Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 28 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |

Anomaly One
163
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 03:29:00 -
[31] - Quote
ESS LESS
I get it, I get it. Never forget. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a8sfaN8zT8E http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5l_ZjVyRxx4 Trust me, I'm an Anomaly. DUST 514 FOR PC |

SmilingVagrant
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2261
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 03:30:00 -
[32] - Quote
Whoops sorry couldn't post again there for a second because my gang was trying to lock a maladiction that has a 1.9 align/warp speed making it entirely untouchable due to 1 second server ticks.
Apparently stuffing sebos in a stilleto till it locks a pod in a second isn't enough. |

Genseric Tollaris
SniggWaffe WAFFLES.
17
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 03:35:00 -
[33] - Quote
SmilingVagrant wrote:Whoops sorry couldn't post again there for a second because my gang was trying to lock a maladiction that has a 1.9 align/warp speed making it entirely untouchable due to 1 second server ticks.
Apparently stuffing sebos in a stilleto till it locks a pod in a second isn't enough.
Then how about you whiny fucks go back to high sec. You'll get the big isk and you can grief the hell out of all the carebears and pubbies and you won't have to worry about interceptors. Seriously. Why do you even null? |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Academy The ROC
2105
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 03:38:00 -
[34] - Quote
Beekeeper Bob wrote:I'm still trying to figure out why suddenly deploy-able structures are suddenly a hot item with CCP. I mean, I realize they have nothing else important to work on....  And we had lots of posts demanding new structures....  How many man hours were invested in all these dumb structures? It's not like Tidi is going to fly in the long run, or the node crashes that happen every time a Super fight unfolds. The Sov system is basically broken, yet CCP seems to be more worried about ship balancing. Who's steering the ship, the hamsters?
I've suspected this for some time, but they flat out can't do a lot of the things that need done at this point.
You know, the whole "The guys who coded the POS system quit and we don't know how to change it" thing. Writ large. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á |

Batelle
Komm susser Tod
1261
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 03:41:00 -
[35] - Quote
Of course they dont like it. It represents a direct nerf to their income and a whole new mechanic for blues to get butthurt at other blues.
Its fantastic. "CCP is changing policy, and has asked that we discontinue the bonus credit program after November 7th. So until then, enjoy a super-bonus of 1B Blink Credit for each 60-day GTC you buy!"
Never forget. |

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
967
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 03:42:00 -
[36] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Beekeeper Bob wrote:I'm still trying to figure out why suddenly deploy-able structures are suddenly a hot item with CCP. I mean, I realize they have nothing else important to work on....  And we had lots of posts demanding new structures....  How many man hours were invested in all these dumb structures? It's not like Tidi is going to fly in the long run, or the node crashes that happen every time a Super fight unfolds. The Sov system is basically broken, yet CCP seems to be more worried about ship balancing. Who's steering the ship, the hamsters? I've suspected this for some time, but they flat out can't do a lot of the things that need done at this point. You know, the whole "The guys who coded the POS system quit and we don't know how to change it" thing. Writ large. I personally wonder if the 2 are related; if the goal for the POS code is to have it simply be replaced at a time when the code behind the mobile structures becomes robust enough to result in a suitable replacement. That could simply mean that the surge of structures is partially an experiment towards this end. |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Academy The ROC
2105
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 03:46:00 -
[37] - Quote
Tyberius Franklin wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Beekeeper Bob wrote:I'm still trying to figure out why suddenly deploy-able structures are suddenly a hot item with CCP. I mean, I realize they have nothing else important to work on....  And we had lots of posts demanding new structures....  How many man hours were invested in all these dumb structures? It's not like Tidi is going to fly in the long run, or the node crashes that happen every time a Super fight unfolds. The Sov system is basically broken, yet CCP seems to be more worried about ship balancing. Who's steering the ship, the hamsters? I've suspected this for some time, but they flat out can't do a lot of the things that need done at this point. You know, the whole "The guys who coded the POS system quit and we don't know how to change it" thing. Writ large. I personally wonder if the 2 are related; if the goal for the POS code is to have it simply be replaced at a time when the code behind the mobile structures becomes robust enough to result in a suitable replacement. That could simply mean that the surge of structures is partially an experiment towards this end.
Damn, now I think I might need a tinfoil hat. You seriously read my freaking mind.
Yeah, that's just about precisely what I think. I think they're testing the waters, so to speak, to try and cut it all out and replace it in one fell swoop.
This behavior pattern has precedence in the way they handled the gate animations, which lends credence to the theory. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á |

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
967
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 03:48:00 -
[38] - Quote
Batelle wrote:Of course they dont like it. It represents a direct nerf to their income and a whole new mechanic for blues to get butthurt at other blues.
Its fantastic. It's an unnecessary risk though in which it's considerably easier to lose more than you stand to gain when you try to take advantage of it. At the very least the amount put at risk should be the same as what you stand to gain and furthermore probably shouldn't be a defacto loss for not participating.
Lore wise it still doesn't make sense to me.
I mean logically you would think concord would be happy capsuleers were roughing up pirates where they live rather than letting them build strength and further disrupt the empires. |

Skill Training Online
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
232
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 03:49:00 -
[39] - Quote
I think the only failing is that it doesn't tax incursion income and it doesn't work in high-sec. Thank You Obama! |

SmilingVagrant
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2269
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 03:51:00 -
[40] - Quote
Genseric Tollaris wrote:SmilingVagrant wrote:Whoops sorry couldn't post again there for a second because my gang was trying to lock a maladiction that has a 1.9 align/warp speed making it entirely untouchable due to 1 second server ticks.
Apparently stuffing sebos in a stilleto till it locks a pod in a second isn't enough. Then how about you whiny fucks go back to high sec. You'll get the big isk and you can grief the hell out of all the carebears and pubbies and you won't have to worry about interceptors. Seriously. Why do you even null?
God yeah your right, we should probably just let the game become so broken no one enjoys playing it, I mean it's only like two point five years till star citizen comes out. I say we get remote doomsdays back too. |
|

Genseric Tollaris
SniggWaffe WAFFLES.
23
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 03:55:00 -
[41] - Quote
SmilingVagrant wrote:Genseric Tollaris wrote:SmilingVagrant wrote:Whoops sorry couldn't post again there for a second because my gang was trying to lock a maladiction that has a 1.9 align/warp speed making it entirely untouchable due to 1 second server ticks.
Apparently stuffing sebos in a stilleto till it locks a pod in a second isn't enough. Then how about you whiny fucks go back to high sec. You'll get the big isk and you can grief the hell out of all the carebears and pubbies and you won't have to worry about interceptors. Seriously. Why do you even null? God yeah your right, we should probably just let the game become so broken no one enjoys playing it, I mean it's only like two point five years till star citizen comes out. I say we get remote doomsdays back too.
I'm sure CCP will fix the horrible and unjust imbalance when they see you vote with your feet and move back to empire. |

SmilingVagrant
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2271
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 03:56:00 -
[42] - Quote
Hey CCP I have this wild idea to make the PVE in your game even more tedious. Replace all bounties with Tags. ALL bounties. Then make it so the tags can only be traded in for raw materials. Which you use to craft your ships yourself. |

SmilingVagrant
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2271
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 03:57:00 -
[43] - Quote
Genseric Tollaris wrote: I'm sure CCP will fix the horrible and unjust imbalance when they see you vote with your feet and move back to empire.
"Move back" implies I've ever spent significant time in empire. |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Academy The ROC
2105
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 03:57:00 -
[44] - Quote
SmilingVagrant wrote:Hey CCP I have this wild idea to make the PVE in your game even more tedious. Replace all bounties with Tags. ALL bounties. Then make it so the tags can only be traded in for raw materials. Which you use to craft your ships yourself.
Heck, why even have money?
Let's get this **** into a barter system. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á |

Genseric Tollaris
SniggWaffe WAFFLES.
23
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 04:04:00 -
[45] - Quote
SmilingVagrant wrote:Genseric Tollaris wrote: I'm sure CCP will fix the horrible and unjust imbalance when they see you vote with your feet and move back to empire.
"Move back" implies I've ever spent significant time in empire.
I apologize for confusing you. I had intended to imply your character was born in high sec, and thus came from high sec. That's how I came to phrase it as 'move back'. I hope that's clear to you. Seriously though, move to high sec. It'll solve all your problems. Carebears to gank, scrubs to duel, pubbies to insult and you'll be swimming in mountains of lvl 4 isk. |

SmilingVagrant
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2271
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 04:05:00 -
[46] - Quote
Why do that when I can just send an alt to highsec and continue to shoot at unimportant recruiting alliance full of pubbie scrublords like yourself? |

Batelle
Komm susser Tod
1262
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 04:05:00 -
[47] - Quote
despite what everyone's saying, there are plenty of dead-end pockets and other places where people already like to rat where you could easily drop one down for a few hours without having it snatched.
As for lengthening the payout period, that might be needed, but people should consider that its balanced against the defenders forming up BEFORE the hostiles enter system. "CCP is changing policy, and has asked that we discontinue the bonus credit program after November 7th. So until then, enjoy a super-bonus of 1B Blink Credit for each 60-day GTC you buy!"
Never forget. |

Genseric Tollaris
SniggWaffe WAFFLES.
23
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 04:08:00 -
[48] - Quote
SmilingVagrant wrote:Why do that when I can just send an alt to highsec and continue to shoot at unimportant recruiting alliance full of pubbie scrublords like yourself?
For the pleasure of doing it with your main of course. And so you don't have to cry all over the forums about how unfair the game is. Change your play style bro, then you won't have to whinge as much. |

SmilingVagrant
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2272
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 04:12:00 -
[49] - Quote
Genseric Tollaris wrote:SmilingVagrant wrote:Why do that when I can just send an alt to highsec and continue to shoot at unimportant recruiting alliance full of pubbie scrublords like yourself? For the pleasure of doing it with your main of course. And so you don't have to cry all over the forums about how unfair the game is. Change your play style bro, then you won't have to whinge as much.
It's not unfair, it's broken. There's a difference. A hotdrop is generally "Unfair" to the recipient of a hotdrop. But it's not broken, it has a counter, and it has inherent risks and rewards. I realize you are dumb so you may not understand the inherent "Risk vs Reward" tenant that is the entire basis for this game and I'd spell it out but I'm honestly pretty lazy. |

Joan Greywind
No Swag Initiative
267
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 04:13:00 -
[50] - Quote
Fix Lag wrote:You know there's a pretty huge issue when
Goonswarm Federation Mordus Angels Fatal Ascension Razor Alliance Li3 Federation Tactical Narcotics Team Space Monkey's Alliance Pandemic Legion Black Legion Nulli Secunda Against All Authorities Darkness of Despair D00M. Northern Coalition. The Initiative. Brothers of Tangra Fidelas Constans Gentleman's Agreement Solar Fleet Circle of Two The Kadeshi Legion of xXDEATHXx Curatores Veritatis Alliance Spaceship Samurai Executive Outcomes
all have managed to agree that the new ESS deployable is really fucking stupid.
S
Oh how terrible, all the big nullsec blobbers agree that actually pvping to keep their ratters income up is a travesty. This is totally unacceptable, I mean do you actually mean that now we can't just dock up? Do you mean now we have to actually start protecting our renters and ratting income, tsk tsk, totally unacceptable.
Anyways the only issue I find with it is the time to steal is very short, 60 secs is way too low, it should at least be 3 mins and 5 mins ideally. Give time for actual ships to warp there.
|
|

trader joes Ichinumi
Straightedge and Compass Industrial The Crimson Tower
13
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 04:14:00 -
[51] - Quote
A flat nerf to null bounties would have been simpler and less annoying. |

SmilingVagrant
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2272
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 04:16:00 -
[52] - Quote
trader joes Ichinumi wrote:A flat nerf to null bounties would have been simpler and less annoying.
I pretty much agree. Allthough CCP has always stated that increased rewards should follow the more risks a player takes (And of course survives). A pure isk faucet like rat bounties was a bad idea from the get go. I rather like what one goon posted which was if you want to reduce faucets and get isk moving around in the economy, change half of the rat bounties into LP and put LP stores in every nullsec station.
But that's a good idea so CCP would never do that. |

Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
2408
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 04:19:00 -
[53] - Quote
Batelle wrote:As for lengthening the payout period, that might be needed, but people should consider that its balanced against the defenders forming up BEFORE the hostiles enter system. So the ESS will be bait for the untouchable AFK cloakers and other nullsec pests. Sounds like the ESS might be quite useful after all.
Oh god. |

Genseric Tollaris
SniggWaffe WAFFLES.
24
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 04:21:00 -
[54] - Quote
SmilingVagrant wrote: It's not unfair, it's broken. There's a difference. A hotdrop is generally "Unfair" to the recipient of a hotdrop. But it's not broken, it has a counter, and it has inherent risks and rewards. I realize you are dumb so you may not understand the inherent "Risk vs Reward" tenant that is the entire basis for this game and I'd spell it out but I'm honestly pretty lazy.
No, please do explain it to me. As though you were explaining it to a child. Explain to me how the ESS is broken and has no counter. Explain to me how it doesn't add to the risk v reward dimension. Explain how it won't be fixed if CCP finds that it really is broken and you're not just a whinging *****.
|

Joan Greywind
No Swag Initiative
269
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 04:21:00 -
[55] - Quote
Riot Girl wrote:Batelle wrote:As for lengthening the payout period, that might be needed, but people should consider that its balanced against the defenders forming up BEFORE the hostiles enter system. So the ESS will be bait for the untouchable AFK cloakers and other nullsec pests. Sounds like the ESS might be quite useful after all.
AFK cloakers are only harmful if they actually decloak. Prepare to start defending your ratting income as should be the case. |

Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
2408
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 04:25:00 -
[56] - Quote
I wonder how long it takes to access the funds from the module. Oh god. |

Pinky Hops
Spartan's DNA
247
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 04:25:00 -
[57] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Quote:incursions and l4's dont generate a ton of isk. Granted, you qualify this statement as "they generate loyalty points instead", but that is still bar none the stupidest thing I have ever heard anyone say on these forums.
what?
so you don't understand the difference between say, a pound of gold, and a wad of cash? you view them as equivalent?
if you mine gold out of the ground - you "create" dollars?.... no - you don't. ...
or are you just being thick on purpose? some sort of troll?
reminds me of this picture:
https://0-media-cdn.foolz.us/ffuuka/board/tg/image/1338/97/1338970066809.png |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Academy The ROC
2105
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 04:26:00 -
[58] - Quote
Riot Girl wrote:I wonder how long it takes to access the funds from the module.
I believe 60 seconds overall. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á |

Unsuccessful At Everything
The Troll Bridge
9239
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 04:27:00 -
[59] - Quote
I look at this as a fantastic buff to cloaky system campers! Now, all I have to do is once in a while, get in range of this thing, and the rest of the time just stay cloaked up... and local will tell them im active and theyll be twice as scared! Actually..scared and PISSED because they'll think im stealing from them too!
But you know guys, we can always make up for this reduction in bounties by increasing highsec ganking.... Not that I really want more competition, but hey, peeps gotta eat. Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings? |

Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
2409
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 04:28:00 -
[60] - Quote
Plenty of time to initiate a fight. Can it be hidden by the d-scan things? Oh god. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 28 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |