardecs, and never be able to join an alliance again (corps with outgoing wars can't join alliances).
The C0VEN war dec was a hasty reaction they made when we war dec'd their renter alliance I-BRA. We immediately made the C0VEN war mutual so we could pick it up at a point in the future, however at the time we had actually moved out to the Esoteria and Feythabolis area to disrupt traffic and isk making of their blues and renters, and to pick off juicy targets as they presented themselves. This was greatly helped by a couple of friendly and disillusioned corps in I-BRA and ROL, and as you can see from the kills it gave us a good ability to change fittings and ships multiple times, despite having no station access. Even giving us a chance to switch once to an alpha tornado gang and one shot a nightmare as it sat just outside its POS shields in P9F-ZG.
We weren't even in high sec at the time of the war dec, and, as anyone who knows us can tell, we usually don't go to high sec very often. Theres no intention of us to evade their war dec by use of any mechanics, we're just busy and will pick at it over time and as we see fit. C0VEN has made no offer of settlement indicating that they wish to bring it to a close, so I assume they are happy to keep it running indefinitely as well. We will likely return to our disruptive ops around their 0.0 space very soon, maybe after that we'll do the same in high sec empire and see what juicy targets they float around there. At least in empire ROL won't be dropping solo supercaps on our cloaky nano gangs. |

Karah Serrigan
The Hatchery Team Liquid
70
|
Posted - 2012.09.26 12:29:00 -
[49] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:Destiny Corrupted wrote:The Zerg Overmind wrote:Any corporations that drop out of C0VEN I believe will remain in permanent outgoing wardecs, and never be able to join an alliance again (corps with outgoing wars can't join alliances). What the ****, are you for real? Is that the way it actually works? I'm not into alliance stuff, so I don't have firsthand experience, but is this the way it works now? How is this even a thing? :\ I'm pretty sure that's how it works, but I haven't explicitly tested it yet. The more ways I carve it, the more ways I find our victims are screwed. If this is really how it works i see no future for your business because there is no way this wont be taken as an exploit and fixed. |

Pipa Porto
1051
|
Posted - 2012.09.26 12:39:00 -
[50] - Quote
Karah Serrigan wrote:If this is really how it works i see no future for your business because there is no way this wont be taken as an exploit and fixed.
Could it be that that is his intention?
That's the reason DecShield 1.0 was formed, so it stands to reason... EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |
|

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
929
|
Posted - 2012.09.26 14:15:00 -
[51] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Karah Serrigan wrote:If this is really how it works i see no future for your business because there is no way this wont be taken as an exploit and fixed. Could it be that that is his intention? That's the reason DecShield 1.0 was formed, so it stands to reason... I think all three of us might be operating under a too-optimistic assumption that CCP wants to preserve pvp in high-sec. (USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST) |

flakeys
Angels of Anarchy Interstellar Confederation
375
|
Posted - 2012.09.26 14:33:00 -
[52] - Quote
Starting to like the current mechanics more and more .Good one bringing this to the attention once more Zerg . The surest way to remain poor is to be an honest man ...-á |

Ample Norks
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2012.09.26 17:23:00 -
[53] - Quote
Wow you must have loads of kills.
Let me count them up....0+0+0+0+0+0+0 x 10 = 0
I would be impressed if you were achieving anything. Unfortunatley it seems unsuspecting corps are falling for this drivel and realising they themselves face not just one hostile but however many you have 'Trapped'
I wonder how many have closed because of this. Looking at the membership of the corps that have joined and left you since this new mechanic has been in place it would seem you are having the opposite effect to what you claim to be providing. |

Cannibal Kane
Umkhonto We Sizwe
551
|
Posted - 2012.09.26 18:08:00 -
[54] - Quote
Ample Norks wrote:Wow you must have loads of kills.
Let me count them up....0+0+0+0+0+0+0 x 10 = 0
I would be impressed if you were achieving anything. Unfortunatley it seems unsuspecting corps are falling for this drivel and realising they themselves face not just one hostile but however many you have 'Trapped'
I wonder how many have closed because of this. Looking at the membership of the corps that have joined and left you since this new mechanic has been in place it would seem you are having the opposite effect to what you claim to be providing.
Coming from a NPC char with no kills of it's own. Your opinion in this matter means **** all. I'm not a Pirate, I'm a Terrorist.
The Crazy Space Poor South African.
*Hair done by LGÇÖOr+¬al, because I'm worth it. |

Ample Norks
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2012.09.26 18:28:00 -
[55] - Quote
Check the facts and form your own opinion, if you have the ability. |

Devil Dodger
Cult of Escobar
6
|
Posted - 2012.09.26 19:19:00 -
[56] - Quote
What I really want to know is how can I join Dec Shield to pew pew? Support my implant marketing campaign: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1903853#post1903853 Our customer list: http://poachers.mindflood.org/ |

Pipa Porto
1055
|
Posted - 2012.09.26 22:19:00 -
[57] - Quote
Destiny Corrupted wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Karah Serrigan wrote:If this is really how it works i see no future for your business because there is no way this wont be taken as an exploit and fixed. Could it be that that is his intention? That's the reason DecShield 1.0 was formed, so it stands to reason... I think all three of us might be operating under a too-optimistic assumption that CCP wants to preserve pvp in high-sec.
If they don't and this forces them to show their hand earlier, that works too. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Tarsas Phage
Freight Club
93
|
Posted - 2012.09.26 23:45:00 -
[58] - Quote
Karah Serrigan wrote:The Zerg Overmind wrote:Destiny Corrupted wrote:The Zerg Overmind wrote:Any corporations that drop out of C0VEN I believe will remain in permanent outgoing wardecs, and never be able to join an alliance again (corps with outgoing wars can't join alliances). What the ****, are you for real? Is that the way it actually works? I'm not into alliance stuff, so I don't have firsthand experience, but is this the way it works now? How is this even a thing? :\ I'm pretty sure that's how it works, but I haven't explicitly tested it yet. The more ways I carve it, the more ways I find our victims are screwed. If this is really how it works i see no future for your business because there is no way this wont be taken as an exploit and fixed.
I wouldn't throw the word "exploit" around too readily in this case. I, and I presume many others, would probably see it as a severe oversight, or lack of complete mapping of the possibilities on CCP's behalf.
I was at FF2012 this year, in the roundtable which the then-new (and now current) wardec mechanics were presented and hashed out. The room was full of people who engage(d) in wardecs and machanics-bending as a normal course of playing eve, and I don't recall this possibility ever being mentioned at that time... I can only assume that it escaped us all because it was a lot of info to digest.
But here we are, and Dec Shield rides again. Many of you may recall the "forever war" that the Goons and others got trapped in shortly after these new mechanics were put in place, where the Goons dec'd (aggressed) a corp, and that corp made the war both mutual and open to allies, locking them into a never-ceasing war with potentially unlimited numbers joining it against them, for free. CCP nipped that in the bud, and now we have ally contracts lasting only 2 weeks, they cost ISK, and mutual wars now allow no allies. I believe this situation to be no different from that, and hope CCP acts equally as quickly to address it.
/T |

Iam Widdershins
Project Nemesis
735
|
Posted - 2012.09.27 00:02:00 -
[59] - Quote
Tarsas Phage wrote:Many of you may recall the "forever war" that the Goons and others got trapped in shortly after these new mechanics were put in place, where the Goons dec'd (aggressed) a corp, and that corp made the war both mutual and open to allies, locking them into a never-ceasing war with potentially unlimited numbers joining it against them, for free. CCP nipped that in the bud, and now we have ally contracts lasting only 2 weeks, they cost ISK, and mutual wars now allow no allies. I believe this situation to be no different from that, and hope CCP acts equally as quickly to address it.
/T Mutual wars ostensibly allow no allies... but the sad fact is that the mutual status of the war can be toggled at will without limitation: the war can be made mutual only as often as it needs to be to continue its free status, and allies can be piled on as desired at all other times.
Mutual status of a war needs to be only toggleable twice: once turned on, then off again, it must be impossible to re-mutual. Engaging mutual status in a war must drop all allies from the war, and perhaps even make it impossible from then on to accept any allies after it has been made non-mutual again.
I'm pretty sure most of us expected it to look something like that but were sorely disappointed when it came to light just how incomplete the nuances of the mechanics really were. Lobbying for your right to delete your signature |

Tarsas Phage
Freight Club
93
|
Posted - 2012.09.27 00:33:00 -
[60] - Quote
Iam Widdershins wrote:Mutual wars ostensibly allow no allies... but the sad fact is that the mutual status of the war can be toggled at will without limitation: the war can be made mutual only as often as it needs to be to continue its free status, and allies can be piled on as desired at all other times.
Mutual status of a war needs to be only toggleable twice: once turned on, then off again, it must be impossible to re-mutual. Engaging mutual status in a war must drop all allies from the war, and perhaps even make it impossible from then on to accept any allies after it has been made non-mutual again.
I'm pretty sure most of us expected it to look something like that but were sorely disappointed when it came to light just how incomplete the nuances of the mechanics really were.
To spell it out:
CONTEXT: Defending Corporation in a war.
- IF war is made mutual
- Ally contracts ended;
- Ally contracts disallowed;
- Alliance join disallowed;
- ELSE
- Ally contracts allowed;
- Alliance join allowed;
CONTEXT: Defending Alliance in a war.
- IF war is made mutual
- Ally contracts ended;
- Corporation join disallowed;
- Leaving Corps get Non-Mutual 1-week copy; (see note)
- ELSE
- Ally contracts allowed;
- Corporation join allowed;
- Leaving Corps get Non-Mutual 1-week copy; (see note)
Note: Which upon leaving a Defending Alliance, these corps are free to set their copy of the war to mutual, but then fall under the first rule block governing Mutual Wars set by Defending Corporations. |
|

Tatakai no Tenshi
Good Fights
1
|
Posted - 2012.09.27 02:35:00 -
[61] - Quote
My corporation has just applied, and will be joining the alliance in 24 hours. Until CCP decides to nerf this, I am planning use of all the targets provided here to wreak havoc.
The doors are open for everyone. Mains, alts, you name it. Just drop and app into 'Good Fights'. The corp will be in the alliance within the next 24h, so keep that in mind if you have ships to move. The corp will be basing out of Jita 4-4.
Feel free to contact me if you have any questions. -TnT |

Gerard Gendri
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
64
|
Posted - 2012.09.27 03:57:00 -
[62] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:They don't all bail. Only about 20% of our victims have bailed. And since we'll continue to accumulate them, the choice of highsec targets we're holding captive will only get better. Some entities will never be able to escape or disband like the nullsec alliances. If any of them are foolish enough to declare wars they'll end up screwed.
You actually think that a wardec makes any impact at all on a nullsec alliance? |

Iam Widdershins
Project Nemesis
735
|
Posted - 2012.09.27 04:27:00 -
[63] - Quote
Gerard Gendri wrote:The Zerg Overmind wrote:They don't all bail. Only about 20% of our victims have bailed. And since we'll continue to accumulate them, the choice of highsec targets we're holding captive will only get better. Some entities will never be able to escape or disband like the nullsec alliances. If any of them are foolish enough to declare wars they'll end up screwed. You actually think that a wardec makes any impact at all on a nullsec alliance? Clearly you weren't paying much attention when Privateers, The 0rphanage, and Moar Tears roamed the land. Lobbying for your right to delete your signature |

Adolf Hilmar
Strange Energy Gentlemen's Agreement
89
|
Posted - 2012.09.27 05:18:00 -
[64] - Quote
Gerard Gendri wrote:You actually think that a wardec makes any impact at all on a nullsec alliance?
Yes, because they won't be able to recruit new corps into their alliance. |

Tarryn Nightstorm
Hellstar Towing and Recovery
643
|
Posted - 2012.09.27 05:46:00 -
[65] - Quote
Gerard Gendri wrote:
You actually think that a wardec makes any impact at all on a nullsec alliance?
Look out, everybody:
WE GOT US A REAL BADASS HERE!!
For ****'s sake...
Meta-gaming for carebears:
Whine on the forums like a little ***** until CCP gets sick of you and hands you everything you ask for just to shut you up. |

Pipa Porto
1057
|
Posted - 2012.09.27 06:46:00 -
[66] - Quote
Adolf Hilmar wrote:Gerard Gendri wrote:You actually think that a wardec makes any impact at all on a nullsec alliance? Yes, because they won't be able to recruit new corps into their alliance.
Why would that be? EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
203
|
Posted - 2012.09.27 07:36:00 -
[67] - Quote
Gerard Gendri wrote:You actually think that a wardec makes any impact at all on a nullsec alliance? Yes, I'm quite positive that wardecs have massive effects on nullsec alliances. Moar Tears demonstrated this over and over again by killing dozens of jump freighters every month that belonged to nullsec alliances. Nullsec alliances don't have military arms in highsec, thus their lowbies get picked off regularily.
Fine you say, so they deserve that. But these aren't just normal wars we're holding over them, these are outgoing wars. And alliance with an outgoing war CANNOT recruit another corporation to the alliance, ever again. If any corporations ever leave that alliance, they'll also have outgoing wars. A corporation with an outgoing war CANNOT join an alliance, ever again.
So yes, there are consequences, and they are brutal, even if you don't care about the loss of your assets to highsec pirates. And the worst insult of it all is that you can blame yourselves for having made the outgoing war to begin with. So let's not pretend there are no consequences to us trapping you, because there will be, until such time CCP stops me.
PS, I have extended aid to TEST alliance for your wars, but I don't expect you'll let us absorb your wars Burn Highsec Griefers |

Pipa Porto
1060
|
Posted - 2012.09.27 07:37:00 -
[68] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:But these aren't just normal wars we're holding over them, these are outgoing wars. And alliance with an outgoing war CANNOT recruit another corporation to the alliance, ever again. If any corporations ever leave that alliance, they'll also have outgoing wars. A corporation with an outgoing war CANNOT join an alliance, ever again.
Wait, seriously?
Jesus Christ CCP. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Karah Serrigan
The Hatchery Team Liquid
70
|
Posted - 2012.09.27 09:10:00 -
[69] - Quote
Gerard Gendri wrote:The Zerg Overmind wrote:They don't all bail. Only about 20% of our victims have bailed. And since we'll continue to accumulate them, the choice of highsec targets we're holding captive will only get better. Some entities will never be able to escape or disband like the nullsec alliances. If any of them are foolish enough to declare wars they'll end up screwed. You actually think that a wardec makes any impact at all on a nullsec alliance? Hey was it before or after the change that forced the highsec corps to drop the wardecs on goons, that they started to suicide gank in niarja with their mains???? |

Pipa Porto
1062
|
Posted - 2012.09.27 09:42:00 -
[70] - Quote
Karah Serrigan wrote:Gerard Gendri wrote:The Zerg Overmind wrote:They don't all bail. Only about 20% of our victims have bailed. And since we'll continue to accumulate them, the choice of highsec targets we're holding captive will only get better. Some entities will never be able to escape or disband like the nullsec alliances. If any of them are foolish enough to declare wars they'll end up screwed. You actually think that a wardec makes any impact at all on a nullsec alliance? Hey was it before or after the change that forced the highsec corps to drop the wardecs on goons, that they started to suicide gank in niarja with their mains????
During that Wardec, weren't they too busy with HAG suicide ganking Hulks? EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |
|

flakeys
Angels of Anarchy Interstellar Confederation
375
|
Posted - 2012.09.27 15:14:00 -
[71] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Karah Serrigan wrote:Gerard Gendri wrote:The Zerg Overmind wrote:They don't all bail. Only about 20% of our victims have bailed. And since we'll continue to accumulate them, the choice of highsec targets we're holding captive will only get better. Some entities will never be able to escape or disband like the nullsec alliances. If any of them are foolish enough to declare wars they'll end up screwed. You actually think that a wardec makes any impact at all on a nullsec alliance? Hey was it before or after the change that forced the highsec corps to drop the wardecs on goons, that they started to suicide gank in niarja with their mains???? During that Wardec, weren't they too busy with HAG suicide ganking Hulks?
And i'm sure current war price wasn't placed as one big gift into their hands ... The surest way to remain poor is to be an honest man ...-á |

Reppyk
The Black Shell
178
|
Posted - 2012.09.27 15:28:00 -
[72] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:Fine you say, so they deserve that. But these aren't just normal wars we're holding over them, these are outgoing wars. And alliance with an outgoing war CANNOT recruit another corporation to the alliance, ever again. If any corporations ever leave that alliance, they'll also have outgoing wars. A corporation with an outgoing war CANNOT join an alliance, ever again. RIP C0ven.
EDIT : ZO, will you make your maths ? You can beat Privateer's wardec record !  |

Karah Serrigan
The Hatchery Team Liquid
70
|
Posted - 2012.09.27 15:32:00 -
[73] - Quote
Reppyk wrote:The Zerg Overmind wrote:Fine you say, so they deserve that. But these aren't just normal wars we're holding over them, these are outgoing wars. And alliance with an outgoing war CANNOT recruit another corporation to the alliance, ever again. If any corporations ever leave that alliance, they'll also have outgoing wars. A corporation with an outgoing war CANNOT join an alliance, ever again. RIP C0ven. EDIT : ZO, will you make your maths ? You can beat Privateer's wardec record !  If an alliance with outgoing wars cant accept new corporation, how are corporations able to join Dec Shield and spread new wars then?
Pipa Porto wrote: During that Wardec, weren't they too busy with HAG suicide ganking Hulks?
You mean because there was only a short time frame of 2 months before the patch when this was possible rather than ALL the years when they were wardecced? |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
203
|
Posted - 2012.09.27 15:42:00 -
[74] - Quote
Karah Serrigan wrote: If an alliance with outgoing wars cant accept new corporation, how are corporations able to join Dec Shield and spread new wars then?
Dec Shield is only experiencing INCOMING wars, thus we can recruit as many corps as we want without consequence.
Reppyk wrote:EDIT : ZO, will you make your maths ? You can beat Privateer's wardec record !  What's their wardec record? We're pretty high ourselves Burn Highsec Griefers |

Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
672
|
Posted - 2012.09.27 15:44:00 -
[75] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:The Zerg Overmind wrote:But these aren't just normal wars we're holding over them, these are outgoing wars. And alliance with an outgoing war CANNOT recruit another corporation to the alliance, ever again. If any corporations ever leave that alliance, they'll also have outgoing wars. A corporation with an outgoing war CANNOT join an alliance, ever again. Wait, seriously? Jesus Christ CCP.
Just answered FuzzWork Enterprises http://www.fuzzwork.co.uk/
Blueprint calculator, invention chance calculator, isk/m3 Ore chart-á and other 'useful' utilities. |

Pipa Porto
1064
|
Posted - 2012.09.27 19:08:00 -
[76] - Quote
Karah Serrigan wrote:Pipa Porto wrote: During that Wardec, weren't they too busy with HAG suicide ganking Hulks?
You mean because there was only a short time frame of 2 months before the patch when this was possible rather than ALL the years when they were wardecced?
Whe?
I was responding to the claim that suicide ganking freighters was only possible because they weren't wardecced. I pointed out that, during the last big wardec they weren't suicide ganking freighters because they were too busy suicide ganking exhumers.
As a big old bonus, being wardecced would not affect their suicide gank strategies with Freighters either (from what I understand, they spend most of their time logged off to avoid ze faction Popo, only logging in once the target is picked and bumped off the gate). EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Karah Serrigan
The Hatchery Team Liquid
70
|
Posted - 2012.09.27 19:26:00 -
[77] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Karah Serrigan wrote:Pipa Porto wrote: During that Wardec, weren't they too busy with HAG suicide ganking Hulks?
You mean because there was only a short time frame of 2 months before the patch when this was possible rather than ALL the years when they were wardecced? Whe? I was responding to the claim that suicide ganking freighters was only possible because they weren't wardecced. I pointed out that, during the last big wardec they weren't suicide ganking freighters because they were too busy suicide ganking exhumers. As a big old bonus, being wardecced would not affect their suicide gank strategies with Freighters either (from what I understand, they spend most of their time logged off to avoid ze faction Popo, only logging in once the target is picked and bumped off the gate). Yes and i made the claim because they arent doing by alpha strikes. They are using the cheapest hull they can get, catalysts, brutixes, and bump things offgate to get as much time as possible. If they were wardecced, they would have to switch to arty ships and get one shot off on the gate, or do it with alts out of alliance. But they, being goonswarm, crave for attention, so doing it in alt characters is out of the questions and we wouldnt have a 20 pages long "goon freighter suicide gank" thread.
As to the hulkageddon thing, it wasnt an operation in one system, you cant hunt catalysts in whole eve. But you can camp a single system and wait for their freighter ganking squad. And they were constantly and repeatedly wardecced by different highsec griefing corps/alliances, probably for longer than 5 hulkageddon durations combined. |

Pipa Porto
1064
|
Posted - 2012.09.27 19:44:00 -
[78] - Quote
Karah Serrigan wrote: Yes and i made the claim because they arent doing by alpha strikes. They are using the cheapest hull they can get, catalysts, brutixes, and bump things offgate to get as much time as possible. If they were wardecced, they would have to switch to arty ships and get one shot off on the gate, or do it with alts out of alliance. But they, being goonswarm, crave for attention, so doing it in alt characters is out of the questions and we wouldnt have a 20 pages long "goon freighter suicide gank" thread.
As to the hulkageddon thing, it wasnt an operation in one system, you cant hunt catalysts in whole eve. But you can camp a single system and wait for their freighter ganking squad. And they were constantly and repeatedly wardecced by different highsec griefing corps/alliances, probably for longer than 5 hulkageddon durations combined.
If they were wardecced, they'd simply keep bumping until the WT gets bored and stops following them, or they'd have an alt gank squad set up for when WTs are around. Or they'd just gank the WTs.
Or, they'd switch to Arty and either alpha through the WTs before ganking the freighter or alpha the freighter. What's that fleet composition that they were using to take large swaths of space? The Alpha doctrine? I wonder what principle it operates on... EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Chicken Pizza
Penumbra Institute
69
|
Posted - 2012.09.27 22:39:00 -
[79] - Quote
Gerard Gendri wrote:The Zerg Overmind wrote:They don't all bail. Only about 20% of our victims have bailed. And since we'll continue to accumulate them, the choice of highsec targets we're holding captive will only get better. Some entities will never be able to escape or disband like the nullsec alliances. If any of them are foolish enough to declare wars they'll end up screwed. You actually think that a wardec makes any impact at all on a nullsec alliance?
Learn the game you're playing before you make stupid implications. |

Tolene
Rave Technologies Inc. C0VEN
0
|
Posted - 2012.09.28 18:17:00 -
[80] - Quote
Despite some people expectations c0ven will not die because of a perma war in Hisek. Hisek warriors must realize that people who live in null sec spend 99% of their game time in null sec where they can shoot anyone they please. Our pubies are brought to null sec within 24/48 hours after they join up. We have no use for people who refuse to live in null sec. Only logistics must venture into hisek on regular basis but they can easily avoid wardecs.
The Zerg Overmind wrote: Yes, I'm quite positive that wardecs have massive effects on nullsec alliances. Moar Tears demonstrated this over and over again by killing dozens of jump freighters every month that belonged to nullsec alliances. Nullsec alliances don't have military arms in highsec, thus their lowbies get picked off regularily.
From a null sec perspective a hisek war usually generates loses in the first 24-48 hours of fighting. Mostly people that die are people who did not read the war notification or thought that they will be lucky. In null sec alliances 95% of the logistics are done by NPC corp alts therefore susceptible only to ganks. Method may be bothersome but works just fine. For example not a single c0ven logistic ship were lost to war targets since our perma war with Penumbra started.
The Zerg Overmind wrote: Fine you say, so they deserve that. But these aren't just normal wars we're holding over them, these are outgoing wars. And alliance with an outgoing war CANNOT recruit another corporation to the alliance, ever again. If any corporations ever leave that alliance, they'll also have outgoing wars. A corporation with an outgoing war CANNOT join an alliance, ever again.
This is the only real drawback of a perma war. But it can be easily bypassed by creating a sacrificial corp and joining it in order to join null sec ally. After you get bored you can just disband the corp and join your old one as wars don't follow players.
On the other hand c0ven can now wardec their null sec enemies without any remorse. Our war with tribal band was a nice change of pace. We had tons of fun and can now say that null sec is a lot better place for pvp 
On the topic of mechanics one simple change would solve the issue and made the wardecs work as intended. In case of mutual war both sides should be flagged as aggressors. Both the aggressor and defender have to make a conscious decision about declaring war on each other. Only way to get out of war would be surrender or disband for both sides of the conflict which in my opinion would make the system fair. |
|

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
207
|
Posted - 2012.09.28 23:37:00 -
[81] - Quote
Everything Tolene said is true, and I agree with you. We will try to get the matter resolved asap. In the mean time I just needed victims to point to and say "Look, your game mechanics are allowing me to do completely unfair things to these people". CCP responds faster when they have public pressure on them to perform. Burn Highsec Griefers |

Kc Decartes
Syndicate Holdings
55
|
Posted - 2012.09.29 04:07:00 -
[82] - Quote
Good Day Nublitz,
I am KcD, and you have deced me, so we are deced together, for now and all time, which is grand, and good. I felt I should wave my hand as/in a gesture that represents the fun we will no doubt have together. It makes me happy, and my belly tickle, just in anticipation of the inevitable pleasure we will induce from ourselves, based on the experience we encounter via this hoopla.
I look forward to working with you, and yours, and the crew of misfits you believe make your organization dreamy.
With warm regards,
KcD D.F.C.S.
no TRUST in mankind no confidence IN government there will never be enduring FREEDOM. |

VegasMirage
The Scope Gallente Federation
113
|
Posted - 2012.09.29 11:48:00 -
[83] - Quote
Iam Widdershins wrote:Meh, we're more likely to end up at war with you guys. It's not going to be a huge difference either way tbh. We joined DS last time around and didn't see jack **** for like 3 weeks.
Widders you did it wrong cuz my crew got like 20 bill in kills with Dec Shield (we had this convo already)
and yes this "tarp" Zerg set up can easily be translated into an infinite source of tears
combined with my corp jumping tactics this can be a devastating strategy
|

Iam Widdershins
Project Nemesis
736
|
Posted - 2012.09.29 12:55:00 -
[84] - Quote
VegasMirage wrote:Iam Widdershins wrote:Meh, we're more likely to end up at war with you guys. It's not going to be a huge difference either way tbh. We joined DS last time around and didn't see jack **** for like 3 weeks. Widders you did it wrong cuz my crew got like 20 bill in kills with Dec Shield (we had this convo already) and yes this "tarp" Zerg set up can easily be translated into an infinite source of tears combined with my corp jumping tactics this can be a devastating strategy edit: inb4 here are the reasons why you and your crew didn't kill anything when in Dec Shield editedit: inb4 Jita camping isn't an option (l33tsauce do it differently) You inb4'd me... so why do you even ask :P Not trying to be elitist about the Jita thing, our guys just can't stand it most of the time.
P.S. your machariel fakemail is gone now \o/ Lobbying for your right to delete your signature |

Karah Serrigan
The Hatchery Team Liquid
70
|
Posted - 2012.09.29 13:32:00 -
[85] - Quote
Tolene wrote:The Zerg Overmind wrote: Fine you say, so they deserve that. But these aren't just normal wars we're holding over them, these are outgoing wars. And alliance with an outgoing war CANNOT recruit another corporation to the alliance, ever again. If any corporations ever leave that alliance, they'll also have outgoing wars. A corporation with an outgoing war CANNOT join an alliance, ever again.
This is the only real drawback of a perma war. But it can be easily bypassed by creating a sacrificial corp and joining it in order to join null sec ally. After you get bored you can just disband the corp and join your old one as wars don't follow players. On the other hand c0ven can now wardec their null sec enemies without any remorse. Our war with tribal band was a nice change of pace. We had tons of fun and can now say that null sec is a lot better place for pvp  On the topic of mechanics one simple change would solve the issue and made the wardecs work as intended. In case of mutual war both sides should be flagged as aggressors. Both the aggressor and defender have to make a conscious decision about declaring war on each other. Only way to get out of war would be surrender or disband for both sides of the conflict which in my opinion would make the system fair. Have to correct one thing: Alliances with outgoing wars can still accept corporations. Ive tested this the last 2 days. However, corps with outgoing wars cant apply to alliances. I support the change, that in a mutual war both sides should be counted aggressors though.
And here you see the OCD plagued part of me whining that all these wardecs make the war history look bad, even with no interactions in those wars :((( |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
211
|
Posted - 2012.09.29 23:45:00 -
[86] - Quote
Karah Serrigan wrote:Tolene wrote:The Zerg Overmind wrote: Fine you say, so they deserve that. But these aren't just normal wars we're holding over them, these are outgoing wars. And alliance with an outgoing war CANNOT recruit another corporation to the alliance, ever again. If any corporations ever leave that alliance, they'll also have outgoing wars. A corporation with an outgoing war CANNOT join an alliance, ever again.
This is the only real drawback of a perma war. But it can be easily bypassed by creating a sacrificial corp and joining it in order to join null sec ally. After you get bored you can just disband the corp and join your old one as wars don't follow players. On the other hand c0ven can now wardec their null sec enemies without any remorse. Our war with tribal band was a nice change of pace. We had tons of fun and can now say that null sec is a lot better place for pvp  On the topic of mechanics one simple change would solve the issue and made the wardecs work as intended. In case of mutual war both sides should be flagged as aggressors. Both the aggressor and defender have to make a conscious decision about declaring war on each other. Only way to get out of war would be surrender or disband for both sides of the conflict which in my opinion would make the system fair. Have to correct one thing: Alliances with outgoing wars can still accept corporations. Ive tested this the last 2 days. However, corps with outgoing wars cant apply to alliances. I support the change, that in a mutual war both sides should be counted aggressors though. And here you see the OCD plagued part of me whining that all these wardecs make the war history look bad, even with no interactions in those wars :((( I stand corrected. I just tested this myself, and yes an alliance with outgoing wardecs can accept corporations. I'm not sure when this changed, or if I was always crazy. I'm updating information to reflect this new understanding
Burn Highsec Griefers |

Alx Warlord
Security Task Force
169
|
Posted - 2012.09.30 03:59:00 -
[87] - Quote
Well, if this is a know issue, and some people are abusing it, ( Despite the fact that this is really fun) , there should be some disciplinary actions over the abusers sooner or latter... maybe some acc bans? and tears? [Discussion] - New POS system ( Construction Block Built - Starbasecraft) <<< Please CCP read this! |

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
935
|
Posted - 2012.09.30 04:10:00 -
[88] - Quote
Alx Warlord wrote:Well, if this is a know issue, and some people are abusing it, ( Despite the fact that this is really fun) , there should be some disciplinary actions over the abusers sooner or latter... maybe some acc bans? and tears? Account bans for literally pressing a button that was created and implemented by CCP for the sole purpose of being pressed?
Also, this "feature" is completely intentional. It's a high-sec pvp nerf at its core, and therefore has been on CCP's agenda for the past couple of years. The only thing that will change anything in this case is public outcry, but I'm not holding out hope, considering that they haven't even budged from their proposed Crimewatch designs. (USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST) |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
217
|
Posted - 2012.10.01 21:59:00 -
[89] - Quote
Apparently if you've got too many wardecs the UI breaks and you can't scroll to the bottom of the menu to accept the corp: http://dl.eve-files.com/media/1210/2012.10.01.21.14.23.jpg
luckily you can still use the keyboard to blindly hit accept :) Burn Highsec Griefers |

Emerald Decartes
Syndicate Holdings
29
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 02:28:00 -
[90] - Quote
Sff, cool story bro.
Maybe if you had something more productive to do with your time, instead of investing your time into this joke organization, which as far as I can tell employees tactics that only involve spam mailing people as a deterrent to a war dec... which is ofc ineffective... you'd be much more happy not only in eve, but no doubt in rl as well...
I for one enjoy the daily mails from "dec shield ambassador 1-5." It lets me know that you're still trying... very hard.
Thank you for allowing us to become involved in the plotted down fall of your lame idea, practice, and ofc existence.
Cya around and kind regards,
ED D.F.C.S. no TRUST in mankind no confidence IN goverment there will never be enduring FREEDOM. |
|

Innar Mong
Mong's Marauders
5
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 02:51:00 -
[91] - Quote
Dear CCP,
This is broken.
In honor of you, I have wrote u a peomz that wurk just like the new wardec systim:
Roses are Red Bacon is red Poems are Hard Bacon.
sinsearlie, --Mong
edited: for speeling |

Enderw Wiggin
Syndicate Holdings
2
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 04:25:00 -
[92] - Quote
Innar Mong wrote:Dear CCP,
This is broken.
In honor of you, I have wrote u a peomz that wurk just like the new wardec systim:
Roses are Red Bacon is red Poems are Hard Bacon.
sinsearlie, --Mong
edited: for speeling
Lulz....
"There must be some way out of here.... said the joker to the thief."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1__dINxiXU
ICU
|

Juda Decartes
Syndicate Holdings
1
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 05:43:00 -
[93] - Quote
FREE BUMP
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1__dINxiXU
Collectively we are but mist.
It made me happy to see the initiative was responding once again.
Death to the less than.
Juda |

Oracle of Delphi
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
3
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 05:58:00 -
[94] - Quote
Blessed is your adventure. Go forth and destroy the known, and as they knew each other, and how they interact, it is your ability to know them, and what they do.
Delphi see's all and blesses the Decartes as they slowly undertake in the near insane notion of reconciling all within this a group. . . . .
|

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
217
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 13:33:00 -
[95] - Quote
Emerald Decartes wrote: Sff, cool story bro.
Maybe if you had something more productive to do with your time, instead of investing your time into this joke organization, which as far as I can tell employees tactics that only involve spam mailing people as a deterrent to a war dec... which is ofc ineffective... you'd be much more happy not only in eve, but no doubt in rl as well...
I for one enjoy the daily mails from "dec shield ambassador 1-5." It lets me know that you're still trying... very hard.
Thank you for allowing us to become involved in the plotted down fall of your lame idea, practice, and ofc existence.
Cya around and kind regards,
ED
Quoted for tears. umad bro?
I'm not sure what you mean by spam mails. I can only assume you're referring to all the notifications you get of your wars being copied and ended by various entities that pass in/out of the alliance. The ambassador corps have been a highly effective program at obtaining wars from alliances. Any notification you get about one of them means we obtained another few wars.
And if you hadn't noticed, we're trying to be taken out by CCP. We want wardecs fixed much more than you do, as we're actually investing isk, time, and energy towards solving the problem:
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1969901
But you can still be mad, I know that feel bro Burn Highsec Griefers |

Arame Azur
Eat My Shorts Inc.
0
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 13:34:00 -
[96] - Quote
Ok, I see it like this: Carebear Corp 1 with Wardec join Dec Shield, Dec Shield set the war mutual. Carebear Corp 1 leaves Dec Shield with 1 week mutual war on his A*s. Carebear Corp 2 with Wardec join Dec Shield, Dec Shield set the war mutual. Carebear Corp 2 leaves Dec Shield with 1 week mutual wars on his A*s. And so on ...
My Point of View: Free targets for all "trapped griefers" you call us
And the point is: the Carebears produce nothing, no goods to fly the trade hubs, no Missionrunning etc ... I prefer the possibility to wardec much more Corps and Alliances in Hisec to get more Targets into Dec Shield 
A grand conspiracy of the Goons * ROFL *
Free Wardecs for all \o/ |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
217
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 13:47:00 -
[97] - Quote
It's true. But if you were all looking for easy targets to prey on you'd be at war with Ivy League. Which would help me a lot to consolidate all your wars against them. Makes it a lot easier to gather them up.
I don't deny that it's getting worse and worse for people bringing new wars to us (since they have to endure something like 85 wars at the time of typing this - up from 60 some wars a week ago). But it's unlikely they're running freighters between Jita/Amarr while at war anyways.
I'd be interested to hear any good ganking stories against our people :) Burn Highsec Griefers |

Karah Serrigan
The Hatchery Team Liquid
72
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 14:12:00 -
[98] - Quote
Notifications what are you doing notifications stahp.
This is getting mildly annoying, when will CCP intervene? |

lanyaie
563
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 14:30:00 -
[99] - Quote
my alt corp got kicked out of decshield...notifications went up by quite alot Hay |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
220
|
Posted - 2012.10.03 10:13:00 -
[100] - Quote
Well here's another unintended consequence of the broken rules.
1.) A corp offers a surrender to us for 70mil isk 2.) I drop a corp out of Dec Shield 3.) Accept their surrender to the alliance, get the 70mil isk 4.) Accept dropped corp back into alliance, resume war
Surrender mechanics are also made pointless by the current ruleset, but thanks for the isk \o/ Burn Highsec Griefers |
|

VegasMirage
The Scope Gallente Federation
140
|
Posted - 2012.10.03 10:50:00 -
[101] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:Well here's another unintended consequence of the broken rules.
1.) A corp offers a surrender to us for 70mil isk 2.) I drop a corp out of Dec Shield 3.) Accept their surrender to the alliance, get the 70mil isk 4.) Accept dropped corp back into alliance, resume war
Surrender mechanics are also made pointless by the current ruleset, but thanks for the isk \o/
Brofessor Zerg,
You've done it again - thunked outside the sandbox.
Keep up the great werk!!! CCP should pay you for your time.
Is it possible NOT to share these broken mechanics?
I may be willing to pay you to NOT post what's broken in the future.
Incoming convo in-game...
ALL HAIL ZERG \o/
PS: perhaps NOT posting the broken mechanics will make more players happy (this is my role btw to make as many of you happy as possible)
|

Reppyk
The Black Shell
182
|
Posted - 2012.10.03 11:41:00 -
[102] - Quote
VegasMirage wrote:I may be willing to pay you to NOT post what's broken in the future. Hey Vegas, do you have any idea why ZO is doing this ? Protip : it's written somewhere. Protip-¦ : you don't get it. |

VegasMirage
The Scope Gallente Federation
140
|
Posted - 2012.10.03 13:18:00 -
[103] - Quote
Reppyk wrote:VegasMirage wrote:I may be willing to pay you to NOT post what's broken in the future. Hey Vegas, do you have any idea why ZO is doing this ? Protip : it's written somewhere. Protip-¦ : you don't get it.
ZOMG you win again Reppy so quick on his toes
obv you missed the part where I started the whole using Dec Shield to grief mercs/indy griefers
it's written somewhere, find it |

P'JITA ZOLO
The Rifter Project Dec Shield
0
|
Posted - 2012.10.03 19:47:00 -
[104] - Quote
I am convinced...
YES
this is a...
BUMP! |

Kc Decartes
Syndicate Holdings
57
|
Posted - 2012.10.04 02:25:00 -
[105] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:Emerald Decartes wrote: Sff, cool story bro.
Maybe if you had something more productive to do with your time, instead of investing your time into this joke organization, which as far as I can tell employees tactics that only involve spam mailing people as a deterrent to a war dec... which is ofc ineffective... you'd be much more happy not only in eve, but no doubt in rl as well...
I for one enjoy the daily mails from "dec shield ambassador 1-5." It lets me know that you're still trying... very hard.
Thank you for allowing us to become involved in the plotted down fall of your lame idea, practice, and ofc existence.
Cya around and kind regards,
ED
Quoted for tears. umad bro? I'm not sure what you mean by spam mails. I can only assume you're referring to all the notifications you get of your wars being copied and ended by various entities that pass in/out of the alliance. The ambassador corps have been a highly effective program at obtaining wars from alliances. Any notification you get about one of them means we obtained another few wars. And if you hadn't noticed, we're trying to be taken out by CCP. We want wardecs fixed much more than you do, as we're actually investing isk, time, and energy towards solving the problem: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1969901But you can still be mad, I know that feel bro
I call shenanigans on you good sir ^_^
http://i48.tinypic.com/125qt5k.jpg
After a year of this charade you are ether really stupid or just plan insane, assuming your statement is an accurate reflection of your intent... Regardless, we look forward to getting to know you.
Cool song...
"There are many here among us, that feel that life is but a joke"
;-)
KcD DFCS
D.F.C.S.
no TRUST in mankind no confidence IN government there will never be enduring FREEDOM. |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
230
|
Posted - 2012.10.04 05:13:00 -
[106] - Quote
Kc Decartes wrote:I call shenanigans on you good sir ^_^ http://i48.tinypic.com/125qt5k.jpgAfter a year of this charade you are ether really stupid or just plan insane, assuming your statement is an accurate reflection of your intent... Regardless, we look forward to getting to know you. I'm not sure what charade you're referring to. Your picture shows that Dec Shield has been around for a while, which is true. Our first iteration was in protest against the GM ruling to overturn the ban on alliance wardec shedding, so that's what we did. And we did a LOT of it, for over 450 corporations:
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=22792
our alliance logo and message were directly aimed at provoking a response from CCP to change the rules to stop us: http://dl.eve-files.com/media/1111/DecShield.jpg
We did massive protesting and constructive feedback to institute wardec mechanic changes, and we talked quite regularily with the community at the time, which is why everyone knew our intentions and goals: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=29894
After the expansion that changed wardecs we lay dormant under the assumption that CCP had actually fixed wardecs. We were wrong. A few weeks ago we began investigating again after hearing rumors, and that's when we decided to fire up Dec Shield again to provoke a change in wardec mechanics. So far we're getting a lot of publicity and spreading the message quite effectively.
We have a very thorough list of things currently wrong with wardecs, and the ways to fix things here: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=157449
So it's kind of hard to claim we aren't working to fix things. The added bonus is we get to grief people along the way, and it's all for a good cause. There will be tears until we are stopped Burn Highsec Griefers |

Dirk Decartes
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
6
|
Posted - 2012.10.04 07:00:00 -
[107] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:Kc Decartes wrote:I call shenanigans on you good sir ^_^ http://i48.tinypic.com/125qt5k.jpgAfter a year of this charade you are ether really stupid or just plan insane, assuming your statement is an accurate reflection of your intent... Regardless, we look forward to getting to know you. I'm not sure what charade you're referring to. Your picture shows that Dec Shield has been around for a while, which is true. Our first iteration was in protest against the GM ruling to overturn the ban on alliance wardec shedding, so that's what we did. And we did a LOT of it, for over 450 corporations: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=22792our alliance logo and message were directly aimed at provoking a response from CCP to change the rules to stop us: http://dl.eve-files.com/media/1111/DecShield.jpgWe did massive protesting and constrUctive feeDback to Institute wardEc mechanic changes, and we talked quite regularily with the community at the time, which is why everyone knew our intentions and goals: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=29894After the expansion that changed wardecs we lay dormant under the assumption that CCP had actually fixed wardecs. We were wrong. A few weeks ago we began investigating again after hearing rumors, and that's when we decided to fire up Dec Shield again to provoke a change in wardec mechanics. So far we're getting a lot of publicity and spreading the message quite effectively. We have a very thorough list of things currently wrong with wardecs, and the ways to fix things here: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=157449So it's kind of hard to claim we aren't working to fix things. The added bonus is we get to grief people along the way, and it's all for a good cause. There will be tears until we are stopped
"Cool Story Bro" |

Tora Bushido
EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective
80
|
Posted - 2012.10.04 07:18:00 -
[108] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind, bringer of free targets, new loot and more pvp....... We want you as Alliance CEO! 
My resists to bad posts are 78-89-83-90 ....... The metal head plate increased it by 5%.
|

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
231
|
Posted - 2012.10.04 08:05:00 -
[109] - Quote
Tora Bushido wrote:The Zerg Overmind, bringer of free targets, new loot and more pvp....... We want you as Alliance CEO!  Thank you, thank you. On behalf of myself I accept this grave responsibility. Of course, if at any time you want to make a corp specifically for griefing our targets you're welcome to join this side of the war. Everyone is welcome on this side of the fence. Our targets are generally terrible players and the wars are free. Join the dark side. Burn Highsec Griefers |

Zeus Maximo
Mentally Assured Destruction
3
|
Posted - 2012.10.04 17:56:00 -
[110] - Quote
On behalf of U-MAD I would like to thank Dec shield once again for the free wars!
and this kill:
Mean War Griefer
 |
|

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
231
|
Posted - 2012.10.04 21:51:00 -
[111] - Quote
I just ran up some stats in prep for Vegas tomorrow.
We are in 91 wars. These wars contain 2294 players, with 184 corporations. 11 of these are legacy wars against closed corporations We receive around 3 surrender offers per day We average 3.5 new wars per day Burn Highsec Griefers |

Gaia Ma'chello
V.I.C.E.
29
|
Posted - 2012.10.05 17:57:00 -
[112] - Quote
OK, Im really missing something. How is any player in the aggressor corp trapped? Cannot everyone in the aggressor corp simply drop corp and form a new one, thus nullifying all the effects of Dec Shield? |

Iam Widdershins
Project Nemesis
738
|
Posted - 2012.10.06 00:45:00 -
[113] - Quote
Gaia Ma'chello wrote:OK, Im really missing something. How is any player in the aggressor corp trapped? Cannot everyone in the aggressor corp simply drop corp and form a new one, thus nullifying all the effects of Dec Shield? Well yeah, but that's like the most hilariously shameful thing you can possibly do as someone who considers themselves any kind of competent. Plus a lot of the trapped entities are alliances, which makes it not nearly so simple. Lobbying for your right to delete your signature |

Kc Decartes
Syndicate Holdings
58
|
Posted - 2012.10.06 03:17:00 -
[114] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:Kc Decartes wrote:I call shenanigans on you good sir ^_^ http://i48.tinypic.com/125qt5k.jpgAfter a year of this charade you are ether really stupid or just plan insane, assuming your statement is an accurate reflection of your intent... Regardless, we look forward to getting to know you. I'm not sure what charade you're referring to. Your picture shows that Dec Shield has been around for a while, which is true. Our first iteration was in protest against the GM ruling to overturn the ban on alliance wardec shedding, so that's what we did. And we did a LOT of it, for over 450 corporations: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=22792our alliance logo and message were directly aimed at provoking a response from CCP to change the rules to stop us: http://dl.eve-files.com/media/1111/DecShield.jpgWe did massive protesting and constructive feedback to institute wardec mechanic changes, and we talked quite regularily with the community at the time, which is why everyone knew our intentions and goals: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=29894After the expansion that changed wardecs we lay dormant under the assumption that CCP had actually fixed wardecs. We were wrong. A few weeks ago we began investigating again after hearing rumors, and that's when we decided to fire up Dec Shield again to provoke a change in wardec mechanics. So far we're getting a lot of publicity and spreading the message quite effectively. We have a very thorough list of things currently wrong with wardecs, and the ways to fix things here: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=157449So it's kind of hard to claim we aren't working to fix things. The added bonus is we get to grief people along the way, and it's all for a good cause. There will be tears until we are stopped
Well then, I'd have to say you're insane. The repetitive motions you are currently engaged in will have no different outcome, no matter how many times you repeat the routine. Your expectation of otherwise is by definition insane. It would seem that you have become the goal or epitome of of what you sought with regards to an attempted deconstruction of the protocol, in game dynamics.
I am glad, and I express gratitude for what you have done. In your own inability to grasp an in-game policy you have made it possible for my rag-tag group to indulgent in our darker sides, justified only by your infatuation with debunking a system.
Keep up the good work.
;-)
-KcD
D.F.C.S.
no TRUST in mankind no confidence IN government there will never be enduring FREEDOM. |

Enderw Wiggin
Syndicate Holdings
2
|
Posted - 2012.10.06 06:43:00 -
[115] - Quote
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qItugh-fFgg
"All your base r belong 2 us"
^_^
D.F.C.S. |

Iam Widdershins
Project Nemesis
738
|
Posted - 2012.10.06 07:08:00 -
[116] - Quote
Kc Decartes wrote:[quote=The Zerg Overmind] Well then, I'd have to say you're insane. The repetitive motions you are currently engaged in will have no different outcome, no matter how many times you repeat the routine. Your expectation of otherwise is by definition insane. It would seem that you have become the goal or epitome of of what you sought with regards to an attempted deconstruction of the protocol, in game dynamics.
I am glad, and I express gratitude for what you have done. In your own inability to grasp an in-game policy you have made it possible for my rag-tag group to indulgent in our darker sides, justified only by your infatuation with debunking a system.
Keep up the good work.
;-)
-KcD
That's a lot of big words coming from a child who's so obviously mad. Why are you so distraught? Lobbying for your right to delete your signature |

Dirk Decartes
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
6
|
Posted - 2012.10.06 07:33:00 -
[117] - Quote
Iam Widdershins wrote:Kc Decartes wrote:[quote=The Zerg Overmind] Well then, I'd have to say you're insane. The repetitive motions you are currently engaged in will have no different outcome, no matter how many times you repeat the routine. Your expectation of otherwise is by definition insane. It would seem that you have become the goal or epitome of of what you sought with regards to an attempted deconstruction of the protocol, in game dynamics.
I am glad, and I express gratitude for what you have done. In your own inability to grasp an in-game policy you have made it possible for my rag-tag group to indulgent in our darker sides, justified only by your infatuation with debunking a system.
Keep up the good work.
;-)
-KcD
That's a lot of big words coming from a child who's so obviously mad. Why are you so distraught?
"cool story bro" |

Tora Bushido
EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective
85
|
Posted - 2012.10.06 11:15:00 -
[118] - Quote
So far I am really enjoying this dec shield thing. It gives us free new targets to shoot at (including loot , tears, etc) and it doesn't costs us anything. We even make money with it, by sending surrender mails to people who have a mutual war with us. If they pay, we wont dec em for weeks after they drop the mutual war. If they don't pay, we 'll destroy their corp till its dead.
I think this is the most fun I had since the Jita Burn thing from Goons 
Only annoying thing is, that you can have a lot of mutual wars with dead corps and that there can always join a bigger fish in Dec Shield. But then again.....they will be at war with all of the others. And we are working closely together with many more pvp corps who are 'trapped' 
So far..... Dec Shield <3
My resists to bad posts are 78-89-83-90 ....... The metal head plate increased it by 5%.
|

VegasMirage
183
|
Posted - 2012.10.06 12:50:00 -
[119] - Quote
Tora Bushido wrote:So far I am really enjoying this dec shield thing. It gives us free new targets to shoot at (including loot , tears, etc) and it doesn't costs us anything. We even make money with it, by sending surrender mails to people who have a mutual war with us. If they pay, we wont dec em for weeks after they drop the mutual war. If they don't pay, we 'll destroy their corp till its dead. I think this is the most fun I had since the Jita Burn thing from Goons  Only annoying thing is, that you can have a lot of mutual wars with dead corps and that there can always join a bigger fish in Dec Shield. But then again.....they will be at war with all of the others. And we are working closely together with many more pvp corps who are 'trapped'  So far..... Dec Shield <3
ughhh... only if I had the energy.
I don't even...
likes watching grown men cry-á (Gò»n+¦Gò¦,) |

Ammzi
Imperial Guardians Tribal Band
1038
|
Posted - 2012.10.06 13:15:00 -
[120] - Quote
Fully supported. :)
+1 quote CCP Spitfire
"Hello Im Blue,"
|
|

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
999
|
Posted - 2012.10.06 23:47:00 -
[121] - Quote
VegasMirage wrote:Tora Bushido wrote:So far I am really enjoying this dec shield thing. It gives us free new targets to shoot at (including loot , tears, etc) and it doesn't costs us anything. We even make money with it, by sending surrender mails to people who have a mutual war with us. If they pay, we wont dec em for weeks after they drop the mutual war. If they don't pay, we 'll destroy their corp till its dead. I think this is the most fun I had since the Jita Burn thing from Goons  Only annoying thing is, that you can have a lot of mutual wars with dead corps and that there can always join a bigger fish in Dec Shield. But then again.....they will be at war with all of the others. And we are working closely together with many more pvp corps who are 'trapped'  So far..... Dec Shield <3 ughhh... only if I had the energy. I don't even... Oh, watch out guys. We have a real hardman on our hands here. (USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST) |

VegasMirage
183
|
Posted - 2012.10.07 01:54:00 -
[122] - Quote
Destiny Corrupted wrote:VegasMirage wrote:Tora Bushido wrote:So far I am really enjoying this dec shield thing. It gives us free new targets to shoot at (including loot , tears, etc) and it doesn't costs us anything. We even make money with it, by sending surrender mails to people who have a mutual war with us. If they pay, we wont dec em for weeks after they drop the mutual war. If they don't pay, we 'll destroy their corp till its dead. I think this is the most fun I had since the Jita Burn thing from Goons  Only annoying thing is, that you can have a lot of mutual wars with dead corps and that there can always join a bigger fish in Dec Shield. But then again.....they will be at war with all of the others. And we are working closely together with many more pvp corps who are 'trapped'  So far..... Dec Shield <3 ughhh... only if I had the energy. I don't even... Oh, watch out guys. We have a real hardman on our hands here.
I don't know 6.5 billion in kills, no losses in less than 2 hours from start of wardec from Tora's mercs wasn't bad, but I'm sure you've done better o_O or not. likes watching grown men cry-á (Gò»n+¦Gò¦,) |

Chicken Pizza
Penumbra Institute
71
|
Posted - 2012.10.07 02:37:00 -
[123] - Quote
Kc Decartes wrote:Well then, I'd have to say you're insane. The repetitive motions you are currently engaged in will have no different outcome, no matter how many times you repeat the routine. Your expectation of otherwise is by definition insane. It would seem that you have become the goal or epitome of of what you sought with regards to an attempted deconstruction of the protocol, in game dynamics.
I am glad, and I express gratitude for what you have done. In your own inability to grasp an in-game policy you have made it possible for my rag-tag group to indulgent in our darker sides, justified only by your infatuation with debunking a system.
Keep up the good work.
;-)
-KcD
Quite an elegant way to say absolutely nothing at all. |

Emerald Decartes
Syndicate Holdings
30
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 04:01:00 -
[124] - Quote
Chicken Pizza wrote:Kc Decartes wrote:Well then, I'd have to say you're insane. The repetitive motions you are currently engaged in will have no different outcome, no matter how many times you repeat the routine. Your expectation of otherwise is by definition insane. It would seem that you have become the goal or epitome of of what you sought with regards to an attempted deconstruction of the protocol, in game dynamics.
I am glad, and I express gratitude for what you have done. In your own inability to grasp an in-game policy you have made it possible for my rag-tag group to indulgent in our darker sides, justified only by your infatuation with debunking a system.
Keep up the good work.
;-)
-KcD
Quite an elegant way to say absolutely nothing at all.
I believe he said:
1: Zerg is a dumb-ass for trying to justify Dec Shield as an attempt to debunk an in game dynamic. 2: He's happy that we get free war decs 3: What happens due to said decs is not his fault, since we are not the aggressors.
I know it's hard to keep up sometimes... but hey, you're alright m8. I don't mind translating English into lemming for you. Deciphering a mad man isn't easy.
ED
D.F.C.S. no TRUST in mankind no confidence IN goverment there will never be enduring FREEDOM. |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
233
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 06:58:00 -
[125] - Quote
So I'm back from Vegas now. I talked to Veritas and Soundwave quite a bit, and they find the entire thing hilarious. Soundwave gave me his business card so I could give him details about things, and Veritas was just enjoying everyone's misfortune. They were both really cool guys. Veritas was very chaotic neutral about everything.
In short, it seems they plan to let us continue for quite some time, as they haven't received enough complaints or requests to change things yet. So for the foreseeable future we'll all be able to enjoy these wars together. Burn Highsec Griefers |

Kc Decartes
Syndicate Holdings
58
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 07:26:00 -
[126] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:So I'm back from Vegas now. I talked to Veritas and Soundwave quite a bit, and they find the entire thing hilarious. Soundwave gave me his business card so I could give him details about things, and Veritas was just enjoying everyone's misfortune. They were both really cool guys. Veritas was very chaotic neutral about everything.
In short, it seems they plan to let us continue for quite some time, as they haven't received enough complaints or requests to change things yet. So for the foreseeable future we'll all be able to enjoy these wars together.
This is the same soundwave that covered for goons, has a history of dismissible poor in-gaming biases, and who has lead eve into the oblivion that it currently rest?
I'll never forget the conversation he had with goons just before fanfest... you know the fanfest where that dude said people should kill themselves. Soundwave chuckled about it when told it would happen, he found it funny.
I'll create my own opinion of what you're doing... thank you 4 your update though. I'm looking forward to the aussie meet coming up soon, as is much of eve from what I understand.
;-) D.F.C.S.
no TRUST in mankind no confidence IN government there will never be enduring FREEDOM. |

VegasMirage
190
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 13:15:00 -
[127] - Quote
Kc Decartes wrote:The Zerg Overmind wrote:So I'm back from Vegas now. I talked to Veritas and Soundwave quite a bit, and they find the entire thing hilarious. Soundwave gave me his business card so I could give him details about things, and Veritas was just enjoying everyone's misfortune. They were both really cool guys. Veritas was very chaotic neutral about everything.
In short, it seems they plan to let us continue for quite some time, as they haven't received enough complaints or requests to change things yet. So for the foreseeable future we'll all be able to enjoy these wars together. This is the same soundwave that covered for goons, has a history of dismissible poor in-gaming biases, and who has lead eve into the oblivion that it currently rest? I'll never forget the conversation he had with goons just before fanfest... you know the fanfest where that dude said people should kill themselves. Soundwave chuckled about it when told it would happen, he found it funny. I'll create my own opinion of what you're doing... thank you 4 your update though. I'm looking forward to the aussie meet coming up soon, as is much of eve from what I understand. ;-)
Zerg is having fun trouble shooting parts of Eve. He's providing a valuable service while being paid in tears. Not a bad trade-off imo.
You depict (2) GM's as being heinous game haXors wielding their power-wand in all aspects of the game. For this alone, you are bad.
CCP are publishers... they allow you to have conflict through free-interaction otherwise this game would be no more interesting than your real life.
This topic. Not that serious.
Aussie meet, nobody cares.
likes watching grown men cry-á (Gò»n+¦Gò¦,) |

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
1029
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 13:27:00 -
[128] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:So I'm back from Vegas now. I talked to Veritas and Soundwave quite a bit, and they find the entire thing hilarious. Soundwave gave me his business card so I could give him details about things, and Veritas was just enjoying everyone's misfortune. They were both really cool guys. Veritas was very chaotic neutral about everything.
In short, it seems they plan to let us continue for quite some time, as they haven't received enough complaints or requests to change things yet. So for the foreseeable future we'll all be able to enjoy these wars together. Well, I understand the hilarity part, but do they really see no issue with permanently locking corporations out of joining alliances? Or that their "surrender" feature is completely useless, despite the "massive" development effort it took them to implement it? I think that says a lot about our developers, really. If they hate wars so much, then why not just remove them? (USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST) |

VegasMirage
190
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 13:38:00 -
[129] - Quote
Destiny Corrupted wrote:The Zerg Overmind wrote:So I'm back from Vegas now. I talked to Veritas and Soundwave quite a bit, and they find the entire thing hilarious. Soundwave gave me his business card so I could give him details about things, and Veritas was just enjoying everyone's misfortune. They were both really cool guys. Veritas was very chaotic neutral about everything.
In short, it seems they plan to let us continue for quite some time, as they haven't received enough complaints or requests to change things yet. So for the foreseeable future we'll all be able to enjoy these wars together. Well, I understand the hilarity part, but do they really see no issue with permanently locking corporations out of joining alliances? Or that their "surrender" feature is completely useless, despite the "massive" development effort it took them to implement it? I think that says a lot about our developers, really. If they hate wars so much, then why not just remove them?
I don't understand why you people are confused. The surrender doesn't work because the people offering surrender do it on their own terms.
If they would contact us directly and use convo to discuss the terms, then maybe it would work. Instead they just send an offer and expect us to say "ok" to 100 mill.
Another problem is that there is no way to counter offer the surrender, which I think would be nice. You only have an option to say yes or no.
Many corps who were mutual to me have closed their corps, then re-opened them again under the same name (which seems like a viable counter exploit). CCP should make it once the corp closes during a mutual war, the shares are divided between all the conquerors based on % killed. (proly too complicated).
The corp should not be able to be reopened with the same name. WarDec is an ever evolving process, I don't ever expect it to be perfect.
likes watching grown men cry-á (Gò»n+¦Gò¦,) |

Iam Widdershins
Project Nemesis
738
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 17:07:00 -
[130] - Quote
I completely agree about the surrender mechanic. Forcing surrenders to be initiated by the defender is basically dismissing the mechanic as useless, because it will never be used that way.
A defender will rarely pull themselves together and find the guts to admit that they lost and put up a decent surrender offer; in order for it to ever be used they have to be convinced in person by the attackers that they should send an offer for x amount, then they actually need to go through with it all the way.
They would be much more likely to accept a surrender offer made by the attackers: that way they control exactly when the war ends themselves and it's as easy as clicking "yes" instead of submitting an amount they hope will work and then leaving it up to the grace of their aggressors to decide if they think that's enough or not.
Psychologically there is just far too much that's discouraging about a system where the defender has to initiate a surrender and I don't see this system being used extensively until the system is expanded to allow offers of both kinds. Lobbying for your right to delete your signature |
|

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
1041
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 22:32:00 -
[131] - Quote
I was talking about this:
The Zerg Overmind wrote:Well here's another unintended consequence of the broken rules.
1.) A corp offers a surrender to us for 70mil isk 2.) I drop a corp out of Dec Shield 3.) Accept their surrender to the alliance, get the 70mil isk 4.) Accept dropped corp back into alliance, resume war
Surrender mechanics are also made pointless by the current ruleset, but thanks for the isk \o/
(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST) |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
237
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 23:10:00 -
[132] - Quote
They don't hate wars. It's just a lesser priority right now until we make it important enough. And I've got something brewing here that might raise the evilness factor by 100 fold. Just sit tight and we'll see if we can burn the galaxy together. Burn Highsec Griefers |

VegasMirage
190
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 23:17:00 -
[133] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:They don't hate wars. It's just a lesser priority right now until we make it important enough. And I've got something brewing here that might raise the evilness factor by 100 fold. Just sit tight and we'll see if we can burn the galaxy together.
imo null sec shoulda been fixed way before hi sec griefer mechanics, and now hi sec is paying the price
but carry on this is fun :) likes watching grown men cry-á (Gò»n+¦Gò¦,) |

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
1043
|
Posted - 2012.10.09 00:57:00 -
[134] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:They don't hate wars. It's just a lesser priority right now until we make it important enough. And I've got something brewing here that might raise the evilness factor by 100 fold. Just sit tight and we'll see if we can burn the galaxy together. I'm afraid to ask. I see you finally made the war mutual. Should I be stocking up on tampons? (USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST) |

Kc Decartes
Syndicate Holdings
58
|
Posted - 2012.10.09 02:16:00 -
[135] - Quote
VegasMirage wrote:Kc Decartes wrote:The Zerg Overmind wrote:So I'm back from Vegas now. I talked to Veritas and Soundwave quite a bit, and they find the entire thing hilarious. Soundwave gave me his business card so I could give him details about things, and Veritas was just enjoying everyone's misfortune. They were both really cool guys. Veritas was very chaotic neutral about everything.
In short, it seems they plan to let us continue for quite some time, as they haven't received enough complaints or requests to change things yet. So for the foreseeable future we'll all be able to enjoy these wars together. This is the same soundwave that covered for goons, has a history of dismissible poor in-gaming biases, and who has lead eve into the oblivion that it currently rest? I'll never forget the conversation he had with goons just before fanfest... you know the fanfest where that dude said people should kill themselves. Soundwave chuckled about it when told it would happen, he found it funny. I'll create my own opinion of what you're doing... thank you 4 your update though. I'm looking forward to the aussie meet coming up soon, as is much of eve from what I understand. ;-) Zerg is having fun trouble shooting parts of Eve. He's providing a valuable service while being paid in tears. Not a bad trade-off imo. You depict (2) GM's as being heinous game haXors wielding their power-wand in all aspects of the game. For this alone, you are bad. CCP are publishers... they allow you to have conflict through free-interaction otherwise this game would be no more interesting than your real life. This topic. Not that serious. Aussie meet, nobody cares.
Well let me get my wizard cap, cause all game publishers are grand, dreamy, and special ..:|;-)
Out of curiosity, are you in this?
http://soundcloud.com/neutronblaster/bayushitomadoucherage
Also, you post too much... like 15-20 posts a day... Seek help.
On topic: What is the benefit of making a war mutual Zerg? Ofc we are at war, so fun and shenanigans will be, and should be had. That is the nature and fun within this game we play. I bs you, you bs me. And so the universe functions as it should.
Kind regards,
-KcD
D.F.C.S.
no TRUST in mankind no confidence IN government there will never be enduring FREEDOM. |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
239
|
Posted - 2012.10.09 03:24:00 -
[136] - Quote
Destiny Corrupted wrote:The Zerg Overmind wrote:They don't hate wars. It's just a lesser priority right now until we make it important enough. And I've got something brewing here that might raise the evilness factor by 100 fold. Just sit tight and we'll see if we can burn the galaxy together. I'm afraid to ask. I see you finally made the war mutual. Should I be stocking up on tampons? Ya I was gone for 3 days, but I checked ahead of time to make sure you wouldn't be able to retract before I got back to mutual it, lol. The 100x more evil thing doesn't look like it's going to pan out, but I'll know for sure tomorrow. Burn Highsec Griefers |

Suitonia
Corp 54 Curatores Veritatis Alliance
106
|
Posted - 2012.10.09 05:14:00 -
[137] - Quote
Kc Decartes wrote:
On topic: What is the benefit of making a war mutual Zerg? Ofc we are at war, so fun and shenanigans will be, and should be had. That is the nature and fun within this game we play. I bs you, you bs me. And so the universe functions as it should.
Kind regards,
-KcD
You didn't read the thread at all did you? The benefit of him making the war mutual is that now your corporation can never join an alliance ever again. Your war also can now be transferred to anyone at any-time for any length of time. in 24 hours notice you could be at war with any entity, some of which could lay dormant for months or years.
Now you might be thinking, I don't want to join an alliance anyway, and that you don't care that you could be at war with anyone at anytime, and that your corporation is only 5 members strong so disbanding it is no big deal right?
Thats exactly the point Zerg is trying to make. These new rules make deccing anyone in anything aside from a throw-away alt corp completely stupid. The whole point of the changes was to plug exploits, and make war something where you commit, but at the same time, get rid of bullying and 1 man-shows, however ironically the inferno rules encourage just that. Want to dec that corp that keeps can flipping/harrasing/stealing from your missions/griefing you? Want to dec the pirates camping the pipe to 0.0 to your space? Want to dec the people who keep camping your 0.0 entry gate but jump to the safety of highsec everytime your PvPers arrive? Want to dec the rival corporation who is mining your ore or producing the same stuff as you? Want to become a mercenary outfit?
Well good luck with that. Now for almost any ""legitimate"" (Air Quotes needed) reason to go to war other than on your alt in a throwaway corp for lulz has horrendous consequences. Never being able to join an alliance again, and locked permanently in an at war corp with anyone who wants to be at war with you, which could just be a 1 man alt corporation which stays logged off for 5 months, or a guy who is constantly stalking you, you don't know, you will always have to look over your shoulder.
Any alliance gets caught with this now also faces unique problems. All of it's members suffer the same fate, and any member corp that wishes to join said alliance will suffer the same fate, the infected alliance will be the last alliance that any applying corp, or any member corporation ever applies too, if they leave, they can't join another alliance ever again without disbanding. |

Emerald Decartes
Syndicate Holdings
31
|
Posted - 2012.10.09 05:23:00 -
[138] - Quote
Suitonia wrote:Kc Decartes wrote:
On topic: What is the benefit of making a war mutual Zerg? Ofc we are at war, so fun and shenanigans will be, and should be had. That is the nature and fun within this game we play. I bs you, you bs me. And so the universe functions as it should.
Kind regards,
-KcD
You didn't read the thread at all did you? The benefit of him making the war mutual is that now your corporation can never join an alliance ever again. Your war also can now be transferred to anyone at any-time for any length of time. in 24 hours notice you could be at war with any entity, some of which could lay dormant for months or years. Now you might be thinking, I don't want to join an alliance anyway, and that you don't care that you could be at war with anyone at anytime, and that your corporation is only 5 members strong so disbanding it is no big deal right? Thats exactly the point Zerg is trying to make. These new rules make deccing anyone in anything aside from a throw-away alt corp completely stupid. The whole point of the changes was to plug exploits, and make war something where you commit, but at the same time, get rid of bullying and 1 man-shows, however ironically the inferno rules encourage just that. Want to dec that corp that keeps can flipping/harrasing/stealing from your missions/griefing you? Want to dec the pirates camping the pipe to 0.0 to your space? Want to dec the people who keep camping your 0.0 entry gate but jump to the safety of highsec everytime your PvPers arrive? Want to dec the rival corporation who is mining your ore or producing the same stuff as you? Want to become a mercenary outfit? Well good luck with that. Now for almost any ""legitimate"" (Air Quotes needed) reason to go to war other than on your alt in a throwaway corp for lulz has horrendous consequences. Never being able to join an alliance again, and locked permanently in an at war corp with anyone who wants to be at war with you, which could just be a 1 man alt corporation which stays logged off for 5 months, or a guy who is constantly stalking you, you don't know, you will always have to look over your shoulder. Any alliance gets caught with this now also faces unique problems. All of it's members suffer the same fate, and any member corp that wishes to join said alliance will suffer the same fate, the infected alliance will be the last alliance that any applying corp, or any member corporation ever applies too, if they leave, they can't join another alliance ever again without disbanding.
We use to pay a lot each week in dec fees seeking conflict for something interesting to entertain us in eve, were as now we get free shows and targets of interest...
I think what kc is getting at is that there is a balance to every dynamic. What you call exploits we call good fun.
Why would we leave our group due to dec shield? We hope and look forward to someone stalking us, and know that someone somewhere is being stalked by us...
ED D.F.C.S. no TRUST in mankind no confidence IN goverment there will never be enduring FREEDOM. |

Suitonia
Corp 54 Curatores Veritatis Alliance
106
|
Posted - 2012.10.09 05:26:00 -
[139] - Quote
Also worth pointing out that alliances can also seek the warm protection of dec-shield.
1. Create an alt corporation, bonus points for appropriate name such as "lolnomorealliancesforu" 2. Apply and Accept it into your alliance. 3. IF you ever get war declared on your alliance, "lolnomorealliancesforu" leaves the alliance, and applies to join Dec-Shield. After 24 hours, Now your aggressors can never join an alliance ever again!! Or if it's alliance, all its current and future members get infected and can never join an alliance afterwards ever again! And they also all have to deal with the threat of being at war permanently, and the war can be transferred to any willing entity within 24 hours, forever. ???? 4. Profit!!.... err... well tears and hopefully a whine thread and petitions so CCP can fix this ****** mechanic.
Don't forget to put this information and a link to this thread in your alliance description!! |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
240
|
Posted - 2012.10.09 07:33:00 -
[140] - Quote
Suitonia wrote:Also worth pointing out that alliances can also seek the warm protection of dec-shield.
1. Create an alt corporation, bonus points for appropriate name such as "lolnomorealliancesforu" 2. Apply and Accept it into your alliance. 3. IF you ever get war declared on your alliance, "lolnomorealliancesforu" leaves the alliance, and applies to join Dec-Shield. After 24 hours, Now your aggressors can never join an alliance ever again!! Or if it's alliance, all its current and future members get infected and can never join an alliance afterwards ever again! And they also all have to deal with the threat of being at war permanently, and the war can be transferred to any willing entity within 24 hours, forever. ???? 4. Profit!!.... err... well tears and hopefully a whine thread and petitions so CCP can fix this ****** mechanic.
Don't forget to put this information and a link to this thread in your alliance description!! Don't forget that if you're an alliance that is wardecced, and you don't have the alts or inclination to go through the process of a war transfer corp, all you have to do is email me and I'll apply with a 1 man "Dec Shield Ambassador" corp which can take the war for you. We want to make it as easy as possible to infect all the aggressors in the game with Dec Shield :P Burn Highsec Griefers |
|

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
1053
|
Posted - 2012.10.09 11:03:00 -
[141] - Quote
Be careful about overdrawing your targets. You can infect everyone, yes, but at that point anyone who joins Dec Shield "for the kills" is going to be at war with a hundred plus focused empire war corporations and alliances, and that's not exactly something to be taken lightly. Even veritable badass mother-truckers like Vegas would think twice about docking up at their hangouts by that point, lest they're willing to engage thirty-odd ships after coming back out.
Also a quick anecdote: the corporation that gave us the infection is now spamming surrender offers. Instead of being at war with just a few people, they're at war with something like 90 corporations and over a thousand players. Now that they've realized what they've gotten themselves into, they're disbanding.
Still, no matter how you look at it, even if you end up getting hundreds of kills and no losses from Dec Shield, the system is inherently flawed and needs to be fixed.
"Infection." I kind of like the sound of that. Maybe you should get a virus theme going for the ambassador corps. (USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST) |

VegasMirage
190
|
Posted - 2012.10.09 18:41:00 -
[142] - Quote
Suitonia wrote:Kc Decartes wrote:
On topic: What is the benefit of making a war mutual Zerg? Ofc we are at war, so fun and shenanigans will be, and should be had. That is the nature and fun within this game we play. I bs you, you bs me. And so the universe functions as it should.
Kind regards,
-KcD
You didn't read the thread at all did you? The benefit of him making the war mutual is that now your corporation can never join an alliance ever again. Your war also can now be transferred to anyone at any-time for any length of time. in 24 hours notice you could be at war with any entity, some of which could lay dormant for months or years. Now you might be thinking, I don't want to join an alliance anyway, and that you don't care that you could be at war with anyone at anytime, and that your corporation is only 5 members strong so disbanding it is no big deal right? Thats exactly the point Zerg is trying to make. These new rules make deccing anyone in anything aside from a throw-away alt corp completely stupid. The whole point of the changes was to plug exploits, and make war something where you commit, but at the same time, get rid of bullying and 1 man-shows, however ironically the inferno rules encourage just that. Want to dec that corp that keeps can flipping/harrasing/stealing from your missions/griefing you? Want to dec the pirates camping the pipe to 0.0 to your space? Want to dec the people who keep camping your 0.0 entry gate but jump to the safety of highsec everytime your PvPers arrive? Want to dec the rival corporation who is mining your ore or producing the same stuff as you? Want to become a mercenary outfit? Well good luck with that. Now for almost any ""legitimate"" (Air Quotes needed) reason to go to war other than on your alt in a throwaway corp for lulz has horrendous consequences. Never being able to join an alliance again, and locked permanently in an at war corp with anyone who wants to be at war with you, which could just be a 1 man alt corporation which stays logged off for 5 months, or a guy who is constantly stalking you, you don't know, you will always have to look over your shoulder. Any alliance gets caught with this now also faces unique problems. All of it's members suffer the same fate, and any member corp that wishes to join said alliance will suffer the same fate, the infected alliance will be the last alliance that any applying corp, or any member corporation ever applies too, if they leave, they can't join another alliance ever again without disbanding.
10/10 very well said
enough analyzing, can we get on with shooting each other in the face now? likes watching grown men cry-á (Gò»n+¦Gò¦,) |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
243
|
Posted - 2012.10.09 20:18:00 -
[143] - Quote
http://cdn.memegenerator.net/instances/400x/28049864.jpg
That incredibly evil thing we were experimenting with didn't pan out, so now I can tell you what it was. It seems that corps that get accepted into an alliance have 24hrs in which they can declare outgoing wars. Our thoughts were to get accepted to nullsec alliances, then wardec Dec Shield, set mutual, and then when the corp joined the alliance it would transfer the outgoing wardec to the alliance, and we'd have the alliance trapped.
As you could imagine, this would make the game incredibly unsafe and we'd quickly be able to grief tens of thousands. But alas, the accepted corp just sits in the "Accepted" state until their outgoing war ends Burn Highsec Griefers |

Suitonia
Corp 54 Curatores Veritatis Alliance
108
|
Posted - 2012.10.09 20:26:00 -
[144] - Quote
Another potentially evil thing you could do is create Dec Shield MkII. Then declare war on Dec Shield MkII with Dec Shield and make the war mutual, and locking anyone who joins Dec Shield for protection into the infected state where they could be hunted for eternity! I'm sure the one war would slip under the rug with the 100+ wars you have going on now. Obviously it would probably slow down the rate of your future infections though when people become aware and don't join dec shield, maybe something for you to ponder if you ever achieve your campaign goal of CCP stating they're fixing it for a parting gift. |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
243
|
Posted - 2012.10.09 20:34:00 -
[145] - Quote
lol that is an amusing idea. I hadn't thought about it because for a while I thought alliances with outgoing wars couldn't recruit corps, but they can. I think half the corps leaving Dec Shield disband anyways because of the crushing weight of 100 wars they take with them.
Burn Highsec Griefers |

Aralissia
Epicurus' philosophy
4
|
Posted - 2012.10.09 22:37:00 -
[146] - Quote
if something looks too good to be true, it usually is.... so where did I make a mistake?
1) My corp joins Dec Shield (if all else fails, I decc myself with a disposable alt-corp so they accept me) => I now have 100+ incoming wars while in Dec Shield => alt corp is screwed (but disposable) 2) My corp leaves Dec Shield (You will boot me out once you have alt-corp's war, right?) => my corp, now out of your alliance, still has the 100+ incoming wars 3) I make all these wars "mutual" (or only the ones I like)
=> I now have a corporation that has about 100 free eternal wars, I can join my pvp-chars whenever I see fit and have them leave the corp when needed. Without any consequences to those pvp-chars. The pvp-chars can leve-join MyCorp unrestricted? => I do not have to pay anything for these wars. => Al long as I keep the wars mutual (for free?) the other party can not end those wars.
Of course, I keep an eye on Dec Shield to see if they harvest any 'intersting' new wars, and rejoin them if so :-)
I must have overlooked something somewhere.... |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
243
|
Posted - 2012.10.09 22:43:00 -
[147] - Quote
Aralissia wrote:if something looks too good to be true, it usually is.... so where did I make a mistake?
1) My corp joins Dec Shield (if all else fails, I decc myself with a disposable alt-corp so they accept me) => I now have 100+ incoming wars while in Dec Shield => alt corp is screwed (but disposable) 2) My corp leaves Dec Shield (You will boot me out once you have alt-corp's war, right?) => my corp, now out of your alliance, still has the 100+ incoming wars 3) I make all these wars "mutual" (or only the ones I like)
=> I now have a corporation that has about 100 free eternal wars, I can join my pvp-chars whenever I see fit and have them leave the corp when needed. Without any consequences to those pvp-chars. The pvp-chars can leve-join MyCorp unrestricted? => I do not have to pay anything for these wars. => Al long as I keep the wars mutual (for free?) the other party can not end those wars.
Of course, I keep an eye on Dec Shield to see if they harvest any 'intersting' new wars, and rejoin them if so :-)
I must have overlooked something somewhere.... Nope, that's exactly correct. Else I wouldn't have written a massive post about how to fix everything that's broken: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1969901
Everyone are more than welcome to our wars. You can pick and choose which ones you want by just unmutualing the ones you don't want. You can always come back and pick them up again by rejoining Dec Shield Burn Highsec Griefers |

Aralissia
Epicurus' philosophy
4
|
Posted - 2012.10.09 22:59:00 -
[148] - Quote
this smells like concentrated evil 
|

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
1053
|
Posted - 2012.10.10 00:41:00 -
[149] - Quote
A very painful realization.
Being at war with Dec Shield makes us no longer able to declare new wars.
You might say "sure, you can still declare wars!" Technically, you're right. But each corporation that leaves Dec Shield creates its own war. And each new war that is created raises the price of declaring a new war by 50 million ISK. Today, about seven corporations left Dec Shield. When I went to declare war on a separate target, I noticed that the cost to do so would be 400 million.
This is already in the realm of impossibility to be able to afford. But the worst part is, that if this continues, we will no longer be able to take mercenary jobs, since clients will not pay such high war fees even if we do the actual work for free.
So, Zerg, what this essentially means is that if you cycle about 20 alt corporations in and out of your alliance on a weekly basis, all of Dec Shield's currently-trapped targets will have war bills so expensive that they won't be able to declare new wars. (USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST) |

Grumpymunky
Super Monkey Tribe of Danger
625
|
Posted - 2012.10.10 01:30:00 -
[150] - Quote
Destiny Corrupted wrote:A very painful realization.
Being at war with Dec Shield makes us no longer able to declare new wars.
You might say "sure, you can still declare wars!" Technically, you're right. But each corporation that leaves Dec Shield creates its own war. And each new war that is created raises the price of declaring a new war by 50 million ISK. Today, about seven corporations left Dec Shield. When I went to declare war on a separate target, I noticed that the cost to do so would be 400 million.
This is already in the realm of impossibility to be able to afford. But the worst part is, that if this continues, we will no longer be able to take mercenary jobs, since clients will not pay such high war fees even if we do the actual work for free.
So, Zerg, what this essentially means is that if you cycle about 20 alt corporations in and out of your alliance on a weekly basis, all of Dec Shield's currently-trapped targets will have war bills so expensive that they won't be able to declare new wars. Time to disband and reform as Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Knitting Company? 
Post with your monkey.
CCP Gargant: Thread locked due to lack of pants. |
|

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
1053
|
Posted - 2012.10.10 01:38:00 -
[151] - Quote
Grumpymunky wrote:Destiny Corrupted wrote:A very painful realization.
Being at war with Dec Shield makes us no longer able to declare new wars.
You might say "sure, you can still declare wars!" Technically, you're right. But each corporation that leaves Dec Shield creates its own war. And each new war that is created raises the price of declaring a new war by 50 million ISK. Today, about seven corporations left Dec Shield. When I went to declare war on a separate target, I noticed that the cost to do so would be 400 million.
This is already in the realm of impossibility to be able to afford. But the worst part is, that if this continues, we will no longer be able to take mercenary jobs, since clients will not pay such high war fees even if we do the actual work for free.
So, Zerg, what this essentially means is that if you cycle about 20 alt corporations in and out of your alliance on a weekly basis, all of Dec Shield's currently-trapped targets will have war bills so expensive that they won't be able to declare new wars. Time to disband and reform as Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Knitting Company?  We will never do that. This corporation is our pride. We've been around for many years with a 100% positive reputation as a mercenary corporation. Disbanding is not an option.
Basically, we're stuck like this until CCP makes changes. It was hard to find paying clients before this happened, but now it will be impossible. Within a week, the fee to declare war will probably reach the billion-ISK mark. No client will pay that much just for the fee. We can offer to work for free, and still no one will hire us. Declaring wars for personal reasons is also out of the question.
We're stuck like this. (USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST) |

Grumpymunky
Super Monkey Tribe of Danger
625
|
Posted - 2012.10.10 01:53:00 -
[152] - Quote
Destiny Corrupted wrote:We will never do that. This corporation is our pride. We've been around for many years with a 100% positive reputation as a mercenary corporation. Disbanding is not an option.
Basically, we're stuck like this until CCP makes changes. It was hard to find paying clients before this happened, but now it will be impossible. Within a week, the fee to declare war will probably reach the billion-ISK mark. No client will pay that much just for the fee. We can offer to work for free, and still no one will hire us. Declaring wars for personal reasons is also out of the question.
We're stuck like this. Down to suicide ganks and infiltrations then?  ... until CCP utterly destroys that as well.
Post with your monkey.
CCP Gargant: Thread locked due to lack of pants. |

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
1053
|
Posted - 2012.10.10 02:09:00 -
[153] - Quote
Grumpymunky wrote:Destiny Corrupted wrote:We will never do that. This corporation is our pride. We've been around for many years with a 100% positive reputation as a mercenary corporation. Disbanding is not an option.
Basically, we're stuck like this until CCP makes changes. It was hard to find paying clients before this happened, but now it will be impossible. Within a week, the fee to declare war will probably reach the billion-ISK mark. No client will pay that much just for the fee. We can offer to work for free, and still no one will hire us. Declaring wars for personal reasons is also out of the question.
We're stuck like this. Down to suicide ganks and infiltrations then?  ... until CCP utterly destroys that as well. CCP is making it fairly obvious that they no longer want us here. I've always given the devs the benefit of the doubt for all eight of my years here, but all people have their limits. Every year, something gets taken away, and nothing gets added for players like us. Logging in is starting to feel like an exercise in futility, and I'm not simply saying that because I feel burned out. I've been burned out before, but I always came back after short breaks.
This time it's different. This time it feels like I should be looking for a new game as a permanent solution. (USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST) |

VegasMirage
190
|
Posted - 2012.10.10 04:56:00 -
[154] - Quote
Destiny Corrupted wrote:Grumpymunky wrote:Destiny Corrupted wrote:We will never do that. This corporation is our pride. We've been around for many years with a 100% positive reputation as a mercenary corporation. Disbanding is not an option.
Basically, we're stuck like this until CCP makes changes. It was hard to find paying clients before this happened, but now it will be impossible. Within a week, the fee to declare war will probably reach the billion-ISK mark. No client will pay that much just for the fee. We can offer to work for free, and still no one will hire us. Declaring wars for personal reasons is also out of the question.
We're stuck like this. Down to suicide ganks and infiltrations then?  ... until CCP utterly destroys that as well. CCP is making it fairly obvious that they no longer want us here. I've always given the devs the benefit of the doubt for all eight of my years here, but all people have their limits. Every year, something gets taken away, and nothing gets added for players like us. Logging in is starting to feel like an exercise in futility, and I'm not simply saying that because I feel burned out. I've been burned out before, but I always came back after short breaks. This time it's different. This time it feels like I should be looking for a new game as a permanent solution.
proof that the best tears in game are merc tears
I hope you're a grown man, cuz I like.. well it's in my signature O_o likes watching grown men cry-á (Gò»n+¦Gò¦,) |

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
1054
|
Posted - 2012.10.10 05:14:00 -
[155] - Quote
VegasMirage wrote:Destiny Corrupted wrote:Grumpymunky wrote:Destiny Corrupted wrote:We will never do that. This corporation is our pride. We've been around for many years with a 100% positive reputation as a mercenary corporation. Disbanding is not an option.
Basically, we're stuck like this until CCP makes changes. It was hard to find paying clients before this happened, but now it will be impossible. Within a week, the fee to declare war will probably reach the billion-ISK mark. No client will pay that much just for the fee. We can offer to work for free, and still no one will hire us. Declaring wars for personal reasons is also out of the question.
We're stuck like this. Down to suicide ganks and infiltrations then?  ... until CCP utterly destroys that as well. CCP is making it fairly obvious that they no longer want us here. I've always given the devs the benefit of the doubt for all eight of my years here, but all people have their limits. Every year, something gets taken away, and nothing gets added for players like us. Logging in is starting to feel like an exercise in futility, and I'm not simply saying that because I feel burned out. I've been burned out before, but I always came back after short breaks. This time it's different. This time it feels like I should be looking for a new game as a permanent solution. proof that the best tears in game are merc tears I hope you're a grown man, cuz I like.. well it's in my signature O_o That must be it. That or I'm just not having fun in the "new" EVE. I don't see a reason for continuing to staunchly defend a game that is no longer true to its founding principles. I once had a similar attitude to yours, the "deal with it or gtfo" kind. I realize now that it's kind of silly because the majority of time it will force you to defend an objectively bad product, though it is pretty useful for troll-baiting. Either way, the features I liked the most have been almost completely removed. High-sec is quickly becoming a shelter, FW is a joke populated almost entirely by farmers, and while wormholes have remained relatively intact, they're not enough to provide a consistent source of action, unless you want to primarily run Sleeper sites. "g0 bck to null n fite otha peepal who wanna fite" isn't really an option for me either.
If you have any constructive advice, I'd sure like to hear it. Otherwise make yourself useful by holding a bucket under my head. (USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST) |

Shederov Blood
Wrecketeers
3
|
Posted - 2012.10.10 06:11:00 -
[156] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:In short, it seems they plan to let us continue for quite some time, as they haven't received enough complaints or requests to change things yet. Proving that incessant complaining is the only reason anything gets fixed, regardless of whether it's actually broken or not.
|

Blackhuey
Into The Pink
24
|
Posted - 2012.10.10 07:38:00 -
[157] - Quote
http://evemaps.dotlan.net/alliance/Dec_Shield/corporations
4 single player corps? Are you resetting to lighten the war load? Or are PvP corps preferring to leave and only keep the decs they want? @blackhuey | @srspodcast | Srs Bzns Podcast: http://srspodcast.com
|

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
246
|
Posted - 2012.10.10 14:41:00 -
[158] - Quote
Blackhuey wrote:http://evemaps.dotlan.net/alliance/Dec_Shield/corporations
4 single player corps? Are you resetting to lighten the war load? Or are PvP corps preferring to leave and only keep the decs they want? A few of those corps are just placeholders in the alliance to help maintain 51% vote control over executorship. If a corp stays in alliance for more than 7 days than they get a vote over who can run the alliance, and we obviously can't let our enemies seize control of Dec Shield.
So I rotate the pvp corps in/out of the alliance to prevent a buildup which could be used against us. The Dec Shield Ambassador corps are corps that I joined other alliances with and then bring their wars back to Dec Shield Burn Highsec Griefers |

Hannibal Vexor
Paradox Collective Choke Point
3
|
Posted - 2012.10.10 21:56:00 -
[159] - Quote
As a member of a corp dec'd by this service or whatever it is... I would like to say LOL!
Dec shield currently has 3 members in it. One member per corp of the 3 corps still in there. We had a sudden spam of corps declaring wars and then surrendering, when checking they were all coming from Dec Shield.
Personally I have no fear of a 3 man alliance. We STARTED the war that brought them in so giving us more targets for free (cause when it goes mutual it is free iirc) is just fine.
If Dec shield PVP'ers (if there are any out there) want some fun... well we live in Eurgrana and play in Geminate.
Hannibal
|

Yuller
The Filthy Few Pendulum of Doom
11
|
Posted - 2012.10.10 22:51:00 -
[160] - Quote
Sounds like a good idea but someone obviously didn't read the patch details....As a aggressor corp/alliance i find this very funny....Said corp enter with 1 war and then leave with so many they can't even hope to move for 1 week...Thats right the wars go with you for 1 week people.....Read the patch notes..Dec shield started out as a good idea before the patch but now is really useless for a corp that is trying to get out of a dec....Now if your a pvp corp then its party time or a aggressor alliance like we are It just adds up to free targets for 1 week....
|
|

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
249
|
Posted - 2012.10.11 04:35:00 -
[161] - Quote
Yuller wrote:Sounds like a good idea but someone obviously didn't read the patch details....As a aggressor corp/alliance i find this very funny....Said corp enter with 1 war and then leave with so many they can't even hope to move for 1 week...Thats right the wars go with you for 1 week people.....Read the patch notes..Dec shield started out as a good idea before the patch but now is really useless for a corp that is trying to get out of a dec....Now if your a pvp corp then its party time or a aggressor alliance like we are It just adds up to free targets for 1 week....
That's funny, you were begging on your knees in an email to me to surrender for a billion. And then got very irate once I refused to let your tears end. Perhaps you missed that part of the story? Burn Highsec Griefers |

Tora Bushido
EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective
88
|
Posted - 2012.10.11 11:20:00 -
[162] - Quote
We're still enjoying all these wars. So far only two downsides. They stay offline or leave corp and we need to add so many corps to the scouts 
So far.... dec shield <3 My resists to bad posts are 78-89-83-90 ....... The metal head plate increased it by 5%.
|

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
1062
|
Posted - 2012.10.11 11:30:00 -
[163] - Quote
Had our first Dec Shield customer kill today.
It was fun, but I still wish I could declare new wars without paying half a billion. I don't mind a forever war, but can I at least continue to be a mercenary? I mean, CCP used that word more times than the current presidential candidates used "middle-class" in their campaigns. (USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST) |

Hemmo Paskiainen
Armenian Noodle Dip
366
|
Posted - 2012.10.11 20:24:00 -
[164] - Quote
Destiny Corrupted wrote:Had our first Dec Shield customer kill today.
It was fun, but I still wish I could declare new wars without paying half a billion. I don't mind a forever war, but can I at least continue to be a mercenary? I mean, CCP used that word more times than the current presidential candidates used "middle-class" in their campaigns.
i like being in dec shield. whith 90 ish war dec's you have wt everywere for pew pew CCP FIX BLACK OPS FFS
[url]http://img232.imageshack.us/img232/9679/whatihavedoneineve.jpg[/url] |

Empirer Decartes
Syndicate Holdings
9
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 04:58:00 -
[165] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:Yuller wrote:Sounds like a good idea but someone obviously didn't read the patch details....As a aggressor corp/alliance i find this very funny....Said corp enter with 1 war and then leave with so many they can't even hope to move for 1 week...Thats right the wars go with you for 1 week people.....Read the patch notes..Dec shield started out as a good idea before the patch but now is really useless for a corp that is trying to get out of a dec....Now if your a pvp corp then its party time or a aggressor alliance like we are It just adds up to free targets for 1 week....
That's funny, you were begging on your knees in an email to me to surrender for a billion. And then got very irate once I refused to let your tears end. Perhaps you missed that part of the story?
What a sad and sorry group of incapable, unwilling, misfits that you lead. If you'd only take the time to train them, help them, guide them they would not cower in the dark, uninformed and afraid of their petty foe they believe is grand.
You, Zerg, if that if your main... are a cancer on this game. Your offenses will not be forgotten.
|

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
255
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 06:07:00 -
[166] - Quote
Empirer Decartes wrote: What a sad and sorry group of incapable, unwilling, misfits that you lead. If you'd only take the time to train them, help them, guide them they would not cower in the dark, uninformed and afraid of their petty foe they believe is grand.
You, Zerg, if that if your main... are a cancer on this game. Your offenses will not be forgotten.
Your bitter tears of anguish sustain us. I don't believe this is the first time we've heard you choking up, feebly attempting to mask that you sob yourself to sleep each night, impotent to prevent us from owning you. And yes, we own you, as is self evident by your failure to step back and accept your rapid decline to oblivion.
With each post you demonstrate your complete failure to understand the organizational structure and purpose of Dec Shield. Which is quite a remarkable demonstration of your slow wit, being that I've outlined it incredibly clearly and detailed every aspect of our operation.
We have been civil and courteous, even offering you a place at our side to enjoy the glorious gauntlet of 100 wars, and you choose to shed tears instead. Well those tears shall no longer go to waste. We'll keep a bucket open just for you, and when you've filled it with tears we shall release it to the community so that all may share in your hilarious disgrace. Please, retort. Burn Highsec Griefers |

Emerald Decartes
Syndicate Holdings
33
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 06:10:00 -
[167] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:Empirer Decartes wrote: What a sad and sorry group of incapable, unwilling, misfits that you lead. If you'd only take the time to train them, help them, guide them they would not cower in the dark, uninformed and afraid of their petty foe they believe is grand.
You, Zerg, if that if your main... are a cancer on this game. Your offenses will not be forgotten.
Your bitter tears of anguish sustain us. I don't believe this is the first time we've heard you choking up, feebly attempting to mask that you sob yourself to sleep each night, impotent to prevent us from owning you. And yes, we own you, as is self evident by your failure to step back and accept your rapid decline to oblivion. With each post you demonstrate your complete failure to understand the organizational structure and purpose of Dec Shield. Which is quite a remarkable demonstration of your slow wit, being that I've outlined it incredibly clearly and detailed every aspect of our operation. We have been civil and courteous, even offering you a place at our side to enjoy the glorious gauntlet of 100 wars, and you choose to shed tears instead. Well those tears shall no longer go to waste. We'll keep a bucket open just for you, and when you've filled it with tears we shall release it to the community so that all may share in your hilarious disgrace. Please, retort.
lol, you're like a psychic... offering people false hope. D.F.C.S. no TRUST in mankind no confidence IN goverment there will never be enduring FREEDOM. |

Kc Decartes
Syndicate Holdings
65
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 06:19:00 -
[168] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:Empirer Decartes wrote: What a sad and sorry group of incapable, unwilling, misfits that you lead. If you'd only take the time to train them, help them, guide them they would not cower in the dark, uninformed and afraid of their petty foe they believe is grand.
You, Zerg, if that if your main... are a cancer on this game. Your offenses will not be forgotten.
Your bitter tears of anguish sustain us. I don't believe this is the first time we've heard you choking up, feebly attempting to mask that you sob yourself to sleep each night, impotent to prevent us from owning you. And yes, we own you, as is self evident by your failure to step back and accept your rapid decline to oblivion. With each post you demonstrate your complete failure to understand the organizational structure and purpose of Dec Shield. Which is quite a remarkable demonstration of your slow wit, being that I've outlined it incredibly clearly and detailed every aspect of our operation. We have been civil and courteous, even offering you a place at our side to enjoy the glorious gauntlet of 100 wars, and you choose to shed tears instead. Well those tears shall no longer go to waste. We'll keep a bucket open just for you, and when you've filled it with tears we shall release it to the community so that all may share in your hilarious disgrace. Please, retort.
I've been working on this new strategy. One time I seen this dude take out a medium pos in high sec with a nightmare and and a nighthawk. He could range the guns. Was very impressive. I can't want until I find one of your clients pos's. I've been wanted to test this for like a year now.
Thank you for dec shield.... that doesn't mean Ed is wrong though... you are a cancer m8. Just saying.... no need to get all emo about it.
KcD D.F.C.S.
no TRUST in mankind no confidence IN government there will never be enduring FREEDOM. |

VegasMirage
190
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 06:56:00 -
[169] - Quote
Kc Decartes wrote:The Zerg Overmind wrote:Empirer Decartes wrote: What a sad and sorry group of incapable, unwilling, misfits that you lead. If you'd only take the time to train them, help them, guide them they would not cower in the dark, uninformed and afraid of their petty foe they believe is grand.
You, Zerg, if that if your main... are a cancer on this game. Your offenses will not be forgotten.
Your bitter tears of anguish sustain us. I don't believe this is the first time we've heard you choking up, feebly attempting to mask that you sob yourself to sleep each night, impotent to prevent us from owning you. And yes, we own you, as is self evident by your failure to step back and accept your rapid decline to oblivion. With each post you demonstrate your complete failure to understand the organizational structure and purpose of Dec Shield. Which is quite a remarkable demonstration of your slow wit, being that I've outlined it incredibly clearly and detailed every aspect of our operation. We have been civil and courteous, even offering you a place at our side to enjoy the glorious gauntlet of 100 wars, and you choose to shed tears instead. Well those tears shall no longer go to waste. We'll keep a bucket open just for you, and when you've filled it with tears we shall release it to the community so that all may share in your hilarious disgrace. Please, retort. I've been working on this new strategy. One time I seen this dude take out a medium pos in high sec with a nightmare and and a nighthawk. He could range the guns. Was very impressive. I can't want until I find one of your clients pos's. I've been wanted to test this for like a year now. Thank you for dec shield.... that doesn't mean Ed is wrong though... you are a cancer m8. Just saying.... no need to get all emo about it. KcD
and you and your side kick "Ed" the talking donkey are really bad at posting
corp jumping cry babies just became appealing to me... again likes watching grown men cry-á (Gò»n+¦Gò¦,) |

Enderw Wiggin
Syndicate Holdings
3
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 07:01:00 -
[170] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:Empirer Decartes wrote: What a sad and sorry group of incapable, unwilling, misfits that you lead. If you'd only take the time to train them, help them, guide them they would not cower in the dark, uninformed and afraid of their petty foe they believe is grand.
You, Zerg, if that if your main... are a cancer on this game. Your offenses will not be forgotten.
Your bitter tears of anguish sustain us. I don't believe this is the first time we've heard you choking up, feebly attempting to mask that you sob yourself to sleep each night, impotent to prevent us from owning you. And yes, we own you, as is self evident by your failure to step back and accept your rapid decline to oblivion. With each post you demonstrate your complete failure to understand the organizational structure and purpose of Dec Shield. Which is quite a remarkable demonstration of your slow wit, being that I've outlined it incredibly clearly and detailed every aspect of our operation. We have been civil and courteous, even offering you a place at our side to enjoy the glorious gauntlet of 100 wars, and you choose to shed tears instead. Well those tears shall no longer go to waste. We'll keep a bucket open just for you, and when you've filled it with tears we shall release it to the community so that all may share in your hilarious disgrace. Please, retort.
lulz
.....................() ............_.-'' ,-'`-. ``-._ ........,-'....,'........\.........-. .......,'......'...........\..........\ ....../......./..............\.........\ ...../_...../................\...... _\ .......`-./_..---'''|``---.._\,-'' .....................| .....................| .....................| .....................| .....................| .....................| .....................| ................... .| ................. ;..| ..................`..' -Wiggin
Best get the umbrella out. Zerg seems upset. He's going to make It rain "dec ambassador" war dec notifications xD
|
|

VegasMirage
190
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 07:07:00 -
[171] - Quote
Enderw Wiggin wrote:The Zerg Overmind wrote:Empirer Decartes wrote: What a sad and sorry group of incapable, unwilling, misfits that you lead. If you'd only take the time to train them, help them, guide them they would not cower in the dark, uninformed and afraid of their petty foe they believe is grand.
You, Zerg, if that if your main... are a cancer on this game. Your offenses will not be forgotten.
Your bitter tears of anguish sustain us. I don't believe this is the first time we've heard you choking up, feebly attempting to mask that you sob yourself to sleep each night, impotent to prevent us from owning you. And yes, we own you, as is self evident by your failure to step back and accept your rapid decline to oblivion. With each post you demonstrate your complete failure to understand the organizational structure and purpose of Dec Shield. Which is quite a remarkable demonstration of your slow wit, being that I've outlined it incredibly clearly and detailed every aspect of our operation. We have been civil and courteous, even offering you a place at our side to enjoy the glorious gauntlet of 100 wars, and you choose to shed tears instead. Well those tears shall no longer go to waste. We'll keep a bucket open just for you, and when you've filled it with tears we shall release it to the community so that all may share in your hilarious disgrace. Please, retort. lulz .....................() ............_.-'' ,-'`-. ``-._ ........,-'....,'........\.........-. .......,'......'...........\..........\ ....../......./..............\.........\ ...../_...../................\...... _\ .......`-./_..---'''|``---.._\,-'' .....................| .....................| .....................| .....................| .....................| .....................| .....................| ................... .| ................. ;..| ..................`..' -Wiggin Best get the umbrella out. Zerg seems upset. He's going to make It rain "dec ambassador" war dec notifications xD
same corp as KcD why am I not surprised. likes watching grown men cry-á (Gò»n+¦Gò¦,) |

Dirk Decartes
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
6
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 07:17:00 -
[172] - Quote
VegasMirage wrote:Enderw Wiggin wrote:The Zerg Overmind wrote:Empirer Decartes wrote: What a sad and sorry group of incapable, unwilling, misfits that you lead. If you'd only take the time to train them, help them, guide them they would not cower in the dark, uninformed and afraid of their petty foe they believe is grand.
You, Zerg, if that if your main... are a cancer on this game. Your offenses will not be forgotten.
Your bitter tears of anguish sustain us. I don't believe this is the first time we've heard you choking up, feebly attempting to mask that you sob yourself to sleep each night, impotent to prevent us from owning you. And yes, we own you, as is self evident by your failure to step back and accept your rapid decline to oblivion. With each post you demonstrate your complete failure to understand the organizational structure and purpose of Dec Shield. Which is quite a remarkable demonstration of your slow wit, being that I've outlined it incredibly clearly and detailed every aspect of our operation. We have been civil and courteous, even offering you a place at our side to enjoy the glorious gauntlet of 100 wars, and you choose to shed tears instead. Well those tears shall no longer go to waste. We'll keep a bucket open just for you, and when you've filled it with tears we shall release it to the community so that all may share in your hilarious disgrace. Please, retort. lulz .....................() ............_.-'' ,-'`-. ``-._ ........,-'....,'........\.........-. .......,'......'...........\..........\ ....../......./..............\.........\ ...../_...../................\...... _\ .......`-./_..---'''|``---.._\,-'' .....................| .....................| .....................| .....................| .....................| .....................| .....................| ................... .| ................. ;..| ..................`..' -Wiggin Best get the umbrella out. Zerg seems upset. He's going to make It rain "dec ambassador" war dec notifications xD same corp as KcD why am I not surprised.
Ender... lulz...
Mirage... Go fck yourself. <):=D
|

flakeys
Angels of Anarchy Interstellar Confederation
385
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 09:40:00 -
[173] - Quote
Dirk Decartes wrote:VegasMirage wrote:Enderw Wiggin wrote:The Zerg Overmind wrote:Empirer Decartes wrote: What a sad and sorry group of incapable, unwilling, misfits that you lead. If you'd only take the time to train them, help them, guide them they would not cower in the dark, uninformed and afraid of their petty foe they believe is grand.
You, Zerg, if that if your main... are a cancer on this game. Your offenses will not be forgotten.
Your bitter tears of anguish sustain us. I don't believe this is the first time we've heard you choking up, feebly attempting to mask that you sob yourself to sleep each night, impotent to prevent us from owning you. And yes, we own you, as is self evident by your failure to step back and accept your rapid decline to oblivion. With each post you demonstrate your complete failure to understand the organizational structure and purpose of Dec Shield. Which is quite a remarkable demonstration of your slow wit, being that I've outlined it incredibly clearly and detailed every aspect of our operation. We have been civil and courteous, even offering you a place at our side to enjoy the glorious gauntlet of 100 wars, and you choose to shed tears instead. Well those tears shall no longer go to waste. We'll keep a bucket open just for you, and when you've filled it with tears we shall release it to the community so that all may share in your hilarious disgrace. Please, retort. lulz .....................() ............_.-'' ,-'`-. ``-._ ........,-'....,'........\.........-. .......,'......'...........\..........\ ....../......./..............\.........\ ...../_...../................\...... _\ .......`-./_..---'''|``---.._\,-'' .....................| .....................| .....................| .....................| .....................| .....................| .....................| ................... .| ................. ;..| ..................`..' -Wiggin Best get the umbrella out. Zerg seems upset. He's going to make It rain "dec ambassador" war dec notifications xD same corp as KcD why am I not surprised. Ender... lulz... Mirage... Go fck yourself. <):=D
I'll save mirrage some time , and dirk again same corp as KcD , why is he not surprised?
There is a sufficiency in the world for man's need but not for man's greed.-á |

Suitonia
Corp 54 Curatores Veritatis Alliance
109
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 12:21:00 -
[174] - Quote
How long do you think it will take for KcD to realize the actual point of Dec Shield? It's already been spelled out for him and pretty sure he replied directly to several of the posts telling him.
I'm going to go with never. |

VegasMirage
203
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 14:28:00 -
[175] - Quote
Suitonia wrote:How long do you think it will take for KcD to realize the actual point of Dec Shield? It's already been spelled out for him and pretty sure he replied directly to several of the posts telling him.
I'm going to go with never.
KcD is too busy padding his killboard with cyno kills to notice what's really going on... but... then.. it is... his 15 bucks
I hope that's not your main likes watching grown men cry-á (Gò»n+¦Gò¦,) |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
263
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 15:52:00 -
[176] - Quote
Wow this guy is more ruffled than a bag of potato chips. I step away for the night and come back to find he's spammed out the thread with his alts, all named the same, agreeing with himself. They even have the same forum signatures, lol Burn Highsec Griefers |

Isana Tori
What's A Paladin Dec Shield
0
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 15:59:00 -
[177] - Quote
My years of Spanish has taught me that all of the alts have the last name meaning "of Cartes"
Also, his jimmies are in fact rustled. |

VegasMirage
205
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 16:03:00 -
[178] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:Wow this guy is more ruffled than a bag of potato chips. I step away for the night and come back to find he's spammed out the thread with his alts, all named the same, agreeing with himself. They even have the same forum signatures, lol
the termis "inceptionfag", KcD is an inceptionfag, that is all
likes watching grown men cry-á (Gò»n+¦Gò¦,) |

Kal Arkhenty
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
3
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 16:29:00 -
[179] - Quote
Isana Tori wrote:My years of Spanish has taught me that all of the alts have the last name meaning "of Cartes".
Or, he attempted to look book-smart but failed to correctly spell "Descartes".
|

Shederov Blood
Wrecketeers
19
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 16:58:00 -
[180] - Quote
Kal Arkhenty wrote:Isana Tori wrote:My years of Spanish has taught me that all of the alts have the last name meaning "of Cartes". Or, he attempted to look book-smart but failed to correctly spell "Descartes". Or he's warning you about putting decartes before dehorses. |
|

Tora Bushido
EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective
89
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 18:01:00 -
[181] - Quote
Hemmo Paskiainen wrote:Destiny Corrupted wrote:Had our first Dec Shield customer kill today.
It was fun, but I still wish I could declare new wars without paying half a billion. I don't mind a forever war, but can I at least continue to be a mercenary? I mean, CCP used that word more times than the current presidential candidates used "middle-class" in their campaigns. i like being in dec shield. whith 90 ish war dec's you have wt everywere for pew pew
Then please come to highsec and stop logging off everytime ..... cuz we have been running locaters on you guys for ever. 
My resists to bad posts are 78-89-83-90 ....... The metal head plate increased it by 5%.
|
|

ISD Praetoxx
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
340

|
Posted - 2012.10.12 18:52:00 -
[182] - Quote
Thread cleaned.
Keep posts constructive and on topic! - ISD Praetoxx ISD Praetoxx Ensign Community Communication Liasons (CCLs) Interstellar Service Department |
|

Isana Tori
What's A Paladin Dec Shield
1
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 20:59:00 -
[183] - Quote
Kal Arkhenty wrote:Isana Tori wrote:My years of Spanish has taught me that all of the alts have the last name meaning "of Cartes". Or, he attempted to look book-smart but failed to correctly spell "Descartes".
Of Scartes? That makes even less sense.
Also, for content. I am enjoying the prospects of war targets that cannot run away from their war. Surely this is not how it is intended to be? Almost unlimited targets brought to me who cannot run away but I can walk away at any time and come back later to finish?
This is going to be great. |

Suitonia
Corp 54 Curatores Veritatis Alliance
111
|
Posted - 2012.10.13 11:36:00 -
[184] - Quote
How do the mechanics for alliance wars work for declaring wars? Can only the executor declare wars or can any corporation in the alliance launch a war (with director roles).
|

Serious Desire
Annoyance. Pirate Coalition
2
|
Posted - 2012.10.13 14:06:00 -
[185] - Quote
Response on my petition from CCP regarding this issue:
The war declaration system feature is functioning as designed. If you're not happy with the way this feature is performing, post in the forums and it's possible a developer might read the post, they read them all the time. If they feel it's a worthy modification to pursue, it will be added to the workload.
Please keep in mind that we in Customer Support are not able discuss or make any decisions in relations to game or art design, we only deal with gameplay issues.
Best regards, |

VegasMirage
206
|
Posted - 2012.10.13 16:58:00 -
[186] - Quote
Serious Desire wrote:Response on my petition from CCP regarding this issue:
The war declaration system feature is functioning as designed. If you're not happy with the way this feature is performing, post in the forums and it's possible a developer might read the post, they read them all the time. If they feel it's a worthy modification to pursue, it will be added to the workload.
Please keep in mind that we in Customer Support are not able discuss or make any decisions in relations to game or art design, we only deal with gameplay issues.
Best regards,
OMG!!! More "pirate" merc posers shedding tears. ZERG you've done what many have tried to do for years. Congrats my Bromannder.
Griefers, Mercs "Pirates" w/ever get serious and just go out and fight like you wanted in the first place. I get so many requests to drop my mutual wars its hilarious.
You wanted a fight, you got "Working as Intended"... stop crying and go fight.
Next is the bounty system and Crime Watch, hilarity shall ensue!!! likes watching grown men cry-á (Gò»n+¦Gò¦,) |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
288
|
Posted - 2012.10.13 18:08:00 -
[187] - Quote
VegasMirage wrote:Serious Desire wrote:Response on my petition from CCP regarding this issue:
The war declaration system feature is functioning as designed. If you're not happy with the way this feature is performing, post in the forums and it's possible a developer might read the post, they read them all the time. If they feel it's a worthy modification to pursue, it will be added to the workload.
Please keep in mind that we in Customer Support are not able discuss or make any decisions in relations to game or art design, we only deal with gameplay issues.
Best regards, OMG!!! More "pirate" merc posers shedding tears. ZERG you've done what many have tried to do for years. Congrats my Bromannder. Griefers, Mercs "Pirates" w/ever get serious and just go out and fight like you wanted in the first place. I get so many requests to drop my mutual wars its hilarious. You wanted a fight, you got "Working as Intended"... stop crying and go fight. Next is the bounty system and Crime Watch, hilarity shall ensue!!! Nah, those don't count as tears. Tears would be bitter whining. This is an attempt at constructive feedback to change the game for the better. We applaud all support for the cause. I wouldn't mock those who speak up to help us. But don't worry, Decartes + alts will be back, and then we can all revel in his misery. Burn Highsec Griefers |

Karah Serrigan
The Hatchery Team Liquid
73
|
Posted - 2012.10.13 18:40:00 -
[188] - Quote
VegasMirage wrote:Serious Desire wrote:Response on my petition from CCP regarding this issue:
The war declaration system feature is functioning as designed. If you're not happy with the way this feature is performing, post in the forums and it's possible a developer might read the post, they read them all the time. If they feel it's a worthy modification to pursue, it will be added to the workload.
Please keep in mind that we in Customer Support are not able discuss or make any decisions in relations to game or art design, we only deal with gameplay issues.
Best regards, OMG!!! More "pirate" merc posers shedding tears. ZERG you've done what many have tried to do for years. Congrats my Bromannder. Griefers, Mercs "Pirates" w/ever get serious and just go out and fight like you wanted in the first place. I get so many requests to drop my mutual wars its hilarious. You wanted a fight, you got "Working as Intended"... stop crying and go fight. Next is the bounty system and Crime Watch, hilarity shall ensue!!!
Sorry to burst your bubble, but most probably dont care about how many people can shoot them in highsec. If you decced eve uni and RvB you arleady have a few thousand, adding a few hundred doesnt affect the behaviour at all.
On the contrary, what is really annoying are notification spams, an endless list of meaningless wars with 0 kills (btw if this list is long enough, opening the war history causes the client to freeze on older systems, similar to how a long employment history does) and the dozen wars that want to be paid in the wallet, which means that you cant have auto payment activated. Why do i have to pay for wars that i didnt start anyway?
And how do these wars look on mercanary corps. Someone who potentially wants to hire said corp sees they have had a thousand wars, he goes through the list and picks a few randomly and all he sees is 0 kills done. Why would he hire those mercs if they cant get a kill?
|

Kc Decartes
Syndicate Holdings
67
|
Posted - 2012.10.13 22:22:00 -
[189] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:VegasMirage wrote:Serious Desire wrote:Response on my petition from CCP regarding this issue:
The war declaration system feature is functioning as designed. If you're not happy with the way this feature is performing, post in the forums and it's possible a developer might read the post, they read them all the time. If they feel it's a worthy modification to pursue, it will be added to the workload.
Please keep in mind that we in Customer Support are not able discuss or make any decisions in relations to game or art design, we only deal with gameplay issues.
Best regards, OMG!!! More "pirate" merc posers shedding tears. ZERG you've done what many have tried to do for years. Congrats my Bromannder. Griefers, Mercs "Pirates" w/ever get serious and just go out and fight like you wanted in the first place. I get so many requests to drop my mutual wars its hilarious. You wanted a fight, you got "Working as Intended"... stop crying and go fight. Next is the bounty system and Crime Watch, hilarity shall ensue!!! Nah, those don't count as tears. Tears would be bitter whining. This is an attempt at constructive feedback to change the game for the better. We applaud all support for the cause. I wouldn't mock those who speak up to help us. But don't worry, Decartes + alts will be back, and then we can all revel in his misery.
Be back? I never went anywhere. As I've said many times in this thread, I enjoy Dec shield and the opportunity it gives my group. I do recognize though that Dec Shield is a huge troll, so I treat it as such.
I also admit I am enjoying your astroturfing of this thread. It's your thread though, so can't say I blame you.
As for the others in my group, I can assure you they are not alts. Emerald is my wife. Ed is... well complicated... Ender is a cousin. You see we are family, and we are/were enjoying trolling a troll.
Well enough about me, I'm sure you have ships to make explode (being facetious.) I've asked my group to limit comms in your topic since one of us received a warning, and another had their post edited.
Have fun though. and maybe one day I'll see you on the battlefield.
Regards,
KcD D.F.C.S.
no TRUST in mankind no confidence IN government there will never be enduring FREEDOM. |

VegasMirage
206
|
Posted - 2012.10.14 01:37:00 -
[190] - Quote
Kc Decartes wrote:The Zerg Overmind wrote:VegasMirage wrote:Serious Desire wrote:Response on my petition from CCP regarding this issue:
The war declaration system feature is functioning as designed. If you're not happy with the way this feature is performing, post in the forums and it's possible a developer might read the post, they read them all the time. If they feel it's a worthy modification to pursue, it will be added to the workload.
Please keep in mind that we in Customer Support are not able discuss or make any decisions in relations to game or art design, we only deal with gameplay issues.
Best regards, OMG!!! More "pirate" merc posers shedding tears. ZERG you've done what many have tried to do for years. Congrats my Bromannder. Griefers, Mercs "Pirates" w/ever get serious and just go out and fight like you wanted in the first place. I get so many requests to drop my mutual wars its hilarious. You wanted a fight, you got "Working as Intended"... stop crying and go fight. Next is the bounty system and Crime Watch, hilarity shall ensue!!! Nah, those don't count as tears. Tears would be bitter whining. This is an attempt at constructive feedback to change the game for the better. We applaud all support for the cause. I wouldn't mock those who speak up to help us. But don't worry, Decartes + alts will be back, and then we can all revel in his misery. Be back? I never went anywhere. As I've said many times in this thread, I enjoy Dec shield and the opportunity it gives my group. I do recognize though that Dec Shield is a huge troll, so I treat it as such. I also admit I am enjoying your astroturfing of this thread. It's your thread though, so can't say I blame you. As for the others in my group, I can assure you they are not alts. Emerald is my wife. Ed is... well complicated... Ender is a cousin. You see we are family, and we are/were enjoying trolling a troll. Well enough about me, I'm sure you have ships to make explode (being facetious.) I've asked my group to limit comms in your topic since one of us received a warning, and another had their post edited. Have fun though. and maybe one day I'll see you on the battlefield. Regards, KcD
a family of trolls, imagine that
you guys all live in your mom's basement? likes watching grown men cry-á (Gò»n+¦Gò¦,) |
|

Kc Decartes
Syndicate Holdings
67
|
Posted - 2012.10.14 01:51:00 -
[191] - Quote
VegasMirage wrote:Kc Decartes wrote:The Zerg Overmind wrote:VegasMirage wrote:Serious Desire wrote:Response on my petition from CCP regarding this issue:
The war declaration system feature is functioning as designed. If you're not happy with the way this feature is performing, post in the forums and it's possible a developer might read the post, they read them all the time. If they feel it's a worthy modification to pursue, it will be added to the workload.
Please keep in mind that we in Customer Support are not able discuss or make any decisions in relations to game or art design, we only deal with gameplay issues.
Best regards, OMG!!! More "pirate" merc posers shedding tears. ZERG you've done what many have tried to do for years. Congrats my Bromannder. Griefers, Mercs "Pirates" w/ever get serious and just go out and fight like you wanted in the first place. I get so many requests to drop my mutual wars its hilarious. You wanted a fight, you got "Working as Intended"... stop crying and go fight. Next is the bounty system and Crime Watch, hilarity shall ensue!!! Nah, those don't count as tears. Tears would be bitter whining. This is an attempt at constructive feedback to change the game for the better. We applaud all support for the cause. I wouldn't mock those who speak up to help us. But don't worry, Decartes + alts will be back, and then we can all revel in his misery. Be back? I never went anywhere. As I've said many times in this thread, I enjoy Dec shield and the opportunity it gives my group. I do recognize though that Dec Shield is a huge troll, so I treat it as such. I also admit I am enjoying your astroturfing of this thread. It's your thread though, so can't say I blame you. As for the others in my group, I can assure you they are not alts. Emerald is my wife. Ed is... well complicated... Ender is a cousin. You see we are family, and we are/were enjoying trolling a troll. Well enough about me, I'm sure you have ships to make explode (being facetious.) I've asked my group to limit comms in your topic since one of us received a warning, and another had their post edited. Have fun though. and maybe one day I'll see you on the battlefield. Regards, KcD a family of trolls, imagine that you guys all live in your mom's basement?
My mother passed away several months ago from cancer. It was a long and drawn out death that we were all hoping would come years ago. It was difficult, but I pulled through it, and am more strong as a result of the experience.
KcD
*edit typos D.F.C.S.
no TRUST in mankind no confidence IN government there will never be enduring FREEDOM. |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
293
|
Posted - 2012.10.14 18:53:00 -
[192] - Quote
Currently in 109 wars, with 9 more applications accepted in the last day, and 2 confirmed wardec transfer corps accepted as well :P Burn Highsec Griefers |

Astroniomix
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
267
|
Posted - 2012.10.14 20:38:00 -
[193] - Quote
Kc Decartes wrote:
My mother passed away several months ago from cancer. It was a long and drawn out death that we were all hoping would come years ago. It was difficult, but I pulled through it, and am more strong as a result of the experience.
KcD
*edit typos
So you're adopted? |

Unggh
Horse Feathers
0
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 02:34:00 -
[194] - Quote
Just making sure I'm doing this right...I already have an alt corp in a decced alliance. If I drop that alliance and apply to dec shield asap, it should transfer the war, correct?
(and yes, posting with an alt, for obvious reasons >_> ) |

Shederov Blood
Wrecketeers
37
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 08:38:00 -
[195] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind is watching you poop! |

VegasMirage
206
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 16:39:00 -
[196] - Quote
the unibrow, must have for space leaders likes watching grown men cry-á (Gò»n+¦Gò¦,) |

NEONOVUS
Saablast Followers
16
|
Posted - 2012.10.17 21:40:00 -
[197] - Quote
I find this at once clever and horrifying- the mark of an excellent or horrible idea. Good because those who are harassed continuously now have a remedy. Bad because war decs are useful as a means of settling something between 2 groups. |

VegasMirage
209
|
Posted - 2012.10.17 23:28:00 -
[198] - Quote
NEONOVUS wrote:I
Bad because war decs are useful as a means of settling something between 2 groups.
your premise is based on faulty facts, no war I've been in solved anything
likes watching grown men cry-á (Gò»n+¦Gò¦,) |

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
1296
|
Posted - 2012.10.18 01:35:00 -
[199] - Quote
VegasMirage wrote:NEONOVUS wrote:I
Bad because war decs are useful as a means of settling something between 2 groups. your premise is based on faulty facts, no war I've been in solved anything You must be doing it wrong. A good chunk of my wars have solved the important issue of people owing me money. (USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST) |

VegasMirage
209
|
Posted - 2012.10.18 04:25:00 -
[200] - Quote
Destiny Corrupted wrote:VegasMirage wrote:NEONOVUS wrote:I
Bad because war decs are useful as a means of settling something between 2 groups. your premise is based on faulty facts, no war I've been in solved anything You must be doing it wrong. A good chunk of my wars have solved the important issue of people owing me money.
Really do they pay you? Have you had a successful surrender?
I bleed people of isk all the time, but in the end they didn't need that 50 billion isk anyways.
It would be nice to see some statistics from CCP regarding surrender, terms and reasons for war.
likes watching grown men cry-á (Gò»n+¦Gò¦,) |
|

Kc Decartes
Syndicate Holdings
67
|
Posted - 2012.10.18 05:13:00 -
[201] - Quote
VegasMirage wrote:Destiny Corrupted wrote:VegasMirage wrote:NEONOVUS wrote:I
Bad because war decs are useful as a means of settling something between 2 groups. your premise is based on faulty facts, no war I've been in solved anything You must be doing it wrong. A good chunk of my wars have solved the important issue of people owing me money. Really do they pay you? Have you had a successful surrender? I bleed people of isk all the time, but in the end they didn't need that 50 billion isk anyways. It would be nice to see some statistics from CCP regarding surrender, terms and reasons for war.
You'd be surprised how often people pay when they find out something they hold dear is at risk of obliteration. The ones that care simply can't see an eve without. The ones with logic consider it an acceptable loss in the grand scheme. I think though that you would have problems determining the success rate of a good heist, as most are done under the table and out of eve forums... crazy I know. D.F.C.S.
no TRUST in mankind no confidence IN government there will never be enduring FREEDOM. |

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
1305
|
Posted - 2012.10.18 05:51:00 -
[202] - Quote
VegasMirage wrote:Destiny Corrupted wrote:VegasMirage wrote:NEONOVUS wrote:I
Bad because war decs are useful as a means of settling something between 2 groups. your premise is based on faulty facts, no war I've been in solved anything You must be doing it wrong. A good chunk of my wars have solved the important issue of people owing me money. Really do they pay you? Have you had a successful surrender? I bleed people of isk all the time, but in the end they didn't need that 50 billion isk anyways. It would be nice to see some statistics from CCP regarding surrender, terms and reasons for war. I'll be completely honest with you: not lately.
We used to get a lot of ransoms, but right around the time Dec Shield was first formed, that stopped. Bears learned to either shed wars, or disband. I don't think we've had a war ransom paid for over a year now. (USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST) |

De'Veldrin
East India Ore Trade Intrepid Crossing
416
|
Posted - 2012.10.18 14:12:00 -
[203] - Quote
Isana Tori wrote:Kal Arkhenty wrote:Isana Tori wrote:My years of Spanish has taught me that all of the alts have the last name meaning "of Cartes". Or, he attempted to look book-smart but failed to correctly spell "Descartes". Of Scartes? That makes even less sense.
I am hoping you're joking, but just in case...Descartes is not a Spanish word, it's a name.
Unsub or don't.-á I don't care what your reasons are, and neither does anyone else.-á Just click the button and go away - or don't. |

Karah Serrigan
The Hatchery Team Liquid
73
|
Posted - 2012.10.18 14:19:00 -
[204] - Quote
Okay were bad at this whole war thing so can someone enlighten us: http://i.imgur.com/7mkWm.jpg Why are 2 week old bills still showing up. Why do some wars cost 150m and 250m, despite the corps having only 1-2 members. Why did the cost against ivy league spike from ~280m to >1b although they did not get any new members and are still at ~2.2k? |

VegasMirage
209
|
Posted - 2012.10.18 15:49:00 -
[205] - Quote
Karah Serrigan wrote:Okay were bad at this whole war thing so can someone enlighten us: http://i.imgur.com/7mkWm.jpgWhy are 2 week old bills still showing up. Why do some wars cost 150m and 250m, despite the corps having only 1-2 members. Why did the cost against ivy league spike from ~280m to >1b although they did not get any new members and are still at ~2.2k?
you wanna play with the BIGDOGS you gotta manup and break the bank
na, I'm joking it's funny tho how CCP like what's going on - especially the part about griefers losing isk 
boomerang nerf, mining vessel buff, techmoon nerf, war dec (griefer isk drain) mechanic, "working as intended"
and now, Retribution filled with more "consequences for actions"
It all adds up to 1 thing imo, it will require you to pay more isk/rl currency to continue what you're doing now
Pay to Play, Pay to Win likes watching grown men cry-á (Gò»n+¦Gò¦,) |

Karah Serrigan
The Hatchery Team Liquid
73
|
Posted - 2012.10.18 16:30:00 -
[206] - Quote
VegasMirage wrote:Karah Serrigan wrote:Okay were bad at this whole war thing so can someone enlighten us: http://i.imgur.com/7mkWm.jpgWhy are 2 week old bills still showing up. Why do some wars cost 150m and 250m, despite the corps having only 1-2 members. Why did the cost against ivy league spike from ~280m to >1b although they did not get any new members and are still at ~2.2k? you wanna play with the BIGDOGS you gotta manup and break the bank na, I'm joking it's funny tho how CCP like what's going on - especially the part about griefers losing isk  boomerang nerf, mining vessel buff, techmoon nerf, war dec (griefer isk drain) mechanic, "working as intended" and now, Retribution filled with more "consequences for actions" It all adds up to 1 thing imo, it will require you to pay more isk/rl currency to continue what you're doing now Pay to Play, Pay to Win
But why? There was nothing in the patchlogs according to my knowledge and Ivy league didnt get any new members. Last week it was 280m and now its >1b. http://community.eveonline.com/updates/patchnotes.asp?newpatchlogID=73456 |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
304
|
Posted - 2012.10.18 17:17:00 -
[207] - Quote
Karah Serrigan wrote:Okay were bad at this whole war thing so can someone enlighten us: http://i.imgur.com/7mkWm.jpgWhy are 2 week old bills still showing up. Why do some wars cost 150m and 250m, despite the corps having only 1-2 members. Why did the cost against ivy league spike from ~280m to >1b although they did not get any new members and are still at ~2.2k? This isn't a member count issue. This is because you have a number of outgoing wars that are not mutual, which inflates your wardec costs for additional wars. You have all these outgoing unmutual wars because corps that leave Dec Shield set all 120 wars unmutual, and then it takes a week for them to drop. So you have a continuous cycling of corps with unmutual wars against you, which keep the cost of declaring new wars much higher. And it appears to act as a multiplier against player count in the target to give you the new cost. Hence why Ivy League now costs you 1.4bil to wardec.
In short, if you ever want to declare war again it's going to cost you a ton of money Burn Highsec Griefers |

Karah Serrigan
The Hatchery Team Liquid
74
|
Posted - 2012.10.18 17:49:00 -
[208] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:Karah Serrigan wrote:Okay were bad at this whole war thing so can someone enlighten us: http://i.imgur.com/7mkWm.jpgWhy are 2 week old bills still showing up. Why do some wars cost 150m and 250m, despite the corps having only 1-2 members. Why did the cost against ivy league spike from ~280m to >1b although they did not get any new members and are still at ~2.2k? This isn't a member count issue. This is because you have a number of outgoing wars that are not mutual, which inflates your wardec costs for additional wars. You have all these outgoing unmutual wars because corps that leave Dec Shield set all 120 wars unmutual, and then it takes a week for them to drop. So you have a continuous cycling of corps with unmutual wars against you, which keep the cost of declaring new wars much higher. And it appears to act as a multiplier against player count in the target to give you the new cost. Hence why Ivy League now costs you 1.4bil to wardec. In short, if you ever want to declare war again it's going to cost you a ton of money I thought amount of wars you have only affects the warcost if you are a corporation, not an alliance? Can you back your theory up with a link to the patch notes where that is stated? Also, if you look at the screenshot, one of the wars is 250m against a 2 man corp and dated at 22.10. (10/22 for you murricans), while another is only 100m at 23.10. (23/10). That kind of counterproofs your theory already :S |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
304
|
Posted - 2012.10.18 17:59:00 -
[209] - Quote
Karah Serrigan wrote: I thought amount of wars you have only affects the warcost if you are a corporation, not an alliance? Can you back your theory up with a link to the patch notes where that is stated? Also, if you look at the screenshot, one of the wars is 250m against a 2 man corp and dated at 22.10. (10/22 for you murricans), while another is only 100m at 23.10. (23/10). That kind of counterproofs your theory already :S
I'm not 100% sure, because not many people have actually been in your situation before to test it with this much detail. But I believe the wars at the varying cost levels are due to however many corps were set unmutual at the time the bill was issued. So the 100mil wars you had 1 corp set at unmutual, 150 was 2 corps, 200 was 3 corps, 250 4 corps, etc. And the massive cost for Ivy League was a 5x multiplier (~280mil x5 = 1.375bil) because you had 5 unmutual wars at the time that bill came up.
http://community.eveonline.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&nbid=42269
CCP SoniClover wrote:As before, the number of non-mutual wars the aggressor has declared acts as a multiplier (for each war). New wars are created now when a corporation leaves an alliance (to get rid of the dec shield exploit), but these new wars are not counted as cost multiplier HAHAHA, so I just re-read that post. They got it wrong, again. These new wars most definitely ARE counted as a cost multiplier as you're seeing. Burn Highsec Griefers |

Karah Serrigan
The Hatchery Team Liquid
74
|
Posted - 2012.10.18 18:34:00 -
[210] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:Karah Serrigan wrote: I thought amount of wars you have only affects the warcost if you are a corporation, not an alliance? Can you back your theory up with a link to the patch notes where that is stated? Also, if you look at the screenshot, one of the wars is 250m against a 2 man corp and dated at 22.10. (10/22 for you murricans), while another is only 100m at 23.10. (23/10). That kind of counterproofs your theory already :S
I'm not 100% sure, because not many people have actually been in your situation before to test it with this much detail. But I believe the wars at the varying cost levels are due to however many corps were set unmutual at the time the bill was issued. So the 100mil wars you had 1 corp set at unmutual, 150 was 2 corps, 200 was 3 corps, 250 4 corps, etc. And the massive cost for Ivy League was a 5x multiplier (~280mil x5 = 1.375bil) because you had 5 unmutual wars at the time that bill came up. http://community.eveonline.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&nbid=42269CCP SoniClover wrote:As before, the number of non-mutual wars the aggressor has declared acts as a multiplier (for each war). New wars are created now when a corporation leaves an alliance (to get rid of the dec shield exploit), but these new wars are not counted as cost multiplier HAHAHA, so I just re-read that post. They got it wrong, again. These new wars most definitely ARE counted as a cost multiplier as you're seeing. Hmm this is very weird. Everything points towards your theory, but then again we already had wars for 150m before (6.10. and 8.10. on the screenshot) but this is the first time the Ivy league war has been multiplied. Then again our war with Sixty-three is mutual but still shows up as a bill. Also the bills AFTER ivy league (24.10. and 25.10.) didnt get multiplied either. I conclude: Jeez, CCP, this system is completely broken. |
|

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
1349
|
Posted - 2012.10.18 18:41:00 -
[211] - Quote
I'm gonna confirm that something weird is going on. The multipliers sometimes work like CCP said, and sometimes not. We don't have any normal outgoing wars this second, and when I checked the price of declaring one, it was 50 million. A week ago, with one outgoing war, the price was 400 million (against a 20-man corporation for the record). At both times, we had a bunch of Dec Shield wars up. I'll keep checking often to see if there's some kind of pattern. (USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST) |

Gritz1
Ice Fire Warriors Late Night Alliance
129
|
Posted - 2012.10.18 18:51:00 -
[212] - Quote
The worst part of this is the eve mails every day.
The two seconds I was allowed in high sec I could not find any of these folks we are forever war decced against.
but god damn these eve mails.. lol |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
304
|
Posted - 2012.10.18 19:42:00 -
[213] - Quote
Gritz1 wrote:The worst part of this is the eve mails every day.
The two seconds I was allowed in high sec I could not find any of these folks we are forever war decced against.
but god damn these eve mails.. lol http://cdn.memegenerator.net/instances/400x/28049864.jpg
Here, it's about time I boot a few more corps to generate some more mails, please enjoy them Burn Highsec Griefers |

Cordo Draken
ABOS Industrial Enterprises
22
|
Posted - 2012.10.18 20:49:00 -
[214] - Quote
Hooray! Thank you for supplying forever free random War Targets! *Applaudes* eëÆWhomever said, "You only get one shot to make a good impression," was utterly wrong. I've made plenty of great impressions with my AutocannonseëÆ eÉà |

VegasMirage
231
|
Posted - 2012.10.18 20:52:00 -
[215] - Quote
Cordo Draken wrote:Hooray! Thank you for supplying forever free random War Targets!  *Applaudes*
I know man, it's getting better and better imo
CCP should just remove all security space and make it all like null sec, then we could just shoot everybody - also remove the market who needs it. likes watching grown men cry-á (Gò»n+¦Gò¦,) |

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
1356
|
Posted - 2012.10.18 21:47:00 -
[216] - Quote
Market can stay. Any type of decent moneymaking in high-sec has to go though. Leave missions up to level two, and maybe some tiny, low-end roids in the belts. Basically just enough to get noobies started out and accustomed to game mechanics.
It would be realistic, too. How stupid is it that such concentrated amounts of raw wealth exist in overpopulated mega-society home worlds? You'd imagine that those resources would be the first to get depleted as empires expanded outward.
Of course we all know what would happen to the sub count if CCP did that. The average contemporary gamer's wants are well-known nowadays. (USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST) |

Unsuccessful At Everything
The Troll Bridge
229
|
Posted - 2012.10.18 22:46:00 -
[217] - Quote
ZO, This has been one of the most delicious 11 page threads I have read so far. You sir have my +1 anyday. Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings? |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
306
|
Posted - 2012.10.19 00:08:00 -
[218] - Quote
Current stats update:
Current permanent wardecs: 123 Current players trapped: 9329 Current corporations trapped: 274 Current alliances trapped: 23 Burn Highsec Griefers |

Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
731
|
Posted - 2012.10.19 00:18:00 -
[219] - Quote
Destiny Corrupted wrote:Market can stay. Any type of decent moneymaking in high-sec has to go though. Leave missions up to level two, and maybe some tiny, low-end roids in the belts. Basically just enough to get noobies started out and accustomed to game mechanics.
It would be realistic, too. How stupid is it that such concentrated amounts of raw wealth exist in overpopulated mega-society home worlds? You'd imagine that those resources would be the first to get depleted as empires expanded outward.
Of course we all know what would happen to the sub count if CCP did that. The average contemporary gamer's wants are well-known nowadays.
Should I refer you to the British Empire? Which retained a great deal of money, because the people who leave for the frontier aren't the rich ones. Or perhaps the Roman Empire?
Empires traditionally funnel funds back to their home cities (worlds) FuzzWork Enterprises http://www.fuzzwork.co.uk/ Blueprint calculator, invention chance calculator, isk/m3 Ore chart-á and other 'useful' utilities. |

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
1362
|
Posted - 2012.10.19 00:42:00 -
[220] - Quote
I think you missed the point I was trying to make. (USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST) |
|

Yaaar's Revenge
The Dark Space Initiative
43
|
Posted - 2012.10.19 06:53:00 -
[221] - Quote
I don't even...wait what? I don't know where I stand on this idea, but I'm pretty sure it's a terrible idea for terrible people. I just get that feeling |

Tolene
Rave Technologies Inc. C0VEN
1
|
Posted - 2012.10.19 10:54:00 -
[222] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:Current stats update:
Current permanent wardecs: 123 Current players trapped: 9329 Current corporations trapped: 274 Current alliances trapped: 23
All those wars and for the past month I haven't seen a single war target while in empire. BTW any new developments on the wardec mechanic despite dec shield being called an exploit? I'm out of the loop as I was bust in some null sec wars recently  |

Gritz1
Ice Fire Warriors Late Night Alliance
130
|
Posted - 2012.10.19 18:32:00 -
[223] - Quote
I would love to actually see a war target. |

Isana Tori
What's A Paladin Dec Shield
2
|
Posted - 2012.10.19 19:14:00 -
[224] - Quote
There are only 13 of us, so you have to look hard. I see tons of war targets for me though.  |

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
1384
|
Posted - 2012.10.19 19:23:00 -
[225] - Quote
Isana Tori wrote:There are only 13 of us, so you have to look hard. I see tons of war targets for me though.  Let me know if you want me to throw a fight so you guys can finally get a kill on those boards.  (USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST) |

Isana Tori
What's A Paladin Dec Shield
2
|
Posted - 2012.10.19 20:23:00 -
[226] - Quote
It's ok. I'm patiently stalking the best kills. And with about 10k pilots to choose from, there's no need to rush in. |

IG-88
The Law Offices of Dewey Screwem and Howe
0
|
Posted - 2012.10.20 00:47:00 -
[227] - Quote

Truely a brilliant idea......and thats coming from someone who is just now locked in a "permawar" with them.....still, gotta respect the tactic. *golfclap*
Now the expected trollolol....
But *sigh* now whatever shall I do?? Surely I must throw my hands in the air, bash my face into the keyboard, and quit eve forever!
lol
As Im about to find out, mind providing a 'spoiler' ? What happens when the carebears that just weasled out of a wardec with a 1-man corp, gets wardec'd again by me? They join Dec Shield again? Cool, cool.....wonder how ****** up thier corp history will look with them joining you guys 20 times...... wonder if anyone will ever take these poor souls into thier alliance with a record like that.... lol

|

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
1402
|
Posted - 2012.10.20 00:49:00 -
[228] - Quote
IG-88 wrote:As Im about to find out, mind providing a 'spoiler' ? What happens when the carebears that just weasled out of a wardec with a 1-man corp, gets wardec'd again by me? They join Dec Shield again? Cool, cool.....wonder how ****** up thier corp history will look with them joining you guys 20 times...... wonder if anyone will ever take these poor souls into thier alliance with a record like that.... lol I've had people hop dozens of times on our corporation during the days of the pre-Inferno Dec Shield. The bears don't seem to notice, mind, or care.
Actually, some saw it as a badge of honor for "beating the griefers." (USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST) |

Blake Gates Heleneto
Android Gang
5
|
Posted - 2012.10.20 02:48:00 -
[229] - Quote
IG-88 wrote: Truely a brilliant idea......and thats coming from someone who is just now locked in a "permawar" with them.....still, gotta respect the tactic. *golfclap* Now the expected trollolol.... But *sigh* now whatever shall I do?? Surely I must throw my hands in the air, bash my face into the keyboard, and quit eve forever! lol As Im about to find out, mind providing a 'spoiler' ? What happens when the carebears that just weasled out of a wardec with a 1-man corp, gets wardec'd again by me? They join Dec Shield again? Cool, cool.....wonder how ****** up thier corp history will look with them joining you guys 20 times...... wonder if anyone will ever take these poor souls into thier alliance with a record like that.... lol 
And the point of your corporation creation and within the same day war-deccing us as a 1-man corporation? |

IG-88
The Law Offices of Dewey Screwem and Howe
0
|
Posted - 2012.10.20 14:57:00 -
[230] - Quote
Blake Gates Heleneto wrote:
And the point of your corporation creation and within the same day war-deccing us as a 1-man corporation?
Carebear tears are delicious? Really, is there any other reason to roll out a hi-sec war? |
|

Taraxon Taranogas
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
14
|
Posted - 2012.10.20 15:49:00 -
[231] - Quote
Gritz1 wrote:I would love to actually see a war target.
The "perma" war thing is a bunch of crap. I agree. |

Blake Gates Heleneto
Android Gang
5
|
Posted - 2012.10.20 17:33:00 -
[232] - Quote
IG-88 wrote:Blake Gates Heleneto wrote:
And the point of your corporation creation and within the same day war-deccing us as a 1-man corporation?
Carebear tears are delicious? Really, is there any other reason to roll out a hi-sec war?
Lol carebear tears are delicious? You need to venture out of mom's basement every now and again. Fresh air is delicious too. |

IG-88
The Law Offices of Dewey Screwem and Howe
0
|
Posted - 2012.10.20 17:44:00 -
[233] - Quote
See? Delicious!
edit; it's a carriage house! rofl |

VegasMirage
232
|
Posted - 2012.10.20 17:48:00 -
[234] - Quote
Isana Tori wrote:It's ok. I'm patiently stalking the best kills. And with about 10k pilots to choose from, there's no need to rush in.
Well I had a spare hour and I made a video last night of our CEO in our Dec Shield corp with over 60 wars and made a loop without a Scout around the map starting in Jita > Amarr > Hek/Rens > Dodixie and back to Jita over 69 jumps (will link video later)
AND NOT 1 war target was in local. We did see 1 red who recently left his agressing corp.
Then on the same video we looked closer at the corps war deccing Dec Shield. Here's our findings:
For the "most part" the agressors are 1-3 man corps. We went out on a limb and made an educated guess that the members were probably alts of mains doing other things (my guess is carebearing somewhere in Eve).
These are corps set up for opportunistic kills and not waging "real war" or attempting to establish epeen efficiency like Moar Tears spent a year doing (for example). These are more or less guerrilla operations set-up to settle a score and with the current mechanics is not a very inviting environment considering you're locked into more wars than you expected.
Also, it's hard to see the amount of kills Dec Shield is responsible for because the wars are "shed" and corps still fighting those wars are not tracked and not in Dec Shield any longer. Zerg is kinda the "Walmart of Wars" whereby you can join Dec Shield collect free wars with disregard to quality etc., you get the picture.
It's funny cause his name "Zerg" is exactly what he's doing to you guys in game 
likes watching grown men cry-á (Gò»n+¦Gò¦,) |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
307
|
Posted - 2012.10.20 19:56:00 -
[235] - Quote
Well... a certain major alliance in the game *cough* Goonswarm Federation *cough* declared an outgoing war against Manifest Destiny, and are now trapped in a mutual state forever. I was trying to get GSF's war with Outbreak., but because of their outgoing war, it's now impossible to bring it back to Dec Shield.
The irony is that GSF is currently being protected by Dec Shield. Because we already have Manifest Destiny trapped against us. Which means that they cannot spread the GSF war to anyone else. Anyone can join Manifest Destiny to fight GSF for free. But any corp that leaves Manifest Destiny will no longer ever be able to join an alliance again. Which means they cannot transfer the wars back to their alliances.
I wonder if I can strike a deal, or if everyone is just going to remain caught in this terribly hilarious messy web of wars. Burn Highsec Griefers |

Kc Decartes
Syndicate Holdings
67
|
Posted - 2012.10.21 04:31:00 -
[236] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:Well... a certain major alliance in the game *cough* Goonswarm Federation *cough* declared an outgoing war against Manifest Destiny, and are now trapped in a mutual state forever. I was trying to get GSF's war with Outbreak., but because of their outgoing war, it's now impossible to bring it back to Dec Shield.
The irony is that GSF is currently being protected by Dec Shield. Because we already have Manifest Destiny trapped against us. Which means that they cannot spread the GSF war to anyone else. Anyone can join Manifest Destiny to fight GSF for free. But any corp that leaves Manifest Destiny will no longer ever be able to join an alliance again. Which means they cannot transfer the wars back to their alliances.
I wonder if I can strike a deal, or if everyone is just going to remain caught in this terribly hilarious messy web of wars.
We've found many targets today as a benefit of your service, so I thank you. It's a shame it took so long for AWWWW to make a war with us.
Besides these fine gents and their contribution, we have only seen your unhappy clients. The story is always the same. We go into their systems, they dock, and ***** about you/your service. In the long run I'm sure you understand how your organization will be seen. It is after all the younger players that will create our tomorrow.
I think you're very confused. You do not lead any wars my friend, you create spam mails only, and take advantage of newer players.
Our research is still ongoing, and since your head is very large, you believe that you are creating wars or something. All you do though is feed on new players who believe in your bs astroturfing on the forums, and ofc your grand ability to spam mail. As if more experienced pilots don't know who you are, and don't anticipate Mirage's mandatory response...I like your style though, and I'm still eager and looking forward to one day having conflict with the puppet master. I think 2013 is going to be a most fun year.
Kind regard as always,
KcD
D.F.C.S.
no TRUST in mankind no confidence IN government there will never be enduring FREEDOM. |

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
1407
|
Posted - 2012.10.21 04:46:00 -
[237] - Quote
Holy cow dude, you still don't understand what Dec Shield is for? (USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST) |

Kc Decartes
Syndicate Holdings
67
|
Posted - 2012.10.21 04:57:00 -
[238] - Quote
Destiny Corrupted wrote:Holy cow dude, you still don't understand what Dec Shield is for?
ofc... trolling xD
Guess my young, eager, starry eyes were/are looking for something more though. D.F.C.S.
no TRUST in mankind no confidence IN government there will never be enduring FREEDOM. |

Enderw Wiggin
Syndicate Holdings
3
|
Posted - 2012.10.21 05:47:00 -
[239] - Quote
Broken down kitchen at the top of the stairs Can I mix in with your affairs? Share a smoke, Make a joke Grasp and reach for a leg of hope Words to memorize, words hypnotize Words make my mouth exercise. Words all fail the magic prize Nothing I can say when I'm in your thighs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmo6qyhdav8
..:|:-)) |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
310
|
Posted - 2012.10.21 07:42:00 -
[240] - Quote
Kc Decartes wrote:We've found many targets today as a benefit of your service, so I thank you. It's a shame it took so long for AWWWW to make a war with us.
Besides these fine gents and their contribution, we have only seen your unhappy clients. The story is always the same. We go into their systems, they dock, and ***** about you/your service. In the long run I'm sure you understand how your organization will be seen. It is after all the younger players that will create our tomorrow.
I think you're very confused. You do not lead any wars my friend, you create spam mails only, and take advantage of newer players.
Our research is still ongoing, and since your head is very large, you believe that you are creating wars or something. All you do though is feed on new players who believe in your bs astroturfing on the forums, and ofc your grand ability to spam mail. As if more experienced pilots don't know who you are, and don't anticipate Mirage's mandatory response...I like your style though, and I'm still eager and looking forward to one day having conflict with the puppet master. I think 2013 is going to be a most fun year.
Kind regard as always,
KcD
http://cdn.memegenerator.net/instances/250x250/10644622.jpg
Burn Highsec Griefers |
|

Emerald Decartes
Syndicate Holdings
35
|
Posted - 2012.10.21 07:55:00 -
[241] - Quote
Fear leads to anger, anger leads to hate, hate leads to suffering.
https://gimmebar-assets.s3.amazonaws.com/4eaabc354ad08.gif D.F.C.S. no TRUST in mankind no confidence IN goverment there will never be enduring FREEDOM. |

Isana Tori
What's A Paladin Dec Shield
2
|
Posted - 2012.10.21 17:18:00 -
[242] - Quote
My time bouncing around looking for targets is a patient waiting game. Most war targets to me are in fast ships burning gate to gate as fast as they can.
The other time I spend hours in traffic systems waiting near gates. It's almost as if being in perpetual war with no out has a draining effect on people. |

Kalel Nimrott
EG CORP Talocan United
69
|
Posted - 2012.10.21 19:01:00 -
[243] - Quote
There is no way that a wardec mechanics could ever work without someone finding its way with it. This way its the most fun, tho. |

Karah Serrigan
The Hatchery Team Liquid
74
|
Posted - 2012.10.21 19:18:00 -
[244] - Quote
Isana Tori wrote:My time bouncing around looking for targets is a patient waiting game. Most war targets to me are in fast ships burning gate to gate as fast as they can.
What else is highsec for? |

VegasMirage
233
|
Posted - 2012.10.21 19:46:00 -
[245] - Quote
Kc Decartes wrote:Destiny Corrupted wrote:Holy cow dude, you still don't understand what Dec Shield is for? ofc... trolling xD Guess my young, eager, starry eyes were/are looking for something more though.
0/10 if trolling you should be banned likes watching grown men cry-á (Gò»n+¦Gò¦,) |

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
1409
|
Posted - 2012.10.21 21:03:00 -
[246] - Quote
Isana Tori wrote:My time bouncing around looking for targets is a patient waiting game. Most war targets to me are in fast ships burning gate to gate as fast as they can.
The other time I spend hours in traffic systems waiting near gates. It's almost as if being in perpetual war with no out has a draining effect on people. You're giving the Dec Shield white knights a bit too much credit here. Without even counting the fact that they are outnumbered by the "mean war griefers," there's the whole "these guys aren't the average empire carebears" aspect of the conflict to consider.
Why are you not seeing anyone? Because the people you're at war with aren't the type to shove all of their belongings into untanked Badgers on autopilot to Jita.
All that people have to do to avoid you is to scout ahead. You're more than welcome to think that using scouts, which 99% of the people you're at war with do anyway as standard practice, is emotionally draining I guess. (USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST) |

Seraph IX Basarab
Vengance Inc.
46
|
Posted - 2012.10.22 05:06:00 -
[247] - Quote
Destiny Corrupted wrote:Isana Tori wrote:My time bouncing around looking for targets is a patient waiting game. Most war targets to me are in fast ships burning gate to gate as fast as they can.
The other time I spend hours in traffic systems waiting near gates. It's almost as if being in perpetual war with no out has a draining effect on people. You're giving the Dec Shield white knights a bit too much credit here. Without even counting the fact that they are outnumbered by the "mean war griefers," there's the whole "these guys aren't the average empire carebears" aspect of the conflict to consider. Why are you not seeing anyone? Because the people you're at war with aren't the type to shove all of their belongings into untanked Badgers on autopilot to Jita. All that people have to do to avoid you is to scout ahead. You're more than welcome to think that using scouts, which 99% of the people you're at war with do anyway as standard practice, is emotionally draining I guess. edit: I will admit that managing all those standings is pretty tiring.
Correct me if i'm wrong, but isn't the fact that you take the time to 'explain' all of that, indicate that there actually IS an effect on your behavior to such an extent that you need to address it here? No? |

OT Smithers
BLOMI
292
|
Posted - 2012.10.22 06:20:00 -
[248] - Quote
Random thoughts after reading this thread:
* Why in the hell did I read this. Don't I have anything better to do with my time?
* This sounds like a hillariously bad screw up on CCPs part. Left uncorrected this is going to continue to spiral out of control. I salute Dec Shield for exposing this as the issue it is.
* On the other hand, I can easily imagine quite few PvP corporations joining Dec Shield just for the targets and free wars.
* This completely destroys Merc Corps. It's more damaging to them than it is to high sec griefer corps. Bad move CCP. |

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
1410
|
Posted - 2012.10.22 06:50:00 -
[249] - Quote
Seraph IX Basarab wrote:Correct me if i'm wrong, but isn't the fact that you take the time to 'explain' all of that, indicate that there actually IS an effect on your behavior to such an extent that you need to address it here? No? I don't think so. That's a pretty hefty jump in logic. Am I not allowed to comment on something just because it doesn't affect me? (USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST) |

Reppyk
The Black Shell
188
|
Posted - 2012.10.22 11:00:00 -
[250] - Quote
OT Smithers wrote:* This completely destroys Merc Corps. It's more damaging to them than it is to high sec griefer corps. Bad move CCP. Yes that one. 
I haven't play last week, but last time I speak about it, 3 well-known merc corps answered me that they stopped declaring wardecs, and were just waiting for an "ally" contract. 3 positive answers from a pool of 8 corps. 2 of the other corps are WH mercs, the 3 remaining groups were the Marmitte (they are already trapped and well, they have enough numbers to deal with it anyway), a lowsec merc corp where the average SS is below -5 and my own corp, because I don't care that much since I'll be trapped sooner or later and I don't live in highsec. |
|

Tah'ris Khlador
Space Ghosts. Break-A-Wish Foundation
220
|
Posted - 2012.10.22 19:37:00 -
[251] - Quote
A Dec Shield ambassador corporation has left the alliance we are warring. Not only do we get to continue warring those silly people, but now we get Dec Shield fun? BRING ON THE CRAZY WAR DECs.
Managing standings will be a ***** though. |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
313
|
Posted - 2012.10.22 21:30:00 -
[252] - Quote
Tah'ris Khlador wrote:A Dec Shield ambassador corporation has left the alliance we are warring. Not only do we get to continue warring those silly people, but now we get Dec Shield fun? BRING ON THE CRAZY WAR DECs.
Managing standings will be a ***** though. Ya, you guys are trapped. If you ever see a Dec Shield ambassador corp leave your target, then it's already too late :P Burn Highsec Griefers |

Kc Decartes
Syndicate Holdings
71
|
Posted - 2012.10.23 04:09:00 -
[253] - Quote
VegasMirage wrote:Kc Decartes wrote:Destiny Corrupted wrote:Holy cow dude, you still don't understand what Dec Shield is for? ofc... trolling xD Guess my young, eager, starry eyes were/are looking for something more though. 0/10 if trolling you should be banned
Cry me a river with your w(h)ine.
Not to mention your statement in comparison to your signature is quite ironic. You don't like they way we play eve? You want big brother ccp to ban me... boohoohoo.
Dec shield is the troll.... I would normally say something like... didn't you know? We both know who's alt you are though, so whats the point?
Regards as always,
KcD D.F.C.S.
no TRUST in mankind no confidence IN government there will never be enduring FREEDOM. |

VegasMirage
233
|
Posted - 2012.10.23 17:30:00 -
[254] - Quote
Kc Decartes wrote:VegasMirage wrote:Kc Decartes wrote:Destiny Corrupted wrote:Holy cow dude, you still don't understand what Dec Shield is for? ofc... trolling xD Guess my young, eager, starry eyes were/are looking for something more though. 0/10 if trolling you should be banned Cry me a river with your w(h)ine. Not to mention your statement in comparison to your signature is quite ironic. You don't like they way we play eve? You want big brother ccp to ban me... boohoohoo. Dec shield is the troll.... I would normally say something like... didn't you know? We both know who's alt you are though, so whats the point? Regards as always, KcD
Wha dafugg just came out your mouth? likes watching grown men cry-á (Gò»n+¦Gò¦,) |

Cannibal Kane
Praetorian Cannibals
641
|
Posted - 2012.10.25 12:37:00 -
[255] - Quote
Isana Tori wrote:My time bouncing around looking for targets is a patient waiting game. Most war targets to me are in fast ships burning gate to gate as fast as they can.
The other time I spend hours in traffic systems waiting near gates. It's almost as if being in perpetual war with no out has a draining effect on people.
I hope this is your alt. Since you talk a far to big game for someone with 0 kills. Not to mention no kills for your corp according to EVE-Kill. Corps that are trapped in DS I see everywhere when I fly around and it does not seem to slow the larget corps/alliances down.
And as Vegas mentioned most 1-3 man corps are prolly alt of carebears trying PVP, he is not wrong. I say trying since your one if you have a Main for Indy. I am sure I will get trapped at some point but I really do not give a rats ass. I will just close this down and continue what I do in a new corp. I don't care about the number of targets, I like to focus on my attention on people.
DS is good for one thing... pointing out flaws in the system. If anybody believes it is there for any other reason they are delusional. I'm not a Pirate, I'm a Terrorist.
The Crazy Space Poor South African.
*Hair done by LGÇÖOr+¬al, because I'm worth it. |

Alekseyev Karrde
Noir. Noir. Mercenary Group
691
|
Posted - 2012.10.25 15:57:00 -
[256] - Quote
Has someone you "trapped" ever earned a surrender?
Question totally unrelated to the prospect of a war with a small group of empire PVPers who spikes with people unable to defend themselves every couple days. "Alekseyev Karrde: mercenary of my heart."-á -Arydanika, Voices from the Void
CSM7 rep, CSM 4 vet Noir./Noir. Academy Recruiting: www.noirmercs.com |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
320
|
Posted - 2012.10.25 19:05:00 -
[257] - Quote
Alekseyev Karrde wrote:Has someone you "trapped" ever earned a surrender?
Question totally unrelated to the prospect of a war with a small group of empire PVPers who spikes with people unable to defend themselves every couple days. Sure, but we'd just use the fake surrender mechanics to steal their isk at that point. After a few weeks of being trapped against Dec Shield it's entirely impossible to release a captured corp/alliance anyways, since dozens of corps hold mutual wars against them. And I couldn't talk people into releasing them if I wanted to Burn Highsec Griefers |

Reppyk
The Black Shell
193
|
Posted - 2012.10.25 22:30:00 -
[258] - Quote
Alekseyev Karrde wrote:Has someone you "trapped" ever earned a surrender?
Question totally unrelated to the prospect of a war with a small group of empire PVPers who spikes with people unable to defend themselves every couple days. A long time ago, at least one year ago, I wardeced some indus bears. Their PVP corp wardecced me in return (onoz). Of course, I made it mutual. After one week, I got some iskies from one of their member and set them free... |

VegasMirage
242
|
Posted - 2012.10.26 00:35:00 -
[259] - Quote
Arth Lawing wrote:The Zerg Overmind wrote:
It's truly sad to see how fast we can spread these wars. C0VEN was at war with Penumbra Institute (a 13 man corp that was harassing them), and C0VEN wanted to pursue them into highsec for vengeance. Now C0VEN is trapped in 7 wars, and that number will only escalate. Any corporations that drop out of C0VEN I believe will remain in permanent outgoing wardecs, and never be able to join an alliance again (corps with outgoing wars can't join alliances).
The C0VEN war dec was a hasty reaction they made when we war dec'd their renter alliance I-BRA. We immediately made the C0VEN war mutual so we could pick it up at a point in the future, however at the time we had actually moved out to the Esoteria and Feythabolis area to disrupt traffic and isk making of their blues and renters, and to pick off juicy targets as they presented themselves. This was greatly helped by a couple of friendly and disillusioned corps in I-BRA and ROL, and as you can see from the kills it gave us a good ability to change fittings and ships multiple times, despite having no station access. Even giving us a chance to switch once to an alpha tornado gang and one shot a nightmare as it sat just outside its POS shields in P9F-ZG. We weren't even in high sec at the time of the war dec, and, as anyone who knows us can tell, we usually don't go to high sec very often. Theres no intention of us to evade their war dec by use of any mechanics, we're just busy and will pick at it over time and as we see fit. C0VEN has made no offer of settlement indicating that they wish to bring it to a close, so I assume they are happy to keep it running indefinitely as well. We will likely return to our disruptive ops around their 0.0 space very soon, maybe after that we'll do the same in high sec empire and see what juicy targets they float around there. At least in empire ROL won't be dropping solo supercaps on our cloaky nano gangs.
blah blah blah... blah
you have NO SOV, you have NO ISK, you have NO DIGNITY
you got your **** pushed in by TRIBE a noob alliance... keep the story straight please. Oh, and 1/2 of ROL joined them... derp.
to sum it up, you have NOTHING now and you moved to hi sec and ONLY now realized you're at constant war with a lot of people and the problem is growing... goodbye isk, goodbye KDR goodbye goodfights, GOODBYE Period Basis and Paragon Soul.
C0VEN, you may continue. likes watching grown men cry-á (Gò»n+¦Gò¦,) |

Miss Trapper
War Declaration Spear
0
|
Posted - 2012.10.26 01:51:00 -
[260] - Quote
I am so excited!!!!! Once Goonswarm Federation is trapped, maybe CCP will get off their butt and fix the system. |
|

VegasMirage
242
|
Posted - 2012.10.26 05:51:00 -
[261] - Quote
Miss Trapper wrote:I am so excited!!!!! Once Goonswarm Federation is trapped, maybe CCP will get off their butt and fix the system.
you don't read well it seems, they are being protected by Dec Shield (quite the opposite of being trapped) likes watching grown men cry-á (Gò»n+¦Gò¦,) |

Xolve
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
1178
|
Posted - 2012.10.26 08:33:00 -
[262] - Quote
Miss Trapper wrote:I am so excited!!!!! Once Goonswarm Federation is trapped, maybe CCP will get off their butt and fix the system.
Actually- most bitter Goons are more than happy with the prospect of no more member corps.
Last I recall, we went out of our way to prevent people from joining the alliance; but you know, magical things can happen for a paltry sum of 500m. Inappropriate signature removed. Navigator. |

Karah Serrigan
The Hatchery Team Liquid
76
|
Posted - 2012.10.26 15:09:00 -
[263] - Quote
Miss Trapper wrote:I am so excited!!!!! Once Goonswarm Federation is trapped, maybe CCP will get off their butt and fix the system. We should have corestwo write an article about in on themittani, that sure will speed up things! |

Miss Trapper
War Declaration Spear
0
|
Posted - 2012.10.26 15:45:00 -
[264] - Quote
Xolve wrote:Miss Trapper wrote:I am so excited!!!!! Once Goonswarm Federation is trapped, maybe CCP will get off their butt and fix the system. Actually- most bitter Goons are more than happy with the prospect of no more member corps. Last I recall, we went out of our way to prevent people from joining the alliance; but you know, magical things can happen for a paltry sum of 500m.
True, I didn't think about that. Well, here is another fun "exploit" somebody posted over in Warfare and Tactics:
If you have a corp in your alliance that you don't like and want to boot, you can force them to disband their corp.
Step 1. Have your alliance wardec you 1-man alt corp. Step 2. 1 man alt corp sets the dec mutual Step 3. Boot the corp from your alliance Step 4. Have the 1 man alt corp set the resulting war dec with the booted corp mutual. Step 5. Have the 1 man alt corp unset the alliance war mutual and surrender.
You now have trapped the booted corp and they can never join a new alliance. There is no tracing back who declared war, so if you guys want to use some high level director spies you can force your enemies corps to disband before they can reform a new alliance. Just a thought... |

Le Prospecteur
T3chnicolour
2
|
Posted - 2012.10.26 16:11:00 -
[265] - Quote
VegasMirage wrote:Miss Trapper wrote:I am so excited!!!!! Once Goonswarm Federation is trapped, maybe CCP will get off their butt and fix the system. you don't read well it seems, they are being protected by Dec Shield (quite the opposite of being trapped)
Though GSF may not be trapped, am i right in believing corps kicked from Dec Shield can still join other alliances? If so, just create a throwaway corp, join Dec Shield, get kicked, join Manifest Destiny. now got the pleasure of both? Rinse & repeat every week/two weeks at leisure. |

Xolve
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
1183
|
Posted - 2012.10.27 03:59:00 -
[266] - Quote
Le Prospecteur wrote: Though GSF may not be trapped, am i right in believing corps kicked from Dec Shield can still join other alliances? If so, just create a throwaway corp, join Dec Shield, get kicked, join Manifest Destiny. now got the pleasure of both? Rinse & repeat every week/two weeks at leisure.
Actually- you are incorrect.
Corps/Alliances involved in a Mutual war can only leave that alliance, and only re-join that alliance.
Neither side may accept new corps for the duration of the war. Inappropriate signature removed. Navigator. |

Tetsuigablm
Lianowar Legion
0
|
Posted - 2012.10.27 09:39:00 -
[267] - Quote
So whats to stop people from just leaving the corp and making another one and starting the whole thing over, so some guy trys to pirate the people im with, so i dec him for it, and all of a sudden im the bad guy, they can just join your tidy little outfit, and poof were engaged with some ******** amount of people, your system is clearly working as intended.... |

VegasMirage
242
|
Posted - 2012.10.27 20:23:00 -
[268] - Quote
Tetsuigablm wrote:So whats to stop people from just leaving the corp and making another one and starting the whole thing over, so some guy trys to pirate the people im with, so i dec him for it, and all of a sudden im the bad guy, they can just join your tidy little outfit, and poof were engaged with some ******** amount of people, your system is clearly working as intended....
Since I allied with Dec Shield last year, I have "collected" over 60 closed corporations/alliances, +/- 20 billion in kills and nearly nothing in losses, a tear pool that's kept me subscribed through some terrible expansions and patches 
As a matter of fact some of the larger alliances have actually done exactly what I suggested previously and what you're on to - close and reopen under same name. If you're a true griefer/merc you don't care what your history looks like.
I just had a sizable alliance leader contact me in game via email and ask me to help him get his alliance out of the war trap. There's nothing anybody can really do once you get snared by Zerg. Not even Zerg can stop the hurt once the trap is set.
All Hail Zerg! likes watching grown men cry-á (Gò»n+¦Gò¦,) |

Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local Break-A-Wish Foundation
877
|
Posted - 2012.10.27 21:34:00 -
[269] - Quote
Wait what, who the hell is declaring wars on people and has POS towers? Because you should tell me. |

VegasMirage
242
|
Posted - 2012.10.27 23:40:00 -
[270] - Quote
Vimsy Vortis wrote:Wait what, who the hell is declaring wars on people and has POS towers? Because you should tell me.
spacebears who think they're good... Noir  likes watching grown men cry-á (Gò»n+¦Gò¦,) |
|

Sanya Mazepa
Lions Of Judah Intrepid Crossing
1
|
Posted - 2012.10.28 03:20:00 -
[271] - Quote
The worst decision any ceo can make is joining this alliance. I have inherited 150 wars. Giving me more grief than I began with. |

VegasMirage
242
|
Posted - 2012.10.28 17:14:00 -
[272] - Quote
Sanya Mazepa wrote:The worst decision any ceo can make is joining this alliance. I have inherited 150 wars. Giving me more grief than I began with.
amazing how this thread is like the 3rd threadnaught on the topic for the past 3 months and people are just getting it
take down your POS's close your corp and reopen it likes watching grown men cry-á (Gò»n+¦Gò¦,) |

Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local Break-A-Wish Foundation
885
|
Posted - 2012.10.28 17:46:00 -
[273] - Quote
VegasMirage wrote:Vimsy Vortis wrote:Wait what, who the hell is declaring wars on people and has POS towers? Because you should tell me. spacebears who think they're good... Noir  I was hoping for a surprise, we all knew Alekseyev karrde didn't actually care about PVP anyway, that much has been very apparent since about the time he decided that his stance on every single PVP related mechanics change was "Don't worry I'm sure this change will be good for PVP". |

Alekseyev Karrde
Noir. Noir. Mercenary Group
699
|
Posted - 2012.10.28 19:42:00 -
[274] - Quote
Vimsy Vortis wrote:VegasMirage wrote:Vimsy Vortis wrote:Wait what, who the hell is declaring wars on people and has POS towers? Because you should tell me. spacebears who think they're good... Noir  I was hoping for a surprise, we all knew Alekseyev karrde didn't actually care about PVP anyway, that much has been very apparent since about the time he decided that his stance on every single PVP related mechanics change was "Don't worry I'm sure this change will be good for PVP". Neutral-repair-bear detected. "Alekseyev Karrde: mercenary of my heart."-á -Arydanika, Voices from the Void
CSM7 rep, CSM 4 vet Noir./Noir. Academy Recruiting: www.noirmercs.com |

Jack Carrigan
Order of the Shadow The Revenant Order
774
|
Posted - 2012.10.28 19:46:00 -
[275] - Quote
BRILLIANT! "War is not measured in terms of who wins or loses, who is right or wrong.-á It is measured in terms of who survives." |

Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local Break-A-Wish Foundation
885
|
Posted - 2012.10.28 21:53:00 -
[276] - Quote
Alekseyev Karrde wrote:Neutral-repair-bear detected. I and people like me voted for you because you're the leader of one of the most well known mercenary organizations in the game and because we knew that changes to the war mechanics were on the slate for development. We did so knowing that you have always been very publicly against the use of neutral logistics and trusted that regardless of that you'd work to see that the mechanics changes were in the interest of the gameplay not sucking balls.
And here we are sitting here post inferno with a record low number of listed mercs in the merc contracts channel, every merc corp and alliance in the game entangled in a giant mass of mutual wars that shouldn't exist, charging clients unreasonable fees just to cover the cost of declaring war and with The 0rphanage disbanded and you think that the reason people are upset with you is a mechanic that we assumed as being changed anyway?
You're either totally detached from reality or you're being intellectually disingenuous to shirk making real responses to criticism, either way your failure to represent the people who got you your position on the CSM is absolute and your dismissive attitude is childish and disgraceful. |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
347
|
Posted - 2012.10.28 22:33:00 -
[277] - Quote
Vimsy Vortis wrote:Alekseyev Karrde wrote:Neutral-repair-bear detected. I and people like me voted for you because you're the leader of one of the most well known mercenary organizations in the game and because we knew that changes to the war mechanics were on the slate for development. We did so knowing that you have always been very publicly against the use of neutral logistics and trusted that regardless of that you'd work to see that the mechanics changes were in the interest of the gameplay not sucking balls. And here we are sitting here post inferno with a record low number of listed mercs in the merc contracts channel, every merc corp and alliance in the game entangled in a giant mass of mutual wars that shouldn't exist, charging clients unreasonable fees just to cover the cost of declaring war and with The 0rphanage disbanded and you think that the reason people are upset with you is a mechanic that we assumed was being changed anyway? You're either totally detached from reality or you're being intellectually disingenuous to shirk making real responses to criticism, either way your failure to represent the people who got you your position on the CSM is absolute and your dismissive attitude is childish and disgraceful. Alekseyev Karrde has actually been incredibly supportive of the goals of fixing wardecs. I genuinely feel bad about trapping him, and Hans Jagerblitzen because they're on the side of the people here. The CSM are on your side, every week they're pushing CCP to fix wardecs.
In other news, we just trapped Ushra'Khan, 297 man alliance, 11 corps. \o/ Burn Highsec Griefers |

Wacktopia
Noir. Noir. Mercenary Group
274
|
Posted - 2012.10.29 02:19:00 -
[278] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:I genuinely feel bad about trapping him
Hold that thought. The bottom line is that now I have one of those annoying signatures. |

Stinky Vegina
Ifriends Holdings i-Friends
0
|
Posted - 2012.10.29 03:55:00 -
[279] - Quote
I personally think that this is awesome, we just got into a war with **** Shield and we're looking forward to re-deccing the other corps that joined and then left.
If ISK was an issue we'd be mining.
As was a pvpers go; you have Holeysheet from what I see and he's always baked and with his 2 alts for remote rep as every fail pvper in empire has so no major issues there...and you really think that a pvp corp or alliance with join you to try to hunt other pvpers?
I for one welcome **** Shield, it's an awesome way to: pick new targets Get great info on who wants to and doesn't want to PVP Who flies what and related KB info from their alliance Death board
Please, corps and alliance keep joining, it makes our life easier and with a ton less work on who to source out for deccing in the future...in fact you might as well stay in **** Shield as you'll get dec'd either way now.
Cheers
|

Reppyk
The Black Shell
193
|
Posted - 2012.10.29 07:40:00 -
[280] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:In other news, we just trapped Ushra'Khan, 297 man alliance, 11 corps. \o/ I want that warcec ! For my collection GÖÑ
|
|

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
349
|
Posted - 2012.10.29 08:00:00 -
[281] - Quote
Stinky Vegina wrote:I personally think that this is awesome, we just got into a war with **** Shield and we're looking forward to re-deccing the other corps that joined and then left.
If ISK was an issue we'd be mining.
As far a pvpers go; you have Holeysheet from what I see and he's always baked and with his 2 alts for remote rep as every fail pvper in empire has so no major issues there...and you really think that a pvp corp or alliance with join you to try to hunt other pvpers?
I for one welcome **** Shield, it's an awesome way for us to: pick new targets Get great info on who wants to and doesn't want to PVP Who flies what and related KB info from their alliance Death board
Please, corps and alliance keep joining, it makes our life easier and with a ton less work on who to source out for deccing in the future...in fact you might as well stay in **** Shield as you'll get dec'd either way now.
Cheers There is exactly 0% chance of you maintaining wardecs against all the people that leave Dec Shield. 0%. The cost will end up being billions per week. All bark and no bite. Let's revisit these assertions in a month's time and then I'll congratulate you if you do as you say. If so I applaud the isk sink.
Reppyk wrote: I want that warcec ! For my collection GÖÑ
You are more than welcome to the war, you'll want to thin it out from the other current wars we have, so apply to Dec Shield with an xfer corp and you can get started with that process :P Burn Highsec Griefers |

Wong Wing
Perkone Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.10.29 11:05:00 -
[282] - Quote
Ummm can someone correct me if im wrong but if the agressing corp removes all isk from thier corp wallet once they are "trapped" the war will end after a week due to insufficeint funds to pay for the war ?
Im pretty sure thats how it works or at least used to work and so no-one will be "trapped" in a war v dec shield unless they are complete retards.
|

Alec Enderas
Sovereign Front
14
|
Posted - 2012.10.29 12:13:00 -
[283] - Quote
Wong Wing wrote:Ummm can someone correct me if im wrong but if the agressing corp removes all isk from thier corp wallet once they are "trapped" the war will end after a week due to insufficeint funds to pay for the war ?
Im pretty sure thats how it works or at least used to work and so no-one will be "trapped" in a war v dec shield unless they are complete retards.
War set as mutual |

Wong Wing
Perkone Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.10.29 12:32:00 -
[284] - Quote
Fair enough, didnt realise set to mutual meant a cost free war.
|

VegasMirage
247
|
Posted - 2012.10.29 21:04:00 -
[285] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:Vimsy Vortis wrote:Alekseyev Karrde wrote:Neutral-repair-bear detected. I and people like me voted for you because you're the leader of one of the most well known mercenary organizations in the game and because we knew that changes to the war mechanics were on the slate for development. We did so knowing that you have always been very publicly against the use of neutral logistics and trusted that regardless of that you'd work to see that the mechanics changes were in the interest of the gameplay not sucking balls. And here we are sitting here post inferno with a record low number of listed mercs in the merc contracts channel, every merc corp and alliance in the game entangled in a giant mass of mutual wars that shouldn't exist, charging clients unreasonable fees just to cover the cost of declaring war and with The 0rphanage disbanded and you think that the reason people are upset with you is a mechanic that we assumed was being changed anyway? You're either totally detached from reality or you're being intellectually disingenuous to shirk making real responses to criticism, either way your failure to represent the people who got you your position on the CSM is absolute and your dismissive attitude is childish and disgraceful. Alekseyev Karrde has actually been incredibly supportive of the goals of fixing wardecs. I genuinely feel bad about trapping him, and Hans Jagerblitzen because they're on the side of the people here. The CSM are on your side, every week they're pushing CCP to fix wardecs. In other news, we just trapped Ushra'Khan, 297 man alliance, 11 corps. \o/
Sorry but you're wrong. Vimsy is correct in everything he's said about Alekseyeve Kard-whatever his name is.
I Didn't think I'd hear Zerg cowing down to Aleks, but I guess I didn't really know you in the first place. If I knew you were an Aleks fanboi I'd never have helped your cause in the past. The guy is a terrible self-serving CSM representative, and an even worse eve player. He still promotes the Merc contracts channel (even though its completely useless) b/c its his only means of perceived relevance.
Anybody who cries like Aleks just did about using neutral reps is bad and should be included with those crying about EWAR and falcon use. You're terrible b/c you haven't realized there are dozens of ways to counter those tactics. All you're doing is changing the possibilities for people with 1 main and a repper alt. For subscribers like myself with 5-8 remote repping alts, you've just made us into Gods. We'll be killing while the rest of you watch.
Many people in Eve, Aleks one of them want CCP to cater to them and make the game easy. This is the resulting mess everybody is in now. It will continue to be carebear friendly with the next expansion. AND Eve is pay to win, get over it.
likes watching grown men cry-á (Gò»n+¦Gò¦,) |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
351
|
Posted - 2012.10.29 21:07:00 -
[286] - Quote
VegasMirage wrote: Sorry but you're wrong. Vimsy is correct in everything he's said about Alekseyeve Kard-whatever his name is.
I Didn't think I'd hear Zerg cowing down to Aleks, but I guess I didn't really know you in the first place. If I knew you were an Aleks fanboi I'd never have helped your cause in the past. The guy is a terrible self-serving CSM representative, and an even worse eve player. He still promotes the Merc contracts channel (even though its completely useless) b/c its his only means of perceived relevance.
Anybody who cries like Aleks just did about using neutral reps is bad and should be included with those crying about EWAR and falcon use. You're terrible b/c you haven't realized there are dozens of ways to counter those tactics. All you're doing is changing the possibilities for people with 1 main and a repper alt. For subscribers like myself with 5-8 remote repping alts, you've just made us into Gods. We'll be killing while the rest of you watch.
Many people in Eve, Aleks one of them want CCP to cater to them and make the game easy. This is the resulting mess everybody is in now. It will continue to be carebear friendly with the next expansion. AND Eve is pay to win, get over it.
I'll just jump on this right now. Never voted for him, don't know anything about him. All I know is that he supports our position to get wardecs fixed and seemed reasonable in email exchanges. If everyone wants to shoot him, then join Dec Shield and the war is all yours :) Burn Highsec Griefers |

VegasMirage
247
|
Posted - 2012.10.29 21:11:00 -
[287] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:VegasMirage wrote: Sorry but you're wrong. Vimsy is correct in everything he's said about Alekseyeve Kard-whatever his name is.
I Didn't think I'd hear Zerg cowing down to Aleks, but I guess I didn't really know you in the first place. If I knew you were an Aleks fanboi I'd never have helped your cause in the past. The guy is a terrible self-serving CSM representative, and an even worse eve player. He still promotes the Merc contracts channel (even though its completely useless) b/c its his only means of perceived relevance.
Anybody who cries like Aleks just did about using neutral reps is bad and should be included with those crying about EWAR and falcon use. You're terrible b/c you haven't realized there are dozens of ways to counter those tactics. All you're doing is changing the possibilities for people with 1 main and a repper alt. For subscribers like myself with 5-8 remote repping alts, you've just made us into Gods. We'll be killing while the rest of you watch.
Many people in Eve, Aleks one of them want CCP to cater to them and make the game easy. This is the resulting mess everybody is in now. It will continue to be carebear friendly with the next expansion. AND Eve is pay to win, get over it.
I'll just jump on this right now. Never voted for him, don't know anything about him. All I know is that he supports our position to get wardecs fixed and seemed reasonable in email exchanges. If everyone wants to shoot him, then join Dec Shield and the war is all yours :)
You get it now, self-serving CSM is affected so he decides to try and fix the problem. If it didn't affect Aleks he'd sit in his wormhole farming sleepers on his alt and not bat an eye (as he's been doing for the past 3 months).
I say leave the mechanic in place, it's separating the boys from the men. A new game play style is forming up and there will be new bawses in Eve.
likes watching grown men cry-á (Gò»n+¦Gò¦,) |

Stinky Vegina
Ifriends Holdings i-Friends
0
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 00:09:00 -
[288] - Quote
It doesn't actually cost us anything to be at war now and from what I just tested out it doesn't cost us anything different than before to war dec people.
I'm at a lose of how this affects us other than a email mail saying we're at war? There are no "fleets" of pvpers waiting outside the station for us or hunting us, we're deccing as we usually do without issues from/ to **** shield.
Take Stug corp for instance, they joined your alliance then our war is your war which is all good as it's free of charge for random targets for the 24 hours they have to be in your alliance, but now I can re-dec Stug for the same price I org. dec'd them for and they can't rejoin your alliance for the cool down period which means I still have 6+ days of targets with this group and they're still SOL as I'll just keep the bill paid until they disband or re-join you again at which time I still win as they will stay in your alliance = targets or quit again = targets...
I agree with what you're doing don't get me wrong but I would point out all the facts as we still win either way...the alliances or corps that join **** shield just make themselves more visible which I again say is great.
Zerg, if you were open to donations I personally would have sent you ISK for this.
:-)
Wong Wing wrote:Ummm can someone correct me if im wrong but if the agressing corp removes all isk from thier corp wallet once they are "trapped" the war will end after a week due to insufficeint funds to pay for the war ?
Im pretty sure thats how it works or at least used to work and so no-one will be "trapped" in a war v dec shield unless they are complete retards.
|

Emerald Decartes
Syndicate Holdings
37
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 06:03:00 -
[289] - Quote
VegasMirage wrote:Sanya Mazepa wrote:The worst decision any ceo can make is joining this alliance. I have inherited 150 wars. Giving me more grief than I began with. amazing how this thread is like the 3rd threadnaught on the topic for the past 3 months and people are just getting it take down your POS's close your corp and reopen it
Your "threadnaught" was a gift from Kcd. Don't forget who's **** u sucked to get where you are.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TClSxYdUnlw
Sfff u and this thread.
..:):-)
Ed D.F.C.S. no TRUST in mankind no confidence IN goverment there will never be enduring FREEDOM. |

VegasMirage
247
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 08:20:00 -
[290] - Quote
Emerald Decartes wrote:VegasMirage wrote:Sanya Mazepa wrote:The worst decision any ceo can make is joining this alliance. I have inherited 150 wars. Giving me more grief than I began with. amazing how this thread is like the 3rd threadnaught on the topic for the past 3 months and people are just getting it take down your POS's close your corp and reopen it Your "threadnaught" was a gift from Kcd. Don't forget who's **** u sucked to get where you are. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TClSxYdUnlwSfff u and this thread. ..:):-) Ed
whaddafaqq? clarify plz
likes watching grown men cry-á (Gò»n+¦Gò¦,) |
|

Gate Green
Unity Holdings Ushra'Khan
0
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 22:52:00 -
[291] - Quote
Confirming U'K is at war with Dec Shield (Sigh.), and that CCP's GM's do not see this as abuse, and confirm it as a perfectly valid mechanic. Le sigh. |

Ugleb
Masuat'aa Matari Ushra'Khan
261
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 23:21:00 -
[292] - Quote
Confirming that U'K now has mutual wars against THREE different entities, NONE of which we ever declared war against or had ever even heard of before we declared war on a different alliance which we do NOT have a mutual war against.
If this is 'working as intended' then I think someone needs to explain the whole thing to me again now please, because I'm not getting it. 
If the alliance we war decced had us set mutual I would understand being 'trapped' into a war we started, but I don't see why three random corps/alliances get to lock us in when the original target hasn't. It would make more sense to me if the mutual wars all relied on the original target setting us mutual, with everything else ending when they relinquish the war. http://uglebsjournal.wordpress.com/ To contact [-MM-] or [UNITY]: http://www.masuataa.co.uk/defaul1t.asp - channel "Masuat'aa Public" http://www.ushrakhan.com/ - channel "Voices U'K" |

Xuixien
Rifterlings Damu'Khonde
151
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 23:30:00 -
[293] - Quote
Although my sympathies go out to my brothers and sisters in Ushra'Khan...
I wholly approve of Space AIDS. Rabble Rabble!! Rifterlings is currently recruiting frigate and cruiser pilots for LowSec/NullSec small gang PvP and FW. Newbies and veterans alike are welcome.
|

kraiklyn Asatru
T.R.I.A.D Ushra'Khan
20
|
Posted - 2012.10.31 00:08:00 -
[294] - Quote
Everyone has AIDS! AIDS AIDS AIDS! AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS! Everyone has AIDS!
And so this is the end of our story And everyone is dead from AIDS It took from me my best friend My only true pal My only bright star (he died of AIDS)
Well I'm gonna march on Jita Lead the fight and charge the brigades There's a hero inside of all of us I'll make them see everyone has AIDS
My father (AIDS!) My sister (AIDS!) My uncle and my cousin and her best friend (AIDS AIDS AIDS!) The gays and the straights And the white and the spades
Everyone has AIDS! My grandma and my dog 'ol blue (AIDS AIDS AIDS) CCP has got it and so do you (AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS) C'mon everybody we got quilting to do (AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS) We gotta break down these baricades, everyone has AIDS!
|

Horak Thor
T.R.I.A.D Ushra'Khan
117
|
Posted - 2012.10.31 00:38:00 -
[295] - Quote
Woooo this effects me 0 although i might get new things to shoot that dont make me take sec hits \o/ TRIAD is recruiting "TRIAD Agency" in game channel |

Xuixien
Rifterlings Damu'Khonde
151
|
Posted - 2012.10.31 01:32:00 -
[296] - Quote
If you think about it, it really fits with the "Retribution" theme, doesn't it? Rabble Rabble!! Rifterlings is currently recruiting frigate and cruiser pilots for LowSec/NullSec small gang PvP and FW. Newbies and veterans alike are welcome.
|

Philpip
T.R.I.A.D Ushra'Khan
49
|
Posted - 2012.10.31 07:31:00 -
[297] - Quote
Hang on, I think I am missing something here.
Your whole premise is to lock in an 'attacking' corp / alliance into an endless war, turning the attackers into prey?
How does locking a war turn an active PvPer into a carebear?
We live in losec and shoot most things on sight. All you have done is save me some sec status \o/ (not that you'll come to losec).
|

Reppyk
The Black Shell
193
|
Posted - 2012.10.31 10:13:00 -
[298] - Quote
Philpip wrote:We live in losec and shoot most things on sight. All you have done is save me some sec status \o/ (not that you'll come to losec). ZO is only playing with the wardec mechanisms, he doesn't have to hunt you down by himself. I even think that the Decshield doesn't need to have pvprs in the alliance (or "giving the decs" to other (alt) corps). The wardec itself is the grief. Most people don't care about losing a ship or two (after all we're all space-rich) to these wars. The problem is that someone could kill you. You know it may happen anytime, and you know you can't really prevent it.
Losses from last week : http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=15043069 (radar/magneto cheetah) http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=15033238 (pve hound, for FW lvl4 missions ?) http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=15040734 (pve drake) http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=14975082 (prowler)
These are not even 5% of your losses, so yes (this additionnal wardec) is not a problem, but you know you have a few bears in your alliance (like any alliance). |

kraiklyn Asatru
T.R.I.A.D Ushra'Khan
21
|
Posted - 2012.10.31 10:42:00 -
[299] - Quote
Lol we are always at war regardless, people can always kill us. Half of us are flashy and half of highsec is offlimits due to faction navies, none of those losses are related. Literally nothing changes, Rens and Hek are camped most of the time anyway.
3 out of those 4 are faction warfare losses due to derping. We have quite a few newbies so there is gonna be derping anyway. The other one is zombies, whom we decced first. We already caused them to ditch all their lowsec pocos so mission accomplished, for further kills we will have to go down to Paragon Soul.
So to decshield, we live in eszur. It has a pretty TLF station, please come camp it with vindies. |

Reppyk
The Black Shell
193
|
Posted - 2012.10.31 10:45:00 -
[300] - Quote
If that war is not a problem, why are you posting 6x about it ?  |
|

kraiklyn Asatru
T.R.I.A.D Ushra'Khan
21
|
Posted - 2012.10.31 10:56:00 -
[301] - Quote
Hate incompetence and a broken game. Hate it even more if ****** CCP employees respond with 'working as intended'.
Hence my posting here, my posting about faction warfare etc. |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
356
|
Posted - 2012.10.31 12:20:00 -
[302] - Quote
It seems it's still possible to leave dead corps floating all over the place, including inside an alliance.
http://evemaps.dotlan.net/corp/Wong_Wing_Corporation
This could potentially be very useful for us, as we could keep a bunch of dead corps in alliance to maintain majority vote for executorship, without actually dedicating any characters to it. We'll have to test whether or not their votes actually still contribute to ownership of an alliance... Burn Highsec Griefers |

HoleySheet1
My L1ttl3 Pwny Dec Shield
90
|
Posted - 2012.10.31 12:40:00 -
[303] - Quote
I await further orders, my master We make eve burn, forget about jita. |

Xuixien
Rifterlings Damu'Khonde
152
|
Posted - 2012.10.31 13:47:00 -
[304] - Quote
Reppyk wrote:The wardec itself is the grief.
The problem is that someone could kill you.
You know it may happen anytime, and you know you can't really prevent it.
Hello.
What is Faction Warfare, and what sorts of players participate in it? Rabble Rabble!! Rifterlings is currently recruiting frigate and cruiser pilots for LowSec/NullSec small gang PvP and FW. Newbies and veterans alike are welcome.
|

Axl Borlara
T.R.I.A.D Ushra'Khan
53
|
Posted - 2012.10.31 14:47:00 -
[305] - Quote
Xuixien wrote:Reppyk wrote:The wardec itself is the grief.
The problem is that someone could kill you.
You know it may happen anytime, and you know you can't really prevent it. Hello. What is Faction Warfare, and what sorts of players participate in it?
Good point.
I can kind of see how this might affect high-sec corps, but given that we chose the giant wardec that is faction warfare and deal with pirates in low sec, I don't see how this makes the slightest difference to us. Except a few more war targets to shoot in the face. |

Reppyk
The Black Shell
193
|
Posted - 2012.10.31 14:54:00 -
[306] - Quote
Xuixien wrote:Hello.
What is Faction Warfare, and what sorts of players participate in it? No idea bro', lowsec is so scarry I would not venture farther than 0.8ss. |

HoleySheet1
My L1ttl3 Pwny Dec Shield
90
|
Posted - 2012.10.31 15:22:00 -
[307] - Quote
iM IN DEC SHIELD, i AINT LEAVING. iF YOU WAR DEC SOMEONE, EXPECT MASSIVE REPRISAL....FROM ME raaaaaaaawwwwwwr STUPID caps LOCK!!!!!!
If dec shield is ur aggressor....pay the rasom or stay docked. 2+2
I had a sponge bath this morning, in restrainsts....it was an......experience. My nurse took advantage, but its ok. |

Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local Break-A-Wish Foundation
914
|
Posted - 2012.10.31 16:08:00 -
[308] - Quote
Axl Borlara wrote:Xuixien wrote:Reppyk wrote:The wardec itself is the grief.
The problem is that someone could kill you.
You know it may happen anytime, and you know you can't really prevent it. Hello. What is Faction Warfare, and what sorts of players participate in it? Good point. I can kind of see how this might affect high-sec corps, but given that we chose the giant wardec that is faction warfare and deal with pirates in low sec, I don't see how this makes the slightest difference to us. Except a few more war targets to shoot in the face. I'd just like to point out that you can hardly call faction warfare a wardec on account of the faction navy protecting you in highsec. You're at significantly more risk of being attacked in highsec during a regular wardec than you are if you're in faction warfare. The exception being in space where concord hold sovereignty.
The entire reason my corp never even considered faction warfare as an option for highsec PVP was that the presence of faction navies rendered it totally pointless. |

kraiklyn Asatru
T.R.I.A.D Ushra'Khan
21
|
Posted - 2012.10.31 17:03:00 -
[309] - Quote
Faction navies are easily avoided. People can still camp stations quite easily. |

Xuixien
Rifterlings Damu'Khonde
154
|
Posted - 2012.10.31 17:45:00 -
[310] - Quote
Vimsy Vortis wrote:Axl Borlara wrote:Xuixien wrote:Reppyk wrote:The wardec itself is the grief.
The problem is that someone could kill you.
You know it may happen anytime, and you know you can't really prevent it. Hello. What is Faction Warfare, and what sorts of players participate in it? Good point. I can kind of see how this might affect high-sec corps, but given that we chose the giant wardec that is faction warfare and deal with pirates in low sec, I don't see how this makes the slightest difference to us. Except a few more war targets to shoot in the face. I'd just like to point out that you can hardly call faction warfare a wardec on account of the faction navy protecting you in highsec. You're at significantly more risk of being attacked in highsec during a regular wardec than you are if you're in faction warfare. The exception being in space where concord hold sovereignty. The entire reason my corp never even considered faction warfare as an option for highsec PVP was that the presence of faction navies rendered it totally pointless.
Trigger99 would like to have a word with you. Rabble Rabble!! Rifterlings is currently recruiting frigate and cruiser pilots for LowSec/NullSec small gang PvP and FW. Newbies and veterans alike are welcome.
|
|

Xolve
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
1197
|
Posted - 2012.10.31 18:07:00 -
[311] - Quote
HoleySheet1 wrote:iM IN DEC SHIELD, i AINT LEAVING. iF YOU WAR DEC SOMEONE, EXPECT MASSIVE REPRISAL....FROM ME raaaaaaaawwwwwwr STUPID caps LOCK!!!!!!
If dec shield is ur aggressor....pay the rasom or stay docked. 2+2
I had a sponge bath this morning, in restrainsts....it was an......experience. My nurse took advantage, but its ok.
Someone's trying too hard.
Also- learn how to fit a hurricane you scrub. Inappropriate signature removed. Navigator. |

Unsuccessful At Everything
The Troll Bridge
377
|
Posted - 2012.10.31 19:44:00 -
[312] - Quote
Now that Dec Shield is being endorsed by Holeysheet1, Im starting to lose respect for ZOs plan. Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings? |

Ugleb
Masuat'aa Matari Ushra'Khan
262
|
Posted - 2012.10.31 21:45:00 -
[313] - Quote
Reppyk wrote:If that war is not a problem, why are you posting 6x about it ? 
Personally I was commenting on the broken mechanics, not the specific random wars we somehow ended up in.
I really do not see why we can have three mutual wars that we can't leave that are all against entities we never interacted with directly. All without the alliance we originally war decced having to set the war mutual. If the point of this is to draw attention to broken mechanics, then we really should talk about it. http://uglebsjournal.wordpress.com/ To contact [-MM-] or [UNITY]: http://www.masuataa.co.uk/defaul1t.asp - channel "Masuat'aa Public" http://www.ushrakhan.com/ - channel "Voices U'K" |

Ugleb
Masuat'aa Matari Ushra'Khan
262
|
Posted - 2012.10.31 21:47:00 -
[314] - Quote
Vimsy Vortis wrote:I'd just like to point out that you can hardly call faction warfare a wardec on account of the faction navy protecting you in highsec. You're at significantly more risk of being attacked in highsec during a regular wardec than you are if you're in faction warfare. The exception being in space where concord hold sovereignty.
The entire reason my corp never even considered faction warfare as an option for highsec PVP was that the presence of faction navies rendered it totally pointless.
You may be overestimating the prowess of faction navies. They are surprisingly tankable. http://uglebsjournal.wordpress.com/ To contact [-MM-] or [UNITY]: http://www.masuataa.co.uk/defaul1t.asp - channel "Masuat'aa Public" http://www.ushrakhan.com/ - channel "Voices U'K" |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
356
|
Posted - 2012.10.31 21:51:00 -
[315] - Quote
Ugleb wrote:Personally I was commenting on the broken mechanics, not the specific random wars we somehow ended up in.
I really do not see why we can have three mutual wars that we can't leave that are all against entities we never interacted with directly. All without the alliance we originally war decced having to set the war mutual. If the point of this is to draw attention to broken mechanics, then we really should talk about it. This is absolutely true. The more awareness we can raise about the whole situation the faster we can get things fixed. Right now I'm trying to talk Pangu Coalition into letting me trap Brick Squad (but they're not sure if I'm on the level). God only knows why Brick would wardec people in this day and age... but I'm hopeful we can catch them too :P Burn Highsec Griefers |

Tysinger
Shoulda Checked Local Break-A-Wish Foundation
33
|
Posted - 2012.10.31 23:33:00 -
[316] - Quote
I for one, do not mind all the free decs :) I think we have like 30+ now and counting lolol |

Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local Break-A-Wish Foundation
914
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 02:08:00 -
[317] - Quote
kraiklyn Asatru wrote:Faction navies are easily avoided. People can still camp stations quite easily. Except they don't with any frequency. |

Mehashi 'Kho
Spiritus Draconis Sicarius Draconis
24
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 08:48:00 -
[318] - Quote
Vimsy Vortis wrote:kraiklyn Asatru wrote:Faction navies are easily avoided. People can still camp stations quite easily. Except they don't with any frequency. With respect, every day mate, at least in minny space. Cynthia nezmor and friends in Hek, trigger and his associates in Rens, and i remember back in gallente space - Villore fdu and Dodixie trade station being camped pretty frequently too. Not sure about Lituria, been a while since i've been that way. In a 0.5 all it takes is one med rep and some resists to perma tank the navy. |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
356
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 10:23:00 -
[319] - Quote
A chart made of our progress from the data points I had: http://i.imgur.com/X2Xm3.jpg Burn Highsec Griefers |

Tora Bushido
EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective
98
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 11:06:00 -
[320] - Quote
Tysinger wrote:I for one, do not mind all the free decs :) I think we have like 30+ now and counting lolol
Same here...... Almost at the point where we will make a statue for Zerg. He who brought more wars and loot.....
My resists to bad posts are 78-89-83-90 ....... The metal head plate increased it by 5%.
|
|

HoleySheet1
My L1ttl3 Pwny Dec Shield
92
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 12:18:00 -
[321] - Quote
You got a perty mouth boy! But seriously loot? im in! If killing ppl and causing grief to griefers aint enough. can i at least leave my handprint in the statue? GRIEFER GRIEFERS UNITE!!!!!!!!!! |

Tau Cabalander
Retirement Retreat Working Stiffs
1068
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 19:30:00 -
[322] - Quote
Because I'm stupid, could I get a clarification, please:
Can mutual wars be made non-mutual by the defender at any time? I thought once a war was made mutual, it would always remain mutual, i.e. if you threw the mutual switch, the switch would then break-off in your hand.
Or is a corp leaving an alliance considered a special event that changes alliance mutual wars to non-mutual (regular) corp wars?
Or does this only apply to wars the corp absorbed from the alliance, because it wasn't their war to begin with before they joined the alliance?
[Geez, for a "simple" mechanic it sure seems to be complicated.] |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
380
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 19:46:00 -
[323] - Quote
Tau Cabalander wrote:Because I'm stupid, could I get a clarification, please:
Can mutual wars be made non-mutual by the defender at any time? I thought once a war was made mutual, it would always remain mutual, i.e. if you threw the mutual switch, the switch would then break-off in your hand.
Or is a corp leaving an alliance considered a special event that changes alliance mutual wars to non-mutual (regular) corp wars?
Or does this only apply to wars the corp absorbed from the alliance, because it wasn't their war to begin with before they joined the alliance?
[Geez, for a "simple" mechanic it sure seems to be complicated.] I've never encountered any problems with toggling wars mutual or unmutual at any time. I remember old rumors that you weren't supposed to be able to toggle flip it back and forth constantly, or any time past the first 24hrs or something, but that doesn't seem to affect us if it's ingame at all. It's also possible that the act of joining/leaving the alliance creates a "new war" which then lets you toggle the switch again without any cooldowns created in the "previous" copy of the war.
Corps leaving the alliance have to manually toggle the wars to non-mutual, all 166 of them, lol. Make sure you use the drop down menu on the right side of the wardec interface though, the right click option doesn't work at all: http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/1210/togglingUnmutual.jpg
Burn Highsec Griefers |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
380
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 09:26:00 -
[324] - Quote
It saddens me to bring you this news, but Dark Tide Federation alliance just disbanded to get out of war. But their member corps are still stuck with the wars, so they can't use these corps to join a new alliance.
http://evemaps.dotlan.net/alliance/Dark_Tide_Federation/corporations
Their CEO was pleasant, and I regret doing this to them, but I couldn't make any exceptions. These mechanics really need to be fixed Burn Highsec Griefers |

Kaanchana
24th Imperial Crusade Amarr Empire
176
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 15:24:00 -
[325] - Quote
Just out of interest, will you let anyone join the corp as an individual? Any rules or payments etc?
And is there a place where i can see what are the corps/alliances trapped in war? (an out of game list) |

Crystal Kane
Blackwater Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 17:00:00 -
[326] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:It saddens me to bring you this news, but Dark Tide Federation alliance just disbanded to get out of war. But their member corps are still stuck with the wars, so they can't use these corps to join a new alliance. http://evemaps.dotlan.net/alliance/Dark_Tide_Federation/corporationsTheir CEO was pleasant, and I regret doing this to them, but I couldn't make any exceptions. These mechanics really need to be fixed
I am/was a member of Dark Tide Federation of which you mention. The corp that joined you guys was a griefer corp targeting our mining ops for can flipping so we decided to dec them. Legitimate in my opinion.
Do you have any systems in place for other griefer corps not exploiting your exploitation? :P
Sometimes HS wars happen for good reason. And our corporation/alliance has a very similar mindset regarding griefers. |

William M Gibson
Blackwater Logistics
0
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 17:36:00 -
[327] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:It saddens me to bring you this news, but Dark Tide Federation alliance just disbanded to get out of war. But their member corps are still stuck with the wars, so they can't use these corps to join a new alliance. http://evemaps.dotlan.net/alliance/Dark_Tide_Federation/corporationsTheir CEO was pleasant, and I regret doing this to them, but I couldn't make any exceptions. These mechanics really need to be fixed
Indeed, it is quite regettable...But I do not condone his actions, the mechanic is clearly broken and needs to be fixed. At this time however I must reform the entire alliance to escape this...He has his plans, and I have my own. I wish you luck in fixing this mechanic ZO. You run a good cause, and while some innocents do get trapped in the crossfire there'll be good changes to follow once this ends.
DTF will rise again.
o7 |

JustAnotherPlaceHolder
Content Providers
2
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 19:08:00 -
[328] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:It saddens me to bring you this news, but Dark Tide Federation alliance just disbanded to get out of war. But their member corps are still stuck with the wars, so they can't use these corps to join a new alliance. http://evemaps.dotlan.net/alliance/Dark_Tide_Federation/corporationsTheir CEO was pleasant, and I regret doing this to them, but I couldn't make any exceptions. These mechanics really need to be fixed Your crusade, while admirable, has one possible flaw: What if CCP doesn't change the mechanics? Do you have a plan for that?
Also, we'll (you guys and my corp) will be testing a new twist in all this. The corp we decced surrendered to us, but then joined your shield. We got the mail indicating we'd be decced in 24hrs, but the first war will end before that. I'm assuming we'll get drawn in anyway, but this will be an interesting test of this particular "bug"
Did CCP put any play testing into the new war dec mechanic? Clearly not.
edit: also, for those of you using this as a target hunting opportunity, the corp Barnim Libertines [BARLI] has an offline POS in Inari if you're looking for something to do (though I imagine you'd have to be desperate). |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
380
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 19:48:00 -
[329] - Quote
JustAnotherPlaceHolder wrote:The Zerg Overmind wrote:It saddens me to bring you this news, but Dark Tide Federation alliance just disbanded to get out of war. But their member corps are still stuck with the wars, so they can't use these corps to join a new alliance. http://evemaps.dotlan.net/alliance/Dark_Tide_Federation/corporationsTheir CEO was pleasant, and I regret doing this to them, but I couldn't make any exceptions. These mechanics really need to be fixed Your crusade, while admirable, has one possible flaw: What if CCP doesn't change the mechanics? Do you have a plan for that? Also, we'll (you guys and my corp) will be testing a new twist in all this. The corp we decced surrendered to us, but then joined your shield. We got the mail indicating we'd be decced in 24hrs, but the first war will end before that. I'm assuming we'll get drawn in anyway, but this will be an interesting test of this particular "bug" Did CCP put any play testing into the new war dec mechanic? Clearly not. edit: also, for those of you using this as a target hunting opportunity, the corp Barnim Libertines [BARLI] has an offline POS in Inari if you're looking for something to do (though I imagine you'd have to be desperate). Ya I just noticed this. So it sent you an email saying your war target was joining an alliance? Because if so that's new, and one of our proposed changes. If they ended the war before I hit accept on their application the war won't even register against Dec Shield.
I believe it's even possible to be at war with corporations in an alliance without being at war with the alliance, for up to 24hrs, if the war starts to end right before they join the alliance. I know I've seen it before, but can't remember the exact mechanics to reproduce it off the top of my head.
Edit: If CCP changes mechanics to stop this that doesn't ruin anything. That IS our goal here. Dec Shield has only ever been around to demonstrate loopholes in wardec mechanics. If there are no more loopholes and everything gets fixed then our mission is accomplished and everyone can celebrate. Burn Highsec Griefers |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
380
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 20:01:00 -
[330] - Quote
Okay, so new wardec exploit I just pieced together:
A few days ago we discovered how to get dead corps into alliances (corp applies to alliance, alliance accepts app, disband corp, corp then joins the alliance with 0 players). When you boot that corp from the alliance it gets copies of all the current wars, and they're all mutual against a dead corp. It is literally impossible now to ever set anyone free again because I can't access that corp.
In this way you can hold all wars permanent against dead corps without actually spending any characters to hold them prisoner. I believe you will be able to successfully petition this to remove the war, but this is a nasty one :P
Edit: See "Wong Wing Corporation" ingame Burn Highsec Griefers |
|

Zeus Maximo
Mentally Assured Destruction
4
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 20:33:00 -
[331] - Quote
Why would an alliance disband after being trapped in dec shield? If you are actually trapped then you are fine; if you join like holeysheet1 did then you aren't. Way too many trapped pirate/griefer/merc corps for anyone joining dec shield to be a threat.
Now if a legit corp were to actually join dec shield to get some targets then I would definitely approve of that.They would hold a trade hub for a day and then all of us tired of the notifications would travel there and take out our frustration Hell we even sat in jita in hopes of a "pro station pvper" to undock and think he owned the place. Our wish was never granted to say the least. Instead we went back to killing red fed and eve uni.
Zerg, something I do miss is the old mechanics. It was actually fun joining your alliance the day before the inferno patch and then waking up with 70 wars that were extended for a week! Those were the days..... People still accuse us of being carebears since we were in dec shield pre inferno 
|

Kronic Offender
Solarise Flares SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 20:41:00 -
[332] - Quote
The war dec system needs to be temporarily placed on hold as it is broken. A new system that allows corps to deny the war dec needs to be developed in it's place. |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
380
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 21:11:00 -
[333] - Quote
Zeus Maximo wrote:Why would an alliance disband after being trapped in dec shield? If you are actually trapped then you are fine; if you join like holeysheet1 did then you aren't. Way too many trapped pirate/griefer/merc corps for anyone joining dec shield to be a threat. Now if a legit corp were to actually join dec shield to get some targets then I would definitely approve of that.They would hold a trade hub for a day and then all of us tired of the notifications would travel there and take out our frustration  Hell we even sat in jita in hopes of a "pro station pvper" to undock and think he owned the place. Our wish was never granted to say the least. Instead we went back to killing red fed and eve uni. Zerg, something I do miss is the old mechanics. It was actually fun joining your alliance the day before the inferno patch and then waking up with 70 wars that were extended for a week! Those were the days..... People still accuse us of being carebears since we were in dec shield pre inferno  They disbanded the alliance because they plan to reform a new alliance that isn't trapped with a wardec. But they'll need to disband their current corps as well first.
And pre-Inferno we had a number of pvpers in Dec Shield. I would offer to share all our wars with you, but you're a corp so I can't give them to you. We have a different set of pvpers now, because all the old pvpers are trapped by us in corps, and thus can't get access to our wars. I think the only large pvp entity that is actually making use of our wars is Moar Tears. There are plenty of smaller ones in alliance and floating about though.
For pvpers who want to join Dec Shield but don't know what corp to join, I recommend one of these:
Wiking Brigade My L1ttl3 Pony Blades of Doom Lethal Death Squad
I don't know which are the most active or anything though Burn Highsec Griefers |

JustAnotherPlaceHolder
Content Providers
2
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 22:52:00 -
[334] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:Ya I just noticed this. So it sent you an email saying your war target was joining an alliance? Because if so that's new, and one of our proposed changes. If they ended the war before I hit accept on their application the war won't even register against Dec Shield.
I believe it's even possible to be at war with corporations in an alliance without being at war with the alliance, for up to 24hrs, if the war starts to end right before they join the alliance. I know I've seen it before, but can't remember the exact mechanics to reproduce it off the top of my head.
Edit: If CCP changes mechanics to stop this that doesn't ruin anything. That IS our goal here. Dec Shield has only ever been around to demonstrate loopholes in wardec mechanics. If there are no more loopholes and everything gets fixed then our mission is accomplished and everyone can celebrate. Basic order of operations was: defender corp surrenders, I accept, I get the mail that says war ends in 24hrs. About 3 or 4 hrs later, I get the mail that says defender has joined an alliance and I'll be at war with the alliance.
I get back today and right this minute the war dec vs the defender corp is over. The alliance dec starts (or is scheduled to start) at 00:04. So we'll see in 2 hrs.
I wasn't asking what you'll do if they fix wardecs, but what you'll do if they don't. Having read the post above about dead corps, it looks like you're out of options! lol
Interesting approach to solving this problem. I hope it works. I can think of some other things that could use the ad absurdum treatment. |

JustAnotherPlaceHolder
Content Providers
2
|
Posted - 2012.11.03 00:23:00 -
[335] - Quote
As of 00:21. exactly 24hrs after receiving the defender joining alliance mail, no decs have transferred. The defender corp doesn't show as in the alliance nor does it show it in its alliance history, so maybe there's a timing thing.
edit: 01:15, defender corp is now in Dec Shield. Still no wars for us. Looks like the evemail may get sent no matter what.
edit: 02:11, still no wars. so confirming defender corp that surrenders before being accepted into the alliance doesn't draw the aggressor into the dec shield, but eve mail warning is still sent.
have fun guys |

Eve Scion
Time To Cry
0
|
Posted - 2012.11.03 10:07:00 -
[336] - Quote
I left manually the alliance after you absorbed my wardec thank you sooo much BUT :
I got back all the wars of the alliance 170 wardec in my Mailbox  i set all absorbed wars to non-mutual manually (damn...)
how long I have to wait so that these wars stop ? Because I have half of the galaxy on the bottom
sorry for my crappy english
Best Regard |

Arduemont
Rotten Legion Ops
585
|
Posted - 2012.11.03 10:46:00 -
[337] - Quote
I hope this gets sorted soon.
This is probably the biggest in-game ****-up facing Eve at the moment. Let's hope they can find some development times to fix this for retribution. "In the age of information, ignorance is a choice." |

Ben Youssef Noban
Sons of the Prophet
9
|
Posted - 2012.11.03 13:10:00 -
[338] - Quote
3 weeks from the time Goonswarm Federation gets infected will be the fix (but it probably won't be a very good one).
|

VegasMirage
247
|
Posted - 2012.11.03 17:35:00 -
[339] - Quote
Consequences. likes watching grown men cry-á (Gò»n+¦Gò¦,) |

JustAnotherPlaceHolder
Content Providers
2
|
Posted - 2012.11.03 17:57:00 -
[340] - Quote
VegasMirage wrote:Consequences. Allow me to finish your sentence...
Consequences... there are none. (If you planned ahead to drop corp)
Once again, as with the old war dec system, the only people war decs affect are those who are attached to their corp name or have a POS they can't take down quickly. Wardecs affect no one else with half a brain.
|
|

Eve Scion
Time To Cry
0
|
Posted - 2012.11.03 20:09:00 -
[341] - Quote
No solution to my problem? |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
380
|
Posted - 2012.11.03 20:23:00 -
[342] - Quote
Eve Scion wrote:No solution to my problem? The wardecs will drop off within a week. Some will drop off sooner, many will offer surrenders. I'm afraid there's no way to avoid the wardecs copying in both directions, yet...
Ben Youssef Noban wrote:3 weeks from the time Goonswarm Federation gets infected will be the fix (but it probably won't be a very good one). Goonswarm are actually trapped in an outgoing wardec, but not against us. Going on two weeks now, so next week we should hear a solution :P Burn Highsec Griefers |

Megos Adriano
Rifterlings Damu'Khonde
25
|
Posted - 2012.11.03 20:32:00 -
[343] - Quote
Vimsy Vortis wrote:kraiklyn Asatru wrote:Faction navies are easily avoided. People can still camp stations quite easily. Except they don't with any frequency.
http://eve-kill.net/?a=pilot_detail&plt_id=259003
http://eve-kill.net/?a=pilot_detail&plt_id=751830 And boom goes the dynamite. |

Lin-Young Borovskova
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
883
|
Posted - 2012.11.03 20:49:00 -
[344] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:Eve Scion wrote:No solution to my problem? The wardecs will drop off within a week. Some will drop off sooner, many will offer surrenders. I'm afraid there's no way to avoid the wardecs copying in both directions, yet... Ben Youssef Noban wrote:3 weeks from the time Goonswarm Federation gets infected will be the fix (but it probably won't be a very good one). Goonswarm are actually trapped in an outgoing wardec, but not against us. Going on two weeks now, so next week we should hear a solution :P
Aren't you underestimating how much Goonswarm would like to have all high sec valid target without concord intervention?
At least it's what we can read all around the forum from some GS players but I actually doubt. brb |

Eve Scion
Time To Cry
0
|
Posted - 2012.11.03 21:50:00 -
[345] - Quote
Thank you for your reply zerg but it is a bug or it is normal?
How to survive in these conditions for a young corporation ?
Next time i would lead the war in a conventional way... |

Wacktopia
Noir. Noir. Mercenary Group
281
|
Posted - 2012.11.04 12:44:00 -
[346] - Quote
Arduemont wrote:I hope this gets sorted soon.
This is probably the biggest in-game ****-up facing Eve at the moment. Let's hope they can find some development times to fix this for retribution.
It's p. bad. CCP do know about it of course and hopefully they're working or at least thinking of a solution.
In the mean time, grab your shotguns! The bottom line is that now I have one of those annoying signatures. |

KushHaze
Havoc Violence and Chaos BricK sQuAD.
0
|
Posted - 2012.11.04 16:16:00 -
[347] - Quote
What a great thread, sounds like something RvB could get into. |

Reaver Glitterstim
Dromedaworks inc
218
|
Posted - 2012.11.04 17:04:00 -
[348] - Quote
I can't wait till Decshield and all participants realize they're no match for Goons.
This will be way more fun than watching Jita burn. -á"The Mittani: Hated By Badposters i'm strangely comfortable with it" -Mittens |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
381
|
Posted - 2012.11.05 01:00:00 -
[349] - Quote
KushHaze wrote:What a great thread, sounds like something RvB could get into. RvB is already involved, we have both sides trapped against us.
Reaver Glitterstim wrote:I can't wait till Decshield and all participants realize they're no match for Goons.
This will be way more fun than watching Jita burn. Goonswarm is trapped by someone else, not us
Eve Scion wrote:Thank you for your reply zerg but it is a bug or it is normal?
How to survive in these conditions for a young corporation ?
Next time i would lead the war in a conventional way... But doing things conventionally is so dull Burn Highsec Griefers |

Eve Scion
Time To Cry
1
|
Posted - 2012.11.05 03:11:00 -
[350] - Quote
This presumed Removal Wardec system is a pure trap...
we are in deep **** because i simply wanted to protect my young corporation of a free and potential mortal agression by a PVP Corp in High Sec...
In the end we have half of the galaxy against us just for avoid one war wtf that system sucks
Without speaking about morons who try to take advantage of it. |
|

Tah'ris Khlador
Space Ghosts. Break-A-Wish Foundation
229
|
Posted - 2012.11.05 03:53:00 -
[351] - Quote
Eve Scion wrote:This presumed Removal Wardec system is a pure trap...
we are in deep **** because i simply wanted to protect my young corporation of a free and potential mortal agression by a PVP Corp in High Sec...
In the end we have half of the galaxy against us just for avoid one war wtf that system sucks
Without speaking about morons who try to take advantage of it.
I wish simply the peace and return to the anonymity.
This occurred because you did not properly research what you were getting yourself into, and you were looking to take advantage of a mechanic that was also already fixed for being horribly broken as well.
On a positive note, whoever decced you first is now trapped with Dec Shield, presuming they weren't before you joined Dec Shield. If they were prior to, then this is just hilarious. |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
384
|
Posted - 2012.11.05 04:14:00 -
[352] - Quote
"Hi, I'm a one month old player with my own 1 person corp. I was recently wardec'd by some griefers who see me as an easy target (I'm writing this while trapped in a station). Please make their life a living hell. And thanks for offering such a great service. --- "
*Accepted his app* *Goes from being camped in station by 8 players to being camped in by 11,000 players* http://images.wikia.com/dragonage/images/2/2a/Anchorman-well-that-escalated-quickly.jpg Burn Highsec Griefers |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
393
|
Posted - 2012.11.05 10:17:00 -
[353] - Quote
Exploit of the day:
Building off the previous bug of allowing dead corporations into alliance, apparently you can make identical copies of those corporations at the same time.
Step 1.) Make a corporation Step 2.) Apply to join alliance Step 3.) Alliance hits accept on your application Step 4.) Disband the corporation Step 5.) Reform the corporation with identical name, ticker, etc Step 6.) Repeat steps 2-5 as many times as desired Step 7.) Enjoy your clones
The test corp used was "Unstable Mitosis [XPLTR]" founded by "The Cloner"
http://mobileinfantry.free.fr/pics/would-you-like-to-know-more.jpg Burn Highsec Griefers |

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
2779
|
Posted - 2012.11.05 19:15:00 -
[354] - Quote
I'm so glad the CSM and CCP Soundwave spent so long perfecting the Inferno 1.1 wardec changes to prevent abuse of the system.
The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedomInferno Wardecs - Shoot Goons for FREE $300,000 dollars :(-á |

Shizuken
Venerated Stars
120
|
Posted - 2012.11.05 20:24:00 -
[355] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:Bienator II wrote:don't call it dec shield. call it "its a trap" or "ackbar foundation" lol good names, but Dec Shield is what we have, notorious and evil. We've just acquired our first war with a sov holding nullsec alliance. I'm sure they'll be most displeased tomorrow when they learn that they're permanently screwed. The tears of our enemies will sustain us. By the time we're through with the game, the act of declaring war will be so hideous and unthinkable that wardecs will stop entirely. CCP will once again be forced to change wardec mechanics to stop us. Start the countdown.
Lol, where do I sign up to invest in this? Or do you take donations? |

Casirio
DEEP-SPACE CO-OP LTD Exhale.
104
|
Posted - 2012.11.05 23:24:00 -
[356] - Quote
so what's this rumour about TEST being trapped? c/d? |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
405
|
Posted - 2012.11.05 23:35:00 -
[357] - Quote
TEST has just taken on 9 mutual wardecs of their choosing:
Manifest Destiny. C0VEN One. The Marmite Collective The Hollow Men Lonetrek Salvage and Scrap The Skunkworks Kicking Smurfs Spatial Distortions
They obtained these wars from Dec Shield and brought them back to their alliance. TEST is however NOT trapped. TEST are the defending side in these wars. So if the wars don't work out for them they can selective unmutual and drop them. I am surprised that they would willingly choose to have mutual wars with so many highsec griefers though. It will be quite interesting for the chosen 9 :P Burn Highsec Griefers |

Zeus Maximo
Mentally Assured Destruction
4
|
Posted - 2012.11.06 01:51:00 -
[358] - Quote
I feel unworthy of not being chosen :(
But...... guerrilla warfare is the worst warfare!
btw: I feel special to live in the time of zerg. He has a doctorate in warfare and a masters in concord law. Nothing gets by him  |

Not Xolve
State War Academy Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.11.06 06:36:00 -
[359] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:TEST has just taken on 9 mutual wardecs of their choosing:
Manifest Destiny. C0VEN One. The Marmite Collective The Hollow Men Lonetrek Salvage and Scrap The Skunkworks Kicking Smurfs Spatial Distortions
They obtained these wars from Dec Shield and brought them back to their alliance. TEST is however NOT trapped. TEST are the defending side in these wars. So if the wars don't work out for them they can selective unmutual and drop them. I am surprised that they would willingly choose to have mutual wars with so many highsec griefers though. It will be quite interesting for the chosen 9 :P
Because out of alliance logistics are hard right? |

Kc Decartes
Syndicate Holdings
73
|
Posted - 2012.11.06 06:43:00 -
[360] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:TEST has just taken on 9 mutual wardecs of their choosing:
Manifest Destiny. C0VEN One. The Marmite Collective The Hollow Men Lonetrek Salvage and Scrap The Skunkworks Kicking Smurfs Spatial Distortions
They obtained these wars from Dec Shield and brought them back to their alliance. TEST is however NOT trapped. TEST are the defending side in these wars. So if the wars don't work out for them they can selective unmutual and drop them. I am surprised that they would willingly choose to have mutual wars with so many highsec griefers though. It will be quite interesting for the chosen 9 :P
who the fck is test, and why should I care? I call shenanigans good sir.
Regards,
..:):-)
D.F.C.S.
no TRUST in mankind no confidence IN government there will never be enduring FREEDOM. |
|

