Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Geldorf Drakar
Amarr Port Royal Independent Kontractors Imperial Republic Of the North
|
Posted - 2007.03.20 23:10:00 -
[1]
I must say that I am severly dissapointed with CCP decision to include a voice client into EVE. As well I am supprised at CCPs naivety, thinking that Users would turn to an integrated voice client which they have to pay for, when nearly everyone has a TS or Vent server available for use, free I might add.
One must ask why anyone would prefer to use a integrated client that costs more to use and has vastly inferior quality than TS or Vent, not to mention the fact that TS and Vent contain features EVE Voice simply does not have.
Generally I support everything CCP does with EVE from new content to changes in modules but in this case I must strongly object. I am sure that had the time that was wasted upon EVE voice could have been better used to correct bugs and lag issues within EVE, rather than implimenting something inferior to the tools the EVE community allready has.
I wouldnt even be supprised if EVE voice causes increased lag issues.
Fix lag and bugs and develop new content before you start doing things that dont need to be done at all CCP. "Long live the Emperor" Opinions expressed above are mine and mine only
|

Esurnir
Amarr Bears Inc FREGE Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.03.20 23:14:00 -
[2]
Are graphist able to fix bug ? Are vivox people able to change the queuing system of the server ? No. They are people working for bug, they are people working for new content, most of new content manpower can't be switched to bug fixxing. ----
Quote: Thou shall pew pew.
Book of Revelation 12, 51 |

Baleorg
Gallente Guys of Sarcasm
|
Posted - 2007.03.20 23:15:00 -
[3]
besides, you dont have to use vivox, NOONE is forcing you... in fact when you DONT subscribe you wont even notice its there since it wont
BTW: A GOOD Cache-Cleaner |

Svenstaro
Amarr Templars of Space CORE.
|
Posted - 2007.03.20 23:17:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Geldorf Drakar I must say that I am severly dissapointed with CCP decision to include a voice client into EVE. As well I am supprised at CCPs naivety, thinking that Users would turn to an integrated voice client which they have to pay for, when nearly everyone has a TS or Vent server available for use, free I might add.
One must ask why anyone would prefer to use a integrated client that costs more to use and has vastly inferior quality than TS or Vent, not to mention the fact that TS and Vent contain features EVE Voice simply does not have.
Generally I support everything CCP does with EVE from new content to changes in modules but in this case I must strongly object. I am sure that had the time that was wasted upon EVE voice could have been better used to correct bugs and lag issues within EVE, rather than implimenting something inferior to the tools the EVE community allready has.
I wouldnt even be supprised if EVE voice causes increased lag issues.
Fix lag and bugs and develop new content before you start doing things that dont need to be done at all CCP.
Maybe Vivox offered CCP something they couldn't refuse :) I don't think CCP got this idea by their own they're smart enough to know what people use and that an external client is much more powerful than any ingame solution will ever be.
____________________________________________ Toyship Wallpapers |

Niccolado Starwalker
Shadow Templars
|
Posted - 2007.03.20 23:19:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Geldorf Drakar I must say that I am severly dissapointed with CCP decision to include a voice client into EVE. As well I am supprised at CCPs naivety, thinking that Users would turn to an integrated voice client which they have to pay for, when nearly everyone has a TS or Vent server available for use, free I might add.
One must ask why anyone would prefer to use a integrated client that costs more to use and has vastly inferior quality than TS or Vent, not to mention the fact that TS and Vent contain features EVE Voice simply does not have.
Generally I support everything CCP does with EVE from new content to changes in modules but in this case I must strongly object. I am sure that had the time that was wasted upon EVE voice could have been better used to correct bugs and lag issues within EVE, rather than implimenting something inferior to the tools the EVE community allready has.
I wouldnt even be supprised if EVE voice causes increased lag issues.
Fix lag and bugs and develop new content before you start doing things that dont need to be done at all CCP.
I am going to get EVE Voice. This because the sound quality will be way better! TS/Vent sucks big time. The quality of the sound is Les horribles!
Viewed in that light, 10 dollar a year is to me nothing!
Originally by: Eldo Davip PORTRAITS OMFG WOOT. WE R GONIG FOR MROE BREEE!!!!11
|

Svenstaro
Amarr Templars of Space CORE.
|
Posted - 2007.03.20 23:20:00 -
[6]
Ever tried ventrilo on 44khz? If not, feel free to join me, it doesn't get much better.
____________________________________________ Toyship Wallpapers |

Smagd
Encina Technologies Namtz'aar k'in
|
Posted - 2007.03.20 23:22:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Geldorf Drakar As well I am supprised at CCPs naivety, thinking that Users would turn to an integrated voice client which they have to pay for, when nearly everyone has a TS or Vent server available for use, free I might add.
You have someone who provides free TS servers? As in noone has to pay their bandwidth? Sign me up please, I'll bring 400 alliance mates.
If it's really free for what you do, I'll envy you and leave you the option not to use the integrated stuff. Thank you.
Originally by: Geldorf Drakar
One must ask why anyone would prefer to use a integrated client that costs more to use and has vastly inferior quality than TS or Vent, not to mention the fact that TS and Vent contain features EVE Voice simply does not have.
Well, for the features it has that TS and Vent don't, maybe. Just maybe. And I'm not yet decided myself. I hate telephones, and my commanders usually have to haul me onto TS by the scruff of my neck.
Originally by: Geldorf Drakar
I am sure that had the time that was wasted upon EVE voice could have been better used to correct bugs and lag issues within EVE, rather than implimenting something inferior to the tools the EVE community allready has.
I think you forgot to research this a little. I believe there was a dev blog stating that most of the work was done by Vivox. But if you're too lazy to look it up so am I.
Originally by: Geldorf Drakar
I wouldnt even be supprised if EVE voice causes increased lag issues.
Yeah, and I wouldn't be surprised if global warming was caused by all the UFO research in Area 51. They don't use the same servers if that's what you were thinking of.
Originally by: Geldorf Drakar
Fix lag and bugs and develop new content before you start doing things that dont need to be done at all CCP.
Seconded on fixing the bugs, but let's see, this patch's looking pretty so far - except they shouldn't have fixed the ONE bug EvE Voice integration caused so far: Delayed mode local! \o/ That was a good one, I want it back :)
On not adding new content: I believe that's a different department doing that. For instance, I hardly expect the designers working on the new ship models and textures to help out with cluster overload. Of course, if that's how you run business in your part of the country ....
Family Tahar, of Clan Hadar, of Caravan of Namtz'Aar K'in |

Crumplecorn
Gallente Eve Cluster Explorations
|
Posted - 2007.03.20 23:31:00 -
[8]
Edited by: Crumplecorn on 20/03/2007 23:28:55 Ha ha, having just tested Vivox by logging my main and my alt and talking to myself using the corp channel, I realised that the one area wher Vivox will truly pwn is in small scale stuff like this.
Voice chat with all the people in any channel (except local) is only one click away.
TS/Vent can't do that. And Vivox can do everything TS/Vent can do (except OOG, which is apparently coming in the future).
Vivox > All
Even if Vivox fails in the alliance/fleetop arena (and it may yet suceed), it really adds to Eve that anywhere where we could once type to each other we can now talk to each other instead with such ease.
Useless feature? Try 'one of the best additions in recent times'. -
If you go into your options menu, there's a difficulty slider. Put that all the way over to the easiest setting and you'll be fine. |

CHAOS100
Momentum. Dusk and Dawn
|
Posted - 2007.03.20 23:40:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Crumplecorn Edited by: Crumplecorn on 20/03/2007 23:28:55 Ha ha, having just tested Vivox by logging my main and my alt and talking to myself using the corp channel, I realised that the one area wher Vivox will truly pwn is in small scale stuff like this.
Voice chat with all the people in any channel (except local) is only one click away.
TS/Vent can't do that. And Vivox can do everything TS/Vent can do (except OOG, which is apparently coming in the future).
Vivox > All
Even if Vivox fails in the alliance/fleetop arena (and it may yet suceed), it really adds to Eve that anywhere where we could once type to each other we can now talk to each other instead with such ease.
Useless feature? Try 'one of the best additions in recent times'.
Why would you want to talk to everyone in every channel? Seems like easy ability to spam and easy to embarass yourself in several ways I wont bother mentioning. And btw it IS possible in vent, as are many things... and people just don't use them... because those features are just THAT useful /sarcasm.
What if 1 person doesn't pay for vivox, then it will be pointless to make a voice mail to corp or to talk during any operation. Also, quality doesn't beat vent unfortunately.
It will probably cause lag in the same way gang bonuses cause lag in fleets.
--------------
|

Benco97
Gallente Multiverse Corporation The Core Collective
|
Posted - 2007.03.20 23:41:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Crumplecorn Edited by: Crumplecorn on 20/03/2007 23:28:55 Ha ha, having just tested Vivox by logging my main and my alt and talking to myself using the corp channel, I realised that the one area wher Vivox will truly pwn is in small scale stuff like this.
Voice chat with all the people in any channel (except local) is only one click away.
TS/Vent can't do that. And Vivox can do everything TS/Vent can do (except OOG, which is apparently coming in the future).
Vivox > All
Even if Vivox fails in the alliance/fleetop arena (and it may yet suceed), it really adds to Eve that anywhere where we could once type to each other we can now talk to each other instead with such ease.
Useless feature? Try 'one of the best additions in recent times'.
If it's got the Crumply seal of approval then it's got my vote!
"MY GOD KEEP THIS AWAY FROM BENCO97!!!!!" - Constantine Arcanum |
|

Aedeas
|
Posted - 2007.03.20 23:43:00 -
[11]
Next up in the EVE Shop. EvE Branded VoIP Headsets...

|

James Lyrus
Lyrus Associates
|
Posted - 2007.03.20 23:46:00 -
[12]
Originally by: CHAOS100
Originally by: Crumplecorn Edited by: Crumplecorn on 20/03/2007 23:28:55 Ha ha, having just tested Vivox by logging my main and my alt and talking to myself using the corp channel, I realised that the one area wher Vivox will truly pwn is in small scale stuff like this.
Voice chat with all the people in any channel (except local) is only one click away.
TS/Vent can't do that. And Vivox can do everything TS/Vent can do (except OOG, which is apparently coming in the future).
Vivox > All
Even if Vivox fails in the alliance/fleetop arena (and it may yet suceed), it really adds to Eve that anywhere where we could once type to each other we can now talk to each other instead with such ease.
Useless feature? Try 'one of the best additions in recent times'.
Why would you want to talk to everyone in every channel? Seems like easy ability to spam and easy to embarass yourself in several ways I wont bother mentioning. And btw it IS possible in vent, as are many things... and people just don't use them... because those features are just THAT useful /sarcasm.
What if 1 person doesn't pay for vivox, then it will be pointless to make a voice mail to corp or to talk during any operation. Also, quality doesn't beat vent unfortunately.
It will probably cause lag in the same way gang bonuses cause lag in fleets.
That's actually my biggest problem with eve-voice. In order to be useful, everyone in the corp's going to have to get it. Or, I could just keep paying what's just 'not all that much' (to me) for a vent server.
|

Phrixus Zephyr
D00M. Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2007.03.20 23:49:00 -
[13]
Do you really think there is any corp or alliance out there, which relies on voice communication that is going to have even close to the majority of its members buying this feature? No? So what's the point of anyone buying it if your corperation/alliance isn't going to use it because a large portion of your member base can't afford it?
I'm half expecting to see threads in recruitment asking for 'VOIP Only' but to be honest, it'll be their loss when they limit their recruitment pool to such an extent.
Originally by: Ice Conch In soviet russia, soap drops you!
|

Gaven Blands
|
Posted - 2007.03.20 23:55:00 -
[14]
I imagine having an integrated voice server will just make it that little bit easier for Alliance-Friendly GM's to listen in on enemy alliances. Sounds Good. Use it at your peril.
Eve: Cheats prosper. |

Mal Loc
|
Posted - 2007.03.20 23:59:00 -
[15]
Originally by: Geldorf Drakar when nearly everyone has a TS or Vent server available for use, free I might add.
I have been looking around for hosted voice solutions and have not found anything free. I was planning on using Eve's integrated voice because it seemed like a great deal for the price. $10/year and you don't need to bother with hosting bandwidth etc. But if there are free solutions, I would reconsider. What free solutions are people using? Your signature exceeds the maximum allowed filesize of 24000 bytes -Eldo Davip ([email protected]) |

Crumplecorn
Gallente Eve Cluster Explorations
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 00:00:00 -
[16]
Originally by: CHAOS100 Why would you want to talk to everyone in every channel? Seems like easy ability to spam and easy to embarass yourself in several ways I wont bother mentioning. And btw it IS possible in vent, as are many things... and people just don't use them... because those features are just THAT useful /sarcasm.
I don't want to talk to everyone in every channel, but, for instance, I keep in contact with a few friends via another corp's public channel. Up until now to actually talk to them they had to give me access to their TS server. Now I can chat to them, and anyone else in the channel, directly in the client.
And if I want to talk with one of them individually, we can do an audio convo (I assume, not checked this, would be a major omission though), rather than the two of us having to find a spot on some TS server.
As for being possible in Vent, I didn't know that I could talk to a bunch of people who have no association other than being in the same chat channel at the same time by merely clicking once, using vent. They should advertise that feature, complete and total integration with Eve would encourage it's use over TS. Except, ofc, integrated VOIP software is, as so many people run to point out .
Originally by: CHAOS100 What if 1 person doesn't pay for vivox, then it will be pointless to make a voice mail to corp or to talk during any operation. Also, quality doesn't beat vent unfortunately.
That's funny, not everyone in my old corp had TS/Vent, and yet they aren't useless. Oh, that's right, this tired argument is garbage. Got to keep that in mind. -
If you go into your options menu, there's a difficulty slider. Put that all the way over to the easiest setting and you'll be fine. |

Crumplecorn
Gallente Eve Cluster Explorations
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 00:02:00 -
[17]
Originally by: James Lyrus That's actually my biggest problem with eve-voice. In order to be useful, everyone in the corp's going to have to get it. Or, I could just keep paying what's just 'not all that much' (to me) for a vent server.
Notify: A deaf (IRL) person has joined your corp. All your VOIP tools are now useless as one person cannot use them.
...
Right. -
If you go into your options menu, there's a difficulty slider. Put that all the way over to the easiest setting and you'll be fine. |

Kerfira
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 00:03:00 -
[18]
Originally by: Geldorf Drakar I must say that I am severly dissapointed with CCP decision to include a voice client into EVE. As well I am supprised at CCPs naivety, thinking that Users would turn to an integrated voice client which they have to pay for, when nearly everyone has a TS or Vent server available for use, free I might add.
One must ask why anyone would prefer to use a integrated client that costs more to use and has vastly inferior quality than TS or Vent, not to mention the fact that TS and Vent contain features EVE Voice simply does not have.
You're seeing this from the perspective of a player who is already in one of the larger alliances, and who has access to TS through that. For sure, for these players there is little incentive to switch.
However, for players in smaller corp, or just for casual chats with other players they encounter, this is a good solution. It is voluntary, and is reasonably priced compared to a TS/Vent server.
|

Crumplecorn
Gallente Eve Cluster Explorations
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 00:04:00 -
[19]
Edited by: Crumplecorn on 21/03/2007 00:02:01
Originally by: Phrixus Zephyr Do you really think there is any corp or alliance out there, which relies on voice communication that is going to have even close to the majority of its members buying this feature? No? So what's the point of anyone buying it if your corperation/alliance isn't going to use it because a large portion of your member base can't afford it?
I'm half expecting to see threads in recruitment asking for 'VOIP Only' but to be honest, it'll be their loss when they limit their recruitment pool to such an extent.
We are talking about a bunch of people who pay 15 euros (or equiv) or a multiple of this per month for Eve, but can't afford an additional <1 euro for integrated voice.
This is a very small demographic, excluding it really won't cause you any problems.
Also, your post assumes the only use of VOIP is fleet ops. Presumably using the classic 'this is the only way I use it, so it must be the only way anyone uses it' logic. -
If you go into your options menu, there's a difficulty slider. Put that all the way over to the easiest setting and you'll be fine. |

Tractormech
Caldari Fortune's Fools
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 00:09:00 -
[20]
I don't mine. Therefore mining is useless and should be removed from the game. DEVs stop working on mining and remove this useless feature.
|
|

vladdy2
VentureCorp Imperial Republic Of the North
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 00:17:00 -
[21]
Originally by: Tractormech I don't mine. Therefore mining is useless and should be removed from the game. DEVs stop working on mining and remove this useless feature.
/signed   ---------------------------------
|

Frug
Zenithal Harvest
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 00:18:00 -
[22]
WTB 1 year vivox access. Offering 100 million isk. Msg me. :P
- - - - - - - - - - Do not use dotted lines - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - or automatic signatures - - - - - - - -
"186,282 miles per second; It's not just a good idea, it's the law." |

Crumplecorn
Gallente Eve Cluster Explorations
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 00:18:00 -
[23]
Originally by: Tractormech I don't mine. Therefore mining is useless and should be removed from the game. DEVs stop working on mining and remove this useless feature.
I think you just won the thread. -
If you go into your options menu, there's a difficulty slider. Put that all the way over to the easiest setting and you'll be fine. |

Hllaxiu
Shiva Morsus Mihi
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 00:18:00 -
[24]
Edited by: Hllaxiu on 21/03/2007 00:14:59
Quote:
Quote: I'm half expecting to see threads in recruitment asking for 'VOIP Only' but to be honest, it'll be their loss when they limit their recruitment pool to such an extent.
We are talking about a bunch of people who pay 15 euros (or equiv) or a multiple of this per month for Eve, but can't afford an additional <1 euro for integrated voice.
This is a very small demographic, excluding it really won't cause you any problems.
I'm expecting alliances to say "Instead of giving that $1 (or 1 euro or pound or whatever) to CCP, send it via the paypal link to us, so we can buy a really awesome TS server!"
I mean, 1000 person alliance times $1 a month can buy a lot of server. --- Our greatest glory is not in never failing, but in rising up every time we fail. - Emerson |

Verone
Veto. Veto Corp
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 00:23:00 -
[25]
Originally by: Niccolado Starwalker
I am going to get EVE Voice. This because the sound quality will be way better! TS/Vent sucks big time. The quality of the sound is Les horribles!
Viewed in that light, 10 dollar a year is to me nothing!
Have tested it, Ventrilo has a way better bitrate and quality when set up properly.
I'll still be using Ventrilo as well as the rest of my corp as I'd rather members hang onto voice comms and not be disconnected if their game client crashes, to prevent silly losses.
NEWEST MOVIE : VETO FOR HIRE
|

Crumplecorn
Gallente Eve Cluster Explorations
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 00:24:00 -
[26]
Originally by: Hllaxiu Edited by: Hllaxiu on 21/03/2007 00:14:59
Quote:
Quote: I'm half expecting to see threads in recruitment asking for 'VOIP Only' but to be honest, it'll be their loss when they limit their recruitment pool to such an extent.
We are talking about a bunch of people who pay 15 euros (or equiv) or a multiple of this per month for Eve, but can't afford an additional <1 euro for integrated voice.
This is a very small demographic, excluding it really won't cause you any problems.
I'm expecting alliances to say "Instead of giving that $1 (or 1 euro or pound or whatever) to CCP, send it via the paypal link to us, so we can buy a really awesome TS server!"
I mean, 1000 person alliance times $1 a month can buy a lot of server.
So you can have one TS server which is tied to your alliance, or all have voice coms which work with anyone else in the game?
That's a tough choice. -
If you go into your options menu, there's a difficulty slider. Put that all the way over to the easiest setting and you'll be fine. |

Benco97
Gallente Multiverse Corporation The Core Collective
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 00:27:00 -
[27]
Like I said in a thread about this before, I will be using this service but not for what most peopel are assuming it's for. You have your little fleet op thingy on your private voice server ,well that nice, well done. I'll be using it to talk to people I DON'T KNOW, you know.. sometimes we talk to people outside our corps? or even people we've never talked to before! it's an opportunity to meet new people. Imagine you're a pirate, you're ransoming someone. What you going to do, give them you're server details so they can log on to your ventrillo or simply use the eve voice ans send them a mighty "ARR!" I rest my case.
"MY GOD KEEP THIS AWAY FROM BENCO97!!!!!" - Constantine Arcanum |

Vabjekf
Caldari
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 00:42:00 -
[28]
TS/Vent are better for anything you need voice com for. As people have stated above, more controll, and the ability to not lose it if eve crashs <- important
As far as normal chatting? This is the internet, not some floozy voicemail service. Use text
Im actualy happy about this pay thing. It will ensure that nobody will use it because its not useful unless everyone has acess to it, but that would be disasterous as you would get wierdos trying to voice convo you to negotiate prices for isogen or something -_-
|

Crumplecorn
Gallente Eve Cluster Explorations
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 00:48:00 -
[29]
This is likely a troll, but I'll bite...
Originally by: Vabjekf TS/Vent are better for anything you need voice com for. As people have stated above, more controll, and the ability to not lose it if eve crashs <- important
Wrong, wrong, and getting fixed, respectively.
Originally by: Vabjekf As far as normal chatting? This is the internet, not some floozy voicemail service. Use text
Find out what the second M in MMORPG is for. You must have no friends or **** friends if you never talk to them.
Originally by: Vabjekf Im actualy happy about this pay thing. It will ensure that nobody will use it because its not useful unless everyone has acess to it, but that would be disasterous as you would get wierdos trying to voice convo you to negotiate prices for isogen or something -_-
Wrong and WTF? respectively. -
If you go into your options menu, there's a difficulty slider. Put that all the way over to the easiest setting and you'll be fine. |

Vabjekf
Caldari
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 00:55:00 -
[30]
Originally by: Crumplecorn This is likely a troll, but I'll bite...
Originally by: Vabjekf TS/Vent are better for anything you need voice com for. As people have stated above, more controll, and the ability to not lose it if eve crashs <- important
Wrong, wrong, and getting fixed, respectively.
Originally by: Vabjekf As far as normal chatting? This is the internet, not some floozy voicemail service. Use text
Find out what the second M in MMORPG is for. You must have no friends or **** friends if you never talk to them.
I talk to people all the time. With text. My old friend bob, sometimes ill call him up on the phone and say "get online i need to talk to you". And then we use text. Text is better. The only time i have full conversations with people using my voice is when they are infront of me.
Originally by: Vabjekf Im actualy happy about this pay thing. It will ensure that nobody will use it because its not useful unless everyone has acess to it, but that would be disasterous as you would get wierdos trying to voice convo you to negotiate prices for isogen or something -_-
Wrong and WTF? respectively.
You have obviously never played a game that had intigrated free voice communication.
|
|

Crumplecorn
Gallente Eve Cluster Explorations
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 01:09:00 -
[31]
Originally by: Vabjekf You have obviously never played a game that had intigrated free voice communication.
That is true. What am I missing? -
If you go into your options menu, there's a difficulty slider. Put that all the way over to the easiest setting and you'll be fine. |

Dark Flare
Caldari Corpus PCG
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 01:13:00 -
[32]
Well, I don't care what you nay-sayers think. I like it.
Used it most of tonight on a "Gang" window, worked brilliantly, hardly ANY breakup at all, and absolutely no issues with it. Top notch stuff if you ask me.
Good job CCP, and I'll probably be paying for this Vivox stuff when the 30day trial of it runs out :) Dark Flare - Corpus PCG |

Vabjekf
Caldari
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 01:15:00 -
[33]
You become required to use it at all times everywhere. And you get to listen to random people laughing at themselves or freaking out or paniking or generaly being idiots and asses and whatnot. Little kids or high strung wierdos.
Its kind of funny at times. But the problem is that you are never able to turn it off or else you basicaly just may aswell turn the whole game off because nobody will play with you.
The fact that this has a required pay means that everyone can not expect everyone to have it, and therefore it will not become the default means of communication. This is a gigantic blessing. Because games like DDO which had intigrated voice where just terrible to play sometimes because you had to listen to play but listening was so painful=p
Voice is good for situations where it actualy helps. But all the time? Dont people ever like to listen to music anymore? Or just sit in silence sometimes?
|

Crumplecorn
Gallente Eve Cluster Explorations
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 01:19:00 -
[34]
Edited by: Crumplecorn on 21/03/2007 01:16:16
Originally by: Vabjekf You become required to use it at all times everywhere. And you get to listen to random people laughing at themselves or freaking out or paniking or generaly being idiots and asses and whatnot. Little kids or high strung wierdos.
Its kind of funny at times. But the problem is that you are never able to turn it off or else you basicaly just may aswell turn the whole game off because nobody will play with you.
The fact that this has a required pay means that everyone can not expect everyone to have it, and therefore it will not become the default means of communication. This is a gigantic blessing. Because games like DDO which had intigrated voice where just terrible to play sometimes because you had to listen to play but listening was so painful=p
Voice is good for situations where it actualy helps. But all the time? Dont people ever like to listen to music anymore? Or just sit in silence sometimes?
I don't know exactly how the systems you are referring to are implemented, but in Vivox each channel is essentially its own voice server. This problem will occur no more with Vivox than it did with TS/Vent.
For those for whom VOIP will be required, it already is required. For the rest of us, it will always be optional.
Plus in Eve you can shoot people who act the maggot. -
If you go into your options menu, there's a difficulty slider. Put that all the way over to the easiest setting and you'll be fine. |

Lygos
Finis Actum
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 01:25:00 -
[35]
Edited by: Lygos on 21/03/2007 01:23:46
The only area in which Vivox might be truly useful is in talking to people with whom you might not habitually talk. Otherwise, 3rd party clients are a more efficient use of hardware resources.
For example, in a ransom situation, it might be as useful as T2 Hatemail. If this is not possible, then it's not worth it. If it's just going to get a lot of regular civil extortionists banned, then it's silly.
If people only used Vivox in a lighter capacity, as in adhoc communications or trading, then I could see the bandwidth reqs dropping, and perhaps a discounted service. It won't be around if it doesn't pay the bills, and there's also the concern that the EVE community is still quite small for an online service.
Hopefully Vivox will have some success in EVE, and then other games, and the pricing and options will become more competitive.
--- T2 Risk | Corp Divisions |

Daelin Blackleaf
No Joy Corp Pride - Honor - Duty
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 01:40:00 -
[36]
More competitive?
I'm poor... heck I'm poorer than poor. I eats my Tesco Value and drinks my Traitors Gate (1ltr of Vodka for less than a packet of cigarettes... if you can bring yourself to drink it) so I can afford to give the little un's walkers crisps and Bernard Matthews turkey dinosaurs.
I'm as poor as all that, I gots no job, my government taxes me to the hilt, I lives in a cruddy over-priced little village, can't afford a car, and the benefits for parents never seem to go up with the prices and you know what... I can afford Vivox.
|

Fuujin
hirr Morsus Mihi
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 01:47:00 -
[37]
$10 for a year? Sign me up!
|

Armin Novastorm
Gallente I-Omniscient-I
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 01:48:00 -
[38]
Originally by: Crumplecorn Edited by: Crumplecorn on 21/03/2007 01:16:16
Originally by: Vabjekf You become required to use it at all times everywhere. And you get to listen to random people laughing at themselves or freaking out or paniking or generaly being idiots and asses and whatnot. Little kids or high strung wierdos.
Its kind of funny at times. But the problem is that you are never able to turn it off or else you basicaly just may aswell turn the whole game off because nobody will play with you.
The fact that this has a required pay means that everyone can not expect everyone to have it, and therefore it will not become the default means of communication. This is a gigantic blessing. Because games like DDO which had intigrated voice where just terrible to play sometimes because you had to listen to play but listening was so painful=p
Voice is good for situations where it actualy helps. But all the time? Dont people ever like to listen to music anymore? Or just sit in silence sometimes?
I don't know exactly how the systems you are referring to are implemented, but in Vivox each channel is essentially its own voice server. This problem will occur no more with Vivox than it did with TS/Vent.
For those for whom VOIP will be required, it already is required. For the rest of us, it will always be optional.
Plus in Eve you can shoot people who act the maggot.
Not in high sec, but im guessin you almost never go there.
P.S. Cant find the difficulty slider, can you help me locate it?
|

Salusa VC
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 01:53:00 -
[39]
Originally by: Smagd
Originally by: Geldorf Drakar As well I am supprised at CCPs naivety, thinking that Users would turn to an integrated voice client which they have to pay for, when nearly everyone has a TS or Vent server available for use, free I might add.
You have someone who provides free TS servers? As in noone has to pay their bandwidth? Sign me up please, I'll bring 400 alliance mates.
You miss the point. If each and every one of your alliance mates pay up for IVC thats $4k.
I reckon you can get some dedicated TS/Vent bandwith for a fraction of that, dont you?
|

Crumplecorn
Gallente Eve Cluster Explorations
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 02:02:00 -
[40]
Originally by: Armin Novastorm
Originally by: Crumplecorn Edited by: Crumplecorn on 21/03/2007 01:16:16
Originally by: Vabjekf You become required to use it at all times everywhere. And you get to listen to random people laughing at themselves or freaking out or paniking or generaly being idiots and asses and whatnot. Little kids or high strung wierdos.
Its kind of funny at times. But the problem is that you are never able to turn it off or else you basicaly just may aswell turn the whole game off because nobody will play with you.
The fact that this has a required pay means that everyone can not expect everyone to have it, and therefore it will not become the default means of communication. This is a gigantic blessing. Because games like DDO which had intigrated voice where just terrible to play sometimes because you had to listen to play but listening was so painful=p
Voice is good for situations where it actualy helps. But all the time? Dont people ever like to listen to music anymore? Or just sit in silence sometimes?
I don't know exactly how the systems you are referring to are implemented, but in Vivox each channel is essentially its own voice server. This problem will occur no more with Vivox than it did with TS/Vent.
For those for whom VOIP will be required, it already is required. For the rest of us, it will always be optional.
Plus in Eve you can shoot people who act the maggot.
Not in high sec, but im guessin you almost never go there.
P.S. Cant find the difficulty slider, can you help me locate it?
I'm in highsec quite often, and am willing to accept the limitations 
Ask Frug about the slider :p -
If you go into your options menu, there's a difficulty slider. Put that all the way over to the easiest setting and you'll be fine. |
|

Crumplecorn
Gallente Eve Cluster Explorations
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 02:02:00 -
[41]
Originally by: Armin Novastorm
Originally by: Crumplecorn Edited by: Crumplecorn on 21/03/2007 01:16:16
Originally by: Vabjekf You become required to use it at all times everywhere. And you get to listen to random people laughing at themselves or freaking out or paniking or generaly being idiots and asses and whatnot. Little kids or high strung wierdos.
Its kind of funny at times. But the problem is that you are never able to turn it off or else you basicaly just may aswell turn the whole game off because nobody will play with you.
The fact that this has a required pay means that everyone can not expect everyone to have it, and therefore it will not become the default means of communication. This is a gigantic blessing. Because games like DDO which had intigrated voice where just terrible to play sometimes because you had to listen to play but listening was so painful=p
Voice is good for situations where it actualy helps. But all the time? Dont people ever like to listen to music anymore? Or just sit in silence sometimes?
I don't know exactly how the systems you are referring to are implemented, but in Vivox each channel is essentially its own voice server. This problem will occur no more with Vivox than it did with TS/Vent.
For those for whom VOIP will be required, it already is required. For the rest of us, it will always be optional.
Plus in Eve you can shoot people who act the maggot.
Not in high sec, but im guessin you almost never go there.
P.S. Cant find the difficulty slider, can you help me locate it?
I'm in highsec quite often, and am willing to accept the limitations 
Ask Frug about the slider :p -
If you go into your options menu, there's a difficulty slider. Put that all the way over to the easiest setting and you'll be fine. |

Soulita
Gallente Inner Core
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 02:08:00 -
[42]
Edited by: Soulita on 21/03/2007 02:05:25
Originally by: Phrixus Zephyr Do you really think there is any corp or alliance out there, which relies on voice communication that is going to have even close to the majority of its members buying this feature? No? So what's the point of anyone buying it if your corperation/alliance isn't going to use it because a large portion of your member base can't afford it?
I'm half expecting to see threads in recruitment asking for 'VOIP Only' but to be honest, it'll be their loss when they limit their recruitment pool to such an extent.
Exactly.
Voip is anti-social because it costs extra, and because it splits the community. Fairly bad for a piece of software that is meant for communication. 
Also fairly bad to introduce anti-social software into an mmorpg. Sort of counter-productive.
|

Soulita
Gallente Inner Core
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 02:08:00 -
[43]
Edited by: Soulita on 21/03/2007 02:14:10 Edited by: Soulita on 21/03/2007 02:05:25
Originally by: Phrixus Zephyr Do you really think there is any corp or alliance out there, which relies on voice communication that is going to have even close to the majority of its members buying this feature? No? So what's the point of anyone buying it if your corperation/alliance isn't going to use it because a large portion of your member base can't afford it?
I'm half expecting to see threads in recruitment asking for 'VOIP Only' but to be honest, it'll be their loss when they limit their recruitment pool to such an extent.
Exactly.
Voip is anti-social because it costs extra, and because it splits the community. Fairly bad for a piece of software that is meant for communication. 
Also fairly bad to introduce anti-social software into an mmorpg. Sort of counter-productive.
If Voip was free, like voice com is in many other games, it might make sense.
|

Devious
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 02:13:00 -
[44]
its got techhi issues i know my corp wont use it, ventrillo has much more features and yes if we crash or the game crashes we have a 3rd party ap to continue speaking on..vivox has a ton of bugs....i did the sisi test with it when they first released it ..it sounded a lot better then than it does now....also the options are a bit fubar should just let the Windows Xp/vista Deal with the audio/mic settings having a 2nd EQ in game doesnt help, as if your playing music speech gets drowned out by it...in game sounds have to be turned off to even understand what a fellow player is talking about...something has to be done with the audio output levels of this eve voice...i have to shout into my mic...not a good thing in a busy household late at night...Ventrillo can stream my whispers why cant vivox?
|

Xetu Noi
DKP
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 02:17:00 -
[45]
I think you folks are missing the REAL benefit to an in game voice system: security. TS & Vent are a security nightmare, both out of game by making you vulnerable personally to identification and attack by hackers and in game by revealing your identity across multiple characters and allowing for meta gaming attacks and intel gathering....
It amazes me in this day and age the people still log onto TS/Vent servers they don't control. Its the IRC nightmare of the MMO world.
|

Crumplecorn
Gallente Eve Cluster Explorations
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 02:23:00 -
[46]
Originally by: Soulita Edited by: Soulita on 21/03/2007 02:14:10 Edited by: Soulita on 21/03/2007 02:05:25
Originally by: Phrixus Zephyr Do you really think there is any corp or alliance out there, which relies on voice communication that is going to have even close to the majority of its members buying this feature? No? So what's the point of anyone buying it if your corperation/alliance isn't going to use it because a large portion of your member base can't afford it?
I'm half expecting to see threads in recruitment asking for 'VOIP Only' but to be honest, it'll be their loss when they limit their recruitment pool to such an extent.
Exactly.
Voip is anti-social because it costs extra, and because it splits the community. Fairly bad for a piece of software that is meant for communication. 
Also fairly bad to introduce anti-social software into an mmorpg. Sort of counter-productive.
If Voip was free, like voice com is in many other games, it might make sense.
To find out why this argument is crap, read up. -
If you go into your options menu, there's a difficulty slider. Put that all the way over to the easiest setting and you'll be fine. |

Soulita
Gallente Inner Core
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 02:26:00 -
[47]
Originally by: Crumplecorn
Originally by: Soulita Edited by: Soulita on 21/03/2007 02:14:10 Edited by: Soulita on 21/03/2007 02:05:25
Originally by: Phrixus Zephyr Do you really think there is any corp or alliance out there, which relies on voice communication that is going to have even close to the majority of its members buying this feature? No? So what's the point of anyone buying it if your corperation/alliance isn't going to use it because a large portion of your member base can't afford it?
I'm half expecting to see threads in recruitment asking for 'VOIP Only' but to be honest, it'll be their loss when they limit their recruitment pool to such an extent.
Exactly.
Voip is anti-social because it costs extra, and because it splits the community. Fairly bad for a piece of software that is meant for communication. 
Also fairly bad to introduce anti-social software into an mmorpg. Sort of counter-productive.
If Voip was free, like voice com is in many other games, it might make sense.
To find out why this argument is crap, read up.
Bull. You read up. Dont get me started.
|

Cmdr Delrox
Black Lance Against ALL Authorities
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 02:32:00 -
[48]
I like the new addition of the voice to game.
TS for alliance, ventrillo for corp and Vivox for random groups of people to talk to.
Alt Posting
Death to Dark Shikari |

Flinx Evenstar
Minmatar Momentum. Dusk and Dawn
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 02:48:00 -
[49]
The biggest problem I see with integrated Voice.
It means that when you crash, or lose connection to server...you also lose voice comms.
Not great in a fleet battle, when you have no idea what is going on as you try to log back in.
|

heheheh
Singularity.
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 02:48:00 -
[50]
Sounds alright if you like that sort of thing, personally i wont be using it, My alliance have vent for ops and other than that i dont feel the need to talk to people, i go out to the pub or something if i wanna do that.
|
|

Depp Knight
Evolution Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 03:43:00 -
[51]
If the voice client crashes when the game is down then that would just suck, period. DoesnÆt matter what other features it has, thatÆs a huge flaw. I honestly believe if that was the case that most large alliance would continue to use their 3rd party program for voice communication. Also the price is a bit steep. TS is not free but for a large corp/alliance to pay 15 dollars/euros or whatever it is per person, is expensive. Think about it, a 200 player alliance decides they want to use it, it will cost 3 grand total. Now what I do know that TS does not cost 3 grand to use every year. Also what if you leave a corp that use this eve speak and join one that doesnÆt. You have just pretty much wasted your cash for a feature that you will rarely use.
IMO itÆs just an up sell for a product. Just a way to get more money to CCP but unless the price drops down and the voice com doesnÆt crash and the maintenance of it is only used in large patch days then I donÆt see a reason for one to use it. Of course to have the ability to chat to anyone in the world of eve is great however would you pay for that plus eve subscription to chat to strangers?
From what I read it has some great features but the 2 major flaws, Price, and crashing is a step in the wrong direction.
|

Verite Rendition
Caldari AUS Corporation CORE.
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 05:51:00 -
[52]
Edited by: Verite Rendition on 21/03/2007 05:49:33
Originally by: Depp Knight
If the voice client crashes when the game is down then that would just suck, period. DoesnÆt matter what other features it has, thatÆs a huge flaw. I honestly believe if that was the case that most large alliance would continue to use their 3rd party program for voice communication. Also the price is a bit steep. TS is not free but for a large corp/alliance to pay 15 dollars/euros or whatever it is per person, is expensive. Think about it, a 200 player alliance decides they want to use it, it will cost 3 grand total. Now what I do know that TS does not cost 3 grand to use every year. Also what if you leave a corp that use this eve speak and join one that doesnÆt. You have just pretty much wasted your cash for a feature that you will rarely use.
IMO itÆs just an up sell for a product. Just a way to get more money to CCP but unless the price drops down and the voice com doesnÆt crash and the maintenance of it is only used in large patch days then I donÆt see a reason for one to use it. Of course to have the ability to chat to anyone in the world of eve is great however would you pay for that plus eve subscription to chat to strangers?
From what I read it has some great features but the 2 major flaws, Price, and crashing is a step in the wrong direction.
I've actually run the math on the costs and it isn't in CCP's favor. I can get a TS or Vent server from one of the major gaming-service provider for what comes out to $.21/month/slot once we're talking about more than a couple dozen slots. That's a whole $2.52 a year/slot versus the $10 CCP is charging now and $15 they'll charge in the future, for a cost of 1/4th and 1/6th the CCP service. And this isn't taking in to consideration the fact that you only need to pay for the max amount of slots you'll use instead of activating every EVE account(a peak server capacity would be what? 1/2 the total of most alliances at any given point) which pushes the cost of a dedicated server to under 10% of the cost of the EVE service*. Certainly CCP has costs to pay including bandwidth and development, but given the numbers it strikes me as steep.
And yes, the fact that it crashes with the game makes it unacceptable in the current form for any sort of 0.0 fleet combat use.
* Given the half-full rule, you'd spend an average of $1.26/year per account versus $15/year for the EVE service ---- AUS Corp Lead Megalomanic |

Anthal
Order's Chaos FREGE Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 05:54:00 -
[53]
Originally by: Salusa VC You miss the point. If each and every one of your alliance mates pay up for IVC thats $4k.
I reckon you can get some dedicated TS/Vent bandwith for a fraction of that, dont you?
400 man Vent server, same place I rent from, is $150 a month. 12 * 150 = $1800 per year.
If your alliance is only 400 people strong, you can knock that down to a 200 man easily (because, honestly, what are the chances that more than that will be on vent at the same time?). A 200 man is $60 a month, or $720 per year.
|

Latex Sandals
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 06:08:00 -
[54]
Originally by: Crumplecorn I mean, 1000 person alliance times $1 a month can buy a lot of server.
So you can have one TS server which is tied to your alliance, or all have voice coms which work with anyone else in the game?
That's a tough choice.
That's an easy choice. I'll take the non-integrated server that is running on a second computer so that it doesn't lag out the main one.
I'll take the free option that has superior sound quality and that doesn't crash when the game client does.
|

Crumplecorn
Gallente Eve Cluster Explorations
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 07:41:00 -
[55]
Edited by: Crumplecorn on 21/03/2007 07:39:03
Originally by: Latex Sandals That's an easy choice. I'll take the non-integrated server that is running on a second computer so that it doesn't lag out the main one.
This could refer to either, since it is the client which is integrated,
Originally by: Latex Sandals I'll take the free option that has superior sound quality and that doesn't crash when the game client does.
This can't refer to either, since neither are free.
Try again.
And looking at the other responses, people are still comparing a service which lets you talk with anyone via in-game channels vs. a server which is tied to your own corp/alliance as if they are the same thing. -
If you go into your options menu, there's a difficulty slider. Put that all the way over to the easiest setting and you'll be fine. |

Varrakk
Chosen Path Lotka Volterra
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 08:50:00 -
[56]
Would I have to buy Vivox access on every account, or is it once per person?
|

Juwi Kotch
Gallente VIRTUAL LIFE VANGUARD Galactic-Federation
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 08:52:00 -
[57]
Edited by: Juwi Kotch on 21/03/2007 08:49:40
The voice-chat function is in fact splitting the Eve community into those who have, and those who don't. Plus, we have the language issue, for many it is much easier to read and write then to listen and talk (ever talked to a Louisiana guy, or someone from northern Scotland?).
Having said that, voice-chat is a natural development step of MMOGs. In 10 years from now that will be a standard function of any MMOG which wants to be regarded serious, probably even in 5 years already. It will be an integral part then, and not just an option you can volunteer to pay for or not. So we just better get used to it.
I personally will order it, but I doubt I will use it much. I have sound switched off very often, and even no radio running in the background, I enjoy silence. But I think it is a good option to have, and it will have its uses and advantages.
Juwi Kotch
JOIN NOW, KLICK SIG! |

w0rmy
Intensive CareBearz TALIONIS ALLIANCE
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 09:00:00 -
[58]
Originally by: Baleorg in fact when you DONT subscribe you wont even notice its there since it wont
Oh you mean like not noticing local appear?
The bug he wont have to experience because hes not using Vivox?

It has already caused bugs, the same thing CCP swore black and blue it wouldnt.
Whether we use it or not, we all get the bugs that come with it.
Your signature is inappropriate. Please read the forum rules before reposting- Tirg |

Garia666
Amarr adeptus gattacus O X I D E
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 09:22:00 -
[59]
I agree a 100% with Geldorf.
CCp should actualy pay alliances to use it instead of the otherway around. ->My Vids<- CCP= More skilz more moneh! |

Karim alRashid
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 09:48:00 -
[60]
I'd like to know what measures are taken to prevent devs, GMs, etc. from eavesdropping on enemy alliance/corp channels (where applicable).
|
|

bigfatbird
Cutting Edge Incorporated RAZOR Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 09:54:00 -
[61]
Originally by: Esurnir Are graphist able to fix bug ? Are vivox people able to change the queuing system of the server ? No. They are people working for bug, they are people working for new content, most of new content manpower can't be switched to bug fixxing.
No but you can give the money you invested into vixox to other departments. Thats what he says imo.
|

Gmoorick
R.u.S.H. - Fanatics Ultima Rati0
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 10:35:00 -
[62]
Just give me client-independent in-game voice and I'll pay 40$ a year ;)
Integrating voice to EVE is good unless your client/nod crashes while you're in a gang or fleet. Now this feature will be used for those who don't like typing.
|

w0rmy
Intensive CareBearz
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 10:38:00 -
[63]
Originally by: Karim alRashid I'd like to know what measures are taken to prevent devs, GMs, etc. from eavesdropping on enemy alliance/corp channels (where applicable).
Their phenominal IA department.
Your signature is inappropriate. Please read the forum rules before reposting- Tirg |

Pharos Dei
Amarr
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 10:53:00 -
[64]
wow so many people in this thread are basically retarded...
you dont like vivox? you think that vent/ts is better/cheaper/whatever..
well, then DONT ****in use it! damn...
you think 10$ a year wil split up the community, and/or you cant afford it, and thus are antisocial?
well, get a job... or stay true to your oppinions and get rid of you cars, houses, electricity, sanitational facilities and food & water... since ive heard there a re a few people in africa that dont have this luxury too ( and you sure as hell dont want to seperate yourself...)
damnit people are so stupid... dont like it, dont use, but STFU... Your signature exceeds the maximum allowed filesize of 24000 bytes -Hango ([email protected]) |

Vort X
EON Order Te-Ka
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 11:12:00 -
[65]
Edited by: Vort X on 21/03/2007 11:11:50 If everyone would use it I'd say it's a fantastic addition, but obviously they wont, for different reasons. My reason is the sound quality. English is not my first language, so the high quality, crisp sound that our vent server delivers, makes it piece of cake to understand even diffierent accents. On Vivox, personally I found myself in trouble to understand the conservation, especially when spoken English delivered with strong accent. Sound quality is vital for me, so Vent is the obvious choice for me over Vivox atm. If Vivox will use a better codec on their paid servers, I might change my mind.
|

Gaven Blands
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 11:19:00 -
[66]
Originally by: Karim alRashid I'd like to know what measures are taken to prevent devs, GMs, etc. from eavesdropping on enemy alliance/corp channels (where applicable).
Yes, they deleted my post posing a similar point. I guess that goes some way to show that CCP still have no way whatsoever to prevent GM/Dev cheating and need to maintain the whitewash at any cost.
Is it even possible that CCP could deliver a fair game with cheating constraints even if they actually wanted to?
What's the problem with people wanting to know if the ViVox system is corruptable? Doesn't really sound like the new open caring sharing CCP does it when you're deleting such concerns. Which is why nobody should put any faith in you any more.
Eve: Cheats prosper. |

Koori
eXceed Inc. INVICTUS.
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 11:48:00 -
[67]
Personally I hate using TS/Vent. Not because it's crap. I just hate switching windows, manageing all the IP adresses etc. I'm really looking forward to Vivox voice chat simply because it will be integrated in game and I'll be able to join channels and speak with people just by clicking an icon.
I think that you should stop whining and moaning. Every serious game developer in the world is thinking about or working on integrating voice comms in their game. It's the way the games are working now.
|

Cosmos Elf
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 12:09:00 -
[68]
400 member corp total cost for Eve Voice:
$4000/year or $333.34/month
400 member corp total cost for Teamspeak:
$960/year or $80/month (Based on a quick google for prices. There is possibly cheaper hosting out there.) --
|

Roshan longshot
Gallente Ordos Humanitas FREGE Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 12:47:00 -
[69]
Well turkey dung!! I cant use this wonderful feature! Dial up or satilite modems not supported!
Well another item crossed out on my list of "Lets hang around and see what happens to Eve."
Only five more items...
Free-form Professions, ensure no limetations on professions. Be a trader, fighter, industialist, researcher, hunter pirate or mixture of them all.
[i]As read from the original box.
|

Roshan longshot
Gallente Ordos Humanitas FREGE Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 12:51:00 -
[70]
Originally by: Cosmos Elf 400 member corp total cost for Eve Voice:
$4000/year or $333.34/month
400 member corp total cost for Teamspeak:
$960/year or $80/month (Based on a quick google for prices. There is possibly cheaper hosting out there.)
Ah....it states there that after 30 day trial...you pay only $10 a year for the first year. Now this is being added to your account fees. Not being paid by corp or alliances.
And by rights, CCP has offered a service, if they so choose they can ban the use of Vent/TS as unauthorized 'third' party programs.
After all what is .85 a month? if you cant afford that you should not even be playing on line games.
Free-form Professions, ensure no limetations on professions. Be a trader, fighter, industialist, researcher, hunter pirate or mixture of them all.
[i]As read from the original box.
|
|

Tarish Montrey
Gallente Vindicate and Deliverance The Kano Organisation
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 12:54:00 -
[71]
Edited by: Tarish Montrey on 21/03/2007 12:52:43 Cool found it. Sig follows- Nice and young. Get on the floor............I love it one two step. |

Yuleth Gix
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 13:05:00 -
[72]
If I have multiple accounts can I use eve-voice in all or do I have to pay the 10$ to activate the voice feature on each account?
|

Prophet Jurah
Amarr
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 13:12:00 -
[73]
Originally by: James Lyrus
Originally by: CHAOS100
Originally by: Crumplecorn Edited by: Crumplecorn on 20/03/2007 23:28:55 Ha ha, having just tested Vivox by logging my main and my alt and talking to myself using the corp channel, I realised that the one area wher Vivox will truly pwn is in small scale stuff like this.
Voice chat with all the people in any channel (except local) is only one click away.
TS/Vent can't do that. And Vivox can do everything TS/Vent can do (except OOG, which is apparently coming in the future).
Vivox > All
Even if Vivox fails in the alliance/fleetop arena (and it may yet suceed), it really adds to Eve that anywhere where we could once type to each other we can now talk to each other instead with such ease.
Useless feature? Try 'one of the best additions in recent times'.
Why would you want to talk to everyone in every channel? Seems like easy ability to spam and easy to embarass yourself in several ways I wont bother mentioning. And btw it IS possible in vent, as are many things... and people just don't use them... because those features are just THAT useful /sarcasm.
What if 1 person doesn't pay for vivox, then it will be pointless to make a voice mail to corp or to talk during any operation. Also, quality doesn't beat vent unfortunately.
It will probably cause lag in the same way gang bonuses cause lag in fleets.
That's actually my biggest problem with eve-voice. In order to be useful, everyone in the corp's going to have to get it. Or, I could just keep paying what's just 'not all that much' (to me) for a vent server.
The same thing applies to ventrilo. Everyone has to use it too. Your point is?
|
|

Timmeh 2000
Forum Moderator Interstellar Services Department

|
Posted - 2007.03.21 13:17:00 -
[74]
Thread cleaned a little - please remember everyone is entitled to their opinion. Do not launch into personal attacks, profanity or trolling or the thread will need to be locked.
|
|

Victor Valka
Caldari Archon Industries
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 13:19:00 -
[75]
Why doesn't CCP just add 1 euro a month to out subscription cost?
Considering EVE has the highest subscription cost on the MMOG market (AFAIK), and we can (obviously) afford to pay that, I'm not really seeing the problem here. 
Originally by: Diana Marc Notice that BoB is agreeing with RA's concern. That's like Elrond and Sauron agreeing to reduce carbon emissions.
|

Harisdrop
Gallente
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 13:21:00 -
[76]
What happens if you have two accounts. Does this VIVOX subscription work for both?
|

Winterblink
Body Count Inc. Mercenary Coalition
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 13:26:00 -
[77]
To be honest, I was pretty skeptical about it, I mean I've used TS or Ventrilo for tons of different MMOs. They're definitely not perfect, but they get the job done overall.
Then I went to Fanfest, and heard about the possibilities the Vivox solution offers.
My biggest issue was that CCP was just going to toss in a VOIP feature adding no value, for a few extra bucks a month from people. But the possibilities for integration into EVE are quite astonishing. I don't know many who weren't impressed who were there. Would all of those possibilities be here during the first implementation? It was basically stated that the feature set supported would be up to CCP, and if they include basic stuff to start and add more robust features later when things have settled then that's fine by me.
Thing is, there's a lot this can offer that TS and Ventrilo cannot. We may not be seeing it right now (and may not for a while, or even ever in the case of some things), but the possibilities are quite intriguing.
|

Baleorg
Gallente Guys of Sarcasm
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 13:32:00 -
[78]
Originally by: w0rmy
Originally by: Baleorg in fact when you DONT subscribe you wont even notice its there since it wont
Oh you mean like not noticing local appear? The bug he wont have to experience because hes not using Vivox?
 It has already caused bugs, the same thing CCP swore black and blue it wouldnt. Whether we use it or not, we all get the bugs that come with it.
local was a different issue, maybe partly of vivox, but that has been fixed.. i had NO vivox at that time, and i even run the "dreaded" win2k
i enabled vivox at evening though, still no issues, and i even use 2 soundcards
for me it works fine
BTW: A GOOD Cache-Cleaner |

Baleorg
Gallente Guys of Sarcasm
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 13:35:00 -
[79]
Originally by: Cosmos Elf 400 member corp total cost for Eve Voice:
$4000/year or $333.34/month
400 member corp total cost for Teamspeak:
$960/year or $80/month (Based on a quick google for prices. There is possibly cheaper hosting out there.)
you forgot to substract the alts on the corp...
BTW: A GOOD Cache-Cleaner |

Baleorg
Gallente Guys of Sarcasm
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 13:35:00 -
[80]
Originally by: Harisdrop What happens if you have two accounts. Does this VIVOX subscription work for both?
does your creditcard subscription work for both accounts? no... of course not... each account has its own subscription, silly :-P
BTW: A GOOD Cache-Cleaner |
|

Winterblink
Body Count Inc. Mercenary Coalition
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 13:39:00 -
[81]
Originally by: Baleorg
Originally by: Harisdrop What happens if you have two accounts. Does this VIVOX subscription work for both?
does your creditcard subscription work for both accounts? no... of course not... each account has its own subscription, silly :-P
The question was asked at Fanfest last year, whether a single sub would cover multiple accounts. The answer from the Vivox fella was basically, if that's how CCP wants it to be handled then that's what will happen. :)
|

Plutoinum
German Cyberdome Corp Cult of War
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 13:47:00 -
[82]
Edited by: Plutoinum on 21/03/2007 13:53:13
Originally by: Benco97
What you going to do, give them you're server details so they can log on to your ventrillo or simply use the eve voice ans send them a mighty "ARR!" I rest my case.
Yes, and probably a lot of conversations of smacktards, who got killed. Local is easier to ignore. If the victim is in a bad mood, I don't want to get dragged down too, but enjoy my loot. 
Btw. I've got 4 accounts, but only 1 voice. I don't think I want to pay for each account. And I need usual teamspeak/ventrilo anyway, because I like to talk with my corp mates, even if I am logged off or relogging to another char. ___________ Muuuhhh !!! |

Doppleganger
Minmatar Band of Builders Inc. Firmus Ixion
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 13:49:00 -
[83]
Maybe I'm still stuck in the past but I still never have my sound enabled in EVE when it comes to fleet battles and I leave it that way about 95% of the time I play eve.
I was always told turn all effects off, turn sound off and turn msgs off to reduce a bit of the lag in fleet battles so why would I want an intergraded voice that might lead to more lag in fleet battles.
Maybe like I said I'm just stuck in the past and none of those things no longer add to fleet battle lag but just in case I leave them all off anyway.
All that would leave vivox for is the 5% of the time I have sound enabled, so maybe... its not like its spendy.
|

Soulita
Gallente Inner Core
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 14:00:00 -
[84]
Originally by: Winterblink To be honest, I was pretty skeptical about it, I mean I've used TS or Ventrilo for tons of different MMOs. They're definitely not perfect, but they get the job done overall.
Then I went to Fanfest, and heard about the possibilities the Vivox solution offers.
My biggest issue was that CCP was just going to toss in a VOIP feature adding no value, for a few extra bucks a month from people. But the possibilities for integration into EVE are quite astonishing. I don't know many who weren't impressed who were there. Would all of those possibilities be here during the first implementation? It was basically stated that the feature set supported would be up to CCP, and if they include basic stuff to start and add more robust features later when things have settled then that's fine by me.
Thing is, there's a lot this can offer that TS and Ventrilo cannot. We may not be seeing it right now (and may not for a while, or even ever in the case of some things), but the possibilities are quite intriguing.
I have absolutly no idea how CCP could introduce a feature like that and charge extra for it. I play other online games in which the voice chat is completely free of charge.
Having said that, there is an easy solution. Raise the normal online subscription fee by 30cents or maybe 50cents per month, and make the ingame voice a standard feature for everyone.
I have said it before and will say it again. By splitting the community, as it is doing the way it is introduced, it is an anti-social feature and has no place in an mmorpg.
|

Gaia Thorn
Villains Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 14:13:00 -
[85]
4 questions ! 1. how do CCP intend to police the voice channels for profanity and threats ?
2. Will their be a choice to increase the sound quality further along ? 3. Are their any icons that show you have voice enabled in local so i know im not speaking to people that dont have it activated ?
4. how do i prove that i have been harassed in voice channels ?
|

Harisdrop
Gallente
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 14:14:00 -
[86]
First you have to be in a private channel.
Umm have you ever been on TS/Vent
|

Winterblink
Body Count Inc. Mercenary Coalition
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 14:16:00 -
[87]
Edited by: Winterblink on 21/03/2007 14:13:36
Originally by: Soulita I have said it before and will say it again. By splitting the community, as it is doing the way it is introduced, it is an anti-social feature and has no place in an mmorpg.
So you're basically against the disparity between the haves and have-nots, not against the feature itself or the additional charges for it, if I'm reading your entire post right.
Personally I don't agree with your labeling of the feature as "antisocial", but I can understand where you're coming from.
Edit: Oh, and EVE Online is not technically a MMORPG. But that's a whole other discussion. :)
|

Soulita
Gallente Inner Core
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 14:25:00 -
[88]
Edited by: Soulita on 21/03/2007 14:30:25 Edited by: Soulita on 21/03/2007 14:23:56
Originally by: Winterblink
Originally by: Soulita I have said it before and will say it again. By splitting the community, as it is doing the way it is introduced, it is an anti-social feature and has no place in an mmorpg.
So you're basically against the disparity between the haves and have-nots, not against the feature itself or the additional charges for it, if I'm reading your entire post right.
Personally I don't agree with your labeling of the feature as "antisocial", but I can understand where you're coming from.
The problem with the feature is, it is in effect an add on that costs RL extra money. Some will have it, some wont. Splitting the community and breaking CCPs promise not to charge extra for add ons.
|

Winterblink
Body Count Inc. Mercenary Coalition
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 14:30:00 -
[89]
Originally by: Soulita The problem with the feature is, it is in effect an add on that costs RL extra money. Splitting the community and breaking CCPs promise not to charge extra for add ons.
CCP's "promise" was not to charge extra for expansion content. You don't NEED this to play EVE, not having it won't keep you from flying to any place you want, or getting access to new ships and gear. The Voice stuff is not new complexes, new NPCs, new deployable gear for POSes, or anything like that.
|

Harisdrop
Gallente
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 14:33:00 -
[90]
VIVOX is the uber client security. I can understand most feeling not to play. I guess if you cant get the ip and password to jump into my conversation then I guess you will get mad.
I like the common feature that if you dont want to have VIVOX then you dont need it. There will be a feeling as more leave the Vent and TS world and your excluded from most voice comms you will be seperated from the community.
|
|

Gaia Thorn
Villains Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 14:33:00 -
[91]
o yeah forgot.
What happend to all eve exspansions are FREE ?? Seeing that this is a exspansion to the game ccp is sorta breking their biggest selling point. For me this is a slippery slope when introducing "premium" features to the game.
This could lead to us paying for expansions and hell even ships and mods if you want to make it extreme. T1 = start stuff T2 = better T1 stuff T3 = solo pwn mobile stuff for RL cash
|

Winterblink
Body Count Inc. Mercenary Coalition
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 14:39:00 -
[92]
Originally by: Gaia Thorn o yeah forgot.
What happend to all eve exspansions are FREE ?? Seeing that this is a exspansion to the game ccp is sorta breking their biggest selling point. For me this is a slippery slope when introducing "premium" features to the game.
This could lead to us paying for expansions and hell even ships and mods if you want to make it extreme. T1 = start stuff T2 = better T1 stuff T3 = solo pwn mobile stuff for RL cash
Just to comment on that slippery slope, if people would just quit proving to the gaming industry time and time again that they're willing to pay real life money for in-game gear and money, maybe we wouldn't see official attempts to get in on the action (ex. Everquest2's Marketplace).
I'm of course not suggesting that's what CCP's trying to do here. :)
|

Soulita
Gallente Inner Core
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 14:39:00 -
[93]
Edited by: Soulita on 21/03/2007 14:38:38
Originally by: Winterblink
Originally by: Soulita The problem with the feature is, it is in effect an add on that costs RL extra money. Splitting the community and breaking CCPs promise not to charge extra for add ons.
CCP's "promise" was not to charge extra for expansion content. You don't NEED this to play EVE, not having it won't keep you from flying to any place you want, or getting access to new ships and gear. The Voice stuff is not new complexes, new NPCs, new deployable gear for POSes, or anything like that.
This is not entirely correct. If a corp of your friends for example turns "Voip only", and you dont have it, then in effect you wont be able to effectively fly complexes, hunt new npcs etc etc with them.
Making the feature
a) anti-social b) limiting access to game content to you (if you dont want to switch friends because of the new 'feature')
There is a difference between primary directly visible effects, and those that are more indirect but still true and just as important.
|

Winterblink
Body Count Inc. Mercenary Coalition
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 14:40:00 -
[94]
Originally by: Soulita This is not entirely correct. If a corp of your friends for example turns "Voip only", and you dont have it, then in effect you wont be able to effectively fly complexes, hunt new npcs etc etc with them.
There is a difference between primary directly visible effects, and those that are more indirect but still true and just as important.
TS and Ventrilo do that right now when it comes to fleet combat.
|

Daelin Blackleaf
No Joy Corp Pride - Honor - Duty
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 14:48:00 -
[95]
It is not free because it is not handled by CCP. It's a service provided by an outside company with their own servers and their own costs.
CCP's only other options would be to provide the service themselves (which would require a lot of dedictation and likely cost them more than getting vivox to do it) or to pay it themselves. Either way the price gets passed down to us either as an extra ú1 a month or as reduced content/fixes due to the money going elsewhere.
As for the TS/Vent fans, yes the fact that it works out of game is a HUGE advantage. It's being worked on with Vivox. Get me a TS server with 30,000+ slots and we'll talk comparitive prices.
This feature is basically in it's first and most basic implementation, likely to see if money can be made from it before more money is spent on it. If it does well expect to see far more from it, including yet closer integration with the client and other added features you will never see on TS/Vent. The added separate price ensures that Vivox must perform well, they must improve, it means that they compete with others instead of receiving a monopoly on EvE voice comms at which point advancement grinds to a halt.
There will in time be other corporations offering similar services to Vivox due to the increasing size of the MMO market. Competition will keep these services healthy and progressing.
|

Soulita
Gallente Inner Core
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 14:48:00 -
[96]
Edited by: Soulita on 21/03/2007 14:53:01 Edited by: Soulita on 21/03/2007 14:45:06
Originally by: Winterblink
Originally by: Soulita This is not entirely correct. If a corp of your friends for example turns "Voip only", and you dont have it, then in effect you wont be able to effectively fly complexes, hunt new npcs etc etc with them.
Making the feature
a) anti-social b) limiting access to game content to you (if you dont want to switch friends because of the new 'feature')
There is a difference between primary directly visible effects, and those that are more indirect but still true and just as important.
TS and Ventrilo do that right now when it comes to fleet combat.
Somehow yes, but there is a difference.
Alliances or corps using Vent or TS can invite you to fly with them. They just give you guest access to their TS or Vent. This will cost you nothing. Look at Burn Edens downtime TS for example. This has a community combining effect, not a splitting one like vivox.
If you want to fly with a corp or alliance that uses vivox you would have to subscribe to vivox and pay for it. Fairly big difference, and not a good one.
|

Winterblink
Body Count Inc. Mercenary Coalition
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 14:57:00 -
[97]
Originally by: Soulita Somehow yes, but there is a difference.
Alliances or corps using Vent or TS can invite you to fly with them. They just give you a guest access to their TS or Vent. This will cost you nothing. Look at Burn Edens downtime TS for example. Unlike vivox this has a community combining effect, not a splitting one like vivox.
If you want to fly with a corp or alliance that uses vivox you would have to subscribe to vivox and pay for it. Fairly big difference.
You seem to be bouncing between two main points: cost (barrier to entry, if you will), and exclusion from content.
Now previously you posted a suggestion for them to bump the monthly subscription cost up so everyone gets the feature. I read that as that you're really not concerned about the cost of the feature, correct? Yet as evidenced above, you still keep coming back to it as a point of contention.
If that's so, then your argument of it being antisocial (the exclusion bit) is entirely without merit, since you have no issues with the barrier to entry. Thus whether it's integrated into the default subscription or not doesn't seem to matter, based on the rest of your posts.
Just trying to understand what your issue with it really is, that's all.
|

aeti
Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 14:59:00 -
[98]
Originally by: Crumplecorn And Vivox can do everything TS/Vent can do
no it can't
|

Mirana Niranne
Gallente The Ninja Coalition Phobos Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 15:08:00 -
[99]
Edited by: Mirana Niranne on 21/03/2007 15:07:26
Originally by: Cosmos Elf 400 member corp total cost for Eve Voice:
$4000/year or $333.34/month
400 member corp total cost for Teamspeak:
$960/year or $80/month (Based on a quick google for prices. There is possibly cheaper hosting out there.)
First up, $4000 for the first year, after that it would be $6000. If you have alts, you need vivox for each account or you have to switch between clients to chat. Using TS you just use your PTT button regardless of the window you have open.
I won't get into the voice quality over features debate, to me all I care is that I can hear people clearly. From a monetary standpoint though, $0.85 a month is a ripoff for a single voice user, and $1.25 a month after the first year is DEFINTELY a ripoff when you consider the service my corp uses costs us $0.30 per user per month. IF we needed everyone to pay their way, each person would need to give us $3.60 a year for their share of the service (which since it's corp supported, those who can't afford jack squat can still use our voice through their free client). Now keep in mind this is from a hosting service that is making a PROFIT from us. |

Mortuus
Minmatar Just-fun Dark Matter Coalition
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 15:10:00 -
[100]
OMG $1 a month? How ever will I survive!!
Wait, let me get that change I got from lunch yesterday....yea, thats about half of it in coin. Sweet.
We'll probably be using Vent/TS/Vivox; TS for the alliance, Vent for corp, and Vivox so I can talk to the tons of friends I have in EvE without us all switching from one server to another constantly.
ex-Occassus Republica <3 |
|

Soulita
Gallente Inner Core
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 15:37:00 -
[101]
Edited by: Soulita on 21/03/2007 15:47:56 Edited by: Soulita on 21/03/2007 15:35:49
Originally by: Winterblink You seem to be bouncing between two main points: cost (barrier to entry, if you will), and exclusion from content.
Both points are true.
Originally by: Winterblink Now previously you posted a suggestion for them to bump the monthly subscription cost up so everyone gets the feature. I read that as that you're really not concerned about the cost of the feature, correct? Yet as evidenced above, you still keep coming back to it as a point of contention.
Incorrect. It is very likely not everyone - actually maybe only a minority of people - will choose to purchase the vivox service - due to the relatively high extra cost (Around 7% extra). The more people use vivox, the less extra charge is neccesary per person to break even or make a profit with it. Of course there is a limit on how cheap it can get due to bandwith useage. Still, a slight increase of subscription fee for everyone (lets say 1% to 3%) would have a similar financial effect for CCP/vivox as charging a lot extra for it for some (around 7% as it is now). At the same time this would turn vivox from a community splitting into a community combining feature, since everyone could use it.
Originally by: Winterblink If that's so, then your argument of it being antisocial (the exclusion bit) is entirely without merit, since you have no issues with the barrier to entry. Thus whether it's integrated into the default subscription or not doesn't seem to matter, based on the rest of your posts.
Untrue, as you can see by what I said above.
Originally by: Winterblink Just trying to understand what your issue with it really is, that's all.
Hope that helped.
|

Harisdrop
Gallente
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 15:47:00 -
[102]
The best part of VIVOX is that only those that want it will be using it. Therefore no whining...
Can you say that about TS vs Vent???
|

Winterblink
Body Count Inc. Mercenary Coalition
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 15:50:00 -
[103]
Originally by: Soulita The more people use vivox, the less extra charge is neccesary per person to break even or make a profit with it.
Tell that to my long distance carrier, mobile carrier, power and utilities providers, and the jerks who I give money to whenever I pump my gas. Oh and the movie and music industries too. Seriously, are you expecting anything different? More people are playing EVE now than when it launched, and the price hasn't dropped a cent. Why get all up in arms over the voice support?
Originally by: Soulita Still, a slight increase of subscription fee for everyone (lets say 1% to 3%) would have a similar financial effect for CCP/vivox as charging a lot extra for it for some (around 7% as it is now), while at the same time bringing the added benefit that vivox could turn from a community splitting into a community combining feature, since everyone could use it.
Hope that helped.
Yes, but I still entirely disagree with you on the whole "community splitting" issue. It would have been an issue already with TS and Ventrilo, and I don't see anyone breaking out the torches and pitchforks over that.
|

Soulita
Gallente Inner Core
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 16:02:00 -
[104]
Originally by: Winterblink
Originally by: Soulita Hope that helped.
Yes, but I still entirely disagree with you...TS..Vent...
Well, we are turning around in circles. I already answered the part about TS and Vent.
Originally by: Soulita Alliances or corps using Vent or TS can invite you to fly with them. They just give you guest access to their TS or Vent. This will cost you nothing. Look at Burn Edens downtime TS for example. This has a community combining effect, not a splitting one like vivox.
If you want to fly with a corp or alliance that uses vivox you would have to subscribe to vivox and pay for it. Fairly big difference, and not a good one.
Honestly winter, you are disappointing me a bit. Vivox is splitting the community as it is introduced atm, vivox costs more than it could/should etc. And you still keep protecting it?
|

Winterblink
Body Count Inc. Mercenary Coalition
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 16:27:00 -
[105]
Originally by: Soulita Honestly winter, you are disappointing me a bit. Vivox is splitting the community as it is introduced atm, vivox costs more than it could/should etc. And you still keep protecting it?
I'm not protecting it, I just don't see the value in making assumptions on the effects of something which was only just implemented. You're not the first to have these concerns, and a lot of those were addressed by the Vivox session at Fanfest. If you weren't there to haven't seen any kind of transcript of it, you missed out on a very informative presentation.
Nobody HAS to use it. But I think the hope is that it will show its value through some of the more interesting integration features that are possible, because as a standalone VOIP solution it would be no different than paying for a TS or Vent server.
Anyway, try not to lump me in to the corporate-shill pile, because that's not my intent.
|

Professional Troll
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 16:27:00 -
[106]
Originally by: Soulita Incorrect. It is very likely not everyone - actually maybe only a minority of people - will choose to purchase the vivox service - due to the relatively high extra cost (Around 7% extra).
You realize that most companies charge 15-30% extra for optional content extensions? Blizzard charges roughly 10% assuming the player has been a subscriber from the beginning, SOE is close to 20%... and that's all I can think off the top of my head.
Originally by: Soulita The more people use vivox, the less extra charge is neccesary per person to break even or make a profit with it. Of course there is a limit on how cheap it can get due to bandwith useage.
And it cost Blizzard ($40+7 million subscribers) $280 million dollars to develope the expansion for their game?
Originally by: Soulita Still, a slight increase of subscription fee for everyone (lets say 1% to 3%) would have a similar financial effect for CCP/vivox as charging a lot extra for it for some (around 7% as it is now). At the same time this would turn vivox from a community splitting into a community combining feature, since everyone could use it.
What about the people who don't have headsets? Or the ones who are running EVE on bare minimum systems or systems without sound cards? Your toys suck! |T|R|O|L|L|I|N|G| My anti-drug.
Because CCP won't let me be an attention ***** any more and I don't want to become a ***** head . |

Ogul
Caldari ZiTek Deepspace Explorations Prime Orbital Systems
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 16:29:00 -
[107]
Basically this is just an increase in subscription fees by approx. 8% (monthly payment assumed), at some point everybody will just have to use it.
What I don't like is that a CTD/disconnect will now disrupt all communications. I haven't tried it, but does client lag influence voice communication too?
|

Winterblink
Body Count Inc. Mercenary Coalition
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 16:33:00 -
[108]
Originally by: Ogul Basically this is just an increase in subscription fees by approx. 8% (monthly payment assumed), at some point everybody will just have to use it.
What I don't like is that a CTD/disconnect will now disrupt all communications. I haven't tried it, but does client lag influence voice communication too?
That was definitely talked about at FF. If I recall correctly, and someone can feel free to correct me if they see fit, the response was essentially that Vivox has contingencies for this, such as external software that can pick up on dropped connections to their service. So it'd be like a client on your desktop, and if EVE drops it just picks up so you can hear everyone moaning about how their node just got nuked.
No idea if that's allowed with CCP's solution though. Again, I think the intent is to bring out a starter service and see what the response is, and add on the funky stuff as we go forward. Which is a smart way to do things, if you ask me.
|

Soulita
Gallente Inner Core
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 16:39:00 -
[109]
Edited by: Soulita on 21/03/2007 16:38:05
Originally by: Winterblink Nobody HAS to use it...
No offense, but we realy are turning around in circles.
Here your answer, was a reply to you in this thread:
Originally by: Soulita This is not entirely correct. If a corp of your friends for example turns "Voip only", and you dont have it, then in effect you wont be able to effectively fly complexes, hunt new npcs etc etc with them.
And please winter, stop making me quote again what I already said. If you have no new arguments, let it be.
|

Harisdrop
Gallente
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 16:47:00 -
[110]
I hope Vent and TS go the way of dual MWD.
It was a fad but now fleets that are run with VIVOX will run more efficient. People will get VIVOX cause its makes your gaming better. Soo sad we wont see you old schooler there.
|
|

Soulita
Gallente Inner Core
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 16:49:00 -
[111]
Originally by: Harisdrop I hope Vent and TS go the way of dual MWD.
It was a fad but now fleets that are run with VIVOX will run more efficient. People will get VIVOX cause its makes your gaming better. Soo sad we wont see you old schooler there.
Do you happen to be a vivox employee by any chance?
|

Winterblink
Body Count Inc. Mercenary Coalition
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 17:01:00 -
[112]
Originally by: Soulita And please winter, stop making me quote again what I already said. If you have no new arguments, let it be.
Please. All you seem to be able to do is say "you're wrong" and quote something you said earlier, instead of actually addressing what was said. That's not discussing, that's not even arguing (for the record, I was doing the former, not the latter).
And I "let it be" back when I said I understood what you were getting at, just disagreed with it.
fin
|

Vendito
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 17:09:00 -
[113]
Besides the quality and convenience of this new feature I think alliances are forgetting one huge benefit of this - security. It¦s always a pain in my alliance having to constantly resetting passwords and being on the lookout for spies that infiltrate the TS server. This is basically going to take that away, if you are not in the gang you can¦t listen in.
Yesterday I spoke to many very old friends that I have only chatted with until now, so I just think this stuff is great.
Will also be interesting when we can walk in stations and have Kariokee bars...
|

Harisdrop
Gallente
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 17:15:00 -
[114]
Looking for a website that will be posting the public channels.
I see the need to charge isk to visit channels.
I hope there is method to make a video with VIVOX imbedded of fleet combat.
can you see the implications
|

Mintaric
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 17:17:00 -
[115]
Sorry but I prefer Vivox to TS/vent.
I don't have to run a server for TS/Vent, I don't have to have both programs installed. I don't have to spend time figuring out IP address, ports and passwords just to be able to talk to someone. It saves alot of time. You can get in a group and have chat instantly. It's a great help for a variety of situations.
I can see who is talking without having to alt/tab out to TS/Vent.
Better quality.
|

Soulita
Gallente Inner Core
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 17:18:00 -
[116]
Edited by: Soulita on 21/03/2007 17:24:01 Edited by: Soulita on 21/03/2007 17:19:17
Originally by: Winterblink
Originally by: Soulita And please winter, stop making me quote again what I already said. If you have no new arguments, let it be.
Please. All you seem to be able to do is say "you're wrong" and quote something you said earlier, instead of actually addressing what was said. That's not discussing, that's not even arguing (for the record, I was doing the former, not the latter).
And I "let it be" back when I said I understood what you were getting at, just disagreed with it.
fin
What you just wrote borders on flaming. I wont take it that way, since you are above those things I hope.
Go ahead and prove me wrong on my arguments if you can. But if you bring up the same points over and over again you will get the same valid arguments as an answer over and over again. This goes till you can prove them wrong, or stop. Since you could not prove them wrong, I am glad you say 'fin' from your part.
|

Tissa
Minmatar UK Corp
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 17:36:00 -
[117]
Originally by: Soulita repeated stuff over and over getting more stressed with each post
Good lord, the thing is under a day old also right now it is free just relax a tad please. People will try it out for themselves and see what it works for and what it's flaws are. No need to go on some big heart attack inducing campaign about it.
Personally I think with the 200 cap it clearly ain't going to work for corp/alliance but I suspect it will be more than useful when on gate camps for some amusement - you have your gang on TS and while away the hours chatting in other channels.
Take it for what it is and that's an optional fun new toy to play with and relax a bit.
My views do not represent those of my corp or alliance. (Joined UKC 19/09/06) |

Juwi Kotch
Gallente VIRTUAL LIFE VANGUARD Galactic-Federation
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 17:41:00 -
[118]
Soulita, of course you are correct with the community splitting point. Since I don't like repetition either, I only say that you have explained it well enough several times already.
Don't understand what's so difficult to see that...
Juwi Kotch
JOIN NOW, KLICK SIG! |

Soulita
Gallente Inner Core
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 17:48:00 -
[119]
Edited by: Soulita on 21/03/2007 17:46:11 Yup Juwi, you are right. I'll have some tea now 
|

Grez
Minmatar The Collective Against ALL Authorities
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 17:55:00 -
[120]
Edited by: Grez on 21/03/2007 17:55:00 Some information you Vivox bashers may like to know:
1) It seems the quality is controlled via the ammount of bandwidth you have available. Two friends of mine (one on broadband like me, and one on a 56k connection) tried this out with me - the person with the 56k sounded a little worse off for quality than most, but I'd say it wasn't as bad as some TS servers I've used in my time. The broadband friend however sounded perfect, like any TS server.
2) It's $10 for a year. That's less than $1 per month. AKA, nothing. I'm pretty much sure everyone and their grandma could afford this. Hell, I wouldn't even mind sub prices going up by $1 and including Vivox.
3) EVE-Voice uses the Vivox servers, not TQ, or any of the EVE servers. Meaning it doesn't induce strain on the server(s).
4) Vivox did a very large portion of the work. Only a small amount of work was needed by CCP (mainly UI changes I'd imagine, and settings implimentation, which is like writing a "Hello world" program for programmers like these).
5) Whilst some people prefer third-party programs, others don't have two screens, or run the game in windowed mode. Therefor, they cannot see who is talking without asking "Who said that?". Intergrating Vivox into EVE makes it easier to see who is talking, and what is going on. If Jimmybob says "Enemy coming", you can instantly see who said it, and who they are (he may be set as group A's scout).
Also, exclusion via EVE-Voice? What the hell? TS and Ventrilo do exactly the same. Some users don't have it, or can't use it full stop (for unknown reasons). Doing this means that they don't have to be excluded. There's always someone (in my experience), having to relay commands via typing in gang. What if you no longer had to do that, and those that can't use TS/Vent, had EVE-Voice? They could simply join audio, and someone can relay the commands without having to type (although there will always be some silly fool who refuses to use Vent, TS or EVE-Voice).
6) No-one is forcing you to use EVE-Voice. If you do not want to use it, don't use it. It's pretty simple to understand. This benifits many users, and doesn't for some. I can see this helping small corperations, or large alliances who no-longer want to burden one person with several hundred dollar bills every few months. --- Cache Clearer |
|

Roshan longshot
Gallente Ordos Humanitas FREGE Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 18:00:00 -
[121]
Originally by: Juwi Kotch Soulita, of course you are correct with the community splitting point. Since I don't like repetition either, I only say that you have explained it well enough several times already.
Don't understand what's so difficult to see that...
Juwi Kotch
Not to get off topic here, but Juwi I just noticed your signature. Your ribbons dont match, they are out of order, and I very seriously dont think you deserve the light blue with 5 white stars.
Free-form Professions, ensure no limetations on professions. Be a trader, fighter, industialist, researcher, hunter pirate or mixture of them all.
[i]As read from the original box.
|

Khadur
Minmatar Spontaneous Defenestration
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 18:00:00 -
[122]
Proper vent > Vivox
|

Ogul
Caldari ZiTek Deepspace Explorations Prime Orbital Systems
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 18:08:00 -
[123]
Originally by: Grez
3) EVE-Voice uses the Vivox servers, not TQ, or any of the EVE servers. Meaning it doesn't induce strain on the server(s).
It's just that the EVE-client has the nasty habit of freezing in certain situations (e. g. loading the grid). This is where the additional strain of the integrated Vivox functionality comes in.
Originally by: Grez
5) Whilst some people prefer third-party programs, others don't have two screens, or run the game in windowed mode. Therefor, they cannot see who is talking without asking "Who said that?". Intergrating Vivox into EVE makes it easier to see who is talking, and what is going on. If Jimmybob says "Enemy coming", you can instantly see who said it, and who they are (he may be set as group A's scout).
Or you could just teach the guys in your gang to include that kind of information when they talk.
|

Derran
Minmatar Khumatari Holdings Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 18:22:00 -
[124]
Originally by: Salusa VC You miss the point. If each and every one of your alliance mates pay up for IVC thats $4k.
I reckon you can get some dedicated TS/Vent bandwith for a fraction of that, dont you?
You mean like trying to get people to donate real money for it? Good luck with that. With this feature, at least the only people who want it will be on it. $10 for a year is very reasonable and the extra features it has makes it cool. Apparently an FC will be able to see where people are, via the systemmap, when they talk so you won't even really have to ask where they are.
|

Grez
Minmatar The Collective Against ALL Authorities
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 18:27:00 -
[125]
Originally by: Ogul
Originally by: Grez
3) EVE-Voice uses the Vivox servers, not TQ, or any of the EVE servers. Meaning it doesn't induce strain on the server(s).
It's just that the EVE-client has the nasty habit of freezing in certain situations (e. g. loading the grid). This is where the additional strain of the integrated Vivox functionality comes in.
This has nothing to do with Vivox. I don't think you fully understand how the EVE client works. EVE-Voice is done via a completely different server, it's got nothing to do with grid loading. The voice servers don't have anything to do with information being transfered between players in a grid. Hell, there's not even the need for it.
Quote:
Originally by: Grez
5) Whilst some people prefer third-party programs, others don't have two screens, or run the game in windowed mode. Therefor, they cannot see who is talking without asking "Who said that?". Intergrating Vivox into EVE makes it easier to see who is talking, and what is going on. If Jimmybob says "Enemy coming", you can instantly see who said it, and who they are (he may be set as group A's scout).
Or you could just teach the guys in your gang to include that kind of information when they talk.
I've been in numerious alliances, and it's all the same. Someone asks a question, ie, "Who can fly interdictors?" and players always reply "Me". This is only the tip of the iceberg, but you can see where I'm coming from, it simply makes things easier and that's all CCP is trying to do - make things easier for us. --- Cache Clearer |

Derran
Minmatar Khumatari Holdings Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 18:29:00 -
[126]
Originally by: Ogul What I don't like is that a CTD/disconnect will now disrupt all communications.
I'm not understanding this or missing something. How does TS or Vent help in this regard? You can say I crashed and then what? You still can't do anything until you log back in.
|

Arii Smith
Caldari StarHunt Fallout Project
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 18:35:00 -
[127]
I am going to get this out of laziness, I am willing to pay the 85 cents a month just to not have to window out and join vent.
I am not going to use this for fleet ops, I am going to use it for easy and fun social networking with my corpmates. Rather than window out and use vent in a private channel, or waste time typing when I am on a mission I can just talk.
The real selling point of this is added convenience at a price I can more than accept.
|

Darth Bob
Dark Excession The Cartel.
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 18:47:00 -
[128]
- I have NEVER paid for voice communication (TS/Vent) before, so yes, it was completely free as far as I was concerned
- Eve voice crashes when the game crashes, ok that's all, I won't use it.
- so the old gang bonuses were creating lag, but 200 ppl talking to eachother on eve voice are ok? mmmkay...
- less than $1 per month? I have 3 accounts and I know plenty ppl with more than that. so it's more than advertised for 90% of the community
- All the ppl saying $10 is nothing: you can feel free to send it to me, you'll get about as much use from that as eve voice
- [tinfoil hat] I'd like to keep important stuff on a channel that I know 100% sure is safe from devs, thank you very much
|

Ogul
Caldari ZiTek Deepspace Explorations Prime Orbital Systems
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 18:48:00 -
[129]
Edited by: Ogul on 21/03/2007 18:49:31
Originally by: Grez
This has nothing to do with Vivox. I don't think you fully understand how the EVE client works. EVE-Voice is done via a completely different server, it's got nothing to do with grid loading. The voice servers don't have anything to do with information being transfered between players in a grid. Hell, there's not even the need for it.
It's like this: Whenever you warp into a grid that is filled with a lot of ships (e. g. enemy fleet) the client window freezes (you cannot click anything, chat windows are not updating, etc.) until the grid has finally loaded. You are completely right by saying that I do not understand why this has to happen.
What I do know is however, that the amount of data (ships on grid) cannot be transmitted to the client fast enough - hence the freeze.
Vivox might be operating on different servers, but it is another case of data being transmitted to the eve client, which might or might not cause similar consequences. Time will tell.
Originally by: Grez
I've been in numerious alliances, and it's all the same. Someone asks a question, ie, "Who can fly interdictors?" and players always reply "Me". This is only the tip of the iceberg, but you can see where I'm coming from, it simply makes things easier and that's all CCP is trying to do - make things easier for us.
If you want it easy, EVE might not be the game for you.
No, just kidding - I despise those kinds of comments. But I would rather not have chat windows cluttering my screen, voice communication should be just that, not having to watch the screen to know everything I need to know would make things easier for me.
|

Ogul
Caldari ZiTek Deepspace Explorations Prime Orbital Systems
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 18:53:00 -
[130]
Originally by: Derran
Originally by: Ogul What I don't like is that a CTD/disconnect will now disrupt all communications.
I'm not understanding this or missing something. How does TS or Vent help in this regard? You can say I crashed and then what? You still can't do anything until you log back in.
To tell the FC that half his gang has crashed instead of jumping an enemy gatecamp.
To find out if it is a good idea to try to log in again or you should stay logged out.
Furthermore it will be a hassle to log in again and get a gang invite before you are able to hear what is going on.
|
|

Derran
Minmatar Khumatari Holdings Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 19:01:00 -
[131]
Originally by: Ogul To tell the FC that half his gang has crashed instead of jumping an enemy gatecamp.
Wouldn't he already know this happen when they suddenly disappear from gang? Or when he asks what is happening and gets no response?
I personally don't care either way really. It is still just a service you can feel free to use or not as an individual so I don't feel particularly obligated to defend or argue against it since it is a choice, not a requirement. The features that will be integrated into it will certainly be useful. I just like trying to understand some of the logic behind people feeling obligated to speak out against something that hasn't even been fully developed yet. It just doesn't make any sense to me.
|

Topaz Skydiver
Minmatar Narrative Freshfood
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 19:29:00 -
[132]
Edited by: Topaz Skydiver on 21/03/2007 19:26:03
Originally by: Derran
Originally by: Ogul To tell the FC that half his gang has crashed instead of jumping an enemy gatecamp.
Wouldn't he already know this happen when they suddenly disappear from gang? Or when he asks what is happening and gets no response?
Well, for me it's a point. If you fly in a fleet, it's normal to lose one or 2 people every few gates due to cdt. Also not uncommon that someone's client freezes in a battle. Wonder, if voice-com still works then. We'll see. If someone cdt's while moving with a fleet, he usually just says it, then the FC asks him which ship he flies, he answers e.g. interceptor or BS and the FC decides, if the fleet moves on or waits. Something like that has happened in any fleet I've traveled with, I think. Every few jumps: 'I just crashed.' or 'Can you scramble me, I log back in.' or 'Is it clear ? Can I log back in ?' 
|

Hllaxiu
Shiva Morsus Mihi
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 20:24:00 -
[133]
Originally by: Derran Apparently an FC will be able to see where people are, via the systemmap, when they talk so you won't even really have to ask where they are.
You mean the system map that might update the location of your gang mates once an hour if you're lucky? --- Our greatest glory is not in never failing, but in rising up every time we fail. - Emerson |

Hllaxiu
Shiva Morsus Mihi
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 20:27:00 -
[134]
Originally by: Derran
Originally by: Ogul To tell the FC that half his gang has crashed instead of jumping an enemy gatecamp.
Wouldn't he already know this happen when they suddenly disappear from gang? Or when he asks what is happening and gets no response?
Of course, what happens when the FC crashes? They say so, so the 2ic can take over quickly. Otherwise you wait on orders.
The more important part of this, is the first that a lot of people ask when coming onto TS is "whats (system) like?"
Oh, and some people in my corp also play BF2142 and use our same TS. See, we're friends, and like to play some games other than eve every once in a while. The same TS server covers all of that. --- Our greatest glory is not in never failing, but in rising up every time we fail. - Emerson |

Crumplecorn
Gallente Eve Cluster Explorations
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 21:18:00 -
[135]
Originally by: Winterblink
Originally by: Soulita And please winter, stop making me quote again what I already said. If you have no new arguments, let it be.
Please. All you seem to be able to do is say "you're wrong" and quote something you said earlier, instead of actually addressing what was said. That's not discussing, that's not even arguing (for the record, I was doing the former, not the latter).
And I "let it be" back when I said I understood what you were getting at, just disagreed with it.
fin
And this is why I just flame people  -
If you go into your options menu, there's a difficulty slider. Put that all the way over to the easiest setting and you'll be fine. |

Cipher7
Sebiestor tribe
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 21:51:00 -
[136]
Voice client is a crappy idea.
We didn't need it.
You should spend your resources on things that actually improve the game.
|

Daelin Blackleaf
No Joy Corp Pride - Honor - Duty
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 23:29:00 -
[137]
Originally by: Cipher7
Voice client is a crappy idea.
We didn't need it.
You should spend your resources on things that actually improve the game.
Your ignorance is stunning, did you read the thread at all? Did you find out anything at all about vivox before you posted?
|

Cipher7
Sebiestor tribe
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 23:34:00 -
[138]
Originally by: Daelin Blackleaf
Originally by: Cipher7
Voice client is a crappy idea.
We didn't need it.
You should spend your resources on things that actually improve the game.
Your ignorance is stunning, did you read the thread at all? Did you find out anything at all about vivox before you posted?
First of all, yes I've read the thread.
Secondly, yo momma.
And thirdly, if you don't have anything constructive to say then shut your cakehole.
Sincerely, Cipher7
|

Crumplecorn
Gallente Eve Cluster Explorations
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 23:35:00 -
[139]
Originally by: Cipher7 And thirdly, if you don't have anything constructive to say then shut your cakehole.
Quoted for Irony -
If you go into your options menu, there's a difficulty slider. Put that all the way over to the easiest setting and you'll be fine. |

Anon I'muss
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 23:41:00 -
[140]
IMO its a good idea, which if I could afford another VoIP system I'd probably get. But I already have a TS server, which I pay for. I can use it for chats with friends who don't own (or want to) EVE. I have loaned it out to my WoW guild and to several Super Groups on City of Heroes.
The Vivox service might be better, it might have more features than TS (wouldn't be hard) it might sound nicer than Vent but the bottom line is its part of a game making it difficult for people who don't own the game to use.
If they make a system that anyone can sign up to use, and be able to join in game channels without actually owning EVE than it will be more useful than the existing VoIP systems. Until then I and I suspect many others will stick with TS and Vent! _________________________________________________________
My main forum alt...
|
|

Fuujin
hirr Morsus Mihi
|
Posted - 2007.03.21 23:42:00 -
[141]
Amazing how many people are so adamant against it. If you dont have a use for it then dont use it, i'm more than sure many people will however. I know i will on certain occasions, certainly not for fleet ops but it does have its uses.
|

Verite Rendition
Caldari AUS Corporation CORE.
|
Posted - 2007.03.22 02:18:00 -
[142]
Originally by: Fuujin Amazing how many people are so adamant against it. If you dont have a use for it then dont use it, i'm more than sure many people will however. I know i will on certain occasions, certainly not for fleet ops but it does have its uses.
The problem is that it's so stupid it's insulting. CCP wants to charge several times the cost of our external solutions for their own inferior solution. Like so many other things, they can't admit that they're wrong and try to improve it, instead they must be bullheaded and do their own thing(or in this case, enjoy kickbacks from Vivox). ---- AUS Corp Lead Megalomanic |

Sazumaan Johnza
Raven Enterprises Confederation of Independent Corporations
|
Posted - 2007.03.22 03:19:00 -
[143]
This thread is all over the show with assumptions.
1. The integration has taken a lot longer than previously planned. At this stage Vivox needs to monetize the "basic implementation" of the client to get an understanding of risk.
2. Within 2-3 months of release, Vivox/CCP will have a good understanding of uptake and Vivox subscriber estimated growth of going forward.
3. The rate of uptake will likely determine the extent and speed of Vivox customisation for the roll-out of Vivox 2 & 3 and beyond. Don't think for one moment that they will stop with what has been put in place so far. That would be a bit of a waste of time.
4. Vivox has learnt a few things from implementations with other MMO titles. They would have already made suggestions to CCP as to which features to introduce first (to maximise the player value perception and thus get more people to pay the annual Voice fee).
5. We all know that CCP does things big and so I would say that they will work with Vivox to create something super-integrated and customised, offering value over and above a TS/Vent solution. Otherwise I don't think they would have started this project in the first place.
We are comparing an early-phase product (Voice) VS fully deployed products (Vent/TS). Another thing to remember is that value of a network increases exponentially by new members joining. Perhaps there will be a point where enough people are using Vivox where it just doesn't make sense not to have it. (That is, if they can make it more useful than TS/Vent).
Lastely there will probably be situations where TS/Vent. remain a better solution for whatever reason. And that's fine. They can all perfectly well co-exist...the question is , are you enjoying the game more or less prior to Vivox release. If the answer is yes for a large proportion of the player base, I would say it's mission accomplished.
- Sazu
|

Sgt Napalm
Synergy Evolved Serenity Fallen
|
Posted - 2007.03.22 03:25:00 -
[144]
Not worth it 
|

Grez
Minmatar The Collective Against ALL Authorities
|
Posted - 2007.03.22 04:35:00 -
[145]
Edited by: Grez on 22/03/2007 04:32:38 The EVE-Voice system puts NO strain on TQ or any part of EVE. All it does is use EVE's UI to relay information that's going to the VIVOX servers, NOT TQ.
Those arguing about the price:
Yes, it costs more in total than a TS or Vent server for the same amount of people, but...
One person has to pay for that TS or Vent server, and members of the corperation or whatnot might not have paypal, or feel safe sending money to that person in real life for a donation. It's also risky when, say a CEO can't buy a TS or Vent server, but a member can and does, and uses it to preasure the CEO to give him director, or such.
This way, a small corperation can all spend just $10 each to enable EVE-Voice, and use it to chat amongst themselves, without having to signup to a third-party for voice support. Which is also a task in itself (finding a good third-party suplier).
Yes this may not be worth it for the thousand-large alliances, but it was never designed for that. It was designed to help the smaller corperations AGAINST the larger ones that have the people and resources to buy a Teamspeak or Ventrilo server.
For god sake people, do your ******* research before you mouth off spouting your tinfoil hat bull****. Half of you have no idea why this was done, or how it works. If you don't know, then why do you then pretend to, and post it?
Vivox worked on EVE-Voice, with I'd imagine a few developers in EVE (and writing UI implimention is nothing for these guys - they write far harder stuff for a living), meaning it took nothing away from content/bug fixing/whatever other area you say is most important to EVE. --- Cache Clearer |

Maglorre
|
Posted - 2007.03.22 04:52:00 -
[146]
Originally by: Vendito
Will also be interesting when we can walk in stations and have Kariokee bars...
As long as we can also have big sharp pointy things that we can stab these people in the head with then I'm all for it. Particularly if doing so would strangle them with their own headset cables.
|

Ryysa
North Face Force Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.03.22 05:25:00 -
[147]
Edited by: Ryysa on 22/03/2007 05:23:32 Small summary of positive and negative points.
Positive: 1. Complete integration into the game, one-click voicechat in any place in the game. 2. No need for 3rd party applications.
(I really can't find anything more...)
Negative: 1. Complete integration into the game - if game crashes/disconnects, so does your VoIP. Also, if for example you would like to play some <insert game here> for a change with your friends and use VoIP you would still have to have a 3rd party program or hope that VoIP is integrated with that game. However, this will solve itself once ALL multiplayer games incorporate VoIP. 2. Steep price, cost/user is about 3 times less with current 3rd party software, not to mention that for example TeamSpeak can be hosted for free(excluding hosting costs) on a shell you have to host your corporate website/services or even just on a random box you use for work in the IT department in a datacentre. 3. Introducing the "Premium" RL money-reward scheme into EvE. I think if this is pursued, it will destroy this online community. This is just the first step. 4. Strain on the game interface in the EvE client. Did you know that while you are playing eve, about 66% of your computer's resources are used on rendering/processing the UI? Try hitting ctrl+tab for a change when running fraps FPS counter.
Over all, I can say that the negatives currently heavily outweigh the positives. Suggestion: 1. Make the voice free, or transparently free (increase subscription cost for EVERYONE).
This will deal with the majority of disadvantages, while still retaining the advantages imo.
N.F.F. Recruitment |

Cipher7
Sebiestor tribe
|
Posted - 2007.03.22 05:40:00 -
[148]
The problem with the vivox "solution" is that it does not take into account HOW the gaming population uses voice comms.
We don't only use voice comms for fleet ops, we use it for late night bull sessions even when Eve is down.
I know several gaming clans who use the same comms server for multiple games.
Vivox is a bad solution because it is integrated into the Eve client, making it less functional than Teamspeak, while at the same time adding more code to the Eve client and taking up clock cycles.
I don't know if you realize this but most top end alliances run bare minimum HUDs, why would they waste clock cycles on Vivox functionality such as finding out where other gang members are, I assume that functionality needs extra packets going back and forth, and extra processing overhead for displaying who is speaking and so forth.
Doesn't that go against "Need for Speed?"
Need for Speed doesn't mean adding more syruppy bullschit to the client to degrade its performance.
|

Kagura Nikon
Minmatar MASS HOMICIDE The Foundation.
|
Posted - 2007.03.22 10:54:00 -
[149]
Just imagine the revenue if only the 5 largest alliances had all its members in vivox. WTF! 60 thousand dollars.. where probably currently their combined expenditure on voice is less than 100 dollars per year.
If brute force doesn't solve your problem... you are not using enough |

Crumplecorn
Gallente Eve Cluster Explorations
|
Posted - 2007.03.22 11:03:00 -
[150]
Edited by: Crumplecorn on 22/03/2007 11:01:58
Originally by: Cipher7 The problem with the vivox "solution" is that it does not take into account HOW the gaming population uses voice comms.
And the problem with your post is that is does exactly the same.
Oh, and also you flat out state opinion as fact. But that's par for the course in this thread. -
If you go into your options menu, there's a difficulty slider. Put that all the way over to the easiest setting and you'll be fine. |
|

Gaia Thorn
Villains Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.03.22 11:33:00 -
[151]
Still the thing that bothers me is the word "premium" gives the feeeling that only a selected few can use it.
Sure people will use it dont doubt that but see it from another perspective, this game was all about being cost free except your monthly subscription. Now i know you feel like saying but this isnt ccp's program they just implemented it into THEIR game.
That is what ticks me of by implementing it into the game they inherit the program and it becomes a part of EVE. And starts to compete with Vent or TS.
For me this is just a start to makes us more at ease with the concept of premium item's or even services. And in the end you might even have to spend RL money to buy T4 items. Cause they are deemed "premium".
|

Crumplecorn
Gallente Eve Cluster Explorations
|
Posted - 2007.03.22 11:46:00 -
[152]
Originally by: Gaia Thorn Still the thing that bothers me is the word "premium" gives the feeeling that only a selected few can use it.
Sure people will use it dont doubt that but see it from another perspective, this game was all about being cost free except your monthly subscription. Now i know you feel like saying but this isnt ccp's program they just implemented it into THEIR game.
That is what ticks me of by implementing it into the game they inherit the program and it becomes a part of EVE. And starts to compete with Vent or TS.
For me this is just a start to makes us more at ease with the concept of premium item's or even services. And in the end you might even have to spend RL money to buy T4 items. Cause they are deemed "premium".
There's a big difference between paying for an add-on feature, which can even be emulated by external apps, and paying for actual content. I think the next step in this direction would be paying extra for the DX10 client because the graphics are nicer. Or paying a 'second class citizen fee' on the DX9 client.
It would be a good idea to integrate Vivox into the monthly subscription. That would kill most of the arguments against it, even the few intelligent ones. -
If you go into your options menu, there's a difficulty slider. Put that all the way over to the easiest setting and you'll be fine. |

Shadow Lightbringer
Association Of United Bastards
|
Posted - 2007.03.22 11:48:00 -
[153]
I signed up for the 30 day free trial, and I'm going to give it a fair shot. Right now I pay for a TS server which I let two corps and a small WoW guild use. If the Vivox option gives me reasonable audio quality then I will be dumping the TS server because Vivox is a much cheaper option for me.
To those of you who feel CCP has wasted resources to bring this to us, I respectfully disagree. I think over time Vivox is going to win over many people, and it will become a very attractive option for EVE players.
|

Kagura Nikon
Minmatar MASS HOMICIDE The Foundation.
|
Posted - 2007.03.22 11:54:00 -
[154]
If vivox was embeded in the normal subscription and everyone had it.. in 1 week it would take over... but as it is.. i doubt it.
If brute force doesn't solve your problem... you are not using enough |

Andrue
Amarr
|
Posted - 2007.03.22 12:21:00 -
[155]
Edited by: Andrue on 22/03/2007 12:17:59
Originally by: Grez This has nothing to do with Vivox. I don't think you fully understand how the EVE client works. EVE-Voice is done via a completely different server, it's got nothing to do with grid loading. The voice servers don't have anything to do with information being transfered between players in a grid. Hell, there's not even the need for it.
Yah.
The only aspect of the Vivox chat that might have a bearing on Need4Speed is the location indicator on the system map. Even this could be being handled through the Vivox data stream and therefore would have no impact.
Just to try and clarify this "Vivox=Lag/No it doesn't" situation:Most of what Vivox does can be implemented as a separate, invisible application that is started and stopped by Eve. There would need to be some communication between that application and the client but it doesn't need to involve the game servers.
When you speak you send data to the Vivox servers. Most of it is the sound of your voice but part of it can be "I'm in Nererut at position 123; 456". Whoever is listening to that chat channel gets a copy of that datastream (obviously) and also gets the information. At this point the Vivox service application sends the voice data to your sound card and sends the location information to your client.
Whether or not this is what actually happens I don't know but this has two major advantages that would appeal to CCP:
* As noted it removes Vivox from the server-side lag issues and that's all that Need4Speed is concerned with. Client-side lag is the user's problem and can be addressed by them upgrading their machine.
* It avoids having to give Vivox any details of the transmission protocol between client server and/or having to do a lot of work. It's the work of an hour at most to get one application to send a small amount of data to another on the same machine. -- (Battle hardened industrialist)
[Brackley, UK]
Please don't read this signature. |

Neon Genesis
Gallente The Landed Gentry
|
Posted - 2007.03.22 12:37:00 -
[156]
Originally by: Crumplecorn Edited by: Crumplecorn on 20/03/2007 23:28:55 Ha ha, having just tested Vivox by logging my main and my alt and talking to myself using the corp channel, I realised that the one area wher Vivox will truly pwn is in small scale stuff like this.
Voice chat with all the people in any channel (except local) is only one click away.
TS/Vent can't do that. And Vivox can do everything TS/Vent can do (except OOG, which is apparently coming in the future).
Vivox > All
Even if Vivox fails in the alliance/fleetop arena (and it may yet suceed), it really adds to Eve that anywhere where we could once type to each other we can now talk to each other instead with such ease.
Useless feature? Try 'one of the best additions in recent times'.
I want to do voice ransoms, even just for the novelty.
Also, 9.95 for a year is an utter pittance.
|

Crumplecorn
Gallente Eve Cluster Explorations
|
Posted - 2007.03.22 12:39:00 -
[157]
Originally by: Neon Genesis
Originally by: Crumplecorn Edited by: Crumplecorn on 20/03/2007 23:28:55 Ha ha, having just tested Vivox by logging my main and my alt and talking to myself using the corp channel, I realised that the one area wher Vivox will truly pwn is in small scale stuff like this.
Voice chat with all the people in any channel (except local) is only one click away.
TS/Vent can't do that. And Vivox can do everything TS/Vent can do (except OOG, which is apparently coming in the future).
Vivox > All
Even if Vivox fails in the alliance/fleetop arena (and it may yet suceed), it really adds to Eve that anywhere where we could once type to each other we can now talk to each other instead with such ease.
Useless feature? Try 'one of the best additions in recent times'.
I want to do voice ransoms, even just for the novelty.
Also, 9.95 for a year is an utter pittance.
TBH I want voice in local. It would be functionally useless (except maybe in 0.0), but amusing. -
If you go into your options menu, there's a difficulty slider. Put that all the way over to the easiest setting and you'll be fine. |

Daelin Blackleaf
No Joy Corp Pride - Honor - Duty
|
Posted - 2007.03.22 13:08:00 -
[158]
Everyone seems to assume that the only use it has is fleet combat as that is all they use TS/Vent for apparently.
You can use Vivox whenever you want to switch a convo to voice comms without alt-tabbing to TS, setting up a "room" and alt-tabbing back. Not to mention the fact that you can do this with people who aren't on your TS server.
Those who prefer to type will still do so. Even if it were free. I myself would rarely use Vivox due to my PC being situated in the living-room and my constant chatter would drive my partner crazy. It's still well worth the money, especially for those who will get a lot of use out of it.
In time it will come to work out of game and will be quite viable for use by fleets (especially if a large proportion of people don't subscribe to it until then). However if too few people subscribe then it will vanish along with the greatest potential for integrated voice comms this game is likely to see in a long time.
|

hinch
Gallente Furious Angels
|
Posted - 2007.03.22 13:22:00 -
[159]
Originally by: Smagd
You have someone who provides free TS servers? As in noone has to pay their bandwidth? Sign me up please, I'll bring 400 alliance mates.
there are several people including myself who can offer TS servers to corps and alliance with any number of voice slots for ingame isk
the going rate for more of the people who do this seems to be between 1 and 2 million per person.
so if you've got 400 people then at most its only going to cost you what 800 mill a month for a 400 slot TS server?
which for a corp/alliance of that size is next to nothing Furious Angels are recruiting Furious Angels we do it for the girls! |

Barbarellas Daughter
Lonely Barbarella
|
Posted - 2007.03.22 13:23:00 -
[160]
iom really looking forward to listening to Jita local 
|
|

Swamp Ziro
EPSILON TEAM
|
Posted - 2007.03.22 13:29:00 -
[161]
Edited by: Swamp Ziro on 22/03/2007 13:26:10
Originally by: Esurnir Are graphist able to fix bug ? Are vivox people able to change the queuing system of the server ? No. They are people working for bug, they are people working for new content, most of new content manpower can't be switched to bug fixxing.
They are all getting paid from the same money-pool smarty pants. Don't hire vivox people, hire more bugfixers.
|

DeathToHell
|
Posted - 2007.03.22 13:33:00 -
[162]
Edited by: DeathToHell on 22/03/2007 13:30:00 **** Voice !!, I want webcams 
FYI, There ARE free TS servers. Google is your friend 
I`ll pay Isk for the *****, but no way would I use any more RL money towards the game for something I dont really need!
edit: cant say C r a c k ?? lol
|

Crax McGee
Celtic Anarchy Anarchy Empire
|
Posted - 2007.03.22 13:35:00 -
[163]
Gewns will no dout find a way to crash the node by 300+ people shouting 'Yelp' Down the mic in local vivox chat! 
|

Ryysa
North Face Force Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.03.22 14:00:00 -
[164]
Edited by: Ryysa on 22/03/2007 13:56:55
Originally by: hinch
Originally by: Smagd
You have someone who provides free TS servers? As in noone has to pay their bandwidth? Sign me up please, I'll bring 400 alliance mates.
there are several people including myself who can offer TS servers to corps and alliance with any number of voice slots for ingame isk
You do realize that by offering people TS servers for isk you have to pay for a commercial TS license, or you are infringing intellectual property laws. That means you have to pay them per slot.
If you aren't then you are basically doing software piracy (according to their license).
If someone sends them a mail about it/they find out about it, you can expect: 1. For your server to get blacklisted. 2. Your ISP getting a warning, and after that you might be facing a lawsuit.
Ofcourse, this does not really apply if you live in a country where copyright laws are not enforced.
N.F.F. Recruitment |

Teebee
|
Posted - 2007.03.22 14:02:00 -
[165]
Edited by: Teebee on 22/03/2007 13:59:03
Originally by: Geldorf Drakar I must say that I am severly dissapointed with CCP decision to include a voice client into EVE. As well I am supprised at CCPs naivety, thinking that Users would turn to an integrated voice client which they have to pay for, when nearly everyone has a TS or Vent server available for use, free I might add. ------------------------------------------------------
It's Obvious why people would want to use it , its because you can just start talking to people without having to send info for ts - vent and it will cause more outcomes in the game which is a good thing especialy if your bored. hey! just start talking ! But the part I dont like is the fee , EvE is already expensive imo and I dont know if many people will get Voice so if you get it and not many people will then your screwd. I think it should be free for a while before they charge and I realy think that people who hang in Jita all day will get this and just talk crap lol.
|

Crumplecorn
Gallente Eve Cluster Explorations
|
Posted - 2007.03.22 14:05:00 -
[166]
Originally by: Swamp Ziro Edited by: Swamp Ziro on 22/03/2007 13:26:10
Originally by: Esurnir Are graphist able to fix bug ? Are vivox people able to change the queuing system of the server ? No. They are people working for bug, they are people working for new content, most of new content manpower can't be switched to bug fixxing.
They are all getting paid from the same money-pool smarty pants. Don't hire vivox people, hire more bugfixers.
Ooh, yeah, let's have people who are new to the code fixing the bugs.
 -
Originally by: CCP Sharkbait think the problem is found. last startup now.
|

Swamp Ziro
EPSILON TEAM
|
Posted - 2007.03.22 14:09:00 -
[167]
Edited by: Swamp Ziro on 22/03/2007 14:05:29
Originally by: Crumplecorn
Originally by: Swamp Ziro Edited by: Swamp Ziro on 22/03/2007 13:26:10
Originally by: Esurnir Are graphist able to fix bug ? Are vivox people able to change the queuing system of the server ? No. They are people working for bug, they are people working for new content, most of new content manpower can't be switched to bug fixxing.
They are all getting paid from the same money-pool smarty pants. Don't hire vivox people, hire more bugfixers.
Ooh, yeah, let's have people who are new to the code fixing the bugs.

Look I don't care. Don't hire vivox people and use the money to buy Sharkbait some beers, I don't give a damn.
Just don't waste money.
|

Crumplecorn
Gallente Eve Cluster Explorations
|
Posted - 2007.03.22 14:16:00 -
[168]
Originally by: Swamp Ziro Edited by: Swamp Ziro on 22/03/2007 14:05:29
Originally by: Crumplecorn
Originally by: Swamp Ziro Edited by: Swamp Ziro on 22/03/2007 13:26:10
Originally by: Esurnir Are graphist able to fix bug ? Are vivox people able to change the queuing system of the server ? No. They are people working for bug, they are people working for new content, most of new content manpower can't be switched to bug fixxing.
They are all getting paid from the same money-pool smarty pants. Don't hire vivox people, hire more bugfixers.
Ooh, yeah, let's have people who are new to the code fixing the bugs.

Look I don't care. Don't hire vivox people and use the money to buy Sharkbait some beers, I don't give a damn.
Just don't waste money.
It's not a waste of money, and throwing money at problems doesn't solve them.
If that logic is going to be used, can I request that missions are removed, anyone who is employed to work on them be fired, and more money is put into real content? No? Thought not. -
Originally by: CCP Sharkbait think the problem is found. last startup now.
|

Daniel Jackson
Caldari Caldari Provisions
|
Posted - 2007.03.22 14:19:00 -
[169]
CCP Please EMBED the voice chat with our current subscription ___________________
 Sig removed. Lacks EvE related content. -Conuion Meow ([email protected]) |

Swamp Ziro
EPSILON TEAM
|
Posted - 2007.03.22 14:21:00 -
[170]
Originally by: Crumplecorn
Originally by: Swamp Ziro Edited by: Swamp Ziro on 22/03/2007 14:05:29
Originally by: Crumplecorn
Originally by: Swamp Ziro Edited by: Swamp Ziro on 22/03/2007 13:26:10
Originally by: Esurnir Are graphist able to fix bug ? Are vivox people able to change the queuing system of the server ? No. They are people working for bug, they are people working for new content, most of new content manpower can't be switched to bug fixxing.
They are all getting paid from the same money-pool smarty pants. Don't hire vivox people, hire more bugfixers.
Ooh, yeah, let's have people who are new to the code fixing the bugs.

Look I don't care. Don't hire vivox people and use the money to buy Sharkbait some beers, I don't give a damn.
Just don't waste money.
It's not a waste of money, and throwing money at problems doesn't solve them.
If that logic is going to be used, can I request that missions are removed, anyone who is employed to work on them be fired, and more money is put into real content? No? Thought not.
No, because some people like missions. I've yet to see a person that likes vivox.
Also, throwing money at some problems DOES solve them, especially problems like "we don't have enough money!!:("
|
|

Crumplecorn
Gallente Eve Cluster Explorations
|
Posted - 2007.03.22 14:23:00 -
[171]
Originally by: Swamp Ziro
Originally by: Crumplecorn
Originally by: Swamp Ziro Edited by: Swamp Ziro on 22/03/2007 14:05:29
Originally by: Crumplecorn
Originally by: Swamp Ziro Edited by: Swamp Ziro on 22/03/2007 13:26:10
Originally by: Esurnir Are graphist able to fix bug ? Are vivox people able to change the queuing system of the server ? No. They are people working for bug, they are people working for new content, most of new content manpower can't be switched to bug fixxing.
They are all getting paid from the same money-pool smarty pants. Don't hire vivox people, hire more bugfixers.
Ooh, yeah, let's have people who are new to the code fixing the bugs.

Look I don't care. Don't hire vivox people and use the money to buy Sharkbait some beers, I don't give a damn.
Just don't waste money.
It's not a waste of money, and throwing money at problems doesn't solve them.
If that logic is going to be used, can I request that missions are removed, anyone who is employed to work on them be fired, and more money is put into real content? No? Thought not.
No, because some people like missions. I've yet to see a person that likes vivox.
Also, throwing money at some problems DOES solve them, especially problems like "we don't have enough money!!:("
WTF? There are people in every Vivox thread supporting it. There were loads of people who volunteered to test is on Sisi and TQ. Either you don't know what you are talking about, or you're just lying. -
Originally by: CCP Sharkbait think the problem is found. last startup now.
|

Jayad
HIVE X-PACT
|
Posted - 2007.03.22 14:59:00 -
[172]
Originally by: Swamp Ziro No, because some people like missions. I've yet to see a person that likes vivox.
Also, throwing money at some problems DOES solve them, especially problems like "we don't have enough money!!:
Strange statement like Crumple said.
Loads of people are into it, i think its a very good idea. Not sure if its been mentioned in this thread but easy access to VOIP creates a more level playing field amoung corps. Competing without VOIP is very hard especially in fleet combat, so im all for it.
Geldorf,
so i bet your not going to have this active, dammit i wanted to turn our quarterly convo's into voice enabled. Ill probably just join your TS once in a while then lol.
|

Gaia Thorn
Villains Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.03.22 15:06:00 -
[173]
But that's just the thing if they would implement the feature of you buying T2 item straight away you would voilently reject it. But slowly and incremently subject users to such functions and words will make them accustomed to it.
This is the feeling im getting that slowly creeping towards that goal. 1 GTC (RL money for ingame item/time) 2 Voice (start easing in premium services) 3 Items (start selling T2 item for RL cash to reduce load on market) 4 all out sales of everything ( buy youre way to the top)
|

Derran
Minmatar Khumatari Holdings Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2007.03.22 15:39:00 -
[174]
Originally by: Gaia Thorn But that's just the thing if they would implement the feature of you buying T2 item straight away you would voilently reject it. But slowly and incremently subject users to such functions and words will make them accustomed to it.
This is the feeling im getting that slowly creeping towards that goal. 1 GTC (RL money for ingame item/time) 2 Voice (start easing in premium services) 3 Items (start selling T2 item for RL cash to reduce load on market) 4 all out sales of everything ( buy youre way to the top)
You win the tinfoil hat crown. Congradulations.
|

Tarish Montrey
Gallente Vindicate and Deliverance The Kano Organisation
|
Posted - 2007.03.22 15:45:00 -
[175]
I think VIVOX exclusive corps and alliances is completely acceptable. Why do anyone care if I use VIVOX. If I require VIVOX. I have an advantage you dont.
Soo I think VIVOX rocks..
I am Tarish your friendly VIVOX supporter... Sig follows- .Join |

Johnathan Roark
Caldari Quantum Industries Prime Orbital Systems
|
Posted - 2007.03.22 16:07:00 -
[176]
Edited by: Johnathan Roark on 22/03/2007 16:04:11 It looks very cool, but there are some major issues.
1)5 to 10 second delay when you press push to talk and when you can actually talk
2) Not many options
3)voice qualty is not very good
4)I can not bind it to my windows key?
5) This is the biggest reason, i can hear other people, but they can not hear me. Teamspeak still works fine, so its not my issue. unless i am missing an option?
Corporation Management Improvement |

hinch
Gallente Furious Angels
|
Posted - 2007.03.22 16:10:00 -
[177]
Originally by: Ryysa
You do realize that by offering people TS servers for isk you have to pay for a commercial TS license, or you are infringing intellectual property laws. That means you have to pay them per slot.
If you aren't then you are basically doing software piracy (according to their license).
If someone sends them a mail about it/they find out about it, you can expect: 1. For your server to get blacklisted. 2. Your ISP getting a warning, and after that you might be facing a lawsuit.
Ofcourse, this does not really apply if you live in a country where copyright laws are not enforced.
or already own a commercial TS license due to owning a hosting company and a game server hosting company where the TS servers are given away with every server rented :) Furious Angels are recruiting Furious Angels we do it for the girls! |

Davincicod
Minmatar Meat 2 Veg
|
Posted - 2007.03.22 16:25:00 -
[178]
I will not pay for eve voice no matter how good it is. We pay ENOUGH for this game already. Eve voice should be free content as it is part of the game. I'm sorry but CCP arent getting any more money out of me and my corp. Vent and TS it will remain.
|

Anon I'muss
|
Posted - 2007.03.22 16:32:00 -
[179]
Hmm...
Think some of you are just arguing for the sake of arguing!
After testing Vivox using the trial last night I have some thoughts:
1)It doesn't work! My TS works, but Vivox refuses to let me broadcast at all. The PTT either doesn't work or has no effect, thats using the middle mouse button. The 'talk' key must be bound with alt, ctrl or shift which makes that useful, not!
2)I have three accounts, ú10 (or whatever it is) is fine for one account, but ú30 a month is stupid, I hate to think what some of those people who have even more accounts are likely to do. The price of the VoIP either needs to be included in the sub or taken as a separate account, thus allowing one account for the player...
3)The help is woefully inadequate, I've looked at the help here, lots of questions but most of the answers either don't apply or work. If this is being added as a mature software solution it should have a serious support system in place. After all if I'm supposed to pay for it it has to work. If this isn't a mature solution, as many commentators seem to be saying. Why on earth are they charging for it?
As I said before this is not a bad idea, but the current implementation is horrendous, if CCP/Vivox can get that sorted out then they may well be onto a winner as it is there is no 'real' reason to switch from TS/Vent which are better as it stands... heck Skype is better... heck the cheap walkie talkie I bought for my kids is better! _________________________________________________________
My main forum alt...
|

Rangar
Gallente The X-Trading Company Dusk and Dawn
|
Posted - 2007.03.22 16:32:00 -
[180]
Well, with this feature CCP answered a question nobody had asked. I for myself would prefer, if the GMs would answer my petition, which is open for more than 3 weeks now without a single word!
|
|

FarScape III
Caldari Provisions
|
Posted - 2007.03.22 17:17:00 -
[181]
Edited by: FarScape III on 22/03/2007 17:34:20 Edited by: FarScape III on 22/03/2007 17:32:09
Stuff like things items put in game I can never see are useless to me but this I can use, why not?
Only thing is haveing to pay seperate for it I'll not be useing it. Besides I heard it sound not good and I don't even think TS sounds good and is crud but its free, I stilll won't use it if it is not high quality.
|

Latex Sandals
|
Posted - 2007.03.22 17:27:00 -
[182]
Originally by: Vendito security.
Actually, Security is one of the bigger drawbacks I see of Vivox.
With TS we can see who is in the channel and who is active. The FC's can set up secure comms that nobody else can hear. You CAN change the password so that people can't just drop in.
|

Latex Sandals
|
Posted - 2007.03.22 17:37:00 -
[183]
Originally by: Grez The EVE-Voice system puts NO strain on TQ or any part of EVE. All it does is use EVE's UI to relay information that's going to the VIVOX servers, NOT TQ.
If it integrates with the client then there is strain on my game.
We already know that the sound implementation in EvE is so poor that most people turn it off. So turning it back on to get voice coms - and ADDING to the lag by having another draw on the client is just silly.
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 :: [one page] |