Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 .. 254 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
5238
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 16:53:00 -
[421] - Quote
Winchester Steele wrote:mr ed thehouseofed wrote:my 23 yr old son asked me why i did'nt join a corp and i play alone , i made him read every post in this thread . he thinks most of you are freaking idiots and now he understands why i play this game alone. i'm nearly 50 and some of you are the worst gamers i've ever come across in 30 years of gaming , if it wasn't for the fact nearly everyone has mutipile accounts i doubt this game would have lasted this long .
my 2 cents worth Thanks for the unwarranted judgement  . Good to see your playing an MMO with "the worst gamers" you've ever met. Your pretty sheltered for a 50 yr old hey? Head on over to LoL forums if you want to see toxic. Let me return the favor. You seem like an irrelevant anti social moron who plays an mmo by himself and only opens his mouth when he has something ****** to say about the community. I suspect you have very few friends, and that if you were to leave this community not a single soul would miss you. I wouldn't say any of that stuff though because I'm not a judgemental ****. Like you.
lol
What i will never ever understand is people like that guy any many other forum posters who have nothing good to say about the EVE community (and in some Cases EVE itself and even CCP) who insist on continuing to play such a horrible game with horrible people. if i didn't like EVE, CCP or the EVE community I'd put it all in my rear view and literally go back to WoW lol. Or more realistically, Star Trek Online.
Then again I have run acorss dudes whose idea of sexy time is getting beaten with a leather strap or watching some dude (unfortunately never me for some reason....lol) plow their significant other while they watch. There is NO accounting for taste.
|

Aralyn Cormallen
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
231
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 16:54:00 -
[422] - Quote
Aralyn Cormallen wrote: Yeah, you heard that right. Ero's shtick has always been that he is the only one who does exactly what he says he does, the only one who doesn't scam, doesn't cheat his marks. That is the point of what was going on - to make the participant give up, and lose, hence making the loss of his items due to the fact he backed out (right at the last minute, of course). Regardless of the circumstances of the matter, he is able to, every time, state truthfully that the 'loser' gave up. Sure, the guy never had a chance, but if Ero walked with the items at any point, before the participant gave up of his own free will, that undermines his whole ethos and reputation.
Holy ****, I've just realised what I inadvertantly said!
If I work on the assumption that Ero's antics are in order to maintain a reputation for not "cheating" his contestants (since the losers have to voluntarily "give up"), it can be reasonably argued, that he is doing what he is doing in order to secure future profits, based on this reputation. And as with miner bumping, and other situations, it has been solidly CCP's stance that anything can be determined to be not classed as greifing, if it can be proved there is a financial incentive behind the action.
That certainly wasn't where I was going with my original post.
|

Batelle
Tymast Industries 150th
2356
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 16:55:00 -
[423] - Quote
Wesley Otsdarva wrote:Getting on an emotional rollercoaster is easy, getting off is hard. And having people pressuring you to keep going down that path makes it even harder.
Maybe its hard if your mouse-hand is broken. I, too, am often compelled by complete strangers to humiliate myself and give away all my money. "CCP is changing policy, and has asked that we discontinue the bonus credit program after November 7th. So until then, enjoy a super-bonus of 1B Blink Credit for each 60-day GTC you buy!"
Never forget. |

Lady Areola Fappington
New Order Logistics CODE.
1390
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 16:55:00 -
[424] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote: Then again I have run acorss dudes whose idea of sexy time is getting beaten with a leather strap or watching some dude (unfortunately never me for some reason....lol) plow their significant other while they watch. There is NO accounting for taste.
Hey now, you leave Saturday Night out of this! The risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built and we want to keep that (infact, this is much more representative of the consensus opinion within CCP). |

Pashino
Venice Academy
19
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 16:57:00 -
[425] - Quote
Khergit Deserters wrote:Pashino wrote:Malcanis wrote:18 pages in and I'm still waiting for someone to tell me where they think CCP's responsibility to police our out of game actions ends.
Oh, I don't think they can 'police' anything out of game. No bearing on current issue presented in the thread, either. The problem is, once you become aware of something, you're on notice. And then if something bad happens, you can end up being held legally liable. If you are aware of a risk and don't take reasonable precautions, that falls under the definition of negligence.
'Policing' implies proactively search based on criteria - not CCP's job out of game. But when a problem lands in their lap, they can (and often do) take steps. What they react to, and what steps they take is not wholly constrained by a set of laws and rules, which is as it must be to deal with unique situations. Their actions in these cases, or lack thereof, informs the playing community of where CCP stands. |

Malcolm Shinhwa
Bad Touches
1388
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 16:58:00 -
[426] - Quote
Qalix wrote: I don't agree with everything Ripard writes or with every solution he proposes. But he has a generally good point in this current posting theme, EVE has a toxic brand identity. That's not a good thing, no matter how you spin it.
The biggest running joke about Call of Duty is being told who had sex with my mother by a 12yr old. Seems to be doing fine.
The Eve community is, frankly, absolutely no different than every other gaming community. They are equally populated by special snowflakes that think everyone should just play and be nice to everyone, and belligerent tools who do nothing but spew hate and filth. Also there's some cool people who play and have fun and are generally funny in chat. I like those guys the best.
Eve is no different. The only difference is, when someone is a tool, you can take some revenge against them in the game. There is even a CCP promotional video touting this feature. I know violence isn't the answer. I got it wrong on purpose. |

Schmata Bastanold
Black Rebel Rifter Club The Devil's Tattoo
1499
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 16:58:00 -
[427] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:Then again I have run acorss dudes whose idea of sexy time is getting beaten with a leather strap or watching some dude (unfortunately never me for some reason....lol) plow their significant other while they watch. There is NO accounting for taste.
That was very strange day when I discovered that category on RT. A year later I still don't understand it but fortunately those guys are only a background for main action so I don't mind them being there. I am not my skills but... http://eveboard.com/pilot/Schmata_Bastanold |

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
5238
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 16:58:00 -
[428] - Quote
Qalix wrote:Malcanis wrote:Can you give me a reliable method of distinguishing them that doesn't boil down to "stuff that you personally dislike Sure, I can. "Is this guy costing us subscriptions?" For someone who usually posts intelligently, you have completely missed the point. You're stuck in the "ideals of the sandbox" mindset. This topic isn't about ideals or the sandbox, it's about brand identity. CCP is free to do whatever they like. But they're a business. There are consequences for allowing these sorts of things to continue. Right or wrong, real or unreal, sandbox or no sandbox, sooner or later one of these incidents is going to end with someone doing something REALLY crazy. That's the day EVE will become "that game where..." that Ripard is talking about. All the petty arguments about sandbox ideals won't mean a thing when the press has a field day pointing out the inevitable result of sociopathic behavior. Bittervets had better wake up; the sci fi MMO genre is taking off and competition is heating up. The EVE sandbox is totally and utterly dependent on a critical mass of players. Every player they lose and every player they gain is critical to the ecosystem. Everything they can do to preserve the hardcore nature of the game while tempering the asshattery is a good thing. You can pretend otherwise, but EVE's day of reckoning is coming. It won't be dramatic. It will be a slow, steady bleed of players tired of the status quo, the asshattery, and the never ending defense of the indefensible. It will be a slow, steady bleed of players who realize that they can get online and have immediate space fighting fun without the torturous grinding and clicking that EVE offers. I don't agree with everything Ripard writes or with every solution he proposes. But he has a generally good point in this current posting theme, EVE has a toxic brand identity. That's not a good thing, no matter how you spin it.
Such a long post when all you had to do was type "Star Citizen and Erotica1 will kill EVE" and be done with it.
What you see as a toxic brand identity , I see as an 'exclusive' brand identity. ie, Don't play EVE if you can't handle it.
Most people can't so they don't and more power to them.
|

Dlareme
Short Stop Exports
0
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 16:58:00 -
[429] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Tuscor wrote:Just ban Erotica1. The community does not need poisonous twats like that - and I for one am happy for the sandbox and 'emergent gameplay' to take second seat to cleaning the community of such filth. People talk about gays in very similar terms to the ones you have used in your post. Come to that, so have insane monogonadal austrian dictators.
I believe the terms he used are in regard to his thoughts on a single person, not a group of people. Please don't bring other rediculous political crap into a simple forum discussion. |

Marcia en Welle
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
33
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 16:59:00 -
[430] - Quote
People need to calm down. As much as I dislike Erotica's behaviour, and the New Order in general, I actually feel sympathy for those who feel they need to inflict suffering on others.
These people have probably had the same thing done to them in real life where they are too weak to do anything about it, so they come to a game like Eve to take it out on everyone else.
If we simply shout at them, calling all manner of names which I have seen in this thread so far, and then ban their accounts, then we are almost as bad as they are in my opinion, and also we will be making the problem worse.
Also I think some people are getting a little over dramatic, this kind of thing goes on all the time so everyone is exposed, not just in EVE. just look at the you done goofed up video, everyone laughs at that, but in reality you are laughing at someones suffering. And that is just on example, there are many more. So less hypocritical words, less drama and emotion, and more rationality I would suggest is needed.
|
|

Bethan Le Troix
Krusual Investigation Agency
86
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 16:59:00 -
[431] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:18 pages in and I'm still waiting for someone to tell me where they think CCP's responsibility to police our out of game actions ends.
It is obviously NOT an out of game action as an in-game loss of assets occurred via a use of an additional in-game communication program which is allowable by CCP while all parties were in-game.
I am not a 'good girl' in-game although there is reasoning behind my in-game actions. In real life I don't go to church as I am an atheist but I am intelligent enough and have the common sense to know when an action is morally wrong and hurtful to another person. Erotica and her friends crossed the line when they bullied the victim over his apparent speech problem. I haven't read the EULA but I expect it has something to say about bullying in-game. Which this was a case of. What CCP can do about this is up to them but I believe something should happen in terms of in-game assets/accounts.
Do you feel they were justified in 'taking the michael' out of the victims speech problem Malcanis 
Do you think this portrays CCP and the player community in a good light to the outside world 
New Eden is a cruel place. We like it like that. It should stay like that. But Erotica has pushed the envelope beyond the in-game arena. Bullying is wrong. End of story. |

Doireen Kaundur
373
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 17:00:00 -
[432] - Quote
who is Erotica 1 and why should I care? Minimizing the cost of replacing implants.
|

ShipSpin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
4
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 17:01:00 -
[433] - Quote
Capt Starfox wrote:Guys...
First and foremost Jester Trek's report on the bonus round is bias and not completely accurate. So while you're getting all upset try to remember this and the fact this guy willingly gave all his assets away multiple times. At any point he could have left, but chose to stay. And even after everything that happened, at the very end he still considered singing MORE SONGS!
Torture? Are you serious? I wonder why Jester didn't mention waterboarding, or the breaking of fingers/limbs, or the pulling out of teeth.. etc. Oh, probably because it wouldn't fit into his nice comparison. Again, the person had the choice to stay, or continue. It was always up to him; he and he alone. No one tied him down with rope and forced him to play.
I'm not saying this person in particular didn't go through a difficult time, but comparing it to IRL torture is ********, sad and screaming for attention.
Strip Search Phone Call Scam
The guy called into a McDonald's posing as a police officer, he never once made contact with the other individuals involved. He was injustly incarcerated of his crimes! The people involved at this McDonald's location should have known better! They all consented multiple times to what Mr. Stewart was telling them to do over the phone! Any of the individuals involved could have easily left or hung up the phone but they chose to stay/continue to particpate. /S
Whether you want to believe it or not, psychological abuse alone is still a very serious issue. |

AkJon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd Ferguson Alliance
226
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 17:02:00 -
[434] - Quote
I guess this just goes to show that there's a Sohkar born every minute.
(I haven't read this whole thread so sorry if someone else thought of the joke first.)
'Let's make the world safe for gullible idiots!'
Ummm, no, let's not and say we did. |

Marcia en Welle
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
33
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 17:05:00 -
[435] - Quote
ShipSpin wrote:Capt Starfox wrote:Guys...
First and foremost Jester Trek's report on the bonus round is bias and not completely accurate. So while you're getting all upset try to remember this and the fact this guy willingly gave all his assets away multiple times. At any point he could have left, but chose to stay. And even after everything that happened, at the very end he still considered singing MORE SONGS!
Torture? Are you serious? I wonder why Jester didn't mention waterboarding, or the breaking of fingers/limbs, or the pulling out of teeth.. etc. Oh, probably because it wouldn't fit into his nice comparison. Again, the person had the choice to stay, or continue. It was always up to him; he and he alone. No one tied him down with rope and forced him to play.
I'm not saying this person in particular didn't go through a difficult time, but comparing it to IRL torture is ********, sad and screaming for attention.
Strip Search Phone Call ScamThe guy called into a McDonald's posing as a police officer, he never once made contact with the other individuals involved. He was injustly incarcerated of his crimes! The people involved at this McDonald's location should have known better! They all consented multiple times to what Mr. Stewart was telling them to do over the phone! Any of the individuals involved could have easily left or hung up the phone but they chose to stay/continue to particpate. /SWhether you want to believe it or not, psychological abuse alone is still a very serious issue.
I'm afraid you are wrong. Psychological abuse is a very nasty issue, and it goes on all the time, literally everywhere in this ultra competitive world we live. But that is not the reason that man was arrested, the reason was for impersonating a police officer, which most certainly is against the law. If Erotica was impersonating CCP, then I am sure we would see her banned instantly.
|

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
5238
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 17:05:00 -
[436] - Quote
AkJon Ferguson wrote:I guess this just goes to show that there's a Sohkar born every minute.
(I haven't read this whole thread so sorry if someone else thought of the joke first.)
'Let's make the world safe for gullible idiots!'
Ummm, no, let's not and say we did.
I truly lol'd at that.
|

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
17398
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 17:06:00 -
[437] - Quote
ShipSpin wrote:Capt Starfox wrote:Guys...
First and foremost Jester Trek's report on the bonus round is bias and not completely accurate. So while you're getting all upset try to remember this and the fact this guy willingly gave all his assets away multiple times. At any point he could have left, but chose to stay. And even after everything that happened, at the very end he still considered singing MORE SONGS!
Torture? Are you serious? I wonder why Jester didn't mention waterboarding, or the breaking of fingers/limbs, or the pulling out of teeth.. etc. Oh, probably because it wouldn't fit into his nice comparison. Again, the person had the choice to stay, or continue. It was always up to him; he and he alone. No one tied him down with rope and forced him to play.
I'm not saying this person in particular didn't go through a difficult time, but comparing it to IRL torture is ********, sad and screaming for attention.
Strip Search Phone Call ScamThe guy called into a McDonald's posing as a police officer, he never once made contact with the other individuals involved. He was injustly incarcerated of his crimes! The people involved at this McDonald's location should have known better! They all consented multiple times to what Mr. Stewart was telling them to do over the phone! Any of the individuals involved could have easily left or hung up the phone but they chose to stay/continue to particpate. /SWhether you want to believe it or not, psychological abuse alone is still a very serious issue. Real world crime vs virtual world crime, know the difference.
|

Capt Starfox
Northstar Cabal Tactical Narcotics Team
599
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 17:06:00 -
[438] - Quote
mr ed thehouseofed wrote:my 23 yr old son asked me why i did'nt join a corp and i play alone , i made him read every post in this thread . he thinks most of you are freaking idiots and now he understands why i play this game alone. i'm nearly 50 and some of you are the worst gamers i've ever come across in 30 years of gaming , if it wasn't for the fact nearly everyone has mutipile accounts i doubt this game would have lasted this long .
my 2 cents worth
So, why do you play if we're some of the worst gamers you've ever experienced and you clearly think that something's wrong with CCP? Could it be because you heard about a spaceship game that had no rules and you wanted to give it a try? But, then found yourself torn between actually liking the game, but not having the WoW hand holding aspect? And, for some reason you decided to stick it out and shitpost on the forums? Because that's all you were able to become in this video game? Abandon all hope ye who x up in fleet
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~PsychoticMonkCSM9~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |

Malcolm Shinhwa
Bad Touches
1390
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 17:07:00 -
[439] - Quote
ShipSpin wrote:Strip Search Phone Call ScamThe guy called into a McDonald's posing as a police officer, he never once made contact with the other individuals involved. He was injustly incarcerated of his crimes! The people involved at this McDonald's location should have known better! They all consented multiple times to what Mr. Stewart was telling them to do over the phone! Any of the individuals involved could have easily left or hung up the phone but they chose to stay/continue to particpate. /SWhether you want to believe it or not, psychological abuse alone is still a very serious issue.
Representing yourself as a police officer, at least in the US is a crime. Making prank phone calls is not or shock jocks would have to fill the other 1/2 hour of the show with more **** stars. Bart Simpson says hi! I know violence isn't the answer. I got it wrong on purpose. |

Winchester Steele
468
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 17:07:00 -
[440] - Quote
Xander Delacroix wrote:On one side we have those who want Erotica1 and his cronies buried in a digital shallow grave.
On the other side, we have those wishing to hoist Erotic1 up on their shoulders as a hero to freedom.
Perhaps, just perhaps, there's a middle ground? Where we can discuss the underlying issue, rather than this single incident? We're all adults, and dealing with the issue of 'potential' cyber bullying is very much an adult issue. So how about we all get off our respective soapboxes, myself included, and start discussing, as adults, this issue and the ramifications that any potential decisions and actions taken regarding the "emergent gameplay" vs "cyber-bullying" debate?
Ok. I think cyber bullying is a bullshit term made up by soccer moms to explain their own failings to teach their children how to properly defend themselves in this dog eat dog world. I think it's utter garbage spewed by socialists and busybodies who are terrified because the internet represents something they can't control.
At it's most base it is a form of thought control from people like you who think they are on the moral highground.
Turn your ******* computer off. Delete your facebook. In this case, just DON'T GO INTO THE BONUS ROUND WITH A KNOWN SCAMMER.
Why is it that folks like you ALWAYS need the authorities (CCP) to fight your battles for you? Man the **** up son. This game is built around the likes of us. It's not the assholes that are playing the wrong game. - James Amril-Kesh. |
|

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
4486
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 17:09:00 -
[441] - Quote
Malcolm Shinhwa wrote:ShipSpin wrote:Strip Search Phone Call ScamThe guy called into a McDonald's posing as a police officer, he never once made contact with the other individuals involved. He was injustly incarcerated of his crimes! The people involved at this McDonald's location should have known better! They all consented multiple times to what Mr. Stewart was telling them to do over the phone! Any of the individuals involved could have easily left or hung up the phone but they chose to stay/continue to particpate. /SWhether you want to believe it or not, psychological abuse alone is still a very serious issue. Representing yourself as a police officer, at least in the US is a crime. Making prank phone calls is not or shock jocks would have to fill the other 1/2 hour of the show with more **** stars. Bart Simpson says hi!
Ahhh the crank call.
Back in my day, all we had was the phone. I remember how we lol'ed when we called the local bowling alley and asked if they had 14 lb. balls. Bring back DEEEEP Space! |

Capt Starfox
Northstar Cabal Tactical Narcotics Team
599
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 17:11:00 -
[442] - Quote
ShipSpin wrote:Strip Search Phone Call ScamThe guy called into a McDonald's posing as a police officer, he never once made contact with the other individuals involved. He was injustly incarcerated of his crimes! The people involved at this McDonald's location should have known better! They all consented multiple times to what Mr. Stewart was telling them to do over the phone! Any of the individuals involved could have easily left or hung up the phone but they chose to stay/continue to particpate. /SWhether you want to believe it or not, psychological abuse alone is still a very serious issue.
So, what's your point? RL crime vs. a video game? And then you lead with something about psychological abuse?
Abandon all hope ye who x up in fleet
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~PsychoticMonkCSM9~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
17398
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 17:13:00 -
[443] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:Ahhh the crank call.
Back in my day, all we had was the phone. I remember how we lol'ed when we called the local bowling alley and asked if they had 14 lb. balls. Asking for Hugh Janus or (short form of)Richard Head was always a giggle.
|

ShipSpin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
8
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 17:13:00 -
[444] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:I'll ask again. How could CCP resist religious groups or the Russian government if they demanded that CCP remove people who engage in "unacceptable" behaviour that "bring the game into disrepute"? After all, "it's simply a case of morals", right? As soon as CCP have conceded the right of any group to demand the removal of a player simply because they dislike what he does out of game, then they're wide open to every pressure group out there who thinks they have a duty to make sure you and I live our lives as they think we should. "it's simply a case of morals"
Simple, CCP is a private company. If CCP decided to ban someone because they wore pink shoes with green polka dots while wearing a business suit, that's their prerogative and they are allowed to do that. However, you may want to look into what a Slippery Slope logical fallacy is. If CCP concedes to the player base in this instance to ban a player, under no circumstances are they required to do so again in the future if they choose not to. |

Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
4285
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 17:15:00 -
[445] - Quote
I see this as using a game as the means to an end. Not playing a game and taking advantage of the mechanics.
Pulling people outside of the game for their twisted amusement is the modus operandi of pedophiles and psychopaths.
CCP could wash their hands of this legally, but once something bad happens out-of-game things will get really bad for them really fast. The press is not your friend, CCP. Nip this in the bud.
Mittanigate was a worldwide sensation (in the gaming press) and what he did was nothing compared to what Erotica1 has going on. You are in for a world of hurt if you don't get a handle on this.
Mr Epeen  There are 86,400 seconds in a day. You just saved one of them by typing 'u' instead of 'you'.-á Congratulations, dumbass! |

Altrue
Exploration Frontier inc Brave Collective
1056
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 17:15:00 -
[446] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:18 pages in and I'm still waiting for someone to tell me where they think CCP's responsibility to police our out of game actions ends.
Hi Malcanis.
Actually, the line has already been drawn.
Don't thank me.
Altrue. Signature Tanking - Best Tanking.
Proposed change for ECM - Not chance based - not max target reduction based |

Batelle
Tymast Industries 150th
2360
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 17:15:00 -
[447] - Quote
Qalix wrote:I don't agree with everything Ripard writes or with every solution he proposes. But he has a generally good point in this current posting theme, EVE has a toxic brand identity. That's not a good thing, no matter how you spin it.
Qalix, people have been saying this for 10+ years, and has proven to be consistently wrong. In fact its usually the opposite. "CCP is changing policy, and has asked that we discontinue the bonus credit program after November 7th. So until then, enjoy a super-bonus of 1B Blink Credit for each 60-day GTC you buy!"
Never forget. |

Winchester Steele
474
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 17:16:00 -
[448] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Just ban Erotica1. Will not be missed and CCP is completely within its rights to do so.
Failing that, play this recording out loud at the next FanFest and see what the assembled community actually thinks of this.
Your choice.
Banning Erotica1 does the entire game and community a boon. Its just one less sub. Who cares.
Just ban you imo. One less sub, who cares. I promise no one will miss you. I find your posting to be morally reprehensible, as I am sure several others in this thread do.
This game is built around the likes of us. It's not the assholes that are playing the wrong game. - James Amril-Kesh. |

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
5246
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 17:16:00 -
[449] - Quote
Winchester Steele wrote:Xander Delacroix wrote:On one side we have those who want Erotica1 and his cronies buried in a digital shallow grave.
On the other side, we have those wishing to hoist Erotic1 up on their shoulders as a hero to freedom.
Perhaps, just perhaps, there's a middle ground? Where we can discuss the underlying issue, rather than this single incident? We're all adults, and dealing with the issue of 'potential' cyber bullying is very much an adult issue. So how about we all get off our respective soapboxes, myself included, and start discussing, as adults, this issue and the ramifications that any potential decisions and actions taken regarding the "emergent gameplay" vs "cyber-bullying" debate? Ok. I think cyber bullying is a bullshit term made up by soccer moms to explain their own failings to teach their children how to properly defend themselves in this dog eat dog world. I think it's utter garbage spewed by socialists and busybodies who are terrified because the internet represents something they can't control. At it's most base it is a form of thought control from people like you who think they are on the moral highground. Turn your ******* computer off. Delete your facebook. In this case, just DON'T GO INTO THE BONUS ROUND WITH A KNOWN SCAMMER.Why is it that folks like you ALWAYS need the authorities (CCP) to fight your battles for you? Man the **** up son.
And watch your advioce be ignored lol.
RIGHT NOW I've got some distant family members (cousins) involved in a facebook shouting match with some other cousins about something stupid. This weekend I saw 1 cousin each from both opposing sides and both vented at me how dumb the other side was. And both kept asking me when i was gonna get on facebook lol.
I'm still in WTF mode over that, they're playing virtual Hatfields and McCoys with each other and then looking at me as If I'm the crazy one for not fooling with facebook.....
|

Tyburn Stannis
Xenon Salvage Inc.
103
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 17:16:00 -
[450] - Quote
Right. So let's say I don't have enough ISK in game to buy the ship I want, so because I'm space poor that means I can't have fun - so by extension, all of you complaining about the blurred line between gaming and reality need to give me ISK, or you're contributing to the ruining of my fun by your inaction - which is real grief emotionz, as it's a real person playing the game, Ergo you're all RL griefers for not giefing iSk 2 me naow and I wil rportz u 2 ccp and the polis!
Ridiculous logic? No more than 80% of the last 21 pages...
I will repeat:
Basic principle of Eve - you are responsible for your own stuff, and responsible for your own actions. Not your corpmates, not your CEO, not CCP, not your mother.
I you want it, covet it, or believe you need it, then it's on you to work for it. Not to expect other people to give it away for free, and if they seem like they are then at least one of you hasn't fully understood the situation.
If you give it away, trade it, put it in a corp hanger, contract it to a total stranger, then it's on you. If you decide to take a problem out of game, onto teamspeak or forums, then it's on you. You, and only you, are the one who clicked "send" or "accept" or "join channel".
o/ |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 .. 254 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |