Because you totally are able to say how credible I am :).
Given the continually negative crap you have been posting here along with Baltec1, all crying over how Nullsec is getting nerfed by any change. Without looking at possible positive sides. If no-one uses them, you are deliberately choosing to loose 5%. Rather than try and get your additional 5%.
Stop making up excuses for your own failings.

Whelp, this isn't referring to what I thought it was, as such, some reading needs done.

It gets better, if you have one up then your bounties drop to 80% and it only takes a minute to access and steal the isk. With there only being a handful of people ratting in each system its going to be easy to swipe the isk unless the owners have an alt in a nubship sitting there waiting to hit share the moment anyone enters local which is taking up someone's alt that could have been used for earning more isk.

It gets better than that.

The isk from the deployable?

Is in the form of "tags" in your cargo bay as best as I can tell. So even if you babysit it with a noobship they can just blap him and take it anyway.

I don't even know how you cash those things in. I may have missed it in the dev blog.

I don't even know how you cash those things in. I may have missed it in the dev blog.

Sounds like NPC buy orders in faction navy stations.

So it's not hard enough to live in null, CCP should definitely make it harder.

If nullsec is soooo bad why do vast numbers of players pay the two major powerblocs tons of isk to rent?

how many is "vast numbers"? The whole of null sec was what, 11% of EVE characters and that sov alliannce members AND renters. Renters are not a real signifigant population in EVE. A look at dotlan of renter allainces (like the Goon's "co-prosperity sphere") wiill show you some relaly really small alliances.

It gets better than that.

The isk from the deployable?

Is in the form of "tags" in your cargo bay as best as I can tell. So even if you babysit it with a noobship they can just blap him and take it anyway.

If nullsec is soooo bad why do vast numbers of players pay the two major powerblocs tons of isk to rent?

But....if the space is soooo bad, why are people paying to live there? Why not just stay in hisec?

It's like seeing an apartment building with 100 apartments and 3 of them rented and saying "if this building sucks so much, why are their 3 families in there?" lol.

Northern Associates. - 4859 members
Brothers of Tangra - 5003 members
Greater Western Co-Prosperity Sphere - 2856 members

Those are 3 of the 4 largest alliances in the game. Your analogy just doesn't hold water. Why would 11% of eve choose to live in sov if it was total ****? Objectively, that just doesn't make sense.

Only if you ignore where people put the other 89%, sure.

The problem isn't null sec sucking, it's that the rest of space has been buffed (or in the cas eof wormholes, 'added') while the last null sec buff (system upgrades scheme) was quickly nerfed soon after it's introduction.
....
It's a broken situation, yet some people are in so much denial it's crazy.

Northern Associates. - 4859 members
Brothers of Tangra - 5003 members
Greater Western Co-Prosperity Sphere - 2856 members

Those are 3 of the 4 largest alliances in the game. Your analogy just doesn't hold water. Why would 11% of eve choose to live in sov if it was total ****? Objectively, that just doesn't make sense.

The problem isn't null sec sucking, it's that the rest of space has been buffed ...

i was off today and the family was out at work and school so i spent 4 hours doing SOE missions in Lanngisi, at the end of that I sold a bunch of sister's core probes and bought a plex (rather than wait for that accounts sub to lapse since in 2 weeks). I hate missions but you just can't beat that rate of return except high sec incursions of chaining FW lvl4 missions. If i'd use that same machariel in null sec anoms I might have cleared close to that much isk, but hell, WHY? I didn't even have to glance at local in lanngisi.

It's a broken situation, yet some people are in so much denial it's crazy.

Well, lets actually take a look at the different regions of eve. There are 5 distinct regions: Hi sec, Low Sec, NPC 0.0, Sov, and WH space. If there was an even population distribution, we could expect to see 20% of the population living in each region.

But, an even population distribution is a bit unrealistic. People can be risk averse, people could be inexperienced, people can simply be uninterested in pvp. Fact of the matter is, its unlikely that hi sec will ever have less than 40% or 50% of the general population.

So lets assume, for simplicity, that we have 50% of the eve population to distribute over Low sec, Npc 0.0, Sov, and WH. An even distribution between these more dangerous zones would put the population in each at 12.5%. Current Sov population levels are at 11%? Hmmmm, doesn't look that far off tbh.

Wrong. Facwar (and therefore lowsec isk generation) has undergone at least one high profile nerf in the last two years.

Hisec underwent both the incursion nerf (which was quite significant) and the meta 0 nerf which removed a considerable source of minerals from missions and therefore revenue.

The probing changes didn't do any favors for level 5 lowsec missions and unscannable eccm tengus. Both the probing changes and meta 0 nerfs affected NPC 0.0 income as well, since pirate missions are a significant source of income for those areas.

Just because you are ignorant of nerfs to other types of space does NOT mean they didn't happen. The only one in denial here seems to be you.

SOE nullsec missions pays 50% more LP than those in hisec. And yet you've done them in hisec. Its the question of security, not about nerfing/buffing missions.

This is so ignorant it's not funny anymore. Who in the blue blazes salvages pirate missions? And properly fit T3 are still very hard to scan.

I am making an open offer right now to any and all alliances who hold Sov in null:

If it is so terrible, I will gladly take it off your hands. I will gladly rake in the profits from moon goo, PI, Anoms, Sigs and renters fees while begging for buffs to null and nerfs to every other segment of the game. Not one of you will take me up on the offer. Why? Can't afford it? Don't want to lose out on your passive free income sources of PI and Moon Goo?

You are just complaining about being forced into 10% tidi PVP or being camped by AFK cloakers. You just can't admit it. You want everyone else to suffer with lame mechanics (like AFK cloakers) and fleet battles that take 16 hours for your fast locker to tell your sentries what to do.

Meanwhile, you don't want anything changed with your precious ISK faucets.

Stop the charade. If hi sec is a better place to make ISK (while raking in the ISK profits from your null sources) then maybe we should be looking into making more space like hi sec? It is better by your own declaration. The crying in this thread is by far the most hypocritical garbage I have heard.

It's incredible how some people mistake individual players for the ENTIRE ALLIANCEs they are in lol.

Based on the post count of whines from the nullbears, one could easily assume.