Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 .. 73 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Ebony Rider
|
Posted - 2008.08.03 16:29:00 -
[1561]
|
Meridius Dex
Amarr 24th Imperial Crusade
|
Posted - 2008.08.03 16:46:00 -
[1562]
Hilarious. Look at all the shiny PL and Tri alts! Keep sending out those alliance-wide evemails, I know you can do it!
-- Meridius Dex --
Amarr = EVE on Hard setting |
Red Thunder
Most Wanted INC G00DFELLAS
|
Posted - 2008.08.03 17:14:00 -
[1563]
Hilarious. Look at all the nooblets making up excuses for them to be losing 2 to 1
Eagles may soar, but weasels dont get sucked into jet engines |
Destuctor
|
Posted - 2008.08.03 18:50:00 -
[1564]
i m againt of the nano nerf
|
Shane Darman
Gallente Break Fleet
|
Posted - 2008.08.03 18:57:00 -
[1565]
I find it hilarious how yall think you can *PERSUADE* CCP to not do it.
Its THEIR Game, THEIR Server, not yours.
If you don't like it, well your SoL
|
Red Thunder
Most Wanted INC G00DFELLAS
|
Posted - 2008.08.03 19:05:00 -
[1566]
yea i know ccp will do it anyway, but maybes they will regret it once they start losing money
Eagles may soar, but weasels dont get sucked into jet engines |
crockp0t
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2008.08.03 19:28:00 -
[1567]
Against. |
Elaine Celeste
|
Posted - 2008.08.03 19:31:00 -
[1568]
I'm against it. Reduce snakes/boosters/gang bonuses/deadspace mwd's slightly... or make them give bonuses to agility instead, but leave the rest of the game alone.
CELESTE LOTTERIES |
Jade Constantine
|
Posted - 2008.08.03 19:49:00 -
[1569]
Was raised in today's CSM meeting - discussion ensued - chatlog is Vote on nano-nerf statement at 16:45
Feel free to have a read about what was said.
Star Fraction | Dare to Dream!
|
THEGREAT LOBO
Beyond Divinity Inc
|
Posted - 2008.08.03 20:03:00 -
[1570]
Against the nerf in its current form
|
|
Katherine Cole
|
Posted - 2008.08.03 20:23:00 -
[1571]
against
|
Great Emrys
Pator Tech School
|
Posted - 2008.08.03 21:11:00 -
[1572]
Against. Nanos need a revision but this goes too far.
|
Seetesh
Pixels Docks Fang Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.08.03 21:19:00 -
[1573]
Against
|
Spyra Gryra
Cruoris Seraphim
|
Posted - 2008.08.03 21:24:00 -
[1574]
sry, nop
|
Minamoto Taira
|
Posted - 2008.08.03 23:11:00 -
[1575]
against
|
hidden tiger
|
Posted - 2008.08.03 23:26:00 -
[1576]
|
Rusty DP
V i r u s
|
Posted - 2008.08.03 23:30:00 -
[1577]
signed/
|
Inistis
V i r u s
|
Posted - 2008.08.03 23:32:00 -
[1578]
against
|
Pogo Stick
|
Posted - 2008.08.03 23:35:00 -
[1579]
Originally by: Elaine Celeste I'm against it. Reduce snakes/boosters/gang bonuses/deadspace mwd's slightly... or make them give bonuses to agility instead, but leave the rest of the game alone.
Iam with this.
|
Red Thunder
Most Wanted INC G00DFELLAS
|
Posted - 2008.08.03 23:46:00 -
[1580]
a better solution http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=838894
Eagles may soar, but weasels dont get sucked into jet engines |
|
Tia' Moroth
|
Posted - 2008.08.03 23:48:00 -
[1581]
Ok so our subscription money is being wasted flying you to Iceland to talk about Issues that really mater such as MUSICAL ****ING INSTRUMENTS? Not the game breaking changes the dev's who asume the standard nano pilot has a full set of High Grade snakes and T2 Rigs.
Christ almight. I might as well biomass my charicters right now.
|
Isanoe nothwood
D00M.
|
Posted - 2008.08.03 23:54:00 -
[1582]
against
|
LVirus
GAME OVER MAN GAME OVER
|
Posted - 2008.08.04 00:13:00 -
[1583]
Edited by: LVirus on 04/08/2008 00:15:11 AGAINST! Plz CCP dont nerf our last defence vs BLOB.
|
Fumunda minuts
|
Posted - 2008.08.04 00:16:00 -
[1584]
Against the Nerf in it's current form. The entire game moves to slow on Sisi now.
|
Karn Mithralia
Neh'bu Kau Beh'Hude Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2008.08.04 01:36:00 -
[1585]
Against as presented. -----------------------------------------
|
Octo VII
|
Posted - 2008.08.04 02:05:00 -
[1586]
Against.
|
Arrgs
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.08.04 02:06:00 -
[1587]
Against as presented
My first video! |
RenegadeRacer
NightCrew
|
Posted - 2008.08.04 02:16:00 -
[1588]
Nano FTW!!!!
|
MuthaTeresa
|
Posted - 2008.08.04 06:00:00 -
[1589]
Against, most definitely.
|
Sylthi
Minmatar Coreward Pan-Galactic
|
Posted - 2008.08.04 06:11:00 -
[1590]
Edited by: Sylthi on 04/08/2008 06:13:29
Originally by: Tia' Moroth Ok so our subscription money is being wasted flying you to Iceland to talk about Issues that really mater such as MUSICAL ****ING INSTRUMENTS? Not the game breaking changes the dev's who asume the standard nano pilot has a full set of High Grade snakes and T2 Rigs.
Christ almight. I might as well biomass my charicters right now.
THIS. I am EXTREMELY disappointed in the CSM reps who voted to put this off and are potentially going to do nothing about this issue.
The entire point of the CSM was/is to bring the concerns of the player base to the CCP devs. There are now several THOUSAND votes (both for and against) telling you to do just that. You then turn around and vote DIRECTLY to NOT do your job. All I can say is: WTF.
The general consensus of the council was that "it is too early" to say/do anything about this. Absolute Bullocks.
Fact: The "Against" vote poll is winning by more than 2 to 1 at the time of this typing, and has been ever since it was posted.
Does this give the CSM any sort of a clue as to the MAJORITY feelings of the player base concerned by this issue?
Fact: Read any 20 pages, hell, read any 10 pages of the "Against" poll and the general consensus becomes so OBVIOUS that a pre-schooler could sort it out. MOST people is BOTH the "For" and "Against" poll agree that a change is needed to speed. But, specifically in the "Against" poll, MANY point but that the devs are going WAY to far and considering too many changes to very BASIC game play elements.
Am I TOTALLY insane, or is this, or is this not, MORE than enough information to DO YOUR JOBS and go to CCP with the idea that they need to (at the very least) severely reduce the scope of the changes they are planning?
Bottom line: To those reps who voted FOR moving forward with this issue: Thank you for keeping the faith with your constituents. To those reps who voted directly NOT to do your jobs: Shame on you. And, good luck getting my vote for re-election.
*
* |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 .. 73 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |