| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 .. 73 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Hareeln
GoonFleet
GoonSwarm
   |
Posted - 2008.07.31 23:13:00 -
[1411]
against |
Freighter Jjoe
|
Posted - 2008.08.01 00:36:00 -
[1412]
I think I will vote with my accounts (against the nerf)
|
Elliott Manchild
omen.
Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2008.08.01 01:09:00 -
[1413]
|
Ephemeron
Retribution Corp.
|
Posted - 2008.08.01 01:41:00 -
[1414]
 Originally by: Avon
Originally by: Ephemeron
Even if this nerf made game balance better (which I don't think), the cost of customer dissatisfaction is too high.
This nerf does more to change the style of EVE PvP than to adjust balance in EVE PvP. We don't want to play a different space game, we want to play THIS space game, that's why we are here.
The speed balance can be adjusted without creating a New Game Experience for EVE
There have been many much bigger changes than this in the past.
Eve survived, and thrived.
I remember some pretty big changes in very early stages of EVE, which is to be expected as everything was new and felt like beta testing a product.
But since EVE has matured, I can't think of any patch that had more game-altering changes than the one proposed here.
All the previous nano nerfs are nothing compared to this, because none of them made speed tactics obsolete.
Dual MWD Raven nerf was kind of big, but again it was a very targeted change, it doesn't quite match the scale of current nerf.
The 50% hp buff was big, effected everybody - it killed sniper Eagle as viable pvp ship. Effected other snipers negatively but sniping didn't die, it still plays key role in fleet warfare. HP buff also made small gang pvp a little tougher, it encouraged blobbing just a little more. But not enough to kill roaming.
Soon after the HP nerf, with introduction of t2 cruisers in game, we started seeing development of modern roaming PvP - speed tactics.
There were many nerfs, I'll admit, they altered EVE PvP focus one way or another. But nothing that compares to this. We are going for a total break down half the game, with new system in its place. It's not evolution of the PvP, it's a replacement of one system with another.
Fleet wars won't be effected much, aside from more titan DDD deaths due to slower accelerating bs. But small scale pvp is completely different.
|
Weeeer
|
Posted - 2008.08.01 02:31:00 -
[1415]
AGAINST
|
Stahlfalke
|
Posted - 2008.08.01 03:56:00 -
[1416]
/against!
|
Pimparella
|
Posted - 2008.08.01 03:58:00 -
[1417]
/against
dont fu ck this game up please :(
|
morteyfarus
|
Posted - 2008.08.01 03:59:00 -
[1418]
no nanonerf!
|
Rocket Ajax
Beyond Divinity Inc
|
Posted - 2008.08.01 04:00:00 -
[1419]
AGAINST!
Changes as they are now, are unacceptable. They break far more than they fix. Ludicrous speed is acheivable only by very specialized, expensive ships. Start with those very specialized set ups and work from there.
|
Irongut
M'8'S
Frontal Impact
|
Posted - 2008.08.01 04:06:00 -
[1420]
I can see the need to fix some speed issues but the currently proposed changes are too many and too much. Also whichever dev said "we need to reduce speeds, let's make webs less effective" needs to be put on coffee making duty, permanently.
-
The future is Black. Brace for Impact! |
|
|
Rezaa
Pandemonium Technologies
|
Posted - 2008.08.01 04:26:00 -
[1421]
Signed NO NERF!!
|
TempSniper
Battlestars
GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.08.01 04:28:00 -
[1422]
support that I am against the nano nerf
|
Shimali Softpaws
Sniggerdly
Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2008.08.01 04:41:00 -
[1423]
against
|
Shimali Softpaws
Sniggerdly
Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2008.08.01 04:42:00 -
[1424]
err against
|
Rezaa
Pandemonium Technologies
|
Posted - 2008.08.01 04:44:00 -
[1425]
OOPS box checked this time
|
Dobriy Ya
Gallente
Brotherhood.
|
Posted - 2008.08.01 04:44:00 -
[1426]
/signed
|
Stenley Twiddle
|
Posted - 2008.08.01 05:46:00 -
[1427]
signed
|
Ar Rimal
|
Posted - 2008.08.01 05:51:00 -
[1428]
signed
|
Sylthi
Minmatar
Coreward Pan-Galactic
|
Posted - 2008.08.01 06:00:00 -
[1429]
People, be SURE to check the "Check here if you want to give your support to the idea/discussion going on" box when you are making your post, or your vote won't get properly tallied.
Thank you for your "No" vote on this critical issue.
Cheers.
P.S. My vote was tallied a LONG time ago, so this post is just a reminder to all of you. Peace.
*
* |
The Hardman
Uncle Fester's Olde Tyme Barbershoppe
|
Posted - 2008.08.01 07:17:00 -
[1430]
not such a great nerf, sonme nerf woudl be ok
|
|
|
nemure
|
Posted - 2008.08.01 07:41:00 -
[1431]
Against
|
Rutger Centemus
Joint Empire Squad
|
Posted - 2008.08.01 08:00:00 -
[1432]
Edited by: Rutger Centemus on 01/08/2008 07:59:54
I would be in favor of maybe 'rebalancing' nano's, though (imho) there not that big a problem.
I am, however, against the 'let's tie a blindfold, whack the pinata with a nerfbat and see what happens' - approach CCP seems intend on following. It just changes to many things at once, seemingly without proper consideration of the results.
|
Russland
|
Posted - 2008.08.01 08:20:00 -
[1433]
Against
|
Bhagavad Gita
|
Posted - 2008.08.01 09:45:00 -
[1434]
/against
The most fun I've had since lowsec tbh.
It's a great way to roam, and strategy rules the battlefield again, rather than just blobin.
Of course you still have nano blobs, but things seem to really be in balance now to where skill matters again.
There are already far too many ships that simply aren't usable now, and this is just going to toss even more into the pile.
|
Agent OO1
|
Posted - 2008.08.01 09:50:00 -
[1435]
Against nano nerf
|
Mauop KocMoca
|
Posted - 2008.08.01 10:49:00 -
[1436]
Against
|
JC X
Pure.
|
Posted - 2008.08.01 10:49:00 -
[1437]
Signed
If this goes ahead... we are going to loose a great aspect of eve combat, Countering Nanos has never been a problem, it forced people to adapt and use diffrent fits. If CCP gives in to the whiners ill be pretty disapointed.
|
Roy Batty68
Immortal Dead
|
Posted - 2008.08.01 11:21:00 -
[1438]
This isn't a nerf. This is a redesign. It is more likely to break far more than it fixes.
I think "ludicrous" speeds need to be fixed. I think this is the wrong way to do it.
Sig removed, inappropriate content. If you would like further details please mail [email protected] ~Saint |
Esmenet
|
Posted - 2008.08.01 11:29:00 -
[1439]
This isnt a nerf its completely breaking something that was working fine.
|
Sago Tuc
Gallente
Warriors tribe
|
Posted - 2008.08.01 11:34:00 -
[1440]
/me against
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 .. 73 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |