| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 .. 31 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 6 post(s) |

Nyancat Audeles
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
652
|
Posted - 2013.11.28 14:19:00 -
[241] - Quote
Kagura Nikon wrote:Nyancat Audeles wrote: You originally mentioned that webs are the most OP EWAR out there. I'm pretty sure most people would disagree. Range-bonused webs? Maybe. But you weren't even referring to those.
I'm pretty sure eliminating the opponent's ability to target you in the first place, or activate any tackle on you whatsoever, will win more fights than pure range control. What's range control if you can't even shoot? Talk about lack of reason.
Webs are indeed one of the most powerful bonuses.
I never said bonused webs aren't very powerful. He mentioned unbonused webs being too powerful (he was comparing it to other unbonused forms of EWAR).
Bonused webs are indeed powerful, as they should be - it's a freaking EWAR BONUS. Webs have the least range, but you pay for that with power.
|

Nyancat Audeles
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
652
|
Posted - 2013.11.28 14:20:00 -
[242] - Quote
Fey Ivory wrote:Kenrailae wrote:The problem isn't the web bonus. Not at all. The Vindi is one of a small handful of ships that can look a larger fleet in the eye and then black their eyes, in an outright, point blank fight. Not resorting to nano-snipy-crap. A real, go big or go home brawl. It's a very important ship for small -> Mid gang PVP, because it allows the fleets willing and able to use them the ability to take fights they wouldn't otherwise even be able to think about taking.
The problem MIGHT be in the way webs stack, and the price tag. A properly fit Vindicator is an expensive ship. It represents a significant investment of SP, isk, and commitment to a fight. It SHOULD be able to stand up to larger fleets.
But even in that, vindi's can be undone by ECM. They can be damped into nothingness. They can be neuted. They already have a fairly low lock range.. And they're already a BS, they take a while to lock anyway. With their Commitment to their webs, they often do not fit a cap booster, or if they do, certainly not an ECCM or sensor booster. They are slow, slow slow ships. Even with links, faction, and overheat, their effective web range is still less than half the distance ECM or damps could shut a ship down from. If a Vindicator wants to get anywhere on the battlefield, it pretty much HAS to MWD. That MWD+ a few TP's are going to make it's signature radius absolutely huge. So Even TP's are effective on vindi's, though not as 'right now' effective as just jamming it, still effective.
There is just no reason to change this.
Dev's are saying 'oh well you don't have to lose your minds....'
Well how many pages did we have to get through on the gallente BS thread before Dev's listened when we said a 6 low 5 midslot Megathron was a bad idea.... How long is the marauders thread?
Last I checked, the whole point of F & I forum section was to discuss features and ideas.
Well... CCP has floated the idea of removing the serpentis web bonus.
The community is responding by and large with a resounding 'NO.'
We don't WANT every ship to be a drake with a different skin. You guys did well with the Frigates and cruisers... but since those it's kinda been mis step after mis step.
This change will really really hurt the small to midsize alliances, in particularly in low sec. We rely on our Vindicators and pirate/faction BS to fight people who would otherwise just bury us under drakes. Those are some of our most important ships for counter blob warfare. It's not because they are ridiculously OP Nerf pls! It's because they are well designed, role specific ships that we have to be very selective about when we field and do not field, because they are a significant commitment in isk and material to a fight. Taking those ships out of our arsenal is pretty much going to guarantee that the bigger blob always wins.
Please stop nerfbatting everything that is decent and replacing it with a fall off/trackingfire rate and MWD signature reduction bonus.
Variety, is a very, very good thing.
My opinion anyway....
A really good post Sir +1
Yup. Added to OP, +1 |

Nyancat Audeles
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
653
|
Posted - 2013.11.28 14:27:00 -
[243] - Quote
Vizvig wrote:Fey Ivory wrote:Vizvig wrote:Nyancat Audeles wrote:
90% webs are not OP. The fact that you need to spend a sh*tload of ISK on expensive
Pay2win Now shut up. Dominix vs Rattlesnake Both are drone boats, One of them has better tank, better dps, basically better everything, and it also cost more, alot more pay to win ? In eve you can pay and increase capability to win. are i wrong? You guys don't understand what Pay To Win means.
That is NOT pay to win.
Pay To Win is when you can buy gear with real money that is NOT available with in-game money. In other words, there is no other way to get those items without paying real money.
That is the VERY DEFINITION of Pay To Win, and why everyone was freaking out with gold ammo, etc. |

Kagura Nikon
Mentally Assured Destruction The Pursuit of Happiness
856
|
Posted - 2013.11.28 14:27:00 -
[244] - Quote
Zamyslinski wrote:Kagura Nikon wrote:
Not my fault you cannot grasp concepts that are not rubbed direclty into your face.
Hes a goon, what did you expect?
Good point. I humbly accept your demonstration of wisdom. "If brute force does not solve your problem..... -áthen you are -ásurely not using enough!" |

Nyancat Audeles
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
653
|
Posted - 2013.11.28 14:35:00 -
[245] - Quote
90% is the only reason people fly this ship. Even 8%, or 9% per level, makes these ships ABSOLUTELY USELESS.
I think that point has been made repeatedly, over and over, by multiple people. There are always going to be a few dissenters who oppose this point, but I think the point has been made, and I hope CCP listens. |

Gypsio III
Questionable Ethics. Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
992
|
Posted - 2013.11.28 14:47:00 -
[246] - Quote
Why would they be useless with an 87% web instead of a 90% one? |

Kagura Nikon
Mentally Assured Destruction The Pursuit of Happiness
856
|
Posted - 2013.11.28 14:47:00 -
[247] - Quote
Nyancat Audeles wrote:90% is the only reason people fly this ship. Even 8%, or 9% per level, makes these ships ABSOLUTELY USELESS.
I think that point has been made repeatedly, over and over, by multiple people. There are always going to be a few dissenters who oppose this point, but I think the point has been made, and I hope CCP listens.
In no way that weould maek them absolutely useless.
If the bonus was 8% per level, the web would reduce a 1km/s ship to 260 m/s It would still be very very powerful. Would hurt the vindicator more than the devil because the vindicator would not be able to instant blap frigates hitting for 100% of damage.
Not being OP is not same as being useless. If webs were useles at that level then no one would use normal webs on other ships.
Also A lot of peopel use serpentis ship more due to the damage than due to web. "If brute force does not solve your problem..... -áthen you are -ásurely not using enough!" |

Kagura Nikon
Mentally Assured Destruction The Pursuit of Happiness
856
|
Posted - 2013.11.28 14:48:00 -
[248] - Quote
Gypsio III wrote:Why would they be useless with an 87% web instead of a 90% one?
That just point hta some peopel are overreactign and whinnign without using the mother of all truth, the MATH "If brute force does not solve your problem..... -áthen you are -ásurely not using enough!" |

Nyancat Audeles
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
653
|
Posted - 2013.11.28 14:53:00 -
[249] - Quote
Kagura Nikon wrote:Nyancat Audeles wrote:90% is the only reason people fly this ship. Even 8%, or 9% per level, makes these ships ABSOLUTELY USELESS.
I think that point has been made repeatedly, over and over, by multiple people. There are always going to be a few dissenters who oppose this point, but I think the point has been made, and I hope CCP listens. In no way that weould maek them absolutely useless. If the bonus was 8% per level, the web would reduce a 1km/s ship to 260 m/s It would still be very very powerful. Would hurt the vindicator more than the devil because the vindicator would not be able to instant blap frigates hitting for 100% of damage. Not being OP is not same as being useless. If webs were useles at that level then no one would use normal webs on other ships. Also A lot of peopel use serpentis ship more due to the damage than due to web. No, people don't.
Especially in PvP.
260 m/s is too much - again, you are not understanding WHY people fly these ships. |

Jake Sake
Boa Innovations Brothers of Tangra
17
|
Posted - 2013.11.28 15:33:00 -
[250] - Quote
Nyancat Audeles wrote:90% is the only reason people fly this ship. Even 8%, or 9% per level, makes these ships ABSOLUTELY USELESS.
I think that point has been made repeatedly, over and over, by multiple people. There are always going to be a few dissenters who oppose this point, but I think the point has been made, and I hope CCP listens. You're doing it wrong, my troll brother! You should put more effort in your troll attempts. Repeat after me:
90% is the only reason people fly this ship. Even 89.9% will turn these ships into an enormous pile of ABSOLUTELY USELESS dog schit!!!11oneone |

NightmareX
Mind Games. Suddenly Spaceships.
246
|
Posted - 2013.11.28 15:40:00 -
[251] - Quote
Also, if the web bonus from the Vindicator gets removed, then what advantage does the Vindicator have against the other pirate battleships? Here is a list of my current EVE / PVP videos.
Suddenly Spaceships fighting in Tama (31.10.2013): https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=291945
Rebirth 4: http://tinyurl.com/ktfyalo |

Gypsio III
Questionable Ethics. Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
992
|
Posted - 2013.11.28 15:40:00 -
[252] - Quote
Kagura Nikon wrote:Gypsio III wrote:Why would they be useless with an 87% web instead of a 90% one? That just point hta some peopel are overreactign and whinnign without using the mother of all truth, the MATH
Yeah. I was trying to get Nyancat to make himself look more stupid,but he's now quietly ignored his own opinion on 87% webs and is now whining about 74% webs, equivalent to a 4.667% bonus per level. He's also introducing a hidden penalty that Serpentis ships can only ever fit one web.  |

Nyancat Audeles
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
654
|
Posted - 2013.11.28 15:45:00 -
[253] - Quote
Gypsio III wrote:He's also introducing a hidden penalty that Serpentis ships can only ever fit one web. 
Because Daredevil pilots will be fitting dual-web, amirite? |

Kagura Nikon
Mentally Assured Destruction The Pursuit of Happiness
856
|
Posted - 2013.11.28 16:00:00 -
[254] - Quote
Nyancat Audeles wrote:Kagura Nikon wrote:Nyancat Audeles wrote:90% is the only reason people fly this ship. Even 8%, or 9% per level, makes these ships ABSOLUTELY USELESS.
I think that point has been made repeatedly, over and over, by multiple people. There are always going to be a few dissenters who oppose this point, but I think the point has been made, and I hope CCP listens. In no way that weould maek them absolutely useless. If the bonus was 8% per level, the web would reduce a 1km/s ship to 260 m/s It would still be very very powerful. Would hurt the vindicator more than the devil because the vindicator would not be able to instant blap frigates hitting for 100% of damage. Not being OP is not same as being useless. If webs were useles at that level then no one would use normal webs on other ships. Also A lot of peopel use serpentis ship more due to the damage than due to web. No, people don't. Especially in PvP. 260 m/s is too much - again, you are not understanding WHY people fly these ships. A 74% web is useless for a ship of this price. People would just fly ships with double-web.
We use vindicators.. we use because of damage. My point has been proved by example. "If brute force does not solve your problem..... -áthen you are -ásurely not using enough!" |

Kagura Nikon
Mentally Assured Destruction The Pursuit of Happiness
856
|
Posted - 2013.11.28 16:01:00 -
[255] - Quote
NightmareX wrote:Also, if the web bonus from the Vindicator gets removed, then what advantage does the Vindicator have against the other pirate battleships?
The new bonus yet undisclosed to replace th e onld one?
Because I am yet to see anyone claiming ccp would make the vindicator be the only pirate ship with 2 bonuses only. "If brute force does not solve your problem..... -áthen you are -ásurely not using enough!" |

NightmareX
Mind Games. Suddenly Spaceships.
246
|
Posted - 2013.11.28 16:12:00 -
[256] - Quote
Kagura Nikon wrote:NightmareX wrote:Also, if the web bonus from the Vindicator gets removed, then what advantage does the Vindicator have against the other pirate battleships? The new bonus yet undisclosed to replace th e onld one? Because I am yet to see anyone claiming ccp would make the vindicator be the only pirate ship with 2 bonuses only. The only new bonus i can see it will get if the web bonus is getting removed is to get even more damage bonuses as the Vindicator is focused around DPS and to apply DPS. And if that's the case then, it will need at least 20% more damage output. Hopefully it will have around 25% more damage then. Here is a list of my current EVE / PVP videos.
Suddenly Spaceships fighting in Tama (31.10.2013): https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=291945
Rebirth 4: http://tinyurl.com/ktfyalo |

Nyancat Audeles
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
654
|
Posted - 2013.11.28 16:23:00 -
[257] - Quote
NightmareX wrote:Kagura Nikon wrote:NightmareX wrote:Also, if the web bonus from the Vindicator gets removed, then what advantage does the Vindicator have against the other pirate battleships? The new bonus yet undisclosed to replace th e onld one? Because I am yet to see anyone claiming ccp would make the vindicator be the only pirate ship with 2 bonuses only. The only new bonus i can see it will get if the web bonus is getting removed is to get even more damage bonuses as the Vindicator is focused around DPS and to apply DPS. And if that's the case then, it will need at least 20% more damage output. Hopefully it will have around 25% more damage then. Because going from 90% to 60% web strenght is a HUGE deal on how good the Vindicator can apply it's damage. This is true. And 300 DPS raildevils are a bad idea. Just keep the web bonus and change a damage bonus to sensor damp bonus or something.
|

Garviel Tarrant
Beyond Divinity Inc Shadow Cartel
1706
|
Posted - 2013.11.28 16:25:00 -
[258] - Quote
Nyancat Audeles wrote:NightmareX wrote:Kagura Nikon wrote:NightmareX wrote:Also, if the web bonus from the Vindicator gets removed, then what advantage does the Vindicator have against the other pirate battleships? The new bonus yet undisclosed to replace th e onld one? Because I am yet to see anyone claiming ccp would make the vindicator be the only pirate ship with 2 bonuses only. The only new bonus i can see it will get if the web bonus is getting removed is to get even more damage bonuses as the Vindicator is focused around DPS and to apply DPS. And if that's the case then, it will need at least 20% more damage output. Hopefully it will have around 25% more damage then. Because going from 90% to 60% web strenght is a HUGE deal on how good the Vindicator can apply it's damage. This is true. And 300 DPS raildevils are a bad idea. Just keep the web bonus and change a damage bonus to sensor damp bonus or something.
 BYDI recruitment closed-ish |

Kagura Nikon
Mentally Assured Destruction The Pursuit of Happiness
856
|
Posted - 2013.11.28 16:29:00 -
[259] - Quote
NightmareX wrote:Kagura Nikon wrote:NightmareX wrote:Also, if the web bonus from the Vindicator gets removed, then what advantage does the Vindicator have against the other pirate battleships? The new bonus yet undisclosed to replace th e onld one? Because I am yet to see anyone claiming ccp would make the vindicator be the only pirate ship with 2 bonuses only. The only new bonus i can see it will get if the web bonus is getting removed is to get even more damage bonuses as the Vindicator is focused around DPS and to apply DPS. And if that's the case then, it will need at least 20% more damage output. Hopefully it will have around 25% more damage then. Because going from 90% to 60% web strenght is a HUGE deal on how good the Vindicator can apply it's damage.
You realize that there are lots of numbers between 60 and 90? "If brute force does not solve your problem..... -áthen you are -ásurely not using enough!" |

Nag'o
Cuisinart Inc. Insidious Empire
34
|
Posted - 2013.11.28 16:30:00 -
[260] - Quote
I'm ok with this nerf as long as they give something to buff it as a tradeoff. Something neat like a Serpentis unique module that projects a spike out of the hull and impales the enemy ship holding it into place. Brain hackz0r. Execute schizophrenia virus. Hyper-phishing activated. Downloading reality. |

Kagura Nikon
Mentally Assured Destruction The Pursuit of Happiness
856
|
Posted - 2013.11.28 16:33:00 -
[261] - Quote
Nag'o wrote:I'm ok with this nerf as long as they give something to buff it as a tradeoff. Something neat like a Serpentis unique module that projects a spike out of the hull and impales the enemy ship holding it into place.
Following the current trend on game balance, The vindicator will get a 100% RANGE bonus to TARGET PAINTERS!!!! "If brute force does not solve your problem..... -áthen you are -ásurely not using enough!" |

Niena Nuamzzar
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
128
|
Posted - 2013.11.28 16:54:00 -
[262] - Quote
Kagura Nikon wrote:Nag'o wrote:I'm ok with this nerf as long as they give something to buff it as a tradeoff. Something neat like a Serpentis unique module that projects a spike out of the hull and impales the enemy ship holding it into place. Following the current trend on game balance, The vindicator will get a 100% RANGE bonus to TARGET PAINTERS!!!! LOL, dunno why Stratios comes to mind...
|

Gypsio III
Questionable Ethics. Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
992
|
Posted - 2013.11.28 17:11:00 -
[263] - Quote
Nyancat Audeles wrote:Gypsio III wrote:He's also introducing a hidden penalty that Serpentis ships can only ever fit one web.  Because Daredevil pilots will be fitting dual-web, amirite?
As easily as any other three-medslot combat frigate, yes.  |

MeBiatch
Republic University Minmatar Republic
1525
|
Posted - 2013.11.28 17:44:00 -
[264] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:I think there's a couple of problems with you OP, but I can see that there's a bit of confusion stemming from how quickly the question got answered in a AMA format.
I'll start by confirming that some kind of change to the Serpentis and Blood Raider web bonus is something we have been thinking about for a while.
Web strength bonuses are some of the most powerful bonuses available to any ship, which makes them very interesting and valuable but also makes some of their results problematic. Interestingly, the way the strength of the bonus presents itself is very different in different contexts. At the frigate level with the Daredevil, the power of 90% webs primarily comes from range control. At the battleship level with the Vindicator it primarily comes from transversal control (especially when used as a force multiplier). At the cruiser level it falls in the middle and ends up being (relatively speaking) less powerful and less oppressive as a result. I am not going to try to claim that we have our plan of action worked out, and there will be plenty of discussion before we implement our Pirate ship balance pass.
One thing I can say for sure though is that we consider the solo Daredevil and the force multiplier Vindicator to both be too strong in their current states, and that we recognize that the primary source of their disproportionate power is the web bonus (for different reasons as I said above).
Another thing I can say for sure is that we will never base our design decisions on what Nyancat has stockpiled or not stockpiled.
i know i wont get any likes for this. but the web bonus needs to go.
I understand why it was done back with the nano nerf back in the day. but it seems like the bonus is just pure op.
now with the other op bonus (resistance) you guys just reduced the amount. this could also be done like a 7.5% per level. or you could just go something new like a falloff bonus... it would **** off alot of people though it would help with the frig keep range and it would help with the transeversal for the bs There are no stupid Questions... just stupid people... Winter Expansion new ship request |

NightmareX
Mind Games. Suddenly Spaceships.
247
|
Posted - 2013.11.28 17:59:00 -
[265] - Quote
MeBiatch wrote:but it seems like the bonus is just pure op. I'm not even sure if you actually think about how ridiculously overpowered the Machariel is going to be against the Vindicator. The only way to have a chance to fight a Machariel in a Vindicator is to use the web. Without the web bonus, the Vindicator will lose to it EVERY single time. PERIOD.
Sure, if the Machariel gets it's speed nerfed as much as the nerf for the Vindicator will be by going from 90% to 60% web strenght, then fine.
So no, if the Machariel doesn't get a massive speed nerf, then no, the web bonus doesn't have to go. Infact, it doesn't even have to go as the main Serpentis bonus is web strenght and DPS, Blood Raider's strenght is web range and neuts, Angel Cartel's strenghts are tracking and speed.
So everyone have it's own strenghts.
Just to make a very clear example. Would you or anyone else who use a Machariel accept to remove the speed advantages the Machariel have over other ships for another bonus? Here is a list of my current EVE / PVP videos.
Suddenly Spaceships fighting in Tama (31.10.2013): https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=291945 Rebirth 4: http://tinyurl.com/ktfyalo |

Xequecal
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
123
|
Posted - 2013.11.28 18:01:00 -
[266] - Quote
Kagura Nikon wrote:Bonuses a curse recive from links include speed, signature, tackle range (very relevant to use its NEUT RANGE BONUS effectively). Shield resistances, shield repair speed, armro resit if you use strange fits, sensr strenght, and mostly important huge boost to track dirsruptor.
Not my fault you cannot grasp concepts that are not rubbed direclty into your face.
Every ship receives these bonuses. However, most other ships receive additional bonuses that the Curse doesn't, such as an indirect improvement of their weapon systems. The fact is that the Curse is a lot worse if both you and the opponent have links than it is if neither of you do. It's the same problem with missile boats, if both you and your opponent have links, a turret-based ship suffers far less from your increased speed and reduced sig because his own increased speed allows him to cut down on transversal to some extent, while at the same time NOTHING you can possibly do can increase your missile damage. |

Harvey James
The Sengoku Legacy
604
|
Posted - 2013.11.28 18:16:00 -
[267] - Quote
MeBiatch wrote:CCP Fozzie wrote:I think there's a couple of problems with you OP, but I can see that there's a bit of confusion stemming from how quickly the question got answered in a AMA format.
I'll start by confirming that some kind of change to the Serpentis and Blood Raider web bonus is something we have been thinking about for a while.
Web strength bonuses are some of the most powerful bonuses available to any ship, which makes them very interesting and valuable but also makes some of their results problematic. Interestingly, the way the strength of the bonus presents itself is very different in different contexts. At the frigate level with the Daredevil, the power of 90% webs primarily comes from range control. At the battleship level with the Vindicator it primarily comes from transversal control (especially when used as a force multiplier). At the cruiser level it falls in the middle and ends up being (relatively speaking) less powerful and less oppressive as a result. I am not going to try to claim that we have our plan of action worked out, and there will be plenty of discussion before we implement our Pirate ship balance pass.
One thing I can say for sure though is that we consider the solo Daredevil and the force multiplier Vindicator to both be too strong in their current states, and that we recognize that the primary source of their disproportionate power is the web bonus (for different reasons as I said above).
Another thing I can say for sure is that we will never base our design decisions on what Nyancat has stockpiled or not stockpiled. i know i wont get any likes for this. but the web bonus needs to go. I understand why it was done back with the nano nerf back in the day. but it seems like the bonus is just pure op. now with the other op bonus (resistance) you guys just reduced the amount. this could also be done like a 7.5% per level. or you could just go something new like a falloff bonus... it would **** off alot of people though it would help with the frig keep range and it would help with the transeversal for the bs
i'll give you a like for this 90% webs are OP and need a nerf .. and webs in general need a rebalance.. Tech 3's need to be multi role ships not cruiser hulls with battleship tank and insane resists ABC's are clearly T2 in all but name AB's need a buff-á like a big mass reduction ..... module tiercide FTW role based instead of tiers please. |

NightmareX
Mind Games. Suddenly Spaceships.
247
|
Posted - 2013.11.28 18:22:00 -
[268] - Quote
Harvey James wrote:i'll give you a like for this 90% webs are OP and need a nerf .. and webs in general need a rebalance.. Can you explain what's so op with 90% webs when a Bhaalgorn can neut over 3k cap in one cycle with 3 neuts?
I'm not sure what's more op here actually.
Here is a list of my current EVE / PVP videos.
Suddenly Spaceships fighting in Tama (31.10.2013): https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=291945 Rebirth 4: http://tinyurl.com/ktfyalo |

Nyancat Audeles
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
654
|
Posted - 2013.11.28 18:23:00 -
[269] - Quote
NightmareX wrote:MeBiatch wrote:but it seems like the bonus is just pure op. I'm not even sure if you actually think about how ridiculously overpowered the Machariel is going to be against the Vindicator. The only way to have a chance to fight a Machariel in a Vindicator is to use the web. Without the web bonus, the Vindicator will lose to it EVERY single time. PERIOD. Sure, if the Machariel gets it's speed nerfed as much as the nerf for the Vindicator will be by going from 90% to 60% web strenght, then fine. So no, if the Machariel doesn't get a massive speed nerf, then no, the web bonus doesn't have to go. Infact, it doesn't even have to go as the main Serpentis bonus is web strenght and DPS, Blood Raider's strenght is web range and neuts, Angel Cartel's strenghts are tracking and speed and Guristas strenghts are drones and shield resists. So everyone have it's own strenghts. Just to make a very clear example. Would you or anyone else who use a Machariel accept to remove the speed advantages the Machariel have over other ships for another bonus? This, pretty much. We might as well turn ALL ships into the same, or very similar ones, with just different skins. |

MeBiatch
Republic University Minmatar Republic
1527
|
Posted - 2013.11.28 18:26:00 -
[270] - Quote
NightmareX wrote:MeBiatch wrote:but it seems like the bonus is just pure op. I'm not even sure if you actually think about how ridiculously overpowered the Machariel is going to be against the Vindicator. The only way to have a chance to fight a Machariel in a Vindicator is to use the web. Without the web bonus, the Vindicator will lose to it EVERY single time. PERIOD. Sure, if the Machariel gets it's speed nerfed as much as the nerf for the Vindicator will be by going from 90% to 60% web strenght, then fine. So no, if the Machariel doesn't get a massive speed nerf, then no, the web bonus doesn't have to go. Infact, it doesn't even have to go as the main Serpentis bonus is web strenght and DPS, Blood Raider's strenght is web range and neuts, Angel Cartel's strenghts are tracking and speed and Guristas strenghts are drones and shield resists. So everyone have it's own strenghts. Just to make a very clear example. Would you or anyone else who use a Machariel accept to remove the speed advantages the Machariel have over other ships for another bonus?
its kinda hard to start to compare the ships without knowing ccp plans for the mach.
I know its going to be hit with a hard nerf. Just not sure if its going to be range or speed or ehp... or maybe a little of all three.
though just by looking at the web bonus by its self its a op bonus period.
There are no stupid Questions... just stupid people... Winter Expansion new ship request |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 .. 31 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |