Except that data only shows where bots were banned in 2011.
Not where they are currently active.
Nor what type of bots were banned.

Which was my point. CCP knows that in 2011 (Fanfest 2012 being early 2012, so primarily 2011 figures) they banned a whole lot of bots in certain places. Great. So... where is the breakdown of bots purpose. As well as the 2012 figures, and the 2013 figures.

After the trashing you tried to give my maths when it was based on a hell of a lot better data than you are claiming.

You are also claiming isk/hr is obviously the only factor mission bots take into account by deciding where to play. And that if isk/hr were higher in Nullsec they would take the vastly increased risk. Which, quite frankly is rubbish.

curiosity: do you believe the things you post or are you just a really awful troll?

Or you mean because I can do basic statistical maths that prove the Goons in this thread have been utterly lying about Null Sec not making more isk than High Sec?

people keep saying this yet nobody has actually provided proof that null sec makes more isk than high sec. until some one starts showing me 50m wallet ticks in anoms, it's quite evident that null sec simply isn't the place to be making isk if you do that by shooting red crosses.

It's irrelevant what your perfect isk/hr is.

spew nonsense.
disregard actual proof.

yeah and this is why everyone laughs at your posts.

the fact that people in null can't even provide evidence of a comparable isk/hour before we consider the interruptions means it's pretty obvious they can't make as much isk as high sec no matter how many times you want to say they can. repeating the same incorrect statements doesn't make them true.

Other than all those people who do produce isk/hr in Nullsec, that you all claim are lying or can't sustain it. While you take the perfect High Sec Isk/hr and pretend it's sustainable and replicable by thousands.

Also known as cherry picking your statistics without thought of true context or wider application.

considering i haven't cherry picked my statistics at all, once again disregarding actual proof because it doesn't conform to your incorrect spewing.

Mhmmm. See, insults, accusations, but no hard figures for a large number of people doing true averages. Rather than single perfect incomes. Overall income in Null is higher. It's that simple. You can argue the individual isk/hr all you want, but the month by month income breaks down and shows Null has the isk. As it should, and as anyone with a brain knows is true.

Mhmmm. See, insults, accusations, but no hard figures for a large number of people doing true averages. Rather than single perfect incomes. Overall income in Null is higher. It's that simple. You can argue the individual isk/hr all you want, but the month by month income breaks down and shows Null has the isk. As it should, and as anyone with a brain knows is true.

Amoms = 90 mil/hr on average

High sec level 4 missions = 100-120 mil/hr

Incursions 150 mil+/hr

Citation needed from both of you as to where the 'active' bots are.
Yes, CCP's bot bans have hit The Forge hard.... Almost like they include Spam Bots as 'Bots'.
Neither of you have any evidence where mission bots & ratting bots happen to live.

The only thing we know is that they do exist.

Amoms = 90 mil/hr on average

High sec level 4 missions = 100-120 mil/hr (Missions go up to 180 mil/hr)

Incursions 150 mil+/hr

Your hi-sec level 4 isk per hour is a bit like the fisherman and, 'it was this big'

Your hi-sec level 4 isk per hour is a bit like the fisherman and, 'it was this big'

Haha risk.

Haha risk.

I guess I'm doing it wrong.

Null-sec ratting, ha ha risk

tell me about how team killing isn't a thing in eve that even has a special name.

You are.

We will min max to get the most out of anything.

For example, we found out it was possible to make tens of billions in a matter of hours with FW when it was on sisi, CCP and everyone else it wasn't possible. We abused the living hell out of it, CCP nerfed it soon after when word got out how to do it.

100-120 is doable for a good chunk of level 4 agents, 180 is SOE and that might be going up a bit more when the BS arrive (depending on its stats).

Null-sec ratting, ha ha risk

We will min max to get the most out of anything.

For example, we found out it was possible to make tens of billions in a matter of hours with FW when it was on sisi, CCP and everyone else it wasn't possible. We abused the living hell out of it, CCP nerfed it soon after when word got out how to do it.
.

Tell me all about how often this actually happens in the incursion community.
I used to run them quite frequently before I started playing in nullsec and I never heard much of anything about this happening.

When was the last time you docked up in high sec because a neut showed up?

The travel time between 'a good chunk of level 4 agents' alone would reduce your isk per hour.

no idea, i don't run incursions. it's just obvious that if i'm not fleeting with any one when running missions then the risk is absolutely zero, in comparison.