Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 .. 254 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |
Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
5173
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 13:39:00 -
[151] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Not my problem or fault if you poke, prod, humiliate and grief people who might turn out to be mentally unstable individuals who suddenly might show up IRL in your face, doorstep or an event you are attending.
Im not responsible for your actions, or theirs.
Ill just read about it in the papers and think to myself "Well, they had it coming. Bound to happen sooner or later".
Yea, we understand that is what you think. What you don't understand is that thinking that way demonstrates some really bad things about you. There is no way to "have it coming" from playing a video game within that video game's rules.'
Recently you (Salvos Rhoska) were involved in a thread naught regarding an upcoming change to reprocessing that CCP is about to implement. Some people disagreed with you in that thread and your responses were upsetting to some.
If one of those people sends you a picture of your house and your family playing in the park because you disagree with a video game maker making changes to their video game, do I get to tell you "whelp, you had it coming", and if so, would that be before or after you called the police and moved your family to another house? |
Bagrat Skalski
Poseidaon
1189
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 13:41:00 -
[152] - Quote
Quote:Also to those who associate what happens to the "victim" to torture, USUALLY YOU CANNOT WALK AWAY FROM TORTURE AT ANY GIVEN POINT
If they don't hold you, than yes, problem is, you can be punished if you walk away, and that was their tactic. Edit signature? What's the point? |
Salvos Rhoska
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
458
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 13:41:00 -
[153] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:And revelling in others misfortune, thats pretty hypocritical right there.
Oh. You mean like Erotica1 revelling in the misfortune of his victims?
Hows that for hypocrisy now?
Im losing count of checkmates here :D |
Bunnie Hop
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
454
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 13:42:00 -
[154] - Quote
I like reading his blogs. That aside, in any other game people doing this type of behaviour would have been banned long ago. I would like to see CCP stand up and say 'there is a line of decency even in a harsh mmo, cross it and be banned'. |
Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
3409
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 13:42:00 -
[155] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:And revelling in others misfortune, thats pretty hypocritical right there. Oh. You mean like Erotica1 revelling in the misfortune of his victims? Hows that for hypocrisy now? Im losing count of checkmates here :D
So, you literally just set yourself on moral equivalency with someone you are suggesting be perma-banned?
Checkmate, indeed. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á
Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
|
Vol Arm'OOO
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
207
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 13:43:00 -
[156] - Quote
Neltharak Idrissil wrote:Malcolm from Marketing wrote:
Your counter arguments are empty of content and pathetic at best.
Your point out Erotica broke no rules or laws, your quite correct. What he has done can be likened to bringing the game into disrepute by going above and beyond to push the boundaries of whats acceptable in the name of emergent gameplay. CCP should consider very carefully if this is the type of behavior they want associated with their game as it's treading very dangerous grounds. Ignoring all that, it's simply a case of morals, ( ironic in a game such as EVE i know ) yes its a game, yes he was a willing participant but that still doesnt excuse what's happened and has happened many times previous.
CCP should remove ALL his assets over ALL his accounts and give him a temp ban. Thats the right course of action in this case, but of course thats not what your interested in is it.
Who the flying hell are you to determine what is "Right" or "Wrong" as a course of action ? How is this different from people losing all their space-business to a rebalane or a market crash ? The harassment part ? We have Kugu, we have comms, we have propaganda which sole purpose is to dogpile on "The enemy" and make them seem like absolute douchebags. Some take offense, some don't care, but it is exactly the same thing. Also to those who associate what happens to the "victim" to torture, USUALLY YOU CANNOT WALK AWAY FROM TORTURE AT ANY GIVEN POINTRead that last sentence again. Again. Last time. If that still isnt enough for you to get the point, Erotica is using people's greed against them. Was his life or health at stake ? Was he held at gunpoint by Erotica and co ? Was he in any way threatened in real life ? Why did he AGREE to singing ? Erotica didnt pick him out of all the people in eve to make his life miserable ? He AGREED to it. After ignoring every warning in the tutorial, he proceeded to willingly give everything he owned in the video-game eve online to a guy he just met.If he has problems with anything, it's with his own reasoning, and if that's enough to push him over an edge or another and make him go apeshit at his wife, he needs professional help. Not a ban of Erotica. If banning erotica is the "right course of action", then i deem you untasteful, your writing offends me, and i am calling for a ban of you. Read malcanis posting once or twice and try to understand what he is saying, because he is actually spot on. "Erotica plays the game in a way i do not like and that many people do not like, ban him". As they would say in law school, this would create a dangerous precedent.
Sure the victim was complicit in his own troubles, but that change whether Erotica 1 is an asshat. Eve isnt a democracy. The sole issue here is whether CCP should look at what erotica 1 has done and decide if it is good for the game and the community. I have no trouble with that at all.
I don't play, I just fourm warrior. |
Neltharak Idrissil
SniggWaffe WAFFLES.
8
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 13:44:00 -
[157] - Quote
Malcolm from Marketing wrote:[quote=Malcanis]
I recall CCP found their morals pretty easily when Mittens stepped out of line at Fan fest. Did he break any laws? No. Did he break any in game rules? No.
Was what he did morally reprehensible on every level? Yes
This scenario with Erotica, while different in it's approach, boils down to the same basic elements and should be taken seriously by CCP.
Calling for people to kill themselves IS breaking a law. So yes, yes he did and paid for it. |
Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Turing Tested
2428
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 13:44:00 -
[158] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:And revelling in others misfortune, thats pretty hypocritical right there. Oh. You mean like Erotica1 revelling in the misfortune of his victims? Hows that for hypocrisy now?
Yes thats exactly what I mean.
Erotica1 does NOT say that others should be banned for revelling in others misfortune.
YOU claim Erotica1 is bad for that and YOU DO IT YOURSELF
THAT is the DEFINITION of hypocrisy.
CHECKDARTGAMESPORTWINTIME *** Vote MTU For CSM *** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn Omnis nomiom nom nom nomi |
Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
5173
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 13:45:00 -
[159] - Quote
Vol Arm'OOO wrote:
Sure the victim was complicit in his own troubles, but that change whether Erotica 1 is an asshat. Eve isnt a democracy. The sole issue here is whether CCP should look at what erotica 1 has done and decide if it is good for the game and the community. I have no trouble with that at all.
Nor do I. What I hope is that CCP doesn't apply a double standard.
ie, CCP can't say it wants emergent gameplay (and tears, CCP employees have themselves talked about tears in various videos for the last 10 years) then start banning people because of emergent game play and tears.
|
Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
5176
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 13:46:00 -
[160] - Quote
Neltharak Idrissil wrote:Malcolm from Marketing wrote:[quote=Malcanis]
I recall CCP found their morals pretty easily when Mittens stepped out of line at Fan fest. Did he break any laws? No. Did he break any in game rules? No.
Was what he did morally reprehensible on every level? Yes
This scenario with Erotica, while different in it's approach, boils down to the same basic elements and should be taken seriously by CCP. Calling for people to kill themselves IS breaking a law. So yes, yes he did and paid for it.
In what country is calling for people to kill themselves against the law? Please link. |
|
Sentamon
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
1542
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 13:47:00 -
[161] - Quote
Bunnie Hop wrote:I like reading his blogs. That aside, in any other game people doing this type of behaviour would have been banned long ago. I would like to see CCP stand up and say 'there is a line of decency even in a harsh mmo, cross it and be banned'.
In these other games, people grief others by playing GM's to get people banned.
How exactly it this better? ~ Professional Forum Alt -á~ |
TigerXtrm
Black Thorne Corporation Black Thorne Alliance
503
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 13:47:00 -
[162] - Quote
It's interesting to see how Erotica's behavior is basically a carbon copy of school bully behavior. The bonus room is nothing more than a bully grabbing a kids bag (or coaxing them to hand it over under friendly pretense) and then making the kid do all kinds of humiliating things in order to get it back. And as with all bullies, this sort of behavior is magnified when the bully has friends who cheer him on (otherwise too scared to intervene in fear of becoming the group's next victim or being thrown out of the group).
Now any school bully would, at some point, be forced to stop. Being it a teacher who intervenes, other kids stepping up or the victim themselves punching them in the gut when pushed too far. But this is the internet. And if there's one place where being a bully is easy, it's the internet. No-one to intervene and the victim in this case is powerless to get back at you. No risk of being punched in the gut in these parts! Would that ability exist, Erotica would have had his ass kicked a long damn time ago and quit his bullying.
The only satisfactory thing we can probably take from this is that Erotica, in real life, is probably on the ass end of this scenario. Being the victim of real life school bullying himself in some degree. I assume he's still in school because I hope no adult person with actual responsibilities in real life does this (or any) amount of online bullying and gets enjoyment out of it.
All in all nothing about this shocks me.
1. Regular people tend to turn into massive sadistic trolls and ***holes on the internet because there is no risk of someone punching you in the face, ever. Not shocking. 2. EVE Roleplaying and 'he should have known better' being used as an excuse too justify bullying behavior within the game. Not shocking. 3. Naive victims in EVE Online who get scammed. Not shocking. 4. Those same victims losing all their stuff and either being humiliated or insulted afterwards. Not shocking.
I can understand how easily one gets dragged into a bullying mode though, especially with friends around things tend to go too far too fast. But where normal people look back a few hours later and go 'oh, sh*t, that really went too far...', there are sadistic children like Erotica who happily do it over and over without a sign of guilt or remorse.
Should the guy be banned for the scam? No. Scamming is part of EVE and he actually does a good job at running it from what I can tell. Should the guy be banned for being an online bully? No, absolutely not. But CCP should make it clear that online bullying like this is unacceptable, period. There is a very distinct line between interacting with an in-game character and bullying a human being. And I would have no problem with CCP enforcing that line.
Anyway, should Erotica1 ever show his face at Fanfest or the CSM and someone decides to roundhouse kick him to the floor... well... I just hope he won't act surprised over it. My YouTube Channel - EVE Tutorials & other game related things! |
Buck Futz
New Order Logistics CODE.
190
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 13:48:00 -
[163] - Quote
Chribba wrote:Buck Futz wrote:Chribba wrote:Buck Futz wrote:And, now, having read the actual blog.... I'm quite convinced that Ripard is the intolerable sort that whines to the coach when he gets hazed by his team-members in the men's locker room.
Of course this is theoretical. Because it would require Ripard actually setting foot in a men's locker room for something other than pilates or yoga. You know, something that doesn't require stretchy see-through pants. And this is exactly this kind of replies that doesn't push the world and community towards a better place. But hey it's easier being a douche than being nice to people... /c I guess in /c's world, douchbag-ism is only reserved for people who 'aren't like him'. Actually I was calling you out for being derogatory towards Ripard - which has absolutely nothing to do with "nothing like me" part. It's the example of why you did not criticize the post rather than saying there's something wrong with a guy doing yoga or pilates - because those have lots to do with the discussion at hand right? /c
I was making inferences about Ripard based on the content of his blog, yes. Similar to how he was making very inferences about Erotica 1 and his ISK-Doubling business. Yet, I am the one you chose to single out as a douche.
Really, its not all that radical to opine that someone who would cry and whine about the everyday 'rough and tumble' of EVE (that Erotica 1 represents) would also cry and whine about a little teenage adversity in the locker room.
Or, to suggest that as adults they would avoid those situations later in life by engaging entirely in non-confrontational activity such as yoga. |
Faltharion Estidal
Vengance Inc. Dirt Nap Squad.
1
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 13:48:00 -
[164] - Quote
Hey malcanis this one is just for you;
The argumente of the gays has nothing to do with this conversation, way to use false cause hmmm? here's to avoid falacy's for your enjoyment: http://i.imgur.com/aEhOy.jpg?1
I belive jester trek is right in this blog, it is true CCP is not responsible for RL acts, but theses actions are taking in acount that they use CCP game and virtual assets to both hunt and torture their victims.
I am all for the ganks and the lols from the scams but this is pushing too far, there has to be a point where enough is enough and using EvE has a means to do and promote this kind of behaviours just put's us all has a comunity in both a bad light has well the company.
I dunno what kind of action should be taken, but if i recall in some countries this kind of action can be tied to both blackmail and torture, if EvE is the middle ground for this to happen then CCP can very well be legaly responsible for their playerbase actions.
But i am no lawyers, my opinion is simply this is too far and too much, i like a gank like the next EvE player, but that does not mean this kind of action can pass up... |
Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Turing Tested
2432
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 13:49:00 -
[165] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:Neltharak Idrissil wrote:Malcolm from Marketing wrote:[quote=Malcanis]
I recall CCP found their morals pretty easily when Mittens stepped out of line at Fan fest. Did he break any laws? No. Did he break any in game rules? No.
Was what he did morally reprehensible on every level? Yes
This scenario with Erotica, while different in it's approach, boils down to the same basic elements and should be taken seriously by CCP. Calling for people to kill themselves IS breaking a law. So yes, yes he did and paid for it. In what country is calling for people to kill themselves against the law? Please link.
Um Ill be honest here, pretty sure its against the law in the UK. (Suicide Act 1961) *** Vote MTU For CSM *** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn Omnis nomiom nom nom nomi |
Salvos Rhoska
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
461
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 13:49:00 -
[166] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:So, you literally just set yourself on moral equivalency with someone you are suggesting be perma-banned?
Checkmate, indeed.
Nope.
Because I have not conducted myself in any fashion that would warrant a ban, or even consideration of one :)
Erotica1 has. Repeatedly and with extremely compelling evidence in heaps.
Go ahead. Play this recording over loudspeakers at the next Fanfest, maybe even at the unveiling of the Monument. I double dare you. Certainly the recording is a shining example of EVEs community and would do great honor and justice to that event, dont you think? |
Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
5176
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 13:49:00 -
[167] - Quote
TigerXtrm wrote:It's interesting to see how Erotica's behavior is basically a carbon copy of school bully behavior. The bonus room is nothing more than a bully grabbing a kids bag (or coaxing them to hand it over under friendly pretense) and then making the kid do all kinds of humiliating things in order to get it back. And as with all bullies, this sort of behavior is magnified when the bully has friends who cheer him on (otherwise too scared to intervene in fear of becoming the group's next victim or being thrown out of the group).
Now any school bully would, at some point, be forced to stop. Being it a teacher who intervenes, other kids stepping up or the victim themselves punching them in the gut when pushed too far. But this is the internet. And if there's one place where being a bully is easy, it's the internet. No-one to intervene and the victim in this case is powerless to get back at you. No risk of being punched in the gut in these parts! Would that ability exist, Erotica would have had his ass kicked a long damn time ago and quit his bullying.
The only satisfactory thing we can probably take from this is that Erotica, in real life, is probably on the ass end of this scenario. Being the victim of real life school bullying himself in some degree. I assume he's still in school because I hope no adult person with actual responsibilities in real life does this (or any) amount of online bullying and gets enjoyment out of it.
All in all nothing about this shocks me.
1. Regular people tend to turn into massive sadistic trolls and ***holes on the internet because there is no risk of someone punching you in the face, ever. Not shocking. 2. EVE Roleplaying and 'he should have known better' being used as an excuse too justify bullying behavior within the game. Not shocking. 3. Naive victims in EVE Online who get scammed. Not shocking. 4. Those same victims losing all their stuff and either being humiliated or insulted afterwards. Not shocking.
I can understand how easily one gets dragged into a bullying mode though, especially with friends around things tend to go too far too fast. But where normal people look back a few hours later and go 'oh, sh*t, that really went too far...', there are sadistic children like Erotica who happily do it over and over without a sign of guilt or remorse.
Should the guy be banned for the scam? No. Scamming is part of EVE and he actually does a good job at running it from what I can tell. Should the guy be banned for being an online bully? No, absolutely not. But CCP should make it clear that online bullying like this is unacceptable, period. There is a very distinct line between interacting with an in-game character and bullying a human being. And I would have no problem with CCP enforcing that line.
Anyway, should Erotica1 ever show his face at Fanfest or the CSM and someone decides to roundhouse kick him to the floor... well... I just hope he won't act surprised over it.
Case in point.
|
Bagrat Skalski
Poseidaon
1189
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 13:50:00 -
[168] - Quote
Vol Arm'OOO wrote: Sure the victim was complicit in his own troubles, but that doesnt change whether Erotica 1 is an asshat. Eve isnt a democracy. The sole issue here is whether CCP should look at what erotica 1 has done and decide if it is good for the game and the community. I have no trouble with that at all.
It is definitely not good when people are taking adwantage of someone elses greed. Same as Being greedy is not a good way to go. But these are their own choices. You can't blame CCP that they have given you choice to be yourself in the game and out of it. Edit signature? What's the point? |
Malcolm from Marketing
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
28
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 13:51:00 -
[169] - Quote
Neltharak Idrissil wrote:
Who the flying hell are you to determine what is "Right" or "Wrong" as a course of action ? How is this different from people losing all their space-business to a rebalane or a market crash ?
The harassment part ? We have Kugu, we have comms, we have propaganda which sole purpose is to dogpile on "The enemy" and make them seem like absolute douchebags. Some take offense, some don't care, but it is exactly the same thing.
Also to those who associate what happens to the "victim" to torture, USUALLY YOU CANNOT WALK AWAY FROM TORTURE AT ANY GIVEN POINT
Read that last sentence again.
Again.
Last time.
If that still isnt enough for you to get the point, Erotica is using people's greed against them. Was his life or health at stake ? Was he held at gunpoint by Erotica and co ?
Was he in any way threatened in real life ? Why did he AGREE to singing ?
Erotica didnt pick him out of all the people in eve to make his life miserable ? He AGREED to it.
After ignoring every warning in the tutorial, he proceeded to willingly give everything he owned in the video-game eve online to a guy he just met.
If he has problems with anything, it's with his own reasoning, and if that's enough to push him over an edge or another and make him go apeshit at his wife, he needs professional help. Not a ban of Erotica.
If banning erotica is the "right course of action", then i deem you untasteful, your writing offends me, and i am calling for a ban of you.
Read malcanis posting once or twice and try to understand what he is saying, because he is actually spot on. "Erotica plays the game in a way i do not like and that many people do not like, ban him".
As they would say in law school, this would create a dangerous precedent.
When the consequences cross over into real life, that what most people consider a boundary being crossed.
So what your basically saying in your entire post is this ~ should i sleep with your wife/girlfriend/boyfriend behind your back, and you subsequently kill me with a gunshot to the head, you shouldnt be blamed or held accountable in any such way as i had what was coming, am i assuming correctly?
|
Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
3414
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 13:51:00 -
[170] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:TigerXtrm wrote:It's interesting to see how Erotica's behavior is basically a carbon copy of school bully behavior. The bonus room is nothing more than a bully grabbing a kids bag (or coaxing them to hand it over under friendly pretense) and then making the kid do all kinds of humiliating things in order to get it back. And as with all bullies, this sort of behavior is magnified when the bully has friends who cheer him on (otherwise too scared to intervene in fear of becoming the group's next victim or being thrown out of the group).
Now any school bully would, at some point, be forced to stop. Being it a teacher who intervenes, other kids stepping up or the victim themselves punching them in the gut when pushed too far. But this is the internet. And if there's one place where being a bully is easy, it's the internet. No-one to intervene and the victim in this case is powerless to get back at you. No risk of being punched in the gut in these parts! Would that ability exist, Erotica would have had his ass kicked a long damn time ago and quit his bullying.
The only satisfactory thing we can probably take from this is that Erotica, in real life, is probably on the ass end of this scenario. Being the victim of real life school bullying himself in some degree. I assume he's still in school because I hope no adult person with actual responsibilities in real life does this (or any) amount of online bullying and gets enjoyment out of it.
All in all nothing about this shocks me.
1. Regular people tend to turn into massive sadistic trolls and ***holes on the internet because there is no risk of someone punching you in the face, ever. Not shocking. 2. EVE Roleplaying and 'he should have known better' being used as an excuse too justify bullying behavior within the game. Not shocking. 3. Naive victims in EVE Online who get scammed. Not shocking. 4. Those same victims losing all their stuff and either being humiliated or insulted afterwards. Not shocking.
I can understand how easily one gets dragged into a bullying mode though, especially with friends around things tend to go too far too fast. But where normal people look back a few hours later and go 'oh, sh*t, that really went too far...', there are sadistic children like Erotica who happily do it over and over without a sign of guilt or remorse.
Should the guy be banned for the scam? No. Scamming is part of EVE and he actually does a good job at running it from what I can tell. Should the guy be banned for being an online bully? No, absolutely not. But CCP should make it clear that online bullying like this is unacceptable, period. There is a very distinct line between interacting with an in-game character and bullying a human being. And I would have no problem with CCP enforcing that line.
Anyway, should Erotica1 ever show his face at Fanfest or the CSM and someone decides to roundhouse kick him to the floor... well... I just hope he won't act surprised over it. Case in point.
Bingo. Idk what kind of powerless, spineless person you have to be to think that hurt feelings equates to actual violence. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á
Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
|
|
Sentamon
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
1542
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 13:52:00 -
[171] - Quote
TigerXtrm wrote:It's interesting to see how Erotica's behavior is basically a carbon copy of school bully behavior. The bonus room is nothing more than a bully grabbing a kids bag (or coaxing them to hand it over under friendly pretense) and then making the kid do all kinds of humiliating things in order to get it back.
Nope, if you want to compare, the kid voluntarily gave him the bag, hoping he'll put some free stuff in there.
~ Professional Forum Alt -á~ |
Neltharak Idrissil
SniggWaffe WAFFLES.
11
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 13:52:00 -
[172] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:
In what country is calling for people to kill themselves against the law? Please link.
As you wish.
http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichCodeArticle.do;jsessionid=D29CB59FEC9FC22FE17AE7AA1BACEABC.tpdjo06v_3?idArticle=LEGIARTI000006417794&cidTexte=LEGITEXT000006070719&categorieLien=id&dateTexte=20091125 Roughly translated
"The fact of incitating suicide from a person is punished by three years of imprisonment and a 45000 euros fine when the provocation has been followed by suicide or a suicide attept."
Or is the freaking government site wrong somehow ? Similar laws exist in quite a bit of countries. So yes, i stand by it. This has the potential of being a very serious legal offense. |
Jita Otsito
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 13:53:00 -
[173] - Quote
1. I find Erotica behavior despicable. My line is when you get nothing in game for your effort but still continue to goad/insult person out of game just to get reaction out of them. Thats why Im reasonably ok (dont want to really play with them, but dont mind them being in game) with people that scam people out of their ingame assets, but discussed kind of behavior is unacceptable for me. 2. IMO if CCP wanted to act point one of TOS gives them all justification theyd need: "You may not abuse, harass or threaten another player or (...)" (abuse: to treat in a harmful, injurious, or offensive way) 3. to avoid slippery slope you can just define this as "abusing people out of game originating in game for no in game purpose". |
Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Turing Tested
2432
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 13:54:00 -
[174] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:So, you literally just set yourself on moral equivalency with someone you are suggesting be perma-banned?
Checkmate, indeed. Nope. Because I have not conducted myself in any fashion that would warrant a ban, or even consideration of one :) Erotica1 has. Repeatedly and with extremely compelling evidence in heaps. Go ahead. Play this recording over loudspeakers at the next Fanfest, maybe even at the unveiling of the Monument. I double dare you. Certainly the recording is a shining example of EVEs community and would do great honor and justice to that event, dont you think?
So... you want to shame someone with a recording of their activities on the internet?
And this...isnt what Erotica1 did?
But she just laughed and said, "Oh, you're so funny" I said, "Yeah, I can't see anyone else smilin' in here. Are you sure? *** Vote MTU For CSM *** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn Omnis nomiom nom nom nomi |
Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
3414
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 13:55:00 -
[175] - Quote
Jita Otsito wrote:1. I find Erotica behavior despicable. My line is when you get nothing in game for your effort but still continue to goad/insult person out of game just to get reaction out of them. Thats why Im reasonably ok (dont want to really play with them, but dont mind them being in game) with people that scam people out of their ingame assets, but discussed kind of behavior is unacceptable for me. 2. IMO if CCP wanted to act point one of TOS gives them all justification theyd need: "You may not abuse, harass or threaten another player or (...)" (abuse: to treat in a harmful, injurious, or offensive way) 3. to avoid slippery slope you can just define this as "abusing people out of game originating in game for no in game purpose".
Emphasis mine.
So how about those death threats and racist slurs, then? Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á
Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
|
Jita Otsito
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 13:58:00 -
[176] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Jita Otsito wrote:1. I find Erotica behavior despicable. My line is when you get nothing in game for your effort but still continue to goad/insult person out of game just to get reaction out of them. Thats why Im reasonably ok (dont want to really play with them, but dont mind them being in game) with people that scam people out of their ingame assets, but discussed kind of behavior is unacceptable for me. 2. IMO if CCP wanted to act point one of TOS gives them all justification theyd need: "You may not abuse, harass or threaten another player or (...)" (abuse: to treat in a harmful, injurious, or offensive way) 3. to avoid slippery slope you can just define this as "abusing people out of game originating in game for no in game purpose". Emphasis mine. So how about those death threats and racist slurs, then? Then ban both. Erotica for longer, since the other has extenuating circumstances (he was actively provoked to do what he did). Somehow I doubt it actually matters if you ban the victim - somehow I dont see him coming back into game after this. |
Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
3416
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 13:59:00 -
[177] - Quote
Jita Otsito wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Jita Otsito wrote:1. I find Erotica behavior despicable. My line is when you get nothing in game for your effort but still continue to goad/insult person out of game just to get reaction out of them. Thats why Im reasonably ok (dont want to really play with them, but dont mind them being in game) with people that scam people out of their ingame assets, but discussed kind of behavior is unacceptable for me. 2. IMO if CCP wanted to act point one of TOS gives them all justification theyd need: "You may not abuse, harass or threaten another player or (...)" (abuse: to treat in a harmful, injurious, or offensive way) 3. to avoid slippery slope you can just define this as "abusing people out of game originating in game for no in game purpose". Emphasis mine. So how about those death threats and racist slurs, then? Then ban both. Erotica for longer, since the other has extenuating circumstances (he was actively provoked to do what he did). Somehow I doubt it actually matters if you ban the victim - somehow I dont see him coming back into game after this.
"extenuating circumstances" for a death threat? Are you serious? Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á
Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
|
Salvos Rhoska
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
462
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 14:00:00 -
[178] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:And this...isnt what Erotica1 did?
Thanks for admitting his guilt :)
CHECKMATE, again.
My god, you are TERRIBLE at this. |
Lin Suizei
207
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 14:00:00 -
[179] - Quote
Malcolm from Marketing wrote:When the consequences cross over into real life, that what most people consider a boundary being crossed.
In this case, I'd consider that the "victim" being unable to distinguish fantasy from reality, and being unable to control his own emotions.
To quote a fellow upstanding EVE player, "the minute you forget its a game, you lose". Lol I can't delete my forum sig. |
Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
5178
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 14:01:00 -
[180] - Quote
Neltharak Idrissil wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:
In what country is calling for people to kill themselves against the law? Please link.
As you wish. French Code Penal article 223-13. Google it, linking doesnt work for some reason. Roughly translated "The fact of incitating suicide from a person is punished by three years of imprisonment and a 45000 euros fine when the provocation has been followed by suicide or a suicide attept." Or is the freaking government site wrong somehow ? Similar laws exist in quite a bit of countries. So yes, i stand by it. This has the potential of being a very serious legal offense.
I interpret laws all day every day as a matter of my job and I get it that sometimes people who aren't used to doing so don't understand things.
For what the Mittani had done to be illegal in France (The country whose law you linked) it would have had to have been FOLLOWED BY suicide or a suicide attempt. Since we know of no such suicide or attempt, what Mittens did was not illegal in the country whose law you linked.
Mittani was in Iceland when he uttered those words. Show me Icelandic law on the matter please. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 .. 254 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |