I am not sure if this is a feature or an issue.

I will undock in a shuttle and the game will have it set at the "Reset Camera" distance. Once I move about and change ships, say my Iteron V, upon undocking, I find myself halfway into my ship - as if the ship is too big for the screen. Once I hit the "Reset Camera" button, the ship will set itself to a distance. Then I return to my trusty shuttle and instead of being at the "Reset Camera" distance when I last left it, the ship is now shrunk into a blip on the screen.

Not game breaking, but just a bit annoying at times.

Weapons & Ammunition

Missiles and bombs now take damage again.

can confirm and expand on this... they now take damage relative to their resistances again!

woop!

I know that someone worked hard on this, and managers approved it. So there is probably a lot of support for this new idea. But you really need to listen to us players.

Just letting my 2 cents be heard too.


CPP - This tree system is really messy.

* It is unpredictable on how it works,
* It does not allow for quick access
* It hijacks other cargo views
* When click and dragging. between tree levels it switches to the new location and I have to find where I was again.


The Filter Idea is interesting but because of how convoluted this tree system is, I will never use it.

I know that someone worked hard on this, and managers approved it. So there is probably a lot of support for this new idea. But you really need to listen to us players.

PLEASE FOR GOD SAKES PUT BACK THE OLD SYSTEM.

We're stuck with the new code. Fixes will occur as CCP gets around to it. Significant lag still remains at POS when moving containers to/from cargo & arrays. All criticism listed above confirmed. Filters of little utility, and estimated cargo value is useless. Enable/Disable cargo value requested. Reduction of useless borders requested. Possibility to further reduce window size from current minimums requested.

Was awful when introduced, marginally improved after god-only-knows how many patches. Losing any sense of optimism that this will ever be revisited/improved/fixed.

Bad job all around CCP.

Just hopped into my broadsword for the first time since the Minnie V3 nonsense... Looks like some kid rubbed charcoal all over the ship and then tried to wipe clean some parts. That is not a compliment.

Do not take this as an insult (well, maybe you should), but you guys (CCP) spent money and resources on these Minmatar asset revisions?

All graphical settings turned on high to appreciate *cough* the bling.

Win7 64-bit, fully patched
nVidia GTX 560 Ti, latest driver.

I am really happy to see that the company is listening to the Test forum feedback threads, the Dev blog threads and various other threads scattered around the eve online forums about how well they have implemented the newest Inventory system. Its really heartening to see a company take so much interest in what the player base has to say about the changes that they make to the game and how well they listen to the players about how the changes they propose will change the game.

Its great to see that high level developers read and respond in the appropriate threads about their own specific projects and continue to interact with the community to adapt the game mechanics to cover exploitative behavior and close loopholes before they become problems in the non test game server.

I am not aware of any company that would take so much stock in what their player base has to say about User interface mechanics and how they could best be changed to serve the maximum amount of players before they moved it off the testing server which they have provided for that expressed purpose.

Or any company that tries harder to resolve buggy or inconsistent programming issues before they release for general public use. Many companies would force it through to fit their release schedule despite massive issues already publicly detailed by the volunteer beta testers. Exploitative behavior outlined by beta testers never gets through to the release version simply because of the vigilance of the Employees slated to review the feedback threads provided by the company for the purpose of finding exploitative or otherwise unwanted mechanics uses.

The Developers have even gone so far as to ask the communities perspective on proposed changes before they are even available of testing, nee` before they are even fully written in code to be tested. And its even nicer to see that a public debate can change a developers mind about how to implement a bit of code. Especially when they have asked if it is the right answer to the question they are attempting to fix.

One day this could be you!
Damn CCP you had such a chance here. What happened?

I think i just bitter vet'ed all over myself.

We're stuck with the new code. Fixes will occur as CCP gets around to it. Significant lag still remains at POS when moving containers to/from cargo & arrays. All criticism listed above confirmed. Filters of little utility, and estimated cargo value is useless. Enable/Disable cargo value requested. Reduction of useless borders requested. Possibility to further reduce window size from current minimums requested.

Was awful when introduced, marginally improved after god-only-knows how many patches. Losing any sense of optimism that this will ever be revisited/improved/fixed.

Bad job all around CCP.

I just don't understand how CCP Soundwave told us they'd put out a fix every week until this had the same functionality as the old...then everyone went on vacation, and nothing gets patched for almost 2 months?

Oh, and then there was the quote that came from the June 1st CSM meeting....where CCP soundwave said "[The unified inventory] is a feature that people aren't liking and we're just going to throw everything at it until they like it,"....how's that work when everyone who created the aforementioned broken system, who should be doing these 'weekly fixes' and be included in the 'throw everything at it'....take the next two months for vacation?

How can CCP as a company justify granting vacation to someone who has obviously NOT done their job, let alone done it well, and is currently needed to fix the pile of stinking poo they left before they ran off on vacation? I don't know too many companies who operate successfully when following this mindset.

Well here is a copy and paste from the CSM meeting

"Two step brought up the Unified Inventory, stating that while most players thought it was better than before, the main issue was still performance."

Look like none of these F-ers can read

This would be funny it is wasn't so true. The Uni. Inv. (as CCP call it) is not a preformance issue. It is unsuited for large scale and I mean large scale container/item use.

My main along with my other accounts (which i've since unsubbed) have quite possible 100+ containers of BPC's in a single station which I bungle into contracts for sale. Unless the BPC icon starts to show the number of runs on it i'm afraid I've no other choice than to have contaiers for each ship type and the number of runs. for example - BPC rifters of 1,5,10 & 30 runs = 4no. containers.

CCP Soundwave has not kept his promise on updating the Uni Ini. till it works.

It is now time to let this account go by the wayside as well i think. Enough of the talking. its actions that they understand.

Edit: Considering V1.2 is about to be released. I'm sure 1.1 feedback will no longer be commented upon.