Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 .. 14 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 36 post(s) |

Querns
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
55
|
Posted - 2012.06.28 17:19:00 -
[91] - Quote
CCP Sreegs wrote:What is the value of LP by itself?
It's wholly dependent on the market. Earning LP doesn't actually generate you any money. Other players have to pay you in order for you to convert the currency to a meaningful state, unless you deal in a barter economy of skillbooks and starbase charters.
I won't disagree that generating hilarious amounts of LP is probably not right, but classifying it as "printing money" is just patently false.
Consider the (unlikely) situation in which CCP either hadn't noticed or didn't care about the FW forex actions. We would have generated infinite LP* (*note: probably no more than 2.1b at a time due to laffeaux signed 32-bit integer, and also it's not truly infinite because even the implants we manipulated had an isk cost to acquire, but that's just semantics.) Assuming that we were terrible at the game and were unable to show restraint in cashing out LP, prices for LP items would have steadily approached the isk cost of the items as LP value went to zero. At that point, you could hardly consider printing infinite LP to be "printing money" -- it's worthless! |

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
48
|
Posted - 2012.06.28 17:19:00 -
[92] - Quote
CCP Sreegs wrote:Nagapito wrote:CCP Sreegs wrote: Nobody ever said anything about manipulating the market prices. What we said was that this could be done in such a way that lead to an artificial disparity (albeit one created by our own systems) between the real value of an item and the number we were calculating value based upon to magically die over and over again to gain another currency.
That's not "Market Manipulation" that's blowing someone up over and over again to magically get more money out of the same item.
So... This means that insurance fraud is actually an exploit? If, somehow, mineral prices hit the ground tomorrow and we start building and blowing ships for the insurance ISK, we are exploiting? As I said I won't deal in hypotheticals. That could certainly be the case but it could also not be. Are you printing money from nowhere? Is that printing being done in a tremendous volume? If either or both of those is yes then I think it's pretty fair to say we'd be pretty displeased.
Insurance fraud was anything but Hypothetical. Those exact circumstance happened and was abused on a very large scale. If it's an exploit, why no rollback? -RubyPorto
IB4TS |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3768
|
Posted - 2012.06.28 17:20:00 -
[93] - Quote
CCP Sreegs wrote: As it stands today our stance is that buying something and purposely blowing it up to generate value in another currency is exploiting. It was clearly not our intent in creating the system for that to occur. The system was meant to encourage PVP not wanton suicidal destruction to print money.
I guess it would somewhat logically be the same to use an example as going to the lamp shop in America, buying a lamp and smashing it, and having the Chinese manufacturer send more money than you paid for it to your account over and over and over again. It's a bit of a stretch in my opinion at least to think this would ever be acceptable.
I don't agree with this decision, but thanks for being clear about it. I would like to point out, however, that the second paragraph absolutely is acceptable and always has been in EVE: insurance fraud is allowed, has always been allowed, and although mechanisms were put in place to reduce its occurrence has never been considered an exploit. And it is straight minerals -> isk conversion, much as these mechanisms allow item -> lp conversion.
I also think it's untenable to try to create a system where you can easily and obviously convert things to LP but you are not allowed to, but that's more a problem for your team and discovering it's not really enforceable. |

Mechaet
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
36
|
Posted - 2012.06.28 17:21:00 -
[94] - Quote
How about if I convert currency (ISK) to other forms, and then use a long-standing, perfectly-understood game mechanic to convert those forms back to currency at a rate higher than input?
I'm only asking because I do this literally every day I play. I've acquired Scrooge McDuck levels of isk doing it, too. |

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
48
|
Posted - 2012.06.28 17:22:00 -
[95] - Quote
Red Teufel wrote:doesn't really make sense to me. they didn't report the exploit immediatly, they abused it for two weeks, then basicly took the work ccp did for FW and took a steamy dump on it in front of the entire player base. who knows how much this frustrated players or caused people to unsub. who's in charge here ccp? you or goons? my best guess a dev told em about the exploit and it wouldn't be the first time a dev has given someone in game a perk. (cough t2 bpos! for all my friends cough cough)
People warned CCP about this when they mentioned it in Fanfest. Forex in an economy as small as EvE (with infinite NPC supplies of one currency) is going to result in this happening. A lot. No matter what. -RubyPorto
IB4TS |

Aryth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
459
|
Posted - 2012.06.28 17:22:00 -
[96] - Quote
CCP Sreegs wrote:Aryth wrote:Weaselior wrote:Nagapito wrote: So... This means that insurance fraud is actually an exploit? If, somehow, mineral prices hit the ground tomorrow and we start building and blowing ships for the insurance ISK, we are exploiting?
That's sort of what we're asking. It's clear it's an exploit to manipulate the price, then use it. What we're asking is if it's an exploit to use a differential we didn't create. This. The market creates these disparties on it's own sometimes without player help. At least active help. Is it ok to use it then? Is it ok to use it as a matter converter? Essentially this system can function like reprocessing for any item in EVE. It has dramatic implications for EVE going forward. I think it certainly has an impact on EVE as you stated, but that impact is something new. To make a statement of USING THE MARKET TO GAIN MONEY IS OVER EVE IS DYING, is a bit silly. (Not you specifically but others in this thread) This isn't a legacy problem and has no impact on how you deal with existing systems. It only impacts your interaction with FW. What we need to do is take a good long hard look at how to deal with items that have disparate values in what are essentially two currencies. I'm pretty sure that is the pivot point in this scenario and from that perspective I'm just Winston Wolf. I don't design these systems. As it stands today our stance is that buying something and purposely blowing it up to generate value in another currency is exploiting. It was clearly not our intent in creating the system for that to occur. The system was meant to encourage PVP not wanton suicidal destruction to print money. I guess it would somewhat logically be the same to use an example as going to the lamp shop in America, buying a lamp and smashing it, and having the Chinese manufacturer send more money than you paid for it to your account over and over and over again. It's a bit of a stretch in my opinion at least to think this would ever be acceptable. There's certainly a design flaw here that needs to be worked out but we have never intentionally introduced a system in EVE where buying an item and killing yourself should be a legitimate way to manufacture income. Least of all on a massive scale.
I just want to point out, that even if someone generates negative returns doing this, they might still have very good financial reasons for doing so.
Please consider the reprocessing angle. This has essentially introduced a mechanic where you can reprocess anything in EVE and get a return (probably not what you paid for it of course). But many manipulation scenerios might mean you can remove some supply from EVE and profit on the spike in the item. I understand the intention wasn't that to begin with. I would ask the developers to consider the ramifications of that in EVE. I think it is a good thing to be able to get some value for anything in EVE as reprocessing tradionally has only worked for a portion of the market. |
|

CCP Sreegs
C C P C C P Alliance
1901

|
Posted - 2012.06.28 17:22:00 -
[97] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:CCP Sreegs wrote:Nagapito wrote:CCP Sreegs wrote: Nobody ever said anything about manipulating the market prices. What we said was that this could be done in such a way that lead to an artificial disparity (albeit one created by our own systems) between the real value of an item and the number we were calculating value based upon to magically die over and over again to gain another currency.
That's not "Market Manipulation" that's blowing someone up over and over again to magically get more money out of the same item.
So... This means that insurance fraud is actually an exploit? If, somehow, mineral prices hit the ground tomorrow and we start building and blowing ships for the insurance ISK, we are exploiting? As I said I won't deal in hypotheticals. That could certainly be the case but it could also not be. Are you printing money from nowhere? Is that printing being done in a tremendous volume? If either or both of those is yes then I think it's pretty fair to say we'd be pretty displeased. Insurance fraud was anything but Hypothetical. Those exact circumstance happened and was abused on a very large scale. If it's an exploit, why no rollback?
I'm discussing this exploit not any one of a number of hypothetical past or future exploits. (or non-exploits) "Sreegs has juuust edged out Soundwave as my favourite dev." - Meita Way 2012 |
|

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3771
|
Posted - 2012.06.28 17:25:00 -
[98] - Quote
CCP Sreegs wrote: I'm discussing this exploit not any one of a number of hypothetical past or future exploits. (or non-exploits)
The issue is the thing you've said directly applies to insurance fraud. Insurance fraud was directly a case where you blew something up and got more than the value of that item back - in isk not an alternative currency like lp. |

Gogela
Direct Action LLC.
830
|
Posted - 2012.06.28 17:29:00 -
[99] - Quote
While I'm sure this is destined to be a goon-run threadnaught, I personally think CCP handled this perfectly. They could have gone extreme and seized all of their assets and isk and banned them, or they could have just ignored the problem (old CCP), but this explanation and the consequences seem very well balanced and *gasp*... fair.
Whoever was in charge of dealing with this... should be given more freedom to deal with things.
+1
|
|

CCP Sreegs
C C P C C P Alliance
1902

|
Posted - 2012.06.28 17:30:00 -
[100] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:CCP Sreegs wrote: I'm discussing this exploit not any one of a number of hypothetical past or future exploits. (or non-exploits)
The issue is the thing you've said directly applies to insurance fraud. Insurance fraud was directly a case where you blew something up and got more than the value of that item back - in isk not an alternative currency like lp.
I don't disagree at all I'm just tired and really not prepared to compare one to the other. I'm still heads down in fixing this one. "Sreegs has juuust edged out Soundwave as my favourite dev." - Meita Way 2012 |
|
|

corestwo
Goonfleet Investment Banking
513
|
Posted - 2012.06.28 17:31:00 -
[101] - Quote
Gogela wrote:While I'm sure this is destined to be a goon-run threadnaught, I personally think CCP handled this perfectly. They could have gone extreme and seized all of their assets and isk and banned them, or they could have just ignored the problem (old CCP), but this explanation and the consequences seem very well balanced and *gasp*... fair.
Whoever was in charge of dealing with this... should be given more freedom to deal with things.
+1
You may not have noticed, but all five of us involved (or the ones posting, anyway) are satisfied with CCP's judgement. I mean, we'd prefer our trillions, but we're all capable market players...I'm sure we'll get there on our own soon enough. 
The other goons posting are posting because posting is what goons do. . |

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
48
|
Posted - 2012.06.28 17:32:00 -
[102] - Quote
CCP Sreegs wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:CCP Sreegs wrote:Nagapito wrote:CCP Sreegs wrote: Nobody ever said anything about manipulating the market prices. What we said was that this could be done in such a way that lead to an artificial disparity (albeit one created by our own systems) between the real value of an item and the number we were calculating value based upon to magically die over and over again to gain another currency.
That's not "Market Manipulation" that's blowing someone up over and over again to magically get more money out of the same item.
So... This means that insurance fraud is actually an exploit? If, somehow, mineral prices hit the ground tomorrow and we start building and blowing ships for the insurance ISK, we are exploiting? As I said I won't deal in hypotheticals. That could certainly be the case but it could also not be. Are you printing money from nowhere? Is that printing being done in a tremendous volume? If either or both of those is yes then I think it's pretty fair to say we'd be pretty displeased. Insurance fraud was anything but Hypothetical. Those exact circumstance happened and was abused on a very large scale. If it's an exploit, why no rollback? I'm discussing this exploit not any one of a number of hypothetical past or future exploits. (or non-exploits)
Fair enough. Insurance fraud just happened to hit both of your Xes in your IF X THEN CCP=Mad statement.
In fact, Insurance Fraud occurred the exact same way that the FW exploit started (with the freighters full of minerals).
The market fell >> The CCP value of minerals stayed higher than the market >> People committed blew up their ships to make tons of money. In this case it was LP, with insurance fraud it was ISK, and instead of having to pay for insurance, all you had to do was join FW.
The furtherance of the exploit was due to the small size of the EvE market and the presence of totally useless, rare items. -RubyPorto
IB4TS |

Squizz Caphinator
Iocaine Industries Happy Endings
45
|
Posted - 2012.06.28 17:35:00 -
[103] - Quote
Wow! Whenever a big isk kill is posted it gets reported in the channel. We had a mini-flood from our bot :)
Impressive even at EveKill's values (which we get from Eve-Central as a 30 day average).
Tyvm for sharing! http://evewho.com - Alliance and Corporation Member Listings http://evechatter.com - Free Alliance and Corporation forums for all. |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3771
|
Posted - 2012.06.28 17:36:00 -
[104] - Quote
CCP Sreegs wrote: I don't disagree at all I'm just tired and really not prepared to compare one to the other. I'm still heads down in fixing this one.
Understandable - thanks! |

Aryth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
464
|
Posted - 2012.06.28 17:38:00 -
[105] - Quote
corestwo wrote:Gogela wrote:While I'm sure this is destined to be a goon-run threadnaught, I personally think CCP handled this perfectly. They could have gone extreme and seized all of their assets and isk and banned them, or they could have just ignored the problem (old CCP), but this explanation and the consequences seem very well balanced and *gasp*... fair.
Whoever was in charge of dealing with this... should be given more freedom to deal with things.
+1 You may not have noticed, but all five of us involved (or the ones posting, anyway) are satisfied with CCP's judgement. I mean, we'd prefer our trillions, but we're all capable market players...I'm sure we'll get there on our own soon enough.  The other goons posting are posting because posting is what goons do.
Not only that, but I was already a trillionaire before this. It's not like I am crying all the way to the poor house if CCP just unwinds me. I will remain one of the riches players in EVE. Sure, I would more like trillions, but I got many news articles, a 160 page thread or whatever, multiple blogs/news annoucements and the most hilarious graph to ever exist in the history of EVE play.
Throw in the most ISK in kills/deaths records, and goddamn. I am pretty smug.
But really. The true reward is to dunk on Stoffer. If there is one things goons love, it's trolling goons. Even Ex-goons.
CCP gets press, we get our capital back, EVE gets another hilarious footnote in history. Everyone won here. We just won less than we woulda liked. |

Mme Pinkerton
71
|
Posted - 2012.06.28 17:39:00 -
[106] - Quote
CCP Sreegs wrote:What we said was that this could be done in such a way that lead to an artificial disparity (albeit one created by our own systems) between the real value of an item and the number we were calculating value based upon to magically die over and over again to gain another currency. Inquiring minds want to know how you determine the "real value" of an item.
Most economists gave up on the idea of an object measure of "value" that is more "real" than the market price at some point in the late 19th/early 20th century (notable exceptions of course being (neo-)Marxists who still try to stick to their labor theory of value). An IPO guide (David H'Levi) | Towards a Positive Argument For Investing (RAW23) | Freighter Operations 101 (Kazuo Ishiguro) | Dominion market analysis (Akita T)
|

corestwo
Goonfleet Investment Banking
515
|
Posted - 2012.06.28 17:40:00 -
[107] - Quote
Aryth wrote:corestwo wrote:Gogela wrote:While I'm sure this is destined to be a goon-run threadnaught, I personally think CCP handled this perfectly. They could have gone extreme and seized all of their assets and isk and banned them, or they could have just ignored the problem (old CCP), but this explanation and the consequences seem very well balanced and *gasp*... fair.
Whoever was in charge of dealing with this... should be given more freedom to deal with things.
+1 You may not have noticed, but all five of us involved (or the ones posting, anyway) are satisfied with CCP's judgement. I mean, we'd prefer our trillions, but we're all capable market players...I'm sure we'll get there on our own soon enough.  The other goons posting are posting because posting is what goons do. Not only that, but I was already a trilloinare before this. It's not like I am crying all the way to the poor house if CCP just unwinds me. I will remain one of the riches players in EVE. Sure, I would more like trillions, but I got many news articles, a 160 page thread or whatever, multiple blogs/news annoucements and the most hilarious graph to ever exist in the history of EVE play. Throw in the most ISK in kills/deaths records, and goddamn. I am pretty smug. But really. The true reward is to dunk on Stoffer. If there is one things goons love, it's trolling goons. Even Ex-goons. CCP gets press, we get our capital back, EVE gets another hilarious footnote in history. Everyone won here. We just won less than we woulda liked.
Can't quote this enough. . |

Dramaticus
Goonswarm Federation
164
|
Posted - 2012.06.28 17:40:00 -
[108] - Quote
There were non-monetary gains to be made that can never be revoked |

Damion Rayne
Lorentz Technology Group
100
|
Posted - 2012.06.28 17:40:00 -
[109] - Quote
Aryth wrote:Sometimes Emergent Gameplay means dunking so hard you break the backboard! I can't say we are happy about this decision, but we respect it. Being unwound is a good thing as it gets us our capital back, and at least shows CCP wanted to be fair here. I applaud that decision. Highest Kill Value ever in EVE? http://imgur.com/1fSsT
I've said it before and I'll say it again,
Every single one of you dirtbags needs a big giant BAN. Every..single..one. If you're Goonswarm, your only desire is to see people quit playing Eve, and basically destroy it. You are a threat and you should be treated as one. Anyone wearing the Goonswarm tags should be permanently banned from Eve Online. Teamwork.. Maturity.. Tactics.. www.tacticalgamer.com |
|

CCP Sreegs
C C P C C P Alliance
1902

|
Posted - 2012.06.28 17:41:00 -
[110] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:CCP Sreegs wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:CCP Sreegs wrote:Nagapito wrote:CCP Sreegs wrote: Nobody ever said anything about manipulating the market prices. What we said was that this could be done in such a way that lead to an artificial disparity (albeit one created by our own systems) between the real value of an item and the number we were calculating value based upon to magically die over and over again to gain another currency.
That's not "Market Manipulation" that's blowing someone up over and over again to magically get more money out of the same item.
So... This means that insurance fraud is actually an exploit? If, somehow, mineral prices hit the ground tomorrow and we start building and blowing ships for the insurance ISK, we are exploiting? As I said I won't deal in hypotheticals. That could certainly be the case but it could also not be. Are you printing money from nowhere? Is that printing being done in a tremendous volume? If either or both of those is yes then I think it's pretty fair to say we'd be pretty displeased. Insurance fraud was anything but Hypothetical. Those exact circumstance happened and was abused on a very large scale. If it's an exploit, why no rollback? I'm discussing this exploit not any one of a number of hypothetical past or future exploits. (or non-exploits) Fair enough. Insurance fraud just happened to hit both of your Xes in your IF X THEN CCP=Mad statement. In fact, Insurance Fraud occurred the exact same way that the FW exploit started (with the freighters full of minerals). The market fell >> The CCP value of minerals stayed higher than the market >> People committed blew up their ships to make tons of money. In this case it was LP, with insurance fraud it was ISK, and instead of having to pay for insurance, all you had to do was join FW. The furtherance of the exploit was due to the small size of the EvE market and the presence of totally useless, rare items.
Yeah and what I'm trying to get at is that I didn't compare how we felt with handling this decision based on past decisions others might have made. We looked at the situation and did what we felt was the right thing for the game as a whole, so I'm not really prepared to discuss x vs. y because we didn't ever discuss it internally and these decisions aren't made solo. "Sreegs has juuust edged out Soundwave as my favourite dev." - Meita Way 2012 |
|
|

corestwo
Goonfleet Investment Banking
515
|
Posted - 2012.06.28 17:42:00 -
[111] - Quote
Damion Rayne wrote:Aryth wrote:Sometimes Emergent Gameplay means dunking so hard you break the backboard! I can't say we are happy about this decision, but we respect it. Being unwound is a good thing as it gets us our capital back, and at least shows CCP wanted to be fair here. I applaud that decision. Highest Kill Value ever in EVE? http://imgur.com/1fSsT I've said it before and I'll say it again, Every single one of you dirtbags needs a big giant BAN. Every..single..one. If you're Goonswarm, your only desire is to see people quit playing Eve, and basically destroy it. You are a threat and you should be treated as one. Anyone wearing the Goonswarm tags should be permanently banned from Eve Online.
Son, you mad. . |

Gogela
Direct Action LLC.
830
|
Posted - 2012.06.28 17:42:00 -
[112] - Quote
Aryth wrote:corestwo wrote:Gogela wrote:While I'm sure this is destined to be a goon-run threadnaught, I personally think CCP handled this perfectly. They could have gone extreme and seized all of their assets and isk and banned them, or they could have just ignored the problem (old CCP), but this explanation and the consequences seem very well balanced and *gasp*... fair.
Whoever was in charge of dealing with this... should be given more freedom to deal with things.
+1 You may not have noticed, but all five of us involved (or the ones posting, anyway) are satisfied with CCP's judgement. I mean, we'd prefer our trillions, but we're all capable market players...I'm sure we'll get there on our own soon enough.  The other goons posting are posting because posting is what goons do. Not only that, but I was already a trillionaire before this. It's not like I am crying all the way to the poor house if CCP just unwinds me. I will remain one of the riches players in EVE. Sure, I would more like trillions, but I got many news articles, a 160 page thread or whatever, multiple blogs/news annoucements and the most hilarious graph to ever exist in the history of EVE play. Throw in the most ISK in kills/deaths records, and goddamn. I am pretty smug. But really. The true reward is to dunk on Stoffer. If there is one things goons love, it's trolling goons. Even Ex-goons. CCP gets press, we get our capital back, EVE gets another hilarious footnote in history. Everyone won here. We just won less than we woulda liked. Wow... frickin' goon... you actually have a really good attitude about this game. 
|

Dramaticus
Goonswarm Federation
164
|
Posted - 2012.06.28 17:43:00 -
[113] - Quote
Damion Rayne wrote:Aryth wrote:Sometimes Emergent Gameplay means dunking so hard you break the backboard! I can't say we are happy about this decision, but we respect it. Being unwound is a good thing as it gets us our capital back, and at least shows CCP wanted to be fair here. I applaud that decision. Highest Kill Value ever in EVE? http://imgur.com/1fSsT I've said it before and I'll say it again, Every single one of you dirtbags needs a big giant BAN. Every..single..one. If you're Goonswarm, your only desire is to see people quit playing Eve, and basically destroy it. You are a threat and you should be treated as one. Anyone wearing the Goonswarm tags should be permanently banned from Eve Online.
This is the non-monetary kind of reward I was talking about. |

Lyron-Baktos
Selective Pressure Rote Kapelle
255
|
Posted - 2012.06.28 17:44:00 -
[114] - Quote
The 5 players involved should be glad nothing serious happened to their accounts. Not reporting it for 2 weeks is unbelievable. On day one when they saw how crazy it was, it should have been reported On holiday. -áIn some other world. Where the music of the radio was a labyrinth of sonorous colours. To a bright centre of absolute convicton where the dripping patchouli was more than scent, It was a sun-á |
|

CCP Sreegs
C C P C C P Alliance
1902

|
Posted - 2012.06.28 17:44:00 -
[115] - Quote
Mme Pinkerton wrote:CCP Sreegs wrote:What we said was that this could be done in such a way that lead to an artificial disparity (albeit one created by our own systems) between the real value of an item and the number we were calculating value based upon to magically die over and over again to gain another currency. Inquiring minds want to know how you determine the "real value" of an item.
It's in the blog. There's the current cost you pay for an item and there's the rolling average of the item's value. LP gain was tied to the long term average cost which is calculated by us. By causing disparity in the two values, whether on purpose or if it happens naturally, you can be in a position where you can print LP (corrected :)) by just buying things and shooting yourself.
The destruction of items to harvest LP is the main issue here. The manipulation of the average cost in and of itself is not at this point in time considered problematic. It's merely how much that can be used to amplify the damage caused by the destruction. "Sreegs has juuust edged out Soundwave as my favourite dev." - Meita Way 2012 |
|

Liam Mirren
553
|
Posted - 2012.06.28 17:45:00 -
[116] - Quote
Goon tears best tears. Excellence is not a skill, it's an attitude.
My guides: http://mirren.freeforums.org |

Bienator II
madmen of the skies
781
|
Posted - 2012.06.28 17:47:00 -
[117] - Quote
this kind of market/LP payout/whatever anomalies should have been detected by CCP long before anyone admited the exploit.
this was basically a best case scenario, a small group of people creates an exceptional LP payout anomaly. If something changes by factor 1000 repeatedly every light should blink at the monitoring tools.
you are monitoring FW, aren't you? a eve-style bounty system https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=359105 You fail you fail you fail you fail you fail you fail you fail to jump because you are cloaked |

Sofia Wolf
Ubuntu Inc. Varangon Tagma
49
|
Posted - 2012.06.28 17:48:00 -
[118] - Quote
While I can see CCP Sreegs did his best to deal with situation fairly I think he forgot something. In order to manipulate LP prices in faction store bunch of LP was invested in to system upgrades that strongly benefited Minmatar at the expense of Amarr side of FW. Given that now it was decided this LP was gained through exploit IMHO CCP should also remove system upgrades gained by those LP, assuming CCP can track which upgrades where bought with legitimate LP and which were acquired by exploit LP. |

Aryth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
464
|
Posted - 2012.06.28 17:48:00 -
[119] - Quote
CCP Sreegs wrote:Mme Pinkerton wrote:CCP Sreegs wrote:What we said was that this could be done in such a way that lead to an artificial disparity (albeit one created by our own systems) between the real value of an item and the number we were calculating value based upon to magically die over and over again to gain another currency. Inquiring minds want to know how you determine the "real value" of an item. It's in the blog. There's the current cost you pay for an item and there's the rolling average of the item's value. LP gain was tied to the long term average cost which is calculated by us. By causing disparity in the two values, whether on purpose or if it happens naturally, you can be in a position where you can print LP (corrected :)) by just buying things and shooting yourself. The destruction of items to harvest LP is the main issue here. The manipulation of the average cost in and of itself is not at this point in time considered problematic. It's merely how much that can be used to amplify the damage caused by the destruction.
I hope when you guys do the redesign, using it as a matter convertor is still possible. I felt it was the most interesting part of this mechanic in the long run. It will provide some creative ways to run manips on item prices as well as create artificial scarcity for items if you are willing to put ISK behind it.
If you think permageddon is bad, wait until you see what we can do with a matter converter. |

corestwo
Goonfleet Investment Banking
516
|
Posted - 2012.06.28 17:48:00 -
[120] - Quote
Aryth wrote:Not only that, but I was already a trillionaire before this. It's not like I am crying all the way to the poor house if CCP just unwinds me. I will remain one of the riches players in EVE. Sure, I would more like trillions, but I got many news articles, a 160 page thread or whatever, multiple blogs/news annoucements and the most hilarious graph to ever exist in the history of EVE play.
Throw in the most ISK in kills/deaths records, and goddamn. I am pretty smug.
But really. The true reward is to dunk on Stoffer. If there is one things goons love, it's trolling goons. Even Ex-goons.
CCP gets press, we get our capital back, EVE gets another hilarious footnote in history. Everyone won here. We just won less than we woulda liked.
Liam Mirren wrote:Goon tears best tears. Does not compute...
Bienator II wrote:this kind of market/LP payout/whatever anomalies should have been detected by CCP long before anyone admited the exploit.
this was basically a best case scenario, a small group of people creates an exceptional LP payout anomaly. If something changes by factor 1000 repeatedly every light should blink at the monitoring tools.
you are monitoring FW, aren't you? If they weren't before, they certainly are now. . |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 .. 14 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |