Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 .. 54 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 5 post(s) |
Domoso
|
Posted - 2009.11.12 19:22:00 -
[391]
Edited by: Domoso on 12/11/2009 19:25:11 I get it! I get it! The sov & SC changes aren't meant to make the game "better". With the tears overflowing in this thread I finally get CCP's motivations in order to open up nullsec. It's to **** off the older players so much so they quit, alliances collapse under their own weight, nullsec is then vacated open to the newer players to move in. Wow! Who could have thought that instead of introducing aspects of the game which would provide some virtual "natural" disaster in the form of something like supernovas to wipe out whole systems of assets, CCP is introducing mechanics so horrific, so disastrous that in effect they result in the same outcome.
Wow! All I can say is I have a new respect for CCP.....you devious game designers you. Dev = Devious? And the way CCP throws it in the Community's face in essence saying "We don't need you! You don't tell us what to do! We tell you what to do and you'll enjoy it or else!". Ruthless man, real ruthless. That's the way to put your customers in their place! Man, I've got wood just thinking how ball-sy that is.
|
John Zorg
Caldari The Arrow Project Morsus Mihi
|
Posted - 2009.11.12 19:22:00 -
[392]
So you say the 14+ bill that I spent on a mothership has basically just halved in value?!?! Are you going to refund me the difference or just tell me tough ****, deal with it? I accepted the loss I would take because of the clone vats but this is not fair.
I am so angry now. I spent years of time to reach this level, I spent hours of game time to get this ship, months of training time, hundreds of dollars only for you now to tell me you want to destroy it. I want my ISK back if you go through with this.
You have a great game and great potential but you guys insist on ****ing it up. We as a community have made plenty of posts to help build this game and you just decide this is how you will do it and don't care otherwise. Why is there a CSM, wtf do they really mean to you? It's just a great marketing drive to say to new players, come play here, we have the community working with us. You don't care what the community thinks.
Get EVE players to design your game cause you people clearly have no intention of bettering it.
Disgusted is what comes to mind.
JZ
|
Aphrodite Whiterose
Amarr Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2009.11.12 19:23:00 -
[393]
You have to run a whole seperate account for a supercap and you can only fly the 1 ship with it, why anyone would want to pay a sub just to be able to fly a mom now is a mystery.
----------------------------------------------- Amarr - Playing EVE in Hardcore Mode since 2007 |
Shigsy
Ignition.
|
Posted - 2009.11.12 19:23:00 -
[394]
Posting again cause you know... rofl :ccp:
Join "C&P" ingame! |
Cyno911
|
Posted - 2009.11.12 19:27:00 -
[395]
Just found out there is no " cancel becus of upcoming patch " selection when i canceld my subs, can you add that ccp?
And just bring back the things you had 1 week ago, and make EVERY ONE happy again. Now you are just making bad PR.
|
Cuisinar
Gallente The Scope
|
Posted - 2009.11.12 19:28:00 -
[396]
wait guys!!! wait!!!!! i got it...
ccp > ok guys, we need to fix supercaps. any ideas? guyz > yeah , hp buff, fighter bombs and let's talk to the player base. player base > damn about time ccp > ok let's do all the other way around and f*** the player base pretty good player base > X_x
|
Mordrid
D00M. Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2009.11.12 19:28:00 -
[397]
CCP are morons who have no concept of this game. Way to go idiots.
|
Ripper666
D00M. Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2009.11.12 19:31:00 -
[398]
Mordrid is a Moron Who has no concept of this game, this nerf is Proper Ghey, way to go Idiots...? |
the plague
Scoopex Majesta Empire
|
Posted - 2009.11.12 19:33:00 -
[399]
I'm generally very supporting of CCP and its design decisions. Even when I disagree with a particular decision, I can almost always see where the devs were coming from, even if I would have chosen another path. But this is just asinine.
I'm almost always on your side, CCP, but even I have to wonder if there isn't some truth to the charge that the devs no longer play the game or even know what's going on.
The Mothership has always been one of the coolest ships in the game, but one rarely seen or used because it was huge waste of ISK. Worse than a waste of ISK, it was little more than a very expensive target. But finally, after years of neglect, this class of ships was finally going to be made into a weapon fearsome enough to justify the extreme price and inability to dock. After testing the new Supercarrier design several times on SISI over the last few weeks, I was still unconvinced the ship was effective enough as it remains one of the few ships in the game that can have its primary weapons taken away from it quite easily. But still, it was still a move in the right direction.
And then someone decided to nerf the damn thing back into uselessness before we even got to use it! This has got to be some kind of new record.
Really CCP, you need to get it into your heads that many players see cap warfare as EVE's endgame. They won't spend years and years paying for accounts, training up characters, and painstakingly building up in-game assets just to fly the same old ships as the noobs. People want an endgame! It is not unreasonable or "unbalanced" for players who have invested years in your game to demand rewards commensurate with that kind of investment. I think I speak for a lot of people when I say that this habit of nerfing and pre-nerfing everything in the damn game into oblivion is beyond old. A lot of us are to the point where we're questioning whether it's really worth the time, energy and in-game currency to invest in anything in this game because it will likely just get snatched away at some point on the whim of some dev.
Come on CCP, you're supposed to be giving seasoned players more reasons to stick with EVE and keep playing. Instead, your intent seems to be to nerf every worthwhile investment in the game into complete uselessness. But if you're not real damn careful, you're going to end up nerfing EVE into uselessness.
|
Derkan
Shiva Morsus Mihi
|
Posted - 2009.11.12 19:35:00 -
[400]
LoL, and we have 3 ms's in the cooker just cause of the inital changes. U just had to slap us in the face, didn't u.
However, as my feelings towards the carrier changes are bad, I can live with the isk loss. It's the function of the supercapitals that matter most. And this joke of a nerf does not even come close to what you've done with the mobile jump por.. I mean the titan nerf.
The inital Titan changes were promising and I actually had high hopes for the ship. But now, the current changes on sisi are a complete utter joke..
You need to compromise with your member base CCP. We play the game because we enjoy it and want to continue enjoying it. We do not want to see a SWG plague happening to this great game.
|
|
Amy Wang
|
Posted - 2009.11.12 19:37:00 -
[401]
Originally by: John Zorg So you say the 14+ bill that I spent on a mothership has basically just halved in value?!?! Are you going to refund me the difference or just tell me tough ****, deal with it? I accepted the loss I would take because of the clone vats but this is not fair.
I am so angry now. I spent years of time to reach this level, I spent hours of game time to get this ship, months of training time, hundreds of dollars only for you now to tell me you want to destroy it. I want my ISK back if you go through with this.
QFT
|
Shad0wsFury
Helljumpers
|
Posted - 2009.11.12 19:37:00 -
[402]
These emo tears are delicious.
You guys are almost like America's conservative "tea baggers" who are fighting against liberal policy because it hurts YOU directly in the pocketbook.
Think about the changes, and how they will impact EVE as a whole.
5-6b supercarriers will make them fairly affordable, and when working en-masse, can do things that dreads cannot because they are mobile (if slow), and are immune to Ewar (other than HICs). What will we see in a few months? Likely we'll see supercarrier wings that can hit and run, fight aligned, put out frightening dps, respond and retreat and do a number of other things. They won't completely replace dreads, but they could come damn close (just imagine if dreads could fight aligned and put out siege dps...).
All I see in this topic are "I have a mom" whiners, and I don't blame them, tbh. What's important though is how this will impact the game as a whole and not how it's going to hurt a VERY small percentage of the EVE population.
I for one think the changes will be good, allowing for supercarriers to be more attainable for the average player not part of a superpower willing to subsidize one (or build one for cost even), and will add a new layer to capital warfare, something that any capital pilot will tell you can get VERY boring.
|
Agmar
The Illuminati. Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2009.11.12 19:39:00 -
[403]
Originally by: Shad0wsFury immune to Ewar (other than HICs)
And Neuts.
|
Sano Seichiro
|
Posted - 2009.11.12 19:40:00 -
[404]
Edited by: Sano Seichiro on 12/11/2009 19:40:55 Lol guys, I think you did not understand one thing, CCP DONT CARE ABOUT YOUR FEEDBACK. they change the game and that all. Don't waste time whining there.
|
Arcanim Al'Seif
Volatile Nature Systematic-Chaos
|
Posted - 2009.11.12 19:40:00 -
[405]
Originally by: Shad0wsFury These emo tears are delicious.
You guys are almost like America's conservative "tea baggers" who are fighting against liberal policy because it hurts YOU directly in the pocketbook.
Think about the changes, and how they will impact EVE as a whole.
5-6b supercarriers will make them fairly affordable, and when working en-masse, can do things that dreads cannot because they are mobile (if slow), and are immune to Ewar (other than HICs). What will we see in a few months? Likely we'll see supercarrier wings that can hit and run, fight aligned, put out frightening dps, respond and retreat and do a number of other things. They won't completely replace dreads, but they could come damn close (just imagine if dreads could fight aligned and put out siege dps...).
All I see in this topic are "I have a mom" whiners, and I don't blame them, tbh. What's important though is how this will impact the game as a whole and not how it's going to hurt a VERY small percentage of the EVE population.
I for one think the changes will be good, allowing for supercarriers to be more attainable for the average player not part of a superpower willing to subsidize one (or build one for cost even), and will add a new layer to capital warfare, something that any capital pilot will tell you can get VERY boring.
Good thing that just like dreads/carriers you can dock them, allowing you to not have to use a garage account to stay in it permanently...no...wait...
|
Aphrodite Whiterose
Amarr Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2009.11.12 19:42:00 -
[406]
I wouldnt even care about the price change if the damage was the same but you could expect to see alliance mom fleets for sure then.
----------------------------------------------- Amarr - Playing EVE in Hardcore Mode since 2007 |
Ghengis Khan
Minmatar tr0pa de elite Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2009.11.12 19:44:00 -
[407]
Deleting posts won't solve this problem, CCP
|
Darknesss
NibbleTek
|
Posted - 2009.11.12 19:45:00 -
[408]
Originally by: CCP StevieSG Hello everyone. While we appreciate that this thread is generating quite a bit of feedback we would ask that your responses be polite and respectful. Please note that any posts which break the forum rules may result in a warning or ban. Thank you.
Were these changes in any way shape or form polite and respectful? No.
Do you have any idea how long it takes the average player to save up 10-15b isk? No.
The funny thing is, if these changes were to take place, i'd probably profit massively from 3rd party trades along with Chribba, but still im absolutely 100% against it. Seleene appeared to be doing some good for supercapitals, they are and should be VALUABLE and POWERFUL ships capable of alot more than their much cheaper and smaller counterparts. CCP continue to astonish me at how out of touch they are with the common player.
You as a company are so incredibly heavy handed when it comes to patches its insane. You dont just change things or tweak things, you shift game play completely and instantly. You need to put alot more thought into ships BEFORE you release them, you arent costing people just isk, its real life time and real life cash... essentially its damn near to fraud as hilarious as that sounds. If i sold someone an Aston Martin for ú150k take their money and say oops sorry we just decided we're going to give you this 1 ltr Vauxhall Corsa I dont think the person would be very happy, infact I think there would be physical violence.
Dark
|
Dratic
Honour Bound Eternal Rapture
|
Posted - 2009.11.12 19:45:00 -
[409]
Originally by: the plague I'm generally very supporting of CCP and its design decisions. Even when I disagree with a particular decision, I can almost always see where the devs were coming from, even if I would have chosen another path. But this is just asinine.
I'm almost always on your side, CCP, but even I have to wonder if there isn't some truth to the charge that the devs no longer play the game or even know what's going on.
The Mothership has always been one of the coolest ships in the game, but one rarely seen or used because it was huge waste of ISK. Worse than a waste of ISK, it was little more than a very expensive target. But finally, after years of neglect, this class of ships was finally going to be made into a weapon fearsome enough to justify the extreme price and inability to dock. After testing the new Supercarrier design several times on SISI over the last few weeks, I was still unconvinced the ship was effective enough as it remains one of the few ships in the game that can have its primary weapons taken away from it quite easily. But still, it was still a move in the right direction.
And then someone decided to nerf the damn thing back into uselessness before we even got to use it! This has got to be some kind of new record.
Really CCP, you need to get it into your heads that many players see cap warfare as EVE's endgame. They won't spend years and years paying for accounts, training up characters, and painstakingly building up in-game assets just to fly the same old ships as the noobs. People want an endgame! It is not unreasonable or "unbalanced" for players who have invested years in your game to demand rewards commensurate with that kind of investment. I think I speak for a lot of people when I say that this habit of nerfing and pre-nerfing everything in the damn game into oblivion is beyond old. A lot of us are to the point where we're questioning whether it's really worth the time, energy and in-game currency to invest in anything in this game because it will likely just get snatched away at some point on the whim of some dev.
Come on CCP, you're supposed to be giving seasoned players more reasons to stick with EVE and keep playing. Instead, your intent seems to be to nerf every worthwhile investment in the game into complete uselessness. But if you're not real damn careful, you're going to end up nerfing EVE into uselessness.
This. The number of things ccp has nerfed when i think about it is just staggering. It appears every part of the pvp game has been effected. I haven't been playin the 6 years the vets have but since i started. Damps got nerfed, Drones got nerfed, Nos got nerfed, speed got nerfed, cyno effect removed, ecm got nerfed, missles nerfed, scanner button nerfed, whats next ccp? As with another post, why should people invest any time in your game you'll only take it away from them.
|
Emily Elderburry
|
Posted - 2009.11.12 19:46:00 -
[410]
SINCE YOU DELETED MY POST I'll POST IT AGAIN.
This sums it all up; +1 to the plague
Originally by: the plague I'm generally very supporting of CCP and its design decisions. Even when I disagree with a particular decision, I can almost always see where the devs were coming from, even if I would have chosen another path. But this is just asinine.
I'm almost always on your side, CCP, but even I have to wonder if there isn't some truth to the charge that the devs no longer play the game or even know what's going on.
The Mothership has always been one of the coolest ships in the game, but one rarely seen or used because it was huge waste of ISK. Worse than a waste of ISK, it was little more than a very expensive target. But finally, after years of neglect, this class of ships was finally going to be made into a weapon fearsome enough to justify the extreme price and inability to dock. After testing the new Supercarrier design several times on SISI over the last few weeks, I was still unconvinced the ship was effective enough as it remains one of the few ships in the game that can have its primary weapons taken away from it quite easily. But still, it was still a move in the right direction.
And then someone decided to nerf the damn thing back into uselessness before we even got to use it! This has got to be some kind of new record.
Really CCP, you need to get it into your heads that many players see cap warfare as EVE's endgame. They won't spend years and years paying for accounts, training up characters, and painstakingly building up in-game assets just to fly the same old ships as the noobs. People want an endgame! It is not unreasonable or "unbalanced" for players who have invested years in your game to demand rewards commensurate with that kind of investment. I think I speak for a lot of people when I say that this habit of nerfing and pre-nerfing everything in the damn game into oblivion is beyond old. A lot of us are to the point where we're questioning whether it's really worth the time, energy and in-game currency to invest in anything in this game because it will likely just get snatched away at some point on the whim of some dev.
Come on CCP, you're supposed to be giving seasoned players more reasons to stick with EVE and keep playing. Instead, your intent seems to be to nerf every worthwhile investment in the game into complete uselessness. But if you're not real damn careful, you're going to end up nerfing EVE into uselessness.
|
|
Mahke
Aeon Of Strife
|
Posted - 2009.11.12 19:46:00 -
[411]
Despite all the rage, this isn't actually a bad change for prospective supercarrier pilots: if I had an extra character that was capable of flying momships/supercarriers, I'd be more inclined to buy one with new prices/capabilities, not less. After taking cost into account this isn't really a nerf at all (imho, I could easily be wrong of course).
Of course, everyone who currently has one is going to be extremely ticked off: weaker ship, loss of (effective) isk, other people having an easier time getting into the same toys (thus making them feel less special to those already in them). Honestly I'm surprised the tears aren't even more extreme,
Despite that, you (CCP) should not reimburse people for the patch change because it would break with practice in the past and add a certain unfair inconsistency: people aren't reimbursed when their ships are nerfed, for their trit when veld spawn rate increased, for their rigs on sub-BS ships when rig sizes were changed (and overall that probably whiped out tremendously more value than this change), etc. To reimburse for value changes based on nerfs/buffs for one specific time while generally not doing so would be pretty uncool.
However, you're going to hear louder and more vociferous complaints, and more of them on this one than other similar changes: because it effects a smaller group of people to a greater degree each.
|
Sarah Norbulk
Dawn of a new Empire The Initiative.
|
Posted - 2009.11.12 19:48:00 -
[412]
Originally by: Arcanim Al'Seif
Originally by: Shad0wsFury These emo tears are delicious.
Good thing that just like dreads/carriers you can dock them, allowing you to not have to use a garage account to stay in it permanently...no...wait...
]
Let's see. 50 people per alliance, $14.95 per account, plenty of alliances that's a good bit of coin, but this change is about 'balance'.
|
VinceNoir
Amarr Galactic Shipyards Inc Huzzah Federation
|
Posted - 2009.11.12 19:48:00 -
[413]
Being a mothership pilot myself, I find this a completely unacceptable change. You took the most highly praised change that was planned for Dominion and completely destroyed it. I did not invest my time to make 16b isk and finally get a Nyx just to have a Dev who has probably never experienced flying one himself to wave his hand and cut the price tag in half.
The changes that were announced at Fanfest were widely accepted as great changes to the game. Motherships were FINALLY going to be worth the price that so many of us paid for them. Now this Dev team is scrapping it to make a change that will just **** off every mothership pilot in this game. I suggest you fire the Dev who proposed this and revert back to the changes announced at Fanfest.
|
Amy Wang
|
Posted - 2009.11.12 19:51:00 -
[414]
What CCP doesnt realize enough imho is that these arent just the whines of some too-rich-for-their-own-good vets.
These people are (with the exception of the odd carebear that will not use the thing in combat anyway) often leaders in their respective communities and a good chunk of these ships are community projects even, a lot of combined effort and resources went into these ships and the means of building them, just removing this from the game without any form of reimbursement is a slap in the face to the very people that make this sandbox roll.
Do you really want to do that? Reimbursing the cost difference between now and then on ships and prolly BPOs (they are getting cheaper I assume?) is the least you should offer and you should offer it fast to appease the rightfully engraged.
|
Mr Bright
Shade. Cry Havoc.
|
Posted - 2009.11.12 19:53:00 -
[415]
is it just me or is everyone agreeing with each other for once?:D
|
Kkhaarn
Black Serpent Technologies R.A.G.E
|
Posted - 2009.11.12 19:55:00 -
[416]
Looks like you can kiss this mom pilot good bye. Gonna unsub the account and get rid of the Wyvern. What a waste.
|
IceAero
Amarr Shadow Company THE KLINGONS
|
Posted - 2009.11.12 19:56:00 -
[417]
I like this change.
|
dracice
R.E.C.O.N.
|
Posted - 2009.11.12 19:58:00 -
[418]
i think currently w ith the amount of people who can afford motherships and replace them easily even at current prices. ccp forsees motherships online.
i forsee pandemic legion or IT alliance with like 50-100ms gangs, what kind of numbers could break that spider tank?
currently lets say with hp boost and a nice fit you have a 30m hp super carrier, imagine 20 of them spider tanking with carrier backup or triage backup.
the kinds of numbers people are gonna have to bring to beat that will again break the servers.
and then with 12k dps each? pwning dreads left right n centre.
the way i see it, they are not dreads yet there dps is almost up to a dread. second they have immunity to e-warfare, third huge HP over a dread, by itself a super carrier could probably kill 5-10 dreads before it died, but since i havent looked at actual maths and calculated it thats a guess based on the HP boost buffer.
thats the positive side still out of this whole thing.
the negetive of course is the value in isk players lose however that happens all the time etc etc, and well why is it different in this case?
theres still tech 2 bpos out there which others CANNOT get, an unfair advantage on what the devs want to be a level playing field.
another negetive is the 10 fighter/bomber thing. the more fighters or bombers you deployed the more an enemy have to do to kill your dps, id say give the super carrier a bonus to buff the HP on their fighters/bombers by like 20% per level. making them the equivelent of 20 in actual total HP.
because face it ccp if you are reading this, if you make their dps so easily destroyed (lol fighter HP) and LOL BOMBER HP and only 10 of them, what do they do when there damage on the field is destroyed? Press the start button on the stop watch and see how long it takes for their hp to melt while they are useless?
or give a mothership the ability to construct a fighter or bomber inside it like in starcraft :)
|
Dramaticus
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2009.11.12 20:00:00 -
[419]
Originally by: Mr Bright is it just me or is everyone agreeing with each other for once?:D
we've pretty much all been agreeing with each other since the Dominion dev post last Friday. when IT Alliance dudes are empty quoting Atlas dudes who are empty quoting AAA dudes who are agreeing with The Mittani, something is seriously wrong and its not us.
Please don't use RL pictuers of players in Sig without permission. - WeatherMan |
Shigsy
Ignition.
|
Posted - 2009.11.12 20:00:00 -
[420]
Delete posts quicker, thread is still growing
Join "C&P" ingame! |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 .. 54 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |