| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .. 157 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 25 post(s) |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
7285
|
Posted - 2014.06.19 23:55:00 -
[1081] - Quote
Tyberius Franklin wrote: Lets also not forget that common hauling wisdom prior to this was simply don't haul more than 2x your gank cost.
It was the standard. Past tense. It was the standard until the freighter pilots' whimpering cries reached critical mass to have the devs give them the ability to fit a tank like they claimed they wanted.
Now, we have a point to make. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
Psychotic Monk for CSM9. |

Mallak Azaria
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5248
|
Posted - 2014.06.19 23:56:00 -
[1082] - Quote
Ukucia wrote:The entire point is you don't need to use a hypocritical argument. There's plenty of others.
Tell me what is hypocritical about telling people exactly how they can avoid being my latest victim? This post was lovingly crafted by a member of the Goonwaffe Posting Cabal & proud member of the popular gay hookup site, somethingawful.com |

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
2394
|
Posted - 2014.06.19 23:57:00 -
[1083] - Quote
Ukucia wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Ukucia wrote: If it's the solution you're pushing, it is. You're saying they should go play your way. Just like the "carebear" demanding gankers go do something else is saying you should play their way.
No, it's not, lol. Carebears cry all the time about how they want to get back at gankers. Telling them the way to do it is not forcing them to do anything. It's just answering an open aired question. Granted it's just like a carebear to cry about getting the answer they wanted, but still. Post 1: Carebear: You should play differently. You: How dare you tell me to play differently. Post B: Carebear: Damn gankers You: You should play differently. And if you had read my post and had put actual thought into it, you'd understand that this is absolutely not what's actually happening.
The case of the bottomless dress. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=349499
- Stop staring at them! ;) -
|

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
1208
|
Posted - 2014.06.19 23:59:00 -
[1084] - Quote
Mallak Azaria wrote:Tyberius Franklin wrote:But really what more would rigs have done? Would CODE not have set up it's blockade? Would the GSF/friends not be lending support? I doubt either of those would have played out terribly differently. A good tank options up other options, such as utilising the power of friendship in this single player themepark spaceship game. Ok, that's a non-sequitur at this point since the method of fitting and the number of players involved in hauling have no relation. But if we're going down this path anyways, are your own haulers setting an example by running with 10+ support through highsec to counter potential 80 man gank squads?
Most importantly, why is it so bad to do the smart thing, not tie up a dozen pilots and simply bypass the blockade? Cause it only requires one character? Why should we waste effort? |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
7285
|
Posted - 2014.06.20 00:00:00 -
[1085] - Quote
Ukucia wrote: And if this is so abhorrent, why is telling them to go PVP to fix it ok?
Because that's the answer they solicited, you obtuse lout. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
Psychotic Monk for CSM9. |

Mallak Azaria
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5248
|
Posted - 2014.06.20 00:02:00 -
[1086] - Quote
Tyberius Franklin wrote:Mallak Azaria wrote:Tyberius Franklin wrote:But really what more would rigs have done? Would CODE not have set up it's blockade? Would the GSF/friends not be lending support? I doubt either of those would have played out terribly differently. A good tank options up other options, such as utilising the power of friendship in this single player themepark spaceship game. Ok, that's a non-sequitur at this point since the method of fitting and the number of players involved in hauling have no relation. But if we're going down this path anyways, are your own haulers setting an example by running with 10+ support through highsec to counter potential 80 man gank squads? Most importantly, why is it so bad to do the smart thing, not tie up a dozen pilots and simply bypass the blockade? Cause it only requires one character? Why should we waste effort?
No they run with 1 other guy who webs them in to a 2 second align time like all of the other high-value haulers that don't get ganked. This post was lovingly crafted by a member of the Goonwaffe Posting Cabal & proud member of the popular gay hookup site, somethingawful.com |

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
2394
|
Posted - 2014.06.20 00:03:00 -
[1087] - Quote
Mallak Azaria wrote:Tyberius Franklin wrote:Mallak Azaria wrote:Tyberius Franklin wrote:But really what more would rigs have done? Would CODE not have set up it's blockade? Would the GSF/friends not be lending support? I doubt either of those would have played out terribly differently. A good tank options up other options, such as utilising the power of friendship in this single player themepark spaceship game. Ok, that's a non-sequitur at this point since the method of fitting and the number of players involved in hauling have no relation. But if we're going down this path anyways, are your own haulers setting an example by running with 10+ support through highsec to counter potential 80 man gank squads? Most importantly, why is it so bad to do the smart thing, not tie up a dozen pilots and simply bypass the blockade? Cause it only requires one character? Why should we waste effort? No they run with 1 other guy who webs them in to a 2 second align time like all of the other high-value haulers that don't get ganked. Two seconds in a freighter? :O The case of the bottomless dress. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=349499
- Stop staring at them! ;) -
|

Mallak Azaria
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5248
|
Posted - 2014.06.20 00:03:00 -
[1088] - Quote
Tyberius Franklin wrote:Most importantly, why is it so bad to do the smart thing, not tie up a dozen pilots and simply bypass the blockade? Cause it only requires one character? Why should we waste effort?
This is actually a good question, but I'm not the person you should be directing it towards. I would suggest asking the people who repeatedly smash their faces straight in to our gank squads. This post was lovingly crafted by a member of the Goonwaffe Posting Cabal & proud member of the popular gay hookup site, somethingawful.com |

Mallak Azaria
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5249
|
Posted - 2014.06.20 00:08:00 -
[1089] - Quote
Solecist Project wrote:Mallak Azaria wrote:Tyberius Franklin wrote:Most importantly, why is it so bad to do the smart thing, not tie up a dozen pilots and simply bypass the blockade? Cause it only requires one character? Why should we waste effort? This is actually a good question, but I'm not the person you should be directing it towards. I would suggest asking the people who repeatedly smash their faces straight in to our gank squads. HEY! I just noticed that you changed the angle from the camera to your face slightly! It's ... highly unusual, although it's just a slight change. I like it, though. (: Oh yeah and the coat. Of course. Nice. :)
I changed the facial expression to match my current feelings toward the general playerbase of EVE aswell. This post was lovingly crafted by a member of the Goonwaffe Posting Cabal & proud member of the popular gay hookup site, somethingawful.com |

Sentamon
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
1907
|
Posted - 2014.06.20 00:10:00 -
[1090] - Quote
Mallak Azaria wrote: Maybe they shouldn't have complained about rigs being a ****** choice, considering the significant part of the tank is now in the armour or shield. It takes something like 80 T1 catalysts to kill a triple bulkhead freighter. 80 people. Is it asking too much for the freighter pilot to maybe make some friends in the popular single player themepark game EVE Online?
Or one multiboxer in 12 Battlecruisers or so, and one bump ship. The 80 people is a nice thought. :D ~ Professional Forum Alt -á~ |

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
2396
|
Posted - 2014.06.20 00:11:00 -
[1091] - Quote
Mallak Azaria wrote:I changed the facial expression to match my current feelings toward the general playerbase of EVE aswell. *smiles brightly* Hmmm........ I think, that ............ yes ... I see... :D The case of the bottomless dress. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=349499
- Stop staring at them! ;) -
|

Mallak Azaria
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5249
|
Posted - 2014.06.20 00:11:00 -
[1092] - Quote
Sentamon wrote:Mallak Azaria wrote: Maybe they shouldn't have complained about rigs being a ****** choice, considering the significant part of the tank is now in the armour or shield. It takes something like 80 T1 catalysts to kill a triple bulkhead freighter. 80 people. Is it asking too much for the freighter pilot to maybe make some friends in the popular single player themepark game EVE Online?
Or one multiboxer in 12 Battlecruisers or so, and one bump ship. The 80 people is a nice thought. :D
Or one dual-web Daredevil while rocking intertia stabilizers. This post was lovingly crafted by a member of the Goonwaffe Posting Cabal & proud member of the popular gay hookup site, somethingawful.com |

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
1208
|
Posted - 2014.06.20 00:18:00 -
[1093] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Tyberius Franklin wrote: Lets also not forget that common hauling wisdom prior to this was simply don't haul more than 2x your gank cost.
It was the standard. Past tense. It was the standard until the freighter pilots' whimpering cries reached critical mass to have the devs give them the ability to fit a tank like they claimed they wanted. Now, we have a point to make. I'm not sure what the point they are trying to make is. It's not fit a tank, because those with tanks, both partial and full are being killed. It's not haul reasonable loads because empty freighters are being killed.
I can only guess it's "because we can" for the most part. That said, it wasn't just a matter of adding tank. Not on the part of the request or CCP's response.
Regarding what wisdom was vs is, I doubt there has really been any change save stay out of Aufay. There won't be until 1) bulkheads are proven to be worth fitting for all cargo values by actually useful as a deterrent (not the case in Aufay), and 2) ganking of non-bulkhead fit freighters for that reason and no other becomes significantly more widespread. |

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
2396
|
Posted - 2014.06.20 00:19:00 -
[1094] - Quote
Tyberius Franklin wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Tyberius Franklin wrote: Lets also not forget that common hauling wisdom prior to this was simply don't haul more than 2x your gank cost.
It was the standard. Past tense. It was the standard until the freighter pilots' whimpering cries reached critical mass to have the devs give them the ability to fit a tank like they claimed they wanted. Now, we have a point to make. I'm not sure what the point they are trying to make is. It's not fit a tank, because those with tanks, both partial and full are being killed. It's not haul reasonable loads because empty freighters are being killed. I can only guess it's "because we can" for the most part. That said, it wasn't just a matter of adding tank. Not on the part of the request or CCP's response. Regarding what wisdom was vs is, I doubt there has really been any change save stay out of Aufay. There won't be until 1) bulkheads are proven to be worth fitting for all cargo values by actually useful as a deterrent (not the case in Aufay), and 2) ganking of non-bulkhead fit freighters for that reason and no other becomes significantly more widespread. The freighters are getting ganked mostly for economic reasons.
Only morons think this brings anybody actual e-peen.
Please note that lots of people think it does, including gankers of course. The case of the bottomless dress. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=349499
- Stop staring at them! ;) -
|

Mallak Azaria
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5249
|
Posted - 2014.06.20 00:20:00 -
[1095] - Quote
Tyberius Franklin wrote:I doubt there has really been any change save stay out of Aufay.
Don't let facts get in the way of a good whine. This post was lovingly crafted by a member of the Goonwaffe Posting Cabal & proud member of the popular gay hookup site, somethingawful.com |

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
1208
|
Posted - 2014.06.20 00:26:00 -
[1096] - Quote
Mallak Azaria wrote:No they run with 1 other guy who webs them in to a 2 second align time like all of the other high-value haulers that don't get ganked. As a non freighter pilot I would have thought immediately webbing the ship would have lowered it's agility as well as it's speed making a true 2 second align not quite possible. Or is it that it only needs to alight for 2 sec before the web can effectively sling it into warp?
Genuine question.
|

La Nariz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2524
|
Posted - 2014.06.20 00:32:00 -
[1097] - Quote
Sentamon wrote:Mallak Azaria wrote: Maybe they shouldn't have complained about rigs being a ****** choice, considering the significant part of the tank is now in the armour or shield. It takes something like 80 T1 catalysts to kill a triple bulkhead freighter. 80 people. Is it asking too much for the freighter pilot to maybe make some friends in the popular single player themepark game EVE Online?
Or one multiboxer in 12 Battlecruisers or so, and one bump ship. The 80 people is a nice thought. :D
This isn't the isboxer whining thread.
This thread is garbage thanks to all of the npc alts and we can't have any kind of serious discussion with them here. Support this thread so we can get to the bottom of this freighter problem:
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4603364#post4603364 This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Proof Highsec reward needs to be nerfed: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqC-BTui2uSGdDlxa2dWOG5ieHB0QXBVWW82bGN5TFE&usp=sharing |

Mallak Azaria
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5254
|
Posted - 2014.06.20 00:41:00 -
[1098] - Quote
Tyberius Franklin wrote:Mallak Azaria wrote:No they run with 1 other guy who webs them in to a 2 second align time like all of the other high-value haulers that don't get ganked. As a non freighter pilot I would have thought immediately webbing the ship would have lowered it's agility as well as it's speed making a true 2 second align not quite possible. Or is it that it only needs to alight for 2 sec before the web can effectively sling it into warp? Genuine question.
Pretty much. With effective webber placement getting the webs to land in time is a trivial issue & a freighter moving in such a way is essentially impossible to bump intentionally. This post was lovingly crafted by a member of the Goonwaffe Posting Cabal & proud member of the popular gay hookup site, somethingawful.com |

Voyager Arran
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
316
|
Posted - 2014.06.20 01:05:00 -
[1099] - Quote
Tyberius Franklin wrote:Mallak Azaria wrote:No they run with 1 other guy who webs them in to a 2 second align time like all of the other high-value haulers that don't get ganked. As a non freighter pilot I would have thought immediately webbing the ship would have lowered it's agility as well as it's speed making a true 2 second align not quite possible. Or is it that it only needs to alight for 2 sec before the web can effectively sling it into warp? Genuine question. Edit: And youtube has demonstrated the error of my thinking on that front. Interesting.
It's a fun little quirk of mechanics. Being webbed reduces your maximum speed instantaneously and your current speed gradually (assuming you were over your new limit). This means that at the moment a Freighter with any momentum is hit by something like, say, a cheaply fit triple-web Slasher, it is suddenly going well above its new maximum speed and will immediately take off into warp.
The Freighter also needs to be aligned in its direction of warp, but a ship jumping through a gate has no preexisting velocity vector to override.
This is also why you don't web things trying to warp out before someone has pointed them. |

DrysonBennington
Aliastra Gallente Federation
138
|
Posted - 2014.06.20 01:53:00 -
[1100] - Quote
Quote:Sent: 2014.06.19 00:55 To: The Conference Elite, Capt Starfox, James 315, Khoda Khan,
Greetings o/
Starting Sunday (possibly monday) 2100 Eve Time, we are going to be striking the capital of the Bot-Aspirant Freighters that think they are safe autopiloting through Uedama.
This will be a very large hotspot of Activity (white knights/fanboys etc)
However I believe we can get some seriously sick kills every 15 minutes.
If you havent trained for a T2 Brutix.
Train for the T2 Brutix.
This is a mandatory CTA. If you are online you are in this fleet.
Do Not Autopilot through Uedama or the surrounding systems.
If you are piloting through this system don't be arrogant or stupid otherwise CODE will gank your freighter or orca. Interested in fighting against CODE?
Contact me in game.
Genesia 1:1.1 and the vile and wretched who make spoils unto others calling theirselves saviors from the chaos that they create will burn at the sounds of a million hand claps and the recoil of the blaster, launcher, cannon and laser from those of the Protectorate Rangers.
In time CODE will burn to nothing more than an ember of each pilots former self as each CODE member tries to remember when they were young and new in their Capsule and everything was on the horizon. They will burn in the knowledge of their knowing that they can never go back to the solstice, to their havens of freedom that they enjoyed before they became....CODE. |

Loraine Gess
Confedeferate Union of Tax Legalists
402
|
Posted - 2014.06.20 02:16:00 -
[1101] - Quote
DrysonBennington wrote:Quote:Sent: 2014.06.19 00:55 To: The Conference Elite, Capt Starfox, James 315, Khoda Khan,
Greetings o/
Starting Sunday (possibly monday) 2100 Eve Time, we are going to be striking the capital of the Bot-Aspirant Freighters that think they are safe autopiloting through Uedama.
This will be a very large hotspot of Activity (white knights/fanboys etc)
However I believe we can get some seriously sick kills every 15 minutes.
If you havent trained for a T2 Brutix.
Train for the T2 Brutix.
This is a mandatory CTA. If you are online you are in this fleet. Do Not Autopilot through Uedama or the surrounding systems. If you are piloting through this system don't be arrogant or stupid otherwise CODE will gank your freighter or orca. Interested in fighting against CODE? Contact me in game. Genesia 1:1.1 and the vile and wretched who make spoils unto others calling theirselves saviors from the chaos that they create will burn at the sounds of a million hand claps and the recoil of the blaster, launcher, cannon and laser from those of the Protectorate Rangers. In time CODE will burn to nothing more than an ember of each pilots former self as each CODE member tries to remember when they were young and new in their Capsule and everything was on the horizon. They will burn in the knowledge of their knowing that they can never go back to the solstice, to their havens of freedom that they enjoyed before they became....CODE.
How many years before that happens? Cause "CODE" has been around for a while.
|

Goddess Purelight
Suhail Holdings
0
|
Posted - 2014.06.20 03:02:00 -
[1102] - Quote
I didn't read all the posts forgive me...
1. Why not use the Frogs to move stuff. (They do great work, so you don't have to) 2. Why not use a scout to make sure your not going to get ganked 3. Why not just pay the code (that might not have helped in this case but still) its chump change Ya I know my my writing skills suck.
Ok last thing,
In real life you can get ganked anywhere u go, why not in eve?
Forgive my sucky writing skills will read the rest of posts in bed to nite and may edit this
(TL:DR In real life you can get ganked anywhere u go, why not in eve?) |

Nexus Day
Lustrevik Trade and Travel Bureau
1005
|
Posted - 2014.06.20 03:50:00 -
[1103] - Quote
EvE is for bullies plain and simple, almost no one wants nor do mechanics support fair fights. CCP supports bullying because it is what makes this game "edgy".
Next time you want to complain to CCP about no real growth or half delivered content for the past several years; shut up, go bully someone and enjoy your edgy game. Or become a hypocrite and complain and support that which is preventing the growth of this game. This thread has so much content it may be 'Thread of the Year' and it is only January.
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
22556
|
Posted - 2014.06.20 03:58:00 -
[1104] - Quote
Nexus Day wrote:EvE is for bullies plain and simple, almost no one wants nor do mechanics support fair fights. CCP supports bullying because it is what makes this game "edgy". Plenty of people want GÇ£fairGÇ¥ fights, and there is nothing in the mechanics that prohibit them. They're as supported as all other kinds of fights.
Also, it's interesting that you'd use the word GÇ£supportGÇ¥ to describe the attitude that it is grounds for immediate bans. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Capt Starfox
Northstar Cabal Tactical Narcotics Team
709
|
Posted - 2014.06.20 04:14:00 -
[1105] - Quote
DrysonBennington wrote:Quote:Sent: 2014.06.19 00:55 To: The Conference Elite, Capt Starfox, James 315, Khoda Khan,
Greetings o/
Starting Sunday (possibly monday) 2100 Eve Time, we are going to be striking the capital of the Bot-Aspirant Freighters that think they are safe autopiloting through Uedama.
This will be a very large hotspot of Activity (white knights/fanboys etc)
However I believe we can get some seriously sick kills every 15 minutes.
If you havent trained for a T2 Brutix.
Train for the T2 Brutix.
This is a mandatory CTA. If you are online you are in this fleet. Do Not Autopilot through Uedama or the surrounding systems. If you are piloting through this system don't be arrogant or stupid otherwise CODE will gank your freighter or orca. Interested in fighting against CODE? Contact me in game. Genesia 1:1.1 and the vile and wretched who make spoils unto others calling theirselves saviors from the chaos that they create will burn at the sounds of a million hand claps and the recoil of the blaster, launcher, cannon and laser from those of the Protectorate Rangers. In time CODE will burn to nothing more than an ember of each pilots former self as each CODE member tries to remember when they were young and new in their Capsule and everything was on the horizon. They will burn in the knowledge of their knowing that they can never go back to the solstice, to their havens of freedom that they enjoyed before they became....CODE.
Level Red 5 alert!!!!
e: needed more ! Abandon all hope ye who x up in fleet
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~PsychoticMonkCSM9~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |

loyalanon
The Conference Elite CODE.
293
|
Posted - 2014.06.20 04:29:00 -
[1106] - Quote
DrysonBennington wrote:Quote:Sent: 2014.06.19 00:55 To: The Conference Elite, Capt Starfox, James 315, Khoda Khan,
Greetings o/
Starting Sunday (possibly monday) 2100 Eve Time, we are going to be striking the capital of the Bot-Aspirant Freighters that think they are safe autopiloting through Uedama.
This will be a very large hotspot of Activity (white knights/fanboys etc)
However I believe we can get some seriously sick kills every 15 minutes.
If you havent trained for a T2 Brutix.
Train for the T2 Brutix.
This is a mandatory CTA. If you are online you are in this fleet. Do Not Autopilot through Uedama or the surrounding systems. If you are piloting through this system don't be arrogant or stupid otherwise CODE will gank your freighter or orca. Interested in fighting against CODE? Contact me in game. Genesia 1:1.1 and the vile and wretched who make spoils unto others calling theirselves saviors from the chaos that they create will burn at the sounds of a million hand claps and the recoil of the blaster, launcher, cannon and laser from those of the Protectorate Rangers. In time CODE will burn to nothing more than an ember of each pilots former self as each CODE member tries to remember when they were young and new in their Capsule and everything was on the horizon. They will burn in the knowledge of their knowing that they can never go back to the solstice, to their havens of freedom that they enjoyed before they became....CODE.
Scissor attack technique time?
|

Jethro Winchester
Collapsed Out Overload Everything
4
|
Posted - 2014.06.20 05:52:00 -
[1107] - Quote
Loyalanon is a cunt.
That being said there is absolutely nothing wrong with what he or the rest of CODE does in HS. Ganking is nothing new and HS was never intended to be 100% safe. Aside from the occasional case of bad luck if you're ganked in HS it's your own fault. Use a scout, pay attention to your potentially multi-billion isk ship, and stop asking CCP to idiot-proof the game for you. |

Princess Suicide
The Conference Elite CODE.
0
|
Posted - 2014.06.20 06:45:00 -
[1108] - Quote
Wow man.
Loyal is one of the best FC's in the game. He does everything himself and asks for very little in return. You should be ashamed of yourself for such words.
Also,
Dryson. You fail on forums as much as you fail in game. Thanks for being bad so I can poke fun. |

Dally Lama
Republic University Minmatar Republic
17
|
Posted - 2014.06.20 07:09:00 -
[1109] - Quote
Princess Suicide wrote:Wow man.
Loyal is one of the best FC's in the game. He does everything himself and asks for very little in return. How does being a good FC make you ineligible in being a ****? New Fitting Window | Exact Distances Above 10km | Remove all inactive contacts |

Dave Stark
6391
|
Posted - 2014.06.20 07:11:00 -
[1110] - Quote
i'll admit, i haven't had time to read this thread in the last few days. however, i've got a bit of free time today and i think 40 pages of carebear tears about ganking might be a great way to pass the time.
let me grab some snacks and get comfortable. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .. 157 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |