if ccp fixes local

Implying local needs fixing.

So what your saying is its fine that people know the instant u jump in system if your hostile or not and instantly dock up.

But u haven said u spend most of your time in highsec grinding isk I would assume u agree that High secs risk vs rewards is broken at least?

hm, Solar Citizens seems to eat approx 400 bil a month in ratting losses every month

but i though local made 0.0 residents invulnerable


edit: hahahahaha

Most renters are dumb or bots.
Far more of them would die a horrible death if local was not there to tell them when bad people showed up.

probably far less of them would die, if wormhole's 1/5th the ship loss rate of nullsec is any indication

The safety of whs comes from the way they work not the lack of local.

Just think how safe WHs would be if they had local.

Wormholes do have local, it's just delayed until someone is daft enough to use it. There is a lore reason behind it to, [rp] There are beacons in known space that are legacy items from when the gate network was built, these interrogate ship transponders to show pilots who are in local, in wh space there are no beacons because they are unknown space and nobody has built any because capsuleers don't have the technology to do so, when capsuleers can build their own gates they will have the tech to build the beacons [/rp]

It's a whole lot easier to control traffic in and out of whs via the mechanic of closing any incoming k162s and only warping to and thus spawning your static exits if you need to (this was the case when I was doing whs, some people will say my understanding of the mechanic is wrong but I can only go on my own experience), therefore the lack of instant local is a minor drawback. In hi/lo/nullsec you don't have the luxury of being able to close exits in this way, hence bluelists, gatecamps, local being used for intel and corp/alliance intel channels.

TL;DR whs have delayed local, and it would be a dumb as a box of rocks dev who removed it completely from any area of space.

The problem isn't local, the problem is the complete and utter lack of nullsec population.


I have said, multiple times, that I spend most of my eve-time in hisec making isk. As for risk/reward in hisec being broken, well duh.

I said every time use WH stile local.

I still don't see how that one guy can hate this idea so much.

Null gets WH stile local but to make up for the complet lack of intel.

We can add a counter of sorts that shows the number of people in the system.

I have faith people will find a way to Live in eve with out instant local .I have seen them adapt to far crazyer changes.

I said every time use WH stile local.

Yes, they'll move to hisec, or they'll move to WHs where the rewards corresponds to the risk/effort/reward.

Preserve the lore

Remove cloaked ships from local.

We change local to work like WHs, and add a readout of the number of players in system to the ui,
Now you can still tell if theres a large fleet in your space, u can still tell if theres targets in system, and small gangs and solo pilots still have the chance to slip between the cracks.

This member of the herd doesn't rely on local for intell genius, I use a chanel specifically for that.

Grow up.

always CFC fighting to keep local in all these threads.

Not surprised.

As you post with your NPC alt.

Who castrated you? Let me guess?
You're alliance kicks when you use local, like the OP?

Not really npc alt at all. Don't worry

Castrated me? I am a woman

Oh and, you saying no local would make it safer for PVE:ers than with local has to be the joke of the day by the way. You know who would hurt by removing local? Alliances with thousands of tards, that's who!

But then I'm like, ***** called me a tard.

Its nice to see everyone agreeing removing local.would make.it harder for people to.know.if I was in your system or not.


Just to clear this up THATS THE POINT.

It's obvious you're only seeing one part of a significantly more complex picture. I'm sorry you're incapable of understanding why this is an utterly ******** suggestion, but it is.

It's obvious you're only seeing one part of a significantly more complex picture. I'm sorry you're incapable of understanding why this is an utterly ******** suggestion, but it is.