Tora Bushido
EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective
98
|
Posted - 2012.11.06 12:31:00 -
[361] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote: The Marmite Collective The Hollow Men Lonetrek Salvage and Scrap The Skunkworks Kicking Smurfs Spatial Distortions
All corps that are or have been in The Marmite Alliance...... We don't have problems with this war dec. If we stick to guerrilla war far, they will have issues. If we go fleet fights, station hugging......we might have issues 
A good way to get better is to fight a good big alliance. And remember guys.....its a game  My resists to bad posts are 78-89-83-90 ....... The metal head plate increased it by 5%.
|

Reticle
Sight Picture
76
|
Posted - 2012.11.06 18:45:00 -
[362] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:TEST has just taken on 9 mutual wardecs of their choosing:
Manifest Destiny. C0VEN One. The Marmite Collective The Hollow Men Lonetrek Salvage and Scrap The Skunkworks Kicking Smurfs Spatial Distortions
They obtained these wars from Dec Shield and brought them back to their alliance. TEST is however NOT trapped. TEST are the defending side in these wars. So if the wars don't work out for them they can selective unmutual and drop them. I am surprised that they would willingly choose to have mutual wars with so many highsec griefers though. It will be quite interesting for the chosen 9 :P How did they do this? How did they manage to selectively choose the wars? I don't understand the mechanics. |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
412
|
Posted - 2012.11.06 20:40:00 -
[363] - Quote
Reticle wrote:The Zerg Overmind wrote:TEST has just taken on 9 mutual wardecs of their choosing:
Manifest Destiny. C0VEN One. The Marmite Collective The Hollow Men Lonetrek Salvage and Scrap The Skunkworks Kicking Smurfs Spatial Distortions
They obtained these wars from Dec Shield and brought them back to their alliance. TEST is however NOT trapped. TEST are the defending side in these wars. So if the wars don't work out for them they can selective unmutual and drop them. I am surprised that they would willingly choose to have mutual wars with so many highsec griefers though. It will be quite interesting for the chosen 9 :P How did they do this? How did they manage to selectively choose the wars? I don't understand the mechanics. A corp joins Dec Shield, then leaves. They then set all the wars they don't want to unmutual, wait a week for them to drop off. Then they're left with only mutual wars against people they want to fight, and then they apply with that corp to their alliance. And 24hrs later that alliance has the wars of their choosing.
Anyone is welcome to join Dec Shield and do the same to selectively poach wars they want from our epic stockpile of them :P Burn Highsec Griefers |

Tora Bushido
EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective
98
|
Posted - 2012.11.06 22:46:00 -
[364] - Quote
Yeh, same here. If you have a corp......send me a mail, join alliance and leave. Tadaa .... many wars for at least a week  My resists to bad posts are 78-89-83-90 ....... The metal head plate increased it by 5%.
|

Solstice Project
Carebear Cadaver Productions
2032
|
Posted - 2012.11.06 23:47:00 -
[365] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote: A corp joins Dec Shield, then leaves. They then set all the wars they don't want to unmutual, wait a week for them to drop off. Then they're left with only mutual wars against people they want to fight, and then they apply with that corp to their alliance. And 24hrs later that alliance has the wars of their choosing.
Anyone is welcome to join Dec Shield and do the same to selectively poach wars they want from our epic stockpile of them :P
OMG !! O_O
Perfect explanation for what i wanted to know !
So i can hop in and out and i have 11k more targets to shoot at.
That's not a bug, that's a feature ! Inappropriate signature removed. Spitfire |

Bugsy VanHalen
Society of lost Souls
232
|
Posted - 2012.11.07 18:53:00 -
[366] - Quote
Karah Serrigan wrote:The Zerg Overmind wrote:Destiny Corrupted wrote:The Zerg Overmind wrote:Any corporations that drop out of C0VEN I believe will remain in permanent outgoing wardecs, and never be able to join an alliance again (corps with outgoing wars can't join alliances). What the ****, are you for real? Is that the way it actually works? I'm not into alliance stuff, so I don't have firsthand experience, but is this the way it works now? How is this even a thing? :\ I'm pretty sure that's how it works, but I haven't explicitly tested it yet. The more ways I carve it, the more ways I find our victims are screwed. If this is really how it works i see no future for your business because there is no way this wont be taken as an exploit and fixed. This is how it works. I am glad to see others also feel it is an exploit. There is another thread where a small corp Romanian Renegades I believe it is (a Corp founded in 2003) has been hit hard by this "fixed" mechanic.
They joined a faction wars alliance with the intention of getting into faction wars PVP. The alliance they joined then war deced a corp of their own faction. RR did not agree with this war dec and left the alliance. They had no say in whether or not the war was declared. The alliance leader does not need consent from the member corps to declare war. Yet they inherited the aggressor flag even when leaving the alliance because they did not support the war. When they left the alliance the deced corp made the war mutual and they are now locked in a mutual war and can not join another alliance. They were not really the aggressor and were against the war, but inherited the aggressor flag as the war was started by their before they left.
They do not want to disband this corp as it has a long history. They have been together since the beginning of EVE. Yet that is there only means of shedding this war they did not start due to broken aggressor flag mechanics.
I support Dec shield for forcing this flaw into the public eye. Only a few weeks since this patch went live and they have there first SOV holding alliance locked into mutual war. If this happens to an Alliance witha member sitting on the CSM you can be sure it will be fixed. |

Bugsy VanHalen
Society of lost Souls
232
|
Posted - 2012.11.07 18:58:00 -
[367] - Quote
Tora Bushido wrote:Yeh, same here. If you have a corp......send me a mail, join alliance and leave. Tadaa .... many wars for at least a week  As long as you make those wars mutual before they notice and retract them I believe they will become permanent wars. This is where the exploit comes in. Only the defender has the power to end the war. Even if your corp gets the wars through this broken mechanic. |

Vincent Athena
V.I.C.E.
1122
|
Posted - 2012.11.07 23:18:00 -
[368] - Quote
Im wondering how much of this is really an exploit or different from "working as intended". Zerg talks about burning high sec griefers, burning corps, burning alliances. Maybe its all as planned.
Maybe that is why the expansion was called Inferno.
Im thinking all of this drama, hilarity and spreading of wars is exactly what CCP wanted to see. Greifers burning! Corps burning! Wars spreading like fire! Inferno success! http://vincentoneve.wordpress.com/ |

Catalyst XI
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
16
|
Posted - 2012.11.07 23:48:00 -
[369] - Quote
^ i believe its called "war aids"....... |

Nir Trild
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.11.08 04:29:00 -
[370] - Quote
Vincent Athena wrote:Im wondering how much of this is really an exploit or different from "working as intended". Zerg talks about burning high sec griefers, burning corps, burning alliances. Maybe its all as planned.
Maybe that is why the expansion was called Inferno.
Im thinking all of this drama, hilarity and spreading of wars is exactly what CCP wanted to see. Greifers burning! Corps burning! Wars spreading like fire! Inferno success!
lol no.
then would been every (nearly) other feature of inferno a trap ...or even a lie!
Because the surrender mechanic, which should work for sure now is pointless like the whole new ally system...or kicking allies out of a war as soon as it would make mutual.
Because you can (backup) copys of your war.
And because a war should be something between TWO entitys ccp says: http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Wars
I like to quote the following
Musiaba Schenoly wrote:... Mercs and new ally-system are not needed anymore, gj!  Just copy your war! Perhaps make it mutual and transfer it - to a dead corp or a fake alliance like dec shield - wherever you like! And the evil evil evil highsec griefers - ccp may ban 'em, hello kitty will prevail! - are stucked in an infinite war. Who needs a working sandbox, if you can trap them like that? You wd someone with something more than an one-man-and-his-alt corp? Fail! Forever no highsec logistics, no incursions with organized fleets anymore. You want to join a new alliance? Oh sry - its gamemechanically impossible! Because you have an MUTUAL outgoing war to someone, who get it from someone - who copied it from someone you never have seen or known! What you are complaining? You will get some notifications every day! An alliance with dec shields wars tries to recruit you and you haven't already outgoing wars? You could have such a fine and long war history (one or two wars may result in no kills and no losses, or even more than one or two? But don't care you are a fine pvp-corp) - just join! Ofc it will be your last alliance! Oh, what about joining any other alliance? You should be true - it could be your last again! Although they aren't already in dec shields wars: They got problems with you and want to make you never ever join another alliance? Np, they could dec an alt-corp, which makes the war mutual to boot you then, the alt-corp could set the resulting war mutual to the booted corp and surrender to the alliance! ( https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2099149#post2099149) And ALL this is NOT griefplay? Don't care what the initiator of dec shield may tell us here https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1957430 ! But nvm! everything works like intended:  It may be the isk-sink everybody demands - finally, yay! Because everytime you decced someone or want something to do like discribed, the solution is soo easy (dunno who adviseed it anymore but makes sense in this context) you can always disband the corporation and reform a new one. Ofc that wouldn't be corp-hopping to avoid wars, what was already addressed in the past somehow. That all may seem a little bit complicated or even strange, but perhaps ccp could make an addon in the remote future, what advances highsec war mechanic ...oh wait.
|
|

Andreus Ixiris
Mixed Metaphor
1134
|
Posted - 2012.11.08 15:21:00 -
[371] - Quote
This is a disgusting abuse of a bugged system and you are a horrible person for exploiting it.
You're also awesome and hilarious and I love you. Mane 614
|

Musiaba Schenoly
FIRST AID SERVICE GROUP
1
|
Posted - 2012.11.08 16:51:00 -
[372] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:Dec Shield is back once again to use wardec mechanics to inflict grief upon your enemies.
The Plan: ...
Edit: Wording changed to match our forum rules, CCP Phantom
nice1, any other comments ccp Phantom? |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
423
|
Posted - 2012.11.08 20:14:00 -
[373] - Quote
Musiaba Schenoly wrote:The Zerg Overmind wrote:Dec Shield is back once again to use wardec mechanics to inflict grief upon your enemies.
The Plan: Due to current wardec mechanics, ...
Edit: Wording changed to match our forum rules, CCP Phantom nice1, any other comments ccp Phantom? LOL, he changed the word ABUSE to USE in the first sentence. We just got trolled Burn Highsec Griefers |

Tah'ris Khlador
Space Ghosts. Break-A-Wish Foundation
237
|
Posted - 2012.11.08 20:30:00 -
[374] - Quote
I am presently initiating an operation to create a "Forever War" with a particular alliance of non-interest. I was decidedly way too giddy when I realized I could accomplish this task. This might be a sign that I play too much eve. |

Tora Bushido
EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective
100
|
Posted - 2012.11.09 11:14:00 -
[375] - Quote
No idea why people keep calling this an exploit. Its an error by design.  My resists to bad posts are 78-89-83-90 ....... The metal head plate increased it by 5%.
|

Brib Vogt
DC-centre Destiny's Call
2
|
Posted - 2012.11.09 16:46:00 -
[376] - Quote
CCP Tallest wrote:Permanent war decs will be fixed in Retribution. We have made it so that in a mutual war, the original aggressor has the option of retracting the war. And by "we have made it so", I mean Punkturis has made it so. |

Tah'ris Khlador
Space Ghosts. Break-A-Wish Foundation
241
|
Posted - 2012.11.09 19:22:00 -
[377] - Quote
Brib Vogt wrote:CCP Tallest wrote:Permanent war decs will be fixed in Retribution. We have made it so that in a mutual war, the original aggressor has the option of retracting the war. And by "we have made it so", I mean Punkturis has made it so.
Can you link where this is posted? That is a poor fix, but I'd rather reply to the original post than here. |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
445
|
Posted - 2012.11.11 00:42:00 -
[378] - Quote
We've officially crossed 12k players trapped Burn Highsec Griefers |

ZaBob
Twilight Labs Unsung Voices
272
|
Posted - 2012.11.11 10:18:00 -
[379] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:We've officially crossed 12k players trapped.
We also just got an interesting case. We just trapped "o7 Mate" corp against Dec Shield. But in the 24hrs before their we got their war, they applied to Dec Shield. Corps that apply to an alliance are still able to make outgoing wars, but once accepted they'll be trapped in permanent limbo of the "Accepted" state. Now this guy is trapped in that state, forever :P
It looks like they got unstuck? |

Kc Decartes
Syndicate Holdings
73
|
Posted - 2012.11.11 10:36:00 -
[380] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:We've officially crossed 12k players trapped.
We also just got an interesting case. We just trapped "o7 Mate" corp against Dec Shield. But in the 24hrs before their we got their war, they applied to Dec Shield. Corps that apply to an alliance are still able to make outgoing wars, but once accepted they'll be trapped in permanent limbo of the "Accepted" state. Now this guy is trapped in that state, forever :P
Nobody cares anymore Zerg. The exploit is about to be patched. Thank you for the ***** and giggles though, they've been fun.
Time to stop trolling and move on. This glass house is about to have a stone tossed through it's front door.
Cya around.
KcD D.F.C.S.
no TRUST in mankind no confidence IN government there will never be enduring FREEDOM. |
|

Goonspiracy
Hedion University Amarr Empire
114
|
Posted - 2012.11.11 19:44:00 -
[381] - Quote
Dec Shield + Goonswarm. Controlling your game in ways that you can't begin to understand... |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
446
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 02:48:00 -
[382] - Quote
Kc Decartes wrote:lulz From: Kc Decartes Sent: 2012.11.12 02:41 To: The Zerg Overmind,
Your ***** are falling apart. Keep in mind we told u they would, almost 4 months ago now. I wanted to take this time to thank you for the giggles you've provided.
Ofc though you know that I'll always market towards your down fall. I never said one word on the fourms that I didn't mean.
I'm going to dance with you well after the dec game has ended. As if I was not on your comms since the birth of what you made your name with.
Cya around hero,
KcD The amazing thing is that you STILL don't understand our motives
Kc Decartes wrote:Re: Re: lulz From: Kc Decartes Sent: 2012.11.12 02:47 To: The Zerg Overmind,
I do understand, only on a more grand lvl then you. In the long run, it is you who does not understand. Burn Highsec Griefers |

Kc Decartes
Syndicate Holdings
78
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 03:04:00 -
[383] - Quote
It just tickles me pink that you still care about little ol' me
xD
Re: Re: lulz From: Kc Decartes Sent: 2012.11.12 03:19 To: The Zerg Overmind,
Step outside of jita or 1.0 and see how unarmed I am....
Re: lulz From: The Zerg Overmind Sent: 2012.11.12 03:18 To: Kc Decartes,
I don't need to defend myself against an unarmed man
****** end
lulz
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7cufG2Dlxvk D.F.C.S.
no TRUST in mankind no confidence IN government there will never be enduring FREEDOM. |

Isana Tori
What's A Paladin
2
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 04:30:00 -
[384] - Quote
Do people not really get what we're doing here? Do they really think the fix hurts us somehow? |

Emerald Decartes
Syndicate Holdings
39
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 04:31:00 -
[385] - Quote
Isana Tori wrote:Do people not really get what we're doing here? Do they really think the fix hurts us somehow?
I guess time will tell... D.F.C.S. no TRUST in mankind no confidence IN goverment there will never be enduring FREEDOM. |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
446
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 04:41:00 -
[386] - Quote
How are you still failing to realize that the announced fix to wardecs has been our goal THE ENTIRE TIME. We won our goal and you can't seem to grasp that. We've ALL won because of this. Burn Highsec Griefers |

Emerald Decartes
Syndicate Holdings
39
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 04:50:00 -
[387] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:How are you still failing to realize that the announced fix to wardecs has been our goal THE ENTIRE TIME. We won our goal and you can't seem to grasp that. We've ALL won because of this.
lulz...
F A I L
Nice contribution on your way out.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1NCV2vmQT_4
Say what you will... lets see what dec shield is in 6 months... lol
We are your future. Trolls that can see though your trolling and to the next lvl of troll-ism. I'm sad you didn't see this coming. You act so smart. You should have seen us sleeping in your bed. D.F.C.S. no TRUST in mankind no confidence IN goverment there will never be enduring FREEDOM. |

Cordo Draken
ABOS Industrial Enterprises
22
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 05:37:00 -
[388] - Quote
Emerald Decartes wrote:The Zerg Overmind wrote:How are you still failing to realize that the announced fix to wardecs has been our goal THE ENTIRE TIME. We won our goal and you can't seem to grasp that. We've ALL won because of this. lulz... F A I L Nice contribution on your way out. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1NCV2vmQT_4Say what you will... lets see what dec shield is in 6 months... lol We are your future. Trolls that can see though your trolling and to the next lvl of troll-ism. I'm sad you didn't see this coming. You act so smart. You should have seen us sleeping in your bed.
Hey Man, I admit that I originally misread the intentions here by Dec Shield, Largely due to not reading the OP and just posting my love of added targets. After clearly reading the OP, Dec Shield was providing us all a service and I applaud him. There are just those that have taken up on either side to grab kills on the unsuspecting, either Fail Bears or fail Pvpers. The truly sad thing is that CCP probably wouldn't have done squat about it if Goons hadn't been caught up in this effect. Now Perhaps that's a red herring, but even still with the slight fix... War Decs still don't do properly what they should! I.E. Promote combat interaction from both sides, Aggressors & Defenders. Until they develop a sensible system that does that, wars will seem lopsided to most. More work needs to be done... Another Team of Devs that PROPERLY understand what the community Needs. Casue they clearly missed it this time around IMO. eëÆWhomever said, "You only get one shot to make a good impression," was utterly wrong. I've made plenty of great impressions with my AutocannonseëÆ eÉà |

DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
439
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 05:49:00 -
[389] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:How are you still failing to realize that the announced fix to wardecs has been our goal THE ENTIRE TIME. We won our goal and you can't seem to grasp that. We've ALL won because of this.
You only won after the Goons got Decc Trapped trapped by Manifest Destiney Just like the last war decc change was instigated only after the Goons got dogpiled& trapped by Jade Constintine LESSON LEARNED : if you don't affect the major NULL Alliances jack won't get changed until after you do  Meta-gaming for NULL SECCers: Whine on the forums like a little ***** until CCP gets sick of you and hands you everything you ask for just to shut you up.-á Typical NULL seccer whine: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6u299-o66wo&feature=related |

Juda Decartes
Syndicate Holdings
1
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 07:25:00 -
[390] - Quote
Cordo Draken wrote:Emerald Decartes wrote:The Zerg Overmind wrote:How are you still failing to realize that the announced fix to wardecs has been our goal THE ENTIRE TIME. We won our goal and you can't seem to grasp that. We've ALL won because of this. lulz... F A I L Nice contribution on your way out. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1NCV2vmQT_4Say what you will... lets see what dec shield is in 6 months... lol We are your future. Trolls that can see though your trolling and to the next lvl of troll-ism. I'm sad you didn't see this coming. You act so smart. You should have seen us sleeping in your bed. Hey Man, I admit that I originally misread the intentions here by Dec Shield, Largely due to not reading the OP and just posting my love of added targets. After clearly reading the OP, Dec Shield was providing us all a service and I applaud him. There are just those that have taken up on either side to grab kills on the unsuspecting, either Fail Bears or fail Pvpers. The truly sad thing is that CCP probably wouldn't have done squat about it if Goons hadn't been caught up in this effect. Now Perhaps that's a red herring, but even still with the slight fix... War Decs still don't do properly what they should! I.E. Promote combat interaction from both sides, Aggressors & Defenders. Until they develop a sensible system that does that, wars will seem lopsided to most. More work needs to be done... Another Team of Devs that PROPERLY understand what the community Needs. Casue they clearly missed it this time around IMO.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wjQdaPDdseY
You never touched us, nor seen what we could do, we were and are more then you could ever be, by via flight with this pistol
|
|

Isana Tori
What's A Paladin
2
|
Posted - 2012.11.13 05:32:00 -
[391] - Quote
The "Of Cartes" guy with many alts (and I still have no idea where Cartes is) comes close to winning best troll for this thread.
Vague threats and misunderstanding of overall purpose gave this thread life and for that I thank him. Why he would post on several accounts pretending to be different people is beyond me but I don't judge much. |

Ryder McGrump
Chaos From Order Manifest Destiny.
0
|
Posted - 2012.11.13 15:38:00 -
[392] - Quote
Ben Youssef Noban wrote: 3 weeks from the time Goonswarm Federation gets infected will be the fix (but it probably won't be a very good one).
From the time we made the war with Goonswarm " MUTUAL "
It did indeed take approximately 3 weeks before CCP announced that they were looking at the war dec system. Maybe they were looking at it already, but they should of told everyone that they were. As of now Eve players will always have the impression that the war system which most knew was broken ONLY ever gets fixed when it affects a Large null sec entity.
And before everyone starts complaining about my post..let it be known i have no problems with war....i have over 18,000 war targets atm :-) . As i am also in a Mutual war with TEST and many others, tbh i can't be bothered to to count the wars we have atm, it keeps increasing and when i see a war target if at all possible it will assplode in a ball of flames ( maybe it might even be me that assplodes ) |

Kc Decartes
Syndicate Holdings
78
|
Posted - 2012.11.13 19:47:00 -
[393] - Quote
Isana Tori wrote:The "Of Cartes" guy with many alts (and I still have no idea where Cartes is) comes close to winning best troll for this thread.
Vague threats and misunderstanding of overall purpose gave this thread life and for that I thank him. Why he would post on several accounts pretending to be different people is beyond me but I don't judge much.
\o/
I win

D.F.C.S.
no TRUST in mankind no confidence IN government there will never be enduring FREEDOM. |

Emerald Decartes
Syndicate Holdings
39
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 01:17:00 -
[394] - Quote
Isana Tori wrote:The "Of Cartes" guy with many alts (and I still have no idea where Cartes is) comes close to winning best troll for this thread.
Vague threats and misunderstanding of overall purpose gave this thread life and for that I thank him. Why he would post on several accounts pretending to be different people is beyond me but I don't judge much.
\o/ ..| eah we won eve :-))
and Kc made this thread... just for you Isana, so you're welcome, and that comes from all of us.
Sffff xD D.F.C.S. no TRUST in mankind no confidence IN goverment there will never be enduring FREEDOM. |

Oracle of Delphi
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
4
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 11:49:00 -
[395] - Quote
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sqL3-n2-3J4
epic |

Alekseyev Karrde
Noir. Noir. Mercenary Group
735
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 15:29:00 -
[396] - Quote
For a PVP alliance with allegedly 12k war targets, you'd think they'd be a little more active. "Alekseyev Karrde: mercenary of my heart."-á -Arydanika, Voices from the Void
CSM7 rep, CSM 4 vet Noir./Noir. Academy Recruiting: www.noirmercs.com |

Cannibal Kane
Praetorian Cannibals
677
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 17:51:00 -
[397] - Quote
Alekseyev Karrde wrote:For a PVP alliance with allegedly 12k war targets, you'd think they'd be a little more active.
lol was thinking the same...
I don't see that many kills either. But this was not the point of the dec shield. It is to highlight how horribly broken the system is.
I'm not a Pirate, I'm a Terrorist.
The Crazy Space Poor South African.
*Hair done by LGÇÖOr+¬al, because I'm worth it. |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
450
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 20:54:00 -
[398] - Quote
You guys seem to have a lot of expectations of a 1 man alliance run by an alt in spare time Burn Highsec Griefers |

RonPaul Rox
The Scope Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.11.15 06:15:00 -
[399] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:You guys seem to have a lot of expectations of a 1 man alliance run by an alt in spare time
lol even the CSM guy doesnt get it, way to do your research |

Messoroz
AQUILA INC Verge of Collapse
300
|
Posted - 2012.11.15 06:55:00 -
[400] - Quote
Ryder McGrump wrote:Ben Youssef Noban wrote: 3 weeks from the time Goonswarm Federation gets infected will be the fix (but it probably won't be a very good one).
From the time we made the war with Goonswarm " MUTUAL " It did indeed take approximately 3 weeks before CCP announced that they were looking at the war dec system. Maybe they were looking at it already, but they should of told everyone that they were. As of now Eve players will always have the impression that the war system which most knew was broken ONLY ever gets fixed when it affects a Large null sec entity. And before everyone starts complaining about my post..let it be known i have no problems with war....i have over 18,000 war targets atm :-) . As i am also in a Mutual war with TEST and many others, tbh i can't be bothered to to count the wars we have atm, it keeps increasing and when i see a war target if at all possible it will assplode in a ball of flames ( maybe it might even be me that assplodes )
LOL Manifest Destiny doing wardecs.
You should tell everybody about the time after the Alliance Tournament you got all butt hurt at our spies who clearly metagamed your suck out of the tournament. Your alliance proceeded to wardec a corp that trolololed you guys into infinitely. |
|

Shylari Avada
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
46
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 01:49:00 -
[401] - Quote
bufnitza calatoare wrote:
end of the day any good pvp corp will redec that corp that left your alliance so will bad ones lol..
Aside from empire griefers all the PVP players in this game live in space where war decs are meaningless, like low or null.
Hope that helps.
Also- lol empire pvp
|

Shylari Avada
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
46
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 21:39:00 -
[402] - Quote
Messoroz wrote:LOL Manifest Destiny doing wardecs.
They've killed a whopping 15 ships this month, we are still in the recovery process from this terrible, terrible scourge on our empire activity/holdings.
|

Tora Bushido
EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective
107
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 22:11:00 -
[403] - Quote
Shylari Avada wrote:[Aside from empire griefers all the PVP players in this game live in space where war decs are meaningless, like low or null. Hope that helps.
Also- lol empire pvp
Confirming most nul sec alliances are clueless in highsec .... Best decs we had in highsec were with nul sec alliances. My resists to bad posts are 78-89-83-90 ....... The metal head plate increased it by 5%.
|

VegasMirage
248
|
Posted - 2012.11.18 18:59:00 -
[404] - Quote
Tora Bushido wrote:Shylari Avada wrote:[Aside from empire griefers all the PVP players in this game live in space where war decs are meaningless, like low or null. Hope that helps.
Also- lol empire pvp
Confirming most nul sec alliances are clueless in highsec ....  Best decs we had in highsec were with nul sec alliances.
how do you pvp in dull sec when everybody is blue? likes watching grown men cry-á (Gò»n+¦Gò¦,) |

cynthia greythorne
Twilight Labs Unsung Voices
1
|
Posted - 2012.11.19 11:32:00 -
[405] - Quote
Thank you, Zerg Overmind!
Some strive for greatness, but few achieve it. You stand among the best.
And a salute to the German Freakshow whom we met through Dec Shield. Great work! |

Shylari Avada
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
56
|
Posted - 2012.11.19 20:56:00 -
[406] - Quote
Tora Bushido wrote:Shylari Avada wrote:[Aside from empire griefers all the PVP players in this game live in space where war decs are meaningless, like low or null. Hope that helps.
Also- lol empire pvp
Confirming most nul sec alliances are clueless in highsec ....  Best decs we had in highsec were with nul sec alliances.
Because the odd mission runner and guy undocking a Transport or a shuttle in jita is a fine representation of nullsec amirite?
|

Isana Tori
What's A Paladin
2
|
Posted - 2012.11.20 01:44:00 -
[407] - Quote
Yea it's the null sec players that are terrible  |

HoleySheet1
Under the Wings of Fury
93
|
Posted - 2012.11.20 01:53:00 -
[408] - Quote
Look at me! I'm cool. |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
457
|
Posted - 2012.11.21 10:21:00 -
[409] - Quote
Now with NCDot and RED.Overlord. They have chosen to trust CCP's ability to fix wardecs. Because they've done such a great job up to now :P
[Vader] I find your *cough* *cough* faith disturbing [/Vader]
Burn Highsec Griefers |

Tora Bushido
EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective
108
|
Posted - 2012.11.21 11:04:00 -
[410] - Quote
Shylari Avada wrote:Tora Bushido wrote:Shylari Avada wrote:[Aside from empire griefers all the PVP players in this game live in space where war decs are meaningless, like low or null. Hope that helps.
Also- lol empire pvp
Confirming most nul sec alliances are clueless in highsec ....  Best decs we had in highsec were with nul sec alliances. Because the odd mission runner and guy undocking a Transport or a shuttle in jita is a fine representation of nullsec amirite?
Because the odd highsec carebear that gets blobbed in his mining ship in nulsec, is a fine rep of highsec .... So many nul sec players who think that they are sooo good, just because they are part of a big group and kill in blobs. Clueless. Not saying there are no good players in nulsec, because there are many......just as there are in highsec. But if people say everyone in highsec is a bad pvp carebear, then expect it to bounce back in ya face. 
My resists to bad posts are 78-89-83-90 ....... The metal head plate increased it by 5%.
|
|

Zeus Maximo
Mentally Assured Destruction
4
|
Posted - 2012.11.21 21:50:00 -
[411] - Quote
Tora Bushido wrote:Because the odd highsec carebear that gets blobbed in his mining ship in nulsec, is a fine rep of highsec ....  So many nul sec players who think that they are sooo good, just because they are part of a big group and kill in blobs. Clueless. Not saying there are no good players in nulsec, because there are many......just as there are in highsec. But if people say everyone in highsec is a bad pvp carebear, then expect it to bounce back in ya face. 
You sir, speak the truth. Too many null sec pvpers claim to be gods and then come to high sec and expect to be treated as such. We recently went to null sec to see how we faired against these gods since they were always inviting us...... First day we killed a 2.7 bil pod along with many other things.
http://spacejews.org/kb/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=3687
In my opinion the average null sec pvper can't function without a blob Yet to lose a ship without them requiring one.... |

Solj RichPopolous
Mentally Assured Destruction
20
|
Posted - 2012.11.21 21:57:00 -
[412] - Quote
Zeus Maximo wrote:Tora Bushido wrote:Because the odd highsec carebear that gets blobbed in his mining ship in nulsec, is a fine rep of highsec ....  So many nul sec players who think that they are sooo good, just because they are part of a big group and kill in blobs. Clueless. Not saying there are no good players in nulsec, because there are many......just as there are in highsec. But if people say everyone in highsec is a bad pvp carebear, then expect it to bounce back in ya face.  You sir, speak the truth. Too many null sec pvpers claim to be gods and then come to high sec and expect to be treated as such. We recently went to null sec to see how we faired against these gods since they were always inviting us...... First day we killed a 2.7 bil pod along with many other things. http://spacejews.org/kb/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=3687In my opinion the average null sec pvper can't function without a blob  Yet to lose a ship without them requiring one....
Because of MWD. |

Shylari Avada
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
59
|
Posted - 2012.11.22 01:57:00 -
[413] - Quote
Zeus Maximo wrote:Tora Bushido wrote:Because the odd highsec carebear that gets blobbed in his mining ship in nulsec, is a fine rep of highsec ....  So many nul sec players who think that they are sooo good, just because they are part of a big group and kill in blobs. Clueless. Not saying there are no good players in nulsec, because there are many......just as there are in highsec. But if people say everyone in highsec is a bad pvp carebear, then expect it to bounce back in ya face.  You sir, speak the truth. Too many null sec pvpers claim to be gods and then come to high sec and expect to be treated as such. We recently went to null sec to see how we faired against these gods since they were always inviting us...... First day we killed a 2.7 bil pod along with many other things. http://spacejews.org/kb/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=3687In my opinion the average null sec pvper can't function without a blob  Yet to lose a ship without them requiring one....
I think you Overestimate how much nullsec types care about the version of PvP you enjoy (and vice versa).
I also don't see any forum overflowing with null pilots proclaiming their amazing prowess at pvp over literally anyone. Small 30-45 man corps and alliances in highest however... |

Kalel Nimrott
EG CORP Talocan United
82
|
Posted - 2012.11.22 14:29:00 -
[414] - Quote
Everyone is going to be at war with everyone and f*uck concord! |

Istyn
Tactical Knightmare
154
|
Posted - 2012.11.22 20:35:00 -
[415] - Quote
Shylari Avada wrote:When you can leave a docking radius, somebody will actually listen to your opinion.
YOU CAN LEAVE THOSE!? |

Reppyk
The Black Shell
209
|
Posted - 2012.11.22 23:29:00 -
[416] - Quote
Istyn wrote:[quote=Shylari Avada]YOU CAN LEAVE THOSE!? Of course, for the falcon alt(s). |

Tora Bushido
EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective
109
|
Posted - 2012.11.23 11:22:00 -
[417] - Quote
You seem like the classic example why I don't like certain nulsec players. First of all, you speak for entire nulsec and second you base your comments on feelings and tears instead of facts. So get your facts straight, reduce the nul ego and then reply again kid. 
And no, I am not saying we dont get a lot of kills on the 4-4 .... we do get a lot of kills there and also on other trade hubs. We have dedicated station huggers to annoy the ships out of you (pods too) . But we also kill a LOT of other ships in the rest of highsec. We are mercenaries and our jobs is to kill as many as possible for our clients. My resists to bad posts are 78-89-83-90 ....... The metal head plate increased it by 5%.
|

Shylari Avada
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
60
|
Posted - 2012.11.23 20:39:00 -
[418] - Quote
Tora Bushido wrote:You seem like the classic example why I don't like certain nulsec players. First of all, you speak for entire nulsec and second you base your comments on feelings and tears instead of facts. So get your facts straight, reduce the nul ego and then reply again kid. 
I did get the facts straight, your alliance sits on Jita/Amarr and occasionally in Hek/Dodixie ganking noob ships and industrials on an undock, your proclaimed 'kills elsewhere' are less than 2% of the total kills your alliance has. For another face in GoonSwarm you sure credit me with a lot of power speaking for 8690 people (which I am not), I just thought it was funny that you were saying us 'Nullseccers look down on Empire PvPers when you clearly do it differently' when actually, you don't.
You are the stereotype.
Congratulations on that.
Tora Bushido wrote:And no, I am not saying we dont get a lot of kills on the 4-4 .... we do get a lot of kills there and also on other trade hubs. We have dedicated station huggers to annoy the ships out of you (pods too)  . But we also kill a LOT of other ships in the rest of highsec. We are mercenaries and our jobs is to kill as many as possible for our clients.
By not leaving the safety of a trade hub or the comforting caress of a docking radius, if people pay you to pew, I truly feel sorry for them- for you and your ilk are a bad investment. |

ZaBob
Twilight Labs Unsung Voices
277
|
Posted - 2012.11.25 07:18:00 -
[419] - Quote
Shylari Avada wrote:By not leaving the safety of a trade hub or the comforting caress of a docking radius, if people pay you to pew, I truly feel sorry for them- for you and your ilk are a bad investment.
I disagree. Vehemently, in fact.
If that's where the victims can be found, then that's *precisely* where they should be. I can't imagine why you would think otherwise, unless you have a certain, um, "feelings" about how things "ought to be done".
Especially if those Jita kills involve lots of ISK... I prefer facts, numbers, and results, to "feelings" like "station huging".
From where I sit, the stats speak for themselves, but are further amplified the virtual banishment of our wardecers. And if their noobs and industrials feel the pain, well, that's who our opponents were attacking, so your disdain is, um, very strange to me.
But it was hardly just their noobs and industrials. One of the Jita kills was the CEO of the executor corp of the decing alliance, in a Tempest.
I think you really are EXACTLY the classic example of which he speaks -- claiming to be in any position to judge whether his services were a good investment is completely laughable.
You don't have a clue what you're talking about.
|

Ozzell Onasi
Corpus Alienum Game of Tears
0
|
Posted - 2012.11.25 16:45:00 -
[420] - Quote
Well, this alliance seems to be full of fail. I'm severly dissapointed at the lack of WT's when our corp got pulled to war against this coalition of newbs and carebears. |
|

ZaBob
Twilight Labs Unsung Voices
277
|
Posted - 2012.11.25 17:02:00 -
[421] - Quote
Ozzell Onasi wrote:Well, this alliance seems to be full of fail. I'm severly dissapointed at the lack of WT's when our corp got pulled to war against this coalition of newbs and carebears.
Oh, you think your WT's are obligated to make themselves available to you in locations of your choice?
Typical FAIL.
|

Shylari Avada
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
62
|
Posted - 2012.11.25 22:39:00 -
[422] - Quote
ZaBob wrote:Ozzell Onasi wrote:Well, this alliance seems to be full of fail. I'm severly dissapointed at the lack of WT's when our corp got pulled to war against this coalition of newbs and carebears. Oh, you think your WT's are obligated to make themselves available to you in locations of your choice? Typical FAIL.
Just go shopping for them in Jita, because other systems are dangerous and stuff.
Also- Fail isn't a noun, and should never be used as such. |

Tora Bushido
EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective
111
|
Posted - 2012.11.25 22:50:00 -
[423] - Quote
Boring and useless discussion..... We know what we are and what we do. Not in the mood to explain you further why how etc... 
Let's get back on topic how great Dec Shield has been for high sec fun the last few months  My resists to bad posts are 78-89-83-90 ....... The metal head plate increased it by 5%.
|

Reppyk
Yarrbear Inc. BricK sQuAD.
210
|
Posted - 2012.11.26 09:38:00 -
[424] - Quote
Confirming that Tora is getting kills in my shower, my room and my bed. And even elsewhere.
Can we have a k/d or iskwar topic now please ? |

Kira Vanachura
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
16
|
Posted - 2012.11.26 21:46:00 -
[425] - Quote
One of my other character's alliances got wardecced. Can a corp in that alliance drop the alliance and pass the wardec to you guys or is that not possible? |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
464
|
Posted - 2012.11.26 22:22:00 -
[426] - Quote
Kira Vanachura wrote:One of my other character's alliances got wardecced. Can a corp in that alliance drop the alliance and pass the wardec to you guys or is that not possible? Yes that's very possible. That's what we've been using our ambassador corps for. If you'd like I could send an ambassador corp to join the alliance and bring it over myself. That way you don't need to do any work but hit accept on the application Burn Highsec Griefers |

ZaBob
Twilight Labs Unsung Voices
279
|
Posted - 2012.11.26 22:22:00 -
[427] - Quote
Shylari Avada wrote:ZaBob wrote:Oh, you think your WT's are obligated to make themselves available to you in locations of your choice?
Typical FAIL.
Just go shopping for them in Jita, because other systems are dangerous and stuff. Also- Fail isn't a noun, and should never be used as such.
Oh, wow, just wow.
You might want to consider consulting a dictionary before you take it upon yourself to try to dictate how people use the English language.
You might also want to consider not telling people what their goals should be in the game, or what people should look for in a mercenary.
Just for your edification -- fail, as a noun used to denote a failure to achieve a standard, has gone in and out of fashion. It was formerly marked as obsolete in the OED, but was reinstated as current in 1993, long before the current internet meme. |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
473
|
Posted - 2012.12.01 21:54:00 -
[428] - Quote
So RvB - RED Federation has just disbanded (3000 players), and we just stole their alliance name so they can't reform. If only there were some mechanic in place to prevent these alliances from being permanently trapped in wars. I'm not even sure they can reform into a new alliance because they're still stuck in outgoing wars. Burn Highsec Griefers |

Isana Tori
What's A Paladin
3
|
Posted - 2012.12.01 23:05:00 -
[429] - Quote
But I thought Dec Shield couldn't do anything! Have I been lied to by high sec "warriors" who didn't understand what was going on?  |

Shylari Avada
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
68
|
Posted - 2012.12.01 23:43:00 -
[430] - Quote
Today (or sometime soon) marks the birth of RvB - Red Federationdot |
|

Mallak Azaria
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1312
|
Posted - 2012.12.02 11:34:00 -
[431] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:So RvB - RED Federation has just disbanded (3000 players), and we just stole their alliance name so they can't reform. If only there were some mechanic in place to prevent these alliances from being permanently trapped in wars. I'm not even sure they can reform into a new alliance because they're still stuck in outgoing wars.
They could've just waited another week. It's about time CCP stops catering to the lazy players with this sense of entitlement for fear of losing money. These aren't the people making the game better, these are the people wanting you to turn EVE in to a game that is like most other MMO's. |

VegasMirage
258
|
Posted - 2012.12.02 11:46:00 -
[432] - Quote
Mallak Azaria wrote:The Zerg Overmind wrote:So RvB - RED Federation has just disbanded (3000 players), and we just stole their alliance name so they can't reform. If only there were some mechanic in place to prevent these alliances from being permanently trapped in wars. I'm not even sure they can reform into a new alliance because they're still stuck in outgoing wars. They could've just waited another week.
I can't agree with your signature more.
likes watching grown men cry-á (Gò»n+¦Gò¦,) |

Professor Clio
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
135
|
Posted - 2012.12.02 16:40:00 -
[433] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:So RvB - RED Federation has just disbanded (3000 players), and we just stole their alliance name so they can't reform. If only there were some mechanic in place to prevent these alliances from being permanently trapped in wars. I'm not even sure they can reform into a new alliance because they're still stuck in outgoing wars.
Red disbanded because for some reason the alliance bill went unpaid (either by mistake or bug, we don't know). Trust me we dont care about all these wars, in fact we welcome them. You do know what we're about right? Constant pvp?
Also we'd have disbanded blue too if we had disbanded because of you. You really have an over-inflated sense of ego. |

Kyle Yanowski
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
93
|
Posted - 2012.12.02 16:55:00 -
[434] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:So RvB - RED Federation has just disbanded (3000 players), and we just stole their alliance name so they can't reform. If only there were some mechanic in place to prevent these alliances from being permanently trapped in wars. I'm not even sure they can reform into a new alliance because they're still stuck in outgoing wars.
This guy wants a cookie... someone give him a cookie.
I'm going back to blowing things up....
|

Connall Tara
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
55
|
Posted - 2012.12.02 17:02:00 -
[435] - Quote
Confirming that Red alliance has not disbanded due to decshield. pretty adorable that they think that though ^_^
it appears for some reason the maintainance bill didn't get paid despite iskies being in the wallet, we're petitioning accordingly and should be resuming normal servic- wait? oh right we're still all murdering eachother for giggles thanks to the borked wardec mechanics, ach well ^^
seriously though, claiming an RVB side disbanded because of decshield? so cute ^_^ Fly reckless cohost and all round bad pilot o7 |

Catalyst XI
Red Federation
21
|
Posted - 2012.12.02 17:24:00 -
[436] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:So RvB - RED Federation has just disbanded (3000 players), and we just stole their alliance name so they can't reform. If only there were some mechanic in place to prevent these alliances from being permanently trapped in wars. I'm not even sure they can reform into a new alliance because they're still stuck in outgoing wars.
god dammit, all that sov we grinded, gone.
What i am suppose to do now? go back to shooting highsec scrubs? i feel so lost. |

Mizhir
Red Federation
483
|
Posted - 2012.12.02 17:37:00 -
[437] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:So RvB - RED Federation has just disbanded (3000 players), and we just stole their alliance name so they can't reform. If only there were some mechanic in place to prevent these alliances from being permanently trapped in wars. I'm not even sure they can reform into a new alliance because they're still stuck in outgoing wars.
Sorry. I cant hear you for all the frigs popping in poinen. Did you say anything important?
If you are having Smurf problems I feel bad for you son I got 99 problems but a Blue aint one.
Dude, where is my alliance? |

Shylari Avada
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
85
|
Posted - 2012.12.03 00:35:00 -
[438] - Quote
Connall Tara wrote:seriously though, claiming an RVB side disbanded because of decshield? so cute ^_^
You're reading comprehension is terrible, they didn't take credit for disbanding your alliance, they took credit for stealing the name. |

VegasMirage
260
|
Posted - 2012.12.03 16:54:00 -
[439] - Quote
Mizhir wrote:The Zerg Overmind wrote:So RvB - RED Federation has just disbanded (3000 players), and we just stole their alliance name so they can't reform. If only there were some mechanic in place to prevent these alliances from being permanently trapped in wars. I'm not even sure they can reform into a new alliance because they're still stuck in outgoing wars. Sorry. I cant hear you for all the frigs popping in poinen. Did you say anything important?
b/c you're a 3 system hopping gate hugging solo pvp artist? likes watching grown men cry-á (Gò»n+¦Gò¦,) |

J'Poll
Kings of the Underground Side Effect.
580
|
Posted - 2012.12.03 22:08:00 -
[440] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:So RvB - RED Federation has just disbanded (3000 players), and we just stole their alliance name so they can't reform. If only there were some mechanic in place to prevent these alliances from being permanently trapped in wars. I'm not even sure they can reform into a new alliance because they're still stuck in outgoing wars.
Please go on and repeat it 1000 times in your head, maybe you will start to believe yourself.
As NONE of the rest of the EVE playerbase does.
Everybody in EVE knows that RvB-R disbanded cause they screwed something up:
Didn't want to pay that alliance upkeep bill to CONCORD...
Old look Corporation recruitment thread Corporation Website |
|

Miko Jin
University of Caille Gallente Federation
13
|
Posted - 2012.12.03 23:26:00 -
[441] - Quote
J'Poll wrote:The Zerg Overmind wrote:So RvB - RED Federation has just disbanded (3000 players), and we just stole their alliance name so they can't reform. If only there were some mechanic in place to prevent these alliances from being permanently trapped in wars. I'm not even sure they can reform into a new alliance because they're still stuck in outgoing wars. Please go on and repeat it 1000 times in your head, maybe you will start to believe yourself. As NONE of the rest of the EVE playerbase does. Everybody in EVE knows that RvB-R disbanded cause they screwed something up: Didn't want to pay that alliance upkeep bill to CONCORD...
But the mechanics put the final nail in the coffin? |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
491
|
Posted - 2012.12.04 00:27:00 -
[442] - Quote
So a week ago I ran a test by dropping a corp out of Dec Shield, and setting all their wars to unmutual so I could measure when they would end. I dropped the corp out at 03:07 the 26th Eve time. This is the result of when the wars dropped off:
http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/1212/Dec_Shield_Wars.jpg
You'll find it interesting that it took anywhere from 7 days + 34mins, to 7 days + 169mins for them to start retraction. The top three wars in that list were from different circumstances, so you can ignore them.
But this test case proves that a corp dropped from alliance with unmutual wars will preserve their war for 7 days + change. This is strong experimental evidence the new exploit will work to keep everyone trapped. Burn Highsec Griefers |

Silence iKillYouu
KA POW POW Inc Late Night Alliance
210
|
Posted - 2012.12.04 02:39:00 -
[443] - Quote
We are loving this free war thing http://fw-frontline.blogspot.com/ |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
491
|
Posted - 2012.12.04 08:51:00 -
[444] - Quote
10 minutes before Retribution I wanted to post the current glory of our war efforts
Current permanent wardecs: 282 Current players trapped: 16459 Current corporations trapped: 582 Current alliances trapped: 50 Burn Highsec Griefers |

Schalac
Apocalypse Reign
181
|
Posted - 2012.12.04 10:36:00 -
[445] - Quote
And after retribution goes live it is all over. SCHALAC HAS SPOKEN!! http://eveboard.com/pilot/Schalac |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
491
|
Posted - 2012.12.04 10:39:00 -
[446] - Quote
I have two different devs telling me they've closed the new loophole method I explained. Not sure what method they're going to use though, but we can live in hope. We'll know soon enough Burn Highsec Griefers |

J'Poll
Kings of the Underground Side Effect.
581
|
Posted - 2012.12.04 10:51:00 -
[447] - Quote
*Added Retract War option for aggressor if defender has set war to mutual.
From the patch notes....expecting whining threads soon... Old look Corporation recruitment thread Corporation Website |

Ra Jackson
CRIMINALS IN ACTION
58
|
Posted - 2012.12.04 13:26:00 -
[448] - Quote
Shylari Avada wrote: It's not about how 'things ought to be done' and more about risk averse pubbies pretending to have something worth chest beating on forums. Killing anything in Jita- with the exception of frigates with stupid numbers of PLEX, JF's packed full of moongoo, or a capital ship that was reimbursed and claimed in Jita is pointless, irrelevant and gives no claims to skill, power or prowess.
Funny. If you replace Jita with Uedama pretty much the same points can be adressed to Goons  |

Isana Tori
State Protectorate Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2012.12.04 16:26:00 -
[449] - Quote
Who is going to be whining in this thread after it works? |

JC Anderson
Noir. Noir. Mercenary Group
784
|
Posted - 2012.12.04 23:50:00 -
[450] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:I have two different devs telling me they've closed the new loophole method I explained. Not sure what method they're going to use though, but we can live in hope. We'll know soon enough
Is it the retract war thingy mentioned in the patch notes?
I didn't even know they were planning on fixing this in Retribution in all honesty. |
|

Mizhir
Red Federation
608
|
Posted - 2012.12.04 23:58:00 -
[451] - Quote
VegasMirage wrote:Mizhir wrote:The Zerg Overmind wrote:So RvB - RED Federation has just disbanded (3000 players), and we just stole their alliance name so they can't reform. If only there were some mechanic in place to prevent these alliances from being permanently trapped in wars. I'm not even sure they can reform into a new alliance because they're still stuck in outgoing wars. Sorry. I cant hear you for all the frigs popping in poinen. Did you say anything important? b/c you're a 3 system hopping gate hugging solo pvp artist?
And your point is? If you are having Smurf problems I feel bad for you son I got 99 problems but a Blue aint one.
Dude, where is my alliance? |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
494
|
Posted - 2012.12.05 00:09:00 -
[452] - Quote
The retract war option is NOT ENOUGH as I've so eloquently explained so many times over the past few weeks:
Novermber 11th posted initial exploit theory November 22nd seeking clarification for the new exploit November 30th official announcement of new exploit November 30th feedback to devs officially announcing new exploit November 30th directly emailed devs explicitly outlining the exploit and stating that the changes weren't enough Dev posts claiming wardec trapping no longer possible. Unclear if he's aware of new exploit December 4th experimental evidence documenting viability of exploit December 4th raising public awareness December 4th email response from dev claiming things should be fixed. This is direct response to email about new exploit
Burn Highsec Griefers |

JC Anderson
Noir. Noir. Mercenary Group
784
|
Posted - 2012.12.05 00:59:00 -
[453] - Quote
Hrm so I wonder what they did in relation to the claim that they fixed it. |

JC Anderson
Noir. Noir. Mercenary Group
784
|
Posted - 2012.12.05 01:04:00 -
[454] - Quote
Shylari Avada wrote:Today (or sometime soon) marks the birth of RvB - Red Federationdot
Red Swarm Federation |

Shylari Avada
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
126
|
Posted - 2012.12.05 12:38:00 -
[455] - Quote
JC Anderson wrote:Shylari Avada wrote:Today (or sometime soon) marks the birth of RvB - Red Federationdot Red Swarm Federation
Needs more dots and zeros.
Ra Jackson wrote:Shylari Avada wrote: It's not about how 'things ought to be done' and more about risk averse pubbies pretending to have something worth chest beating on forums. Killing anything in Jita- with the exception of frigates with stupid numbers of PLEX, JF's packed full of moongoo, or a capital ship that was reimbursed and claimed in Jita is pointless, irrelevant and gives no claims to skill, power or prowess.
Funny. If you replace Jita with Uedama pretty much the same points can be adressed to Goons 
Not 'Goons', Just 'MiniLuv'.
I don't expect someone like you to understand intra-alliance organization, or the SIGs and Squads structure of our Alliance, but I assure you Goons kill (and die) everywhere. |

Bethesda
Unknown Test RELOADED DOT
1
|
Posted - 2012.12.05 18:18:00 -
[456] - Quote
not fixed |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
504
|
Posted - 2012.12.05 23:33:00 -
[457] - Quote
So an update on what we're seeing so far:
1.) We're not sure if the situation has been fixed.
2.) Wars that are set mutual by the defender can start a 24hr retraction by the aggressor. We set all our wars unmutual right before the expansion to avoid this (and rightfully so, a dropped corp experienced 74 retractions in under 8hrs by staying mutual)
3.) No wars against Dec Shield have ended in the past 48hrs (by random distribution of our 286 wars around 81 should have naturally ended by now), so something is going on
4.) We proposed a new method of maintaining infinite war by a repeating multi-day staggered sequence of dropping corps out of alliance and rejoining a few days later to restore any dropped wars. Under the old rules this would have been effective because the start date of wars were set fresh when a corp joined/left an alliance. Two devs have sworn this is fixed, but not how they fixed it. Our proposed fix was to inherit the start date from the parent war when making a copy to prevent the 7 day extensions.
5.) Corps dropping out of an alliance still do not inherit the start dates of their parent wars. Because of the dev insistence that this loophole won't work we've concluded that all wars have a hidden end-date that isn't visible to the players. It is possible that copied wars now inherit this hidden end-date timer from the parent wars. Thus it's very possible the loophole is closed and we won't know until it's too late.
6.) But using evidence from point 3 above, something has changed with wardec mechanics. Or it's a "feature" we never knew about before because we had never unmutualed wars. As I said, we should of had 81 retractions by now and we've had none. Therefore we've come to believe that the act of unmutualing a war sets the hidden end-date timer back by at least 48hrs (probably 7 days). Therefore, since it's possible to instantly mutual/unmutual a war we've begun tests along these lines to see if unmutualing extends the end-date. We will know for sure in 5 days the results of these tests.
Burn Highsec Griefers |

Bethesda
Unknown Test RELOADED DOT
1
|
Posted - 2012.12.06 22:08:00 -
[458] - Quote
From what I can see situation is as Follows -
Wars run on a weekly timer of billing cycle dates - perhaps the non-mutual wars will expire 24hrs after the next bill.....
Any new wars from corps out of a war decced alliance do get a new timer and also their own bill (hence 7 day timer)
Mutual wars are retractable.
What are the rules on a war decced corp joining an alliance? does it create a new timer if they do? etc |

JC Anderson
Noir. Noir. Mercenary Group
791
|
Posted - 2012.12.07 00:35:00 -
[459] - Quote
I think were going to end up needing to wait for a week before we know exactly what has changed and what hasn't. |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
506
|
Posted - 2012.12.07 00:35:00 -
[460] - Quote
Bethesda wrote:From what I can see situation is as Follows -
Wars run on a weekly timer of billing cycle dates - perhaps the non-mutual wars will expire 24hrs after the next bill.....
Any new wars from corps out of a war decced alliance do get a new timer and also their own bill (hence 7 day timer)
Mutual wars are retractable.
What are the rules on a war decced corp joining an alliance? does it create a new timer if they do? etc Wardecced corps are allowed to join alliance. It ends their current war and starts a fresh 7 day timer war with the alliance. If the alliance already had that war I think it just merges with that war and doesn't change any timers.
Out of curiosity, when is your bill set for? For these entities:
Dec Shield Wardec Flopper Wardec Flipper Wardec Flapper Zerg Hatchery RvB - Red Federation
It will help us to know if the exploit has been fixed Burn Highsec Griefers |
|

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
506
|
Posted - 2012.12.07 02:28:00 -
[461] - Quote
Using information we've gathered from aggressors, and from tests we're running on the test server. We can conclude that the proposed exploit we've been warning CCP about for weeks, is indeed closed.
However, we have discovered a new exploit that will allow us to keep you trapped indefinitely. We will now resume activities and recruitment immediately Burn Highsec Griefers |

Nylith Empyreal
Crowbar Industries. Rebel Alliance of New Eden
178
|
Posted - 2012.12.07 07:45:00 -
[462] - Quote
Glorious fun as always. "Oh, you can't help that," said the troll: "we're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad." "How do you know I'm mad?" -ásaid the forumwarrior. "You must be," said the troll, "or you wouldn't have come here." |

Ra Jackson
CRIMINALS IN ACTION
70
|
Posted - 2012.12.07 09:12:00 -
[463] - Quote
Shylari Avada wrote:Ra Jackson wrote:Shylari Avada wrote: It's not about how 'things ought to be done' and more about risk averse pubbies pretending to have something worth chest beating on forums. Killing anything in Jita- with the exception of frigates with stupid numbers of PLEX, JF's packed full of moongoo, or a capital ship that was reimbursed and claimed in Jita is pointless, irrelevant and gives no claims to skill, power or prowess.
Funny. If you replace Jita with Uedama pretty much the same points can be adressed to Goons  Not 'Goons', Just 'MiniLuv'. I don't expect someone like you to understand intra-alliance organization, or the SIGs and Squads structure of our Alliance, but I assure you Goons kill (and die) everywhere.
And your point is? I expect nothing else from an 8k ppl alliance than to die everywhere. I don't care about intra-alliance dribble. Why should I? "Someone like me" is obviously not in Goons, and Miniluv are Goons to "someone like us". |

Tora Bushido
EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective
113
|
Posted - 2012.12.07 11:15:00 -
[464] - Quote
Hehe....and the story continues....
Will keep an eye on the 'data' Zerg.....  My resists to bad posts are 78-89-83-90 ....... The metal head plate increased it by 5%.
|

cynthia greythorne
Twilight Labs Unsung Voices
3
|
Posted - 2012.12.07 11:28:00 -
[465] - Quote
All hail The Zerg Overmind!!  |

Bethesda
Unknown Test RELOADED DOT
1
|
Posted - 2012.12.07 20:18:00 -
[466] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:
Out of curiosity, when is your bill set for? For these entities:
Dec Shield - no date - through mails should be 10/12 but has the mutual thing messed with the dates? Wardec Flopper - no date -through mails should be 12/12? Wardec Flipper 11/12 Wardec Flapper - no date - through mails should be 13/12? But ends today Zerg Hatchery 11/12 RvB - Red Federation 11/12 |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
530
|
Posted - 2012.12.07 21:53:00 -
[467] - Quote
GMs have just set "RvB - RED Federation" free.
-3060 trapped players Burn Highsec Griefers |

Mike Adoulin
Trans-Aerospace Industries
74
|
Posted - 2012.12.07 22:09:00 -
[468] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote: The tears must flow.
He who controls the tears, controls the universe.
 |

Michael Harari
The Hatchery Team Liquid
389
|
Posted - 2012.12.07 23:43:00 -
[469] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:GMs have just set "RvB - RED Federation" free.
-3060 trapped players
Is anyone surprised that RvB gets special treatment? |

Junko Sideswipe
Love Squad Confederation of xXPIZZAXx
98
|
Posted - 2012.12.08 17:29:00 -
[470] - Quote
Still decced by Dec Shield and friends, I repealed all the mutual wars on patch day and they still manage to exploit it to keep us trapped. Now I have multiple non-mutual wars, including one with Dec Shield that says it's been going on since october. Sent in a petition yesterday with no response. What a CF, I don't know why they aren't taking their own wardec system more seriously when they put in a significant amount of effort to make it a focal point of their last expansion.
I appreciate the work Dec Shield is doing, there's no way to make them fix broken features like this unless you break them even harder. Confederation of xXPIZZAXx CEO TRUE and HONEST boyfriend-free girl gamer |
|

Tah'ris Khlador
Space Ghosts. Break-A-Wish Foundation
271
|
Posted - 2012.12.08 19:55:00 -
[471] - Quote
Michael Harari wrote:The Zerg Overmind wrote:GMs have just set "RvB - RED Federation" free.
-3060 trapped players Is anyone surprised that RvB gets special treatment?
Not at all. I actually expected it to happen sooner. |

Professor Clio
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
144
|
Posted - 2012.12.08 22:48:00 -
[472] - Quote
Tah'ris Khlador wrote:Michael Harari wrote:The Zerg Overmind wrote:GMs have just set "RvB - RED Federation" free.
-3060 trapped players Is anyone surprised that RvB gets special treatment? Not at all. I actually expected it to happen sooner.
Just a quick note. RvB - Blue is still trapped in wars by dec shield and we couldn't care less. The only reason Red shed ALL its war (including the one with blue) is that a bug disbanded the Red Alliance. When CCP restored it they didn't restore the wars along with it which was actually rather unfortunate as it led to a 24 hour DT in RvB fighting this week. Decshield and its wars have had no impact on us other than the stream of notifications. |

Tah'ris Khlador
Space Ghosts. Break-A-Wish Foundation
274
|
Posted - 2012.12.09 01:06:00 -
[473] - Quote
A bug. I see. |

NEONOVUS
Saablast Followers
59
|
Posted - 2012.12.09 03:26:00 -
[474] - Quote
Tah'ris Khlador wrote:A bug. I see. Hey I have had worse just trying to make a simple script to calculate the various effects of laminar flow over an airfoil. Especially since as pointed out Red did everything right on their end.
Also curious Zerg, will you continue this if as suspected all three methods are closed? Will you hunt for more or will you feel your duties are done? |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
537
|
Posted - 2012.12.09 04:25:00 -
[475] - Quote
NEONOVUS wrote:Also curious Zerg, will you continue this if as suspected all three methods are closed? Will you hunt for more or will you feel your duties are done? I believe the third method is still valid. We will know for sure if every non-GM'd war is still trapped on the 12th. Burn Highsec Griefers |

Tah'ris Khlador
Space Ghosts. Break-A-Wish Foundation
274
|
Posted - 2012.12.09 04:54:00 -
[476] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:NEONOVUS wrote:Also curious Zerg, will you continue this if as suspected all three methods are closed? Will you hunt for more or will you feel your duties are done? I believe the third method is still valid. We will know for sure if every non-GM'd war is still trapped on the 12th.
I'm hoping that it somehow is fixed. I've stopped bothering to add target corps on my alts because the number of notifications was getting obscene. Not counting on it though. Yay notifications!
Or maybe we'll get lucky and be "GM'd". *snicker* |

Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local Break-A-Wish Foundation
923
|
Posted - 2012.12.09 05:17:00 -
[477] - Quote
NEONOVUS wrote:Also curious Zerg, will you continue this if as suspected all three methods are closed? Will you hunt for more or will you feel your duties are done? I think that between godawful game design and the questionable skills of CCPs programming staff you'll be very lucky to see CCP come up with fixes that actually work to close all of the exploits.
Even if they were closed the core game design behind the current wardec system is so bad that wars will still be an absolute joke. As long as you can enlist allies into a war for trivial costs wars will remain the exclusive domain of dedicated PVP corps and not something that the average highsec corp would even consider. And as long as the costs remain as high as they are they will be limited in accessibility to people regularly make giant piles of isk.
Zerg has done an outstanding job of pointing out the godawful mechanical holes in the war mechanics but the fact still remains that, by design, CCP made war declarations a tool that that people can't afford to use and if you do use it just happens to cut your throat. |

VegasMirage
260
|
Posted - 2012.12.09 11:24:00 -
[478] - Quote
Mizhir wrote:VegasMirage wrote:Mizhir wrote:The Zerg Overmind wrote:So RvB - RED Federation has just disbanded (3000 players), and we just stole their alliance name so they can't reform. If only there were some mechanic in place to prevent these alliances from being permanently trapped in wars. I'm not even sure they can reform into a new alliance because they're still stuck in outgoing wars. Sorry. I cant hear you for all the frigs popping in poinen. Did you say anything important? b/c you're a 3 system hopping gate hugging solo pvp artist? And your point is?
that you're important and we all really should learn something from you...  likes watching grown men cry-á (Gò»n+¦Gò¦,) |

Raesha Nardieu
The Soul Society Pax Romana Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2012.12.09 11:32:00 -
[479] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:Everything Tolene said is true, and I agree with you. We will try to get the matter resolved asap. In the mean time I just needed victims to point to and say "Look, your game mechanics are allowing me to do completely unfair things to these people". CCP responds faster when they have public pressure on them to perform.
You say you want to end high sec griefing yet in the case of my alliance *YOU* are the griefers...how are you trying to get matters resolved when you are snide and unresponsive to all attempts at diplomacy? We are a mining/indy alliance, do *NOT* actively war dec and do not promote behaviour that could bring wars upon us as everyone knows highsec wars are senseless. The *only* time we dec is to even the playing field against groups that dec us (which if you had bothered to check the history has only happend twice). I also happen to know we are not the only carebears you have in your current dec list while your own mission statement clearly states you *ONLY* target pirate/merc/griefer corps & alliances which would imply that you do a bit of research and are selective with the targets you choose. The truth is you're not, your goal is to have as many active eternal wars as possible and to continue to use exploits as your manner to have fun in the game just like any other griefer corp/alliance. At least true merc/griefer corps are honest in what they do... and honesty I can respect... what you do, I cannot respect.
Our griefers came to you when they got caught with their breeches down and you took them in and continued the griefing of us for the past month. You go against yourself by saying you wish to bring attention to the broken mechanics and end highsec griefing yet you are guilty of the same thing you are so-called trying to stop and paint yourself here as being a sort of Robin Hood when you're no better than the thugs you protect.
I dont support what you are doing because it sounds noble on paper but being the true moralfag I am, when you dont do your research and target indy corps/alliances that are already being griefed, you lose any support you would have had from me and others like me. What good does it do for the whole of EvE and it's community to run off the new players before they even have a chance to start loving the game? Thats what happens when you target groups like my alliance.
And my apologies for sounding like a whiny little wench... I just wished to point out Dec Shield are not and have not been acting as admirably and honourably as they would like all of you here to believe and are actually griefers themselves that are further contributing to the rising ship and mineral costs by not allowing carebears to get out and seed our markets. |

FireusI
Famz Corp.
6
|
Posted - 2012.12.09 12:36:00 -
[480] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind
The main thing is u now the one who is trying his best to become Griefers in high sec and i hope as soon as CCP sort out the mess u have made bad ur accounts and I.P from ever playing eve again .
I lost some great friends cuz of all this in real life cuz they think i was the one putting up all these dam war decks when i am not all cuz of a loop hole ur exploiting in the game |
|

Gary Bell
Hard Knocks Inc.
22
|
Posted - 2012.12.09 12:38:00 -
[481] - Quote
Raesha Nardieu wrote:The Zerg Overmind wrote:Everything Tolene said is true, and I agree with you. We will try to get the matter resolved asap. In the mean time I just needed victims to point to and say "Look, your game mechanics are allowing me to do completely unfair things to these people". CCP responds faster when they have public pressure on them to perform. You say you want to end high sec griefing yet in the case of my alliance *YOU* are the griefers...how are you trying to get matters resolved when you are snide and unresponsive to all attempts at diplomacy? We are a mining/indy alliance, do *NOT* actively war dec and do not promote behaviour that could bring wars upon us as everyone knows highsec wars are senseless. The *only* time we dec is to even the playing field against groups that dec us (which if you had bothered to check the history has only happend twice). I also happen to know we are not the only carebears you have in your current dec list while your own mission statement clearly states you *ONLY* target pirate/merc/griefer corps & alliances which would imply that you do a bit of research and are selective with the targets you choose. The truth is you're not, your goal is to have as many active eternal wars as possible and to continue to use exploits as your manner to have fun in the game just like any other griefer corp/alliance. At least true merc/griefer corps are honest in what they do... and honesty I can respect... what you do, I cannot respect. Our griefers came to you when they got caught with their breeches down and you took them in and continued the griefing of us for the past month. You go against yourself by saying you wish to bring attention to the broken mechanics and end highsec griefing yet you are guilty of the same thing you are so-called trying to stop and paint yourself here as being a sort of Robin Hood when you're no better than the thugs you protect. I dont support what you are doing because it sounds noble on paper but being the true moralfag I am, when you dont do your research and target indy corps/alliances that are already being griefed, you lose any support you would have had from me and others like me. What good does it do for the whole of EvE and it's community to run off the new players before they even have a chance to start loving the game? Thats what happens when you target groups like my alliance. And my apologies for sounding like a whiny little wench... I just wished to point out Dec Shield are not and have not been acting as admirably and honourably as they would like all of you here to believe and are actually griefers themselves that are further contributing to the rising ship and mineral costs by not allowing carebears to get out and seed our markets.
Tears... NOM NOM NOM... Stop Mining and start PEWing .. its way less lame
|

Raesha Nardieu
The Soul Society Pax Romana Alliance
1
|
Posted - 2012.12.09 12:45:00 -
[482] - Quote
Gary Bell wrote:Raesha Nardieu wrote:The Zerg Overmind wrote:Everything Tolene said is true, and I agree with you. We will try to get the matter resolved asap. In the mean time I just needed victims to point to and say "Look, your game mechanics are allowing me to do completely unfair things to these people". CCP responds faster when they have public pressure on them to perform. You say you want to end high sec griefing yet in the case of my alliance *YOU* are the griefers...how are you trying to get matters resolved when you are snide and unresponsive to all attempts at diplomacy? We are a mining/indy alliance, do *NOT* actively war dec and do not promote behaviour that could bring wars upon us as everyone knows highsec wars are senseless. The *only* time we dec is to even the playing field against groups that dec us (which if you had bothered to check the history has only happend twice). I also happen to know we are not the only carebears you have in your current dec list while your own mission statement clearly states you *ONLY* target pirate/merc/griefer corps & alliances which would imply that you do a bit of research and are selective with the targets you choose. The truth is you're not, your goal is to have as many active eternal wars as possible and to continue to use exploits as your manner to have fun in the game just like any other griefer corp/alliance. At least true merc/griefer corps are honest in what they do... and honesty I can respect... what you do, I cannot respect. Our griefers came to you when they got caught with their breeches down and you took them in and continued the griefing of us for the past month. You go against yourself by saying you wish to bring attention to the broken mechanics and end highsec griefing yet you are guilty of the same thing you are so-called trying to stop and paint yourself here as being a sort of Robin Hood when you're no better than the thugs you protect. I dont support what you are doing because it sounds noble on paper but being the true moralfag I am, when you dont do your research and target indy corps/alliances that are already being griefed, you lose any support you would have had from me and others like me. What good does it do for the whole of EvE and it's community to run off the new players before they even have a chance to start loving the game? Thats what happens when you target groups like my alliance. And my apologies for sounding like a whiny little wench... I just wished to point out Dec Shield are not and have not been acting as admirably and honourably as they would like all of you here to believe and are actually griefers themselves that are further contributing to the rising ship and mineral costs by not allowing carebears to get out and seed our markets. Tears... NOM NOM NOM... Stop Mining and start PEWing .. its way less lame
No tears from me mate, just stating fact and calling a spade a spade... I guess you think those shiny ships you like to fly to pewpew in are magically created out of thin air... you should learn pewpew & carebearing are a symbiotic relationship. Without us carebears mining and building ships you wouldnt have anything to fly or to blow up. |

FireusI
Famz Corp.
7
|
Posted - 2012.12.09 12:57:00 -
[483] - Quote
I total agree with you Raesha Nardieu if it was not for us miners eve would be DEAD cuz no one would have any thing to fly or buying.
As for PVP done it got board of it lived in null got borad of that too
As for mining love it made good friends while doing this built loads of stuff in eve and sold it to PVP'ers
So i see a circle here miners mine builders build sellers sale pvper pvp
so if u dont have the 1st in the list what u going to be flying or killing
So what the hell u going to fly or blow up
ur own captain quaters or ur own pc
|

Mara Tessidar
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
681
|
Posted - 2012.12.09 13:11:00 -
[484] - Quote
FireusI wrote:I total agree with you Raesha Nardieu if it was not for us miners eve would be DEAD cuz no one would have any thing to fly or buying.
As for PVP done it got board of it lived in null got borad of that too
As for mining love it made good friends while doing this built loads of stuff in eve and sold it to PVP'ers
So i see a circle here miners mine builders build sellers sale pvper pvp
so if u dont have the 1st in the list what u going to be flying or killing
So what the hell u going to fly or blow up
ur own captain quaters or ur own pc
You are dumb EveO is a circus train that is for bafflingly unclear reasons also carrying tanks of chlorine gas,-ácrashing and exploding in the middle of a small midwestern town. -áCalling it a mere train wreck gives neither the entertainment nor the horror it offers its proper due. |

Isana Tori
Booty chasers
8
|
Posted - 2012.12.09 14:12:00 -
[485] - Quote
How do all these people suggest bringing war dec problems to light without having actual cases to point to? You don't think it's odd that once the numbers began to rise and major players in Eve were caught that this was fixed? For all the complaining about Dec Shield, he actually did get the wars fixed (mostly), which if you look at the very first post, was his goal all along.
I do find it funny that all the people here complaining about him are forgetting one thing: they declared war on someone to get trapped. This was not a case of some poor defenseless carebear having Dec Shield run up on them. Yes, eve RvB went out of its way to dec someone else in a system they really should have known was bugged.
I also laugh at the different replies from people. Carebears are convinced the sky is falling and "elite pvpers" haven't even noticed so they say. It's almost like a default response from these people in any situation.
Hopefully more and more war dec bugs go away and we can move on to other problems to fix and maybe we'll all get trapped in that too!
|

NEONOVUS
Saablast Followers
59
|
Posted - 2012.12.09 15:17:00 -
[486] - Quote
Isana Tori wrote:How do all these people suggest bringing war dec problems to light without having actual cases to point to? You don't think it's odd that once the numbers began to rise and major players in Eve were caught that this was fixed? For all the complaining about Dec Shield, he actually did get the wars fixed (mostly), which if you look at the very first post, was his goal all along.
I do find it funny that all the people here complaining about him are forgetting one thing: they declared war on someone to get trapped. This was not a case of some poor defenseless carebear having Dec Shield run up on them. Yes, eve RvB went out of its way to dec someone else in a system they really should have known was bugged.
I also laugh at the different replies from people. Carebears are convinced the sky is falling and "elite pvpers" haven't even noticed so they say. It's almost like a default response from these people in any situation.
Hopefully more and more war dec bugs go away and we can move on to other problems to fix and maybe we'll all get trapped in that too!
So if I dec some one to get what seems to be a dead corp dead stick pos out, and then they run to Dec shield it is my fault?
I do agrree nemesis of Buzz lightyear accomplished his goal of getting mutual fixed. His new find may or may not work is now starting to push it. Given that as he can not talk about it, but from the time line it seems he explicity sought it out rather than going and finding it to be a natural part of the game. Sort of like how I can take down a pos without a personal war dec. Not that it works anymore due to the change in flags. Or does it, hmm need to go and test. |

Mund Richard
18
|
Posted - 2012.12.09 15:17:00 -
[487] - Quote
Isana Tori wrote:I do find it funny that all the people here complaining about him are forgetting one thing: they declared war on someone to get trapped. This was not a case of some poor defenseless carebear having Dec Shield run up on them. Yes, eve RvB went out of its way to dec someone else in a system they really should have known was bugged. Point there, true. Let's assume after a wardec declared on them, finding the agressors 1-man-corp OGB, they dec that? Agression, or evening the play field? How about if carebears wardec notorious canflippers/ninjasalvagers aiming at them when only a few are online? Agression or self-defence?
Sometimes a war started before the dec, ignoring that is... ignorance.
Then again, it can get to kindergarten levels really fast: "I did it because he did this" - "I only did this because he did that" - "That I did because this one time he..." Sarcasm can be like drugs. |

Hinsty David
I can't pronounce Bacaruda Dec Shield
0
|
Posted - 2012.12.09 15:31:00 -
[488] - Quote
NEONOVUS wrote: So if I dec some one to get what seems to be a dead corp dead stick pos out, and then they run to Dec shield it is my fault?
I do agrree nemesis of Buzz lightyear accomplished his goal of getting mutual fixed. His new find may or may not work is now starting to push it. Given that as he can not talk about it, but from the time line it seems he explicity sought it out rather than going and finding it to be a natural part of the game. Sort of like how I can take down a pos without a personal war dec. Not that it works anymore due to the change in flags. Or does it, hmm need to go and test.
Your fault? Kinda? It's a busted system, and if you want to engage in war decs in a busted system, you have to know this could happen. There were and are ways to get around getting caught in that trap and still kill the tower, it's just easier to flat out dec them.
So I wouldn't exactly lay all the blame at your feet, but as Eve is fond of telling us, actions have consequences. And in a busted system, sometimes you get pulled in. Be glad it has been mostly fixed now and the worst (mutual trapping) is now gone for the most part. |

Hinsty David
I can't pronounce Bacaruda Dec Shield
0
|
Posted - 2012.12.09 15:36:00 -
[489] - Quote
Mund Richard wrote:Isana Tori wrote:I do find it funny that all the people here complaining about him are forgetting one thing: they declared war on someone to get trapped. This was not a case of some poor defenseless carebear having Dec Shield run up on them. Yes, eve RvB went out of its way to dec someone else in a system they really should have known was bugged. Point there, true. Let's assume after a wardec declared on them, finding the agressors 1-man-corp OGB, they dec that? Agression, or evening the play field? How about if carebears wardec notorious canflippers/ninjasalvagers aiming at them when only a few are online? Agression or self-defence? Sometimes a war started before the dec, ignoring that is... ignorance. Then again, it can get to kindergarten levels really fast: "I did it because he did this" - "I only did this because he did that" - "That I did because this one time he..."
It is indeed a constant one up. When people war dec someone for ANY reasons, it's an escalation of the conflict. It's not really fair for one side to decide when the escalation is over.
One group decides to escalate by going to war, it's not unusual to suspect the other side will ratchet it up as well. If there was another step in the process (and there are) the first group would probably do that as well.
It was a "I'll call and raise" moment that the deccers didn't see coming and now want no part of but its too late. You can't back out of that hand now.
|

Cannibal Kane
Praetorian Cannibals
818
|
Posted - 2012.12.09 16:54:00 -
[490] - Quote
Well...
It was only a matter of time but I finally got pulled into Dec Shield.
My Corp will now go on ice and I will create multiple corps purely to go after these guys. I'm not a Pirate, I'm a Terrorist.
The Crazy Space Poor South African.
*Hair done by LGÇÖOr+¬al, because I'm worth it. |
|

NEONOVUS
Saablast Followers
59
|
Posted - 2012.12.09 20:38:00 -
[491] - Quote
Cannibal Kane wrote:Well...
It was only a matter of time but I finally got pulled into Dec Shield.
My Corp will now go on ice and I will create multiple corps purely to go after these guys. Wait why exactly does this harm you? I mean I will help you if you need t1 stuff run as much as I can. For everything else, use Red Frog with a 24 hour preplan for positioning.
|

Hinsty David
I can't pronounce Bacaruda Dec Shield
0
|
Posted - 2012.12.09 21:07:00 -
[492] - Quote
NEONOVUS wrote:
So wait no war dec= no conflict as defined in the EULA (ignore emergent gameplay here) Thus what ever led to the need for war would go unpunished. Given that none of these defending corps have attempted to do things on their own, I would say they are using an exploit to gain an advantage now. If you were to tell me that the decced corp set it to mutual and then signed on all of nullsec through copious usage of alcahol and cash, I would say hazards of the game. But now that the corp is running away from the fight and then being told its not their fault and the other group was bullying issues arise. And saying well its a bugged system so you shouldnt use it is an example of ill thought (similar to blaming the Austrailian DJs for the nurses death when the international media declared her persona and everything else) Given that dec sheild was explicitly created to remove any threat to defenders by decoupling consequences of war from the actions precipitating I would say that it definitely should be shutdown now that its stated goal is over. Further continuance of its existence risks mission creep as it attempts to find ever more bizarre reasons to justify itself.
I think Zerg is looking to make sure there are no more exploits in the war dec system. If there is no way to trap people, then there is nothing for him to do. I'm not how he could continue or "justify itself" if the war dec bugs are gone.
If Dec Shield CAN continue with war dec mechanics issue, then it clearly isn't solved yet and the stated goal isn't over.
|

NEONOVUS
Saablast Followers
59
|
Posted - 2012.12.09 21:11:00 -
[493] - Quote
The stated goal was to get mutual wars to not be a flip switch walk off thing, and about wars carrying. Both of those have been fixed. He has a possible third one that is related but doesnt talk about it since he is in dialogue with CCP on it until the 12th. So if those clear any further existence is as mentioned mission creep. |

Hinsty David
I can't pronounce Bacaruda Dec Shield
0
|
Posted - 2012.12.09 21:17:00 -
[494] - Quote
NEONOVUS wrote:The stated goal was to get mutual wars to not be a flip switch walk off thing, and about wars carrying. Both of those have been fixed. He has a possible third one that is related but doesnt talk about it since he is in dialogue with CCP on it until the 12th. So if those clear any further existence is as mentioned mission creep.
I agree with you but again I ask. Even if he WANTED to continue this.... what could he do? If all avenues of war dec griefing are closed, what are his options?
If he has options to keep using Dec Shield, they obviously didn't fix everything? |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
537
|
Posted - 2012.12.09 22:53:00 -
[495] - Quote
Hinsty David wrote: I agree with you but again I ask. Even if he WANTED to continue this.... what could he do? If all avenues of war dec griefing are closed, what are his options?
If he has options to keep using Dec Shield, they obviously didn't fix everything?
If everything is fixed then we'll make the public announcements, hang up the towel, and then go dormant until we're needed again.
Raesha Nardieu wrote: You say you want to end high sec griefing yet in the case of my alliance *YOU* are the griefers...how are you trying to get matters resolved when you are snide and unresponsive to all attempts at diplomacy?
You go against yourself by saying you wish to bring attention to the broken mechanics and end highsec griefing yet you are guilty of the same thing you are so-called trying to stop and paint yourself here as being a sort of Robin Hood when you're no better than the thugs you protect.
I just wished to point out Dec Shield are not and have not been acting as admirably and honourably as they would like all of you here to believe and are actually griefers themselves that are further contributing to the rising ship and mineral costs by not allowing carebears to get out and seed our markets.
Snide and unresponsive? As far as I know I haven't received any communication from your corp until 20 minutes ago. Sending a 0isk surrender offer does not constitute communication.
I am no Ser. If you are an aggressor, you are guilty.
I hear countless sob stories from every entity without dignity. I had to make a policy to decline them all, else no one would be trapped.
Burn Highsec Griefers |

FnStrabo
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2012.12.10 03:08:00 -
[496] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:Hinsty David wrote: I agree with you but again I ask. Even if he WANTED to continue this.... what could he do? If all avenues of war dec griefing are closed, what are his options?
If he has options to keep using Dec Shield, they obviously didn't fix everything?
If everything is fixed then we'll make the public announcements, hang up the towel, and then go dormant until we're needed again. Raesha Nardieu wrote: You say you want to end high sec griefing yet in the case of my alliance *YOU* are the griefers...how are you trying to get matters resolved when you are snide and unresponsive to all attempts at diplomacy?
You go against yourself by saying you wish to bring attention to the broken mechanics and end highsec griefing yet you are guilty of the same thing you are so-called trying to stop and paint yourself here as being a sort of Robin Hood when you're no better than the thugs you protect.
I just wished to point out Dec Shield are not and have not been acting as admirably and honourably as they would like all of you here to believe and are actually griefers themselves that are further contributing to the rising ship and mineral costs by not allowing carebears to get out and seed our markets.
Snide and unresponsive? As far as I know I haven't received any communication from your corp until 20 minutes ago. Sending a 0isk surrender offer does not constitute communication. I am no Ser. If you are an aggressor, you are guilty. I hear countless sob stories from every entity without dignity. I had to make a policy to decline them all, else no one would be trapped.
Wow! Can I call BS on this guy ^^^
Zerg, according to you, this dec shield is supposed to get the griefers and aggressors. Funny... I know a corp that started an unprovoked WD. They were found using alts in another corp to boost/rep their pvp members who started the war. The defenders War dec'd the alt corp to keep them from being able to do this without potential for reprisal.
Guess who ran to dec shield? You supported the aggressor/griefer.
Your high ideals are just a bunch of BS. Your nothing more than a griefer yourself. Get off your high horse. CCP should just Ban you for exploitation of game mechanics.
Go crawl back into whatever hole you hatched in. |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
537
|
Posted - 2012.12.10 03:19:00 -
[497] - Quote
FnStrabo wrote: Wow! Can I call BS on this guy ^^^
Zerg, according to you, this dec shield is supposed to get the griefers and aggressors. Funny... I know a corp that started an unprovoked WD. They were found using alts in another corp to boost/rep their pvp members who started the war. The defenders War dec'd the alt corp to keep them from being able to do this without potential for reprisal.
Guess who ran to dec shield? You supported the aggressor/griefer.
Your high ideals are just a bunch of BS. Your nothing more than a griefer yourself. Get off your high horse. CCP should just Ban you for exploitation of game mechanics.
Go crawl back into whatever hole you hatched in.
Quoted for the lulz Burn Highsec Griefers |

FnStrabo
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2012.12.10 03:22:00 -
[498] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:
Quoted for the lulz
Spoken like a true troll of attention that you are. |

Michael Harari
The Hatchery Team Liquid
391
|
Posted - 2012.12.10 03:29:00 -
[499] - Quote
FnStrabo wrote:The Zerg Overmind wrote:
Quoted for the lulz
Spoken like a true troll of attention that you are.
Post with your main |

Hinsty David
I can't pronounce Bacaruda Dec Shield
0
|
Posted - 2012.12.10 03:30:00 -
[500] - Quote
FnStrabo wrote:The Zerg Overmind wrote:
Quoted for the lulz
Spoken like a true troll of attention that you are.
You didn't have to come in here and bring up the story, so.... good job?
|
|

Surfin's PlunderBunny
The Python Cartel.
4106
|
Posted - 2012.12.10 04:00:00 -
[501] - Quote
Hinsty David wrote:FnStrabo wrote:The Zerg Overmind wrote:
Quoted for the lulz
Spoken like a true troll of attention that you are. You didn't have to come in here and bring up the story, so.... good job?
He's just mad because he's bald "Little ginger moron" ~David Hasselhoff-á |

Joshua Foiritain
Coreli Corporation Corelum Syndicate
139
|
Posted - 2012.12.10 12:06:00 -
[502] - Quote
FnStrabo wrote: The Zerg Overmind wrote:Hinsty David wrote: I agree with you but again I ask. Even if he WANTED to continue this.... what could he do? If all avenues of war dec griefing are closed, what are his options?
If he has options to keep using Dec Shield, they obviously didn't fix everything?
If everything is fixed then we'll make the public announcements, hang up the towel, and then go dormant until we're needed again. Raesha Nardieu wrote: You say you want to end high sec griefing yet in the case of my alliance *YOU* are the griefers...how are you trying to get matters resolved when you are snide and unresponsive to all attempts at diplomacy?
You go against yourself by saying you wish to bring attention to the broken mechanics and end highsec griefing yet you are guilty of the same thing you are so-called trying to stop and paint yourself here as being a sort of Robin Hood when you're no better than the thugs you protect.
I just wished to point out Dec Shield are not and have not been acting as admirably and honourably as they would like all of you here to believe and are actually griefers themselves that are further contributing to the rising ship and mineral costs by not allowing carebears to get out and seed our markets.
Snide and unresponsive? As far as I know I haven't received any communication from your corp until 20 minutes ago. Sending a 0isk surrender offer does not constitute communication. I am no Ser. If you are an aggressor, you are guilty. I hear countless sob stories from every entity without dignity. I had to make a policy to decline them all, else no one would be trapped. Wow! Can I call BS on this guy ^^^ Zerg, according to you, this dec shield is supposed to get the griefers and aggressors. Funny... I know a corp that started an unprovoked WD. They were found using alts in another corp to boost/rep their pvp members who started the war. The defenders War dec'd the alt corp to keep them from being able to do this without potential for reprisal. Guess who ran to dec shield? You supported the aggressor/griefer. Your high ideals are just a bunch of BS. Your nothing more than a griefer yourself. Get off your high horse. CCP should just Ban you for exploitation of game mechanics. Go crawl back into whatever hole you hatched in. rofl, welcome to 6 months ago dude. Dec Shield is the most effective anti-carebear troll in the history of eve. Random carebears read this topic, join dec shield to get rid of their war and find out that instead of being at war with 1 corp they're now at war with hundreds. Most end up disbanding within a few days :p
Yay for free war targets, nay for the endless notification spam :( |

Eram Fidard
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.12.10 14:42:00 -
[503] - Quote
Mund Richard wrote: evening the play field?
=(((((((
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/evening
doesn't mean what you think it means...
try 'levelling'
edit: I considered making a serious reply to this topic, but thankfully I got ahold of myself. |

Raesha Nardieu
The Soul Society Pax Romana Alliance
2
|
Posted - 2012.12.10 17:41:00 -
[504] - Quote
Raesha Nardieu wrote: You say you want to end high sec griefing yet in the case of my alliance *YOU* are the griefers...how are you trying to get matters resolved when you are snide and unresponsive to all attempts at diplomacy?
You go against yourself by saying you wish to bring attention to the broken mechanics and end highsec griefing yet you are guilty of the same thing you are so-called trying to stop and paint yourself here as being a sort of Robin Hood when you're no better than the thugs you protect.
I just wished to point out Dec Shield are not and have not been acting as admirably and honourably as they would like all of you here to believe and are actually griefers themselves that are further contributing to the rising ship and mineral costs by not allowing carebears to get out and seed our markets.
Snide and unresponsive? As far as I know I haven't received any communication from your corp until 20 minutes ago. Sending a 0isk surrender offer does not constitute communication.
I am no Ser. If you are an aggressor, you are guilty.
I hear countless sob stories from every entity without dignity. I had to make a policy to decline them all, else no one would be trapped. [/quote]
The Zerg Overmind:
If you still have your mails, I would like to call your attention to mails starting from 2012.11.22 with one of my bosses in alliance leadership.
Alliance war transfer From: Sent: 2012.11.22 03:54 To: The Zerg Overmind
That is the first contact we attempted to make with you and have been met with either snide remarks or silence at each attempt... the subsequent surrender offers have been everyday since the launch of Retribution... so again, do you wish to maintain that you are trying to resolve issues? Furthermore, your own reaction above and throughout this thread proves how snide you are.
Its true, we did dec a corp but as has already been stated, that was to even the playing field. We were dec'd by a corp, they had alts that were in a different corp who sat OG boosting, we forewarned them to stop interfering or become targets themselves... they didnt listen. As was pointed out earlier, you cant possibly know the story to all such conflicts and who are you to choose who is the true aggressor and who is truly guilty?
If you were truly trying to help improve EvE and be a constructive member of the community, you could find other ways to put your talents for hunting bugs and extrenuous testing of exploits to use and to cause change while having a positive influence on the game and the community instead of inflicting change through negative action. Have you ever thought about messing about on the test server and spamming CCP Devs with bug reports to get these things fixed before they're live and exploitable in game?
Oh and nice to know that one who has shown no honour or dignity himself in this matter is trying to play judge and jury of such throughout all of EvE. |

ZaBob
Twilight Labs Unsung Voices
283
|
Posted - 2012.12.10 19:20:00 -
[505] - Quote
NEONOVUS wrote: So if I dec some one to get what seems to be a dead corp dead stick pos out, and then they run to Dec shield it is my fault?
Yes.
You thought they were dead. You were wrong. Seems completely clear-cut to me!
Even an honest mistake, is still a mistake. |

ZaBob
Twilight Labs Unsung Voices
283
|
Posted - 2012.12.10 21:50:00 -
[506] - Quote
Eram Fidard wrote:Mund Richard wrote: evening the play field?
=((((((( http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/eveningdoesn't mean what you think it means... try 'levelling' edit: I considered making a serious reply to this topic, but thankfully I got ahold of myself.
Well, at least you were being relatively nice about it, so I'll point this out nicely...
Following your own link, I see definition #21 of "even" as a transitive verb, of which "evening" is the participle form, which appears to be the usage he was using.
Why is it that people who trouble to correct people's grammar on the internet get it wrong far more often than not?
|

Tah'ris Khlador
Space Ghosts. Break-A-Wish Foundation
276
|
Posted - 2012.12.10 22:07:00 -
[507] - Quote
*Yoink* |

Tah'ris Khlador
Space Ghosts. Break-A-Wish Foundation
276
|
Posted - 2012.12.10 22:09:00 -
[508] - Quote
Raesha Nardieu wrote:Oh and nice to know that one who has shown no honour or dignity himself in this matter is trying to play judge and jury of such throughout all of EvE.
There it is! The tears are centered on this concept! If you accept that EVE has no basis with honor or dignity, your tears will flow less.
Sure Dec Shield is annoying, but I mean, come on. Zerg has clearly stated he is not making exceptions when it comes to releasing people, what makes you so special? You aren't RVB - Red Federation!
EDIT: Regardless, if you read the latest patch notes, CCP plugged the latest hole by allowing Aggressors to also retract wars that were mutual at any point. So we've boiled Inferno down to the Ally system when it comes to war mechanics. Everything else was nerfed to fix the glaring holes. |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
542
|
Posted - 2012.12.10 22:21:00 -
[509] - Quote
Raesha Nardieu wrote:The Zerg Overmind:
If you still have your mails, I would like to call your attention to mails starting from 2012.11.22 with one of my bosses in alliance leadership.
Alliance war transfer From: Sent: 2012.11.22 03:54 To: The Zerg Overmind
That is the first contact we attempted to make with you and have been met with either snide remarks or silence at each attempt... the subsequent surrender offers have been everyday since the launch of Retribution... so again, do you wish to maintain that you are trying to resolve issues? Furthermore, your own reaction above and throughout this thread proves how snide you are.
Its true, we did dec a corp but as has already been stated, that was to even the playing field. We were dec'd by a corp, they had alts that were in a different corp who sat OG boosting, we forewarned them to stop interfering or become targets themselves... they didnt listen. As was pointed out earlier, you cant possibly know the story to all such conflicts and who are you to choose who is the true aggressor and who is truly guilty?
If you were truly trying to help improve EvE and be a constructive member of the community, you could find other ways to put your talents for hunting bugs and extrenuous testing of exploits to use and to cause change while having a positive influence on the game and the community instead of inflicting change through negative action. Have you ever thought about messing about on the test server and spamming CCP Devs with bug reports to get these things fixed before they're live and exploitable in game?
Oh and nice to know that one who has shown no honour or dignity himself in this matter is trying to play judge and jury of such throughout all of EvE. I did respond to that email the day it was sent. I replied with useful information summarizing the upcoming changes, with a link directly to the devblog.
It's not my fault you're the guilty party here. You wardecced and there are consequences (at least there was in Inferno, lol). Welcome to Eve. I'm quite content to make an example of your tears in the forums, please continue. A story about how you're a special snowflake I should make an exception for would be appreciated. And I'd be sure to pass it on to management for consideration.
Burn Highsec Griefers |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
543
|
Posted - 2012.12.10 22:42:00 -
[510] - Quote
It's over now. CCP stealth fixed the third method today with the patch:
"Wars that are now made mutual will always be able to be retracted by the aggressor, even if the war is made non-mutual."
http://community.eveonline.com/updates/patchnotes.asp Burn Highsec Griefers |
|

Serious Desire
Annoyance.
3
|
Posted - 2012.12.11 02:17:00 -
[511] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:It's over now. CCP stealth fixed the third method today with the patch: "Wars that are now made mutual will always be able to be retracted by the aggressor, even if the war is made non-mutual." http://community.eveonline.com/updates/patchnotes.aspUpdate: We're testing this. There is no evidence that this is working as advertised.
Bro, you're truly a moron if you believe CCP is able to fix the BS code they try and write. This isn't fixed. If anything, they probably made it worse. |

Junko Sideswipe
Love Squad Confederation of xXPIZZAXx
99
|
Posted - 2012.12.11 05:36:00 -
[512] - Quote
Welp, we're back up to about 16 non-mutual wars we didn't pay for. This is getting pretty ridiculous, sent a petition in on friday, no response. Sent another one in earlier today, no response. Even just a "hold on we're discussing this with devs" would be nice.
Also I've noticed not even one dev has posted in this thread, what's up with that? Confederation of xXPIZZAXx CEO TRUE and HONEST boyfriend-free girl gamer |

Tah'ris Khlador
Space Ghosts. Break-A-Wish Foundation
277
|
Posted - 2012.12.11 06:30:00 -
[513] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:It's over now. CCP stealth fixed the third method today with the patch: "Wars that are now made mutual will always be able to be retracted by the aggressor, even if the war is made non-mutual." http://community.eveonline.com/updates/patchnotes.aspUpdate: We're testing this. There is no evidence that this is working as advertised.
My test assumed that this is post patch mutual settings only, presuming that a "previously mutual" flag wasn't being stored until now. So, if it was done right, Dec Shield wars should still be ending one way or another soon.
Not sure if a corporation that drops out from an alliance that once had the war mutual carries the flag though. Might be able to use that carry it further? I'm too tired to think this part through properly. |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
543
|
Posted - 2012.12.11 08:50:00 -
[514] - Quote
Tah'ris Khlador wrote: My test assumed that this is post patch mutual settings only, presuming that a "previously mutual" flag wasn't being stored until now. So, if it was done right, Dec Shield wars should still be ending one way or another soon.
Not sure if a corporation that drops out from an alliance that once had the war mutual carries the flag though. Might be able to use that carry it further? I'm too tired to think this part through properly.
These were exactly my thoughts on how to proceed. But I'm pretty sure that it won't work. I'm not sure why the patch isn't setting everyone free right now Burn Highsec Griefers |

JC Anderson
Noir. Noir. Mercenary Group
810
|
Posted - 2012.12.11 14:05:00 -
[515] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:Tah'ris Khlador wrote: My test assumed that this is post patch mutual settings only, presuming that a "previously mutual" flag wasn't being stored until now. So, if it was done right, Dec Shield wars should still be ending one way or another soon.
Not sure if a corporation that drops out from an alliance that once had the war mutual carries the flag though. Might be able to use that carry it further? I'm too tired to think this part through properly.
These were exactly my thoughts on how to proceed. But I'm pretty sure that it won't work. I'm not sure why the patch isn't setting everyone free right now. Some people do seem to be escaping though
I won't be surprised if some of the dec's will still need CCP intervention to yank them free. As in, it won't be possible to do it again with a new war dec, but some of the ones already active might be stuck or something along those lines. |

JC Anderson
Noir. Noir. Mercenary Group
811
|
Posted - 2012.12.11 16:13:00 -
[516] - Quote
CCP Paradox posted about this in general discussion this morning --
CCP Paradox wrote:Hulemand wrote:Our war with them was made non-mutual on December 4th, resulting in a war bill we did not pay. Now we had a new war bill today on December 11th. Seems like the war is not ending. What happened in the last week, that the bills for the wars were cancelled before Dec 4th which created new bills for a 7 day war. Additionally after the Retribution release, this could also happen. So bills were cancelled again, and this was resolved yesterday. This created new 7 day ways for everyone from Dec 11th. This is the last week. The bills cannot be cancelled and created again, resulting in another 7 day war. If a war is made mutual and then non mutual, you will always have the option to retract the war, from then on out. If a corp joins an alliance, you will have a bill for just the alliance. If a corp leaves an alliance, you will have a bill for the alliance and corp that left. Both of these bills will always carry the same status as the original bill. If the original bill had a due date of 16th December, and had not been paid. Then both the Corp that left, and Alliance will have the same values. You would see both of them in the wallet as due on the 16th, and that have not been paid yet. I hope this clears it up for now.
|

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
546
|
Posted - 2012.12.11 16:14:00 -
[517] - Quote
Nevermind, found it Burn Highsec Griefers |

Msgerbs
Imperial Assualt Guild
40
|
Posted - 2012.12.11 18:20:00 -
[518] - Quote
CCP should really stop "fixing" wars. If you declare war on somebody, you should be taking a risk. You should be GUARANTEED at least a week of fighting against whoever they call in. None of this "LOL I declared war on you but I'm getting owned so I'm just going to withdraw instantly" bullcrap. |

Ristlin Wakefield
Wanderers of the Eternal Darkness Eternal Pretorian Alliance
166
|
Posted - 2012.12.11 19:25:00 -
[519] - Quote
Msgerbs wrote:CCP should really stop "fixing" wars. If you declare war on somebody, you should be taking a risk. You should be GUARANTEED at least a week of fighting against whoever they call in. None of this "LOL I declared war on you but I'm getting owned so I'm just going to withdraw instantly" bullcrap.
People run all the time in EVE, why not run away from wars too? I have a lover, her name is EVE. I see her every night and all she asks in return is that I have a pilot's license. |

Unsuccessful At Everything
The Troll Bridge
703
|
Posted - 2012.12.11 19:30:00 -
[520] - Quote
Ristlin Wakefield wrote:
People run all the time in EVE, why not run away from wars too?
For some reason I just got a Monty Python and The Holy Grail flashback.... Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings? |
|

Kalel Nimrott
EG CORP Talocan United
92
|
Posted - 2012.12.11 20:02:00 -
[521] - Quote
I'm gonna miss reading about all those tears... |

Msgerbs
Imperial Assualt Guild
40
|
Posted - 2012.12.11 20:05:00 -
[522] - Quote
Ristlin Wakefield wrote:Msgerbs wrote:CCP should really stop "fixing" wars. If you declare war on somebody, you should be taking a risk. You should be GUARANTEED at least a week of fighting against whoever they call in. None of this "LOL I declared war on you but I'm getting owned so I'm just going to withdraw instantly" bullcrap. People run all the time in EVE, why not run away from wars too? Because a wardec is committing to fight a certain corporation for a week. I'm fine with being able to withdraw a non-mutual war, it makes sense. But being able to withdraw immediately from a mutual war is stupid. You should be committed to at least the remaining week of the war before you can withdraw. |

Domineren
Social Terrorism. Wicked Intentions.
4
|
Posted - 2012.12.11 20:45:00 -
[523] - Quote
Serious Desire wrote:The Zerg Overmind wrote:It's over now. CCP stealth fixed the third method today with the patch: "Wars that are now made mutual will always be able to be retracted by the aggressor, even if the war is made non-mutual." http://community.eveonline.com/updates/patchnotes.aspUpdate: We're testing this. There is no evidence that this is working as advertised. Bro, you're truly a moron if you believe CCP is able to fix the BS code they try and write. This isn't fixed. If anything, they probably made it worse. Dont you know? CCP= Cant Code Properly |

AnzacPaul
Invictus Australis
110
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 20:52:00 -
[524] - Quote
Still not fixed
From: CONCORD Sent: 2012.12.12 20:42
Invictus Australis has declared war on Dec Shield Ambassador 27.0. Fighting can legally occur between those involved. |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
552
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 20:57:00 -
[525] - Quote
No. It's still fixed. I just made a mistake by letting a couple alliance escape early by toggling the mutuality thing before I brought Allies into the war to shoot you. I restored those wars using a dropped corp, hence why you had retracted against us, and then magically were back at war again today. I found it amusing, but it's only delaying the inevitable. All our wars end on the 18th.
The dropped corp's wars are ending on the 18th as well. You can verify that from the bills your corp has received. Still fixed, you'll all be free on the 18th
Burn Highsec Griefers |

AnzacPaul
Invictus Australis
110
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 21:22:00 -
[526] - Quote
I don't even care about the wars, it's stopping us from joining a new alliance that is the issue.
Well played :)
|

Art Gallery
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 23:09:00 -
[527] - Quote
Who pays the bills? And why do I never see any WTs? |

NEONOVUS
Saablast Followers
62
|
Posted - 2012.12.13 03:54:00 -
[528] - Quote
Art Gallery wrote:Who pays the bills? And why do I never see any WTs? No one yet and maybe if you undocked... |

Tah'ris Khlador
Space Ghosts. Break-A-Wish Foundation
280
|
Posted - 2012.12.13 03:57:00 -
[529] - Quote
Art Gallery wrote:Who pays the bills? And why do I never see any WTs?
Probably because you're in an NPC corp. They don't have wars. |

NEONOVUS
Saablast Followers
62
|
Posted - 2012.12.13 04:00:00 -
[530] - Quote
Tah'ris Khlador wrote:Art Gallery wrote:Who pays the bills? And why do I never see any WTs? Probably because you're in an NPC corp. They don't have wars. Ooh good point. That might just be her main.
Also what will you do now that people no longer require proxies to deal with Dec Shield? Just dec all the corps anyways? |
|

Art Gallery
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.12.13 06:28:00 -
[531] - Quote
NEONOVUS wrote:Tah'ris Khlador wrote:Art Gallery wrote:Who pays the bills? And why do I never see any WTs? Probably because you're in an NPC corp. They don't have wars. Ooh good point. That might just be her main. Also what will you do now that people no longer require proxies to deal with Dec Shield? Just dec all the corps anyways?
People dont need proxies to deal with Dec Shield. |

Hinsty David
I can't pronounce Bacaruda Dec Shield
2
|
Posted - 2012.12.13 15:37:00 -
[532] - Quote
NEONOVUS wrote:Tah'ris Khlador wrote:Art Gallery wrote:Who pays the bills? And why do I never see any WTs? Probably because you're in an NPC corp. They don't have wars. Ooh good point. That might just be her main. Also what will you do now that people no longer require proxies to deal with Dec Shield? Just dec all the corps anyways?
Sounds like someone gets all their info off this forum. |

Tah'ris Khlador
Space Ghosts. Break-A-Wish Foundation
288
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 05:58:00 -
[533] - Quote
So it's still glitched for us. We are unable to retract the mutual war. Love the broken. |

Junko Sideswipe
Love Squad Confederation of xXPIZZAXx
99
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 06:02:00 -
[534] - Quote
The bill timers finally ran out, all of our decs are ending EXCEPT dec shield, which they declared mutual earlier today somehow, and I can't make it non-mutual now. Confederation of xXPIZZAXx CEO TRUE and HONEST boyfriend-free girl gamer |

Arame Azur
Eat My Shorts Inc.
0
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 07:04:00 -
[535] - Quote
Yes there is still a bug in the Warmechanic. If the defender set the war mutual, the attacker must wait until the next downtime to retract the mutual war. |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
554
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 23:42:00 -
[536] - Quote
Arame Azur wrote:Yes there is still a bug in the Warmechanic. If the defender set the war mutual, the attacker must wait until the next downtime to retract the mutual war. ya, we discovered that a few days ago and reported it to them, but no word back. I'm calculating the current stats now, but it looks like 115 wars have been retracted in the last 24hrs Burn Highsec Griefers |

NEONOVUS
Saablast Followers
79
|
Posted - 2012.12.19 00:49:00 -
[537] - Quote
Arame Azur wrote:Yes there is still a bug in the Warmechanic. If the defender set the war mutual, the attacker must wait until the next downtime to retract the mutual war. Doesnt sound like a bug so much. Corp roles and other things have to wait until downtime, so this probably is just one of them.
Oh and RIP Dec Shield. |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
554
|
Posted - 2012.12.19 01:08:00 -
[538] - Quote
Haha, look at them slopes:
http://i.imgur.com/8KNhd.png Burn Highsec Griefers |

NEONOVUS
Saablast Followers
79
|
Posted - 2012.12.19 02:54:00 -
[539] - Quote
What happened October 18th? |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
554
|
Posted - 2012.12.19 03:00:00 -
[540] - Quote
Oct 5th was Eve Vegas October 18th was the acquisition of RvB November 20th was acquisition of RED.Overlord and Northern Coalition December 6th, GMs set RvB - Red Federation free December 11th, CCP releases patch to close last exploit. I restore all dropped wars using a dropped corp December 18th, all wars set to end, I set mutual to see who's willing to stick around, mass exodus Burn Highsec Griefers |
|

Thomas Gore
State Protectorate Caldari State
30
|
Posted - 2012.12.19 06:32:00 -
[541] - Quote
So mission accomplished I guess?
What will be your next target in forcing CCP to fix broken game mechanics? :) |

Ronan Connor
13
|
Posted - 2012.12.19 12:35:00 -
[542] - Quote
Thomas Gore wrote:So mission accomplished I guess?
What will be your next target in forcing CCP to fix broken game mechanics? :)
Allthough some of you cant hear it anymore, I would be for bounties. Though it was a great idea, one has to admit there is alot of missuse, like every freighter in 4-4 gets one, blackmailing of noobs, bounties without a reason on positive sec standing...
The only way I see CCP is fixing the missuse in the very next future, is to go where it hurts them.
Put a bounty on noobs in starting areas. It doesnt need to be very high. I know it is a harsh measure, but I cant see any other way to make CCP see sense and fix the ideas of bounties. What we see now is, that innocent player and innocent corps get bounties. Some of the player accept it, but even some older player feel like they are perma wardecced, which is somewhat similar to the dec shield. Anyway, this leads that people are afraid partially to go out there and play the game they pay for.
My suggestions would be:
1) Bounties are only valid in Null Sec, Low Sec and Wormholes 2) Bounties in High Sec are only valid during a War Dec, with a negative sec standing or with a kill right on you. Otherwise they wont even show up, while you are in High sec. A kill right would be valid as long the bounty value is not payed out 100% but the amount of the bounty cant be higher as the (both) kill mails i.e. 250 misk loss for a miner with implants mean 250 misk max. bounty on the kill right. --> as a bonus for you C&P guys, this would mean can flipping in high sec doesnt give kill rights anymore. 3) Maybe bounties could be paid out as well in 0.5 and 0.6 systems. But then as a semi low sec the income there must be raised of course to match risk vs. the then too low income there. (Rats give more, more LP like 15.000 for a lvl 4 etc).
This is the most eminent broken game mechanic, as it endangers CCP's income, even without action from our side.
|

Cannibal Kane
Umkhonto We Sizwe
872
|
Posted - 2012.12.19 13:51:00 -
[543] - Quote
Ronan Connor wrote:Thomas Gore wrote:So mission accomplished I guess?
What will be your next target in forcing CCP to fix broken game mechanics? :) Allthough some of you cant hear it anymore, I would be for bounties. Though it was a great idea, one has to admit there is alot of missuse, like every freighter in 4-4 gets one, blackmailing of noobs, bounties without a reason on positive sec standing... The only way I see CCP is fixing the missuse in the very next future, is to go where it hurts them. Put a bounty on noobs in starting areas. It doesnt need to be very high. I know it is a harsh measure, but I cant see any other way to make CCP see sense and fix the ideas of bounties. What we see now is, that innocent player and innocent corps get bounties. Some of the player accept it, but even some older player feel like they are perma wardecced, which is somewhat similar to the dec shield. Anyway, this leads that people are afraid partially to go out there and play the game they pay for. My suggestions would be: 1) Bounties are only valid in Null Sec, Low Sec and Wormholes 2) Bounties in High Sec are only valid during a War Dec, with a negative sec standing or with a kill right on you. Otherwise they wont even show up, while you are in High sec. A kill right would be valid as long the bounty value is not payed out 100% but the amount of the bounty cant be higher as the (both) kill mails i.e. 250 misk loss for a miner with implants mean 250 misk max. bounty on the kill right. --> as a bonus for you C&P guys, this would mean can flipping in high sec doesnt give kill rights anymore. 3) Maybe bounties could be paid out as well in 0.5 and 0.6 systems. But then as a semi low sec the income there must be raised of course to match risk vs. the then too low income there. (Rats give more, more LP like 15.000 for a lvl 4 etc). This is the most eminent broken game mechanic, as it endangers CCP's income, even without action from our side.
The only reason you posted with alt is because you knew that the suggestion you gave is horrible.
If you posted with your main you might have thought of something better and posted it in the feature/suggestions forum where it belongs. I'm not a Pirate, I'm a Terrorist.
The Crazy Space Poor South African.
*Hair done by LGÇÖOr+¬al, because I'm worth it. |

Ronan Connor
13
|
Posted - 2012.12.19 14:04:00 -
[544] - Quote
Cannibal Kane wrote:Ronan Connor wrote:Thomas Gore wrote:So mission accomplished I guess?
What will be your next target in forcing CCP to fix broken game mechanics? :) Allthough some of you cant hear it anymore, I would be for bounties. Though it was a great idea, one has to admit there is alot of missuse, like every freighter in 4-4 gets one, blackmailing of noobs, bounties without a reason on positive sec standing... The only way I see CCP is fixing the missuse in the very next future, is to go where it hurts them. Put a bounty on noobs in starting areas. It doesnt need to be very high. I know it is a harsh measure, but I cant see any other way to make CCP see sense and fix the ideas of bounties. What we see now is, that innocent player and innocent corps get bounties. Some of the player accept it, but even some older player feel like they are perma wardecced, which is somewhat similar to the dec shield. Anyway, this leads that people are afraid partially to go out there and play the game they pay for. My suggestions would be: 1) Bounties are only valid in Null Sec, Low Sec and Wormholes 2) Bounties in High Sec are only valid during a War Dec, with a negative sec standing or with a kill right on you. Otherwise they wont even show up, while you are in High sec. A kill right would be valid as long the bounty value is not payed out 100% but the amount of the bounty cant be higher as the (both) kill mails i.e. 250 misk loss for a miner with implants mean 250 misk max. bounty on the kill right. --> as a bonus for you C&P guys, this would mean can flipping in high sec doesnt give kill rights anymore. 3) Maybe bounties could be paid out as well in 0.5 and 0.6 systems. But then as a semi low sec the income there must be raised of course to match risk vs. the then too low income there. (Rats give more, more LP like 15.000 for a lvl 4 etc). This is the most eminent broken game mechanic, as it endangers CCP's income, even without action from our side. The only reason you posted with alt is because you knew that the suggestion you gave is horrible. If you posted with your main you might have thought of something better and posted it in the feature/suggestions forum where it belongs. The reason I am posting with my alt is, that I did try a neutral suggestion once and my corp got wardecced. There are too many griefers around, if your main play style is not pvp.
Other then that I mean what I say. Bounties on players who dont enjoy pvp as much, make them feel like perma war decced. Though I generally like the idea of bounties ( I even did start small scale pvp and got a couple of suspects) there is alot of missuse going on here. Even you couldnt deny that.
Now back to business 
Are you giving some constructive input or not? I am still missing a better suggestion in your post. Remember, when you point at someone else, there are always three fingers point back at you. Now go ahead. I am open.  |

Ra Jackson
CRIMINALS IN ACTION Pure Madness.
77
|
Posted - 2012.12.19 14:15:00 -
[545] - Quote
Ronan Connor wrote: Put a bounty on noobs in starting areas. It doesnt need to be very high. I know it is a harsh measure, but I cant see any other way to make CCP see sense and fix the ideas of bounties. What we see now is, that innocent player and innocent corps get bounties. Some of the player accept it, but even some older player feel like they are perma wardecced, which is somewhat similar to the dec shield. Anyway, this leads that people are afraid partially to go out there and play the game they pay for.
Please elaborate how that bounty prevents you to play the game in any way. I'd like to see where your understanding of the bounty system went terribly wrong. |

Ronan Connor
13
|
Posted - 2012.12.19 14:52:00 -
[546] - Quote
Ra Jackson wrote:Ronan Connor wrote: Put a bounty on noobs in starting areas. It doesnt need to be very high. I know it is a harsh measure, but I cant see any other way to make CCP see sense and fix the ideas of bounties. What we see now is, that innocent player and innocent corps get bounties. Some of the player accept it, but even some older player feel like they are perma wardecced, which is somewhat similar to the dec shield. Anyway, this leads that people are afraid partially to go out there and play the game they pay for.
Please elaborate how a bounty prevents you from playing the game in any way. I'd like to see where your understanding of the bounty system went terribly wrong. Like I said. There are eve player who dont like the idea of pvp. To them a bounty is scaring. I see it in my corp where people got bounties and asked anxious how we can remove it. To them they have a feeling of threat like they are in a wardec. I feel a bit myself that way, though I did do some small scale pvp already.
The thing is, people in corps tend to station spin or dont play at all, when there is a wardec and they dont like the idea of pvp. This is happening to existing player and some new player. There is blackmailing for that reason already ("give me 10 million or you get a bounty"). They stay in station and dont turn up. I can see this in my own corp already. You can get bounties for nothing and that cant be "working as intended".
I dont want bounties to get removed, but to have feasible boundaries to give them away.
I know many of you will fall for "htfu" and be done with it. Its just eve is not only existing of pvp oriented player. Pretending that eve is a pure pvp game wont change that. |

Aducat Ragnarson
Cult of the Black Goat Dark Taboo
59
|
Posted - 2012.12.19 15:49:00 -
[547] - Quote
So basically you say that your players do not understand the bounty mechanism correctly and that it should be changed for that reason? Bounties. Do. Not. Give. Killrights. A bounty does not affect your gameplay at all. |

Ra Jackson
CRIMINALS IN ACTION Pure Madness.
79
|
Posted - 2012.12.19 15:49:00 -
[548] - Quote
Ronan Connor wrote:Like I said. There are eve player who dont like the idea of pvp. To them a bounty is scaring. I see it in my corp where people got bounties and asked anxious how we can remove it. To them they have a feeling of threat like they are in a wardec. I feel a bit myself that way, though I did do some small scale pvp already.
The thing is, people in corps tend to station spin or dont play at all, when there is a wardec and they dont like the idea of pvp. This is happening to existing player and some new player. There is blackmailing for that reason already ("give me 10 million or you get a bounty"). They stay in station and dont turn up. I can see this in my own corp already. You can get bounties for nothing and that cant be "working as intended".
I dont want bounties to get removed, but to have feasible boundaries to give them away.
I know many of you will fall for "htfu" and be done with it. Its just eve is not only existing of pvp oriented player. Pretending that eve is a pure pvp game wont change that.
And how does it influence your carebear gaming apart from an obscure fear of.. I don't know what? |

Ronan Connor
13
|
Posted - 2012.12.19 16:34:00 -
[549] - Quote
Aducat Ragnarson wrote:So basically you say that your players do not understand the bounty mechanism correctly and that it should be changed for that reason? Bounties. Do. Not. Give. Killrights. A bounty does not affect your gameplay at all. I do know that. But that does not mean everybody does. Its just feels like a red cross to many.
@Ra Thats just it. The fear causes some player not to undock. If you are trying to see the issue from this point of view, you will consider it enough.
|

Ra Jackson
CRIMINALS IN ACTION Pure Madness.
79
|
Posted - 2012.12.19 17:19:00 -
[550] - Quote
Ronan Connor wrote:@Ra Thats just it. The fear causes some player not to undock. If you are trying to see the issue from this point of view, you will consider it enough.
Why don't you inform your guys that the bounty doesn't really change anything? Staying docked just "because" actually shows how admirably well the new bounty system works lol. Either way, as was already pointed out: Not understanding mechanics is not a sensible reason to demand changes to the game. |
|

Da Grim Reaper
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
6
|
Posted - 2012.12.19 18:22:00 -
[551] - Quote
Ronan Connor wrote: Thats just it. The fear causes some player not to undock. If you are trying to see the issue from this point of view, you will consider it enough.
Taking this to the logical conclusion:
I am afraid that someone might gank me without a bounty because the game allows it, therefore I should not undock. I am afraid that I might lose my ship in a mission, therefore I will not do mission. I am afraid that I might make a bad market transaction, therefore I will not use the market. I do not understand something, therefore I am afraid, therefore I will do nothing not even learn what I do not understand. I am afraid that I might get asked a question about why I am canceling, therefore I will avoid canceling just to prevent someone from asking.
Bounties are not the issue, FEAR is the issue. |

NEONOVUS
Saablast Followers
79
|
Posted - 2012.12.19 18:25:00 -
[552] - Quote
To test this, please place a bounty of 1 billion on me. I will then proceed to fly about and see how long it is before I get ganked. In the event I am not ganked, please place another bounty of 1 billion on me. Repeat until ganking occurs. At this point we will have evidence of where the limit should be laced. |

HoleySheet1
Under the Wings of Fury The Marmite Collective
105
|
Posted - 2012.12.20 20:43:00 -
[553] - Quote
So this thread i s suppose to mean something? My buddy zerg clicks a few buttons and claims to mess things up for us predators? Keep up the good work buddy. While you're at the rear...we're owning on the front lines in eve....if not the forums. You did what too many of us was either too lazy or apathetic to do. Congratulations. |

NEONOVUS
Saablast Followers
80
|
Posted - 2012.12.20 22:51:00 -
[554] - Quote
HoleySheet1 wrote:So this thread i s suppose to mean something? My buddy zerg clicks a few buttons and claims to mess things up for us predators? Keep up the good work buddy. While you're at the rear...we're owning on the front lines in eve....if not the forums. You did what too many of us was either too lazy or apathetic to do. Congratulations. Are you complimenting him or hating him? Like this post if complimenting |

NEONOVUS
Saablast Followers
80
|
Posted - 2012.12.20 22:51:00 -
[555] - Quote
And this one if hating. |

Emu Meo
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
17
|
Posted - 2012.12.21 05:09:00 -
[556] - Quote
This is still broken, there is no way to end the mutual wars still and new wars are still accruing. |

Surfin's PlunderBunny
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
4613
|
Posted - 2012.12.21 05:11:00 -
[557] - Quote
I don't like that word  "Little ginger moron" ~David Hasselhoff-á |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
556
|
Posted - 2012.12.27 07:06:00 -
[558] - Quote
The end of the second era is at hand. I've updated the first post in this thread with a complete summary of events, including pictures and charts. Burn Highsec Griefers |

Solstice Project
Carebear Cadaver Productions
2452
|
Posted - 2012.12.27 11:52:00 -
[559] - Quote
Reading the OP reminded me of this great quote from CCP Tuxford, which sadly was a troll ... but - in my eyes - has potential to fix everything ... ... and it would serve as a nice isk sink.
CCP Tuxford wrote:In fact the new default is to be at war with everyone. When you create a corp you are at war with everybody in the known universe and you need to declare peace.
Inappropriate signature removed. Spitfire |

Nakashyro
Perkone Caldari State
9
|
Posted - 2012.12.28 16:03:00 -
[560] - Quote
Zerg - from what I can gather via conversations with folks, the endless war dec hacks are still working and folks are still "trapped" - but you say otherwise. What's the real scoop? Wormhole exploration, sales, and location services. Mail me. |
|

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
612
|
Posted - 2012.12.28 20:20:00 -
[561] - Quote
Nakashyro wrote:Zerg - from what I can gather via conversations with folks, the endless war dec hacks are still working and folks are still "trapped" - but you say otherwise. What's the real scoop? As of writing this we still have 118 wars. Most are against corps that are inactive, don't care, or don't know how to retract. There's no way to keep people trapped right now, so my guess is that whoever is saying this just isn't aware of how to retract wars. Game mechanics have been shifting very rapidly, so they might not be up to date with the most recent changes. Just because a war exists doesn't mean they're trapped in it. If there is some way to keep people trapped I'd be very interested to know it. Burn Highsec Griefers |

Kc Decartes
Syndicate Holdings
83
|
Posted - 2013.01.04 05:52:00 -
[562] - Quote
Kc Decartes wrote:Good Day Nublitz,
I am KcD, and you have deced me, so we are deced together, for now and all time, which is grand, and good. I felt I should wave my hand as/in a gesture that represents the fun we will no doubt have together. It makes me happy, and my belly tickle, just in anticipation of the inevitable pleasure we will induce from ourselves, based on the experience we encounter via this hoopla.
I look forward to working with you, and yours, and the crew of misfits you believe make your organization dreamy.
With warm regards,
KcD
Zerg,
It's a shame you never did anything grand while behind the wheel of such a mighty power house. You know like pvp. I say now, as I have said before... you were, and are a troll, and a joke of an =v= player.
Now with this stigma, you always will be what you are. At least though you have been clever, within your own circles, which no doubt represent the masses that are eve. I leave you now, weak and on your knees, wishing you the best in 2013 and quoting my original post for posterity.
Cya around hero.
Kc +É D.F.C.S.
no TRUST in mankind no confidence IN government there will never be enduring FREEDOM. |

VegasMirage
356
|
Posted - 2013.01.04 05:55:00 -
[563] - Quote
Kc Decartes wrote:Kc Decartes wrote:Good Day Nublitz,
I am KcD, and you have deced me, so we are deced together, for now and all time, which is grand, and good. I felt I should wave my hand as/in a gesture that represents the fun we will no doubt have together. It makes me happy, and my belly tickle, just in anticipation of the inevitable pleasure we will induce from ourselves, based on the experience we encounter via this hoopla.
I look forward to working with you, and yours, and the crew of misfits you believe make your organization dreamy.
With warm regards,
KcD Zerg, It's a shame you never did anything grand while behind the wheel of such a mighty power house. You know like pvp. I say now, as I have said before... you were, and are a troll, and a joke of an =v= player. Now with this stigma, you always will be what you are. At least though you have been clever, within your own circles, which no doubt represent the masses that are eve. I leave you now, weak and on your knees, wishing you the best in 2013 and quoting my original post for posterity. Cya around hero. Kc +É
he did more to impact the game than you ever will likes watching grown men cry-á (Gò»n+¦Gò¦,) |

Tah'ris Khlador
Space Ghosts. Break-A-Wish Foundation
454
|
Posted - 2013.01.04 06:28:00 -
[564] - Quote
Kc Decartes wrote:Kc Decartes wrote:Good Day Nublitz,
I am KcD, and you have deced me, so we are deced together, for now and all time, which is grand, and good. I felt I should wave my hand as/in a gesture that represents the fun we will no doubt have together. It makes me happy, and my belly tickle, just in anticipation of the inevitable pleasure we will induce from ourselves, based on the experience we encounter via this hoopla.
I look forward to working with you, and yours, and the crew of misfits you believe make your organization dreamy.
With warm regards,
KcD Zerg, It's a shame you never did anything grand while behind the wheel of such a mighty power house. You know like pvp. I say now, as I have said before... you were, and are a troll, and a joke of an =v= player. Now with this stigma, you always will be what you are. At least though you have been clever, within your own circles, which no doubt represent the masses that are eve. I leave you now, weak and on your knees, wishing you the best in 2013 and quoting my original post for posterity. Cya around hero. Kc +É
You again. I hope you're just trolling and not as stupid as you come across. What does it take to explain to you that fixing the mechanic was the goal, not PVPing all those who got trapped?
Weak and on his knees? WTF you been smoking? Lestatra: Eve is now fully committed to pvp . |

Kc Decartes
Syndicate Holdings
83
|
Posted - 2013.01.04 06:53:00 -
[565] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote: Of course, if at any time you want to make a corp specifically for griefing our targets you're welcome to join this side of the war. Everyone is welcome on this side of the fence. Our targets are generally terrible players and the wars are free. Join the dark side.
I guess I'm smoking propaganda, cause it seems to me that Zerg was after more then just "fixing game mechanics" D.F.C.S.
no TRUST in mankind no confidence IN government there will never be enduring FREEDOM. |

Tah'ris Khlador
Space Ghosts. Break-A-Wish Foundation
458
|
Posted - 2013.01.04 07:56:00 -
[566] - Quote
Kc Decartes wrote:The Zerg Overmind wrote: Of course, if at any time you want to make a corp specifically for griefing our targets you're welcome to join this side of the war. Everyone is welcome on this side of the fence. Our targets are generally terrible players and the wars are free. Join the dark side. I guess I'm smoking propaganda, cause it seems to me that Zerg was after more then just "fixing game mechanics"
That was a bonus, and the glorious opportunity he allowed others to seize upon. Some even took advantage of that opportunity. I'm finding it funny that you're disappointed he didn't PVP with you. Are you upset you never got to unleash pent up anger over this mechanic incorrectly upon the one you thought was responsible for it all? Lestatra: Eve is now fully committed to pvp . |

Kc Decartes
Syndicate Holdings
83
|
Posted - 2013.01.04 08:01:00 -
[567] - Quote
Tah'ris Khlador wrote:Kc Decartes wrote:The Zerg Overmind wrote: Of course, if at any time you want to make a corp specifically for griefing our targets you're welcome to join this side of the war. Everyone is welcome on this side of the fence. Our targets are generally terrible players and the wars are free. Join the dark side. I guess I'm smoking propaganda, cause it seems to me that Zerg was after more then just "fixing game mechanics" That was a bonus, and the glorious opportunity he allowed others to seize upon. Some even took advantage of that opportunity. I'm finding it funny that you're disappointed he didn't PVP with you.
I'm disappointed that he pretended to be elite...
We all know what he's about, and it's not about forcing change in game with regards to war dynamics, for the further development of in game mechanics.... Zerg was an opportunist. I find that offensive. D.F.C.S.
no TRUST in mankind no confidence IN government there will never be enduring FREEDOM. |

Tah'ris Khlador
Space Ghosts. Break-A-Wish Foundation
458
|
Posted - 2013.01.04 08:11:00 -
[568] - Quote
Kc Decartes wrote:Tah'ris Khlador wrote:Kc Decartes wrote:The Zerg Overmind wrote: Of course, if at any time you want to make a corp specifically for griefing our targets you're welcome to join this side of the war. Everyone is welcome on this side of the fence. Our targets are generally terrible players and the wars are free. Join the dark side. I guess I'm smoking propaganda, cause it seems to me that Zerg was after more then just "fixing game mechanics" That was a bonus, and the glorious opportunity he allowed others to seize upon. Some even took advantage of that opportunity. I'm finding it funny that you're disappointed he didn't PVP with you. I'm disappointed that he pretended to be elite... We all know what he's about, and it's not about forcing change in game with regards to war dynamics, for the further development of in game mechanics.... Zerg was an opportunist. I find that offensive.
You should probably not play EVE then. Opportunists created it. You use Facebook? You should deactivate that shite right away.
You're not eating sliced bread are you? OH GOD YOU DIDN'T?! Lestatra: Eve is now fully committed to pvp . |

Kc Decartes
Syndicate Holdings
83
|
Posted - 2013.01.04 08:23:00 -
[569] - Quote
Tah'ris Khlador wrote:Kc Decartes wrote:Tah'ris Khlador wrote:Kc Decartes wrote:The Zerg Overmind wrote: Of course, if at any time you want to make a corp specifically for griefing our targets you're welcome to join this side of the war. Everyone is welcome on this side of the fence. Our targets are generally terrible players and the wars are free. Join the dark side. I guess I'm smoking propaganda, cause it seems to me that Zerg was after more then just "fixing game mechanics" That was a bonus, and the glorious opportunity he allowed others to seize upon. Some even took advantage of that opportunity. I'm finding it funny that you're disappointed he didn't PVP with you. I'm disappointed that he pretended to be elite... We all know what he's about, and it's not about forcing change in game with regards to war dynamics, for the further development of in game mechanics.... Zerg was an opportunist. I find that offensive. You should probably not play EVE then. Opportunists created it. You use Facebook? You should deactivate that shite right away. You're not eating sliced bread are you? OH GOD YOU DIDN'T?!
I guess I should think you're clever as you edit your **** none stop. I don't...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qItugh-fFgg
I have my eye on u D.F.C.S.
no TRUST in mankind no confidence IN government there will never be enduring FREEDOM. |

Tah'ris Khlador
Space Ghosts. Break-A-Wish Foundation
458
|
Posted - 2013.01.04 08:30:00 -
[570] - Quote
Kc Decartes wrote:I have my eye on u
My eye is better. Lestatra: Eve is now fully committed to pvp . |
|

Kc Decartes
Syndicate Holdings
83
|
Posted - 2013.01.04 08:40:00 -
[571] - Quote
Well if we're going to talk **** at random, I think I deserve a little:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sqL3-n2-3J4
^_^
See through the mediocre that you believe created your intent and existence. See the future, without opportunist, a gaming parallel that existed before you, and will exist after you. I'll see you in-game no doubt... D.F.C.S.
no TRUST in mankind no confidence IN government there will never be enduring FREEDOM. |

Maxious
Dragon Knights of EvE
49
|
Posted - 2013.01.05 11:19:00 -
[572] - Quote
just to add that CCP has now taken out the accumulative price increase for wardecing a single corp. at first the wardec price would increase for every corp that wardecs a single corp. but now its just the same price for every one that joins. however the merc hiring for the defending corp still increases at an massive rate. |

Atia Secunda
Fluffy Rabbit killers warcorp
0
|
Posted - 2013.01.30 17:47:00 -
[573] - Quote
So has Dec Shields become inactive? |

Psychotic Monk
The Skunkworks
589
|
Posted - 2013.01.30 19:14:00 -
[574] - Quote
There's no longer a reason for it to exist, so yes. Founding member of the Belligerent Undesirables movement. |

Gizznitt Malikite
Agony Unleashed Agony Empire
1763
|
Posted - 2013.01.30 21:13:00 -
[575] - Quote
Why not actually turn Dec-Shield into a friendly Ally Alliance....
Any Corps looking for highsec pew pew can join the Dec-Shield, and then offer Dec-shield as an Ally to any corp that want's it.
|

Atia Secunda
Fluffy Rabbit killers warcorp
0
|
Posted - 2013.01.30 22:17:00 -
[576] - Quote
well its too bad if its gone inactive cause it still have like 50+ mutual wars on the go. Closest thing to the old day privateers |

Cannibal Kane
Chosen of New Eden
1338
|
Posted - 2013.01.31 07:07:00 -
[577] - Quote
Oh my...
I completely forgot about this. My fav corp got trapped in there.
Need to get it up and running again. "I saw him fight by the monument in Jita. -áHe flowed in his Machariel like a Shinto spirit, 800MM shells sprouting in his passing. -áHis hair flowed in the corona of his target's warp core breach. -áIt was truly majestic. -áAnd while everyone stared in awe I stole the loot and ran off.-áBecause I am like that." --áNEONOVUS |

Mr R4nd0m
Retribution. Paper Tigers.
98
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 15:52:00 -
[578] - Quote
Well if DEC SHIELD has gone inactive and is able to transfer to wars to this alliance (as im not really doing anything with it) I am happy for people to join the alliance and pew pew as much as they want.
as long as the wars are mutual of course. |

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
625
|
Posted - 2013.02.11 09:18:00 -
[579] - Quote
I'm open to suggestions. For now we're just sitting around holding however many wars we have until we find some interesting use for them. Most will be inactive or dead legacy wars. Becoming a hub alliance for corps to join would end up being costly and some nefarious group would sneak in a bunch of corps and just seize control of executorship and the game would be over. Burn Highsec Griefers |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 20 :: [one page] |