ESS can't work in high sec due to the inability to defend it from Neuts, where as Null Sec you can shotgun anyone who looks suspicious. Other than that issue, a 25% income boost sounds great.

Most likely CCP would loose a big portion of their revenue which would mean their stock would decrease and it would lead to staff layoffs which would cut the game developement and eventualy it would lead to the point where the game would only be played by few "elite nerds" who like to blow each other up.

So please do remove high sec... I hope it turns out nicely for you.

Most likely CCP would loose a big portion of their revenue which would mean their stock would decrease and it would lead to staff layoffs which would cut the game developement and eventualy it would lead to the point where the game would only be played by few "elite nerds" who like to blow each other up.

So please do remove high sec... I hope it turns out nicely for you.

ie any person playing this game on a character without a massive blatant history of awoxing will have no trouble accessing null, getting themselves half-a-donut sized blue list, and having either CFC, PL or N3 protect them from needing to engage in SOV warfare. .

PFFFno

Just... no lol

That's the single most laughable statement I think Ive ever heard.

I can't possibly imagine - given that I'm perfectly aware of who plays in pblrd, since I'm privvy to the alliance chat, that any person could not find an actively recruiting corp out of the 80+ who would take them and even on the utterly distant chance that someone failed at that, there are other easily located renting alliances equally full of moderate standard corps.

I've got absolutely no idea why you'd even post that dribble.

Why? You WANT the things you prophesised to come true?

Why are you playing if you want the game to fail?

I don't want the game to fail....... it's not something I would want to see

So please do remove high sec... I hope it turns out nicely for you.

Whatever you say Jack, you're the Master Race

Oh dear god... how do people like you even born and survive the childhood.

The percentage cost of acquisition of a sub for a player that subsequently lives in null is smaller, because those players typically have longer lasting subs. This is something CCP has pointed out themselves, and is clearly reflected in all the steps they've taken to make null less exclusive.

[snip]

Personal attacks, nice :) If you could stick to answering the question, that would be great.

I see you must do well communicating with human beings.

Also, I notice you are against the reduction in safety of High Sec in this thread, but for the removal of cloaks as a method for safe transversal of low sec in another thread.

How do you rationalise these two views and the possibility they could be seen as being in direct opposition of each other?

How I communicate is my bussiness and my bussiness alone and if you don't like it then it's one of your problems... again.

I do not need rationalise two seperate points of views from two seperate topics as they are complerely different and that is why there is no point of merging them together into a topic where the question is what would happen if high sec would be nerfed.

So please stay on topic mr I'm better communicator than you

I think you will find the word is "drivel"

And I posted it because its true. None of the groups you have quoted have open recruitment, and they would be mad to, if they did.

Please, you only exist because of the "accords" signed, that is about as exclusive as you can get...

NPC Null - a very small section of Null
B0T/PBLRD - I won't support either
Provi - oh wait, they only exist because others call the shots for them

So where is this "less exclusive Null"?

No it isn't. Its the business of you and those who you communicate with, unless you are of the belief that you say something and that makes it a fact. Is communication a one-way street for you?

Im perplexed why you think these two topics are unconnected. If Hisec were more dangerous, would cloaking ships not be more useful? It is was safer, would that in any way effect your wish to have their effect reduced in lowsec? I can't understand how one would not effect the other.

I have, Im keeping you on topic by asking you not to question my parentage, if thats ok.

Well in your case I see it might best to stay on a one-way street .

Though your name "Candless" kinda says it all

But if you have something you want to talk about lowsec cloaking or other cloaking we can talk about those in another topic cause they don't reflect this topic.

Stay on topic which is What would happen if CCP finally nerfed hisec? and it has nothing to do with your origins.

No dribble was the word I was looking for, I'm a native English speaker, and I am quite capable of selecting the word I want.

I had a casual glance over the recruitment forums, and yes there was a Vale located PBLRD corp recruiting ad on the front page at the time of this post, directly requesting people that want to PVE, and it happens to be a corp I'm familiar with and can vouch for the accuracy of their ad (and no it isn't my corp).

perhaps its easier for me to see that, since I immediately recognise the name of the local corps.

Of course, if you are trying to argue that high sec bounties are too high an isk faucet and should be nerfed....

No, we say that isk earning in empire is too high and should be reduced to below null sec so that there is a reason to go there.

No, we say that isk earning in empire is too high and should be reduced to below null sec so that there is a reason to go there.

Your not even worth an answer after that.

Good day.

Numerous posters have already shown you CCP data showing that it is already higher in null than HS.

Where?

All I have seen is data on isk fausets which is useless for looking into income levels.

Null sec mostly rewards in raw isk while high sec gives most of its reward in LP.

Where?

All I have seen is data on isk fausets which is useless for looking into income levels.

Null sec mostly rewards in raw isk while high sec gives most of its reward in LP.

Hahahahahaha.

This is so untrue it's actually funny.

There's plenty of ways to make income in null, and the highest earning ones do not directly involve any ratting.