EVE Search - Dev Blog: Fast Forward

Check My IP Information

All Channels

EVE Information Portal

Dev Blog: Fast Forward

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 .. 16 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 22 post(s)
Katarina Reid Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State 240	Posted - 2012.10.22 17:02:00 - [31] - Quote Were these on test server or we just hoping everything will be fine?
Tiberious Thessalonia True Slave Foundations Shaktipat Revelators 570	Posted - 2012.10.22 17:03:00 - [32] - Quote Bad Messenger wrote: To implement this earlier is biggest fuckup CCP can make in FW ever I'm quoting this for later. could you please explain why?

CCP Fozzie C C P C C P Alliance 1940	Posted - 2012.10.22 17:04:00 - [33] - Quote Katarina Reid wrote: Where these on test server or we just hoping everything will be fine? We've tested it internally on test servers not open to the public (first on an internal server then on Buckingham, which you may have noticed was in VIP mode since the end of last week). Game Designer \| Team Game of Drones https://twitter.com/CCP_Fozzie

Bienator II madmen of the skies 1049	Posted - 2012.10.22 17:05:00 - [34] - Quote the only point i am not quite sure about is the mission count cap. I would rather try to solve that issue by adding a penalty of not finishing a (FW) mission (e.g. standing with the agent) - this will make many think twice how many missions they accept at once. But this is a difficult issue in general since those who accept the mission are not nessesary those who finish the mission. (but this is only a sidenote, again: awesome work!) a eve-style bounty system https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=359105 You fail you fail you fail you fail you fail you fail you fail to jump because you are cloaked
Morwen Lagann Tyrathlion Interstellar 353	Posted - 2012.10.22 17:06:00 - [35] - Quote Tiberious Thessalonia wrote: Bad Messenger wrote: To implement this earlier is biggest fuckup CCP can make in FW ever I'm quoting this for later. could you please explain why? It's Damar. 'nuff said, really...
Nirnaeth Ornoediad Clan Shadow Wolf Fatal Ascension 126	Posted - 2012.10.22 17:06:00 - [36] - Quote This October Surprise is so full of win it's not even funny. I'm glad to see CCP responding quickly to significant balance issues rather than sitting on their hands for years. "The Mittani isn't even gone for a day and CCP's management is already making bad decisions." THE MITTANI for CEO of CCP 1-800-273-8255
Gogela Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance 1299	Posted - 2012.10.22 17:06:00 - [37] - Quote I like this faster iteration deployment thing you've got going on. This is how it should work. Pretty good job thar, Team Game of Drones. Every Ship in GëíGêçGëí \| [FX7] \| Vote Cthulhu 2012
Rordan D'Kherr Imperial Academy Amarr Empire 106	Posted - 2012.10.22 17:09:00 - [38] - Quote Bad Messenger wrote: To implement this earlier is biggest fuckup CCP can make in FW ever First tears here?`
l0rd carlos Friends Of Harassment 58	Posted - 2012.10.22 17:09:00 - [39] - Quote \o/ Yay. Thank you very much. Now we only need the new crimewatch and my life is complete :) German blog about smallscale lowsec pvp: http://friendsofharassment.wordpress.com
DarthNefarius Minmatar Heavy Industries 391	Posted - 2012.10.22 17:10:00 - [40] - Quote So is there a mad RUSH for WINmatar Teir 5 today? Good to see the madness cut short & suddenly Seriously the LP Store ISK reduction was a horrible idea when there were far too few ISK sinks already I'm glad to see it wiped off the map & hope it never rears its ugly head again in another Monty Haul like bonanza. Cheap attribute implants will be floating around in the market for years. Go to the timber yard and buy some logs. They will also show nothing.

Hans Jagerblitzen Autocannons Anonymous Late Night Alliance 3195	Posted - 2012.10.22 17:13:00 - [41] - Quote Rordan D'Kherr wrote: Bad Messenger wrote: To implement this earlier is biggest fuckup CCP can make in FW ever First tears here?` Works for me. FIRST TEARS!! Vice Secretary of the 7th Council of Stellar Management.
DJ P0N-3 Table Flippendeavors 48	Posted - 2012.10.22 17:13:00 - [42] - Quote Not all surprises come gift-wrapped!
DexterShark Li3's Electric Cucumber Li3 Federation 0	Posted - 2012.10.22 17:17:00 - [43] - Quote What happens if there's no real tears and everyone just shrugs and agrees this change is for the best? What then? Can we get some folks to come in and roleplay some tears?
Seleene Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion 2007	Posted - 2012.10.22 17:17:00 - [44] - Quote Delayed to page three because I went to lunch. Cripes! CSM 7 Chairman My Blog - Where I say stuff Follow Seleene on Twitter!
Zoe Alarhun Knysna Grim Reapers Absolute Darkness 101	Posted - 2012.10.22 17:17:00 - [45] - Quote Thanks alot. Changes sound good.
Tiberious Thessalonia True Slave Foundations Shaktipat Revelators 571	Posted - 2012.10.22 17:18:00 - [46] - Quote DexterShark wrote: What happens if there's no real tears and everyone just shrugs and agrees this change is for the best? What then? Can we get some folks to come in and roleplay some tears? Nah. Most of the RPer FW people I know want this change sooner rather than later because they are pissed off that no one is actually fighting.
Lydia Schmidt State War Academy Caldari State 4	Posted - 2012.10.22 17:20:00 - [47] - Quote Dev blog wrote: We will be implementing a cap on the number of missions one character can have open at once. This cap will affect all Security, Distribution and Mining missions, not just FW missions. The exceptions to the limit will be Storyline, Cosmos and Epic Arc missions. The current plan is for the cap to be 5 simultaneous missions. When is a mission counted as being "open"? After being accepted or after being offered?
Veshta Yoshida PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris 325	Posted - 2012.10.22 17:26:00 - [48] - Quote Well I asked for an update to plans for FW. Almost exactly as was initially presented with only minor inconsequential tweaks, exactly as anticipated/feared. "...was the culmination of our dialogue with the FW community up to that point." There was dialogue Certainly news to me and I have been all over, inside and at one with practically every FW thread the past four years .. the changes Inferno brought more or less proved that the extent of communication going from community-to-CCP is limited to tallying cries/moans as the people wanting something for nothing will always be in majority, in Eve as in real life. "..but players have been telling us that the situation is degrading faster than we had expected." Told you that before the damn changes even went live, doesn't take much logic to deduce which option a person will opt for if one will yield limitless funds and the other "merely" intermittent fun. "The actual multiplier numbers for the LP gain bonuses have been adjusted since we posted the original plan to increase the benefit at Tier 5 somewhat." Good, thought you might turn your back on the Shakorites. Assuming this WZ control is the same as before .. how the hell do you propose Amarr will ever get more than Tier2 .. vast majority of enemy systems are way out in the sticks behind a bazillion bottleneck systems. Once more, because it obviously didn't register the last 50 times I said it in the past 4 years: Sort the Amarr/Minmatar map. Failing to do so means that Amarr will always be fighting uphill even when numbers are 'equal' .. wasn't that important the first four years but now that you implement very direct and tangible benefits ... "This is in place to provide diminishing returns and to compensate for the increased LP gain from the new tier system." You didn't check your logs at all, did you? Do a search for LP currently in wallets in the bloat militias .. maybe, just maybe if something cataclysmic happens this will have the desired effect, but the smart money is on the bloats spending the 1% of their current LP hoards to get 5x buffer for their systems, massive LP gain increase (which will count for defensive I'd wager) and even more security as their enemy pulls stakes and quits FW in disgust. "Add new LP rewards for defensive plexing at a reduced and variable rate..." and "Add new LP rewards for defensive plexing at a reduced and variable rate." Swapping offensive farming for defensive farming complete with exchanging the brick wall of the bloats with one made from titanium reinforced concrete .. good move. That will really set things in motion!!!!! PS: Inferno did not in fact revitalize FW, it killed it dead within a fortnight (3 weeks on the outside). The hordes of players joining did so pad their wallets, some left again after their targets were met while others remain to this day. "Nay sayer!, I hear you cry .. check your logs, how long did it take for the grand strategy of putting everything into vulnerable with no contest and farming it into oblivion before a mass-flip to evolve .. 14-16 days. PPS: You will of course erase the past nine months of fail by resetting both fronts so people get to actually fight for the massive benefits that system occupancy will have .. right? Thank you for vindicating all my doom'n'gloom. Saddens me on the behalf of FW that I was not proven wrong though
Akrasjel Lanate Imperial Guardians 798	Posted - 2012.10.22 17:26:00 - [49] - Quote Hehehe... cool.
Velarra Ghost Festival Naraka. 118	Posted - 2012.10.22 17:27:00 - [50] - Quote DarthNefarius wrote: Cheap attribute implants will be floating around in the market for years. Unless they're removed entirely along with current clone costs?

SkyMeetFire The Rising Stars Initiative Mercenaries 10	Posted - 2012.10.22 17:29:00 - [51] - Quote CCP Soundwave wrote: SURPRISE! http://i.imgur.com/Zvet0.gif
Shepard Book Underground Stargate 83	Posted - 2012.10.22 17:29:00 - [52] - Quote I was looking forward to the re positioning of the capture / defending nodes in the faction ware fare plexes. Did I miss that in this blog? I did not see it.
X Gallentius Justified Chaos 538	Posted - 2012.10.22 17:31:00 - [53] - Quote Thanks CCP chatgris for large Gallente buff. Caldari will likely need to bust as many bunkers as possible today. Federation militia counter-bunker fleets form up! Have fun with the pew!
Vincent Athena V.I.C.E. 1069	Posted - 2012.10.22 17:32:00 - [54] - Quote Yesterday I was thinking of investing in PLEX. For some reason I decided not to, and just bought what I needed to support my accounts. Lucky me. http://vincentoneve.wordpress.com/
Hans Jagerblitzen Autocannons Anonymous Late Night Alliance 3196	Posted - 2012.10.22 17:33:00 - [55] - Quote Shepard Book wrote: I was looking forward to the re positioning of the capture / defending nodes in the faction ware fare plexes. Did I miss that in this blog? I did not see it. As far as I know this is still planned, just not for imminent release. This was one of my first questions too! Vice Secretary of the 7th Council of Stellar Management.
Scrapyard Bob EVE University Ivy League 1149	Posted - 2012.10.22 17:35:00 - [56] - Quote I'm not really convinced on the connection between FW and rising PLEX prices. Unless it meant that there were a few hundred new accounts created solely for the farming of FW LP and they were powered with PLEX, which may have increased demand enough on PLEX purchases to drive up costs. I think the simpler explanation is that the poor economic climate in the real world means fewer people are willing to splurge on buying PLEX/GTC to sell in-game for ISK. Combine that with the new features that CCP rolls out like a re-sculpt for PLEX, new AUR items, and other things that can be bought with PLEX and you have too much demand compared to the supply. (And maybe toss in a little speculator action.)
Shepard Book Underground Stargate 83	Posted - 2012.10.22 17:36:00 - [57] - Quote Hans Jagerblitzen wrote: Shepard Book wrote: I was looking forward to the re positioning of the capture / defending nodes in the faction ware fare plexes. Did I miss that in this blog? I did not see it. As far as I know this is still planned, just not for imminent release. This was one of my first questions too! Thanks

CCP Phantom C C P C C P Alliance 2349	Posted - 2012.10.22 17:37:00 - [58] - Quote Bad Messenger wrote: To implement this earlier is biggest fuckup CCP can make in FW ever If that is the case, then it would be great to hear why it is so in your opinion. Just saying that you think something would be bad doesn't help our developers to figure out eventual issues. CCP Phantom - German Community Coordinator


CCP Fozzie C C P C C P Alliance 1948	Posted - 2012.10.22 17:37:00 - [59] - Quote Shepard Book wrote: I was looking forward to the re positioning of the capture / defending nodes in the faction ware fare plexes. Did I miss that in this blog? I did not see it. Yup, all of the stuff in the linked forum posts by Ytterbium is still in the plan, with the exception of the "Any defender anywhere in the plex stops capture" thing which the community correctly pointed out to us wasn't going to be a positive change. Game Designer \| Team Game of Drones https://twitter.com/CCP_Fozzie

Arec Bardwin 791	Posted - 2012.10.22 17:39:00 - [60] - Quote Surprise buttplex!



Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 .. 16 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.