So wake up call to all whiners.

Base tracking of the limited mega ion siege blaster 1, Im using the meta because im a WHer and Im pro, is 0.0054125. Fifteen percent of this is 0.000811875. Now for those that fail at math, and if CCP doesnt fail at math, then the new number WILL be 0.004600625. Again this number is assuming CCP do something funny and completely fail at math.

The current tracking of the Dual Modal Giga Pulse Laser 1 is 0.0040512. This means that the moros will still have noticeably better tracking than the rev. Anyone who has ever tried to do dread blapping with the rev knows that it is not bad. Rev blapping is pretty easy.

The optimal range nerf is not that bad either. The moros gets 5 mid slots. So for a tracking dread, you would use 2 sebos, and 3 TCUs. Two tracking one optimal range. Thats 14KM of optimal and 34 KM of falloff. With 2 webbing ships on field webbing down what you are shooting, its going to die. No questions asked, its going to die.

The moros gets 5 mid slots. So for a tracking dread, you would use 2 sebos, and 3 TCUs.

There is a reason you see a whole lot of Moros's in w-space these days, and this change should help fix the reason for that. I have no problem with the Moros doing the most damage, but it should have severe range problems while doing so.

I don't actually remember any other dev who was as hated for his "changes" as this one.
And yeah, the "everything is to be the same" approach to balance is disturbing.

A dread touching a POS shield should be able to get 100% damage against it without special configuration.

A dread touching a POS shield should be able to get 100% damage against it without special configuration.

CCP Fozzie. You are by far the most inept, ham-handed Dev to swing the nerf bat. The word 'tweak' doesn't exist for you. It's all about breaking some mechanic so hard it ain't worth having.

I object to your halfwit addle brained excuses for wasting all the time we players spent maxing out Moros skills. I dare you to be so clumsy around the super capital crowd. Oh wait....that would be bad for your old alliance

I don't think he's trying to stop dread blapping, I think he's trying to improve balance between dreads.

if you are gonna nerf the moros then nerf the moros, don't make a useless ship. I haven't done the math but seriously...everyone has a moros because it's the best dread...now everyone is gonna have to get rid of them with no buyers?...great

if you are gonna nerf the moros then nerf the moros, don't make a useless ship. I haven't done the math but seriously...everyone has a moros because it's the best dread...now everyone is gonna have to get rid of them with no buyers?...great

About time my beloved Phoenix gets some actual love.

I think so to but not sure this is the best way to go about it - I'd rather see some adjustments to the whole dreadnaught package guns, ammo, ship hulls, etc. with player feedback taken into account and more testing before it comes to TQ than doing it piecemeal chucking in some changes to one aspect.

:(

I can understand nerfing the moros tracking but optimal also?

It's still the best one tbh.

Ouch!

Nobody will be training for the minnie dread now. The whole point was that it would be excellent tracking but now why even bother. Will remain unused with such a heavy handed nerf.

The moros nerf is especially hard. I'd suggest an optimal nerf of -5 to -7km, while mantaining the falloff bonus, and not touching the tracking.

Dreads and especially titans don't track for **** without tp's or webs unless shooting at bc's or drakes so I simply don't understand this nerf. These are not being over-used or abused and seem like they're fufilling a good niche to counter sub-caps. This simply takes another tool out of the hand to counter massive bs or bc blobs with such a heavy-handed nerf.

If this is what you think doesn't it deserve to be nerfed even more? Look anywhere and when dreads are concerned it's almost all gallente dreads.

:(

I can understand nerfing the moros tracking but optimal also?

was the Nags tracking actually too high? It has to shield tank really so it doesnt have tracking computers with tracking scripts in the mids like the armor dreads can, this will mean a fit nag will have less tracking than a Rev is that intended?

Regarding pheonix I think a massive improvement would be to change the 5% kinetic damage per level to 5% missile damage per level so it can take advantage of the multiple damage types of missiles. Also reduce the volume of capital missiles a bit so a variety can be kept in cargo.

Doing 100% kinetic damage is a massive massive weakness of a pheonix its too easy to tank 1 damage type

Fozzie, I think that you should read this: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=228586&find=unread

This is something really interesting that you could have a good use for it.

It is realted to caldari and galente.

why all the whines and boos, and all the hard nerfing forth and back ?
why not just remove the dreads and supers and titans, and reimburse all players. get back to the ground table. do all other balancing first and then come back with new ideas for dreads, titans and supers and fresh datas....


honestly, i really think ,ccp you should reset all players sp to zero and let the users allocate the sp to whatever they wanted. you have changed the game so much recently and even more with the next release, that eve is and becomes a totally different game then it was last year..

...He said while smiling uncontrollably.

Hello once again everyone. We've got a small package of tweaks to capital weapons to announce, intended

X-L Blasters: -15% tracking, -10km optimal, +10km falloff

Let us know what you think!