Coming from a guy who dodges wardecs that IS pretty funny.

If you do, then you're pretty good at hiding it.


I'd love to see where you get the "1/10th its size", since most of the fleets we engaged were between 200 and up towards 900.


I don't live in null, I join fleets in null.

5) You are easily tricked into wasting money on war decing inactive corps.

You are absolutely clueless about nullsec gameplay, having lived in hisec the whole time you've played the game save for a few months you spent in a dying alliance that couldn't hold its own despite having a lot more supercapitals, a similar sized coalition and funny little events occurring in their favor like the bubbles disappearing from their supercapital staging tower. Your attempts to participate in this discussion only show how little you know - you only want local removed because you want to join the chorus around ~something~ and hey you might as well argue with teh gooniez about how risk averse they are when you dodge wardecs, lest anybody interrupt your peaceful mission running.

Hi we're holding a cooking contest with 45 billion ISK in prizes, we're funding Hulkageddon and we dropped 100 billion ISK on giving Tornadoes to a bunch of bored goons to celebrate things. If you think that wardec fees are anything resembling a "waste of money" for us you're pretty wrong.

You are absolutely clueless about nullsec gameplay, having lived in hisec the whole time you've played the game save for a few months you spent in a dying alliance that couldn't hold its own despite having a lot more supercapitals, a similar sized coalition and funny little events occurring in their favor like the bubbles disappearing from their supercapital staging tower. Your attempts to participate in this discussion only show how little you know - you only want local removed because you want to join the chorus around ~something~ and hey you might as well argue with teh gooniez about how risk averse they are when you dodge wardecs, lest anybody interrupt your peaceful mission running.

So your saying war dec fees are too cheap and should be scaled comparing the size of the aggressor to the size of the defender. What would you recommend as a fair price for a 9089 man alliance decing a 4 man corp, besides pathetic of course?

Well besides the insults I have spent alot more time than than in Null but left because it was BORING. I want local removed, Sov changed and Jump drives nerfed because Null is a stagnant sore on EvE.
Oh and as usual for your failed quotes I don't run missions either.

On the war dec we differ and this is probably why you like lord Zim don't seem to understand balance. You would consider a war of 9089 to 4 balanced, I however do not. Null is unbalanced and boring, how many opinions do you need before you see you are only speaking of your own interests.

I love winning. You're shooting blanks Zim. You have no real discourse, no worthwhile counter opinion. Convoluted rhetoric is your peak. Im done for the night, ill be on tomorrow sometime to bring this issue again to the forefront. Convoluted might be giving you to much credit though. Remedial is probably a better fit.

Wardecs would still be cheap for us because ~80 tech moons~



Or you can admit that you are risk-averse and you want local removed because you don't want the enemies knowing that you're moving through their space because it's too hard to come up with tactics to mitigate local. You don't want nullsec to be hard, you want it to be hilariously easy for one side (see the idea you agreed with about showing only members of the sov-holding alliance in local) and completely broken for anybody who wishes to do anything in that space without being surrounded by 60 friendlies.

You don't care about balance, you care about getting easy kills. You dodged that wardec despite the easy opportunity to get a few kills out of it, while inviting everyone in the game to assist you (and get stuck at war with us, 'heh') because you cannot fight your own battles. This is why you ditched BTA, this is why you asked everyone to come to your aid.

As to the cost of war decs now you are saying you get too much isk from you tech moons. You keep saying Null should not be made more dangerous then keep giving reasons why it should be.

Like I have said before if you want safe in EvE try Hi-sec or more to your pace Hello Kitty.

As to the cost of war decs now you are saying you get too much isk from you tech moons. You keep saying Null should not be made more dangerous then keep giving reasons why it should be.

making systems easier to take and lose, or for stations to be destructible.

Good thing you didn't run away from a wardec screaming like a little girl, or this comment would look pretty ironic.


If only we did say that nullsec should be made more dangerous by, oh I dunno, making systems easier to take and lose, or for stations to be destructible.

If only...

You have had alot of people tell you are loosing the argument so I suppose you should be given points for stubbornness.

I've been told I've lost the argument by you and Caliph. You ran away from a wardec screaming like a little girl, Caliph just wardecs hisec pubbies and ganks them, and keeps averting the topic when I start pushing him a little.

You'll excuse me if I take both your proclamations of victory with a pinch of salt.

As shown Goonswarm want a nice safe null sec.

You do too.

No more exciting and changeable not stagnant and boring.

Such a pity "your" changes would cause it to be stagnant and boring on a daily basis, then.

It is now.

"it's already stagnant and boring let's make it worse"

It is now.

It is for you maybe. I'm sorry you are bad at Eve Online and have no friends to help you out.

The rest of us are shooting stuff, getting blown up, making news and getting paid.


Sucks to be you I guess.

No actually just like alot of players I gave up Null as a bad joke and moved on. You guys complain about Nulls low population and then complain if anyone wants to improve it. You only seem able to throw insults and complain like little children. I feel sorry for you.

I don't get your thinking. You would like to make living in nullsec harder in terms of removing local... so more people would move there?

One has to admit that there are plenty of players in null who enjoy lazy and casual gameplay. They do enjoy rather safe areas where they can rat, plex or mine to fund their PvP activity (or, most of it, as many alliances have ship replacement programs anyway). Currently, many players who live in highsec are afraid of null, because they think it's dangerous gate camp land with endless hostile roams coming to get you and blow up your expensive faction fit PvE ship. They are avoiding the idea of moving there, by setting some goals to achieve first (in terms of SP, mostly). Now, if you removed the main intel provider of nullsec, would that increase the chance that these scared little folks would move down from the safety of highsec to the new, shiny "spam directional scan to win and hope not to die" nullsec?

People who live in nullsec and hold their own sov are already doing work to keep it, and to keep it as safe as possible for the alliance residents to live and profit up there. Yes, you can of course make everything harder for people. I don't deny it, it would be fun most of the time. But would it really attract more people to move and to live in nullsec?

Then nerf bombs. Change them. Make them super powerful torpedoes that can only hit capitals. It would be a small sacrifice, and im a dedicated cloaky kind of player, for the greater good of the game.

But also remember that even if that were the case no local means that for that to occur a scouting operation would have had to of occured first. Maybe it would be a well earned uncounterable attack.