Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 .. 98 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 19 post(s) |

Vara Vampira
STEEL CITY. DARKNESS.
14
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 18:54:00 -
[1591] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:Mikhem wrote:Hot topic of this week seems to be Erotica 1 ban and I decided to listen this audio file through about it. It seems that victim could have dyslexia and it was abused alot. Dyslexia means difficulty to read. I found relevant internet links for reading about this incident. This audio file was kind of sad to listen through. ...truncated...Victim has made two forum posts and here is link to his profile containing links to these posts. https://gate.eveonline.com/Profile/sohkar And to quote the "victim" in this case: Sohkar wrote:I dont think erotica 1 should be banned but just because of that i dont think what he did was 100% right but i choose to do what i did and i said what i said he didnt tell me to say it. So if even the "victim" has stated Erotica 1 should not be banned, how can people still not see that this is CCP responding to a CSM members personal vendetta and the outcry of the public, not the needs of the "victim"? Let's drop the act. We all know why I keep pushing for answers and why we will never get any. This has got nothing to do with rules against harassment, it's PR, plain and simple. A CSM member started a witch hunt, the community got stirred up into a rage shitstorm and CCP buckled to public pressure to save face.
It just shows CCP will cave to the masses despite whats right or wrong. Support Erotica 1, remove Ripard Teg from CSM. |

Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
4701
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 18:55:00 -
[1592] - Quote
The rule is the same as it's always been.
You push CCP's buttons and you get stomped. Happens all the time. From locked posts to perma-bans.
There's no ambiguity here. Just butt hurt on a massive scale by whiners that like to play 'what if' games. Outliers are not the norm in this game. And neither is common sense, apparently.
Mr Epeen  There are 86,400 seconds in a day. You just saved one of them by typing 'u' instead of 'you'.-á Congratulations, dumbass! |

Sentamon
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
1772
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 18:57:00 -
[1593] - Quote
MatrixSkye Mk2 wrote: There is a difference between using the game as a tool to inflict real life malice, grief and humiliation versus someone ranting on twitter or quibbling with another player.
You'll have a hard time making your case for "malice, grief, and humiliation" when not even the "victim" involved feels this way.
You could make a case that CCP no longer wants bonus rooms and people being mean toward each other ... well, "just because" CCP wants it that way ... but it seems the opposite is true. ~ Professional Forum Alt -á~ |

Helena Russell Makanen
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
299
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 18:59:00 -
[1594] - Quote
Dorn Val wrote:Helena Russell Makanen wrote:Dorn Val wrote:
Actually I have done that and I reached the conclusions that have driven my posts. I still do not agree with how this situation was handled.
Dorn I think everyone realizes you do not agree with how this situation was handled by now. But if you prefer post it over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over again. I am sure it will change everything.  Dorn Val looks at your corporation and wants you to point to the doll and show everyone where the miner bumpers touched you :)
IIRC I have only ever seen a miner bumper once across several Eve accounts. He was having a hissy fit in local because he got concorded after bravely firing on an un-armed mining ship. Was kinda cute.
"If a miner needs to go to the bathroom, for instance, I ask that they dock up first, or at the very least ask the Supreme Protector for permission to go."-á --á James 315 - aka - the miner bumper |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2949
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 18:59:00 -
[1595] - Quote
Darkopus wrote:so why then do players who have in game actions feel the need to take it to coms and ask for mayo smeared victory pictures. We can go round in a massive circle all day on this and I guess the only people that know are CCP. We can ask them for details and clarifications in fact we did and the response was the post by Falcon with a few follow ups from Guard. CCP are not at liberty nor do they have to give us any more information than they want to. They clearly identified that they examine these things on a case by case basis and also clearly sated that for any situation where you feel threatened IRL to report it to your local law enforcement agency.
The bonus round stuff was an extraordinary case which I agree would be helpfull if we got more details on their lines of thinking, but we know we won't get that. The bottom line here is that this is not a democracy, we play and access this game at CCP's pleasure and when we reach a stage where we don't like what they are peddling there is always the biomass option. However to think that we are in some kind of democracy where we can demand answers from CCP is delusional. We clearly can demand answers form CCP. They didn't choose to respond to this when it happened, they did it when people protested against it and made a 400 page thread in a day.
I'm of the firm belief that CCPs responsibility should end with EVE, and third party tools, sites and communications services should not have the EULA/ToS covering them, which has been the case since EVE was born. If they want to extend it to cover third party services, then it should cover ALL of them, regardless of medium, so twitter, blogs, forums should ALL be covered by the same rules.
The harassment rules should continue to operate on a case by case basis, and that's fine, but if they are going to choose to extend the EULA/ToS to some third party services, it should be clear exactly which services they extend to and the extent to which they extend. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list. |

Sentamon
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
1772
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 18:59:00 -
[1596] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:The rule is the same as it's always been. You push CCP's buttons and you get stomped. Happens all the time. From locked posts to perma-bans. There's no ambiguity here. Just butt hurt on a massive scale by whiners that like to play 'what if' games. Outliers are not the norm in this game. And neither is common sense, apparently. Mr Epeen 
Interesting statement from a man playing a game loaded with outliers, especially when compared to the rest of the mmo scene. ~ Professional Forum Alt -á~ |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2949
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 19:01:00 -
[1597] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:The rule is the same as it's always been. You push CCP's buttons and you get stomped. Happens all the time. From locked posts to perma-bans. There's no ambiguity here. Just butt hurt on a massive scale by whiners that like to play 'what if' games. Outliers are not the norm in this game. And neither is common sense, apparently. Mr Epeen  The ambiguity comes with how far into third party services the rules extend. Previously this was "not at all" as clearly stated by GMs. Now, it's clear that has changed. So what has it changed to? The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list. |

Salvos Rhoska
902
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 19:02:00 -
[1598] - Quote
Tell you what.
Write up your questions, and address them to CCP directly.
You are asking people who try to answer them, but are not actually in any position to do so. Hence, everything they answer, is just their opinion.
Write em up and address them to CCP. ------------ |

Vara Vampira
STEEL CITY. DARKNESS.
14
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 19:03:00 -
[1599] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Tell you what. Right up your questions, and address them to CCP directly.
they tend to say " nope" and lock them because they know they were in the wrong. doing so is futile
Support Erotica 1, remove Ripard Teg from CSM. |

Drone 16
Law Dogz
131
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 19:05:00 -
[1600] - Quote
Vara Vampira wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:Mikhem wrote:Hot topic of this week seems to be Erotica 1 ban and I decided to listen this audio file through about it. It seems that victim could have dyslexia and it was abused alot. Dyslexia means difficulty to read. I found relevant internet links for reading about this incident. This audio file was kind of sad to listen through. ...truncated...Victim has made two forum posts and here is link to his profile containing links to these posts. https://gate.eveonline.com/Profile/sohkar And to quote the "victim" in this case: Sohkar wrote:I dont think erotica 1 should be banned but just because of that i dont think what he did was 100% right but i choose to do what i did and i said what i said he didnt tell me to say it. So if even the "victim" has stated Erotica 1 should not be banned, how can people still not see that this is CCP responding to a CSM members personal vendetta and the outcry of the public, not the needs of the "victim"? Let's drop the act. We all know why I keep pushing for answers and why we will never get any. This has got nothing to do with rules against harassment, it's PR, plain and simple. A CSM member started a witch hunt, the community got stirred up into a rage shitstorm and CCP buckled to public pressure to save face. It just shows CCP will cave to the masses despite whats right or wrong.
Bro, have you heard of this thing called "ganking" it is a rage inducing, tear duct stimulating practice conducted by a group of players for the purpose of fun and/or profit. It is non-consensual pvp, that is what Eve is about. Pvp is everywhere even the forums.
You just got forum ganked.
I was not in the "ban E1 crowd" I thought he could be given a warning. Now, I'm not so sure, there are a lot of deviant minds on this forum, some of you need a wake up call. This game isn't the place for you to get off on humiliation and degradation if you want that get married. Blow up ships, scam, collect tears, laugh at your victims just keep it classy.
While I was not for E1 getting banned, watching you internet tough guys whine and cry is providing me with a guilty pleasure.
It puts the peanutbutter on itself or it leaves the bonus round... - E1's greatest Hits |
|

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2949
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 19:05:00 -
[1601] - Quote
Danalee wrote:Look, Lucas, you know my character hates your character with a passion, ingame but what you are doing here on the forums deserves not only mad props but also very much respect. I did get that impression, and thanks :D The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list. |

Jayem See
CTRL-Q Iron Oxide.
2522
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 19:05:00 -
[1602] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:Mr Epeen wrote:The rule is the same as it's always been. You push CCP's buttons and you get stomped. Happens all the time. From locked posts to perma-bans. There's no ambiguity here. Just butt hurt on a massive scale by whiners that like to play 'what if' games. Outliers are not the norm in this game. And neither is common sense, apparently. Mr Epeen  The ambiguity comes with how far into third party services the rules extend. Previously this was "not at all" as clearly stated by GMs. Now, it's clear that has changed. So what has it changed to?
I've already answered this for you several times. You don't like my answers so you keep asking the same thing. Ask CCP via a petition / ticket and see how it comes back. Aaaaaaand relax. |

Salvos Rhoska
902
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 19:06:00 -
[1603] - Quote
Vara Vampira wrote:they tend to say " nope" and lock them because they know they were in the wrong. doing so is futile
CCP Falcon said:
CCP Falcon wrote:As always, CCP will not discuss specific cases of policy enforcement. However, if you have any questions regarding this statement, please feel free to pose them in this thread, and we will respond to the best of our ability.
So just write up your questions in a clear and concise manner. I would recommend a numbered format. The more intelligible and well-considered your list of questions is, the more likely they are to answer it. Put some time into it, and make it "easy" for them to read through it and answer.
And then address them to CCP directly here in this thread. ------------ |

Danalee
Oberon Incorporated RAZOR Alliance
807
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 19:06:00 -
[1604] - Quote
Vara Vampira wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:Tell you what. Right up your questions, and address them to CCP directly. they tend to say " nope" and lock them because they know they were in the wrong. doing so is futile
Don't feed that little troll, especially not with posts that make sense... It's like throwing water on a gremlin while feeding him after 10PM.
D.
 |

Drone 16
Law Dogz
131
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 19:06:00 -
[1605] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Tell you what. Write up your questions, and address them to CCP directly. You are asking people who try to answer them, but are not actually in any position to do so. Hence, everything they answer, is just their opinion. Write em up and address them to CCP.
Tried to tell him that already he is just dense It puts the peanutbutter on itself or it leaves the bonus round... - E1's greatest Hits |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2952
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 19:07:00 -
[1606] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Tell you what. Write up your questions, and address them to CCP directly. You are asking people who try to answer them, but are not actually in any position to do so. Hence, everything they answer, is just their opinion. Write em up and address them to CCP. Or... I can continue to post them here. That way, CCP gets to read them, other players get to read them, you get to read them and I get to continue my right to freedom of speech. I think I'll go with my option, but honestly, thanks very much for the kind suggestion. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list. |

Salvos Rhoska
902
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 19:09:00 -
[1607] - Quote
Danalee wrote:Don't feed that little troll, especially not with posts that make sense... It's like throwing water on a gremlin while feeding him after 10PM.]
NO U ------------ |

Drone 16
Law Dogz
131
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 19:09:00 -
[1608] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:The rule is the same as it's always been. You push CCP's buttons and you get stomped. Happens all the time. From locked posts to perma-bans. There's no ambiguity here. Just butt hurt on a massive scale by whiners that like to play 'what if' games. Outliers are not the norm in this game. And neither is common sense, apparently. Mr Epeen 
Epeen, can I call you that?
I just want to say that I wish I had your ability to push it in so far and do it in so few words. You have a gift my friend. A gift!  It puts the peanutbutter on itself or it leaves the bonus round... - E1's greatest Hits |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2952
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 19:10:00 -
[1609] - Quote
Jayem See wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:Mr Epeen wrote:The rule is the same as it's always been. You push CCP's buttons and you get stomped. Happens all the time. From locked posts to perma-bans. There's no ambiguity here. Just butt hurt on a massive scale by whiners that like to play 'what if' games. Outliers are not the norm in this game. And neither is common sense, apparently. Mr Epeen  The ambiguity comes with how far into third party services the rules extend. Previously this was "not at all" as clearly stated by GMs. Now, it's clear that has changed. So what has it changed to? I've already answered this for you several times. You don't like my answers so you keep asking the same thing. Ask CCP via a petition / ticket and see how it comes back. No thanks, I'll continue to ask here. I'm not sure which of your answers you think was *the answer*, so if you could drop a link, that would be awesome. In addition to that I'll continue to ask others and debate this as I am fully within my rights to do so. But to you as well, thanks for the suggestion, I do appreciate you looking out for me and ensuring I have a clear idea of my options. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list. |

Salvos Rhoska
902
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 19:11:00 -
[1610] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:Tell you what. Write up your questions, and address them to CCP directly. You are asking people who try to answer them, but are not actually in any position to do so. Hence, everything they answer, is just their opinion. Write em up and address them to CCP. Or... I can continue to post them here. That way, CCP gets to read them, other players get to read them, you get to read them and I get to continue my right to freedom of speech. I think I'll go with my option, but honestly, thanks very much for the kind suggestion.
Seriously.
My recommendation is that you formulate your questions into as clear, concise and intelligible a numbered list as possible, and then post it here in this thread with a clear header addressing it to CCP.
Nobody else here can answer the questions you are asking. Nobody else here is in any position to answer them. Everyone elses answer is just a matter of subjective opinion, to which they personally are entitled.
Arguing against US, does not change CCPs position on this issue.
Write up your stuff, and address it to CCP, here in this thread. ------------ |
|

Moja Hinken
State War Academy Caldari State
23
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 19:13:00 -
[1611] - Quote
Don't understand why you all are trying to debate with Lucas Kell and Danalee. It has been made very clear to us how CCP feels. It has been made very clear to both of them individually by several of you. They are either trolls or the dumbest people I have ever met. |

Jayem See
CTRL-Q Iron Oxide.
2522
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 19:13:00 -
[1612] - Quote
Quote: But to you as well, thanks for the suggestion, I do appreciate you looking out for me and ensuring I have a clear idea of my options.
I assure you I am not looking out for you. I disagree with you.
You are free to keep asking the questions. I did you the courtesy of answering your questions in a civil manner. Several times in fact.
You can do me the courtesy of not being lazy and reading them. I assure you I answered every question you asked of me when you quoted my posts. Aaaaaaand relax. |

Danalee
Oberon Incorporated RAZOR Alliance
807
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 19:13:00 -
[1613] - Quote
Drone 16 wrote:Danalee wrote:Look, Lucas, you know my character hates your character with a passion, ingame but what you are doing here on the forums deserves not only mad props but also very much respect. Lucas Kell wrote: Just FYI, Erotica 1's evidence also showed the "victim" hurling real life death threats and racial abuse, as well as several other people on the bonus room side. Seems strange they were so selective in the interpretation of the evidence. It almost seems like they weren't even responding to the evidence at all, but to the public outcry and the CSM with a personal vendetta.
TheGunslinger42 wrote: Also the magnitude of this turn of events has just become shockingly clear as Lucas and I are in agreement --- Ripard Teg did not merely "expose" a wrong. If he had responsibly reported the issue, and wanted to open a discussion, that would be great. But he opened his piece with literally stating that another player was pure evil, and followed up with literally calling him a torturer, and ended by pleading for the immediate removal of the individual.
That is not responsible journalism, that is not exposing a wrong, that is highly biased, sensationalist dreck. It's clear from the get go that his agenda is to get Erotica1 banned, and that he is willing to use any tactics possible - even horrific ones such as trivialising torture - to accompish it.
This one was nice too; Jebediah Phoenix wrote:So we can get perma-banned now for asking people to do a little song and dance? When the "victim" wasn't punished for racism and death threats? When apparently encouraging someone to commit suicide is worth only a 3 month ban? Yeah, nice priorities CCP. Successful witch hunt guys. INB4 OMG TEARS! Too late
It's not too late to try and fix what's wrong, friend Drone. Don't be sad. Heck, your support throughout this thread and the previous is what keeps us sane/grownup people going.
D.

|

Vara Vampira
STEEL CITY. DARKNESS.
14
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 19:14:00 -
[1614] - Quote
Moja Hinken wrote:Don't understand why you all are trying to debate with Lucas Kell and Danalee. It has been made very clear to us how CCP feels. It has been made very clear to both of them individually by several of you. They are either trolls or the dumbest people I have ever met.
how CCP was forced to feel by the masses and corrupt CSM you mean? Support Erotica 1, remove Ripard Teg from CSM. |

dexington
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
1210
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 19:14:00 -
[1615] - Quote
Moja Hinken wrote:They are either trolls or the dumbest people I have ever met.
One does not exclude the other I'm a relatively respectable citizen. Multiple felon perhaps, but certainly not dangerous. |

Drone 16
Law Dogz
131
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 19:15:00 -
[1616] - Quote
Sentamon wrote:Mr Epeen wrote:The rule is the same as it's always been. You push CCP's buttons and you get stomped. Happens all the time. From locked posts to perma-bans. There's no ambiguity here. Just butt hurt on a massive scale by whiners that like to play 'what if' games. Outliers are not the norm in this game. And neither is common sense, apparently. Mr Epeen  Interesting statement from a man playing a game loaded with outliers, especially when compared to the rest of the mmo scene.
Apparently, whatever E1 did was far enough out of the norm that he got banned. It puts the peanutbutter on itself or it leaves the bonus round... - E1's greatest Hits |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2954
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 19:16:00 -
[1617] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Seriously.
My recommendation is that you formulate your questions into as clear, concise and intelligible a numbered list as possible, and then post it here in this thread with a clear header addressing it to CCP.
Nobody else here can answer the questions you are asking. Nobody else here is in any position to answer them. Everyone elses answer is just a matter of subjective opinion, to which they personally are entitled.
Arguing against US, does NOT change CCPs position on this issue.
Write up your stuff, and address it to CCP, here in this thread. I understand what you are saying, and I appreciate your suggestion, however in this instance I am choosing to go a different way with this and publicly discuss said questions instead. I understand that no player speaks on behalf of CCP. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list. |

Drone 16
Law Dogz
134
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 19:17:00 -
[1618] - Quote
Vara Vampira wrote:Moja Hinken wrote:Don't understand why you all are trying to debate with Lucas Kell and Danalee. It has been made very clear to us how CCP feels. It has been made very clear to both of them individually by several of you. They are either trolls or the dumbest people I have ever met. how CCP was forced to feel by the masses and corrupt CSM you mean?
I think the Palpatine might dissolve the Senate too if we are not careful. OMG the drama
It puts the peanutbutter on itself or it leaves the bonus round... - E1's greatest Hits |

Jayem See
CTRL-Q Iron Oxide.
2524
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 19:17:00 -
[1619] - Quote
Vara Vampira wrote:Moja Hinken wrote:Don't understand why you all are trying to debate with Lucas Kell and Danalee. It has been made very clear to us how CCP feels. It has been made very clear to both of them individually by several of you. They are either trolls or the dumbest people I have ever met. how CCP was forced to feel by the masses and corrupt CSM you mean?
How you seem to fail to realise that some things are more important than role-playing in a game you mean? Aaaaaaand relax. |

MatrixSkye Mk2
Republic University Minmatar Republic
777
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 19:18:00 -
[1620] - Quote
Sentamon wrote:MatrixSkye Mk2 wrote: There is a difference between using the game as a tool to inflict real life malice, grief and humiliation versus someone ranting on twitter or quibbling with another player.
You'll have a hard time making your case for "malice, grief, and humiliation" when not even the "victim" involved feels this way. You could make a case that CCP no longer wants bonus rooms and people being mean toward each other ... well, "just because" CCP wants it that way ... but it seems the opposite is true. Intent does not depend on how the message or signal was received. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 .. 98 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |