Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 .. 60 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 16 post(s) |

Gripen
1631
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 15:01:00 -
[241] - Quote
Oh... once again this stupid MWD signature bonus which makes choosing between MWD and AB even more no-brainer decision. Instead of adding choices you remove them from the game again and again.
CCP Rise wrote:... afterburner variations that are already very strong ... I must confess, that I haven't been active for last year but isn't ABHACs just one trick pony against incompetent foes who fail at trivial thing of providing webbing support and keeping it alive and this format popularity sharply declined after short initial spark of novelty? Am I wrong here? |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
10871
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 15:02:00 -
[242] - Quote
CCP Rise wrote: I think the Cerberus is going to be really powerful. It can now do the extremely long range thing with HML as well as added capacity to be an amazing HAM skirmisher.
"Amazing" is exactly the right word.
1 Kings 12:11
|

Lixia Saran
Reasonable People Of Sound Mind
17
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 15:02:00 -
[243] - Quote
Dear CCP Santa,
while you are rebalancing T2 ships, please can you please pass a note to the art team to remove space camo (I'm looking at you vagabond!)
Thanks,
Lixia
P.S.: Milk and Cookies are on the table. |

Marcel Devereux
Aideron Robotics
241
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 15:02:00 -
[244] - Quote
Another minor nit. Please remove the launchers from Deimos. There is no need for them without the utility high. |

War Kitten
Panda McLegion
2394
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 15:02:00 -
[245] - Quote
+1 on the Ishtar CPU. It has always been the reason this ship can't fully shine.
The CPU rigs were a godsend when they came in, and then the drone damage mods helped the ship a lot, but they reintroduced the CPU issue as well.
Lots of good ideas here...
(I also agree that the 50m3 bay/level is a goofy bonus, but I trained HAC 5 years ago. I like the analogy of fitting 1 gun and getting +1 gun per level on other ships :) )
I find that without a good mob to provide one for them, most people would have no mentality at all. |

David Kir
Tailender
53
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 15:03:00 -
[246] - Quote
Voith wrote:riando wrote:Guys, I hope you're joking, " Vaga anyway as a close range active brawler" Or you know nothing about vaga, or ... i hope you're joking, vaga its a kite long range ship! It has not slots from active tank! So, ideal would be maximize bonus for tracking&faloff. And nothing new not need!
Holy **** people. The vaga got nothing but buffs. It's called an ASB. Look it up, fit one, experience Godmode on Vaga.
It did get a minor speed nerf.
|

Voith
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
119
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 15:03:00 -
[247] - Quote
CCP Rise wrote:Alright I've been pretty busy today but I'm trying to catch up on feedback. Here's some initial thoughts:
I'll look at the Ishtar fitting. To me it seems like one of the stronger HACs already and it gained a bonus to damage projection and application so I didn't see a need to give it even more buffs. I don't think of it as a ship that ought to be running medium sized mods in all its high slots. All that said, I'll have another look.
So.. you don't expect the Ishtar, a Heavy Assault Cruiser, to use Cruiser sized Modules?
Why is it constantly Gallente, and Drone Ships, that get random gimping?
If you "balanced" any of the other HACs around using Frigate modules people would laugh.
Wait, people ARE laughing at the Ishtar changes!
|

Ivol Kishtani
Republic University Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 15:04:00 -
[248] - Quote
David Kir wrote:Ivol Kishtani wrote:Does anyone use the Muninn as a long range platform? I would think a 4th mid would be more useful than an additional low. It's often used in armor alpha gangs, and quite effectively so. The extra low gives it that little bit of tank or damage it needs. BL Muninn+Huginn gangs are infamous.
BL Muninn gangs are shield not armor. |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
10871
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 15:05:00 -
[249] - Quote
David Kir wrote:Voith wrote:riando wrote:Guys, I hope you're joking, " Vaga anyway as a close range active brawler" Or you know nothing about vaga, or ... i hope you're joking, vaga its a kite long range ship! It has not slots from active tank! So, ideal would be maximize bonus for tracking&faloff. And nothing new not need!
Holy **** people. The vaga got nothing but buffs. It's called an ASB. Look it up, fit one, experience Godmode on Vaga. It did get a minor speed nerf.
But it got a major tank buff. And although it lost some of it's range control ability, it's still easily the fastest cruiser hull other than the egregious Cynabal.
1 Kings 12:11
|

Harvey James
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
296
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 15:05:00 -
[250] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:CCP Rise wrote: I think the Cerberus is going to be really powerful. It can now do the extremely long range thing with HML as well as added capacity to be an amazing HAM skirmisher.
"Amazing" is exactly the right word.
sarcasm malcanis or expressing that HAMS range is still insanely high atm Tech 3's need to be multi role ships not cruiser hulls with battleship tank and insane resists ABC's are clearly T2 in all but name AB's need a buff-á like a big mass reduction ... module tiercide FTW role based instead of tiers please. |
|

TrouserDeagle
Beyond Divinity Inc Shadow Cartel
277
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 15:05:00 -
[251] - Quote
Lol @ all these wormhole guys thinking T3s don't need to be massively nerfed/deleted entirely |

JerseyBOI 2
Pod Liberation Authority HYDRA RELOADED
4
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 15:06:00 -
[252] - Quote
IN THE ISHTAR you seriously you really gonna be like "oh there's that talos lemme drop heavies on him" please its a joke needs sentry bonus or ship is not viable in any other form except ahac and even then its better with sentries |

David Kir
Tailender
53
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 15:06:00 -
[253] - Quote
Lixia Saran wrote:Malcanis wrote:Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:Omnathious Deninard wrote:This worries me for the T3 balance, many of these ships cant compete with the Navy balance pass. Will this mean T3 ships will be worse than T1? Yup. All hail the great "rebalance". Nothing wrong with paying 400 M for a hull and subssytems, plus risk 3-5 days SP every time you fly it, for the privilege of gutting the rigs every time you want to change its role. Yes, will be doing that instead of buying 20 T1 cruiser hulls that outperform the T2 and T3 equivalent. Agreed entirely. The mob hunger for T3 nerfs risks doing real damage to the game. Agreed here as well. I can barely see the justification of flying a vaga over a SFI (granted one's a shield the other's mostly an armor ship) because of the price difference vs the 'gain' in power.
This. 400 mil (for the unfitted ship) and 3 days of training are enough to justify their existence in the current form. Just rebalance the Accelerated Ejection Bay, and you'll have fixed the major source of imbalance.
|

Harvey James
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
297
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 15:06:00 -
[254] - Quote
Gripen wrote:Oh... once again this stupid MWD signature bonus which makes choosing between MWD and AB even more no-brainer decision. Instead of adding choices you remove them from the game again and again. CCP Rise wrote:... afterburner variations that are already very strong ... I must confess, that I haven't been active for last year but isn't ABHACs just one trick pony against incompetent foes who fail at trivial thing of providing webbing support and keeping it alive and this format popularity sharply declined after short initial spark of novelty? Am I wrong here?
maybe if they buffed AB's it would be a more genuine choice Tech 3's need to be multi role ships not cruiser hulls with battleship tank and insane resists ABC's are clearly T2 in all but name AB's need a buff-á like a big mass reduction ... module tiercide FTW role based instead of tiers please. |

Pesadel0
the muppets DARKNESS.
75
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 15:06:00 -
[255] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:David Kir wrote:Voith wrote:riando wrote:Guys, I hope you're joking, " Vaga anyway as a close range active brawler" Or you know nothing about vaga, or ... i hope you're joking, vaga its a kite long range ship! It has not slots from active tank! So, ideal would be maximize bonus for tracking&faloff. And nothing new not need!
Holy **** people. The vaga got nothing but buffs. It's called an ASB. Look it up, fit one, experience Godmode on Vaga. It did get a minor speed nerf. But it got a major tank buff. And although it lost some of it's range control ability, it's still easily the fastest cruiser hull other than the egregious Cynabal.
SO why take a vaga when you can take a sfi? |

Capqu
Love Squad
142
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 15:07:00 -
[256] - Quote
CCP Rise wrote: I think the Cerberus is going to be really powerful. It can now do the extremely long range thing with HML as well as added capacity to be an amazing HAM skirmisher. The role bonus means it has a lot of added survivability while it establishes or maintains range for both roles.
the fact that you don't even mention rlml when talking about the cerb shows just how out of touch these changes really are. hmls are garbage, there is no point in using them instead of rapid lights unless you force it by making extremely specific, narrow ship bonuses that only affect one and not the other. that's a pretty big hint of awful design
http://pizza.eve-kill.net |

David Kir
Tailender
53
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 15:08:00 -
[257] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:David Kir wrote:Voith wrote:riando wrote:Guys, I hope you're joking, " Vaga anyway as a close range active brawler" Or you know nothing about vaga, or ... i hope you're joking, vaga its a kite long range ship! It has not slots from active tank! So, ideal would be maximize bonus for tracking&faloff. And nothing new not need!
Holy **** people. The vaga got nothing but buffs. It's called an ASB. Look it up, fit one, experience Godmode on Vaga. It did get a minor speed nerf. But it got a major tank buff. And although it lost some of it's range control ability, it's still easily the fastest cruiser hull other than the egregious Cynabal.
I know, it was just to point out that it did get ONE nerf. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
15605
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 15:09:00 -
[258] - Quote
CCP Rise wrote:I'll look at the Ishtar fitting. To me it seems like one of the stronger HACs already and it gained a bonus to damage projection and application so I didn't see a need to give it even more buffs. I don't think of it as a ship that ought to be running medium sized mods in all its high slots. All that said, I'll have another look. The problem is that the Ishtar has problem running S-sized mods in its high slots, to say nothing about any kind of highslot drone mod or remote support mod. Giving it a proper amount of CPU is not so much a buff as it is a balancing of the ship. The new drone mods (and especially their T2 variants) have already ruled out any kind of highslot extravaganza, and even with the old T1 mods, you were always at the very edge of what the CPU would allowGǪ
GǪwith small guns fitted. By all means, keep the CPU limited, but then do something that lets it actually fit the modules that are in line with the ship's main purpose. If that means going outside of the ship balancing act and changing the drone mods, or if it means giving the ship a fitting bonus doesn't particularly matter (to meGǪ Maximus Andendare disagrees). What matters is that everything you want to fit on an Ishtar eats CPU like crazy before you even get to such extravagances as turrets. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: newbie skill plan 2.0. |

Omnathious Deninard
Novis Initiis
1275
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 15:09:00 -
[259] - Quote
It would be nice to do something interesting like a +100% velocity bonus to Afterburners, instead of the MWD sig reduction bonus. Ideas for Drone ImprovementTwitter Account-á @Omnathious |

Blodhgarm Dethahal
Transcendent Sedition Dustm3n
14
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 15:09:00 -
[260] - Quote
Just 2 things..
One.. On the Sacrilidge.. PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE get rid of the utility high slot for a 6th low, I want this thing to be a tanking machine (or fit more DPS, whichever one comes first). It would vastly help with its brawling capibility I think.
Two.. Tracking Bonus would be nice on the Diemos instea of MWD bonus. -Bl+¦d
Wormholes are the best Space.. |
|

The Djego
Hellequin Inc. Mean Coalition
126
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 15:10:00 -
[261] - Quote
CCP Rise wrote:
While the Sacrilege didn't gain bonuses or slot changes, the added PG and added drone bay push it over the edge I think it would become a solid heavy brawler with a lot of utility. I spent some time trying to find a 4th bonus that fits better than the cap recharge bonus but it's actually very difficult. I think keeping its character as a really sturdy bruiser seems more interesting than anything else I've come across, but I'll keep watching feedback on this. Its really important to me that this both useful and fun.
How about limiting the damage bonus just to HAMs and give it a 20% per level velocity for HAMs, so it simply works like the SAC before the HAM range nerf as heavy tanked medium range missile platform with up to 60km range? It doesn't need more drones. Another launcher or a little bit higher damage bonus would be more helpful(because of the limited low slots) HACs are not primary brawling ships and the sac overlapping in the brawling role with HAM Drake is what makes it so bad. Improve discharge rigging: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=246166&find=unread
|

TrouserDeagle
Beyond Divinity Inc Shadow Cartel
278
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 15:11:00 -
[262] - Quote
Capqu wrote:CCP Rise wrote: I think the Cerberus is going to be really powerful. It can now do the extremely long range thing with HML as well as added capacity to be an amazing HAM skirmisher. The role bonus means it has a lot of added survivability while it establishes or maintains range for both roles.
the fact that you don't even mention rlml when talking about the cerb shows just how out of touch these changes really are. hmls are garbage, there is no point in using them instead of rapid lights unless you force it by making extremely specific, narrow ship bonuses that only affect one and not the other. that's a pretty big hint of awful design
If they thought HMLs were garbage, they'd probably be fixing HMLs, rather than handing out RLML bonuses. |

Capqu
Love Squad
142
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 15:12:00 -
[263] - Quote
TrouserDeagle wrote:Capqu wrote:CCP Rise wrote: I think the Cerberus is going to be really powerful. It can now do the extremely long range thing with HML as well as added capacity to be an amazing HAM skirmisher. The role bonus means it has a lot of added survivability while it establishes or maintains range for both roles.
the fact that you don't even mention rlml when talking about the cerb shows just how out of touch these changes really are. hmls are garbage, there is no point in using them instead of rapid lights unless you force it by making extremely specific, narrow ship bonuses that only affect one and not the other. that's a pretty big hint of awful design If they thought HMLs were garbage, they'd probably be fixing HMLs, rather than handing out RLML bonuses.
i'm not saying they think they are garbage, they clearly think they're fine because rise thinks they are worth using ever
which they aren't http://pizza.eve-kill.net |

Harvey James
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
297
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 15:12:00 -
[264] - Quote
CCP RISE
I'm getting the impression here that people don't want more tank they want more options like... dps and speed, projection, tracking, armour tanking being viable without becoming unable to fit things like guns etc... more fitting ability like cpu.. and more interesting bonuses.
Bottom line here is brawling HACS aren't a great role because other ships do it better like bc's navy bc's T3's etc...
MWD bonus fits with ships that kite like a vaga, HAM cerberus .. but these need speed buffs too work. Also sort out the strange resistances they should be more omni rather than ranging from 90% -0%
Tech 3's need to be multi role ships not cruiser hulls with battleship tank and insane resists ABC's are clearly T2 in all but name AB's need a buff-á like a big mass reduction ... module tiercide FTW role based instead of tiers please. |

darius mclever
53
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 15:13:00 -
[265] - Quote
Esharan wrote:Hi Rise,
I'm not important, but I fly a lot of Vagabonds and have for years.
I think the shield boost bonus is...just like totally useless. I mean its cool you added the speed bonus to the base stats; but the % of people that are going to plop a SB on a vagabond is so small because it's gonna lose its cap too fast with MWD/Shield Booster and lets face it, the Vagabond is a kiter.
Isn't there anything else you could slap on it? Tracking? ROF? even additional sig reduction like 4% per level so the Vaga has a real small signature radius - like frigate sized..idk.
The SB bonus just seems like an enormous waste of space.
Even with ASBs? |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
10871
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 15:15:00 -
[266] - Quote
Harvey James wrote:Malcanis wrote:CCP Rise wrote: I think the Cerberus is going to be really powerful. It can now do the extremely long range thing with HML as well as added capacity to be an amazing HAM skirmisher.
"Amazing" is exactly the right word. sarcasm malcanis or expressing that HAMS range is still insanely high atm
I'll be amazed if people use the cerb as a skirmisher.
Well, to be fair they'll probably use it once, to try it out, but I'll be amazed if they repeat the attempt, because it's too slow to avoid medium tackle and too fragile to tank the DPS when it's inevitably webbed and pointed down while the guys who brought Vagabonds trololol away, enjoying their 700m/s speed avantage and tanking bonus.
It's going to make for a nice cheap alternative to the Tengu for a guristas/serp missile ratter for people who don't live in space restful enough to use Ravens, so that's something.
1 Kings 12:11
|
|

CCP Rise
C C P C C P Alliance
1667

|
Posted - 2013.07.18 15:16:00 -
[267] - Quote
Capqu, so aggressive =/
I did forget to mention in last post that I think adding RLML to Cerb makes sense to me. |
|

TheButcherPete
The James Gang SpaceMonkey's Alliance
300
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 15:17:00 -
[268] - Quote
Using HMLs to snipe is kind of silly... THE KING OF EVE RADIO
ElQuirko is my son |
|

CCP Rise
C C P C C P Alliance
1667

|
Posted - 2013.07.18 15:17:00 -
[269] - Quote
Quote:I'll be amazed if people use the cerb as a skirmisher.
I think you're super wrong here. We will have to see I guess. |
|

Capqu
Love Squad
143
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 15:19:00 -
[270] - Quote
CCP Rise wrote:Capqu, so aggressive =/
I did forget to mention in last post that I think adding RLML to Cerb makes sense to me.
i'm sorry, it was a crime of passion http://pizza.eve-kill.net |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 .. 60 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |