Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 .. 40 :: one page |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 5 post(s) |

Halcyon Harvey
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
9
|
Posted - 2013.12.13 23:01:00 -
[841] - Quote
Scatim Helicon wrote:It hasn't helped that a great deal of WiS advocacy talked in great length about how weirdly excited they were at the idea of things like 'setting up a bar in a station somewhere'. Because, you know, if I was an immortal posthuman able to fly a mile-long spaceship and trigger barrages of artillery shells the size of a family car by plugging the controls directly into my brain, the thing I'd really be looking forward to doing would be pulling pints and cleaning up vomit in the toilets down at the King's Arms on a Friday night. I'm still a little teary-eyed. Thanks for that. Couldn't have said it better.
WiS is such a pointless thing. That's what I can't get over.
How about implementing that long abandoned planetary flight thing to properly compliment DUST? What about increasing what we can do with planets, thus making them a truly viable player focus? Why not new exploration options to compliment what was ultimately a very good decision to expand EVE vertically by adding WH space? New ships. New environments. New things to do. New places to explore... and conquer.
Based on what Scatim just said (because he's right) you're not a cultural peon. Nor are you Han Solo. You are a pod pilot in command of a massive crew. Why are you ****ing around on foot shoving bananas up other pilot's tailpipes? Forsaken (An EVE Thing) |

Stitcher
Alexylva Paradox
2690
|
Posted - 2013.12.13 23:05:00 -
[842] - Quote
Scatim Helicon wrote:It hasn't helped that a great deal of WiS advocacy talked in great length about how weirdly excited they were at the idea of things like 'setting up a bar in a station somewhere'. Because, you know, if I was an immortal posthuman able to fly a mile-long spaceship and trigger barrages of artillery shells the size of a family car by plugging the controls directly into my brain, the thing I'd really be looking forward to doing would be pulling pints and cleaning up vomit in the toilets down at the King's Arms on a Friday night.
Something tells me that the owner of a club/casino catering to millionaire immortal clientele probably pays somebody else to do all the dirty work for them and just enjoys good company, the house take from the roulette wheel and the profits from the back-room trade in outlawed boosters.
The casino owners in Vegas hardly have to pour the drinks at their casino's bar, do they?
Quote:Now, exploring the deep space wreckage of long-lost civilisations with nothing but a vacuum-suit and a flashlight, negotiating malfunctioning security systems and making off with rare and precious artifacts? That's something I can get behind, and if/when CCP gives the greenlight to working on a release for it I'll be interested to see what they can come up with. But that vision wasn't even on the table until CCP had already had two failed stabs at the WiS concept, so its hard to take seriously those who were so eager to see WiS when all it had to offer was a Second Life clone and $70 monocles.
This is the point. There's so much gameplay potential to EoF. Own a casino, hack megacorporate databases, smuggle boosters, explore nightmarish ruins, plan military campaigns, get in a shootout with booster smugglers, meet up with Guristas agents in the bowels of an Ishukone station, or hell, just chill out in a bar and RP if that's your thing.
Just because a given person wouldn't themselves want to do any of those things doesn't mean it shouldn't be in the game.
Halcyon Harvey wrote:You think that EVE is this majestic thing that can be anything it wants to be.
Because it is. An in-character blog and a video: http://verinsjournal.blogspot.com http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tu1mbsgo738
|

Halcyon Harvey
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
10
|
Posted - 2013.12.13 23:14:00 -
[843] - Quote
Stitcher wrote:Halcyon Harvey wrote:You think that EVE is this majestic thing that can be anything it wants to be. Because it is. I applaud your idealism.
I prefer realism though. It has undoubtedly served me better.
What you want is not possible here.
And it has been done before. Over there. Forsaken (An EVE Thing) |

Stitcher
Alexylva Paradox
2690
|
Posted - 2013.12.13 23:21:00 -
[844] - Quote
Either without the other will get you nowhere. Idealism without realism is naivety - realism without idealism is cynicism.
I like to think what I'm proposing is both idealistic and realistic. An in-character blog and a video: http://verinsjournal.blogspot.com http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tu1mbsgo738
|

Halcyon Harvey
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
10
|
Posted - 2013.12.13 23:26:00 -
[845] - Quote
Stitcher wrote:Either without the other will get you nowhere. Idealism without realism is naivety - realism without idealism is cynicism.
I like to think what I'm proposing is both idealistic and realistic. But that's the problem.
It's not.
I'm sure you're aware of how much of a mess EVE's current code is. I'm also sure that you are aware that the reason we log in each day is to do comparatively vast and amazing things amongst the stars. I don't want CCP to waste time and money allowing me to crawl around on the dirty ground of some station looking for my insanely expensive monocle that just popped off.
This game does have incredible potential, but I want the universe I fly around in to become more complex and interesting and dynamic. And anything that allowed me to spend my time crouched behind some bulkhead while my enemies plink away at me with their pocket lazorz would never be anything close to what most of us would deem to be fun or acceptable.
WiS is thinking small. EVE is all about thinking big. Forsaken (An EVE Thing) |

Stitcher
Alexylva Paradox
2690
|
Posted - 2013.12.13 23:37:00 -
[846] - Quote
Halcyon Harvey wrote:I'm sure you're aware of how much of a mess EVE's current code is.
This seems to be some kind of gospel among the people who dislike WiS, or any new features at all for that matter.
Was EVE's code written sixteen years ago by enthusiastic amateurs? yes.
Has it since been polished and replaced piece by piece by enthusiastic professionals? Also yes.
Is that process complete? No.
Is it perfect? No.
Is code EVER perfect? Also no.
Does it work? Yes.
Do improvements to the code tend to come along when there's a new feature in the pipeline that demands them? Emphatically yes - very much so.
Quote:I'm also sure that you are aware that the reason we log in each day is to do comparatively vast and amazing things amongst the stars.
And why shouldn't we also be able to log in each day to do dangerous and exciting things in the space stations that compliment and contribute to the vast and amazing things among the stars?
Besides, my day-to-day experience of the vast and amazing things has involved lots of little and dull things that accumulate and grow into the vast and amazing thing with time and effort. behind all those capital ships exploding in the big nullsec battles is a lot of highsec miners shooting the breeze on voice comms while doing nothing terribly exciting.
Quote:This game does have incredible potential, but I want the universe I fly around in to become more complex and interesting and dynamic.
Which is exactly what I want too. I think that adding the ability to do sandboxy stuff on foot in a station will add complexity, interest and dynamism.
Quote:And anything that allowed me to spend my time crouched behind some bulkhead while my enemies plink away at me with their pocket lazorz would never be anything close to what most of us would deem to be fun or acceptable.
What, as opposed to docking games while your enemies plink away at you with their pulse lasorz? Sometimes you get camped in EVE - shazbot happens. You may as well be able to play poker down at the bar where they confiscate your weapons before letting you in while you're docked.
Quote:WiS is thinking small. EVE is all about thinking big.
You really haven't read a thing I've written, have you? I'm talking in terms EoF being HUGE. I'm talking in terms of EoF doubling the size of the sandbox or more.
How is that not "thinking big" enough for you? An in-character blog and a video: http://verinsjournal.blogspot.com http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tu1mbsgo738
|

Halcyon Harvey
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
10
|
Posted - 2013.12.13 23:49:00 -
[847] - Quote
Stitcher wrote:You really haven't read a thing I've written, have you? I'm talking in terms EoF being HUGE. I'm talking in terms of EoF doubling the size of the sandbox or more.
How is that not "thinking big" enough for you? That's the thing, Stitcher. You think like I used to 10 years ago when I couldn't understand why nothing happened the way I envisioned it... the way I wanted it to be... to appeal to everyone I wanted it to appeal to. The best things EVE has ever done have been doable, passable things that enhance what it already is. And even then, there have been major problems and setbacks and backlashes and all that nonsense.
But people's time is limited. Technology is limited. Funds are limited. And when you think of everything that would have to go into WiS to make it everything you want it to be, why would you even undock ever again? EVE would become two games - a game for station dwellers, and a game for pilots. If everything you wanted was actually included in WiS, you wouldn't need EVE at all! You'd be spending hours and hours just having adventures... in stations.
And again, the reason we don't have it, is because it's very very difficult to do. And frankly, I don't even think it's worth it. Put that time and money into making the things that happen in space better. Give us more things to do. In space. With our massive spaceships. It all boils down to a simple disagreement over what makes EVE "better".
I don't think WiS makes it better. I think it's pointless. Forsaken (An EVE Thing) |

Davon Mandra'thin
Rotten Legion Ops
394
|
Posted - 2013.12.13 23:51:00 -
[848] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:Davon Mandra'thin wrote:
Except elections are not designed to be representative of only the people who voted, they are designed to be representative of all the people with the right to vote. .
Not in EVE: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1942633#post1942633CCP Xhagen wrote:- Problem two: representation on the CSM. CCP Veritas pointed out the error in my thinking, what I want is not actually fair representation of ALL EVE players, but of THOSE WHO VOTE (it follows from there that the more people that vote, the better representation we get). The current voting system is sufficient, but there are many vastly better systems out there.
Touch+¬. A stand corrected.
|

Stitcher
Alexylva Paradox
2690
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 00:03:00 -
[849] - Quote
Halcyon Harvey wrote:Stitcher wrote:You really haven't read a thing I've written, have you? I'm talking in terms EoF being HUGE. I'm talking in terms of EoF doubling the size of the sandbox or more.
How is that not "thinking big" enough for you? That's the thing, Stitcher. You think like I used to 10 years ago when I couldn't understand why nothing happened the way I envisioned it... the way I wanted it to be... to appeal to everyone I wanted it to appeal to. The best things EVE has ever done have been doable, passable things that enhance what it already is. And even then, there have been major problems and setbacks and backlashes and all that nonsense. But people's time is limited. Technology is limited. Funds are limited. And when you think of everything that would have to go into WiS to make it everything you want it to be, why would you even undock ever again? EVE would become two games - a game for station dwellers, and a game for pilots. If everything you wanted was actually included in WiS, you wouldn't need EVE at all! You'd be spending hours and hours just having adventures... in stations. And again, the reason we don't have it, is because it's very very difficult to do. And frankly, I don't even think it's worth it. Put that time and money into making the things that happen in space better. Give us more things to do. In space. With our massive spaceships. It all boils down to a simple disagreement over what makes EVE "better". I don't think WiS makes it better. I think it's pointless.
Gotcha. Textbook bittervet. An in-character blog and a video: http://verinsjournal.blogspot.com http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tu1mbsgo738
|

Davon Mandra'thin
Rotten Legion Ops
394
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 00:34:00 -
[850] - Quote
Halcyon Harvey wrote:Bitter vet stuff.
Serious urge to tell you to post with you main... Kind of just did... I think.
|

Rebel Witch
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
22
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 00:38:00 -
[851] - Quote
Stitcher and the others who support WiS are an asset to the community for their other efforts as well. It just so happens i share their vision of "more to the game we love".
My only suggestion for CCP regarding implementing WiS, start small and work with it slowly. Gradually build up to something great to give yourselves time to "add or subtract" without being overwhelmed with a big job or big expectations.
EVE is the MMO of progress, there is nothing else like it and has set the bar on so many aspects of gaming. I hope CCP add's WiS soon and that it becomes a huge hit for EVE and her community for years...no, decades to come. |

Halcyon Harvey
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
10
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 01:07:00 -
[852] - Quote
Davon Mandra'thin wrote:Halcyon Harvey wrote:Bitter vet stuff. Serious urge to tell you to post with you main... Kind of just did... I think. No, this is my main.
I only recently started playing EVE, but I have this amazing ability to deliver a realistic and well-informed presentation of a false "bitter vet" perspective based on the decade worth of vicarious experience that I absorbed in less than a week.

Grow up.
You can chalk my views up to me being a burned out old schooler who no longer takes any of this particularly seriously, which is partly true, but you could also accept that fact that I'm actually trying to convey an important message here. That message is simple; EVE is good at being EVE. It keeps may of us coming back again and again, even after years of absence. However, it is idealistic and naive indeed to say the least that features like WiS will ever be implemented in such a way that the extremes of what we envision it to be will actually be contained therein. And furthermore, because it will be a disappointment, it would be best if EVE continued to develop its current interactive platform.
Now how about rather than attempting to call me out in an impotent fashion, you actually contribute something? Forsaken (An EVE Thing) |

Stitcher
Alexylva Paradox
2698
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 01:27:00 -
[853] - Quote
Well, speaking as an old schooler who's never burned out even once... I find your lack of enthusiasm upsetting.
It would interest me to know why you feel a version of walking in stations that was thematically, mechanically and content-wise pure EVE and which contributed to both the size and available content of the sandbox would not enrich the game, however.
Setting aside any doubts about its feasibility - if CCP managed to make EoF in a way that completely justified and even exceeded my enthusiasm, and that people didn't abandon the spaceship side of the game in favour of it... what possible objection could you have? An in-character blog and a video: http://verinsjournal.blogspot.com http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tu1mbsgo738
|

Halcyon Harvey
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
10
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 01:50:00 -
[854] - Quote
Stitcher wrote:Well, speaking as an old schooler who's never burned out even once... I find your lack of enthusiasm upsetting.
It would interest me to know why you feel a version of walking in stations that was thematically, mechanically and content-wise pure EVE and which contributed to both the size and available content of the sandbox would not enrich the game, however.
Setting aside any doubts about its feasibility - if CCP managed to make EoF in a way that completely justified and even exceeded my enthusiasm, and that people didn't abandon the spaceship side of the game in favour of it... what possible objection could you have? None whatsoever.
Seriously. None. If I walked in tomorrow and it was all done and fully implemented and super-detailed and worth doing from time to time myself, I wouldn't question it. But we're talking about an improbable eventuality, and the further pursuit of that improbable eventuality will, in my estimation, result in lameness if it is ever actually introduced. Therefore, I find it to be a huge waste of time and money at this point in actual time that is happening right now, not some fictional fantasy land where we all get to live out our dream of leaving the wide open, dangerous, beautiful and endless depths of space so that we can pretend to be Mos Eisley patrons.
It's only my opinion, but this game could do with even deeper attention to cosmic environments, more space that might even have to be charted and eventually controlled exclusively by players, and new and interesting ship types that revolutionize fleets. That requires focus. WiS is a diversion from that, and since I have no faith in CCP's ability to deliver anything more than a neat little set of meaningless timesinks, I have no desire to back the whole concept.
So there's our resolution. We agree to disagree. I couldn't possibly explain it in more detail. Forsaken (An EVE Thing) |
|

ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
617

|
Posted - 2013.12.14 02:55:00 -
[855] - Quote
I have removed some rule breaking posts and those quoting them. As always I let some edge cases stay. Please people, keep it on topic and above all civil!
The rules: 2. Be respectful toward others at all times.
The purpose of the EVE Online forums is to provide a platform for exchange of ideas, and a venue for the discussion of EVE Online. Occasionally there will be conflicts that arise when people voice opinions. Forum users are expected to be courteous when disagreeing with others.
3. Ranting is prohibited.
A rant is a post that is often filled with angry and counterproductive comments. A free exchange of ideas is essential to building a strong sense of community and is helpful in development of the game and community. Rants are disruptive, and incite flaming and trolling. Please post your thoughts in a concise and clear manner while avoiding going off on rambling tangents.
4. Personal attacks are prohibited.
Commonly known as flaming, personal attacks are posts that are designed to personally berate or insult another forum user. Posts of this nature are not beneficial to the community spirit that CCP promote and as such they will not be tolerated.
5. Trolling is prohibited.
Trolling is a defined as a post that is deliberately designed for the purpose of angering and insulting other players in an attempt to incite retaliation or an emotional response. Posts of this nature are disruptive, often abusive and do not contribute to the sense of community that CCP promote.
19. All posts must be related to EVE Online.
Posts regarding other companies and products or services are prohibited and any content of this nature will be removed. Posts regarding other games are however permitted on the Out of Pod Experience forum for the purposes of discussion only.
22. Post constructively.
Negative feedback can be very useful to further improve EVE Online provided that it is presented in a civil and factual manner. All users are encouraged to honestly express their feelings regarding EVE Online and how it can be improved. Posts that are non-constructive, insulting or in breach of the rules will be deleted regardless of how valid the ideas behind them may be. Users are also reminded that posting with a lack of content also constitutes non-constructive posting.
26. Off-topic posting is prohibited.
Off-topic posting is permitted within reason, as sometimes a single comment may color or lighten the tone of discussion. However, excessive posting of off-topic remarks in an attempt to derail a thread may result in the thread being locked, or a forum warning being issued.
30. Abuse of CCP employees and ISD volunteers is prohibited.
CCP operate a zero tolerance policy on abuse of CCP employees and ISD volunteers. This includes but is not limited to personal attacks, trolling, GÇ£outingGÇ¥ of CCP employee or ISD volunteer player identities, and the use of any former player identities when referring to the aforementioned parties. Our forums are designed to be a place where players and developers can exchange ideas in a polite and friendly manner for the betterment of EVE Online. Players who attack or abuse employees of CCP, or ISD volunteers, will be permanently banned from the EVE Online forums across all their accounts with no recourse, and may also be subject to action against their game accounts. ISD Ezwal Commander Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
982
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 03:15:00 -
[856] - Quote
Stitcher wrote:Anslo wrote:Please move this offtopic discussion to another thread and stop trying to derail/get ISD to lock this one.
Moving on, aside from war rooms, does anyone have feasible ideas for implementing say, EVA avatar gameplay compatible with the current server ticks? I don't think that "Compatible with current server ticks" is actually that great of an obstacle - DUST and (when it's released) Valkyrie will both be operating at much faster speeds than that because they operate on battle servers which run at a much faster tick rate. Shunting EVE characters between server nodes is routine, it happens every time you jump through a stargate. If it's not technically possible to move us onto a battle server without logging us off, then increasing or decreasing the tick rate of TQ's server nodes, unless I misunderstand how it works, is the basis of TiDi - did you see that Alliance Tournament match where time kept speeding up? Might be I just made a dev laugh at my hilarious wrongness, but if that IS how it works then I don't see any obstacles to game mechanics that operate with much faster reaction times than spaceships EVE. Not a games programmer but this is true. EvE and WiS don't have to use the same engine. Much like Dust players are connected through PS3 to EVE via local chat, it would be very easy to use EVE as a login server for WiS. You dock, click Captains quarter, then you're in queue to log in to the WIS server. You don't leave EVE, you're still in it however you're concurrently logged into the WIS server.
The WIS server can be brand new code (perhaps ported from Dust) on an entirely separate client, with an entirely separate engine to EVE. The only connection (which we know already works via Dust) is local.
Any argument that EVE's legacy code is too complex, or it would introduce bugs to EVE is really just smoke and mirrors. |

Gislin D'ahl
EVE University Ivy League
4
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 03:23:00 -
[857] - Quote
Tear Dancer wrote:Walking in stations and exotic dancing in stations now that would be fun  Give me more isk boys! (and girls)
I miss the buffs from watching the exotic dancers in Star Wars Galaxies! |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
982
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 05:35:00 -
[858] - Quote
I created a post in F&I - its called Cmon CCP, Lets Do this?
If you want to support a push for WIS, go in and +1 it. |

Dracvlad
Taishi Combine Pirate Nation.
205
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 07:38:00 -
[859] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote:I created a post in F&I - its called Cmon CCP, Lets Do this?
If you want to support a push for WIS, go in and +1 it.
I looked at the post and could not support the idea you suggested, so will not post in it. If you do not want LOCAL go to WH space,-áand those people who think that WH space is like 0.0 but without local,-álight a cyno and try jumping to it.-á-á There is a structural issue with Eve, based on accounts with no link, vast reserves of ISK-áand plex, which makes it too easy to metagame the destruction of small alliances. |

Vidua Arte Album
State War Academy Caldari State
14
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 08:06:00 -
[860] - Quote
Dracvlad wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:I created a post in F&I - its called Cmon CCP, Lets Do this?
If you want to support a push for WIS, go in and +1 it. I looked at the post and could not support the idea you suggested, so will not post in it. Yesterday she said she doesn't really care about WiS, but that post conviniently got deleted. I, for one, won't support such a shady person either. |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
984
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 08:14:00 -
[861] - Quote
Vidua Arte Album wrote:Dracvlad wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:I created a post in F&I - its called Cmon CCP, Lets Do this?
If you want to support a push for WIS, go in and +1 it. I looked at the post and could not support the idea you suggested, so will not post in it. Yesterday she said she doesn't really care about WiS, but that post conviniently got deleted. I, for one, won't support such a shady person either. Mods deleted it. I said I would like it however it's no biggie if it's not developed. I have more important things to focus on. And yes I am shady. |

Vidua Arte Album
State War Academy Caldari State
14
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 08:25:00 -
[862] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote:Vidua Arte Album wrote:Dracvlad wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:I created a post in F&I - its called Cmon CCP, Lets Do this?
If you want to support a push for WIS, go in and +1 it. I looked at the post and could not support the idea you suggested, so will not post in it. Yesterday she said she doesn't really care about WiS, but that post conviniently got deleted. I, for one, won't support such a shady person either. Mods deleted it. I said I would like it however it's no biggie if it's not developed. I have more important things to focus on. And yes I am shady. Let's not have this thread derailed again.
I personally don't care much about WiS, but I just loooooove the character creator, so I guess I'm partially on this side of the fence. ^^
|

Dracvlad
Taishi Combine Pirate Nation.
205
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 09:24:00 -
[863] - Quote
Vidua Arte Album wrote:Dracvlad wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:I created a post in F&I - its called Cmon CCP, Lets Do this?
If you want to support a push for WIS, go in and +1 it. I looked at the post and could not support the idea you suggested, so will not post in it. Yesterday she said she doesn't really care about WiS, but that post conviniently got deleted. I, for one, won't support such a shady person either.
Infinity Ziona is someone I respect in Eve, nothing shady about her at all, I just did not like the idea she posted in F&I, don't put words in my mouth. If you do not want LOCAL go to WH space,-áand those people who think that WH space is like 0.0 but without local,-álight a cyno and try jumping to it.-á-á There is a structural issue with Eve, based on accounts with no link, vast reserves of ISK-áand plex, which makes it too easy to metagame the destruction of small alliances. |

Vidua Arte Album
State War Academy Caldari State
14
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 09:34:00 -
[864] - Quote
Dracvlad wrote:Vidua Arte Album wrote:Dracvlad wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:I created a post in F&I - its called Cmon CCP, Lets Do this?
If you want to support a push for WIS, go in and +1 it. I looked at the post and could not support the idea you suggested, so will not post in it. Yesterday she said she doesn't really care about WiS, but that post conviniently got deleted. I, for one, won't support such a shady person either. Infinity Ziona is someone I respect in Eve, nothing shady about her at all, I just did not like the idea she posted in F&I, don't put words in my mouth. We are all super happy you are having an opinion about something or someone, just like everybody else does. And just like every opinion, it's neither right or wrong. It just is. |

Thellorms Nor'Fein
Federal Bounty Services
24
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 10:28:00 -
[865] - Quote
Stitcher wrote:Speaking for myself, I want more WiS content. It doesn't need to be big expansions, it doesn't need to be major overhauls. I'd just like to see it slowly grow and improve beyond its current, purely cosmetic status.
I don't care if it takes resources away from something else. What we have right now just isn't enough, and I reject the notion that EVE is purely an internet spaceships game right now - it's far too big and metagamey to be just that - and I completely reject the idea that it should always remain solely about the spaceships.
I am, however, resigned to not seeing WiS receive any attention for several years now.
Going way back on the thread here, but I couldn't have said this better myself in as few words. It's just exactly how I feel (and then some!). Ahh, Jita... - http://i.imgur.com/UHGT4xc.jpg |

Ramona McCandless
Imperial Shipment Amarr Empire
1423
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 10:35:00 -
[866] - Quote
Dracvlad wrote:
EDIT: You are a stupid Troll, blocked
When you say this you do realise you are saying;
"I dont agree with your opinion, but it offends me so much that I will call you a name and then make sure I don't have to hear your opinion again, because it offends me and, by extention, makes me reconsider my own opinion"
I, too, admire Ioseph Stalin, but I don't think following his example is a good idea. Non omnis moriar |

Dracvlad
Taishi Combine Pirate Nation.
205
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 11:13:00 -
[867] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Dracvlad wrote:
EDIT: You are a stupid Troll, blocked
When you say this you do realise you are saying; "I dont agree with your opinion, but it offends me so much that I will call you a name and then make sure I don't have to hear your opinion again, because it offends me and, by extention, makes me reconsider my own opinion" I, too, admire Ioseph Stalin, but I don't think following his example is a good idea.
You are blocked too, and I realized that this toon was one of yours.
I called you what you are, I listen to other peoples opinions, but what is important, is how they say things and the intent behind it and whether the person has an open mind on the subject and can actually hold an open debate and listen to other views, once it is clear that the person is just a megaphone then I remove them as background noise, simple as. No apologies...
I live in France, I went to Montpelier which is a city that has a statue of Stalin in the centre, I made a point of going there late at night and I pee'd on its leg, Stalin, lol!!!
If you do not want LOCAL go to WH space,-áand those people who think that WH space is like 0.0 but without local,-álight a cyno and try jumping to it.-á-á There is a structural issue with Eve, based on accounts with no link, vast reserves of ISK-áand plex, which makes it too easy to metagame the destruction of small alliances. |

Ramona McCandless
Imperial Shipment Amarr Empire
1425
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 11:22:00 -
[868] - Quote
Dracvlad wrote:
You are blocked too, and I realized that this toon was one of yours.
This is apparently the second time you have blocked me
And your failure to understand my meaning does not invalidate the fact that you appear incapable of having a debate as an adult yourself
That you judge without supporting evidence the validity of another person's view, and dismiss it because it differs from your own supports this
extra territorium jus dicenti impune non paretur Non omnis moriar |

Rebel Witch
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
24
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 16:23:00 -
[869] - Quote
Ahhh yeah, Still remember the anticipation started in 2007 with the video of Ambulation of a "different but inclusive" aspect of EVE that involved the most basic and well known mechanic of MMO's "walking around" with an Avatar, interaction using characters not just ships.
I know it is unwanted by some, but i get the feeling that a great many more people would like to see it still happen in EVE.
After all, i think EVE has one of the best looking Avatar programs in all MMO's. Now if they can just expand on that little by little into Walking in Stations environments. Bonus!
|

Ramona McCandless
Imperial Shipment Amarr Empire
1436
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 16:26:00 -
[870] - Quote
"9 What has happened before will happen again. What has been done before will be done again. There is nothing new in the whole world. 10 "Look," they say, "here is something new!" But no, it has all happened before, long before we were born. 11 No one remembers what has happened in the past, and no one in days to come will remember what happens between now and then. "
- Ecclesiastes 1:9-11 Non omnis moriar |
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 .. 40 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |