Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .. 136 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 6 post(s) |

Baron Holbach
The Northerners Northern Coalition.
30
|
Posted - 2015.03.03 17:32:45 -
[271] - Quote
RIP capitals, honestly CCP - give any reason way to use capitals in future
also this station structures disable/enable seems like ultimate grief scheme, the main things to worry in my option would be various industry upgrades (factory and lab services)
pleas also add option to remove upgrades from ihub (or at-least disable them somehow to remove massive cost linked with some upgrades - like jb or jammer upgrades)
|

knobber Jobbler
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
514
|
Posted - 2015.03.03 17:33:07 -
[272] - Quote
Tiberian Deci wrote:Mostlyharmlesss wrote:Aryndel Vyst wrote:HEY LETS MAKE SOV EASIER TO TAKE FROM LARGE ENTITIES BUT GIVE NO BENEFITS WHATSOEVER TO THE RESIDENTS.
Do you want everyone to do high sec incursions or something?
~content creation~ Not emptying quoting. I'm convinced that every sov holder that cries about lack of benefits doesn't want to actually fight anyone, they just want it to be easy to sit on what they have and continue making money and not fighting people. This isn't to say that there is no merit to the 'lack of benefits' claim, but no one complaining about it has presented one yet.
No, it's a conflict driver. Find me a war in history that was had "because it was fun". If you de-incentive the reasons to hold space, null will become pretty boring after a while. Simply having your flag in space is not enough. |

KIller Wabbit
The Scope Gallente Federation
880
|
Posted - 2015.03.03 17:34:15 -
[273] - Quote
"The result of all these design features is that the best method to exert control over a structure with the Entosis Link is to establish effective military control over the grid around the target structure."
And there you go -> N+1 mechanic trap pit spotted. Will be interesting to see if the 4X capture speed mechanic is enough to kill N+1
Everything else - looks good to me.
CCP .. always first with the wrong stuff
CSM .. CCP Shills with a vacation plan
|

Primary This Rifter
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
630
|
Posted - 2015.03.03 17:35:23 -
[274] - Quote
Tia Aves wrote:If anyone wants a more balanced and thought out view as opposed to all of the mindless whining I highly suggest the thread on the EVE sub-Reddit. /r/EVE is an anti-CFC circlejerk, so that's hardly surprising. I'm sure everyone there supports these changes out of spite.
Reminder: CCP thinks you have no right to your alliance logos.
|

waltari
Mortis Angelus The Kadeshi
3
|
Posted - 2015.03.03 17:36:02 -
[275] - Quote
So basically sov nullsec turns into some weird form of Faction Warfare with a benefit to literaly nobody, full of 24/7 hellcamped freeports filled with trolls who doesnt realy want to hold the SOV anyway (due to reason mentioned earlier), whilst denying the current holders possibility to protect it effectively due to split timezones, great concept realy, keep up good work. |

Nyan Lafisques
Fairly Ganked
13
|
Posted - 2015.03.03 17:36:31 -
[276] - Quote
Primary This Rifter wrote:Tia Aves wrote:If anyone wants a more balanced and thought out view as opposed to all of the mindless whining I highly suggest the thread on the EVE sub-Reddit. /r/EVE is an anti-CFC circlejerk, so that's hardly surprising. I'm sure everyone there supports these changes out of spite.
Grrr goons. People there enjoy the changes not because of goons, but because they believe these changes are good. |

Andrea Keuvo
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
306
|
Posted - 2015.03.03 17:36:39 -
[277] - Quote
Saidin Thor wrote:I'm not sure CCP has ever had to deal with IHhub logistics first-hand. Being easy to destroy may or may not be a good thing, but IHubs are a HUGE pain to place and upgrade right now. Bigger upgrades AND the IHubs themselves can only be transported in a freighter right now. There's no way a little alliance has the logistics capacity to regularly replace IHubs that roaming gangs will be destroying just for the lulz unless that changes.
If you want to stick with the "but sov logistics should be hard" mantra, then at least resizing them for jump freighters would be better than nothing. Ideally, making IHubs and their upgrades Blockade Runner size would open up a lot of options for the little guy.
Another change related to IHubs I would suggest is allowing IHubs to be placed on moons (so you can place them next to POSes). This gives an alliance the OPTION to have a VERY LOW barrier to messing with system upgrades. A POS isn't particularly difficult to defang even with a small group, but gives an IHub some level of protection against marauders that are just trying to salt the fields.
Also the premise that defenders will regularly use jump bridges during capture events has to be a joke, right? Have the CCP employees that live in null sec ever tried chaining jump bridges since the fatigue changes went through? Let us know how that worked out for them for the subsequent two weeks.
Yeah if they intend to go on with these new mechanics then ihubs and all of their upgrades need to be reduced in size to fit in a JF. Might want to think about introducing some of those new upgrades when these changes go live because right now it's really borderline as far as it being worth it to live in null to make isk. |

EvilweaselFinance
BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation
452
|
Posted - 2015.03.03 17:36:40 -
[278] - Quote
Primary This Rifter wrote:Tia Aves wrote:If anyone wants a more balanced and thought out view as opposed to all of the mindless whining I highly suggest the thread on the EVE sub-Reddit. /r/EVE is an anti-CFC circlejerk, so that's hardly surprising. I'm sure everyone there supports these changes out of spite. when it comes to this, its not so much an anti-cfc circlejerk as a bunch of people who no longer hold sov
people who hold sov but hate us realize how bad this is |

Proton Stars
OREfull
23
|
Posted - 2015.03.03 17:37:16 -
[279] - Quote
To the CSM. Did you really endorse this?
|

Amyclas Amatin
SUNDERING Goonswarm Federation
616
|
Posted - 2015.03.03 17:37:27 -
[280] - Quote
This primetime ****. The **** are the Australians going to do?
Also we can now rat 20 hours a day while only worrying about that 4 hour window when **** becomes vulnerable. What.
For more information on the New Order of High-Sec, please visit: http://www.minerbumping.com/
Remember that whenever you have a bad day in EVE, the correct reponse is "Thank you CCP, may I please have another?"
|
|

Lena Lazair
Khanid Irregulars Khanid's Legion
259
|
Posted - 2015.03.03 17:37:45 -
[281] - Quote
Touchie Mc TwiddleHands wrote:However, CCP should support this transition as much as possible, by adding a proper Coalition system. Alliances should be able to create and join Coalitions (Hey, you could even name your coalition Brave Collective etc so you can still 100% identify with your buddies in other timezones!). They would be visible in-game just like alliances, and provide basic management features such as a Coalition chat, an overview state ("pilot is in my coallition"), standings and, maybe, shared access to the new sovereignity overview. This would allow the current big alliances to keep their names and identities aswell as provide sov combat to members of all timezones.
Meh, I'm going to give the same answer to this that is so prevalent when carebears ask for social corps in highsec... "that is what chat channels are for". |

Maya Cinderfort
Exiled Tech Space Monkey Protectorate
2
|
Posted - 2015.03.03 17:37:52 -
[282] - Quote
Nyan Lafisques wrote:Maya Cinderfort wrote:MiliasColds wrote:
everyone keeps saying 10 minutes, ITS ONLY 10 MINUTES IF YOU HAVE 0 INDICES. so yes they can take the systems you have but don't use, if you use them no it's more like 30-40 minutes. which you should be able to kill him in.
points is i still don'T want to check after one red doing his thing. like realy no ty So basically you don't want to have to protect your space?
ofc but a single guy should just not be able to do anything in the first place it's a system not worlds collide lvl 4
& again i like the idea of fighting over nodes, maybe in class limited nodes to make it "different"
BUT getting a system should allways be boring, because the reward you get is better.
out of eve example here.
grinding eggs for a netherwing drake in WoW for maybe 30 hours straight sure wasn't fun but the reward was awesome.
same goes for systems. |

Current Habit
Get LP or Die Trying
32
|
Posted - 2015.03.03 17:38:04 -
[283] - Quote
Is the implementation of Command nodes a first step towards allowing EVE:Legion and EVE:Valkyrie people to influence sov by capturing nodes on the ground or inside special 'Valkyrie-arenas' (if/when they are ever released)? |

Rowells
ANZAC ALLIANCE Fidelas Constans
2045
|
Posted - 2015.03.03 17:38:06 -
[284] - Quote
also what happens when a character in an NPC corp tries to use this module? does it count and can they actually take anything? |

Tiberian Deci
Sleeper Slumber Party Test Alliance Please Ignore
49
|
Posted - 2015.03.03 17:38:08 -
[285] - Quote
knobber Jobbler wrote:Tiberian Deci wrote:Mostlyharmlesss wrote:Aryndel Vyst wrote:HEY LETS MAKE SOV EASIER TO TAKE FROM LARGE ENTITIES BUT GIVE NO BENEFITS WHATSOEVER TO THE RESIDENTS.
Do you want everyone to do high sec incursions or something?
~content creation~ Not emptying quoting. I'm convinced that every sov holder that cries about lack of benefits doesn't want to actually fight anyone, they just want it to be easy to sit on what they have and continue making money and not fighting people. This isn't to say that there is no merit to the 'lack of benefits' claim, but no one complaining about it has presented one yet. No, it's a conflict driver. Find me a war in history that was had "because it was fun". If you de-incentive the reasons to hold space, null will become pretty boring after a while. Simply having your flag in space is not enough.
War in real history or a war in Eve history, because they are completely separate things. |

Vigilanta
S0utherN Comfort DARKNESS.
79
|
Posted - 2015.03.03 17:38:30 -
[286] - Quote
a small part of my wonders if CCP get liek ultra hard nipples when they release these major change blogs, rarely are they filled with OMG amazing, its 85% WTF and 15% lol i love the tears these guys are generating.
CCP = the cable company in that south park episode. |

Praisos Severasse
University of Caille Gallente Federation
5
|
Posted - 2015.03.03 17:38:52 -
[287] - Quote
My eyes ARE BURNING!!! great changes!!! let be hell!!! at last more players will be active and not just zombie grunts... WELL DONE CCP when it gets polished i think it will be great!!!!!  |

Yugo 60
Cyberdyne Systems Co.
1
|
Posted - 2015.03.03 17:38:54 -
[288] - Quote
Problem: SOV vaule Ok, you made sov taking and harassing sov holders easier. Where are the bufss for actually holding the space? Why to hold SOV at all when you can just live in npc null and troll residents of nearby regions. I'm expecting major buffs to nullsec so that it's worth going through all that defensive activity to keep space.
Problem: Supercaps With proposed changes supercaps lose their role pretty much. Expecting a major re-purpose of supers (and maybe dreads) to make them viable or we can just selfdestruct them for lolz.
Problem: Timezones If your goal is to have 3-4 parts of space with exclusive EU/US/RUS/AU timezone sov holders then your idea is good. If not, CHANGE TIMEZONE IDEA.
Problem: Interceptors Having "uncatchable" fleets of interceptors troll reinforcing everything in the region (or two) during one evening every single time that some structure is out of RF just for the heck of it (and to make sov holders form up for def all the time) is not what I would call a good mechanics. CHANGE INTERCEPTORS to make them catchable or give them inability of RFing.
Problem: Cloaky AFKers SOV activitiy directly tied to defending sov is cool. But first wave of invading someones SOV will be having 3-4 AFK cloaked "l33t pvpers" in every system of one constellation for a few days to drop their mining/ratting activities. It is not really what I would call interesting and fair mechanic. CHANGE AFK CLOAKING. |

Chal0ner
Coreli Corporation The Kadeshi
155
|
Posted - 2015.03.03 17:39:18 -
[289] - Quote
Need to re-read. First reaction. Prime time sounds like a basically broken idea before it even was launched. It will allienate and segregate alliances with both EU and US tz players. Someone is going to suffer.
More guerilla warfare is good on the other hand. (As long as they stay the **** out of Delve )
Will re-read though. |

Anhenka
The Cult of Personality DARKNESS.
1142
|
Posted - 2015.03.03 17:39:52 -
[290] - Quote
EvilweaselFinance wrote:Primary This Rifter wrote:Tia Aves wrote:If anyone wants a more balanced and thought out view as opposed to all of the mindless whining I highly suggest the thread on the EVE sub-Reddit. /r/EVE is an anti-CFC circlejerk, so that's hardly surprising. I'm sure everyone there supports these changes out of spite. when it comes to this, its not so much an anti-cfc circlejerk as a bunch of people who no longer hold sov people who hold sov but hate us realize how bad this is
Confirming I both hate goons and think that the 4 hour zone is a terrible idea, as a US player in an EU alliance. |
|

Tiberian Deci
Sleeper Slumber Party Test Alliance Please Ignore
49
|
Posted - 2015.03.03 17:40:07 -
[291] - Quote
Primary This Rifter wrote:Tia Aves wrote:If anyone wants a more balanced and thought out view as opposed to all of the mindless whining I highly suggest the thread on the EVE sub-Reddit. /r/EVE is an anti-CFC circlejerk, so that's hardly surprising. I'm sure everyone there supports these changes out of spite.
It's an anti-CFC circlejerk because the CFC is one of the things that are killing the game in it's current state. |

Nyan Lafisques
Fairly Ganked
13
|
Posted - 2015.03.03 17:40:08 -
[292] - Quote
Maya Cinderfort wrote:Nyan Lafisques wrote:Maya Cinderfort wrote:MiliasColds wrote:
everyone keeps saying 10 minutes, ITS ONLY 10 MINUTES IF YOU HAVE 0 INDICES. so yes they can take the systems you have but don't use, if you use them no it's more like 30-40 minutes. which you should be able to kill him in.
points is i still don'T want to check after one red doing his thing. like realy no ty So basically you don't want to have to protect your space? ofc but a single guy should just not be able to do anything in the first place it's a system not worlds collide lvl 4 & again i like the idea of fighting over nodes, maybe in class limited nodes to make it "different" BUT getting a system should allways be boring, because the reward you get is better. out of eve example here. grinding eggs for a netherwing drake in WoW for maybe 30 hours straight sure wasn't fun but the reward was awesome. same goes for systems.
That single guy won't do **** if you have any defensive bonus. He won't show up for the timer, and if you can't kill a single guy out of your thousand+ alliance in your prime time than I don't know what to say... |

Total Newbie
Deadly Shadow Clan Executive Outcomes
26
|
Posted - 2015.03.03 17:40:44 -
[293] - Quote
Since the proposed change is out, I would think that the meeting minutes of The current CSM and it's members who are supporting this be published as well. The NDA seems to be null and void now. |

Akrasjel Lanate
Naquatech Conglomerate Naquatech Syndicate
1738
|
Posted - 2015.03.03 17:40:50 -
[294] - Quote
Proton Stars wrote:To the CSM. Did you really endorse this?
They know about this
Akrasjel Lanate
General Director(CEO) of Naquatech Conglomerate
Executor of Naquatech Syndicate
Citizen of Solitude
|

Primary This Rifter
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
630
|
Posted - 2015.03.03 17:40:52 -
[295] - Quote
Nyan Lafisques wrote:Primary This Rifter wrote:Tia Aves wrote:If anyone wants a more balanced and thought out view as opposed to all of the mindless whining I highly suggest the thread on the EVE sub-Reddit. /r/EVE is an anti-CFC circlejerk, so that's hardly surprising. I'm sure everyone there supports these changes out of spite. Grrr goons. People there enjoy the changes not because of goons, but because they believe these changes are good. People are entirely free to hold beliefs that are wrong.
Reminder: CCP thinks you have no right to your alliance logos.
|

Olya Tsarev
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
3
|
Posted - 2015.03.03 17:41:10 -
[296] - Quote
Proton Stars wrote:To the CSM. Did you really endorse this?
I heard Sion was a big fan of it and posted about it on the CFC forums before it was announced. You know, NDA leaks and all that.
I can't really provide any evidence but I've heard you don't need to provide any to make these sort of statements.  |

Elenahina
Agony Unleashed Agony Empire
163
|
Posted - 2015.03.03 17:41:13 -
[297] - Quote
MiliasColds wrote:a note for out of timezone players (from declared prime time)
you still raise indices which makes things easier to defend. you can still help with capture events that are ongoing past prime time. you can be useful attacking other alliances whose prime time aligns with your TZ you can assist allies you can contribute to general logistics you can attrack and reinforces POS and stations services
doesn't seem like nothing to me
Your heathen logic has no place here! Begone foul witch!
Agony Unleashed is Recruiting - Small Gang PvP in Null Sec
|

Eli Apol
Pro Synergy
85
|
Posted - 2015.03.03 17:41:23 -
[298] - Quote
Sounds awesome +1
If you hold too much space you'll be spending your whole primetime fighting off little bands all over the place annoying you with a quick Entosis link to test out your localised defences.
If you 're actually using the space then you should have a defensive fleet within range to quickly react. If not then you've now got a timer to chase in a couple of days.
I'm not sure if 4hrs is long enough for the primetime, 6-8hrs should still be coverable by most alliances and allows multi TZ cooperation more easily.
Also I might be dumb but did they actually say what the winning conditions were for a command point chase? I know 10-0 was an auto win, is it just to win by 10pts at any stage or something more complex? |

Dracvlad
Taishi Combine Second-Dawn
661
|
Posted - 2015.03.03 17:41:36 -
[299] - Quote
Still mulling over a number of things on how they wil pan out, but overall I like it, its a shake up mechanism, a pretty big one at that.
People should not get too hung up over TZ, you will get fights when you attack other people which are not in your alliances main TZ, you will be defending your structures during your TZ against people putting it into RF and doing so in small gang combat.
I need to read it through a couple of times more in certain areas and work it through, but a lot more small fights will be generated from this and hard nosed players that want to muck around with poor systems can carve those out.
Just make sure to remove POS reporting please...
Ella's Snack bar
|

M1k3y Koontz
Aether Ventures Surely You're Joking
654
|
Posted - 2015.03.03 17:42:02 -
[300] - Quote
EvilweaselFinance wrote:we have to create a strategic mining division to protect important systems are you ******* kidding me
nullsec mining has been broken for ages, go look at the price of mega and zyd and then think about why on earth mining should play a role here
I'm sure your AFK-tars will be able to kill enough rats to make up for your lack of miners.
How much herp could a herp derp derp if a herp derp could herp derp.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .. 136 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |