That didn't seem to be his point at all. He just seems very confused.

CCP shouldn't manage risk/reward in pvp? Wow.

Sorry but I have a hard time taking anything you say seriously after this.

If people just followed the Law they'd never get ganked. BTW I like how a thread about us ganking empty freighters (showing that we're not completely in it for profit) has turned into a whinefest about how its too easy to profit from ganking.

Take yer damned pants off your head and listen to the words that are being pointed at you.

zero risk activity

Your average suicide ganker makes less isk in a month than a level 4 mission runner. Sometimes you get great drops, but you sit around for hours scanning things for it.

You appear to have missed Mallak Azarias point.

If people weren't dumb enough to make themselves profitable to gank they wouldn't be a worthwhile target for suicide gankers to choose, it's not a hard concept to grasp for those of us that are capable of rational thought.


I believe he's referring to your blanket statement that suicide ganking is the ONLY high profit, low cost, zero risk activity in the game. His anecdote proves your statement to be false, which is probably why you'r trying to spin it in a fashion that doesn't make you look like a fool.

Sorry, but he didn't prove anything at all. It makes no sense for a 1.35 bil ship to try to gank an incursus. The example he gave is totally ridiculous and unrealistic. Honestly feel bad for you that you don't realize this.

Suicide gankers get to pick their targets, ensuring profitability

No, I understood his non-point. It is a typical victim blaming mentality. "It is the homeowners fault that someone broke in and killed his whole family because he used iron bars on his door instead of titanium".

You kids should hear yourselves.

On top of that. I'd say the majority of players that fall victim to suicide ganking aren't even aware that it is possible untill it happens to them. Like the margin trading scam, suicide ganking only requires the victim to be unaware of certain game mechanics to be successful. I would never have thought it would be possible to gank a freighter in HS without reading about it on the forums and being curious.

Being a victim of suicide ganking doesn't neccesarily have anything to do with a lack of intelligence. Your victims are most likely to be casual players that pay cash for their subs and have real lives that make EVE easy to drop once a catastrophic loss occurs on a freighter that the person has been potentially saving up for months to buy.

In reguards to that confused person.

Sorry, but he didn't prove anything at all. It makes no sense for a 1.35 bil ship to try to gank an incursus. The example he gave is totally ridiculous and unrealistic. Honestly feel bad for you that you don't realize this.

You kids should hear yourselves.

Says the NPC who equates home invasion and murder to fictional events in a video game.

Suicide gankers get to pick their targets, ensuring profitability

No, I understood his non-point. It is a typical victim blaming mentality. "It is the homeowners fault that someone broke in and killed his whole family because he used iron bars on his door instead of titanium".

You kids should hear yourselves.

On top of that. I'd say the majority of players that fall victim to suicide ganking aren't even aware that it is possible untill it happens to them. Like the margin trading scam, suicide ganking only requires the victim to be unaware of certain game mechanics to be successful. I would never have thought it would be possible to gank a freighter in HS without reading about it on the forums and being curious.

Being a victim of suicide ganking doesn't neccesarily have anything to do with a lack of intelligence. Your victims are most likely to be casual players that pay cash for their subs and have real lives that make EVE easy to drop once a catastrophic loss occurs on a freighter that the person has been potentially saving up for months to buy, or transports all their goods in a hauler, not knowing a single vexor can easily take it out. It is easy to not be aware of concord response times when security status has much more obvious differences.

In reguards to that confused person.

Sorry, but he didn't prove anything at all. It makes no sense for a 1.35 bil ship to try to gank an incursus. The example he gave is totally ridiculous and unrealistic. Honestly feel bad for you that you don't realize this.

Oi. Nutmonkey. Yes. Baltec1 is correct. 1.35 bil ship got hellamad at me for taking his metal scraps. My incursus t

Oi. Nutmonkey. Yes. Baltec1 is correct. 1.35 bil ship got hellamad at me for taking his metal scraps. My incursus then had supersized sexytime in his othrus's hindquarters. no spitting on it first. 250 mil in loot resulted, plus a bonus of 400mil in bounty (YAY) ISK does not equal tank.
Oh yes, and I pay cash for my account as I cannot be arsed to bother with plexbullshite. So your money argument is pretty much mulch like the isk vs tank idea as well. As said before, I'm not confused. Your pants are on your head. Take them off, sit down, and STFU.

Says the NPC who equates home invasion and murder to fictional events in a video game.

Sorry, but I don't think anyone can take you or baltec1 very seriously.

like I said, a ridiculous and unrealistic example of suicide ganking. I'm surprised you thought to offer such an extreme case of anecdotal "evidence".

Sorry, but I don't think anyone can take you or baltec1 very seriously.

like I said, a ridiculous and unrealistic example of suicide ganking. I'm surprised you thought to offer such an extreme case of anecdotal "evidence".

Sorry, but I don't think anyone can take you or baltec1 very seriously.

Suicide gankers get to pick their targets, ensuring profitability

No, I understood his non-point. It is a typical victim blaming mentality. "It is the homeowners fault that someone broke in and killed his whole family because he used iron bars on his door instead of titanium".

You kids should hear yourselves.

On top of that. I'd say the majority of players that fall victim to suicide ganking aren't even aware that it is possible untill it happens to them. Like the margin trading scam, suicide ganking only requires the victim to be unaware of certain game mechanics to be successful. I would never have thought it would be possible to gank a freighter in HS without reading about it on the forums and being curious.

Being a victim of suicide ganking doesn't neccesarily have anything to do with a lack of intelligence. Your victims are most likely to be casual players that pay cash for their subs and have real lives that make EVE easy to drop once a catastrophic loss occurs on a freighter that the person has been potentially saving up for months to buy, or transports all their goods in a hauler, not knowing a single vexor can easily take it out. It is easy to not be aware of concord response times when security status has much more obvious differences.

In reguards to that confused person.

Sorry, but he didn't prove anything at all. It makes no sense for a 1.35 bil ship to try to gank an incursus. The example he gave is totally ridiculous and unrealistic. Honestly feel bad for you that you don't realize this.

it was purely an example of a victim blaming mentality.

Try to stay on topic instead of being so butt mad over being wrong.

[Whereas you have provided zero evidence at all that suicide ganking is a high-profit risk-free activity.

NPC troll?!