Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .. 188 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
xlam
|
Posted - 2009.10.19 11:04:00 -
[4171]
Take a beta-version of the program includes new ships and new features in the Dominion, pls :)
|
panomanium
|
Posted - 2009.10.19 11:44:00 -
[4172]
I have some questions about the EFT defence part. What numbers do we put in the fields? Do we put the damage the ship we are facing will do based off the eve-info/shipdb website? Do we put the percent of damage that faction will do like say 50 kin/50 Therm (serpentis)? Just trying to get a very clear picture on my drakes passive tank against each faction. Don't want to go through each ship. Not completely understanding how the numbers are generated to put in there. Thanks!
|
Lilywinter
|
Posted - 2009.10.19 12:56:00 -
[4173]
Cloak offlining is bugged.
EFT says offline cloak remove scan resolution penalty. Fitting screen and game say EFT wrong.
I test and EFT is wrong.
I put prototype cloak on Thrasher and lock sentry gun.
Game target time (i has stopwatch) and fit screen says 3 seconds lock, 632 scan res, no cloak fitted 6 seconds lock, 315 scan res, cloak offline 6 seconds lock, 315 scan res, cloak online and de-active
EFT says 632mm scan res no cloak 316mm scan res cloak 632mm scan res cloak fit and offline <- WRONG
|
Doc Brown
Gallente Angel of War
|
Posted - 2009.10.20 15:49:00 -
[4174]
*chough* iphone/ipod touch port please *chough* _________________________________________________
6 T2 BPO's + 6 Months = ?????? (But I doubt it's good)
|
Intangible Mirage
|
Posted - 2009.10.21 16:07:00 -
[4175]
Just a small request. Under 'File' can we have a 'recent fits' menu that opens to the side with maybe 10 fits we've done last like how many programs now have an 'open recent' function which does the same thing.
|
Bucky O'Hair
Minmatar Brutor tribe
|
Posted - 2009.10.21 16:28:00 -
[4176]
Originally by: Doc Brown *chough* iphone/ipod touch port please *chough*
+1
"Let's Croak Some Toads" |
Arresi
Amarr GTE Limited
|
Posted - 2009.10.22 07:36:00 -
[4177]
Originally by: Bucky O'Hair
Originally by: Doc Brown *chough* iphone/ipod touch port please *chough*
+1
That would be cool, but as a programmer I would know that will take TONS of code and commitment.
|
Allan Atlantica
Gallente
|
Posted - 2009.10.23 15:17:00 -
[4178]
Not sure about the current release, but in the previous release, when importing character data, if Eve Web service is not online, you have to re-enter your user account and API key, the next time you try an import.
Regards,
Allan
|
Allan Atlantica
Gallente
|
Posted - 2009.10.23 15:39:00 -
[4179]
Could someone please explain how the Cap Booster module affects the capacitor balance. In other words, what does cap stable mean when it is only stable when you have a cap booster with certain size charges?
Regards,
Allan
|
Polly Prissypantz
Dingleberry Appreciation Society
|
Posted - 2009.10.25 03:31:00 -
[4180]
Originally by: Allan Atlantica Could someone please explain how the Cap Booster module affects the capacitor balance. In other words, what does cap stable mean when it is only stable when you have a cap booster with certain size charges?
It means exactly that. You're cap stable as long as you have cap charges. If you want to know your cap balance without cap charges, just turn off the cap booster in EFT.
|
|
Furystorm
|
Posted - 2009.10.25 09:30:00 -
[4181]
is 2.11.1 the latest version?
|
Kaivaja
|
Posted - 2009.10.25 11:02:00 -
[4182]
Originally by: Furystorm is 2.11.1 the latest version?
Can you find the very first post of this thread? |
Anselmrt
Darqsyde Exploration Limited Mass - Effect
|
Posted - 2009.10.25 15:13:00 -
[4183]
Just something of note from my experience with this program - couldnt see if anyone has noticed this or if im plainly doing something wrong...
Quite simply, the environmental effects option, albeit it s troke of genius and soemthing i have wanted for a while since moving to w-space appears to give incorrect information (in my experience Pulsar effects, as that it where i am based) particularly concerning Armour resits, and Shield resists. This also calculates an incorrect EHP and def rating, which you can imagine is a pita.
I wonder if i am a) doing seomthing wrong, or b) if its bugged and if so...
Thanks for reading.
~Ansel o7
|
Tiberius Abraxus
Gallente Coterie
|
Posted - 2009.10.26 07:01:00 -
[4184]
Just a small bug: Remote armour repair bonuses to range and capacitor use for the Oneiros and Exequror dont seem to be factored in.
Other than that fantastic application!
|
Zaqar
Pator Tech School
|
Posted - 2009.10.26 10:21:00 -
[4185]
Originally by: Tiberius Abraxus Just a small bug: Remote armour repair bonuses to range and capacitor use for the Oneiros and Exequror dont seem to be factored in.
Looks fine to me - post a sceenshot of your problem.
|
Dipluz
Caldari DEATH'S LEGION
|
Posted - 2009.10.27 14:35:00 -
[4186]
Hey folks, I dont know if this is only me, but is EFT or EVE calculating EFF. HP wrong? beacuse in Eve my phobos with my leadership bonuses "only" having 133k eff.hp (with slaves in my head), but on EFT, with slave set and gang bonuses it says I have 187k eff.hp?
It kinda made me wonder what the hell! my ship is very heavily tanked and I cant imagine it only has 133k hp, some of you guys who had similar experience?
screenshot to show you guys what i mean:
Ingame EFF.HP Ingame EFF.HP
EFT EFF.HP
EFT EFF.HP
Is there some detail ive missed ? or is there something wrong with EFT or is it EVE theres something wrong with.
|
Josorna
|
Posted - 2009.10.27 14:38:00 -
[4187]
This "effective HP" thingy is talked about once at every single page, at least...
But, EFT assumes omnidamage when calculating EHP, Eve assumes the damage your setup is weakest agaisnt.
|
Sea Gate
Caldari Sea Gate Corp
|
Posted - 2009.10.27 20:37:00 -
[4188]
Is there anyway to modify a ships default hp? Would like to get a start on a new mothership fit.
|
Jack Sabastian
|
Posted - 2009.10.28 22:28:00 -
[4189]
Problem with the "Drone Mining Augmentor".
In EFT it calculated the mining drone yield using the stacking penalty for the second and third Drone Mining Augmentors, where as in EVE the stacking penalty is NOT applied. You actualy have to go and mine with a drone for 1 minute as the attributes on a drone don't reflect your bonuses and and ship bonuses.
For Specific numbers with my skills (mining drones 3, Drone interfacing 3) and 3XDrone Mining Augmentor I a Mining Drone I should mine with stacking penalty 34.88 m3/min, which is what EFT says. Without the stacking penalty it should mine 36.73 m3/min which is what I get in EVE
|
Jack Sabastian
|
Posted - 2009.10.28 22:37:00 -
[4190]
Originally by: Lilywinter Cloak offlining is bugged.
EFT says offline cloak remove scan resolution penalty. Fitting screen and game say EFT wrong.
I test and EFT is wrong.
I put prototype cloak on Thrasher and lock sentry gun.
Game target time (i has stopwatch) and fit screen says 3 seconds lock, 632 scan res, no cloak fitted 6 seconds lock, 315 scan res, cloak offline 6 seconds lock, 315 scan res, cloak online and de-active
EFT says 632mm scan res no cloak 316mm scan res cloak 632mm scan res cloak fit and offline <- WRONG
If by online and offline you are talking about the green checkmark that acts as a signal about activated and not activated, in EFT an mod is online when you install it.
In EVE if a module is offline you ship behaves as if it's not there. As a nice glitch with this if offline a huge plate your ship is suddenly more manuverable as it suddenly "losses" the mass of the plate. This can also help you in getting though wormholes as some times a plated ship will be to massive, offline the plate an you can get thorough.
|
|
Zorbeg
|
Posted - 2009.10.29 06:19:00 -
[4191]
Is there a newer (good) version of EFT? I tried 2.91, but it's buggy and doesn't display some modules
|
ZexxxxM
|
Posted - 2009.10.30 21:04:00 -
[4192]
Is it a BUG - or (PBSC problem betwin screen and chair) ...The Drake dosen't accept Large (shield Rigs) "Core Defense Field Purger I" in version 2.11.1, i have a Drake in game and its fit with 3 of them ... version 2.7 accept them ...
Tks for the fantastic ap. Regards.
|
Zaqar
Pator Tech School
|
Posted - 2009.10.30 22:46:00 -
[4193]
Originally by: ZexxxxM Is it a BUG - or (PBSC problem betwin screen and chair) ...The Drake dosen't accept Large (shield Rigs) "Core Defense Field Purger I" in version 2.11.1, i have a Drake in game and its fit with 3 of them ... version 2.7 accept them ...
Tks for the fantastic ap. Regards.
When they introduced the different rig sizes, all existing rigs were converted to large ones. Your Drake has them because they were fitted before that patch. Use mediums in EFT, they are otherwise identical.
|
DeputyFruitfly
|
Posted - 2009.10.31 07:06:00 -
[4194]
Do the Active Shielding and Shield Efficiency ganglinks really not work for capital shield boost/captial shield transport? EFT doesn't show a difference in duration/activation with them fit to a Chimera.
(all level 5 skills, in wing cmdr position, eft 2.11)
|
Vincent Jarjadian
|
Posted - 2009.10.31 10:18:00 -
[4195]
Any chance of SISI based dominion stats for new ships?
|
Kentares Kodiak
|
Posted - 2009.10.31 12:03:00 -
[4196]
Originally by: ZexxxxM Is it a BUG - or (PBSC problem betwin screen and chair) ...The Drake dosen't accept Large (shield Rigs) "Core Defense Field Purger I" in version 2.11.1, i have a Drake in game and its fit with 3 of them ... version 2.7 accept them ...
Tks for the fantastic ap. Regards.
Similar problem with the Hulk. It uses large rigs but EFT says he uses Medium.
|
Vincent Jarjadian
|
Posted - 2009.10.31 14:00:00 -
[4197]
they may be fitted but to be honest rigs are a non issue...
try fitting a new drake and large rigs wont fit, so EFT is correct.
the small/medium/large rigs all have the same effects.
|
Iron Predator
|
Posted - 2009.10.31 23:14:00 -
[4198]
I'm having problems with EFT I have fitted 5 x Heavy missile launchers on to a caracal the cpu says 44 in eft but in game it is 46.75 which stops me fitting them as I'm putting on a tight fit. Just thought I'd highlight it for a fix :)
|
Zaqar
Pator Tech School
|
Posted - 2009.11.01 00:08:00 -
[4199]
Originally by: Kentares Kodiak
Originally by: ZexxxxM Is it a BUG - or (PBSC problem betwin screen and chair) ...The Drake dosen't accept Large (shield Rigs) "Core Defense Field Purger I" in version 2.11.1, i have a Drake in game and its fit with 3 of them ... version 2.7 accept them ...
Tks for the fantastic ap. Regards.
Similar problem with the Hulk. It uses large rigs but EFT says he uses Medium.
It's not a problem. Drakes and Hulks both use medium rigs, in EFT and in-game.
|
Gia Lente
|
Posted - 2009.11.01 15:14:00 -
[4200]
Think I found a bug. I get a higher effective repair rate on a Damnation using an Eos as a squad booster than a Damnation. All V character, all three armor link mods. I would think it should be the other way around.
I get the same results on other ships where I have both of these command ships maxed out. The Eos gives a better effective rep rate than the Damnation.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .. 188 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |