Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 .. 86 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 24 post(s) |

Mund Richard
244
|
Posted - 2013.01.09 21:12:00 -
[511] - Quote
Edward Pierce wrote:Take it easy buddy, not all replies are to your posts. Just noticed, and was going to edit, nvm now.
Wish there was a Rogue Drone Faction Battleship... Infested Domi! Including all the wiggly bits to tend to your swarm, droneboat role bonus, and ofc with turrets. |

Mekhana
Spiritus Draconis Sicarius Draconis
712
|
Posted - 2013.01.09 21:15:00 -
[512] - Quote
I don't like crude language but wtf CCP?
Still sticking with active armor rep bonuses for Gallente when they are useless. |

Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy Caldari State
370
|
Posted - 2013.01.09 21:24:00 -
[513] - Quote
Edward Pierce wrote:mynnna wrote:The T2 LSE also offers a fairly non-trivial boost to shield recharge and thus passive tank, so comparing it directly to an 800mm plate isn't entirely fair. I'm not saying the 800m plate compares to the LSE, I'm just pointing out the inadequacy of Jorma's oversimplification. So yes, shield tanking is very different from armor tanking; lets leave it at that and move on from this module to module comparison.
With current stats Drake with one LSE has double the EHP 800mm Harbi has (77k vs 36k). |

Edward Pierce
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
28
|
Posted - 2013.01.09 21:27:00 -
[514] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Edward Pierce wrote:mynnna wrote:The T2 LSE also offers a fairly non-trivial boost to shield recharge and thus passive tank, so comparing it directly to an 800mm plate isn't entirely fair. I'm not saying the 800m plate compares to the LSE, I'm just pointing out the inadequacy of Jorma's oversimplification. So yes, shield tanking is very different from armor tanking; lets leave it at that and move on from this module to module comparison. With current stats Drake with one LSE has double the EHP 800mm Harbi has (77k vs 36k). Yes, armor and shield tanking is different, we all get it.
Can we move on? |

Colonel Goatbanger
The Goatbangers Club
0
|
Posted - 2013.01.09 21:41:00 -
[515] - Quote
I know that numerous people replied to this already, but two things stick out to me (similar to what already has been said).
1. With the HM nerf, which subsequently has gimped those who pilot Drakes isn't it about time to get rid of the Kin bonus and replace it with a RoF bonus (5-7.5-10%)?
2. If you intend to radically alter the Cyclone (from AC fit Missile fit) then why would you gimp it even further by not going all the way with a sixth launcher instead of this half-assed split weapon system crud you insist upon?
As far as Amarr and Gallente ships I have no opinion since I don't fly them and I prefer that pilots more experienced with lasers and drones provide commentary.  |

Miang Sun
University of Caille Gallente Federation
11
|
Posted - 2013.01.09 21:41:00 -
[516] - Quote
Not happy at all with Gallente ship changes.
|

Roosevelt Coltrane
Rupakaya
11
|
Posted - 2013.01.09 21:45:00 -
[517] - Quote
Zimmy Zeta wrote:Roosevelt Coltrane wrote:I have BC V and good drone skills, so this doesn't effect me, but where does a new Amarr pilot who specializes in drones (with a side dish of Missiles) go after the Prophecy?
Gallente pilots can go Domi>Navi Domi/Sin.
I like the Prophecy, don't change it, but I thought you wanted to make the game more new player friendly. What is the next step for a newish Amarr pilot? Armageddon I'd say. Considering that the NavyGeddon already has a huge dronebay and bandwidth, I suppose they increse the drone capacity of the standard Geddon, too when the battleships are due for tiericide.
Geddon and Navy Geddon can field a full flight of heavies/sentiries, but both are turret only ships with no drone bonuses.
The progression path of Dragoon>Arbitrator/Curse>Prophecy are all Drone bonused ships that can use launchers. Aside from the Pilgrim, all the Amarr drone boats have as many or more launcher hardpoints than turret hardpoints. |

4LeafClover
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
21
|
Posted - 2013.01.09 21:46:00 -
[518] - Quote
SMT008 wrote:
Why would anyone choose to fly the new Cyclones ? It's pretty simple.
First, you can choose what damage you want to deal.
Second, you have one hell of an active tank.
Third, it's not a slowbrick.
Fourth, doesn't look like a Drake.
If you want to solo in this ship, you do the same thing Cyclone pilots already do, except with missiles and 2 utility slots.
Any questions ?
First - So can a drake, but they don't get a bonus to them all....you can still choose to shoot anything you like. AND YOU HAVE TWO EXTRA BAYS!
Second - 0.o an impressive tank with 5 slots? 1 prop, 1 web, 1 point, 2 slots left? Put LAR? maybe, but it's a one trick pony and you don't have grid to do anything else...including high dps launchers... fill two of your three holes in shield resists? Hmmmm... Keep in mind the Drake has 6 mids.
Third - It's not a fast BRICK either....it is a quicker glass missile boat....and that sounds like fun to fly for a guy that has trained projectile weapons....
Fourth - You have a valid point here
I'll give you 10 successful solo Drake fits, for every 1 successful solo Cyclone fit.
|

Edward Pierce
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
28
|
Posted - 2013.01.09 21:50:00 -
[519] - Quote
Colonel Goatbanger wrote:I know that numerous people replied to this already, but two things stick out to me (similar to what already has been said). 1. With the HM nerf, which subsequently has gimped those who pilot Drakes isn't it about time to get rid of the Kin bonus and replace it with a RoF bonus (5-7.5-10%)? 2. If you intend to radically alter the Cyclone (from AC fit Missile fit) then why would you gimp it even further by not going all the way with a sixth launcher instead of this half-assed split weapon system crud you insist upon? As far as Amarr and Gallente ships I have no opinion since I don't fly them and I prefer that pilots more experienced with lasers and drones provide commentary. 
CCP Fozzie wrote:Dear Capsuleers. Two utility highslots is not the same as split weapons. All the best. -Love Fozzie
:Had to deal with something else, will reply to more questions tomorrow: The Cyclone has two utility slots, not mixed weapon systems.
Blatantly stealing this from Mynnna's review on TheMittani.com: The ROF bonus on the Cyclone is better than the kinetic damage bonus on the Drake. The Cyclone also has an extra low which allows it to have more damage mods. Giving it a 7th launcher would give it too much DPS compared to other BCs. |

Sinzor Aumer
Atlas Research Group Aerodyne Collective
36
|
Posted - 2013.01.09 21:53:00 -
[520] - Quote
Zimmy Zeta wrote:SMT008 wrote:The Harbinger needs a CPU boost (VERY IMPORTANT) and a PWG boost. Oh, I see. I was stupid then, sorry. If 800mm RRT + biggest guns + Neut is not possible, then we have indeed a problem with the Harbi that CCP should address. Heavy Pulses are not the biggest guns. Heavy Beams are. And 1600mm plate fits even on some cruiser hulls (armor HACs, anyone?) - so should be not a problem at all on BC. Battleships mostly carry 2 or even 3x1600 plates. That's why Harbinger should get a HUGE buff in PG, to be able to fit either: 1) 1600 plate + MWD + rack of pulses + med.nosf/neut, or 2) 2x med.reps + AB + med.cap-booster + rack of beams I can close my eyes on CPU, as there are non-energized plates, and that's amarrian ship after all, so should be tight on CPU. But the power grid - it needs some! |
|

Mund Richard
245
|
Posted - 2013.01.09 21:58:00 -
[521] - Quote
Edward Pierce wrote:Blatantly stealing this from Mynnna's review on TheMittani.com: The ROF bonus on the Cyclone is better than the kinetic damage bonus on the Drake. The Cyclone also has an extra low which allows it to have more damage mods. Giving it a 7th launcher would give it too much DPS compared to other BCs. I agree, a 7th launcher would be too much. How about giving it a 6th launcher? Wish there was a Rogue Drone Faction Battleship... Infested Domi! Including all the wiggly bits to tend to your swarm, droneboat role bonus, and ofc with turrets. |

fukier
RISE of LEGION
676
|
Posted - 2013.01.09 21:58:00 -
[522] - Quote
you iknow i was really hopping for a dev responce today... but i think that today fozzie spent most of the day working over the rebalance and is relaying the info to the csm before responding... At the end of the game both the pawn and the Queen go in the same box. |

Gypsio III
Chemikals Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
485
|
Posted - 2013.01.09 22:00:00 -
[523] - Quote
Gneeznow wrote:The ferox, drake and brutix are missing their utility high for a warfare link.
Maybe the Ferox, Drake and Brutix should all be given a utility high by removing a turret from each? |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
1208
|
Posted - 2013.01.09 22:02:00 -
[524] - Quote
Sinzor Aumer wrote: Heavy Pulses are not the biggest guns. Heavy Beams are.
This is wrong and you should be ashamed.
Heavy pulse are the largest mid sized close range guns, Heavy Beams are the largest long range guns. Apples and Oranges.
|

mynnna
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
162
|
Posted - 2013.01.09 22:04:00 -
[525] - Quote
Mund Richard wrote:Edward Pierce wrote:Blatantly stealing this from Mynnna's review on TheMittani.com: The ROF bonus on the Cyclone is better than the kinetic damage bonus on the Drake. The Cyclone also has an extra low which allows it to have more damage mods. Giving it a 7th launcher would give it too much DPS compared to other BCs. I agree, a 7th launcher would be too much. How about giving it a 6th launcher?
You get ~395 DPS with HAMs plus ~160 ought of a flight of medium drones, so you're at 550 DPS. Or you can use two flights of light drones and do either ~500 DPS or deploy ECM drones. Two utility highs - a unique quality, now - lets you add 60 DPS in the form of a pair of 425mm ACs if you so choose, or use them for neuts.
A sixth launcher, by comparison, would add 80 DPS.
Now, it's obviously a minority opinion if all the whinging in the thread about it is any indication, but I really don't have much of a problem with where the cyclone stands. This post was crafted by a member of the GoonSwarm Federation Economic Cabal, the foremost authority on Eve: Online economics and gameplay. |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Heretic Nation
2598
|
Posted - 2013.01.09 22:04:00 -
[526] - Quote
Gypsio III wrote:Gneeznow wrote:The ferox, drake and brutix are missing their utility high for a warfare link. Maybe the Ferox, Drake and Brutix should all be given a utility high by removing a turret from each?
Sure, remove all the turrets you want from the Drake. More seriously: I keel you!!
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos
Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Edward Pierce
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
28
|
Posted - 2013.01.09 22:06:00 -
[527] - Quote
Mund Richard wrote:Edward Pierce wrote:Blatantly stealing this from Mynnna's review on TheMittani.com: The ROF bonus on the Cyclone is better than the kinetic damage bonus on the Drake. The Cyclone also has an extra low which allows it to have more damage mods. Giving it a 7th launcher would give it too much DPS compared to other BCs. I agree, a 7th launcher would be too much. How about giving it a 6th launcher? I'm beginning to like you.
Good catch, but the point still stands though. With double the drone size, ability to choose its damage type, an extra low and an extra high slot over the Drake, changing one of those two utility slots to a launcher would make it go over board on the DPS. |

Jean Louie
7
|
Posted - 2013.01.09 22:07:00 -
[528] - Quote
Gallente still suck as usual.
Gallente need a defense bonus similar to resistance, no more armor rep bonuses please that's for PVE. Nobody flies a fleet with active armor tanks. |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Heretic Nation
2598
|
Posted - 2013.01.09 22:10:00 -
[529] - Quote
Jean Louie wrote:Gallente still suck as usual.
Gallente need a defense bonus similar to resistance, no more armor rep bonuses please that's for PVE. Nobody flies a fleet with active armor tanks.
Not everyone flies in fleets.
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos
Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Mund Richard
245
|
Posted - 2013.01.09 22:12:00 -
[530] - Quote
Edward Pierce wrote:Good catch, but the point still stands though. With double the drone size, ability to choose its damage type, an extra low and an extra high slot over the Drake, changing one of those two utility slots to a launcher would make it go over board on the DPS. Dunno, Cane has 6 RoF AND Damage bonused turrets and a launcher, compared to that 6 RoF but not damage bonused launchers and a turret (and some extra drones) doesn't sound so game breaking, but I haven't really flown HAM ships, so I could be off. Wish there was a Rogue Drone Faction Battleship... Infested Domi! Including all the wiggly bits to tend to your swarm, droneboat role bonus, and ofc with turrets. |
|

Maximus Andendare
Future Corps Sleeper Social Club
53
|
Posted - 2013.01.09 22:16:00 -
[531] - Quote
Mekhana wrote:I don't like crude language but wtf CCP?
Still sticking with active armor rep bonuses for Gallente when they are useless. This. At least the other race that is stuck with an active tanking bonus (Minmatar, Cyclone (ASB ftw!)) has the awesome dual-damage-bonus Hurricane for fleet work. For the Gallente pilots, they just get stuck with two ships with one effective bonus.
|

Zarnak Wulf
In Exile.
900
|
Posted - 2013.01.09 22:20:00 -
[532] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:Jean Louie wrote:Gallente still suck as usual.
Gallente need a defense bonus similar to resistance, no more armor rep bonuses please that's for PVE. Nobody flies a fleet with active armor tanks. Not everyone flies in fleets. -Liang
That is true but I was still hoping for a tracking or falloff bonus on the Brutix as opposed to the active rep. The Myrm as a drone boat and with un-bonused high slots will always be favored for the tank role and a little variety would be nice. |

mynnna
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
162
|
Posted - 2013.01.09 22:21:00 -
[533] - Quote
Mund Richard wrote:Edward Pierce wrote:Good catch, but the point still stands though. With double the drone size, ability to choose its damage type, an extra low and an extra high slot over the Drake, changing one of those two utility slots to a launcher would make it go over board on the DPS. Dunno, Cane has 6 RoF AND Damage bonused turrets and a launcher, compared to that 6 RoF but not damage bonused launchers and a turret (and some extra drones) doesn't sound so game breaking, but I haven't really flown HAM ships, so I could be off.
The way the changes read to me is that the Hurricane is your hammer. It's unquestionably a higher DPS ship, pushing out about 715 DPS with 425mm autos, 3x gyros and hobgoblins; guns are ~615 of that. But its bias towards armor tanking (six lows, four mids) means you either run a lightweight shield tank or sacrifice range or damage (possibly both).
Cyclone's the scalpel. 360 DPS from HAMs, with a bigger drone bay and two utility slots. Want max damage? Bring hammerheads and guns in the utility and you get over 600 DPS. Or maybe a bit more flexiblity, so we bring light drones - with warriors, you still get 535 DPS. Or HAMs and Hammerheads for 550 dps and some tank breaking neuts. Or HAMs, neuts, and a pair of sentries (dropped outside the furball) if you want something really wild.
On the other hand, six launchers as proposed means the max DPS setup is HAMs and hammerheads - it does 632 DPS, and has the same one utility slot as the hurricane. So at that point your DPS is about as good as what a Hurricane can do with his guns alone, and if he really wanted to he could roll a flight of ECM drones instead. So in essence, you're a worse hurricane, and where's the fun in that? This post was crafted by a member of the GoonSwarm Federation Economic Cabal, the foremost authority on Eve: Online economics and gameplay. |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Heretic Nation
2599
|
Posted - 2013.01.09 22:22:00 -
[534] - Quote
Zarnak Wulf wrote:That is true but I was still hoping for a tracking or falloff bonus on the Brutix as opposed to the active rep. The Myrm as a drone boat and with un-bonused high slots will always be favored for the tank role and a little variety would be nice.
I feel like a falloff bonus on the Brutix is most certainly a bad idea. If it's mobile, it will completely gobble up the Deimos's role beyond any recognition - ever. If it's immobile it's basically useless. A tracking bonus would be alright, but it's not like you don't have enough mids for the Holy Quad.
The rep bonus is fine, and I suspect we'll see some armor tanking changes that make it ideal.
-Liang
Ed: Besides, you'd think we would have learned about QQing after the Deimos didn't get buffed and the projectile overboost. Then again, maybe projectiles weren't overboosted because I literally don't care about projectile ships. /shrug Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos
Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

4LeafClover
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
21
|
Posted - 2013.01.09 22:23:00 -
[535] - Quote
Edward Pierce wrote:Mund Richard wrote:Edward Pierce wrote:Blatantly stealing this from Mynnna's review on TheMittani.com: The ROF bonus on the Cyclone is better than the kinetic damage bonus on the Drake. The Cyclone also has an extra low which allows it to have more damage mods. Giving it a 7th launcher would give it too much DPS compared to other BCs. I agree, a 7th launcher would be too much. How about giving it a 6th launcher? I'm beginning to like you. Good catch, but the point still stands though. With double the drone size, ability to choose its damage type, an extra low and an extra high slot over the Drake, changing one of those two utility slots to a launcher would make it go over board on the DPS.
So now minmatar pilots must be efficient in projectile, missiles, and drones? Not to mention that their tanking is also split, so they must train both armor and shield tanking...that is if they would like to efficiently fly minmatar ships? Is there another race that must do all of this? |

Maximus Andendare
Future Corps Sleeper Social Club
53
|
Posted - 2013.01.09 22:24:00 -
[536] - Quote
Roosevelt Coltrane wrote:Zimmy Zeta wrote:Roosevelt Coltrane wrote:I have BC V and good drone skills, so this doesn't effect me, but where does a new Amarr pilot who specializes in drones (with a side dish of Missiles) go after the Prophecy?
Gallente pilots can go Domi>Navi Domi/Sin.
I like the Prophecy, don't change it, but I thought you wanted to make the game more new player friendly. What is the next step for a newish Amarr pilot? Armageddon I'd say. Considering that the NavyGeddon already has a huge dronebay and bandwidth, I suppose they increse the drone capacity of the standard Geddon, too when the battleships are due for tiericide. Geddon and Navy Geddon can field a full flight of heavies/sentiries, but both are turret only ships with no drone bonuses. The progression path of Dragoon>Arbitrator/Curse>Prophecy are all Drone bonused ships that can use launchers. Aside from the Pilgrim, all the Amarr drone boats have as many or more launcher hardpoints than turret hardpoints. Don't forget that drones represent damage projection for Gallente pilots, since blasters can't reach out and touch someone from afar. Amarr don't share this problem, as their ships are quite capable of hitting out very far with Scorch (and not even using the longer-range beams).
I doubt that we'd ever see an Amarrian BS overhauled to be a dedicated drone boat 1) because its not necessary since they can project damage and 2) there already is a armor drone BS in that category (with the Rattlesnake covering the shield drone BS). CCP diversifies, I've seen, when there is a demand or a hole to fill. Armor drone BS is already filled, and aside from the hull being ugly, the Domi does a pretty good job.
|

Maximus Andendare
Future Corps Sleeper Social Club
53
|
Posted - 2013.01.09 22:26:00 -
[537] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:Jean Louie wrote:Gallente still suck as usual.
Gallente need a defense bonus similar to resistance, no more armor rep bonuses please that's for PVE. Nobody flies a fleet with active armor tanks. Not everyone flies in fleets. -Liang Many, MANY people do.
|

mynnna
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
162
|
Posted - 2013.01.09 22:27:00 -
[538] - Quote
4LeafClover wrote:Edward Pierce wrote:Mund Richard wrote:Edward Pierce wrote:Blatantly stealing this from Mynnna's review on TheMittani.com: The ROF bonus on the Cyclone is better than the kinetic damage bonus on the Drake. The Cyclone also has an extra low which allows it to have more damage mods. Giving it a 7th launcher would give it too much DPS compared to other BCs. I agree, a 7th launcher would be too much. How about giving it a 6th launcher? I'm beginning to like you. Good catch, but the point still stands though. With double the drone size, ability to choose its damage type, an extra low and an extra high slot over the Drake, changing one of those two utility slots to a launcher would make it go over board on the DPS. So now minmatar pilots must be efficient in projectile, missiles, and drones? Not to mention that their tanking is also split, so they must train both armor and shield tanking...that is if they would like to efficiently fly minmatar ships? Is there another race that must do all of this?
Well lets see, Caldari "must be" efficient in both railguns and missiles and it's not like they don't have drone bays at all. Amarr "must be" efficient in both lasers and missiles and drones are even more important to them. I guess Gallente get lucky, they only have to train guns and drones. Man, so unfair.
Lets not bring up "you have to train multiple weapon systems!!!" like it's an actual valid complaint; thanks. This post was crafted by a member of the GoonSwarm Federation Economic Cabal, the foremost authority on Eve: Online economics and gameplay. |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Heretic Nation
2600
|
Posted - 2013.01.09 22:28:00 -
[539] - Quote
Maximus Andendare wrote:Liang Nuren wrote:Jean Louie wrote:Gallente still suck as usual.
Gallente need a defense bonus similar to resistance, no more armor rep bonuses please that's for PVE. Nobody flies a fleet with active armor tanks. Not everyone flies in fleets. -Liang Many, MANY people do.
The Brutix was never going to be your go-to ship for fleet work. Blasters don't scale, and it's useless to pretend like a medium rail fit is going to be worth a ****.
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos
Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Maximus Andendare
Future Corps Sleeper Social Club
53
|
Posted - 2013.01.09 22:28:00 -
[540] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:Maximus Andendare wrote:Liang Nuren wrote:Jean Louie wrote:Gallente still suck as usual.
Gallente need a defense bonus similar to resistance, no more armor rep bonuses please that's for PVE. Nobody flies a fleet with active armor tanks. Not everyone flies in fleets. -Liang Many, MANY people do. The Brutix was never going to be your go-to ship for fleet work. Blasters don't scale, and it's useless to pretend like a medium rail fit is going to be worth a ****. -Liang AFAIK "Gallente need a defense bonus similar to resistance" is a sweeping statement and not specific to the Brutix. It is true, however, that Gallente would be well served with at least one hull (that's not a T3) to have some bonus that isn't crappy active armor tanking, because, you know, *some* people do fly Gallente and do fly in fleets, especially in wormholes.
4LeafClover wrote:So now minmatar pilots must be efficient in projectile, missiles, and drones? Not to mention that their tanking is also split, so they must train both armor and shield tanking...that is if they would like to efficiently fly minmatar ships? Is there another race that must do all of this? This is new? |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 .. 86 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |