| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .. 107 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 5 post(s) |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
9909
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 22:51:00 -
[1111] - Quote
Doc Severide wrote:Diamond Zerg wrote:Hold on a minute guys, I'm getting a lot of replies about how the hisec PvE population will quit.
To me, this doesn't make much sense. Not much sense to who? It' makes perfect sense. I for one would quit immediately AND Biomass and destroy everything. There would be no coming back...
People said the same thing when they nerfed incursions. High sec will not quit. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
974
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 22:53:00 -
[1112] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Tyberius Franklin wrote:If these are the source complaints than I'd argue the goal of any highsec nerf is flawed. If avenues of making isk only result in no one doing them due to increased risks then increasing null population by nerfing highsec should have a similar effect with a similar end result. We ask for a nerf because our equivalent of level 4 missions, anoms, have been nerfed to the point where it is not worth running them. CCP have stated that they cannot buff them so there is only one option open to us. With this latest nerf to anom income all we are going to see is even more people going to high sec to make more isk for near no risk. Even aside from this nerf, the behavior of the players hasn't and the concentration of activity hasn't been in favor of null for a long time. Not prior to the truesec anom nerfs, not prior to incursions, and likely not prior to a number of income changes before that. The premise of an income differential that doesn't totally break one or more areas of space leading to your intent of keeping people in null to make isk is just something I don't see working.
And regarding the refusal to buff, that's probably a much easier issue to trace the source of. As with a number of other things those who have found a way to take the mechanic for all it's worth, and a more pure isk injection mechanic than the highsec counterparts at that, have cause CCP to start capping reward potentials to the detriment of others who aren't reaching those peaks. |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
9909
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 22:55:00 -
[1113] - Quote
Kimmi Chan wrote:baltec1 wrote:Kimmi Chan wrote:
Well then just give your extra income to a nice charity.
That wont get null players back into null to make their isk. Neither does nerfing income in High Sec. Nerf High Sec all you want. We don't have AFK Cloakers. We don't have to check local and DScan every 15 secs. We don't have to dock every time a neutral comes into system. But you already know that - you live in High Sec. Honestly man, it really would make more sense to lobby to buff those anoms again rather than nerf high sec. I mean i get it, you have to do all that **** I listed above, you should get more. But how much more would make it worth your time and risk to go back and stay back? 150m/hr like Missions? 200m/hr like Incursions? You'd still have to deal with the asshats so it really can never be enough can it?
It was enough before the forsaken nerf. Simple fact is that CCP do not want to turn the taps back on in terms of isk. If high sec had seen the exact same nerfs mirrored that null has seen we wouldn't be in this trouble. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
9909
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 22:57:00 -
[1114] - Quote
Tyberius Franklin wrote: Even aside from this nerf, the behavior of the players hasn't and the concentration of activity hasn't been in favor of null for a long time. Not prior to the truesec anom nerfs, not prior to incursions, and likely not prior to a number of income changes before that. The premise of an income differential that doesn't totally break one or more areas of space leading to your intent of keeping people in null to make isk is just something I don't see working.
And regarding the refusal to buff, that's probably a much easier issue to trace the source of. As with a number of other things those who have found a way to take the mechanic for all it's worth, and a more pure isk injection mechanic than the highsec counterparts at that, have cause CCP to start capping reward potentials to the detriment of others who aren't reaching those peaks.
Stopping mission blitzing would go a long way to bringing back balance without touching the "casuals". Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
710
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 22:58:00 -
[1115] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Kimmi Chan wrote:Neither does nerfing income in High Sec.
Nerf High Sec all you want.
We don't have AFK Cloakers. We don't have to check local and DScan every 15 secs. We don't have to dock every time a neutral comes into system.
But you already know that - you live in High Sec.
Honestly man, it really would make more sense to lobby to buff those anoms again rather than nerf high sec. I mean i get it, you have to do all that **** I listed above, you should get more. But how much more would make it worth your time and risk to go back and stay back?
150m/hr like Missions? 200m/hr like Incursions?
You'd still have to deal with the asshats so it really can never be enough can it?
It was enough before the forsaken nerf. Simple fact is that CCP do not want to turn the taps back on in terms of isk. If high sec had seen the exact same nerfs mirrored that null has seen we wouldn't be in this trouble.
Do you suppose there was a possible reason why they nerf ONLY null at that time and left high sec and lo sec alone? Surely they didn't do it just to be spiteful. Surely they didn't have a high level executive meeting where the tone was a simple, **** Null Sec!" I really have to wonder why they would have taken such an action.
"You should just create one thread and put all of your complaints in it instead of littering the forums with multiple threads." ~CCP Falcon
Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
974
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 22:59:00 -
[1116] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Doc Severide wrote:Diamond Zerg wrote:Hold on a minute guys, I'm getting a lot of replies about how the hisec PvE population will quit.
To me, this doesn't make much sense. Not much sense to who? It' makes perfect sense. I for one would quit immediately AND Biomass and destroy everything. There would be no coming back... People said the same thing when they nerfed incursions. High sec will not quit. Highsec had alternatives when it came to PvE income in that situation. In a case of a blanket nerf to all income streams that wouldn't be the case. How that would end up we can only speculate since it has never happened. Also if the suspicions are true that highsec is really not a place where people live but rather a biproduct of alts and easy isk then we'd likely see some of those accounts reduced for lack of use IF the nerf worked as intended. |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
9909
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 23:01:00 -
[1117] - Quote
Kimmi Chan wrote:
Do you suppose there was a possible reason why they nerf ONLY null at that time and left high sec and lo sec alone? Surely they didn't do it just to be spiteful. Surely they didn't have a high level executive meeting where the tone was a simple, **** Null Sec!" I really have to wonder why they would have taken such an action.
They did it without considering the bigger picture. Just look at this latest plan. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
974
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 23:03:00 -
[1118] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Tyberius Franklin wrote: Even aside from this nerf, the behavior of the players hasn't and the concentration of activity hasn't been in favor of null for a long time. Not prior to the truesec anom nerfs, not prior to incursions, and likely not prior to a number of income changes before that. The premise of an income differential that doesn't totally break one or more areas of space leading to your intent of keeping people in null to make isk is just something I don't see working.
And regarding the refusal to buff, that's probably a much easier issue to trace the source of. As with a number of other things those who have found a way to take the mechanic for all it's worth, and a more pure isk injection mechanic than the highsec counterparts at that, have cause CCP to start capping reward potentials to the detriment of others who aren't reaching those peaks.
Stopping mission blitzing would go a long way to bringing back balance without touching the "casuals". I agree, but fat chance on it happening. Same reason anoms probably won't be revamped from being what IMHO is the worst PvE in the game: no one wants CCP to devote time to fixing what ails it. |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
9909
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 23:04:00 -
[1119] - Quote
Tyberius Franklin wrote: Highsec had alternatives when it came to PvE income in that situation. In a case of a blanket nerf to all income streams that wouldn't be the case. How that would end up we can only speculate since it has never happened. Also if the suspicions are true that highsec is really not a place where people live but rather a biproduct of alts and easy isk then we'd likely see some of those accounts reduced for lack of use IF the nerf worked as intended.
High sec had nothing to match pre nerf incursions. The same people said they were going to quit over the ice changes and the POCO changes. Its nothing but empty threats. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
711
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 23:06:00 -
[1120] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Kimmi Chan wrote:
Do you suppose there was a possible reason why they nerf ONLY null at that time and left high sec and lo sec alone? Surely they didn't do it just to be spiteful. Surely they didn't have a high level executive meeting where the tone was a simple, **** Null Sec!" I really have to wonder why they would have taken such an action.
They did it without considering the bigger picture. Just look at this latest plan.
And by latest plan I assume you are referring to the ESS.
I think you and I can both agree that the ESS is stupid and if it's going to be deployable anywhere it should be deployable everywhere. But we'll leave that discussion on the thread regarding that abomination.
So in the time since the Forsaken Nerf they've had time to evaluate the results of their intervention, the nerf, and have come to the conclusion that you guys still suck and aren't deserving of pre-nerf bounties? I mean they've had time to see the big picture and to perhaps, in hindsight, re-evaluate that nerf and have done what to remedy the "trouble" that null sec is in? "You should just create one thread and put all of your complaints in it instead of littering the forums with multiple threads." ~CCP Falcon
Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |

MatrixSkye Mk2
Republic University Minmatar Republic
714
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 23:11:00 -
[1121] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:MatrixSkye Mk2 wrote:baltec1 wrote:Null has seen nerf after nerf to its income that have only impacted null. Can you list what these "nerfs after nerfs" have been that are exclusive to null alone? Remember: I'm using your own standard here. If a nerf is not exclusive to null then it should not be categorized as a nerf to null. *Forsaken nerf, ended farming via blaster ships. *Anom nerf, CCP wanted us to fight over the "handful of good anom systems" and so, nerfed the vast bulk of systems to work off truesec. At the same time that these nerfs happened high sec income was buffed with the addition of incursions for one and SOE ships (plus more high sec level 4 SOE agents) with the other. Again, using your own standard here:
Forsaken sites are NOT null-sec only sites. This is NOT a null sec nerf. Anom nerfs were not null exlusive to null. Therefore, by your own standard, this is NOT a null sec nerf.
In reference to the hi sec "buffs":
Incursions are not hi sec only, therefore, by your own standard, this is NOT a hi sec buff.
Same with SOE.
So bottom line is, just as you claim hi sec has not been nerfed, neither has null.
|

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
711
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 23:11:00 -
[1122] - Quote
Tyberius Franklin wrote:baltec1 wrote:Tyberius Franklin wrote: Even aside from this nerf, the behavior of the players hasn't and the concentration of activity hasn't been in favor of null for a long time. Not prior to the truesec anom nerfs, not prior to incursions, and likely not prior to a number of income changes before that. The premise of an income differential that doesn't totally break one or more areas of space leading to your intent of keeping people in null to make isk is just something I don't see working.
And regarding the refusal to buff, that's probably a much easier issue to trace the source of. As with a number of other things those who have found a way to take the mechanic for all it's worth, and a more pure isk injection mechanic than the highsec counterparts at that, have cause CCP to start capping reward potentials to the detriment of others who aren't reaching those peaks.
Stopping mission blitzing would go a long way to bringing back balance without touching the "casuals". I agree, but fat chance on it happening. Same reason anoms probably won't be revamped from being what IMHO is the worst PvE in the game: no one wants CCP to devote time to fixing what ails it.
I also agree with the bolded Baltec quote.
"You should just create one thread and put all of your complaints in it instead of littering the forums with multiple threads." ~CCP Falcon
Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
9909
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 23:12:00 -
[1123] - Quote
Kimmi Chan wrote:
And by latest plan I assume you are referring to the ESS.
I think you and I can both agree that the ESS is stupid and if it's going to be deployable anywhere it should be deployable everywhere. But we'll leave that discussion on the thread regarding that abomination.
So in the time since the Forsaken Nerf they've had time to evaluate the results of their intervention, the nerf, and have come to the conclusion that you guys still suck and aren't deserving of pre-nerf bounties? I mean they've had time to see the big picture and to perhaps, in hindsight, re-evaluate that nerf and have done what to remedy the "trouble" that null sec is in?
We were pointing out that null industry was massively broken 8 years ago. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
974
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 23:15:00 -
[1124] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Tyberius Franklin wrote: Highsec had alternatives when it came to PvE income in that situation. In a case of a blanket nerf to all income streams that wouldn't be the case. How that would end up we can only speculate since it has never happened. Also if the suspicions are true that highsec is really not a place where people live but rather a biproduct of alts and easy isk then we'd likely see some of those accounts reduced for lack of use IF the nerf worked as intended.
High sec had nothing to match pre nerf incursions. The same people said they were going to quit over the ice changes and the POCO changes. Its nothing but empty threats that have been screamed every time someones unbalanced golden goose has been nerfed. You will always have those posts, but, as stated before, none of them represent the holistic nerf of highsec on a magnitude that would result in the positives that people who want such a nerf claim it would result in.
That said, I don't think we've seen the sub data to see if there was any change in subs, however minor it may be, that may have correlated with those changes. |

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
711
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 23:20:00 -
[1125] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Kimmi Chan wrote:
And by latest plan I assume you are referring to the ESS.
I think you and I can both agree that the ESS is stupid and if it's going to be deployable anywhere it should be deployable everywhere. But we'll leave that discussion on the thread regarding that abomination.
So in the time since the Forsaken Nerf they've had time to evaluate the results of their intervention, the nerf, and have come to the conclusion that you guys still suck and aren't deserving of pre-nerf bounties? I mean they've had time to see the big picture and to perhaps, in hindsight, re-evaluate that nerf and have done what to remedy the "trouble" that null sec is in?
We were pointing out that null industry was massively broken 8 years ago.
Thanks for sticking with us Baltec. It looks like a lot of us are ganging up on you and I do appreciate you hanging in there with us. Seriously.
Null industry has been broken forever man. You're not lying. They did implement some improvements though and are there not more on the way?
But there again you run into the issue of the AFK Cloaky *******, the constant DScan local checking, docking when Neut = TRUE.
I think your best course of action is to write up a serious proposal for how to fix Null Industry, work it out with your fellow Null Industrialists. really consider what your vision is and how best to implement it. Leave out any language involving nerfs to other regions as honestly, I think that is unproductive and will only look like brow-beating. Put it in Features and Ideas, link to it in your sig. Hell send me an EveMail about it and I'll put it in my damn signature.
I really enjoy this game brother. And I'm not feeding you a line when I say that I want you to enjoy it too. But we can both make it better without turning it into an Us v. Them thing right?
"You should just create one thread and put all of your complaints in it instead of littering the forums with multiple threads." ~CCP Falcon
Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
9909
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 23:28:00 -
[1126] - Quote
Tyberius Franklin wrote: You will always have those posts, but, as stated before, none of them represent the holistic nerf of highsec on a magnitude that would result in the positives that people who want such a nerf claim it would result in.
That said, I don't think we've seen the sub data to see if there was any change in subs, however minor it may be, that may have correlated with those changes.
The introduction of tracking and stacking penalties didnt hit sub numbers, neither did the beehive nerf or the nano nerf.
After you have seen the amount of big nerfs that bitter vets like me have you soon learn to tell when people are just using hollow threats to try and keep an overpowered toy. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

stoicfaux
3869
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 23:30:00 -
[1127] - Quote
You can nerf high-sec when null-sec industry and trade are viable. Otherwise you're kidding yourself.
WASABI: Warp Acceleration System Ancillary Boost Injected(Gäó)
|

Arsine Mayhem
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
84
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 23:31:00 -
[1128] - Quote
Remove sec status and lets find out. |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
9909
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 23:33:00 -
[1129] - Quote
Kimmi Chan wrote:baltec1 wrote:Kimmi Chan wrote:
And by latest plan I assume you are referring to the ESS.
I think you and I can both agree that the ESS is stupid and if it's going to be deployable anywhere it should be deployable everywhere. But we'll leave that discussion on the thread regarding that abomination.
So in the time since the Forsaken Nerf they've had time to evaluate the results of their intervention, the nerf, and have come to the conclusion that you guys still suck and aren't deserving of pre-nerf bounties? I mean they've had time to see the big picture and to perhaps, in hindsight, re-evaluate that nerf and have done what to remedy the "trouble" that null sec is in?
We were pointing out that null industry was massively broken 8 years ago. Thanks for sticking with us Baltec. It looks like a lot of us are ganging up on you and I do appreciate you hanging in there with us. Seriously. Null industry has been broken forever man. You're not lying. They did implement some improvements though and are there not more on the way? But there again you run into the issue of the AFK Cloaky *******, the constant DScan local checking, docking when Neut = TRUE. I think your best course of action is to write up a serious proposal for how to fix Null Industry, work it out with your fellow Null Industrialists. really consider what your vision is and how best to implement it. Leave out any language involving nerfs to other regions as honestly, I think that is unproductive and will only look like brow-beating. Put it in Features and Ideas, link to it in your sig. Hell send me an EveMail about it and I'll put it in my damn signature. I really enjoy this game brother. And I'm not feeding you a line when I say that I want you to enjoy it too. But we can both make it better without turning it into an Us v. Them thing right?
Unfortunately, nerfs are needed sometimes. In the case of industry, you cannot compete with free so high sec will be having to see charges to use their facilities go up sharply just to get null and WH on an even footing as well as some very big changes in the way outposts and POS work. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
711
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 23:40:00 -
[1130] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Kimmi Chan wrote:baltec1 wrote:Kimmi Chan wrote:
And by latest plan I assume you are referring to the ESS.
I think you and I can both agree that the ESS is stupid and if it's going to be deployable anywhere it should be deployable everywhere. But we'll leave that discussion on the thread regarding that abomination.
So in the time since the Forsaken Nerf they've had time to evaluate the results of their intervention, the nerf, and have come to the conclusion that you guys still suck and aren't deserving of pre-nerf bounties? I mean they've had time to see the big picture and to perhaps, in hindsight, re-evaluate that nerf and have done what to remedy the "trouble" that null sec is in?
We were pointing out that null industry was massively broken 8 years ago. Thanks for sticking with us Baltec. It looks like a lot of us are ganging up on you and I do appreciate you hanging in there with us. Seriously. Null industry has been broken forever man. You're not lying. They did implement some improvements though and are there not more on the way? But there again you run into the issue of the AFK Cloaky *******, the constant DScan local checking, docking when Neut = TRUE. I think your best course of action is to write up a serious proposal for how to fix Null Industry, work it out with your fellow Null Industrialists. really consider what your vision is and how best to implement it. Leave out any language involving nerfs to other regions as honestly, I think that is unproductive and will only look like brow-beating. Put it in Features and Ideas, link to it in your sig. Hell send me an EveMail about it and I'll put it in my damn signature. I really enjoy this game brother. And I'm not feeding you a line when I say that I want you to enjoy it too. But we can both make it better without turning it into an Us v. Them thing right? Unfortunately, nerfs are needed sometimes. In the case of industry, you cannot compete with free so high sec will be having to see charges to use their facilities go up sharply just to get null and WH on an even footing as well as some very big changes in the way outposts and POS work.
So long as those nerfs are not intended to fully cripple highsec industry and exist only to improve industry in Null I am not averse to reading it. My thinking however is that it really isn't a competition is it? Instead of selling officer/faction mods in Jita, sell them in a Null system or better yet put them on contract for the **** you need. Ruby said Tritanium is in short supply and you guys can't seem to get enough of it. If you use the assets that are strictly Null in origin can you not leverage those for what you need?
I'll give you X Tritanium for that Pith-A whatchamacallit.
Seems to me that you are selling short on this **** by selling it in Empire. If people want to fly bling ships, make them come get the **** from you at a higher cost than what you would make in Empire of course, Or those tosser mission runners can just fit T2 and cry about how ****** their fit is unless they go to Null.
Just spit-balling ideas here man.
"You should just create one thread and put all of your complaints in it instead of littering the forums with multiple threads." ~CCP Falcon
Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |

Cipher Jones
The Thomas Edwards Taco Tuesday All Stars
1102
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 23:42:00 -
[1131] - Quote
No **** null has seen nerf after nerf. So has every sector as we mentioned many times.
Grow some balls and move to w-space if you wanna make real money. Accounts may not be used for business purposes. Access to the System and playing EVE is intended for your personal entertainment, enjoyment and recreation, and not for corporate, business, commercial or income-seeking activities.-á |

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
711
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 23:55:00 -
[1132] - Quote
Cipher Jones wrote:No **** null has seen nerf after nerf. So has every sector as we mentioned many times.
Grow some balls and move to w-space if you wanna make real money.
Not empty quoting:
Kimmi Chan wrote:How is it that Null is banging their fists on the table and WH denizens just do their thing without a care for what is happening here? Is W-space any less of a challenge?
"You should just create one thread and put all of your complaints in it instead of littering the forums with multiple threads." ~CCP Falcon
Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
974
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 00:01:00 -
[1133] - Quote
Kimmi Chan wrote: So long as those nerfs are not intended to fully cripple highsec industry and exist only to improve industry in Null I am not averse to reading it. My thinking however is that it really isn't a competition is it? Instead of selling officer/faction mods in Jita, sell them in a Null system or better yet put them on contract for the **** you need. Ruby said Tritanium is in short supply and you guys can't seem to get enough of it. If you use the assets that are strictly Null in origin can you not leverage those for what you need?
I'll give you X Tritanium for that Pith-A whatchamacallit.
Seems to me that you are selling short on this **** by selling it in Empire. If people want to fly bling ships, make them come get the **** from you at a higher cost than what you would make in Empire of course, Or those tosser mission runners can just fit T2 and cry about how ****** their fit is unless they go to Null.
Just spit-balling ideas here man.
From the standpoint of practicality I'd think isk would be the best trade medium in most cases for whatever goods you are trading, even if only because isk is a necessary component of any market transaction.
And regarding not exporting to empire, the bulk of sales you'd likely see are people who will just resell in Jita for a profit, which should have the nullsec population asking, why not just cut out the middle man? Also non-blues being unable to dock in outposts and NBSI make for a hostile market place for outsiders. |

Hasikan Miallok
Republic University Minmatar Republic
181
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 00:02:00 -
[1134] - Quote
If CCP really wanted to get rid of the concentration of players in highsec all they need to do is stop spawning new players in highsec school. People start in high and never get around to leaving.
Just give new players an option of spawning in a losec school in SOV space if they want. Of course the alliances involved will have an interesting problem with awoxxers and spies if they just accept all the newcomers unconditionally.
If nothing else these systems with new SOV space schools will give null alliances something else to squabble over :D |

MatrixSkye Mk2
Republic University Minmatar Republic
714
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 00:16:00 -
[1135] - Quote
Cipher Jones wrote:No **** null has seen nerf after nerf. So has every sector as we mentioned many times. What I find extremely hypocritical is how they callously twist the data in their favor to claim how null sec has seen "nerf after nerf", and then twist the data in the other direction to claim hi sec has never been nerfed. In other words, they use a double standard to make these silly claims.
This is why I don't have much sympathy for them. They tend not to carry weight. They're rather stuffed with a whole lot of biased BS. And it is always the same handful of posters too.
|

Benny Ohu
Chaotic Tranquility Casoff
2234
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 01:54:00 -
[1136] - Quote
Kimmi Chan wrote:So long as those nerfs are not intended to fully cripple highsec industry and exist only to improve industry in Null I am not averse to reading it. unfortunately whatever is said gets a bunch of drips completely missing the point yelling 'you're trying to force us into nullsec', 'you nullbears have just been doing it wrong', 'well stop shooting non-blues who try to go to null', 'nullsec is supposed to be somalia' (lol) etc etc etc |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Academy The ROC
2154
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 02:07:00 -
[1137] - Quote
Benny Ohu wrote:Kimmi Chan wrote:So long as those nerfs are not intended to fully cripple highsec industry and exist only to improve industry in Null I am not averse to reading it. unfortunately whatever is said gets a bunch of drips completely missing the point yelling 'you're trying to force us into nullsec', 'you nullbears have just been doing it wrong', 'well stop shooting non-blues who try to go to null', 'nullsec is supposed to be somalia' (lol) etc etc etc
Pretty much.
Baltec even put it pretty well.
Play long enough, and the screams of "I'll quit!" eventually all start to sound the same. Hollow lies meant to hold onto their golden goose or to try and hold the gameplay of other people hostage.
Even if they're serious, the sheer intellectual dishonesty on display warrants their being disregarded. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á |

Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
953
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 02:08:00 -
[1138] - Quote
Benny Ohu wrote:Kimmi Chan wrote:So long as those nerfs are not intended to fully cripple highsec industry and exist only to improve industry in Null I am not averse to reading it. unfortunately whatever is said gets a bunch of drips completely missing the point yelling 'you're trying to force us into nullsec', 'you nullbears have just been doing it wrong', 'well stop shooting non-blues who try to go to null', 'nullsec is supposed to be somalia' (lol) etc etc etc Mainly it's Nulls own creation though. They have the slots potential easily after the last round of buffs, and the slots are already CHEAPER than high sec once they are built. There is a case for making the initial capital investment cheaper, or stations offer more. There is also a case for ALL Stations/Outposts to have more expensive lines, in order to allow POS manufacturing (Which again, Null Pos's cost less upkeep than High Pos's) to compete with stations. And there is a very good case for getting rid of the stupidly low refining levels, making it just a single basic add on, and making it at least 40% on Amarr stations. Refining is not an entire branch of the game on it's own, and should not be getting put through the same levels of upgrades as the lab slots, offices & industry lines.
But there is not a good case for only high sec having higher costs. There is not a good case for nerfing lvl 4's & incursions when Null Sec is 50% of the entire isk faucets in the game approximately. There is not a good case to nerf concord in any way. These things are designed to simply destroy high. |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Academy The ROC
2154
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 02:11:00 -
[1139] - Quote
Quote:They have the slots potential easily after the last round of buffs
Oh, do they now?
What did we manage to figure out about that, anyway? Wasn't it something like 60 billion over 2 stations and 2 systems just to get the production equivalent to an average highsec station(station, not system)?
I honestly don't remember it, but I do recall that the specifics posted made me laugh so hard I choked. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á |

Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
953
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 02:17:00 -
[1140] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Oh, do they now?
What did we manage to figure out about that, anyway? Wasn't it something like 60 billion over 2 stations and 2 systems just to get the production equivalent to an average highsec station(station, not system)?
I honestly don't remember it, but I do recall that the specifics posted made me laugh so hard I choked.
Actually a single Amarr outpost upgraded is the equivalent of between 6-8 High Sec industrial stations depending exactly how efficiently you make use of the bonus speed on the slots. It was the equivalent of a good industrial hub. Not the best available in high sec, which I agree with you guys the best few high sec systems probably are too good and those individual systems could use a nerf.
But 6-8 stations from a pair of outposts. Capital cost is irrelevant really to industry costs, as when time > infinity, cost > zero for capital investment. So the earlier it's done the earlier it's paid off. And if you try and factor it in, you end up breaking industry five years down the track when it is paid off.
Also, if you bothered reading, you will see I am saying that the refining should be in the same outpost, so 6-8 stations from just one outpost is what I'm suggesting. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .. 107 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |