EVE Search - Awoxing is no more

Check My IP Information

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

Awoxing is no more

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 29 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Destiny Corrupted Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company 2585	Posted - 2015.01.18 15:04:22 - [811] - Quote Tim Timpson wrote: Destiny Corrupted wrote: All of this talk about how CEOs don't recruit noobs because of awoxing completely ignores the fact that CEOs don't recruit noobs at much higher rates because they can be future war spies. Doesn't even begin to compare. Maybe you feel safe talking about hypotheticals, but I actually infiltrate these corporations by the dozen and get hired to protect them sometimes, so I have more than enough practical experience with regard to the matter. I think I heard awoxing being mentioned half a dozen times at most by these people in the last five or six years, but every single one of them make war spying an almost-daily piece of conversation. Spies will always get it. Fact. If you have something that needs to be spied on, a spy will get in. I've never had a corp I've been unable to infiltrate to spy on beyond personal corps full of alts who recruit nobody and generally don't need to be spied on. The best way to deal with spies is by restricting information flow in the first place, recruitment is generally irrelevant once you reach a certain size. You've just done a complete 180. I presented to you an aspect of the game that's responsible for keeping new players out of corporations to a much higher degree than awoxing, and your response is "information management." Holy crap. Tim Timpson wrote: Dave Stark wrote: Tim Timpson wrote: Awoxers will just have to put a bit of effort in. amount of effort put in is irrelevant if the feature is no longer there. Dave, I'm sure you've been here long enough to know what awoxing is. Awoxing does not require corp aggression. What. I wrote some true EVE stories! And no, they're not of the generic "my 0.0 alliance had lots of 0.0 fleets and took a lot of 0.0 space" sort. Check them out here: https://truestories.eveonline.com/users/2074-destiny-corrupted
J'Poll Green Skull LLC 5580	Posted - 2015.01.18 15:04:55 - [812] - Quote Tim Timpson wrote: J'Poll wrote: Get on comms with your recruit and it is actually quite easy to spot a new player from someone who made an alt. By just spotting irregularity in knowledge of game mechanics etc. Lol, because people are incapable of lying. Sure, but it is very very hard to be consistant with your lies if you are pretending to be a new player while you have knowledge about certain mechanics. Someone who is new, isn't fully dedicated skilling into a certain ship + fit for instance. Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy Help channel: Help chat - Reloaded Public roams channels: RvB Ganked / Redemption Road / Spectre Fleet / Bombers bar / The Content Club
J'Poll Green Skull LLC 5581	Posted - 2015.01.18 15:06:21 - [813] - Quote Tim Timpson wrote: I've read your posts and you have barely an understanding of simple mechanics. You struggled to understand how mining yield works, which is probably one of the most basic things to understand. Cause, maybe none of the corp were even remotely interested in mining all together. Cause, nobody with even more then 1 braincell would like to mine in EVE. Hell, I can tell you, I would rather put a gun to my head and pull the trigger then I would ever mine in this game. Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy Help channel: Help chat - Reloaded Public roams channels: RvB Ganked / Redemption Road / Spectre Fleet / Bombers bar / The Content Club
Sol Jing Ko Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation 6	Posted - 2015.01.18 15:06:25 - [814] - Quote /me pulls on J'Poll's shirt. Excuse me, ma'am??
J'Poll Green Skull LLC 5581	Posted - 2015.01.18 15:10:11 - [815] - Quote Tim Timpson wrote: Well apparently it's a bad idea, because new players who stay in NPC corps tend to quit. You might want to have a word with some 7+ year vets that are still in the NPC starter corp. Or with some people in public chat channels that are in the game for at least a year and still in a NPC corp and still happily playing. A player that leaves while in a NPC corp, most likely would have left anyway if they are in a player corp. You do know that a corp isnt' the only way to play together with others. The lack of socializing iwth others doesn't change if they can join "any of those random **** corps that pollute EVE" And this change will NOT change most of the proper corps recruitment policy. Don't expect that RnK or any of the other good corps will suddenly open recruitment to everybody. Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy Help channel: Help chat - Reloaded Public roams channels: RvB Ganked / Redemption Road / Spectre Fleet / Bombers bar / The Content Club**
Tim Timpson Solitude Trading 16	Posted - 2015.01.18 15:13:03 - [816] - Quote J'Poll wrote: A. Yes, it is VERY easy to spot a true new player from a veteran with a new character if you put some effort in it. B. Haha, so an Awoxer that skilled his SP to meet your SP limit, suddenly isn't a issue anymore. So, if I with 50 mil SP apply to a corp, that means I can't ever be an awoxer to your logic. C. It's weird that a trainee corp does work. They can have all the benefit of being in teh corp (just use the alliance chat as a corp chat) without any of the downsides for them being an awoxer. It's not segregating when you do everything as an alliance together. D. It's not we don't recruit you, it's let's give you a trial period before we truely accept you among us. E. Again, please point me to all those corps that don't recruit new players now, but will definately will after this change hits. The majority of the corps that don't recruit new players now, do that cause they don't want to deal with new player teaching. Those that truely want to teach new players in EVE, already do this by letting them in. F. Effectively you are crying your eyes out so much about your inability to protect yourself against an awoxer, that CCP (yet again) gives in to your demands to make EVE Hello Kitty Online more. Personally as I live in low-sec, I don't really give a **** about the change itself. But it just shows that CCP only looks at one thing: How to make EVE completely safe so we can have more of those WoW carebear people like yourself in this game, ruining the game with their feel of entitlement. G. Maybe people's behaviour should change. It's called adaptation to your surroundings. The only people that don't want to change their behaviour, are the ones that cried so much they want absolute safety in high-sec. And from the progression so far, it looks like it will happen. I can already tell the next thing you will cry about, it's either ganking being too easy and/or wardecs should be removed all together. And I wouldn't be half surprised if CCP, yet again will give in to your entitlement. A. Wrong. B. No, that's not what it means at all. But very few awoxers are going to get all the way up to 50m SP just to use a corp aggression awox. Players at that level are going to be robbing you, which is not being removed. C. While a trainee corp does work, it's not particularly fun for the recruit, is not perfectly safe and takes more effort. Generally only alliances will have training corps. A corp outside of an alliance generally won't. And again, you can;t force people to do this, so it still means most people just won't recruit newbies since it's easeir and more effective. D. Which is great sounding to you but sounds lame to the recruit. Mainly because it's lame. E. I'm not going to go back through this thread to give you a list that you can;t be bothered to make. Especially since you supposedly have a list of heaps of corps who currently are awesome and recruit day one newbies, yet you refuse to prove that. F. I'm not crying about anything. I don't need to cry. The change won;t affect me, it;s a change to help newbies, and most importantly, the change is already coming. I've already won by not being against what CCP is doing. Why would I cry about something that is happening which I agree with? G. Well you can't force a behavioural change. Yes, it would be great if people just used the current system and actually recruited noobs and dealt with awoxers in another way. but they don't, so the point is moot. And lol onto the typical "YOU MUST WANT THE WHOLE GAME TO BE SAFE AND EASY!!!". Seriously, stop being terrible. Easy mode awoxing is going. Get over it.
J'Poll Green Skull LLC 5581	Posted - 2015.01.18 15:13:06 - [817] - Quote Destiny Corrupted wrote: Tim Timpson wrote: Destiny Corrupted wrote: All of this talk about how CEOs don't recruit noobs because of awoxing completely ignores the fact that CEOs don't recruit noobs at much higher rates because they can be future war spies. Doesn't even begin to compare. Maybe you feel safe talking about hypotheticals, but I actually infiltrate these corporations by the dozen and get hired to protect them sometimes, so I have more than enough practical experience with regard to the matter. I think I heard awoxing being mentioned half a dozen times at most by these people in the last five or six years, but every single one of them make war spying an almost-daily piece of conversation. Spies will always get it. Fact. If you have something that needs to be spied on, a spy will get in. I've never had a corp I've been unable to infiltrate to spy on beyond personal corps full of alts who recruit nobody and generally don't need to be spied on. The best way to deal with spies is by restricting information flow in the first place, recruitment is generally irrelevant once you reach a certain size. You've just done a complete 180. I presented to you an aspect of the game that's responsible for keeping new players out of corporations to a much higher degree than awoxing, and your response is "information management." Holy crap. Exactly my thought, awoxing is just a tiny share if you compare them with spying and theft. Can you guess what the next 2 logical things are that CCP will delete from the game? Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy Help channel: Help chat - Reloaded Public roams channels: RvB Ganked / Redemption Road / Spectre Fleet / Bombers bar / The Content Club
Tim Timpson Solitude Trading 16	Posted - 2015.01.18 15:15:44 - [818] - Quote J'Poll wrote: Tim Timpson wrote: Well apparently it's a bad idea, because new players who stay in NPC corps tend to quit. You might want to have a word with some 7+ year vets that are still in the NPC starter corp. OK, this is the last time I'm telling you this since you obviously don't get it. Some people doing something doesn't mean others also do that. CCP showed the stats last fanfest that people who don;t interact and stay in NPC corps tend to leave. What's incredibly dumb here is that people like you are complaining over a change that will encourage people to leave NPC corps, and I bet in the same breath you'd complain that people don;t leave NPC corps. Which is it? Do you want people to stay in NPC corps or join player corps and interact with other players?
Solecist Project Weapons of Mass Distraction 19549	Posted - 2015.01.18 15:19:07 - [819] - Quote You people really are a sad bunch of victims. Ralph King-Griffin > ** you sol, years, **ing years since thats happend The Cuppy Cake Song <3 <3 <3 :D :D :D Come along now, come along with me and I'll eeaasee your pain..
Tim Timpson Solitude Trading 16	Posted - 2015.01.18 15:22:29 - [820] - Quote Destiny Corrupted wrote: You've just done a complete 180. I presented to you an aspect of the game that's responsible for keeping new players out of corporations to a much higher degree than awoxing, and your response is "information management." How have I? You stated that spies are ea reason people keep new players out, I pointed out that it's futile to keep people out for that reason since spies will get in regardless. I think you must be struggling with understanding something that has been said there if you somehow think that's a 180. Destiny Corrupted wrote: Tim Timpson wrote: Dave Stark wrote: Tim Timpson wrote: Awoxers will just have to put a bit of effort in. amount of effort put in is irrelevant if the feature is no longer there. Dave, I'm sure you've been here long enough to know what awoxing is. Awoxing does not require corp aggression. What. Do you know what awoxing means? Awoxing is not just shooting another player. Robbing a corp is awoxing for example. The ability to shoot a player in highsec was just a method used by lazy awoxers who couldn't be bothered to put the effort it. Now they will have to.

Tim Timpson Solitude Trading 16	Posted - 2015.01.18 15:23:27 - [821] - Quote J'Poll wrote: Can you guess what the next 2 logical things are that CCP will delete from the game? Hopefully your characters when you inevitably ragequit. Oh what's that? You aren't quitting? I guess CCP have no reason to not go ahead with this change then.
Solecist Project Weapons of Mass Distraction 19549	Posted - 2015.01.18 15:25:16 - [822] - Quote ... May I please remind people of breathing ... ... taking a step back ... ... and realising when they are starting to insta-respond and blindly ragepost. Take at least a minute after reading a post ... ... letting it sink in ... ... before you even start typing out the response. Insta-responding shows pure pattern-based behaviour and comparison of already saved data (one's stupid viewpoint) compared to letting information actually sink in for better processing. Try it. Don't be a machine. Thanks. ... Ralph King-Griffin > ** you sol, years, **ing years since thats happend The Cuppy Cake Song <3 <3 <3 :D :D :D Come along now, come along with me and I'll eeaasee your pain..
Solecist Project Weapons of Mass Distraction 19559	Posted - 2015.01.18 15:25:44 - [823] - Quote ... May I please remind people of breathing ... ... taking a step back ... ... and realising when they are starting to insta-respond and blindly ragepost. Take at least a minute after reading a post ... ... letting it sink in ... ... before you even start typing out the response. Insta-responding shows pure pattern-based behaviour and comparison with already saved data (one's viewpoint) compared to letting information actually sink in for better processing. Try it. Don't be a machine. Thanks. ... Ralph King-Griffin > ** you sol, years, **ing years since thats happend The Cuppy Cake Song <3 <3 <3 :D :D :D Come along now, come along with me and I'll eeaasee your pain..
Tim Timpson Solitude Trading 16	Posted - 2015.01.18 15:25:55 - [824] - Quote J'Poll wrote: Sure, but it is very very hard to be consistant with your lies if you are pretending to be a new player while you have knowledge about certain mechanics. Really? I've never had a problem with it. J'Poll wrote: Someone who is new, isn't fully dedicated skilling into a certain ship + fit for instance. Which is why you don;t do that. Not only do I know how to not be obvious, I have awoxing skills plans set up which were inspired by real newbies actual attempts at skilling and have all sorts of weird methods of skilling. It's even better once they start telling you how to skill up better and you follow their advice.
Solecist Project Weapons of Mass Distraction 19559	Posted - 2015.01.18 15:27:12 - [825] - Quote Tim is a great example of an insta-responder. And he lacks actual believeability. Ralph King-Griffin > ** you sol, years, **ing years since thats happend The Cuppy Cake Song <3 <3 <3 :D :D :D Come along now, come along with me and I'll eeaasee your pain..
J'Poll Green Skull LLC 5581	Posted - 2015.01.18 15:29:18 - [826] - Quote Tim Timpson wrote: A. Wrong. B. No, that's not what it means at all. But very few awoxers are going to get all the way up to 50m SP just to use a corp aggression awox. Players at that level are going to be robbing you, which is not being removed. C. While a trainee corp does work, it's not particularly fun for the recruit, is not perfectly safe and takes more effort. Generally only alliances will have training corps. A corp outside of an alliance generally won't. And again, you can;t force people to do this, so it still means most people just won't recruit newbies since it's easeir and more effective. D. Which is great sounding to you but sounds lame to the recruit. Mainly because it's lame. E. I'm not going to go back through this thread to give you a list that you can;t be bothered to make. Especially since you supposedly have a list of heaps of corps who currently are awesome and recruit day one newbies, yet you refuse to prove that. F. I'm not crying about anything. I don't need to cry. The change won;t affect me, it;s a change to help newbies, and most importantly, the change is already coming. I've already won by not being against what CCP is doing. Why would I cry about something that is happening which I agree with? G. Well you can't force a behavioural change. Yes, it would be great if people just used the current system and actually recruited noobs and dealt with awoxers in another way. but they don't, so the point is moot. And lol onto the typical "YOU MUST WANT THE WHOLE GAME TO BE SAFE AND EASY!!!". Seriously, stop being terrible. Easy mode awoxing is going. Get over it. A. It's only wrong if you are too stupid to spot someone who is lying and pretending to be a new player. You can never hide your knowledge about game mechanics compeletly. B. You would be surprised how many higher skilled people do exactly this. Though I agree, they tend to add theft with it as their main goal. C. So, how is it not fun for the recruit. There is LITTERALLY no difference to what he can do in the trainee corp that he could do in the real corp, other then his corp ticker in space. D. Not if you have a good recruit that really wants to join your corp and if you let him on comms and join all the activities. If they find it lame, then you are not the corp they were looking for. They should join any of the **** random high-sec corps that litter EVE. E. Okay, but only list corps that are good corps, not just random corps in highsec that have NO clue what they are doing. Only list those that are good, know what they are doing, have the logistics etc in place to assist a new player in EVE AND that stated they will immediately change their recruitment policy. F. Hmz, I like the idea...but I'm not affected by it...doesn't compute. How would joining a random ** ran high-sec corp help a new player? Please, enlighten me how a corp that does not know the basic ways of EVE can help a new player. I can say, a ** corp experience for a new player will make them leave just as fast, if not faster. As if that corp is that *, all others will likely be the same anyway. Now at least the corps that DO recruit new players, often do it for the reason to benefit a new player. So, you win by just being a mindless drone always agreeing with what is happening to you. Damn, you must be living in a dictatorship country where free speech isn't allowed. G. Not really. YOu do know by voicing your opinion instead of being mr numbnuts who just agrees with everything, you can make a change. Again, I've said, I'm not against the system. If there are consequences to it too, and the consequences don't have to be huge. Say, like CONCORD is willing to look the other way when you pay then 50mil for a week to shoot some other corp, why not say, sure, you can not shoot each other, for a fee small fee. If a corp has to pay say...50 mil a month...to keep FF off, I'm perfectly fine with the system. Currently there is no real consequence to turn it on, and no benefit of leaving it off (for the vast majority of the high-sec corps). A small fee of 50 mil a month, it doesn't hurt a corp at all, yet they get the benefit of the system. If a corp doesn't want to pay that amount of ISK to make CONCORD pay attention to their members, then CONCORD will go back to their donuts. I'm not against the change, I'm against how they implement it. And yes, now easy mode awoxing is going. Next you want easy mode ganking to be going and then easy mode wardecs should be a thing of the past. * or just another small fee or a tax % Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy Help channel: Help chat - Reloaded Public roams channels: RvB Ganked / Redemption Road / Spectre Fleet / Bombers bar / The Content Club
Tim Timpson Solitude Trading 16	Posted - 2015.01.18 15:37:25 - [827] - Quote J'Poll wrote: Tim Timpson wrote: I've read your posts and you have barely an understanding of simple mechanics. You struggled to understand how mining yield works, which is probably one of the most basic things to understand. Cause, maybe none of the corp were even remotely interested in mining all together. Cause, nobody with even more then 1 braincell would like to mine in EVE. Hell, I can tell you, I would rather put a gun to my head and pull the trigger then I would ever mine in this game. So to be clear, what you're saying is you were arguing a point you had no clue about with a miner who in fact did know what he was talking about, even though it's a very very basic principle? And you're saying that when you were in corps like Borealis Mining Concern, you never picked up basic knowledge on mining? And yet you want us to believe that all the rest of the rubbish you are coming up with now isn't also made up even though you seem to have about the same level of knowledge? J'Poll wrote: ABCDEFG I'm not going to get into a giant alphabetised argument with someone like yourself. I get it, you don't like the change and you will say anything to try to make it sound like it's terrible. The fact is CCP know what they are doing, they've told us about this, had discussions with the CSM and with us, and they've made a decision. The change is coming, so you can either put up with it or quit, it really is that simple. Edit: Oh, and a fee would go against the reason they are making the change. The change is being made so that it is risk and cost free to recruit new players, so I doubt we'll see a fee.
Solops Crendraven Solops Inc 54	Posted - 2015.01.18 15:40:32 - [828] - Quote Well Im glad We are having a Heated Debate About awoxing is no more again! I Agree with the OP it pro bally sucks that it will be harder to awox however it must really really suck being a Traitor Though How can You Awoxers live with yourselves? Check Me Out!!! On Twitch Tv 24/7 enter link description here
Solecist Project Weapons of Mass Distraction 19568	Posted - 2015.01.18 15:42:57 - [829] - Quote Solops Crendraven wrote: Well Im glad We are having a Heated Debate About awoxing is no more again! I Agree with the OP it pro bally sucks that it will be harder to awox however it must really really suck being a Traitor Though How can You Awoxers live with yourselves? I know one of the first generation of awoxxers. He knows no feelings of regrets, as he said himself, but at the same time he has gigantic issues with telling lies. So what he does is simply telling them upfront that he is doing it ... ... and whoever still takes him into the corp can only blame himself. Ralph King-Griffin > ** you sol, years, **ing years since thats happend The Cuppy Cake Song <3 <3 <3 :D :D :D Come along now, come along with me and I'll eeaasee your pain..
J'Poll Green Skull LLC 5584	Posted - 2015.01.18 15:46:18 - [830] - Quote Tim Timpson wrote: And you're saying that when you were in corps like Borealis Mining Concern, you never picked up basic knowledge on mining? And yet you want us to believe that all the rest of the rubbish you are coming up with now isn't also made up even though you seem to have about the same level of knowledge? BOMIC was a mining/mission corp, guess what part I was active in. Quote: Edit: Oh, and a fee would go against the reason they are making the change. The change is being made so that it is risk and cost free to recruit new players, so I doubt we'll see a fee. And the whole less risk for same reward goes against CCP's own risk vs reward policy they always claim to have in high respect. Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy Help channel: Help chat - Reloaded Public roams channels: RvB Ganked / Redemption Road / Spectre Fleet / Bombers bar / The Content Club

J'Poll Green Skull LLC 5584	Posted - 2015.01.18 15:48:04 - [831] - Quote Tim Timpson wrote: J'Poll wrote: ABCDEFG I'm not going to get into a giant alphabetised argument with someone like yourself. I get it, you don't like the change and you will say anything to try to make it sound like it's terrible. The fact is CCP know what they are doing, they've told us about this, had discussions with the CSM and with us, and they've made a decision. The change is coming, so you can either put up with it or quit, it really is that simple. Edit: Oh, and a fee would go against the reason they are making the change. The change is being made so that it is risk and cost free to recruit new players, so I doubt we'll see a fee. Haha, And as usual, you do not quote the part where I clearly state I have no issue with the change itself. You are the person who loves strawmen and goes to the end of the world to manipulate it all to suit you. P.s. show me where they actually had a poll with the entire community, not just ask a small section about their opinion. I never saw any question pointed at me what my opinion is about this. So you whole: They had a discussion with us is false. They had a discussion with a small part of the community. Hmz, last time I checked, CCP also had risk vs reward as one of the highly valued things, and this change will go straight against that thing (it makes it less risky without lowering reward). Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy Help channel: Help chat - Reloaded Public roams channels: RvB Ganked / Redemption Road / Spectre Fleet / Bombers bar / The Content Club
Solecist Project Weapons of Mass Distraction 19589	Posted - 2015.01.18 15:50:15 - [832] - Quote .... No, he's just not properly reading and processing the replies. ... Ralph King-Griffin > ** you sol, years, **ing years since thats happend The Cuppy Cake Song <3 <3 <3 :D :D :D Come along now, come along with me and I'll eeaasee your pain..
Tim Timpson Solitude Trading 16	Posted - 2015.01.18 15:53:32 - [833] - Quote J'Poll wrote: Haha, And as usual, you do not quote the part where I clearly state I have no issue with the change itself. You are the person who loves strawmen and goes to the end of the world to manipulate it all to suit you. I didn't quote any part. An you don have issues with the change, that why you want it to be different. If you had no issues with the change it would be fine as is. Instead you want CCP to take away the reason they are making the change for some punishment you think corps should have to suffer. And again, it's already happening. The time for crying about it is long gone. Either HTFU and deal with it or stop playing.
Dave Stark 7306	Posted - 2015.01.18 15:59:02 - [834] - Quote Tim Timpson wrote: Dave Stark wrote: Tim Timpson wrote: Awoxers will just have to put a bit of effort in. amount of effort put in is irrelevant if the feature is no longer there. Dave, I'm sure you've been here long enough to know what awoxing is. Awoxing does not require corp aggression. yes it does, otherwise it's suicide ganking.
Solecist Project Weapons of Mass Distraction 19591	Posted - 2015.01.18 16:01:11 - [835] - Quote Tim Timpson wrote: And again, it's already happening. The time for crying about it is long gone. Either HTFU and deal with it or stop playing. Edit: and by the way if you're going to keep doing the whole "I know you are so what am I" thing, at least try to make sense with them. Not quoting your post and responding anyway isn't a strawman, it's simply ignoring the fact that you didn't put a tl;dr. I actually didn't read your post because the first 2 lines of tears bored me. I skim read the highlights in a couple of paragraphs. Fun fact: While the time for crying about it is long gone according to him ... ... the time for making everyone know how he thinks about those who "cry about it" ... isn't. No, it's really important to keep on pointlessly talking and talking and talking although he should know that there is no point doing so. Which leads to the one conclusion that all he cares about is being right ... ... and shoving it down the throats of everyone who thinks otherwise. Yeah, no, this person has no conscious thought whatsoever. The fact that he has started editting in more to his replies, because he simply failed to properly reply to the posts at the first time, further shows that he's just a stupid reacting machine and should be rather ignored than responded to. I suggest ignoring him, J'Poll. You are wasting your time and you are constantly at risk of becoming a person like this ... well ... non-human, tbh. Ralph King-Griffin > ** you sol, years, **ing years since thats happend The Cuppy Cake Song <3 <3 <3 :D :D :D Come along now, come along with me and I'll eeaasee your pain..
Tim Timpson Solitude Trading 16	Posted - 2015.01.18 16:01:58 - [836] - Quote Dave Stark wrote: Tim Timpson wrote: Dave Stark wrote: [quote=Tim Timpson]Awoxers will just have to put a bit of effort in. amount of effort put in is irrelevant if the feature is no longer there. Dave, I'm sure you've been here long enough to know what awoxing is. Awoxing does not require corp aggression. Last time I checked, concord doesn;t exist outside of highsec. And awoxing generally refers to joining corps to rob them too, and certainly refers to joining a corp to set them up for your hostile alts.
Syn Shi School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State 82	Posted - 2015.01.18 16:02:25 - [837] - Quote Awoxing will still go on. Killing new players who don't know better will just take a few more steps. 2 different things, the latter keep trying to attach themselves to Awoxing, but we all know better.
J'Poll Green Skull LLC 5586	Posted - 2015.01.18 16:02:30 - [838] - Quote Tim Timpson wrote: J'Poll wrote: Haha, And as usual, you do not quote the part where I clearly state I have no issue with the change itself. You are the person who loves strawmen and goes to the end of the world to manipulate it all to suit you. I didn't quote any part. Yet, the post clearly shows you quoted... Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy Help channel: Help chat - Reloaded Public roams channels: RvB Ganked / Redemption Road / Spectre Fleet / Bombers bar / The Content Club
J'Poll Green Skull LLC 5586	Posted - 2015.01.18 16:03:49 - [839] - Quote Tim Timpson wrote: J'Poll wrote: P.s. show me where they actually had a poll with the entire community, not just ask a small section about their opinion. Lol, show me why they need to. They never have done whole community polls, so why would they do that now?. Uhm, you were the one that claimed they did ask the community in the first place. Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy Help channel: Help chat - Reloaded Public roams channels: RvB Ganked / Redemption Road / Spectre Fleet / Bombers bar / The Content Club
Solecist Project Weapons of Mass Distraction 19591	Posted - 2015.01.18 16:03:56 - [840] - Quote ... And now we see that he added a huge part to his post a bit above, because in his haste he never managed to properly process what he read and thus failed to reply to everything the first time. He just keeps going on insta-responding, because he is blindly angry about how everyone else can be so wrong on the internet and how other people do not share his own viewpoint which is obviously the right one. .... Ralph King-Griffin > ** you sol, years, **ing years since thats happend The Cuppy Cake Song <3 <3 <3 :D :D :D Come along now, come along with me and I'll eeaasee your pain..



Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 29 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.