| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
1161. Add CAPTCHAs for high-frequency trading - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Droidster wrote: Nevyn Auscent wrote: If you see such software, report it to CCP with links. They will then investigate it and then find a way to detect everyone using that particular piece of software, then mass ban them all. That's a ni...
- by SurrenderMonkey - at 2016.02.15 02:45:45
|
1162. Hi-res chart for ship symbols? - in EVE New Citizens Q&A [original thread]
Nat Silverguard wrote: Droidster the CAM of ENCQA More of a DrysonBennington, IMO. CAM has occasionally said something funny.
- by SurrenderMonkey - at 2016.02.15 02:35:32
|
1163. Game mechanic of warp scrams - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Sonja Fury wrote: My issue is in the era where ECM now has falloff why do these scrams not have a falloff value or chance to scram. To at least give someone a chance to get away. Nothing should be definite when it comes to ECM. Sounds good. ...
- by SurrenderMonkey - at 2016.02.15 01:25:16
|
1164. Game mechanic of warp scrams - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Quote: - Scripted Warp Disruption Field Generator (Heavy Interdictors only) = Infinite warp disruption strength on a single target (Mircowarpdrives and Microjumpdrives still work). Scripted hictor points are a scram now, and the subject of m...
- by SurrenderMonkey - at 2016.02.14 23:13:57
|
1165. Game mechanic of warp scrams - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Rayne Dakara wrote: Hello, I'm a little bit frustrated so excuse my language: What happens when you have two warp core stabilizers fitted on ship and you are subject of warp scrambler attempt guess what you can't warp since you don't have 3 f...
- by SurrenderMonkey - at 2016.02.14 21:35:28
|
1166. Em damage resistance - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Anci Bird wrote: I am little confused with Em damage resistance, please can you explain me what I am missing. I have a drake and have 16% Em damage resistance. When I equip EM Ward Field II my Em damage resistance is again 16%.If I equip Therma...
- by SurrenderMonkey - at 2016.02.14 17:49:07
|
1167. So I've finally advanced my pi techniques a bit. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Quote: I'm not even going to bother with the higher tier manufacturing stuff, especially since this is all highsec minmaxing. It also requires me to launch "all" materials from the command center, Oh dear lord . You should spend an afterno...
- by SurrenderMonkey - at 2016.02.14 17:40:09
|
1168. Criminals not permaflashy on overview? - in EVE New Citizens Q&A [original thread]
Droidster wrote: CONCORD attacks -5 players on sight. CONCORD considers -5 players "criminals". No, they don't. Not outside of one constellation in Genesis, anyway, where CONCORD has sov. Not even sure it still happens there. Quote: I...
- by SurrenderMonkey - at 2016.02.14 06:50:30
|
1169. I need help with drug setup - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Sanic Xaqueter wrote: did I stump the entire forums? Yes, your very basic question about reactions that could have been answered by any reactions tutorial or a couple of hours mucking about on SiSi has everyone at a loss. Reactions always c...
- by SurrenderMonkey - at 2016.02.14 05:32:33
|
1170. Stop requiring confirmation for one-sided contracts - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Droidster wrote: I am trying to make useful suggestions to the developers. All you guys do is post sarcasm, put downs and snide remarks. That probably has something to do with your special blend of Dunning-Kruger syndrome and petty whingi...
- by SurrenderMonkey - at 2016.02.14 04:49:05
|
1171. Need more defensive options - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Noel LeBlanc wrote: SurrenderMonkey wrote: Noel LeBlanc wrote: It's not about what I've lost. I'm talking about possibilities. Your complaint is about ships exploding too quickly, but your only experience with exploding has been in s...
- by SurrenderMonkey - at 2016.02.14 03:44:12
|
1172. Need more defensive options - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Noel LeBlanc wrote: It's not about what I've lost. I'm talking about possibilities. Your complaint is about ships exploding too quickly, but your only experience with exploding has been in ships that were particularly flimsy. So, yeah, in...
- by SurrenderMonkey - at 2016.02.14 02:56:26
|
1173. Need more defensive options - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Noel LeBlanc wrote: There needs to be more defensive options. I'm still relatively new, and I'm therefore flying around in tin cans, but it still seems to be too easy to be 1-shot KO'ed. I love that EVE is dangerous and all that, but the balan...
- by SurrenderMonkey - at 2016.02.14 02:40:17
|
1174. Skill Display - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Beyl Ahashion wrote: Currently if you have 2 or more characters on one account, and you can only research skills on one character, then the game won't allow you to even see the skills that the other characters have. We often need to be able to ...
- by SurrenderMonkey - at 2016.02.13 22:51:20
|
1175. Sticky:Dev blog: Structure fitting in the EVE: Citadel Expansion - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Querns wrote: People were saying the same thing about Liquid Ozone last time, too. Yet, here we are, with LO3 barely affected. Before: Fully mining out a high sec belt provides fuel for a single large tower for 436 hours. After: Fully min...
- by SurrenderMonkey - at 2016.02.13 19:31:02
|
1176. Sticky:Dev blog: Structure fitting in the EVE: Citadel Expansion - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Querns wrote: Jinrai Tremaine wrote: EvilweaselFinance wrote: Stront use in citidels has to be higher than current use because currently it is a garbage byproduct ice, rather than the King Of Ices like it was supposed to be. I'm sorry,...
- by SurrenderMonkey - at 2016.02.13 18:53:50
|
1177. Blueprints - in Science and Industry [original thread]
"Yes, hi, hello everyone, please tell me the best way to compete against you in the market. Thanks, OP"
- by SurrenderMonkey - at 2016.02.13 17:32:05
|
1178. Sticky:Dev blog: Structure fitting in the EVE: Citadel Expansion - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Jinrai Tremaine wrote: CCP Ytterbium wrote: Alright, update regarding the stront numbers: We're going to decrease required stront numbers from 400 to 200 for a batch of 40 fuel blocks.
Stront volume is being decreased from 3 to 2m3.
...
- by SurrenderMonkey - at 2016.02.13 17:23:01
|
1179. T2 BPO Invention - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Sasha Mayaki wrote: Please, let me know your thoughts. Regards, Duck Horrible idea that can't be salvaged. Invention is in a pretty good place, leave it alone.
- by SurrenderMonkey - at 2016.02.13 16:26:05
|
1180. Sticky:Dev blog: Structure fitting in the EVE: Citadel Expansion - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Nevyn Auscent wrote: Alexis Nightwish wrote: Maybe I'm misremembering but I thought they said at some point that citadels won't auto-defend - someone will have to actually "pilot" them for combat purposes. So, there's really nothing wrong w...
- by SurrenderMonkey - at 2016.02.13 00:37:50
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |