EVE Search - Sticky:[Winter] Combat Cruisers

All Channels

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

Sticky:[Winter] Combat Cruisers

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 .. 33 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 12 post(s)
TrouserDeagle Beyond Divinity Inc Shadow Cartel 48	Posted - 2012.10.02 19:19:00 - [211] - Quote I've got 7 days left on medium beam laser specialisation 5. I'm going to leave it going as a joke.
Grog Drinker The Tuskers 94	Posted - 2012.10.02 19:20:00 - [212] - Quote Maller desperately needs a utility high/another mid/drones. As it is now it will be mugged by any frig that gets in range.
MIrple BSC LEGION Tactical Narcotics Team 135	Posted - 2012.10.02 19:28:00 - [213] - Quote Major Killz wrote: Fre@king h8ers. They have no real reason to hate other than the ship is MInmatar so it must be overpowered. They don't look @ the fact many other ships are being boosted by alot. They tend not to look @ thier benifits or how they would stack agains the Rupture and many of them will beat the ship. Frack it! Lets h8 and nerf that b!tch because you no that h0e is overpowered = / @ kiting 3 other ships will be better than the Rupture. Up close 4 other ships will be better than the Rupture. The Rupture may up being number 1 @ not being great @ anything but good enough @ everything = / OMG the Rupture is faster than other combat cruisers. Well it is now and should be because it's weak compared to a vexor close range and weak compared to a bellicose, caracal and omen long range. Also, I like how people in other threads were going on about why Caldari seem to make it out of all these boost with near overpwoered ships and Gallente don't. It so happens Gallente have a near overpowered ship and now people are b!tching about how underderpowered the Caldari ship is... Stealth please don't fix my OP ship. Yes I have a problem with this ship being faster the the other 3 races ATTACK CRUISERS. I Think if the speed was brought down to on par or slightly slower the the other 3 races attack cruisers. It would still be a good ship but not step on the toes of the Stabber.
Sigras Conglomo IMPERIAL LEGI0N 225	Posted - 2012.10.02 19:35:00 - [214] - Quote why is the rupture so darn fast? I thought the idea was that the attack cruisers were high damage, high speed, low tank and the combat cruisers were moderate damage. low speed, high tank If this is the case, why is the rupture faster than the omen, thorax, and caracal?
Major Killz Chaotic Tranquility 75	Posted - 2012.10.02 19:38:00 - [215] - Quote Sigras wrote: why is the rupture so darn fast? I thought the idea was that the attack cruisers were high damage, high speed, low tank and the combat cruisers were moderate damage. low speed, high tank If this is the case, why is the rupture faster than the omen, thorax, and caracal? Because. Thats y = /
Kahega Amielden Rifterlings Damu'Khonde 516	Posted - 2012.10.02 19:39:00 - [216] - Quote Quote: Damage bonused rails are more useful than range bonused ones. Once you're hitting at a certain range it stops actually being helpful and just ridiculous. Besides, Gallente have to deal with the suck that is Railguns too, so it's hardly homogeneity. The problem with rails isn't that their stats are bad it's that any sort of fighting beyond 150km (which happens to be what railguns are good at) is useless because of on-grid warping. Fix that and suddenly they can become good. Anyway, the problem with reducing their range is that then they start getting into beam laser territory, and beam lasers are just better at beam laser ranges.
Garviel Tarrant Beyond Divinity Inc Shadow Cartel 91	Posted - 2012.10.02 19:41:00 - [217] - Quote Liang Nuren wrote: Takeshi Yamato wrote: The new Omen and Maller demonstrate why the Maller should really have been redesigned as HAM ship. I believe the Maller not having drones is an attempt to differentiate it from the Omen. The drone bay and the second ship bonus (-10% cap usage vs +5% armor resists) are the only major differences between the two ships. The slot layout is identical and minor differences in armor and speed don't really affect the "feel" of the ship. Now the Maller is running into problems because not having a drone bay hurts especially with lasers. But if you give it a drone bay, it's going to be very, very similar to the Omen. At the same time, the Maller pretty much needs a cap injector too because it doesn't have a laser cap usage bonus. So it would need one more slot than its peers which is "breaking the rules" so to speak. If the Maller becomes a HAM ship you don't need to give it a drone bay nor an extra slot and it's going to be a very different ship from the Omen. There is a similar problem at the frigate level too, with too many laser ships being too similar to each other. I feel like the right answer is to turn the Omen into a giant Slicer - make it fast with an optimal+damage bonus. Then give the Maller the brawler role with a 25m^3 drone bay. -Liang Or keep the bonuses as they are and use beams.. you know, the long range weapon... **** TE's
Obsidiana White-Noise 192	Posted - 2012.10.02 19:44:00 - [218] - Quote CCP Fozzie wrote: Moa: Cruiser skill bonuses: 5% bonus to Medium Hybrid Turret damage 5% bonus to shield resistances Fittings: 800 PWG (+20), 375 CPU (+15) Defense (shields / armor / hull) : 2100(+225) / 1200(-129) / 1500(-24) Capacitor (amount / recharge rate / average cap per second): 1425(+50) / 475s(-16.25s) / 3 (+0.2) Mobility (max velocity / agility / mass / align time): 195(+31) / 0.54 / 11720000 / 5.9s Cargo capacity: 450 (+200) Slot layout: 6 H, 4 M, 4 L, 5 turrets, 2 launchers Let us know what you think! o.O; Of all of the cruisers, you aren't changing the slots on the Moa? What!? I'm happy about everything else, but the slots are just bad. I really though it should get 6 mid slots. You can't even fit a full tackle and shield tank. This is nuts. I think the Merlin should be an example. Slot layout: 5 H (-1), 5 M (+1), 4 L, 5 turrets, 2 launchers I personally feel that is too many low slots, but I think 5 mid slots is the most we will get. At least you can fit partial tackle, a decent tank, and full damage mods. You still can't do a full tackle, but this is a combat ship, not a tackle/attack ship. It just is annoying because every other ship in the class can fit a full 3 slot tackle.
Alara IonStorm 3234	Posted - 2012.10.02 19:47:00 - [219] - Quote Liang Nuren wrote: I feel like the right answer is to turn the Omen into a giant Slicer - make it fast with an optimal+damage bonus. Then give the Maller the brawler role with a 25m^3 drone bay. -Liang Ding Ding Ding! * On another note CCP Fozzie why exactly did you chicken out on fixing medium rails and just Shield Gallente'd the Moa. Just sad. * 4 Turret Double DPS Bonus Rupture, really? Decided to skip giving it a real role besides Blaster wannabe / The Ship people will kite with instead of the Stabber? * Vexors fine. +100 more Grid would be nice but its fine. Sigh.
Takeshi Yamato Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic 494	Posted - 2012.10.02 19:49:00 - [220] - Quote Petrus Blackshell wrote: I, for one, will be flying Quad Light Beam Laser Omen all day erry day. What.
Alara IonStorm 3234	Posted - 2012.10.02 19:51:00 - [221] - Quote Omnathious Deninard wrote: Correct me if a am wrong but ships with the attack role are supposed to be high damage low tank, and combat are supposed to be moderate damage and high tank. So my pondering is why gallente is the way it is, for example Frigates: Tristran: Combat role, drone tracking and hp bonus, hybrid tracking bonus. Incursus: Attack role, hybrid damage bonus, local armor rep bonus Cruisers: Vexor: Combat role, Drone damage and hp bonus, hybrid damage bonus Thorax: Attack role, hybrid damage bonus, hybrid tracking bonus So what is this? Atron Attack Attack Tristan Combat role Incursus Combat role
Petrus Blackshell Rifterlings Damu'Khonde 1725	Posted - 2012.10.02 19:59:00 - [222] - Quote Takeshi Yamato wrote: Petrus Blackshell wrote: I, for one, will be flying Quad Light Beam Laser Omen all day erry day. What. As they are now, they track about as well and have similar multifrequency and damage to Focused Medium Pulses, but are a little easier to fit. After this... CCP Fozzie wrote: Alongside the announcement of these ships, we're also proposing some adjustment to the fitting requirements of certain medium sized turrets which will help us keep the fittings of several ships within better ranges as we go forward: -Drop the powergrid usage of Focused Medium Pulse lasers by 5% -Drop the powergrid usage of Heavy Pulse lasers by 10% -Drop the powergrid usage of all cruiser sized beam lasers by 10% -Drop the powergrid usage of all cruiser sized artillery by 10% They will be even easier to fit. Note that, as is, fitting a couple metastasis rigs puts their tracking between 220mm and 425mm autocannons, which is not bad for something with 6 km optimal range. Combine that with all the Omen's new fittings, and you will be able to get a nice tank, tackle, and now 40m^3 drones (because frigates suck), all on a somewhat fast cruiser with the full range flexibility of lasers. That, and QLBLs look friggin badass. Rifterlings - small gang frigate PvP - low/nullsec operations, newbie-friendly, free ship program; Join today! www.rifterlings.com Accidentally The Whole Frigate (blog) - Learning how to pew pew, one loss at a time - www.thewholefrigate.com
Grath Telkin Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion 1032	Posted - 2012.10.02 20:00:00 - [223] - Quote Obsidiana wrote: It just is annoying because every other ship in the class can fit a full 3 slot tackle. The Moa can too whats your point?
Takeshi Yamato Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic 494	Posted - 2012.10.02 20:09:00 - [224] - Quote Petrus Blackshell wrote: As they are now, they track about as well and have similar multifrequency and damage to Focused Medium Pulses, but are a little easier to fit, requiring less CPU, but more PG. ... Note that, as is, fitting a couple metastasis rigs puts their tracking between 220mm and 425mm autocannons, which is not bad for something with 6 km optimal range. Beams look sweet, I agree but ... I guess you're planning on surprising frigates that think they can get under your guns? Quad Light Beams can't Scorch though. Their range is about the same with Aurora loaded but the tracking and dps sucks compared to FMPs. Scorch gets 42% more dps and 0.084 rad/sec tracking. Aurora gets 0.025 rad/sec.
Aaron Greil Royal Imperial Navy Reserves 41	Posted - 2012.10.02 20:09:00 - [225] - Quote Major Killz wrote: Fre@king h8ers. They have no real reason to hate other than the ship is MInmatar so it must be overpowered. They don't look @ the fact many other ships are being boosted by alot. They tend not to look @ thier benifits or how they would stack agains the Rupture and many of them will beat the ship. Frack it! Lets h8 and nerf that b!tch because you no that h0e is overpowered = / @ kiting 3 other ships will be better than the Rupture. Up close 4 other ships will be better than the Rupture. The Rupture may up being number 1 @ not being great @ anything but good enough @ everything = / OMG the Rupture is faster than other combat cruisers. Well it is now and should be because it's weak compared to a vexor close range and weak compared to a bellicose, caracal and omen long range. Also, I like how people in other threads were going on about why Caldari seem to make it out of all these boost with near overpwoered ships and Gallente don't. It so happens Gallente have a near overpowered ship and now people are b!tching about how underderpowered the Caldari ship is... that post gave me cancer
Petrus Blackshell Rifterlings Damu'Khonde 1726	Posted - 2012.10.02 20:19:00 - [226] - Quote Takeshi Yamato wrote: Petrus Blackshell wrote: As they are now, they track about as well and have similar multifrequency and damage to Focused Medium Pulses, but are a little easier to fit, requiring less CPU, but more PG. ... Note that, as is, fitting a couple metastasis rigs puts their tracking between 220mm and 425mm autocannons, which is not bad for something with 6 km optimal range. Beams look sweet, I agree but ... I guess you're planning on surprising frigates that think they can get under your guns? Quad Light Beams can't Scorch though. Their range is about the same with Aurora loaded but the tracking and dps sucks compared to FMPs. Scorch gets 42% more dps and 0.084 rad/sec tracking. Aurora gets 0.025 rad/sec. I'm not sure what I'd be trying to hit at 20 km with Aurora as an Omen that I'd miss with 0.025, given its speed. That is, that my drones wouldn't be able to handle. Stabber, maybe? Also, this isn't really to surprise frigates so much as to free up fittings for fitting other neat things. We'll have to see how the fittings turn out. I might just end up flying FMP (but QLBLs look so cool I might just gimp my fits to use them). Rifterlings - small gang frigate PvP - low/nullsec operations, newbie-friendly, free ship program; Join today! www.rifterlings.com Accidentally The Whole Frigate (blog) - Learning how to pew pew, one loss at a time - www.thewholefrigate.com
Tycho Enderas KR Acquisition and Logistics 2	Posted - 2012.10.02 20:21:00 - [227] - Quote Given that the current Moa has the same bonuses as the Rokh doesn't that kind of imply that the bonuses are not the issue so much as other stats and/or issues with medium hybrids (specifically rails) in general? Granted the 25% dmg boost helps medium rails but its not a buff its a tradeoff for range. Seems to me like the bonuses should have stayed the same but with an extra turret/high slot or a buff to medium rails.
Spr09 East India Ore Trade Intrepid Crossing 53	Posted - 2012.10.02 20:24:00 - [228] - Quote aaannndd Gallente gets the short end of the stick again. Mixed bonuses, largest sig radius, and low mobility, At least make it a full drone boat so it at least looks like it can be built into an Ishkur.
Alara IonStorm 3235	Posted - 2012.10.02 20:33:00 - [229] - Quote Tycho Enderas wrote: Given that the current Moa has the same bonuses as the Rokh doesn't that kind of imply that the bonuses are not the issue so much as other stats Not in the least. Give the Rokh 5 Large Rails instead of 8 and those bonuses and it would suck balls. Tycho Enderas wrote: Granted the 25% dmg boost helps medium rails but its not a buff its a tradeoff for range. They should have lost a High, added a Mid and given it Dmg + Opt so it could be the worth while Rail Boat it deserved. Tycho Enderas wrote: or a buff to medium rails. Beams, Rails and Artillery do not have it much better. 8 Cruisers you think they could come up with 1 Long Range designed one.
TrouserDeagle Beyond Divinity Inc Shadow Cartel 49	Posted - 2012.10.02 20:34:00 - [230] - Quote Tycho Enderas wrote: Given that the current Moa has the same bonuses as the Rokh doesn't that kind of imply that the bonuses are not the issue so much as other stats and/or issues with medium hybrids (specifically rails) in general? Granted the 25% dmg boost helps medium rails but its not a buff its a tradeoff for range. Seems to me like the bonuses should have stayed the same but with an extra turret/high slot or a buff to medium rails. Maybe medium rails, but it's definitely the slots and the fitting. Tier 3 battleships can just fit anything they feel like. A moa can do 200 rails at best, with 1 lse, though that isn't without fitting mods. Even if it did have the fitting, it would still be massively limited by its 4 mids and inadequate capacitor.
Vladimir Norkoff Income Redistribution Service 60	Posted - 2012.10.02 20:36:00 - [231] - Quote Spr09 wrote: aaannndd Gallente gets the short end of the stick again. Mixed bonuses, largest sig radius, and low mobility, At least make it a full drone boat so it at least looks like it can be built into an Ishkur. I don't want to be rude, but you should probably stop posting. You obviously have no freaking clue wtf you are talking about. These Vexor changes make it a broken overpowered beast.
Lili Lu 509	Posted - 2012.10.02 20:45:00 - [232] - Quote Dear Balancing Team, I sorta can't believe what I'm seeing with some parts of this set of ships. Maller - NO DRONES WTF I mean even the Moa has 3 lights. Give that poor brick a drone bay of at least equal size. Would it kill ya to give it 15m3 of drones? And I think 25 would at least make it not totally suck as it will with the posted design. Moa - It's almost like you swapped what was the expectation on the Rupture and Moa as far as high slots. I guess you didn't want to give the Moa 5 medium slots for some reason and so threw it another high. But I think I would expect 5 highs and 5 mids instead. It's not like the ship would become another Drake if it had 5 mids, and it wouldn't be another Ferox since it doesn't have an optimal bonus. And if any ship would have no drones one would expect it would be this ship, but I have no problem with a 15m3 dronebay. Vexor - I like this one the most. I've always liked the hull anyway. I guess the only change I would like is another 25m3 of drone bay (not bandwidth). I've not been liking the higher bandwidth but only almost the same bay concept with Gallente. Afterall the Domi has a plenty of spares. Drone boats in general need sufficient room for some spares. Drones die or get lost a lot in battles. And please stop this bloated signature for gallente ships paradigm. Reduce that sig please. Rupture - Ok, here's a pattern I was noticing, speed - Moa 195, Maller 205, Vexor 215, Rupture 240 Shouldn't that be 225 People are already pointing out how it's faster than some of the attack cruisers. I know speed is the thing for Minmatar but how about sticking with the pattern. It would still be fastest combat cruiser at 225. And with 5 lows you're probably just asking for the nano'd fits if you keep that speed at 240. I suppose I'm not so concerned with these things as I have been with the new destroyers and the frigate stats favoring the more mids (available for a TD) ships. But if there is one thing you must change with these it is giving the Maller a drone bay. THE MALLER NEEDS A FRIGGIN DRONE BAY. Thanks, Lilu
Liang Nuren Heretic Army Heretic Nation 2300	Posted - 2012.10.02 20:48:00 - [233] - Quote Vladimir Norkoff wrote: Spr09 wrote: aaannndd Gallente gets the short end of the stick again. Mixed bonuses, largest sig radius, and low mobility, At least make it a full drone boat so it at least looks like it can be built into an Ishkur. I don't want to be rude, but you should probably stop posting. You obviously have no freaking clue wtf you are talking about. These Vexor changes make it a broken overpowered beast. Noooo, it's not OP at all! Leave my pretty alone! Look at that evil, mean Rupture instead! -Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
Garviel Tarrant Beyond Divinity Inc Shadow Cartel 92	Posted - 2012.10.02 20:57:00 - [234] - Quote Liang Nuren wrote: Vladimir Norkoff wrote: Spr09 wrote: aaannndd Gallente gets the short end of the stick again. Mixed bonuses, largest sig radius, and low mobility, At least make it a full drone boat so it at least looks like it can be built into an Ishkur. I don't want to be rude, but you should probably stop posting. You obviously have no freaking clue wtf you are talking about. These Vexor changes make it a broken overpowered beast. Noooo, it's not OP at all! Leave my pretty alone! Look at that evil, mean Rupture instead! -Liang It really isn't.. The bandwith is silly and drones have absolutely terrible projection. Its not terrible but not op either.
Vladimir Norkoff Income Redistribution Service 60	Posted - 2012.10.02 21:14:00 - [235] - Quote Garviel Tarrant wrote: Liang Nuren wrote: Noooo, it's not OP at all! Leave my pretty alone! Look at that evil, mean Rupture instead! -Liang It really isn't.. The bandwith is silly and drones have absolutely terrible projection. Its not terrible but not op either. Errr.... Vexor ain't about projection. It's about getting in your face and unleashing hell. And with these changes it just does that ALOT better now. One of the the highest cruiser speeds with it's low mass and decent agility. Enough mids to sport a modest shield buffer, with plenty of lows for damage mods. Increased grid so you can slap on some Neutrons for extra love. Bandwidth is perfectly fine for it's close-range blaster assault. It's a cruiser that will be surpassing 800+dps, with a ~25K+ buffer, and still be able to tackle. That is pretty broken. I use a Vexor all the time. It is my go-to ship for shooting people in the face. As it is now on TQ, it's pretty damn good. And I'm rather successful using it. And that's flying it with an armor tank. These proposed changes will just make it an insane killing machine.
Tinkerrbell Sefem Velox Swift Angels Alliance 3	Posted - 2012.10.02 21:14:00 - [236] - Quote Dear CCP The changes are all in the right direction, things need to change for these ships to be more in line with each other. Since these ships are about Pvp, make them effective for pvp. I think these changes should be implemented, or thought about DON'T CHANGE THE RUPTURE, improve the other 3 so they surpass it. It's the golden child no touchy. 1.Moa, Maller, Vexer need more fitting room, add 5% more power grid and cpu across the board. This change would make these ships more useful. 2. Fix the slot layout of these 2 ships, Moa, Maller GÇóMaller needs 4 mid slots. If you dont give it a mid slot give it 25-25 of drones or even 50-50 of drones. GÇóMoa needs 5 mid slots, plus 20-20 of drones or 25-25 drones. The Maller also needs more capacitor, give it 7% more cap or make lazors more user friendly. this should help a lot, speed is not the issue here. sign Tinkerrbell
Onslaughtor True Slave Foundations Shaktipat Revelators 17	Posted - 2012.10.02 21:20:00 - [237] - Quote As a primarily amarr/ caldari pilot I will comment on the Maller and Moa first, then discuss what I see in the Vexor and Rupture. Maller. I'm loving the change to lasers damage and the tank bonus has always been great. The powergrid increase combined with the pwg reduction on medium laser weapons, will make for a very strong fit. I would go on but there is a BIG gaping hole in the ships design, by that I mean its cap. Like the Abaddon this thing is going to drain its cap so fast. I see that you removed a high and only have 3 mids. Originally when using lasers on a Maller you use a nos to help with your cap, because you need a web in order to compete with other ships these days you don't use those mids for cap boosters. The Maller from what I'm seeing is going to be inferior on its own. A solution to this is to give it another mid or high. I'm going to push for another high, because its far more limiting than another mid, and because people will most likely use it for a medium nos it will help limit that massive tank it can have. If the Maller doesn't get the high it could definitely use drones. 20 or 25 bandwidth and dronebay. I like the direction, but that missing high slot and or drones it is a big crippling point for the ship, almost to the point of uselessness. Moa Damage bonus is nice. But the slot layout seems off. 6 4 4. For a shield ship that is too few mids. With blasters as it s primary weapon I would take that extra high, and move it to the mids. Other than that I like it. Vexor Love it. But I think it needs a larger drone bay. Also kinda wish it had some other bonus besides the 5% damage bonus, feels overused. Maybe a hull bonus (joking)....... actually that would be a very novel idea.... would give it more ehp but would limit its armor or shields for reps.... could be a thing. Rupture I see one real issue with this ship, its too fast. In eve speed is very powerful and the rupture already boasts a respectable tank, has great dps, has the second largest drone bay out this set, its not cap dependent, and can both armor and shield fit. It can't have everything. As a whole I think that this group leaves the most to be desired. The stats for most of these don't support their play style and role. Keep up the good work, I'll be waiting on the updates for this one.
Murl Pulse Industries Knights Collective 1	Posted - 2012.10.02 21:41:00 - [238] - Quote Love the vexor...don't change a thing!
Garviel Tarrant Beyond Divinity Inc Shadow Cartel 92	Posted - 2012.10.02 21:43:00 - [239] - Quote Vladimir Norkoff wrote: Garviel Tarrant wrote: Liang Nuren wrote: Noooo, it's not OP at all! Leave my pretty alone! Look at that evil, mean Rupture instead! -Liang It really isn't.. The bandwith is silly and drones have absolutely terrible projection. Its not terrible but not op either. Errr.... Vexor ain't about projection. It's about getting in your face and unleashing hell. And with these changes it just does that ALOT better now. One of the the highest cruiser speeds with it's low mass and decent agility. Enough mids to sport a modest shield buffer, with plenty of lows for damage mods. Increased grid so you can slap on some Neutrons for extra love. Bandwidth is perfectly fine for it's close-range blaster assault. It's a cruiser that will be surpassing 800+dps, with a ~25K+ buffer, and still be able to tackle. That is pretty broken. I use a Vexor all the time. It is my go-to ship for shooting people in the face. As it is now on TQ, it's pretty damn good. And I'm rather successful using it. And that's flying it with an armor tank. These proposed changes will just make it an insane killing machine. Everything is about projection, doesn't matter if you're brawling or kiting. Projection and range controll are everything. And 800 dps.. So i'm guessing a 20k ehp shield buffer thing with 2 2 1 drones, void and heat. So its not actually 800 First the ogres can be outrun by a space station and die fast. Hammerheads are better but also lag behind a LOT when they do the AB/MWD switch. Doing the Same thing the Thorax can get pretty much the same dps/tank while being faster without relying as heavily on drones so meh? The really broken thing is that there is absolutely NO reason why you should fit an 800 plate over an LSE. That is seriously broken.. And you would have to be mad to fit a medium repper.. So if you're taking GCC to fight you're going to have to do a lot of waiting, and a lot of docking.
Junko Sideswipe Love Squad Confederation of xXPIZZAXx 77	Posted - 2012.10.02 21:51:00 - [240] - Quote Looking forward to double LSE ruptures.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 .. 33 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.