Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 21 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |

Iudicium Vastus
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
145
|
Posted - 2013.11.02 22:03:00 -
[391] - Quote
Baali Tekitsu wrote: Peopel will always buy GTCs, there is a certain total demand for GTC. By giving people an incentive to buy through SOMER they take away from other sites like dotlan who have an affiliate link but no incentive.
I would say that for the cost of a 30day GTC vs paying sub as normal there should be something for that extra $5/mo. Using GTCs for 3 months I could have paid sub for 4 months. So I may be part of a small group that blatantly express that for my extra $5/mo I expect some sort of bonus or incentive.
And even for those times I want to pay for longer periods of subs at once, paying it directly is still cheaper than any bulk pack of GTCs could offer. |

Frying Doom
3162
|
Posted - 2013.11.02 22:11:00 -
[392] - Quote
Iudicium Vastus wrote:Baali Tekitsu wrote: Peopel will always buy GTCs, there is a certain total demand for GTC. By giving people an incentive to buy through SOMER they take away from other sites like dotlan who have an affiliate link but no incentive.
I would say that for the cost of a 30day GTC vs paying sub as normal there should be something for that extra $5/mo. Using GTCs for 3 months I could have paid sub for 4 months. So I may be part of a small group that blatantly express that for my extra $5/mo I expect some sort of bonus or incentive. And even for those times I want to pay for longer periods of subs at once, paying it directly is still cheaper than any bulk pack of GTCs could offer. Or you could actually pay the extra to help support some of the great community sites this game has, hell even the Goons used to sell GTC (Not sure if they do anymore) to help with their server costs, there are so many sites worth supporting.
If you do not wish to donate to any site, then just pay your money straight to CCP.
Personally I think there are many great sites worth that extra donation. Sites that were built to help this community and Somer Blink is not one of them. They have shown they are here only to help them selves.
Charity is its own reward. Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Baali Tekitsu
B0SSAURA xXPlease Pandemic Citizens Reloaded Alliance.Xx
287
|
Posted - 2013.11.02 22:11:00 -
[393] - Quote
Iudicium Vastus wrote:Baali Tekitsu wrote: Peopel will always buy GTCs, there is a certain total demand for GTC. By giving people an incentive to buy through SOMER they take away from other sites like dotlan who have an affiliate link but no incentive.
I would say that for the cost of a 30day GTC vs paying sub as normal there should be something for that extra $5/mo. Using GTCs for 3 months I could have paid sub for 4 months. So I may be part of a small group that blatantly express that for my extra $5/mo I expect some sort of bonus or incentive. And even for those times I want to pay for longer periods of subs at once, paying it directly is still cheaper than any bulk pack of GTCs could offer. For that extra 5$ you get the option to turn the GTC into a PLEX.
|

Diomedes Calypso
Aetolian Armada
161
|
Posted - 2013.11.02 22:21:00 -
[394] - Quote
Baali Tekitsu wrote:TigerXtrm wrote:Sturmwolke wrote:Careby wrote: If Somer can actually sell 300,000 GTC's in a week (which they would have to do to make that estimated $800,000), just imagine the millions CCP will rake in.
Wrong attribution. Somer doesn't sell 300K GTCs in a week ... the right term to use is captured. Put it this way, the demand for GTC is one whole pie ... they stole a significant portion of the pie. If Somer didn't exists, that portion would otherwise gone to other vendors/CCPdirectly. Made wonder me if some fools at CCP thought the same way too, thinking Somer sold them a lot GTCs.  That makes no sense... at all. Please elaborate on the point you're trying to make? Peopel will always buy GTCs, there is a certain total demand for GTC. By giving people an incentive to buy through SOMER they take away from other sites like dotlan who have an affiliate link but no incentive.
You are certainly correct about one portion of SOMER's sales... those that would have done the $>PLEX>ISK transactions with or without any gambling motivation.
Of the people who fit in that category that I know who ALSO play Blink.. I'd guess that the gambling motive had that small subset buy at least 50% more. That is a very small slice of the player base but not nearly as tiny a slice of the regular $>PLEX>ISK player-purchasers. My guess would be that the number would be 12% more plex>isk purchases.. maybe making up 1 or 2% more net income for CCP due to Blink gambling. That guess was built on guess's of ranges that might be seen from market sales etc...just a narrowing of errors but .... everyone would do that a bit differently. Only internal number crunching would give a truer number. It isn't a 0% increase. that I'm sure of. . |

Baali Tekitsu
B0SSAURA xXPlease Pandemic Citizens Reloaded Alliance.Xx
287
|
Posted - 2013.11.02 22:23:00 -
[395] - Quote
Diomedes Calypso wrote:Baali Tekitsu wrote:TigerXtrm wrote:Sturmwolke wrote:Careby wrote: If Somer can actually sell 300,000 GTC's in a week (which they would have to do to make that estimated $800,000), just imagine the millions CCP will rake in.
Wrong attribution. Somer doesn't sell 300K GTCs in a week ... the right term to use is captured. Put it this way, the demand for GTC is one whole pie ... they stole a significant portion of the pie. If Somer didn't exists, that portion would otherwise gone to other vendors/CCPdirectly. Made wonder me if some fools at CCP thought the same way too, thinking Somer sold them a lot GTCs.  That makes no sense... at all. Please elaborate on the point you're trying to make? Peopel will always buy GTCs, there is a certain total demand for GTC. By giving people an incentive to buy through SOMER they take away from other sites like dotlan who have an affiliate link but no incentive. You are certainly correct about one portion of SOMER's sales... those that would have done the $>PLEX>ISK transactions with or without any gambling motivation. Of the people who fit in that category that I know who ALSO play Blink.. I'd guess that the gambling motive had that small subset buy at least 50% more. That is a very small slice of the player base but not nearly as tiny a slice of the regular $>PLEX>ISK player-purchasers. My guess would be that the number would be 12% more plex>isk purchases.. maybe making up 1 or 2% more net income for CCP due to Blink gambling. That guess was built on guess's of ranges that might be seen from market sales etc...just a narrowing of errors but .... everyone would do that a bit differently. Only internal number crunching would give a truer number. It isn't a 0% increase. that I'm sure of. It certainly isnt community supporting either.
|

Frying Doom
3164
|
Posted - 2013.11.02 22:48:00 -
[396] - Quote
Baali Tekitsu wrote:It certainly isnt community supporting either.
It does bring up another interesting point.
Somer with its 'for profit business' have been doing this 'bonus' for years, now the average person is greedy and will go for what gives them more.
So with Somer managing to get so much of the pie via their 'bonus', how many of our actual community sites are struggling to just cover the cost of their servers because of this?
How many of our community sites are now running off pure donations as they know they cannot compete in the GTC market?
It is a for profit business and it has no place in EvE, even the EULA says so.
Somer Blink, destroying this community, one GTC sale at a time. Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Altrue
Exploration Frontier inc
671
|
Posted - 2013.11.02 22:53:00 -
[397] - Quote
Every player or entity is equal when face the EULA. But some entities are more equal than others.
You will see, CCP will let blink continue, otherwise they wouldn't have waited for all this noise from their playerbase to act. G££ <= Me |

Diomedes Calypso
Aetolian Armada
162
|
Posted - 2013.11.02 22:54:00 -
[398] - Quote
Baali Tekitsu wrote:[quote=Diomedes Calypso] It certainly isnt community supporting either.
I agree. but.. guess I'm weird but I figure it's a good idea to recognize stuff that seems true to me even if it weakens my over all desire or position.
I do think that it risks more to game play than I first thought. there is a well written post above that I "liked" that makes a good case why the influence is bad.
Seems to me I should recognize a gambling short-term increase plex even if it could decrease sales long term by a far bigger number if it hurt the game.
(it could be my RL profession as a commercial real estate broker that try's to look for the real divide between two parties and find adjustments to the terms that don't cost either side -- a landlord will pay for a different sort of Tenant Improvement if it had more general purpose use than the one the corporate planner proposed ...or a different date taking occupancy could let that last 10 cents per square foot divide be bridged...
... it's just an instinct that what is good for me (getting paid) means getting into the minutia dividing parties and finding what less obvious parts can give without either side compromising on what means most to them.. perhaps even giving an ability to sweeten what means most for both parties !)
My motivation as a broker type problem solver would be to find a way of keeping the gambling based sales without hurting the game at large. (ironically, after considering the dangers of "ship inflation" related to the gambling makes the much maligned vanity ship give away make more sense..... I don't advocate it but it's funny to notice) . |

Baali Tekitsu
B0SSAURA xXPlease Pandemic Citizens Reloaded Alliance.Xx
287
|
Posted - 2013.11.02 23:13:00 -
[399] - Quote
Diomedes Calypso wrote:
I agree. but.. guess I'm weird but I figure it's a good idea to recognize stuff that seems true to me even if it weakens my over all desire or position.
I just dont write lenthy posts/responses as my english is quite limited.
Diomedes Calypso wrote: I do think that it risks more to game play than I first thought. there is a well written post above that I "liked" that makes a good case why the influence is bad.
Seems to me I should recognize a gambling short-term increase In GTC sales even if it could decrease sales long term by a far bigger number if it hurt the game.
(it could be my RL profession as a commercial real estate broker that try's to look for the real divide between two parties (ccp and players.. not somer and ccp ) and find adjustments to the terms that don't cost either side -- a landlord will pay for a different sort of Tenant Improvement if it had more general purpose use than the one the corporate planner proposed ...or a different date taking occupancy could let that last 10 cents per square foot divide be bridged...
... it's just an instinct that what is good for me (getting paid) means getting into the minutia dividing parties and finding what less obvious parts can give without either side compromising on what means most to them.. perhaps even giving an ability to sweeten what means most for both parties !)
One possible compromise which I could imagine is that SOMER would pay a share of their income to real community services but that doesnt seem realistic as they first would need to admit that not all of their income goes off for server maintanance costs and generally would raise many more problems.
Diomedes Calypso wrote: My motivation as a broker type problem solver would be to find a way of keeping the gambling based sales without hurting the game at large. (ironically, after considering the dangers of "ship inflation" related to the gambling makes the much maligned vanity ship give away make more sense..... I don't advocate it but it's funny to notice)
I thought that SOMER just buys the ships they raffle off the market as everybody else does. At the first view the volume of ships blinked seems ridiculous but the actual number of ships payed out is much less as many chose to get the ISK value or blink credit as reward, not the ship/item itself. Means the number of ships in game doesnt actually increase. |

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
1491
|
Posted - 2013.11.02 23:13:00 -
[400] - Quote
I would suggest that at long last Somer are acting in accordance with the true spirit of Eve Online and taking are CCP for a ride.
I wonder if CCP still think Somer are nice trustworthy folk with whom they can do 'honest' business? This is not a signature. |
|

Diomedes Calypso
Aetolian Armada
163
|
Posted - 2013.11.02 23:30:00 -
[401] - Quote
Baali Tekitsu wrote:
I thought that SOMER just buys the ships they raffle off the market as everybody else does. At the first view the volume of ships blinked seems ridiculous but the actual number of ships payed out is much less as many chose to get the ISK value or blink credit as reward, not the ship/item itself. Means the number of ships in game doesnt actually increase.
My thought is that people are flying Machariels that they never would have if the had to decide "maybe I'll go spend $15 to get a Machariel"
If they decide "This blink is really fun.. look a Macheirel is up ! damn .. no credits !.. better buy a GTC" they've essentially spent $15 to buy the Macherial (or however you spell that ) Actually, given rules of probablity.. the price would be more than the $15 because of the premium to play.
I really don't think there is a solution that is good for the game as a whole.. I can think of some that are less bad though.
Absolutely, there can be no compromise whatsover on the direct ISK bonus to outside action.
No compromise on the Direct requirement.. "you must buy from us only to get the in game perk" .
... I can think of some ways where they could be neutral to who the players bought the GTCs from while still having a slight (negotiable how slight) edge in terms of ease of in game links.
Even there.. I'm not sure than in game links landing on out of game full commercial sites is good.
Landing on a kb page with banner ads there for a next click ? maybe (thats the gray to me)
. |

Careby
Careby Exploration
71
|
Posted - 2013.11.03 00:07:00 -
[402] - Quote
Sturmwolke wrote:Wrong attribution. Somer doesn't sell 300K GTCs in a week ... the right term to use is captured. Put it this way, the demand for GTC is one whole pie ... they stole a significant portion of the pie. If Somer didn't exist, that portion would have otherwise gone to other vendors/CCPdirectly. Made wonder me if some fools at CCP thought the same way too, thinking Somer sold them a lot GTCs.  I understand what you are saying, and there is some truth to it but it doesn't tell the whole story.
First of all, GTC are directly convertible to Plex, and Plex can be "used up" (removed from the game) in ways other than paying for game time. So the demand for Plex is not really constant. Otherwise CCP would have little incentive to run Plex sales.
Additionally, the effective price of GTC affects the number of active accounts. A player wavering between allowing an account to expire may be swayed by the bonus deal, or an active player may decide to add an additional account.
But I do agree that the normal "market share" for GTC has been captured at the expense of other resellers and other community websites.
|

TigerXtrm
Black Thorne Corporation Black Thorne Alliance
237
|
Posted - 2013.11.03 00:48:00 -
[403] - Quote
Iudicium Vastus wrote:Baali Tekitsu wrote: Peopel will always buy GTCs, there is a certain total demand for GTC. By giving people an incentive to buy through SOMER they take away from other sites like dotlan who have an affiliate link but no incentive.
I would say that for the cost of a 30day GTC vs paying sub as normal there should be something for that extra $5/mo. Using GTCs for 3 months I could have paid sub for 4 months. So I may be part of a small group that blatantly express that for my extra $5/mo I expect some sort of bonus or incentive. And even for those times I want to pay for longer periods of subs at once, paying it directly is still cheaper than any bulk pack of GTCs could offer.
For those of us forced to pay the direct game time in local currency (Euro or Pound), it's often cheaper to buy a GTC with dollars. Buying directly on the EVE website only becomes cheaper with 6 month plans or more and not everyone is willing to buy that much gametime in one go all the time.
If I buy on a month to month basis directly from CCP I pay Gé¼15,- ($20,-) for one month. If I buy a 60 day GTC I pay $35,- (Gé¼25,-). So that comes down to Gé¼12,50 a month instead of Gé¼15,-. Even CCP's 3 month plan is slightly more expensive than that at Gé¼12,95 a month. My YouTube Channel - EVE Tutorials & other game related things! |

Frying Doom
3171
|
Posted - 2013.11.03 02:32:00 -
[404] - Quote
TigerXtrm wrote:Iudicium Vastus wrote:Baali Tekitsu wrote: Peopel will always buy GTCs, there is a certain total demand for GTC. By giving people an incentive to buy through SOMER they take away from other sites like dotlan who have an affiliate link but no incentive.
I would say that for the cost of a 30day GTC vs paying sub as normal there should be something for that extra $5/mo. Using GTCs for 3 months I could have paid sub for 4 months. So I may be part of a small group that blatantly express that for my extra $5/mo I expect some sort of bonus or incentive. And even for those times I want to pay for longer periods of subs at once, paying it directly is still cheaper than any bulk pack of GTCs could offer. For those of us forced to pay the direct game time in local currency (Euro or Pound), it's often cheaper to buy a GTC with dollars. Buying directly on the EVE website only becomes cheaper with 6 month plans or more and not everyone is willing to buy that much gametime in one go all the time. If I buy on a month to month basis directly from CCP I pay Gé¼15,- ($20,-) for one month. If I buy a 60 day GTC I pay $35,- (Gé¼25,-). So that comes down to Gé¼12,50 a month instead of Gé¼15,-. Even CCP's 3 month plan is slightly more expensive than that at Gé¼12,95 a month. I can honestly say that is the first post of yours that has made sense.
Look on the bright side, with the 'bonus' removed yourself and people in the same boat as you are more likely to buy GTCs off actual community sites, allowing them to once more grow and become more numerous.
Somer and its 'redacted' have acted as a cancer on this games community, stripping the rightful support from those community sites and giving them to a business.
Yes people will chose to support Somer as well on a level playing field but at least people such as yourself are more likely to actually consider buying off other sites now.
Hell EvE radio needs help, but atm they have not even a GTC link. Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

YesYes NoNoNo
Karmic Rebalance
54
|
Posted - 2013.11.03 03:01:00 -
[405] - Quote
TigerXtrm wrote:Sturmwolke wrote:Careby wrote: If Somer can actually sell 300,000 GTC's in a week (which they would have to do to make that estimated $800,000), just imagine the millions CCP will rake in.
Wrong attribution. Somer doesn't sell 300K GTCs in a week ... the right term to use is captured. Put it this way, the demand for GTC is one whole pie ... they stole a significant portion of the pie. If Somer didn't exists, that portion would otherwise gone to other vendors/CCPdirectly. Made wonder me if some fools at CCP thought the same way too, thinking Somer sold them a lot GTCs.  That makes no sense... at all. Please elaborate on the point you're trying to make?
I think the point he's trying to make is that he was awake in highschool economics class. |

TharOkha
0asis Group
637
|
Posted - 2013.11.03 06:12:00 -
[406] - Quote
Interesting. My posts was removed from this thread because i just wrote that it is very likely that SOMER and CCP are at one ship. CCP probably gets a cut from somer casino, he recieved special scorpions.. Hints are everywhere and censorship is on a roll. All i have asked was just if it is bad to RMT if CCP gets a cut from it. GÇ£If reality can destroy the dream, why shouldn't the dream destroy reality?GÇ¥ |

Sal Landry
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
121
|
Posted - 2013.11.03 07:09:00 -
[407] - Quote
TharOkha wrote:Interesting. My posts were removed from this thread because i just wrote that it is very likely that SOMER and CCP are at one ship. So long as CCP refuses to make a statement about it, technically any forum post related to it can be deleted based on the "no rumors" rule. |

AnUnskilled Pilot
State War Academy Caldari State
21
|
Posted - 2013.11.03 07:30:00 -
[408] - Quote
It's assumed at this point that CCP or certain rogue CCP employees are behind this scandal to enrich themselves. CCP themselves profiting from Somerblink seems unlikely as they would get the money from the GTC itself. A group of rogue employees getting kickbacks on the other hand is likely given how carefully CCP is handling the situation and doing nothing just praying for it to be over.
Even if certain rogue employees were caught it would be in CCPs best interest to hide it as this would be an even bigger scandal and perhaps break laws and/or be the end of the company. |

AnUnskilled Pilot
State War Academy Caldari State
22
|
Posted - 2013.11.03 07:47:00 -
[409] - Quote
TharOkha wrote:Interesting. My posts were removed from this thread because i just wrote that it is very likely that SOMER and CCP are at one ship. CCP probably gets a cut from somer casino, then he recieved special scorpions.. Hints are everywhere and censorship is on a roll.  All im asking is if it is bad to RMT if CCP gets a cut from it.
This is another scenario, CCP is completely intertwined or simply is Somer Blink, which benefits CCP enormously. It creates a large sink of ISK stimulating the economy and leading people to purchase a large quantity of plexes. In the meetings about Somer blink whichever employees responsible simply say: "BUT LOOK AT ALL THE MONEY WE MADE".
Every scenario stinks - but let us be honest. Have you EVER seen any company be so tight lipped about something that could easily be cleared up? CCP has some sort of vested interest in this |

mechtech
Ice Liberation Army
552
|
Posted - 2013.11.03 10:11:00 -
[410] - Quote
AnUnskilled Pilot wrote: This is another scenario, CCP is completely intertwined or simply is Somer Blink, which benefits CCP enormously. It creates a large sink of ISK stimulating the economy and leading people to purchase a large quantity of plexes. In the meetings about Somer blink whichever employees responsible simply say: "BUT LOOK AT ALL THE MONEY WE MADE".
Every scenario stinks - but let us be honest. Have you EVER seen any company be so tight lipped about something that could easily be cleared up? CCP has some sort of vested interest in this
You're trying to stir up too much drama.
CCP listened to the community, re-evaluated their policies, and sent a message to all of their GTC affiliates instructing them to shut down all in-game bonus related operations.
This wasn't an issue where CCP needed to write long apologies, it was an issue that needed action, and we got it. Sure, CCP could speak up a bit more on this issue, but it's likely whatever they say will just make people more mad and perhaps affect their relationship with their GTC affiliates. It's better that this is strictly business and has been dealt with as such.
As for other MMO companies being tight lipped... it can get far far worse, trust me. CCP has better communication than most MMORPG companies. |
|

RAW23
425
|
Posted - 2013.11.03 10:53:00 -
[411] - Quote
mechtech wrote:[quote=AnUnskilled Pilot]
This wasn't an issue where CCP needed to write long apologies, it was an issue that needed action, and we got it. Sure, CCP could speak up a bit more on this issue, but it's likely whatever they say will just make people more mad and perhaps affect their relationship with their GTC affiliates. It's better that this is strictly business and has been dealt with as such.
There are lots of issues CCP still needs to address though. Firstly, it's important that they come clean on:
1) How this situation arose in the first place and who was responsible for saying that it was acceptable for Somer to offer isk incentives for GTC referrals, thus turning his in-game business into an out of game business in direct contravention of the EULA.
2) We need to know whether a) they recognised that this behaviour was RMT at the time but permitted it anyway, now changing the rules because they don't want mass RMT to take place, or b) that they didn't realise that this was RMT but they now do.
3) Why Somer, or indeed any player outside the CSM, has direct skype access to devs at CCP rather than having to use the normal petitions process followed by the rest of the player-base. Related to this is the question of for exactly how long Somer has had privileged access to CCP staff and thus privileged influence over their decision-making.
4) Why CCP devs have been publicly proclaiming the trustworthiness of a single player in a game where trust is a marketable commodity. A subsidiary to this is that we deserve to know whether there was actually any audit carried out to determine the truth of these statements or if they were just pulled out of the air.
5) Whether there are any other advantages Somer has been given over his competitors that we don't yet know about, beyond the many hundred billions worth of ships, the vouches by developers, free advertising from CCP, permission to RMT their isk, and privileged access and influence.
Without giving full answers to all these questions, no partial answers giving reasons for awarding Somer unique ships and huge bonuses will be satisfactory. It is essential that the broader context is now adequately filled in. If CCP won't do that themselves then it's pretty clear that the community will carry on chipping away at the issue. While it's true that there aren't really any good answers to some of these questions, since CCP are going to look bad when they admit that they have behaved badly, at least they can hope to draw a line under the situation and move forward. That won't happen if there is a steady drip of revelations about the relationship poisoning the forums and players' attitudes towards CCP for weeks to come. In the face of CCP silence many people will, not unreasonably, assume the worst. There are two types of EVE player:
those who believe there are two types of EVE player and those who do not. |

Luci Ambrye
The Service Crew
15
|
Posted - 2013.11.03 10:53:00 -
[412] - Quote
mechtech wrote:This wasn't an issue where CCP needed to write long apologies, it was an issue that needed action, and we got it.
Action that gave SOMER 10 days to reap as much as they like before stopping so as not to get banned? Its like the Police sending drug dealers a mail telling them that in 10 days they are getting raided, its absolutely ludicrous.
As far as I am concerned, CCP have gone too far over this and in 3 days, this will be the first of my 3 accounts that expires and wont be resubbed. Some will say good riddance to yet another whiner, fine, you are entitled to your opinion, the same way I am and my opinion is that this stinks to high heaven and i want nothing to do with a game that is seriously unbalanced after this episode. |

Vincent R'lyeh
Screaming Hayabusa
241
|
Posted - 2013.11.03 11:05:00 -
[413] - Quote
Luci Ambrye wrote:mechtech wrote:This wasn't an issue where CCP needed to write long apologies, it was an issue that needed action, and we got it. Action that gave SOMER 10 days to reap as much as they like before stopping so as not to get banned? Its like the Police sending drug dealers a mail telling them that in 10 days they are getting raided, its absolutely ludicrous. As far as I am concerned, CCP have gone too far over this and in 3 days, this will be the first of my 3 accounts that expires and wont be resubbed. Some will say good riddance to yet another whiner, fine, you are entitled to your opinion, the same way I am and my opinion is that this stinks to high heaven and i want nothing to do with a game that is seriously unbalanced after this episode.
Can I have your stuff?
I need it to fit all the ships I've won on Blink this weekend I have deliberately developed an air of cynicism that I originally intended to make me appear somewhat louche and caddish but actually comes across as irritable hostility combined with the unspoken threat of sudden violence..... |

Baali Tekitsu
B0SSAURA xXPlease Pandemic Citizens Reloaded Alliance.Xx
291
|
Posted - 2013.11.03 11:05:00 -
[414] - Quote
Luci Ambrye wrote:mechtech wrote:This wasn't an issue where CCP needed to write long apologies, it was an issue that needed action, and we got it. Action that gave SOMER 10 days to reap as much as they like before stopping so as not to get banned? Its like the Police sending drug dealers a mail telling them that in 10 days they are getting raided, its absolutely ludicrous. As far as I am concerned, CCP have gone too far over this and in 3 days, this will be the first of my 3 accounts that expires and wont be resubbed. Some will say good riddance to yet another whiner, fine, you are entitled to your opinion, the same way I am and my opinion is that this stinks to high heaven and i want nothing to do with a game that is seriously unbalanced after this episode. May I have your things? GÖÑ |

Dudley Schwartz
Magic Hamsters
89
|
Posted - 2013.11.03 12:14:00 -
[415] - Quote
Still waiting for a detailed response from CCP. I see BLINK is still cashing out in the meantime.
On a less serious note, that CCP/SOMER teamspeak leak spoof was hilarious, that was until ISD Fcktard locked it ;D
Yep still mad about this whole BLINK scandal, let's hope we receive some explanation very soon. Jita 4/4, the heart and soul of New Eden. |

Reiisha
Evolution
387
|
Posted - 2013.11.03 12:32:00 -
[416] - Quote
So no one has thought of the fact that PLEX are soaring up in price right now, maybe CCP and Blink are working together to introduce more PLEX into the economy to get the price down? Maybe Blink isn't actually getting the cut on sales and everything goes straight to CCP?
Of course, such a logical explanation must be heresy and the conspiracy theorists are obviously right.
If you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all... |

Baali Tekitsu
B0SSAURA xXPlease Pandemic Citizens Reloaded Alliance.Xx
291
|
Posted - 2013.11.03 12:35:00 -
[417] - Quote
Reiisha wrote:So no one has thought of the fact that PLEX are soaring up in price right now, maybe CCP and Blink are working together to introduce more PLEX into the economy to get the price down? Maybe Blink isn't actually getting the cut on sales and everything goes straight to CCP?
Of course, such a logical explanation must be heresy and the conspiracy theorists are obviously right. And why would CCP tell them to stop it then? Why would CCP stay silent about the matter for a whole week then? Questions questions... |

IDGAD
Get in the van I have candy.
40
|
Posted - 2013.11.03 12:41:00 -
[418] - Quote
Baali Tekitsu wrote:Reiisha wrote:So no one has thought of the fact that PLEX are soaring up in price right now, maybe CCP and Blink are working together to introduce more PLEX into the economy to get the price down? Maybe Blink isn't actually getting the cut on sales and everything goes straight to CCP?
Of course, such a logical explanation must be heresy and the conspiracy theorists are obviously right. And why would CCP tell them to stop it then? Why would CCP stay silent about the matter for a whole week then? Questions questions...
They will never be honest with the community. It's pretty obvious CCP has some sort of investment in Blink, and we will instead get some diversion from the truth. No one will ever know the truth, and CCP will continue to slowly degrade from within. But why don't we all enjoy EVE while we still can? It's still fun for now. |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
563
|
Posted - 2013.11.03 12:59:00 -
[419] - Quote
Aivo Dresden wrote:Argus Sorn wrote:In fact, if you turned down SOMER prizes you might have more folks like myself included interested in donating. Empty words, why should your contribution depend on who else is contributing? That makes no sense.
It makes complete sense. First, why would I give to your event when you are more than adequately supported by SOMER. I'd much rather give to someone who needs my contribution. But more importantly - in real life and in EVE, what charities and organizations I give to depends greatly on who they choose to associate with, endorse, accept money from, etc.. A donation is business, and it is more than reasonable for me to choose to not do business with people who do business with SOMER.
SOMER has bought your support, by supporting your charity - and that is fine. But it does not make it okay for them to violate the EULA and it also means you need to own that support - and the good and bad that comes with it.
|

RAW23
427
|
Posted - 2013.11.03 13:00:00 -
[420] - Quote
Reiisha wrote:So no one has thought of the fact that PLEX are soaring up in price right now, maybe CCP and Blink are working together to introduce more PLEX into the economy to get the price down? Maybe Blink isn't actually getting the cut on sales and everything goes straight to CCP?
Of course, such a logical explanation must be heresy and the conspiracy theorists are obviously right.
Since this is an explanation without any supporting evidence your analysis falls far better under the heading of a 'conspiracy theory' than the reality-based analyses that you attack. Hundreds of groundless 'logical explanations' can be run up but they are meaningless without evidence. This is the very essence of a 'conspiracy theory', which tends to be an explanatory narrative used to connect data that otherwise seems difficult to account for. There are two types of EVE player:
those who believe there are two types of EVE player and those who do not. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 21 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |