Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 .. 50 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 48 post(s) |

Domanique Altares
Rifterlings Point Blank Alliance
79
|
Posted - 2013.05.19 21:05:00 -
[1201] - Quote
Baycity Kitty wrote:Shilalasar wrote:But if you can get an orca in you can just put your T3 into the hangar and switch once you are in the site  Except I hear that the Orca won't allow any non-industrial ships to be put in its hanger now. So you can't move anything buy mining ships in an orca in odyssey
If true, it's probably the result of people screaming about all the 'useless' mining and indy skills they had to train prior to this point. Kind of like asking to be able to use 8 probes again results in being able to launch only 8 probes all at once, instead of 7 all at once. We get 8 probes, they get a reason to have mining skills if they want to use the Orca to its fullest.
 |

Omnathious Deninard
The Scope Gallente Federation
1039
|
Posted - 2013.05.19 21:06:00 -
[1202] - Quote
Baycity Kitty wrote:Shilalasar wrote:But if you can get an orca in you can just put your T3 into the hangar and switch once you are in the site  Except I hear that the Orca won't allow any non-industrial ships to be put in its hanger now. So you can't move anything buy mining ships in an orca in odyssey Confirmed this in not true. http://i.imgur.com/rDZgLka.jpg Ideas For Drone Improvement Repourpose Deep Space Scanner Probes |

Domanique Altares
Rifterlings Point Blank Alliance
79
|
Posted - 2013.05.19 21:09:00 -
[1203] - Quote
Omnathious Deninard wrote:Baycity Kitty wrote:Shilalasar wrote:But if you can get an orca in you can just put your T3 into the hangar and switch once you are in the site  Except I hear that the Orca won't allow any non-industrial ships to be put in its hanger now. So you can't move anything buy mining ships in an orca in odyssey Confirmed this in not true. http://i.imgur.com/rDZgLka.jpg
Thank goodness, and thank you.
Now let's bury this, before CCP gets ideas. |

Unezka Turigahl
Det Som Engang Var
72
|
Posted - 2013.05.19 21:18:00 -
[1204] - Quote
I can do lvl 4 missions in a Drake, we better ban T3s and Battleships from lvl 4s. Ban pirate BS from hisec incursions too, they aren't strictly necessary, only T1 BS with T1 guns allowed! Derp.
The fact that you don't NEED a T3 to do 4/10s is irrelevant. Its convenience. And unlike with lvl 4 missions and incursions, ISK is not being generated by farming faction modules in 4/10s *. They must be sold on market for ISK that already exists, if you even get a nice drop in the first place. So why such an attack on convenience/efficiency in hisec exploration? Why single out this form of hisec PvE as needing more inconvenience added? No other high end hisec PvE has ship restrictions placed on it.
The Tengu isn't even particularly unbeatable by other ships. Its just popular because missiles are very easy to use and its kinetic bonus just happens to line up with the best 4/10 site. I foresee a thousand hisec tengu exploration pilots becoming hisec incursion basilisk pilots. Fabricating ISK instead of trading for it.
I really don't see what the issue is with T3s running 4/10s.
* Yes, yes, I know, you do get some bounties in the process of running a 4/10. So technically a bit of ISK is being generated. But you get my point. |

Noztra Ernaga
m o t i o n
9
|
Posted - 2013.05.19 22:06:00 -
[1205] - Quote
Ok, seems like CCP chose the most stupid way to solve issues - to ban Tengu from high-sex exploration.
Change the location of the site or something, move 4/10 to lowsec, I take it, but to ban T3, this is just wrong.
Time to move on, unsubbing. And no, you cant have my stuff :) Spent last 2,5 month skilling for Tengu highsec/lowsec exploration and now it is obsolete. Thanks.
Do not like the direction this game is heading. |

Tzu Wu
The 51st Corp The 51st Alliance of Internet Spaceship Pilots
5
|
Posted - 2013.05.19 22:42:00 -
[1206] - Quote
Not yet,at least.Mark it down,Orcas will only be only able to carry indys come Odyssey. |

Johan Toralen
Clockwork X3
31
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 00:00:00 -
[1207] - Quote
Noztra Ernaga wrote:Time to move on, unsubbing. And no, you cant have my stuff :) Spent last 2,5 month skilling for Tengu highsec/lowsec exploration and now it is obsolete. Thanks.
I understand your disappointment but lets wait first how things will actualy turn out after Odyssey (granted i feel rather pessimistic myself). Thers still room for CCP to get at least a few things right despite all the **** ups so far. Tengu should be perfect ship for null sec profession sites should they decide to make them worthwile. Probing bonus, interdiction nullifier, cov ops cloak, enough mid slots for analyzers and additional probing mods. (under the assumption that not much dps and tank will be necessary for the sites aka rat spawns can be avoided or at least evaded). And i think or hope so that they change their mind about Tengu ban from low sec sites or leave the sites as they are but move them all to low. |

Arista Shahni
Real Simple Construction The Citadel Consortium
24
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 00:37:00 -
[1208] - Quote
Not going to argue with players about the nuances. This is my official "Down with this sort of thing". A major part of probing is the MIND skill, not the SP SKILL.
I play EVE because my hand eye coordination stinks, bad nerves, blah blah pity me. Scanning is perfectfor noncombat for me because it requires time, thought, and no twitch.
I do NOT live in Highsec because of my scanning habits. 4/10's being moved will not move me.
It's already hard to highsec scan due to the # of players scanning out sites. The lack of sites will NOT push me into low, it will push me out of scanning.
When has EVE ever catered to the lowest common denominator? I worked my tail off to learn everything I have and this cheapens it worse than any Medieval-like-MMO nerf I have ever played.
I mean. ..if this is going to happen at least make an Explo verison of this special keyboard: http://i.imgur.com/ujEMc8O.png
I hope someone is running a tear harvetser cause I'm bleeding them like Amarr shields right now. "I was dreaming once, and I dreampt of a world where I was nothing more than a biological fitting; a slave to the machine and crew, instead of the other way around. Don't you wonder at how easy it would have been for this scenario to happen, instead of how it actually unfolded?" |

Daniel Plain
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
1106
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 03:40:00 -
[1209] - Quote
Roime wrote:Daniel Plain wrote:i would really like to see a new player in a t1 cruiser do the serpentis 4/10. in fact, i would probably sacrifice a covops just to warp scramble him as soon as he has room aggro. This is the way and mentality of the hisec bear. Killing noobs instead of helping them. gg you must be playing another game, i'm sure. because typical hisec bears in eve would not even know what warp scrambling is, let alone have the idea to actually target another player.
also, i cannot say that i remember ever seeing you in the new citizen forum.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings" -MXZF |

Noztra Ernaga
m o t i o n
9
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 06:09:00 -
[1210] - Quote
Johan Toralen wrote:I understand your disappointment but lets wait first how things will actualy turn out after Odyssey (granted i feel rather pessimistic myself). Thers still room for CCP to get at least a few things right despite all the **** ups so far. Tengu should be perfect ship for null sec profession sites should they decide to make them worthwile. Probing bonus, interdiction nullifier, cov ops cloak, enough mid slots for analyzers and additional probing mods. (under the assumption that not much dps and tank will be necessary for the sites aka rat spawns can be avoided or at least evaded). And i think or hope so that they change their mind about Tengu ban from low sec sites or leave the sites as they are but move them all to low.
Yes, but why dont they rather solve the root of the problem? Instead of banning T3s, which are not the root of the problem but a consequence, why not to reconsider if a site with possible 800M loot really belongs to high-sec?
The root of the problem is the possible sweet loot. Why are not unrated sites problematic? Because to get really valuable loot out of those, you have to travel to low sec during last escalation and it is perfectly fine, that is a good design.
Remove the loot, move it to low sec, create lowsec escalation of it or whatever and it will make wonders. Its supply and demand. Thats it. But please do not tell us what should be flown :( |
|

Sipphakta en Gravonere
4S Corporation RAZOR Alliance
109
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 06:17:00 -
[1211] - Quote
Noztra Ernaga wrote:Time to move on, unsubbing. And no, you cant have my stuff :) Spent last 2,5 month skilling for Tengu highsec/lowsec exploration and now it is obsolete. Thanks.
Good bye. Eve doesn't need people who are unable to adapt.
I wish I were a cat. That way, I could kill things and people would applaud - instead of screaming out "OH GOD NO, NOT MY DAUGHTER!" |

Omnathious Deninard
The Scope Gallente Federation
1040
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 06:38:00 -
[1212] - Quote
Sipphakta en Gravonere wrote:Noztra Ernaga wrote:Time to move on, unsubbing. And no, you cant have my stuff :) Spent last 2,5 month skilling for Tengu highsec/lowsec exploration and now it is obsolete. Thanks.
Good bye. Eve doesn't need people who are unable to adapt. It is not a matter of adapting, it is being squeezed out. T3 ships are solo exploration ships, CCP seems to be doing everything in there power to remove solo exploration. With the removal of T3 ships form 3/10 and 4/10 sites, inorder to do them now you must have a ton of ships scattered throught the galaxy, or have a Orca or another type of ship with a SMA to follow you around. I will admit that I feel T3 ships are too powerful for a 3/10 and largely a 4/10 site, but at the same time a T1 cruiser can do most 4/10 sites, so why sould they allow any advanced cruisers and battlecruisers in them? A Destroyer can do a 3/10 site, why allow any cruisers in them at all?
It all seems to boil down to the removal of solo exploration, which if that is what one finds entertaining then un-subbing is the only thing to do. Ideas For Drone Improvement Repourpose Deep Space Scanner Probes |

Noztra Ernaga
m o t i o n
9
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 07:21:00 -
[1213] - Quote
Sipphakta en Gravonere wrote:Good bye. Eve doesn't need people who are unable to adapt.
By adapting you mean to change ships and create the same pressure on 4/10 in high-sec? How is the situation chaning? Just because it wont be Tengu but other ship, the problem gets solved by miracle? No, in a few months people will start a new forum whine being beaten in 4/10 competition by other ship used by high-sec exploration veterans.
I can use a Drake and play it the same as Tengu, oh wait, I will have better and passive tank...
Just because I want CCP to solve to root of the problem instead of prohibiting certain ships, I am unable to adapt, good logic, great :) |

Roime
Ten Thousand Years Shinjiketo
2886
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 08:50:00 -
[1214] - Quote
So looks like the concensus is:
- block T2 cruisers as well from hisec plexes - remove ship restrictions from lowsec plexes - decrease loot drops from hisec sites
I understand the opposition, after all CCP is trying to make exploration more player skill based instead of SP/ISK based, and that makes my ~elite hisec explorers~ very unhappy.
-á- All I really wanted was to build a castle among the stars - |

Omnathious Deninard
The Scope Gallente Federation
1041
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 09:06:00 -
[1215] - Quote
Why stop there? 3/10 sites are easily done in a destroyer, and 4/10 sites can be done in a t1 cruiser. So lets make that the restrictions.
Or the sites could be changed to make it a challenge for the ships that can enter them, a 3/10 should be difficult for a T2 cruiser, or a group of t1 cruisers. A 4/10 site should be a challenge for a command ship but manageable for a group of battle cruisers.
The loot drops need not change. Ideas For Drone Improvement Repourpose Deep Space Scanner Probes |

Paul Clancy
Korpu no Byakko
32
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 09:15:00 -
[1216] - Quote
It seems I have found an small issue with modules/rigs intended to improve Rangefinding. Please read this, |

Noztra Ernaga
m o t i o n
11
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 09:55:00 -
[1217] - Quote
People were complaining about Tengus, so Tengus get banned from 4/10. Lets place our bets which ship is going to be the next victim in a few months :)
What about unrated sites, are there any new ship restrictions? Or is it only Tengu banned from 3/10 a 4/10? Thanks. |

Sylvia Nardieu
audacity.
18
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 10:12:00 -
[1218] - Quote
Roime wrote:So looks like the concensus is: - block T2 cruisers as well from hisec plexes - remove ship restrictions from lowsec plexes - decrease loot drops from hisec sites I understand the opposition, after all CCP is trying to make exploration more player skill based instead of SP/ISK based, and that makes my ~elite hisec explorers~ very unhappy.
Well my suggestions would be:
- Randomize sig strenghts - no more farming DED's (= very simple solution, eh CCP?). This would complicate navigation in wh space tho, so I'd try to find a solution to compensate for that (perhaps making all kinds of wh's the same sig strenght? Dunno, haven't really thought that one out.).
- Ban tech 3's from DED3/10's but leave 4/10's alone - Give DSPs back (for deep safe probing) - Remove DED 4/10s from highsec OR fix loot tables so there's more likelyhood for better drops in lowsec in comparison to highsec - Bring back DED 1 and 2/10s to lowsec in form of scannable (using this new discovery scanners) signatures which pop on overview when warped to (kinda like FW plexes). Also balance them so that all rats have to be killed in first room(s), and faction rat is a bit tougher to kill, hence providing time for potential engagements to happen (kind of like serp 4/10). Make these spawn across constelations, promoting roaming and pvp in the process.
Some other things: - give back timer when doing system scan (I can't see how long it will take untill it ends atm) - give back the list of signatures discovered by discovery scanner - I don't want to get nauseous by spinning around all the time
and finally - learn to manage expectations, becasue they determine satisfaction in the end. I think you failed miserably on this one with Odyssey. Just look at these qoutes from Odyssey page: - "Some will encounter sites never discovered before, and others will be confronted with intriguing tests of skill and resolve. Ample rewards await those that return from their journeys with ships intact., and - "There is now more among the stars, enticing even the most experienced veterans to explore.".
What 'more' are you referring to, since nothing really new has been added? No new sites have been announced so far, there have been hints at rebalancing loot but its still all in the hint category with only 2 weeks left to go. If anything, there is actually less among the stars at the moment, less probe types to start with, and I do hope you don't think that silly minigame presents a " tests of skill and resolve", or that it will make "most experienced veterans" flock to exploration sites . |

Sipphakta en Gravonere
4S Corporation RAZOR Alliance
109
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 10:13:00 -
[1219] - Quote
Omnathious Deninard wrote: It is not a matter of adapting, it is being squeezed out. T3 ships are solo exploration ships, CCP seems to be doing everything in there power to remove solo exploration.
You can still do solo exploration, you just need another ship for it if you want to do it in highsec.
Quote:With the removal of T3 ships form 3/10 and 4/10 sites, inorder to do them now you must have a ton of ships scattered throught the galaxy, or have a Orca or another type of ship with a SMA to follow you around.
You may or may not have noticed that the signatures have become easier to scan down, at least in HS. You don't need a scanbonused ship anymore to find these sites. Many battlecruisers have utility highslots for a probe launcher. Or you could go refit in one of the many many many stations.
Quote:I will admit that I feel T3 ships are too powerful for a 3/10 and largely a 4/10 site, but at the same time a T1 cruiser can do most 4/10 sites, so why sould they allow any advanced cruisers and battlecruisers in them? A Destroyer can do a 3/10 site, why allow any cruisers in them at all?
With the new skill requirements, it will become easier to specialize in tech2 ships, giving newer players more variety in ships. At some point you have to draw the line for what ships you want to allow in the complexes. It seems fine to me to not allow cruisers with battleship tank/dps in the beginner complexes.
Quote: It all seems to boil down to the removal of solo exploration, which if that is what one finds entertaining then un-subbing is the only thing to do.
See above. You can still do solo exploration. You just have to adapt. I wish I were a cat. That way, I could kill things and people would applaud - instead of screaming out "OH GOD NO, NOT MY DAUGHTER!" |

Sipphakta en Gravonere
4S Corporation RAZOR Alliance
109
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 10:14:00 -
[1220] - Quote
Noztra Ernaga wrote:What about unrated sites, are there any new ship restrictions? Or is it only Tengu banned from 3/10 a 4/10? Thanks.
All strategic cruisers have been excluded from those plexes. I wish I were a cat. That way, I could kill things and people would applaud - instead of screaming out "OH GOD NO, NOT MY DAUGHTER!" |
|

Sylvia Nardieu
audacity.
19
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 10:20:00 -
[1221] - Quote
Sipphakta en Gravonere wrote: With the new skill requirements, it will become easier to specialize in tech2 ships, giving newer players more variety in ships. At some point you have to draw the line for what ships you want to allow in the complexes. It seems fine to me to not allow cruisers with battleship tank/dps in the beginner complexes.
DED4's are beginner complexes? I thought those would be DED1 and 2's but hey... |

Sipphakta en Gravonere
4S Corporation RAZOR Alliance
109
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 10:21:00 -
[1222] - Quote
Noztra Ernaga wrote:By adapting you mean to change ships and create the same pressure on 4/10 in high-sec? How is the situation changing? Just because it wont be Tengu but other ship, the problem gets solved by miracle? No, in a few months people will start a new forum whine being beaten in 4/10 competition by other ship used by high-sec exploration veterans.
So, when there is effectively no change, why do you whine about it and threaten to unsubscribe? Why don't you just change to another ship and go on with your merry life?
Quote:I can use a Drake and play it the exactly same way, oh wait, I will have better and passive tank... I want to fly Tengu, because I find the ship more fun than boring Drake.
Low- and Nullsec has plenty of opportunities to use your tengu for exploration.
Quote:The problem is a site in safe high-sec generating loot worth up to almost 1B. Its a matter of supply and demand. If the site really is created for new players, then such a valuable loot has nothing to do in there, unless it is a part of lowsec expedition.
The value of the loot is another problem, yes. If the T3 nerf doesn't play out, I'm sure CCP will take a look at the loottables/site distribution again. For now I think taking it slowly is the best path to go. I wish I were a cat. That way, I could kill things and people would applaud - instead of screaming out "OH GOD NO, NOT MY DAUGHTER!" |

Noztra Ernaga
m o t i o n
11
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 10:23:00 -
[1223] - Quote
Sipphakta en Gravonere wrote:All strategic cruisers have been excluded from those plexes.
I can somehow accept that in case Battlecruisers are still allowed. Too bad I do not want to fly that boring Drake ship, so for me it means to skill something new and accept 2 month of Tengu training as time wasted :(
You might say its not much, but for me it is, my toon is relatively new with just 15M SP, so this really hurts. |

Sarmatiko
1118
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 10:27:00 -
[1224] - Quote
Noztra Ernaga wrote: By adapting you mean to change ships and create the same pressure on 4/10 in high-sec? How is the situation changing? Just because it wont be Tengu but other ship, the problem gets solved by miracle? No, in a few months people will start a new forum whine being beaten in 4/10 competition by other ship used by high-sec exploration veterans.
Yes! So don't cry, change ships (to Cerberus, it will be easy) and "create the same pressure". But looking at the amount of tears it's obvious that Tengu was the key to that pressure, because suddenly you don't have ship scan bonus anymore and now you need to compete with all those "peasants on T1\T2".
I, for one, welcome your leave from highsec exploration 
|

Sipphakta en Gravonere
4S Corporation RAZOR Alliance
109
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 10:27:00 -
[1225] - Quote
Sylvia Nardieu wrote:DED4's are beginner complexes? I thought those would be DED1 and 2's but hey...
Let's see.
- Located in High Sec - Enemies are BC and below (With the exception of the 1 BS in Serpentis 4/10) - Can be done by 4 week old Newbie without breaking a sweat
What would you call it? I wish I were a cat. That way, I could kill things and people would applaud - instead of screaming out "OH GOD NO, NOT MY DAUGHTER!" |

Durzel
Questionable Ethics. Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
123
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 10:29:00 -
[1226] - Quote
Sipphakta en Gravonere wrote:Sylvia Nardieu wrote:DED4's are beginner complexes? I thought those would be DED1 and 2's but hey... Let's see. - Located in High Sec - Enemies are BC and below (With the exception of the 1 BS in Serpentis 4/10) - Can be done by 4 week old Newbie without breaking a sweat What would you call it? A broken plex.
To be honest imo 4/10s dropping 300m in loot in highsec when it's just BC and below in the plex is disproportionate risk/reward, T3s or not. It's not like they're even that uncommon.
4/10s should be equivalent to one of the level 4 Worlds Collide rooms, minus the instant aggro. Make the plex more than just "burn to the satellite as fast as you can whilst tanking the anemic damage from everything on grid" |

Noztra Ernaga
m o t i o n
11
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 10:32:00 -
[1227] - Quote
Sarmatiko wrote:So don't cry, change ships (to Cerberus, it will be easy) and "create the same pressure". But looking at the amount of tears it's obvious that Tengu was the key to that pressure, because suddenly you don't have ship scan bonus anymore and now you need to compete with all those "peasants on T1\T2". I, for one, welcome your leave from highsec exploration 
With the new modules and more comfortable scanning? I can guarantee you that I will be able to scan sites with any decent ship as effective as now with a Tengu :)
When someone uses second account and scans with a Heron/Buzzard and then warps to a 4/10 with a dmg specialized ship, it is ok? Just because he/she pays for two accounts, its acceptable? :) |

Sylvia Nardieu
audacity.
19
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 10:35:00 -
[1228] - Quote
Sipphakta en Gravonere wrote: What would you call it?
- Located in High Sec
Misplaced
Quote:- Enemies are BC and below (With the exception of the 1 BS in Serpentis 4/10) I mostly do Serp, so obviously others are poorly balanced.
Quote:Can be done by 4 week old Newbie without breaking a sweat 4 weeks w/o breaking a sweat? You serious? Please send me an evemon plan for that char. |

Omnathious Deninard
The Scope Gallente Federation
1041
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 10:37:00 -
[1229] - Quote
Sipphakta en Gravonere wrote: With the new skill requirements, it will become easier to specialize in tech2 ships, giving newer players more variety in ships. At some point you have to draw the line for what ships you want to allow in the complexes. It seems fine to me to not allow cruisers with battleship tank/dps in the beginner complexes.
Apparently you did not look at the training time of the new skill requirements, they are about the same amount of time now as they were before. How does that make it any easier? Ideas For Drone Improvement Repourpose Deep Space Scanner Probes |

Sipphakta en Gravonere
4S Corporation RAZOR Alliance
109
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 11:28:00 -
[1230] - Quote
Omnathious Deninard wrote:Apparently you did not look at the training time of the new skill requirements, they are about the same amount of time now as they were before. How does that make it any easier?
You are right, they switched the prerequisites to something more useful. My bad. I wish I were a cat. That way, I could kill things and people would applaud - instead of screaming out "OH GOD NO, NOT MY DAUGHTER!" |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 .. 50 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |