Im pretty sure that if the MERs continue like this, there will be timers on ratting anoms too.

Im not complaining though. I agree that having such massive isk faucets is bad.

Massive isk faucet? Um.. ratting in several billion isk ships that take years to master just to make 150m an hour is not a faucet. CCP your ******* ******** on this one.

Removed some more offensive and off-topic posts. Please continue to be constructive, guys!

And you don't get a cute gif this time since someone threatened to kill my puppies from the last one.

Guys relax and just spend summer time not for eve. And let CCP care their game...


And for REAL you, CCP intervent in economy by OVERALL nerf carriers and s.carriers. But let's scummers and other **** live =) Nice.
And now Phoenix can solo tank 3 Nyxs. Hooray!

And sun update, yeah it nice at last!

[img]http://web.ccpgamescdn.com/newssystem/media/71813/1/GermanFlag33.png[/img] -á[img]http://cdn1.eveonline.com/community/devblog/FLAG_-_RUSSIAN-33.png[/img]

Hi Space Friends,
Coming with our release on Tuesday, weGÇÖre significantly reducing the damage output of Fighters.

Why:
We are making this change because Carriers & Supercarriers are too strong in PvE, specifically anomaly ratting in Nullsec. As you may have seen in the May Monthly Economy Report, there is a significant upward trend in the Money Supply. This is primarily due to NPC Bounties.

This trend is unsustainable. Having such a large ISK faucet is bad for the economy, and this ISK faucet is concentrated to a relatively small number of players.

We also think that Carriers and Supercarriers are a bit too effective in PvP now. This change will significantly change the PvP balance, but weGÇÖre confident that Carriers and Supercarriers will remain powerful options for PvP.

What:

• Light Fighters (Space Superiority): No Change
• Light Fighters (Attack): 20% reduction to Basic Attack and Heavy Rocket Salvo damage.
• Support Fighters: No Change
• Heavy Fighters (Heavy Attack): 10% reduction to Basic Attack and Torpedo Salvo damage.
• Heavy Fighters (Long Range Attack): 30% reduction to Basic Attack damage.
• Heavy Fighters (Shadow): No Change
• NPCs are 15% more likely to shoot at fighters than they are currently.

We will continue to observe the economy after these changes and will make adjustments as necessary to keep it healthy for all our players.

[img]http://web.ccpgamescdn.com/newssystem/media/71813/1/GermanFlag33.png[/img] -á[img]http://cdn1.eveonline.com/community/devblog/FLAG_-_RUSSIAN-33.png[/img]

Hi Space Friends,
Coming with our release on Tuesday, weGÇÖre significantly reducing the damage output of Fighters.

Why:
We are making this change because Carriers & Supercarriers are too strong in PvE, specifically anomaly ratting in Nullsec. As you may have seen in the May Monthly Economy Report, there is a significant upward trend in the Money Supply. This is primarily due to NPC Bounties.

This trend is unsustainable. Having such a large ISK faucet is bad for the economy, and this ISK faucet is concentrated to a relatively small number of players.

We also think that Carriers and Supercarriers are a bit too effective in PvP now. This change will significantly change the PvP balance, but weGÇÖre confident that Carriers and Supercarriers will remain powerful options for PvP.

What:

• Light Fighters (Space Superiority): No Change
• Light Fighters (Attack): 20% reduction to Basic Attack and Heavy Rocket Salvo damage.
• Support Fighters: No Change
• Heavy Fighters (Heavy Attack): 10% reduction to Basic Attack and Torpedo Salvo damage.
• Heavy Fighters (Long Range Attack): 30% reduction to Basic Attack damage.
• Heavy Fighters (Shadow): No Change
• NPCs are 15% more likely to shoot at fighters than they are currently.

We will continue to observe the economy after these changes and will make adjustments as necessary to keep it healthy for all our players.

Uh...you do realize WH's lost capital escalations? It's completely useless to do them now, we just don't ***** and moan so you probably forgot but it's k. WH's are easier than sitting in null with local and running every time a neut comes in, just commanding fighters around. Yep.

Seriously, you ratting carriers can all rot. There's literally no risk to you in nullsec, if you get caught and die it's 110% your fault.

Removed some more offensive and off-topic posts. Please continue to be constructive, guys!

And you don't get a cute gif this time since someone threatened to kill my puppies from the last one.

[img]http://web.ccpgamescdn.com/newssystem/media/71813/1/GermanFlag33.png[/img] -á[img]http://cdn1.eveonline.com/community/devblog/FLAG_-_RUSSIAN-33.png[/img]

Hi Space Friends,
Coming with our release on Tuesday, weGÇÖre significantly reducing the damage output of Fighters.

Why:
We are making this change because Carriers & Supercarriers are too strong in PvE, specifically anomaly ratting in Nullsec. As you may have seen in the May Monthly Economy Report, there is a significant upward trend in the Money Supply. This is primarily due to NPC Bounties.

This trend is unsustainable. Having such a large ISK faucet is bad for the economy, and this ISK faucet is concentrated to a relatively small number of players.

We also think that Carriers and Supercarriers are a bit too effective in PvP now. This change will significantly change the PvP balance, but weGÇÖre confident that Carriers and Supercarriers will remain powerful options for PvP.

What:

• Light Fighters (Space Superiority): No Change
• Light Fighters (Attack): 20% reduction to Basic Attack and Heavy Rocket Salvo damage.
• Support Fighters: No Change
• Heavy Fighters (Heavy Attack): 10% reduction to Basic Attack and Torpedo Salvo damage.
• Heavy Fighters (Long Range Attack): 30% reduction to Basic Attack damage.
• Heavy Fighters (Shadow): No Change
• NPCs are 15% more likely to shoot at fighters than they are currently.

We will continue to observe the economy after these changes and will make adjustments as necessary to keep it healthy for all our players.

[img]http://web.ccpgamescdn.com/newssystem/media/71813/1/GermanFlag33.png[/img] -á[img]http://cdn1.eveonline.com/community/devblog/FLAG_-_RUSSIAN-33.png[/img]

Hi Space Friends,
Coming with our release on Tuesday, weGÇÖre significantly reducing the damage output of Fighters.

Why:
We are making this change because Carriers & Supercarriers are too strong in PvE, specifically anomaly ratting in Nullsec. As you may have seen in the May Monthly Economy Report, there is a significant upward trend in the Money Supply. This is primarily due to NPC Bounties.

This trend is unsustainable. Having such a large ISK faucet is bad for the economy, and this ISK faucet is concentrated to a relatively small number of players.

We also think that Carriers and Supercarriers are a bit too effective in PvP now. This change will significantly change the PvP balance, but weGÇÖre confident that Carriers and Supercarriers will remain powerful options for PvP.

What:

• Light Fighters (Space Superiority): No Change
• Light Fighters (Attack): 20% reduction to Basic Attack and Heavy Rocket Salvo damage.
• Support Fighters: No Change
• Heavy Fighters (Heavy Attack): 10% reduction to Basic Attack and Torpedo Salvo damage.
• Heavy Fighters (Long Range Attack): 30% reduction to Basic Attack damage.
• Heavy Fighters (Shadow): No Change
• NPCs are 15% more likely to shoot at fighters than they are currently.

We will continue to observe the economy after these changes and will make adjustments as necessary to keep it healthy for all our players.

Uh...you do realize WH's lost capital escalations? It's completely useless to do them now, we just don't ***** and moan so you probably forgot but it's k. WH's are easier than sitting in null with local and running every time a neut comes in, just commanding fighters around. Yep.

Seriously, you ratting carriers can all rot. There's literally no risk to you in nullsec, if you get caught and die it's 110% your fault.

A year ago, we got the long awaited Capital ship changes which finally revitalized the class as a whole. It was obvious that Capital ships were going to be very powerful, both in PVP and PVE. You gave us powerful end game ships to work towards - something worth commitment to Eve. Roughly six months later you did the same thing with the Rorqual. Now, a year after these changes, when most players have finally begun to benefit from them, you reduce the ships back to roughly where they were before.

Maybe that's a good thing in the long run, maybe it's not. Maybe it pisses off so many people who feel that you pulled another bait and switch with training. Maybe it makes Battleships great again. But this is a major change that affects way more than running anomalies.
.....

Or maybe they will do something else and make Eve more interesting. If you pursue this, however, it has to be across the board. Everything has to be finite or people will just shift to continuous PVE in another part of space. Yes, that means the Damsel can only be rescued from Dodixie so many times a day...

Across the board, ISK-generating PVE should be more like wormhole space or Incursions. PVE content eventually depletes. Out of things to do locally? Leave home and go kill some dudes or crab it up some place new.