| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 24 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |

Marvin Shields
Division 156
1
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 05:48:00 -
[1] - Quote
Making my first post on the forums ever, so bear with me here...
I'll admit I have my faults, but seeing someone comment on a Reddit post, and the massive sh*tstorm that followed, got me thinking...
This is a game where we cannot die for good, and where the rules are pretty much removed, which gives us a lot of "creative" freedom.
Why is all of that creativity and freedom being used to harass new players? I just don't understand it.
We want this game to thrive and succeed. We want big things for this game. It's gone on a year, with more people joining and staying every year than the one before it. We have statistics that prove this.
... But do we have any that show how many have left? Or why they left? Why doesn't CCP have an exit survey for those who never finished their trial, or who subbed for a month but never came back, or who played for X years but stopped altogether?
I have in my very long Eve career seen some of the most venomous, most vindictive people in gaming. Bear in mind, I played Ultima Online back when it came out and for many years following that, and that was THE game that started the open-world community-driven content MMO genre. Eve may be more polished and may have a greater following and has lasted a HELL of a lot longer, but UO was where it allllll started kids. I remember when Lord British was murdered. I wasn't there, but I remember the ICQ messages from my guild mates telling me what happened the next day.
Even in UO where you could kill anyone you wanted and where craftiness could get you around the in-game NPC guards (Think CONCORD) after stealing **** or killing someone in the middle of town, there was a code of honor or ethics or whatever you want to call it. I am not talking about a bunch of neckbeard-stroking nerds crafting official decrees, I mean just PEOPLE who had an agreement that being dicks to one another ALL THE TIME just isn't fun. Even the PK's who'd run around Fofofofo'ing while flinging explosion potions and hurling energy bolts at new players, one-shotting them, would ressurrect the ghost of the player and give them a bit of gold. Maybe I have a selective memory, but that's what it was like.
Enough with that old dinosaur game though, let's talk Eve.
We have thousands of people online at any given time. Of those thousands we have a good portion of them who want to play the game the way they want to play it, be it exploring, mining, PVE, market stuff, production, etc. They can be casuals, they can be hardcore, they just generally don't engage in PVP unless THEY WANT TO or if they are forced to defend themselves. These people keep to Highsec, occasionally daytripping to low/null/WH space for fun/adventure or to fatten their wallets.
Then you have another huge portion who enjoy PVP, who reap the benefit of living in dangerous space and living around dangerous people, but who help one another and who actually try to make the game fun for others, while engaging in fleet or solo warfare for the purpose of fun or conquest.
Then you have the a-holes, as the gentleman on Reddit so adequately phrased it. I can see why people wouldn't take kindly to being called a-holes, but when you go around with the sole purpose of "harvesting tears" as you guys call it, it's not easy to find a more fitting name than *******.
... You guys are the reason people don't want to play this game. You are why on news posts about Eve you see comments like "I love reading about Eve, but I never want to play it". It's not always the learning curve, folks.
Yeah it makes content, these "jihad fleets" and Hulkageddon, but really, you're just crapping on the parades of hundreds/thousands of people who just want to enjoy the game they're paying a sub for, or who are just starting out.
Case in point: Destiny. This guy, a SCII commentator (Whatever the hell that is, is that an occupation these days? You mean I waste my time managing a server farm while this guy gets paid to talk about Starcraft?), decided to stream his new entry into Eve, and people camped his starting station, suicide ganking him every time he'd undock. And high-fives were thrown around, cheers were had, Jabber broadcasts were made with "DUNK THIS F*GGOT" as the closing line, etc. I read dozens of threads here, on Kugu, on Reddit, and on *other message boards* where people were actually cheering because someone was being driven out of the game, a game they'd never played.
What kind of attitude is that? This IS a game that takes pride in being reckless and rule-free (Mostly), but are we as a community going to accept that as writ and let it slide?
Then you have this guy, Daionnis. He complained on Reddit about how this game is full of assholes who love nothing more than to ruin peoples' gameplay experience. An apt observation! But the comments on his post just made my jaw drop. Not a single positive comment or really anyone agreeing with him, it was like standing knee-deep in a pool of juvenile insecurity and chestbeating. I've never been more ashamed of this community. I know Reddit's Eve community doesn't represent all or really any significant part of Eve's population, but it's still a damn shame when someone making a valid point (There is no such thing as "leave me alone" in this game) is getting trampled in the comments below him because the little children cannot bear to be called out for what they are, assholes who like to hurt people for fun.
Now, I am not calling anyone here an *******. I was just using his word. But really, c'mon. Are we as a community really that freaking self-absorbed that we cannot say "Hey, maybe purposefully ruining peoples' experience in-game should be where we stop short and draw the line"?
We had a CSM chairman literally stand on-stage and tell people to harass an ISBoxing ice miner, who had voiced concerns about suicidal thoughts in a message to him, with the hopes that the guy would actually hurt himself. (Cont'd) |

Marvin Shields
Division 156
1
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 05:50:00 -
[2] - Quote
And what happened? What happened that day? Gaming press ate it up. Holy crap I remember Eurogamer, IGN, everyone talking about Alexander "The Mittani" Gianturco goading an audience of Eve players into harassing a suicidal man to hopefully see him go over the edge.
What happened in the audience though shocked me; Instead of being booed off the stage (Which is what I'd have attempted to do if I were in the audience), he was met with laughter and applause.
Because that's the people who play this game. Or at least the ones who are most visible, most audible, and most rampant, because the people who instigate this behavior within the game allow the behavior to creep and spread within their ranks.
It's bogus, and I as an Eve player for going on seven years now will not stand for it.
I am calling for a cultural revolution within Eve.
I am so optimistic this thread is going to be filled with positive, uplifting comments talking about the evil within this game and how we can stamp it out, but then again I am also under the influence of sleeping pills so that might be them at work. I am ninety percent sure.
|

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
122
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 05:57:00 -
[3] - Quote
You have written an excellent post and I applaud you for taking the time to put forth your opinions about a subject you appear to feel strongly about.
I wish this thread and you the best of luck and I hope that your experiences are overall positive and make you happy. |

Kyperion
General Washington's Irregulars
25
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 06:01:00 -
[4] - Quote
[quote=Marvin Shields What happened in the audience though shocked me; Instead of being booed off the stage (Which is what I'd have attempted to do if I were in the audience), he was met with laughter and applause.
Because that's the people who play this game. Or at least the ones who are most visible, most audible, and most rampant, because the people who instigate this behavior within the game allow the behavior to creep and spread within their ranks. [/quote]
Pretty much. Especially on the forums it seems like EVE is a refuge for the refuse of humanity, like Mos Eisley from Star Wars, EVE is a wretched hive of scum and villainy.
But its also mechanically one of the best Space ship games around, and graphically amazing which is why I keep coming back to it.
|

Lugia3
Emerald Inc.
883
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 06:04:00 -
[5] - Quote
That's like going into a vegetarian convention while eating a hamburger. What do you expect when walking to the section for EvE players? "CCP Dolan is full of ****." - CCP Bettik |

Django Askulf
Black Rebel Death Squad
13
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 06:13:00 -
[6] - Quote
Marvin Shields wrote:
It's bogus, and I as an Eve player for going on seven years now will not stand for it.
Thoughts?!
Can I have all your stuff?
|

Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
2337
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 06:13:00 -
[7] - Quote
I am reasonably certain that more than one CCP exec stays awake late at night, worrying that Star Citizen, or some other like game, has game mechanics and moderators that actively discourage the type of sociopathic behaviour that CCP embraces and celebrates.
When that game is finally built, even if it half as visually appealing as Eve, and one-quarter the depth of the Eve, will be the catalyst of an exodus of paying customers. No doubt a significant percentage of the Eve player population will cheer that exodus, giddy that all the "carebear losers have finally left THEIR game", but the accountants know better.
I eagerly anticipate that day as well, but clearly not for the reasons that the myopic sadists do. Most people viewed Orwell's writings as a warning. The harper regime and the goons treat them as a guidebook. |

Scipio Artelius
The Vendunari End of Life
634
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 06:16:00 -
[8] - Quote
Kyperion wrote:Especially on the forums it seems like EVE is a refuge for the refuse of humanity, -1 eve-bazaar - Discount prices on ships and PLEX. Real savings to drive your ISK further. |

Kyperion
General Washington's Irregulars
25
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 06:20:00 -
[9] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:I am reasonably certain that more than one CCP exec stays awake late at night, worrying that Star Citizen, or some other like game, has game mechanics and moderators that actively discourage the type of sociopathic behaviour that CCP embraces and celebrates.
When that game is finally built, even if it half as visually appealing as Eve, and one-quarter the depth of the Eve, will be the catalyst of an exodus of paying customers. No doubt a significant percentage of the Eve player population will cheer that exodus, giddy that all the "carebear losers have finally left THEIR game", but the accountants know better.
I eagerly anticipate that day as well, but clearly not for the reasons that the myopic sadists do.
While I don't think EVE will ever die, I too look forward to what appears to be a new wave of spaceship games.
If Egosoft could polish an X-series based MMO, itd be pretty awesome
|

Marvin Shields
Division 156
2
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 06:35:00 -
[10] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:I am reasonably certain that more than one CCP exec stays awake late at night, worrying that Star Citizen, or some other like game, has game mechanics and moderators that actively discourage the type of sociopathic behaviour that CCP embraces and celebrates.
When that game is finally built, even if it half as visually appealing as Eve, and one-quarter the depth of the Eve, will be the catalyst of an exodus of paying customers. No doubt a significant percentage of the Eve player population will cheer that exodus, giddy that all the "carebear losers have finally left THEIR game", but the accountants know better.
I eagerly anticipate that day as well, but clearly not for the reasons that the myopic sadists do.
I do too! But the difference is I honest-to-god love this game. I started playing at a time in my life when I felt like I needed an escape to get away from my dull, boring, abusive life. I fell into a good corp, made some good friends, even got some of my old UO pals off their old ICQ's and onto Teamspeak and flying spaceships with me! I fell in love with the "world", and so did they. I'm thrilled to say they still play to this day :)
Star Citizen doesn't have the dark, gritty dystopian ultra-future that Eve does.
I swear though, it's like the people who want to be rampaging psycopaths in real life but can't for obvious reasons decided one day to start up an Eve subscription and then started referring buddies, because the amount of - Or should I say, the sheer lack of humanity I see in this game on a daily basis makes me sick to my stomach sometimes. I'm not a goddamned saint, not in-game or IRL, but the crap some players do is just disgusting.
But that's on an extreme. What's doing the most damage is just the general lack of empathy. Nobody cares anymore. It's all boiled down to "I WUNDR HOW GUD KILLMAIL IZ GUN B" to these cretins.
|

Zack Korth
Blasphemy INC.
297
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 06:36:00 -
[11] - Quote
eves mean, me sad, cry, spend 40 minutes on butthurt GD post, not a toon i don't want getting D'D'D'D'DUNKED |

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
122
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 06:47:00 -
[12] - Quote
Marvin Shields wrote:Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:I am reasonably certain that more than one CCP exec stays awake late at night, worrying that Star Citizen, or some other like game, has game mechanics and moderators that actively discourage the type of sociopathic behaviour that CCP embraces and celebrates.
When that game is finally built, even if it half as visually appealing as Eve, and one-quarter the depth of the Eve, will be the catalyst of an exodus of paying customers. No doubt a significant percentage of the Eve player population will cheer that exodus, giddy that all the "carebear losers have finally left THEIR game", but the accountants know better.
I eagerly anticipate that day as well, but clearly not for the reasons that the myopic sadists do. I do too! But the difference is I honest-to-god love this game. I started playing at a time in my life when I felt like I needed an escape to get away from my dull, boring, abusive life. I fell into a good corp, made some good friends, even got some of my old UO pals off their old ICQ's and onto Teamspeak and flying spaceships with me! I fell in love with the "world", and so did they. I'm thrilled to say they still play to this day :) Star Citizen doesn't have the dark, gritty dystopian ultra-future that Eve does. I swear though, it's like the people who want to be rampaging psycopaths in real life but can't for obvious reasons decided one day to start up an Eve subscription and then started referring buddies, because the amount of - Or should I say, the sheer lack of humanity I see in this game on a daily basis makes me sick to my stomach sometimes. I'm not a goddamned saint, not in-game or IRL, but the crap some players do is just disgusting. But that's on an extreme. What's doing the most damage is just the general lack of empathy. Nobody cares anymore. It's all boiled down to "I WUNDR HOW GUD KILLMAIL IZ GUN B" to these cretins.
Eh, it's just herd mentality. Like, they're egocentric proven through their actions of acting in a way that benefits themselves at the expense of others. So naturally, selfish people incapable of contemplating a situation from any view point other than their own because they're too small minded are obviously going to notice the comments made by others who reflect their broken existence.
So these people meet up in an environment together, and because they're defining themselves by their ability to perform actions within a video game, they naturally place their actions onto a pedestal and parade them around as one would a float on Thanksgiving. These broken people, being part of their own herd, are showcasing to themselves and others that this is the type of person they are, which sharing similar qualities to others like them, results in an establishment of camaraderie through positive reinforcement of each others actions.
So when they act in a completely unacceptable way as you described as cheering on the attempts of trying to convince someone to commit suicide, the fellow broken people believing in their twisted reality that it's the right actions cheer it as a representation of themselves, echoing in more and more joining in.
All the while, the good people, the people like you and I who condemn such actions, understand the type of people we're in such close proximity to, people who enjoy hurting others. We know this, because naturally we're more intelligent than these people who's lowly obsession with the petty labels them as subpar mentally. So we act in accordance with what we understand to be the most effective way to limit drawing the ire of these mentally unstable individuals who prove their desire is to hurt others, by remaining silent so they don't wish to realize and act upon the confrontation of coming to a reality where not everyone agrees with their point of view.
You're right, they're wrong. Because of their affliction, they wont understand it yet. Sadly, some of them may never understand it. Take solace knowing that you're not the only person who feels the way you do. We're actually the majority, even in this game. Just most of them are a bit smarter than you and I are, just enough so that they'll make the choice not to draw attention to themselves. |

Marvin Shields
Division 156
2
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 06:48:00 -
[13] - Quote
Zack Korth wrote:eves mean, me sad, cry, spend 40 minutes on butthurt GD post, not a toon i don't want getting D'D'D'D'DUNKED
Hey look! An example! I've been looking for one of those! |

Sibyyl
189
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 06:55:00 -
[14] - Quote
I think my experience in the game has been different. There are intelligent people everywhere, and many of them go the extra mile to help you, provided you are able to help yourself. I love how connected corp mates are socially, through Jabber and Mumble.
/Fÿ¡
Now that you are *campers* you will have more *parties* and no more *sad* *lonely* *bubbles*. |

Marvin Shields
Division 156
4
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 06:56:00 -
[15] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote: Stuff and things
Couldn't agree more.
Though I'm glad I chose my holding alt who never undocks as my forum handle instead of a main, because once Americans start waking up and seeing this they're going to have some fun things to say.
We Americans are d*cks. |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1786
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 07:09:00 -
[16] - Quote
Yeah lol. Hanging with some guys who are trying to set up a non kill everything in siight area in Stain. We have up to 7 perma-residing hot droppers at various times who's only goal is to annoy. They don't even drop lol.
One was today suggesting I'm a pedo watching childporn because I ignored it in local. We just ignore them but that's pretty much the mentality that CCP has fostered in its memberbase.
Few months ago NC. lured a guy recovering from cancer on the pretext he could join their alliance and blew him and all his stuff up for lols.
Another group humiliated some guy on team speak, recorded it and posted it to the general public.
Some of these people are literally the shitestains of humanity and seem incapable of separating real life from a video game and they seem proud of it.
Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20013
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 07:10:00 -
[17] - Quote
EhmGǪ I'm fairly certain that they do have an exit survery, and I know for a fact that they do have numbers on how many have left because they've referred to them on multiple occasions.
As for your general complaint, you realise that harassment and griefing are bannable offences right? Oh, and Divine Entervention is a self-confessed bigot and a troll, so if you find yourself agreeing with him, you should probably take a time to reassess your stance because you're slipping awfully close to a very unhealthy placeGǪ GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Victor Andall
Complexes and Abaddons
261
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 07:13:00 -
[18] - Quote
You're equating a niche of players, however broad, to the entire community.
That's a fallacy.
Mean people will always be more vocal than the ones that mind their own business and even strive to be helpful toward others. You're doing yourself no services by projecting the action of one category of players on everyone else.
People get that this is how the game is and live with it.
And in waltz you throwing accusations at everyone indiscriminately, insulting everyone because some people have a personality you don't like.
This is why we can't have nice things.
I feel like I've learned more about the game in the 6 months that I've been playing than you have in your seven years.
And now to address the Mittani incident as you mentioned it. BECAUSE **** ME IF WE HAVEN'T BEEN OVER THAT A BAJILLION TIMES YET.
I confess, this fallacy was so horribly blatant that I just stopped reading right then and there.
Because no matter that you go on saying that those are the people that are most visible and blah blah.
You're making EVERYONE here responsible for the audience's reaction. To a guy's drunken words. At a game convention. Some years ago.
TL;DR stop playing with a-holes I just undocked for the first time and someone challenged me to a duel. Wat do?
Andall Combat Tournaments - on hiatus. Contact for more information. |

Marvin Shields
Division 156
6
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 07:18:00 -
[19] - Quote
Tippia wrote:EhmGǪ I'm fairly certain that they do have an exit survery, and I know for a fact that they do have numbers on how many have left because they've referred to them on multiple occasions.
As for your general complaint, you realise that harassment and griefing are bannable offences right? Oh, and Divine Entervention is a self-confessed bigot and a troll, so if you find yourself agreeing with him, you should probably take a time to reassess your stance because you're slipping awfully close to a very unhealthy placeGǪ
I don't recall reading any metrics on amount of people who have left and for X reason.
And yet it happens! The report function exists but it persists. Hell the report function gets abused to the point I'm sure the GM's don't even care anymore. Same crap happened in WoW while my old roommate played it, she got offended by a player's handle, something along the lines of IKILLGAYS or something, and reported it. It took two months for the person to get a forced name change...
I could be wrong and totally talking out my ass here, but you know it happens. It's not super secret.
Also so far Divine Entervention has been anything but, so for now at least I think I am safe. |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
17082
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 07:22:00 -
[20] - Quote
Marvin Shields wrote:Also so far Divine Entervention has been anything but, so for now at least I think I am safe. You should try reading his other posts, he's an egotist, self righteous, bigoted troll.
Psychotic Monk for CSM 9 |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20014
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 07:28:00 -
[21] - Quote
Marvin Shields wrote:I don't recall reading any metrics on amount of people who have left and for X reason. The last mention I can think of is in the CSM9 summer minutes, iirc. It's usually a pretty big part in any discussion about the NPE.
Incidentally, the leading cause for people quitting is trying to go it alone and treating the game as your average content-consumption themepark game.
Quote:And yet it happens! The report function exists but it persists. Hell the report function gets abused to the point I'm sure the GM's don't even care anymore. Same crap happened in WoW GǪand I think that's where the disconnect is: this is not WoW. What people think of as griefing and harassment is vastly different in EVE than it is elsewhere. If you start actually drilling down into the complains made about EVE and its environment, you will inevitably find that it consists in large part of people who simply had their preconceived notions shattered in regards to how they think an MMO works.
They somehow miss that this is a full-PvP multiplayer sandbox, and assume that it will work exactly the same as a PvE-centric themepark game, and when reality intrudes on them, it's a rude awakening. This is not a problem with the game or its players GÇö it's a problem with those preconceived notions.
Quote:Also so far Divine Entervention has been anything but, so for now at least I think I am safe. Wait until he gets his moral superiority engines running and you'll notice that he starts making prejudiced statements about everything and everyone without knowing anything about themGǪ it's not a pretty sight. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Katran Luftschreck
Royal Ammatar Engineering Corps
2356
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 07:29:00 -
[22] - Quote
Some people simply have poisonous mentalities. Bullied little fat kids who turn to the internet to get their revenge on the world.
Some of us have more positive attitudes. Ever wonder what happens when carebears leave hisec?
So tonight I smuggled a blank jump clone into nullsec, found a nice spot to do some ratting, had a little fun with that. When it was done I was staring at like fifty wrecks and realizing that my Noctis was still safe in hisec. Shrugged, headed to the nearest station, saw a guy in a Noctis parked right outside.
I led him over to my pile of wrecks, made them all blue just to be safe, and told him to have fun looting it all.
The hard part is sifting through the sludge to find the few decent people, I guess. But we're still out there, fighting the only fight that really matters - the fight to keep our sense of common decency no matter what the toxic slime of the world throws at us.
Of course tomorrow I'll be jumping back to hisec and taking a very long shower. Nullsec in a Nutshell: http://nedroid.com/comics/2006-08-24-2155-arrrdino.gif |

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
125
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 07:30:00 -
[23] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Marvin Shields wrote:Also so far Divine Entervention has been anything but, so for now at least I think I am safe. You should try reading his other posts, he's an egotist, self righteous, bigoted troll.
I completely understand that people who think differently than I do consider it necessary to insult me to avoid confronting the possibility of their opinions being grounded in a false reality.
I forgive you for feeling it necessary to insult me. I understand the position you're in and why you feel it is necessary. |

Mandarine
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
16
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 07:32:00 -
[24] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:I am reasonably certain that more than one CCP exec stays awake late at night, worrying that Star Citizen, or some other like game, has game mechanics and moderators that actively discourage the type of sociopathic behaviour that CCP embraces and celebrates.
When that game is finally built, even if it half as visually appealing as Eve, and one-quarter the depth of the Eve, will be the catalyst of an exodus of paying customers. No doubt a significant percentage of the Eve player population will cheer that exodus, giddy that all the "carebear losers have finally left THEIR game", but the accountants know better.
I eagerly anticipate that day as well, but clearly not for the reasons that the myopic sadists do.
God, this will be a glorious day. I-¦ve been waiting for it for years as well.
The ganker community is pathetic and the toxic trolls calling people trolls when they are in fact spot on, are no less vitriolic. |

Marvin Shields
Division 156
10
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 07:34:00 -
[25] - Quote
Victor Andall wrote:
You're making EVERYONE here responsible for the audience's reaction. To a guy's drunken words. At a game convention. Some years ago.
>>CSM Chairman two years running (I think?) >>Leader of largest organized group of gamers in gaming history >>Has been featured on legitimate news publications
Yep. "A guy".
Not to give Mittens an even bigger ego for his minions to stroke, but he's the most memorable name in the entire community, and a name more non-players can easily run into if they read the occasional Eve-related news article. Especially recently.
Sorry, are we supposed to take the words THE MOST PROMINENT EVE PLAYER IN EVE HISTORY let spew forth from his mouth and just cast them aside BECAUSE HE WAS DRUNK?
Like, I know this is a videogame, but this **** happened in real life so it's important (For me) that you understand that that is tantamount to a stinking drunk Vladimir Putin standing on the world stage (His equivalent to Fanfest) and proclaiming to his audience "POLAND SHOULD GO KILL ITSELF AND HEY GUYS YOU SHOULD HELP IT LOLOLOLUMAD?".
Would that be excusable since he was drunk?
Is there also a statute of limitations on how long ago we can hold someone accountable for advocating harassing a player to the point of possible suicide?
It's not that I hold a grudge, I wouldn't buy the guy a drink certainly, but it's not like he's some Joe Average random Capsuleer whose cheese slipped off the cracker during the Alliance Panel. That's inexcusable. It was an embarrassment to the community and I think the fact CCP has allowed him to even stay in the game period is an insult to the rest of us.
|

Schmata Bastanold
Black Rebel Rifter Club The Devil's Tattoo
1481
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 07:37:00 -
[26] - Quote
That is a really strange mental state to pay for one game you don't enjoy playing just to have a forums to announce you are waiting for it to die when another game will finally be released.
But of course OTHERS are crazy and psycho and mental... I am not my skills but... http://eveboard.com/pilot/Schmata_Bastanold |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20014
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 07:41:00 -
[27] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:I completely understand that people who think differently than I do consider it necessary to insult me to avoid confronting the possibility of their opinions being grounded in a false reality. You should understand it since it's the entire foundation for your MO: base your prejudice on a false reality and proceed to insult and fallacy-bomb everyone who rejects your baseless premise. Your trolling credentials are also impeccable with your consistent unwillingness to answer even the simplest questions about your premises, assumptions or assertions.
Marvin Shields wrote:Sorry, are we supposed to take the words THE MOST PROMINENT EVE PLAYER IN EVE HISTORY let spew forth from his mouth and just cast them aside BECAUSE HE WAS DRUNK? No-one has ever asked you to, least of all him. The whole GÇ£excuseGÇ¥ thing is just something people have invented who have a vested political interest in getting him out of the game. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Schmata Bastanold
Black Rebel Rifter Club The Devil's Tattoo
1481
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 07:42:00 -
[28] - Quote
Marvin Shields wrote:"POLAND SHOULD GO KILL ITSELF AND HEY GUYS YOU SHOULD HELP IT LOLOLOLUMAD?".
Please stay away from using my country name in your pathetic attempt to revive Mittanigate from its status of a horse flogged to death and beyond. I am not my skills but... http://eveboard.com/pilot/Schmata_Bastanold |

Marvin Shields
Division 156
11
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 07:42:00 -
[29] - Quote
Schmata Bastanold wrote:That is a really strange mental state to pay for one game you don't enjoy playing just to have a forums to announce you are waiting for it to die when another game will finally be released.
But of course OTHERS are crazy and psycho and mental...
I enjoy playing this game. My characters are each specialized to their roles and each have their spots in various corporations and alliances in New Eden. I play the Meta very well as well. I pay a sub for my accounts because I support the development of the game and it's side projects (Dust, Valkyrie).
I never said I am waiting for it to die nor did I say I hope another game takes it's place, I said I am looking forward to the day the bittervets and retards who act and think like them realize they don't have anymore carebears to harass because they all got sick of their **** and moved to brighter horizons. |

Schmata Bastanold
Black Rebel Rifter Club The Devil's Tattoo
1481
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 07:45:00 -
[30] - Quote
Marvin Shields wrote:I said I am looking forward to the day the bittervets and retards who act and think like them realize they don't have anymore carebears to harass because they all got sick of their **** and moved to brighter horizons.
You mean a day when Eve will finally get audience it deserves? Cool, let's wait together.
I am not my skills but... http://eveboard.com/pilot/Schmata_Bastanold |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20014
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 07:47:00 -
[31] - Quote
Marvin Shields wrote:I never said I am waiting for it to die nor did I say I hope another game takes it's place, I said I am looking forward to the day the bittervets and retards who act and think like them realize they don't have anymore carebears to harass because they all got sick of their **** and moved to brighter horizons. The thing is, if they wanted to do that, they could have done so a long time ago. So the implied threat of people leaving en masse has very little bite to it. If they haven't already, why would they suddenly make a completely different decision? GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
17083
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 07:48:00 -
[32] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Marvin Shields wrote:Also so far Divine Entervention has been anything but, so for now at least I think I am safe. You should try reading his other posts, he's an egotist, self righteous, bigoted troll. I completely understand that people who think differently than I do consider it necessary to insult me to avoid confronting the possibility of their opinions being grounded in a false reality. I forgive you for feeling it necessary to insult me. I understand the position you're in and why you feel it is necessary. It's not an insult, I'm merely telling the truth as I see it. You insist on denigrating others, you deliberately post in a way designed to inflame and infuriate and then you bang on about people not respecting your posts, while denying them the respect that you feel you deserve.
Psychotic Monk for CSM 9 |

Victor Andall
Complexes and Abaddons
263
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 08:20:00 -
[33] - Quote
Bottom line, really, in my opinion, is that if you play a game for social gratification, you're off to a bad start nonetheless.
You think EVE is bad? Log into XBox Live one day.
So some people extort and gank and bump your ship and "force" you to sing on Teamspeak in order to let you go.
So?
******* sing. Or just say no and get your ship blown up. Hell, get your pod blown up while you're at it. It doesn't need to change who you are. If it does, your problems are rooted more deeply than the space submarine pewpewlazors game we're playing here.
Every single case of player grievance in regards to other players boils down to not following that single most important EVE rule.
Never risk something you're not willing to lose. Be it ships, time, money or dignity (to needlessly dramatize), if you don't want to lose it, don't risk it. I've shrugged off more losses than I'd liked to in my short career as an EVE player and I intend to shrug off more.
EVE is not real.
EVE is game. I just undocked for the first time and someone challenged me to a duel. Wat do?
Andall Combat Tournaments - on hiatus. Contact for more information. |

Katran Luftschreck
Royal Ammatar Engineering Corps
2358
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 08:42:00 -
[34] - Quote
Marvin Shields wrote:Sorry, are we supposed to take the words THE MOST PROMINENT EVE PLAYER IN EVE HISTORY let spew forth from his mouth and just cast them aside BECAUSE HE WAS DRUNK?
Wait, when was Chribba drunk? Nullsec in a Nutshell: http://nedroid.com/comics/2006-08-24-2155-arrrdino.gif |

Lors Dornick
Kallisti Industries Solar Assault Fleet
1030
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 08:44:00 -
[35] - Quote
Marvin Shields wrote: I'll admit I have my faults, but seeing someone comment on a Reddit post
That's easily avoided, just don't go to reddit.
Vote for Fuzzy Steve! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4236322
|

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
17085
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 08:59:00 -
[36] - Quote
Katran Luftschreck wrote:Marvin Shields wrote:Sorry, are we supposed to take the words THE MOST PROMINENT EVE PLAYER IN EVE HISTORY let spew forth from his mouth and just cast them aside BECAUSE HE WAS DRUNK? Wait, when was Chribba drunk? Chribba's secret is that he is always drunk.
Psychotic Monk for CSM 9 |

Bagrat Skalski
Poseidaon
1064
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 09:30:00 -
[37] - Quote
Quote:Why is all of that creativity and freedom being used to harass new players? I just don't understand it.
Not all, but you will see and hear more about it being used that way. Because of butthurt. _¦Å-æ-»¦Ñ¦¼-Ä_-¢-å¦ä_-½-»-å¦ÿ-ò-û¦¦ |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2669
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 09:32:00 -
[38] - Quote
Katran Luftschreck wrote:Some people simply have poisonous mentalities. Bullied little fat kids who turn to the internet to get their revenge on the world.
Some of us have more positive attitudes.

Infinity Ziona wrote: Few months ago NC. lured a guy recovering from cancer on the pretext he could join their alliance and blew him and all his stuff up for lols.
the guy's rl situation has nothing to do with the game, it was unfair of him to try and guilt people into giving him an ingame advantage. it wasn't the alliance that tricked the guy, it was some random in their chat. and that arse ragemailed me with 'i hope you get cancer too'. there's one person at fault in that situation |
|

Chribba
Otherworld Enterprises Otherworld Empire
11271
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 10:01:00 -
[39] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Katran Luftschreck wrote:Marvin Shields wrote:Sorry, are we supposed to take the words THE MOST PROMINENT EVE PLAYER IN EVE HISTORY let spew forth from his mouth and just cast them aside BECAUSE HE WAS DRUNK? Wait, when was Chribba drunk? Chribba's secret is that he is always drunk. I'm so drunk you can't even notice it! It's as if I was sober, but I'm not, except I am.
|
|

Azami Nevinyrall
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
1703
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 10:08:00 -
[40] - Quote
Each game has its own community. Each community has its **** heads. Its just how the community evolved over the years. Its what makes the game unique, its what makes each game unique.
Some people are good, some are bad. Welcome to the human race! Azami Nevinyrall for CSM9! |

admiral root
Red Galaxy Disband.
961
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 10:08:00 -
[41] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:SSDD
I think you missed the part in the thread title where it said serious discussion. Why is it so hard to understand that all the things you whine about players doing fall within the rules of the game? More to the point, why are you even here? You obviously aren't happy so maybe you should try doing something else with your time. No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |

Jaxon Grylls
Institute of Archaeology
74
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 10:12:00 -
[42] - Quote
Katran Luftschreck wrote: Wait, when was Chribba drunk?
Damn, beat me to it.
Notorious does not equal prominent |

flakeys
The Mjolnir Bloc The Bloc
2098
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 10:17:00 -
[43] - Quote
Marvin Shields wrote: ... But do we have any that show how many have left? Or why they left? Why doesn't CCP have an exit survey for those who never finished their trial, or who subbed for a month but never came back, or who played for X years but stopped altogether?
When you cancel your sub there is an exit survey asking why you are leaving eve fyi .
We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.
|

Salvos Rhoska
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
291
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 10:35:00 -
[44] - Quote
Reddit. There is your problem. Prime example of a toxic community, as you call it. |

flakeys
The Mjolnir Bloc The Bloc
2098
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 10:39:00 -
[45] - Quote
Marvin Shields wrote: I swear though, it's like the people who want to be rampaging psycopaths in real life but can't for obvious reasons decided one day to start up an Eve subscription and then started referring buddies, because the amount of - Or should I say, the sheer lack of humanity I see in this game on a daily basis makes me sick to my stomach sometimes. I'm not a goddamned saint, not in-game or IRL, but the crap some players do is just disgusting.
I think you're vision of human behaviour is mostly based on ideals and dreams instead of reality then.
We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.
|

Silvetica Dian
Manson Family Advent of Fate
814
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 10:43:00 -
[46] - Quote
Sibyyl wrote:I think my experience in the game has been different. There are intelligent people everywhere, and many of them go the extra mile to help you, provided you are able to help yourself. I love how connected corp mates are socially, through Jabber and Mumble.
/Fÿ¡
This is my experiance too. everywhere i have gone in eve i have found friendly people willing to help. Oh except in highsec carebear corps. There i found nothing but apathy and disinterest. Eve is all about communities and people that are incapable of joining a good one will ofc have a poorer experience than people who do manage to join one or more decent communities Money at its root is a form of rationing. When the richest 85 people have as much wealth as the poorest 3.5 billion (50% of humanity) it is clear where the source of poverty is. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jan/20/trickle-down-economics-broken-promise-richest-85 |

Kyperion
General Washington's Irregulars
29
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 10:43:00 -
[47] - Quote
flakeys wrote:Marvin Shields wrote: I swear though, it's like the people who want to be rampaging psycopaths in real life but can't for obvious reasons decided one day to start up an Eve subscription and then started referring buddies, because the amount of - Or should I say, the sheer lack of humanity I see in this game on a daily basis makes me sick to my stomach sometimes. I'm not a goddamned saint, not in-game or IRL, but the crap some players do is just disgusting.
I think you're vision of human behaviour is mostly based on ideals and dreams instead of reality then.
Only when tyrants and bullies are not held to account by civilized minds. I.E. the people that make the rules
|

Ssabat Thraxx
Dominion Tenebrarum
46
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 10:47:00 -
[48] - Quote
Kyperion wrote:flakeys wrote:Marvin Shields wrote: I swear though, it's like the people who want to be rampaging psycopaths in real life but can't for obvious reasons decided one day to start up an Eve subscription and then started referring buddies, because the amount of - Or should I say, the sheer lack of humanity I see in this game on a daily basis makes me sick to my stomach sometimes. I'm not a goddamned saint, not in-game or IRL, but the crap some players do is just disgusting.
I think you're vision of human behaviour is mostly based on ideals and dreams instead of reality then. Only when tyrants and bullies are not held to account by civilized minds. I.E. the people that make the rules
I think you'll find that what draws the majority of Eve players to Eve is that it lacks lots of "rules." It's why I'm here 
|

flakeys
The Mjolnir Bloc The Bloc
2098
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 10:58:00 -
[49] - Quote
Mandarine wrote:Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:I am reasonably certain that more than one CCP exec stays awake late at night, worrying that Star Citizen, or some other like game, has game mechanics and moderators that actively discourage the type of sociopathic behaviour that CCP embraces and celebrates.
When that game is finally built, even if it half as visually appealing as Eve, and one-quarter the depth of the Eve, will be the catalyst of an exodus of paying customers. No doubt a significant percentage of the Eve player population will cheer that exodus, giddy that all the "carebear losers have finally left THEIR game", but the accountants know better.
I eagerly anticipate that day as well, but clearly not for the reasons that the myopic sadists do. God, this will be a glorious day. I-¦ve been waiting for it for years as well. The ganker community is pathetic and the toxic trolls calling people trolls when they are in fact spot on, are no less vitriolic.
So because a few guys feel like behaving like little bratts you guys are hoping eve goes flat on it's face , not thinking about a big majority of players who don't harass anyone and enjoy the game who will not enjoy a mass exodus.
Who wants to ruin who's day again ?
Thank you for proving what i said above about human behaviour ...
We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.
|

flakeys
The Mjolnir Bloc The Bloc
2098
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 11:04:00 -
[50] - Quote
Ssabat Thraxx wrote:Kyperion wrote:flakeys wrote:Marvin Shields wrote: I swear though, it's like the people who want to be rampaging psycopaths in real life but can't for obvious reasons decided one day to start up an Eve subscription and then started referring buddies, because the amount of - Or should I say, the sheer lack of humanity I see in this game on a daily basis makes me sick to my stomach sometimes. I'm not a goddamned saint, not in-game or IRL, but the crap some players do is just disgusting.
I think you're vision of human behaviour is mostly based on ideals and dreams instead of reality then. Only when tyrants and bullies are not held to account by civilized minds. I.E. the people that make the rules I think you'll find that what draws the majority of Eve players to Eve is that it lacks lots of "rules." It's why I'm here 
And as such show true human behaviour , taking into account that we still DO have certain rules set in eve so imagine what would happen if even those where lifted .
We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.
|

Seven Koskanaiken
The Shadow Plague Fidelas Constans
991
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 11:10:00 -
[51] - Quote
Marvin Shields wrote:People are leaving this game, daily, because they cannot handle the harassment, the griefing, the scamming, and the constant fear of losing everything they own or a chunk of their paycheck because of some opportunistic ass with an itchy F1 finger.
I'm not an alt of James Arget and I am not running for CSM, so believe me when I say this **** needs to go.
Thoughts?!
If this is the constant fear in their life, then they must have a pretty privileged life. |

Inari Visas
X-Prot
40
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 11:16:00 -
[52] - Quote
This thread is amazing.
I have never seen a more abusive discussion about the subject of moral responsibility. |

Freako X
Doom Inc
126
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 11:49:00 -
[53] - Quote
OP is correct. Eve is viewed as a mean-spirited community driven game.
On one hand, I accept it and move on ...
On another hand, I ignore the malcontents and move on .....
But the truth is that the perceived culture of Eve is negative and abusive. That reflects on me as a gamer and I 'should' be upset and I 'should' be more proactive to help fight that perception.
Truth is that I am lucky to get a good 4-8 hours of uninterrupted game play a month. The game does not take up enough of my valuable free time to warrant a virtual crusade. Don't get me wrong, the haters are on a crusade because life is just not fair to them so it's payback time in an anonymous environment. It requires a counter crusade, revolution, to combat that culture. Especially since it is a headless culture.
CCP 'could' moderate local channels and temporarily block avatars with a history of aggressive, abusive communication. They won't. CCP could treat corp leaders as .... well ... leaders and temporarily remove their ability to use public chat channels (including fleets and private channels outside of corporate and private chats) if their business promotes hate. They won't. CCP could invoke a noise pollution tax on characters or corp (or individual) earnings if they are found guilty of promoting a negative culture. They won't.
I commend the OP for the courage to put a well thought out, well written essay on the forums to spur a discussion. I will continue to do what I always do ... do my small part to have a positive impact. I can't carry the banner as the game is a game and not important enough for me to take up a crusade.
Peace. |

Salvos Rhoska
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
293
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 12:01:00 -
[54] - Quote
I think the eaelier comment by someone, that much uneccessary and unfounded disgruntlement is actually rooted in some peoples inability or unwillingness to accept or understand the nature of this game as compared to many other MMOs, rather than the "toxiccommunity", is very true.
Its not the behavior of other people towards them that is the problem, the problem is their own attitude.
If I walk around in life with unrealistic expectations both of the way the world works and of the nature of my fellow mankind, I will be repeatedly dissappointed and angry, not because of what other autonomous people are doing in it, but because I am so stupid as to assume I am responsible for, or capable of controlling, anyone else except myself.
These people dont seem to understand the fundamental link between the ability to control an outcome, and being responsible for it.
I am not responsible for how others view my actions. Why? Because I have no business or auspice to control how they view it. That is their own prerogative, purview and privilege and one I cannot determine or define. Its in their own head to which I have no access or business.
Reciprocally, this also means that though they are free to view my actions as they wish, their views have NO control over my own autonomous choices in my own life. Their views are their own, and not mine, and do not define how I choose to live my life, no matter how they try to claim that theirs is the "right" way.
But many people dont understand this. They think because they dont "like" something, that somehow means they are entitled to judge and restrict those who do like that.
How does this translate in EVE?
As some people who expect others to behave according to how THEY demand and perceive they should, according to their own internal system of beliefs. Is that fair towards the other person? Hell no. Does that entitle them to dictate how others should behave or think? Absolutely not. Why not? Becuase the same rationale could be levelled right back at them, and they, in return, be expected (against their own autonomy and self-determination) to act as those other people whom they presume to dictate to, dictate right back to them.
Its a ridiculous arrangement, premise and approach to interaction with others.
Its also extremely offensive and socially reprehenensible to even THINK you are in somekind of position to dictate to others how they should behave. It is none of your business. You have no control over how others behave, only over how YOU yourself behave.
I am not responsible for how you feel about something. I am not responsible to your personal view on how "things should be". I am not beholden to act as you in your head think I should. You dont, and cant, control me, nor I you.
Its abhorrent to even think or attempt otherwise, and yet that is exactly what this thread is trying to defend.
Stop trying to dictate how others live their lives and how they choose to conduct themselves. |

Sexy Cakes
Have A Seat
719
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 12:12:00 -
[55] - Quote
too long; didn't read Not today spaghetti. |

Malcolm from Marketing
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
16
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 12:17:00 -
[56] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:I am reasonably certain that more than one CCP exec stays awake late at night, worrying that Star Citizen, or some other like game, has game mechanics and moderators that actively discourage the type of sociopathic behaviour that CCP embraces and celebrates.
When that game is finally built, even if it half as visually appealing as Eve, and one-quarter the depth of the Eve, will be the catalyst of an exodus of paying customers. No doubt a significant percentage of the Eve player population will cheer that exodus, giddy that all the "carebear losers have finally left THEIR game", but the accountants know better.
I eagerly anticipate that day as well, but clearly not for the reasons that the myopic sadists do.
This is me.
I only have 4 account which i pay for with real money, but EVE isnt dying, it's just getting more hostile every passing year.
4 years ago when i started, missioners could do their thing without worrying about being ganked, baited by loot thief's or some other such activity, same for miners and every other high sec carebear, sure they all got talked down to for not playing the game how others thought it should be played, but it was tollerable.
Now, for me at least, EVE isnt as appealing, i can only play sporadically due to family/work/real life so used to enjoy hopping on to go exploring for a couple of hours, running a few missions, or anything else i fancied doing at the time, now, i cant do that in peace knowing some douche can just suicide gank me for funsies and hopefully tears. That's just not enjoyable.
Im really looking forward to Star Citizen and what it could offer and morph into over time, and can see myself cancelling all my subs and going to a game i can enjoy MY WAY and not have to fear assholes out to ruin my fun in highsec.
The only way i see this being remedied is if CCP cut down Concord response times 50-75% for all highsec systems to make ganking and harassment extremely hard for all those but the most dedicated of douchbags.
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20021
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 12:29:00 -
[57] - Quote
Malcolm from Marketing wrote:Now, for me at least, EVE isnt as appealing, i can only play sporadically due to family/work/real life so used to enjoy hopping on to go exploring for a couple of hours, running a few missions, or anything else i fancied doing at the time, now, i cant do that in peace knowing some douche can just suicide gank me for funsies and hopefully tears. That's just not enjoyable. So here's a question: what is keeping you from taking precautions to ensure that this doesn't happen? Has it ever happened? And should it ever happen, how will it affect your gameplay? GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
2912
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 12:31:00 -
[58] - Quote
There's nothing wrong with the Eve community. Grow up, OP. Oh god. |

Salvos Rhoska
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
294
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 12:34:00 -
[59] - Quote
@Malcolm:
So just to clarify, are you stating that you want to be immune from player aggression in high-sec?
Is that an accurate summation of your post? |

Malcolm from Marketing
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
16
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 12:54:00 -
[60] - Quote
Tippia wrote:So here's a question: what is keeping you from taking precautions to ensure that this doesn't happen? Has it ever happened? And should it ever happen, how will it affect your gameplay?
Fortunately i've never been caught no, but thats probably more down to my paranoid nature when logging into this game, new players dont have that paranoia about them, and only get it once they've been blown up a few times, maybe the first time losing a ship to PVP they didnt ask for is enough for them to delete the client, i dunno, but thats what im getting at. Douche players will force PVP on to new players if they want it or not, and that quite frankly is not appealing what so ever when taking your first few steps in a new game.
Now, IF it did happen and i got ganked or some such, then im experienced enough to deal with it, learn from it and avoid it next time, but that just me, someone who's played just over 4 years, not a new player a day/month into EVE.
Salvos Rhoska wrote:@Malcolm:
So just to clarify, are you stating that you want to be immune from player aggression in high-sec?
Is that an accurate summation of your post?
Absolutely not no, but making it much more of a pain for the instigator and with harsher consequences would be a welcome more and make EVE more attractive to new players that DONT want to PVP that 3yr old player in highsec.
|

War Kitten
Panda McLegion xXPlease Pandemic Citizens Reloaded Alliance.Xx
5146
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 12:58:00 -
[61] - Quote
I think most of the OP's complaints can be resolved in three steps...
Stay out of hisec Stay off reddit Stay off the internet
Seriously, if a few bad apples ruin your entire orchard, you've got to stop focusing on the bad apples.
Eve's community in low and nullsec is fantastic, encouraging and helpful. Trust is a way of life in nullsec. Fear is a way of life in hisec because that's where the riffraff truly are, preying on the weak that don't know the rules or don't know how to play the game yet.
I find that without a good mob to provide one for them, most people would have no mentality at all. |

Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
2912
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 13:00:00 -
[62] - Quote
Malcolm from Marketing wrote:Douche players will force PVP on to new players if they want it or not, and that quite frankly is not appealing what so ever when taking your first few steps in a new game. You're not allowed to gank people in rookie systems so it's not even a problem.
Oh god. |

Cannibal Kane
Cannibal Empire
3372
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 13:01:00 -
[63] - Quote
War Kitten wrote:I think most of the OP's complaints can be resolved in three steps...
Stay out of hisec Stay off reddit Stay off the internet
Seriously, if a few bad apples ruin your entire orchard, you've got to stop focusing on the bad apples.
Eve's community in low and nullsec is fantastic, encouraging and helpful. Trust is a way of life in nullsec. Fear is a way of life in hisec because that's where the riffraff truly are, preying on the weak that don't know the rules or don't know how to play the game yet.
Truth be told.
Majority of people in EVE are good and helpful. The bad always gets the news which makes it appear that Bad is actually the majority.
"I saw him fight by the monument in Jita. He flowed in his Machariel like a Shinto spirit, 800MM shells sprouting in his passing. His hair flowed in the corona of his target's warp core breach. It was truly majestic. And while everyone stared in awe I stole the loot and ran off. Because I am like that." - NEONOVUS |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20024
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 13:07:00 -
[64] - Quote
Malcolm from Marketing wrote:Fortunately i've never been caught no, but thats probably more down to my paranoid nature when logging into this game, new players dont have that paranoia about them, and only get it once they've been blown up a few times, maybe the first time losing a ship to PVP they didnt ask for is enough for them to delete the client, i dunno, but thats what im getting at. That's just it: what you're demonstrating is that it's not nearly as bad as it is often made out to be. Even you, who have experiences that show the exact opposite, believe in this myth of the poor mission runner under siege. It's not common, and it's not particularly hard to avoid, and it is apparently fully possible to learn without ever being a target.
Quote:Douche players will force PVP on to new players if they want it or not, and that quite frankly is not appealing what so ever when taking your first few steps in a new game. GǪand those who do get slapped silly with the banhammer since newbie griefing is severely frowned upon by CCP.
Quote:Now, IF it did happen and i got ganked or some such, then im experienced enough to deal with it, learn from it and avoid it next time, but that just me, someone who's played just over 4 years, not a new player a day/month into EVE. Why would a newbie not be able to do the same? And is there any particular reason to suspect that newbies particularly need to do this at any greater rate?
Really, what I'm getting at is that, even if this exceedingly rare event should occur, the real impact for you is pretty small. So why is it something that you even distracts you from doing what you want to do in peace? It sounds to me like you trust (and prefer to spread) the myth more than your actual experience. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
2349
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 13:10:00 -
[65] - Quote
flakeys wrote:Mandarine wrote:Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:I am reasonably certain that more than one CCP exec stays awake late at night, worrying that Star Citizen, or some other like game, has game mechanics and moderators that actively discourage the type of sociopathic behaviour that CCP embraces and celebrates.
When that game is finally built, even if it half as visually appealing as Eve, and one-quarter the depth of the Eve, will be the catalyst of an exodus of paying customers. No doubt a significant percentage of the Eve player population will cheer that exodus, giddy that all the "carebear losers have finally left THEIR game", but the accountants know better.
I eagerly anticipate that day as well, but clearly not for the reasons that the myopic sadists do. God, this will be a glorious day. I-¦ve been waiting for it for years as well. The ganker community is pathetic and the toxic trolls calling people trolls when they are in fact spot on, are no less vitriolic. So because a few guys feel like behaving like little bratts you guys are hoping eve goes flat on it's face , not thinking about a big majority of players who don't harass anyone and enjoy the game who will not enjoy a mass exodus. Who wants to ruin who's day again ? Thank you for proving what i said above about human behaviour ...
You are correct in at least one area: The group that enjoys inflicting pain on others, through the game or forums, is definitely the minority in the game. It may be growing, but it is still the minority. I don't think anyone said otherwise. But the fact remains that the minority are so virulent that they can really adversely affect the game play of the majority. How many New Order gankers need to be operating in a system to affect how many many multiples of miners?
The fact remains that no matter what percentage of Eve players are sadists, CCP is quite happy allowing them full reign, and must love what they do, since they do nothing to slow their attacks on the majority down. That is a very dangerous business model if a game appears that caters to that larger group.
BTW, my char right now is in low sec, and spent last night ratting there. I was not attacked by anyone, probably because it was such a quiet backwater. But even if it was attacked, I would have no problem with that, since I was in low sec and piracy is fair game there. Now, if I was insulted and harassed in local chat, that would be a different situation. That should never ever be tolerated, but CCP seems ready to accept the level of vitriol one sees in local chat. And that is just really sad.
I had a case of it a number of weeks ago. Some clown was abusing the mechanic where if he attacked the MTU my drones attacked him, and then he had a mutual fight. He warped in logi support, and the jig was up. (BTW, GM reimbursed my ship when I petitioned). He opened a convo with me afterwards. I did not rant, I only stated that I did not know about the drone mechanic and should have had my drones on passive. At that point he invited a bunch of his friends to the chat. Apparently one of them knew me from my FCON days, and made some caustic remark. I simply did not respond. He then said "this is boring", and left the chat. he and his buddies were looking for me to rant and rave so they could enjoy tears.
That is the kind of behaviour that CCP has to kill off, and that kind of mindset. Most people viewed Orwell's writings as a warning. The harper regime and the goons treat them as a guidebook. |

Salvos Rhoska
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
296
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 13:13:00 -
[66] - Quote
Malcolm from Marketing wrote:Absolutely not no, but making it much more of a pain for the instigator and with harsher consequences would be a welcome more and make EVE more attractive to new players that DONT want to PVP that 3yr old player in highsec.
Explain to me why it is necessary to make it a "pain" to the instigator? Why should the consequences be harsher?
Your statement carries an inherent contradiction. Though such a change might provide more incentive to players who do not want to pvp, it simultaneously removes an incentive to players who do want to pvp.
Summa summarum, that is not a reasonable request on that basis, because one populations actions are incentivised at the expense of anothers. |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
14091
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 13:14:00 -
[67] - Quote
Malcolm from Marketing wrote:Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:I am reasonably certain that more than one CCP exec stays awake late at night, worrying that Star Citizen, or some other like game, has game mechanics and moderators that actively discourage the type of sociopathic behaviour that CCP embraces and celebrates.
When that game is finally built, even if it half as visually appealing as Eve, and one-quarter the depth of the Eve, will be the catalyst of an exodus of paying customers. No doubt a significant percentage of the Eve player population will cheer that exodus, giddy that all the "carebear losers have finally left THEIR game", but the accountants know better.
I eagerly anticipate that day as well, but clearly not for the reasons that the myopic sadists do. This is me. I only have 4 account which i pay for with real money, but EVE isnt dying, it's just getting more hostile every passing year. 4 years ago when i started, missioners could do their thing without worrying about being ganked, baited by loot thief's or some other such activity, same for miners and every other high sec carebear, sure they all got talked down to for not playing the game how others thought it should be played, but it was tollerable.
I'm sorry but this is simply not true. Mission runners have been a prime target for as long as I have been playing (Sept 2006 - closing on 8 years now!). What changed is this: you became aware of it happening.
As Tippia correctly points out, the absolute chance of any particular hi-sec mission runner being targeted is extremely small. Over the years, you read stories or heard tales of missioners being ganked, and conflated that "trend" with an increasing likelihood.
If you don't believe me that mission runners were targets back in the day, well look at this: http://eve-search.com/search/hi-sec%20mission%20gank/page/20
Note that that is page 20, and the date of the posts.
Also maybe google up "lofty29" and "the lofty trick"
1 Kings 12:11
|

Kontrapshun
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
14
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 13:17:00 -
[68] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:I am reasonably certain that more than one CCP exec stays awake late at night, worrying that Star Citizen, or some other like game, has game mechanics and moderators that actively discourage the type of sociopathic behaviour that CCP embraces and celebrates.
When that game is finally built, even if it half as visually appealing as Eve, and one-quarter the depth of the Eve, will be the catalyst of an exodus of paying customers. No doubt a significant percentage of the Eve player population will cheer that exodus, giddy that all the "carebear losers have finally left THEIR game", but the accountants know better.
I eagerly anticipate that day as well, but clearly not for the reasons that the myopic sadists do.
I think it is understood that once Star Citizen is going well enough to actually play without bugs, drops, etc... EVE will lose most if not all the PVE players and the PVP crowd will play much less. 40 Million RL dollars from the crowd says that!
It's just like anything else... If you don't change it, it's old.... CCP doesn't change this game, but for the moment, it's all there is. |

Nicolai Serkanner
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
80
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 13:17:00 -
[69] - Quote
Tippia wrote: Oh, and Divine Entervention is a self-confessed bigot and a troll, GǪ
Ah... so I'm not the only one who noticed that.  |

Feyd Rautha Harkonnen
Lords.Of.Midnight The Devil's Warrior Alliance
615
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 13:19:00 -
[70] - Quote
Marvin Shields wrote: .... [nerf everything heresy] ...
EvE being a sandbox, experiences are variable and not as uniformly stark and dire as you profess, as in real life there is good and bad everywhere. The difference (and what makes EvE special), is that CCP doesn't bubble-wrap you from the bad (not completely yet anyway...), it's up to YOU and all new players to put brain and vast web resources to bear in avoiding the bad, just like in real life.
However...
When you go from 'how do I..' or 'can someone help me', into crossing that heretical line of espousing 'things should be nerfed..remove ganking...' to suit your carebear refusal to learn, I must regrettably add a +1 to the Kill-It-Forward queue.
In fact, your heresy against HTFU was so extensive, I am forced to do something I have never done...I am actually adding a +2 to the Kill-It-Forward queue.
F
Would you like to know more? |

Notorious Fellon
Republic University Minmatar Republic
256
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 13:20:00 -
[71] - Quote
OP:
There are a few of us who are very much trying to change that toxic culture or at least not be a part of it. I for one, completely agree with your original post.
Unfortunately, the forums are full of vitriol and hate spewing trolls trying desperately to get a rise out of people due to some strange love-me-daddy attention-***** syndrome. Not only is it allowed to persist, it is encouraged. In the game, it is worse (in some places, some channels, etc). There are bastions of decent people, however. They are simply hard to find.
One of my pilots sits in Amarr npc corpchat. It is one of the nicer places full of helpful people. The community tries in what ways it can to moderate the occasional turd that floats to the top. I have also been a part of a fine corp and alliance a few years ago that was full of excellent people; a mix of Europeans, Americans and Australians. I miss that corporation.
One positive that comes out of the current state of the EVE player community; we always know the worst of the gaming community will stay in EVE until the day it dies (if it ever does). I hope they always have this sandbox so they can fight over who gets to **** in it the loudest.
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20024
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 13:20:00 -
[72] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:The fact remains that no matter what percentage of Eve players are sadists, CCP is quite happy allowing them full reign, and must love what they do, since they do nothing to slow their attacks on the majority down. GǪaside from the fact that harassing and griefing other players is a bannable offence, you mean?
Quote:That is the kind of behaviour that CCP has to kill off, and that kind of mindset. What? The behaviour of taking advantage of mistakes you make, knowingly or not, that give them a better chance of beating you? Or the behaviour that you took trivially handled on your own? Why should it be killed off when one is just playing the game and the other is not a problem?
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
14092
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 13:22:00 -
[73] - Quote
Looks like hauler ganks aren't a new thing either: http://eve-search.com/thread/327001-0
1 Kings 12:11
|

Salvos Rhoska
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
296
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 13:23:00 -
[74] - Quote
You have no business dictating how others should behave.
Concern yourself with how you yourself behave, that is your only real and best recourse of action, and the only one which you have any right to enforce or dictate. |

Doireen Kaundur
199
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 13:31:00 -
[75] - Quote
Maybe Im missing something here but I stay away from "personalities" and "celebs" in EVE. I have no idea who/what Mittani is and i dont care.
EVE is my escape from RL. If it starts to remble RL, then why bother?
I interact in the forums and ingame. But Im sure as hell not going to take anyone that seriously here. Especially legends in their own minds.
Minimizing the cost of replacing implants.
|

Kyperion
General Washington's Irregulars
30
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 13:31:00 -
[76] - Quote
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote:Marvin Shields wrote: .... [nerf everything heresy] ...
EvE being a sandbox, experiences are variable and not as uniformly stark and dire as you profess, as in real life there is good and bad everywhere. The difference (and what makes EvE special), is that CCP doesn't bubble-wrap you from the bad (not completely yet anyway...), it's up to YOU and all new players to put brain and vast web resources to bear in avoiding the bad, just like in real life. However... When you go from 'how do I..' or 'can someone help me', into crossing that heretical line of espousing 'things should be nerfed..remove ganking...' to suit your carebear refusal to learn, I must regrettably add a +1 to the Kill-It-Forward queue. In fact, your heresy against HTFU was so extensive, I am forced to do something I have never done...I am actually adding a + 2 to the Kill-It-Forward queue. F
Hey look, a guy with a blog and a killmail epeen complex
Go get some sunlight.
|

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
17085
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 13:31:00 -
[77] - Quote
Kontrapshun wrote:Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:I am reasonably certain that more than one CCP exec stays awake late at night, worrying that Star Citizen, or some other like game, has game mechanics and moderators that actively discourage the type of sociopathic behaviour that CCP embraces and celebrates.
When that game is finally built, even if it half as visually appealing as Eve, and one-quarter the depth of the Eve, will be the catalyst of an exodus of paying customers. No doubt a significant percentage of the Eve player population will cheer that exodus, giddy that all the "carebear losers have finally left THEIR game", but the accountants know better.
I eagerly anticipate that day as well, but clearly not for the reasons that the myopic sadists do. I think it is understood that once Star Citizen is going well enough to actually play without bugs, drops, etc... EVE will lose most if not all the PVE players and the PVP crowd will play much less. 40 Million RL dollars from the crowd says that! It's just like anything else... If you don't change it, it's old.... CCP doesn't change this game, but for the moment, it's all there is. Personally I think that many Eve players will try both Star Citizen and eventually Elite Dangerous (because Elite), while continuing to play Eve. With the amount of hatred for Eve players on the SC forums I suspect that SC players are destined to live in interesting times.
Neither of them is going to kill Eve off, just as STO, Black Prophecy etc never killed Eve off, either through never materialising or being just plain bloody terrible.
TL;DR Star Citizen won't kill off Eve, it may leave a temporary dip in subscription numbers and snag all of the people that play Eve despite actually hating it, but it'll have no long lasting detrimental effects for CCP.
Psychotic Monk for CSM 9 |

Kyperion
General Washington's Irregulars
30
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 13:36:00 -
[78] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Kontrapshun wrote:Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:I am reasonably certain that more than one CCP exec stays awake late at night, worrying that Star Citizen, or some other like game, has game mechanics and moderators that actively discourage the type of sociopathic behaviour that CCP embraces and celebrates.
When that game is finally built, even if it half as visually appealing as Eve, and one-quarter the depth of the Eve, will be the catalyst of an exodus of paying customers. No doubt a significant percentage of the Eve player population will cheer that exodus, giddy that all the "carebear losers have finally left THEIR game", but the accountants know better.
I eagerly anticipate that day as well, but clearly not for the reasons that the myopic sadists do. I think it is understood that once Star Citizen is going well enough to actually play without bugs, drops, etc... EVE will lose most if not all the PVE players and the PVP crowd will play much less. 40 Million RL dollars from the crowd says that! It's just like anything else... If you don't change it, it's old.... CCP doesn't change this game, but for the moment, it's all there is. Personally I think that many Eve players will try both Star Citizen and eventually Elite Dangerous (because Elite), while continuing to play Eve. With the amount of hatred for Eve players on the SC forums I suspect that SC players are destined to live in interesting times. Neither of them is going to kill Eve off, just as STO, Black Prophecy etc never killed Eve off, either through never materialising or being just plain bloody terrible. TL;DR Star Citizen won't kill off Eve, it may leave a temporary dip in subscription numbers and snag all of the people that play Eve despite actually hating it, but it'll have no long lasting detrimental effects for CCP.
I hope EVE never dies, because the gankers deserve each other and the environment that will ensue when everyone else leaves.
|

SKINE DMZ
Stay Frosty.
334
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 13:37:00 -
[79] - Quote
Marvin Shields wrote:They capture vulnerable players and force them to sing on Teamspeak in return for safe passage, humiliating them in the process, for their own enjoyment and then kill them after anyway because "It's Eve, HTFU noob LOLOLOLOL". I don't understand this whole post, if you don't like the community or even the harshness of the game and the meta surrounding it, why play at all? If you don't want to sing on Teamspeak for a safe passage you also have multiple options, self destruct or even log off?
I think its ridiculous people come out with things like "The group that enjoys inflicting pain on others", I've said this before but you can argue that the whole point of this game is for them to destroy spaceships and steal their stuff, that has absolutely nothing to do with their personality.
The only person who looks like he has an actual problem is the person thinking peoples actions in game represent them in real life. No this game is about doing what you want to do in a game, wether that is murdering and being a thief does not matter. I play Ninja Gaiden but I don't like to slice people up and trust me I am not a ninja.
When(if) EVE dies, it will be because CCP have listened to players who have not much brain capacity who say things like "that mindset should not be here" when the worst thing you can do in a sandbox is force players to play or think a certain way. I disagree |

Spurty
V0LTA Triumvirate.
1263
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 13:42:00 -
[80] - Quote
My worry is that CCP are backing a horse and letting the status quo be. This is effectively an "all clear to continue" nod from the heavens for dickery.
They *have* backed the wrong horse. They have very few cycles to abandon that idea as changes to the game will take far longer than the projected time line of new spaceship games will allow.
Exciting times from the side lines.
My wallet doesn't have any emotional attachment to a game that promotes detachment. Whoever wins gets my $
*signature is not allowed on the EVE Online forums* |

Kyperion
General Washington's Irregulars
30
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 13:58:00 -
[81] - Quote
Spurty wrote:My worry is that CCP are backing a horse and letting the status quo be. This is effectively an "all clear to continue" nod from the heavens for dickery.
They *have* backed the wrong horse. They have very few cycles to abandon that idea as changes to the game will take far longer than the projected time line of new spaceship games will allow.
Exciting times from the side lines.
My wallet doesn't have any emotional attachment to a game that promotes detachment. Whoever wins gets my $
Entropy Online, Age of Ascent, Star Citizen, A potentially revived Homeworld series, and others previously mentioned, It looks like a good time to be a Space Sim fan.
Funny thing is I'm only a carebear in EVE because of how the mechanics work, I love MechWarrior online, and that is pure PVP, the only part of SWTOR that I like is the new Galactic Starfighter gameplay...
The few times I've been in EVE's version of PVP it has been extremely boring, and usually already determined by character skills/ships
Games where you directly pilot whatever craft you are controlling are much better PVP environments, and require more player skill.
If I had a Laptop that could handle WarThunder, I might have already been gone,
But EVE is fantastically beautiful... as boring as some people say mining is, it is almost mystical the graphical renovations they've made. Ship Spinning is actually a valid occupation too. |

Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
2351
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 13:59:00 -
[82] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:I had a case of it a number of weeks ago. Some clown was abusing the mechanic where if he attacked the MTU my drones attacked him, and then he had a mutual fight. Drones auto-aggressing (when set to Aggressive) on a player attacking an MTU was fixed, as far as I know. Was it not?
It was indeed fixed. Like I said, this gank was done some weeks ago.
Most people viewed Orwell's writings as a warning. The harper regime and the goons treat them as a guidebook. |

Salvos Rhoska
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
296
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 14:01:00 -
[83] - Quote
Kyperion wrote:Ship Spinning is actually a valid occupation too.
Yes, as are pirating and ganking. |

xXxyOLoSWeg420BlazeItxXx X360nOsCOpeX
Aliastra Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 14:01:00 -
[84] - Quote
tl;dr |

Kyperion
General Washington's Irregulars
30
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 14:03:00 -
[85] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Kyperion wrote:Ship Spinning is actually a valid occupation too. Yes, as are pirating and ganking.
Pirates, even in hisec have their place...
My problem is with the New Order types, that take ganking and turn it into a cyber-cult.
|

Noxisia Arkana
Deadspace Knights
234
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 14:06:00 -
[86] - Quote
There are good folk in EvE. The problem is the 'nasty' players tend to read up on rules and bend them to favor themselves. If the people that spent their time in EvE were 1/2 as educated as the scammers, and blowhards; there wouldn't be near as many issues.
Yes, in EvE the strong prey on the the week. It's unfortunate and annoying. It is absurdly easy to find a decent mentor in this game if you spend 20 minutes on the forums or 5 minutes in new citizens. With some basic game mechanics under your belt the grief mechanics are pretty easily avoided.
This is a game about spaceship shenanigans. Expect ***hattery. |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
14093
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 14:19:00 -
[87] - Quote
Kyperion wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:Kyperion wrote:Ship Spinning is actually a valid occupation too. Yes, as are pirating and ganking. Pirates, even in hisec have their place... My problem is with the New Order types, that take ganking and turn it into a cyber-cult.
Generally EVE players can be relied on to say that they're not against piracy "in principle" or piracy "in its place"; they're only opposed to "the kind of piracy that affects me".
1 Kings 12:11
|

Dr0000 Maulerant
Union Nanide and Tooling
159
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 14:20:00 -
[88] - Quote
I was shocked that this thread wasn't entirely people trolling OP. Tell me again about how every playstyle you dont engage in "doesn't require any effort" and everyone who does it needs to die in a fire. Be sure to mention about how you tried it once but it was too easy/boring/ethnic-homophobic slur.-á |

Lyelle Wolf
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
16
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 14:22:00 -
[89] - Quote
I would have to agree and state that the EVE community is stagnating itself. Old pilots scare away new pilots and the community doesn't grow, only festers. CCP can't really do anything because it's a majority of their "loud" players that exhibit this type of attitude and they are unsure how well their game will do if they get rid of the blight in EVE.
//LW |

Kiryen O'Bannon
Thrall Nation Brave Collective
76
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 14:22:00 -
[90] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Marvin Shields wrote:Also so far Divine Entervention has been anything but, so for now at least I think I am safe. You should try reading his other posts, he's an egotist, self righteous, bigoted troll. I completely understand that people who think differently than I do consider it necessary to insult me to avoid confronting the possibility of their opinions being grounded in a false reality. I forgive you for feeling it necessary to insult me. I understand the position you're in and why you feel it is necessary.
If you'd actually establish a position and defend it without resorting to prejudicial language fallacy and strawmanning, you might have a point. This post is a perfect example. You fail utterly, indeed don't even try, to actually establish that anyone is insulting you to avoid that possibility; you simple proclaim it to be true. You have not established that Jonah is in any "position" or what that "position" might be; all you're doing is implying it exists and that somehow it's that "position" rather than your observed behavior causing her to say what she does. |

Dr0000 Maulerant
Union Nanide and Tooling
159
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 14:25:00 -
[91] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:
Generally EVE players can be relied on to say that they're not against piracy "in principle" or piracy "in its place"; they're only opposed to "the kind of piracy that affects me".
I disagree, having never actually run into a bumper or other hi-sec shenanigans I find some of their practices very distasteful.
The kind of piracy I do run into (viator slayers) I greatly approve of.
Tell me again about how every playstyle you dont engage in "doesn't require any effort" and everyone who does it needs to die in a fire. Be sure to mention about how you tried it once but it was too easy/boring/ethnic-homophobic slur.-á |

Salvos Rhoska
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
297
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 14:26:00 -
[92] - Quote
Kyperion wrote:My problem is with the New Order types, that take ganking and turn it into a cyber-cult.
Not to get too technical on all this, but there may be elements of EVE that you do not perceive as issues, owing to your current vantage point.
In another thread I took some pains to illustrate the ridiculous extremes some multiboxing ice-mining operations, for instance, have gone to. Here, if you are interested: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4329504#post4329504
Whereas from your perspective, you see a group of griefers and extortionists who's only goal is to ruin the lives of respectable, active and generally benign citizens of the EVE universe, from their perspective, owing to what they do, they all too often actually encounter just how many people there are out there exploiting (deliberately and maliciously) the high-sec mechanics of safety to leverage enormous of wealth.
Surely you agree that multiboxers that critical mass beyond a certain point of reasonability and sustainability, as well as botters, need to be addressed by the community, ingame, in some form or fashion?
Since you are not the one who is prepared to do anything about, as you are too busy doing other high-sec activities such as missioning or your own (hopefully respectable and reasonably active) mining operations, it falls upon others to do something.
Have you ever had the chance to talk one on one with cops that you know personally, about how what they see everyday (that most people don't, in large part thanks to the efforts of these cops to keep these fringe behaviors in check) affects their perception of society at large?
Here's an anecdote from my experience yesterday, if you care to read it. It involves ice-mining and the behavior of players involved in it, and raises the question in one form atleast, of "who are actually the bad guys poisoning the community well with their attitude and behavior towards others: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4344248#post4344248 |

Kyperion
General Washington's Irregulars
32
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 14:26:00 -
[93] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Kyperion wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:Kyperion wrote:Ship Spinning is actually a valid occupation too. Yes, as are pirating and ganking. Pirates, even in hisec have their place... My problem is with the New Order types, that take ganking and turn it into a cyber-cult. Generally EVE players can be relied on to say that they're not against piracy "in principle" or piracy "in its place"; they're only opposed to "the kind of piracy that affects me".
Complete hogwash, New Order has never and most likely will never affect me. But that doesn't change the fact that they are a bunch of dickheads with a herd mentality.
|

Kyperion
General Washington's Irregulars
32
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 14:31:00 -
[94] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Kyperion wrote:My problem is with the New Order types, that take ganking and turn it into a cyber-cult.
Not to get too technical on all this, but there may be elements of EVE that you do not perceive as issues, owing to your current vantage point. In another thread I took some pains to illustrate the ridiculous extremes some multiboxing ice-mining operations, for instance, have gone to. Whereas from your perspective, you see a group of griefers and extortionists who's only goal is to ruin the lives of respectable, active and generally benign citizens of the EVE universe, from their perspective, owing to what they do, they all too often actually encounter just how many people there are out there exploiting (deliberately and maliciously) the high-sec mechanics of safety to leverage enormous of wealth. Surely you agree that multiboxers that critical mass beyond a certain point of reasonability and sustainability, as well as botters, need to be addressed by the community, ingame, in some form or fashion? Since you are not the one who is prepared to do anything about, as you are too busy doing other high-sec activities such as missioning or your own (hopefully respectable and reasonably active) mining operations, it falls upon others to do something. Have you ever had the chance to talk one on one with cops that you know personally, about how what they see everyday (that most people don't, in large part thanks to the efforts of these cops to keep these fringe behaviors in check) affects their perception of society at large? Here's an anecdote from my experience yesterday, if you care to read it. It involves ice-mining and the behavior of players involved in it, and raises the question in one form atleast, of "who are actually the bad guys poisoning the community well with their attitude and behavior towards others: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4344248#post4344248
If you can prove you target the Bots before a lone newbie in a mining barge
|

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
17085
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 14:31:00 -
[95] - Quote
Kyperion wrote:My problem is with the New Order types, that take ganking and turn it into a cyber-cult.
You can thank CCP for that, when the New Order was first started James wasn't trying to sell permits, he was bumping people because they were afk, and because he could. CCP stepped in and told him that this modus operandi wasn't acceptable, therefore James had a discussion with the GM about what was and what was not acceptable, it turns out that doing it with a profit motive was acceptable to CCP, and thus the New Order was born.
Turning it into a quasi religious cult was a stroke of genius, people who raged hard when ganked raged even harder when confronted with gankers preaching quasi religious dictats that make the lore of the Amarr Empire look like a childrens book.
Psychotic Monk for CSM 9 |

Salvos Rhoska
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
297
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 14:34:00 -
[96] - Quote
Kyperion wrote:If you can prove you target the Bots before a lone newbie in a mining barge
But even a noob in a mining barge is quite safe if he takes the necessary precautions to tank his vessel. Ofc there is the possibility that he will be ganked anyways, but that would come at a net loss to the aggressors.
As to bumping, the miner can simply relocate his operation.
In many ways miner bumping is not much different than a Mackinaw/Orca fleet showing up and starting to ferociously stripmine the hell out of exactly the one rock you had your puny lasers aimed at. Would you consider that griefing as well, and the acts of a "herd of dickheads", as you put it? |

Kyperion
General Washington's Irregulars
33
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 14:42:00 -
[97] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Kyperion wrote:If you can prove you target the Bots before a lone newbie in a mining barge
But even a noob in a mining barge is quite safe if he takes the necessary precautions to tank his vessel. Ofc there is the possibility that he will be ganked anyways, but that would come at a net loss to the aggressors. As to bumping, the miner can simply relocate his operation. This kind of relocation of activities due to the intervention of other players is not unusual or counter EVE's general design principles. In many ways miner bumping is not much different than a Mackinaw/Orca fleet showing up and starting to ferociously stripmine the hell out of exactly the one rock you had your puny lasers aimed at. Would you consider that griefing as well, and the acts of a "herd of dickheads", as you put it?
The Miner gang only forces you to switch targets, it does not cost you your ship and then try to extort even more isk from you and potentially more ship losses if they chase you.
So no, there is no comparison between the competition of a gang mining operation and a gank fleet popping up in local. |

Kyperion
General Washington's Irregulars
33
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 14:43:00 -
[98] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Kyperion wrote:My problem is with the New Order types, that take ganking and turn it into a cyber-cult.
You can thank CCP for that, when the New Order was first started James wasn't trying to sell permits, he was bumping people because they were afk, and because he could. CCP stepped in and told him that this modus operandi wasn't acceptable, therefore James had a discussion with the GM about what was and what was not acceptable, it turns out that doing it with a profit motive was acceptable to CCP, and thus the New Order was born. Turning it into a quasi religious cult was a stroke of genius, people who raged hard when ganked raged even harder when confronted with gankers preaching quasi religious dictats that make the lore of the Amarr Empire look like a childrens book.
You are correct in that CCP should have just banhammered the ****
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20029
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 14:45:00 -
[99] - Quote
Kyperion wrote:You are correct in that CCP should have just banhammered the **** How can he be correct about something he never said?
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
17086
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 14:48:00 -
[100] - Quote
Kyperion wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:Kyperion wrote:If you can prove you target the Bots before a lone newbie in a mining barge
But even a noob in a mining barge is quite safe if he takes the necessary precautions to tank his vessel. Ofc there is the possibility that he will be ganked anyways, but that would come at a net loss to the aggressors. As to bumping, the miner can simply relocate his operation. This kind of relocation of activities due to the intervention of other players is not unusual or counter EVE's general design principles. In many ways miner bumping is not much different than a Mackinaw/Orca fleet showing up and starting to ferociously stripmine the hell out of exactly the one rock you had your puny lasers aimed at. Would you consider that griefing as well, and the acts of a "herd of dickheads", as you put it? The Miner gang only forces you to switch targets, it does not cost you your ship and then try to extort even more isk from you and potentially more ship losses if they chase you. So no, there is no comparison between the competition of a gang mining operation and a gank fleet popping up in local. Actually there is, because once the gankers have cleared out the current miners, others move in, including those belonging to the gankers or their friends. Removing the competition via the application of violence is a valid business practice in Eve, just as influencing another country, either militarily or via sanctions, for control over their resources is a valid business practice in the real world.
Kyperion wrote:You are correct in that CCP should have just banhammered the **** Firstly, I never said he should have been hit with the ban hammer, you're reading stuff that isn't there. Secondly he was willing to come to an agreement with the GM about what would be an acceptable way to enforce his will on others, why should he be banned for having the rules clarified, and then abiding by them?
Psychotic Monk for CSM 9 |

Kiryen O'Bannon
Thrall Nation Brave Collective
76
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 14:48:00 -
[101] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Surely you agree that multiboxers that critical mass beyond a certain point of reasonability and sustainability, as well as botters, need to be addressed by the community, ingame, in some form or fashion?
Since you are not the one who is prepared to do anything about, as you are too busy doing other high-sec activities such as missioning or your own (hopefully respectable and reasonably active) mining operations, it falls upon others to do something.
While this may be true within your little roleplay construct, the simple fact is that no evidence whatsoever has been presented indicating that there is a problem by any objective measure.
All you're doing is saying "doing more of this activity than I arbitrarily feel they should" and calling that point "Reasonable". That point can then adjust itself to wherever you need it to be so when you attack someone you can decide they were being "unreasonable".
Let me help you out: There is no such thing as "unreasonable" amounts of mining, with or without multiboxing, nor missioning. Botting is, because it is explicitly against the rules, but that is unrelated to amount; it is not ok to bot 'a little bit." Mining and missioning tap into unlimited resource pools, and there are unlimited sinks to take those resources back out of game again.
The relatively slow rate of inflation that actually happens is the sign of an expanding game economy. In point of fact, missioning introduces currency (and sometimes goods) to the game while mining adds a lot of goods. Those things counteract each other as currency is used as a means to exchange goods. They are both introduced and removed at a fairly steady pace, and no systemic major economic issue really exists.
Strangely, for all this ranting about mining, moon mining is never mentioned. It's far more afk; set up POS, fuel POS, receive bacon. People do it far more "unreasonably" as you put it; coalitions control dozens of moons.
Why? Because the high sec attack community has no chance. That's why Gevlon's campaign against goons gets ridiculed; he has no chance. Attacking a major moon mining operation wouldn't mean tears and loot, it would mean welping against an organized and powerful alliance. |

Salvos Rhoska
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
297
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 14:49:00 -
[102] - Quote
Kyperion wrote: The Miner gang only forces you to switch targets, it does not cost you your ship and then try to extort even more isk from you and potentially more ship losses if they chase you.
So no, there is no comparison between the competition of a gang mining operation and a gank fleet popping up in local.
No, you are mincing terms and concepts now.
Bumping forces you to switch targets, as does a mining fleets depletion of the rock you where pointed at.
The mining fleet curtails your profits by aquiring the ore before you do, without recourse to pay them to leave your rock alone to you, wheres a ganker instead curtails your profits by requiring a payment equivalent in part to the ore you would otherwise mine if left uninterrupted.
@Kiryen O'Bannon
Please consolidate your specific points to me in as concise single sentences as possible. I could not be sure I have understood your specific points and position from my reading of your post. |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
17086
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 14:54:00 -
[103] - Quote
Kiryen O'Bannon wrote: Strangely, for all this ranting about mining, moon mining is never mentioned. It's far more afk; set up POS, fuel POS, receive bacon. People do it far more "unreasonably" as you put it; coalitions control dozens of moons
While moon mining may technically be an afk activity, it requires the ability to defend the mining operations, something most highsec miners refuse to do. It's also a shite income on a per player basis, from what I remember of the figures an ice miners income is in excess of the income from a moon.
Psychotic Monk for CSM 9 |

Salvos Rhoska
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
297
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 14:57:00 -
[104] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote: It's also a shite income on a per player basis, from what I remember of the figures an ice miners income is in excess of the income from a moon.
Highsec ice-mining is about 4.8mil/15mins with an unambitious and simple setup. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4329504#post4329504
Thats my best estimate atleast. Others may have even higher ones, but I doubt lower. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20030
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 15:01:00 -
[105] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote: It's also a shite income on a per player basis, from what I remember of the figures an ice miners income is in excess of the income from a moon.
Highsec ice-mining is about 4.8mil/15mins with an unambitious and simple setup. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4329504#post4329504Thats my best estimate atleast. Others may have even higher ones, but I doubt lower. And a Dyspro moon generates 100 units an hour @-á60k ISK per unit, for 6M ISK/h. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
17086
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 15:03:00 -
[106] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote: It's also a shite income on a per player basis, from what I remember of the figures an ice miners income is in excess of the income from a moon.
Highsec ice-mining is about 4.8mil/15mins with an unambitious and simple setup. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4329504#post4329504Thats my best estimate atleast. Others may have even higher ones, but I doubt lower. And a Dyspro moon generates 100 units an hour @-á60k ISK per unit, for 6M ISK/h.
Thanks Tippia, I knew you'd have the figures to hand, and lets not forget that Ice Mining has a minimal monetary investment, while moon mining requires a POS, its modules, incurs a monthly upkeep cost, and requires the willingness to claim the moon and then defend it from others.
Psychotic Monk for CSM 9 |

Kiryen O'Bannon
Thrall Nation Brave Collective
76
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 15:04:00 -
[107] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Kiryen O'Bannon wrote: Strangely, for all this ranting about mining, moon mining is never mentioned. It's far more afk; set up POS, fuel POS, receive bacon. People do it far more "unreasonably" as you put it; coalitions control dozens of moons
While moon mining may technically be an afk activity, it requires the ability to defend the mining operations, something most highsec miners refuse to do. It's also a shite income on a per player basis, from what I remember of the figures an ice miners income is in excess of the income from a moon. So what if they refuse to do it? Accepting the loss as part of one's overhead cost is a perfectly valid business decision, but for some reason is incredibly rage-inducing.
As for moons, the point is that it's passive income, good or not. Per-player basis is really irrelevant since it isn't doled out like that, and generally entities that own moons own them in proportion to their size.
There's nothing wrong with moon income, and there's nothing wrong with mining. There's nothing wrong with ganking, either. The problem is that the gankers are stifling intelligent discussion of real game issues like high-low-null risk-reward balance and the fact that mining is BORING under a sea of shitposting. Ideas to actually balance the game are buried amid a sea of whining and self-justification. |

Salvos Rhoska
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
297
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 15:05:00 -
[108] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote: It's also a shite income on a per player basis, from what I remember of the figures an ice miners income is in excess of the income from a moon.
Highsec ice-mining is about 4.8mil/15mins with an unambitious and simple setup. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4329504#post4329504
Thats my best estimate atleast. Others may have even higher ones, but I doubt lower. And a Dyspro moon generates 100 units an hour @-á60k ISK per unit, for 6M ISK/h.
Pretty clear which is more profitable then.
The more I watch ice-mining, the more convinced I am it needs a change. Perhaps to randomise the spawns in some fashion. |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2670
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 15:08:00 -
[109] - Quote
thread is now about how people who play bad guys are ruining the game despite the game being about playing bad guys from day one
that people who play as bad guys are bad people irl
and also demanding that people shouldn't be allowed to play bad guys because those people are trying to make me play their way |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
5354
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 15:10:00 -
[110] - Quote
There are players that will go to great lengths to help other players. They are very common throughout EVE.
There are players that enjoy yanking the chain of players that take the game WAY too seriously. To be blunt, NOBODY can make you sing a silly song on TS if you don't really want to.
And yes, there are those that go a bit too far. Welcome to the internet.
As for those that go for sympathy and claim to be inclined to commit suicide if you kill their ship in EVE... wow. It's hard NOT to make fun of their ridiculously obvious and overblown pity plea. However one good thing that came out of that situation is that now that joke would be followed by contacting CCP so that they can arrange to have the authorities drop by the persons home to "have a talk with them to assess their mental stability".
Since CCP stated this was their policy from now on, I've notice the "If I lose this Nightmare I'll kill myself" nonsense has dropped off considerably.
Funny how that works.
You should probably make a clear distinction between the realities of any online community and those of EVE online, as you are attributing issue to EVE that are prevalent in any online community. To carve a successful niche for yourself in EVE you need to be able to out sell, out produce, out fight,-á out run, or out wit your competitors. If you can do none of the above, your only option is to complain on the forums that somehow you are at a disadvantage using the exact same tool set-áas the rest of the player base. |

Salvos Rhoska
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
297
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 15:13:00 -
[111] - Quote
Indeed, threatening ones own suicide inorder to blackmail people into doing what you want, is incredibly unacceptable.
|

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
17086
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 15:14:00 -
[112] - Quote
Kiryen O'Bannon wrote: There's nothing wrong with moon income, and there's nothing wrong with mining. There's nothing wrong with ganking, either.
For the most part I agree, mining however does have a problem, it encourages people to AFK, because it's both boring and repetitive, especially when solo.
Quote: The problem is that the gankers are stifling intelligent discussion of real game issues like high-low-null risk-reward balance and the fact that mining is BORING under a sea of shiptoasting. Meanwhile some of the miners are stifling intelligent discussion of real game issues like AFK playstyles under the pretense that Eve would be a better place without highsec ganking. They also refuse to acknowledge the fact that their "non PvP" playstyle is actually a PvP one, and as such they become valid targets for anybody else by the act of undocking.
Quote:Ideas to actually balance the game are buried amid a sea of whining and self-justification. If the ideas weren't repeated ad nauseum and actually brought something new to the table they probably wouldn't get buried, with Eve being a decade old you can be fairly sure that 99% of the "new ideas" about game balance aren't new at all, they're simply regurgitated ideas that have been used in the past.
Psychotic Monk for CSM 9 |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2670
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 15:15:00 -
[113] - Quote
that's been policy for a long time, and it's a good one
but if i petition the GMs for a pizza, do they send one? noooooo  |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20030
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 15:15:00 -
[114] - Quote
Kiryen O'Bannon wrote:As for moons, the point is that it's passive income, good or not. Per-player basis is really irrelevant since it isn't doled out like that, and generally entities that own moons own them in proportion to their size. Just to clarify, the reason it's being presented that way is that an (uninformed) argument is often made that moons somehow give nullsec entities an unparalleled income source and that entities that don't own moons can't possibly compete with that income. Presenting it in like that puts that GÇ£massiveGÇ¥ income in perspective and show that those assumptions are pretty much universally false.
Quote:The problem is that the gankers are stifling intelligent discussion of real game issues like high-low-null risk-reward balance and the fact that mining is BORING under a sea of shiptoasting. Ideas to actually balance the game are buried amid a sea of whining and self-justification. A bigger problem is the biased partisanship demonstrated GÇö what you describe comes in ample portions from both sides of the argument. The end result is the same, but assigning all the blame to just one side is a bitGǪ misguided. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

RomeStar
Empire Investments Logistics
386
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 15:32:00 -
[115] - Quote
Wall of Text ......I am assuming you are quitting since I didnt bother reading the novel if so may I have your stuff please. Signatured removed, CCP Phantom |

Good Posting
Posting with my Mind
121
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 15:38:00 -
[116] - Quote
Kiryen O'Bannon wrote:
Strangely, for all this ranting about mining, moon mining is never mentioned. It's far more afk; set up POS, fuel POS, receive bacon.
Hello Brave Newbie
Moon mining isn't afk mining, and since you are in an alliance that wants a piece of the cake, the sooner or later you will understand why.
You have to group up to conquer systems, you have to group up to kill a pos, you have to group up to defend your (alliance) pos. Sometimes with real fun alarm clock ops. All that spiced with tidi.
Where is the afk part here? |

Notorious Fellon
Republic University Minmatar Republic
258
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 15:49:00 -
[117] - Quote
Benny Ohu wrote:that's been policy for a long time, and it's a good one but if i petition the GMs for a pizza, do they send one? noooooo 
This belongs in Features and Ideas. You have my support on this suggestion. |

Fiora Isa
State War Academy Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 16:15:00 -
[118] - Quote
Zack Korth wrote:eves mean, me sad, cry, spend 40 minutes on butthurt GD post, not a toon i don't want getting D'D'D'D'DUNKED
LMAO |

Harrison Tato
Barringtons Research
40
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 16:49:00 -
[119] - Quote
Kyperion wrote:[quote=Marvin Shields What happened in the audience though shocked me; Instead of being booed off the stage (Which is what I'd have attempted to do if I were in the audience), he was met with laughter and applause.
Because that's the people who play this game. Or at least the ones who are most visible, most audible, and most rampant, because the people who instigate this behavior within the game allow the behavior to creep and spread within their ranks.
Pretty much. Especially on the forums it seems like EVE is a refuge for the refuse of humanity, like Mos Eisley from Star Wars, EVE is a wretched hive of scum and villainy.
But its also mechanically one of the best Space ship games around, and graphically amazing which is why I keep coming back to it.
[/quote]
Yeah, like somebody with a high fat diet, the turds float to the to (yes there will be a response that informs me that fat doesn't make turds float.)
There is a silent majority of normal people who play this game and even if they relish playing the bad guy, do it with a sense of fun. There is a vocal minority who are damaged and mean sprited who were probably bullied in real life and now have a way to be the agressor. Instead of showing empathy towards those with less power they stomp the ants and then laugh about it. Stomping the ants is Ok. Someone has to be the bad guy but doing it for the sole purpose of making someone feel bad is the sick part. Don't feed the ant stompers. Never let them know you are pissed or frustrated. Better yet, it's a game. If it makes you pissed or frustrated to lose maybe you should find something else to do with your free time. |

Portia Venetia
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
28
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 16:53:00 -
[120] - Quote
Marvin Shields wrote:Bear in mind, I played Ultima Online back when it came out and for many years following that, and that was THE game that started the open-world community-driven content MMO genre. Eve may be more polished and may have a greater following and has lasted a HELL of a lot longer, but UO was where it allllll started kids.
UO is still running: http://www.uo.com |

embrel
BamBam Inc.
131
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 16:59:00 -
[121] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Much. Its abhorrent to even think or attempt otherwise, and yet that is exactly what this thread is trying to defend.
Stop trying to dictate how others live their lives and how they choose to conduct themselves.
Usually a society sets some rules. In Eve most rules we commonly accept IRL don't apply. It seems natural that this leads to frustration on part of some. Especially, as some very basic rules like: "you don't kick babies in the teeth in order to get their candy" don't apply neither.
I am in Eve coz I like the risky environment, but cannot fathom the fun some seem to have kicking babies teeth. |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
17089
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 17:21:00 -
[122] - Quote
embrel wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Much. Its abhorrent to even think or attempt otherwise, and yet that is exactly what this thread is trying to defend.
Stop trying to dictate how others live their lives and how they choose to conduct themselves.
Usually a society sets some rules. In Eve most rules we commonly accept IRL don't apply. It seems natural that this leads to frustration on part of some. Especially, as some very basic rules like: "you don't kick babies in the teeth in order to get their candy" don't apply neither. I am in Eve coz I like the risky environment, but cannot fathom the fun some seem to have kicking babies teeth. There are no babies in Eve, therefore nobody is kicking babies in the teeth, which don't appear for a few months btw, to steal their candy. The nearest equivalent is newbies, and to be honest they have nothing worth stealing unless they decided to try the P2W route and purchase their way up the foodchain, which invariably ends in disillusionment and tears for them, and a healthy profit for others.
Everyone who plays Eve has the same access to exactly the same mechanics and items as everybody else. People choose to not use them to protect themselves, and then whine when others use them to relieve them of their stuff..
As you rightly suggest, due to the context and premise of Eve the real life rules don't apply, many of us accept that and play accordingly, the problem comes when people try to enforce out of context real life rules to a game where they generally don't apply.
Psychotic Monk for CSM 9 |

embrel
BamBam Inc.
131
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 17:30:00 -
[123] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:embrel wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Much. Its abhorrent to even think or attempt otherwise, and yet that is exactly what this thread is trying to defend.
Stop trying to dictate how others live their lives and how they choose to conduct themselves.
Usually a society sets some rules. In Eve most rules we commonly accept IRL don't apply. It seems natural that this leads to frustration on part of some. Especially, as some very basic rules like: "you don't kick babies in the teeth in order to get their candy" don't apply neither. I am in Eve coz I like the risky environment, but cannot fathom the fun some seem to have kicking babies teeth. There are no babies in Eve, therefore nobody is kicking babies in the teeth, which don't appear for a few months btw, to steal their candy. The nearest equivalent is newbies, and to be honest they have nothing worth stealing unless they decided to try the P2W route and purchase their way up the foodchain, which invariably ends in disillusionment and tears for them, and a healthy profit for others. Everyone who plays Eve has the same access to exactly the same mechanics and items as everybody else. People choose to not use them to protect themselves, and then whine when others use them to relieve them of their stuff.. As you rightly suggest, due to the context and premise of Eve the real life rules don't apply, many of us accept that and play accordingly, the problem comes when people try to enforce out of context real life rules to a game where they generally don't apply.
You got me with the teeth. However, some already have one at birth.
And I'd assume it already happened that someone kicked even though there were no candies at all. As otherwise starter systems would not need special rules.
Tbh I didn't have an issue with ganking im Eve. My losses are mostly to me being stupid or a graphic driver crash (****), so that the whole issue actually looks avoidable to me. |

mechtech
Ice Liberation Army
618
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 17:39:00 -
[124] - Quote
I really don't think it used to be so bad, honestly. I think all of this has morphed out of a bored 0.0 culture , and has really gotten worse in recent years.
I have no problem with ganking, corp scamming, ponzis, or any of that, but the childish "tear harvesting" and such really is hugely obnoxious. Hmm, I guess I agree with your post. |

Domanique Altares
Rifterlings Point Blank Alliance
2548
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 17:39:00 -
[125] - Quote
I am an ******* every time I find and detonate some miner/explorer/plexer/PVE player, because I am disrupting their preferred style of gameplay.
They are assholes when they warp off, cloak, stab their ship, or otherwise deny me the chance to engage them, because they are disrupting my preferred style of gameplay.
Apparently we are all assholes for ruining one another's play Rifterlings pirate corporation is now recruitng members for lowsec PvP operations. Newbie friendly, free T1 frigate and dessy hangar, solo tutoring and PvP classes for new members. Join our in game channel 'weflyrifters' and speak to a recruiter today. |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
17090
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 17:39:00 -
[126] - Quote
embrel wrote: You got me with the teeth. However, some already have one at birth.

Quote:And I'd assume it already happened that someone kicked even though there were no candies at all. As otherwise starter systems would not need special rules. Some people probably padded their killboards a bit with newbies in the past, I remember a discussion with a GM about what you could and could not do to newbies in starter systems and certain SoE Arc systems, Arnon IIRC.
Quote:Tbh I didn't have an issue with ganking im Eve. My losses are mostly to me being stupid or a graphic driver crash (****), so that the whole issue actually looks avoidable to me. There you have it in a nutshell, ganks, and scams, are fairly trivial to avoid unless you get caught by a graphics driver crash (looks at AMD, sort it out) or do something stupid, the problem is that people don't like to admit to having done something stupid. Admitting that you've done something stupid in Eve raises you far above the ones that blame everybody else for their own stupidity.
Psychotic Monk for CSM 9 |

E-2C Hawkeye
State War Academy Caldari State
524
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 17:52:00 -
[127] - Quote
Marvin Shields wrote:Making my first post on the forums ever, so bear with me here...
I'll admit I have my faults, but seeing someone comment on a Reddit post, and the massive sh*tstorm that followed, got me thinking...
This is a game where we cannot die for good, and where the rules are pretty much removed, which gives us a lot of "creative" freedom.
Why is all of that creativity and freedom being used to harass new players? I just don't understand it.
Because a bully never picks on somone that they think could fight back and win. This is why there are so many gankers in hi-sec. Gankers prey on players trained and fitted for pve not pvp who can only hope to survive the gank much less fight back.
Others do it for the laughs while some consider ganking a challenge.....not from the fight itself but from the prep and effort that goes into it.
There really is no one right answer here. |

E-2C Hawkeye
State War Academy Caldari State
524
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 17:55:00 -
[128] - Quote
mechtech wrote:I really don't think it used to be so bad, honestly. I think all of this has morphed out of a bored 0.0 culture  , and has really gotten worse in recent years. I have no problem with ganking, corp scamming, ponzis, or any of that, but the childish "tear harvesting" and such really is hugely obnoxious. Hmm, I guess I agree with your post.
Agree that the blue-sec culture has generated more ganking |

Haiiro Aurgnet
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
1
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 17:59:00 -
[129] - Quote
While I agree with you fully, OP, this is a foolhardy campaign. Sadly you aren't going to bring around as social revolution in eve because it is, as you say, a place where people escape to to release their darkest, meanest sides of themselves. Many people can be nice IRL, but build up a lot of frustration- so they take it out on people in eve. Sadly, there is no way to change this. ever. I WANT this game to have less violent, sadistic, sociopathic people, but, it will never happen. Because in today's day and age, people use the "its just a game" excuse to act like trash. and they're right in a sense. It is just a game. That being said, I've met some of the most amazing people through eve. One of my really good friends that I talk to every day now I met through this game. The first corp to take me in was so warm and inviting. the CEO loved me and I became a director within months because we worked hard together for the betterment of our corp as a whole- and times were great. These people DO exist, they're just the quiet ones in the crowd, and you have to search pretty hard for them
tl;dr people online suck, they always will suck. but there are still good people, theyre just quiet. |

Jamwara DelCalicoe Ashley
Arbitrary Spaceship Destruction The Devil's Warrior Alliance
133
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 18:01:00 -
[130] - Quote
It only seems like harassment to newer players because they have not yet HTFU'ed yet http://www.devilswarrior.info/kb |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2674
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 18:06:00 -
[131] - Quote
mechtech wrote:I have no problem with ganking, corp scamming, ponzis, or any of that, but the childish "tear harvesting" and such really is hugely obnoxious. Hmm, I guess I agree with your post. 'tear harvesting' through accepted legitimate gameplay (scamming, awoxing, extortion, ganking, 'bad guy' roleplaying etc) is fine
'tear harvesting' through actual harassment/trolling/griefing is not
the first is a player massively (hilariously) overreacting to another players' legitimate actions ingame. the 'harvester' is not doing anything immoral
and it has nothing to do with 'nullsec culture', this is eve online |

Dersen Lowery
Laurentson INC StructureDamage
1055
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 18:12:00 -
[132] - Quote
Tippia wrote:They somehow miss that this is a full-PvP multiplayer sandbox, and assume that it will work exactly the same as a PvE-centric themepark game, and when reality intrudes on them, it's a rude awakening. This is not a problem with the game or its players GÇö it's a problem with those preconceived notions.
It's a problem with the game to the extent that the game doesn't communicate this. Sure, there's no getting through to some people, but CCP need to deal with the fact that there are huge, long-established MMOs that set and reinforce those notions, and the sooner newcomers to EVE are assured that "be the villain" doesn't mean "roll Horde," the better. Also, "dark Universe" doesn't mean a grimdark color palette and large spikes sticking out of all the mobs.
"Read the EULA" is a cop-out. It's not a tutorial, and anyway, it's (an attempt at) a legal contract, so the people who should be reading them for us are contract lawyers that we retain, and--quick show of hands--who did that when they launched EVE for the first time? (Of those who raised their hands, how many of you are contract lawyers, or are married or closely related to contract lawyers?) Right.
OP is correct that there are no mechanical issues involved here. There are things that CCP could do better as far as getting information out to new players, and there is Gabriel's G.I.F.T. (NSFW)--which also shows that the phenomenon is much larger than EVE. Proud founder and member of the Belligerent Desirables. |

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
5051
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 18:35:00 -
[133] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote: There are no babies in Eve, therefore nobody is kicking babies in the teeth, which don't appear for a few months btw, to steal their candy. The nearest equivalent is newbies, and to be honest they have nothing worth stealing unless they decided to try the P2W route and purchase their way up the foodchain, which invariably ends in disillusionment and tears for them, and a healthy profit for others.
Everyone who plays Eve has the same access to exactly the same mechanics and items as everybody else. People choose to not use them to protect themselves, and then whine when others use them to relieve them of their stuff..
As you rightly suggest, due to the context and premise of Eve the real life rules don't apply, many of us accept that and play accordingly, the problem comes when people try to enforce out of context real life rules to a game where they generally don't apply.
Well said. I play EVE because (beyond the space ships and guns, which I love) it's a game for adults unlike most MMOs and other games. ANY adult game is going to have an adult community and that community is going to rough and blunt.
What I simply don't get is why people would play a game notorious (since it's birth) for the kinds of things that these people are complaining about. WTF is wrong with them, why not play all the other theme park MMOs that not only ban you for in game 'griefing' but will also ban your game account for too many forum infractions.
If I want to ride roller coasters I go to Six Flags and if I want to see naked women I go to a strip club. But I don't go to strip clubs and complain about the lack of roller coasters nor do I go to six flags demaning lapdances (though there was this one time my senior year that we went to six flags and.....well ,ya'll don't wanna hear about that right now I guess but it was awesome ).
I just think that it's so stupid to come into a notorious game and expect people to follow some silly, arbitrary real life morality.
|

Gizznitt Malikite
Agony Unleashed Agony Empire
3687
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 18:39:00 -
[134] - Quote
To be frank, I think this Op is throwing out the barrel of apples because of a few bad ones. There are simply terrible expectations that he keeps perpetrating, and that is a major issue.
Let's take a good look at the examples of bad behavior he brought up:
GÖª "jihad fleets" and Hulkageddon -- This is EXCELLENT content, and I can't fathom why you'd be upset about it. These are typically well publicized events, where news of the even spreads rapidly to all corners of the universe. It makes waves in the markets, booming the economy. It creates a blatant hunter-prey atmosphere, where everyone can chose a side or get out of the way. A can't fathom how you'd find these "unfair" or in poor spirits. Burn Jita, Hulkageddon, Ice interdictions, even Jame's Code crew. These are hurdles, made by players, that you simply have to overcome if you wish to play in their sphere.
GÖª Destiny: I live in Syndicate, and have had a lot of interaction with GEEMU there. Let me give you some insight into how we approach GEEMU. When you live in nullsec, you must expect combat every single time you undock. He doesn't get a free pass just because he is new to the game or nullsec. At the same time, I know many FCs that don't primary Destiny's character the moment our fleets crash. I know many pilots that let GEEMU pods and/or noobships fly through the area when heading to their home system. I know several groups that "team up" with them so they can defeat a tactically superior force. The truth is, the game is harsh, especially when you move to nullsec 2 days after creating a character, before you have a clue about game mechanics. I don't know how Destiny feels he's been treated, but he's been welcomed to the game.
GÖª The Mittani: The Mittani crossed the line at an Alliance Leader Panel, where the historic goal of the panel was to outdo other alliances, usually by using insults and "shocking" commentary. He was called out for crossing the line by a huge portion of the community, was kicked of the CSM, and given a temp ban from game. As for the audience reaction, he didn't cross the line until the end of the session when he revealed the name of the pilot who sent such a dastardly evemail.
You are somewhat right, as there are many PLAYERS in this game that are just bad for the gaming environment. To help address those bad elements, we should have some guildlines on acceptable behavior, because there is a decent portion of the playerbase that regularly crosses the line. But your misplaced "white knight" post fails to even remotely address it!
What is acceptable? -- Communicating RL threats to a fellow player because they blew up your starship, or conned you out of isk. That is unacceptable behavior; why didnt you call them out?
-- Suggesting you may commit suicide or do RL harm to yourself because someone is interfering with your game play. That is unacceptable behavior, why didn't you call them out?
-- Being so emotionally volatile that you lash out when someone again, interferes with your game play. That's unacceptable behavior, why didn't you call them out?
-- Being so desperate for attention, that you make a fool of yourself, sending nude pics to other players or say incriminating things. That's unacceptable behavior, why didn't you call them out?
You see, a healthy player understands that this is a GAME. They understand that attacking their character is different than attacking their PERSONS. Everyone makes mistakes, everyone occasionally gets outplayed, but only the unhealthy members go to these unacceptable extremes. It many ways, it is our social obligation to let them know they are crossing the line, as that is how we protect the integrity of our gaming atmosphere. I will admit some people revel in encouraging them to cross the line and broadcasting to the world when they do, but that rarely harms the healthy members of our gaming society.
PS: who cares about the comments of some reditors? That's a statement about redit, not about EvE. |

Katrina Oniseki
Revenent Defence Corperation Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
3047
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 19:02:00 -
[135] - Quote
There's old stories about Pirate Codes and such. A bygone age where Pirates were Pirates and Griefers were persona non grata. I wasn't around for those days, so maybe it's all fanciful hindsight... but these days the lines are very very blurred. There's still some classy pirates* left though... so there is hope.
Being an honorable pirate isn't really about following the rules. It's about following your own rules, or the rules of a greater Piracy community that seeks to maintain its supply of victims. If you run victims out of the game, you find your waters sparsely populated. You have to give them a reason to keep playing and providing you a target.
I think James 315's New Order does that. They offer the chance to be 'protected' under their permit system. They don't want to exterminate high-sec miners. They just want to raid them, loot them, and keep them around for another go! So they tell the miners if they pay 10 million, they won't get shot again. There's always the immoral agent who shoots them anyways, but it gives the miners a sense that maybe things will be okay. It's still piracy, it's racketeering, it's extortion... but it's sustainable.
Maybe that's the word I'm looking for. Sustainable piracy. Sustainable griefing. Sustainable scamming. Making sure that you don't destroy your own prey population in the process of being a predator. A balanced ecosystem of Pirate and Carebear.
I think, in my time, I'd like to see more of the EVE playerbase get back to that mentality.
*- Vote Psychotic Monk for CSM9! Ch+½j+ì Katrina Oniseki ~ (RDC) Chief Operations Officer ~ [I-RED] Director of Public Relations |

Anslo
The Scope Gallente Federation
4492
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 19:12:00 -
[136] - Quote
Some of us gave up talking and simply acted to back up our stance. Try it sometime.
|

Katrina Oniseki
Revenent Defence Corperation Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
3047
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 19:17:00 -
[137] - Quote
Anslo wrote:Some of us gave up talking and simply acted to back up our stance. Try it sometime.
I was going to honor you as an example of it, but you've told me IC you're not a pirate so many times I didn't want to say it OOC too.
Regardless, good job!
Ch+½j+ì Katrina Oniseki ~ (RDC) Chief Operations Officer ~ [I-RED] Director of Public Relations |

Seven Koskanaiken
The Shadow Plague Fidelas Constans
996
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 19:22:00 -
[138] - Quote
Maybe they treat Eve like real life because it is their real life. Like, maybe they have nothing going on in their life apart from Eve? Just a thought. |

Pandora Barzane
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
88
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 19:44:00 -
[139] - Quote
Tippia wrote:
Incidentally, the leading cause for people quitting is trying to go it alone and treating the game as your average content-consumption themepark game.
citation needed.
|

Sentamon
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
1500
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 19:50:00 -
[140] - Quote
All PvP games die with the following first step:
* lets force people to be nice
New players have absolutely no trouble in EVE unless they bring undo attention to themselves.
~ Professional Forum Alt -á~ |

Estella Osoka
Deep Void Merc Syndicate Sicarius Draconis
335
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 19:56:00 -
[141] - Quote
It's a game. Stop getting so emotionally attached to it, and you will enjoy it more. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20043
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 19:56:00 -
[142] - Quote
Pandora Barzane wrote:citation needed. CSM8 August minutes, Session 5.
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Emelia Aurgnet
University of Caille Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 20:01:00 -
[143] - Quote
Sentamon wrote:All PvP games die with the following first step:
* lets force people to be nice
New players have absolutely no trouble in EVE unless they bring undo attention to themselves.
Agree with this as long as it's not briefing. That's a fine line.
I was once killed by someone who noticed my player was new and refunded the money (and more actually) and encourageed me over an email. He knew how to farm without killing the soil. I've noticed players go to great lengths to help new players in general.
That is unlike any community out there, even the level of discourse in chat arguments is very informed.
Everybody's so effing smart in here. I love it. --
PS, notice Tippia's signature (above this post)? That's great stuff. |

Anslo
The Scope Gallente Federation
4492
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 20:01:00 -
[144] - Quote
Katrina Oniseki wrote:Anslo wrote:Some of us gave up talking and simply acted to back up our stance. Try it sometime. I was going to honor you as an example of it, but you've told me IC you're not a pirate so many times I didn't want to say it OOC too. Regardless, good job! We prefer the term vigilante.
|

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
146
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 20:02:00 -
[145] - Quote
Look at all the little piranhas of hate, circling the OP trying to tear him apart.
Proving his post correct, yet too self-centered and biased to notice. |

Anomaly One
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
4
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 20:03:00 -
[146] - Quote
when the sign says "here be dragons" DID YOU THINK THERE WAS ******* TELETUBIES ON THE OTHER SIDE?
p.s: your posts and dinsdales and a couple of others have an awkward amount of likes. |

Dersen Lowery
Laurentson INC StructureDamage
1055
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 20:07:00 -
[147] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:There are no babies in Eve, therefore nobody is kicking babies in the teeth, which don't appear for a few months btw, to steal their candy. The nearest equivalent is newbies, and to be honest they have nothing worth stealing unless they decided to try the P2W route and purchase their way up the foodchain, which invariably ends in disillusionment and tears for them, and a healthy profit for others.
More to the point, they're babies in the sense that they're largely ignorant of how the game works, and abjectly dependant on both an indifferent parent (the tutorials) and other people in the game (live or via blogs and wikis) to learn. If you enjoy lording your knowledge of the game over other people and taking advantage of whatever preconceptions they might have, they're easy prey and they're incapable of fighting back effectively, so they're more likely to helplessly resort to OOC threats and complaints--tears, basically. Not only do you get to savor the tears, you get the additional thrill of reporting them.
That's why you can't gank in the newbie systems, although, predictably, that prohibition only dares people to see how closely they can toe the line.
Proud founder and member of the Belligerent Desirables. |

Anomaly One
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
4
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 20:14:00 -
[148] - Quote
wrong thread.. nice army of alts by the way |

Shizuken
Venerated Stars
195
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 20:21:00 -
[149] - Quote
Very well put. This needed to be said for a long time. |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
17091
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 20:32:00 -
[150] - Quote
Dersen Lowery wrote: More to the point, they're babies in the sense that they're largely ignorant of how the game works, and abjectly dependant on both an indifferent parent (the tutorials) and other people in the game (live or via blogs and wikis) to learn.
We've all been there, some of us even learnt from it.
Quote:If you enjoy lording your knowledge of the game over other people and taking advantage of whatever preconceptions they might have, they're easy prey and they're incapable of fighting back effectively, so they're more likely to helplessly resort to OOC threats and complaints--tears, basically. Not only do you get to savor the tears, you get the additional thrill of reporting them.
That's why you can't gank in the newbie systems, although, predictably, that prohibition only dares people to see how closely they can toe the line.
Not that many people actually pick on newbies, most players are incredibly supportive of newbies that are willing to accept Eve for what it is, especially if they possess a healthy attitude towards it. However some newbies, and some players that should know better through experience, seem to do nothing but pick faults with a game that in all honesty they aren't suited to. They expect the game to change for them, instead of adapting to the game. They pretty much deserve everything they get, if only because they're either trolling, or trying to turn a game that many of us are quite happy to play, despite its harsh nature, into something it is not.
Psychotic Monk for CSM 9 |

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
149
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 20:47:00 -
[151] - Quote
Back to OP's position:
Anyone who professes joy at someone else's misery is a bad person.
If you feel the person is irrational because he should not be placing value on his in-game suffering because it's not suppose to be taken as "real", well that's a valid argument. There's no issue with your argument.
The issue presents itself when there are people who take joy at other's "problems".
It could be that person who is raging call you a "******" for blowing up his space pixels has a mental illness. You, perceiving him to have an ailment because he is attaching an irrational attachment to his space pixels is completely logical.
So there you are, having performed an action and notice that the person you've performed your perfectly valid action against is handling it improperly. But now you laugh at him. You begin to take joy at your observation of someone's instability.
That's what makes you a bad person, for taking joy at the suffering of others. Is his suffering irrational, yes. Is your joy sadistic? Yes.
It's the same as laughing at a person who is mentally ********. You're the type of person who makes fun at other's plight. This is what makes you the bad person. Not the performing the action, but your reaction at their sickness.
hahaha you have cancer! Hahahaha you have aids! Hahahahah you have depresssion! Hahaha you attribute meaning to things that are meaningless!
This game is full of bad people. |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
14096
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 20:51:00 -
[152] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:Back to OP's position:
Anyone who professes joy at someone else's misery is a bad person.
Have you never laughed at someone taking a pratfall or saying something stupid?
Never?
Really?
1 Kings 12:11
|

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
149
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 20:57:00 -
[153] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:Back to OP's position:
Anyone who professes joy at someone else's misery is a bad person.
Have you never laughed at someone taking a pratfall or saying something stupid? Never? Really?
Heard it here folks, slipping on ice is the exact same as having cancer |

Anslo
The Scope Gallente Federation
4493
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 21:07:00 -
[154] - Quote
You talk too much. Change doesn't happen by talk. I learned that. Others did too. We're growing, we're training, and we're not stopping. We don't like the attitude of some. You wanna change it like we do? Grab your guns and stop feeding the trolls.
|

Coffee Rocks
Thrall Nation Brave Collective
51
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 21:32:00 -
[155] - Quote
I'll happily chime in.
As the CEO of a PVP corp of the newest SOV holding entity, BRAVE Collective, of HERO Coalition - I love this post.
I could not agree with your sentiments harder. I love your post so hard that I want to take it out to dinner, tell it sweet nothings, get married by eloping to the Caribbean, settle down, and make little baby posts that can run around spreading their wee little message of culture (and odd imagery).
Joking aside, THIS is the only thing that I do worry about in EVE. BRAVE, in general, was created with the idea that 1) newbies can have fun, and should have fun, from day one and 2) you don't have to be an **shole to have fun. And let me tell you, an Alliance running around espousing those sentiments has drawn in some hateful, spiteful, ugly people who try to camp us daily. They purposefully will camp pipes in order to ONLY gank the newbies coming to join us, and won't fight an older player. Local is filled with sperging hatred several times a day, TMC comments are downright mean, and Reddit .... well, nuff said, "Reddit". And dear-god-in-heaven, when we took those 2 Sov systems, it seems like we opened a portal to a new level of hate against us. Local chat makes my eyes bleed now.
Funny thing though - Brave Newbies has become Brave Collective. Then it became part of HERO. It now has Sov. In spite of all the 'bittervets' constantly talking down to us, or calling our members names, or making fun of us, we've grown to become one of the largest entities in the game. How?
Because we celebrate our members. We joke about ourselves, but never about our enemies or each other. We cheer for our enemy's victory in battle as much as we applaud our own. And if a newer member does something over the line? We pull them aside and tell them "No. That is not our way, friend." We are trying our very best to change this culture (TEST - to your credit - you are using racial slurs less now, so thank you :P). An entirely crazy notion - we play this game to have fun, and want the same for you.
I didn't just fall in line with the mantra when I joined, obviously. I've always been this way myself. I've got more than one post on my blog about this subject - or ones near enough the subject - including one post that garnered tens of thousands of views that was about the fact that we the good folk in EVE far outweigh the little sh**stains of evil.
We chose Brave over other, established null entities that wanted us to fold in with them because Brave's philosophy was in line with our own. Frankly, I know we're making a difference out there. I see it. Let's hope it continues.
7o thecoffeerocks.blogspot.com Twitter: @thecoffeerocks Steam: CoffeeRocks |

Coffee Rocks
Thrall Nation Brave Collective
52
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 21:42:00 -
[156] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:Back to OP's position:
Anyone who professes joy at someone else's misery is a bad person.
Have you never laughed at someone taking a pratfall or saying something stupid? Never? Really?
Stop trolling, Malcanis. We get it - you hate everyone here.
We're talking about fundamental human nature, and the culture of our little society. The same nature that can make us laugh at a person for being tongue tied (which isn't being sadistic, btw, it's a simple psychological knee-jerk acknowledgement that implies 'I know your embarrassment because I too have been tongue-tied, so don't be embarrassed') is not the same as gaining contentment from the malicious harm done to others.
But, it is the same human nature that makes us want to improve this community. It's easier to "go along get along", I get that, and it's how this undesirable culture has been, well, cultivated.
I for one have never put up with it. I hope that others will join us and do the same, really. thecoffeerocks.blogspot.com Twitter: @thecoffeerocks Steam: CoffeeRocks |

Anslo
The Scope Gallente Federation
4493
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 21:43:00 -
[157] - Quote
As I said before, and as evidenced by the actions of the above poster, and other groups promoting more positive outlooks for Eve; We are growing, and we wont be stopped.
The times are changing.
|

Pandora Barzane
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
88
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 22:00:00 -
[158] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Pandora Barzane wrote:citation needed. CSM8 August minutes, Session 5.
those werent actual figures, more best guesses from ccp. go on, show me actual measure data of people who quit eve because they playing solo.
|

Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
3074
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 22:04:00 -
[159] - Quote
There's a lot of good too... I typically fully reimburse noobs when I happen to blow them up. I know a lot of other people that do too. In my experience, this is the rule for vets more than the exception. Are there total d-bags in game? You bet. For the most part I am one... but when it comes to newer players you might be surprised how accommodating most vets are. Just don't undock in some officer fit mission ship and call yourself a noob. If whatever you fly is over a billion ISK and you're new to the game I'll kill you on principal.
|

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
17091
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 22:06:00 -
[160] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:Malcanis wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:Back to OP's position:
Anyone who professes joy at someone else's misery is a bad person.
Have you never laughed at someone taking a pratfall or saying something stupid? Never? Really? Heard it here folks, slipping on ice is the exact same as having cancer That's not what he said, it's not even within the same universe as what he asked.
You're trivialising cancer by comparing it to slipping on ice; cancer is a long term battle against a foul and underhanded disease that normally ends in an early death. Slipping on ice and ending up on your arse is a miniscule setback that doesn't normally end in a premature death. You really need to get a grip on the scale of misery involved.
You seem to have the same problem distinguishing between cancer and falling over as you do between what happen in game and real life.
Psychotic Monk for CSM 9 |

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
150
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 22:13:00 -
[161] - Quote
It's evolution. Our species, like every other is constantly evolving. Our current version of human is much more capable in terms of intelligence compared to our ancestors hundreds of thousands of years ago.
Considering that humanity is constantly evolving, it's safe to say that right now there are some people who are more "evolved" than others.
Sadly, as displayed with the narrow minded hate in this and other threads, it's obvious which people are still a few laps behind in the human evolution race. It's not their fault, they're just genetically inferior compared to those of us who have been lucky enough to snag these genetics as our own.
I'm sorry to see that many of you are a few steps below on this infinitely long staircase of human evolution. You being egocentric due to the limitations imposed by your poor drawing in the lottery of advancement, well naturally I understand your insistence on thinking that the mere act of being human props you up to the same level as those you feel you "should" be as good as, because of your default entry into humanity. (this would be a creationist-centric belief)
But don't worry, we're here for you. That's what's great about us. Even though we've been distanced through chance from you, we're willing to reach down and lift you up to us so we can all continue forward together. Even if we have to do so while you're kicking and screaming. We understand you don't know any better.
Enjoy the ride |

Coffee Rocks
Thrall Nation Brave Collective
60
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 22:18:00 -
[162] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:Malcanis wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:Back to OP's position:
Anyone who professes joy at someone else's misery is a bad person.
Have you never laughed at someone taking a pratfall or saying something stupid? Never? Really? Heard it here folks, slipping on ice is the exact same as having cancer That's not what he said, it's not even within the same universe as what he asked. You're trivialising cancer by comparing it to slipping on ice; cancer is a long term battle against a foul and underhanded disease that normally ends in an early death. Slipping on ice and ending up on your arse is a miniscule setback that doesn't normally end in a premature death. You really need to get a grip on the scale of misery involved. You seem to have the same problem distinguishing between cancer and falling over as you do between what happens in game and real life.
Troll harder. thecoffeerocks.blogspot.com Twitter: @thecoffeerocks |-áSteam: CoffeeRocks | thecoffeerocks.blogspot.com https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=327221 |

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
150
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 22:22:00 -
[163] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:Malcanis wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:Back to OP's position:
Anyone who professes joy at someone else's misery is a bad person.
Have you never laughed at someone taking a pratfall or saying something stupid? Never? Really? Heard it here folks, slipping on ice is the exact same as having cancer That's not what he said, it's not even within the same universe as what he asked. You're trivialising cancer by comparing it to slipping on ice; cancer is a long term battle against a foul and underhanded disease that normally ends in an early death. Slipping on ice and ending up on your arse is a miniscule setback that doesn't normally end in a premature death. You really need to get a grip on the scale of misery involved. You seem to have the same problem distinguishing between cancer and falling over as you do between what happens in game and real life.
O my bad. See, i made a post and then he quoted 5% of it, completely ignoring the 95% where I connected it to the 5% he chose to focus on.
Because of that, I just assumed we were playing the "make stupid connections" game and I was playing along with him. If he feels like addressing everything else I spoke of, well then I'll assume he wishes to have an actual conversation and not play "stupid" games. |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
17092
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 22:32:00 -
[164] - Quote
Coffee Rocks wrote:Troll harder. Not trolling, please try harder.
BTW congrats on the whole HERO coalition thing, expecting to see some glorious stuff from you guys in the near future.
Psychotic Monk for CSM 9 |

Anslo
The Scope Gallente Federation
4496
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 22:39:00 -
[165] - Quote
Faux logic to justify ******* actions to get a rouse from someone.
Sounds trolling to me. vOv
|

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1810
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 22:43:00 -
[166] - Quote
A lot of the idiocy in game stems from players inability to get kills easily. Unfortunately EVE's fleet fights and its advertising campaigns show a vision of hundreds to thousands of targets, apparently in a never ending stream of brave suicidal supply.
The reality is anything but - the aspiring w.. ganker logs in hoping to be an evil pirate but then finds himself confronted by high sec and gets repeatedly ganked by concord...
So he moves to low, and finds himself sitting at a low sec gate watching cloaky haulers zipping by unable to be se... molested.
So now we have a loser, who would be better off in an FPS, hanging around in EvE unable to get kills because of a lack of patience, logic, intelligence.
Those losers gravitate towards each other of course and then we have blobs of losers who lack the ability to get kills. . .
So they exploit as far as they can around the grey area's of the game..
Disclaimer: I'm using exploit in this case correctly, not the EvE version which usually means CCP doesn't approve, but may not necessarily be an exploit in regards of the actual definition of the word. Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
17092
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 22:50:00 -
[167] - Quote
Anslo wrote:Faux logic to justify ******* actions to get a rouse from someone.
Sounds trolling to me. vOv Well you would be the expert 
Psychotic Monk for CSM 9 |

Mara Pahrdi
The Order of Anoyia
663
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 23:01:00 -
[168] - Quote
Marvin Shields wrote:Making my first post on the forums ever, so bear with me here...
Sure no problem.
Though I'm going to start with a question: Why are you insulting all players in this game in your thread title?
Sure, there are some folks making a fool of themselves, like The Mittani. There certainly are some players with a somewhat weird behaviour. But overall, my experience has been a completely different and rather poditive one.
Ofc I have been ganked once. And ofc I've been ransomed. I even paid the ransom, having made sure before getting ransomed, that the guys doing this to me were likely going to honor it.
If you get ransomed without being prepared and do silly stuff as a victim, honestly, that's your problem. Just tell them to get done with it. If they don't pod you and still hold you for a prolonged time just because they can, now that would be something for a petition in harassment.
I've flown for a short time with some dudes that were part of events you mentioned. Great ingame experience in every respect, nice people to talk to on ts, folks that I'd have liked to meet in RL anytime. Although we probably would have been very different human beings that don't have much in common but EVE. And yet, who knows...
My experience is, that EVE has a good, mostly friendly and helpful community.
Sure, there are some assholes that are allowed to do their things. But you do not have to play their game.
Look at it like this: Blizzard created the dungeon and raid finder and eliminated most other game mechanics previously available to find a decent group, just to give those assholes a chance to play the game. The amount of complaints on the WoW forums shows, you cannot really evade them. Remove insurance. |

Mandarine
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
24
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 23:40:00 -
[169] - Quote
It only took six years! |
|

ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
1002

|
Posted - 2014.03.15 00:11:00 -
[170] - Quote
I have removed some rule breaking posts and those quoting them. As always I let some edge cases stay. Please people, keep it on topic and above all civil!
The rules: 2. Be respectful toward others at all times.
The purpose of the EVE Online forums is to provide a platform for exchange of ideas, and a venue for the discussion of EVE Online. Occasionally there will be conflicts that arise when people voice opinions. Forum users are expected to be courteous when disagreeing with others.
3. Ranting is prohibited.
A rant is a post that is often filled with angry and counterproductive comments. A free exchange of ideas is essential to building a strong sense of community and is helpful in development of the game and community. Rants are disruptive, and incite flaming and trolling. Please post your thoughts in a concise and clear manner while avoiding going off on rambling tangents.
4. Personal attacks are prohibited.
Commonly known as flaming, personal attacks are posts that are designed to personally berate or insult another forum user. Posts of this nature are not beneficial to the community spirit that CCP promote and as such they will not be tolerated.
5. Trolling is prohibited.
Trolling is a defined as a post that is deliberately designed for the purpose of angering and insulting other players in an attempt to incite retaliation or an emotional response. Posts of this nature are disruptive, often abusive and do not contribute to the sense of community that CCP promote.
6. Racism and discrimination are prohibited.
Racism, gender stereotyping and hate speech are not permitted on the EVE Online Forums. Derogatory posting that includes race, religion or sexual preference based personal attacks and trolling can result in immediate suspension of forum posting privileges.
7. Use of profanity is prohibited.
The use of profanity is prohibited on the EVE Online forums. This includes the partial masking of letters using numbers or alternate symbols, and any attempts at bypassing the profanity filter.
9. Posting of private CCP communication is prohibited.
The posting of private communication between the Game Masters, EVE Team members, Moderators, Administrators of the forums and forum users is prohibited. CCP respect the right of our players to privacy and as such you are not permitted to publicize private correspondence (including petition responses and emails) received from any of the aforementioned parties.
10. Discussion of warnings and bans is prohibited.
Such matters shall remain private between CCP and the involved user. Questions or comments concerning warnings and bans will be conveyed through email or private messaging. CCP respect the right of our players to privacy and as such you are not permitted to publicize private correspondence (including petition responses and emails) received from any of the aforementioned parties.
11. Discussion of forum moderation is prohibited.
The discussion of EVE Online forum moderation actions generally leads to flaming, trolling and baiting of our ISD CCL moderators. As such, this type of discussion is strictly prohibited under the forum rules. If you have questions regarding the actions of a moderator, please file a petition under the Community & Forums Category.
19. All posts must be related to EVE Online.
Posts regarding other companies and products or services are prohibited and any content of this nature will be removed. Posts regarding other games are however permitted on the Out of Pod Experience forum for the purposes of discussion only.
22. Post constructively.
Negative feedback can be very useful to further improve EVE Online provided that it is presented in a civil and factual manner. All users are encouraged to honestly express their feelings regarding EVE Online and how it can be improved. Posts that are non-constructive, insulting or in breach of the rules will be deleted regardless of how valid the ideas behind them may be. Users are also reminded that posting with a lack of content also constitutes non-constructive posting.
26. Off-topic posting is prohibited.
Off-topic posting is permitted within reason, as sometimes a single comment may color or lighten the tone of discussion. However, excessive posting of off-topic remarks in an attempt to derail a thread may result in the thread being locked, or a forum warning being issued.
30. Abuse of CCP employees and ISD volunteers is prohibited.
CCP operate a zero tolerance policy on abuse of CCP employees and ISD volunteers. This includes but is not limited to personal attacks, trolling, GÇ£outingGÇ¥ of CCP employee or ISD volunteer player identities, and the use of any former player identities when referring to the aforementioned parties. Our forums are designed to be a place where players and developers can exchange ideas in a polite and friendly manner for the betterment of EVE Online. Players who attack or abuse employees of CCP, or ISD volunteers, will be permanently banned from the EVE Online forums across all their accounts with no recourse, and may also be subject to action against their game accounts.
13 rules broken out of 34 rules total. 4 more and I would have posted the rules NOT broken.....  ISD Ezwal Commander Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|

Fredfredbug4
Eve Defence Force Cult of War
2217
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 00:21:00 -
[171] - Quote
It is a game for sure. If you wind up getting scammed, then all it means is that you lost that round. GG well played. The thing about EVE is that you will never hit rock bottom, because it is a game. You can lose everything but the one thing you will never be able to lose is that humble noob ship you started out with. You got that far starting with just a noob ship before, and you can do it again. Unless you got screwed over on an unprecedented level (like losing your character and all of the skill points with it) then it should be easier the second time around.
Got scammed out of your first 10 billion isk? No biggie! Sure it sucks, but chances are that now that you know what you're doing, you can make 20 billion isk in the same same time it took you to make 10 billion isk.
I wouldn't even say you actually lost something getting duped like that. Learning a lesson that can be valuable even in real life (don't be so gullible and trustworthy of strangers) is worth all the fictional money and even time in the world. Watch Fred Fred Frederation and stop cryptozoologist! Fight against the brutal genocide of fictional creatures across New Eden! Is that a metaphor? Probably not, but the fru-fru- people will sure love it! |

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
155
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 00:28:00 -
[172] - Quote
Considering the context of the OP, basically what it boils down to is some people aren't as evolved as others. Some are more animal than others, thinking only of themselves and how their actions effect themselves, while not caring about the impacts on others. Some are more enlightened and act in accordance with a proper moral and ethical guideline regarding interaction between all people.
Don't worry though, even though we're a few steps ahead of you on the staircase of human evolution, we'll reach down and pick you up to our level for the betterment of all of us. Even while you try and scream at and kick those you perceive to be below you.
You're lucky us good people exist working to make the lives better of everyone, unlike those of you who only care to act for your own self interests.
In EVE and Out. |

Zack Korth
Blasphemy INC.
298
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 00:40:00 -
[173] - Quote
I can't believe no one liked my ****, I laughed typing it. Actually, a new(ish) player just gifted me 250 million yesterday for being helpful, he said I was a swell guy, I believe him too, I am swell. (have pics), also, I haven't killed anyone in a long time, no one's felt compelled to mess with me, I actually disagree with your initial shitpost, I changed my mind, you're wrong. The eve community helps to fulfill your internet spaceships desire, suck it. |
|

ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
1002

|
Posted - 2014.03.15 00:47:00 -
[174] - Quote
I have removed a rule breaking post and the one quoting it.
The rules: 4. Personal attacks are prohibited.
Commonly known as flaming, personal attacks are posts that are designed to personally berate or insult another forum user. Posts of this nature are not beneficial to the community spirit that CCP promote and as such they will not be tolerated.
5. Trolling is prohibited.
Trolling is a defined as a post that is deliberately designed for the purpose of angering and insulting other players in an attempt to incite retaliation or an emotional response. Posts of this nature are disruptive, often abusive and do not contribute to the sense of community that CCP promote.
ISD Ezwal Commander Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
155
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 00:52:00 -
[175] - Quote
We understand you're not capable of thinking outside of yourself.
We're here to help you. We will sift through your barrage of hate to reach the diamond that is your potential self, and nurture you out of your dark existence so you may blossom gloriously into the light of positivity and goodness.
The words may seem offensive, but that's only because you do not understand since you are not yet capable.
But we're here for you. We can help you become the person you need to be, and not the broken shell of one you currently refuse to acknowledge you really are. |

Chopper Rollins
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
565
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 00:54:00 -
[176] - Quote
Marvin Shields wrote:..I have in my very long Eve career seen some of the most venomous, most vindictive people in gaming. Bear in mind, I played Ultima Online back when it came out and for many years following that, and that was THE game that started the open-world community-driven content MMO genre. Eve may be more polished and may have a greater following and has lasted a HELL of a lot longer, but UO was where it allllll started kids..
Well I was around long before the internet, have never played any online game except EvE and in my 4 year experience i have to say it's a great way for the naive to learn harsh lessons without harsh injury. It's pixels. You want change, you make it with power. I think it was Timothy Leary who crunched the miles of sociological data to conclude that the person with the fewest tricks for interacting with others will have those tricks honed to a razor's edge and therefore dominate any encounter. A limited range of ways to interact with others is defines as sickness. Short version: sickness rules.
Goggles. Making me look good. Making you look good. |

Ralen Zateki
Nexis. League of Infamy
134
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 00:55:00 -
[177] - Quote
Nope. Didn't read a single word. For two reasons, well, one really....
Started with [serious discussion].
Then the sub-reason... opened to find what I expected. Huge wall of text - eyes glazed over and mind immediately went blank.
Seriously. Seriously? |

Silvetica Dian
Manson Family Advent of Fate
817
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 01:10:00 -
[178] - Quote
Cannibal Kane wrote:War Kitten wrote:I think most of the OP's complaints can be resolved in three steps...
Stay out of hisec Stay off reddit Stay off the internet
Seriously, if a few bad apples ruin your entire orchard, you've got to stop focusing on the bad apples.
Eve's community in low and nullsec is fantastic, encouraging and helpful. Trust is a way of life in nullsec. Fear is a way of life in hisec because that's where the riffraff truly are, preying on the weak that don't know the rules or don't know how to play the game yet. Truth be told. Majority of people in EVE are good and helpful. The bad always gets the news which makes it appear that Bad is actually the majority. This guy. Mr Kane destroys corps and is the terror of high sec. He murders whole fleets of carebears and drives them out of their corp and sometimes out of eve. He is also a big softie. People that engage with him politely and honourably find him a valued friend. Corps that are being harrassed and he takes a liking to them find the corpses of their enemies laid in tribute at their doors. For causes that he likes he doesn't even charge. This guy encapsulates eve. People with a poor attitude suffer and those with a good attitude prosper. Almost all the a-holes of eve are actually nice people furthering an agenda. Sometimes they disagree and become frenemies. People with a poor attitude however find it rebounds upon them and they lash out blaming everyone but themselves. The experience you find in eve says a lot more about you than it does about the other eve players. Welcome to the sandbox. Money at its root is a form of rationing. When the richest 85 people have as much wealth as the poorest 3.5 billion (50% of humanity) it is clear where the source of poverty is. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jan/20/trickle-down-economics-broken-promise-richest-85 |

Karon Grandolf
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
11
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 01:14:00 -
[179] - Quote
Calling for a cultural revolution within Eve is the right thing to do. If EVE is indeed real, then policing of players should be done by players themselves.
But EVE is no longer real. EVE is not real because EVE does not deliver the game mechanics that allows players to limit bad behavior in any meaningful way.
EVE seems to evolve in a direction where a class of older assholes grief and grind another class of new players that don't stay in the game for very long. But then again, that is hard to know, cause CCP doesn't seem to be willing to share the data on how wars affect subscriptions.
In another similar thread I asked C C P Manifest about this, but he denied my questions, simply ignored them.
I get the idea that CCP is akin scammers, luring new players using the excellent crafting, and promise of doing great things together with good people. What they are really doing is feeding the sharks.
The game mechanics is unbalanced, they do not allow for non-ship PVP'ers to combat the sharks, without becoming sharks themselves. |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
17096
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 01:29:00 -
[180] - Quote
Actually you asked CCP Manifest a question he'd already answered. If you read the post that you've linked he clearly says that as posted in his previous post, which he quoted for your convenience, that CCP are seeing both new players and returning players, which suggests new accounts being opened and old ones being reactivated.
The difference between new accounts and new players is negligible, any new account is new business, regardless of whether it's a genuine newbie or from an existing customer.
Psychotic Monk for CSM 9 |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
3107
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 01:31:00 -
[181] - Quote
To the OP:
You're suffering under the weight of misconceptions about how the game is played. I'll start with your examples.
Destiny. Lol, just wow. Given this guy's attitude and total inability to opsec anything(combined with his obnoxious fans), what did anyone expect would happen? Yeah, people pipebomb him, people hellcamp him. He's made himself unwelcome, and a big giant target at the same time, that's pretty much the community policing itself.
Daionnis. I had to look this guy up.
He doesn't belong in EVE. He needs to go back to WoW, or Star Trek Online, or whatever kiddie ride he came from. He wants perfect safety, which is a phrase people like to use to claim that they should be allowed to pretend like other players don't exist. In a sandbox game, many consider such an attitude a capital crime. Personally I think he can go get stuffed, he doesn't want to play EVE, he wants to make EVE like every other game out there, and screw the people who like it just fine the way it is. Some of us don't take that kind of crap too well.
Quote:People are leaving this game, daily, because they cannot handle the harassment, the griefing, the scamming, and the constant fear of losing everything they own or a chunk of their paycheck because of some opportunistic ass with an itchy F1 finger.
Good. I'd rather they not sub, than they sub and act out later because this game isn't WoW in space. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á
Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1825
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 02:00:00 -
[182] - Quote
Silvetica Dian wrote: Welcome to the sandbox.
EvE is not a sandbox to start with its a theme park.
A PvP sandbox game is a game in which players develop tactics using objects placed in the sandbox by the developers, and other players develop ways to counter those tactics using the same or other objects. The developer acts as a referee. Their role is to place objects in the sandbox and modify the sandbox if certain tactics develop that become theme park (the only practical way to play the game).
In EvE the objects are ships, structures, modules and game mechanics.
Now having been in EvE since 2003 I have had the fortune to observe how EVE has developed and how the developers have added, removed and modified ships, structures, modules and mechanics over the entire 11 years of EvE's life.
In early EvE it was somewhat of a sandbox, there was high, low, null. Players who dared went to null and created empires. They fought over those empires using ships, modules and mechanics. Those that were really brave went 60 jumps into null, carved out an existence whilst fighting against other players. They formed fleets of ships and convoy's to bring back the loots of null. It was all player driven. To take someones space meant forming up a fleet and killing those other players, as many times as they had the spirit to try to stop you. You could be as creative as you wanted, you could do hit and run, you could scout and attack with massive force, you could solo pirate them. It was entirely player driven.
In comparison to the themepark we have now, which is basically "CCP's way" or the "Highway". You can hold space without being in system, you can go to bed while a megafleet is reinforcing your POS safe in the knowledge it'll be completely safe for at least 24 hours. You can't do hit and run attacks. There are no convoys to raid.
There is ONE WAY, the themepark way, to take sov, hold sov and use sov. Supercaps, structures, reinforcement timers, jump bridges and cyno's take the emergent gameplay out of the game because those things are so useful its foolish to do anything any other way.
The same goes for most of the mechanics in game now. If you want to gank a freighter you use catalysts, if you want to fleet up and protect your freighter, well you can't. If you want to tank the freighter, well you can't. About the only sandbox thing you can do is use an unintended feature "webbing" which was only intended to be a hostile module to try get it into warp before its scrammed by an out of corp alt that you can't hurt, because its a disposable alt.
A few years ago, after the alliancse became dominant to the extent null was a waste of time for creating casual content I created a corporation. It was a new idea thought up by me, a player. It involved offering players in game a privateers marque to enable them to fight back against the alliances in game.
It worked and it was effective. We patrolled high sec like the alliances patrolled null sec and we took the fight back to the alliances. They could have fought back, they could have arranged an extension of escorts or even psuedo-domination of parts of highsec to secure routes for their members but they chose to complain to CCP.
CCP nerfed the emergent gameplay and it was back to the themepark for the alliances.
Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Karon Grandolf
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
13
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 02:04:00 -
[183] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Actually you asked CCP Manifest a question he'd already answered. If you read the post that you've linked he clearly says that as posted in his previous post, which he quoted for your convenience, CCP are seeing both new players and returning players, which suggests new accounts being opened and old ones being reactivated. The difference between new accounts and new players is negligible, any new account is new business, regardless of whether it's a genuine newbie or from an existing customer.
At the time I didn't want to correct C C C Manifest cause I wanted answers to my questions. I didn't want to nitpick cause it can drive the attention away from the main topic. But since you do, he did NOT deliver the answer in said previous post.
He mentioned players, new and returning, but I was unsure how 'players' in this context is counted. His 'answer' didn't even clarify this.
New players are different from new accounts. It should be well known that a lot of players have several accounts. Several accounts are controlled and played by the same individual, sometimes multiboxing etc.
Now, it can be difficult to distinguish between the two for sure, but not impossible to create an estimate based on IP adresses and/or credit card numbers for instance. To understand how the playerbase evolves in your game, it would be useful to have these numbers.
Both new accounts and new players are indeed new business, but the quality of the business is different. A new account for an established player can be considered a consolidation of business for instance. This is not true for a new player trying the game for the first time.
I was asking for data to exactly confirm or dismiss the idea that the difference between new accounts and new players is neglible. Do you have data to back up that claim? If so, would you be willing to share? Would CCP?
|

Malcolm Shinhwa
Bad Touches
1305
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 02:13:00 -
[184] - Quote
You know, if I heard about a cut throat PvP all the time video game, first thing I'd do is want to stream my first experiences. Especially if I wanted attention.
Aside from that, here is my testimonial that I give in all such threads:
I was ganked. I was ganked 3 weeks into the game and lost my Venture and 40mil worth of implants. Those implants I got as some sort of signup bonus from CCP. I certainly didn't have 40mil to buy another. I didn't freak out, QQ in local, posting on the forums about ebil gankers, or threaten eternal damnation upon the guy who ganked me. I woke up in my clone vat... wondered what happened... then I figured it out.. I'd been killed by another player... OMG THIS GAME IS FREAKIN' AMAZING!!!! I made friends with that guy, he sent me some great "staying alive in space" tips that I still use to this day. Although I was terrible at it and I don't remember finding him a single target, I started scanning ships for him in Dodixie. Without that experience, I would have rescued that freakin' damsel for a couple of months and then quit this game for something else. Instead I've been playing for 15mo, approximately 10mo longer than any previous MMO.
There are some players that are rude and crude in local and emails. My wife wondered if it would be OK if my teenage son played Eve with me. I said no because a video game wasn't the right forum for him to learn about anal sex. The people who spew the most vial hate in chat are what bother me. But that's why I don't play X-Box live with a headset, because I don't need to know who slept with my mother last night.
The liars, cheats, scammers, pirates, gankers, awoxers, those are things that make this game worth playing. Without bad guys, the game would be boring. You get a tiny rush in this game just by clicking "Undock". Without made up enemies to smite, where is the fun? I know violence isn't the answer. I got it wrong on purpose. |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
10385
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 02:16:00 -
[185] - Quote
I will never understand why people demand CCP change EVE entirely when games such as STO exist which offer exactly what they want. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

KuroVolt
The Legion of Spoon Curatores Veritatis Alliance
1531
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 02:19:00 -
[186] - Quote
Its because more players these days want to role play as the bad guy.
Ironically these are usually the same people who take one glance at my alliance ticker and go "lolroleplayers". BoBwins Law: As a discussion/war between two large nullsec entities grows longer, the probability of one comparing the other to BoB aproaches near certainty. |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1830
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 02:22:00 -
[187] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:I will never understand why people demand CCP change EVE entirely when games such as STO exist which offer exactly what they want. Because we play EVE, its marketed as a sandbox game, it should be a sandbox game. The developers should be performing their required role as developers of a sandbox game which is to act as referee's. They are not. The game play is stagnant. The so-called emergent gameplay is ganking (been in game since M0o and Zombie), the PvP is largely still spawn point based (been in game since 2003), the sov warefare is themepark (theres only one way to do it), the ships are imbalanced to the extent one hull, class or module (supers, caps, blops, cyno's, cats, archons) are used to the exclusion of any emergent new methods / tactics.
Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
3108
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 02:24:00 -
[188] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote:baltec1 wrote:I will never understand why people demand CCP change EVE entirely when games such as STO exist which offer exactly what they want. Because we play EVE, its marketed as a sandbox game, it should be a sandbox game. The developers should be performing their required role as developers of a sandbox game which is to act as referee's. They are not. The game play is stagnant. The so-called emergent gameplay is ganking (been in game since M0o and Zombie), the PvP is largely still spawn point based (been in game since 2003), the sov warefare is themepark (theres only one way to do it), the ships are imbalanced to the extent one hull, class or module (supers, caps, blops, cyno's, cats, archons) are used to the exclusion of any emergent new methods / tactics.
So, how's it going with those pocos? Are they still sov structures? Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á
Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Anslo
The Scope Gallente Federation
4498
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 02:24:00 -
[189] - Quote
KuroVolt wrote:Its because more players these days want to role play as the bad guy.
Ironically these are usually the same people who take one glance at my alliance ticker and go "lolroleplayers". They ain't saying that when CVA hot drops and steam rolls.
Provi block OP.
|

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1830
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 02:29:00 -
[190] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:baltec1 wrote:I will never understand why people demand CCP change EVE entirely when games such as STO exist which offer exactly what they want. Because we play EVE, its marketed as a sandbox game, it should be a sandbox game. The developers should be performing their required role as developers of a sandbox game which is to act as referee's. They are not. The game play is stagnant. The so-called emergent gameplay is ganking (been in game since M0o and Zombie), the PvP is largely still spawn point based (been in game since 2003), the sov warefare is themepark (theres only one way to do it), the ships are imbalanced to the extent one hull, class or module (supers, caps, blops, cyno's, cats, archons) are used to the exclusion of any emergent new methods / tactics. So, how's it going with those pocos? Are they still sov structures? Stop off topic trolling. Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
3108
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 02:31:00 -
[191] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:baltec1 wrote:I will never understand why people demand CCP change EVE entirely when games such as STO exist which offer exactly what they want. Because we play EVE, its marketed as a sandbox game, it should be a sandbox game. The developers should be performing their required role as developers of a sandbox game which is to act as referee's. They are not. The game play is stagnant. The so-called emergent gameplay is ganking (been in game since M0o and Zombie), the PvP is largely still spawn point based (been in game since 2003), the sov warefare is themepark (theres only one way to do it), the ships are imbalanced to the extent one hull, class or module (supers, caps, blops, cyno's, cats, archons) are used to the exclusion of any emergent new methods / tactics. So, how's it going with those pocos? Are they still sov structures? Stop off topic trolling.
Says the person who just rolled out a giant off topic rant about sov in the first place?
Oh, and pocos aren't sov structures, in case you needed to hear it another time. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á
Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1830
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 02:33:00 -
[192] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:baltec1 wrote:I will never understand why people demand CCP change EVE entirely when games such as STO exist which offer exactly what they want. Because we play EVE, its marketed as a sandbox game, it should be a sandbox game. The developers should be performing their required role as developers of a sandbox game which is to act as referee's. They are not. The game play is stagnant. The so-called emergent gameplay is ganking (been in game since M0o and Zombie), the PvP is largely still spawn point based (been in game since 2003), the sov warefare is themepark (theres only one way to do it), the ships are imbalanced to the extent one hull, class or module (supers, caps, blops, cyno's, cats, archons) are used to the exclusion of any emergent new methods / tactics. So, how's it going with those pocos? Are they still sov structures? Stop off topic trolling. Says the person who just rolled out a giant off topic rant about sov in the first place? Oh, and pocos aren't sov structures, in case you needed to hear it another time. Yawn. Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
10386
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 02:37:00 -
[193] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote:baltec1 wrote:I will never understand why people demand CCP change EVE entirely when games such as STO exist which offer exactly what they want. Because we play EVE, its marketed as a sandbox game, it should be a sandbox game. The developers should be performing their required role as developers of a sandbox game which is to act as referee's. They are not. The game play is stagnant. The so-called emergent gameplay is ganking (been in game since M0o and Zombie), the PvP is largely still spawn point based (been in game since 2003), the sov warefare is themepark (theres only one way to do it), the ships are imbalanced to the extent one hull, class or module (supers, caps, blops, cyno's, cats, archons) are used to the exclusion of any emergent new methods / tactics.
So I see you pay no attention to what is going on. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
160
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 02:40:00 -
[194] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:baltec1 wrote:I will never understand why people demand CCP change EVE entirely when games such as STO exist which offer exactly what they want. Because we play EVE, its marketed as a sandbox game, it should be a sandbox game. The developers should be performing their required role as developers of a sandbox game which is to act as referee's. They are not. The game play is stagnant. The so-called emergent gameplay is ganking (been in game since M0o and Zombie), the PvP is largely still spawn point based (been in game since 2003), the sov warefare is themepark (theres only one way to do it), the ships are imbalanced to the extent one hull, class or module (supers, caps, blops, cyno's, cats, archons) are used to the exclusion of any emergent new methods / tactics. So, how's it going with those pocos? Are they still sov structures? Stop off topic trolling. Says the person who just rolled out a giant off topic rant about sov in the first place?
You should be ashamed of yourself.
Shame on you. |

Pain Killer13
Spark Enterprises
9
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 02:43:00 -
[195] - Quote
Personally as someone new to the game, I do wonder why players try to "grief" other players out of the game. I mean don't they want the influx of new players?
|

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
10386
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 02:45:00 -
[196] - Quote
Pain Killer13 wrote:Personally as someone new to the game, I do wonder why players try to "grief" other players out of the game. I mean don't they want the influx of new players?
We don't.
There are some people who when killed automatically think they have being griefed. The truth is that they died because they did something stupid and this game punished stupidity. They simply are not used to this. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Karon Grandolf
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
15
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 02:47:00 -
[197] - Quote
EVE is changing all the time. These changes influence the balances between play styles and what is practically available experiences in the game. This in relation to established players as well as new ones.
I found Infinity Zionas post on the game experience in null very interesting as I have almost no personal experience of that. It seems to support that EVE is evolving in a way that limits the available gameplay. Even if the mechanics are there, the combined net result of players and game mechanics means that large parts of the possible experiences are not practically viable to engage in.
In short, EVE is becoming less of a game than what it could be. It is becoming more gamy, and less roleplaying and exploration friendly. Becoming less community oriented for non-combat players too.
The peaceful industrial high sec corporation is not viable as a lifestyle in EVE, not because it's not mechanically available, but because there are no mechanics to protect that lifestyle from other competing lifestyles in the game. |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
10387
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 02:52:00 -
[198] - Quote
Karon Grandolf wrote:EVE is changing all the time. These changes influence the balances between play styles and what is practically available experiences in the game. This in relation to established players as well as new ones.
I found Infinity Zionas post on the game experience in null very interesting as I have almost no personal experience of that. It seems to support that EVE is evolving in a way that limits the available gameplay. Even if the mechanics are there, the combined net result of players and game mechanics means that large parts of the possible experiences are not practically viable to engage in.
In short, EVE is becoming less of a game than what it could be. It is becoming more gamy, and less roleplaying and exploration friendly. Becoming less community oriented for non-combat players too.
The peaceful industrial high sec corporation is not viable as a lifestyle in EVE, not because it's not mechanically available, but because there are no mechanics to protect that lifestyle from other competing lifestyles in the game.
There are plenty of ways for an industrial corp to protect itself, its not CCPs fault many chose not to use them. I would also take any post infinity makes on null sec with a pinch of salt around the same size as the salt flats of Botswana. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Pain Killer13
Spark Enterprises
10
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 02:54:00 -
[199] - Quote
baltec1 wrote: We don't.
There are some people who when killed automatically think they have being griefed. The truth is that they died because they did something stupid and this game punishes stupidity. They simply are not used to this.
The amount of posts saying "can I have your stuff" leads me to believe otherwise. It's just another way of saying, quit and go cry about it. |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
10387
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 02:56:00 -
[200] - Quote
Pain Killer13 wrote:baltec1 wrote: We don't.
There are some people who when killed automatically think they have being griefed. The truth is that they died because they did something stupid and this game punishes stupidity. They simply are not used to this.
The amount of posts saying "can I have your stuff" leads me to believe otherwise. It's just another way of saying, quit and go cry about it.
Its an EVE meme.
Generally posted when someone is ranting. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1831
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 02:59:00 -
[201] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Karon Grandolf wrote:EVE is changing all the time. These changes influence the balances between play styles and what is practically available experiences in the game. This in relation to established players as well as new ones.
I found Infinity Zionas post on the game experience in null very interesting as I have almost no personal experience of that. It seems to support that EVE is evolving in a way that limits the available gameplay. Even if the mechanics are there, the combined net result of players and game mechanics means that large parts of the possible experiences are not practically viable to engage in.
In short, EVE is becoming less of a game than what it could be. It is becoming more gamy, and less roleplaying and exploration friendly. Becoming less community oriented for non-combat players too.
The peaceful industrial high sec corporation is not viable as a lifestyle in EVE, not because it's not mechanically available, but because there are no mechanics to protect that lifestyle from other competing lifestyles in the game. There are plenty of ways for an industrial corp to protect itself, its not CCPs fault many chose not to use them. I would also take any post infinity makes on null sec with a pinch of salt around the same size as the salt flats of Botswana. Given Goons, a member of a coalition that has exploited the current state of null mechanics to almost have taken the entire conquerable map one would be wise not to put too much weight on a Goons comments regarding the state of null play. Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Anslo
The Scope Gallente Federation
4499
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 03:03:00 -
[202] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Karon Grandolf wrote:EVE is changing all the time. These changes influence the balances between play styles and what is practically available experiences in the game. This in relation to established players as well as new ones.
I found Infinity Zionas post on the game experience in null very interesting as I have almost no personal experience of that. It seems to support that EVE is evolving in a way that limits the available gameplay. Even if the mechanics are there, the combined net result of players and game mechanics means that large parts of the possible experiences are not practically viable to engage in.
In short, EVE is becoming less of a game than what it could be. It is becoming more gamy, and less roleplaying and exploration friendly. Becoming less community oriented for non-combat players too.
The peaceful industrial high sec corporation is not viable as a lifestyle in EVE, not because it's not mechanically available, but because there are no mechanics to protect that lifestyle from other competing lifestyles in the game. There are plenty of ways for an industrial corp to protect itself, its not CCPs fault many chose not to use them. I would also take any post infinity makes on null sec with a pinch of salt around the same size as the salt flats of Botswana.
Meaning stop training industry and go train Pvp to fight back. In other words, play their way.
Hurr.
|

Karon Grandolf
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
16
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 03:04:00 -
[203] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Karon Grandolf wrote:EVE is changing all the time. These changes influence the balances between play styles and what is practically available experiences in the game. This in relation to established players as well as new ones.
I found Infinity Zionas post on the game experience in null very interesting as I have almost no personal experience of that. It seems to support that EVE is evolving in a way that limits the available gameplay. Even if the mechanics are there, the combined net result of players and game mechanics means that large parts of the possible experiences are not practically viable to engage in.
In short, EVE is becoming less of a game than what it could be. It is becoming more gamy, and less roleplaying and exploration friendly. Becoming less community oriented for non-combat players too.
The peaceful industrial high sec corporation is not viable as a lifestyle in EVE, not because it's not mechanically available, but because there are no mechanics to protect that lifestyle from other competing lifestyles in the game. There are plenty of ways for an industrial corp to protect itself, its not CCPs fault many chose not to use them. I would also take any post infinity makes on null sec with a pinch of salt around the same size as the salt flats of Botswana.
There are indeed several actions that can be taken as a reaction to a war. Most if not all of them involves dismantling the the lifestyle I was talking about, which is exactly the point.
This does not make them less fun if you were to embrace them, but it doesn't change that the lifestyle is very hard to maintain, compared to the high sec war deccing lifestyle of griefers and mercenaries.
The combat lifestyle can impose on the non-combat through wars, but the non-combat cannot impose on the combat by barring a corp from high sec for a week for instance. You can pay Concord to be passive, not active.
Not to say that it should be possible, but the balance favors the combat lifestyle. |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
3109
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 03:08:00 -
[204] - Quote
Anslo wrote:baltec1 wrote:Karon Grandolf wrote:EVE is changing all the time. These changes influence the balances between play styles and what is practically available experiences in the game. This in relation to established players as well as new ones.
I found Infinity Zionas post on the game experience in null very interesting as I have almost no personal experience of that. It seems to support that EVE is evolving in a way that limits the available gameplay. Even if the mechanics are there, the combined net result of players and game mechanics means that large parts of the possible experiences are not practically viable to engage in.
In short, EVE is becoming less of a game than what it could be. It is becoming more gamy, and less roleplaying and exploration friendly. Becoming less community oriented for non-combat players too.
The peaceful industrial high sec corporation is not viable as a lifestyle in EVE, not because it's not mechanically available, but because there are no mechanics to protect that lifestyle from other competing lifestyles in the game. There are plenty of ways for an industrial corp to protect itself, its not CCPs fault many chose not to use them. I would also take any post infinity makes on null sec with a pinch of salt around the same size as the salt flats of Botswana. Meaning stop training industry and go train Pvp to fight back. In other words, play their way. Hurr.
Not so.
It's "stop holding your own head in the sand by pretending you can abdicate the ability to defend yourselves." Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á
Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
10390
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 03:11:00 -
[205] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote: Given Goons, a member of a coalition that has exploited the current state of null mechanics to almost have taken the entire conquerable map one would be wise not to put too much weight on a Goons comments regarding the state of null play.
So he should ignore the people who have taken over half of null and can bring high sec to its knees on a whim but trust one pilot who has been shown to be wrong on almost everything they have said?
Yea, that makes sense... Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Anslo
The Scope Gallente Federation
4499
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 03:11:00 -
[206] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Anslo wrote:baltec1 wrote:Karon Grandolf wrote:EVE is changing all the time. These changes influence the balances between play styles and what is practically available experiences in the game. This in relation to established players as well as new ones.
I found Infinity Zionas post on the game experience in null very interesting as I have almost no personal experience of that. It seems to support that EVE is evolving in a way that limits the available gameplay. Even if the mechanics are there, the combined net result of players and game mechanics means that large parts of the possible experiences are not practically viable to engage in.
In short, EVE is becoming less of a game than what it could be. It is becoming more gamy, and less roleplaying and exploration friendly. Becoming less community oriented for non-combat players too.
The peaceful industrial high sec corporation is not viable as a lifestyle in EVE, not because it's not mechanically available, but because there are no mechanics to protect that lifestyle from other competing lifestyles in the game. There are plenty of ways for an industrial corp to protect itself, its not CCPs fault many chose not to use them. I would also take any post infinity makes on null sec with a pinch of salt around the same size as the salt flats of Botswana. Meaning stop training industry and go train Pvp to fight back. In other words, play their way. Hurr. Not so. It's "stop holding your own head in the sand by pretending you can abdicate the ability to defend yourselves."
Is that your excuse for shooting fish in a barrel in highsec versus showing this loud mouthed pubbie consequences by blowing him up?
|

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
10392
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 03:13:00 -
[207] - Quote
Karon Grandolf wrote:
There are indeed several actions that can be taken as a reaction to a war. Most if not all of them involves dismantling the the lifestyle I was talking about, which is exactly the point.
This does not make them less fun if you were to embrace them, but it doesn't change that the lifestyle is very hard to maintain, compared to the high sec war deccing lifestyle of griefers and mercenaries.
The combat lifestyle can impose on the non-combat through wars, but the non-combat cannot impose on the combat by barring a corp from high sec for a week for instance. You can pay Concord to be passive, not active.
Not to say that it should be possible, but the balance favors the combat lifestyle.
EVE is advertised are a dark and cruel game, why would you expect it to be anything else?
You are playing a combat game, treat it as such. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
10392
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 03:15:00 -
[208] - Quote
Anslo wrote:
Is that your excuse for shooting fish in a barrel in highsec versus showing this loud mouthed pubbie consequences by blowing him up?
Its only easy to kill people if they make it easy. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
3109
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 03:18:00 -
[209] - Quote
Anslo wrote:
Is that your excuse for shooting fish in a barrel in highsec versus showing this loud mouthed pubbie consequences by blowing him up?
I would be very interested to hear what your excuse is for explicitly refusing to fight someone without a fleet to back you up? Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á
Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1833
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 03:20:00 -
[210] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Anslo wrote:
Is that your excuse for shooting fish in a barrel in highsec versus showing this loud mouthed pubbie consequences by blowing him up?
Its only easy to kill people if they make it easy. No its only easy to kill people if you choose to make it easy... I could sit in a 0.5 and gank people all day. Could sit on a gate and gank people all day. Could make friends and gank those. Could fake recruit and gank those.
I don't do it because I'd rather play football than touch football, just like I'd rather play cruel harsh EvE than your version of easy safe EvE, Baltec.
I find the current trend of 98-100% kill efficiency an embarassment. I'd be embarassed to have that ratio. Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Anslo
The Scope Gallente Federation
4500
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 03:21:00 -
[211] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Anslo wrote:
Is that your excuse for shooting fish in a barrel in highsec versus showing this loud mouthed pubbie consequences by blowing him up?
I would be very interested to hear what your excuse is for explicitly refusing to fight someone without a fleet to back you up? Bring your own. You don't accommodate your victims, why should I accommodate you?
This pubbie built a fleet. Why can't you? The tools are there. Why do you whine instead of act?
|

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
5358
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 03:21:00 -
[212] - Quote
Karon Grandolf wrote:baltec1 wrote:Karon Grandolf wrote:EVE is changing all the time. These changes influence the balances between play styles and what is practically available experiences in the game. This in relation to established players as well as new ones.
I found Infinity Zionas post on the game experience in null very interesting as I have almost no personal experience of that. It seems to support that EVE is evolving in a way that limits the available gameplay. Even if the mechanics are there, the combined net result of players and game mechanics means that large parts of the possible experiences are not practically viable to engage in.
In short, EVE is becoming less of a game than what it could be. It is becoming more gamy, and less roleplaying and exploration friendly. Becoming less community oriented for non-combat players too.
The peaceful industrial high sec corporation is not viable as a lifestyle in EVE, not because it's not mechanically available, but because there are no mechanics to protect that lifestyle from other competing lifestyles in the game. There are plenty of ways for an industrial corp to protect itself, its not CCPs fault many chose not to use them. I would also take any post infinity makes on null sec with a pinch of salt around the same size as the salt flats of Botswana. There are indeed several actions that can be taken as a reaction to a war. Most if not all of them involves dismantling the the lifestyle I was talking about, which is exactly the point. This does not make them less fun if you were to embrace them, but it doesn't change that the lifestyle is very hard to maintain, compared to the high sec war deccing lifestyle of griefers and mercenaries. The combat lifestyle can impose on the non-combat through wars, but the non-combat cannot impose on the combat by barring a corp from high sec for a week for instance. You can pay Concord to be passive, not active. Not to say that it should be possible, but the balance favors the combat lifestyle. EVE has always, I repeat, ALWAYS favored the defender. It is simplicity itself to avoid combat.
Most people can't be arsed to learn how to do so, and refuse to learn how to continue their normal activities in the face of potential aggression. Denying this obvious fact puts one firmly in that camp.
Shall we also point out that not only is an element of danger a necessary part of the game, without it most "industrial focused" characters would quit out of sheer boredom in remarkably short order. Despite protests otherwise, EVE is a pretty boring mining / harvesting simulator... which is fine because that isn't its goal. It's goal is to provide a universe where you can pursue those interests IN A DANGEROUS AND CHALLENGING ENVIRONMENT.
Many players become quite adept and continuing their peaceful pursuits despite dangerous circumstances they find themselves in.
Others simply complain on the forums, attempting to change the core premise of the game to suit their limited ability to adapt to other players actions. To carve a successful niche for yourself in EVE you need to be able to out sell, out produce, out fight,-á out run, or out wit your competitors. If you can do none of the above, your only option is to complain on the forums that somehow you are at a disadvantage using the exact same tool set-áas the rest of the player base. |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
10392
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 03:24:00 -
[213] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote: No its only easy to kill people if you choose to make it easy... I could sit in a 0.5 and gank people all day. Could sit on a gate and gank people all day. Could make friends and gank those. Could fake recruit and gank those.
I don't do it because I'd rather play football than touch football, just like I'd rather play cruel harsh EvE than your version of easy safe EvE, Baltec.
I find the current trend of 98-100% kill efficiency an embarassment. I'd be embarassed to have that ratio.
We don't care how we kill people if it makes us rich.
Point still stands, don't make it easy for us. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
5358
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 03:27:00 -
[214] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote: No its only easy to kill people if you choose to make it easy... I could sit in a 0.5 and gank people all day. Could sit on a gate and gank people all day. Could make friends and gank those. Could fake recruit and gank those.
I don't do it because I'd rather play football than touch football, just like I'd rather play cruel harsh EvE than your version of easy safe EvE, Baltec.
I find the current trend of 98-100% kill efficiency an embarassment. I'd be embarassed to have that ratio.
We don't care how we kill people if it makes us rich. Point still stands, don't make it easy for us. Or to put it another way, the simplest of precautions and the slightest hint of common sense would easily protect you from any of those situations.
If you chose not employ them, that's your problem... not the fault of the game or the other players. To carve a successful niche for yourself in EVE you need to be able to out sell, out produce, out fight,-á out run, or out wit your competitors. If you can do none of the above, your only option is to complain on the forums that somehow you are at a disadvantage using the exact same tool set-áas the rest of the player base. |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1833
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 03:30:00 -
[215] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:Karon Grandolf wrote:baltec1 wrote:Karon Grandolf wrote:EVE is changing all the time. These changes influence the balances between play styles and what is practically available experiences in the game. This in relation to established players as well as new ones.
I found Infinity Zionas post on the game experience in null very interesting as I have almost no personal experience of that. It seems to support that EVE is evolving in a way that limits the available gameplay. Even if the mechanics are there, the combined net result of players and game mechanics means that large parts of the possible experiences are not practically viable to engage in.
In short, EVE is becoming less of a game than what it could be. It is becoming more gamy, and less roleplaying and exploration friendly. Becoming less community oriented for non-combat players too.
The peaceful industrial high sec corporation is not viable as a lifestyle in EVE, not because it's not mechanically available, but because there are no mechanics to protect that lifestyle from other competing lifestyles in the game. There are plenty of ways for an industrial corp to protect itself, its not CCPs fault many chose not to use them. I would also take any post infinity makes on null sec with a pinch of salt around the same size as the salt flats of Botswana. There are indeed several actions that can be taken as a reaction to a war. Most if not all of them involves dismantling the the lifestyle I was talking about, which is exactly the point. This does not make them less fun if you were to embrace them, but it doesn't change that the lifestyle is very hard to maintain, compared to the high sec war deccing lifestyle of griefers and mercenaries. The combat lifestyle can impose on the non-combat through wars, but the non-combat cannot impose on the combat by barring a corp from high sec for a week for instance. You can pay Concord to be passive, not active. Not to say that it should be possible, but the balance favors the combat lifestyle. EVE has always, I repeat, ALWAYS favored the defender. It is simplicity itself to avoid combat. Most people can't be arsed to learn how to do so, and refuse to learn how to continue their normal activities in the face of potential aggression. Denying this obvious fact puts one firmly in that camp. Shall we also point out that not only is an element of danger a necessary part of the game, without it most "industrial focused" characters would quit out of sheer boredom in remarkably short order. Despite protests otherwise, EVE is a pretty boring mining / harvesting simulator... which is fine because that isn't its goal. It's goal is to provide a universe where you can pursue those interests IN A DANGEROUS AND CHALLENGING ENVIRONMENT. Many players become quite adept at continuing their peaceful pursuits despite dangerous circumstances they find themselves in. Others simply complain on the forums, attempting to change the core premise of the game to suit their limited ability to adapt to other players actions. EvE has never favored the defender lol. This is totally false.
The first time I jumped into low, there was no gate cloak, there was no timer, you appeared in space, in the middle of nowhere and if it was being camped you died before you loaded.
Since then a few nerfs on killing people have been added but a huge amount of stuff introduced to make it easier to catch and kill people - bubbles, hotdrops, cat ganks, increased dps, links, RR boosters, reps, long range tacklers, bubble deploying ships...
In fact the reason we now see an almost industrial-less low and null is because its so easy to catch and kill industrial characters.
Apart from the time where you spawnd without cloak and died to gankers before loading, its never been easier to kill people in game without repercussions. Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
10393
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 03:32:00 -
[216] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote: Or to put it another way, the simplest of precautions and the slightest hint of common sense would easily protect you from any of those situations.
If you chose not employ them, that's your problem... not the fault of the game or the other players.
Its a lesson that many seem unable to learn. 2/3 of our corps supers have been funded by high sec scams and ganking overstuffed haulers. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
10393
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 03:35:00 -
[217] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote: In fact the reason we now see an almost industrial-less low and null is because its so easy to catch and kill industrial characters.
You don't see it because its cheaper to build everything in high sec and just ship it out. Its very easy to get around in low and null to do industry, it just isn't financially viable to do it other than on things that cannot be built in high sec. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
3109
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 03:35:00 -
[218] - Quote
Anslo wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Anslo wrote:
Is that your excuse for shooting fish in a barrel in highsec versus showing this loud mouthed pubbie consequences by blowing him up?
I would be very interested to hear what your excuse is for explicitly refusing to fight someone without a fleet to back you up? Bring your own. You don't accommodate your victims, why should I accommodate you? This pubbie built a fleet. Why can't you? The tools are there. Why do you whine instead of act?
Grr, not whelping.
By the way, how's the blog doing? Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á
Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1836
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 03:38:00 -
[219] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote: In fact the reason we now see an almost industrial-less low and null is because its so easy to catch and kill industrial characters.
You don't see it because its cheaper to build everything in high sec and just ship it out. Its very easy to get around in low and null to do industry, it just isn't financially viable to do it other than on things that cannot be built in high sec. Because you lack an industrial base and market since you kill everything you see. You think we'd have cities if every immigrant was murdered by the locals as soon as they arrived. You do it to yourself so don't whine about the consequences. Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Anslo
The Scope Gallente Federation
4501
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 03:39:00 -
[220] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Anslo wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Anslo wrote:
Is that your excuse for shooting fish in a barrel in highsec versus showing this loud mouthed pubbie consequences by blowing him up?
I would be very interested to hear what your excuse is for explicitly refusing to fight someone without a fleet to back you up? Bring your own. You don't accommodate your victims, why should I accommodate you? This pubbie built a fleet. Why can't you? The tools are there. Why do you whine instead of act? Grr, not whelping. By the way, how's the blog doing? Resorting to changing goal posts huh? That's what I thought. :)
Nice to know I worked and am now better than you. Blog is fine btw. Serves its purpose. I get eve mails thanking me for it! Started a new one for scope even.
|

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
3109
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 03:42:00 -
[221] - Quote
Anslo wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Anslo wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Anslo wrote:
Is that your excuse for shooting fish in a barrel in highsec versus showing this loud mouthed pubbie consequences by blowing him up?
I would be very interested to hear what your excuse is for explicitly refusing to fight someone without a fleet to back you up? Bring your own. You don't accommodate your victims, why should I accommodate you? This pubbie built a fleet. Why can't you? The tools are there. Why do you whine instead of act? Grr, not whelping. By the way, how's the blog doing? Resorting to changing goal posts huh? That's what I thought. :) Nice to know I worked and am now better than you. Blog is fine btw. Serves its purpose. I get eve mails thanking me for it! Started a new one for scope even.
I'm not changing the goalposts at all.
You're the one claiming gankers have no balls, while simultaneously managing enough sophistry to justify refusing to fight me without a fleet to back you up.
You're a hypocrite and a coward, plain and simple. You know it's why your cute little Proveldtariat failed so badly, too. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á
Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Karon Grandolf
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
17
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 03:44:00 -
[222] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Karon Grandolf wrote:
There are indeed several actions that can be taken as a reaction to a war. Most if not all of them involves dismantling the the lifestyle I was talking about, which is exactly the point.
This does not make them less fun if you were to embrace them, but it doesn't change that the lifestyle is very hard to maintain, compared to the high sec war deccing lifestyle of griefers and mercenaries.
The combat lifestyle can impose on the non-combat through wars, but the non-combat cannot impose on the combat by barring a corp from high sec for a week for instance. You can pay Concord to be passive, not active.
Not to say that it should be possible, but the balance favors the combat lifestyle.
EVE is advertised are a dark and cruel game, why would you expect it to be anything else? You are playing a combat game, treat it as such.
EVE is also advertised as 'Real' (see C C P Manifest's bio for instance ;))
There was a time when I agreed that EVE was indeed very real. Mostly because it allowed for an ecology of gameplay styles, and social interaction.
I considered it a testament to the social character of the human, that in spite of what EVE allowed of mischief, the most predominant experience in EVE was still people helping each other and coorporate to create something together.
It was possible to play with a group of people, regardless of what kind of gameplay you preferred to engage in.
The environment allowed for it because it was better balanced between the styles of play. None was too dominant.
I believe the current environment leads to more isolated non-combat players than before.
EVE is not only a combat game, even if it's advertised as such.
But more than anything it would be great to have actual data to discuss these issues. I also asked C C P Manifest if they have the data. never got an answer. So we don't know whether they chose not to share or simply don't know themselves.
I agree with Ranger1 that EVE should provide A DANGEROUS AND CHALLENGING ENVIRONMENT. The problem is that it is not. |

Anslo
The Scope Gallente Federation
4501
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 03:51:00 -
[223] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Anslo wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
I'm not changing the goalposts at all.
You're the one claiming gankers have no balls, while simultaneously managing enough sophistry to justify refusing to fight me without a fleet to back you up.
You're a hypocrite and a coward, plain and simple. You know it's why your cute little Proveldtariat failed so badly, too.
And now you see why Care Bears get upset. Irrelevant thought. You simply are not capable of amassing a force to fight me. Also the Proveldtariat didn't fail. We simply evolved. Come at us, bro. "The Proveldtariat didn't fail, we just stopped doing anything toward the goals we originally had". Gotcha. 
Come see what we accomplished! Unlike you lot, we let our actions speak without pontificating it. But again, you're simply incapable. Oh well.
|

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
161
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 03:51:00 -
[224] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
You're a hypocrite and a coward, plain and simple.
I think because of this post it's fair to say this guy should be warned or possibly banned. |

Eli Kzanti
The Pod Foundation
71
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 03:53:00 -
[225] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:You're the one claiming gankers have no balls, while simultaneously managing enough sophistry to justify refusing to fight me without a fleet to back you up. Its unfortunate because they do, in fact, seem to lack in that area... unless you'd like to point out how exactly ganking requires any balls whatsoever? :P |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
3109
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 03:56:00 -
[226] - Quote
Anslo wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Anslo wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
I'm not changing the goalposts at all.
You're the one claiming gankers have no balls, while simultaneously managing enough sophistry to justify refusing to fight me without a fleet to back you up.
You're a hypocrite and a coward, plain and simple. You know it's why your cute little Proveldtariat failed so badly, too.
And now you see why Care Bears get upset. Irrelevant thought. You simply are not capable of amassing a force to fight me. Also the Proveldtariat didn't fail. We simply evolved. Come at us, bro. "The Proveldtariat didn't fail, we just stopped doing anything toward the goals we originally had". Gotcha.  Come see what we accomplished! Unlike you lot, we let our actions speak without pontificating it. But again, you're simply incapable. Oh well.
You've "accomplished" a minor league gatecamp in Huola that everyone and their brother knows about in advance.
/golfclap Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á
Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
3109
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 03:57:00 -
[227] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
You're a hypocrite and a coward, plain and simple.
I think because of this post it's fair to say this guy should be warned or possibly banned.
Care to explain? Or are you just trolling? Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á
Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Eli Kzanti
The Pod Foundation
71
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 03:58:00 -
[228] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:You've "accomplished" a minor league gatecamp in Huola that everyone and their brother knows about in advance.
/golfclap ^ evidently hasnt got a clue there. Or anywhere, from the looks of things. One more shot at saying something accurate?  |

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
161
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 04:02:00 -
[229] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
You're a hypocrite and a coward, plain and simple.
I think because of this post it's fair to say this guy should be warned or possibly banned. Care to explain? Or are you just trolling? https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Forum_rules?_ga=1.4786810.818293199.1393290763 |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1837
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 04:03:00 -
[230] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote: Because you lack an industrial base and market since you kill everything you see. You think we'd have cities if every immigrant was murdered by the locals as soon as they arrived. You do it to yourself so don't whine about the consequences.
No its cost. Its cheaper to just import from empire. No its because you don't have a customer base big enough to support industry and probably would had you and the rest of the alliances not decided to murder all your customers.
Were there a better spread of players across EVE there would likely be justification for better mechanics to be implemented to support those characters. Since you prefer a null wasteland with your exclusive pre-industrial age tribal social systems you don't have those mechanics. Stop whinging. Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
3109
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 04:08:00 -
[231] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:
Telling someone that I believe they are a coward is not a personal attack.
Anslo is a coward. He's also a hypocrite for literally saying that an entire subset of players do not have any balls, while hiding behind his fleet to say so.
That's just a fact, like saying that Infinity Ziona is a liar. He is, unless pocos became sov assets in the last few weeks. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á
Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
161
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 04:11:00 -
[232] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Telling someone that I believe they are a coward is not a personal attack.
Anslo is a coward. He's also a hypocrite for literally saying that an entire subset of players do not have any balls, while hiding behind his fleet to say so.
That's just a fact, like saying that Infinity Ziona is a liar. He is, unless pocos became sov assets in the last few weeks.
I'm so sorry for you.
Knowing bags of hate like you exist is such a cruel reminder of how unfair life really is.  
I truly hope things get better for you. |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
3109
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 04:13:00 -
[233] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Telling someone that I believe they are a coward is not a personal attack.
Anslo is a coward. He's also a hypocrite for literally saying that an entire subset of players do not have any balls, while hiding behind his fleet to say so.
That's just a fact, like saying that Infinity Ziona is a liar. He is, unless pocos became sov assets in the last few weeks.
I'm so sorry for you. Knowing bags of hate like you exist is such a cruel reminder of how unfair life really is.   I truly hope things get better for you.
The funny thing is, that my daughter likes to sit on my lap when I'm on my suicide ganker character. She loves to watch as other ships blow up, her enthusiasm is hilarious. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á
Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Karon Grandolf
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
17
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 04:14:00 -
[234] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Karon Grandolf wrote: I agree with Ranger1 that EVE should provide A DANGEROUS AND CHALLENGING ENVIRONMENT. The problem is that it is not.
Yet here you are complaining that you cannot run your non combat corp because its too dangerous.
Once again these issues are reduced to a question about a single pilot or a single corp. My interest is the combined result of the interaction between the different styles of play in the game.
I don't wish to complain. I'm sad to see the potential of the game being wasted as a whole. It is very difficult to run a non-combat corp in high sec of significant size. Not because it's dangerous, but because non-combat players find high sec combat boring.
A high sec war is the combat culture imposing on the non-combat. The combat culture impose on the non-combat on their own terms. They change the play for the non-combat to better fit the combat. I do not disaprove of this.
What is lacking is the non-combat culture being able to impose itself on the combat culture on the non-combat terms. Maybe it should be possible to exclude for a period, certain pilots and/or corporations that has become a menace to the industries of high sec? Or just make them legit targets for anyone in high sec for a period.
This could be used instead of a limit to the number of war decs. The more wars, the cheaper it becomes to use this tool. High sec needs mechanics to effectively police itself. The non-combat culture needs tools to bring the dangerous and challenging environment to the combat culture on it's own terms using non-combat tools. |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1837
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 04:14:00 -
[235] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Divine Entervention wrote: Telling someone that I believe they are a coward is not a personal attack. Anslo is a coward. He's also a hypocrite for literally saying that an entire subset of players do not have any balls, while hiding behind his fleet to say so. That's just a fact, like saying that Infinity Ziona is a liar. He is, unless pocos became sov assets in the last few weeks. I'm tired of attempting to educate you however its incorrect to say I'm a liar for saying that POCO's act like sov assets or to refer to POCO's as sov assets in the context that I referred to them as such - since POCO's in null are always destroyed by the sov owning alliance and their own POCO's installed + they reinforce and have the same HP / mechanics as sov assets making them Sov Assets.
Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Katrina Oniseki
Revenent Defence Corperation Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
3051
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 04:16:00 -
[236] - Quote
Holy **** Anslol is tearing this thread up, rofl.
Loving it! Ch+½j+ì Katrina Oniseki ~ (RDC) Chief Operations Officer ~ [I-RED] Director of Public Relations |

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
161
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 04:16:00 -
[237] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Telling someone that I believe they are a coward is not a personal attack.
Anslo is a coward. He's also a hypocrite for literally saying that an entire subset of players do not have any balls, while hiding behind his fleet to say so.
That's just a fact, like saying that Infinity Ziona is a liar. He is, unless pocos became sov assets in the last few weeks.
I'm so sorry for you. Knowing bags of hate like you exist is such a cruel reminder of how unfair life really is.   I truly hope things get better for you. The funny thing is, that my daughter likes to sit on my lap when I'm on my suicide ganker character. She loves to watch as other ships blow up, her enthusiasm is hilarious.
Yea, I've always felt there should be some sort of test adults should have to take if they wish to reproduce. You have proven that you're a reason why it should be so.
That little girl has zero chance |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
3109
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 04:23:00 -
[238] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote: I'm tired of attempting to educate you however its incorrect to say I'm a liar for saying that POCO's act like sov assets or to refer to POCO's as sov assets in the context that I referred to them as such - since POCO's in null are always destroyed by the sov owning alliance and their own POCO's installed + they reinforce and have the same HP / mechanics as sov assets making them Sov Assets.
Notice how frantically he dodges and gyrates, almost literally bending over backwards to justify such a statement.
The Internet Gymnast in his natural habitat. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á
Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Katrina Oniseki
Revenent Defence Corperation Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
3052
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 04:24:00 -
[239] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote: Please do not listen to your daddy. He is a bad person. If you believe the things he tells you, you too will grow up to be a bad person. Call social services and tell them he's a bad person so you can be put in a home with people who will raise you into a good person.
As a parent as well, I think you're taking this a bit too far. She isn't part of this video game political war. Let's leave her out of it, okay?
Have some class, even if he brought her into it. Ch+½j+ì Katrina Oniseki ~ (RDC) Chief Operations Officer ~ [I-RED] Director of Public Relations |

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
161
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 04:24:00 -
[240] - Quote
Katrina Oniseki wrote:Divine Entervention wrote: Please do not listen to your daddy. He is a bad person. If you believe the things he tells you, you too will grow up to be a bad person. Call social services and tell them he's a bad person so you can be put in a home with people who will raise you into a good person.
As a parent as well, I think you're taking this a bit too far. She isn't part of this video game political war. Let's leave her out of it, okay? Have some class, even if he brought her into it.
I'm not the one who brought her up. He could've kept that to himself. |

Erotica 1
Krypteia Operations CODE.
4287
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 04:26:00 -
[241] - Quote
ISD, please lock here and reopen on Reddit. Maybe a WoW subreddit would be appropriate as he will likely find his supporters there. See Bio for isk doubling rules. If you didn't read bio, chances are you funded those who did. |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1838
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 04:28:00 -
[242] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:Katrina Oniseki wrote:Divine Entervention wrote: Please do not listen to your daddy. He is a bad person. If you believe the things he tells you, you too will grow up to be a bad person. Call social services and tell them he's a bad person so you can be put in a home with people who will raise you into a good person.
As a parent as well, I think you're taking this a bit too far. She isn't part of this video game political war. Let's leave her out of it, okay? Have some class, even if he brought her into it. I'm not the one who brought her up. He could've kept that to himself. I'm pretty sure Kalrus is suffering from EVE-itis. Its where your forum / ingame personality gets blurred with your out of game persona.
He's likely a good father, just a terribly bad poster and really bad at EvE Online. Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
3109
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 04:32:00 -
[243] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:Erotica 1 wrote:ISD, please lock here and reopen on Reddit. Maybe a WoW subreddit would be appropriate as he will likely find his supporters there. Do you think choosing to play EvE over WoW makes you a better person?
No, just a better gamer. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á
Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
161
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 04:35:00 -
[244] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:Erotica 1 wrote:ISD, please lock here and reopen on Reddit. Maybe a WoW subreddit would be appropriate as he will likely find his supporters there. Do you think choosing to play EvE over WoW makes you a better person? No, just a better gamer.
I disagree. WoW's PvP is much more fast paced and requires more manual dexterity.
PvP in EvE is actually a huge joke, it's more reliant on planning rather than "skill".
Disturbingly, WoW PvP is more skillful.
|

Erotica 1
Krypteia Operations CODE.
4290
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 04:44:00 -
[245] - Quote
It's not my fault. It is what it is. See Bio for isk doubling rules. If you didn't read bio, chances are you funded those who did. |

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
164
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 04:45:00 -
[246] - Quote
Erotica 1 wrote:It's not my fault. It is what it is.
You're not able to make judgements about anything other than yourself because the only thing/person in this world you truly care about is yourself. You have no idea what anything "is" other than you. |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
10396
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 04:48:00 -
[247] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote: No its because you don't have a customer base big enough to support industry and probably would had you and the rest of the alliances not decided to murder all your customers.
Were there a better spread of players across EVE there would likely be justification for better mechanics to be implemented to support those characters. Since you prefer a null wasteland with your exclusive pre-industrial age tribal social systems you don't have those mechanics. Stop whinging.
We go through tens of thousands of ships and mods every month, Nullsec outstrips high sec on ship losses by millions. We are by far the biggest market in EVE to sell to. If it was viable we would be producing everything in our own space as it would provide easier logistics. Cost is the only thing that stops us from doing this. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
10396
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 04:55:00 -
[248] - Quote
Karon Grandolf wrote:
Once again these issues are reduced to a question about a single pilot or a single corp. My interest is the combined result of the interaction between the different styles of play in the game.
I don't wish to complain. I'm sad to see the potential of the game being wasted as a whole. It is very difficult to run a non-combat corp in high sec of significant size. Not because it's dangerous, but because non-combat players find high sec combat boring.
A high sec war is the combat culture imposing on the non-combat. The combat culture impose on the non-combat on their own terms. They change the play for the non-combat to better fit the combat. I do not disaprove of this.
What is lacking is the non-combat culture being able to impose itself on the combat culture on the non-combat terms. Maybe it should be possible to exclude for a period, certain pilots and/or corporations that has become a menace to the industries of high sec? Or just make them legit targets for anyone in high sec for a period.
This could be used instead of a limit to the number of war decs. The more wars, the cheaper it becomes to use this tool. High sec needs mechanics to effectively police itself. The non-combat culture needs tools to bring the dangerous and challenging environment to the combat culture on it's own terms using non-combat tools.
So your plan is to get CCP to do all the protecting for you by banning people who attack you from high sec.
See this is exactly why people like you get shafted time after time. You do nothing to protect yourself and think that CCP should be protecting you. This game is not like that, if you want protection then you have to do it yourself, there are more than enough tools in game to defend yourself with. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Marvin Shields
Division 156
106
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 05:00:00 -
[249] - Quote
What's wrong ISD? Can't handle the truth? |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
3110
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 05:01:00 -
[250] - Quote
Marvin Shields wrote:What's wrong ISD? Can't handle the truth?
Discussing moderation. Always a good idea. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á
Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Malcolm Shinhwa
Bad Touches
1307
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 05:02:00 -
[251] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Karon Grandolf wrote:
Once again these issues are reduced to a question about a single pilot or a single corp. My interest is the combined result of the interaction between the different styles of play in the game.
I don't wish to complain. I'm sad to see the potential of the game being wasted as a whole. It is very difficult to run a non-combat corp in high sec of significant size. Not because it's dangerous, but because non-combat players find high sec combat boring.
A high sec war is the combat culture imposing on the non-combat. The combat culture impose on the non-combat on their own terms. They change the play for the non-combat to better fit the combat. I do not disaprove of this.
What is lacking is the non-combat culture being able to impose itself on the combat culture on the non-combat terms. Maybe it should be possible to exclude for a period, certain pilots and/or corporations that has become a menace to the industries of high sec? Or just make them legit targets for anyone in high sec for a period.
This could be used instead of a limit to the number of war decs. The more wars, the cheaper it becomes to use this tool. High sec needs mechanics to effectively police itself. The non-combat culture needs tools to bring the dangerous and challenging environment to the combat culture on it's own terms using non-combat tools.
So your plan is to get CCP to do all the protecting for you by banning people who attack you from high sec. See this is exactly why people like you get shafted time after time. You do nothing to protect yourself and think that CCP should be protecting you. This game is not like that, if you want protection then you have to do it yourself, there are more than enough tools in game to defend yourself with.
His plan is also to have everyone but him fight by giving wardecers some sort of suspect flag. I know violence isn't the answer. I got it wrong on purpose. |

Malcolm Shinhwa
Bad Touches
1307
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 05:03:00 -
[252] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Marvin Shields wrote:What's wrong ISD? Can't handle the truth? Discussing moderation. Always a good idea.
This thread is getting locked as soon as an ISD wakes up regardless. I'll help spur it along....
Just buy a New Order permit. Only 10mil isk for a year's worth of hisec mining.
.. ISD's hate that sort of thing. I know violence isn't the answer. I got it wrong on purpose. |

Erotica 1
Krypteia Operations CODE.
4292
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 05:09:00 -
[253] - Quote
I propose this thread gets locked because OP is attacking the community- ranting, trolling, and surely a couple more things. See Bio for isk doubling rules. If you didn't read bio, chances are you funded those who did. |

Marvin Shields
Division 156
106
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 05:12:00 -
[254] - Quote
Malcolm Shinhwa wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Marvin Shields wrote:What's wrong ISD? Can't handle the truth? Discussing moderation. Always a good idea. This thread is getting locked as soon as an ISD wakes up regardless. I'll help spur it along.... Just buy a New Order permit. Only 10mil isk for a year's worth of hisec mining. .. ISD's hate that sort of thing.
Eh. I don't give a ****. I don't take kindly to someone coming in and arbitrarily removing content from a discussion because they don't like what's being said. The sad part is this particular member of ISD probably has a vested interest in keeping the info out of the public view for fear of certain entities being shed in a bad light.
Oh well. There goes a perfectly good threadnaught. Thanks ISD Ezwal! |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
3111
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 05:15:00 -
[255] - Quote
Marvin Shields wrote:Malcolm Shinhwa wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Marvin Shields wrote:What's wrong ISD? Can't handle the truth? Discussing moderation. Always a good idea. This thread is getting locked as soon as an ISD wakes up regardless. I'll help spur it along.... Just buy a New Order permit. Only 10mil isk for a year's worth of hisec mining. .. ISD's hate that sort of thing. Eh. I don't give a ****. I don't take kindly to someone coming in and arbitrarily removing content from a discussion because they don't like what's being said. The sad part is this particular member of ISD probably has a vested interest in keeping the info out of the public view for fear of certain entities being shed in a bad light. Oh well. There goes a perfectly good threadnaught. Thanks ISD Ezwal!
In before lock. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á
Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Kyperion
General Washington's Irregulars
41
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 05:20:00 -
[256] - Quote
Marvin Shields wrote:Malcolm Shinhwa wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Marvin Shields wrote:What's wrong ISD? Can't handle the truth? Discussing moderation. Always a good idea. This thread is getting locked as soon as an ISD wakes up regardless. I'll help spur it along.... Just buy a New Order permit. Only 10mil isk for a year's worth of hisec mining. .. ISD's hate that sort of thing. Eh. I don't give a ****. I don't take kindly to someone coming in and arbitrarily removing content from a discussion because they don't like what's being said. The sad part is this particular member of ISD probably has a vested interest in keeping the info out of the public view for fear of certain entities being shed in a bad light. Oh well. There goes a perfectly good threadnaught. Thanks ISD Ezwal!
Did we expect any less from goons and gankers online? |

Erica Dusette
Sky Fighters
3778
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 05:21:00 -
[257] - Quote
Yawn. GÖí -á-á Major (Ret.) Caldari Naval Militia Gÿá -á Sky Fighters | Just an innocent explorer! pâä -áHerrbert: "womwomwowmwoaugharwajwowoooommm"
|

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
10398
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 05:22:00 -
[258] - Quote
Kyperion wrote:Marvin Shields wrote:Malcolm Shinhwa wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Marvin Shields wrote:What's wrong ISD? Can't handle the truth? Discussing moderation. Always a good idea. This thread is getting locked as soon as an ISD wakes up regardless. I'll help spur it along.... Just buy a New Order permit. Only 10mil isk for a year's worth of hisec mining. .. ISD's hate that sort of thing. Eh. I don't give a ****. I don't take kindly to someone coming in and arbitrarily removing content from a discussion because they don't like what's being said. The sad part is this particular member of ISD probably has a vested interest in keeping the info out of the public view for fear of certain entities being shed in a bad light. Oh well. There goes a perfectly good threadnaught. Thanks ISD Ezwal! Did we expect any less from goons and gankers online?
Grr Goons. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Marvin Shields
Division 156
106
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 05:23:00 -
[259] - Quote
Lock it! It's not like any progress was made today! The majority of this thread devolved to shitposting and namecalling and finger pointing, to hell with the SERIOUS DISCUSSION I wanted, to hell with the potential to start a change in this game (Though that was a lofty expectation).
I don't ******* care anymore guys. There's nice people in the game, I never said there weren't. But it only takes a few people shitting in the community pool to ruin the experience for everyone else.
At no time did I say suicide ganking was a bad thing. I said the issue was not with mechanics or gameplay. The issue is with the tear-hungry types who prey on people for no better reason than hoping they get someone to whine in local or throw a temper.
The point has been made; Nothing more to do now than to wait for Mittens' personal ISD slaves to come in and lock the thread. |

Marvin Shields
Division 156
107
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 05:28:00 -
[260] - Quote
Erotica 1 wrote:Marvin Shields wrote:Lock it! It's not like any progress was made today! The majority of this thread devolved to shitposting and namecalling and finger pointing, to hell with the SERIOUS DISCUSSION I wanted, to hell with the potential to start a change in this game (Though that was a lofty expectation).
I don't ******* care anymore guys. There's nice people in the game, I never said there weren't. But it only takes a few people shitting in the community pool to ruin the experience for everyone else.
At no time did I say suicide ganking was a bad thing. I said the issue was not with mechanics or gameplay. The issue is with the tear-hungry types who prey on people for no better reason than hoping they get someone to whine in local or throw a temper.
The point has been made; Nothing more to do now than to wait for Mittens' personal ISD slaves to come in and lock the thread. Well there is one more thing... Can we have your stuff?
This character has a Condor. You're welcome to it. |

Kyperion
General Washington's Irregulars
42
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 05:29:00 -
[261] - Quote
Erotica 1 wrote:Marvin Shields wrote:Lock it! It's not like any progress was made today! The majority of this thread devolved to shitposting and namecalling and finger pointing, to hell with the SERIOUS DISCUSSION I wanted, to hell with the potential to start a change in this game (Though that was a lofty expectation).
I don't ******* care anymore guys. There's nice people in the game, I never said there weren't. But it only takes a few people shitting in the community pool to ruin the experience for everyone else.
At no time did I say suicide ganking was a bad thing. I said the issue was not with mechanics or gameplay. The issue is with the tear-hungry types who prey on people for no better reason than hoping they get someone to whine in local or throw a temper.
The point has been made; Nothing more to do now than to wait for Mittens' personal ISD slaves to come in and lock the thread. Well there is one more thing... Can we have your stuff?
because someone is unhappy with circumstances must mean they are on the verge of rage quitting |

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
164
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 05:32:00 -
[262] - Quote
Basically what it boils down to, is everyone gets really mad that I am better than them at all aspects of existence.
You really should stop comparing yourself to other people. There is always going to be someone who's better than you regardless of what it is, like me.
Just be happy that you are you, and stop letting the fact that you're not as great as everything as I am ruin your outlook on life.
Stop letting yourself get mad and sad because you're bad. Be Glad.
#thebest |

Erotica 1
Krypteia Operations CODE.
4293
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 05:34:00 -
[263] - Quote
I was actually just editing my post when you guys responded.
Let's go ahead and document this ragequit as best as possible, you know, to um, make lots of people take your side. We'll need you to go ahead and provide a full account api so people know this isn't some "complex Erotica 1 scheme." See Bio for isk doubling rules. If you didn't read bio, chances are you funded those who did. |

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
165
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 05:37:00 -
[264] - Quote
Erotica 1 wrote:I was actually just editing my post when you guys responded.
Let's go ahead and document this ragequit as best as possible, you know, to um, make lots of people take your side. We'll need you to go ahead and provide a full account api so people know this isn't some "complex Erotica 1 scheme."
Sorry bro, your Schtick is old. You're irrelevant again.
You bring nothing new to the table, and you can't even generate as much forum content through discourse as this 1 month old new to the game forum slayer. |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
5361
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 05:37:00 -
[265] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Telling someone that I believe they are a coward is not a personal attack.
Anslo is a coward. He's also a hypocrite for literally saying that an entire subset of players do not have any balls, while hiding behind his fleet to say so.
That's just a fact, like saying that Infinity Ziona is a liar. He is, unless pocos became sov assets in the last few weeks.
I'm so sorry for you. Knowing bags of hate like you exist is such a cruel reminder of how unfair life really is.   I truly hope things get better for you. The funny thing is, that my daughter likes to sit on my lap when I'm on my suicide ganker character. She loves to watch as other ships blow up, her enthusiasm is hilarious. Yea, I've always felt there should be some sort of test adults should have to take if they wish to reproduce. You have proven that you're a reason why it should be so. That little girl has zero chance. Put your daughter on the computer and read what I'm saying to her: Please do not listen to your daddy. He is a bad person. If you believe the things he tells you, you too will grow up to be a bad person. Call social services and tell them he's a bad person so you can be put in a home with people who will raise you into a good person. Okay, I stand corrected.
THIS is the stupidest post to ever appear on this forum. To carve a successful niche for yourself in EVE you need to be able to out sell, out produce, out fight,-á out run, or out wit your competitors. If you can do none of the above, your only option is to complain on the forums that somehow you are at a disadvantage using the exact same tool set-áas the rest of the player base. |

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
165
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 05:40:00 -
[266] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:Okay, I stand corrected.
THIS is the stupidest post to ever appear on this forum.
Ranger 1 wrote:Okay, I stand corrected.
THIS is the stupidest post to ever appear on this forum.
Fixed that for ya |

Marvin Shields
Division 156
109
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 05:45:00 -
[267] - Quote
So post-mortem: Over a hundred "likes" on my first post ever, not bad, right? |

Kyperion
General Washington's Irregulars
45
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 05:47:00 -
[268] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Karon Grandolf wrote:
Once again these issues are reduced to a question about a single pilot or a single corp. My interest is the combined result of the interaction between the different styles of play in the game.
I don't wish to complain. I'm sad to see the potential of the game being wasted as a whole. It is very difficult to run a non-combat corp in high sec of significant size. Not because it's dangerous, but because non-combat players find high sec combat boring.
A high sec war is the combat culture imposing on the non-combat. The combat culture impose on the non-combat on their own terms. They change the play for the non-combat to better fit the combat. I do not disaprove of this.
What is lacking is the non-combat culture being able to impose itself on the combat culture on the non-combat terms. Maybe it should be possible to exclude for a period, certain pilots and/or corporations that has become a menace to the industries of high sec? Or just make them legit targets for anyone in high sec for a period.
This could be used instead of a limit to the number of war decs. The more wars, the cheaper it becomes to use this tool. High sec needs mechanics to effectively police itself. The non-combat culture needs tools to bring the dangerous and challenging environment to the combat culture on it's own terms using non-combat tools.
So your plan is to get CCP to do all the protecting for you by banning people who attack you from high sec. See this is exactly why people like you get shafted time after time. You do nothing to protect yourself and think that CCP should be protecting you. This game is not like that, if you want protection then you have to do it yourself, there are more than enough tools in game to defend yourself with.
The only 'defense' CCP's shipfitting mechanics allow for those engaging in PVE... ESPECIALLY miners is a few seconds to GTFO if they detect a bad guy in a belt.
Same for missioners... because for the most part you cannot fit even a combat ship for missions and still have a prayer in a PVP situation... and also because you can almost never overcome a One vs Many situation....
So lets give the gankers what they want... Put some ******* teeth on all merchant ships.... give the Barges deployable defense stations and EWAR mid slots....
Lets see how many of these elite champions of Highsec PVP will still be around when the barges strip miner could target and disintegrate their hull.
|

Kyperion
General Washington's Irregulars
45
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 05:48:00 -
[269] - Quote
Marvin Shields wrote:So post-mortem: Over a hundred "likes" on my first post ever, not bad, right?
Possibly 157, checking to see if I liked it.
|

Malcolm Shinhwa
Bad Touches
1310
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 05:49:00 -
[270] - Quote
Marvin Shields wrote: I don't ******* care anymore guys. There's nice people in the game, I never said there weren't. But it only takes a few people shitting in the community pool to ruin the experience for everyone else.
I don't feel like my experience has been ruined. Mostly I've found with Eve that I can choose to interact with people or not. Can block people in local. I don't have to see their emails. Heck, I think the forum software even blocks people for you. There is no online game I've played at any time that didn't have people that are jerks. Eve is the first one I've found where I get to blow them up though. I know violence isn't the answer. I got it wrong on purpose. |

Kyperion
General Washington's Irregulars
45
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 05:50:00 -
[271] - Quote
Actually thats a damn good idea.... let a strip miner overloaded do X amount of DPS directly to the hull of a ship.... it can disintegrate asteroids after all, why the hell can't they damage ships. |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
3111
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 05:50:00 -
[272] - Quote
Kyperion wrote: The only 'defense' CCP's shipfitting mechanics allow for those engaging in PVE... ESPECIALLY miners is a few seconds to GTFO if they detect a bad guy in a belt.
Same for missioners... because for the most part you cannot fit even a combat ship for missions and still have a prayer in a PVP situation... and also because you can almost never overcome a One vs Many situation....
So lets give the gankers what they want... Put some ******* teeth on all merchant ships.... give the Barges deployable defense stations and EWAR mid slots....
Lets see how many of these elite champions of Highsec PVP will still be around when the barges strip miner could target and disintegrate their hull.
"I can't be asked to fit or fly ships correctly, so give me the most overpowered anything possible, that'll show em!" Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á
Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Goa Chai
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 05:53:00 -
[273] - Quote
Life in New Eden is like life in prison, at first you keep to yourself because you don't know where you fit in, but eventually you learn who you can socialize with and who to avoid, then once you know that survival becomes a matter of looking out for those who look out for you and not drawing attention to yourself, manage that and you might make it through your sentence without getting sh(g)anked and your stuff taken. |

Marvin Shields
Division 156
111
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 05:53:00 -
[274] - Quote
Kyperion wrote:Actually thats a damn good idea.... let a strip miner overloaded do X amount of DPS directly to the hull of a ship.... it can disintegrate asteroids after all, why the hell can't they damage ships.
This proposal's been done to death, but it never gets any less fun to think about.
"Die carebear scu-**** MY SHIP! STOP MINING MY SHIP!" |

Kyperion
General Washington's Irregulars
45
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 05:54:00 -
[275] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Kyperion wrote: The only 'defense' CCP's shipfitting mechanics allow for those engaging in PVE... ESPECIALLY miners is a few seconds to GTFO if they detect a bad guy in a belt.
Same for missioners... because for the most part you cannot fit even a combat ship for missions and still have a prayer in a PVP situation... and also because you can almost never overcome a One vs Many situation....
So lets give the gankers what they want... Put some ******* teeth on all merchant ships.... give the Barges deployable defense stations and EWAR mid slots....
Lets see how many of these elite champions of Highsec PVP will still be around when the barges strip miner could target and disintegrate their hull.
"I can't be asked to fit or fly ships correctly, so give me the most overpowered anything possible, that'll show em!" Yes, because shooting back is OP... ******* idiot |

Erotica 1
Krypteia Operations CODE.
4295
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 05:55:00 -
[276] - Quote
Marvin Shields wrote:So post-mortem: Over a hundred "likes" on my first post ever, not bad, right?
Yep, you're almost to where you can launch a successful Ponzi. Good job! See Bio for isk doubling rules. If you didn't read bio, chances are you funded those who did. |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
3111
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 06:00:00 -
[277] - Quote
Kyperion wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Kyperion wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Kyperion wrote: The only 'defense' CCP's shipfitting mechanics allow for those engaging in PVE... ESPECIALLY miners is a few seconds to GTFO if they detect a bad guy in a belt.
Same for missioners... because for the most part you cannot fit even a combat ship for missions and still have a prayer in a PVP situation... and also because you can almost never overcome a One vs Many situation....
So lets give the gankers what they want... Put some ******* teeth on all merchant ships.... give the Barges deployable defense stations and EWAR mid slots....
Lets see how many of these elite champions of Highsec PVP will still be around when the barges strip miner could target and disintegrate their hull.
"I can't be asked to fit or fly ships correctly, so give me the most overpowered anything possible, that'll show em!" Yes, because shooting back is OP... ******* idiot "8 racks of missiles, Strip Miners that deal dps" Yeah, sure, totally not overpowered.  Depends on the bonuses, 8 turrets with no bonuses would be half as effective as your typical gank ship
Out of curiosity, how much would this monstrosity cost? 1, 2 billion isk? Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á
Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
5363
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 06:01:00 -
[278] - Quote
Karon Grandolf wrote:baltec1 wrote:Karon Grandolf wrote:
There are indeed several actions that can be taken as a reaction to a war. Most if not all of them involves dismantling the the lifestyle I was talking about, which is exactly the point.
This does not make them less fun if you were to embrace them, but it doesn't change that the lifestyle is very hard to maintain, compared to the high sec war deccing lifestyle of griefers and mercenaries.
The combat lifestyle can impose on the non-combat through wars, but the non-combat cannot impose on the combat by barring a corp from high sec for a week for instance. You can pay Concord to be passive, not active.
Not to say that it should be possible, but the balance favors the combat lifestyle.
EVE is advertised are a dark and cruel game, why would you expect it to be anything else? You are playing a combat game, treat it as such. EVE is also advertised as 'Real' (see C C P Manifest's bio for instance ;)) There was a time when I agreed that EVE was indeed very real. Mostly because it allowed for an ecology of gameplay styles, and social interaction. I considered it a testament to the social character of the human, that in spite of what EVE allowed of mischief, the most predominant experience in EVE was still people helping each other and coorporate to create something together. It was possible to play with a group of people, regardless of what kind of gameplay you preferred to engage in. The environment allowed for it because it was better balanced between the styles of play. None was too dominant. I believe the current environment leads to more isolated non-combat players than before. EVE is not only a combat game, even if it's advertised as such. But more than anything it would be great to have actual data to discuss these issues. I also asked C C P Manifest if they have the data. never got an answer. So we don't know whether they chose not to share or simply don't know themselves. I agree with Ranger1 that EVE should provide A DANGEROUS AND CHALLENGING ENVIRONMENT. The problem is that it is not.

I will agree there is always more room for tools and mechanics to aid people in the more peaceful EVE pursuits to benefit from working together.
However, that isn't as easy as it sounds. There seems to be a pervasive attitude that if you work together and split the proceeds of your work you'll end up only getting half as much. Mining is the only (sometimes) exception to this misguided school of thought.
The thing is, to be quite honest, gate camps and ganking can be a highly dangerous activity in EVE. I have on occasion worked a good gate camp (null sec defense or low sec pirate at various times). I have also been the guy that shows a gate camp exactly why that activity can make you extremely vulnerable to a well organized counter attack.
Most gate camps are incredibly easy to reverse, or at the very least break up, by any reasonably organized group of players. In fact, my very first kill was in such an encounter about a decade ago... deep in the wastelands of Aridia. It's only gotten easier since then.
But that is work best suited to a group, which is something the majority of industrialists avoid. When operating solo you need to content yourself with simply evading those camps, using the myriad of tactics and tools at your disposal. *
This results in the other hazard of gate camping. Namely utter boredom if you happen to be in an area where people are competent enough not to blunder under your guns.
*Note: I have on many occasions seen players with sufficient skill to bust up a decent sized gate camp solo, but I don't expect that level of game play from the average player. Nor do I consider myself skilled enough to do so. I do, however, prefer to work closely with people that are of that caliber whenever possible. To carve a successful niche for yourself in EVE you need to be able to out sell, out produce, out fight,-á out run, or out wit your competitors. If you can do none of the above, your only option is to complain on the forums that somehow you are at a disadvantage using the exact same tool set-áas the rest of the player base. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20060
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 06:01:00 -
[279] - Quote
Kyperion wrote:The only 'defense' CCP's shipfitting mechanics allow for those engaging in PVE... ESPECIALLY miners is a few seconds to GTFO if they detect a bad guy in a belt.
Same for missioners... because for the most part you cannot fit even a combat ship for missions and still have a prayer in a PVP situation... and also because you can almost never overcome a One vs Many situation.... First of all, mining isn't PvE.
Second of all, it has nothing (or at least very little) to do with fitting your ship. Notice that he mentions the tools at your disposal, not the modules. Now, granted, many victims seem to forget the modules as well and run around with empty slots and no tank, but defending yourself does not start where the lasers meet your hull GÇö it starts much sooner than that.
If you use the tools at your disposal GÇö local, contact lists, the map, personal chat channels, all the ISK you collect, and most important of all: other players GÇö those few seconds you mention suddenly become minutes, and like it or not, not being around to be a target any more is about as effective a defence as there ever was.
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Kyperion
General Washington's Irregulars
47
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 06:03:00 -
[280] - Quote
"Out of curiosity, how much would this monstrosity cost? 1, 2 billion isk?"
Probably a little more than your typical battleship, with similar training requirements to fly, and similar requirements to fly well.
Really there is no excuse not to give Merchant ships some tank and teeth, with the mobile structures we already have had an extreme design shift to self sufficiency.
|

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1840
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 06:04:00 -
[281] - Quote
Erotica 1 wrote:I propose this thread gets locked because OP is attacking the community- ranting, trolling, and surely a couple more things. I propose that you're proposing this thread gets locked because its exposed the obvious truth about the game, gankers and general asshats in game...
Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
3113
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 06:06:00 -
[282] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote:Erotica 1 wrote:I propose this thread gets locked because OP is attacking the community- ranting, trolling, and surely a couple more things. I propose that you're proposing this thread gets locked because its exposed the obvious truth about the game, gankers and general asshats in game...
In a similar manner to how you always howl about calling the mods when it's continually pointed out to you that you relentlessly lie about everything, and have no clue what you're talking about? Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á
Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
5364
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 06:09:00 -
[283] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:Erotica 1 wrote:I propose this thread gets locked because OP is attacking the community- ranting, trolling, and surely a couple more things. I propose that you're proposing this thread gets locked because its exposed the obvious truth about the game, gankers and general asshats in game... In a similar manner to how you always howl about calling the mods when it's continually pointed out to you that you relentlessly lie about everything, and have no clue what you're talking about? Or perhaps it's because it shows that the gankers and the asshats (with a few notable exceptions) are in fact two separate groups. 
On a more serious note, as I've said before, if you didn't have the "bad guys" to wail and gnash your teeth about you wouldn't enjoy the game nearly as much. Once this bit of self realization hits home, you will find inner harmony.  To carve a successful niche for yourself in EVE you need to be able to out sell, out produce, out fight,-á out run, or out wit your competitors. If you can do none of the above, your only option is to complain on the forums that somehow you are at a disadvantage using the exact same tool set-áas the rest of the player base. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20062
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 06:11:00 -
[284] - Quote
Kyperion wrote: Really there is no excuse not to give Merchant ships some tank and teeth, with the mobile structures we already have had an extreme design shift to self sufficiency.
They already have that if you choose to. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
5366
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 06:20:00 -
[285] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Kyperion wrote: Really there is no excuse not to give Merchant ships some tank and teeth, with the mobile structures we already have had an extreme design shift to self sufficiency.
They already have that if you choose to. I'll have to say this, while I think there are plenty of options for a good player to use the ships, modules and tactics to avoid combat effectively I really would'nt argue with a properly balanced branch of hauler/miner vessels that actually depended more on point defense than tank or evasion capabilities.
I'm reminded of merchant ships in WWII that were equipped with anti aircraft guns to act as (more or less disguised) escorts for supply convoys. Granted you "can" throw a gun on some now, but I'm talking about one that actually might have a chance of taking out a Catalyst or two quickly enough to have a small chance of surviving a gank attempt if the player is really on the ball.
Obviously this would involve a lot of balancing issues, but still it would be a new dimension to the eternal struggle between the ganker and the ganked.
Just a random thought, carry on. To carve a successful niche for yourself in EVE you need to be able to out sell, out produce, out fight,-á out run, or out wit your competitors. If you can do none of the above, your only option is to complain on the forums that somehow you are at a disadvantage using the exact same tool set-áas the rest of the player base. |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
3113
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 06:21:00 -
[286] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:Tippia wrote:Kyperion wrote: Really there is no excuse not to give Merchant ships some tank and teeth, with the mobile structures we already have had an extreme design shift to self sufficiency.
They already have that if you choose to. I'll have to say this, while I think there are plenty of options for a good player to use the ships, modules and tactics to avoid combat effectively I really would'nt argue with a properly balanced branch of hauler/miner vessels that actually depended more on point defense than tank or evasion capabilities. I'm reminded of merchant ships in WWII that were equipped with anti aircraft guns to act as (more or less disguised) escorts for supply convoys. Granted you "can" throw a gun on some now, but I'm talking about one that actually might have a chance of taking out a Catalyst or two quickly enough to have a small chance of surviving a gank attempt if the player is really on the ball. Obviously this would involve a lot of balancing issues, but still it would be a new dimension to the eternal struggle between the ganker and the ganked. Just a random thought, carry on.
They don't have point defense guns in EVE. Drones fill that role, actually. It's observable in battleships especially. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á
Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
5366
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 06:25:00 -
[287] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Ranger 1 wrote:Tippia wrote:Kyperion wrote: Really there is no excuse not to give Merchant ships some tank and teeth, with the mobile structures we already have had an extreme design shift to self sufficiency.
They already have that if you choose to. I'll have to say this, while I think there are plenty of options for a good player to use the ships, modules and tactics to avoid combat effectively I really would'nt argue with a properly balanced branch of hauler/miner vessels that actually depended more on point defense than tank or evasion capabilities. I'm reminded of merchant ships in WWII that were equipped with anti aircraft guns to act as (more or less disguised) escorts for supply convoys. Granted you "can" throw a gun on some now, but I'm talking about one that actually might have a chance of taking out a Catalyst or two quickly enough to have a small chance of surviving a gank attempt if the player is really on the ball. Obviously this would involve a lot of balancing issues, but still it would be a new dimension to the eternal struggle between the ganker and the ganked. Just a random thought, carry on. They don't have point defense guns in EVE. Drones fill that role, actually. It's observable in battleships especially. You are being a bit obtuse. You know exactly what I mean, or you should.  To carve a successful niche for yourself in EVE you need to be able to out sell, out produce, out fight,-á out run, or out wit your competitors. If you can do none of the above, your only option is to complain on the forums that somehow you are at a disadvantage using the exact same tool set-áas the rest of the player base. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20063
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 06:27:00 -
[288] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:Obviously this would involve a lot of balancing issues, but still it would be a new dimension to the eternal struggle between the ganker and the ganked. You know full well that everyone will look at it and say GÇ£what? less cargo/mining efficiency/AFK?! no way!GÇ¥ and then go back to dying horribly in untanked Macks. 
WellGǪ everyone except those who want to hide among unaware miners, of courseGǪ GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Karon Grandolf
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
17
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 06:35:00 -
[289] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Karon Grandolf wrote:
Once again these issues are reduced to a question about a single pilot or a single corp. My interest is the combined result of the interaction between the different styles of play in the game.
I don't wish to complain. I'm sad to see the potential of the game being wasted as a whole. It is very difficult to run a non-combat corp in high sec of significant size. Not because it's dangerous, but because non-combat players find high sec combat boring.
A high sec war is the combat culture imposing on the non-combat. The combat culture impose on the non-combat on their own terms. They change the play for the non-combat to better fit the combat. I do not disaprove of this.
What is lacking is the non-combat culture being able to impose itself on the combat culture on the non-combat terms. Maybe it should be possible to exclude for a period, certain pilots and/or corporations that has become a menace to the industries of high sec? Or just make them legit targets for anyone in high sec for a period.
This could be used instead of a limit to the number of war decs. The more wars, the cheaper it becomes to use this tool. High sec needs mechanics to effectively police itself. The non-combat culture needs tools to bring the dangerous and challenging environment to the combat culture on it's own terms using non-combat tools.
So your plan is to get CCP to do all the protecting for you by banning people who attack you from high sec. See this is exactly why people like you get shafted time after time. You do nothing to protect yourself and think that CCP should be protecting you. This game is not like that, if you want protection then you have to do it yourself, there are more than enough tools in game to defend yourself with.
No, I want tools that fit the specialization, otherwise the pilots will become more like each other in SP distribution and kind of activity.
I want to discuss ways to adjust the balance between war deccers and their targets in high sec. I don't believe that it is sufficient to call for a cultural revolution if the conditions for such a revolution are not present. In EVE these conditions are given by CCP.
I don't want CCP to protect high sec dwellers, I want tools so that high sec dwellers can protect themselves sufficiently to adjust the forementioned balance.
Maybe CCP is happy with the balance as it is, in that case I'll probly not return to EVE anytime soon. Or maybe I'll return from time to time to engage in PVP, but find other games to enjoy gaming experiences I previously found more available in EVE. There is nothing raging about that either. I find it sad that CCP may not want to support gaming experiences that are more casual. EVE used to offer a more varied experience when it comes to required attention.
Whether or not I'm getting shafted is irrelevant. If I fail to adapt I should still get consequenses on the individual level. |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
3114
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 06:37:00 -
[290] - Quote
Karon Grandolf wrote: I don't want CCP to protect high sec dwellers, I want tools so that high sec dwellers can protect themselves sufficiently to adjust the forementioned balance.
Those already exist. Few people use them correctly anyway. You don't need more safety because you're not properly using the safety you already have. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á
Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
5367
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 06:39:00 -
[291] - Quote
Karon Grandolf wrote:baltec1 wrote:Karon Grandolf wrote:
Once again these issues are reduced to a question about a single pilot or a single corp. My interest is the combined result of the interaction between the different styles of play in the game.
I don't wish to complain. I'm sad to see the potential of the game being wasted as a whole. It is very difficult to run a non-combat corp in high sec of significant size. Not because it's dangerous, but because non-combat players find high sec combat boring.
A high sec war is the combat culture imposing on the non-combat. The combat culture impose on the non-combat on their own terms. They change the play for the non-combat to better fit the combat. I do not disaprove of this.
What is lacking is the non-combat culture being able to impose itself on the combat culture on the non-combat terms. Maybe it should be possible to exclude for a period, certain pilots and/or corporations that has become a menace to the industries of high sec? Or just make them legit targets for anyone in high sec for a period.
This could be used instead of a limit to the number of war decs. The more wars, the cheaper it becomes to use this tool. High sec needs mechanics to effectively police itself. The non-combat culture needs tools to bring the dangerous and challenging environment to the combat culture on it's own terms using non-combat tools.
So your plan is to get CCP to do all the protecting for you by banning people who attack you from high sec. See this is exactly why people like you get shafted time after time. You do nothing to protect yourself and think that CCP should be protecting you. This game is not like that, if you want protection then you have to do it yourself, there are more than enough tools in game to defend yourself with. No, I want tools that fit the specialization, otherwise the pilots will become more like each other in SP distribution and kind of activity. I want to discuss ways to adjust the balance between war deccers and their targets in high sec. I don't believe that it is sufficient to call for a cultural revolution if the conditions for such a revolution are not present. In EVE these conditions are given by CCP. I don't want CCP to protect high sec dwellers, I want tools so that high sec dwellers can protect themselves sufficiently to adjust the forementioned balance. Maybe CCP is happy with the balance as it is, in that case I'll probly not return to EVE anytime soon. Or maybe I'll return from time to time to engage in PVP, but find other games to enjoy gaming experiences I previously found more available in EVE. There is nothing raging about that either. I find it sad that CCP may not want to support gaming experiences that are more casual. EVE used to offer a more varied experience when it comes to required attention. Whether or not I'm getting shafted is irrelevant. If I fail to adapt I should still get consequenses on the individual level. I really have to point out that the "non-combat" characters have far more effective defenses and tools at their disposal now than at any time in the past. You make it sound as if things are getting worse for the industrialist, when in fact conditions are much, much more favorable for them now. To carve a successful niche for yourself in EVE you need to be able to out sell, out produce, out fight,-á out run, or out wit your competitors. If you can do none of the above, your only option is to complain on the forums that somehow you are at a disadvantage using the exact same tool set-áas the rest of the player base. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20064
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 06:43:00 -
[292] - Quote
Karon Grandolf wrote:I want to discuss ways to adjust the balance between war deccers and their targets in high sec. I don't believe that it is sufficient to call for a cultural revolution if the conditions for such a revolution are not present. In EVE these conditions are given by CCP.
I don't want CCP to protect high sec dwellers, I want tools so that high sec dwellers can protect themselves sufficiently to adjust the forementioned balance. How is it unbalanced and what tools do you think you're lacking? GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Karon Grandolf
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
17
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 06:48:00 -
[293] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Karon Grandolf wrote: I don't want CCP to protect high sec dwellers, I want tools so that high sec dwellers can protect themselves sufficiently to adjust the forementioned balance.
Those already exist. Few people use them correctly anyway. You don't need more safety because you're not properly using the safety you already have.
If they exist but people rarely use them correctly, maybe there's something about them that makes them unsuitable or difficult to use?
This is where hard data would be nice to have. Otherwise its just personal experience and HTFU etc. |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
3115
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 06:50:00 -
[294] - Quote
Karon Grandolf wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Karon Grandolf wrote: I don't want CCP to protect high sec dwellers, I want tools so that high sec dwellers can protect themselves sufficiently to adjust the forementioned balance.
Those already exist. Few people use them correctly anyway. You don't need more safety because you're not properly using the safety you already have. If they exist but people rarely use them correctly, maybe there's something about them that makes them unsuitable or difficult to use? This is where hard data would be nice to have. Otherwise its just personal experience and HTFU etc.
People are just stupid, lazy, greedy, or all 3.
They're not too hard to use, they're just not mindlessly easy. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á
Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1844
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 07:04:00 -
[295] - Quote
Karon Grandolf wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Karon Grandolf wrote: I don't want CCP to protect high sec dwellers, I want tools so that high sec dwellers can protect themselves sufficiently to adjust the forementioned balance.
Those already exist. Few people use them correctly anyway. You don't need more safety because you're not properly using the safety you already have. If they exist but people rarely use them correctly, maybe there's something about them that makes them unsuitable or difficult to use? This is where hard data would be nice to have. Otherwise its just personal experience and HTFU etc. Nah you're being trolled. Both Kalrus and Trippia are resident forum trolls.
They don't exist. We have a system in which a 2 million isk easy to train ship can put out 700 dps easily. The issue is not miners its the Catalyst. They were designed to be frigate destroyers, there is no reason they need 700 dps for a frigate. Its a broken ship. Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20068
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 07:08:00 -
[296] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote:Nah you're being trolled. Both Kalrus and Trippia are resident forum trolls. Do you have anything to prove this claim?
Quote:They don't exist. We have a system in which a 2 million isk easy to train ship can put out 700 dps easily. Wow. That's a vast improvement over what was available only months ago. Could you provide a fitting?
And what makes you think that tanking modules, local, contact lists, maps, chat channels, ISK, support ships and other players (just to mention a few) don't exist? GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
3116
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 07:09:00 -
[297] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote:Karon Grandolf wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Karon Grandolf wrote: I don't want CCP to protect high sec dwellers, I want tools so that high sec dwellers can protect themselves sufficiently to adjust the forementioned balance.
Those already exist. Few people use them correctly anyway. You don't need more safety because you're not properly using the safety you already have. If they exist but people rarely use them correctly, maybe there's something about them that makes them unsuitable or difficult to use? This is where hard data would be nice to have. Otherwise its just personal experience and HTFU etc. Nah you're being trolled. Both Kalrus and Trippia are resident forum trolls. They don't exist. We have a system in which a 2 million isk easy to train ship can put out 700 dps easily. The issue is not miners its the Catalyst. They were designed to be frigate destroyers, there is no reason they need 700 dps for a frigate. Its a broken ship.
I would love to see the fit that costs 2 million isk and does 700 dps. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á
Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
5055
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 07:09:00 -
[298] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:Erotica 1 wrote:I propose this thread gets locked because OP is attacking the community- ranting, trolling, and surely a couple more things. I propose that you're proposing this thread gets locked because its exposed the obvious truth about the game, gankers and general asshats in game... In a similar manner to how you always howl about calling the mods when it's continually pointed out to you that you relentlessly lie about everything, and have no clue what you're talking about? Or perhaps it's because it shows that the gankers and the asshats (with a few notable exceptions) are in fact two separate groups.  On a more serious note, as I've said before, if you didn't have the "bad guys" to wail and gnash your teeth about you wouldn't enjoy the game nearly as much. Once this bit of self realization hits home, you will find inner harmony. 
That realization never sets in for some people.
I remember back when some people had the "omg, Star Trek Online is gonna kill EVE" hysteria going on (it's gone by many names, Black Prophecy, Jump Gate, EVERY Star Wars MMO, now Star Citizen and secondarily, Elite). People were all like "STO is gonna kill EVE because it has spaceships, won't allow 'griefing', and will have avatar gameplay ect ect".
My retort was generally along the lines of " you don't understand that you don't play EVE just for space ships, but for how valuable things are due to the universal danger of losing stuff" and so forth. They didn't believe me. When STO launched they hailed the 1 million subs it had...for a month or 2...as proof of what they were saying.....
It was the last thing any of them said on the subject, for while they left EVe for STO in thunder and fury, they generally slinked back to EVE (and posting about how the next game was going to kill EVE) in near total silence and bitterness lol. They got bored very quickly being wrapped in the protective cotton of a 'standard' thempark MMO. But did they learn the erro of their ways?
Of course not, they just said 'well, STO sucked, but someone will do it right one day'.
It's like a bad episode of Battlestar Galactica with the narrator saying "this has all happened before, and will happen again" lol. |

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
176
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 07:13:00 -
[299] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:
It's like a bad episode of Battlestar Galactica with the narrator saying "this has all happened before, and will happen again" lol.
This is blasphemy. There is no such thing as a bad episode of BSG and insinuating that there ever was one should be punishable by death.
You go to hell.
You go to hell and you die. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20068
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 07:14:00 -
[300] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:This is blasphemy. There is no such thing as a bad episode of BSG and insinuating that there ever was one should be punishable by death.
You go to hell.
You go to hell and you die. Black Market. Check. Your move. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Karon Grandolf
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
17
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 07:17:00 -
[301] - Quote
Ranger1 wrote:I really have to point out that the "non-combat" characters have far more effective defenses and tools at their disposal now than at any time in the past. You make it sound as if things are getting worse for the industrialist, when in fact conditions are much, much more favorable for them now.
This may or may not be true. My primary concern has been the war mechanic, that is no upper limit on the amount of corps that can be war decced at the same time by the same entity. I believe that relatively more gametime is now played under high sec war than before the changes. I also believe that there are more isolated players now than before, in NPC or very small (one player) corps. My experience tells me it's getting worse.
I could be wrong and asked for information about this. My questions was dismissed C C P Manifest.
Tippia wrote:How is it unbalanced and what tools do you think you're lacking?
I think the balance between game time spend during involuntary war vs. game time spend during voluntary peace has been changed so that it negatively influence the average subscription time of new players. I have only my own experience and forum posts as evidence, and have asked for more.
I want tools that can force peace on a war deccer, just as a war deccer can force war. I want a war force and a peace force competing against each other in high sec. I want this competition be balanced so that both game experiences are available to the players in sufficient amount to keep more new players subscribed. I want this balance on the macro level, as an avarage.
One such tool could be to remove the Concord security of agressive war deccers for a limited time and a fee.
On a personal level I am unhappy with the current balance and for certain types of gaming experiences I use other games where I previously used EVE. This may be a personal thing of course, and if this reaction is limited it may not hurt the game at all.
In that case there's no reason to change anything, I just won't be playing EVE that much. I think I would become more griefer like in the sense that i would occasionally subscribe to engage in agressive high sec PVP. |

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
176
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 07:19:00 -
[302] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:This is blasphemy. There is no such thing as a bad episode of BSG and insinuating that there ever was one should be punishable by death.
You go to hell.
You go to hell and you die. Black Market. Check. Your move. That chick who was bangin Apollo. Any show with an image of her cannot be bad. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20069
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 07:21:00 -
[303] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:That chick who was bangin Apollo. Any show with an image of her cannot be bad. Show, sure. Didn't save the episode.
The Woman King. Checkmate. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
3116
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 07:21:00 -
[304] - Quote
Karon Grandolf wrote: One such tool could be to remove the Concord security of agressive war deccers for a limited time and a fee.
Are you ****ing kidding? You do realize that you can legally shoot them back, right? With no consequences. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á
Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
176
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 07:27:00 -
[305] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:That chick who was bangin Apollo. Any show with an image of her cannot be bad. Show, sure. Didn't save the episode. The Woman King. Checkmate.
Your quick retort led me to believe your interest in the show is ingenuine and you've performed a search to give you a platform to launch an assault.
I found this, it stands out:
http://www.girlsofgeek12.com/15/post/2012/08/the-five-worst-episodes-of-battlestar-galactica.html
I'll say because I'm a lawful individual, it was nice seeing people who perform crime, even in space, being brought to justice. |

a newbie
Dissidence Dawn C.L.O.N.E.
43
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 07:28:00 -
[306] - Quote
As I sit back on the couch and look around, the display in front of me posts bounty after bounty. Each of them someone that has managed to **** someone off more than once. Most of the times they just happen to be someone of notoriety and of little consequence to direct actions taken by them.
Maybe they scammed someone, maybe they ransomed another, or they organized the collapse of your entire civilization. The point being the bounty system is there for a reason. It has been having some great effects as a result. Yes new players may not immediately find it but we (the community) have been helping CCP with requests through our CSMs for 'Small Things' here and there that help both old and new players alike. Maybe they can elevate knowledge of the bounties to new players.
I think the other problem is what you expect coming into an MMO that is hands off. A really GREAT anime on the topic of human nature in a rules free environment is Sword Art Online. Whether or not the art or genre fit your tastes, the detail the writers took in showing what they feel the chaos that would ensue seems a dead on read of people.
In the series, players are trapped in a virtual world, so players eventually become their ideal characters through behavior they would play in a normal game. You have Pkers, exploiters, people challenging sleeping players to a duel and moving their arms to accept duel and killing them. Some of them went so much as to scout as a neutral and be the target hunter for a murderous group of pkers. Some went the other way and were overly generous and blah blah hero stuff, and yet even more holed up in the cities and just 'existed'.
I think coming into a game that is hands off should be understood that it wouldn't feel right if we DIDN'T have people ransoming ships or extracting humility and tears from weaker people. Its not that I think its the greatest way to recruit players, but frankly its just as much a recruiting tool as it is a woe for new players. I have myself recruited far more people into EVE with the lure of violence and espionage than I have with mining and missions. ...um.. fire? |

Karon Grandolf
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
17
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 07:29:00 -
[307] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Karon Grandolf wrote: One such tool could be to remove the Concord security of agressive war deccers for a limited time and a fee.
Are you ****ing kidding? You do realize that you can legally shoot them back, right? With no consequences.
That's exactly what I realize. Shooting back has very little consequence for the war deccers, that is one of the big problems. It is the war deccers that are being protected by Concord as it is right now. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20070
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 07:31:00 -
[308] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:Your quick retort led me to believe your interest in the show is ingenuine and you've performed a search to give you a platform to launch an assault. No, that's just your prejudice speaking.
Quote:I'll say because I'm a lawful individual No. You are an individual who has demonstrated that you approve of real-life harm coming to people who play games. That is pretty far removed from GÇ£lawfulGÇ¥ and pretty close to needing serious medication and possibly incarceration.
Karon Grandolf wrote:That's exactly what I realize. Shooting back has very little consequence for the war deccers, that is one of the big problems. It is the war deccers that are being protected by Concord as it is right now. EhmGǪ the whole point of the wardec is that they're no longer protected by CONCORD. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
3116
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 07:33:00 -
[309] - Quote
Karon Grandolf wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Karon Grandolf wrote: One such tool could be to remove the Concord security of agressive war deccers for a limited time and a fee.
Are you ****ing kidding? You do realize that you can legally shoot them back, right? With no consequences. That's exactly what I realize. Shooting back has very little consequence for the war deccers, that is one of the big problems. It is the war deccers that are being protected by Concord as it is right now.
Neither of them are. You can shoot at each other freely.
The defending corp can also call in allies to their side without an upper limit on numbers.
The defender is, assuming they are at all competent, at an advantage during a wardec. And if they're not competent, then they deserve to dissolve or be docked up the whole time. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á
Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
176
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 07:36:00 -
[310] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:Your quick retort led me to believe your interest in the show is ingenuine and you've performed a search to give you a platform to launch an assault. No, that's just your prejudice speaking. Quote:I'll say because I'm a lawful individual  No. You are an individual who has demonstrated that you approve of real-life harm coming to people who play games. That is pretty far removed from GǣlawfulGǥ and pretty close to needing serious medication and possibly incarceration. Karon Grandolf wrote:That's exactly what I realize. Shooting back has very little consequence for the war deccers, that is one of the big problems. It is the war deccers that are being protected by Concord as it is right now. EhmGǪ the whole point of the wardec is that they're no longer protected by CONCORD.
Do you have anything to prove this claim? |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20074
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 07:46:00 -
[311] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:Do you have anything to prove this claim? In response to someone wanting me GÇö the actual person GÇö dead, rather than ripping him a new one like any normal, well-adjusted, GÇ£lawfulGÇ¥ person would do, you said: GÇ£I agree with your message [GǪ] It detracts from the validity of your stance when you allow yourself to become motivated with a negative intention. You have promise, your heart is in the right place.GÇ¥
Again: you said this to someone who wanted me dead; who wanted to see me violently murdered in real life. From that point on, nothing you say, have said, or ever will say holds any value whatsoever.
You are, in short, a sick, twisted, utterly despicable individual with no concept of reality, morality, or even of the very notion of empathy for human beings. You are a liar, a hypocrite, a bigot, an unabashed narcissist, and a troll. You need medication to fix whatever pathology it is you're suffering from and you need it soon. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Erica Dusette
Sky Fighters
3788
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 07:49:00 -
[312] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:Tippia wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:Your quick retort led me to believe your interest in the show is ingenuine and you've performed a search to give you a platform to launch an assault. No, that's just your prejudice speaking. Quote:I'll say because I'm a lawful individual  No. You are an individual who has demonstrated that you approve of real-life harm coming to people who play games. That is pretty far removed from GÇ£lawfulGÇ¥ and pretty close to needing serious medication and possibly incarceration. Do you have anything to prove this claim? Your posts lol
The same fodder you use.
@ Tippia - I dunno if I'd go so far to call him that. He's simply proven to either be a mediocre troll or exceptional idiot. Not quite sure which. GÖí -á-á Major (Ret.) Caldari Naval Militia Gÿá -á Sky Fighters | Just an innocent explorer! pâä -áHerrbert: "womwomwowmwoaugharwajwowoooommm"
|

Erotica 1
Krypteia Operations CODE.
4296
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 07:54:00 -
[313] - Quote
Most of my bounty comes from satisfied clients. I can't speak for the rest of the leaderboard. See Bio for isk doubling rules. If you didn't read bio, chances are you funded those who did. |

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
177
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 07:57:00 -
[314] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:Do you have anything to prove this claim? In response to someone wanting me GÇö the actual person GÇö dead, rather than ripping him a new one like any normal, well-adjusted, GÇ£lawfulGÇ¥ person would do, you said: GÇ£I agree with your message [GǪ] It detracts from the validity of your stance when you allow yourself to become motivated with a negative intention. You have promise, your heart is in the right place.GÇ¥ Again: you said this to someone who wanted me dead; who wanted to see me violently murdered in real life. From that point on, nothing you say, have said, or ever will say holds any value whatsoever. You are, in short, a sick, twisted, utterly despicable individual with no concept of reality, morality, or even of the very notion of empathy for human beings. You are a liar, a hypocrite, a bigot, an unabashed narcissist, and a troll. You need medication to fix whatever pathology it is you're suffering from and you need it soon.
I agreed with his message about you being a troll. To clarify, I do not want you dead. What he said was wrong and is more reprehensible than you are for "trolling".
Even more reprehensible than your latest vitriol. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20076
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 07:58:00 -
[315] - Quote
Erica Dusette wrote:@ Tippia - I dunno if I'd go so far to call him that. He's simply proven to either be a mediocre troll or exceptional idiot. Not quite sure which. I would. The moment it stepped over into wishing real-world harm on people, he crossed over the line from simple troll to actually [whatever]pathologicial. Now, I know that the post will be deleted. Calling a liar a liar and a bigot a bigot is actually against the rules, but in this particular case, I don't particularly care. It needs to be said, and it will be seen often enough before the mods get to it.
Sooner or later, he will step spectacularly out of bounds because he lacks the inhibitions to keep it safe, at which point he'll be gone. Until then, though, I'll keep reminding him of when and how he outed himself.
Divine Entervention wrote:I agreed with his message about you being a troll. To clarify, I do not want you dead. What he said was wrong and is more reprehensible than you are for "trolling". The problem is that you're a liar, and that this is obviously yet another lie. You didn't even flinch. You only validated what he said. It's too late to try to cover it up now. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
178
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 07:59:00 -
[316] - Quote
Erica Dusette wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:Tippia wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:Your quick retort led me to believe your interest in the show is ingenuine and you've performed a search to give you a platform to launch an assault. No, that's just your prejudice speaking. Quote:I'll say because I'm a lawful individual  No. You are an individual who has demonstrated that you approve of real-life harm coming to people who play games. That is pretty far removed from GÇ£lawfulGÇ¥ and pretty close to needing serious medication and possibly incarceration. Do you have anything to prove this claim? Your posts lol The same fodder you use. @ Tippia - I dunno if I'd go so far to call him that. He's simply proven to either be a mediocre troll or exceptional idiot. Not quite sure which.
He has the right to say what he wants(unless maybe it breaks some forum rules). But that right to let him speak his mind doesn't mean that what he says is correct. |

Kyperion
General Washington's Irregulars
55
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 08:03:00 -
[317] - Quote
Actually, I am coming to the realization that Highsec rules actually are equivalent to gunfree zones, so is the idiotic limitation of weaponless mining/merchant vessels....
Concord, like the police warps in too late.
**** it all, turn everything into a PVP combat ship, and let's all move to Texas.
It is conceptually asinine to conceive of a Universe filled with as many dickheads as EVE and not imagine that every single ************ would be armed like Robocop. |

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
178
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 08:06:00 -
[318] - Quote
Kyperion wrote:Actually, I am coming to the realization that Highsec rules actually are equivalent to gunfree zones, so is the idiotic limitation of weaponless mining/merchant vessels....
Concord, like the police warps in too late.
**** it all, turn everything into a PVP combat ship, and let's all move to Texas.
It is conceptually asinine to conceive of a Universe filled with as many dickheads as EVE and not imagine that every single ************ would be armed like Robocop.
It's kind of like gun-control. They think taking away the guns from the people means the criminals wont still have them, making their "job" that much easier.
Of course miners and haulers should be able to fit a ton of weaponry to defend themselves. It's stupidity that they cannot, because in a universe as hostile as EvE, you'd think the miners and haulers would've learned by now that they need to have 8 200mm cannons on everything they own.
Miners and haulers are stagnant, and not allowed to evolve with the previously changing, and now stagnant game play of EvE. |

Kyperion
General Washington's Irregulars
55
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 08:09:00 -
[319] - Quote
And my idea of 'Defense' is not running away from my house.... its pulling out my Colt 1911 from its hiding spot and blasting the ************ invading my home..... ME not the cops, not my friends, me with my own two hands. So **** this tank the initial volley, run away and get some friends bullshit |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20078
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 08:13:00 -
[320] - Quote
Kyperion wrote:And my idea of 'Defense' is not running away from my house.... its pulling out my Colt 1911 from its hiding spot and blasting the ************ invading my home..... ME not the cops, not my friends, me with my own two hands. So **** this tank the initial volley, run away and get some friends bullshit You can already do this. Your problem is that you seem to think that open space is GÇ£your houseGÇ¥. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
5057
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 08:13:00 -
[321] - Quote
Kyperion wrote:Actually, I am coming to the realization that Highsec rules actually are equivalent to gunfree zones, so is the idiotic limitation of weaponless mining/merchant vessels....
If you thought high sec had rules in the 1st place, it demonstrates that your thinking is indeed as bad as IRL "Gun Free Zones".
Quote: Concord, like the police warps in too late.
CONCORD are like real police, in that we deter and arrest but not "protect" in the purest sense. In the same way that Police don't relieve you of your personal duty to protect yourself, the existence of CONCORD doesn't relieve you of your personal duty to use the various tools the game gives you to protect yourself. Everything from mods to tactics to awareness to friends.
Quote: **** it all, turn everything into a PVP combat ship, and let's all move to Texas.
It is conceptually asinine to conceive of a Universe filled with as many dickheads as EVE and not imagine that every single ************ would be armed like Robocop.
No it is not. EVE gives players sooooo many defensive tools it ain't even funny. IRL all I can do is wear my vest (and hope the vest catches the bullet and that the bullet didn't get fired from a freaking rifle) stay aware of my surroundings and perhaps shoot 1st. I'd trade actual body parts if my partner could "remote rep" me during a fight, or if I could hang a "Damage Control"necklace around my neck, or plug "implants" into my head that would give me more "ehp" against some dude trying to kill me because he doesn't want to go back to prison.......
In other words, there is nothing wrong with the game, the problem is you. |

Kyperion
General Washington's Irregulars
57
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 08:20:00 -
[322] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:Kyperion wrote:Actually, I am coming to the realization that Highsec rules actually are equivalent to gunfree zones, so is the idiotic limitation of weaponless mining/merchant vessels.... If you thought high sec had rules in the 1st place, it demonstrates that your thinking is indeed as bad as IRL "Gun Free Zones". Quote: Concord, like the police warps in too late.
CONCORD are like real police, in that we deter and arrest but not "protect" in the purest sense. In the same way that Police don't relieve you of your personal duty to protect yourself, the existence of CONCORD doesn't relieve you of your personal duty to use the various tools the game gives you to protect yourself. Everything from mods to tactics to awareness to friends. Quote: **** it all, turn everything into a PVP combat ship, and let's all move to Texas.
It is conceptually asinine to conceive of a Universe filled with as many dickheads as EVE and not imagine that every single ************ would be armed like Robocop.
No it is not. EVE gives players sooooo many defensive tools it ain't even funny. IRL all I can do is wear my vest (and hope the vest catches the bullet and that the bullet didn't get fired from a freaking rifle) stay aware of my surroundings and perhaps shoot 1st. I'd trade actual body parts if my partner could "remote rep" me during a fight, or if I could hang a "Damage Control"necklace around my neck, or plug "implants" into my head that would give me more "ehp" against some dude trying to kill me because he doesn't want to go back to prison....... In other words, there is nothing wrong with the game, the problem is you.
Bullshit, 'IRL' you shoot the ************ trying to shoot you.... you can't do that in a mining/merchant ship in eve.... which is ******* stupid
And I feel sorry for your family if you are a cop... if your idea of 'defense' is simply survival.... you are not nearly prepared to do what is necessary to face down a killer. |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1844
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 08:21:00 -
[323] - Quote
lmao this thread has gone in red neck troll mode.. Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Scipio Artelius
The Vendunari End of Life
643
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 08:22:00 -
[324] - Quote
Kyperion wrote:Bullshit, 'IRL' you shoot the ************ trying to shoot you.... you can't do that in a mining/merchant ship in eve.... which is ******* stupid
IRL if you are going to shoot the guy shooting at you, you need a gun.
No different in EvE. The choices you make determine the options you have available. If you don't have a gun, you can't shoot. So either fit some to your ship and make lower ISK/hr, or get friends with guns.
eve-bazaar - Discount prices on ships and PLEX. Real savings to drive your ISK further. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20078
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 08:25:00 -
[325] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote:lmao this thread has gone in red neck troll mode.. So, do you have those 700-dps fittings yet? I'd love to see what they've come up with now. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Kyperion
General Washington's Irregulars
57
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 08:26:00 -
[326] - Quote
Scipio Artelius wrote:Kyperion wrote:Bullshit, 'IRL' you shoot the ************ trying to shoot you.... you can't do that in a mining/merchant ship in eve.... which is ******* stupid IRL if you are going to shoot the guy shooting at you, you need a gun. No different in EvE. The choices you make determine the options you have available. If you don't have a gun, you can't shoot. So either fit some to your ship and make lower ISK/hr, or get friends with guns.
And IRL, we can all carry guns... at least in the United States... you cannot carry a gun on a miner barge or merchant ship in EVE... which is bullshit
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20078
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 08:28:00 -
[327] - Quote
Kyperion wrote:And IRL, we can all carry guns... at least in the United States. No, you don't, not even in the US. However, you can easily call upon someone who does and have them help you out. Kind of like how you assign guards to ride along with the cash truckGǪ
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Kyperion
General Washington's Irregulars
57
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 08:34:00 -
[328] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Kyperion wrote:And IRL, we can all carry guns... at least in the United States. No, you don't, not even in the US. However, you can easily call upon someone who does and have them help you out. Kind of like how you assign guards to ride along with the cash truckGǪ Law abiding citizens can and do carry, and carry concealed, completely looking like harmless individuals, except for the Glock in their pants. |

Scipio Artelius
The Vendunari End of Life
645
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 08:37:00 -
[329] - Quote
Kyperion wrote:And IRL, we can all carry guns... at least in the United States... you cannot carry a gun on a miner barge or merchant ship in EVE... which is bullshit
You are only limited here by what you are prepared to do.
There are many mining ships you can fit guns too and many alternatives to having guns present that don't require you to sacrifice your mining yields.
However, maybe this is better continued in your thread on slots for mining barges as this thread is supposed to be about how everyone in the game that doesn't play exactly as we want them to play, must be a scumbag and loser. How dare they chose to be different and play differently. That's so terrible that they are different. eve-bazaar - Discount prices on ships and PLEX. Real savings to drive your ISK further. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20079
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 08:47:00 -
[330] - Quote
Kyperion wrote:Law abiding citizens can and do carry, and carry concealed, completely looking like harmless individuals, except for the Glock in their pants. Ok, fair enough. I somehow read it as GÇ£doGÇ¥ rather than GÇ£canGÇ¥. 
Still, the answer remains much the same: maybe you can, but you don't. The same goes in EVE: you could carry a gun, but you don't. And just like with that choice, even if you do, it won't really help against the determined attacker unless you bring back-up. The tools exist, people just have this nasty habit of not using them. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Kyperion
General Washington's Irregulars
61
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 08:50:00 -
[331] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Kyperion wrote:Law abiding citizens can and do carry, and carry concealed, completely looking like harmless individuals, except for the Glock in their pants. Ok, fair enough. I somehow read it as GÇ£doGÇ¥ rather than GÇ£canGÇ¥.  Still, the answer remains much the same: maybe you can, but you don't. The same goes in EVE: you could carry a gun, but you don't. And just like with that choice, even if you do, it won't really help against the determined attacker unless you bring back-up.
A .40 Caliber bullet in the T-Box followed by two in the chest will stop any threat 'IRL'
unbonused drones do not carry enough 'dps' (See Stopping power) to deal with gankers, and deal with means kill. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20079
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 08:56:00 -
[332] - Quote
Kyperion wrote:A .40 Caliber bullet in the T-Box followed by two in the chest will stop any threat 'IRL' Not when the threat is 12 guys armed with assault rifles, and they've already shot you once each.
Quote:unbonused drones do not carry enough 'dps' (See Stopping power) to deal with gankers, and deal with means kill. Actually, they do. Maybe only just, but they do. Even more so if you go for the smart option and use something other than pure DPS to stop them. The problem is that there are 12 of them and you didn't see them coming.
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Erica Dusette
Sky Fighters
3791
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 08:58:00 -
[333] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:He has the right to say what he wants(unless maybe it breaks some forum rules). But that right to let him speak his mind doesn't mean that what he says is correct. That's a really odd, and grossly hypocritical, response.
But in anycase I tend to agree with most things I see Tippia post.
You're fortunate that she's obviously enjoying playing your forum games, as it's pretty much the only thing that gives your comments any kind of credence at all. She obviously enjoys the sparring practice lol
I'd get bored with that quickly myself. It's obvious what you're trying to do and I'm not interested much in getting involved myself because everything you write is superficial bullshit aimed at perpetuating a simple argument (note I said argument, not debate). You are a very simple forum troll. Period.
Least I hope you are, as if you truly believe the stuff you say then...uhgg, Tippia has a point about you needing to step away from the keyboard and seek help.
Kyperion wrote:you cannot carry a gun on a miner barge or merchant ship in EVE... which is bullshit
Tell that to the awesome Badger bait that cost my alt her Proteus lol (and almost my bomber too).
Ships require balance. It's silly to expect a mining barge, designed for maximum efficiency at one task (mining) should also be an elite PVP vessel. Next you'll ask for covops everything, and frigates that can fit battleship grade weapons. Stop asking for tools to enable laziness and instead use the tools you already have to survive, or fight, smarter.
It will take extra effort, yes. Sorry but it's unavoidable. GÖí -á-á Major (Ret.) Caldari Naval Militia Gÿá -á Sky Fighters | Just an innocent explorer! pâä -áHerrbert: "womwomwowmwoaugharwajwowoooommm"
|

Scipio Artelius
The Vendunari End of Life
645
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 09:00:00 -
[334] - Quote
Kyperion wrote:A .40 Caliber bullet in the T-Box followed by two in the chest will stop any threat 'IRL'
unbonused drones do not carry enough 'dps' (See Stopping power) to deal with gankers, and deal with means kill. A tank? (sorry, a bit facetious, but also serious in that there is no single strategy that deals with every possible threat).
On the second bit, if drones are your preferred tool, then make sure you train drones to level 5, drone interfacing to level 5, combat drone operation to level 5 and whichever racial specialization to level 5 in order to gain maximum damage and then fit a drone damage amplifier or two.
Of course, the fitting of your ship is a choice you make and if fitting damage mods for drones doesn't fit with what you want to do, then find a different strategy.
Above all, you don't need to bring DPS to deal with gankers. Concord does that.
You only need to ensure your own survivability. Tank your ship and fit damage control mods. That is better than having a couple of hobgoblins fly around. eve-bazaar - Discount prices on ships and PLEX. Real savings to drive your ISK further. |

Kyperion
General Washington's Irregulars
63
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 09:00:00 -
[335] - Quote
Erica Dusette wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:He has the right to say what he wants(unless maybe it breaks some forum rules). But that right to let him speak his mind doesn't mean that what he says is correct. That's a really odd, and grossly hypocritical, response. But in anycase I tend to agree with most things I see Tippia post. You're fortunate that she's obviously enjoying playing your forum games, as it's pretty much the only thing that gives your comments any kind of credence at all. She obviously enjoys the sparring practice lol I'd get bored with that quickly myself. It's obvious what you're trying to do and I'm not interested much in getting involved myself because everything you write is superficial bullshit aimed at perpetuating a simple argument (note I said argument, not debate). You are a very simple forum troll. Period. Least I hope you are, as if you truly believe the stuff you say then...uhgg, Tippia has a point about you needing to step away from the keyboard and seek help. Kyperion wrote:you cannot carry a gun on a miner barge or merchant ship in EVE... which is bullshit
Tell that to the awesome Badger bait that cost my alt her Proteus lol (and almost my bomber too). Ships require balance. It's silly to expect a mining barge, designed for maximum efficiency at one task (mining) should also be an elite PVP vessel. Next you'll ask for covops everything, and frigates that can fit battleship grade weapons. Stop asking for tools to enable laziness and instead use the tools you already have to survive, or fight, smarter. It will take extra effort, yes. Sorry but it's unavoidable.
If you lost a T3 ship to a badger, you are daft.
|

Mandarine
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
27
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 09:03:00 -
[336] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:On a more serious note, as I've said before, if you didn't have the "bad guys" to wail and gnash your teeth about you wouldn't enjoy the game nearly as much. Once this bit of self realization hits home, you will find inner harmony. 
Those guys a growing portion of the playerbase is complaining about, are not playing pod pilots online, they-¦re merely using this game as a platform to get cheap kicks out of total strangers. All of their actions revolve heavily around meta, and going out of their way to cheese every little edge they can. This does not create a healthy gaming environment.
The normal gamer plays pretend being a pod pilot, and cares about ingame goals. The gankers/griefers/scammers that people are dissatisfied with, care mostly about making people mad (and possibly keeping record of their RL rage). This is why they make such a heavy alt usage, as it-¦s good meta to do it again and again and still be able to access highsec, dodge block lists and reputation issues.
Their goals are out-of-game oriented, they want to make people mad IRL and build an online reputation around it. This does not make the game enjoyable, as their meta-playing allows them to escape any form of ingame retribution. But more importantly than that, it-¦s disturbingly sociopathic. |

Tear Harvesters HaveNoLives
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
2
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 09:03:00 -
[337] - Quote
I've arrived late, I don't know whats happened here exactly... talking about defending mining ships?
Let's get back on track here and highlight the real problem again: EVE is filled with grown men who log into an online space game for the purpose of angering other grown men for their own personal amusement.
The OP is a breathe of fresh air. I have done almost everything "evil" this game has to offer and not a single time have I been rude about it. Not once have I extracted a tear or made someone want to quit the game through my words and attitude. If I can do it, so can they. They aren't special and neither am I. This has nothing to do with game mechanics, the issue is that of human interaction. I've ganked many ships and not once have mistreated the people behind the keyboard over it. The same cannot be said for the legion of sad RL losers who use EVE Online to make themselves feel better at everyone else's expense.
CCP doesn't do a single thing about it because they want subscriptions. That means us players only have one reasonable response: Unsubscribe.
I have not payed CCP a single dime since I saw someone having his "tears extracted" in local about 6 months ago. I sent in petitions about the players involved and they saw no repercussions, not even a suspension that put them offline for a week or something.
It's up to us normal functioning adults to show our displeasure towards CCP's lack of action. Anyone and everyone who agrees that the personalities in this game need a culling should stand with me on this. Unsubscribe and just grind for the ISK if needed. It sends the right message to CCP: If you're going to allow all this non-sense in your game to maximize subscriptions, you're not going to maximize subscriptions. |

Erica Dusette
Sky Fighters
3791
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 09:04:00 -
[338] - Quote
Kyperion wrote:If you lost a T3 ship to a badger, you are daft.
No, I lost a T3 ship to the T3 gang for whom the Badger was bait for.
Quite an awesome battle badger fit actually. The guys who murdered me were nice enough to give me it's fit afterward when I congratulated them on an awesome bait. GÖí -á-á Major (Ret.) Caldari Naval Militia Gÿá -á Sky Fighters | Just an innocent explorer! pâä -áHerrbert: "womwomwowmwoaugharwajwowoooommm"
|

Shizuken
Venerated Stars
198
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 09:10:00 -
[339] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:
It's like a bad episode of Battlestar Galactica with the narrator saying "this has all happened before, and will happen again" lol.
This is blasphemy. There is no such thing as a bad episode of BSG and insinuating that there ever was one should be punishable by death. You go to hell. You go to hell and you die.
"Hero" was pretty bad. Do you really think a black dude in a cylon prison for several years would still have such a fine perm? |

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
187
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 09:12:00 -
[340] - Quote
Shizuken wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:
It's like a bad episode of Battlestar Galactica with the narrator saying "this has all happened before, and will happen again" lol.
This is blasphemy. There is no such thing as a bad episode of BSG and insinuating that there ever was one should be punishable by death. You go to hell. You go to hell and you die. "Hero" was pretty bad. Do you really think a black dude in a cylon prison for several years would still have such a fine perm? Move over Jenna, someone else is going with you. |

Shizuken
Venerated Stars
198
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 09:14:00 -
[341] - Quote
Mandarine wrote:But more importantly than that, it-¦s disturbingly sociopathic.
Ive been saying this myself for several years now. |

Sophie d'Amour
Perkone Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 10:03:00 -
[342] - Quote
reason i stop playing EvE.
I just wanna log blow up some NPCs log off. nothing fancy just casual fun.
but after few times being killed in high space and lost really millions i kind of have enough of EvE. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20081
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 10:06:00 -
[343] - Quote
Sophie d'Amour wrote:but after few times being killed in high space and lost really millions i kind of have enough of EvE. What were you in, what were you doing, and where were you when you blew up? GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Kyperion
General Washington's Irregulars
64
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 10:11:00 -
[344] - Quote
Erica Dusette wrote:Kyperion wrote:If you lost a T3 ship to a badger, you are daft.
No, I lost a T3 ship to the T3 gang for whom the Badger was bait for. Quite an awesome battle badger fit actually. The guys who murdered me were nice enough to give me it's fit afterward when I congratulated them on an awesome bait.
So it wasn't the badger that killed you, but his friends.... completely not what we're talking about here. |

Sophie d'Amour
Perkone Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 10:15:00 -
[345] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Sophie d'Amour wrote:but after few times being killed in high space and lost really millions i kind of have enough of EvE. What were you in, what were you doing, and where were you when you blew up?
it do not matter anymore.
|

Kyperion
General Washington's Irregulars
64
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 10:15:00 -
[346] - Quote
Tear Harvesters HaveNoLives wrote:I've arrived late, I don't know whats happened here exactly... talking about defending mining ships?
Let's get back on track here and highlight the real problem again: EVE is filled with grown men who log into an online space game for the purpose of angering other grown men for their own personal amusement.
The OP is a breathe of fresh air. I have done almost everything "evil" this game has to offer and not a single time have I been rude about it. Not once have I extracted a tear or made someone want to quit the game through my words and attitude. If I can do it, so can they. They aren't special and neither am I. This has nothing to do with game mechanics, the issue is that of human interaction. I've ganked many ships and not once have mistreated the people behind the keyboard over it. The same cannot be said for the legion of sad RL losers who use EVE Online to make themselves feel better at everyone else's expense.
CCP doesn't do a single thing about it because they want subscriptions. That means us players only have one reasonable response: Unsubscribe.
I have not payed CCP a single dime since I saw someone having his "tears extracted" in local about 6 months ago. I sent in petitions about the players involved and they saw no repercussions, not even a suspension that put them offline for a week or something.
It's up to us normal functioning adults to show our displeasure towards CCP's lack of action. Anyone and everyone who agrees that the personalities in this game need a culling should stand with me on this. Unsubscribe and just grind for the ISK if needed. It sends the right message to CCP: If you're going to allow all this non-sense in your game to maximize subscriptions, you're not going to maximize subscriptions.
The game mechanics are what allow this kind of human interaction... the game mechanics of artificially making merchant and mining vessels overly weak and without offensive capability.
So what I am proposing is that we give the gankers exactly what they claim to want... excitement, and turn Mining barges and merchant ships into things that we would expect to exist in this kind of Spartan universe.
|

Salvos Rhoska
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
312
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 10:16:00 -
[347] - Quote
:@ OP and other like minded individuals
What exactly are you proposing?
Please provide a conscise numbered list with specific wording of what exactly it is that you want done.
Please append a short explanation to each numbered entry, if it requires elaboration.
Something similar to this:
1) Change x to y: -Reasoning and elaboration
2) Implement mechanic z: - Reasoning and elaboration
This will enable the community to address and consider specifically what it is you are proposing in an informed and organised manner, whereas right now, Inand of thers have no idea what exactly it is you have in mind.
Thanks. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20081
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 10:17:00 -
[348] - Quote
Sophie d'Amour wrote:it do not matter anymore. There are always lessons to be learned.
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Kyperion
General Washington's Irregulars
64
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 10:26:00 -
[349] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Sophie d'Amour wrote:but after few times being killed in high space and lost really millions i kind of have enough of EvE. What were you in, what were you doing, and where were you when you blew up?
To reply to your many posts about existing 'tools'
.... Conceptually the mining barge makes no sense in the EVE Universe.... In a world gone mad with greed and villainy, where damn near anyone has access to cutting edge military hardware..... Mining Barges wouldn't exist.... they would all be tanked like a Marauder, and probably keep the firepower .... they might sacrifice speed and manuevering for that, but they definitely wouldn't be the puny little things they are now, and the smallest one would not be the toughest one.
Alternatively they might be small, fast, low signature frigates, with a full flight of light drones and a stealth bombers cloak bonuses.
Freighters would have about 16 turrets moving as slow as they do.
The kind of sandbox ganking proponents claim eve to be has no room for the kind of weak fitting capabilities seen on most mining/merchant ships.
|

Salvos Rhoska
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
312
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 10:30:00 -
[350] - Quote
Any commensurate increase in PvP potential on freighter/resource vessels would have to be met by a reciprocal reduction in performance in the non-combat role. |

Mandarine
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
29
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 10:31:00 -
[351] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote::@ OP and other like minded individuals
What exactly are you proposing?
Please provide a conscise numbered list with specific wording of what exactly it is that you want done.
Please append a short explanation to each numbered entry, if it requires elaboration.
Something similar to this:
1) Change x to y: -Reasoning and elaboration
2) Implement mechanic z: - Reasoning and elaboration
This will enable the community to address and consider specifically what it is you are proposing in an informed and organised manner, whereas right now, Inand of thers have no idea what exactly it is you have in mind.
Thanks.
This has nothing to do with gameplay issues, and everything with the motivations of a certain category of people who only enjoy EvE as a platform to inflict emotional harm and others, that is, pursue their RL sadistic tendencies.
Most MMOs pre-emptively trammelize their game to prevent toxic interactions, as it-¦s the only way to effectively limit the negative impact those people have.
One other possibility would be to selectively IP ban toxic individuals, but this would require quite a lot of GM work, and forbidding playing behind VPNs and proxies. However, this would allow for the removal of Concord, which is only there so as to keep tear harvesting in check.
|

Erica Dusette
Sky Fighters
3794
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 10:35:00 -
[352] - Quote
Kyperion wrote:Erica Dusette wrote:Kyperion wrote:If you lost a T3 ship to a badger, you are daft.
No, I lost a T3 ship to the T3 gang for whom the Badger was bait for. Quite an awesome battle badger fit actually. The guys who murdered me were nice enough to give me it's fit afterward when I congratulated them on an awesome bait. So it wasn't the badger that killed you, but his friends.... completely not what we're talking about here. I was merely clarifying what happened for your benefit as you didn't seem to understand how baits are generally run, making the ludicrous assumption that a Badger killed a Proteus 1v1. Oh, and then mentioned -I- may be daft. 
But when you think about it this is exactly what this thread is about. I tried to gank someone who was cleverer than me and who had friends hidden close by. Now yes, I do appreciate that clever use of mechanics, cooperative gameplay, or anything that requires you to use more than one ship is what you're dearly hoping to avoid here, but my proty loss is the perfect example of how you can turn the tables on your gankers.
Oh, and that Badger was genuinely running PI too, so in a sense it was indeed a fighting-industrial ship.  GÖí -á-á Major (Ret.) Caldari Naval Militia Gÿá -á Sky Fighters | Just an innocent explorer! pâä -áHerrbert: "womwomwowmwoaugharwajwowoooommm"
|

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
17100
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 10:40:00 -
[353] - Quote
Kyperion wrote: To reply to your many posts about existing 'tools'
.... Conceptually the mining barge makes no sense in the EVE Universe.... In a world gone mad with greed and villainy, where damn near anyone has access to cutting edge military hardware..... Mining Barges wouldn't exist.... they would all be tanked like a Marauder, and probably keep the firepower .... they might sacrifice speed and manuevering for that, but they definitely wouldn't be the puny little things they are now, and the smallest one would not be the toughest one.
A mining ship with the tank of a battleship is already available, it's called the Skiff, and it doesn't require firepower to survive a gank, it requires the person using it to use their head when they fit it.
Quote:Alternatively they might be small, fast, low signature frigates, with a full flight of light drones and a stealth bombers cloak bonuses. Firstly why a cloak bonus?, and secondly, it's called a Venture.
Quote:Freighters would have about 16 turrets moving as slow as they do.
The kind of sandbox ganking proponents claim eve to be has no room for the kind of weak fitting capabilities seen on most mining/merchant ships.
If you want a freighter with 16 turrets that's fine, but you have to be able to live with sacrificing something else to gain those slots, like EHP or cargo capacity. Expect to see them ganking other freighters on a gate near you soon.
Psychotic Monk for CSM 9 |

Sophie d'Amour
Perkone Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 10:41:00 -
[354] - Quote
Kyperion wrote:Tippia wrote:Sophie d'Amour wrote:but after few times being killed in high space and lost really millions i kind of have enough of EvE. What were you in, what were you doing, and where were you when you blew up? To reply to your many posts about existing 'tools' .... Conceptually the mining barge makes no sense in the EVE Universe.... In a world gone mad with greed and villainy, where damn near anyone has access to cutting edge military hardware..... Mining Barges wouldn't exist.... they would all be tanked like a Marauder, and probably keep the firepower .... they might sacrifice speed and manuevering for that, but they definitely wouldn't be the puny little things they are now, and the smallest one would not be the toughest one. Alternatively they might be small, fast, low signature frigates, with a full flight of light drones and a stealth bombers cloak bonuses. Freighters would have about 16 turrets moving as slow as they do. The kind of sandbox ganking proponents claim eve to be has no room for the kind of weak fitting capabilities seen on most mining/merchant ships.
indeed, they use a armored vehicle to transport money also right. it likely have a cannon if many rob it with a tank.
in 1600 they transported valuable goods also in massive combat ships. |

Salvos Rhoska
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
312
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 10:45:00 -
[355] - Quote
Mandarine wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote::@ OP and other like minded individuals
What exactly are you proposing?
Please provide a conscise numbered list with specific wording of what exactly it is that you want done.
Please append a short explanation to each numbered entry, if it requires elaboration.
Something similar to this:
1) Change x to y: -Reasoning and elaboration
2) Implement mechanic z: - Reasoning and elaboration
This will enable the community to address and consider specifically what it is you are proposing in an informed and organised manner, whereas right now, Inand of thers have no idea what exactly it is you have in mind.
Thanks. This has nothing to do with gameplay issues, and everything with the motivations of a certain category of people who only enjoy EvE as a platform to inflict emotional harm and others, that is, pursue their RL sadistic tendencies. Most MMOs pre-emptively trammelize their game to prevent toxic interactions, as it-¦s the only way to effectively limit the negative impact those people have. One other possibility would be to selectively IP ban toxic individuals, but this would require quite a lot of GM work, and forbidding playing behind VPNs and proxies. However, this would allow for the removal of Concord, which is only there so as to keep tear harvesting in check.
I'm sorry, but either you did not read my post, or chose to disregard its contents.
In either case, you did not reply in the format I had suggested would be conducive to a more organised and concise discussion of what exactly it is that OP and like minded individuals want done.
Therefore I am forced to disregard the contents of your post, just as you chose to disregard the contents of mine.
I'm sorry, but you really leave me no option in that regard.
Please reformat your post to fit the model I proposed, in order to facilitate discussion on this matter in an organised, informed and concise manner. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20082
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 10:52:00 -
[356] - Quote
Kyperion wrote:Conceptually the mining barge makes no sense in the EVE Universe.... In a world gone mad with greed and villainy, where damn near anyone has access to cutting edge military hardware..... Mining Barges wouldn't exist. That's not really the world of EVE though. Capsuleers might have access to that hardware, but they are a vanishingly small minority and the normal world have long since stopped trying to make make those nutcases behave normally (because, to be fair, they're not even people any more). Instead, they've implemented a single overseer body and generally just let the capsuleers do what they want against each other.
Mining barges still need to exist and for your standard human prospecting company, they do the job just fine. Most regular, standard-human ships that go after them aren't that much of a threat.
Quote:The kind of sandbox ganking proponents claim eve to be has no room for the kind of weak fitting capabilities seen on most mining/merchant ships. The kind of sandbox they claim EVE to be already provides those ships with all the defensive capabilities they need, if piloted correctly.
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Vaju Enki
Secular Wisdom
1252
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 10:59:00 -
[357] - Quote
******** themepark carebears don't get sandbox games and cry on the forums, nothing new. The Tears Must Flow |

Kyperion
General Washington's Irregulars
65
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 10:59:00 -
[358] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Mandarine wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote::@ OP and other like minded individuals
What exactly are you proposing?
Please provide a conscise numbered list with specific wording of what exactly it is that you want done.
Please append a short explanation to each numbered entry, if it requires elaboration.
Something similar to this:
1) Change x to y: -Reasoning and elaboration
2) Implement mechanic z: - Reasoning and elaboration
This will enable the community to address and consider specifically what it is you are proposing in an informed and organised manner, whereas right now, Inand of thers have no idea what exactly it is you have in mind.
Thanks. This has nothing to do with gameplay issues, and everything with the motivations of a certain category of people who only enjoy EvE as a platform to inflict emotional harm and others, that is, pursue their RL sadistic tendencies. Most MMOs pre-emptively trammelize their game to prevent toxic interactions, as it-¦s the only way to effectively limit the negative impact those people have. One other possibility would be to selectively IP ban toxic individuals, but this would require quite a lot of GM work, and forbidding playing behind VPNs and proxies. However, this would allow for the removal of Concord, which is only there so as to keep tear harvesting in check. I'm sorry, but either you did not read my post, or chose to disregard its contents. In either case, you did not reply in the format I had suggested would be conducive to a more organised and concise discussion of what exactly it is that OP and like minded individuals want done. I proposed it not for my "personal interest", but in order to better facilitate understanding of everyones specific positions and proposals. Therefore I am forced to disregard the contents of your post, just as you chose to disregard the contents of mine. I'm sorry, but you really leave me no option in that regard. It is very confusing to me, why you would deliberately make the choice to respond to my post of which the contents is ONLY a suggestion for a format of discussion, in a fashion that is completely contrary to the only contents of my post, which is to ask for people to use the format I proposed. Please reformat your post to fit the model I proposed, in order to facilitate discussion on this matter in an organised, informed and concise manner.
1.) Concord response times lowered significantly across the board... but they actively chase criminals out of high sec... as in follow in warp and through stargates. They also pod people with a low enough standing
2.) every ship has a viable PVP combat fitting.... to either run away despite scramble, cloak, or surpise with a hold out pistol capable of taking on any ship in its class or holding out against one class above
3.) Many less NPC in missions, but way tougher, and an AI that uses scramblers/bubbles/stasis etc like a player would
4.) instead of only One PVP tournament, have little ones all over New Eden, set up Ded spaces for matches... actually, this kind of consensual 'arena' combat could eventually replace missions altogether.
|

Ralph King-Griffin
Var Foundation inc.
377
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 10:59:00 -
[359] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:
That little girl has zero chance.
Put your daughter on the computer and read what I'm saying to her:
Please do not listen to your daddy. He is a bad person. If you believe the things he tells you, you too will grow up to be a bad person. Call social services and tell them he's a bad person so you can be put in a home with people who will raise you into a good person.
this is about the single most vile thing i have had the displeasure of reading outside of Reddit. seriously man, im not one with much of a moral code but you should be genuinely ashamed for that comment, i am for being part of the same community that generated it.
edit: yeah i know im a little late to it but still. If in doubt...do...excessively. |

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
188
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 11:05:00 -
[360] - Quote
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:
That little girl has zero chance.
Put your daughter on the computer and read what I'm saying to her:
Please do not listen to your daddy. He is a bad person. If you believe the things he tells you, you too will grow up to be a bad person. Call social services and tell them he's a bad person so you can be put in a home with people who will raise you into a good person.
this is about the single most vile thing i have had the displeasure of reading outside of Reddit. seriously man, im not one with much of a moral code but you should be genuinely ashamed for that comment, i am for being part of the same community that generated it. edit: yeah i know im a little late to it but still.
I agree, he should be ashamed of himself for exposing his daughter to eve and then using his own daughter as some sort of leverage in an argument.
His own daughter, for shame. |

Yarda Black
Epidemic. Nulli Secunda
72
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 11:06:00 -
[361] - Quote
I haven't read all the posts. Sorry if that leads me to repeat something that has been said between page 3 and here.
Why are people being (insert insult), why the sandbox allows for anything?
Reason 1: Untrue. The badies, and their actions, stick out making them look more present then they really are.
Reason 2: Being nice takes more effort.
Reason 3: Being a (insert same or different insult) is the next step after being nice. Being nice becomes boring after a few years.
Reason 4: Being a (insert yet another insult) can easily cover up failure at pro-PvP - "I wasnt being lame, I was collecting tears".
Seriously; HTFU |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1850
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 11:08:00 -
[362] - Quote
You don't need fantastic new ships or super barges. What you need is balance. The Catalyst does not need 700 dps to kill a frigate (its intended role), ship scanners should not be free 100 accurate perves into every ship fitting.
Change those two things you will see a lot of ganking decrease overnight.
Oh and freighters (which are currently just shuttles) need fitting options. Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20083
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 11:11:00 -
[363] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote:The Catalyst does not need 700 dps to kill a frigate (its intended role), ship scanners should not be free 100 accurate perves into every ship fitting. What makes you say that killing frigates is the intended role of Catalysts? And you do realise that squeezing 700 DPS out of a Catalyst makes it highly unsuitable for most kind of ganking, right?
Quote:Oh and freighters (which are currently just shuttles) need fitting options. I'd prefer it if my freighter wasn't nerfed, thankyouverymuch.
Oh, andGǪQuote:Change those two things you will see a lot of ganking decrease overnight. Why is that needed? GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Kyperion
General Washington's Irregulars
67
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 11:12:00 -
[364] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote::@ OP and other like minded individuals
What exactly are you proposing?
Please provide a conscise numbered list with specific wording of what exactly it is that you want done.
Please append a short explanation to each numbered entry, if it requires elaboration.
Something similar to this:
1) Change x to y: -Reasoning and elaboration
2) Implement mechanic z: - Reasoning and elaboration
This will enable the community to address and consider specifically what it is you are proposing in an informed and organised manner, whereas right now, Inand of thers have no idea what exactly it is you have in mind.
Thanks.
To continue
5.) The Empires would actively distrust Pod people... they would not freely let more and more systems fall into the hands of space immortals.... so any system in nullsec should be subject to an invasion, and I'm talking dwarfing the largest incursion ever even imagined.... and this invasion if allowed by the owning corp/alliance/coalition... would drop their sovereignty.
6.) Because of said mistrust, it would be even more important to remain on good terms with the NPC faction(s) of your choice... if you want to remain in high sec... also add a what have you done for me lately component, that represents the growing mistrust of these new breed of undying humans. |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1850
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 11:13:00 -
[365] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:The Catalyst does not need 700 dps to kill a frigate (its intended role), ship scanners should not be free 100 accurate perves into every ship fitting. What makes you say that killing frigates is the intended role of Catalysts? And you do realise that squeezing 700 DPS out of a Catalyst makes it highly unsuitable for most kind of ganking, right? Quote:Oh and freighters (which are currently just shuttles) need fitting options. I'd prefer it if my freighter wasn't nerfed, thankyouverymuch. Oh, andGǪ Quote:Change those two things you will see a lot of ganking decrease overnight. Why is that needed? Not interested in conversing with trolls sorry... Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Ralph King-Griffin
Var Foundation inc.
377
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 11:14:00 -
[366] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:Ralph King-Griffin wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:
That little girl has zero chance.
Put your daughter on the computer and read what I'm saying to her:
Please do not listen to your daddy. He is a bad person. If you believe the things he tells you, you too will grow up to be a bad person. Call social services and tell them he's a bad person so you can be put in a home with people who will raise you into a good person.
this is about the single most vile thing i have had the displeasure of reading outside of Reddit. seriously man, im not one with much of a moral code but you should be genuinely ashamed for that comment, i am for being part of the same community that generated it. edit: yeah i know im a little late to it but still. I agree, he should be ashamed of himself for exposing his daughter to eve and then using his own daughter as some sort of leverage in an argument. His own daughter, for shame. I sincerely hope that your misinterpretation of my post was deliberate, if not you have genuine issues.
as stated, you should be ashamed. i am. If in doubt...do...excessively. |

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
189
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 11:15:00 -
[367] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote:Tippia wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:The Catalyst does not need 700 dps to kill a frigate (its intended role), ship scanners should not be free 100 accurate perves into every ship fitting. What makes you say that killing frigates is the intended role of Catalysts? And you do realise that squeezing 700 DPS out of a Catalyst makes it highly unsuitable for most kind of ganking, right? Quote:Oh and freighters (which are currently just shuttles) need fitting options. I'd prefer it if my freighter wasn't nerfed, thankyouverymuch. Oh, andGǪ Quote:Change those two things you will see a lot of ganking decrease overnight. Why is that needed? Not interested in conversing with trolls sorry...
When he asks you for evidence that he's a troll, just link him the posts where I proved he is one. |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2679
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 11:15:00 -
[368] - Quote
and if killing frigs was a catalyst's intended role, it doesn't follow that it was the only intended role or that ganking is an unintended role |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20083
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 11:16:00 -
[369] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote:Not interested in conversing with trolls sorry... Then talk to me instead.
What makes you think that Catalysts are just meant to kill frigates? Do you realise how much a 700-dps Catalyst cost and the consequences of this price tag? Why does ganking need to be reduced? GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
10410
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 11:20:00 -
[370] - Quote
Kyperion wrote:Scipio Artelius wrote:Kyperion wrote:Bullshit, 'IRL' you shoot the ************ trying to shoot you.... you can't do that in a mining/merchant ship in eve.... which is ******* stupid IRL if you are going to shoot the guy shooting at you, you need a gun. No different in EvE. The choices you make determine the options you have available. If you don't have a gun, you can't shoot. So either fit some to your ship and make lower ISK/hr, or get friends with guns. And IRL, we can all carry guns... at least in the United States... you cannot carry a gun on a miner barge or merchant ship in EVE... which is bullshit
I had a full page dedicated to my combat iteron V in EON magazines >50 mil isk combat ship challange. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Effect One
Vengeful Swan
136
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 11:31:00 -
[371] - Quote
It's not bogus; it's player driven content.
'EVE is a game about spaceships and there's an enormous amount of work to do on the in-space gameplay before players (or developers) are ready to sacrifice it for a totally new type of gameplay' - CCP Rise |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
10411
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 11:33:00 -
[372] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote: Not interested in conversing with trolls sorry...
I too would like to know why you think an average of 30 freighter ganks a month is in need of being nerfed given that at least half a million trips are made by them every month. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2679
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 11:40:00 -
[373] - Quote
Benny Ohu wrote:and if killing frigs was a catalyst's intended role, it doesn't follow that it was the only intended role or that ganking is an unintended role also, even if ganking were an unintended role, it does not mean ganking is an undesirable role |

Iam The Empress
Evil Monkey Asylum Evil Monkeys Asylum
76
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 11:48:00 -
[374] - Quote
The game is a cess pit of horrible people and i agre with you. The corp i run is based on real life first and anyone who is not a decent person is ejected within 24 hours of joining.
The best thing to do is fine a corp like ours and just stick with them.
Also streaming is never a good idea mate. It truly isnt.
The internet brings out the worst in people and tbh
I have nothing but contempt for around 80% of the eve community.
They are disgusting excuses for humans who take delight in insulting others for the sake of it, and 90% of them are on this game 24/7 and have no lives. It is a sad state of affairs, but a true one.
I will be +1 your post because you are right. We have recruited people from other games straight into our corporation and they have expressed a disgust at the eve forums and reddit.
I 100% agree with you.
It needs to change but as most of the devs and gms are ex null players, they have the same attitudes.
Empress |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
10415
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 11:53:00 -
[375] - Quote
Iam The Empress wrote:The game is a cess pit of horrible people and i agre with you. The corp i run is based on real life first and anyone who is not a decent person is ejected within 24 hours of joining.
The best thing to do is fine a corp like ours and just stick with them.
Also streaming is never a good idea mate. It truly isnt.
The internet brings out the worst in people and tbh
I have nothing but contempt for around 80% of the eve community.
They are disgusting excuses for humans who take delight in insulting others for the sake of it, and 90% of them are on this game 24/7 and have no lives. It is a sad state of affairs, but a true one.
I will be +1 your post because you are right. We have recruited people from other games straight into our corporation and they have expressed a disgust at the eve forums and reddit.
I 100% agree with you.
It needs to change but as most of the devs and gms are ex null players, they have the same attitudes.
Empress
You come to a PvP focused game and get angry when people PvP you... Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Salvos Rhoska
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
315
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 11:54:00 -
[376] - Quote
@ Iam The Empress: The irony being that you don't realise what a hateful, intolerant, misanthropic, judgmental and bad person you prove yourself to be with the attitudes you express in your post. |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
10416
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 11:57:00 -
[377] - Quote
Sophie d'Amour wrote:Tippia wrote:Sophie d'Amour wrote:but after few times being killed in high space and lost really millions i kind of have enough of EvE. What were you in, what were you doing, and where were you when you blew up? it do not matter anymore.
You lost a Gnosis in a 0.5 system which was setup for mining with 5x t2 deep core miners, a mining forman link, cargo expanders and no tank aside from a single EM ward amplifier 1.
Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20085
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 11:59:00 -
[378] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:@ Iam The Empress: The irony being that you don't realise what a hateful, intolerant, judgmental and bad person you prove yourself to be with the attitudes you express in your post. It's kind of funny how often it plays out that way GÇö the ones crying the loudest about the supposed horribleness and GÇ£sociopathyGÇ¥ and disgusting nature of EVE community end up showing that they, more than the people they complain about, fit the criteria.  GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
17100
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 11:59:00 -
[379] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Sophie d'Amour wrote:Tippia wrote:Sophie d'Amour wrote:but after few times being killed in high space and lost really millions i kind of have enough of EvE. What were you in, what were you doing, and where were you when you blew up? it do not matter anymore. You lost a Gnosis in a 0.5 system which was setup for mining with 5x t2 deep core miners, a mining forman link, cargo expanders and no tank aside from a single EM ward amplifier 1. That's an abomination of a ship, it deserved to be aborted, in fact it should never have been conceived.
Psychotic Monk for CSM 9 |

Kyperion
General Washington's Irregulars
71
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 12:03:00 -
[380] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:baltec1 wrote:Sophie d'Amour wrote:Tippia wrote:Sophie d'Amour wrote:but after few times being killed in high space and lost really millions i kind of have enough of EvE. What were you in, what were you doing, and where were you when you blew up? it do not matter anymore. You lost a Gnosis in a 0.5 system which was setup for mining with 5x t2 deep core miners, a mining forman link, cargo expanders and no tank aside from a single EM ward amplifier 1. That's an abomination of a ship, it deserved to be aborted, in fact it should never have been conceived.
That fit, that ship, in a 0.5 system is probably not going to last long....
|

Helia Tranquilis
State War Academy Caldari State
15
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 12:21:00 -
[381] - Quote
Majority of the replies on this thread only imply that it is impossible for the hardened bitter-vet crowd to understand eve from the viewpoint of a new player playing outside of blob-warfare. Can you expect a new player to have similar view of eve as a veteran watching the game through blood-stained combat goggles? |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
10416
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 12:23:00 -
[382] - Quote
Helia Tranquilis wrote:Majority of the replies on this thread only imply that it is impossible for the hardened bitter-vet crowd to understand eve from the viewpoint of a new player playing outside of blob-warfare. Can you expect a new player to have similar view of eve as a veteran watching the game through blood-stained combat goggles?
We were once new players too. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Helia Tranquilis
State War Academy Caldari State
15
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 12:27:00 -
[383] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Helia Tranquilis wrote:Majority of the replies on this thread only imply that it is impossible for the hardened bitter-vet crowd to understand eve from the viewpoint of a new player playing outside of blob-warfare. Can you expect a new player to have similar view of eve as a veteran watching the game through blood-stained combat goggles? We were once new players too. Yet such a time was several years ago, likely in a very different environment.
|

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
10416
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 12:29:00 -
[384] - Quote
Helia Tranquilis wrote: Yet such a time was several years ago, likely in a very different environment.
It was more dangerous back then. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Salvos Rhoska
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
315
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 12:30:00 -
[385] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Helia Tranquilis wrote:Majority of the replies on this thread only imply that it is impossible for the hardened bitter-vet crowd to understand eve from the viewpoint of a new player playing outside of blob-warfare. Can you expect a new player to have similar view of eve as a veteran watching the game through blood-stained combat goggles? We were once new players too.
I am still a new player, and agree with the Vets on this.
As someone pointed out earlier, some people come into EVE with the wrong expectations.
They don't understand that what is actively against the games rules in other MMOs, is not against the rules in EVE. It takes some adjustment, especially if that player has never played a game with a ruleset like EVE before (like UO or Darkfall for example).
It takes some personal adjustment to be able to cope with other people taking or blowing up your stuff, which is something they have never experienced before., without taking it personally, as you would offline, where it is contextually "wrong" and sanctioned. |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2679
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 12:33:00 -
[386] - Quote
Helia Tranquilis wrote:Majority of the replies on this thread only imply that it is impossible for the hardened bitter-vet crowd to understand eve from the viewpoint of a new player playing outside of blob-warfare. Can you expect a new player to have similar view of eve as a veteran watching the game through blood-stained combat goggles? first time i was podded i was in convo with a pirate i said 'oh no i was shot by a guy called yarpen' guy said 'oh yarpen's online? cool i wanted to join his corp, thanks for telling me' i was chuffed 'cos i'd apparently been podded by some kind of pirate king
i knew about eve's scamming, ganking and skulduggery before i joined. it's why i joined, even though i engage in none of these activities |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20085
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 12:36:00 -
[387] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Helia Tranquilis wrote:Yet such a time was several years ago, likely in a very different environment. It was more dangerous back then. And there was far less guidance.
It's not so much that anyone expects new players to have similar views of EVE as the older players, but that we expect them to at least take into consideration the fact that we've been there too, been through the same things they have, and figured out all kinds of neat ways to survive and even prosper. That when we say they can do something, there is actually a sliver of a chance that they can and that we're telling them this out of experience. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Mina Sebiestar
Mactabilis Simplex Cursus
631
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 12:46:00 -
[388] - Quote
There are generally good ppl in game but what you OP is trying to change is generation after generation of spineless scrubs that found their game if CCP don't curb that behavior via game mechanic things are here to stay so just roll with right kinda ppl. http://i.imgur.com/1N37t.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/KTjFEt6.jpg I dont always fly stabber but when i do...
|

Nicolai Serkanner
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
83
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 13:03:00 -
[389] - Quote
Helia Tranquilis wrote:Majority of the replies on this thread only imply that it is impossible for the hardened bitter-vet crowd to understand eve from the viewpoint of a new player playing outside of blob-warfare. Can you expect a new player to have similar view of eve as a veteran watching the game through blood-stained combat goggles?
I am a new player and agree with the vets about this topic. |

Helia Tranquilis
State War Academy Caldari State
15
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 13:07:00 -
[390] - Quote
Tippia wrote:baltec1 wrote:Helia Tranquilis wrote:Yet such a time was several years ago, likely in a very different environment. It was more dangerous back then. And there was far less guidance. It's not so much that anyone expects new players to have similar views of EVE as the older players, but that we expect them to at least take into consideration the fact that we've been there too, been through the same things they have, and figured out all kinds of neat ways to survive and even prosper. That when we say they can do something, there is actually a sliver of a chance that they can and that we're telling them this out of experience. Yes, I'm aware that tutorials barely existed some time ago. But do the tutorials prepare for the world even now? That deserves another topic altogether.
There were comments about newbies being griefed or ganked right out of rookie station, did you experience that as well? Greeted by flashy reds or yellows 1 jump from the starter system? Spammed by duel requests before knowing what duel even is? Just a few examples out the top of my head.
What should also be considered is the fact that players are the product of their time. Players who started 5-10 years ago aren't necessarily of the same generation of people or players. They may have grown in a different kind of world, and that has the potential to carry here to the game. HTFU has very different meaning to a 12-year-old (PEGI 12 game) than to a 30-year-old.
|

Nicolai Serkanner
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
83
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 13:07:00 -
[391] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote:Tippia wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:The Catalyst does not need 700 dps to kill a frigate (its intended role), ship scanners should not be free 100 accurate perves into every ship fitting. What makes you say that killing frigates is the intended role of Catalysts? And you do realise that squeezing 700 DPS out of a Catalyst makes it highly unsuitable for most kind of ganking, right? Quote:Oh and freighters (which are currently just shuttles) need fitting options. I'd prefer it if my freighter wasn't nerfed, thankyouverymuch. Oh, andGǪ Quote:Change those two things you will see a lot of ganking decrease overnight. Why is that needed? Not interested in conversing with trolls sorry...
Why do you call somebody a troll when you just can't answer the simple question which is part of the conversation you are having?
|

Bagrat Skalski
Poseidaon
1065
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 13:14:00 -
[392] - Quote
I will not paste in some obvious meme about internet and anonymity. _¦Å-æ-»¦Ñ¦¼-Ä_-¢-å¦ä_-½-»-å¦ÿ-ò-û¦¦ |

Nicolai Serkanner
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
83
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 13:15:00 -
[393] - Quote
Kyperion wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:Kyperion wrote:Actually, I am coming to the realization that Highsec rules actually are equivalent to gunfree zones, so is the idiotic limitation of weaponless mining/merchant vessels.... If you thought high sec had rules in the 1st place, it demonstrates that your thinking is indeed as bad as IRL "Gun Free Zones". Quote: Concord, like the police warps in too late.
CONCORD are like real police, in that we deter and arrest but not "protect" in the purest sense. In the same way that Police don't relieve you of your personal duty to protect yourself, the existence of CONCORD doesn't relieve you of your personal duty to use the various tools the game gives you to protect yourself. Everything from mods to tactics to awareness to friends. Quote: **** it all, turn everything into a PVP combat ship, and let's all move to Texas.
It is conceptually asinine to conceive of a Universe filled with as many dickheads as EVE and not imagine that every single ************ would be armed like Robocop.
No it is not. EVE gives players sooooo many defensive tools it ain't even funny. IRL all I can do is wear my vest (and hope the vest catches the bullet and that the bullet didn't get fired from a freaking rifle) stay aware of my surroundings and perhaps shoot 1st. I'd trade actual body parts if my partner could "remote rep" me during a fight, or if I could hang a "Damage Control"necklace around my neck, or plug "implants" into my head that would give me more "ehp" against some dude trying to kill me because he doesn't want to go back to prison....... In other words, there is nothing wrong with the game, the problem is you. Bullshit, 'IRL' you shoot the ************ trying to shoot you.... you can't do that in a mining/merchant ship in eve.... which is ******* stupid And I feel sorry for your family if you are a cop... if your idea of 'defense' is simply survival.... you are not nearly prepared to do what is necessary to face down a killer.
Wrong ... drones; and A Miner can be battle fit. Battle Ventures for instance.
|

Bagrat Skalski
Poseidaon
1065
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 13:26:00 -
[394] - Quote
Battle freighters anyone? I have proposed at least something in lows so they can stay on the field or be more susceptible depending on the fit. Cargo expanders or bulkheads, things like that, but it's really something for another thread. _¦Å-æ-»¦Ñ¦¼-Ä_-¢-å¦ä_-½-»-å¦ÿ-ò-û¦¦ |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20104
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 13:30:00 -
[395] - Quote
Helia Tranquilis wrote:Yes, I'm aware that tutorials barely existed some time ago. But do the tutorials prepare for the world even now? That deserves another topic altogether. It wasn't just the tutorials GÇö it was everything. No formal database exploration; no wikis; lots of information treated as GÇ£proprietaryGÇ¥ to specific groups; far fewer newbie-oriented groups and certainly no dev-sponsored teaching; fewer experiments and just generally less understood mechanics. Hell, I don't even remember a newbie Q&A forum when I startedGǪ 
Quote:There were comments about newbies being griefed or ganked right out of rookie station, did you experience that as well? Greeted by flashy reds or yellows 1 jump from the starter system? Spammed by duel requests before knowing what duel even is? Just a few examples out the top of my head. Yes, and it was more common. Again, the mechanics were more esoteric and the resources for learning them non-existant so it was a lot easier for the attackersGǪ oh, and they were less protected GÇö not just mechanically (ganking was easier, losses smaller) but GÇ£legallyGÇ¥ as well since the policies were far looser and more arbitrary. The whole section on GÇ£if you mess with newbies in these 16 systems, we will stomp your colonGÇ¥ in the rules didn't even exist.
GǪand I haven't even gotten to the part about walking uphill, barefoot, in the snow yet. 
Quote:What should also be considered is the fact that players are the product of their time. Players who started 5-10 years ago aren't necessarily of the same generation of people or players. They may have grown in a different kind of world, and that has the potential to carry here to the game. HTFU has very different meaning to a 12-year-old (PEGI 12 game) than to a 30-year-old. That is a fair point, but the question at that point is really if it should affect the design. Yes, parents can expect the game content (but not necessarily the interactions) to be non-offensive enough to suit a 12-year-old, but that doesn't mean it's actually a game for 12-year-olds. In practice, getting that rating is more a retail considerations GÇö when releasing those boxed copies, it was needed in order for some outlets to carry the game. Also, ratings aside, EVE has always been a more adult game than your average MMO. Is that a bad thing? Or is it just a thing that needs to be communicated more clearly? GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Malcolm from Marketing
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
20
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 13:39:00 -
[396] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Helia Tranquilis wrote:Majority of the replies on this thread only imply that it is impossible for the hardened bitter-vet crowd to understand eve from the viewpoint of a new player playing outside of blob-warfare. Can you expect a new player to have similar view of eve as a veteran watching the game through blood-stained combat goggles? We were once new players too.
Very true, and when we were new players, EVE was a very different place. |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
10419
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 13:45:00 -
[397] - Quote
Malcolm from Marketing wrote:
Very true, and when we were new players, EVE was a very different place.
It was a lot more harsh for a new player back then. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Salvos Rhoska
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
316
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 13:50:00 -
[398] - Quote
Wacthing the Rookie Chat for a day or two is quite informative of what may be some of the most immediate needs and issues of real first time players entering the game.
Many questions are repeated dozens of times a day.
I would be for some sort of stricter control and delineation of the Rookie systems. New players need and imo deserve a bit of insulation from some of the more overt threats out there. Not much, but just enough to avoid new player attrition feom aome of the more obvious and immediate frustrations they may face. |

Goe Rilla
24th Imperial Crusade Amarr Empire
5
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 14:00:00 -
[399] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:I think the eaelier comment by someone, that much uneccessary and unfounded disgruntlement is actually rooted in some peoples inability or unwillingness to accept or understand the nature of this game as compared to many other MMOs, rather than the "toxiccommunity", is very true.
Its not the behavior of other people towards them that is the problem, the problem is their own attitude.
If I walk around in life with unrealistic expectations both of the way the world works and of the nature of my fellow mankind, I will be repeatedly dissappointed and angry, not because of what other autonomous people are doing in it, but because I am so stupid as to assume I am responsible for, or capable of controlling, anyone else except myself.
These people dont seem to understand the fundamental link between the ability to control an outcome, and being responsible for it.
I am not responsible for how others view my actions. Why? Because I have no business or auspice to control how they view it. That is their own prerogative, purview and privilege and one I cannot determine or define. Its in their own head to which I have no access or business.
Reciprocally, this also means that though they are free to view my actions as they wish, their views have NO control over my own autonomous choices in my own life. Their views are their own, and not mine, and do not define how I choose to live my life, no matter how they try to claim that theirs is the "right" way.
But many people dont understand this. They think because they dont "like" something, that somehow means they are entitled to judge and restrict those who do like that.
How does this translate in EVE?
As some people who expect others to behave according to how THEY demand and perceive they should, according to their own internal system of beliefs. Is that fair towards the other person? Hell no. Does that entitle them to dictate how others should behave or think? Absolutely not. Why not? Becuase the same rationale could be levelled right back at them, and they, in return, be expected (against their own autonomy and self-determination) to act as those other people whom they presume to dictate to, dictate right back to them.
Its a ridiculous arrangement, premise and approach to interaction with others.
Its also extremely offensive and socially reprehenensible to even THINK you are in somekind of position to dictate to others how they should behave. It is none of your business. You have no control over how others behave, only over how YOU yourself behave.
I am not responsible for how you feel about something. I am not responsible to your personal view on how "things should be". I am not beholden to act as you in your head think I should. You dont, and cant, control me, nor I you.
Its abhorrent to even think or attempt otherwise, and yet that is exactly what this thread is trying to defend.
Stop trying to dictate how others live their lives and how they choose to conduct themselves.
Social Apathy 101 |

Erotica 1
Krypteia Operations CODE.
4310
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 14:15:00 -
[400] - Quote
It seems all of the latest protections and safeties for new players are doing more harm than good. When I was new, not that long ago, it was exciting to find out things the hard way. See Bio for isk doubling rules. If you didn't read bio, chances are you funded those who did. |

Salvos Rhoska
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
316
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 14:17:00 -
[401] - Quote
Goe Rilla wrote:Eve Online Priest 2423546, preaching us Social Apathy 101.
It is the exact opposite.
I preach social awareness of, responsibility in and the autonomy of every single individual.
Nobody has the right to dictate to another person what is right or wrong, or how they should live.
You have it exactly backwards.
Who are you to dictate to another person what to believe in, how to live, or what choices they should make in their life?
Stop trying to violate and impinge upon the rights of other individuals to make their own choices. Stop trying to tell other people how to live. THAT is socially unacceptable, in the extreme, and you should stop it immediately. |

Goe Rilla
24th Imperial Crusade Amarr Empire
5
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 14:51:00 -
[402] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Goe Rilla wrote:Eve Online Priest 2423546, preaching us Social Apathy 101. Stop trying to violate and impinge upon the rights of other individuals to make their own choices. Stop trying to tell other people how to live. THAT is socially unacceptable, in the extreme, and you should stop it immediately.
If those individual rights prevents and violates others to have those same rights, then you're damn right I will speak out for the one being unjustly and gratuitously violated against.
If I come into your home, take a **** on your carpet and **** your wife, I would take it as my individual right to do so, right ?
Get a ******* grip on the social empathy of things, even just a little. |

Salvos Rhoska
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
316
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 14:52:00 -
[403] - Quote
Goe Rilla wrote: If those individual rights prevents and violates others to have those same rights, then you're damn right I will speak out for the one being unjustly violated against.
If I come into your home, take a **** on your carpet and **** your wife, I would take it as my individual right to do so, right ?
Get a ******* grip on the social empathy of things, even just a little.
Nobodys rights are being violated unjustly in the game, or by the game.
Your premise is false.
And there is NO SUCH THING as someones "individual rights prevents and violates others to have those same rights".
One persons rights do NOT prevent or violate anyone elses same rights.
You don't even understand the concepts you are speaking of. |

Ryann Padecain
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
19
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 14:56:00 -
[404] - Quote
Does anyone else here has a suspicion that Divine Entervention is Harry Forever's retarde-d dad? |

Eurydia Vespasian
Storm Hunters Disturbed Acquaintance
6130
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 14:57:00 -
[405] - Quote
this is getting heavy. |

Goe Rilla
24th Imperial Crusade Amarr Empire
5
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 14:58:00 -
[406] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Goe Rilla wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:Goe Rilla wrote:Eve Online Priest 2423546, preaching us Social Apathy 101. Stop trying to violate and impinge upon the rights of other individuals to make their own choices. Stop trying to tell other people how to live. THAT is socially unacceptable, in the extreme, and you should stop it immediately. If those individual rights prevents and violates others to have those same rights, then you're damn right I will speak out for the one being unjustly violated against. If I come into your home, take a **** on your carpet and **** your wife, I would take it as my individual right to do so, right ? Get a ******* grip on the social empathy of things, even just a little. Nobodys rights are being violated unjustly in the game. Your premise is false.
There couldn't be more evidence of a premise, my friend...
Gratuitous and personal humiliations and verbal slander was proven a rampant fact in the game and Out of game also, if you re-read the OPs post or lately paying attention.
If you choose to deny that evidence, Im not sure why, or perhaps one would guess you're trying to euthanize your audience into thinking there is no such large sized invisible ***** being inserted in their rectum... |

Helia Tranquilis
State War Academy Caldari State
15
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 15:01:00 -
[407] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Helia Tranquilis wrote:What should also be considered is the fact that players are the product of their time. Players who started 5-10 years ago aren't necessarily of the same generation of people or players. They may have grown in a different kind of world, and that has the potential to carry here to the game. HTFU has very different meaning to a 12-year-old (PEGI 12 game) than to a 30-year-old. That is a fair point, but the question at that point is really if it should affect the design. Yes, parents can expect the game content (but not necessarily the interactions) to be non-offensive enough to suit a 12-year-old, but that doesn't mean it's actually a game for 12-year-olds. In practice, getting that rating is more a retail consideration GÇö when releasing those boxed copies, it was needed in order for some outlets to carry the game. Also, ratings aside, EVE has always been a more adult game than your average MMO. Is that a bad thing? Or is it just a thing that needs to be communicated more clearly? EVE is definitely an adult game, no doubt about that. What I wanted to point out was that you can expect part of the player base to consist of quite a young players. It is entirely possible that some of the loud reactions to griefs on the forums may as well be written by non-adult player. The harshness of this game requires certain character brought by maturity to be able to cope with.
As few have already commented, the existence of safety nets may hinder the hardening process, but in reality it is all about balance; how to ensure you aren't fooled to false feeling of safety and yet not being constantly rolf-stomped by certain groups.
One thing is certain: tutorials need to be completely reworked. Starting by bringing back the pod-express by Aura and make a nice and understandable video about the forms of emergent gameplay that the new player can expect to encounter on their first jump out of the starter system.
|

Salvos Rhoska
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
316
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 15:04:00 -
[408] - Quote
Goe Rilla wrote:There couldn't be more evidence of a premise, my friend...
Gratuitous and personal humiliations and verbal slander was proven a rampant fact in the game and Out of game also, if you re-read the OPs post or have been paying attention lately.
You don't have a right to not be humiliated for your mistakes.
Do you even know what "slander" means?
The law supercedes EVE. If someone violates the law, that is obviously an issue where another autonomous individuals rights have been breached by ANOTHER INDIVIDUALS ACTIONS, but NOT BY THAT OTHER INDIVIDUALS RIGHTS.
CCP has absolutely zero responsibility for or control of what happens outside of the game.
Are you so juvenile or uneducated that you cannot distinguish the difference in definitions of these concepts and terms?
You are like a child talking about adult issues. You clearly have zero understand of what your rights actually are, and what those same rights actually are in others. Like a child whos idea of rights is limited to "i was nice and did as I was told to the best of my understanding, that means I now have the right to that piece of candy as a reward".
How exactly are peoples rights being violated ingame?
Be specific. Give me 3 examples. Either do that or remove yourself. |

Goe Rilla
24th Imperial Crusade Amarr Empire
5
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 15:10:00 -
[409] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote: You don't have a right to not be humiliated for your mistakes.
Well, who gave you the right to humiliate in the first place ? Your individual self yes ?
So why stop me wanting my individual self and right to not be humiliated, even for my mistakes, if that's what I want my individual right to be ?
Quote:Do you even know what "slander" means?
Don't start on me there.
Quote:The law supercedes EVE. If someone violates the law, that is obviously an issue where another autonomous individuals rights have been breached by ANOTHER INDIVIDUALS ACTIONS, but NOT BY THAT OTHER INDIVIDUALS RIGHTS.
CCP has absolutely zero responsibility for or control of what happens outside of the game.
Are you so juvenile or uneducated that you cannot distinguish the difference in definitions of these concepts and terms?
You are like a child talking about adult issues. You clearly have zero understand of what your rights actually are, and what those same rights actually are in others. Like a child whos idea of rights is limited to "i was nice and did as I was told to the best of my understanding, that means I now have the right to that piece of candy as a reward".
I could have told you about my individually-given right to not take any ad-hominen **** from anybody, had it been a real life interaction there, I would've judged it right to a good kick in the face for that.
Quote:How exactly are peoples rights being violated ingame?
Be specific. Give me 3 examples. Either do that or remove yourself.
Read my reply to the first quote. |

Arsine Mayhem
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
157
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 15:14:00 -
[410] - Quote
Marvin Shields wrote:And what happened? What happened that day? Gaming press ate it up. Holy crap I remember Eurogamer, IGN, everyone talking about Alexander "The Mittani" Gianturco goading an audience of Eve players into harassing a suicidal man to hopefully see him go over the edge.
What amazes me is:
1. He wasn't permabaned. 2. He isn't in jail for terrorist threats. 3. People still follow him, how pathetic are they?
People that fill their KB's with hisec ganks and call it pvp, or wardec noobies trying to start a corp are losers also.
First thing I look at on a KM is location. Easily shows the losers in the game. |

Arsine Mayhem
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
157
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 15:15:00 -
[411] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Malcolm from Marketing wrote:
Very true, and when we were new players, EVE was a very different place.
It was a lot more harsh for a new player back then.
Oh, here's one now. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20113
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 15:17:00 -
[412] - Quote
Arsine Mayhem wrote:What amazes me is:
1. He wasn't permabaned. 2. He isn't in jail for terrorist threats. 3. People still follow him, how pathetic are they? Why does it amaze you? What he did was not a permaban offence, he's did not make any terrorist threats, and he's from a pre-existing community. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Salvos Rhoska
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
316
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 15:17:00 -
[413] - Quote
@Goe Rilla:
You (by your own demonstration) don't know the meanings of the words you are using.
Your (again by your own demonstration) understanding of what rights you have, which are exactly the same rights as I have, is completely false.
You are not sufficiently educated or informed enough to discuss these matters.
There can be no discussion or relevant communication on an issue when you DONT KNOW WHAT THE WORDS MEAN.
You are like a child trying to discuss adult issues. Its pathetic to observe. Laughable, frankly. |

Goe Rilla
24th Imperial Crusade Amarr Empire
5
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 15:22:00 -
[414] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Your understanding of what rights you have, which are exactly the same rights as I have, is completely false.
False ?
Feel free to show me how so in my latter sentences, because so far I don't see it.
PS: You may refrain from superior-looking manner of speech, or you lose all credibility, haven't they taught you that at law school ? ;) |

Salvos Rhoska
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
316
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 15:28:00 -
[415] - Quote
Goe Rilla wrote:False ?
Feel free to show me how so in my latter sentences, because so far I don't see it.
PS: You may refrain from superior-looking manner of speech, or you lose all credibility, haven't they taught you that at relativist law school ? ;)
I already showed that you did not understand the nature of slander, and that you think rights exist, which do infact not. I was taught in law school (and in every school for that matter) that I should know the meanings of the words I use. Infact that is what schools are all about, to learn the meanings of the words we use. Wherent you? There is nothing "superior" about the words or their meanings.
Now, to illustrate my point:
Give us one specific and real example of how your rights have been violated in EVE
This is not a rhetorical question. |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
3123
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 15:30:00 -
[416] - Quote
Abon wrote:Arsine Mayhem wrote:Marvin Shields wrote:And what happened? What happened that day? Gaming press ate it up. Holy crap I remember Eurogamer, IGN, everyone talking about Alexander "The Mittani" Gianturco goading an audience of Eve players into harassing a suicidal man to hopefully see him go over the edge. What amazes me is: 1. He wasn't permabaned. 2. He isn't in jail for terrorist threats. 3. People still follow him, how pathetic are they? People that fill their KB's with hisec ganks and call it pvp, or wardec noobies trying to start a corp are losers also. First thing I look at on a KM is location. Easily shows the losers in the game.  Terrorist Threats! Call the Cyber Police! Right?
Cyber Police? We're well into Thought Police territory in this thread by now. Hell, we basically were on the first page. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á
Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Anslo
The Scope Gallente Federation
4503
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 15:31:00 -
[417] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Telling someone that I believe they are a coward is not a personal attack.
Anslo is a coward. He's also a hypocrite for literally saying that an entire subset of players do not have any balls, while hiding behind his fleet to say so.
That's just a fact, like saying that Infinity Ziona is a liar. He is, unless pocos became sov assets in the last few weeks.
I'm so sorry for you. Knowing bags of hate like you exist is such a cruel reminder of how unfair life really is.   I truly hope things get better for you. The funny thing is, that my daughter likes to sit on my lap when I'm on my suicide ganker character. She loves to watch as other ships blow up, her enthusiasm is hilarious. Alright you seem to be incapable of reading so ill say it completely bluntly.
You talk big. I want you to back up your talk. Get all your ganker friends into a fleet, as many as you can. Then, fight me. I'm not saying come welp into me. It won't be as nearly as satisfying as shaming you and your tank fleet with my fleet of missionary and miners who decided we had enough of griefers and campers.
I am literally saying come at us bro. But since you aren't capable of rallying them, or unwilling, it seems you are intact proven a coward, as the rest of the griefers here. Can't shoot this that'd shoot back now can we?
Get rekt.
<3
|

Moonlit Raid
State War Academy Caldari State
157
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 15:34:00 -
[418] - Quote
Marvin Shields wrote:We had a CSM chairman literally stand on-stage and tell people to harass an ISBoxing ice miner, who had voiced concerns about suicidal thoughts in a message to him, with the hopes that the guy would actually hurt himself. (Cont'd) I was about to mention exactly this. If this is what he have commanding a good portion of the populace, what do you expect? |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20114
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 15:37:00 -
[419] - Quote
Anslo wrote:Alright you seem to be incapable of reading so ill say it completely bluntly.
You talk big. I want you to back up your talk. Get all your ganker friends into a fleet, as many as you can. Then, fight me. I'm not saying come welp into me. It won't be as nearly as satisfying as shaming you and your tank fleet with my fleet of missionary and miners who decided we had enough of griefers and campers.
I am literally saying come at us bro. But since you aren't capable of rallying them, or unwilling, it seems you are intact proven a coward, as the rest of the griefers here. Can't shoot this that'd shoot back now can we?
Get rekt.
<3 As much as Anslo and I have had our disagreements, this is the correct response. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Salvos Rhoska
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
316
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 15:37:00 -
[420] - Quote
Consider the following hypothetical scenario:
What if I was to say to you, that transfer everything you have ingame to my character, or I will commit suicide.
What would be your hypothetical response? |

Moonlit Raid
State War Academy Caldari State
158
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 15:40:00 -
[421] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Consider the following hypothetical scenario: What if I was to say to you, that transfer everything you have ingame to my character, or I will commit suicide. What would be your hypothetical reesponse?
I'd say find yourself some help you're in a bad place. |

Salvos Rhoska
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
316
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 15:42:00 -
[422] - Quote
Moonlit Raid wrote:I'd say find yourself some help you're in a bad place.
And that is more valid a response than any other because what exactly? |

Anslo
The Scope Gallente Federation
4504
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 15:44:00 -
[423] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Anslo wrote:Alright you seem to be incapable of reading so ill say it completely bluntly.
You talk big. I want you to back up your talk. Get all your ganker friends into a fleet, as many as you can. Then, fight me. I'm not saying come welp into me. It won't be as nearly as satisfying as shaming you and your tank fleet with my fleet of missionary and miners who decided we had enough of griefers and campers.
I am literally saying come at us bro. But since you aren't capable of rallying them, or unwilling, it seems you are intact proven a coward, as the rest of the griefers here. Can't shoot this that'd shoot back now can we?
Get rekt.
<3 As much as Anslo and I have had our disagreements, this is the correct response.
You're agreeing with me?...not sure how Im supposed to feel...ok hold on ill fix this.
CCP BAN GANKER THEY OP TOO STRONK PLS NERF OR BAN K THX
|

Arsine Mayhem
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
157
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 15:46:00 -
[424] - Quote
Hisec KM, pvp (or so they call it) for the pathetic. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20116
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 15:55:00 -
[425] - Quote
Anslo wrote:You're agreeing with me?...not sure how Im supposed to feel...ok hold on ill fix this.
CCP BAN GANKER THEY OP TOO STRONK PLS NERF OR BAN K THX We'll see what the tally is after the fight, won't we? Of course, now you have an incentive to throw the match to prove a point.  GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Goe Rilla
24th Imperial Crusade Amarr Empire
5
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 15:56:00 -
[426] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Goe Rilla wrote:False ?
Feel free to show me how so in my latter sentences, because so far I don't see it.
PS: You may refrain from superior-looking manner of speech, or you lose all credibility, haven't they taught you that at relativist law school ? ;) I already showed that you did not understand the nature of slander, and that you think rights exist, which do infact not. I was taught in law school (and in every school for that matter) that I should know the meanings of the words I use. Wherent you? There is nothing "superior" about the words or their meanings. Now, to illustrate my point: Give me one specific and real example of how your rights have been violated in EVEThis is not a rhetorical question.
No but there is something superior and deeply insecure about the individual that uses them, or chooses to scold those down that may not use them as well as he's expecting them to..
Anyway,
You wanted an example, and i wont give you one of my personal experience because I prefer to take my own precautions with this, especially here, and it is my right to want this for myself, wouldn't you say ?
So instead we'll take "The Mittani" one. That guy chose to be an absolute and "nonsensitive" a-hole to the other guy, and to go further with it in wide-open public.
Now I ask myself, what could the latter guy have done to deserve such a humiliating treatment ?
Ah yes, a suicide note...
And what could the former guy have done to think on the implications of his humiliating treatment ?
Just that, to think, and to empathize before the act, instead of serving us with a general round of a-holic, unwarranted and humiliating apathy.
You CAN evaluate and adapt your own rights according to others existing around you, and in fact, that's basis for all the things done with one another, be it something as simple as meeting the crowd walking down the street...
Your case to prove that rights remain on their own and tied up to the individual alone, couldn't be further from how reality works. |

Anslo
The Scope Gallente Federation
4504
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 15:58:00 -
[427] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Anslo wrote:You're agreeing with me?...not sure how Im supposed to feel...ok hold on ill fix this.
CCP BAN GANKER THEY OP TOO STRONK PLS NERF OR BAN K THX We'll see what the tally is after the fight, won't we? Of course, now you have an incentive to throw the match to prove a point.  WHAT BET I DIDN'T MAKE A BET AND THROW THE MATCH YOU GOT NOTHIN ON ME TIPPIA.
But yeah he won't show up. They never do :(
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20116
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 16:00:00 -
[428] - Quote
Anslo wrote:WHAT BET I DIDN'T MAKE A BET AND THROW THE MATCH YOU GOT NOTHIN ON ME TIPPIA.
But yeah he won't show up. They never do :( Well, there's always that, which would prove another point, I suppose. Still, I thought it was a neat trap.  GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Bagrat Skalski
Poseidaon
1066
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 16:00:00 -
[429] - Quote
As i have said it some time ago, if you want to win this game, you have to stop playing. You will not lose any ISK, you will not lose your honor, your freedom, your time and your nerves, you will earn a peace of mind laying on the bed and thinking about your lovely wife or a cake you had earlier. _¦Å-æ-»¦Ñ¦¼-Ä_-¢-å¦ä_-½-»-å¦ÿ-ò-û¦¦ |

Erotica 1
Krypteia Operations CODE.
4311
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 16:02:00 -
[430] - Quote
The Mittani is not a bad guy. But it is pretty sickening that there are certain people who want to bring up that event over and over. Give some thought to how keeping that issue alive affects the other person made famous by it. Let it go. See Bio for isk doubling rules. If you didn't read bio, chances are you funded those who did. |

Salvos Rhoska
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
316
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 16:03:00 -
[431] - Quote
Words have meanings. If you don't know those meanings, you should not use the words. That has nothing to do with being superior. Its just the facts of life. You can point at a banana and call it an apple all you want, that does not make it an apple.
The Mittani did not violate anyone's rights. Nor has he been legally prosecuted on any charge for violating anyones rights as related to that incident.
Let me restate that so it is completely clear. He did not violate anyone's rights.
Now, I repeat the question:
Give me one specific and real example of how your rights have been violated in EVE Feel free to use alternate names to protect the identity of the involved individuals. |

Anslo
The Scope Gallente Federation
4504
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 16:04:00 -
[432] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Anslo wrote:WHAT BET I DIDN'T MAKE A BET AND THROW THE MATCH YOU GOT NOTHIN ON ME TIPPIA.
But yeah he won't show up. They never do :( Well, there's always that, which would prove another point, I suppose. Still, I thought it was a neat trap.  TBH look at my kb. We clear the campers who trap others. If he showed up with a fleet, I'd say 0 at sun. We don't need a trap to rek them.
And then shadow cartel third parties and hot drops.
WELCOME TO LOWSEC LOLOLOLOL T_T
|

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
3126
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 16:05:00 -
[433] - Quote
Anslo wrote:Tippia wrote:Anslo wrote:You're agreeing with me?...not sure how Im supposed to feel...ok hold on ill fix this.
CCP BAN GANKER THEY OP TOO STRONK PLS NERF OR BAN K THX We'll see what the tally is after the fight, won't we? Of course, now you have an incentive to throw the match to prove a point.  WHAT BET I DIDN'T MAKE A BET AND THROW THE MATCH YOU GOT NOTHIN ON ME TIPPIA. But yeah he won't show up. They never do :(
I would point out that, when I offered to fight you one on one, you explicitly refused. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á
Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
3126
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 16:09:00 -
[434] - Quote
Anslo wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Anslo wrote:Tippia wrote:Anslo wrote:You're agreeing with me?...not sure how Im supposed to feel...ok hold on ill fix this.
CCP BAN GANKER THEY OP TOO STRONK PLS NERF OR BAN K THX We'll see what the tally is after the fight, won't we? Of course, now you have an incentive to throw the match to prove a point.  WHAT BET I DIDN'T MAKE A BET AND THROW THE MATCH YOU GOT NOTHIN ON ME TIPPIA. But yeah he won't show up. They never do :( I would point out that, when I offered to fight you one on one, you explicitly refused. And when I offered a fleet fight, cause a lot of bears want a piece of you, you changed topics because you are not capable. Step up, senpai. This isn't e honor crap.
Like I said, step out behind the coat tails of so many others. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á
Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Anslo
The Scope Gallente Federation
4504
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 16:11:00 -
[435] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Like I said, step out behind the coat tails of so many others.
Get more coat tails. We're just pubbies. Why can't you rally other gankers to back up your big talk?
|

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
3126
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 16:14:00 -
[436] - Quote
Anslo wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Like I said, step out behind the coat tails of so many others.
Get more coat tails. We're just pubbies. Why can't you rally other gankers to back up your big talk?
Why do you need a bunch of other people behind you before you feel safe enough to take a fight? Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á
Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Anslo
The Scope Gallente Federation
4504
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 16:16:00 -
[437] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Anslo wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Like I said, step out behind the coat tails of so many others.
Get more coat tails. We're just pubbies. Why can't you rally other gankers to back up your big talk? Why do you need a bunch of other people behind you before you feel safe enough to take a fight? Why do you need a bunch of miners as targets before you're willing to fight?
|

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
3126
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 16:21:00 -
[438] - Quote
Anslo wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Anslo wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Like I said, step out behind the coat tails of so many others.
Get more coat tails. We're just pubbies. Why can't you rally other gankers to back up your big talk? Why do you need a bunch of other people behind you before you feel safe enough to take a fight? Why do you need a bunch of miners as targets before you're willing to fight?
I don't. I do that on an alt, among plenty of other things. I play just about every part of this game, this character lives in a wormhole, for example. I even still have a ninja salvager. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á
Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Antisocial Malkavian
Antisocial Malkavians
333
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 16:30:00 -
[439] - Quote
The community here is nothing. You wanna see ****, look at a game called "Mechwarrior Online".
THEIR subreddit split in two (lol) because there was a really **** moderator and apparent paid shill named Congzilla, who was stifling dissent so the Goons took over (mind you they created the subreddit in the first place, then left as the game was revealed to be more and more ****, and non Goons got mod positions - effectively "taking over") kicked him out, and decided there would be no more moderating comments or bans.
The defenders of all things MWO basically said, "FINE then we're taking our ball home" and threw a hissy fit known as hpgoutreach. One of the mods there made this massive rant on how he was taking all the content creators there and now the Reddit is split in two lol. http://gizmodo.com/5913381/season-your-food-with-salt-from-real-human-tears
you will be harvested |

Octoven
Phoenix Productions Headshot Gaming
353
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 16:30:00 -
[440] - Quote
I don't mind popping noobs but just one the off occasion or a few times a month. However, when you have tons of massively campaign driven events to do so...yeah I can probably agree that it is more of a detriment to the the game than anything. With that being said, I have been guilty of killing noobs and usually if I know they are a new players (less than 4 months) I typically will give them a bit of isk to replace anything I destroyed. For me it isn't about economic dominance of a noob who has little isk to begin with, I just popped a player without prejudice. The real question I suppose is how do you know if the player you are killing is a true noob or just an alt? If you are a vet player you know enough about noobs to pass as one. In which case once you turn your back and give that new player a break...he pounces. Eve is about survival at any cost, there are measures in place to protect noobs. The starting systems and if im not mistaken the systems surrounding these starting systems are pretty safe for noobs. If you are caught trying to lure one out to gank or such its a ban-able offense if im not mistaken.
If I am in a wh and a noob comes in there, I will pop him period. He received the warning just as I did when attempting to jump that CONCORD will not be around. As for ganking miners, generally noobs are flying ventures anyway. By the time they have got into retrievers, hulks, and macks they have some isk in their pocket and usually have been told by a corp member that you shouldn't fly what you cant afford to lose. Even if they have not been told, they still have the benefit of watching that miner in the belt next to them being burned.
There are more people than you can imagine in eve who give a noob isk for losing a ship, hell I still get isk from losing a ship 5 years later >.< not everyone in eve are complete dicks, but then again without them, the game would get pretty stagnate quickly.
As for the exit survey, CCP does ask when you cancel your sub why you did so. There are numerous categories and even one for custom. It would be nice if they released these statistics. I would be interested in knowing the majority cause of player loss. |

Goe Rilla
24th Imperial Crusade Amarr Empire
5
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 16:30:00 -
[441] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Words have meanings. If you don't know those meanings, you should not use the words. That has nothing to do with being superior. Its just the facts of life. You can point at a banana and call it an apple all you want, that does not make it an apple. The Mittani did not violate anyone's rights. Nor has he been legally prosecuted on any charge for violating anyones rights as related to that incident. You may find his actions reprehensible according to your own moral beliefs, but those are subjective, and amount only to your own opinion. They are not binding on, nor supercede, the opinions of anyone else, including The Mittani or the suicider. Let me restate that so it is completely clear. He did not violate anyone's rights. So this example was not an example of someones rights being violated. Now, I repeat the question: Give me one specific and real example of how your rights have been violated in EVEFeel free to use alternate names to protect the identity of the involved individuals.
In the real world, Bullying is considered an offense, and cyber-bullying increasingly so these days.
Naturally, the offensive liability of The Mittani's actions never saw light of day as his victim never pressed any complaints, and so it remains based on opinions since then...
So it's a very easy case to dismiss and use for those with an agenda to push on for more apathetic retardation.
However, if people started making a habit of calling their lawyers to check on the liability of some of the **** they go through in this game or the next, a tsunami of charges would come pouring in, without a doubt, and certain people would finally start to STFU... |

Antisocial Malkavian
Antisocial Malkavians
333
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 16:31:00 -
[442] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Anslo wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Like I said, step out behind the coat tails of so many others.
Get more coat tails. We're just pubbies. Why can't you rally other gankers to back up your big talk? Why do you need a bunch of other people behind you before you feel safe enough to take a fight?
I thought that was how combat worked in this game? Theres no bushido code in 0.0... http://gizmodo.com/5913381/season-your-food-with-salt-from-real-human-tears
you will be harvested |

Antisocial Malkavian
Antisocial Malkavians
333
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 16:33:00 -
[443] - Quote
Goe Rilla wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:Words have meanings. If you don't know those meanings, you should not use the words. That has nothing to do with being superior. Its just the facts of life. You can point at a banana and call it an apple all you want, that does not make it an apple. The Mittani did not violate anyone's rights. Nor has he been legally prosecuted on any charge for violating anyones rights as related to that incident. You may find his actions reprehensible according to your own moral beliefs, but those are subjective, and amount only to your own opinion. They are not binding on, nor supercede, the opinions of anyone else, including The Mittani or the suicider. Let me restate that so it is completely clear. He did not violate anyone's rights. So this example was not an example of someones rights being violated. Now, I repeat the question: Give me one specific and real example of how your rights have been violated in EVEFeel free to use alternate names to protect the identity of the involved individuals. In the real world, Bullying is considered an offense, and cyber-bullying increasingly so these days. Naturally, the offensive liability of The Mittani's actions never saw light of day as his victim never pressed any complaints, and so it remains based on opinions since then...
Cyber bullying is actually illegal in many states. I guess you wont be able to play EVE in those states lol
http://gizmodo.com/5913381/season-your-food-with-salt-from-real-human-tears
you will be harvested |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
3126
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 16:34:00 -
[444] - Quote
Antisocial Malkavian wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Anslo wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Like I said, step out behind the coat tails of so many others.
Get more coat tails. We're just pubbies. Why can't you rally other gankers to back up your big talk? Why do you need a bunch of other people behind you before you feel safe enough to take a fight? I thought that was how combat worked in this game? Theres no bushido code in 0.0...
You're right, there isn't. But if you're going to call one person out on the forums and then literally refuse to not bring a fleet, it does kinda make you a *****. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á
Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Salvos Rhoska
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
316
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 16:35:00 -
[445] - Quote
Goe Rilla wrote:In the real world, Bullying is considered an offense, and cyber-bullying increasingly so these days.
Naturally, the offensive liability of The Mittani's actions never saw light of day as his victim never pressed any complaints, and so it remains based on opinions since then...
However, if people started making a habit of calling their lawyers to check on the liability of some of the **** they go through in this game or the next, a tsunami of charges would come pouring in, without a doubt.
There was no liability. Nobodies rights where violated.
Infact the moral, and in some sense legal, liability rests on the suicider for trying to blackmail someone else by threatening to take their own life if they did not comply to their demands.
You can't just go up to people and demand them to do what you want, or you will kill yourself.
There is no case against The Mittani on this issue. That is why there was no prosecution.
But returning to topic, I repeat the question a third time to you:
Give me one specific and real example of how your rights have been violated in EVE |

Bagrat Skalski
Poseidaon
1066
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 16:43:00 -
[446] - Quote
If you are about to pod or after you gank someone, wish him good luck next time, with smile, is that so much to ask? These people are certainly worth these words. _¦Å-æ-»¦Ñ¦¼-Ä_-¢-å¦ä_-½-»-å¦ÿ-ò-û¦¦ |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
10420
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 16:46:00 -
[447] - Quote
Goe Rilla wrote:
In the real world, Bullying is considered an offense, and cyber-bullying increasingly so these days.
Naturally, the offensive liability of The Mittani's actions never saw light of day as his victim never pressed any complaints, and so it remains based on opinions since then...
So it's a very easy case to dismiss and use for those with an agenda to push on for more apathetic retardation.
However, if people started making a habit of calling their lawyers to check on the liability of some of the **** they go through in this gameworld or the next, a tsunami of charges would most likely come pouring in, and certain people would finally start to stfu in defense of rampant retardation...
Why are you playing a PvP game if you don't like the fact that PvP can happen to you? Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
10420
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 16:48:00 -
[448] - Quote
Bagrat Skalski wrote:If you are about to pod or after you gank someone, wish him good luck next time, with smile, is that so much to ask? These people are certainly worth these words.
When ganking there is little time for such things. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
17103
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 16:51:00 -
[449] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Bagrat Skalski wrote:If you are about to pod or after you gank someone, wish him good luck next time, with smile, is that so much to ask? These people are certainly worth these words. When ganking there is little time for such things. It's also likely to be seen as adding insult to injury, and cause more threads like this.
Psychotic Monk for CSM 9 |

Oraac Ensor
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
445
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 16:53:00 -
[450] - Quote
Victor Andall wrote:You're equating a niche of players, however broad, to the entire community. No, he is quite specifically NOT doing that.
Protip: always read the OP properly before posting in a thread.
|

Bagrat Skalski
Poseidaon
1066
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 16:54:00 -
[451] - Quote
Still you can wish it to the pilot after you gank him and loot the wreck. All what is despised in the whole thing is a sompletely psychopatic effect when you did not bother even to say anything to a man. You look there like a rogue drone not a man. Be a man, not a complete jerk. Is that so hard?  _¦Å-æ-»¦Ñ¦¼-Ä_-¢-å¦ä_-½-»-å¦ÿ-ò-û¦¦ |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
10421
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 17:00:00 -
[452] - Quote
Bagrat Skalski wrote:Still you can wish it to the pilot after you gank him and loot the wreck. All what is despised in the whole thing is a sompletely psychopatic effect when you did not bother even to say anything to a man. You look there like a rogue drone not a man. Be a man, not a complete jerk. Is that so hard? 
They are most often dead and podded so not in system and sending them a mail with "GF" just rubs salt into the wound and fans the flames of rage. Meanwhile we are getting our pods back to safety, sorting out ships for the next gank, getting everything back into position, dealing with concord and looting the goods and getting our own hauler to safety.
Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
10421
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 17:01:00 -
[453] - Quote
Bagrat Skalski wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote:baltec1 wrote:Bagrat Skalski wrote:If you are about to pod or after you gank someone, wish him good luck next time, with smile, is that so much to ask? These people are certainly worth these words. When ganking there is little time for such things. It's also likely to be seen as adding insult to injury, and cause more threads like this. Whoa, those people need a break, or tell them its only a game.
That would cause yet more rage Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
5063
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 17:05:00 -
[454] - Quote
Antisocial Malkavian wrote:The community here is nothing. You wanna see ****, look at a game called "Mechwarrior Online".
THEIR subreddit split in two (lol) because there was a really **** moderator and apparent paid shill named Congzilla, who was stifling dissent so the Goons took over (mind you they created the subreddit in the first place, then left as the game was revealed to be more and more ****, and non Goons got mod positions - effectively "taking over") kicked him out, and decided there would be no more moderating comments or bans.
The defenders of all things MWO basically said, "FINE then we're taking our ball home" and threw a hissy fit known as hpgoutreach. One of the mods there made this massive rant on how he was taking all the content creators there and now the Reddit is split in two lol.
The Mechwarrior 4 community (spread across various league forums, Dropshipcommand.com and the Netbattletech forums) was the same way a decade before MWO came out. The various EVE forums are quite tame in comparison.
The problem with some EVE players and especially posters is that they mostly only play EVE/visit EVe related forums and don't have a broad enough perspective to understand what's what.
The EVE community is one of the more stable and mature ones. That's why CCP has fanfest every year and the worst thing you hear about is some dude with bad BO or a couple guys starting a space war because one guy called the other guy's girlfriend "hefty". A Mechwarrior (or Call of Duty or Halo or leage of Legends ect ect) community gathering like that would most likely require actual security planning and increased insurance payments lol. |

Bagrat Skalski
Poseidaon
1066
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 17:05:00 -
[455] - Quote
"No hard feelings Bro" too? What times we are living in.... _¦Å-æ-»¦Ñ¦¼-Ä_-¢-å¦ä_-½-»-å¦ÿ-ò-û¦¦ |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
17103
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 17:07:00 -
[456] - Quote
Bagrat Skalski wrote:Still you can wish it to the pilot after you gank him and loot the wreck. All what is despised in the whole thing is a sompletely psychopatic effect when you did not bother even to say anything to a man. You look there like a rogue drone not a man. Be a man, not a complete jerk. Is that so hard?  You've obviously never seen the reactions of some people when they get ganked, any attempts to contact or engage with some of them in conversation is generally met with a torrent of abuse including death threats, the wishing of crippling disease and misfortune upon your family (both out of game), vitriol and hatred.
Yes ganking people may seem jerk like, however, wishing death, crippling disease and misfortune on someone and their family in real life over the explosion of some internet spaceships, in a game that revolves around said explosions, falls outside the range of being a jerk and into the realms of being an obnoxious individual with no concept of the difference between what happens in a game and what happens in real life.
Most gankers couldn't give two hoots what people say or threaten in the context of the game, because it's within the game. Take it outside of the game and it becomes a matter for the shrinks and the old bill.
Bagrat Skalski wrote:Whoa, those people need a break, or tell them its only a game. Lol, we do, and then we end up with threads like this, and their associated holier than thou, if you do bad in a game you're bad IRL hangers on.
Psychotic Monk for CSM 9 |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
10421
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 17:10:00 -
[457] - Quote
Bagrat Skalski wrote:
"No hard feelings Bro" too? What times we are living in....
Bears are the most angry players in EVE and thats the truth, the hatred they can display is unreal at times. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20118
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 17:16:00 -
[458] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Bagrat Skalski wrote:
"No hard feelings Bro" too? What times we are living in....
Bears are the most angry players in EVE and thats the truth, the hatred they can display is unreal at times. I'll put this forward as an illustration of what I got from one: someone wishing me dead for posting on a forumGǪ And I'm not even a ganker GÇö I'm sure those who actually do stuff in game have seen far worse.  GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
5064
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 17:21:00 -
[459] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Bagrat Skalski wrote:
"No hard feelings Bro" too? What times we are living in....
Bears are the most angry players in EVE and thats the truth, the hatred they can display is unreal at times.
One of my buddies on this forum mentioned someone sending a picture of his own house after he ganked someone (ie played the game within the rules). Another well known pirate on these forums that I talk with via PMs told me of a similar situation where he had to involve law enforcement because of actual threats. And those of 2 of the tamer examples.
|

Bagrat Skalski
Poseidaon
1066
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 17:21:00 -
[460] - Quote
I am a bear and i have been podded and ganked, and i wasn't that mad. But I have some background in PvP in other games and know how pointless it is to throw tantrums. Game isn't over. We all will have our butts kicked repeatedly playing this game. We are all in it together.  _¦Å-æ-»¦Ñ¦¼-Ä_-¢-å¦ä_-½-»-å¦ÿ-ò-û¦¦ |

Iam The Empress
Evil Monkey Asylum Evil Monkeys Asylum
77
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 17:25:00 -
[461] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Iam The Empress wrote:The game is a cess pit of horrible people and i agre with you. The corp i run is based on real life first and anyone who is not a decent person is ejected within 24 hours of joining.
The best thing to do is fine a corp like ours and just stick with them.
Also streaming is never a good idea mate. It truly isnt.
The internet brings out the worst in people and tbh
I have nothing but contempt for around 80% of the eve community.
They are disgusting excuses for humans who take delight in insulting others for the sake of it, and 90% of them are on this game 24/7 and have no lives. It is a sad state of affairs, but a true one.
I will be +1 your post because you are right. We have recruited people from other games straight into our corporation and they have expressed a disgust at the eve forums and reddit.
I 100% agree with you.
It needs to change but as most of the devs and gms are ex null players, they have the same attitudes.
Empress You come to a PvP focused game and get angry when people PvP you...
If you had seen my corps pvp killboard, you would realise how stupid that comment is since that is ALL WE DO, however, we have strict rules, no smack in loca, no abuse, no stupid behaviour, treat people with respect.
There is no excuse for the behaviour of people in this game |

Salvos Rhoska
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
316
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 17:32:00 -
[462] - Quote
Iam The Empress wrote:There is no excuse for the behaviour of people in this game
Nice universal generalisation to every single individual person playing in the entire game. Including yourself. |

Scrimtar
Aliastra Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 17:38:00 -
[463] - Quote
I feel about eve like I do R/L there are good and bad and that's just the way it is and no measure of interference is going to change that I will say this about eve though I remember when I first started and got my first BC and thought it was bad ass I had a fellow player that was kind enough to help me test my fine fit (Later I learned it was horribly fit). So we went out and commenced to battling and I noticed he was emitting a strange red like beam at me found out later it was a newt and then nothing worked. He took my ship down to structure then asked for ransom to not blow it up of course I didn't have it so pop went my shiny new BC but afterwards he was kind enough to answer a few questions I had and give me a lot of advise on skills and how to properly fit a ship. I learned more in that 1/2 hr of him teaching me about the game than I had in the probably 3 months I had played so I don't think all gankers or ppl that ransom are bad ppl there just enjoying the game just as a miner explorer or anyone else is and it would be more of a crime to try to get ppl to conform to one persons or groups way of thinking. Anyhow that's my 2 cents worth fly safe all. |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
10422
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 17:39:00 -
[464] - Quote
Iam The Empress wrote:
If you had seen my corps pvp killboard, you would realise how stupid that comment is since that is ALL WE DO, however, we have strict rules, no smack in loca, no abuse, no stupid behaviour, treat people with respect.
There is no excuse for the behaviour of people in this game
You must have rather thin skin.
Tossing insults at each other is a art form out in 0.0 and everyone just takes it as banter. There is no meaning behind it but bears just dont understand it.
Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Arsine Mayhem
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
158
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 17:45:00 -
[465] - Quote
Erotica 1 wrote:The Mittani is not a bad guy. But it is pretty sickening that there are certain people who want to bring up that event over and over. Give some thought to how keeping that issue alive affects the other person made famous by it. Let it go.
I've never seen anything more pathetic in a video game. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20118
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 17:45:00 -
[466] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Tossing insults at each other is a art form out in 0.0 and everyone just takes it as banter. There is no meaning behind it but bears just dont understand it. To be fair, insults as a dominance game is pretty standard practice in any number of closer communities, so that's hardly a unique phenomenon. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Salvos Rhoska
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
316
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 17:47:00 -
[467] - Quote
Arsine Mayhem wrote:I've never seen anything more pathetic in a video game.
In a video game?
Wat? |

Goe Rilla
24th Imperial Crusade Amarr Empire
5
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 17:47:00 -
[468] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Goe Rilla wrote:In the real world, Bullying is considered an offense, and cyber-bullying increasingly so these days.
Naturally, the offensive liability of The Mittani's actions never saw light of day as his victim never pressed any complaints, and so it remains based on opinions since then...
However, if people started making a habit of calling their lawyers to check on the liability of some of the **** they go through in this game or the next, a tsunami of charges would come pouring in, without a doubt. There was no liability. Nobodies rights where violated. Hence, no prosecution. Infact the moral, and in some sense legal, liability rests on the suicider for trying to blackmail someone else by threatening to take their own life if they did not comply to their demands. But you obviously can't sue someone who is clinically of unsound mind (as a suicidal individual is considered to be). But returning to topic, I repeat the question a third time to you: Give me one specific and real example of how your rights have been violated in EVE
More like nobodies rights were officially examined, and so, easy to self-conclude on it like you just did.
Anyway, back on the topic at hand, I countered you for what you were saying about individual rights in general, not just in the Eve universe.
But if you want Eve-specific, i'll give you one:
In my early naive days of Eve I wanted to get into mining, i'd read a bit about the unforgiving nature of the game and its players, so I was a bit informed on precautions to take as a hisec miner.
However, that didnt stop the occasional suicide gank from happening and setting me back several weeks as a penniless starting player with no friends and no resources.
But one day came when the gankings became more repetitive, several times a week, followed by waves of insults in local, tagging, "lolcarebear", "back to wow", and all the likes of abuse we all know and endure in this game.
At this point I realised I would have to make tremendous efforts to remain in the hisec mining activity and keeping it the way I wanted to play the game, but I no later realized those efforts in vain, as ganks became systematic, wherever I went, for nearly a whole damn month. This had tremendous effects on my personal life planning as I would have to dedicate considerably more ammounts of time in the game.
It got to a point where I was forced into making a choice between my life and the game, as I was still paying a monthly subscription at the time (and who cares, it's just my money right ?).
It's at this time I thought on the real motivation behind all this rampant ganking, namecalling, PMs riddled with personal insults and abuse on my person, and all in the prevention of making my own money's worth of what I considered the game to play fun for me.
My right as a paying customer was in having fun with this game using a one of its safest advertised functions to do it with, but I was flat-out denied that right to start the game this way by people desiring nothing else but to stamp over your tracks and **** you, because they could.
At that point I also realized those same people had the choice in themselves not to perform such actions, and so, for a service I paid for, i refused to expose myself and money to actions i'd have next to zero control over, and so that ended up with an non-renewed subscription.
Did I have the choice to continue and choose another starting profession ? Sure.
Did I want to ? Nope.
Was it entirely my fault ? Precisely not one bit, as I was looking for my own way to play and have fun in the game using one of its advertised functions, but got prevented to it by an external force that could not care less about you, or why you paid for this game in the first place. |

Moonlit Raid
State War Academy Caldari State
158
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 17:48:00 -
[469] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Moonlit Raid wrote:I'd say find yourself some help you're in a bad place. And that is more valid a response than what was given by The Mittani because what exactly? You did not comply to the demand, and potentially I committed suicide as a result of that. By your logic and premise, you would be responsible for that, because you did not do what was necessary to prevent me from suicide, which was transfer your assets to my character, or I would commit suicide. By not transfering your assets, according to your own premise, you did not do what was necessary to prevent my suicide, which would have been transferring your assets. I said you should seek help. I didn't tell you to kill yourself. I think the two things are different. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20118
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 17:53:00 -
[470] - Quote
Moonlit Raid wrote:I said you should seek help. I didn't tell you to kill yourself. I think the two things are different. Then again, he didn't say that eitherGǪ
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
14099
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 18:00:00 -
[471] - Quote
Goe Rilla wrote: My right as a paying customer was in having fun with this game using a one of its safest advertised functions to do it with, but I was flat-out denied that right to start the game this way by people desiring nothing else but to stamp over your tracks and **** you, because they could.
Your right to what now?
You have a desire for that, but where on earth did you get the idea that you have a right to it in a game that's openly and explicitly advertised as a single-shard open world with FFA PvP.
You have the following rights in EVE:
You have the right to try doing anything you like
You have the right to try and stop anyone else doing anything you don't like
But you have no right whatsoever to succeed.
1 Kings 12:11
|

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
14099
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 18:03:00 -
[472] - Quote
I think it's time to make my monthly suggestion to ccp that they make the nature of EVE explicitly and unavoidably clear to new players. It should literally be impossible to undock for the first time without clicking through a modal window that stays up for 60 seconds and says very clearly "OTHER PLAYERS CAN AND WILL INTERACT WITH YOU IN ANY AREA OF THE GAME, AND IT IS ALLOWABLE FOR THEM TO DO THINGS YOU MAY NOT LIKE."
1 Kings 12:11
|

Salvos Rhoska
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
316
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 18:04:00 -
[473] - Quote
@Goe Rilla:
You have the right to terminate your account with CCP whenever you want. You also have the right to make use of the service CCP provides, according to their terms and conditions, as long as you are a subscribed customer.
None of your rights have been violated in the example you illustrated.
@Moonlit Raid:
Yes, those are literally two different responses. They are comprised of two different sets of words and communicate two different meanings.
And? So what?
Are you trying to claim your response is morally superior to the other? If so, based on whos moral judgement? Yours? Mine? The Mittanis?
Your moral stance is his response was immoral. His moral stance would bviously seem to be that it was not immoral. My moral stance is one of ambivalence, because I believe a person is free to say what they wish as long as they dont break the law.
None of us can dictate that our personal stance is the "right" one, because for each of us, that amounts only to our own opinion, and one which obviously the other two do not necessarilynshare and to which they are not accountable to, beholden to, or subservient to. |

Good Posting
Posting with my Mind
124
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 18:14:00 -
[474] - Quote
I think eve online has one of the best communities. I don't agree with some behaviours and i find the "tear harvesting11111" a bit childish but people shouldn't take some actions as something personal. It is a game after all.
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20119
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 18:14:00 -
[475] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:I think it's time to make my monthly suggestion to ccp that they make the nature of EVE explicitly and unavoidably clear to new players. It should literally be impossible to undock for the first time without clicking through a modal window that stays up for 60 seconds and says very clearly "OTHER PLAYERS CAN AND WILL INTERACT WITH YOU IN ANY AREA OF THE GAME, AND IT IS ALLOWABLE FOR THEM TO DO THINGS YOU MAY NOT LIKE." Do it.
I'd suggest a quiz to download the client as well GÇö 80% correct required to get to the files. Do you think they'd call that overkill?  GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
10425
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 18:16:00 -
[476] - Quote
Goe Rilla wrote:
More like nobodies rights were officially examined, and so, easy to self-conclude on it like you just did.
Anyway, back on the topic at hand, I countered you for what you were saying about individual rights in general, not just in the Eve universe.
But if you want Eve-specific, i'll give you one:
In my early naive days of Eve I wanted to get into mining, i'd read a bit about the unforgiving nature of the game and its players, so I was a bit informed on precautions to take as a hisec miner.
However, that didnt stop the occasional suicide gank from happening and setting me back several weeks as a penniless starting player with no friends and no resources.
But one day came when the gankings became more repetitive, several times a week, followed by waves of insults in local, tagging, "lolcarebear", "back to wow", and all the likes of abuse we all know and endure in this game.
At this point I realised I would have to make tremendous efforts to remain in the hisec mining activity and keeping it the way I wanted to play the game, but I no later realized those efforts in vain, as ganks became systematic, wherever I went, for nearly a whole damn month. This had tremendous effects on my personal life planning as I would have to dedicate considerably more ammounts of time in the game.
It got to a point where I was forced into making a choice between my life and the game, as I was still paying a monthly subscription at the time (and who cares, it's just my money right ?).
It's at this time I thought on the real motivation behind all this rampant ganking, namecalling, PMs riddled with personal insults and abuse on my person, and all in the prevention of making my own money's worth of what I considered the game to play fun for me.
My right as a paying customer was in having fun with this game using a one of its safest advertised functions to do it with, but I was flat-out denied that right to start the game this way by people desiring nothing else but to stamp over your tracks and **** you, because they could.
At that point I also realized those same people had the choice in themselves not to perform such actions, and so, for a service I paid for, i refused to expose myself and money to actions i'd have next to zero control over, and so that ended up with an non-renewed subscription.
Did I have the choice to continue and choose another starting profession ? Sure.
Did I want to ? Nope.
Was it entirely my fault ? Precisely not one bit, as I was looking for my own way to play and have fun in the game using one of its advertised functions, but got prevented from it by an external force that could not care less about you, or why you joined and paid for this game in the first place.
Given the utter lack of killboard history I will assume you are currently using another account or an alt.
Going simply off what you described it sounds like you tried to mine during one of the interdictions that we ran. In response to you stating that you were not at fault I will say that yes, yes it was your fault. It doesn't matter if you were trying to play differently to other people, you were still playing EVE and as such you play the exact same game as we do so you are fair game.
Now as a miner you have several options open to you including not mining in systems that are under a well advertised attack, staying aligned so you can instantly warp out, not going AFK and using the scanned and you overview to provide yourself intel on what ships are in your area and the option to fit a robust tank as well as choosing a ship like the skiff which is a gankers worst nightmare and selecting a flight of ECM drones.
Like most miners you likely chose to do none of these things and flew an untanked hulk/mack/retri and went for max cargo and yield. So yes, it was your fault. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20119
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 18:26:00 -
[477] - Quote
Goe Rilla wrote:Was it entirely my fault ? Precisely not one bit, as I was looking for my own way to play and have fun in the game using one of its advertised functions, but got prevented from it by an external force that could not care less about you, or why you joined and paid for this game in the first place. It rather was. Just like they had to force their ways onto you to get what they wanted, you have to force your ways on them to get what you want. You failed to do so, so you didn't get your way.
Welcome to the sandbox, where you aren't guaranteed to succeed at anything you attempt, but rather get to attempt anything you want to succeed at. To do so, you will have to overcome other players who have opposing interests and who are trying to do exactly the same. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
14104
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 18:41:00 -
[478] - Quote
Just for clarification:
I don't scam
I don't gank
I don't laugh at people who are bad enough that they get killed by somone who players as badly as me
I make a habit of helping new players
I do play in an NBSI alliance in 0.0 but I don't awox or spy
But
I want my choice to play that way to have meaning. If I were forced to play that way then my choice to do would mean nothing; I'd be just a clockwork orange, and I'd soon quit the game. Because the only reason that EVE Online, A Bad Game gets people to log in is because of the player interaction.
I accept that this choice means that I will sometimes be at a disadvantage. I am self secure enough to laugh off attempts by players who choose a different path to try and make me feel bad when those choices cost me. Generally I manage to turn the attempt back on them and have a laugh myself.
I am content that my choice has overall been to my advantage ingame: my word is good, there are many people in game ready to lend me ISK or assets (Bliss if you're reading this I'll trade the Rev back when the rugby is over and I log in OK?) but win or lose, my choices, my consequences, my responsibility: my game.
1 Kings 12:11
|

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
14104
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 18:42:00 -
[479] - Quote
And no one can take that away from me, and by god I'll fight you if you try.
1 Kings 12:11
|

Varius Xeral
Galactic Trade Syndicate
2309
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 18:52:00 -
[480] - Quote
It's actually Molle's game, but at least you think you're making autonomous decisions, so your point still stands. Official Representative of The Nullsec Zealot Cabal |

Kyperion
General Washington's Irregulars
78
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 18:58:00 -
[481] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Just for clarification:
I don't scam
I don't gank
I don't laugh at people who are bad enough that they get killed by somone who players as badly as me
I make a habit of helping new players
I do play in an NBSI alliance in 0.0 but I don't awox or spy
But
I want my choice to play that way to have meaning. If I were forced to play that way then my choice to do would mean nothing; I'd be just a clockwork orange, and I'd soon quit the game. Because the only reason that EVE Online, A Bad Game gets people to log in is because of the player interaction.
I accept that this choice means that I will sometimes be at a disadvantage. I am self secure enough to laugh off attempts by players who choose a different path to try and make me feel bad when those choices cost me. Generally I manage to turn the attempt back on them and have a laugh myself.
I am content that my choice has overall been to my advantage ingame: my word is good, there are many people in game ready to lend me ISK or assets (Bliss if you're reading this I'll trade the Rev back when the rugby is over and I log in OK?) but win or lose, my choices, my consequences, my responsibility: my game. what meaning or consequence does ganking have if the primary strategy involves throw away characters and in a game where a gank ship loss is never consequential? |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
14115
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 19:01:00 -
[482] - Quote
Kyperion wrote:Malcanis wrote:Just for clarification:
I don't scam
I don't gank
I don't laugh at people who are bad enough that they get killed by somone who players as badly as me
I make a habit of helping new players
I do play in an NBSI alliance in 0.0 but I don't awox or spy
But
I want my choice to play that way to have meaning. If I were forced to play that way then my choice to do would mean nothing; I'd be just a clockwork orange, and I'd soon quit the game. Because the only reason that EVE Online, A Bad Game gets people to log in is because of the player interaction.
I accept that this choice means that I will sometimes be at a disadvantage. I am self secure enough to laugh off attempts by players who choose a different path to try and make me feel bad when those choices cost me. Generally I manage to turn the attempt back on them and have a laugh myself.
I am content that my choice has overall been to my advantage ingame: my word is good, there are many people in game ready to lend me ISK or assets (Bliss if you're reading this I'll trade the Rev back when the rugby is over and I log in OK?) but win or lose, my choices, my consequences, my responsibility: my game. what meaning or consequence does yanking have if the primary strategy involves throw away characters and in a game where a tank ship loss is never consequential?
I don't care. It's my job to keep my ship safe when I'm in space. I accept the risk and try and learn from my errors when I lose.
I've lost ships when I wasn't paying attention or just plain screwed up. I didn't whine about it because I'm a grown man.
1 Kings 12:11
|

Kyperion
General Washington's Irregulars
79
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 19:07:00 -
[483] - Quote
this immature "I didn't whine about losing ships" is ******* stupid. There have been a few, but for the most part people are just pontificating on how *CONSEQUENTLESS* .... and retardedly easy it is to kill merchant/mining ships...... a real man would say that's pussifying piracy and fight for more ships to have a reason and reasonable ability to **** each other up |

Helia Tranquilis
State War Academy Caldari State
16
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 19:12:00 -
[484] - Quote
I thought we had a good conversation going... until a certain continent woke up and the normal poo-flinging commenced. |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
14116
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 19:14:00 -
[485] - Quote
Kyperion wrote:this immature "I didn't whine about losing ships" is ******* stupid. There have been a few, but for the most part people are just pontificating on how *CONSEQUENTLESS* .... and retardedly easy it is to kill merchant/mining ships...... a real man would say that's pussifying piracy and fight for more ships to have a reason and reasonable ability to **** each other up
Ok well, you can say it's stupid - but I'm the one who's having a good game experience playing my way.
I apologise for not being as thin-skinned as you think I should be. No doubt it's a personal failing of mine.
1 Kings 12:11
|

Bagrat Skalski
Poseidaon
1067
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 19:15:00 -
[486] - Quote
Seriously, few shabby pirates with guns can capture whole tanker with cargo worth millions in real life? The game is completely fair when you look at that from this perspective. _¦Å-æ-»¦Ñ¦¼-Ä_-¢-å¦ä_-½-»-å¦ÿ-ò-û¦¦ |

Kyperion
General Washington's Irregulars
80
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 19:20:00 -
[487] - Quote
Bagrat Skalski wrote:Seriously, few shabby pirates with guns can capture whole tanker with cargo worth millions in real life? This game is completely fair when you look at that from this perspective. until death is permanent in this game and that means each actual human behind the controls only gets one shot at eve life... no, no its not... because those inbred fucksticks got a bullet to the head each and no jump clones |

Kyperion
General Washington's Irregulars
80
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 19:23:00 -
[488] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Kyperion wrote:this immature "I didn't whine about losing ships" is ******* stupid. There have been a few, but for the most part people are just pontificating on how *CONSEQUENTLESS* .... and retardedly easy it is to kill merchant/mining ships...... a real man would say that's pussifying piracy and fight for more ships to have a reason and reasonable ability to **** each other up Ok well, you can say it's stupid - but I'm the one who's having a good game experience playing my way. I apologise for not being as thin-skinned as you think I should be. No doubt it's a personal failing of mine. and you can claim to be thick skinned but you are not. it is one of your failings.
|

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
14118
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 19:23:00 -
[489] - Quote
Kyperion wrote:Bagrat Skalski wrote:Seriously, few shabby pirates with guns can capture whole tanker with cargo worth millions in real life? This game is completely fair when you look at that from this perspective. until death is permanent in this game and that means each actual human behind the controls only gets one shot at eve life... no, no its not... because those inbred fucksticks got a bullet to the head each and no jump clones
The tanker captain was equally without a clone and could also be killed the same way. Are you sure that's the balancing change you want?
1 Kings 12:11
|

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
14118
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 19:24:00 -
[490] - Quote
Kyperion wrote:Malcanis wrote:Kyperion wrote:this immature "I didn't whine about losing ships" is ******* stupid. There have been a few, but for the most part people are just pontificating on how *CONSEQUENTLESS* .... and retardedly easy it is to kill merchant/mining ships...... a real man would say that's pussifying piracy and fight for more ships to have a reason and reasonable ability to **** each other up Ok well, you can say it's stupid - but I'm the one who's having a good game experience playing my way. I apologise for not being as thin-skinned as you think I should be. No doubt it's a personal failing of mine. and you can claim to be thick skinned but you are not. it is one of your failings.
Ah, the "NO YOU ARE" rebuttal. As devastating now as it was in the playground when I was 6.
1 Kings 12:11
|

Salvos Rhoska
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
321
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 19:26:00 -
[491] - Quote
Kyperion wrote:inbred fucksticks
Ooh the anger is rising in this one.
Such a moral person. So much dignity and restraint.
You think a ship fit and intended for a resource/haul activity should be capable of fighting off a ship fit and intended for destroying other ships?
What planet do you live on exactly? |

Kyperion
General Washington's Irregulars
80
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 19:29:00 -
[492] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Kyperion wrote:inbred fucksticks Ooh the anger is rising in this one. Such a moral person. So much dignity and restraint. You think a ship fit and intended for a resource/haul activity should be capable of fighting off a ship fit and intended for destroying other ships? What planet do you live on exactly? the planet where that routinely happens on a daily basis.... see everything fom armored trucks to concealed carry laws. |

Kyperion
General Washington's Irregulars
80
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 19:31:00 -
[493] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Kyperion wrote:Bagrat Skalski wrote:Seriously, few shabby pirates with guns can capture whole tanker with cargo worth millions in real life? This game is completely fair when you look at that from this perspective. until death is permanent in this game and that means each actual human behind the controls only gets one shot at eve life... no, no its not... because those inbred fucksticks got a bullet to the head each and no jump clones The tanker captain was equally without a clone and could also be killed the same way. Are you sure that's the balancing change you want? we all do it everytime we undock from bed so why the hell not? |

Salvos Rhoska
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
321
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 19:32:00 -
[494] - Quote
Kyperion wrote:the planet where that routinely happens on a daily basis.... see everything fom armored trucks to concealed carry laws.
Oh?
Do they use combat tanks to mine ore these days?
Do they use aircraft carriers for transporting large quantities of crude oil?
I must have MISSED THE ******* MEMO. |

Goe Rilla
24th Imperial Crusade Amarr Empire
5
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 19:33:00 -
[495] - Quote
http://www.reactionface.info/sites/default/files/images/1287666826226.png
 |

Bagrat Skalski
Poseidaon
1069
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 19:34:00 -
[496] - Quote
We know there are gamers that like games you play to get away from a real life cruelty, but EVE is a bit too real for those people probably. Sentient Drone: **y d* y*u h*** *s *** |

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
197
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 19:36:00 -
[497] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Goe Rilla wrote:There couldn't be more evidence of a premise, my friend...
Gratuitous and personal humiliations and verbal slander was proven a rampant fact in the game and Out of game also, if you re-read the OPs post or have been paying attention lately. First of all. I am not your friend. I am not friends with people who are so socially twisted and selfish as to presume they have any mandate or prerogative to dictate to other people how they should live their autonomous lives. Second of all, you don't have a right to not be humiliated for your mistakes. No such right exists. Where did you get it into your head that such a right exists? Care to cite me a legal source that says so? Do you even know what "slander" means? "A false defamation (expressed in spoken words, signs, or gestures) which injures the character or reputation of the person defamed; distinguished from libel." It is VERBAL, as distinguished from libel, which is written. Which means NOTHING THAT IS WRITTEN can constitute slander. So where is this verbal slander you refer to happening? In private 3rd party voice chats? Those are no business of CCPs, and being in those channels is entirely on your own responsibility and recognisance. The law supercedes EVE. If someone violates the law, that is obviously an issue where another autonomous individuals rights have been breached by ANOTHER INDIVIDUALS ACTIONS, but NOT BY THAT OTHER INDIVIDUALS RIGHTS. If someone is verbally speaking slander about your actual PERSON, then by all means, go ahead and report them to your local police. CCP has absolutely zero responsibility for or control of what happens outside of the game. Are you so juvenile or uneducated that you cannot distinguish the difference in definitions of these concepts and terms? You are like a child talking about adult issues. You clearly have zero understand of what your rights actually are, and what those same rights actually are in others. Like a child whos idea of rights is limited to "i was nice and did as I was told to the best of my understanding, that means I now have the right to that piece of candy as a reward". How exactly are peoples rights being violated ingame? You say that There couldn't be more evidence of a premise" Be specific. Give me 3 examples.
This entire thread is like the: Salvos Being Wrong Show |

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
5064
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 19:41:00 -
[498] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Kyperion wrote:Malcanis wrote:Just for clarification:
I don't scam
I don't gank
I don't laugh at people who are bad enough that they get killed by somone who players as badly as me
I make a habit of helping new players
I do play in an NBSI alliance in 0.0 but I don't awox or spy
But
I want my choice to play that way to have meaning. If I were forced to play that way then my choice to do would mean nothing; I'd be just a clockwork orange, and I'd soon quit the game. Because the only reason that EVE Online, A Bad Game gets people to log in is because of the player interaction.
I accept that this choice means that I will sometimes be at a disadvantage. I am self secure enough to laugh off attempts by players who choose a different path to try and make me feel bad when those choices cost me. Generally I manage to turn the attempt back on them and have a laugh myself.
I am content that my choice has overall been to my advantage ingame: my word is good, there are many people in game ready to lend me ISK or assets (Bliss if you're reading this I'll trade the Rev back when the rugby is over and I log in OK?) but win or lose, my choices, my consequences, my responsibility: my game. what meaning or consequence does yanking have if the primary strategy involves throw away characters and in a game where a tank ship loss is never consequential? I don't care. It's my job to keep my ship safe when I'm in space. I accept the risk and try and learn from my errors when I lose. I've lost ships when I wasn't paying attention or just plain screwed up. I didn't whine about it because I'm a grown man.
This exchange demonstrates the divide between us (the Malcanis' ...Malcanii, whatever of the world) and them (The Kyperions and the rest of the cry squad on these forums). The one side as a sense of personal responsiblity and adulthood, the other, a sense of deep entitlement.
The responsible players (in game and out) tend to be happier, the irresponsible ones are mad at the world for not conforming to their desires 'just because'. At some point , all I can do is feel sorry for all these angry/sad people. |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
14121
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 19:49:00 -
[499] - Quote
If malcanis was not a proper noun, the plural would probably be malcanes
eg: 1 testis, 2 testes
1 Kings 12:11
|

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
14121
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 19:50:00 -
[500] - Quote
But it is, so it's Malcanises
I think a discussion about grammer would be a good and productive direction for this thread to take.
1 Kings 12:11
|

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
14121
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 19:54:00 -
[501] - Quote
I think we should talk about people who, for reasons best known to themselves and Satan, Prince Of Lies use "boni" as the plural of bonus. As we should all know, the correct plural in English is "bonuses". A bonus is not a hippopotamus. They're not even the same ******* language for the love of God.
Should these people be banned or merely receive community sanction?
1 Kings 12:11
|

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
198
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 19:54:00 -
[502] - Quote
Salvos, lets create a hypothetical situation to see how you would handle your preached outlook on social interaction:
You are married. I live across town. When you go to work, I come to your house and repeatedly make sexual advances to your wife. This is something I want to do. I want to sleep with her. I understand you and she are married, but according to you, I'm not suppose to let your feelings on a matter dictate how I feel, so I continue to do so. It's not even against the law.
She begins sleeping with me. She understands she's married to you and you might be upset, but according to you, she's not suppose to really take your feelings into consideration when choosing how she wishes to act and feel.
Your wife and I are now engaged in really outrageous, degrading sexual acts with no regard of your personal feelings on the matter.
You come home from work. She wants me to sleep with her while you watch. I want you to watch, and know that I am much more capable of sexually pleasing your wife.
Would this be wrong? I mean, none of us are suppose to care what others think and feel, everything we do is suppose to be about ourselves.
Right? |

Kyperion
General Washington's Irregulars
83
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 19:56:00 -
[503] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:Malcanis wrote:Kyperion wrote:Malcanis wrote:Just for clarification:
I don't scam
I don't gank
I don't laugh at people who are bad enough that they get killed by somone who players as badly as me
I make a habit of helping new players
I do play in an NBSI alliance in 0.0 but I don't awox or spy
But
I want my choice to play that way to have meaning. If I were forced to play that way then my choice to do would mean nothing; I'd be just a clockwork orange, and I'd soon quit the game. Because the only reason that EVE Online, A Bad Game gets people to log in is because of the player interaction.
I accept that this choice means that I will sometimes be at a disadvantage. I am self secure enough to laugh off attempts by players who choose a different path to try and make me feel bad when those choices cost me. Generally I manage to turn the attempt back on them and have a laugh myself.
I am content that my choice has overall been to my advantage ingame: my word is good, there are many people in game ready to lend me ISK or assets (Bliss if you're reading this I'll trade the Rev back when the rugby is over and I log in OK?) but win or lose, my choices, my consequences, my responsibility: my game. what meaning or consequence does yanking have if the primary strategy involves throw away characters and in a game where a tank ship loss is never consequential? I don't care. It's my job to keep my ship safe when I'm in space. I accept the risk and try and learn from my errors when I lose. I've lost ships when I wasn't paying attention or just plain screwed up. I didn't whine about it because I'm a grown man. This exchange demonstrates the divide between us (the Malcanis' ...Malcanii, whatever of the world) and them (The Kyperions and the rest of the cry squad on these forums). The one side as a sense of personal responsiblity and adulthood, the other, a sense of deep entitlement. The responsible players (in game and out) tend to be happier, the irresponsible ones are mad at the world for not conforming to their desires 'just because'. At some point , all I can do is feel sorry for all these angry/sad people. you are an idiot. nowhere am I complaining about any loss I have ever suffered, just the idiot "pvp" crowd that don't want people to be able to shoot the bad guys |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
10426
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 19:56:00 -
[504] - Quote
Kyperion wrote: the planet where that routinely happens on a daily basis.... see everything fom armored trucks to concealed carry laws.
Said ships were a disaster in both world wars. Almost all of them were sunk and the only a handful scored hits and almost all of those were on friendly subs. There are none active in any navy today or any navy for the last 70 years. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
14122
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 19:58:00 -
[505] - Quote
Kyperion wrote: you are an idiot. nowhere am I complaining about any loss I have ever suffered, just the idiot "pvp" crowd that don't want people to be able to shoot the bad guys
I live in 0.0, where you can shoot anyone you like for whatever reasons seem good to you.
Do you?
1 Kings 12:11
|

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
10426
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 19:58:00 -
[506] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:Salvos, lets create a hypothetical situation to see how you would handle your preached outlook on social interaction:
You are married. I live across town. When you go to work, I come to your house and repeatedly make sexual advances to your wife. This is something I want to do. I want to sleep with her. I understand you and she are married, but according to you, I'm not suppose to let your feelings on a matter dictate how I feel, so I continue to do so. It's not even against the law.
She begins sleeping with me. She understands she's married to you and you might be upset, but according to you, she's not suppose to really take your feelings into consideration when choosing how she wishes to act and feel.
Your wife and I are now engaged in really outrageous, degrading sexual acts with no regard of your personal feelings on the matter.
You come home from work. She wants me to sleep with her while you watch. I want you to watch, and know that I am much more capable of sexually pleasing your wife.
Would this be wrong? I mean, none of us are suppose to care what others think and feel, everything we do is suppose to be about ourselves.
Right?
His refusal to address this will mean that he understands he is wrong and wishes to avoid it to not have to weaken his stance, proving him wrong. Wrong, something he feels he can never be.
This has what to do with a PvP internet spaceship game? Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Kyperion
General Washington's Irregulars
83
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 20:00:00 -
[507] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Kyperion wrote: you are an idiot. nowhere am I complaining about any loss I have ever suffered, just the idiot "pvp" crowd that don't want people to be able to shoot the bad guys
I live in 0.0, where you can shoot anyone you like for whatever reasons seem good to you. Do you? no, because I'd rather not be a mindless cog in the wheel of a giant douche flavored blue donut. |

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
198
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 20:00:00 -
[508] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:Salvos, lets create a hypothetical situation to see how you would handle your preached outlook on social interaction:
You are married. I live across town. When you go to work, I come to your house and repeatedly make sexual advances to your wife. This is something I want to do. I want to sleep with her. I understand you and she are married, but according to you, I'm not suppose to let your feelings on a matter dictate how I feel, so I continue to do so. It's not even against the law.
She begins sleeping with me. She understands she's married to you and you might be upset, but according to you, she's not suppose to really take your feelings into consideration when choosing how she wishes to act and feel.
Your wife and I are now engaged in really outrageous, degrading sexual acts with no regard of your personal feelings on the matter.
You come home from work. She wants me to sleep with her while you watch. I want you to watch, and know that I am much more capable of sexually pleasing your wife.
Would this be wrong? I mean, none of us are suppose to care what others think and feel, everything we do is suppose to be about ourselves.
Right?
His refusal to address this will mean that he understands he is wrong and wishes to avoid it to not have to weaken his stance, proving him wrong. Wrong, something he feels he can never be. This has what to do with a PvP internet spaceship game?
Morality
|

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
10426
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 20:02:00 -
[509] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:
Morality
Its a PvP game, morality has nothing to do with it. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
10426
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 20:03:00 -
[510] - Quote
Kyperion wrote:Malcanis wrote:Kyperion wrote: you are an idiot. nowhere am I complaining about any loss I have ever suffered, just the idiot "pvp" crowd that don't want people to be able to shoot the bad guys
I live in 0.0, where you can shoot anyone you like for whatever reasons seem good to you. Do you? no, because I'd rather not be a mindless cog in the wheel of a giant douche flavored blue donut.
What blue donut?
And please, do tell us how people like me are mindless cogs. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
200
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 20:04:00 -
[511] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:
Morality
Its a PvP game, morality has nothing to do with it.
It's a sandbox governed by choices. Morality exists. |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
14123
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 20:05:00 -
[512] - Quote
Kyperion wrote:Malcanis wrote:Kyperion wrote: you are an idiot. nowhere am I complaining about any loss I have ever suffered, just the idiot "pvp" crowd that don't want people to be able to shoot the bad guys
I live in 0.0, where you can shoot anyone you like for whatever reasons seem good to you. Do you? no, because I'd rather not be a mindless cog in the wheel of a giant douche flavored blue donut.
Just so that I'm clear, you're supposed to be the one claiming the moral high ground in this discussion?
1 Kings 12:11
|

Kyperion
General Washington's Irregulars
85
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 20:05:00 -
[513] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:
Morality
Its a PvP game, morality has nothing to do with it. in a pvp game ..... miners would have the ability to kill you with their giant space rock disintegration lasers |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
14123
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 20:06:00 -
[514] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:baltec1 wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:
Morality
Its a PvP game, morality has nothing to do with it. It's a sandbox governed by choices. Morality exists.
This, as written, I absolutely agree with. EVE is one of the very, very few MMOs that allows one to make a moral choice.
Of course that also means that peope can make choices you don't like;
1 Kings 12:11
|

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
200
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 20:07:00 -
[515] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:baltec1 wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:
Morality
Its a PvP game, morality has nothing to do with it. It's a sandbox governed by choices. Morality exists. This, as written, I absolutely agree with. EVE is one of the very, very few MMOs that allows one to make a moral choice. Of course that also means that peope can make choices you don't like;
And absolutely no where have I stated people should not be allowed to make those choices, or that CCP should impose restrictions to limit people's ability to make choices to play the game how they see fit. |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2683
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 20:08:00 -
[516] - Quote
miners have the same opportunity to destroy any other person's spaceship as that person does the miners' |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
10428
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 20:09:00 -
[517] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:
It's a sandbox governed by choices. Morality exists.
Its also a PvP game, get used to being shot at. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
10428
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 20:10:00 -
[518] - Quote
Kyperion wrote: in a pvp game ..... miners would have the ability to kill you with their giant space rock disintegration lasers
They get to kill people with drones. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
200
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 20:11:00 -
[519] - Quote
Benny Ohu wrote:miners have the same opportunity to destroy any other person's spaceship as that person does the miners'
Not necessarily.
|

Salvos Rhoska
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
321
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 20:13:00 -
[520] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:----
You are a bad person. |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2683
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 20:14:00 -
[521] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:Benny Ohu wrote:miners have the same opportunity to destroy any other person's spaceship as that person does the miners' Not necessarily. refusing to get off their arses doesn't count as an unavailable opportunity |

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
200
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 20:15:00 -
[522] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:---- You are a bad person.
I'm not perfect. The difference between us is I understand it and act in accordance with becoming a better person.
Knowing that alone makes me better than most, because they fail to realize they aren't as great as they think they are. |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
14124
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 20:19:00 -
[523] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:Malcanis wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:baltec1 wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:
Morality
Its a PvP game, morality has nothing to do with it. It's a sandbox governed by choices. Morality exists. This, as written, I absolutely agree with. EVE is one of the very, very few MMOs that allows one to make a moral choice. Of course that also means that peope can make choices you don't like; And absolutely no where have I stated people should not be allowed to make those choices, or that CCP should impose restrictions to limit people's ability to make choices to play the game how they see fit.
Good for you. If only more people could accept that that which we disagree with need not be banned by higher authority.
1 Kings 12:11
|

Goe Rilla
24th Imperial Crusade Amarr Empire
6
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 20:19:00 -
[524] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:Salvos, lets create a hypothetical situation to see how you would handle your preached outlook on social interaction:
You are married. I live across town. When you go to work, I come to your house and repeatedly make sexual advances to your wife. This is something I want to do. I want to sleep with her. I understand you and she are married, but according to you, I'm not suppose to let your feelings on a matter dictate how I feel, so I continue to do so. It's not even against the law.
She begins sleeping with me. She understands she's married to you and you might be upset, but according to you, she's not suppose to really take your feelings into consideration when choosing how she wishes to act and feel.
Your wife and I are now engaged in really outrageous, degrading sexual acts with no regard of your personal feelings on the matter.
You come home from work. She wants me to sleep with her while you watch. I want you to watch, and know that I am much more capable of sexually pleasing your wife.
Would this be wrong? I mean, none of us are suppose to care what others think and feel, everything we do is suppose to be about ourselves.
Right?
His refusal to address this will mean that he understands he is wrong and wishes to avoid it to not have to weaken his stance, proving him wrong. Wrong, something he feels he can never be.
this, thank you.
Quote:It's a sandbox governed by choices. Morality exists.
and this |

Sephira Galamore
Inner Beard Society Affirmative.
294
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 20:22:00 -
[525] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:It's a sandbox governed by choices. Morality exists. Its also a PvP game, get used to being shot at. Where do you have that from?
Wikipedia wrote:Eve Online (stylised EVE Online) is a video game by CCP Games. It is a player-driven, persistent-world MMORPG set in a science fiction space setting. CCP wrote:The Sandbox is the game world of EVE combined with the persistent actions of thousands upon thousands of players who interact with one another in a single-server environment.. Player-driven != PvP; player interaction != PvP
Unless you assume that if a game has feature x, it is an x-game. Then I claim Eve is a PvE game. :p |

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
201
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 20:23:00 -
[526] - Quote
Benny Ohu wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:Benny Ohu wrote:miners have the same opportunity to destroy any other person's spaceship as that person does the miners' Not necessarily. refusing to get off their arses doesn't count as an unavailable opportunity
You down for some hypotheticals? First lets lay down some ground rules, because "technically" I could spend thousands and thousands of dollars purchasing 20 accounts that specialize in many aspects of the game.
A miner, who's played for 2 months has spent all of his time mining and training to get to a Exhumer. So I have no combat skills, because I'm a "miner". I've chosen a path that defines a "miner". You say a miner has the same opportunity to kill any other persons ship.
Well I'm sorry but my exhumer cannot kill your t3 battleship. I simply don't have that opportunity because of game imposed limitations.
Which is why I said Not necessarily. |

Salvos Rhoska
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
321
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 20:24:00 -
[527] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:
I'm not perfect. The difference between us is I understand it and act in accordance with becoming a better person.
Knowing that alone makes me better than most, because they fail to realize they aren't as great as they think they are.
And also you refused to answer, meaning you understand I've backed you into a corner presenting a dilemma with your belief. You refused to answer and instead leveraged an insult.
You're easy.
The difference between us is that I am a good person. I understand what that entails and I act in accordance with being that, as well as continuing to be that.
You, however, are a bad person. Who does not understand what it entails to be a good person, and does not act in accordance with that entails.
Knowing this difference, is what makes me better than you. I understand, you, do not. As I've said earlier, you are a dilettante, a hack. You talk a lot, but you don't actually walk the walk.
What is it I refused to answer? I don't see where you presented a question to me. Go ahead and quote where you put a question to me personally, and I will answer it.
I already beat you once. This will be fun to slap you around a second time. Why? Because I am a good person who enjoys defeating bad people. You are what defines me as good, and beating you is what defines me as better. |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2683
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 20:26:00 -
[528] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:Benny Ohu wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:Benny Ohu wrote:miners have the same opportunity to destroy any other person's spaceship as that person does the miners' Not necessarily. refusing to get off their arses doesn't count as an unavailable opportunity You down for some hypotheticals? First lets lay down some ground rules, because "technically" I could spend thousands and thousands of dollars purchasing 20 accounts that specialize in many aspects of the game. A miner, who's played for 2 months has spent all of his time mining and training to get to a Exhumer. So I have no combat skills, because I'm a "miner". I've chosen a path that defines a "miner". You say a miner has the same opportunity to kill any other persons ship. Well I'm sorry but my exhumer cannot kill your t3 battleship. I simply don't have that opportunity because of game imposed limitations. Which is why I said Not necessarily. refusing to get off their arses doesn't count as an unavailable opportunity |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
14124
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 20:29:00 -
[529] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:Benny Ohu wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:Benny Ohu wrote:miners have the same opportunity to destroy any other person's spaceship as that person does the miners' Not necessarily. refusing to get off their arses doesn't count as an unavailable opportunity You down for some hypotheticals? First lets lay down some ground rules, because "technically" I could spend thousands and thousands of dollars purchasing 20 accounts that specialize in many aspects of the game. A miner, who's played for 2 months has spent all of his time mining and training to get to a Exhumer. So I have no combat skills, because I'm a "miner". I've chosen a path that defines a "miner". You say a miner has the same opportunity to kill any other persons ship. Well I'm sorry but my exhumer cannot kill your t3 battleship. I simply don't have that opportunity because of game imposed limitations. Which is why I said Not necessarily.
Your limitations are due to your choices. You own them. They are your responsibility. Furthermore, even a miner can hugely mitigate his loss percentages. You can buddy up with another miner in the same corp as you, use a couple of 60% webs to reducse your speed to a very low level and align at 70% of that lwo speed to a celestial. If destroyers start warping into the grid, you can then instawarp out. In hi-sec, if you choose a distant plant with lots of moons to align to, this is utterly uncounterable. it only requires that you pay attention, and only requires training propulsion jamming I (6000 SP) on top of whatever mining skills you have
1 Kings 12:11
|

Salvos Rhoska
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
321
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 20:30:00 -
[530] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:
I'm not perfect. The difference between us is I understand it and act in accordance with becoming a better person.
Knowing that alone makes me better than most, because they fail to realize they aren't as great as they think they are.
And also you refused to answer, meaning you understand I've backed you into a corner presenting a dilemma with your belief. You refused to answer and instead leveraged an insult.
You're easy.
Delusional Evasion, failing to answer obviously directed towards him questions and instead replacing it with an unfounded assessment derived from a obviously twisted, distorted mind. Now, you have the right to say what you wish(as long as it doesn't break this forum's rules). But that right doesn't make what you say correct.If you wish, I will ALLOW you to shatter into a hundred pieces and begin uttering nonsense so you can say you were "trolling" the entire time so you can "save face". (Which is funny to be a person who thinks being a troll is better than being a sincere wrong person)
Funny. Because I never said what is in your quotation. You did.
Thanks for failing again. +1 to me. |

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
201
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 20:31:00 -
[531] - Quote
Benny Ohu wrote: refusing to get off their arses doesn't count as an unavailable opportunity
You're thick. I get that now, carry on. Have fun! |

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
201
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 20:32:00 -
[532] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Funny. Because I never said what is in your quotation. You did.
Thanks for failing again. +1 to me.
haha you say you have "law training" and you went to law school. . . . well I see why you didn't "make it". You're incredibly immature. |

Salvos Rhoska
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
321
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 20:36:00 -
[533] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:---
Keep digging yourself deeper.
You further prove your own moral and intellectual inferiority with every post. |

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
201
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 20:41:00 -
[534] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:--- Keep digging yourself deeper. You further prove your own moral and intellectual inferiority with every post.
I'm rubber and you're glue! whatever you say bounces off of me and sticks to you!
nah nah nah nah boo booooooooo |

Goe Rilla
24th Imperial Crusade Amarr Empire
6
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 20:54:00 -
[535] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:
I'm not perfect. The difference between us is I understand it and act in accordance with becoming a better person.
Knowing that alone makes me better than most, because they fail to realize they aren't as great as they think they are.
And also you refused to answer, meaning you understand I've backed you into a corner presenting a dilemma with your belief. You refused to answer and instead leveraged an insult.
You're easy.
The difference between us is that I am a good person. I understand what that entails and I act in accordance with being that, as well as continuing to be that. You, however, are a bad person. Who does not understand what it entails to be a good person, and does not act in accordance with that entails. Knowing this difference, is what makes me better than you. I understand, you, do not. As I've said earlier, you are a dilettante, a hack. You talk a lot, but you don't actually walk the walk. What is it I refused to answer? I don't see where you presented a question to me. Go ahead and quote where you put a question to me personally, and I will answer it. I already beat you once. This will be fun to slap you around a second time. Why? Because I am a good person who enjoys defeating bad people. You are what defines me as good, and beating you is what defines me as better.
So, you're a tool to the good person ? |

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
202
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 20:57:00 -
[536] - Quote
He's stating he's a good person even though he subscribes to a moral philosophy centered around doing whatever you want to other people because you're only suppose to care about yourself.
While I'm stating I'm a good person because my moral philosophy is centered around treating others fairly, taking their feelings and desires into consideration and trying to make them happy so I can be happy that I've had a positive impact on others.
I don't think he knows what a good person is. It's apparent his entire existence is wrapped up within himself, and he's all that really matters. .. . to him anyways.
Me though?
Well I'm #thebest |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
10429
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 20:59:00 -
[537] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:He's stating he's a good person even though he subscribes to a moral philosophy centered around doing whatever you want to other people because you're only suppose to care about yourself.
While I'm stating I'm a good person because my moral philosophy is centered around treating others fairly, taking their feelings and desires into consideration and trying to make them happy so I can be happy that I've had a positive impact on others.
I don't think he knows what a good person is. It's apparent his entire existence is wrapped up within himself, and he's all that really matters. .. . to him anyways.
Me though?
Well I'm #thebest
So I guess everyone who shoots others in battlefield 4 are also bad people. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Ralph King-Griffin
Var Foundation inc.
384
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 21:02:00 -
[538] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:He's stating he's a good person even though he subscribes to a moral philosophy centered around doing whatever you want to other people because you're only suppose to care about yourself.
While I'm stating I'm a good person because my moral philosophy is centered around treating others fairly, taking their feelings and desires into consideration and trying to make them happy so I can be happy that I've had a positive impact on others.
I don't think he knows what a good person is. It's apparent his entire existence is wrapped up within himself, and he's all that really matters. .. . to him anyways.
Me though?
Well I'm #thebest So I guess everyone who shoots others in battlefield 4 are also bad people. Only those that preorderd premium.... If in doubt...do...excessively. |

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
202
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 21:04:00 -
[539] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:He's stating he's a good person even though he subscribes to a moral philosophy centered around doing whatever you want to other people because you're only suppose to care about yourself.
While I'm stating I'm a good person because my moral philosophy is centered around treating others fairly, taking their feelings and desires into consideration and trying to make them happy so I can be happy that I've had a positive impact on others.
I don't think he knows what a good person is. It's apparent his entire existence is wrapped up within himself, and he's all that really matters. .. . to him anyways.
Me though?
Well I'm #thebest So I guess everyone who shoots others in battlefield 4 are also bad people.
No, but the ones shooting others while calling them a "******" are bad people. Every competitive act can be experienced with honor and dignity. The one's who forgo it to upset others lessen themselves before their insults do any impact on the ones they aim them at.
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20122
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 21:05:00 -
[540] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:He's stating he's a good person even though he subscribes to a moral philosophy centered around doing whatever you want to other people because you're only suppose to care about yourself. Do you have anything to support this claim?
Quote:While I'm stating I'm a good person because my moral philosophy is centered around treating others fairly, taking their feelings and desires into consideration and trying to make them happy so I can be happy that I've had a positive impact on others. GǪand yet you act in complete opposition to these supposed guidelines by being prejudiced and by dictating how they should act. So what you're saying about your person is effectively a lie. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
10430
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 21:07:00 -
[541] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:
No, but the ones shooting others while calling them a "******" are bad people. Every competitive act can be experienced with honor and dignity. The one's who forgo it to upset others lessen themselves before their insults do any impact on the ones they aim them at.
You do know that the most vile insults and threats come from bears right? Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Sentamon
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
1503
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 21:11:00 -
[542] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:
No, but the ones shooting others while calling them a "******" are bad people. Every competitive act can be experienced with honor and dignity. The one's who forgo it to upset others lessen themselves before their insults do any impact on the ones they aim them at.
You do know that the most vile insults and threats come from bears right?
Nullbears in particular.
~ Professional Forum Alt -á~ |

Ralph King-Griffin
Var Foundation inc.
385
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 21:11:00 -
[543] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:
No, but the ones shooting others while calling them a "******" are bad people. Every competitive act can be experienced with honor and dignity. The one's who forgo it to upset others lessen themselves before their insults do any impact on the ones they aim them at.
You do know that the most vile insults and threats come from bears right? One rather prominent example comes to mind If in doubt...do...excessively. |

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
202
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 21:14:00 -
[544] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:
No, but the ones shooting others while calling them a "******" are bad people. Every competitive act can be experienced with honor and dignity. The one's who forgo it to upset others lessen themselves before their insults do any impact on the ones they aim them at.
You do know that the most vile insults and threats come from bears right?
Yea, which is an indication that they're placing an exaggerated value on to what should be meaningless. But the people who poke those demented "bears" with the hope of pushing them into a zone where they breakdown and withdraw into a lesser person who spews insults, are sadistic for wanting to cause misery at the expense of others. You know which people I'm talking about too.
The "tear collectors". If you understand that someone is attaching an irrational value onto video games, you shouldn't be making fun of him for having an mental illness. That's practically the same as bullying a ******** kid. It's not funny and there's no excuse for people who perform those actions. If you blow a guy up and he displays an irrational reaction, you shouldn't fan the flames. You should completely disengage from him.
But then again, people who take pleasure at other's suffering are mentally disabled as well, so they don't comprehend their actions are wrong. But I do, I understand it's wrong and I'll tell them so. I'll also tell the guy crying about his venture he's placing an irrational emphasis on the value of a pixel. |

Rastafarian God
51
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 21:18:00 -
[545] - Quote
I'm not sure what Reddit is because I have never heard anything good about it and have not checked it out.
As for EVE, its been my experience that people are quiet and dont talk to people at all for the most part. It seems that talking in local is as taboo and yelling ***** in church. I see very little player interaction vocally. Even people I'm blue with in lowsec rarely bother so say anything even when its just us in system.
Mainly all I see is some random chasing me after I'm already gone on my other monitor that has my scout alt running on it. It's hilarious watching people scurry for nothing, or to accidentally attack a Battlecruiser in a Dessy.
When I do see this ass hatery the OP speaks of, although rare, I just ignore it. I dont know how many times people have thought they had me dead to rights and started pulling some of the crap the OP speaks of just for me to walk away with there jaws dropped.
Like said there is nothing wrong with the game itself, its just some of the people have taken things too seriously. There is nothing wrong with asking someone to sing, they do not have to sing, they choose too. If you dont want your voice all over the internet just sit there and tell them to go frell themselves. You're not catching me singing, ill die with my honor in tact tyvm.
It reminds me of how some people got so into WoW back when I played it. They where so hard core into it that it became there lives and they defined themselves by the game. EVE has some of those same people. You are not going to reason with those people. Yes there are some stupid crappy people in this game we would be better off without, but we can't force them to leave.
All you can really do is do your best not to put yourself into a situation that allows you to fall prey to people. Wich is sort of what this game is about. |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
10431
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 21:18:00 -
[546] - Quote
Sentamon wrote:baltec1 wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:
No, but the ones shooting others while calling them a "******" are bad people. Every competitive act can be experienced with honor and dignity. The one's who forgo it to upset others lessen themselves before their insults do any impact on the ones they aim them at.
You do know that the most vile insults and threats come from bears right? Nullbears in particular.
They tend to be silent. They are special snowflakes of a different nature. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Ralph King-Griffin
Var Foundation inc.
385
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 21:27:00 -
[547] - Quote
This is all verry rich for the man that passed the "that little girl has no chance" comment.
If in doubt...do...excessively. |

Chopper Rollins
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
568
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 21:32:00 -
[548] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:If you blow a guy up and he displays an irrational reaction, you shouldn't fan the flames. You should completely disengage from him.
That SHOULD word is an express elevator to nowhere. You will never, ever convince people of anything using that word. You can try reason, logic, ethics but the word should as a beginning makes it all your wishful opinion. In fact, as a free human, the quoted declaration of what i should do naturally makes me want to do the very opposite, unless i am older than 12, in which case i hear you, shrug, and do whatever i was going to do anyway.
Goggles. Making me look good. Making you look good. |

Winchester Steele
383
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 21:33:00 -
[549] - Quote
Marvin Shields wrote: *lots of moaning and crying.* REDDIT. *A bunch more whiny tears.*
OP, I don't know about the rest of the nonsense you are blathering about ( something something ebushido I assume, its always the same **** with your type) but I think I found the main problem with your post. I took the liberty of highlighting where you went wrong. You're welcome. ... |

fugazii
Slippery Penguin
20
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 21:36:00 -
[550] - Quote
-I haven't read a single post in this thread other than ops.-
OP If you're old enough to remember the beginning of EVE then you know exactly what happened. The EVE community was never like this in the beginning. CAOD was a place of discussion on par with the serious discussion subsection of kugu, a place where Jade Constantine style posting was common. People cared about stats, people cared about rep, people cared about ****. But you described exactly what happened in your post, maybe unintentionally. Reddit, hulkageddon, mittani, ..communities joined, specifically something awful joined. Goons came and the landscape changed, the culture changed. That was their stated goal was to ruin the game, they've done this with other games. Reddit, dreddit, test, 4chan broski, pizza, they're just psyudo-copycat communities built off of what something awful is. It all dates to the beginning, to goons coming to the game. Anyone who played prior to this can easily point that out. That is the culture shift. |

Chopper Rollins
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
568
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 21:36:00 -
[551] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:You should completely disengage from him OR try to help him legitimately, and not a facade of helping to illicit and further traumatize the broken individual..
The word should is still in your edit. Also: traumatize the broken individual
IT'S PIXELS FOR RICE CAKES! PIXELS!
Goggles. Making me look good. Making you look good. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20124
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 21:39:00 -
[552] - Quote
fugazii wrote:The EVE community was never like this in the beginning. CAOD was a place of discussion on par with the serious discussion subsection of kugu, a place where Jade Constantine style posting was common. What, you mean pimping (as in the sex trade) alts at your local trade hub?  GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Silivar Karkun
Imperial Shipment Amarr Empire
194
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 21:50:00 -
[553] - Quote
Katrina Oniseki wrote:There's old stories about Pirate Codes and such. A bygone age where Pirates were Pirates and Griefers were persona non grata. I wasn't around for those days, so maybe it's all fanciful hindsight... but these days the lines are very very blurred. There's still some classy pirates* left though... so there is hope.
Being an honorable pirate isn't really about following the rules. It's about following your own rules, or the rules of a greater Piracy community that seeks to maintain its supply of victims. If you run victims out of the game, you find your waters sparsely populated. You have to give them a reason to keep playing and providing you a target.
I think James 315's New Order does that. They offer the chance to be 'protected' under their permit system. They don't want to exterminate high-sec miners. They just want to raid them, loot them, and keep them around for another go! So they tell the miners if they pay 10 million, they won't get shot again. There's always the immoral agent who shoots them anyways, but it gives the miners a sense that maybe things will be okay. It's still piracy, it's racketeering, it's extortion... but it's sustainable.
Maybe that's the word I'm looking for. Sustainable piracy. Sustainable griefing. Sustainable scamming. Making sure that you don't destroy your own prey population in the process of being a predator. A balanced ecosystem of Pirate and Carebear.
I think, in my time, I'd like to see more of the EVE playerbase get back to that mentality.
*- Vote Psychotic Monk for CSM9!
very good proposition i must say....
i agree with the OP too, the community here can be so toxic sometimes, the EVE community has to set a rule of conduct for the game, something that regulates how people deals with people here, its not a set of prohibitions but more of a universal agreement for certain matters.
for example:
-PvP against new players is forbidden unless both use rookie ships for it (only civilian modules):
if a veteran wants to engage a noob(im talking people with less than 1 day in the game that has just started the tutorials), at least use something that is to lvl with him, rookie ships are replacable so both of you wont have problems of isk later, but the target has to know about this and the engagement must be of course, a duel.
-NPC null sec regions free of Bubble presence:
this regions should be an entry lvl place for people who want to try the null sec life, people may not put bubbles here, leave that for sov driven regions
there could be other ideas but this is the most i have thought about, it doesnt hurt people, unless you think that you need a bubble in order to put a gatecamp anyways, people doesnt need them in low sec, and null sec gates dont have sentries so there's no excuse.....
|

Salvos Rhoska
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
323
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 21:53:00 -
[554] - Quote
@Divine: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4349408#post4349408
Missed your post.
Both of you would be within your rights to do so.
Whether I think your actions are "wrong" or not does not change that. You are both responsible for your actions, as I would be for whatever action I take in response to it. |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
10432
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 21:54:00 -
[555] - Quote
Silivar Karkun wrote:
very good proposition i must say....
i agree with the OP too, the community here can be so toxic sometimes, the EVE community has to set a rule of conduct for the game, something that regulates how people deals with people here, its not a set of prohibitions but more of a universal agreement for certain matters.
for example:
-PvP against new players is forbidden unless both use rookie ships for it (only civilian modules):
if a veteran wants to engage a noob(im talking people with less than 1 day in the game that has just started the tutorials), at least use something that is to lvl with him, rookie ships are replacable so both of you wont have problems of isk later, but the target has to know about this and the engagement must be of course, a duel.
-NPC null sec regions free of Bubble presence:
this regions should be an entry lvl place for people who want to try the null sec life, people may not put bubbles here, leave that for sov driven regions
there could be other ideas but this is the most i have thought about, it doesnt hurt people, unless you think that you need a bubble in order to put a gatecamp anyways, people doesnt need them in low sec, and null sec gates dont have sentries so there's no excuse.....
I just thought of two ways for vets to exploit your ideas. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
202
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 21:58:00 -
[556] - Quote
But I wouldn't. Because I wouldn't wish to hurt you. I understand you and your wife have made a committment to each other, and despite my desire to have a connection you possess, I would not let my own desire rank as more important than your own.
That's what makes me a better person. I would respect you to the point where the issue of conflict wouldn't even materialize to become an issue in the first place. Despite being different than you in being in another body experiencing my own experiences, I understand essentially we're just the same kind of existence, the universe contemplating itself.
Now, you do not have to feel the same way as I do. But I am allowed to classify you as a person who is self centered and only cares about yourself and only does actions that benefit yourself, and choose how I wish to interact with you because of that. I will not impede on your ability to be self centered, but I will choose to act upon the classification you've earned and treat you accordingly, how I see fit, in a manner that still respects your right to be what I consider a horrible self centered human being. |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
14129
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 22:03:00 -
[557] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Silivar Karkun wrote:
very good proposition i must say....
i agree with the OP too, the community here can be so toxic sometimes, the EVE community has to set a rule of conduct for the game, something that regulates how people deals with people here, its not a set of prohibitions but more of a universal agreement for certain matters.
for example:
-PvP against new players is forbidden unless both use rookie ships for it (only civilian modules):
if a veteran wants to engage a noob(im talking people with less than 1 day in the game that has just started the tutorials), at least use something that is to lvl with him, rookie ships are replacable so both of you wont have problems of isk later, but the target has to know about this and the engagement must be of course, a duel.
-NPC null sec regions free of Bubble presence:
this regions should be an entry lvl place for people who want to try the null sec life, people may not put bubbles here, leave that for sov driven regions
there could be other ideas but this is the most i have thought about, it doesnt hurt people, unless you think that you need a bubble in order to put a gatecamp anyways, people doesnt need them in low sec, and null sec gates dont have sentries so there's no excuse.....
I just thought of two ways for vets to exploit your ideas.
So obvious it's practically a law.
1 Kings 12:11
|

Sentamon
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
1503
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 22:05:00 -
[558] - Quote
Anyone that truly gets upset by anything that happens in this GAME, should immediately see a good shrink. ~ Professional Forum Alt -á~ |

Salvos Rhoska
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
323
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 22:06:00 -
[559] - Quote
@ Divine:
Again you demonstrate you are a dilettante and a hack when it comes to matters of ethics and morality. Juvenile, frankly.
By your ridiculous logic, and per that specific scenario you painted, I would then still be a better man than you, because I choose to not emasculate you and feed your genitals to my dogs.
I'm sorry, kid. But you don't understand of what you speak.
Come back when you've read some Nietzsche, Plato, Sartre, Rand or infact when you've read the works of even one actual philosopher on the matters of ethics.
Discussing these matters with you reminds me of nothing so much as discussing with some stoned teenage mall rat emo who has not yet psychologically or socially matured to the level where he understands what personal responsibility is. |

Foxstar Damaskeenus
Biohazard. WINMATAR.
43
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 22:09:00 -
[560] - Quote
Most of us play Eve because its hard. The threat of constantly being blown up and having to take risks is what makes this game unique. Every time you un dock you make a calculated risk.
I do worry about new players quitting though, isn't their some rule about not ganking people in the starter systems? I have on many occasion after blowing someone up and realizing they are less than a month old, contracting them back their loot, sending some ISK and offering advice. |

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
203
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 22:15:00 -
[561] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:@ Divine:
Again you demonstrate you are a dilettante and a hack when it comes to matters of ethics and morality. Juvenile, frankly.
By your ridiculous logic, and per that specific scenario you painted, I would then still be a better man than you, because I choose to not emasculate you and feed your genitals to my dogs.
I'm sorry, kid. But you don't understand of what you speak.
Come back when you've read some Nietzsche, Plato, Sartre, Rand or infact when you've read the works of even one actual philosopher on the matters of ethics.
Discussing these matters with you reminds me of nothing so much as discussing with some stoned teenage mall rat emo who has not yet psychologically or socially matured to the level where he understands what personal responsibility is.
Again you demonstrate you are a dilettante and a hack when it comes to matters of ethics and morality. Juvenile and immature. |

Salvos Rhoska
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
323
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 22:16:00 -
[562] - Quote
They say imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.
But in your case, I just take it to further evidence the brain of a parrot that repeats things without understanding them. |

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
203
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 22:18:00 -
[563] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:They say imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.
But in your case, I just take it to further evidence the brain of a parrot that repeats things without understanding them.
Which you chose to use my argument towards me, which was imitation on your part.
Thanks for the compliment. |

Salvos Rhoska
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
323
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 22:30:00 -
[564] - Quote
That didn't make any sense. |

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
203
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 22:34:00 -
[565] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:That didn't make any sense.
So you have a hard time understanding things. That makes sense considering your egotistical/selfish outlook on life. |

Marsha Mallow
128
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 22:37:00 -
[566] - Quote
Both of you are bad people. Get out. - |

Salvos Rhoska
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
325
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 22:37:00 -
[567] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:Which you chose to use my argument towards me, which was imitation on your part. Explain this to me.
The first part isn't even grammatically comprehensible. And what exactly did I imitate? |

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
203
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 22:41:00 -
[568] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:By your ridiculous logic, and per that specific scenario you painted, I would then still be a better man than you, because I choose to not emasculate you and feed your genitals to my dogs.
Never mind your choosing to bring forth a conclusion you reached where emasculating someone and feeding his genitals to a dog is even a POSSIBLE suggestion worth considering, which you've proven you did by bringing it into the conversation of your own volition.
|

Nicolai Serkanner
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
84
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 22:43:00 -
[569] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:Which you chose to use my argument towards me, which was imitation on your part. Explain this to me. The first part isn't even grammatically comprehensible. And what exactly did I imitate?
He can't for it isn't English.
|

Salvos Rhoska
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
325
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 22:45:00 -
[570] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:By your ridiculous logic, and per that specific scenario you painted, I would then still be a better man than you, because I choose to not emasculate you and feed your genitals to my dogs. Never mind your choosing to bring forth a conclusion you reached where emasculating someone and feeding his genitals to a dog is even a POSSIBILITY worth considering, which you've proven you did by bringing it into the conversation of your own volition.
You are the one who brought into the conversation, of your own volition, the POSSIBILITY of screwing my wife.
Which by your logic, means you've just proven that you are someone who would screw another man's wife, because you actually considered it. As proven by your own words and including it into the scenario.
You failed again, kid. You really are not any good at this at all. You just aren't smart enough. |

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
204
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 22:47:00 -
[571] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:By your ridiculous logic, and per that specific scenario you painted, I would then still be a better man than you, because I choose to not emasculate you and feed your genitals to my dogs. Never mind your choosing to bring forth a conclusion you reached where emasculating someone and feeding his genitals to a dog is even a POSSIBILITY worth considering, which you've proven you did by bringing it into the conversation of your own volition. You are the one who brought into the conversation of your own volition, the POSSIBILITY worth considering which youve proven of screwing my wife. Ergo you just proved that you are someone who would screw another man's wife, because you actually considered it. You failed again, kid. You really are not any good at this at all. You just aren't smart enough.
Actually no, that was someone else's volition. Goe Rilla was the person who initially brought into being, the scenario based around sleeping with one's wife.
But you don't seem to care about actuality.
Also, why do you feel that cutting off the genitals of a man and feeding it to an animal is an appropriate response to infidelity? |

Tear Harvesters HaveNoLives
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
6
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 22:54:00 -
[572] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:I think the eaelier comment by someone, that much uneccessary and unfounded disgruntlement is actually rooted in some peoples inability or unwillingness to accept or understand the nature of this game as compared to many other MMOs, rather than the "toxiccommunity", is very true.
Its not the behavior of other people towards them that is the problem, the problem is their own attitude.
If I walk around in life with unrealistic expectations both of the way the world works and of the nature of my fellow mankind, I will be repeatedly dissappointed and angry, not because of what other autonomous people are doing in it, but because I am so stupid as to assume I am responsible for, or capable of controlling, anyone else except myself.
These people dont seem to understand the fundamental link between the ability to control an outcome, and being responsible for it.
I am not responsible for how others view my actions. Why? Because I have no business or auspice to control how they view it. That is their own prerogative, purview and privilege and one I cannot determine or define. Its in their own head to which I have no access or business.
Reciprocally, this also means that though they are free to view my actions as they wish, their views have NO control over my own autonomous choices in my own life. Their views are their own, and not mine, and do not define how I choose to live my life, no matter how they try to claim that theirs is the "right" way.
But many people dont understand this. They think because they dont "like" something, that somehow means they are entitled to judge and restrict those who do like that.
How does this translate in EVE?
As some people who expect others to behave according to how THEY demand and perceive they should, according to their own internal system of beliefs. Is that fair towards the other person? Hell no. Does that entitle them to dictate how others should behave or think? Absolutely not. Why not? Becuase the same rationale could be levelled right back at them, and they, in return, be expected (against their own autonomy and self-determination) to act as those other people whom they presume to dictate to, dictate right back to them.
Its a ridiculous arrangement, premise and approach to interaction with others.
Its also extremely offensive and socially reprehenensible to even THINK you are in somekind of position to dictate to others how they should behave. It is none of your business. You have no control over how others behave, only over how YOU yourself behave.
I am not responsible for how you feel about something. I am not responsible to your personal view on how "things should be". I am not beholden to act as you in your head think I should. You dont, and cant, control me, nor I you.
Its abhorrent to even think or attempt otherwise, and yet that is exactly what this thread is trying to defend.
Stop trying to dictate how others live their lives and how they choose to conduct themselves. In summary: A whole bunch of excuses for anti-social childish behaviour.
If things were your way, I could go to nightclubs and randomly call girls "skanks". If they get offended, that's their fault not mine. If things were your way, I could tell my university professer he's a fat ugly sweaty loser. If he gets offended, that's his fault. If things were your way, I could go to the gym and tell people who are new to working out that they are petty, skinny weaklings who couldn't lift a feather. If they get offered, hey that's their fault too.
If you truly believe this to be true, you are simply proving our point even further: That griefers and grief-supporters are truly anti-social people who have no place in a game that involves large scale social interaction. |

Salvos Rhoska
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
325
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 22:55:00 -
[573] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:Also, why do you feel that cutting off the genitals of a man and feeding it to an animal is an appropriate response to infidelity?
The scenario was entirely of your creation, not his. I already linked the specific thread above. You are dissembling now. Whether deliberately because you are dishonest, or unintentionally because you are an idiot incapable of remembering your own words, or the chronology of events.
Now you imply that I "feel" that it is an appropriate response.
Nowhere have I said that I "feel" it is an appropriate response. Show me where I have said that I "feel" it is an appropriate response? Oh, you can't?
You argued that you are a better man than me, because you would not screw my wife due to consideration of me. The real reason you would not screw my wife, is because of the consideration that if you did, I might cut your balls off and toss them to my dogs.
That is the reason you do not do it, and certainly not one which makes you a "better" man than any other. What does, however, make me a better man by the same logic, is that if you did indeed do it, I would choose not to cut off your tiny appendage and I love my dogs too much to feed them such trash. |

Salvos Rhoska
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
325
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 22:56:00 -
[574] - Quote
Tear Harvesters HaveNoLives wrote:---
Ignored as troll alt.
Your name is FAR too obvious.
Please, try to maintain even a modicum of effort and skill in your trolling. |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
17107
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 22:57:00 -
[575] - Quote
Sephira Galamore wrote:baltec1 wrote:Its also a PvP game, get used to being shot at. Where do you have that from? Wikipedia wrote:Eve Online (stylised EVE Online) is a video game by CCP Games. It is a player-driven, persistent-world MMORPG set in a science fiction space setting. CCP wrote:The Sandbox is the game world of EVE combined with the persistent actions of thousands upon thousands of players who interact with one another in a single-server environment.. Player-driven != PvP; player interaction != PvP Unless you assume that if a game has feature x, it is an x-game. Then I claim Eve is a PvE game. :p My point is, Eve is a lot of things. To a lot of different people, and often many things at once. Ofc the sandbox part means, you can try to include them in your game (as can they vice versa), but again, that is your personal decision :)
Eve is most definitely a PvP game, you should try reading the new player faq that was published recently, extracts relevant to your post are quoted below for your convenience.
Official New Player FAQ wrote:5.3 SOME PLAYER JUST SHOT ME; IS THAT ALLOWED? In EVE Online, any player may attack any other player if they choose to, no matter where they happen to be. This is because EVE Online is essentially a PvP (Player versus Player) game at its core ..... Furthermore, as we mentioned previously, once you enter New Eden you must consider every action you take as a form of PvP since this is the core game concept ..... The essential core concept of EVE Online is that it is full time PvP in a sandbox environment ..... 7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided.
Psychotic Monk for CSM 9 |

ButtFungus
SOONWAFFE
20
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 22:58:00 -
[576] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:By your ridiculous logic, and per that specific scenario you painted, I would then still be a better man than you, because I choose to not emasculate you and feed your genitals to my dogs. Never mind your choosing to bring forth a conclusion you reached where emasculating someone and feeding his genitals to a dog is even a POSSIBILITY worth considering, which you've proven you did by bringing it into the conversation of your own volition. You are the one who brought into the conversation of your own volition, the POSSIBILITY worth considering which youve proven of screwing my wife. Ergo you just proved that you are someone who would screw another man's wife, because you actually considered it. You failed again, kid. You really are not any good at this at all. You just aren't smart enough. Actually no, that was someone else's volition. Goe Rilla was the person who initially brought into being, the scenario based around sleeping with one's wife. But you don't seem to care about actuality. Also, why do you feel that cutting off the genitals of a man and feeding it to an animal is an appropriate response to infidelity? I agree. The man didn't do anything but nail a woman. She was the one that cheated, so you should cut her genitals off and feed them to your dog. You should take the dude out and buy him a beer for showing you what a whorin' b**ch you married. |

Mandarine
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
31
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 23:00:00 -
[577] - Quote
D. I., you need to stop answering trolls They-¦re wired differently. Their moral pragmatism (which is a form of mild autism) is a consequence of their absence of empathy, which makes them see everything as a low-level conflictual situation in which one has to have the upper hand, since no universal truths are agreed upon.
And just as gankers/scammers etc use complex meta and corrupt communication to generate Schadenfreude, your textual exchanges with them are disharmonious and rife with dishonesty, basic sophistry, and false emotional appeals on their part. It-¦s absolutely pointless. |

Tear Harvesters HaveNoLives
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
8
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 23:01:00 -
[578] - Quote
When your actions cause mental anguish for a large amount of players, you should feel ashamed to defend such actions by claiming it is their fault for feeling the mental anguish. Such person should feel even more ashamed that they commit these actions for no reasonable gain other than personal enjoyment. The vast, vast, vast majority of us control our behavior as a means of being respectful and non-offensive to the community around us. People who cannot control themselves in that manner have behavioral issues and are perhaps sociopaths.
I have no interest in arguing further with anyone who cannot see that, to me that person is self-inducing a delusion so he doesn't have to feel about himself. |

Salvos Rhoska
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
325
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 23:02:00 -
[579] - Quote
Just as you use calling other people trolls and blaming others as a means to avoid culpability, responsibility and introspection for your own actions, choices and life. |

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
205
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 23:02:00 -
[580] - Quote
ButtFungus wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:By your ridiculous logic, and per that specific scenario you painted, I would then still be a better man than you, because I choose to not emasculate you and feed your genitals to my dogs. Never mind your choosing to bring forth a conclusion you reached where emasculating someone and feeding his genitals to a dog is even a POSSIBILITY worth considering, which you've proven you did by bringing it into the conversation of your own volition. You are the one who brought into the conversation of your own volition, the POSSIBILITY worth considering which youve proven of screwing my wife. Ergo you just proved that you are someone who would screw another man's wife, because you actually considered it. You failed again, kid. You really are not any good at this at all. You just aren't smart enough. Actually no, that was someone else's volition. Goe Rilla was the person who initially brought into being, the scenario based around sleeping with one's wife. But you don't seem to care about actuality. Also, why do you feel that cutting off the genitals of a man and feeding it to an animal is an appropriate response to infidelity? I agree. The man didn't do anything but nail a woman. She was the one that cheated, so you should cut her genitals off and feed them to your dog. You should take the dude out and buy him a beer for showing you what a whorin' b**ch you married.
hahahaha! what?! No! Not at all. You should just divorce her and go on living your life. I mean if you want to buy that guy a beer, sure go for it. It'll probably lead to a great friendship. But the genital removing is wrong. |

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
205
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 23:07:00 -
[581] - Quote
Mandarine wrote:D. I., you need to stop answering trolls They-¦re wired differently. They -¦re moral pragmatists (which is a form of mild autism), is a consequence of their absence of empathy, which makes them see everything as a low-level conflictual situation in which one has to have the upper hand, since no universal truths are agreed upon.
And just as gankers/scammers etc use complex meta and corrupt communication to generate Schadenfreude, your textual exchanges with them are disharmonious and rife with dishonesty, basic sophistry, and false emotional appeals on their part. It-¦s absolutely pointless.
I know. But I feel as though if I give them a point to focus their efforts on, that they'll paint themselves as their true persons. They make the choice to interact with me and through it, their true selves break through the cracks of their ego's walls and you get to see them for who they really are.
They use their flames to condemn and punish. I use my righteous fury to expose and purge.
I understand the path I walk has no conclusive end. But I will choose to martyr myself for your better understanding of these people who would otherwise try to deceive you.
|

Mandarine
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
31
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 23:18:00 -
[582] - Quote
Are you an alt of those very people?
|

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
205
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 23:21:00 -
[583] - Quote
Mandarine wrote:Are you an alt of those very people?
I have zero alts. This is my only character, and I just started playing like a month ago. |

Chopper Rollins
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
569
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 23:27:00 -
[584] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Again you demonstrate you are a dilettante and a hack when it comes to matters of ethics and morality. Juvenile, frankly
Must strenuously object to the implication that morality and ethics are some kind of complex science only for super intelligent folks. Ethics and morality can generally be understood by children, who lack only wisdom from experience that guides choices. This thread is silly, like all the other e-bushido fueled drivel.
Goggles. Making me look good. Making you look good. |

Salvos Rhoska
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
328
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 23:32:00 -
[585] - Quote
Chopper Rollins wrote:Ethics and morality can generally be understood by children, who lack only wisdom from experience that guides choices.
Children can not generally understand ethics and morality except at its very rudiments. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_development http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_Kohlberg%27s_stages_of_moral_development
I dont want to argue, I understand the gist of your comment. Just saying that children infact have a completely different, infantile, way of comprehending morality. |

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
205
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 23:33:00 -
[586] - Quote
And now you resort to calling everyone who expresses a different opinion than your own as children who lack wisdom.
You're either trolling, or you're mentally ill. |

Marsha Mallow
128
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 23:36:00 -
[587] - Quote
Mandarine wrote:D. I., you need to stop answering trolls They-¦re wired differently. Their moral pragmatism (which is a form of mild autism) is a consequence of their absence of empathy, which makes them see everything as a low-level conflictual situation in which one has to have the upper hand, since no universal truths are agreed upon.
And just as gankers/scammers etc use complex meta and corrupt communication to generate Schadenfreude, your textual exchanges with them are disharmonious and rife with dishonesty, basic sophistry, and false emotional appeals on their part. It-¦s absolutely pointless. I love how you label PVPers in a PVP game as reprehensible sociopath lunatic trolls and then claim a position of moral and intellectual superiority. And name calling, I mean really? Fair enough some of us do squeal "yarrr" and "pew pew pew" when we are playing (which is a bit odd) but at least we don't burst into tears when someone violences our boats. I quite like it when people shoot mine, saves the trip home.
Mandarine is one of the reasons some people slide into nastiness ingame. All we are doing is playing (properly), and we get all this abuse, ranting, name-calling etc. What do people expect when they rage like babies? I suppose we should all ask politely "Do you mind if I shoot your spaceship" then apologise afterwards, eh.
Tear Harvesters HaveNoLives wrote:When your actions cause mental anguish for a large amount of players, you should feel ashamed to defend such actions by claiming it is their fault for feeling the mental anguish. Such person should feel even more ashamed that they commit these actions for no reasonable gain other than personal enjoyment. The vast, vast, vast majority of us control our behavior as a means of being respectful and non-offensive to the community around us. People who cannot control themselves in that manner have behavioral issues and are perhaps sociopaths.
I have no interest in arguing further with anyone who cannot see that, to me that person is self-inducing a delusion so he doesn't have to feel about himself. Stop feeling mental anguish over space pixels then. It's not disrespectful or offensive to shoot stuff - it is to abuse everyone around you for doing it. I would love to see any of you people who use the term "sociopath" try this crap in an FPS. - |

Salvos Rhoska
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
328
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 23:36:00 -
[588] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:And now you resort to calling everyone who expresses a different opinion than your own as children who lack wisdom.
You're either trolling, or you're mentally ill.
Not everyone. Just you. And its not wisdom I said you lacked, but intellect.
And now you call everyone who disagrees with you, mentally ill, eh? And everyone who has a different morality, bad people?
**** off already, kid. Go outside and play or something for once in your life before you become a complete lost case. |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
3135
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 23:40:00 -
[589] - Quote
Mandarine wrote:D. I., you need to stop answering trolls They-¦re wired differently. Their moral pragmatism (which is a form of mild autism) is a consequence of their absence of empathy, which makes them see everything as a low-level conflictual situation in which one has to have the upper hand, since no universal truths are agreed upon.
And just as gankers/scammers etc use complex meta and corrupt communication to generate Schadenfreude, your textual exchanges with them are disharmonious and rife with dishonesty, basic sophistry, and false emotional appeals on their part. It-¦s absolutely pointless.
Given the content in the evemail you sent me the other day, you don't get to talk about anyone behaving with sophistry or a lack of empathy. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á
Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
14135
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 23:44:00 -
[590] - Quote
I think if there was a single thing I could say to this thread it would be this.
1 Kings 12:11
|

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1857
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 23:49:00 -
[591] - Quote
Can a mod please clean this thread out. This is not Something Aweful forums - one of the comments in this thread suggests cutting off a womans genitals and feeding them to a dog ffs....
Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Chopper Rollins
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
569
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 23:55:00 -
[592] - Quote
lol wikipedia get out
Goggles. Making me look good. Making you look good. |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
3137
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 23:56:00 -
[593] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote:Can a mod please clean this thread out. This is not Something Aweful forums - one of the comments in this thread suggests cutting off a womans genitals and feeding them to a dog ffs....
Yeah, it's getting absurd. Some nutcase was claiming you can get 700 dps out of a 2 million isk Catalyst, for goodness sakes. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á
Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
205
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 23:57:00 -
[594] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:And now you resort to calling everyone who expresses a different opinion than your own as children who lack wisdom.
You're either trolling, or you're mentally ill. Not everyone. Just you. And its not wisdom I said you lacked, but intellect. And now you call everyone who disagrees with you, mentally ill, eh? And everyone who has a different morality, bad people? **** off already, kid. Go outside and play or something for once in your life before you become a complete lost case.
Well luckily for me you've already proven you're someone who's opinion I should attribute no value to.
The consequence of your actions. |

ButtFungus
SOONWAFFE
20
|
Posted - 2014.03.15 23:58:00 -
[595] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:ButtFungus wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:By your ridiculous logic, and per that specific scenario you painted, I would then still be a better man than you, because I choose to not emasculate you and feed your genitals to my dogs. ... why do you feel that cutting off the genitals of a man and feeding it to an animal is an appropriate response to infidelity? I agree. The man didn't do anything but nail a woman. She was the one that cheated, so you should cut her genitals off and feed them to your dog. You should take the dude out and buy him a beer for showing you what a whorin' b**ch you married. hahahaha! what?! No! Not at all. You should just divorce her and go on living your life. I mean if you want to buy that guy a beer, sure go for it. It'll probably lead to a great friendship. But the genital removing is wrong. Well, I suppose I have to agree with that, but Salvos seems to be predisposed to, for whatever reason, to dealing with emotional crises by removing the genitalia of those who wrong him. While I cannot judge him, I must make an effort to point him at the correct target. |

Salvos Rhoska
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
328
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 00:05:00 -
[596] - Quote
ButtFungus wrote: Well, I suppose I have to agree with that, but Salvos seems to be predisposed to, for whatever reason, to dealing with emotional crises by removing the genitalia of those who wrong him. While I cannot judge him, I must make an effort to point him at the correct target.
You misread me.
I said I would choose not do that if I was the person in the scenario he outlined.
Go back and see for yourself. |

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
205
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 00:05:00 -
[597] - Quote
ButtFungus wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:ButtFungus wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:By your ridiculous logic, and per that specific scenario you painted, I would then still be a better man than you, because I choose to not emasculate you and feed your genitals to my dogs. ... why do you feel that cutting off the genitals of a man and feeding it to an animal is an appropriate response to infidelity? I agree. The man didn't do anything but nail a woman. She was the one that cheated, so you should cut her genitals off and feed them to your dog. You should take the dude out and buy him a beer for showing you what a whorin' b**ch you married. hahahaha! what?! No! Not at all. You should just divorce her and go on living your life. I mean if you want to buy that guy a beer, sure go for it. It'll probably lead to a great friendship. But the genital removing is wrong. Well, I suppose I have to agree with that, but Salvos seems to be predisposed to, for whatever reason, to dealing with emotional crises by removing the genitalia of those who wrong him. While I cannot judge him, I must make an effort to point him at the correct target.
if anyone deserves the removal of their genitalia, which I strongly disagree with but in the context of the conversation I will entertain an answer, is Salvos. For being so much better than me at every aspect of existence yet not being able to prove he is man enough to satisfy the needs of his significant other as well as I, someone so lowly, am capable of doing. Because if he's so much better than me, yet he cannot satisfy the needs of his partner, well then he is undeserving of his genitalia and should have it removed.
His wife? she is just looking for the happiness that I'm O So able to deliver. |

Mandarine
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
33
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 00:05:00 -
[598] - Quote
Marsha Mallow wrote: I love how you label PVPers in a PVP game as reprehensible sociopath lunatic trolls and then claim a position of moral and intellectual superiority. And name calling, I mean really? Fair enough some of us do squeal "yarrr" and "pew pew pew" when we are playing (which is a bit odd) but at least we don't burst into tears when someone violences our boats. I quite like it when people shoot mine, saves the trip home.
Mandarine is one of the reasons some people slide into nastiness ingame. All we are doing is playing (properly), and we get all this abuse, ranting, name-calling etc. What do people expect when they rage like babies? I suppose we should all ask politely "Do you mind if I shoot your spaceship" then apologise afterwards, eh.
Do you consider that people who recycle scamming alts are playing properly?
Do you consider that people who pretend to ask for help in their mission, only to gank the naive dude who comes to help them, play properly?
Do you think it-¦s proper to use a game not to pursue ingame goals, but rather to exploit the emotional attachment of standard gamers to their ingame belongings by using complex meta and maximum cheese to make them rage IRL?
Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Given the content in the evemail you sent me the other day, you don't get to talk about anyone behaving with sophistry or a lack of empathy.
I know what you did with it, cherrypicked and lied, and we both are aware of how it was considered by the people whose job it is to consider such things. |

Erotica 1
Krypteia Operations CODE.
4316
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 00:06:00 -
[599] - Quote
This brings up an interesting morallity question. In some parts of the world, a certain something is cut off once a woman reaches sexual maturity. Now most of us here, including myself, would say that is terrible. But who are we to judge another culture? See Bio for isk doubling rules. If you didn't read bio, chances are you funded those who did. |

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
205
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 00:06:00 -
[600] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:ButtFungus wrote: Well, I suppose I have to agree with that, but Salvos seems to be predisposed to, for whatever reason, to dealing with emotional crises by removing the genitalia of those who wrong him. While I cannot judge him, I must make an effort to point him at the correct target.
You misread me. I said I would choose not do that if I was the person in the scenario he outlined. Go back and see for yourself.
You're the one who introduced the prospect of genital removal of your own volition. Meaning it was a possibility you considered. |

ButtFungus
SOONWAFFE
21
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 00:09:00 -
[601] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote:Can a mod please clean this thread out. This is not Something Aweful forums - one of the comments in this thread suggests cutting off a womans genitals and feeding them to a dog ffs....
If you'd bother to read back to the posts quoted, you would see that they were talking about how not sleeping with a man's wife makes him a better man because he didn't do something bad, and the response was that not removing the first man's genitals and feeding them to a dog makes him a better man for not doing something even worse than the thing the first man did not do. At that point, I felt the need to mention that if someone does not sleep with your wife, you should not not remove his genitals, you should not remove your wife's genitals because she is the one who didn't commit infidelity, not the man. See how confusing things get when you open your mouth without fully understanding a situation? |

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
205
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 00:15:00 -
[602] - Quote
ButtFungus wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:Can a mod please clean this thread out. This is not Something Aweful forums - one of the comments in this thread suggests cutting off a womans genitals and feeding them to a dog ffs....
If you'd bother to read back to the posts quoted, you would see that they were talking about how not sleeping with a man's wife makes him a better man because he didn't do something bad, and the response was that not removing the first man's genitals and feeding them to a dog makes him a better man for not doing something even worse than the thing the first man did not do. At that point, I felt the need to mention that if someone does not sleep with your wife, you should not not remove his genitals, you should not remove your wife's genitals because she is the one who didn't commit infidelity, not the man. See how confusing things get when you open your mouth without fully understanding a situation?
I had something caught in my nose while I was reading this. Halfway through, your words caused a torrent of air to dislodge it.
I had to wash my hands, but thank you. |

Salvos Rhoska
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
328
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 00:15:00 -
[603] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:You're the one who introduced the prospect of genital removal of your own volition. Meaning it was a possibility you considered.
And?
I can consider far worse than that. I can conceive of so many sadistic tortures that it would take several volumes to outline.
But not acting on them is, again, what makes me the better man than you, in the contrived scenario you considered of your own volition where you imagine screwing my wife next to me in my own bed and asking me to join in.
Yeah. Your words. |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
9154
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 00:15:00 -
[604] - Quote
ButtFungus wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:Can a mod please clean this thread out. This is not Something Aweful forums - one of the comments in this thread suggests cutting off a womans genitals and feeding them to a dog ffs....
If you'd bother to read back to the posts quoted, you would see that they were talking about how not sleeping with a man's wife makes him a better man because he didn't do something bad, and the response was that not removing the first man's genitals and feeding them to a dog makes him a better man for not doing something even worse than the thing the first man did not do. At that point, I felt the need to mention that if someone does not sleep with your wife, you should not not remove his genitals, you should not remove your wife's genitals because she is the one who didn't commit infidelity, not the man. See how confusing things get when you open your mouth without fully understanding a situation? What the holy **** is this thread even about. "Pretty much all 14 of the CSM were in favor of a drone assign nerf for OBVIOUS gameplay reasons" - Sala Cameron
|

ButtFungus
SOONWAFFE
22
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 00:19:00 -
[605] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:ButtFungus wrote: Well, I suppose I have to agree with that, but Salvos seems to be predisposed to, for whatever reason, to dealing with emotional crises by removing the genitalia of those who wrong him. While I cannot judge him, I must make an effort to point him at the correct target.
You misread me. I said I would choose not to do that if I was the person in the hypothetical (and ridiculous) scenario he outlined. Go back and see for yourself. I realize this. What I was referring to is that you did not say that not divorcing your wife and tossing her penniless behind out on the street makes you a better man, you went right to mutilation, first thing, go to response. |

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
205
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 00:22:00 -
[606] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:You're the one who introduced the prospect of genital removal of your own volition. Meaning it was a possibility you considered. And? I can consider far worse than that. I can conceive of so many sadistic tortures that it would take several volumes to outline. But not acting on them is, again, what makes me the better man than you, in the contrived scenario you considered of your own volition where you imagine screwing my wife next to me in my own bed and asking me to join in. Yeah. Your words.
Why would you consider the act of sleeping with your wife a bad thing? Aren't we all entitled to happiness? I'm happy, she's happy, and we want to show you our happiness.
Why would that situation where we are expressing our happiness with each other to you result in you considering removing my genitals and feeding it to a dog is an appropriate response?
Why wouldn't you just join in? instead of sitting there thinking about how you're not feeding my balls to a dog? |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
3140
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 00:29:00 -
[607] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:ButtFungus wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:Can a mod please clean this thread out. This is not Something Aweful forums - one of the comments in this thread suggests cutting off a womans genitals and feeding them to a dog ffs....
If you'd bother to read back to the posts quoted, you would see that they were talking about how not sleeping with a man's wife makes him a better man because he didn't do something bad, and the response was that not removing the first man's genitals and feeding them to a dog makes him a better man for not doing something even worse than the thing the first man did not do. At that point, I felt the need to mention that if someone does not sleep with your wife, you should not not remove his genitals, you should not remove your wife's genitals because she is the one who didn't commit infidelity, not the man. See how confusing things get when you open your mouth without fully understanding a situation? What the holy **** is this thread even about.
Puppies, duh. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á
Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
205
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 00:31:00 -
[608] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:ButtFungus wrote: I realize this. What I was referring to is that you did not say that not divorcing your wife and tossing her penniless behind out on the street makes you a better man, you went right to mutilation, first thing, go to response.
I went right to that deliberately for purposes of illustrating my point in the example, that by the same logic he raised hiself up as a "better man", I can simply claim that there is an even more heinous act that I also then refrain from taking, which makes me then commensurately the even better man. It may seem stupid, but so is his premise and logic, therefore so is this outcome. Its not actually me in the example, you realise? Its not an actual event or situation. As such, there is no need for me to outline which laywer I would call to file divorce, what his number is, what socks I would put on as I leave the house, etc. Only purpose was to illustrate the flaw in his logic.
So you're a pessimist. You automatically go to what could be worse instead of what could be better. Got it, being a pessimist, it's understandable why you're so egotistical and selfish, because since you have such a dim outlook on life, you automatically assume the worst and withdraw within your self.
Dont worry man, I understand that you've experienced some aspects of life that's caused you o withdraw into your shell to protect yourself and wish the removal of genitals on people who just want to have a good time.
But you can get better. I can help you.
We can help you. Sure, there are alot of bad people in the world, and in this community. But there are good people here too and if you're willing to make the effort to let us show you how life can be amazing, we will be glad to take you under our wings and show you a world of possibility! |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
9159
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 00:31:00 -
[609] - Quote
Seriously though, **** these fragile flowers and their "what about me" mentality. What about you? Don't like it, play another game. "Pretty much all 14 of the CSM were in favor of a drone assign nerf for OBVIOUS gameplay reasons" - Sala Cameron
|

Marsha Mallow
131
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 00:33:00 -
[610] - Quote
Mandarine wrote:Do you consider that people who recycle scamming alts are playing properly? Creating and discarding alts for griefplay purposes is against the Eula, but I'm happy with scamming over all. Weeds out the numpties and ISK buyers. Also some of them are really inventive.
Mandarine wrote:Do you consider that people who pretend to ask for help in their mission, only to gank the naive dude who comes to help them, play properly? Yep. Don't talk to strangers, make proper friends etc etc - actually I despise PVE. Should be removed altogether and we should be forced to make our money by looting other players. Maybe.
Mandarine wrote:Do you think it-¦s proper to use a game not to pursue ingame goals, but rather to exploit the emotional attachment of standard gamers to their ingame belongings by using complex meta and maximum cheese to make them rage IRL? Don't be attached to your ingame belongings - they're mine.
I bet you rage when someone 1isks you on the market too. Actually can you write a proper list of bad behaviour, so I can make sure I'm doing all of them. Tia - |

Erotica 1
Krypteia Operations CODE.
4316
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 00:33:00 -
[611] - Quote
This is a Goonswarm recruiting thread. I'm glad a recruiter has shown up finally. See Bio for isk doubling rules. If you didn't read bio, chances are you funded those who did. |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
9159
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 00:35:00 -
[612] - Quote
I don't see one. "Pretty much all 14 of the CSM were in favor of a drone assign nerf for OBVIOUS gameplay reasons" - Sala Cameron
|

ButtFungus
SOONWAFFE
22
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 00:36:00 -
[613] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:Seriously though, **** these fragile flowers and their "what about me" mentality. What about you? Don't like it, play another game. awww, are the fragile little flowers upsetting big bad goon man? Don't like it? Don't not play another game |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
17109
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 00:37:00 -
[614] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:How did a wimpering little **** like OP get over 60 likes on his post within 48 hours? So the assholes are the reason more happy special snowflakes who want to carefully control every single aspect of their gameplay experience don't play EVE?
GOOD. Go play another game. Because there's a minority of simpering fools that think Eve should be more like a generic themepark MMO, some of them even believe that by doing violence onto others in a game you prove that you're a *insert mental illness of choice* in real life, and that they're morally superior for not violencing other peoples spaceships without consent.
Psychotic Monk for CSM 9 |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
9160
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 00:39:00 -
[615] - Quote
ButtFungus wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:Seriously though, **** these fragile flowers and their "what about me" mentality. What about you? Don't like it, play another game. awww, are the fragile little flowers upsetting big bad goon man? Don't like it? Don't not play another game This game is built around the likes of us. It's not the assholes that are playing the wrong game. "Pretty much all 14 of the CSM were in favor of a drone assign nerf for OBVIOUS gameplay reasons" - Sala Cameron
|

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
205
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 00:41:00 -
[616] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:How did a wimpering little **** like OP get over 60 likes on his post within 48 hours? So the assholes are the reason more happy special snowflakes who want to carefully control every single aspect of their gameplay experience don't play EVE?
GOOD. Go play another game. Because there's a minority of simpering fools that think Eve should be more like a generic themepark MMO
Who has said this? those people need to stfu |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
9160
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 00:44:00 -
[617] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:How did a wimpering little **** like OP get over 60 likes on his post within 48 hours? So the assholes are the reason more happy special snowflakes who want to carefully control every single aspect of their gameplay experience don't play EVE?
GOOD. Go play another game. Because there's a minority of simpering fools that think Eve should be more like a generic themepark MMO Who has said this? those people need to stfu or play another game. It's a minority. It's a large minority. "Pretty much all 14 of the CSM were in favor of a drone assign nerf for OBVIOUS gameplay reasons" - Sala Cameron
|

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
205
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 00:46:00 -
[618] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:How did a wimpering little **** like OP get over 60 likes on his post within 48 hours? So the assholes are the reason more happy special snowflakes who want to carefully control every single aspect of their gameplay experience don't play EVE?
GOOD. Go play another game. Because there's a minority of simpering fools that think Eve should be more like a generic themepark MMO Who has said this? those people need to stfu or play another game. It's a minority. It's a large minority.
Well whoever tries to make EVE a generic themepark MMO, tell them to stfu or leave.
You'll have my blessing. There are already enough generic themepark MMO's on the market for them to choose from. |

Goe Rilla
24th Imperial Crusade Amarr Empire
7
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 01:02:00 -
[619] - Quote
Erotica 1 wrote:This brings up an interesting morallity question. In some parts of the world, a certain something is cut off once a woman reaches sexual maturity. Now most of us here, including myself, would say that is terrible. But who are we to judge another culture?
Not judge, but to just FEEL somebody else's excruciating and life-changing pain at that very moment, and then, examine the reasons for it.
FEEL first, judge later, get it ? |

Marsha Mallow
133
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 01:10:00 -
[620] - Quote
Ooo let's talk about Mittengate again, there's a Goon in the house.
Personally I found the Mittengate episode hilarious, and it should be warbled on about endlessly just to rub it in. Fair enough he was drunk, but there's an interview segment which took place before he was on the stage where he stated he'd thought about mentioning the Wiz. He made a conscious decision to say what he did, out of arrogance. Granted, the Wiz was being an idiot, but that isn't an acceptable justification - and what was said was jaw-droppingly stupid. The post when he was removed from the CSM "oh I fell on my sword and now CCP have twisted the blade" abloobloobloo or whatever was epic. The incident is one of the only times CCP have publically intervened and backhanded the whole of Goonswarm for being complete tools. They all came out and screamed like toddlers all over the forums, it was awesome. Your votes didn't count, muahaha.
See, being a bit of a dickhead has it's benefits. You get to gleefully enjoy the torment of other dickheads. Why can't you just let us have our fun? - |

Mandarine
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
36
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 01:13:00 -
[621] - Quote
Because playing games is meant to have fun together, instead of at one another-¦s expense |

Ralph King-Griffin
Var Foundation inc.
386
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 01:22:00 -
[622] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote:Can a mod please clean this thread out. This is not Something Aweful forums - one of the comments in this thread suggests cutting off a womans genitals and feeding them to a dog ffs....
Seriously this should happen immediately. If in doubt...do...excessively. |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
9162
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 01:22:00 -
[623] - Quote
Marsha Mallow wrote:Ooo let's talk about Mittengate again, there's a Goon in the house.
Personally I found the Mittengate episode hilarious, and it should be warbled on about endlessly just to rub it in. Fair enough he was drunk, but there's an interview segment which took place before he was on the stage where he stated he'd thought about mentioning the Wiz. He made a conscious decision to say what he did, out of arrogance. Granted, the Wiz was being an idiot, but that isn't an acceptable justification - and what was said was jaw-droppingly stupid. The post when he was removed from the CSM "oh I fell on my sword and now CCP have twisted the blade" abloobloobloo or whatever was epic. The incident is one of the only times CCP have publically intervened and backhanded the whole of Goonswarm for being complete tools. They all came out and screamed like toddlers all over the forums, it was awesome. Your votes didn't count, muahaha.
See, being a bit of a dickhead has it's benefits. You get to gleefully enjoy the torment of other dickheads. Why can't you just let us have our fun? I wasn't in Goonswarm at the time. You might actually be rather interested to go look at what I had to say when it happened. "Pretty much all 14 of the CSM were in favor of a drone assign nerf for OBVIOUS gameplay reasons" - Sala Cameron
|

Winchester Steele
387
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 01:23:00 -
[624] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:ButtFungus wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:Seriously though, **** these fragile flowers and their "what about me" mentality. What about you? Don't like it, play another game. awww, are the fragile little flowers upsetting big bad goon man? Don't like it? Don't not play another game This game is built around the likes of us. It's not the assholes that are playing the wrong game.
Gods yes! This one simple statement perfectly sums up my thoughts about Eve and the whiny b*tches who want to turn it into a rubber padded themepark. Consider it stolen (in true Eve fashion). This game is built around the likes of us. It's not the assholes that are playing the wrong game. - James Amril-Kesh. |

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
5064
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 01:24:00 -
[625] - Quote
Mandarine wrote:Because playing games is meant to have fun together, instead of at one another-¦s expense
If that were true, all goames would be Cooperative games. Co-op games are where you are meant to have fun together, competative games always end with one person having fun "at another's expense".
When i play poker I'm not playing for your enjoyment, I'm playing for your money. |

Marsha Mallow
134
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 01:26:00 -
[626] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:I wasn't in Goonswarm at the time. You might actually be rather interested to go look at what I had to say when it happened. I know, I'm just messing with you. You could at least pretend to be outraged though  - |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
17110
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 01:27:00 -
[627] - Quote
Mandarine wrote:Because playing games is meant to be fun together, instead of at one another-¦s expense FTFY
It's a competitive game, someone has to lose in order for someone to win.
Psychotic Monk for CSM 9 |

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
206
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 01:28:00 -
[628] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Mandarine wrote:Because playing games is meant to be fun [s]together, instead of at one another-¦s expense[s] FTFY It's a competitive game, someone has to lose in order for someone to win.
Incorrect, there is no clearly stated win lose objectives. The people decide what is winning and what is losing for themselves individually.
Show me where CCP has stated that to win EvE, you have to perform an action that requires someone else to lose. Proof of lying in thread.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4349703#post4349703 |

Winchester Steele
388
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 01:31:00 -
[629] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:Mandarine wrote:Because playing games is meant to have fun together, instead of at one another-¦s expense If that were true, all goames would be Cooperative games. Co-op games are where you are meant to have fun together, competative games always end with one person having fun "at another's expense". When i play poker I'm not playing for your enjoyment, I'm playing for your money. I guess it's good for all of us that we're not playing poker, we're playing EvE.
Tell that to the dumb sh*t who lost 2600.00 to goons last week. I'd call that a Royal Flush wouldn't you? This game is built around the likes of us. It's not the assholes that are playing the wrong game. - James Amril-Kesh. |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
17110
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 01:31:00 -
[630] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Mandarine wrote:Because playing games is meant to be fun [s]together, instead of at one another-¦s expense[s] FTFY It's a competitive game, someone has to lose in order for someone to win. Incorrect, there is no clearly stated win lose objectives. The people decide what is winning and what is losing for themselves individually. Show me where CCP has stated that to win EvE, you have to perform an action that requires someone else to lose. Which part of competitive do you not understand? When you compete against someone else there is always a loser.
Psychotic Monk for CSM 9 |

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
206
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 01:33:00 -
[631] - Quote
Winchester Steele wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:Mandarine wrote:Because playing games is meant to have fun together, instead of at one another-¦s expense If that were true, all goames would be Cooperative games. Co-op games are where you are meant to have fun together, competative games always end with one person having fun "at another's expense". When i play poker I'm not playing for your enjoyment, I'm playing for your money. I guess it's good for all of us that we're not playing poker, we're playing EvE. Tell that to the dumb sh*t who lost 2600.00 to goons last week. I'd call that a Royal Flush wouldn't you?
That wasn't poker though, that was EvE. and I'd call it a guy putting 2600 into a space ship and having it blown up.
You know, what it is. . . . . Proof of lying in thread.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4349703#post4349703 |

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
206
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 01:35:00 -
[632] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Mandarine wrote:Because playing games is meant to be fun [s]together, instead of at one another-¦s expense[s] FTFY It's a competitive game, someone has to lose in order for someone to win. Incorrect, there is no clearly stated win lose objectives. The people decide what is winning and what is losing for themselves individually. Show me where CCP has stated that to win EvE, you have to perform an action that requires someone else to lose. Which part of competitive do you not understand? When you compete against someone else there is always a loser.
Show me where CCP has stated that to win EvE, you have to perform an action that requires someone else to lose.
Prove it. Proof of lying in thread.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4349703#post4349703 |

Marsha Mallow
137
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 01:37:00 -
[633] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote: Show me where CCP has stated that to win EvE, you have to perform an action that requires someone else to lose.
Prove it.
Nobody listens to CCP, we just make stuff up ourselves. - |

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
206
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 01:40:00 -
[634] - Quote
Marsha Mallow wrote:Divine Entervention wrote: Show me where CCP has stated that to win EvE, you have to perform an action that requires someone else to lose.
Prove it.
Nobody listens to CCP, we just make stuff up ourselves.
Precisely
Thanks for proving my point.
Even though there's no CCP to ignore on the issue because they've never stated what is a definitive win or loss. Proof of lying in thread.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4349703#post4349703 |

Erotica 1
Krypteia Operations CODE.
4317
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 01:40:00 -
[635] - Quote
When you ragequit EVE in the future, you can claim you won EVE, I don't care. See Bio for isk doubling rules. If you didn't read bio, chances are you funded those who did. |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
9164
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 01:41:00 -
[636] - Quote
Marsha Mallow wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:I wasn't in Goonswarm at the time. You might actually be rather interested to go look at what I had to say when it happened. I know, I'm just messing with you. You could at least pretend to be outraged though  As a result of that incident I not only got the opportunity to demonstrate my outrage, but also my incredible ability to move on with my life. "Pretty much all 14 of the CSM were in favor of a drone assign nerf for OBVIOUS gameplay reasons" - Sala Cameron
|

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
17110
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 01:44:00 -
[637] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Which part of competitive do you not understand? When you compete against someone else there is always a loser.
Show me where CCP has stated that to win EvE, you have to perform an action that requires someone else to lose. Prove it. Do you understand the concept of being the victor in a competitive environment? Without a loser there is no winner.
How about you prove that it is possible to win in a competitive environment, without there being a loser too.
Psychotic Monk for CSM 9 |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
9164
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 01:45:00 -
[638] - Quote
Trophies for participation, that's how. "Pretty much all 14 of the CSM were in favor of a drone assign nerf for OBVIOUS gameplay reasons" - Sala Cameron
|

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
17112
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 01:47:00 -
[639] - Quote
^^ heh that's a relatively new phenomenon, and tbh it's bloody stupid.
Psychotic Monk for CSM 9 |

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
208
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 01:47:00 -
[640] - Quote
Jonah Eastytoprovewrongstein wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Which part of competitive do you not understand? When you compete against someone else there is always a loser.
Show me where CCP has stated that to win EvE, you have to perform an action that requires someone else to lose. Prove it. Do you understand the concept of being the victor in a competitive environment? Without a loser there is no winner. How about you prove that it is possible to win in a competitive environment, without there being a loser too.
You seem to be focusing only one one of many aspects within eve. You're neglecting to consider the multiple ways people can decide to want to play EvE.
There is nothing on their website or in the EULA that states the objective of EVE is to compete with other people and every one joining HAS to do so.
In fact, the words compete or competition never show up in the EULA. Not once. Not twice. Zero times.
Please stop being ignorant. Proof of lying in thread.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4349703#post4349703 |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
17112
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 01:50:00 -
[641] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Which part of competitive do you not understand? When you compete against someone else there is always a loser.
Show me where CCP has stated that to win EvE, you have to perform an action that requires someone else to lose. Prove it. Do you understand the concept of being the victor in a competitive environment? Without a loser there is no winner. How about you prove that it is possible to win in a competitive environment, without there being a loser too. You seem to be focusing only one one of many aspects within eve. You're neglecting to consider the multiple ways people can decide to want to play EvE. There is nothing on their website or in the EULA that states the objective of EVE is to compete with other people and every one joining HAS to do so. In fact, the words compete or competition never show up in the EULA. Not once. Not twice. Zero times. Please stop being ignorant. Please stop being a pedantic troll. It doesn't state anywhere in lifes terms and conditions that you'll be competing with other people for jobs, success, your home, your spouse, decent school places for your kids etc, but you are.
Psychotic Monk for CSM 9 |

Erotica 1
Krypteia Operations CODE.
4317
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 01:51:00 -
[642] - Quote
Hmm.. trophies for participation... that gives me an idea. See Bio for isk doubling rules. If you didn't read bio, chances are you funded those who did. |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
9167
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 01:52:00 -
[643] - Quote
How could EVE ever be a cooperative game anyway without competition? Cooperation against what? Sansha's Nation? Sure... "Pretty much all 14 of the CSM were in favor of a drone assign nerf for OBVIOUS gameplay reasons" - Sala Cameron
|

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
17112
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 01:54:00 -
[644] - Quote
Erotica 1 wrote:Hmm.. trophies for participation... that gives me an idea. Heh you're behind the times, getting a trophy for coming last in a competition is now the norm, especially for kids, because it might hurt their feelings.
Psychotic Monk for CSM 9 |

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
208
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 01:54:00 -
[645] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:How could EVE ever be a cooperative game anyway without competition? Cooperation against what? Sansha's Nation? Sure...
So you answered your own question. It's nice to see you understand.
+1
Proof of lying in thread.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4349703#post4349703 |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
17114
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 01:57:00 -
[646] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:How could EVE ever be a cooperative game anyway without competition? Cooperation against what? Sansha's Nation? Sure... So you answered your own question. It's nice to see you understand. +1 I don't think he means what you think he means
Even cooperating against Sanshas Nation in an incursion involves competition, such as who can gain the most LP, who can clear sites fastest etc.
Psychotic Monk for CSM 9 |

Mandarine
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
36
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 02:00:00 -
[647] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:Mandarine wrote:Because playing games is meant to have fun together, instead of at one another-¦s expense If that were true, all goames would be Cooperative games. Co-op games are where you are meant to have fun together, competative games always end with one person having fun "at another's expense". When i play poker I'm not playing for your enjoyment, I'm playing for your money.
Believe it or not, in all games devoid of super serious stakes like money or world ranking in something important like chess, there is a tacit agreement between all sane players sharing basic common sense, to play nice and making sure everybody has fun. It-¦s very much emotionally cooperative, even if it-¦s tabletop warfare.
Now, there are always some players with issues, who revel in being disruptive and who envision all games as you and Jonah do, that is, zero-sum equations in which fun is always had at your opponent-¦s expense, Those people, in RL games, are not reinvited, because it-¦s boring, tedious and irritating to play with them.
In a game such as EvE, there is no way not to play with them or collectively choose to remove them from the game. That is why all the guys who enjoy spaceships, mmos and being disruptive, flock to New Eden. |

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
208
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 02:01:00 -
[648] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Which part of competitive do you not understand? When you compete against someone else there is always a loser.
Show me where CCP has stated that to win EvE, you have to perform an action that requires someone else to lose. Prove it. Do you understand the concept of being the victor in a competitive environment? Without a loser there is no winner. How about you prove that it is possible to win in a competitive environment, without there being a loser too. You seem to be focusing only one one of many aspects within eve. You're neglecting to consider the multiple ways people can decide to want to play EvE. There is nothing on their website or in the EULA that states the objective of EVE is to compete with other people and every one joining HAS to do so. In fact, the words compete or competition never show up in the EULA. Not once. Not twice. Zero times. Please stop being ignorant. Please stop being a pedantic troll. It doesn't state anywhere in lifes terms and conditions that you'll be competing with other people for jobs, success, your home, your spouse, decent school places for your kids etc, but you are.
OK so you wish to compare the fact that life doesn't have a terms of service that explicitly states you'll be competing. Cool, as you know I enjoy bringing in real life comparisons, so this one is on you for wanting to initiate it.
Considering that according to you, life and eve are similar in not stating it is mandatory to compete, then we also have to assume that instead of competing we can exist cooperatively.
If it's not clearly stated that one has to compete or cooperate, then we get to choose. Proof of lying in thread.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4349703#post4349703 |

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
208
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 02:03:00 -
[649] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:How could EVE ever be a cooperative game anyway without competition? Cooperation against what? Sansha's Nation? Sure... So you answered your own question. It's nice to see you understand. +1 I don't think he means what you think he meansEven cooperating against Sanshas Nation in an incursion involves competition, such as who can gain the most LP, who can clear sites fastest etc.
It doesn't matter what his intention of saying it is, to insult me, by answering his own question he proves that it's possible that everyone cooperate with each other to accomplish objectives other than competition via blowing up each others ships. Proof of lying in thread.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4349703#post4349703 |

Erotica 1
Krypteia Operations CODE.
4317
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 02:04:00 -
[650] - Quote
Let's keep the discussion to in game, lest we go off topic again talking about cheating spouses. See Bio for isk doubling rules. If you didn't read bio, chances are you funded those who did. |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
17116
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 02:15:00 -
[651] - Quote
Mandarine wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:Mandarine wrote:Because playing games is meant to have fun together, instead of at one another-¦s expense If that were true, all goames would be Cooperative games. Co-op games are where you are meant to have fun together, competative games always end with one person having fun "at another's expense". When i play poker I'm not playing for your enjoyment, I'm playing for your money. Believe it or not, in all games devoid of super serious stakes like money or world ranking in something important like chess, there is a tacit agreement between all sane players sharing basic common sense, to play nice and making sure everybody has fun. It-¦s very much emotionally cooperative, even if it-¦s tabletop warfare. As someone who started out with tabletop gaming back in the 80's, there are always people who moan, whine and cry when they lose, they don't tend to get invited back because playing games with them is pointless, they'll always be the first to accuse others of underhanded shenanigans when things don't go their way.
Quote:Now, there are always some players with issues, who revel in being disruptive and who envision all games as you and Jonah do, that is, zero-sum equations in which fun is always had at your opponent-¦s expense, Those people, in RL games, are not reinvited, because it-¦s boring, tedious and irritating to play with them. Strangely enough, despite what you assume about me, I often get asked to play RL games with other people, probably because I'm not a sore loser.
You make a lot of baseless assumptions in this post, firstly I'm not a zero sum gamer and I don't believe Jenn is either, we both do what many see as carebear stuff, neither of us indulges in ship to ship PvP unless we have to. What we are is realists, we accept that we're playing a competitive game where anybody, at anytime is free to try and stop us doing what we want to, and we plan accordingly.
Quote:In a game such as EvE, there is no way not to play with them or collectively choose to remove them from the game. That is why all the guys some people who enjoy spaceships, mmos and being disruptive, flock come to New Eden. And nor should there be, if they play within the rules of the game, I fixed the latter part of your post btw, you're welcome.
Psychotic Monk for CSM 9 |

Marsha Mallow
138
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 02:16:00 -
[652] - Quote
Mandarine wrote:Believe it or not, in all games devoid of super serious stakes like money or world ranking in something important like chess, there is a tacit agreement between all sane players sharing basic common sense, to play nice and making sure everybody has fun. It-¦s very much emotionally cooperative, even if it-¦s tabletop warfare. What like monopoly or chess? My cousins used to throw the board across the room and storm about when they noticed us slyly stealing money or removing pieces from the board when they weren't looking. You might be right about the sane thing though.
Mandarine wrote:Now, there are always some players with issues, who revel in being disruptive and who envision all games as you and Jonah do, that is, zero-sum equations in which fun is always had at your opponent-¦s expense, Those people, in RL games, are not reinvited, because it-¦s boring, tedious and irritating to play with them. That's odd, because ingame the most disruptive and obnoxious people tend to either have a well developed sense of humour or they are completely hammered and thus entertaining to play with.
Mandarine wrote:In a game such as EvE, there is no way not to play with them or collectively choose to remove them from the game. That is why all the guys who enjoy spaceships, mmos and being disruptive, flock to New Eden. Well, what the **** are you doing here then? You are clearly in the wrong ******* game. Do you get some sort of sadistic enjoyment out of sitting there telling us how naughty we are. Are we supposed to care?
- |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
17116
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 02:18:00 -
[653] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote: OK so you wish to compare the fact that life doesn't have a terms of service that explicitly states you'll be competing. Cool, as you know I enjoy bringing in real life comparisons, so this one is on you for wanting to initiate it.
Considering that according to you, life and eve are similar in not stating it is mandatory to compete, then we also have to assume that instead of competing we can exist cooperatively.
If it's not clearly stated that one has to compete or cooperate, then we get to choose.
Yes you can choose to play or work cooperatively with others, what you can't do is expect others to play or work cooperatively with you. This is as true in real life as it is in Eve.
Psychotic Monk for CSM 9 |

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
208
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 02:25:00 -
[654] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Divine Entervention wrote: OK so you wish to compare the fact that life doesn't have a terms of service that explicitly states you'll be competing. Cool, as you know I enjoy bringing in real life comparisons, so this one is on you for wanting to initiate it.
Considering that according to you, life and eve are similar in not stating it is mandatory to compete, then we also have to assume that instead of competing we can exist cooperatively.
If it's not clearly stated that one has to compete or cooperate, then we get to choose.
Yes you can choose to play or work cooperatively with others, what you can't do is expect others to play or work cooperatively with you. This is as true in real life as it is in Eve.
Exactly, so since we're both making our choices, we get to choose how we react and consider those choices.
Considering there is no overarching mandate demanding that we play a certain way, we get to judge how others are based on their actions.
This is as true in EvE as it is in Real Life. Proof of lying in thread.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4349703#post4349703 |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
17119
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 02:28:00 -
[655] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote: Exactly, so since we're both making our choices, we get to choose how we react and consider those choices.
Considering there is no overarching mandate demanding that we play a certain way, we get to judge how others are based on their actions.
This is as true in EvE as it is in Real Life.
Yes we're both making choices, no you don't get to judge others in real life because of the choices they make in a computer game, because a computer game is not real life.
Psychotic Monk for CSM 9 |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
9174
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 02:28:00 -
[656] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:How could EVE ever be a cooperative game anyway without competition? Cooperation against what? Sansha's Nation? Sure... So you answered your own question. It's nice to see you understand. +1 I don't think he means what you think he meansEven cooperating against Sanshas Nation in an incursion involves competition, such as who can gain the most LP, who can clear sites fastest etc. It doesn't matter what his intention of saying it is, to insult me, by answering his own question he proves that it's possible that everyone cooperate with each other to accomplish objectives other than competition via blowing each others ships up. No, my point was whatever cooperative gameplay you might try to do wouldn't be purely cooperative for long. "Pretty much all 14 of the CSM were in favor of a drone assign nerf for OBVIOUS gameplay reasons" - Sala Cameron
|

Erotica 1
Krypteia Operations CODE.
4319
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 02:32:00 -
[657] - Quote
I'm willing to set aside our differences and work cooperatively with Divine Entervention to start a titan BPO copying operation. We can call it Titans4Everyone. See Bio for isk doubling rules. If you didn't read bio, chances are you funded those who did. |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
17119
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 02:34:00 -
[658] - Quote
Erotica 1 wrote:I'm willing to set aside our differences and work cooperatively with Divine Entervention to start a titan BPO copying operation. We can call it Titans4Everyone. Bad Bobby is that you?
Psychotic Monk for CSM 9 |

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
208
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 02:34:00 -
[659] - Quote
Jonah EasyToBeatstein wrote:Divine Entervention wrote: Exactly, so since we're both making our choices, we get to choose how we react and consider those choices.
Considering there is no overarching mandate demanding that we play a certain way, we get to judge how others are based on their actions.
This is as true in EvE as it is in Real Life.
Yes we're both making choices, no you don't get to judge others in real life because of the choices they make in a computer game, because a computer game is not real life.
Yes I do. You've already stated that EvE is similar to real life in the regards that they're both governed by the choices of how we wish to play. Because we're the individuals choosing to perform the action within the game within real life, we get to judge the person who makes those choices by the overarching morality of real life context because of the stated similarity you've already established exists.
Where is it stated in the EULA or on any official website that I cannot consider someone who acts like a bad person as a bad person?
You have your opinion, and you're allowed to have it. But just like you're allowed to consider my opinion wrong, I'm allowed to consider yours wrong and judge you just like you judge me. Proof of lying in thread.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4349703#post4349703 |

Taal Khurin
Happy Asteroid Ltd
127
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 02:40:00 -
[660] - Quote
I agree that some peeps take things too far, but i personally haven't really ever encountered any true malevolence since i have been playing, lots of complete tools yes, but nothing serious. |

Mandarine
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
36
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 02:42:00 -
[661] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Yes we're both making choices, no you don't get to judge others in real life because of the choices they make in a computer game, because a computer game is not real life.
But those people are not playing a computer game. They don-¦t play pretend being a pod pilot, they just use meta and ingame cheese in a way to cause emotional harm to people. They enjoy the RL rage of their victims much more than anything. They develop glee by witnessing their own selves (i:e. not their character) being the cause of the RL distress of some unknown Joe, which they have created by using a video game as a platform.
Marsha Mallow wrote: Well, what the **** are you doing here then? You are clearly in the wrong ******* game. Do you get some sort of sadistic enjoyment out of sitting there telling us how naughty we are. Are we supposed to care?
Why do you answer me continuously, if you don-¦t care?
Moreover, I-¦m supposed to be on some kind of self-proclaimed moral high ground, while you are a moral pragmatist and think that ethics depend on context. So, why does my delusional moral self-aggrandizement annoy you, if you postulate that morals are irrelevant?
Oh I see, you think that ingame actions and RL behavior are de-coupled. To which I-¦ll just ask you to read my answer to Jonah above. |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
1861
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 02:44:00 -
[662] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:How did a wimpering little **** like OP get over 60 likes on his post within 48 hours? So the assholes are the reason more happy special snowflakes who want to carefully control every single aspect of their gameplay experience don't play EVE?
GOOD. Go play another game. Kalrus, Jenn and Trippia decided to post. Want to make billions a week solo running combat sites in null sec? -á Read my Exploratation Guide here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=309467 |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
17120
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 02:45:00 -
[663] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote: Yes I do. You've already stated that EvE is similar to real life in the regards that they're both governed by the choices of how we wish to play. Because we're the individuals choosing to perform the action within the game within real life,
No, there is a very real distinction between actions within a game and actions in real life. Shooting people in a game where the norm is to shoot people is not the same as shooting people in real life where doing so is considered, with notable exceptions, as a crime.
Quote: we get to judge the person who makes those choices by the overarching morality of real life context because of the stated similarity you've already established exists. You really do believe in some utter bollocks, the over reaching morality of real life does not apply in a game where that overreaching morality is not the norm.
Quote:Where is it stated in the EULA or on any official website that I cannot consider someone who acts like a bad person as a bad person? You can, as long as you keep it in the context of the game, the problem is that you're not keeping it in that context, you're taking your judgement and allowing it to colour your real life view of people.
Quote:You have your opinion, and you're allowed to have it. But just like you're allowed to consider my opinion wrong, I'm allowed to consider yours wrong and judge you just like you judge me. My opinion doesn't involve painting people as "bad" because of their actions in a game, which very specifically is not real life.
Psychotic Monk for CSM 9 |

Erotica 1
Krypteia Operations CODE.
4319
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 02:46:00 -
[664] - Quote
I don't know about you guys, but I'm going to login to the actual game in a few minutes after a quick smoke and see what interesting things happen tonight. See Bio for isk doubling rules. If you didn't read bio, chances are you funded those who did. |

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
208
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 02:52:00 -
[665] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Divine Entervention wrote: Yes I do. You've already stated that EvE is similar to real life in the regards that they're both governed by the choices of how we wish to play. Because we're the individuals choosing to perform the action within the game within real life,
No, there is a very real distinction between actions within a game and actions in real life. Shooting people in a game where the norm is to shoot people is not the same as shooting people in real life where doing so is considered, with notable exceptions, as a crime. Quote: we get to judge the person who makes those choices by the overarching morality of real life context because of the stated similarity you've already established exists. You really do believe in some utter bollocks, the over reaching morality of real life does not apply in a game where that overreaching morality is not the norm. Quote:Where is it stated in the EULA or on any official website that I cannot consider someone who acts like a bad person as a bad person? You can, as long as you keep it in the context of the game, the problem is that you're not keeping it in that context, you're taking your judgement and allowing it to colour your real life view of people. Quote:You have your opinion, and you're allowed to have it. But just like you're allowed to consider my opinion wrong, I'm allowed to consider yours wrong and judge you just like you judge me. My opinion doesn't involve painting people as "bad" because of their actions in a game, which very specifically is not real life.
The very real connection between the actions taking place in game is they're being enacted based on the choices of the person in real life. The person in real life making the choices is the connection. If you were not in game making those choices, then they wouldn't be existing within with world of EvE. You are making it happen of your own volition.
Right now, you are typing to me on the forums. Is it not you typing to me? Who is it then, that is conversing with me right now? Based on your actions within the confines of these forums, I'm able to label and judge you how I see fit according to my belief system which is rooted in reality. Because I know in reality, there's a human being choosing to sit at his computer and perform the action of conversing with me.
You are disconnected from yourself and your own actions if you fail to see that you are the cause of your own actions, in real life, in a game, on forums, driving in your car, watching tv, whatever. Within reality, which you are sitting pretending you're imaginary, you are you.
You state the result of my conclusion is that it emerges into my opinion of defining who is and who isn't a bad person. But the same side of that same coin is you've reached a conclusion that I believe in some "utter bollocks". Yet your arrival at your conclusion is some how more justified than mine and should hold more validity? Nope, because you fail to understand the connection between you and reality. Proof of lying in thread.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4349703#post4349703 |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
17120
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 02:52:00 -
[666] - Quote
Mandarine wrote: But those people are not playing a computer game. They don-¦t play pretend being a pod pilot,
In what way is actively playing a computer game not playing a computer game?
Quote: they just use meta and ingame cheese in a way to cause emotional harm to people. They enjoy the RL rage of their victims much more than anything. They develop glee by witnessing their own selves (i:e. not their character) being the cause of the RL distress of some unknown Joe, which they have created by using a video game as a platform. Maybe if the unknown Joe didn't throw a childish tantrum every time something doesn't go his way, in a computer game, then people wouldn't try to harvest his anger and anguish.
It takes 2 to tango.
Quote:Marsha Mallow wrote: Well, what the **** are you doing here then? You are clearly in the wrong ******* game. Do you get some sort of sadistic enjoyment out of sitting there telling us how naughty we are. Are we supposed to care?
Why do you answer me continuously, if you don-¦t care? Moreover, I-¦m supposed to be on some kind of self-proclaimed moral high ground, while you are a moral pragmatist and think that ethics depend on context. So, why does my delusional moral self-aggrandizement annoy you, if you postulate that morals are irrelevant? Oh I see, you think that ingame actions and RL behavior are de-coupled. To which I-¦ll just ask you to read my answer to Jonah above. Ummm in a healthy individual ingame and RL behaviour are decoupled. If they weren't I'd be wanting a selection of clones, a supercarrier sat in the garage next to my corpse collection and lasers that go pewpewpew.
Psychotic Monk for CSM 9 |

Malrikk
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
12
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 02:56:00 -
[667] - Quote
I have two friends that prefer an online MMO if the ability to PK or harass another player at will is present.
This got me thinking; why? Questioning these two people I found various similarities in how they grew up, their beliefs, etc. Interestingly enough they were both weak kids that were picked on in their younger years, never had girlfriends, bullied, etc. Of course it goes even deeper than that, but I'm not here to give a lesson in psychiatry.
My only conclusion on my two friends is much like my take on your atypical law enforcement agent who desires control and power because of their childhood. That type of control and power is definitely allowable in Eve, so it really shouldn't be a shock that these types of players are the dominating population in the game. Unfortunately it's a great reason to unsubscribe, as the old adage goes; if you hang around **** long enough you'll start to smell like **** yourself. |

Erotica 1
Krypteia Operations CODE.
4319
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 02:58:00 -
[668] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:Lots of words
*puff, puff, pass See Bio for isk doubling rules. If you didn't read bio, chances are you funded those who did. |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
3144
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 03:00:00 -
[669] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:How did a wimpering little **** like OP get over 60 likes on his post within 48 hours? So the assholes are the reason more happy special snowflakes who want to carefully control every single aspect of their gameplay experience don't play EVE?
GOOD. Go play another game. Kalrus, Jenn and Trippia decided to post.
If you're going to give two of us nicknames, it's rather impolite to not give Jenn one also. Get with the program. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á
Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

ButtFungus
SOONWAFFE
22
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 03:05:00 -
[670] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:Trophies for participation, that's how. Is this what you have in mind? Feel free to award as needed Trophy |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
3149
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 03:07:00 -
[671] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote: Maybe if the unknown Joe didn't throw a childish tantrum every time something doesn't go his way, in a computer game, then people wouldn't try to harvest his anger and anguish.
It takes 2 to tango.
Oh, so much this. I didn't start tear harvesting because I felt like it. I started it because the so called "victims" make such a fuss over a videogame that it's hilarious. If you saw a grown man stub his toe and start screaming to the sky about how God needs to get all the pebbles off the sidewalk, you'd laugh too. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á
Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
208
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 03:11:00 -
[672] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote: Ummm in a healthy individual ingame and RL behaviour are decoupled. If they weren't I'd be wanting a selection of clones, a supercarrier sat in the garage next to my corpse collection and lasers that go pewpewpew.
So you admit you are of poor ethical character because you are willing to convince yourself that ethical standards do not apply to your self in a particular context, by separating moral reactions from inhumane conduct by disabling the mechanism of self-condemnation because you are sitting at your computer?
In a game driven by your choices?
Proof of lying in thread.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4349703#post4349703 |

Anslo
The Scope Gallente Federation
4510
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 03:11:00 -
[673] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote: Maybe if the unknown Joe didn't throw a childish tantrum every time something doesn't go his way, in a computer game, then people wouldn't try to harvest his anger and anguish.
It takes 2 to tango.
Oh, so much this. I didn't start tear harvesting because I felt like it. I started it because the so called "victims" make such a fuss over a videogame that it's hilarious. If you saw a grown man stub his toe and start screaming to the sky about how God needs to get all the pebbles off the sidewalk, you'd laugh too. It's so cute. I'm relevant and a bad ass cause I can make bears cry! But I can't actually get together a fleet or be relevant beyond tear collecting...but it's cool! I'm cool guys, right?
...guise?
Hue.
|

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
17120
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 03:11:00 -
[674] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote: The very real connection between the actions taking place in game is they're being enacted based on the choices of the person in real life. The person in real life making the choices is the connection. If you were not in game making those choices, then they wouldn't be existing within with world of EvE. You are making it happen of your own volition.
More psychobabble bollocks, have you considered writing an article for a journalistic publication such as the Daily Mail or National Enquirer? They lap up shite like this.
Quote:Right now, you are typing to me on the forums. Is it not you typing to me? Who is it then, that is conversing with me right now? Based on your actions within the confines of these forums, I'm able to label and judge you how I see fit according to my belief system which is rooted in reality. Because I know in reality, there's a human being choosing to sit at his computer and perform the action of conversing with me. Your belief system is not rooted in reality, it's rooted in your own ego.
Quote:You are disconnected from yourself and your own actions if you fail to see that you are the cause of your own actions, in real life, in a game, on forums, driving in your car, watching tv, whatever. Within reality, which you are sitting pretending you're imaginary, you are you. Reality is real, Eve, despite CCPs claim to the contrary is fantasy. The difference between you and I is that I can differentiate between reality and fantasy.
Quote:Nowhere in EvE's EULA does it state I'm not allowed to think of anyone how I wish. Though I do not, I'm allowed to think every CCP employee is stupid( I do not!!!!!!), but do they try to prevent me from doing so? No, only you are.
You state the result of my conclusion is that it emerges into my opinion of defining who is and who isn't a bad person. But the same side of that same coin is you've reached a conclusion that I believe in some "utter bollocks". Yet your arrival at your conclusion is some how more justified than mine and should hold more validity? Nope, because you fail to understand the connection between you and reality. As I stated earlier, if you keep you opinion, based on their ingame actions, of someone within the game then that's fine, taking that opinion outside of game is not. If you wish to judge me in real life, then judge me on my actions in real life, not my actions within a computer game. My conclusion is not based on your actions within the game, it is based on your actions on this forum, which in the case of GD is generally out of character, as opposed to incharcter.
Quote:You're trying to oppress my ability to have an opinion different than yours. And when you try to tell me you're not trying to oppress my ability to have an opinion, just my ability to speak it, I'll respond with, Why do you feel you get to judge who is allowed to speak their opinion and who can? Let me guess, whoever agrees with you can keep talking, but everyone who disagrees needs to shut up. . . Which would result in you being a controlling, delusional, narcissistic, psychopath. . . . Only if that's how you feel though.
So tell me again about my choice of having an opinion and speaking it? I'm not trying to oppress your opinion, I'm merely pointing out the huge great holes in the logic behind it, as far as I'm concerned you can keep on spewing forth your ill considered thoughts as much as you like, and I will continue to point out the holes in them.
Psychotic Monk for CSM 9 |

Mandarine
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
38
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 03:13:00 -
[675] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote: In what way is actively playing a computer game not playing a computer game?
Maybe if the unknown Joe didn't throw a childish tantrum every time something doesn't go his way, in a computer game, then people wouldn't try to harvest his anger and anguish.
It takes 2 to tango.
Ummm in a healthy individual ingame and RL behaviour are decoupled. If they weren't I'd be wanting a selection of clones, a supercarrier sat in the garage next to my corpse collection and lasers that go pewpewpew.
- They develop glee by witnessing their own selves (i:e. not their character) being the cause of the RL distress of some unknown Joe, which they have created by using a video game as a platform. Now consider the reveries of many gamers imagining their favorite character, whom they impersonate, waging battles, solving puzzles, interacting in some form or another with other player-controlled characters, all in the environment of the game, and you can see who is playing a game, and who is just using it to harvest Schadenfreude without caring about the ingame narrative.
- You cannot expect people who play a game just to play well, a game, not to get slightly irritated when being targeted by people whose only purpose is to make them mad, and who couldn-¦t care less about play pretending or developign an ingame narrative
- A healthy individual who can relate to other people and feel some kind of empathy, will unconsciously agree to certain fundamental truths regarding interactions with others, when there is communication. verbal or not, and regardless of context.
Kaarous Aldurald wrote: If you saw a grown man stub his toe and start screaming to the sky about how God needs to get all the pebbles off the sidewalk, you'd laugh too.
There are not many people who enjoy being audience to others-¦ pain or embarassment. Those who do usually have deep issues, |

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
208
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 03:15:00 -
[676] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:I'm not trying to oppress your opinion, I'm merely pointing out the huge great holes in the logic behind it, as far as I'm concerned you can keep on spewing forth your ill considered thoughts as much as you like, and I will continue to point out the holes in them.
The only hole in either of our arguments is that you fail to realize the connection between the reactions in eve being of your initial action.
You are delusional.
If I'm playing EvE mining rocks, and you do not log in to blow me up, do you ever blow me up?
So it's perfectly possible to exist in the game without you blowing me up, yet you make the choice to log in, find me, and blow me up.
The only reason bad things happen to people within EvE is because some people make the decision to make those bad things happen. Proof of lying in thread.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4349703#post4349703 |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
17120
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 03:15:00 -
[677] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote: Ummm in a healthy individual ingame and RL behaviour are decoupled. If they weren't I'd be wanting a selection of clones, a supercarrier sat in the garage next to my corpse collection and lasers that go pewpewpew. So you admit you are of poor ethical character because you are willing to convince yourself that ethical standards do not apply to your self in a particular context, by separating moral reactions from inhumane conduct by disabling the mechanism of self-condemnation because you are sitting at your computer? In a game driven by your choices? In a game where you decide how you wish to play. Wow, which particular orifice did this gem spring from?
My real life ethical standards apply to real life, where they are the norm. Context is everything, in the context of Eve my real life moral standards are a weakness, which others will exploit.
Psychotic Monk for CSM 9 |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
3151
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 03:16:00 -
[678] - Quote
Anslo wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote: Maybe if the unknown Joe didn't throw a childish tantrum every time something doesn't go his way, in a computer game, then people wouldn't try to harvest his anger and anguish.
It takes 2 to tango.
Oh, so much this. I didn't start tear harvesting because I felt like it. I started it because the so called "victims" make such a fuss over a videogame that it's hilarious. If you saw a grown man stub his toe and start screaming to the sky about how God needs to get all the pebbles off the sidewalk, you'd laugh too. It's so cute. I'm relevant and a bad ass cause I can make bears cry! But I can't actually get together a fleet or be relevant beyond tear collecting...but it's cool! I'm cool guys, right? ...guise? Hue.
If you're going to call me out and refuse to not fight in a fleet, you don't get to keep crying about it. If you have a problem with me, come find me and duel/gank/bump/wardec me. But don't get butthurt because I refuse to jump through hoops for you. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á
Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Anslo
The Scope Gallente Federation
4510
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 03:17:00 -
[679] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Anslo wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote: Maybe if the unknown Joe didn't throw a childish tantrum every time something doesn't go his way, in a computer game, then people wouldn't try to harvest his anger and anguish.
It takes 2 to tango.
Oh, so much this. I didn't start tear harvesting because I felt like it. I started it because the so called "victims" make such a fuss over a videogame that it's hilarious. If you saw a grown man stub his toe and start screaming to the sky about how God needs to get all the pebbles off the sidewalk, you'd laugh too. It's so cute. I'm relevant and a bad ass cause I can make bears cry! But I can't actually get together a fleet or be relevant beyond tear collecting...but it's cool! I'm cool guys, right? ...guise? Hue. If you're going to call me out and refuse to not fight in a fleet, you don't get to keep crying about it. If you have a problem with me, come find me and duel/gank/bump/wardec me. But don't get butthurt because I refuse to jump through hoops for you. Why would I wardec an alt of a loud mouthed coward? I prove my point with every one of your **** posts :3
get rekt, nerd.
|

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
208
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 03:19:00 -
[680] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote: Ummm in a healthy individual ingame and RL behaviour are decoupled. If they weren't I'd be wanting a selection of clones, a supercarrier sat in the garage next to my corpse collection and lasers that go pewpewpew. So you admit you are of poor ethical character because you are willing to convince yourself that ethical standards do not apply to your self in a particular context, by separating moral reactions from inhumane conduct by disabling the mechanism of self-condemnation because you are sitting at your computer? In a game driven by your choices? In a game where you decide how you wish to play. Wow, which particular orifice did this gem spring from? My real life ethical standards apply to real life, where they are the norm. Context is everything, in the context of Eve my real life moral standards are a weakness, which others will exploit.
So you let some "sorcery square" define when your ethics are engaged or not.
So you admit you morally disengage your ethics when you play EvE, which means that you are a person who makes the choice when to be ethical and when not, instead of being ethical all the time.
Because you prove to me that there are circumstances when you will choose when to let your ethics apply, I have to conclude that there might be other instances in your life where you're willing to do the wrong thing regardless of whether or not you feel it's right or wrong. Proof of lying in thread.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4349703#post4349703 |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
3151
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 03:21:00 -
[681] - Quote
Anslo wrote: Why would I wardec an alt of a loud mouthed coward? I prove my point with every one of your **** posts :3
get rekt, nerd.
Why would I bother to fight a loudmouthed coward who only fights 10 to 1? I prove my point with every blowhard post you make.
How's that Proveldtariat thing doing? Stopped any ganks lately?
Oh, and you're a shitflinging coward who hides in NPC corps, because you got chased out of real ones. There's that too. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á
Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Haedonism Bot
Revolutionary Front
911
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 03:29:00 -
[682] - Quote
I dig this thread.
Of course, I've only read page 1 so far, and ISD Ezwal already deleted half of it. (Dude, stop doing that, seriously, let the people talk.) www.everevolutionaryfront.com
Psychotic Monk for CSM9 |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
17120
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 03:30:00 -
[683] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote: So you let some "sorcery square" define when your ethics are engaged or not.
If by sorcery square you mean within the confines of the virtual environment provided by CCP then yes you would be correct in that statement
Quote:So you admit you morally disengage your ethics when you play EvE, which means that you are a person who makes the choice when to be ethical and when not, instead of being ethical all the time. Once again yes.
Quote:Because you prove to me that there are circumstances when you will choose when to let your ethics apply, I have to conclude that there might be other instances in your life where you're willing to do the wrong thing regardless of whether or not you feel it's right or wrong. And this is where you go wrong, just because I'm willing to compromise my moral code in a virtual world, which by its very nature is not reality and where that code could be perceived as a weakness, does not mean I'm willing to compromise it within the real world.
In the real world I won't lie to you, steal from you, murder you, kick your dog, shoot your cat or any of the other things that are frowned upon, because it would be wrong to do so.
In an environment like Eve I will do all of the above to you if I feel the need to do so, because it isn't the real world.
Psychotic Monk for CSM 9 |

Anslo
The Scope Gallente Federation
4510
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 03:30:00 -
[684] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Anslo wrote: Why would I wardec an alt of a loud mouthed coward? I prove my point with every one of your **** posts :3
get rekt, nerd.
Why would I bother to fight a loudmouthed coward who only fights 10 to 1? I prove my point with every blowhard post you make. How's that Proveldtariat thing doing? Stopped any ganks lately? Oh, and you're a shitflinging coward who hides in NPC corps, because you got chased out of real ones. There's that too.
I said get a fleet. You refusing to shows you're either a coward or incapable of getting one.
The ganks stopped because people got smarted about how to protect themselves. As I said, I get eve mails about how people enjoyed the info they used to protect themselves. What have you done for eve save for talk big and not delivering?
Hiding in an NPC corp? I didn't realize fighting in lowsec constitutes hiding? Or are you afraid to lose sec status? Whats it say that an NPC corp member is more relevant than youll ever be? And chased out? You mean like how I "gate camp?"
You just get worse and worse. You cant even come up with actual facts for what happens in game.
Ha hahaha, you're pathetic, kid. Enjoy irrelevancy :)
|

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
3153
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 03:31:00 -
[685] - Quote
Haedonism Bot wrote:I dig this thread.  Of course, I've only read page 1 so far, and ISD Ezwal already deleted half of it. (Dude, stop doing that, seriously, let the people talk.)
Ah, he's got a job to do, lay off. Yes, it's voluntary, but if you're going to sign up for something (like stopping ganks in highsec *cough Anslo cough*), then you might as well have the intestinal fortitude to see it through. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á
Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Haedonism Bot
Revolutionary Front
911
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 03:31:00 -
[686] - Quote
Ooh, Anslo is here, I love trolling that dude. I'll be back tomorrow. www.everevolutionaryfront.com
Psychotic Monk for CSM9 |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
3154
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 03:34:00 -
[687] - Quote
Haedonism Bot wrote:Ooh, Anslo is here, I love trolling that dude. I'll be back tomorrow.
He gets so very upset when you won't fight him on his very specific terms, doesn't he? Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á
Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Divine Entervention
The Advent of Faith Against ALL Anomalies
208
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 03:35:00 -
[688] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:And this is where you go wrong, just because I'm willing to compromise my moral code in a virtual world, which by its very nature is not reality and where that code could be perceived as a weakness, does not mean I'm willing to compromise it within the real world.
In the real world I won't lie to you, steal from you, murder you, kick your dog, shoot your cat or any of the other things that are frowned upon, because it would be wrong to do so.
In an environment like Eve I will do all of the above to you if I feel the need to do so, because it isn't the real world.
You are correct in the idea that by choosing to morally disengage from your own conduct that it doesn't necessarily mean you will carry that behavior out of game. I'm not saying you will.
I'm merely explaining that you show a propensity to morally disengage your ethical beliefs. Meaning that since you've proven you'll do it sometimes, who's to say you wont do it again in another context you feel isn't worthy of you needing to maintain your ethical standards?
Because of your proven propensity for such behavior, I'm allowed to classify you as someone who has a propensity to disengage his ethical beliefs depending on his circumstance and treat you as such.
Which is what I'm doing. Proof of lying in thread.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4349703#post4349703 |

Anslo
The Scope Gallente Federation
4510
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 03:37:00 -
[689] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Haedonism Bot wrote:Ooh, Anslo is here, I love trolling that dude. I'll be back tomorrow. He gets so very upset when you won't fight him on his very specific terms, doesn't he?
Kaar gets so very trollish when you point out that he can never fight back anything but miners~
|

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
3154
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 03:43:00 -
[690] - Quote
Anslo wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Haedonism Bot wrote:Ooh, Anslo is here, I love trolling that dude. I'll be back tomorrow. He gets so very upset when you won't fight him on his very specific terms, doesn't he? Kaar gets so very trollish when you point out that he can never fight back anything but miners~
If you call me a national socialist, I'll have Miner Bingo. You're a "PvP player", supposedly, but I am pretty sure that Lord James will give me this one. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á
Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
17120
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 03:48:00 -
[691] - Quote
Mandarine wrote: - They develop glee by witnessing their own selves (i:e. not their character) being the cause of the RL distress of some unknown Joe, which they have created by using a video game as a platform.
Citation needed, you have no proof of this it is merely supposition on your part.
Quote:Now consider the reveries of many gamers imagining their favorite character, whom they impersonate, waging battles, solving puzzles, interacting in some form or another with other player-controlled characters, all in the environment of the game, and you can see who is playing a game, and who is just using it to harvest Schadenfreude without caring about the ingame narrative.
- You cannot expect people who play a game just to play well, a game, not to get slightly irritated when being targeted by people whose only purpose is to make them mad, and who couldn-¦t care less about play pretending or developign an ingame narrative The ingame narrative is generated by players, it's why Eve is considered a player driven game. With no pirates, scammers, Goons (GrrGäó) and all the other people being villains the ingame narrative would be either non existent or as boring as watching paint dry.
Quote:- A healthy individual who can relate to other people and feel some kind of empathy, will unconsciously agree to certain fundamental truths regarding interactions with others, when there is communication, verbal or not, and regardless of context. You're partially right, a healthy individual can relate to and does feel empathy for others. When it comes to context you're wrong, in the context of Eve real life morality is meaningless, within the Eve universe the social norms of the real world do not exist, which is why the Eve universe is described as a dystopia. An apt comparison would be that Eve is the equivalent to what is now Europe, in the 17th century during the 30 year war.
Quote:There are not many people who enjoy being audience to others-¦ pain or embarrassment. Those who do usually have deep issues. Slapstick comedy and Japanese game shows say otherwise.
Divine Entervention wrote:You are correct in the idea that by choosing to morally disengage from your own conduct that it doesn't necessarily mean you will carry that behavior out of game. I'm not saying you will.
I'm merely explaining that you show a propensity to morally disengage your ethical beliefs. Meaning that since you've proven you'll do it sometimes, who's to say you wont do it again in another context you feel isn't worthy of you needing to maintain your ethical standards?
Because of your proven propensity for such behavior, I'm allowed to classify you as someone who has a propensity to disengage his ethical beliefs depending on his circumstance and treat you as such.
Which is what I'm doing. You're still failing to make the distinction between real and virtual worlds, and it's a very real distinction.
Psychotic Monk for CSM 9 |

Malcolm Shinhwa
Bad Touches
1311
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 03:55:00 -
[692] - Quote
Erotica 1 wrote:I don't know about you guys, but I'm going to login to the actual game in a few minutes after a quick smoke and see what interesting things happen tonight.
I flew with RvB Ganked and well killed all the things. It was great. I hope no one's feelings got hurt when their pretend spaceships exploded. I know violence isn't the answer. I got it wrong on purpose. |

Mandarine
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
39
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 04:05:00 -
[693] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Citation needed, you have no proof of this it is merely supposition on your part. The ingame narrative is generated by players, it's why Eve is considered a player driven game. With no pirates, scammers, Goons (GrrGäó) and all the other people being villains the ingame narrative would be either non existent or as boring as watching paint dry. You're partially right, a healthy individual can relate to and does feel empathy for others. When it comes to context you're wrong, in the context of Eve real life morality is meaningless, within the Eve universe the social norms of the real world do not exist, which is why the Eve universe is described as a dystopia. An apt comparison would be that Eve is the equivalent to what is now Europe, in the 17th century during the 30 year war. Slapstick comedy and Japanese game shows say otherwise.
This is no suppostion but hard fact. EvE griefers have been parading for years about how they enjoy collecting tears and such, and often state that it-¦s better than any ingame gain. That-¦s why they use alts also, the character they use is irrelevant.
Your points 3 & 4 do not take into account the fact stated just above. While the standard gamer wants to play pretend, the griefer/ganker/scammer sees EvE not as a game but as an online app to make people mad IRL. The content he generates is purely out-of-game oriented: his glee at witnessing himself, his RL self, being the cause of the RL rage of a RL person.
Which is why morals and ethics are very much relevant.
Slapstick comedy is comedy, meaning, it-¦s not real. People don-¦t really suffer, it-¦s cathartic comedy. Same for japanese shows. It-¦s usually absurd and there-¦s no ill will intended. Intention is very much the cornerstone of human interactions.
Only people with issues laugh when people get hurt IRL, emotionally or physically. |

Anslo
The Scope Gallente Federation
4510
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 04:08:00 -
[694] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Anslo wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Haedonism Bot wrote:Ooh, Anslo is here, I love trolling that dude. I'll be back tomorrow. He gets so very upset when you won't fight him on his very specific terms, doesn't he? Kaar gets so very trollish when you point out that he can never fight back anything but miners~ If you call me a national socialist, I'll have Miner Bingo. You're a "PvP player", supposedly, but I am pretty sure that Lord James will give me this one. Dude wat? I called you a scrub. Government has nothing to do with it.
Much delusion. Such lulz. Wow.
|

ButtFungus
SOONWAFFE
22
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 04:17:00 -
[695] - Quote
Mandarine wrote:... Kaarous Aldurald wrote: If you saw a grown man stub his toe and start screaming to the sky about how God needs to get all the pebbles off the sidewalk, you'd laugh too. There are not many people who enjoy being audience to others-¦ pain or embarassment. Those who do usually have deep issues. This is more like enjoying Wile E Coyote fall off a cliff, smack into the ground, and having that acme missile fall on top of him reducing him to coyote dust because they are both Pixels. Except you get to push the coyote off the cliff and drop the missile on his head. |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
17120
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 04:22:00 -
[696] - Quote
Mandarine wrote:This is no suppostion but hard fact. EvE griefers have been parading for years about how they enjoy collecting tears and such, and often state that it-¦s better than any ingame gain. That-¦s why they use alts also, the character they use is irrelevant. If this is truly the case, the best way of getting rid of people that play solely to collect tears is to not provide them, if there are no tears to collect, will there be people who collect them?
Quote:Your points 3 & 4 do not take into account the fact stated just above. While the standard gamer wants to play pretend, the griefer/ganker/scammer sees EvE not as a game but as an online app to make people mad IRL. The content he generates is purely out-of-game oriented: his glee at witnessing himself, his RL self, being the cause of the RL rage of a RL person. That's because I don't accept your supposition, as far as I'm concerned it's bunkum. If people feel the need to rage over the loss of some pixels then they have problems of their own, and should possibly consider another game, one where their pixels don't explode.
Quote:Which is why morals and ethics are very much relevant. In real life yes, in a virtual dystopia, not so much.
Quote:Slapstick comedy is comedy, meaning, it-¦s not real. People don-¦t really suffer, it-¦s cathartic comedy. Same for japanese shows. It-¦s usually absurd and there-¦s no ill will intended. Intention is very much the cornerstone of human interactions.
Only people with issues laugh when people get hurt IRL, emotionally or physically. It's a good thing Eve isn't real life then, like comedy and Japanese game shows it's not real, it's entertainment. People don't really suffer, and there's no real life ill will intended, because it's all within the context of the game.
Psychotic Monk for CSM 9 |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
3155
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 04:33:00 -
[697] - Quote
Ok, so slapstick comedy is ok, 3 Stooges stuff and all that.
But hurting someone else's character in a videogame... is not?
Are you literally insane? Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á
Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Kyperion
General Washington's Irregulars
92
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 05:05:00 -
[698] - Quote
Who really gives a damn, if this is 'supposed' to be a "PVP" games the developers should drop the shenanigans completely remove mining/trading/missions, and their respective ships... **** it all lets just have everybody in one big continuous shoot out....
If that ever happened James 315 and his New order pussies would quit EVE. |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
17121
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 05:15:00 -
[699] - Quote
Kyperion wrote:Who really gives a damn, if this is 'supposed' to be a "PVP" games the developers should drop the shenanigans completely remove mining/trading/missions, and their respective ships... **** it all lets just have everybody in one big continuous shoot out....
If that ever happened James 315 and his New order pussies would quit EVE. You do realise that technically mining, trading and mission running are all forms of PvP right?
Psychotic Monk for CSM 9 |

Kyperion
General Washington's Irregulars
92
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 05:16:00 -
[700] - Quote
Also, in regards to the State of the EVE Online forum community... I think this thread speaks for itself,
Especially the people taking offense to a certain poster's zaney moral arguments... but still fully engaging those arguments instead of keeping it on track.
............................................................................................................................................................
Final Conclusion:
If you claim that EVE is supposed to be PVP all the time, you should want and fight for Every ship to have good if not great PVP combat capability and lethality.
....If not you are a coward, at least in EVE.
/Thread |

Kyperion
General Washington's Irregulars
92
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 05:17:00 -
[701] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Kyperion wrote:Who really gives a damn, if this is 'supposed' to be a "PVP" games the developers should drop the shenanigans completely remove mining/trading/missions, and their respective ships... **** it all lets just have everybody in one big continuous shoot out....
If that ever happened James 315 and his New order pussies would quit EVE. You do realise that technically mining, trading and mission running are all forms of PvP right?
That the biggest cop out in the history of gaming.... 'technically' you could view achievements on gaming consoles as a form of "PVP" |

Antisocial Malkavian
Antisocial Malkavians
336
|
Posted - 2014.03.16 05:20:00 -
[702] - Quote
I STILL say look at the MWO community before you judge this one. Plus the lolz accidentally created by the makers of the game are priceless http://gizmodo.com/5913381/season-your-food-with-salt-from-real-human-tears
you will be harvested |
|

ISD Dorrim Barstorlode
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
2927

|
Posted - 2014.03.16 05:20:00 -
[703] - Quote
Topic locked for cleaning. ISD Dorrim Barstorlode Captain Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 24 :: [one page] |