Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 .. 17 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 6 post(s) |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
12685
|
Posted - 2014.08.13 08:26:00 -
[211] - Quote
Quote:Lowered activation cost for 100MN Micro Warp Drives Capacitor activation cost is cut in half for all 100MN Micro Warp Drives.
Oh man this is big! Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

James Baboli
Ferrous Infernum
63
|
Posted - 2014.08.13 08:56:00 -
[212] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Quote:Lowered activation cost for 100MN Micro Warp Drives Capacitor activation cost is cut in half for all 100MN Micro Warp Drives. Oh man this is big! I know. full stable MWD BS with 2 mods? Please. That crazy bag FC with the silly things on the hull that shouldn't but just did. |

Carniflex
StarHunt Mordus Angels
283
|
Posted - 2014.08.13 09:05:00 -
[213] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Quote:Lowered activation cost for 100MN Micro Warp Drives Capacitor activation cost is cut in half for all 100MN Micro Warp Drives. Oh man this is big!
I think there was this limited edition shuttle thingy a while ago. A SoC one?
If the "shuttle bay" is kept at 5000 m3 could we at least get a sisters shuttle? One with a probe launcher and mmm.. cov ops cloak? Here, sanity... niiiice sanity, come to daddy... okay, that's a good sanity... *THWONK!* GOT the bastard. |

erg cz
Sliperer
107
|
Posted - 2014.08.13 09:28:00 -
[214] - Quote
Give it 5000 m3 cargo bay instead ;)
Now seriosly: Astero has T2 ship ability - covert op cloak Stratios has T2 ship ability - covert op cloak, 5/5/5 layout and way biggest cargo hold among all cruisers Gnosis has 6/6/6 layout and biggest cargohold among all BC ( even bigger, than all T1 BS ) Nestor should have bigger cargo hold, than a T2 BS, 7/6/7 layout (cause 7/7/7 would make it OP) and T2 ability. If we can not get covert op cloak, give it at least bastion mode module.
Fleet hangar, big enough to transport fitted mining barge, frigate and industrial ship, can be actually attractive for WH solo tourists, who wants to bring all his stuff with him in one ship. Especially if that ship can be anchored and used as shielded POS with 0 powergrid and 0 CPU ;) |

The Djego
Hellequin Inc. Mean Coalition
263
|
Posted - 2014.08.13 10:33:00 -
[215] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote: Secondly, we are adding a new function to the Nestor that fits well with its role as a group support vessel. We are giving the Nestor a 5000m3 Ship Maintenance Bay that will allow friendly ships to refit when they are nearby.
And finally, we are reducing the Nestor's signature radius a bit from the current 465m to 420m.
We know that some of you will be unsatisfied with the fact that we're not adding covert cloak or jump drive capabilities or some other completely new role to the Nestor with this pass. We won't rule out the possibility of future changes but we are first going to observe the results of these adjustments in Hyperion. -Fozzie
The nestor is not used because it is a pointless gimic ship, designed with zero direction and not a real concept what it should actually do behind it. Non of the changes will change that till somebody actually gives the Nestor a working concept behind it.
Make it like a utility platform like marauders, give it a 100% damage bonus to lasers, reduce the turrets to 3 and give it a useful fitting and cap(the current one is still a joke, it needs 600m in T2 BS sized RR rigs to power up medium reps, yes medium not even large) to mount RR, Puls and tank at the same time. Reduce the sig even further to 380m since it just takes even with the resist bonus more damage than most other BS by the big sig from my experience and give it around 2-2.5k more base armor hit points to make it overall less squishy and more practical without a plate. Maybe add another 100% to the RR range bonus, since this is also something that vastly limits its use currently for stuff like Incs. Another thing would be to give it finally the 10 target slots like Logis and Marauders have them, to be more attractive in the Logi role and multi task better(lock stuff to shoot and RR at the same time).
Also reduce the LP prices of the Nestor in the SOE LP shop down to 350-450k LP for the BPC, it is nowhere worth the asking price of 600k, you admitted that yourself with the introduction of the chips.
progodlegend wrote:I think people complaining about the Nestor having no uses are being incredibly uncreative.
If the price comes down, as with this change it should, then I can envision quite a few uses for it.
You guys got to think outside of the box :).
People did say the exact same thing when the Nestor was introduced, a bad ship doesn't become good by being cheap, it is just a cheaper bad ship. Btw I have a 5B nestor that I use quite a bit and everybody that claims to be creative with it just tiered to use the hull for something where it was worse than a cheaper ship. Improve discharge rigging: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=246166&find=unread
|

Rek Seven
Probe Patrol Ixtab.
1724
|
Posted - 2014.08.13 11:12:00 -
[216] - Quote
It's pretty clear now that this ship will never get a covert ops cloak. If it did, that would justify the current price but as CCP are seeking to reduce the price, it's unlikely the ships will get a cloak.
People say price isn't a balancing factor but they're wrong. If this ship drops below 500 mill and we start to see gangs of RR Nestors roaming around, people are going to start screaming for it to be nerfed.
Advantages of a nestor gang * great repping ability * good drone damage * good laser damage projection * good tank * good speed * can refit in space (e.g. fit warp stabs when in trouble) * can escape using a MJD
Disadvantages ... cost?
The design of this ship has been a mess from day one. Fozzie should have balanced the ship around the ability to fit a covert cloak and everyone would be happy... but no. instead he's just going to pile more bonuses on it until it becomes the swiss army knife of eve.
Ps. the ship is ugly as ****! +1 |

Jezza McWaffle
Pandora Sphere Disavowed.
139
|
Posted - 2014.08.13 11:14:00 -
[217] - Quote
Can't wait to make some OP setups with this. C6 Wormhole blog http://holelotofwaffle.wordpress.com/ |

Kyuuseishu
Pikachu's Paradise
0
|
Posted - 2014.08.13 11:27:00 -
[218] - Quote
erg cz wrote:Give it 5000 m3 cargo bay instead ;)
Now seriosly: Astero has T2 ship ability - covert op cloak Stratios has T2 ship ability - covert op cloak, 5/5/5 layout and way biggest cargo hold among all cruisers Gnosis has 6/6/6 layout and biggest cargohold among all BC ( even bigger, than all T1 BS ) Nestor should have bigger cargo hold, than a T2 BS, 7/6/7 layout (cause 7/7/7 would make it OP) and T2 ability. If we can not get covert op cloak, give it at least bastion mode module.
Fleet hangar, big enough to transport fitted mining barge, frigate and industrial ship, can be actually attractive for WH solo tourists, who wants to bring all his stuff with him in one ship. Especially if that ship can be anchored and used as shielded POS with 0 powergrid and 0 CPU ;)
There isn't a single BS sized ship that can fit the covert ops cloak, it would be the first ship that size able to do so, so it can't exactly have a T2 BS cov ops fitting bonus when one does not exist. But, give it the bastion module? It is in no way, shape, or form along the same lines as a Marauder class BS so this just doesn't fit at all into the ships support role.
With the fleet hangar it does effectively have a bigger cargohold than T2 BS' by a large margin, and giving it an extra low slot, it would have to sacrifice something else in return. |

Tij Lamor
University of Caille Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2014.08.13 12:16:00 -
[219] - Quote
I've been intrigued by the Nestor since I started playing Eve - the flexibility to adapt to different roles appeals to me. I've created generalist characters that dabble in many areas of the New Eden sandbox, why not a generalist ship?
One problem has been price. For less than the cost of a Nestor I can buy an Onerios for logistics, a Stratios for exploration and a Rattlesnake for combat - each much better in its specialized role than the Nestor.
The idea of adding a ship maintenance bay, presumably with fleet fitting service, got me thinking about the ship again. The ability to refit on the fly has been available since the mobile depot was introduced but built in and fleet accessible adds considerable value. The perfect spot for a ship with these capabilities is wormhole space but a lot of wormholes have a 20 million kg mass restriction and it would be nice if we could shrink Nestor to that level GÇô call it a GÇ£PocketGÇ¥ Battleship. IGÇÖd be willing to give up half the drone bay, some cargo space, a high slot and some tank to achieve this. To compensate, a lighter ship should be better able to speed tank.
I see the ship being fit for one role at a time with primary roles being: * fleet support GÇô logistics including a full squadron of heavy logistic drones, fleet fitting service and I would really like to see a command link. * sniper GÇô sentry drones and range bonus for lasers GÇô should be a good choice for level 4 missions. * wormhole exploration GÇô role bonuses for scanning and hacking. Can fit a conventional cloak.
I would like the logistics skill added to the requirement to fly this ship with the logistic bonuses tied to this skill. Should also be a bonus for logistic drones.
As a smaller ship closer in size to a Battle Cruiser the price from the LP store can be reduced GÇô perhaps 400,000 LP instead of 600,000. This would help bring the market price down and current owners could receive a refund of 200,000 SOE LP.
I donGÇÖt think this ship would be overpowered GÇô it isnGÇÖt the best at any role. Its strength is the ability to switch roles which will be very valuable in wormhole space and attractive to people (like me) who own and love their Leatherman tool.
I would definitely buy one.
|

James Baboli
Ferrous Infernum
65
|
Posted - 2014.08.13 12:31:00 -
[220] - Quote
The Djego wrote:[quote=CCP Fozzie]
Make it like a utility platform like marauders, give it a 100% damage bonus to lasers, reduce the turrets to 3 and give it a useful fitting and cap(the current one is still a joke, it needs 600m in T2 BS sized RR rigs to power up medium reps, yes medium not even large) to mount RR, Puls and tank at the same time. Reduce the sig even further to 380m since it just takes even with the resist bonus more damage than most other BS by the big sig from my experience and give it around 2-2.5k more base armor hit points to make it overall less squishy and more practical without a plate. Maybe add another 100% to the RR range bonus, since this is also something that vastly limits its use currently for stuff like Incs. Another thing would be to give it finally the 10 target slots like Logis and Marauders have them, to be more attractive in the Logi role and multi task better(lock stuff to shoot and RR at the same time).
Sooo. It can't do RR while running a weapon with a massive cap problem? Surprise. Soo why do you need cap for an armor tank? EANMs are good enough of a passive that its ridiculous. Unless you want to local tank it, run DPS and logi, in which case, what is even going on there? Soo a drone and logi boat with a minor secondary bonus to lasers can't do all three at once without bling? I am shocked.
As for more EHP, that ship needs more base armor like I need a hole in my cranium. It already has the 6th highest base armor HP of any faction battleship, with the amar navy and bhaal finishing ahead of it. Its closest matches in shield, the SNI and rattler do have more buffer, but this is matched with substantially harder time getting insane resists as there is more pressure on those midslots in almost every case as well as the active nature of shield tank. That crazy bag FC with the silly things on the hull that shouldn't but just did. |
|

James Baboli
Ferrous Infernum
66
|
Posted - 2014.08.13 12:33:00 -
[221] - Quote
Tij Lamor wrote:I've been intrigued by the Nestor since I started playing Eve - the flexibility to adapt to different roles appeals to me. I've created generalist characters that dabble in many areas of the New Eden sandbox, why not a generalist ship?
One problem has been price. For less than the cost of a Nestor I can buy an Onerios for logistics, a Stratios for exploration and a Rattlesnake for combat - each much better in its specialized role than the Nestor.
The idea of adding a ship maintenance bay, presumably with fleet fitting service, got me thinking about the ship again. The ability to refit on the fly has been available since the mobile depot was introduced but built in and fleet accessible adds considerable value. The perfect spot for a ship with these capabilities is wormhole space but a lot of wormholes have a 20 million kg mass restriction and it would be nice if we could shrink Nestor to that level GÇô call it a GÇ£PocketGÇ¥ Battleship. IGÇÖd be willing to give up half the drone bay, some cargo space, a high slot and some tank to achieve this. To compensate, a lighter ship should be better able to speed tank.
I see the ship being fit for one role at a time with primary roles being: * fleet support GÇô logistics including a full squadron of heavy logistic drones, fleet fitting service and I would really like to see a command link. * sniper GÇô sentry drones and range bonus for lasers GÇô should be a good choice for level 4 missions. * wormhole exploration GÇô role bonuses for scanning and hacking. Can fit a conventional cloak.
I would like the logistics skill added to the requirement to fly this ship with the logistic bonuses tied to this skill. Should also be a bonus for logistic drones.
As a smaller ship closer in size to a Battle Cruiser the price from the LP store can be reduced GÇô perhaps 400,000 LP instead of 600,000. This would help bring the market price down and current owners could receive a refund of 200,000 SOE LP.
I donGÇÖt think this ship would be overpowered GÇô it isnGÇÖt the best at any role. Its strength is the ability to switch roles which will be very valuable in wormhole space and attractive to people (like me) who own and love their Leatherman tool.
I would definitely buy one.
The problem with a BS that size, with battleship EHP, weapons and capacitor capacity, as well as fitting room, is that it then becomes a pre-nano nerf WTF kiting ship of doom. That crazy bag FC with the silly things on the hull that shouldn't but just did. |

Steph Livingston
Neko's Blanket
40
|
Posted - 2014.08.13 14:32:00 -
[222] - Quote
I appreciate that the Nestor is still getting changes, but I still won't fly mine in it's current state.
I actually think adding a ship maintenance bay makes the problem worse, not better. One of the main problems the Nestor has right now is that it really doesn't have a role, or the focus, to give it purpose. Ever since the stats were finalized players have asked the same question: 'Why?'
Adding a maintenance bay just takes the ship one step closer to a carrier, and at since the cost is the same most people would rather USE a carrier for the same function. I know the Nestor is supposed to be a wormhole vessel, but without a cloak it's really a sitting duck in there anyways. If a carrier is unavailable then logistics ships are cheaper and easier to replace.
I'd go as far as saying the maintenance bay is a step in the wrong direction. It really doesn't give the Nestor a purpose, it just makes it more like a carrier, for the same price point.
If you want to make the Nestor more useful, give the Nestor more of a wormhole focus. I know a covert ops cloak is out of the picture but for me the ideal change would be losing the probe strength and encryption bonuses, which don't work as well on a BS sized hull, in exchange for the Nestor to be invisible, or highly resistant, to probe scans. It wouldn't do anything when the enemy was on top of you, but it would be ALMOST as good as a cloak when trying to hide or setting up ambushes. |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
12699
|
Posted - 2014.08.13 14:37:00 -
[223] - Quote
Steph Livingston wrote:I appreciate that the Nestor is still getting changes, but I still won't fly mine in it's current state.
I actually think adding a ship maintenance bay makes the problem worse, not better. One of the main problems the Nestor has right now is that it really doesn't have a role, or the focus, to give it purpose. Ever since the stats were finalized players have asked the same question: 'Why?'
Adding a maintenance bay just takes the ship one step closer to a carrier, and at since the cost is the same most people would rather USE a carrier for the same function. I know the Nestor is supposed to be a wormhole vessel, but without a cloak it's really a sitting duck in there anyways. If a carrier is unavailable then logistics ships are cheaper and easier to replace.
I'd go as far as saying the maintenance bay is a step in the wrong direction. It really doesn't give the Nestor a purpose, it just makes it more like a carrier, for the same price point.
If you want to make the Nestor more useful, give the Nestor more of a wormhole focus. I know a covert ops cloak is out of the picture but for me the ideal change would be losing the probe strength and encryption bonuses, which don't work as well on a BS sized hull, in exchange for the Nestor to be invisible, or highly resistant, to probe scans. It wouldn't do anything when the enemy was on top of you, but it would be ALMOST as good as a cloak when trying to hide or setting up ambushes.
Its a support battleship that is ideal for small roaming gangs. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Steph Livingston
Neko's Blanket
40
|
Posted - 2014.08.13 14:45:00 -
[224] - Quote
That may be the purpose, but I don't know many people that would dedicate that much ISK on a roam when they could take a logistics, and still outfit 3-4 other people for the same price as a single Nestor. The benefit just isn't worth it.
If the group DID have that much ISK to commit, most groups usually go with a hot drop carrier. It's the same price, and does the job better in most regards. |

Rroff
Questionable Ethics. Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
708
|
Posted - 2014.08.13 14:48:00 -
[225] - Quote
Have to say many of the comments in this thread even when not intended to that end seem to suggest the nestor should be a faction black ops heh.
Do like the addition of a limited ship maintenance bay. |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
12700
|
Posted - 2014.08.13 15:01:00 -
[226] - Quote
Steph Livingston wrote:That may be the purpose, but I don't know many people that would dedicate that much ISK on a roam when they could take a logistics, and still outfit 3-4 other people for the same price as a single Nestor. The benefit just isn't worth it.
If the group DID have that much ISK to commit, most groups usually go with a hot drop carrier. It's the same price, and does the job better in most regards.
Cant go roaming in a carrier. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Kagura Nikon
Mentally Assured Destruction The Pursuit of Happiness
1547
|
Posted - 2014.08.13 15:06:00 -
[227] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Steph Livingston wrote:I appreciate that the Nestor is still getting changes, but I still won't fly mine in it's current state.
I actually think adding a ship maintenance bay makes the problem worse, not better. One of the main problems the Nestor has right now is that it really doesn't have a role, or the focus, to give it purpose. Ever since the stats were finalized players have asked the same question: 'Why?'
Adding a maintenance bay just takes the ship one step closer to a carrier, and at since the cost is the same most people would rather USE a carrier for the same function. I know the Nestor is supposed to be a wormhole vessel, but without a cloak it's really a sitting duck in there anyways. If a carrier is unavailable then logistics ships are cheaper and easier to replace.
I'd go as far as saying the maintenance bay is a step in the wrong direction. It really doesn't give the Nestor a purpose, it just makes it more like a carrier, for the same price point.
If you want to make the Nestor more useful, give the Nestor more of a wormhole focus. I know a covert ops cloak is out of the picture but for me the ideal change would be losing the probe strength and encryption bonuses, which don't work as well on a BS sized hull, in exchange for the Nestor to be invisible, or highly resistant, to probe scans. It wouldn't do anything when the enemy was on top of you, but it would be ALMOST as good as a cloak when trying to hide or setting up ambushes. Its a support battleship that is ideal for small roaming gangs.
Maybe extra 0.5 au/s warp speed coudl be the buff needed to make it excel on that role... "If brute force does not solve your problem..... -áthen you are -ásurely not using enough!" |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
12700
|
Posted - 2014.08.13 15:15:00 -
[228] - Quote
Kagura Nikon wrote:
Maybe extra 0.5 au/s warp speed coudl be the buff needed to make it excel on that role...
No need. Its not all that hard to get 3au out of any battleship. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Kagura Nikon
Mentally Assured Destruction The Pursuit of Happiness
1547
|
Posted - 2014.08.13 15:34:00 -
[229] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Kagura Nikon wrote:
Maybe extra 0.5 au/s warp speed coudl be the buff needed to make it excel on that role...
No need. Its not all that hard to get 3au out of any battleship.
Yet most people seems to not think its worth. Maybe the nestor just need a different metagame to shine. .. maybe after sov is completely changed upside down.. maybe.
"If brute force does not solve your problem..... -áthen you are -ásurely not using enough!" |

BayneNothos
United Electro-Magnetic Federation Business Alliance of Manufacturers and Miners
103
|
Posted - 2014.08.13 15:37:00 -
[230] - Quote
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:
What are you smoking? Run the eft numbers, 2 guardians put out 20% more reps then 1 nestor and 1 feeder guardian, or 2 spider nestors. And 2 guardians do it for fraction of the price, do it up to 70km vs 21km, are faster, tankier, hardier vs ECM, lock 2 times faster, and have way less sig.
And if you need talisman sets to make a ship work, thats an automatic fail.
Thanks no thanks.
I think you need to check your math. 50% bonus, that means you get a free repper for every two you stick on it. In this case, that's 9 RR modules effectively. So unless you're not doing cap chains on your Guardians a single Nestor reps more.
If you're running a pair of 4/1 Guardians, that's 8 RR modules to 9. Run with 3 people, you're doing 18 RR modules to the triple Guardians 12.
Nestor has more mids so it can do more funky stuff like double Sebo's which put it's lock times to comparable with Guardians. It can run WAY more ECCM. It's also got a full flight of bonused heavy/sentry drones. Guardians don't thrown down 400-500 dps each while doing reps.
It's not a replacement of Guardians, never said it was. But it's got some pretty good strengths and if the hull wasn't worth nearly a carrier, we'd see it a lot more. If you're an Incursion runner or a low end WH group, it's worth a look into once the price drops. |
|

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
12700
|
Posted - 2014.08.13 15:37:00 -
[231] - Quote
Kagura Nikon wrote:baltec1 wrote:Kagura Nikon wrote:
Maybe extra 0.5 au/s warp speed coudl be the buff needed to make it excel on that role...
No need. Its not all that hard to get 3au out of any battleship. Yet most people seems to not think its worth. Maybe the nestor just need a different metagame to shine. .. maybe after sov is completely changed upside down.. maybe.
Most of the people who hate this ship also hated the marauder changes. They wont be happy unless they get an overpowered cov ops monster for 300 mil. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Hakaari Inkuran
State War Academy Caldari State
183
|
Posted - 2014.08.13 15:53:00 -
[232] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Kagura Nikon wrote:
Maybe extra 0.5 au/s warp speed coudl be the buff needed to make it excel on that role...
No need. Its not all that hard to get 3au out of any battleship. A T2 hyperspace rig and a 15% warp speed implant still doesn't get a 2AU to 3AU. What do you think "not hard" qualifies as? |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
12700
|
Posted - 2014.08.13 15:55:00 -
[233] - Quote
Hakaari Inkuran wrote:baltec1 wrote:Kagura Nikon wrote:
Maybe extra 0.5 au/s warp speed coudl be the buff needed to make it excel on that role...
No need. Its not all that hard to get 3au out of any battleship. A T2 hyperspace rig and a 15% warp speed implant still doesn't get a 2AU to 3AU. What do you think "not hard" qualifies as?
The implant set and a t1 rig. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

LUMINOUS SPIRIT
The Dark Space Initiative Scary Wormhole People
478
|
Posted - 2014.08.13 16:24:00 -
[234] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Steph Livingston wrote:That may be the purpose, but I don't know many people that would dedicate that much ISK on a roam when they could take a logistics, and still outfit 3-4 other people for the same price as a single Nestor. The benefit just isn't worth it.
If the group DID have that much ISK to commit, most groups usually go with a hot drop carrier. It's the same price, and does the job better in most regards. Cant go roaming in a carrier.
Yes you can. its called a cyno loki/proteus/absolution.
baltec, there hasnt been a single nestor-based roam in EVE since the ship came out. That tells you something. |

LUMINOUS SPIRIT
The Dark Space Initiative Scary Wormhole People
478
|
Posted - 2014.08.13 16:28:00 -
[235] - Quote
BayneNothos wrote:LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:
What are you smoking? Run the eft numbers, 2 guardians put out 20% more reps then 1 nestor and 1 feeder guardian, or 2 spider nestors. And 2 guardians do it for fraction of the price, do it up to 70km vs 21km, are faster, tankier, hardier vs ECM, lock 2 times faster, and have way less sig.
And if you need talisman sets to make a ship work, thats an automatic fail.
Thanks no thanks.
I think you need to check your math. 50% bonus, that means you get a free repper for every two you stick on it. In this case, that's 9 RR modules effectively. So unless you're not doing cap chains on your Guardians a single Nestor reps more. If you're running a pair of 4/1 Guardians, that's 8 RR modules to 9. Run with 3 people, you're doing 18 RR modules to the triple Guardians 12. Nestor has more mids so it can do more funky stuff like double Sebo's which put it's lock times to comparable with Guardians. It can run WAY more ECCM. It's also got a full flight of bonused heavy/sentry drones. Guardians don't thrown down 400-500 dps each while doing reps. It's not a replacement of Guardians, never said it was. But it's got some pretty good strengths and if the hull wasn't worth nearly a carrier, we'd see it a lot more. If you're an Incursion runner or a low end WH group, it's worth a look into once the price drops.
I dont need to check my math because EFT does it for me. 5/1 guardians are better, because nestors need to fit energy transfer arrays, or they burn out of cap in 20 seconds flat, which is a big no-no. |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
12702
|
Posted - 2014.08.13 16:31:00 -
[236] - Quote
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:baltec1 wrote:Steph Livingston wrote:That may be the purpose, but I don't know many people that would dedicate that much ISK on a roam when they could take a logistics, and still outfit 3-4 other people for the same price as a single Nestor. The benefit just isn't worth it.
If the group DID have that much ISK to commit, most groups usually go with a hot drop carrier. It's the same price, and does the job better in most regards. Cant go roaming in a carrier. Yes you can. its called a cyno loki/proteus/absolution. baltec, there hasnt been a single nestor-based roam in EVE since the ship came out. That tells you something.
Cyno jammers, more fuel than you can carry and a lone carrier deep behind enemy lines. It wont last long.
Incidentally show me all of the other small gang roams involving pirate battleships. Even if people saw this as the perfect ship it would be very very rare to find one pvping. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

LUMINOUS SPIRIT
The Dark Space Initiative Scary Wormhole People
478
|
Posted - 2014.08.13 16:33:00 -
[237] - Quote
Hakaari Inkuran wrote:baltec1 wrote:Kagura Nikon wrote:
Maybe extra 0.5 au/s warp speed coudl be the buff needed to make it excel on that role...
No need. Its not all that hard to get 3au out of any battleship. A T2 hyperspace rig and a 15% warp speed implant still doesn't get a 2AU to 3AU. What do you think "not hard" qualifies as?
He means you need to put 2bil of implants in your head to make the ship marginally useful in warp speed alone.
I think he defends Nestor too much, as quick glance doesnt show a single kill in a nestor on his profile.
baltec1, show us you actually used the nestor in a roam, and we will tip our hats to you. Otherwise, stop defending something you yourself dont use. |

LUMINOUS SPIRIT
The Dark Space Initiative Scary Wormhole People
478
|
Posted - 2014.08.13 16:36:00 -
[238] - Quote
[quote=baltec1
Incidentally show me all of the other small gang roams involving pirate battleships. Even if people saw this as the perfect ship it would be very very rare to find one pvping.[/quote]
I run into vindicators with cynos fairly often; we use bhaalgorns almost every day; machariels are seen here and there on occasion - killed one on a roam a few months back.
it happens.
Not so with nestor. |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
12703
|
Posted - 2014.08.13 16:38:00 -
[239] - Quote
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:Hakaari Inkuran wrote:baltec1 wrote:Kagura Nikon wrote:
Maybe extra 0.5 au/s warp speed coudl be the buff needed to make it excel on that role...
No need. Its not all that hard to get 3au out of any battleship. A T2 hyperspace rig and a 15% warp speed implant still doesn't get a 2AU to 3AU. What do you think "not hard" qualifies as? He means you need to put 2bil of implants in your head to make the ship marginally useful in warp speed alone. I think he defends Nestor too much, as quick glance doesnt show a single kill in a nestor on his profile. baltec1, show us you actually used the nestor in a roam, and we will tip our hats to you. Otherwise, stop defending something you yourself dont use.
500 mil of implants.
I dont need to show that I use the nestor to understand how it will work. I have 4 years of flying battleships in almost any kind of fleet behind me. I understand how they work. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
12703
|
Posted - 2014.08.13 16:39:00 -
[240] - Quote
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:
I run into vindicators with cynos fairly often; we use bhaalgorns almost every day; machariels are seen here and there on occasion - killed one on a roam a few months back.
it happens.
Not so with nestor.
Thats because it costs twice as much and people generally cant fit ships themselves. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 .. 17 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |