Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 .. 16 :: one page |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 22 post(s) |

Veshta Yoshida
PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
329
|
Posted - 2012.10.22 19:31:00 -
[121] - Quote
Caellach Marellus wrote:...It stops missions being the primary LP source in FW post changes. You really that naive?
+225% LP for maxed tier which two militias will have pretty much 'forever' due to defensive LP and buffer/bleed, gives you some 70-80k LP per mission .. with no announced changes or policy in regards to missions you use militia alt/main to collect and pop missions while running them in non-militia alt (officially not allowed but to my knowledge not enforced). Not as much as cash-out system of today, but combined with defensive farms the amount of total LP generated should be roughly the same.
Poison pills in missions that can only spawn in hostile space .. that is what it would look like if missions were not supposed to be the primary income.
|

Gunship
Forced Penetration
1
|
Posted - 2012.10.22 19:34:00 -
[122] - Quote
New to FW (going to give it a try since I have become tired of 0.0 caps and blobs)
From what I have seen the last few days playing as Amarr is the out numbering (10:1 at a guess). Cleary its too easy to force T5's when outnumbering the other side , so it really needs to be fixed so 50/50 gives the most PVP and the most earnings! Not saying I know how to do that, but it must be the goal! Perhaps killing the outnumbers (take the ships in local at the time) gives less than the other way around or something?
The easy take off a "home" system, NPC's should be hostile, but perhaps with the twist that when "hostiles" enter they switch targets and the timer stops (so it can't be miss used).
I really want this to be a way for me to play the game in a more casual way , but still the PVP way.
While I have no need to earn billions, I see nothing wrong with PVP bringing in an income, in fact I think it really would help the game along. I don't want to spend my free time playing eve to care bear, I hate it. I pay real money, so give me real fun.
Edit: Just want to really stress that LB (in the end isk) should be given mostly for killing the other sides ships (PvP), not the PVE (taking systems). Also why the whole LB thing, can't I just get isk pending the current state of play. |

Hans Jagerblitzen
Autocannons Anonymous Late Night Alliance
3205
|
Posted - 2012.10.22 19:37:00 -
[123] - Quote
Poetic Stanziel wrote:Hans Jagerblitzen wrote: IMHO, there should be only one type of plex period, with NPC's spawning either way. OMFG?!? Are you seriously championing Susan Black's idea that plexes should have NO ship restrictions whatsoever? Do you just blindly agree with every dumb idea she puts forward? Who got elected to the CSM? You or her? You don't seem to do much independent thinking, that's for sure.
Do you just blindly agree with every dumb scandal DHD tries to convince you is worth bleating about? 
All I said was that you shouldn't be able to defensive plex without killing anything. There should be stuff to shoot either way. If not people, than NPC's. Effortless D-plexing for LP is just as bad as effortless O-plexing for LP.
I've always defended ship restrictions, my public record is easily accessible. Go read the minutes again, there's no need for the "puppetmasta" bullshit. Vice Secretary of the 7th Council of Stellar Management.
|

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
540
|
Posted - 2012.10.22 19:38:00 -
[124] - Quote
Niko Lorenzio wrote:"We will be implementing a cap on the number of missions one character can have open at once. This cap will affect all Security, Distribution and Mining missions, not just FW missions. The exceptions to the limit will be Storyline, Cosmos and Epic Arc missions. The current plan is for the cap to be 5 simultaneous missions."
Say what? How does this fix anything. The most efficient way to run FW missions is to take your warp core optimized interceptor to every single agent and pick up a mission. Then you go run them all at once which increases efficiency because I think the missions were originally balanced with the expectation that the player would make 12 jumps or more per mission. If you run them all at once, then the travel time from agent to mission is reduced since you only have to make the initial trip to the enemy warzone once.
Limiting the number of open missions directly nerfs the maximum LP/hour a hard core FW mission farmer can make. It doesn't, however, nerf the amount of LP/hour a more casual mission runner can achieve. |

Caellach Marellus
Aideron Technologies
611
|
Posted - 2012.10.22 19:38:00 -
[125] - Quote
Veshta Yoshida wrote: with no announced changes or policy in regards to missions you use militia alt/main to collect and pop missions while running them in non-militia alt (officially not allowed but to my knowledge not enforced). Not as much as cash-out system of today, but combined with defensive farms the amount of total LP generated should be roughly the same.
So you're saying it'll still be the top if people use an exploit with their alt while def plexing on their main at the same time?
Because the time it takes for a single character to grab 5 missions, leg it into hostile space, and come back could be spent def plexing for a much safer payoff. Enjoy your gaming.
http://northern-goblin.blogspot.com |

Hans Jagerblitzen
Autocannons Anonymous Late Night Alliance
3205
|
Posted - 2012.10.22 19:41:00 -
[126] - Quote
Vyktor Abyss wrote:This blog also caught my eye for the lack of talk of any real system upgrades.... The majority of my feedback was concerning how uninspiring I found your [CCP] vision and plans for those system upgrades and that they were the key element and resource of making people actually want to fight over FW space. I was very surprised to read nothing about them - can you please re-examine your plans for those for the next iteration (after tomorrow). They will still be the key to strategic goals and longer term fun for FW folks after the development spotlight moves away from FW. All in all though, a very welcome surprise. Cheers. 
Like Fozzie said, this isn't the entire FW package, just a rollout of the already-finished stuff. Moving the button to the warp-in, new system upgrades, NPC changes, and more will still all be coming in Retribution. The dev blog is just talking about the imminent changes and the new changes to the old plan, its not a replacement for the roadmap previously discussed in the other two official threads. Vice Secretary of the 7th Council of Stellar Management.
|

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
2613
|
Posted - 2012.10.22 19:42:00 -
[127] - Quote
Veshta Yoshida wrote:CCP Fozzie wrote:Tomorrow is definitely not the last FW patch in the near future. We're still releasing another set of changes in Retribution at the very least. But the system being implemented will be set in stone as it were, yes? So will those future patches be more than the NPC/ Plex changes and tweaks to the various spreadsheets .. that is my concern, because I frankly don't see how switching from swarming Zerg mechanics to a bunkering Terran ditto will do much for FW when it comes to fun/gameplay. CCP Fozzie wrote:And as for the storyline, all I can tell you is that I'm very excited about what I know is coming, and I'm not privy to all of the secret plans. Don't know your sensitivity, you could be one of those people who get faint at the mention of a new iphone coming out even when knowing it will be more of the same .. just saying  Otherwise, good to know. Maddening neglect on that front so will be happy that anything is coming really ..
I was a bit concerned there would be little motivation to actually take a plex offensively, but if you don't you will never raise your tier. Now that things have switched over to a vastly increased LP payout for having a high tier, that should provide a fair amount of incentive.
Personally I believe the largest payouts possible should be for killing rival faction pilots, not territory games, but I know that is difficult to keep free of alt exploitation. To carve a successful niche for yourself in EVE you need to be able to out sell, out produce, out fight,-á out run, or out wit your competitors. If you can do none of the above, your only option is to complain on the forums that somehow you are at a disadvantage using the exact same tool set-áas the rest of the player base. |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
2614
|
Posted - 2012.10.22 19:45:00 -
[128] - Quote
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:Vyktor Abyss wrote:This blog also caught my eye for the lack of talk of any real system upgrades.... The majority of my feedback was concerning how uninspiring I found your [CCP] vision and plans for those system upgrades and that they were the key element and resource of making people actually want to fight over FW space. I was very surprised to read nothing about them - can you please re-examine your plans for those for the next iteration (after tomorrow). They will still be the key to strategic goals and longer term fun for FW folks after the development spotlight moves away from FW. All in all though, a very welcome surprise. Cheers.  Like Fozzie said, this isn't the entire FW package, just a rollout of the already-finished stuff. Moving the button to the warp-in, new system upgrades, NPC changes, and more will still all be coming in Retribution. The dev blog is just talking about the imminent changes and the new changes to the old plan, its not a replacement for the roadmap previously discussed in the other two official threads.
I do hope the new system upgrades will have an impact far beyond FW pilots and their immediate concerns. An empires control in a heavily contested area should have sweeping consequences for anyone living nearby or passing through the area regularly.
The more you impact pilots not directly affiliated with FW, the more interest you will generate in the struggle. To carve a successful niche for yourself in EVE you need to be able to out sell, out produce, out fight,-á out run, or out wit your competitors. If you can do none of the above, your only option is to complain on the forums that somehow you are at a disadvantage using the exact same tool set-áas the rest of the player base. |

Ugleb
Masuat'aa Matari Ushra'Khan
253
|
Posted - 2012.10.22 19:46:00 -
[129] - Quote
Many props to CCP for biting the bullet and putting out these changes now rather than waiting nearly two more months. It might not be the neatest package but it should go a long way towards plugging the holes in the FW system and pushing players back towards fighting for control of space.
Good bye gun-less speed-tanking frigate alts! :D
Much credit to the devs for responding to the situation more quickly than they might have in the past, and for having the guts to not forewarn the playerbase so that we could have got in a last round of mass-mechanics abusing. http://uglebsjournal.wordpress.com/
To contact [-MM-] or [UNITY]: http://www.masuataa.co.uk/defaul1t.asp - channel "Masuat'aa Public" http://www.ushrakhan.com/ - channel "Voices U'K" |

Poetic Stanziel
Fweddit I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
1398
|
Posted - 2012.10.22 19:47:00 -
[130] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:Personally I believe the largest payouts possible should be for killing rival faction pilots, not territory games, but I know that is difficult to keep free of alt exploitation. Not really. LP reward from killing an enemy pilot is based upon the worth of their ship when destroyed.
So, unless someone wants to use an alt to start blowing up their main's 200M ISK ships, the LP gain for this sort of exploitation is going to be reasonably low (not too mention slow.) Of course, the LP gained has to have an estimated ISK worth well below what the blowed-up ship is worth.
Caldari Militia |

Poetic Stanziel
Fweddit I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
1398
|
Posted - 2012.10.22 19:51:00 -
[131] - Quote
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:Poetic Stanziel wrote:Hans Jagerblitzen wrote: IMHO, there should be only one type of plex period, with NPC's spawning either way. OMFG?!?Are you seriously championing Susan Black's idea that plexes should have NO ship restrictions whatsoever? Do you just blindly agree with every dumb idea she puts forward? Who got elected to the CSM? You or her? You don't seem to do much independent thinking, that's for sure. All I said was that you shouldn't be able to defensive plex without killing anything. There should be stuff to shoot either way. If not people, than NPC's. Effortless D-plexing for LP is just as bad as effortless O-plexing for LP. You said no such thing. You wrote "there should be only one type of plex period" and there's really only one way to interpret that. Caldari Militia |

War Kitten
Panda McLegion
1374
|
Posted - 2012.10.22 20:01:00 -
[132] - Quote
Poetic Stanziel wrote:Ranger 1 wrote:Personally I believe the largest payouts possible should be for killing rival faction pilots, not territory games, but I know that is difficult to keep free of alt exploitation. Not really. LP reward from killing an enemy pilot is based upon the worth of their ship when destroyed. So, unless someone wants to use an alt to start blowing up their main's 200M ISK ships, the LP gain for this sort of exploitation is going to be reasonably low (not too mention slow.) Of course, the LP gained has to have an estimated ISK worth well below what the blowed-up ship is worth.
Say what?
Ranger1 says he wishes the largest payouts came from killing other faction's pilots, but that it would be hard to reward that heavily without it being exploited.
You disagree (with something), and point out exactly why ship destruction isn't the highest reward: because of the exploit-proof implementation.
What was your point?
I find that without a good mob to provide one for them, most people would have no mentality at all. |

Hulkdriver003
Inappropriate Contact Infinite Improbabilities
2
|
Posted - 2012.10.22 20:03:00 -
[133] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:Katarina Reid wrote:Where these on test server or we just hoping everything will be fine? We've tested it internally on test servers not open to the public (first on an internal server then on Buckingham, which you may have noticed was in VIP mode since the end of last week).
In other words you have done no real testing and you are just crossing your fingers and hoping it doesnt screw up.
CCP QA Darwin Award on standby |

kalath1032
State Protectorate Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.10.22 20:08:00 -
[134] - Quote
Well done CCP, you just handed total control of the warzone to the Gallenteans forever!
|

Milton Middleson
Rifterlings Damu'Khonde
131
|
Posted - 2012.10.22 20:09:00 -
[135] - Quote
Poetic Stanziel wrote:Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:Poetic Stanziel wrote:Hans Jagerblitzen wrote: IMHO, there should be only one type of plex period, with NPC's spawning either way. OMFG?!?Are you seriously championing Susan Black's idea that plexes should have NO ship restrictions whatsoever? Do you just blindly agree with every dumb idea she puts forward? Who got elected to the CSM? You or her? You don't seem to do much independent thinking, that's for sure. All I said was that you shouldn't be able to defensive plex without killing anything. There should be stuff to shoot either way. If not people, than NPC's. Effortless D-plexing for LP is just as bad as effortless O-plexing for LP. You said no such thing. You wrote "there should be only one type of plex period" and there's really only one way to interpret that.
No distinction between offensive and defensive plexing in terms of NPC spawns. Calm down. |

Silath Slyver Silverpine
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
38
|
Posted - 2012.10.22 20:09:00 -
[136] - Quote
Glad that CCP is doing something about this problem, whether or not it will be effective, I simply do not know, mostly due to ignorance of the mechanics of the issue.
I do wonder though, how long it will take for the effects of these changes to become apparent. Much like the real world economy, changes to supply and demand in EVE often take some time to show their effects due to stockpiles and market manipulation by those with large reserves of capital.
Perhaps this will be the bursting of the PLEX bubble? |

Mawderator
Percussive Diplomacy PERCUSSIVE PIZZA TIME DIPLOMACY
10
|
Posted - 2012.10.22 20:11:00 -
[137] - Quote
Poetic Stanziel wrote:Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:Poetic Stanziel wrote:Hans Jagerblitzen wrote: IMHO, there should be only one type of plex period, with NPC's spawning either way. OMFG?!?Are you seriously championing Susan Black's idea that plexes should have NO ship restrictions whatsoever? Do you just blindly agree with every dumb idea she puts forward? Who got elected to the CSM? You or her? You don't seem to do much independent thinking, that's for sure. All I said was that you shouldn't be able to defensive plex without killing anything. There should be stuff to shoot either way. If not people, than NPC's. Effortless D-plexing for LP is just as bad as effortless O-plexing for LP. You said no such thing. You wrote "there should be only one type of plex period" and there's really only one way to interpret that.
I think the correct interpretation, is that you didn't interpret what he said correctly. Try again. |

Suitonia
Corp 54 Curatores Veritatis Alliance
118
|
Posted - 2012.10.22 20:11:00 -
[138] - Quote
Poetic Stanziel wrote:Trebor Daehdoow wrote:Poetic Stanziel wrote:Hmm. Seems the only posting the CSM does now is to cheerlead devblogs. Well, get elected to CSM8 and change all that, then Wow! Wasn't the platform of most of this CSM to be more TRANSPARENT? Or have you conveniently forgotten those promises. Hilarious.
Why don't you post a blog about it and spam it in 5 unrelated threads. |

Jaime Gomes
God's Equasion
1
|
Posted - 2012.10.22 20:11:00 -
[139] - Quote
MAGICAL!!! SIMPLY MAGICAL!
24 hours notice. Espetacular! Especially for a paying customer. Thanks for the apretiation of being treated like dirt for the 24 hours notice. THe consideration for the players was imense. Trully unbefuking leavable.
"oh those evil afk plexers!". Like afk plexers will end with this. like plexing will end with this.
Thanks for locking up lp's of thousands of characters. this will fail either way . people will completely abandom amarr for good. and caldari will go the same way. just gallente and minmatar from now on. And the only flippings will be done by swutching for a few days and rejoin the other militia. Even alts can do that. Your work will resume to 0. only less billionaires in the game. now they will just be millionaires.
RIP caldari militia. If we dont flip systems tonight.
|

Jaime Gomes
God's Equasion
1
|
Posted - 2012.10.22 20:13:00 -
[140] - Quote
btw i forgott.
Good to see csm supporting this.
ffs
|

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
2614
|
Posted - 2012.10.22 20:13:00 -
[141] - Quote
War Kitten wrote:Poetic Stanziel wrote:Ranger 1 wrote:Personally I believe the largest payouts possible should be for killing rival faction pilots, not territory games, but I know that is difficult to keep free of alt exploitation. Not really. LP reward from killing an enemy pilot is based upon the worth of their ship when destroyed. So, unless someone wants to use an alt to start blowing up their main's 200M ISK ships, the LP gain for this sort of exploitation is going to be reasonably low (not too mention slow.) Of course, the LP gained has to have an estimated ISK worth well below what the blowed-up ship is worth. Say what? Ranger1 says he wishes the largest payouts came from killing other faction's pilots, but that it would be hard to reward that heavily without it being exploited. You disagree (with something), and point out exactly why ship destruction isn't the highest reward: because of the exploit-proof implementation. What was your point?
To be fair, I didn't express myself very clearly... but yes, that exactly. The necessity to keep the LP payout below the abuse threshold would keep the other payouts possible for territory unreasonably low if PVP rewards were the most lucurative payout available. To carve a successful niche for yourself in EVE you need to be able to out sell, out produce, out fight,-á out run, or out wit your competitors. If you can do none of the above, your only option is to complain on the forums that somehow you are at a disadvantage using the exact same tool set-áas the rest of the player base. |

Bad Messenger
Nasranite Watch Liandri Covenant
265
|
Posted - 2012.10.22 20:14:00 -
[142] - Quote
Jaime Gomes wrote:MAGICAL!!! SIMPLY MAGICAL!
24 hours notice. Espetacular! Especially for a paying customer. Thanks for the apretiation of being treated like dirt for the 24 hours notice. THe consideration for the players was imense. Trully unbefuking leavable.
"oh those evil afk plexers!". Like afk plexers will end with this. like plexing will end with this.
Thanks for locking up lp's of thousands of characters. this will fail either way . people will completely abandom amarr for good. and caldari will go the same way. just gallente and minmatar from now on. And the only flippings will be done by swutching for a few days and rejoin the other militia. Even alts can do that. Your work will resume to 0. only less billionaires in the game. now they will just be millionaires.
RIP caldari militia. If we dont flip systems tonight.
no point to flip, just put alt to gallente and defend tomorrow, easy lp with 1 day alts |

IHaveCandyGetInTheVan69
Angry Mustellid Iron Oxide.
262
|
Posted - 2012.10.22 20:15:00 -
[143] - Quote
Good patch, thank god enough warning was given to the players to make strategic decisions before such a big change.
Oh wai-
Still at least it will stop the carebears from cashing out one last time
Oh wait.
Yes its a good update and anything that nerfs farmers is good, but ninja patching isn't cool, mkay? |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
2614
|
Posted - 2012.10.22 20:17:00 -
[144] - Quote
Jaime Gomes wrote:MAGICAL!!! SIMPLY MAGICAL!
24 hours notice. Espetacular! Especially for a paying customer. Thanks for the apretiation of being treated like dirt for the 24 hours notice. THe consideration for the players was imense. Trully unbefuking leavable.
"oh those evil afk plexers!". Like afk plexers will end with this. like plexing will end with this.
Thanks for locking up lp's of thousands of characters. this will fail either way . people will completely abandom amarr for good. and caldari will go the same way. just gallente and minmatar from now on. And the only flippings will be done by swutching for a few days and rejoin the other militia. Even alts can do that. Your work will resume to 0. only less billionaires in the game. now they will just be millionaires.
RIP caldari militia. If we dont flip systems tonight.
You seem to forget, Amarr can flip those systems overnight if they wish too... but previously it was more profitable not to.
Now it will be in their best interest to take those systems that they have purposely left vulnerable on the Minmatar side and defend them. They need to get their Tier up and it will be easier to reap LP's if they do so. To carve a successful niche for yourself in EVE you need to be able to out sell, out produce, out fight,-á out run, or out wit your competitors. If you can do none of the above, your only option is to complain on the forums that somehow you are at a disadvantage using the exact same tool set-áas the rest of the player base. |

Ty Delaney
Gambit Roulette
22
|
Posted - 2012.10.22 20:18:00 -
[145] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:Farmers will move to defensive plexing.
They're only going to get paid worth a damn for d-plexing when doing so in heavily-contested systems, which means (thanks to needing to kill the rats) they'll be plexing in systems with lots of armed enemies right there. I wish them luck. |

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
540
|
Posted - 2012.10.22 20:20:00 -
[146] - Quote
Jaime Gomes wrote:btw i forgott. Good to see csm supporting this. ffs Caldari FW mission running alt spotted. Perhaps the 75k LP/day run by the Caldari was a bit too overwhelming for the devs to look the other way. Still, that 75k LP will go a long way after the patch, and you guys don't even have to spend a week busting bunkers - (not that the farming alts did any of that sort of thing anyways). |

Bad Messenger
Nasranite Watch Liandri Covenant
265
|
Posted - 2012.10.22 20:22:00 -
[147] - Quote
Ty Delaney wrote:X Gallentius wrote:Farmers will move to defensive plexing.
They're only going to get paid worth a damn for d-plexing when doing so in heavily-contested systems, which means (thanks to needing to kill the rats) they'll be plexing in systems with lots of armed enemies right there. I wish them luck.
you really think that some one will still attack plex? |

kalath1032
State Protectorate Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.10.22 20:22:00 -
[148] - Quote
Thanks CCP for giving us the chance to put cleverly thought out plans into action........
And Id be surprised if any large corps / alliances remain in the caldari militia any longer than a week after the changes, because you now created a system were if you all ready own 90% of the systems you will ALWAYS keep 90% of the systems as its now worth defending!
Personally I feel you would have been better off removing LP from vulnerable systems and removing T1 and T5 (just keep T2 to T4). But hey when in the 5 years ive been playing EVE have CCP even changed one thing at a time rather than trying an entirely new failed system
|

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
2614
|
Posted - 2012.10.22 20:22:00 -
[149] - Quote
Ty Delaney wrote:X Gallentius wrote:Farmers will move to defensive plexing.
They're only going to get paid worth a damn for d-plexing when doing so in heavily-contested systems, which means (thanks to needing to kill the rats) they'll be plexing in systems with lots of armed enemies right there. I wish them luck. Yep, solo ninja plexing is pretty much going the way of the Dodo. You'll have to go in with a group and fight to keep the plex. I don't really view that as a bad thing. To carve a successful niche for yourself in EVE you need to be able to out sell, out produce, out fight,-á out run, or out wit your competitors. If you can do none of the above, your only option is to complain on the forums that somehow you are at a disadvantage using the exact same tool set-áas the rest of the player base. |

Veshta Yoshida
PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
329
|
Posted - 2012.10.22 20:23:00 -
[150] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:..Personally I believe the largest payouts possible should be for killing rival faction pilots, not territory games, but I know that is difficult to keep free of alt exploitation. Would be possible if it was moved inside plexes. Slap a x4-5 (or MOAR!) modifier on LP-for-Kills inside plexes, logistics of needing to manually eject to give alt ship to blow up (one or other probably can't dock) combined with needing to be able to access a size restricted plex would keep abuse at bay (mostly ).
Could probably throw some modifier into system upgrade paths as well .. but pew does not seem to be the focus FW from a design standpoint so 'meh'  |
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 .. 16 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |