Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 27 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 37 post(s) |
Prince aikka
Vanguard Frontiers Black Legion.
9
|
Posted - 2013.04.18 14:31:00 -
[31] - Quote
3. You may not use your own or any third-party software, macros or other stored rapid keystrokes or other patterns of play that facilitate acquisition of items, currency, objects, character attributes, rank or status at an accelerated rate when compared with ordinary Game play. You may not rewrite or modify the user interface or otherwise manipulate data in any way to acquire items, currency, objects, character attributes or beneficial actions not actually acquired or achieved in the Game.
Does this effect use of a game pad like the Belkin Nostromo? |
Caviar Liberta
Moira. Villore Accords
107
|
Posted - 2013.04.18 14:32:00 -
[32] - Quote
Roime wrote:"Warp to zero autopilot? You can do that manually by warping to zero"
m8
The jump option lets you warp to zero and jump the gate.
Prior to the jump feature being added, a way to do that was warping to zero and clicking autopilot so you jumped the gate without having to do anything once you reached the gate. |
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
1295
|
Posted - 2013.04.18 14:32:00 -
[33] - Quote
Uppsy Daisy wrote:Steve Ronuken wrote:Uppsy Daisy wrote:When will you be taking down your illegal Eve Market endpoint Steve?
lol EMDR, by itself, is fine. As it does no scraping. It does takes data from clients (like evemon) which do the scraping, but it does no scraping itself. What'd be a semi-workable solution, would be for CCP themselves to feed data into EMDR. And you are happy to run for CSM pushing data that has all been obtained through officially banned means? Isn't that a bit laughable?
I'm not going to knee jerk take it down. What happened before the cache scraping became common was an uploaded based on manually exported market data (using the export button in client). I'd be surprised if that's not reimplemented, as an unified uploader feeder. It'll be a PITA, because it will massively impact the relevance of the data, but it's still possible. Steve Ronuken for CSM 8 Handy tools and SDE conversions Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter |
Ishihiro tanaka
NED-Clan Goonswarm Federation
21
|
Posted - 2013.04.18 14:34:00 -
[34] - Quote
Selena Na'sharr wrote:What's the position on gaming keyboards with macro-capabilities, such as the Logitech G15? Its driver inherently supports some level of user-initiated automation. (in short, do I need to look for a new keyboard? :))
This ^^ needs an answer.
Proud recruiter for the Goonswarm Federation. We have space for rent, contact me ingame! Supers for sale via the trusted third-party service of TheMittani. Dozens of satisfied customers bought or sold their super, join their ranks. Convo me! |
|
CCP Peligro
C C P C C P Alliance
26
|
Posted - 2013.04.18 14:34:00 -
[35] - Quote
Uppsy Daisy wrote:CCP Peligro wrote:Steve Ronuken wrote:Benny Ohu wrote:is cache scraping what evemon does when it 'sends market data from your eve installation cache to online endpoints'? Yes We are looking for cheaters, hackers, botters and the likes. We are not looking for EVEMON users. Basically, please don't worry. And how will you tell the difference between an EVEMON user that you are 'not looking for' and an evil botter? There is no difference. It is totally unenforceable. So why ban it?
I don't know where you got that from, but we can tell the difference between a bot and a legitimate player.
Cache scraping can be used for botting purposes, in which case we will action against it. EVEMon clearly isn't botting software. CCP Peligro - Team Security |
|
Uppsy Daisy
24th Imperial Crusade Amarr Empire
279
|
Posted - 2013.04.18 14:35:00 -
[36] - Quote
CCP Stillman wrote:Mechaet wrote: The cache scraping ban was unexpected, though. How are eve-central et al going to get their market data? I've configured my EveMon to not send in the market data now (and I assume any wise player will do the same). It kind of sucks that clarifications like these result in viable, useful third-party sites finding themselves in a position of being rules-lawyered out of being viable, especially after all those folks put in such massive effort to make something all of us players can use.
You've said that you're trying to lobby for getting Eve marketeers a feed they can use to get market data; did you consider putting a halt to cache scraping bans until you knew the outcome of that effort, or is it an instance where something bad out there is doing cache scraping (or using cache scraping to control something) and you need to act on it more immediately?
I want to clarify that the cache scraping ban isn't new. If you read the EULA, this isn't a new thing. It has never been allowed by the EULA. In regards to enforcement, we don't have plans. It's not at the top of our to-do list. It's simply a case of while it not being allowed by our EULA, it's at our discretion whether or not the effort to enforce it is worth it or not. Right now, we're focused on botting, RMT, client modification that impact other players.
Sorry but that is rubbish.
The EULA has always been completely vague. The nearest we have had previously was that cache scraping was legal.
http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=734561&page=1#9
We have CCP Sreegs' *opinion* that he thought it should be illegal.
You have just spelt out in plain language that it is illegal. This is the first time you have done this. |
Mechaet
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
42
|
Posted - 2013.04.18 14:39:00 -
[37] - Quote
CCP Stillman wrote:Mechaet wrote: The cache scraping ban was unexpected, though. How are eve-central et al going to get their market data? I've configured my EveMon to not send in the market data now (and I assume any wise player will do the same). It kind of sucks that clarifications like these result in viable, useful third-party sites finding themselves in a position of being rules-lawyered out of being viable, especially after all those folks put in such massive effort to make something all of us players can use.
You've said that you're trying to lobby for getting Eve marketeers a feed they can use to get market data; did you consider putting a halt to cache scraping bans until you knew the outcome of that effort, or is it an instance where something bad out there is doing cache scraping (or using cache scraping to control something) and you need to act on it more immediately?
I want to clarify that the cache scraping ban isn't new. If you read the EULA, this isn't a new thing. It has never been allowed by the EULA. In regards to enforcement, we don't have plans. It's not at the top of our to-do list. It's simply a case of while it not being allowed by our EULA, it's at our discretion whether or not the effort to enforce it is worth it or not. Right now, we're focused on botting, RMT, client modification that impact other players. Firstly, thanks for the clarification.
I just (as a programmer myself) don't see how without hooking into the rest of the system outside of Eve's process how you would be able to determine the difference between EveMon doing cache scraping and "Bill and Ted's Excellent Haxxx" doing cache scraping.
Would you let us know before you start throwing bans out to half the player base that non-malicious-intent cache-scraping is now up on your priority list so we can fall into line? I think I can say the majority of the players are not out to harm or game the system; we're just here to play the game :) If that means turning off our market data uploaders in our skill planning programs, I'm pretty sure we'd be fine with that. You'll notice my original response was that of concern for the third-party ecosystem people have built around Eve, not necessarily our fates as players. I'm fairly certain I'm not going to feel the ban hammer for running a simple skill planning software suite (that also happens to cache-scrape for non-botting/RMT purposes). |
|
CCP Peligro
C C P C C P Alliance
26
|
Posted - 2013.04.18 14:40:00 -
[38] - Quote
Ishihiro tanaka wrote:Selena Na'sharr wrote:What's the position on gaming keyboards with macro-capabilities, such as the Logitech G15? Its driver inherently supports some level of user-initiated automation. (in short, do I need to look for a new keyboard? :)) This ^^ needs an answer.
I'm typing on a G15 right now. If you turn your keyboard into a bot, we'll deal with that, but otherwise you are perfectly safe. CCP Peligro - Team Security |
|
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
1295
|
Posted - 2013.04.18 14:40:00 -
[39] - Quote
Uppsy Daisy wrote:CCP Stillman wrote:Mechaet wrote: The cache scraping ban was unexpected, though. How are eve-central et al going to get their market data? I've configured my EveMon to not send in the market data now (and I assume any wise player will do the same). It kind of sucks that clarifications like these result in viable, useful third-party sites finding themselves in a position of being rules-lawyered out of being viable, especially after all those folks put in such massive effort to make something all of us players can use.
You've said that you're trying to lobby for getting Eve marketeers a feed they can use to get market data; did you consider putting a halt to cache scraping bans until you knew the outcome of that effort, or is it an instance where something bad out there is doing cache scraping (or using cache scraping to control something) and you need to act on it more immediately?
I want to clarify that the cache scraping ban isn't new. If you read the EULA, this isn't a new thing. It has never been allowed by the EULA. In regards to enforcement, we don't have plans. It's not at the top of our to-do list. It's simply a case of while it not being allowed by our EULA, it's at our discretion whether or not the effort to enforce it is worth it or not. Right now, we're focused on botting, RMT, client modification that impact other players. Sorry but that is rubbish. The EULA has always been completely vague. The nearest we have had previously was that cache scraping was legal. http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=734561&page=1#9We have CCP Sreegs' *opinion* that he thought it should be illegal. You have just spelt out in plain language that it is illegal. This is the first time you have done this.
This. I'll be disabling my own uploads from Evemon, as we had been running under a 'It's ok to do' from a number of GMs. And I'd expect anyone else to do the same. (To clarify an earlier point, if there's no alternate uploader for EMDR made available, that will also be disabled.)
Steve Ronuken for CSM 8 Handy tools and SDE conversions Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter |
Fade Toblack
Per.ly The 20 Minuters
32
|
Posted - 2013.04.18 14:42:00 -
[40] - Quote
CCP Stillman wrote:In regards to enforcement, we don't have plans. It's not at the top of our to-do list. It's simply a case of while it not being allowed by our EULA, it's at our discretion whether or not the effort to enforce it is worth it or not. Right now, we're focused on botting, RMT, client modification that impact other players.
You're saying that in the forums, but the wiki page reads like this:
Quote: We recognize that some players have engaged in cache scraping in the past, and we want to be clear this practice is not permitted. That said, unless there is an extreme case (i.e., cache scraping combined with other EULA violations), we will not penalize players who have engaged in this practice prior to 15 April 2013. Now that we have made our intent and policy clear, we may, in our sole discretion, deliver appropriate penalties for players that engage in cache scraping after 15 April 2013 (including temporary or permanent bans). In addition, we also may consider eliminating the cache to eliminate this practice and for performance reasons.
Which basically says that any player who uses a cache scraper after 15th April 2013 (3 DAYS AGO!) can now be banned for that purpose.
ALSO SURELY THAT PARAGRAPH IS SO IMPORTANT THAT IT SHOULD BE ON THE DEV BLOG?
Thing is, I've used EveMon to cache scrape in the last 3 days. So in theory by the rule of the EULA you can ban me at any time.
I've used it in the past due to messages from CCP staff stating that cache-scraping was not reverse-engineering and outside the client and therefore not covered by the EULA.
Basically I'm finding the mixed messaging confusing, and this attempt at clarifying your position is only aiding to confuse things. In the dev-blog you're referring to the wiki page as being the official stance - eg cache scraping is now a bannable offence, meanwhile at the same time you're posing messages here saying that you're not going to ban people for using EveMon to cache-scrape.
Hell, let's take this further. On one hand, in the devblog you state that you'll never approve any piece of 3rd party software, meanwhile individual CCP staff are stating that people won't get banned for using EveMon - surely that's an endorsement of a particular piece of 3rd party software?
|
|
Uppsy Daisy
24th Imperial Crusade Amarr Empire
280
|
Posted - 2013.04.18 14:44:00 -
[41] - Quote
Oh well. Much of the infrastructure that players have built up over the years comes tumbling down...
This is a very sad day IMO.
Sorry Steve, I know you have put in a lot of work for the community on it. |
|
CCP Stillman
C C P C C P Alliance
460
|
Posted - 2013.04.18 14:45:00 -
[42] - Quote
Fade Toblack wrote: Hell, let's take this further. On one hand, in the devblog you state that you'll never approve any piece of 3rd party software, meanwhile individual CCP staff are stating that people won't get banned for using EveMon - surely that's an endorsement of a particular piece of 3rd party software?
Do you think people should be banned for using EveMon? Just a random dude in Team Security. |
|
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
1295
|
Posted - 2013.04.18 14:48:00 -
[43] - Quote
CCP Stillman wrote:Fade Toblack wrote: Hell, let's take this further. On one hand, in the devblog you state that you'll never approve any piece of 3rd party software, meanwhile individual CCP staff are stating that people won't get banned for using EveMon - surely that's an endorsement of a particular piece of 3rd party software?
Do you think people should be banned for using EveMon?
What we're saying is:
You're giving us a very mixed message.
You're saying, in a posted policy document: Cache scaping is against the rules and can get you banned.
And you're saying, in a forum post: You won't get banned for using a specific cache scraper (the one built into Evemon)
That, by itself, is a /hideous/ thing to do to your customers. Steve Ronuken for CSM 8 Handy tools and SDE conversions Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter |
Uppsy Daisy
24th Imperial Crusade Amarr Empire
280
|
Posted - 2013.04.18 14:48:00 -
[44] - Quote
double post |
Uppsy Daisy
24th Imperial Crusade Amarr Empire
280
|
Posted - 2013.04.18 14:49:00 -
[45] - Quote
Quote:Do you think people should be banned for using EveMon?
Do you think its fair to threaten them all with being banned?
Now that we have made our intent and policy clear, we may, in our sole discretion, deliver appropriate penalties for players that engage in cache scraping after 15 April 2013 (including temporary or permanent bans). |
Fade Toblack
Per.ly The 20 Minuters
33
|
Posted - 2013.04.18 14:52:00 -
[46] - Quote
CCP Stillman wrote:Do you think people should be banned for using EveMon?
That's not the point. The point is that your message is confusing.
The wiki page says that I can now be banned from Eve for using a feature in EveMon that is on by default - because that feature breaks the EULA (reverse engineers cache files).
Meanwhile you're posting here saying that I can happily use EveMon (presumably as it comes out of the box) without fear of being banned.
Those two statements are contradictory - so which should I be adhering to?
|
Ahri Firestar
Terrulian Exo Arcologies
0
|
Posted - 2013.04.18 14:52:00 -
[47] - Quote
CCP Stillman wrote:Fade Toblack wrote: Hell, let's take this further. On one hand, in the devblog you state that you'll never approve any piece of 3rd party software, meanwhile individual CCP staff are stating that people won't get banned for using EveMon - surely that's an endorsement of a particular piece of 3rd party software?
Do you think people should be banned for using EveMon? That can be thrown right back at you, with the same vague undertone;
Do you think they should be banned for using isboxer? |
Horatius Caul
Kitzless
219
|
Posted - 2013.04.18 14:53:00 -
[48] - Quote
Uppsy Daisy wrote: The EULA has always been completely vague. The nearest we have had previously was that cache scraping was legal.
All EULAs are vague, on purpose. Why? Because they are written to allow the first party to cover all eventualities and do whatever they want with you. The EULA also makes it clear that CCP can ban you for whatever reasons they feel like, should it come to that.
A dev saying that something is okay or another dev saying something should be okay to do doesn't actually void the agreement you've accepted which states that doing so is not okay. The EULA is written by lawyers to protect the company, and random members of staff can't alter its clauses.
What they can do is opt to enforce or not enforce the clauses on a case-by-case basis, which CCP's security staff does. They could just as easily take a blanket approach to the TOS and EULA and enforce it by the letter, which wouldn't just ban everybody using EVEMON but also everybody who's ever used Triexporter to play around with EVE's 3D models, textures, or fonts. But they haven't, because they value these things in the community and don't consider you a bad person. CCP has made an effort to separate botters from other people who violate the EULA, which is more than you can expect from most companies.
"Is this in violation of the EULA" and "Will I get banned for this" are two completely different questions. Amarrad - Amarr language project |
Roime
Shiva Furnace
2556
|
Posted - 2013.04.18 14:54:00 -
[49] - Quote
Ahri Firestar wrote:
Do you think they should be banned for using isboxer?
Yes.
-á- All I really wanted was to build a castle among the stars - |
Nicen Jehr
Swarm Federation
177
|
Posted - 2013.04.18 14:54:00 -
[50] - Quote
jeez calm down stillman has clearly articulated:
- the cache-scraping ban in the EULA allows CCP to take action against those doing it - but Team Security won't take action against cache scrapers unless they are also botting or otherwise gaining game advantage Little Things to improve GëíGïüGëí-á| My Little Things posts |
|
|
CCP Stillman
C C P C C P Alliance
462
|
Posted - 2013.04.18 14:55:00 -
[51] - Quote
Horatius Caul wrote:Uppsy Daisy wrote: The EULA has always been completely vague. The nearest we have had previously was that cache scraping was legal.
All EULAs are vague, on purpose. Why? Because they are written to allow the first party to cover all eventualities and do whatever they want with you. The EULA also makes it clear that CCP can ban you for whatever reasons they feel like, should it come to that. A dev saying that something is okay or another dev saying something should be okay to do doesn't actually void the agreement you've accepted which states that doing so is not okay. The EULA is written by lawyers to protect the company, and random members of staff can't alter its clauses. What they can do is opt to enforce or not enforce the clauses on a case-by-case basis, which CCP's security staff does. They could just as easily take a blanket approach to the TOS and EULA and enforce it by the letter, which wouldn't just ban everybody using EVEMON but also everybody who's ever used Triexporter to play around with EVE's 3D models, textures, or fonts. But they haven't, because they value these things in the community and don't consider you a bad person. CCP has made an effort to separate botters from other people who violate the EULA, which is more than you can expect from most companies. "Is this in violation of the EULA" and "Will I get banned for this" are two completely different questions. This gentleman is spot on.
Trust me, we have no interest in banning people unless they are doing something that hurts the game. Just a random dude in Team Security. |
|
Fade Toblack
Per.ly The 20 Minuters
36
|
Posted - 2013.04.18 14:57:00 -
[52] - Quote
And sorry for the double post.
But ALSO you're saying that cache-scraping HAS ALWAYS been against the EULA - despite posts on the forums by CCP staff in the past stating the opposite.
So what notification will we get when you decide that you're going to go against ALL cache scrapers including EveMon. Are you going to back-date that too?
I also find it fairly despicable that you've offered an amnesty to people who have mistakenly done against the EULA in the past thinking that it was legitimate - however the amnesty is dated 3 days before you brought attention to it.
|
Dp Wiz
Iron Hands Flight School
1
|
Posted - 2013.04.18 14:57:00 -
[53] - Quote
I hope that modification monitoring will not interfere with running Eve on Wine/Cedega/Crossover, since the official package was abandoned. Please make a note somewhere for this case. |
Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
3969
|
Posted - 2013.04.18 15:00:00 -
[54] - Quote
Way to over react people.
This clarification closes a loop hole and gives CCP another tool to use against bots and cheats of various types.
YES, cache scraping is illegal... and if you use cache scraping for botting purposes they reserve the right to shut you down for it.
If you are using cache scraping purely for informational or utility purposes (meaning not to bot or otherwise cheat) then they excercise their right to NOT bust you for it.
This gives them the flexibility to deal with software designed to circumvent the game rules without providing loop holes in their enforcement policy that could be exploited.
This isn't a difficult concept folks.
If you aren't cheating or botting with your cache scraping software they aren't going to ban you, but if the software is modified so as to cross that line they reserve the right to come after you at any time.
Until Crest is fully functional this is actually the smartest way to handle things. It allows them to deal with cheats and bots when necessary without being hamstrung to the point they have to disallow software that is genuinely handy.
Now calm down. To carve a successful niche for yourself in EVE you need to be able to out sell, out produce, out fight,-á out run, or out wit your competitors. If you can do none of the above, your only option is to complain on the forums that somehow you are at a disadvantage using the exact same tool set-áas the rest of the player base. |
Big Jim Slade
No Sacrifice No Victory
34
|
Posted - 2013.04.18 15:00:00 -
[55] - Quote
What about all those Overview modifications by changing the overviews .xml file? Are you also checking modified .xml files to see if players are making your game more user friendly and ban them? |
Muscaat
EVE Markets
32
|
Posted - 2013.04.18 15:01:00 -
[56] - Quote
CCP Stillman wrote: Trust me, we have no interest in banning people unless they are doing something that hurts the game.
Then why post all this crap about suddenly deciding that cache scraping has always been against the EULA and threaten to ban those who do it?
This attempt to clarify the situation seems to have done anything but. |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
3636
|
Posted - 2013.04.18 15:02:00 -
[57] - Quote
As I have been saying to CCP Stillman since this went public (the CSM was not informed of this in advance), CCP should provide an API call to get market data before they declare cache scraping illegal. Many useful 3rd party applications depend on cache scraping, including just about every killboard out there (for market prices). CSM 7 Secretary CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog
|
Mechaet
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
43
|
Posted - 2013.04.18 15:03:00 -
[58] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote: This gives them the flexibility to deal with software designed to circumvent the game rules without providing loop holes in their enforcement policy that could be exploited.
This isn't a difficult concept folks.
I want to say I also agree with the rest of your post, but what you said in the quoted section completely cleared it up for me. Thanks for that.
And thanks CCP Stillman for giving us a devblog to argue with you about :) |
Fade Toblack
Per.ly The 20 Minuters
36
|
Posted - 2013.04.18 15:04:00 -
[59] - Quote
Horatius Caul wrote:"Is this in violation of the EULA" and "Will I get banned for this" are two completely different questions.
Not entirely.
Is this in violation of the EULA = YES you can be banned.
So your second question then becomes: "What's the risk that I'm going to get banned for breaking the EULA in this way"
Now I've done something that was previous stated to be not covered by the EULA. So I couldn't be banned.
For the last three days, I have been inadvertently breaking the EULA. This means that I've been personally unable to make the risk assessment over whether I will get banned before breaking the EULA.
|
Uppsy Daisy
24th Imperial Crusade Amarr Empire
283
|
Posted - 2013.04.18 15:05:00 -
[60] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:Way to over react people.
This clarification closes a loop hole and gives CCP another tool to use against bots and cheats of various types.
YES, cache scraping is illegal... and if you use cache scraping for botting purposes they reserve the right to shut you down for it.
If you are using cache scraping purely for informational or utility purposes (meaning not to bot or otherwise cheat) then they excercise their right to NOT bust you for it.
This gives them the flexibility to deal with software designed to circumvent the game rules without providing loop holes in their enforcement policy that could be exploited.
This isn't a difficult concept folks.
If you aren't cheating or botting with your cache scraping software they aren't going to ban you, but if the software is modified so as to cross that line they reserve the right to come after you at any time.
Until Crest is fully functional this is actually the smartest way to handle things. It allows them to deal with cheats and bots when necessary without being hamstrung to the point they have to disallow software that is genuinely handy.
Now calm down.
Much more clarity is needed.
Is cache scraping to upload to Eve Market Relay or Eve Central illegal? Is cache scraping to better manage you order portfolio illegal? Is cache scraping to find the best trade routes illegal? Is cache scraping to reseach the eve market generally illegal? Is cache scraping to find out whatever someone beats your order illegal? Is cache scraping to feed a manufacturing program with up to date prices illegal?
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 27 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |