| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .. 107 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 5 post(s) |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
10059
|
Posted - 2014.02.03 20:32:00 -
[2281] - Quote
blabla4711 wrote:baltec1 wrote: This from the people who have posted no evidence at all to back up their claims.
Funny remark from Mr. Shitposter himself who never provided anything at all, talk baseless bullshit and pure lies all the time and is about to party because he found a conflict averse sissy like this kimmy-gal who invests his/her time to try to prove something that means absolutely nothing in this subject at hand while you laugh your asses off. 
I see you didnt read that link I provided to that spreadsheet that showed level 3 missions earned more isk that you said level 4s earned. All of the numbers I stated have been verified, you on the other hand have nothing but insults and have contributed nothing to this thread. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
950
|
Posted - 2014.02.03 20:35:00 -
[2282] - Quote
Once again this goes off the rails. Baltec I assume you have data that supports 50m/hr in L3s?
Jenn, I agree that so long as Null is borked, null residents will come to high sec to make ISK. I don't think anyone can deny that. If they ALSO make passive ISK off of PI, that is irrelevant. They are going to make that PI ISK whether they are doing anoms in NullSec or doing L4s in HighSec.
What not one person has discussed is HOW.
69% of the income made in HighSec PVE is LP according to Stoic's data. How do you nerf LP without clogging the ISK sink that is the LP Store?
All I see is people going back and forth with insults, wild and baseless claims, and general ignorance of facts and provided data. "You should just create one thread and put all of your complaints in it instead of littering the forums with multiple threads." ~CCP Falcon
[Member of The BrownCoat Syndicate] |

Philyus
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
1
|
Posted - 2014.02.03 20:40:00 -
[2283] - Quote
admiral root wrote:Mr Epeen wrote:See, it's not about you and your bad luck. It's about the average of everyone that runs these things. Not everyone is as sadly lacking of good drops as you are. Ok, tell us about your faction drops in nullsec. The more the merrier (and the more accurate).
As someone who runs 2-3 accounts almost 8 hours a day in anoms (one perk of working from home), I can give you my experience with faction spawns.
* The spawn chance of a faction ship is 1%. * If I run all 3 accounts 5 days a week, that would be 120 hours or 240 anoms. * That should equal 2.4 spawns a day. * I normally see between 1-3 a day. In a five day week, that would be 5-15. * Out of all those spawns, I will average one item that is worth 100 mil. Everything else is ammo and tags. * Divide that 100mil by 120 hours and it is less than 1mil isk/hour.
It has been two weeks since my last export to empire and my sell container currently holds a Crystal Alpha, a DG Cruise Launcher and a DG Large Shield Booster for a combined market value of 151m. That is less than 1% of my income for that same period of time.
Faction spawns are not a consistent form of income. |

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
951
|
Posted - 2014.02.03 20:40:00 -
[2284] - Quote
blabla4711 wrote:baltec1 wrote: This from the people who have posted no evidence at all to back up their claims.
Funny remark from Mr. Shitposter himself who never provided anything at all, talk baseless bullshit and pure lies all the time and is about to party because he found a conflict averse sissy like this kimmy-gal who invests his/her time to try to prove something that means absolutely nothing in this subject at hand while you laugh your asses off playing forumgames. 
And it's not about conflict averse. Show me the data. Don't have any? Then I will go get it myself. I already have in fact. What have you done? Seriously, aside from this stellar post of pure WTF, what have you done?
"You should just create one thread and put all of your complaints in it instead of littering the forums with multiple threads." ~CCP Falcon
[Member of The BrownCoat Syndicate] |

Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
3957
|
Posted - 2014.02.03 20:42:00 -
[2285] - Quote
La Nariz wrote:blabla4711 wrote:baltec1 wrote: This from the people who have posted no evidence at all to back up their claims.
Funny remark from Mr. Shitposter himself who never provided anything at all, talk baseless bullshit and pure lies all the time and is about to party because he found a conflict averse sissy like this kimmy-gal who invests his/her time to try to prove something that means absolutely nothing in this subject at hand while you laugh your asses off playing forumgames.  https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqC-BTui2uSGdDlxa2dWOG5ieHB0QXBVWW82bGN5TFE&usp=sharingCheck and mate, terrible highsec pubbie npc alt.
Good stuff!
Oh... hold on. No it isn't.
I can do a dozen missions and spreadsheet it too. They'll show me making next to nothing off them, but because that's what I want, I'll keep waving it in everyone's face to prove some pointless theory.
Mr Epeen 
There are 86,400 seconds in a day. You just saved one of them by typing 'u' instead of 'you'.-á Congratulations, dumbass! |

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
2006
|
Posted - 2014.02.03 20:43:00 -
[2286] - Quote
Dear Jenn aWhine, the main thrust of my question was, in fact, what do folk think would happen to the game?
Really what you seem to be saying is that you want to screw the income of hi-sec folk, so that null-sec folk earn more, relatively speaking.
That is a perfectly respectable position to hold, but to pretend it is for the greater good of the game is just not on.
I am sorry you do not care about me, or my play-style, but as I am basically a hi-sec player, I do care for you. This is not a signature. |

blabla4711
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
9
|
Posted - 2014.02.03 20:43:00 -
[2287] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:
I see you didnt read that link I provided to that spreadsheet that showed level 3 missions earned more isk that you said level 4s earned. All of the numbers I stated have been verified, you on the other hand have nothing but insults and have contributed nothing to this thread.
Ah. More lies from Mr. Shitposter. Just link me where you, and you in person, provided any data.
In contrast to you liar, i did.
And while you are at it, link my post where i say anything about the possible isk from l4s. I didnt. Because this alone means next to nothing.
Remember buddy ... its only an insult if its not true.  |

La Nariz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1559
|
Posted - 2014.02.03 20:45:00 -
[2288] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:Good stuff! Oh... hold on. No it isn't. I can do a dozen missions and spreadsheet it too. They'll show me making next to nothing off them, but because that's what I want, I'll keep waving it in everyone's face to prove some pointless theory. Mr Epeen 
I posted everything you'd need to to do reproduce what I have done, so go ahead and show it. This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
10062
|
Posted - 2014.02.03 20:46:00 -
[2289] - Quote
Kimmi Chan wrote:Once again this goes off the rails. Baltec I assume you have data that supports 50m/hr in L3s?
Here Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
952
|
Posted - 2014.02.03 20:47:00 -
[2290] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:La Nariz wrote:blabla4711 wrote:baltec1 wrote: This from the people who have posted no evidence at all to back up their claims.
Funny remark from Mr. Shitposter himself who never provided anything at all, talk baseless bullshit and pure lies all the time and is about to party because he found a conflict averse sissy like this kimmy-gal who invests his/her time to try to prove something that means absolutely nothing in this subject at hand while you laugh your asses off playing forumgames.  https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqC-BTui2uSGdDlxa2dWOG5ieHB0QXBVWW82bGN5TFE&usp=sharingCheck and mate, terrible highsec pubbie npc alt. Good stuff! Oh... hold on. No it isn't. I can do a dozen missions and spreadsheet it too. They'll show me making next to nothing off them, but because that's what I want, I'll keep waving it in everyone's face to prove some pointless theory. Mr Epeen 
This is my first two runs. I have a real deficiency in my social skills. I had ****** implants and I was not accustomed to blitzing (I don't play for ISK/hr so this was actually very difficult).
I can assure you that I did as well as I could with what I had. I am trying to get better at it so I can provide more realistic data but others doing this would also help tremendously so we can have a larger sample size. One person does not an average make. "You should just create one thread and put all of your complaints in it instead of littering the forums with multiple threads." ~CCP Falcon
[Member of The BrownCoat Syndicate] |

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
952
|
Posted - 2014.02.03 20:53:00 -
[2291] - Quote
There is something that I believe is very worth noting.
On my second go at a 4 hour mission running gig this past weekend I got Massive Attack - Sansha's Nation and it paid 2720 LP from and agent in a 0.6 system.
I just did Massive Attack - Serpentis for SOE in Osmon (0.7) and was awarded 3983 LP.
My social skills have not changed since this weekend.
Maybe Massive Attack - Serpentis always pays more than Massive Attack - Sanshas? But a full 1150~ more?
The cash payout was also around 50% higher.
717,000.00:1,160,000 712,000.00:1,070,000
Something strange is afoot at the Circle K... "You should just create one thread and put all of your complaints in it instead of littering the forums with multiple threads." ~CCP Falcon
[Member of The BrownCoat Syndicate] |

La Nariz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1559
|
Posted - 2014.02.03 20:54:00 -
[2292] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:Dear Jenn aWhine, the main thrust of my question was, in fact, what do folk think would happen to the game?
Really what you seem to be saying is that you want to screw the income of hi-sec folk, so that null-sec folk earn more, relatively speaking.
That is a perfectly respectable position to hold, but to pretend it is for the greater good of the game is just not on.
I am sorry you do not care about me, or my play-style, but as I am basically a hi-sec player, I do care for you.
It will get better for those people who live outside of highsec and remain pretty much the same for those that live inside of highsec. There's my prediction. This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. |

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
952
|
Posted - 2014.02.03 20:55:00 -
[2293] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Kimmi Chan wrote:Once again this goes off the rails. Baltec I assume you have data that supports 50m/hr in L3s?
Here
Didn't someone say that was completed before a nerf a while back? Have anything more recent?
"You should just create one thread and put all of your complaints in it instead of littering the forums with multiple threads." ~CCP Falcon
[Member of The BrownCoat Syndicate] |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
10063
|
Posted - 2014.02.03 20:58:00 -
[2294] - Quote
Kimmi Chan wrote:
Didn't someone say that was completed before a nerf a while back? Have anything more recent?
The warp speed changes can infact make them better due to 44% of time being spent in warp. The drone changes are not nearly as bad as people try to make out and there are several other ships that can do the same job.
On those drone changes, Ishtars are by far the most popular ships used in anoms. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
953
|
Posted - 2014.02.03 21:02:00 -
[2295] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Kimmi Chan wrote:
Didn't someone say that was completed before a nerf a while back? Have anything more recent?
The warp speed changes can infact make them better due to 44% of time being spent in warp. The drone changes are not nearly as bad as people try to make out and there are several other ships that can do the same job.
Even so, since 69% of the income is coming from LP, how do you feel it would be best to nerf highsec income Baltec? That is the part that I have not seen iterated by anyone here to my recollection.
"You should just create one thread and put all of your complaints in it instead of littering the forums with multiple threads." ~CCP Falcon
[Member of The BrownCoat Syndicate] |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
10063
|
Posted - 2014.02.03 21:07:00 -
[2296] - Quote
Kimmi Chan wrote:
Even so, since 69% of the income is coming from LP, how do you feel it would be best to nerf highsec income Baltec? That is the part that I have not seen iterated by anyone here to my recollection.
Stop blitzing. If CCP wish to keep LP levels high then remove ship bounties from high sec missions or stop blitzing and add on LP rewards on NPC kills in null sec space (without needing the ESS)
Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
954
|
Posted - 2014.02.03 21:18:00 -
[2297] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Kimmi Chan wrote:
Even so, since 69% of the income is coming from LP, how do you feel it would be best to nerf highsec income Baltec? That is the part that I have not seen iterated by anyone here to my recollection.
Stop blitzing. If CCP wish to keep LP levels high then remove ship bounties from high sec missions or stop blitzing and add on LP rewards on NPC kills in null sec space (without needing the ESS)
Baltec, the LP must flow. I would like to see a lot more LP in Null as I think that is the pain point for you all. Blitzing has to stay. The LP must flow. I don't like it. I don't like blitzing but if the LP doesn't flow then the sink gets clogged. You could actually resolve this with a buff to Null without directly nerfing High. Buff Null with LP. Indirectly, it would be a nerf to High but would all still be dependent on the player market.
That's what I think anyway.
"You should just create one thread and put all of your complaints in it instead of littering the forums with multiple threads." ~CCP Falcon
[Member of The BrownCoat Syndicate] |

E-2C Hawkeye
State War Academy Caldari State
472
|
Posted - 2014.02.03 21:19:00 -
[2298] - Quote
La Nariz wrote:Josef Djugashvilis wrote:admiral root wrote:Josef Djugashvilis wrote:Sorry, just could not resist laughing at your ego  Where's the ego in the post you quoted? The, 'I am a scientist', bit, It is totally irrelevant. No its not because the fool was trying to tell me I don't understand scientific testing and data controls when I've literally made my career out of those. If you were good at understanding scientific testing and data you may want to go back to it because you sure do seem to suck at understanding basic EVE. |

La Nariz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1561
|
Posted - 2014.02.03 21:29:00 -
[2299] - Quote
E-2C Hawkeye wrote: If you were good at understanding scientific testing and data you may want to go back to it because you sure do seem to suck at understanding basic EVE.
So you're telling me I'm bad at EVE? What does that have to do with understanding what makes a good experiment? This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. |

Frostys Virpio
Let's pay some taxes
996
|
Posted - 2014.02.03 21:40:00 -
[2300] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Kimmi Chan wrote: Even so, since 69% of the income is coming from LP, how do you feel it would be best to nerf highsec income Baltec? That is the part that I have not seen iterated by anyone here to my recollection. Stop blitzing. If CCP wish to keep LP levels high then remove ship bounties from high sec missions or stop blitzing and add on LP rewards on NPC kills in null sec space (without needing the ESS) This should of been done a long time ago. Making people kill stuff in mission insetad of bypass every part of it as fast as possible would go a logn way toward reducing the amount of ISK/hours that can be earned in high. Then they can hit the most crazy LP stores if needed with the nerf bat. |

Frostys Virpio
Let's pay some taxes
996
|
Posted - 2014.02.03 21:41:00 -
[2301] - Quote
La Nariz wrote:E-2C Hawkeye wrote: If you were good at understanding scientific testing and data you may want to go back to it because you sure do seem to suck at understanding basic EVE.
So you're telling me I'm bad at EVE? What does that have to do with understanding what makes a good experiment?
The real question is, what field of study did you go through to be able to craft such lovely posts? |

ashley Eoner
262
|
Posted - 2014.02.03 21:43:00 -
[2302] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:ashley Eoner wrote: I'm only asking you to apply the same standards to yourself that you demand of those that disagree with you. I also want you to see the flaw in your statement. Or is that why you refuse to list them?
No what you are doing is making a fool of yourself. You are calling me out and implying that I am telling lies on something that would take anyone a matter of minutes to find. Yeah because backing up your statements with facts and proof is for those that disagree with you only.
Nice to see you continue to refuse to provide any data to back any of your claims.
Applied dps would be lowered in your described situation while not achieving the speeds you claimed.
I would like to thank Kimmi for proving my point by listing his/her implants which show no room for what Baltec claimed.
To address the issue about the ESS. I don't see why he shouldn't use all the tools available to null. We're certainly using all the tools available to highsec. At the very least it'd be interesting to see it's real world effect. As last I was aware pretty much no one was using it for the intended reason.
Seems to me that the a simple change to missions to stop blitzing would be enough to fix most of the problem. SOE LP values would still cause those missions to be higher then average and nerfing blitzing would increase the value of the LP. I'm not sure how CCP could adjust the SOE LP to bring it more in line with the rest of highsec without resulting in potential problems. THe least problematic would be to spread the availability of SOE LP. As once more people can easily run LP in systems away from gankers the LP value will decrease. Like stoic said earlier. |

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
955
|
Posted - 2014.02.03 21:58:00 -
[2303] - Quote
Frostys Virpio wrote:This should of been done a long time ago. Making people kill stuff in mission insetad of bypass every part of it as fast as possible would go a logn way toward reducing the amount of ISK/hours that can be earned in high. Then they can hit the most crazy LP stores if needed with the nerf bat.
ashley Eoner wrote:Seems to me that the a simple change to missions to stop blitzing would be enough to fix most of the problem. SOE LP values would still cause those missions to be higher then average and nerfing blitzing would increase the value of the LP. I'm not sure how CCP could adjust the SOE LP to bring it more in line with the rest of highsec without resulting in potential problems. THe least problematic would be to spread the availability of SOE LP. As once more people can easily run LP in systems away from gankers the LP value will decrease. Like stoic said earlier.
If you reduce the amount of LP in New Eden, you reduce the effectiveness of the LP Store sink.
I think blitzing is stupid. But if you remove it and force full clears for all missions you reduce LP/hr which means it takes longer to buy a ship from the LP Store. Everytime someone buys a Nestor from the LP store, that is 100,000,000 of ISK removed from the game forever. Stratios - 20,000,000. Sisters Core Probes 1,200,000 per 10.
That sink must continue to consume ISK. It must. If there is more LP and you put it in Null, the sink continues to run normally AND has the added benefit of making those in Null a little richer and some people in High a little less rich FROM LP ONLY.
"You should just create one thread and put all of your complaints in it instead of littering the forums with multiple threads." ~CCP Falcon
[Member of The BrownCoat Syndicate] |

La Nariz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1564
|
Posted - 2014.02.03 22:06:00 -
[2304] - Quote
ashley Eoner wrote: Yeah because backing up your statements with facts and proof is for those that disagree with you only.
Nice to see you continue to refuse to provide any data to back any of your claims.
Applied dps would be lowered in your described situation while not achieving the speeds you claimed.
I would like to thank Kimmi for proving my point by listing his/her implants which show no room for what Baltec claimed.
To address the issue about the ESS. I don't see why he shouldn't use all the tools available to null. We're certainly using all the tools available to highsec. At the very least it'd be interesting to see it's real world effect. As last I was aware pretty much no one was using it for the intended reason.
Seems to me that the a simple change to missions to stop blitzing would be enough to fix most of the problem. SOE LP values would still cause those missions to be higher then average and nerfing blitzing would increase the value of the LP. I'm not sure how CCP could adjust the SOE LP to bring it more in line with the rest of highsec without resulting in potential problems. THe least problematic would be to spread the availability of SOE LP. As once more people can easily run LP in systems away from gankers the LP value will decrease. Like stoic said earlier.
If you look at the sheet I am currently gathering data for the ESS so there will be some evidence of its effect on isk/hr. He has provided proof as well, most of the crap has been flowing from the pro-highsec group as can be evidenced by the hordes of npc alts that came here to shitpost. The funniest part of all of it is I provided everything one would need to reproduce what I have done yet not a single highsec pubbie has attempted to do it and has defaulted to their standard crap arguments like "lol no." I even provided screenshots of my wallet when asked to prove its not just made up crap and they still default to "lol no."
The pro-highsec crowd has a lot to prove while the pro-balance crowd has shown plenty of proof already and continues to provide more proof.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqC-BTui2uSGdDlxa2dWOG5ieHB0QXBVWW82bGN5TFE&usp=sharing This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. |

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
955
|
Posted - 2014.02.03 22:08:00 -
[2305] - Quote
La Nariz wrote:ashley Eoner wrote: Yeah because backing up your statements with facts and proof is for those that disagree with you only.
Nice to see you continue to refuse to provide any data to back any of your claims.
Applied dps would be lowered in your described situation while not achieving the speeds you claimed.
I would like to thank Kimmi for proving my point by listing his/her implants which show no room for what Baltec claimed.
To address the issue about the ESS. I don't see why he shouldn't use all the tools available to null. We're certainly using all the tools available to highsec. At the very least it'd be interesting to see it's real world effect. As last I was aware pretty much no one was using it for the intended reason.
Seems to me that the a simple change to missions to stop blitzing would be enough to fix most of the problem. SOE LP values would still cause those missions to be higher then average and nerfing blitzing would increase the value of the LP. I'm not sure how CCP could adjust the SOE LP to bring it more in line with the rest of highsec without resulting in potential problems. THe least problematic would be to spread the availability of SOE LP. As once more people can easily run LP in systems away from gankers the LP value will decrease. Like stoic said earlier.
If you look at the sheet I am currently gathering data for the ESS so there will be some evidence of its effect on isk/hr. He has provided proof as well, most of the crap has been flowing from the pro-highsec group as can be evidenced by the hordes of npc alts that came here to shitpost. The funniest part of all of it is I provided everything one would need to reproduce what I have done yet not a single highsec pubbie has attempted to do it and has defaulted to their standard crap arguments like "lol no
It would take me a bit to fly an Ishtar and I'm Caldari. I would not be caught dead in a Gallente ship. Or maybe that's the only way... 
"You should just create one thread and put all of your complaints in it instead of littering the forums with multiple threads." ~CCP Falcon
[Member of The BrownCoat Syndicate] |

La Nariz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1564
|
Posted - 2014.02.03 22:09:00 -
[2306] - Quote
Frostys Virpio wrote:La Nariz wrote:E-2C Hawkeye wrote: If you were good at understanding scientific testing and data you may want to go back to it because you sure do seem to suck at understanding basic EVE.
So you're telling me I'm bad at EVE? What does that have to do with understanding what makes a good experiment? The real question is, what field of study did you go through to be able to craft such lovely posts?
I earned my posting degree from the popular online hookup site Somethingawful.com This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. |

La Nariz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1564
|
Posted - 2014.02.03 22:11:00 -
[2307] - Quote
Kimmi Chan wrote:It would take me a bit to fly an Ishtar and I'm Caldari. I would not be caught dead in a Gallente ship. Or maybe that's the only way... 
I picked the ishtar because it along with the VNI is a commonly accepted mid-range ratting setup of the current meta. Its pretty much like picking a CNR for mission running. This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. |

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
955
|
Posted - 2014.02.03 22:30:00 -
[2308] - Quote
La Nariz, forgive my ignorance but what kind of travel time exists for completing these? I assume the "lag" time is the time between completion and bounties actually hitting the wallet? Are you scanning down another or travelling to it before or after the lag time? "You should just create one thread and put all of your complaints in it instead of littering the forums with multiple threads." ~CCP Falcon
[Member of The BrownCoat Syndicate] |

La Nariz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1564
|
Posted - 2014.02.03 22:33:00 -
[2309] - Quote
Kimmi Chan wrote:La Nariz, forgive my ignorance but what kind of travel time exists for completing these? I assume the "lag" time is the time between completion and bounties actually hitting the wallet? Are you scanning down another or travelling to it before or after the lag time?
I am in a -0.6 that spawns the anomalies I am not competing with anyone right now but have had several gangs come by. You don't need to scan them down at all the lag time is from me wanting to completely isolate each anomalies income from the rest. The average warp time is probable 1.5-2.25 minutes per anomaly. The ending time is when I enter warp return to my safe to cloak and wait out the income ticks. The begin time is when I enter warp to get to the anomaly I intend to run. I can attempt to put a meaningful number to travel time after I finish this second test. This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. |

La Nariz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1564
|
Posted - 2014.02.03 23:23:00 -
[2310] - Quote
Kimmi Chan wrote:Frostys Virpio wrote:This should of been done a long time ago. Making people kill stuff in mission insetad of bypass every part of it as fast as possible would go a logn way toward reducing the amount of ISK/hours that can be earned in high. Then they can hit the most crazy LP stores if needed with the nerf bat. ashley Eoner wrote:Seems to me that the a simple change to missions to stop blitzing would be enough to fix most of the problem. SOE LP values would still cause those missions to be higher then average and nerfing blitzing would increase the value of the LP. I'm not sure how CCP could adjust the SOE LP to bring it more in line with the rest of highsec without resulting in potential problems. THe least problematic would be to spread the availability of SOE LP. As once more people can easily run LP in systems away from gankers the LP value will decrease. Like stoic said earlier. If you reduce the amount of LP in New Eden, you reduce the effectiveness of the LP Store sink. I think blitzing is stupid. But if you remove it and force full clears for all missions you reduce LP/hr which means it takes longer to buy a ship from the LP Store. Everytime someone buys a Nestor from the LP store, that is 100,000,000 of ISK removed from the game forever. Stratios - 20,000,000. Sisters Core Probes 1,200,000 per 10. That sink must continue to consume ISK. It must. If there is more LP and you put it in Null, the sink continues to run normally AND has the added benefit of making those in Null a little richer and some people in High a little less rich FROM LP ONLY.
You could always account for it elsewhere by for example increasing npc corp tax X% to make up for it. This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .. 107 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |