this would give the myrm the ability to sit at range with its drones and snipe while having a decent burst tank so its no op.

while the brutix would inherit an ability to fit a 1600mm plate and be able to fly as if there were only an 800mm beter agility speed etc so it can pounce on its target as intended.

it would give u an active or buffer option on medium blasters that are both very viable.

List some.

Minmatar - Typhoon, Cyclone, Naglfar, You're on the CSM and you don't even know which ships have split weapons systems?

Dear Capsuleers.
Two utility highslots is not the same as split weapons.
All the best.
-Love Fozzie

Harbinger

Don't get the logic to nerf this ship, isn't it **** enough already that people even use omen rather than harbinger?

myrm:
7.5% bonus to armor repair rate and amount per level
10% bonus to drone damage/hit points/and tracking per level

brutix:
5% bonus to medium hybrid damage per level
10% reduction to mass penalty to armor plates per level

this is what gallente should be

so after running the math on the harb assuming lvl 5 skills between dropping the 1 turret and the 5% increase in dmg bonus
the net change is a 7% buff in dps along with a bit better fitting in return for increase in mass and align time. at anything less than lvl 5 skills its a net nerf in dps. in addition to this the biggest problem with the harb as always been getting in range to do dps which with the proposed changes would be even harder to do. so for a balance that's supposed to help level the playing field for newer players seems to me in the harbs case be a net nerf to an already lackluster ship.

Minmatar - Typhoon, Cyclone, Naglfar,

You're on the CSM and you don't even know which ships have split weapons systems?

Why not just remove the Drake, already? You seem to be whittling away at it each stupid patch. How can you think it's still OP with the missile changes?

Your nerfing the harby when it needed a buffing? Why in gods name?
One less weapon, less powergrid less cpu...?? Are you outa your freaking mind Fozzie???
I want whatever your drinking.
Misha.

Why are removing all the extra high slots that are supposed to be used for the links? Like seriously? If anything you should leave those in place and give most of the BCs extra PG fitting ability so we can actually use the 99% CPU reduction bonus for links. They already don't get the command ship link effectiveness bonus. If you go through with this you may as well take the 99% CPU reduction bonus away. Hardly anyone uses it now and even fewer will after these changes go through.

"And the Harbringer getting +10% damage bonus is a damage buff even with loosing a turret."