EVE Search - Sticky:[Carnyx] The Jackdaw

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

Sticky:[Carnyx] The Jackdaw

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 22 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 7 post(s)
Catherine Laartii Crimson Serpent Syndicate Heiian Conglomerate 523	Posted - 2015.05.10 19:29:48 - [61] - Quote Maurice Shepard wrote: Onslaughtor wrote: ... honestly this is very disappointing. With only two lows there is no room for the fun and creative fits that made the other two so much fun, not counting the silliness that was the 10mn version(But we fixed those and we still can have fun fits like LSE svipuls with web and scram). I don't need 6 mids. Personally I would leave most the stats and just swap a mid to a low. 3-5-6 thats well balanced and keeps it in a different space than the other ships it has to compete against in its own missile using category. If I were to make more changes I would have strived for a different bonus for the missiles, like a 7.5% for rockets and a 5% for lights. But that can be fixed on the weapons themselves. The Propulsion bonus also feels very lackluster to the point where I really donGÇÖt see myself using it for much else than insta warping from gate to gate. I completely agree with this. Also all the people above in this thread that are whining about the PG should probably stop comparing this thing to the pre-nerf extremely OP 10MN AB dual ASB I'm-gonna-moonwalk-out-of-here Svipul and think about why this thing has so little pg. For PG compare to the Corax. For light missile builds, it has 2 less launchers so at top skills that's around 19 more pg to work with than the Corax. Sounds great unil you realize that a corax with 7 launchers and a mwd doesn't even have 1 pg left over to play around with. It will need to fit a micro power core on the bottom in any case if you want to fit med extender and prop with the lights, and if you're like most out here who want to fit double extenders or even go with a LSE, that'll be nearly impossible due to anemic fitting space. What will likely be seen will be light missile Jackdaws with lots of damps or tracking disruptors. They'll be great for long range fire support in fleets with all that extra ewar, i do admit.
Catherine Laartii Crimson Serpent Syndicate Heiian Conglomerate 523	Posted - 2015.05.10 19:44:36 - [62] - Quote Altrue wrote: TrouserDeagle wrote: Quote: Powergrid is very tight for most fittings, but CPU is much more generous. am I going to end up using best named (that means compact btw, your tiericide didn't work) launchers? sure am glad I trained LM spec 5 :( You most certainly are going to if the PWG stays that way. I don't really get the whole effort on making the PWG so tight, there is really no need to sanction 10mn AB fits given that their speed will be laughable at best. they're going the same odd route with the corax with gimping light missile fits. I have no idea why this is the case since the Talwar, even post-patch, would have much less difficulty fitting arty on it than the jackdaw would have fitting light missile launchers.
Zavand Crendraven Rolling Static Gone Critical 18	Posted - 2015.05.10 19:46:37 - [63] - Quote Bob Shaftoes wrote: Yeah this ship is going to be pretty worthless for kiting. If I am doing the math right it will do 1136 with navigation and acceleration control 5 , outside of speed mode 1409m/s outside propulsion mode 160 * 1.25 * (1 + 6.25 * 1500000/1550000)
Catherine Laartii Crimson Serpent Syndicate Heiian Conglomerate 523	Posted - 2015.05.10 19:48:33 - [64] - Quote Hakaari Inkuran wrote: Catherine Laartii wrote: Saerin Korvalu wrote: The main problem I'm seeing with the ship is the gimped PWG. It's ridiculously low. Less PWG than a Corax. -_- I find this infuriating. They shouldn't be locking it to one weapon system; it needs to have usability with light missiles without fitting a crapload of pg mods to even be passable with just a med extender and mwd. Hell, even the speed is wrong. If they're going to make it a strict brawler, it needs to be able to catch up and grab things; the flycatcher is wonderful for that. The hawk gets away with it since it has oodles of tank (and it's still faster than the jackdaw, I believe). Being slow is ONLY ok if you have good viability with light missiles. Give defensive mode a rep bonus instead of the bloody useless sig radius bonus; it only works on the Confessor since it's an armor boat. Bump up speed and powergrid significantly; you already have the 10mn problem fixed by the low mass so you don't need to worry as much about oversized fitting. I will repeat; you NEED to have light missile be the base for what it can fit normally. If you can't fit med extender, mwd, and all the other mids, lows and rigs without any assistance you're doing the build wrong. Please don't give us another Corax. Dude. Flycatcher has 63 pwg and has to fit 7 launchers. This has 56 and only needs to fit 5. It has a built in extender. Calm down. Fair point, now that I've been able to compare it. Still very cautious about it, as the last really good thing that happened to caldari balance was the rail buff, and they had recently nerfed even though they didn't need to. Either way, it does hold great promise as an ewar platform; all those mids mean lots and lots of damps and TDs. Also, I would like to see a rep bonus on it if the Hecate is getting one for armor.
Catherine Laartii Crimson Serpent Syndicate Heiian Conglomerate 523	Posted - 2015.05.10 19:49:56 - [65] - Quote Zavand Crendraven wrote: Bob Shaftoes wrote: Yeah this ship is going to be pretty worthless for kiting. If I am doing the math right it will do 1136 with navigation and acceleration control 5 , outside of speed mode 1409m/s outside propulsion mode 160 * 1.25 * (1 + 6.25 * 1500000/1550000) speed def needs a buff. All of the d3s should be at minimum over 2km/s with mwd, even if this ends up being the slowest one at base stats.
Zavand Crendraven Rolling Static Gone Critical 19	Posted - 2015.05.10 19:53:57 - [66] - Quote Catherine Laartii wrote: Zavand Crendraven wrote: Bob Shaftoes wrote: Yeah this ship is going to be pretty worthless for kiting. If I am doing the math right it will do 1136 with navigation and acceleration control 5 , outside of speed mode 1409m/s outside propulsion mode 160 * 1.25 * (1 + 6.25 * 1500000/1550000) speed def needs a buff. All of the d3s should be at minimum over 2km/s with mwd, even if this ends up being the slowest one at base stats. Actually the others arent that much better Svipul gets 1635m/s the prop mod is gonna be a lot slower thought cuz of the bonus
Hakaari Inkuran State War Academy Caldari State 245	Posted - 2015.05.10 19:55:12 - [67] - Quote Catherine Laartii wrote: Zavand Crendraven wrote: Bob Shaftoes wrote: Yeah this ship is going to be pretty worthless for kiting. If I am doing the math right it will do 1136 with navigation and acceleration control 5 , outside of speed mode 1409m/s outside propulsion mode 160 * 1.25 * (1 + 6.25 * 1500000/1550000) speed def needs a buff. All of the d3s should be at minimum over 2km/s with mwd, even if this ends up being the slowest one at base stats. Speed needs a slight buff but i hope everyone looking at speed remembers to compare with skills and with prop mode. The guy saying this was slower than minnie bcs made that mistake
Malcanis Vanishing Point. The Initiative. 16349	Posted - 2015.05.10 20:24:11 - [68] - Quote Ao Kishuba wrote: Kashuken Farith wrote: decent rocket destroyer that's not damaged locked. Down with Caldari kinetic lock! Seriously, it's 2015... why is this still a thing? Haven't you heard? Kinetic lock makes caldari ships interesting! "It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his ISK/hr depends upon his not understanding it!"
Stitch Kaneland Trust Doesn't Rust Triumvirate. 232	Posted - 2015.05.10 21:30:53 - [69] - Quote Guys.. its a missile a boat. It doesn't need to be as fast as a svipul or confessor. Have we not learned what fast ships and missiles do? Look at the garmur/orthrus, those 2 ships have been a cancer on PvP since their introduction. It has no tracking to contend with. And it will have insane acceleration.. so if its fit with a 1mn MWD, it will still have the acceleration to slingshot most ships. Plus, a 66% bonus to missile velocity will mean even the kiters can't kite it when its fit with LML. Possible you could even get enough range for rockets to hit out to point range with a rig or 2. Give Battlecruisers range to fullfil their Anti-Cruiser role
TrouserDeagle Beyond Divinity Inc Shadow Cartel 1072	Posted - 2015.05.10 22:08:28 - [70] - Quote Stitch Kaneland wrote: Guys.. its a missile a boat. It doesn't need to be as fast as a svipul or confessor. Have we not learned what fast ships and missiles do? Look at the garmur/orthrus, those 2 ships have been a cancer on PvP since their introduction. It has no tracking to contend with. And it will have insane acceleration.. so if its fit with a 1mn MWD, it will still have the acceleration to slingshot most ships. Plus, a 66% bonus to missile velocity will mean even the kiters can't kite it when its fit with LML. Possible you could even get enough range for rockets to hit out to point range with a rig or 2. ravens, navy ospreys and breachers use missiles and go fast, but they aren't cancerous. it's the overpoweredness of lights/rapid lights and the tackle range bonuses and enormous damage bonuses that really cause the cancer. you cannot catch a kiting ship with a fast brawler (the kiting ship's counter) when the kiting ship has a 50% longer disruptor range for very long kiting (this destroys slingshotting), a 50% longer scram range (this extremely destroys slingshotting), and weapons with such long range that it doesn't have to make any investment in range to be able to hit at 60km, even though it's a frigate and that's crazy. if light missiles had less range and possiby alpha, and if mordu ships had no tackle range bonuses, and if their damage bonuses were split into some damage and some rof, and if links and snakes and rapid launchers didn't exist, and if the orthrus didn't effectively have 10 launchers and infinite fitting and a utility high and a dronebay, I'd really be ok with them.

Madeleine Brioche Bank Of Villore 0	Posted - 2015.05.10 23:09:55 - [71] - Quote Garmur and orthrus are made to be long point missile kiter, perhaps Orthrus has too much DPS, but garmur don't, specially with very fast fit. We don't see garmur and othrus everywhere, same for worm and gila that are more powerfull. Linked and snake mordus are hard to catch when you're not, what a surprise for a kiting boat..
Lura Zara Worlds Without Boundaries Special Forces 1	Posted - 2015.05.10 23:10:18 - [72] - Quote TrouserDeagle wrote: Stitch Kaneland wrote: Guys.. its a missile a boat. It doesn't need to be as fast as a svipul or confessor. Have we not learned what fast ships and missiles do? Look at the garmur/orthrus, those 2 ships have been a cancer on PvP since their introduction. It has no tracking to contend with. And it will have insane acceleration.. so if its fit with a 1mn MWD, it will still have the acceleration to slingshot most ships. Plus, a 66% bonus to missile velocity will mean even the kiters can't kite it when its fit with LML. Possible you could even get enough range for rockets to hit out to point range with a rig or 2. ravens, navy ospreys and breachers use missiles and go fast, but they aren't cancerous. it's the overpoweredness of lights/rapid lights and the tackle range bonuses and enormous damage bonuses that really cause the cancer. you cannot catch a kiting ship with a fast brawler (the kiting ship's counter) when the kiting ship has a 50% longer disruptor range for very long kiting (this destroys slingshotting), a 50% longer scram range (this extremely destroys slingshotting), and weapons with such long range that it doesn't have to make any investment in range to be able to hit at 60km, even though it's a frigate and that's crazy. if light missiles had less range and possiby alpha, and if mordu ships had no tackle range bonuses, and if their damage bonuses were split into some damage and some rof, and if links and snakes and rapid launchers didn't exist, and if the orthrus didn't effectively have 10 launchers and infinite fitting and a utility high and a dronebay, I'd really be ok with them. In otherwords, Take away everything that makes the ship what it is, and replace it with compleatly different roles and bonuses. Take away links and the point of a commandship, Take away drugs. Then ill be okay with it so I can murder it with my little blap machine. Sorry but RLML may ruin your day, amung other things, but its the "Hard counter" to frigates and dessies that heavy missiles, HAMS and Normal light missile launchers on a cruiser could not even touch normally. You cant win all your fights, So pick different ones. If you cant out range them, Out speed them, If you cant out range or out speed them. Bait them. If you cant do all of those things, Jam them, If you cant jam them, damp them. EWAR screws over any mordu ship. Be it ECM/Damps, a 3 damp hookbill can make a garmur sit and sputter with his less than rocket distance targetting. Same with an orthrus. People are not original enough to try these things and when their cookie cutter fits fail, They ***** and moan. OP all day long.
Madeleine Brioche Bank Of Villore 0	Posted - 2015.05.10 23:20:40 - [73] - Quote double post
elitatwo Eve Minions Poopstain Removal Team 664	Posted - 2015.05.10 23:22:55 - [74] - Quote Hakaari Inkuran wrote: Dude. Flycatcher has 63 pwg and has to fit 7 launchers. This has 56 and only needs to fit 5. It has a built in extender. Calm down. again, 56 x 1.25 = 70 with Engineering V. Tired of low and nullsec? Join Eve Minions and experience the beauty of wormholes!
Syrias Bizniz KarmaFleet Goonswarm Federation 399	Posted - 2015.05.10 23:41:05 - [75] - Quote TrouserDeagle wrote: it would be helpful to include speeds with various prop mods. even the obviously broken ones that you think aren't broken. Should be ~1850m/s with MWD and all V in Speedmode without any other velocity modifiers. ~690m/s with T2 AB in Speedmode. ~1300m/s on a Meta 10mn AB in Speedmode. Here's a Fit that should actually work as Rocket Brawler: [Jackdaw, Jackdaw Test] Ballistic Control System II Internal Force Field Array I Limited 1MN Microwarpdrive I Medium Ancillary Shield Booster X5 Prototype Engine Enervator Adaptive Invulnerability Field II Medium Ancillary Shield Booster Faint Epsilon Warp Scrambler I Rocket Launcher II, Scourge Rage Rocket Rocket Launcher II, Scourge Rage Rocket Rocket Launcher II, Scourge Rage Rocket Rocket Launcher II, Scourge Rage Rocket Rocket Launcher II, Scourge Rage Rocket Small Anti-EM Screen Reinforcer II Small Anti-EM Screen Reinforcer II Small Auxillary Thrusters II ~1990m/s MWD Speedmode ~274 dps preheat with Rage rockets ~52m signature while MWD off and defensive mode Up to 300 Capbooster charges in cargo, 18 in modules, minus a few because ammo takes cargo, too. So around 33 full cycles of an ASB if you somehow miracously manage to not die in the half hour it will take to actually burn them. Fitting: CPU 336,8 of 337,5 used PG 62 of 70 used Resistances in Defense should be somewhere around the following: 77,9 EM 83,5 TH 81,4 KIN 79,4 EXP Which will net you around 320 dps Tank per heated ASB before imps / drugs / links To be honest, no clue on how to abuse the 5% shield bonus, as fitting MSEs would absolutely screw your PG and you'd have to throw in some fitting mods in your scarce lowslots. And probably run multiple ACR rigs. EDIT: If you'd tackle a Thorax, shut down it's MWD, enter defensive mode and turn off your own MWD, then web him without getting counterwebbed, you'd have a WHOPPING 65m/s advantage over it. Add in a Thorax Web, and the Thorax is already range controlling YOU. As in, your sig means nothing, you gon get nuked.
Syrias Bizniz KarmaFleet Goonswarm Federation 399	Posted - 2015.05.11 00:02:12 - [76] - Quote Max PG* you can get before Imps: Reasonably. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkkIwO_X4i4 70+ 2x 16,25 (Navy MAPC) 1,15 * 1,15 * 1,1 (2x T2 ACR, 1x T1) = 149,1 ---> Following Fit, still requiring a 1% PG Imp: [Jackdaw, Jackdaw LSE] Navy Micro Auxiliary Power Core Navy Micro Auxiliary Power Core Large F-S9 Regolith Shield Induction Limited 1MN Microwarpdrive I Stasis Webifier II Warp Scrambler II Adaptive Invulnerability Field II Stasis Webifier II Rocket Launcher II, Scourge Rage Rocket Rocket Launcher II, Scourge Rage Rocket Rocket Launcher II, Scourge Rage Rocket Rocket Launcher II, Scourge Rage Rocket Rocket Launcher II, Scourge Rage Rocket Small Ancillary Current Router II Small Ancillary Current Router II Small Ancillary Current Router I Topping out at 4922 raw Shields. PG: 149,5 of 149,1 (Req. 1%)
Arya Regnar Darwins Right Hand 704	Posted - 2015.05.11 01:04:12 - [77] - Quote Is it just me or is this ship with dual mse em amp and links like 60k ehp Holy hell that brick, and that's without invulns so you can't even neut it. EvE-Mail me if you need anything.
FT Diomedes The Graduates Get Off My Lawn 953	Posted - 2015.05.11 03:55:17 - [78] - Quote Are people really complaining that you have a hard time fitting a Large Shield Extender on a destroyer hull? The Greatest Ship Ever. Credit to Shahfluffers.
Lura Zara Worlds Without Boundaries Special Forces 1	Posted - 2015.05.11 04:07:49 - [79] - Quote FT Diomedes wrote: Are people really complaining that you have a hard time fitting a Large Shield Extender on a destroyer hull? Yes, yes they are. They also complain about not fitting a 10mn AB to a dessy.
Traejun DiSanctis Astro Technologies SpaceMonkey's Alliance 109	Posted - 2015.05.11 05:05:17 - [80] - Quote elitatwo wrote: Gustav Mannfred wrote: Why is the Jackdaw slower than all cruisers and minmatar Bc's? I think, increasing the speed to about 220 m/s would be better than 160. I also propose a 6/5/3 slot layout, that it can fit more damage modules 160 x 1.25 = 200(m/s) with Navigation V. If you put a nano on you should be at 212m/s (guestimated). Pweese everyone, the values in the thread are the one without any skills applied to them. It only has 2 lows, you propose using one of them on a nano... why? This is a 2 BCU bird. If 1 BCU gets gutted for anything, it'll be a Damage Control. Right now, it looks like a bait ship to me. Stupid massive brick tank, but lacking the PG to fit the offensive mods you need.

Iyacia Cyric'ai Red Federation RvB - RED Federation 137	Posted - 2015.05.11 06:19:54 - [81] - Quote I understand that a speedy 10mn missile lobbing dessie would be overpowered, but 160 is beyond cruiser slow. Every cruiser in the game is literally faster than it by quite a bit and even 1 BC (the Hurricane at 165m/s) is faster than it. Surely it doesn't need to be THAT slow.
Specia1 K State War Academy Caldari State 57	Posted - 2015.05.11 06:24:14 - [82] - Quote So basically it just does what the Corax does with more pshhh. And has the same issues with PG, hence limited fitting options. At least it is nimble, so you can align quickly while the other d3s are dancing around your oh-so-slowness. Please tell me you at least went back to the art department for a facelift?
Iyacia Cyric'ai Red Federation RvB - RED Federation 137	Posted - 2015.05.11 06:31:56 - [83] - Quote Arya Regnar wrote: Is it just me or is this ship with dual mse em amp and links like 60k ehp Holy hell that brick, and that's without invulns so you can't even neut it. Yeah but you can fit a Maller to have over 100K EHP and it'll still go faster than this.
Traejun DiSanctis Astro Technologies SpaceMonkey's Alliance 109	Posted - 2015.05.11 06:40:52 - [84] - Quote Specia1 K wrote: So basically it just does what the Corax does with more pshhh. And has the same issues with PG, hence limited fitting options. At least it is nimble, so you can align quickly while the other d3s are dancing around your oh-so-slowness. Please tell me you at least went back to the art department for a facelift? I don't mind the ugly factor. It fits with Caldari ship design in terms of being no-frills, aesthetically. Pointing out the Corax brings up a great point. The Jackdaw really does just feel like an souped up Corax - more tank, less speed, same fitting issues. Mind you, I think if the Jackdaw had the powergrid to fit it the way people wish they could, it would be beyond OP. But the current levels are a bit extreme. As it stands... it's an overpriced/undersized Drake with the apparent inability to fit the modules it seems to beg for. I see this thing as having 2 possible fits. Rocket brawler: Too slow to close. LML "sniper": Not enough PG to fit it.
Iyacia Cyric'ai Red Federation RvB - RED Federation 137	Posted - 2015.05.11 06:44:31 - [85] - Quote Traejun DiSanctis wrote: Specia1 K wrote: So basically it just does what the Corax does with more pshhh. And has the same issues with PG, hence limited fitting options. At least it is nimble, so you can align quickly while the other d3s are dancing around your oh-so-slowness. Please tell me you at least went back to the art department for a facelift? I don't mind the ugly factor. It fits with Caldari ship design in terms of being no-frills, aesthetically. Pointing out the Corax brings up a great point. The Jackdaw really does just feel like an souped up Corax - more tank, less speed, same fitting issues. Mind you, I think if the Jackdaw had the powergrid to fit it the way people wish they could, it would be beyond OP. But the current levels are a bit extreme. As it stands... it's an overpriced/undersized Drake with the apparent inability to fit the modules it seems to beg for. I see this thing as having 2 possible fits. Rocket brawler: Too slow to close. LML "sniper": Not enough PG to fit it. Corax has damage application bonus so true to its destroyer role, it can roflstomp frigates that get into its range. The currently proposed Jackdaw on the otherhand... why would anyone fly this over a RLML Caracal?
Traejun DiSanctis Astro Technologies SpaceMonkey's Alliance 109	Posted - 2015.05.11 07:01:19 - [86] - Quote Iyacia Cyric'ai wrote: Traejun DiSanctis wrote: Specia1 K wrote: So basically it just does what the Corax does with more pshhh. And has the same issues with PG, hence limited fitting options. At least it is nimble, so you can align quickly while the other d3s are dancing around your oh-so-slowness. Please tell me you at least went back to the art department for a facelift? I don't mind the ugly factor. It fits with Caldari ship design in terms of being no-frills, aesthetically. Pointing out the Corax brings up a great point. The Jackdaw really does just feel like an souped up Corax - more tank, less speed, same fitting issues. Mind you, I think if the Jackdaw had the powergrid to fit it the way people wish they could, it would be beyond OP. But the current levels are a bit extreme. As it stands... it's an overpriced/undersized Drake with the apparent inability to fit the modules it seems to beg for. I see this thing as having 2 possible fits. Rocket brawler: Too slow to close. LML "sniper": Not enough PG to fit it. Corax has damage application bonus so true to its destroyer role, it can roflstomp frigates that get into its range. The currently proposed Jackdaw on the otherhand... why would anyone fly this over a RLML Caracal? Other than the massively inflated brick tank, there doesn't look like a reason. Also, bait. I'm sure there will be plenty of poorly-informed PvP'ers that will see this thing as a nice, juicy target and a way to pad their killboard. I can see this thing getting a lot of people in trouble.
Noobsprayer Republic Military School Minmatar Republic 0	Posted - 2015.05.11 10:29:45 - [87] - Quote Uriam Khanid wrote: before you start to criticize, post this: i am addicted for 10MN T3d. CCP, where my drug? You got that one wrong. It is not about addiction. It is about me being terrible at flying my ship. So bad that just links and high-grades won't do the trick for me. So I expected that ship to be another option to my list of granted pwnage. Now it turns out to require some piloting skills ...
Fourteen Maken The Great Harmon Institute Of Technology Enemy Spotted. 150	Posted - 2015.05.11 10:32:31 - [88] - Quote Bob Shaftoes wrote: Yeah this ship is going to be pretty worthless for kiting. If I am doing the math right it will do 1136 with navigation and acceleration control 5 , outside of speed mode 1136 with an MWD? I hope that's wrong
TrouserDeagle Beyond Divinity Inc Shadow Cartel 1072	Posted - 2015.05.11 10:40:39 - [89] - Quote Syrias Bizniz wrote: Medium Ancillary Shield Booster oh boy I sure do love having to scour the region for miniature navy cap boosters after every fight, and being unable to ever loot anything. sure is fun. the speed looks reasonable though.
Syrias Bizniz KarmaFleet Goonswarm Federation 399	Posted - 2015.05.11 12:56:23 - [90] - Quote TrouserDeagle wrote: Syrias Bizniz wrote: Medium Ancillary Shield Booster oh boy I sure do love having to scour the region for miniature navy cap boosters after every fight, and being unable to ever loot anything. sure is fun. the speed looks reasonable though. The charges should last you for around 20 minutes of permanently cycling your ASBs. Which is probably half a day of roaming in it. Also, FW Losec should be stocked with this ****, not sure where you are around these days though.



Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 22 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

Copyright © 2006-2024, Chribba - OMG Labs. All Rights Reserved. - perf 0,06s, ref 20241222/1743
EVE-Online™ and Eve imagery © CCP.

bitcoin: 1CHRiBBArqpw5Yz7x5KS2RRtN5ubEn5gF

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.