| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 .. 73 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Yaay
Game-Over
The Requiem
   |
Posted - 2008.07.29 18:45:00 -
[1111]
 Originally by: AdmiralFreeman
Originally by: Yaay
my god, 300 people and their 500 alts all voting against, go figure
Think twice before speaking. You can only support the vote with one char per payed account.
and how many people in even have more than one account.
It's the Economy Stupid |
Yaay
Game-Over
The Requiem
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 18:48:00 -
[1112]
Originally by: Jade Constantine
Originally by: Steel Tigeress
Edited by: Steel Tigeress on 29/07/2008 17:04:45
Edited by: Steel Tigeress on 29/07/2008 17:04:13
Originally by: AdmiralFreeman
Originally by: Yaay
my god, 300 people and their 500 alts all voting against, go figure
Think twice before speaking. You can only support the vote with one char per payed account.
I think you'll tend to find the people affected most negatively will also be the most outspoken on issues.... the old business contengent, an unhappy customer will tell 40 people, a happy customer will tell 7
Wrong, the CSM's just have a way of seeing how many accounts accually voted, and not characters.
There is nothing that limits the number of characters you /sign in this thread with. Since there are 3 characters per account, it is perfectly feasable for there to only be 13 pages of actual votes against this nerf.
Judging from the ammount of alts I've spotted where 3 people in a row look the exact same, or 2-3 in a row have the same name with different spellings. I'ld say this thread actually only has around 20 somthing pages of actual votes.
Of course thats going to be exactly the same for the pro nerf thread as well so its something of a null argument.
It's the Economy Stupid |
Tiggi Wrath
Decadence.
RAZOR Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 18:50:00 -
[1113]
against
|
Xrat
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 18:51:00 -
[1114]
against |
DarkMistress IV
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 18:56:00 -
[1115]
against
|
Adrienne Amici
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 18:56:00 -
[1116]
against
|
shanador
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 18:57:00 -
[1117]
against
|
Avon
Caldari
Black Nova Corp
Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 19:04:00 -
[1118]
I was just looking at the names of the people in this thread with a thumbs-up, and I thought I had accidentally fallen in to a macro mining boost thread.
Eve-Online: The Text Adventure |
Gumpy Nighthawk
Octavian Vanguard
RAZOR Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 19:13:00 -
[1119]
I hate the idea, so i'm against it!!
|
Thorek Ironbrow
Caldari
Ironbrow Industries Co.
Soldiers of the Forgotten Abyss
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 19:14:00 -
[1120]
I personally am for, and therefor I shall not tick the box to support. 
____________________________
Originally by: Elirel
this thread is about serious Internet Spaceship stuff.
[/ |
xHomicide
Cutting Edge Incorporated
RAZOR Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 19:26:00 -
[1121]
---
Razor CEI
|
Kelborn Rostu
Decadence.
RAZOR Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 19:27:00 -
[1122]
Against the nanonerf
|
Joe Widowmaker
Quantum Industries
RAZOR Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 19:34:00 -
[1123]
People play like this because it's fun...Take the fun away and people won't play anymore.
|
Avon
Caldari
Black Nova Corp
Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 19:36:00 -
[1124]
Originally by: Joe Widowmaker
People play like this because it's fun...Take the fun away and people won't play anymore.
So people who can't, for whatever reason, play like that aren't entitled to fun?
Nice.
Eve-Online: The Text Adventure |
Calthur
Anal Anomities of Space Hookers
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 19:37:00 -
[1125]
Edited by: Calthur on 29/07/2008 19:37:47
I finish Cruiser V in a few days!! NO WAI!
|
Shurq Ellale
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 19:49:00 -
[1126]
I am pro nerfing nanos generally, but against this nano-nerf. Too heavy-handed for numerous reasons.
For starters, try:
- stacking nanos with ODs and i stabs
- make the polycarbon worse than the nano
- nerf snakes
- nerf gang bonuses (I actually kind of like the bonus to agility idea)
|
Jennice
eXceed Inc.
eXceed.
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 19:51:00 -
[1127]
AGAINST
cuz i just trained nano lol
|
Oritan
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 19:56:00 -
[1128]
Against
|
Sheratos
Beach Boys
BeachBoys
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 19:59:00 -
[1129]
Against |
Damia
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 20:02:00 -
[1130]
Against.
Server speed first, ship speed later.
__________________________________
:Signed: |
Fallorn
GoonFleet
GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 20:17:00 -
[1131]
Voting for this.
Sig removed. If you would like further details please mail [email protected] with a link to your signature. - Elmo Pug
|
Raukho
Industrial Docktors
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 20:21:00 -
[1132]
Roaming in 0.0 will be dead at every fighter bombed bubbled gate camp.
If people spent 1.5 Bill and more on a ship and implants they should be fast.
|
Momochanchan
Hedion University
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 20:21:00 -
[1133]
Girls just want to go fast.
|
Lady Starfire
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 20:22:00 -
[1134]
I have a carrier pilot and as Fun as fighter bombing is I just wanna go fast.
|
Fuzzydice
Octavian Vanguard
RAZOR Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 20:23:00 -
[1135]
Against |
Komoran
Gallente
Most Wanted INC
G00DFELLAS
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 20:24:00 -
[1136]
AGAINST
|
OrcishMonkey
Caldari
Dirt Nap Squad
Dirt Nap Associates
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 20:24:00 -
[1137]
typhoon = fatter then hyperion or baddon LOL
cerb = god
anyways /support
[url=http://killboard.dirtnapsquad.net/?a=pilot_detail&plt_id=47107]
[/url] |
Kahu'mza
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 20:25:00 -
[1138]
Edited by: Kahu''mza on 29/07/2008 20:25:08
Against this nerf |
Morgan La'Chance
Dynamic Reallocation and Logistics
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 20:26:00 -
[1139]
It is too much. Have a look at implants, polycarbs, and stacking, and mess around with speeds and agility if you want, but in its current SiSi edition it is just too much. |
Zirator
Industrial Docktors
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 20:26:00 -
[1140]
I vote against the nerf in it's current form.
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 .. 73 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |