EVE Search - BOOST BLASTERS!

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Ships and Modules

BOOST BLASTERS!

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 .. 45 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 6 post(s)
7shining7one7	Posted - 2009.03.01 16:43:00 - [1261] Originally by: Andnowthenews Dear god is pointless argumentative trolling all i do?. ****, i missed one.
Andnowthenews Caldari State War Academy	Posted - 2009.03.01 16:46:00 - [1262] Originally by: NightmareX So when i said that Blasters don't need a Boost, and then you come here and call me a troll. I called you nothing i asked you a question LTR. Blasters are in real need of a boost as they are way too infective as gang ships.
NightmareX Celtic Anarchy Force Of Evil	Posted - 2009.03.01 16:48:00 - [1263] Edited by: NightmareX on 01/03/2009 16:51:48 Originally by: Andnowthenews Originally by: NightmareX So when i said that Blasters don't need a Boost, and then you come here and call me a troll. I called you nothing i asked you a question LTR. Blasters are in real need of a boost as they are way too infective as gang ships. Originally by: Andnowthenews Dear god is pointless argumentative trolling all you do?. Do i need to make it any clearer for you?. And again. I have to laught to the comment that Blasters are way too infective as gang ships / weapons. I see that your still trying extremely hard to get me off topic here. Maybe i should report you again for doing that. Check out my new flash web page: Dark Paradise
Andnowthenews Caldari State War Academy	Posted - 2009.03.01 16:51:00 - [1264] Edited by: Andnowthenews on 01/03/2009 16:51:47 Originally by: NightmareX Originally by: Andnowthenews Originally by: NightmareX So when i said that Blasters don't need a Boost, and then you come here and call me a troll. I called you nothing i asked you a question LTR. Blasters are in real need of a boost as they are way too infective as gang ships. Originally by: Andnowthenews Dear god is pointless argumentative trolling all you do?. Do i need to make it any clearer for you?. No its perfectly clear as i can see quite clearly and understand written English well enough to see that is a question not a statement.
NightmareX Celtic Anarchy Force Of Evil	Posted - 2009.03.01 16:54:00 - [1265] Edited by: NightmareX on 01/03/2009 16:54:24 Originally by: Andnowthenews Edited by: Andnowthenews on 01/03/2009 16:51:47 Originally by: NightmareX Originally by: Andnowthenews Originally by: NightmareX So when i said that Blasters don't need a Boost, and then you come here and call me a troll. I called you nothing i asked you a question LTR. Blasters are in real need of a boost as they are way too infective as gang ships. Originally by: Andnowthenews Dear god is pointless argumentative trolling all you do?. Do i need to make it any clearer for you?. No its perfectly clear as i can see quite clearly and understand written English well enough to see that is a question not a statement. And why do you ask if i'm a troll, when in fact you are the one that is trolling?. Because i was not trolling at all in that reply, and then you get here and ask if i'm a troll?. And why are you asking that question. I will ofc say i'm not a troll in that reply. But in your eyes i would be a troll anyways. Sweet jesus man. Get it now?. Check out my new flash web page: Dark Paradise
Andnowthenews Caldari State War Academy	Posted - 2009.03.01 17:08:00 - [1266] Edited by: Andnowthenews on 01/03/2009 17:10:06 Originally by: NightmareX off topic + TLDR Anything on topic to add on this new page an explanation to why you think blasters are fine when on SHC gourm and all the others think the fix is a good idea done properly?.
NightmareX Celtic Anarchy Force Of Evil	Posted - 2009.03.01 17:10:00 - [1267] Edited by: NightmareX on 01/03/2009 17:15:43 Originally by: Andnowthenews Originally by: NightmareX TLDR Can i assume it was another rant/justification that went in great off topic detail about how you are not a troll have never been a troll and will report anybody who goes into great detail about irrelevant off topic subjects.......... Try harder to prove that your right. Ow look at that, your trying really hard to find a way to twist you away from what i was telling. Awesome way to prove that your right. EDIT: Originally by: Andnowthenews Edited by: Andnowthenews on 01/03/2009 17:10:06 Originally by: NightmareX off topic + TLDR Anything on topic to add on this new page an explanation to why you think blasters are fine when on SHC gourm and all the others think the fix is a good idea done properly?. No with you here it's not possible to go on topic about Blasters here. Haven't Goum told us many many times in this topic that boosting Blasters like you for example want them to be, then it's going to make them extremely overpowered while making some other weapons systems really underpowered and also makes combat in EVE very unbalanced?. He have told that many times here. I don't care what he have said on SHC, when he have said something totally different here in this topic. That is what count, what he have said here in this topic. Check out my new flash web page: Dark Paradise
Andnowthenews Caldari State War Academy	Posted - 2009.03.01 17:11:00 - [1268] Originally by: NightmareX off topic troll Look up i edited.
NightmareX Celtic Anarchy Force Of Evil	Posted - 2009.03.01 17:14:00 - [1269] Originally by: Andnowthenews Originally by: NightmareX off topic troll Look up i edited. Look at my edited reply to, also the one before your posted here. Check out my new flash web page: Dark Paradise
Andnowthenews Caldari State War Academy	Posted - 2009.03.01 17:23:00 - [1270] Edited by: Andnowthenews on 01/03/2009 17:25:58 Edited by: Andnowthenews on 01/03/2009 17:24:01 Originally by: NightmareX Haven't Goum told us many many times in this topic that boosting Blasters like you for example want them to be, then it's going to make them extremely overpowered while making some other weapons systems really underpowered and also makes combat in EVE very unbalanced?. I have made no posts about it, i am not a alt of your running mate no matter what that other fool insists on saying although i do think its funny how long the list is getting, when anybody post agreement he puts them on it heh. Very amusing considering he is a alt himself imho. And the only posts i read of gourmindongs on here are those about rails being better than blasters in gang combat and that rails are also the comparable system to pulse, and that pretty much says it all as far as im concerned. The underpowered system in eve as we speak is blasters, the fix suggested would not make them OP it would put them right.

NightmareX Celtic Anarchy Force Of Evil	Posted - 2009.03.01 17:24:00 - [1271] Edited by: NightmareX on 01/03/2009 17:26:05 Originally by: Andnowthenews The underpowered system in eve as we speak is blasters, the fix suggested would not make them OP it would put them right. So Artilleries is not more borked than Blasters is?. Yeah it will put the Blasters right to put other weapons system down the drain. Isn't that cool to do?. Check out my new flash web page: Dark Paradise
Andnowthenews Caldari State War Academy	Posted - 2009.03.01 17:28:00 - [1272] Originally by: NightmareX So Artilleries is not more borked than Blasters is?. As you were told on the last page, start a thread about it this one is for fixing a nd balancing blasters.
sophisticatedlimabean Gallente Delinquent Habits	Posted - 2009.03.01 17:29:00 - [1273] Edited by: sophisticatedlimabean on 01/03/2009 17:31:39 Originally by: NightmareX So Artilleries is not more borked than Blasters is lol runs out of arguments starts off topic posts about arties.... Good job you are not policing yourself or you would get yourself banned from reporting off topic comments... PS: YAY ANOTHER ALT:- trollmoreX/trader20/maralt/sophisticatedlimabean/murina/cucac/and now the news... Bolded mine. My views may reflect those of my corp/alliance, but if you wanna know for sure ask em for gods sake.
NightmareX Celtic Anarchy Force Of Evil	Posted - 2009.03.01 17:30:00 - [1274] Edited by: NightmareX on 01/03/2009 17:36:02 Originally by: Andnowthenews Originally by: NightmareX So Artilleries is not more borked than Blasters is?. As you were told on the last page, start a thread about it this one is for fixing a nd balancing blasters. Dude, when you say Blasters are the weapon that need a fix most, i take that as a pure lie. And then i reply by giving you the fact that Artilleries are in need of a boost waaaaaaaaay more than Blasters. I don't need to make a new topic everytime i just want to meantion another weapon system in this topic. And the thing that Artilleries need a boost waaaaaaay before Blasters or any other weapons sytems are a pure fact. So try all you want to take that fact away, but you can't. Originally by: sophisticatedlimabean Originally by: NightmareX So Artilleries is not more borked than Blasters is lol runs out of arguments starts off topic posts about arties.... Good job you are not policing yourself or you would get yourself banned from reporting off topic comments... So your saying that i'm just gonna let peoples tell that Blasters are the weapon that need a fix most when that's a lie?. What the hell i'am supposed to say. I'am supposed to say yes Blasters need a fix much much more than Artilleries do?. When someone makes a topic about something, then we are all free to say that for example that Blasters are not the weapon that needs a fix most. I'm still on topic, because i'm still talking about Blasters. And what about you when you talk about lasers when the topic is about Blasters?. Ok, reporting you for going off topic. Dude, i'm not an idiot. Check out my new flash web page: Dark Paradise
Andnowthenews Caldari State War Academy	Posted - 2009.03.01 17:41:00 - [1275] Edited by: Andnowthenews on 01/03/2009 17:41:57 Originally by: NightmareX tldr+off topic troll It seems to me that you did not have much to say in this thread from the start and now you have ran out of even that you spend most of you time trying to explain your off topic trolling as being insightful... Its not, take a day off and read your posts tomorrow and you will see just how manic and pointless you posting have been over that last few pages. Im done with you so reply/justify all you like but your wasting your breath to try and win a argument with me cos this is what i think and its not gonna change by you mouthing off at me, you will just reinforce/prove it.. Im gone..
Goumindong Amarr Merch Industrial GoonSwarm	Posted - 2009.03.01 17:41:00 - [1276] Edited by: Goumindong on 01/03/2009 17:41:55 Originally by: Andnowthenews Anything on topic to add on this new page an explanation to why you think blasters are fine when on SHC gourm and all the others think the fix is a good idea done properly?. If by "gourm" you're referring to me, then no, that is not true. Marns falloff suggestion is ridiculous. It would bring the "advantage point" for Amarr/Gallente to 21km. It would bring the "advantage point" for Amarr/Minmatar to 37.5km. It would obviate pulse lasers since in any situation you would ever want to fly them you would be better off lobbing torps instead (due to comparative tank issues). I argued quite strongly against it in that thread and will continue to do so. Aside: Reported for reportedly reporting the reported post of reports about reporting reportedly reported posts. Goodness you people, get a room.
NightmareX Celtic Anarchy Force Of Evil	Posted - 2009.03.01 17:43:00 - [1277] Originally by: Andnowthenews Originally by: NightmareX tldr+off topic troll It seems to me that you did not have much to say in this thread from the start and now you have ran out of even that you spend most of you time trying to explain your off topic trolling as being insightful... Its not, take a day off and read your posts tomorrow and you will see just how manic and pointless you posting have been over that last few pages. Im done with your reply/justify all you like but your wasting your breath to try and win a argument with me cos this is what i think and its not gonna change by you mouthing off at me you will just reinforce it.. Im gone.. Oh like you have anything more to add to this topic?. All you can do is to whine whine whine and troll everybody else in this topic. So when you talk about blah blah blah Lasers and booooo Blasters, then that is not off topic?. Yes it must be off topic when you talk about Lasers in a Blaster topic. Get the point?. Check out my new flash web page: Dark Paradise
Andnowthenews Caldari State War Academy	Posted - 2009.03.01 17:46:00 - [1278] You seemed to agree with the idea but not the broad application, and wanted it done on a ship by ship, module by module application instead. Originally by: Goumindong It will also have a lot of unintended consequences. Better to look at things individually and fix the balance problems there. Or did i read wrong.
NightmareX Celtic Anarchy Force Of Evil	Posted - 2009.03.01 17:46:00 - [1279] Edited by: NightmareX on 01/03/2009 17:46:26 Originally by: Goumindong Edited by: Goumindong on 01/03/2009 17:41:55 Originally by: Andnowthenews Anything on topic to add on this new page an explanation to why you think blasters are fine when on SHC gourm and all the others think the fix is a good idea done properly?. If by "gourm" you're referring to me, then no, that is not true. Marns falloff suggestion is ridiculous. It would bring the "advantage point" for Amarr/Gallente to 21km. It would bring the "advantage point" for Amarr/Minmatar to 37.5km. It would obviate pulse lasers since in any situation you would ever want to fly them you would be better off lobbing torps instead (due to comparative tank issues). I argued quite strongly against it in that thread and will continue to do so. Aside: Reported for reportedly reporting the reported post of reports about reporting reportedly reported posts. Goodness you people, get a room. So your not lying at all now Andnowthenews?. Nah, all Goum said on SHC or any other places in your dream was true. See, my point still stands. Your a lying troll Andnowthenews. Check out my new flash web page: Dark Paradise
The Djego Minmatar merovinger inc	Posted - 2009.03.01 17:49:00 - [1280] Originally by: Goumindong Quote: emphasize their strengths and weakness, make them more distinct from other short range weapons It is quite ironic that you are posting this in a thread where everyone else wants to extend the range of blasters to make them better in a gang, to make them less distinct weapons. Aside: What do you think of the signature radius of the Hyperion. This is the opinion of one Person in this Thread, one person != everyone. Many people stated mutliple times that range isn¦t the problem on blasters, it is the efficency at her range. Originally by: Goumindong Originally by: The Djego Since Lasers are intendet to work in exactly the same situations equaly well than Blasters and Aks? No, it was a comment relating to their general strengths and weaknesses. I was saying they are pretty close to each other in efficacy and if you boost one, you're going to have to boost the rest. Why not quoting the rest? Originally by: Goumindong Originally by: Goumindong Not again this stupid discussion, I explaind this to you multipe times why the advantages you see arn¦t advantages on TQ, while you repeeting this line again and again without starting a real discussion. No, you haven't. You've said "nuh uh". And each time i explain again how these mechanics work and how they hanged and what that means for the ships. You keep evade multiple times a comment on my situational examples(related to TQ gameplay) where the big advantages you think to see in the raw data preaty much fail leading to the intendet advantage on TQ. So far we had Hype vs Mega, DPS vs DPS, Tracking vs Tracking, Range vs Range, Damage Type effects vs Armor/T2/Shields, so is this nothing, all points invalid, all arguments wrong? Originally by: Goumindong Originally by: The Djego 1. Ofc they do and there arn¦t any Threads about Rockets, Hams, Aks or Blasters on the Froums. When did you read the last Blasters\AKs\Rockets\Hams\Torps are op Topic, because they serious outperforme other Weapons in her intendet role? I am not sure what you're saying. Serious? Originally by: Goumindong Originally by: The Djego 2. No I don¦t actualy mean this. Even if It would be hilariously broken in your Opinion I would call it hilariously funny, would be kind of a cure to the bing a bigger Blob sydrome and create situations where it wouldn¦t be just stupid to warp in close range Gank Ships into a sniper Blob(asuming there is no lag in eve ofc) instead of bringing your own Sniper Blob or stuff like this. No, it would not be a cure for the "bring a bigger blob" syndrome. People would just bring a bigger blob of the better ships. So having 100 Blaster Ships in a Gang would be practical in the current Primary is..., Secendary is... F1-F8 gameplay we have, over 100 Lases/Rail/Arti fitted Ships to make it FOTM? I personaly highly doubt this, it is practial in a smaller gangs and don¦t traslates to good up to bigger ones. ---- Nerf Tank - Boost Gank! Originally by: Amantus Real men don't need to get into blaster range.

Goumindong Amarr Merch Industrial GoonSwarm	Posted - 2009.03.01 17:53:00 - [1281] Originally by: Andnowthenews ] FROM SHC: You seem to have confused a singular complaint taken from a bevy of complaints aimed at a specific failing of the proposal combined with the reason that specific problem was a problem and the solution to the problem of the complaint as acceptance that there both is a problem and that the fix is good. How you did that, will vex me until i figure out how many licks it takes to get to the center of a tootsie roll.
sophisticatedlimabean Gallente Delinquent Habits	Posted - 2009.03.01 17:54:00 - [1282] Originally by: The Djego Originally by: Goumindong It is quite ironic that you are posting this in a thread where everyone else wants to extend the range of blasters to make them better in a gang, to make them less distinct weapons. Aside: What do you think of the signature radius of the Hyperion. This is the opinion of one Person in this Thread, one person != everyone. Many people stated mutliple times that range isn¦t the problem on blasters, it is the efficency at her range. I actually wanted them to do slightly better dmg at ranges they already hit at (10-20km) not extend the range any as that would not really suit the blaster idea. My views may reflect those of my corp/alliance, but if you wanna know for sure ask em for gods sake.
Andnowthenews Caldari State War Academy	Posted - 2009.03.01 17:58:00 - [1283] Edited by: Andnowthenews on 01/03/2009 18:00:34 Edited by: Andnowthenews on 01/03/2009 17:59:54 Originally by: Goumindong Originally by: Andnowthenews ] FROM SHC: You seem to have confused a singular complaint taken from a bevy of complaints aimed at a specific failing of the proposal combined with the reason that specific problem was a problem and the solution to the problem of the complaint as acceptance that there both is a problem and that the fix is good. It was just a post i saw that seemed to agree with the idea but not with applying it to every ship/system in eve and as such i agree with you. But it seems you did not mean your posts to look that way so meh...it was a genuine error and i apologies for misreading it, hopefullly before the psycotic troll has me hunged or summat.
Goumindong Amarr Merch Industrial GoonSwarm	Posted - 2009.03.01 18:02:00 - [1284] Originally by: The Djego This is the opinion of one Person in this Thread, one person != everyone. Many people stated mutliple times that range isn¦t the problem on blasters, it is the efficency at her range I am sorry, i have to deal with a number of people with multiple varying opinions. The vast majority of them have been arguing for an "increased gang role by extending the range of blasters". If you want more efficiency in your range, i suggest flying a Hyperion. Quote: Why not quoting the rest? The same reason i don't quote nested trees. Space. Quote: You keep evade multiple times a comment on my situational examples(related to TQ gameplay) where the big advantages you think to see in the raw data preaty much fail leading to the intendet advantage on TQ. So far we had Hype vs Mega, DPS vs DPS, Tracking vs Tracking, Range vs Range, Damage Type effects vs Armor/T2/Shields, so is this nothing, all points invalid, all arguments wrong? I have not evaded anything. The rest i have no clue what you're talking about. Quote: Serious? Seriously. I have a hard time reading your stilted English as it is. I understand that its not your first language and so am not begrudging you for it, but that doesn't make it any easier to understand what point you're trying to get across. Quote: So having 100 Blaster Ships in a Gang would be practical in the current Primary is..., Secendary is... F1-F8 gameplay we have, over 100 Lases/Rail/Arti fitted Ships to make it FOTM? Rolling Eyes I personaly highly doubt this, it is practial in a smaller gangs and don¦t traslates to good up to bigger ones. Currently, of course not. But that was not the question. You purported a situation in which warping in at close range with a small group of blaster ships would give you enough of an advantage to beat a larger group of ships. I responded by saying "if that were possible, people would just bring a larger group of the ships that were better"
NightmareX Celtic Anarchy Force Of Evil	Posted - 2009.03.01 18:04:00 - [1285] Edited by: NightmareX on 01/03/2009 18:06:08 Originally by: Andnowthenews it was a genuine error and i apologies for misreading it Thanks for finally admitting it that you missreads here. Now if you only could do an apologie to all of the others here that are trying to tell you something here, then it would be good. Now, ktnxbai. Check out my new flash web page: Dark Paradise
sophisticatedlimabean Gallente Delinquent Habits	Posted - 2009.03.01 18:06:00 - [1286] Edited by: sophisticatedlimabean on 01/03/2009 18:06:30 Originally by: NightmareX Now if you only could do the same to all of the others here that are trying to tell you something here. As you are my alt i suggest you start learning from djego, oh and me... My views may reflect those of my corp/alliance, but if you wanna know for sure ask em for gods sake.
NightmareX Celtic Anarchy Force Of Evil	Posted - 2009.03.01 18:07:00 - [1287] Edited by: NightmareX on 01/03/2009 18:08:13 Originally by: sophisticatedlimabean Edited by: sophisticatedlimabean on 01/03/2009 18:06:30 Originally by: NightmareX Now if you only could do the same to all of the others here that are trying to tell you something here. As you are my alt i suggest you start learning from djego, oh and me... LOL. Oh, i also recommend you to requote my reply there, since i edited it while you was replying to it. Check out my new flash web page: Dark Paradise
Andnowthenews Caldari State War Academy	Posted - 2009.03.01 18:08:00 - [1288] Originally by: NightmareX Edited by: NightmareX on 01/03/2009 18:06:08 Originally by: Andnowthenews it was a genuine error and i apologies for misreading it Thanks for finally admitting it that you missreads here. Now if you only could do an apologie to all of the others here that are trying to tell you something here, then it would be good. Now, ktnxbai. I was not talking to you troll, go harass you buddy you fool you add nothing to this thread.
NightmareX Celtic Anarchy Force Of Evil	Posted - 2009.03.01 18:09:00 - [1289] Edited by: NightmareX on 01/03/2009 18:10:23 Originally by: Andnowthenews Originally by: NightmareX Edited by: NightmareX on 01/03/2009 18:06:08 Originally by: Andnowthenews it was a genuine error and i apologies for misreading it Thanks for finally admitting it that you missreads here. Now if you only could do an apologie to all of the others here that are trying to tell you something here, then it would be good. Now, ktnxbai. I was not talking to you troll, go harass you buddy you fool you add nothing to this thread. Oh the tears, they are so delightful. Check out my new flash web page: Dark Paradise
Andnowthenews Caldari State War Academy	Posted - 2009.03.01 18:11:00 - [1290] Originally by: NightmareX Oh the tears, they are so delightfull. You are the most disgusting and pathetic child troll on this entire forum.



Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 .. 45 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.