| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 24 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |

Kyperion
General Washington's Irregulars
61
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 08:50:00 -
[331] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Kyperion wrote:Law abiding citizens can and do carry, and carry concealed, completely looking like harmless individuals, except for the Glock in their pants. Ok, fair enough. I somehow read it as GÇ£doGÇ¥ rather than GÇ£canGÇ¥.  Still, the answer remains much the same: maybe you can, but you don't. The same goes in EVE: you could carry a gun, but you don't. And just like with that choice, even if you do, it won't really help against the determined attacker unless you bring back-up.
A .40 Caliber bullet in the T-Box followed by two in the chest will stop any threat 'IRL'
unbonused drones do not carry enough 'dps' (See Stopping power) to deal with gankers, and deal with means kill. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20079
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 08:56:00 -
[332] - Quote
Kyperion wrote:A .40 Caliber bullet in the T-Box followed by two in the chest will stop any threat 'IRL' Not when the threat is 12 guys armed with assault rifles, and they've already shot you once each.
Quote:unbonused drones do not carry enough 'dps' (See Stopping power) to deal with gankers, and deal with means kill. Actually, they do. Maybe only just, but they do. Even more so if you go for the smart option and use something other than pure DPS to stop them. The problem is that there are 12 of them and you didn't see them coming.
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Erica Dusette
Sky Fighters
3791
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 08:58:00 -
[333] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:He has the right to say what he wants(unless maybe it breaks some forum rules). But that right to let him speak his mind doesn't mean that what he says is correct. That's a really odd, and grossly hypocritical, response.
But in anycase I tend to agree with most things I see Tippia post.
You're fortunate that she's obviously enjoying playing your forum games, as it's pretty much the only thing that gives your comments any kind of credence at all. She obviously enjoys the sparring practice lol
I'd get bored with that quickly myself. It's obvious what you're trying to do and I'm not interested much in getting involved myself because everything you write is superficial bullshit aimed at perpetuating a simple argument (note I said argument, not debate). You are a very simple forum troll. Period.
Least I hope you are, as if you truly believe the stuff you say then...uhgg, Tippia has a point about you needing to step away from the keyboard and seek help.
Kyperion wrote:you cannot carry a gun on a miner barge or merchant ship in EVE... which is bullshit
Tell that to the awesome Badger bait that cost my alt her Proteus lol (and almost my bomber too).
Ships require balance. It's silly to expect a mining barge, designed for maximum efficiency at one task (mining) should also be an elite PVP vessel. Next you'll ask for covops everything, and frigates that can fit battleship grade weapons. Stop asking for tools to enable laziness and instead use the tools you already have to survive, or fight, smarter.
It will take extra effort, yes. Sorry but it's unavoidable. GÖí -á-á Major (Ret.) Caldari Naval Militia Gÿá -á Sky Fighters | Just an innocent explorer! pâä -áHerrbert: "womwomwowmwoaugharwajwowoooommm"
|

Scipio Artelius
The Vendunari End of Life
645
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 09:00:00 -
[334] - Quote
Kyperion wrote:A .40 Caliber bullet in the T-Box followed by two in the chest will stop any threat 'IRL'
unbonused drones do not carry enough 'dps' (See Stopping power) to deal with gankers, and deal with means kill. A tank? (sorry, a bit facetious, but also serious in that there is no single strategy that deals with every possible threat).
On the second bit, if drones are your preferred tool, then make sure you train drones to level 5, drone interfacing to level 5, combat drone operation to level 5 and whichever racial specialization to level 5 in order to gain maximum damage and then fit a drone damage amplifier or two.
Of course, the fitting of your ship is a choice you make and if fitting damage mods for drones doesn't fit with what you want to do, then find a different strategy.
Above all, you don't need to bring DPS to deal with gankers. Concord does that.
You only need to ensure your own survivability. Tank your ship and fit damage control mods. That is better than having a couple of hobgoblins fly around. eve-bazaar - Discount prices on ships and PLEX. Real savings to drive your ISK further. |

Kyperion
General Washington's Irregulars
63
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 09:00:00 -
[335] - Quote
Erica Dusette wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:He has the right to say what he wants(unless maybe it breaks some forum rules). But that right to let him speak his mind doesn't mean that what he says is correct. That's a really odd, and grossly hypocritical, response. But in anycase I tend to agree with most things I see Tippia post. You're fortunate that she's obviously enjoying playing your forum games, as it's pretty much the only thing that gives your comments any kind of credence at all. She obviously enjoys the sparring practice lol I'd get bored with that quickly myself. It's obvious what you're trying to do and I'm not interested much in getting involved myself because everything you write is superficial bullshit aimed at perpetuating a simple argument (note I said argument, not debate). You are a very simple forum troll. Period. Least I hope you are, as if you truly believe the stuff you say then...uhgg, Tippia has a point about you needing to step away from the keyboard and seek help. Kyperion wrote:you cannot carry a gun on a miner barge or merchant ship in EVE... which is bullshit
Tell that to the awesome Badger bait that cost my alt her Proteus lol (and almost my bomber too). Ships require balance. It's silly to expect a mining barge, designed for maximum efficiency at one task (mining) should also be an elite PVP vessel. Next you'll ask for covops everything, and frigates that can fit battleship grade weapons. Stop asking for tools to enable laziness and instead use the tools you already have to survive, or fight, smarter. It will take extra effort, yes. Sorry but it's unavoidable.
If you lost a T3 ship to a badger, you are daft.
|

Mandarine
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
27
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 09:03:00 -
[336] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:On a more serious note, as I've said before, if you didn't have the "bad guys" to wail and gnash your teeth about you wouldn't enjoy the game nearly as much. Once this bit of self realization hits home, you will find inner harmony. 
Those guys a growing portion of the playerbase is complaining about, are not playing pod pilots online, they-¦re merely using this game as a platform to get cheap kicks out of total strangers. All of their actions revolve heavily around meta, and going out of their way to cheese every little edge they can. This does not create a healthy gaming environment.
The normal gamer plays pretend being a pod pilot, and cares about ingame goals. The gankers/griefers/scammers that people are dissatisfied with, care mostly about making people mad (and possibly keeping record of their RL rage). This is why they make such a heavy alt usage, as it-¦s good meta to do it again and again and still be able to access highsec, dodge block lists and reputation issues.
Their goals are out-of-game oriented, they want to make people mad IRL and build an online reputation around it. This does not make the game enjoyable, as their meta-playing allows them to escape any form of ingame retribution. But more importantly than that, it-¦s disturbingly sociopathic. |

Tear Harvesters HaveNoLives
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
2
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 09:03:00 -
[337] - Quote
I've arrived late, I don't know whats happened here exactly... talking about defending mining ships?
Let's get back on track here and highlight the real problem again: EVE is filled with grown men who log into an online space game for the purpose of angering other grown men for their own personal amusement.
The OP is a breathe of fresh air. I have done almost everything "evil" this game has to offer and not a single time have I been rude about it. Not once have I extracted a tear or made someone want to quit the game through my words and attitude. If I can do it, so can they. They aren't special and neither am I. This has nothing to do with game mechanics, the issue is that of human interaction. I've ganked many ships and not once have mistreated the people behind the keyboard over it. The same cannot be said for the legion of sad RL losers who use EVE Online to make themselves feel better at everyone else's expense.
CCP doesn't do a single thing about it because they want subscriptions. That means us players only have one reasonable response: Unsubscribe.
I have not payed CCP a single dime since I saw someone having his "tears extracted" in local about 6 months ago. I sent in petitions about the players involved and they saw no repercussions, not even a suspension that put them offline for a week or something.
It's up to us normal functioning adults to show our displeasure towards CCP's lack of action. Anyone and everyone who agrees that the personalities in this game need a culling should stand with me on this. Unsubscribe and just grind for the ISK if needed. It sends the right message to CCP: If you're going to allow all this non-sense in your game to maximize subscriptions, you're not going to maximize subscriptions. |

Erica Dusette
Sky Fighters
3791
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 09:04:00 -
[338] - Quote
Kyperion wrote:If you lost a T3 ship to a badger, you are daft.
No, I lost a T3 ship to the T3 gang for whom the Badger was bait for.
Quite an awesome battle badger fit actually. The guys who murdered me were nice enough to give me it's fit afterward when I congratulated them on an awesome bait. GÖí -á-á Major (Ret.) Caldari Naval Militia Gÿá -á Sky Fighters | Just an innocent explorer! pâä -áHerrbert: "womwomwowmwoaugharwajwowoooommm"
|

Shizuken
Venerated Stars
198
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 09:10:00 -
[339] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:
It's like a bad episode of Battlestar Galactica with the narrator saying "this has all happened before, and will happen again" lol.
This is blasphemy. There is no such thing as a bad episode of BSG and insinuating that there ever was one should be punishable by death. You go to hell. You go to hell and you die.
"Hero" was pretty bad. Do you really think a black dude in a cylon prison for several years would still have such a fine perm? |

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
187
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 09:12:00 -
[340] - Quote
Shizuken wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:
It's like a bad episode of Battlestar Galactica with the narrator saying "this has all happened before, and will happen again" lol.
This is blasphemy. There is no such thing as a bad episode of BSG and insinuating that there ever was one should be punishable by death. You go to hell. You go to hell and you die. "Hero" was pretty bad. Do you really think a black dude in a cylon prison for several years would still have such a fine perm? Move over Jenna, someone else is going with you. |

Shizuken
Venerated Stars
198
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 09:14:00 -
[341] - Quote
Mandarine wrote:But more importantly than that, it-¦s disturbingly sociopathic.
Ive been saying this myself for several years now. |

Sophie d'Amour
Perkone Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 10:03:00 -
[342] - Quote
reason i stop playing EvE.
I just wanna log blow up some NPCs log off. nothing fancy just casual fun.
but after few times being killed in high space and lost really millions i kind of have enough of EvE. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20081
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 10:06:00 -
[343] - Quote
Sophie d'Amour wrote:but after few times being killed in high space and lost really millions i kind of have enough of EvE. What were you in, what were you doing, and where were you when you blew up? GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Kyperion
General Washington's Irregulars
64
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 10:11:00 -
[344] - Quote
Erica Dusette wrote:Kyperion wrote:If you lost a T3 ship to a badger, you are daft.
No, I lost a T3 ship to the T3 gang for whom the Badger was bait for. Quite an awesome battle badger fit actually. The guys who murdered me were nice enough to give me it's fit afterward when I congratulated them on an awesome bait.
So it wasn't the badger that killed you, but his friends.... completely not what we're talking about here. |

Sophie d'Amour
Perkone Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 10:15:00 -
[345] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Sophie d'Amour wrote:but after few times being killed in high space and lost really millions i kind of have enough of EvE. What were you in, what were you doing, and where were you when you blew up?
it do not matter anymore.
|

Kyperion
General Washington's Irregulars
64
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 10:15:00 -
[346] - Quote
Tear Harvesters HaveNoLives wrote:I've arrived late, I don't know whats happened here exactly... talking about defending mining ships?
Let's get back on track here and highlight the real problem again: EVE is filled with grown men who log into an online space game for the purpose of angering other grown men for their own personal amusement.
The OP is a breathe of fresh air. I have done almost everything "evil" this game has to offer and not a single time have I been rude about it. Not once have I extracted a tear or made someone want to quit the game through my words and attitude. If I can do it, so can they. They aren't special and neither am I. This has nothing to do with game mechanics, the issue is that of human interaction. I've ganked many ships and not once have mistreated the people behind the keyboard over it. The same cannot be said for the legion of sad RL losers who use EVE Online to make themselves feel better at everyone else's expense.
CCP doesn't do a single thing about it because they want subscriptions. That means us players only have one reasonable response: Unsubscribe.
I have not payed CCP a single dime since I saw someone having his "tears extracted" in local about 6 months ago. I sent in petitions about the players involved and they saw no repercussions, not even a suspension that put them offline for a week or something.
It's up to us normal functioning adults to show our displeasure towards CCP's lack of action. Anyone and everyone who agrees that the personalities in this game need a culling should stand with me on this. Unsubscribe and just grind for the ISK if needed. It sends the right message to CCP: If you're going to allow all this non-sense in your game to maximize subscriptions, you're not going to maximize subscriptions.
The game mechanics are what allow this kind of human interaction... the game mechanics of artificially making merchant and mining vessels overly weak and without offensive capability.
So what I am proposing is that we give the gankers exactly what they claim to want... excitement, and turn Mining barges and merchant ships into things that we would expect to exist in this kind of Spartan universe.
|

Salvos Rhoska
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
312
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 10:16:00 -
[347] - Quote
:@ OP and other like minded individuals
What exactly are you proposing?
Please provide a conscise numbered list with specific wording of what exactly it is that you want done.
Please append a short explanation to each numbered entry, if it requires elaboration.
Something similar to this:
1) Change x to y: -Reasoning and elaboration
2) Implement mechanic z: - Reasoning and elaboration
This will enable the community to address and consider specifically what it is you are proposing in an informed and organised manner, whereas right now, Inand of thers have no idea what exactly it is you have in mind.
Thanks. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20081
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 10:17:00 -
[348] - Quote
Sophie d'Amour wrote:it do not matter anymore. There are always lessons to be learned.
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Kyperion
General Washington's Irregulars
64
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 10:26:00 -
[349] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Sophie d'Amour wrote:but after few times being killed in high space and lost really millions i kind of have enough of EvE. What were you in, what were you doing, and where were you when you blew up?
To reply to your many posts about existing 'tools'
.... Conceptually the mining barge makes no sense in the EVE Universe.... In a world gone mad with greed and villainy, where damn near anyone has access to cutting edge military hardware..... Mining Barges wouldn't exist.... they would all be tanked like a Marauder, and probably keep the firepower .... they might sacrifice speed and manuevering for that, but they definitely wouldn't be the puny little things they are now, and the smallest one would not be the toughest one.
Alternatively they might be small, fast, low signature frigates, with a full flight of light drones and a stealth bombers cloak bonuses.
Freighters would have about 16 turrets moving as slow as they do.
The kind of sandbox ganking proponents claim eve to be has no room for the kind of weak fitting capabilities seen on most mining/merchant ships.
|

Salvos Rhoska
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
312
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 10:30:00 -
[350] - Quote
Any commensurate increase in PvP potential on freighter/resource vessels would have to be met by a reciprocal reduction in performance in the non-combat role. |

Mandarine
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
29
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 10:31:00 -
[351] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote::@ OP and other like minded individuals
What exactly are you proposing?
Please provide a conscise numbered list with specific wording of what exactly it is that you want done.
Please append a short explanation to each numbered entry, if it requires elaboration.
Something similar to this:
1) Change x to y: -Reasoning and elaboration
2) Implement mechanic z: - Reasoning and elaboration
This will enable the community to address and consider specifically what it is you are proposing in an informed and organised manner, whereas right now, Inand of thers have no idea what exactly it is you have in mind.
Thanks.
This has nothing to do with gameplay issues, and everything with the motivations of a certain category of people who only enjoy EvE as a platform to inflict emotional harm and others, that is, pursue their RL sadistic tendencies.
Most MMOs pre-emptively trammelize their game to prevent toxic interactions, as it-¦s the only way to effectively limit the negative impact those people have.
One other possibility would be to selectively IP ban toxic individuals, but this would require quite a lot of GM work, and forbidding playing behind VPNs and proxies. However, this would allow for the removal of Concord, which is only there so as to keep tear harvesting in check.
|

Erica Dusette
Sky Fighters
3794
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 10:35:00 -
[352] - Quote
Kyperion wrote:Erica Dusette wrote:Kyperion wrote:If you lost a T3 ship to a badger, you are daft.
No, I lost a T3 ship to the T3 gang for whom the Badger was bait for. Quite an awesome battle badger fit actually. The guys who murdered me were nice enough to give me it's fit afterward when I congratulated them on an awesome bait. So it wasn't the badger that killed you, but his friends.... completely not what we're talking about here. I was merely clarifying what happened for your benefit as you didn't seem to understand how baits are generally run, making the ludicrous assumption that a Badger killed a Proteus 1v1. Oh, and then mentioned -I- may be daft. 
But when you think about it this is exactly what this thread is about. I tried to gank someone who was cleverer than me and who had friends hidden close by. Now yes, I do appreciate that clever use of mechanics, cooperative gameplay, or anything that requires you to use more than one ship is what you're dearly hoping to avoid here, but my proty loss is the perfect example of how you can turn the tables on your gankers.
Oh, and that Badger was genuinely running PI too, so in a sense it was indeed a fighting-industrial ship.  GÖí -á-á Major (Ret.) Caldari Naval Militia Gÿá -á Sky Fighters | Just an innocent explorer! pâä -áHerrbert: "womwomwowmwoaugharwajwowoooommm"
|

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
17100
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 10:40:00 -
[353] - Quote
Kyperion wrote: To reply to your many posts about existing 'tools'
.... Conceptually the mining barge makes no sense in the EVE Universe.... In a world gone mad with greed and villainy, where damn near anyone has access to cutting edge military hardware..... Mining Barges wouldn't exist.... they would all be tanked like a Marauder, and probably keep the firepower .... they might sacrifice speed and manuevering for that, but they definitely wouldn't be the puny little things they are now, and the smallest one would not be the toughest one.
A mining ship with the tank of a battleship is already available, it's called the Skiff, and it doesn't require firepower to survive a gank, it requires the person using it to use their head when they fit it.
Quote:Alternatively they might be small, fast, low signature frigates, with a full flight of light drones and a stealth bombers cloak bonuses. Firstly why a cloak bonus?, and secondly, it's called a Venture.
Quote:Freighters would have about 16 turrets moving as slow as they do.
The kind of sandbox ganking proponents claim eve to be has no room for the kind of weak fitting capabilities seen on most mining/merchant ships.
If you want a freighter with 16 turrets that's fine, but you have to be able to live with sacrificing something else to gain those slots, like EHP or cargo capacity. Expect to see them ganking other freighters on a gate near you soon.
Psychotic Monk for CSM 9 |

Sophie d'Amour
Perkone Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 10:41:00 -
[354] - Quote
Kyperion wrote:Tippia wrote:Sophie d'Amour wrote:but after few times being killed in high space and lost really millions i kind of have enough of EvE. What were you in, what were you doing, and where were you when you blew up? To reply to your many posts about existing 'tools' .... Conceptually the mining barge makes no sense in the EVE Universe.... In a world gone mad with greed and villainy, where damn near anyone has access to cutting edge military hardware..... Mining Barges wouldn't exist.... they would all be tanked like a Marauder, and probably keep the firepower .... they might sacrifice speed and manuevering for that, but they definitely wouldn't be the puny little things they are now, and the smallest one would not be the toughest one. Alternatively they might be small, fast, low signature frigates, with a full flight of light drones and a stealth bombers cloak bonuses. Freighters would have about 16 turrets moving as slow as they do. The kind of sandbox ganking proponents claim eve to be has no room for the kind of weak fitting capabilities seen on most mining/merchant ships.
indeed, they use a armored vehicle to transport money also right. it likely have a cannon if many rob it with a tank.
in 1600 they transported valuable goods also in massive combat ships. |

Salvos Rhoska
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
312
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 10:45:00 -
[355] - Quote
Mandarine wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote::@ OP and other like minded individuals
What exactly are you proposing?
Please provide a conscise numbered list with specific wording of what exactly it is that you want done.
Please append a short explanation to each numbered entry, if it requires elaboration.
Something similar to this:
1) Change x to y: -Reasoning and elaboration
2) Implement mechanic z: - Reasoning and elaboration
This will enable the community to address and consider specifically what it is you are proposing in an informed and organised manner, whereas right now, Inand of thers have no idea what exactly it is you have in mind.
Thanks. This has nothing to do with gameplay issues, and everything with the motivations of a certain category of people who only enjoy EvE as a platform to inflict emotional harm and others, that is, pursue their RL sadistic tendencies. Most MMOs pre-emptively trammelize their game to prevent toxic interactions, as it-¦s the only way to effectively limit the negative impact those people have. One other possibility would be to selectively IP ban toxic individuals, but this would require quite a lot of GM work, and forbidding playing behind VPNs and proxies. However, this would allow for the removal of Concord, which is only there so as to keep tear harvesting in check.
I'm sorry, but either you did not read my post, or chose to disregard its contents.
In either case, you did not reply in the format I had suggested would be conducive to a more organised and concise discussion of what exactly it is that OP and like minded individuals want done.
Therefore I am forced to disregard the contents of your post, just as you chose to disregard the contents of mine.
I'm sorry, but you really leave me no option in that regard.
Please reformat your post to fit the model I proposed, in order to facilitate discussion on this matter in an organised, informed and concise manner. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20082
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 10:52:00 -
[356] - Quote
Kyperion wrote:Conceptually the mining barge makes no sense in the EVE Universe.... In a world gone mad with greed and villainy, where damn near anyone has access to cutting edge military hardware..... Mining Barges wouldn't exist. That's not really the world of EVE though. Capsuleers might have access to that hardware, but they are a vanishingly small minority and the normal world have long since stopped trying to make make those nutcases behave normally (because, to be fair, they're not even people any more). Instead, they've implemented a single overseer body and generally just let the capsuleers do what they want against each other.
Mining barges still need to exist and for your standard human prospecting company, they do the job just fine. Most regular, standard-human ships that go after them aren't that much of a threat.
Quote:The kind of sandbox ganking proponents claim eve to be has no room for the kind of weak fitting capabilities seen on most mining/merchant ships. The kind of sandbox they claim EVE to be already provides those ships with all the defensive capabilities they need, if piloted correctly.
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Vaju Enki
Secular Wisdom
1252
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 10:59:00 -
[357] - Quote
******** themepark carebears don't get sandbox games and cry on the forums, nothing new. The Tears Must Flow |

Kyperion
General Washington's Irregulars
65
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 10:59:00 -
[358] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Mandarine wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote::@ OP and other like minded individuals
What exactly are you proposing?
Please provide a conscise numbered list with specific wording of what exactly it is that you want done.
Please append a short explanation to each numbered entry, if it requires elaboration.
Something similar to this:
1) Change x to y: -Reasoning and elaboration
2) Implement mechanic z: - Reasoning and elaboration
This will enable the community to address and consider specifically what it is you are proposing in an informed and organised manner, whereas right now, Inand of thers have no idea what exactly it is you have in mind.
Thanks. This has nothing to do with gameplay issues, and everything with the motivations of a certain category of people who only enjoy EvE as a platform to inflict emotional harm and others, that is, pursue their RL sadistic tendencies. Most MMOs pre-emptively trammelize their game to prevent toxic interactions, as it-¦s the only way to effectively limit the negative impact those people have. One other possibility would be to selectively IP ban toxic individuals, but this would require quite a lot of GM work, and forbidding playing behind VPNs and proxies. However, this would allow for the removal of Concord, which is only there so as to keep tear harvesting in check. I'm sorry, but either you did not read my post, or chose to disregard its contents. In either case, you did not reply in the format I had suggested would be conducive to a more organised and concise discussion of what exactly it is that OP and like minded individuals want done. I proposed it not for my "personal interest", but in order to better facilitate understanding of everyones specific positions and proposals. Therefore I am forced to disregard the contents of your post, just as you chose to disregard the contents of mine. I'm sorry, but you really leave me no option in that regard. It is very confusing to me, why you would deliberately make the choice to respond to my post of which the contents is ONLY a suggestion for a format of discussion, in a fashion that is completely contrary to the only contents of my post, which is to ask for people to use the format I proposed. Please reformat your post to fit the model I proposed, in order to facilitate discussion on this matter in an organised, informed and concise manner.
1.) Concord response times lowered significantly across the board... but they actively chase criminals out of high sec... as in follow in warp and through stargates. They also pod people with a low enough standing
2.) every ship has a viable PVP combat fitting.... to either run away despite scramble, cloak, or surpise with a hold out pistol capable of taking on any ship in its class or holding out against one class above
3.) Many less NPC in missions, but way tougher, and an AI that uses scramblers/bubbles/stasis etc like a player would
4.) instead of only One PVP tournament, have little ones all over New Eden, set up Ded spaces for matches... actually, this kind of consensual 'arena' combat could eventually replace missions altogether.
|

Ralph King-Griffin
Var Foundation inc.
377
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 10:59:00 -
[359] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:
That little girl has zero chance.
Put your daughter on the computer and read what I'm saying to her:
Please do not listen to your daddy. He is a bad person. If you believe the things he tells you, you too will grow up to be a bad person. Call social services and tell them he's a bad person so you can be put in a home with people who will raise you into a good person.
this is about the single most vile thing i have had the displeasure of reading outside of Reddit. seriously man, im not one with much of a moral code but you should be genuinely ashamed for that comment, i am for being part of the same community that generated it.
edit: yeah i know im a little late to it but still. If in doubt...do...excessively. |

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
188
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 11:05:00 -
[360] - Quote
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:
That little girl has zero chance.
Put your daughter on the computer and read what I'm saying to her:
Please do not listen to your daddy. He is a bad person. If you believe the things he tells you, you too will grow up to be a bad person. Call social services and tell them he's a bad person so you can be put in a home with people who will raise you into a good person.
this is about the single most vile thing i have had the displeasure of reading outside of Reddit. seriously man, im not one with much of a moral code but you should be genuinely ashamed for that comment, i am for being part of the same community that generated it. edit: yeah i know im a little late to it but still.
I agree, he should be ashamed of himself for exposing his daughter to eve and then using his own daughter as some sort of leverage in an argument.
His own daughter, for shame. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 24 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |