Let me clarify it for you that you can't wezel word your way out of it...

15 Catas with T2 blasters have about 0% risk of not blowing up a Mack.

What should should "15 Catas with T2 blasters" not have about a 0% risk of not blowing up. I can't think of many subcaps here.

It is a constant. No variable, no "other". It's an absolute. It's either, to use your terms, a 0 or a 1.

0=false.
1=true.
When you shoot someone, Concord will blow you up. 0 or 1?

It is carebear pvp. PVP being it involves another player. Not that they can actually attack back.

It's in comment to baltec's statement "These are all risks currently faced by suicide gankers in high sec."

Fact is there are no "risks", it is calculated loses. There is no skill, it is all procedure.

It is carebear pvp. PVP being it involves another player. Not that they can actually attack back.

You guys who think ganking high sec miners is risk free are just not thinking. At all.

Once they explode your ersatz ice cream truck, they have opened themselves up to a MONTH of possible ganking free and clear in High Sec by your little self.

That sounds pretty risky to me.

It is carebear pvp. PVP being it involves another player.

Not that they can actually attack back.

It's in comment to baltec's statement "These are all risks currently faced by suicide gankers in high sec."

Fact is there are no "risks", it is calculated loses. There is no skill, it is all procedure.

It is carebear pvp. PVP being it involves another player. Not that they can actually attack back.

I heard there are freighters dying in the ice belts and the carnage is ramping up

System?

Wuos, The Forge.

We have also taken out several bonus Tengu and many Orca.

It is your choice to do the ganking. That does not make it a risk. It is a result.

Sorry, fail again.

So, being criminally flagged in High Sec for 30 days by multiple entities is not risky.

Got it.

Maybe you need War Dec to understand how risky that proposition indeed is.

Wouldn't affect him, he's too busy hiding behind an NPC corps skirts.

Kamio and Osmon to name a couple more.

*wonders how many of the orca gank ships were named Pequod, Ishmael and Ahab

So, being criminally flagged in High Sec for 30 days by multiple entities is not risky.

Got it.

Maybe you need War Dec to understand how risky that proposition indeed is.

Or maybe hire some Mercs so you can experience 'risk free' High Sec mining for a week.

but only if no one else is around that can attack back.

It is not a risk. It is a result of your actions. You don't want the flag, don't do the ganking. It is your decision.

Yea, go wardec some more noobs, miners

You are the carebears that scan down targets with alts, calculate their defenses, and then attack, but only if no one else is around that can attack back.

Yes? P(B|A) is literally said, "The probability of B given A"

It is not a risk. It is a result of your actions. You don't want the flag, don't do the ganking. It is your decision.

Yea, go wardec some more noobs, miners.

You are the carebears that scan down targets with alts, calculate their defenses, and then attack, but only if no one else is around that can attack back.

The result of a gankers actions and choices increases their risk of explosion at anothers hands, so there is a risk involved. Being an easy target is the result of a miners choices, and the risk of getting ganked while mining can be mitigated by changing those choices.


Did you somehow miss the part where Krixtal states that he is in fact a miner?

It is not a risk. It is a result of your actions. You don't want the flag, don't do the ganking. It is your decision.

Yea, go wardec some more noobs, miners.

You are the carebears that scan down targets with alts, calculate their defenses, and then attack, but only if no one else is around that can attack back.

Let's break it down. When you fire your gun, you don't risk losing a bullet. You know it's going to fire, you know it's going to leave, you know you're going to lose it.

Not really much pidgeon holing there. No need to over complicate things. You take a ship out with full intention of not coming back in it.

Now, you DO risk coming back poorer, because you might not make a profit. But that doesn't equate to the act of suicide ganking and that would be pidgeon holing the situation.

So yea, let's not pidgeon hole the fact you know it's going to be loss, not risk.

Cost is not a risk. It is a cost.

Only in the written word, not in application.

It doesn't cost you anything if you don't die.

The difference, is outcome based on intent.

To prove a constant. It isn't a risk if you do not consider it anything more than a cost.

I will however, take the time to applaud all the people who rise to the defense of people, even in fact of them being wrong and trying to circumvent simple fact into fantasy to pretend something is something different than it is.

Now, get the hell over the fact that suicide ganking is in fact riskless pvp since you aren't putting anything on the line and just gank a ship and be done with it.

I have yet to ever hear anyone ever think they could suicide gank and not get blown up by Concord.

It is your choice to do the ganking. That does not make it a risk. It is a result.

It is not a risk. It is a result of your actions.

Yes? P(B|A) is literally said, "The probability of B given A"

You seem really defensive about having ****** up highschool level statistics; don't worry about it, most people do.

So when you said that they were dependent, you meantGǪ what, exactly?

You're confusing me with you

Almost funny to cite a kill where at least more than half of the squad are braindead multiboxed zombies controlled by the crybearer ..., sorry, your "Architect" Warr Akini ..... what was it again about "skill needed"? The tornado was a very severe threat after all it seems.

More tears or hints about afk-multiboxed-miners or afk-flying freighter please while afking multiboxed in a safe station, waiting for the ping or > 15 minutes gone by to launch and attack .... hypocrisy anyone?

Please tell me how you gank people while you are away from the keyboard.