EVE Search - Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two

Check My IP Information

All Channels

EVE Information Portal

Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .. 136 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 6 post(s)
Awkward Pi Duolus Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic 25	Posted - 2015.03.03 15:44:41 - [31] - Quote If you think Reavers were bad... you just made it very hard for any casual alliance to hold sov in the face of a dedicated core of folks from one of the blocs dropping sov simply to grief. Remember that larger alliances have the ability to organize and sustain action better than most smaller ones. One outcome of these changes may very well be large areas of wasteland that is regularly mowed of sov 'just cause'.
Rowells ANZAC ALLIANCE Fidelas Constans 2042	Posted - 2015.03.03 15:46:10 - [32] - Quote are those numbers for entosis module right? 20km for T1 and 25okm for T2?
Traiori New Eden Renegades This can only end well 207	Posted - 2015.03.03 15:46:19 - [33] - Quote Hate the idea of prime time. It forces every little group in the game to fight at a maximum disadvantage, because we can't organise it so that timers are during a bad moment for the opponent. Yes, timers come at a terrible time for us as small groups but you can normally work around that to some extent. Enforcing a It makes every alliance have to consolidate into a particular timezone because, for instance, you now can't have your EUTZ fighting timers at 1900 and your USTZ fighting timers at 0000 because the fights only happen during "primetime". Even my little 80 man alliance has a "primetime" longer than that. I would do it the other way round: I would select a "quiet period" of up to 8 hours during which structures are not vulnerable. Though I can hear the complaints of every russian as they discover that their offensive timers are always at 3am...
EvilweaselFinance BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation 426	Posted - 2015.03.03 15:46:28 - [34] - Quote Awkward Pi Duolus wrote: If you think Reavers were bad... you just made it very hard for any casual alliance to hold sov in the face of a dedicated core of folks from one of the blocs dropping sov simply to grief. Remember that larger alliances have the ability to organize and sustain action better than most smaller ones. One outcome of these changes may very well be large areas of wasteland that is regularly mowed of sov 'just cause'. yeah, anyone who does not bend the knee will be summarily wiped out brb getting to work on some sufficiently degrading oaths of fealty
Karbowiak 4M-CORP Black Legion. 193	Posted - 2015.03.03 15:46:37 - [35] - Quote Am i the only one wishing that we'd get the old pos warfare sov system back?
Innominate GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 649	Posted - 2015.03.03 15:46:47 - [36] - Quote This design is one of most hilariously amazing things to come out of CCP.
M1k3y Koontz Aether Ventures Surely You're Joking 653	Posted - 2015.03.03 15:46:55 - [37] - Quote 7000 words wasn't a joke, here goes two hours. How much herp could a herp derp derp if a herp derp could herp derp.
Shodan Of Citadel School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State 3	Posted - 2015.03.03 15:47:08 - [38] - Quote Freeport Mode... Gives the aggressor docking rights and turn every battle into high-sec station bullshit. Goal 6... HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA I'm sure Goons will only bring 2-300 people instead of system crushing 2-3000. Entosis Link -turned EVE into some twisted king of the hill system where sheer number of Links win. CCP, give machariels a bonus to juggling and the middle lane.
Angry Mustache GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 188	Posted - 2015.03.03 15:47:09 - [39] - Quote You mentioned that the Entosis link will have low fitting requirements, and not disable propulsion while active. What is there to prevent massive hordes of T2 entosis fitted interceptors from completely swarming an area and putting entosis links on everything? All the ceptor has to do is stay within a 250km bubble of the objective, and even if hostiles show up, you just have to MWD around for 2 minutes. If the enemy is trying to entosis your objective, do the same. What's to stop a large group from putting 1000 nerds in interceptors, and just burn through 100 systems in 1-2 hours? You've made sov easier to take, but that works both ways. Any small group that slights a big group can expect all their space reinforced in less than 30 minutes. By interceptors. So the future of Sov warfare is inteceptor with sov lasers, slippery petes to kill interceptors, and absolutely no fleet on fleet fighting. An official Member of the Goonswarm Federation Complaints Department.
M1k3y Koontz Aether Ventures Surely You're Joking 653	Posted - 2015.03.03 15:47:48 - [40] - Quote Karbowiak wrote: Am i the only one wishing that we'd get the old pos warfare sov system back? Yes. No more structures! How much herp could a herp derp derp if a herp derp could herp derp.

GOB the Magician Enlightened Industries Goonswarm Federation 68	Posted - 2015.03.03 15:47:53 - [41] - Quote Still little reason to actually live in the sov. Perhaps update #37 will address this.
Aryndel Vyst GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 917	Posted - 2015.03.03 15:48:35 - [42] - Quote CCP, can you please address the point to living in null sec? I mean my logic is that because there is more risk to living in null sec there should be more reward, but as it stands this is not the case. Do you have any plans to address the gaping goatse-sized hole in the risk vs. reward proprotion of nullsec vs say high sec? Thanks. Yours in christ, Aryndel Vyst Director of Personnel Operations and Logistics Goonswarm Federation
EvilweaselFinance BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation 426	Posted - 2015.03.03 15:49:23 - [43] - Quote Karbowiak wrote: Am i the only one wishing that we'd get the old pos warfare sov system back? no, i liked that and it was significantly better in a lot of ways than this or dominion it was completely broken by AOE doomsdays protecting cynojammers, but that's gotten fixed, and fuel blocks exist now
Karbowiak 4M-CORP Black Legion. 193	Posted - 2015.03.03 15:51:30 - [44] - Quote EvilweaselFinance wrote: Karbowiak wrote: Am i the only one wishing that we'd get the old pos warfare sov system back? no, i liked that and it was significantly better in a lot of ways than this or dominion it was completely broken by AOE doomsdays protecting cynojammers, but that's gotten fixed, and fuel blocks exist now True story. Plus with the POS system, you could take a system in about a day, instead of spending a week taking on system. Yes you had to steamroll a system with lots of dreads, but compared to the current system, or the proposed one, you atleast had a light at the end of the tunnel. Meh, whatever..
hejsan stolly State War Academy Caldari State 2	Posted - 2015.03.03 15:51:41 - [45] - Quote Looking forward to it. I-¦m glad you are changing things CCP.
Vigilanta S0utherN Comfort DARKNESS. 78	Posted - 2015.03.03 15:52:06 - [46] - Quote if you thought dominion was complicated, wait till you read this. Also, the entosis link gameplay is really really bad. The 4 hour vulnerable per day thing is also bad, your essentially making it so we have to run 4 hour long cta's which is longer than most people have available. I think instead of permanent vulnrability it needs to be triggered somehow, maybe with the sbus doing a 30 minute online timer or something? TLDR, very complex, entoiss link gameplay is just poor
Canenald Jump Drive Appreciation Society Test Alliance Please Ignore 51	Posted - 2015.03.03 15:53:40 - [47] - Quote Capture events sound too much like capture the flag PVP maps in theme park MMOs. Please come up with something else.
JohnMonty Northstar Cabal Tactical Narcotics Team 34	Posted - 2015.03.03 15:54:40 - [48] - Quote "Defenders will also often enjoy the benefits of jump bridges," Best line in the whole thing lol
Tiberian Deci Sleeper Slumber Party Test Alliance Please Ignore 32	Posted - 2015.03.03 15:55:30 - [49] - Quote On a serious note, anyone care to speculate on how PL is going to get fights now?
Yourmoney Mywallet Jita Institute of Applied Monetary Manipulation 357	Posted - 2015.03.03 15:55:53 - [50] - Quote Total Newbie wrote: 2nd phase we have made it so any scrub corp or band of newbie alts can mess with sov. EvilweaselFinance wrote: In other words, welcome to the EVE Cold War: if you're not part of the CFC bloc or the N3 block, you will be sent back to Jita in an afternoon. Best dev blog evvarrr.

Primary This Rifter 4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation 627	Posted - 2015.03.03 15:56:12 - [51] - Quote This? This is it? This is what we've waited several YEARS for? Are you ******* serious? Reminder: CCP thinks you have no right to your alliance logos.
Aryndel Vyst GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 924	Posted - 2015.03.03 15:56:21 - [52] - Quote JohnMonty wrote: "Defenders will also often enjoy the benefits of jump bridges," Best line in the whole thing lol Except ~~~~~~jump fatigue~~~~~ aka ~~~~~emergent gameplay~~~~~
vanflyheight13 Ascendent. Test Alliance Please Ignore 4	Posted - 2015.03.03 15:56:54 - [53] - Quote Prime time effectively divides alliances by timezone. A line member with interests in PVP only cannot directly benefit his or her alliance's defense unless they operate within the 4 hour window specified. I strongly suggest CCP reconsiders the importance of this 4 hour window before implementing it.

CCP Phantom C C P C C P Alliance 5371	Posted - 2015.03.03 15:58:12 - [54] - Quote Rowells wrote: are those numbers for entosis module right? 20km for T1 and 25okm for T2? Yes, that are the numbers right now ... but as the blog says, everything is still in an early stage and we love to hear your feedback and reasons. CCP Phantom - Senior Community Representative - Volunteer Manager

EvilweaselFinance BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation 429	Posted - 2015.03.03 15:58:40 - [55] - Quote how is this for our upcoming oaths of fealty from any non-aligned entity: I, [insert your name here], pledge my undying fealty to Mittani, the King of Space, asking nothing but that he considers not squashing me out of nullsec like a bug because he has a hangover and wants to hurt someone but, recognizing my complete inability to do anything about it if he so chooses because nobody can stand against a motivated attacker, recognize that my existence in nullsec is purely at his sufferance and that even this pledge of loyalty only tips the scales somewhat in favor of my being allowed to exist. to further tip the scales in favor of my potential survival, i promise an unending stream of gifts, praise, and reaffirmations of my abject submission in the most ingrating position of surrender possible.
Tiberian Deci Sleeper Slumber Party Test Alliance Please Ignore 32	Posted - 2015.03.03 15:58:52 - [56] - Quote Aryndel Vyst wrote: JohnMonty wrote: "Defenders will also often enjoy the benefits of jump bridges," Best line in the whole thing lol Except ~~~~~~jump fatigue~~~~~ aka ~~~~~emergent gameplay~~~~~ I haven't built up more than 1d 18h of jump fatigue since it came out, and that was when I hopped across 4 mids in 1.5 hours to move my carrier into a wormhole. If you're getting more than that more often maybe you have more space than you can effectively use, which is the entire point of these changes.
Airi Cho Dark-Rising Executive Outcomes 67	Posted - 2015.03.03 15:59:39 - [57] - Quote Aryndel Vyst wrote: CCP, can you please address the point to living in null sec? I mean my logic is that because there is more risk to living in null sec there should be more reward, but as it stands this is not the case. Do you have any plans to address the gaping goatse-sized hole in the risk vs. reward proprotion of nullsec vs say high sec? Thanks. Yours in christ, Aryndel Vyst Director of Personnel Operations and Logistics Goonswarm Federation It is sometimes even safer than highsec or lowsec.
Cheyennes Evil Doers 1	Posted - 2015.03.03 16:00:09 - [58] - Quote CCP Phantom wrote: Rowells wrote: are those numbers for entosis module right? 20km for T1 and 25okm for T2? Yes, that are the numbers right now ... but as the blog says, everything is still in an early stage and we love to hear your feedback and reasons. You may love to hear it, and You may even love the reasoning... but you have yet to ever listen to the player base. so many good ideas out there but none of the common sense ones ever prevail.
Shodan Of Citadel School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State 3	Posted - 2015.03.03 16:00:27 - [59] - Quote CCP Phantom wrote: Rowells wrote: are those numbers for entosis module right? 20km for T1 and 25okm for T2? Yes, that are the numbers right now ... but as the blog says, everything is still in an early stage and we love to hear your feedback and reasons. yeah, thanks for adding a new map to DOTA... the eve map. Can Drifters be minions?
TrouserDeagle Beyond Divinity Inc Shadow Cartel 1027	Posted - 2015.03.03 16:01:05 - [60] - Quote when are capitals getting nerfed



Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .. 136 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.