Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 .. 14 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Sarmaul
0utbreak
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 18:57:00 -
[1]
8/7/4 please with oodles of CPU and powergrid.
Ta.
TEAM MINMATAR FORUMS - In Rust We Trust - |

Eximius Josari
Citizens of E.A.R.T.H. E.A.R.T.H. Federation
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 18:59:00 -
[2]
Edited by: Eximius Josari on 25/07/2006 18:59:35 8/7/5 without oodles of grid, I don't think we need another artillary boat.
|

anusface1
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 18:59:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Sarmaul 8/7/4 please with oodles of CPU and powergrid.
Ta.
or 8/7/5 if 20 slots :P
|

Cudeiro
Amarr
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 19:00:00 -
[4]
you forgot "and give all people with minmatar bs 5 a full set of cristals implants thx"  "for the glory of General Tani" |

Sarmaul
0utbreak
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 19:00:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Eximius Josari 8/7/5 with not oddles of grid, I don't think we need another artillary boat.
Actually you're right, as shield tanks use more CPU than grid.
TEAM MINMATAR FORUMS - In Rust We Trust - |

Kael D'mende
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 19:01:00 -
[6]
it better have atleast 7 mids now that ccp insist that we shield tank it :O/
and ya, dont gimp the grid/cpu to hard :P
Regards. /Kael |

Amy Wang
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 19:01:00 -
[7]
8/7/5 would be only fair to compensate a little for having the most rubbish bonuses of all tier3 bs....
|

Sarmaul
0utbreak
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 19:01:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Cudeiro you forgot "and give all people with minmatar bs 5 a full set of cristals implants thx" 
Aye, I was thinking about saving up for a snake set but now... 
TEAM MINMATAR FORUMS - In Rust We Trust - |

Sarmaul
0utbreak
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 19:01:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Amy Wang 8/7/5 would be only fair to compensate a little for having the most rubbish bonuses of all tier3 bs....
God you are so wrong (only if it gets 7 mids)
TEAM MINMATAR FORUMS - In Rust We Trust - |

M00dy
ISS Navy Task Force Interstellar Starbase Syndicate
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 19:02:00 -
[10]
It'll the ship to fly in the next Alliance Tournament.
Built in low-grade Crystal set.
|
|

Sarmaul
0utbreak
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 19:03:00 -
[11]
Originally by: M00dy It'll the ship to fly in the next Alliance Tournament.
Built in low-grade Crystal set.
Now imagine it combined with a HG crystal set :P
TEAM MINMATAR FORUMS - In Rust We Trust - |

Kaylana Syi
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 19:04:00 -
[12]
I think this ship just replaced the CNR in next years tournament.
Team Minmatar Carriers need Clone Vats
|

anusface1
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 19:04:00 -
[13]
8 1400 IIs 2 sensor booster IIs 2 tracking comp IIs 3 ECM/Damps RCU II 3 damage mods
4tw
|

Quarantine
Federation of Synthetic Persons YouWhat
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 19:04:00 -
[14]
Sucks. I've succesfully avoided dumping a huge amount of sp into shieldtanking yet, and now this. And if the new gallente blaster boat is going to be faster and of smaller sig than the Tempest, I can guarantee huge amounts of whining from me :)
|

Kael D'mende
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 19:04:00 -
[15]
Originally by: M00dy It'll the ship to fly in the next Alliance Tournament.
Built in low-grade Crystal set.
only if it gets more than 4 launcher slots, unless ofc that the next one will be shorter range :O)
Regards. /Kael |

Chode Rizoum
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 19:06:00 -
[16]
i can see good things
|

M00dy
ISS Navy Task Force Interstellar Starbase Syndicate
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 19:13:00 -
[17]
It will have more Armor hp than Shield hp. 
|

Jenny Spitfire
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 19:15:00 -
[18]
More like 8/6/5. Slot layout looks like Raven.  ---------------- RecruitMe@NOINT!
|

Andrea Jaruwalski
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 19:17:00 -
[19]
Hmmm, Now if the model is as sexy as this sounds. I have my new favorite ship and a reason to buy crystal implants for the sleipnir and this ship.
|

Kaylana Syi
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 19:19:00 -
[20]
Originally by: M00dy It will have more Armor hp than Shield hp. 
That is just the typhoon. If this is any preview of this ship then we should be a.ok.
I just wonder how much shield HP it will have. 9000 on a navy raven is still alot.
Team Minmatar Carriers need Clone Vats
|
|

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 19:22:00 -
[21]
Edited by: Jim McGregor on 25/07/2006 19:23:09
Maelstrom
Bonuses:
* 5% large projectile weapon rate of fire per level * 7.5% shield boost amount per level
I never did like the Cyclone, but hopefully this boat will be more useful. 8 projectiles is definently for the win, combined with 6-7 medium slots and a massive shield boosting bonus. It can be setup to have a fantastic alpha strike, or it can be setup to just sit there and smile while taking damage. 
--- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |

Shamis Orzoz
SniggWaffe
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 19:23:00 -
[22]
Originally by: Jim McGregor
Maelstrom
Bonuses:
* 5% large projectile weapon rate of fire per level * 7.5% shield boost amount per level
I never did like the Cyclone, but hopefully this boat will be more useful. 8 projectiles is definently for the win. 
Where are these stats coming from? Did I miss a big sticky or something?
|

Kael D'mende
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 19:23:00 -
[23]
Originally by: Jenny Spitfire More like 8/6/5. Slot layout looks like Raven. 
I sure hope not :O/ if it is inline with the speculations on the other ships total slot layout, it should have 20 slots total..
my hope is 8/7/4-5 ;O)
Regards. /Kael |

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 19:24:00 -
[24]
Originally by: Shamis Orzoz
Originally by: Jim McGregor
Maelstrom
Bonuses:
* 5% large projectile weapon rate of fire per level * 7.5% shield boost amount per level
I never did like the Cyclone, but hopefully this boat will be more useful. 8 projectiles is definently for the win. 
Where are these stats coming from? Did I miss a big sticky or something?
Hell yes. Check General Discussions sticky. NOW. Run. :)
--- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |

Kael D'mende
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 19:28:00 -
[25]
Edited by: Kael D''mende on 25/07/2006 19:29:53 Wondering how accurate this info is ?
http://evegames.hostingbig.com/eve/data/Ships/Battleships/Tier3@~32;Minmtar.xml
edit: linky broke the link.. so copy paste etc..
Regards. /Kael |

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 19:31:00 -
[26]
Originally by: Kael D'mende Edited by: Kael D''mende on 25/07/2006 19:29:53 Wondering how accurate this info is ?
http://evegames.hostingbig.com/eve/data/Ships/Battleships/Tier3@~32;Minmtar.xml
edit: linky broke the link.. so copy paste etc..
Linkage
Not sure how accurate it is. Personally i would like 7 med slots and 4 low slots instead i think.
--- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |

dabster
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 19:31:00 -
[27]
Link on the left called DEV BLOG Shamiz :-P
/prays for enough cpu D: ___________________________ Brutors Rule! My Eve-vids; Click. |

turnschuh
Eye of God
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 19:31:00 -
[28]
Edited by: turnschuh on 25/07/2006 19:31:38
8x800mm tank/painter/ewar pdu/dmg mods
mmmmhh to bad its going to be a slow ship, thats like totally against its design I hoped to be it a uberstabber
|

Jenny Spitfire
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 19:32:00 -
[29]
Originally by: Kael D'mende
Originally by: Jenny Spitfire More like 8/6/5. Slot layout looks like Raven. 
I sure hope not :O/ if it is inline with the speculations on the other ships total slot layout, it should have 20 slots total..
my hope is 8/7/4-5 ;O)
Made a boo boo. Should have typed 8/6/6. A bit strange for Minmatar to have more mids than Raven, isnt it? ---------------- RecruitMe@NOINT!
|

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 19:33:00 -
[30]
Originally by: Jenny Spitfire
Made a boo boo. Should have typed 8/6/6. A bit strange for Minmatar to have more mids than Raven, isnt it?
Everything goes out the window with these new boats. Gallente gets a fast, agile ship which is kind of why i like minmatar to begin with. And minmatar gets a shield boosting monster which is really a caldari thing, yeah.
--- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |
|

Kael D'mende
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 19:41:00 -
[31]
Originally by: Jenny Spitfire
Originally by: Kael D'mende
Originally by: Jenny Spitfire More like 8/6/5. Slot layout looks like Raven. 
I sure hope not :O/ if it is inline with the speculations on the other ships total slot layout, it should have 20 slots total..
my hope is 8/7/4-5 ;O)
Made a boo boo. Should have typed 8/6/6. A bit strange for Minmatar to have more mids than Raven, isnt it?
humm proberly, but also quite strange to be the slowest of the new bs :O/
i was indeed hoping for a stabber based bs as many others where..
and have to agree with another poster, the design saids speed tbh ;o)
Regards. /Kael |

Matsuo Masato
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 19:41:00 -
[32]
can someone caluclate what the stats one the best faction x-large booster with one boost amp and max skills?
|

M00dy
ISS Navy Task Force Interstellar Starbase Syndicate
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 19:47:00 -
[33]
Originally by: Jenny Spitfire
Originally by: Kael D'mende
Originally by: Jenny Spitfire More like 8/6/5. Slot layout looks like Raven. 
I sure hope not :O/ if it is inline with the speculations on the other ships total slot layout, it should have 20 slots total..
my hope is 8/7/4-5 ;O)
Made a boo boo. Should have typed 8/6/6. A bit strange for Minmatar to have more mids than Raven, isnt it?
Imagine the whinage. 8/6/6 would be so... bleh.
|

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 19:51:00 -
[34]
Originally by: M00dy
Imagine the whinage. 8/6/6 would be so... bleh.
I want 7 medium slots. It would be so much fun to no longer fear Ravens.
DIE RAVENS DIE!
--- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |

Kael D'mende
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 19:53:00 -
[35]
Originally by: Jim McGregor
Originally by: M00dy
Imagine the whinage. 8/6/6 would be so... bleh.
I want 7 medium slots. It would be so much fun to no longer fear Ravens.
DIE RAVENS DIE!
lol... could'nt have said it better myself ;o)
Regards. /Kael |

Double TaP
The Establishment
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 19:53:00 -
[36]
Originally by: Jim McGregor
Originally by: M00dy
Imagine the whinage. 8/6/6 would be so... bleh.
I want 7 medium slots. It would be so much fun to no longer fear Ravens.
DIE RAVENS DIE!
If you are in another battleship and fear ravens, well i fear for you.
|

Dr Tetrahydrocannabinol
Imperium Technologies Firmus Ixion
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 20:01:00 -
[37]
Edited by: Dr Tetrahydrocannabinol on 25/07/2006 20:02:18 Edited by: Dr Tetrahydrocannabinol on 25/07/2006 20:01:33 pretty sure its going to be 6/6 while caldari is 7/5 and galante 5/7 :P
Unless you want to see a 8/4 on the caldari bs with 5% resists
Caldari - BS idea |

Crange
Elite United Corp Antigo Dominion
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 20:03:00 -
[38]
So temp for fleet mael for small gangs and phoon fer solo?
|

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 20:06:00 -
[39]
Originally by: Dr Tetrahydrocannabinol Edited by: Dr Tetrahydrocannabinol on 25/07/2006 20:02:18 Edited by: Dr Tetrahydrocannabinol on 25/07/2006 20:01:33 pretty sure its going to be 6/6 while caldari is 7/5 and galante 5/7 :P
Yeah maybe. But i would prefer 7 meds... i have tried the cyclone as a pvp ship and dont really like it. 3 slots disappear on MWD, warp disruptor and webber. So you really want 4 more medium slots to be able to fit a good tank. 3 is not really enough.
--- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |

Jenny Spitfire
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 20:06:00 -
[40]
Edited by: Jenny Spitfire on 25/07/2006 20:07:22
Originally by: Jim McGregor
Originally by: M00dy
Imagine the whinage. 8/6/6 would be so... bleh.
I want 7 medium slots. It would be so much fun to no longer fear Ravens.
DIE RAVENS DIE!
Nope. You think it is easy to shield tank with 6 slots, huh? At least you know how hard the Raven is tanking with 6 slots. 
/me tries hard to imagine something as huge as a BS that can MWD and orbit at 20km shooting blasters.  ---------------- RecruitMe@NOINT!
|
|

Nafri
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 20:10:00 -
[41]
Originally by: Crange So temp for fleet mael for small gangs and phoon fer solo?
mealstrom is slow,
so it will be:
Tempest for Fleets Typhoon for ganks Meal for Carebearing
From Dusk till Dawn Sig removed, e-mail us if you'd like to know why. -ReverendM ([email protected]) |

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 20:12:00 -
[42]
Originally by: Nafri
Originally by: Crange So temp for fleet mael for small gangs and phoon fer solo?
mealstrom is slow,
so it will be:
Tempest for Fleets Typhoon for ganks Meal for Carebearing
Carebearing = mission running? Still think Raven will be better for that.
--- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |

HippoKing
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 20:16:00 -
[43]
Originally by: Jim McGregor
Originally by: Jenny Spitfire Made a boo boo. Should have typed 8/6/6. A bit strange for Minmatar to have more mids than Raven, isnt it?
Everything goes out the window with these new boats. Gallente gets a fast, agile ship which is kind of why i like minmatar to begin with. And minmatar gets a shield boosting monster which is really a caldari thing, yeah.
Yeah 
|

steveid
Penetrate
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 20:16:00 -
[44]
With the bonus' and slot layouts of this ship you can basically tank sentry guns in low sec solo forever. I find that very worrying personally. Add onto that the possibility of ecm and you've got yourself a kick ass solo pwnmobile. Looks to me horribly horribly overpowered. I'm glad for minnie as they suck, but tbh they need better low end ships as the bs's aren't to bad at all.
|

Sarmaul
0utbreak
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 20:17:00 -
[45]
Edited by: Sarmaul on 25/07/2006 20:17:29
Originally by: Jenny Spitfire Edited by: Jenny Spitfire on 25/07/2006 20:07:22
Originally by: Jim McGregor
Originally by: M00dy
Imagine the whinage. 8/6/6 would be so... bleh.
I want 7 medium slots. It would be so much fun to no longer fear Ravens.
DIE RAVENS DIE!
Nope. You think it is easy to shield tank with 6 slots, huh? At least you know how hard the Raven is tanking with 6 slots. 
/me tries hard to imagine something as huge as a BS that can MWD and orbit at 20km shooting blasters. 
Oh get off your high horse.
The Rokh is a giant Ferox (optimal range + shield resistance bonus) while the Maelstrom is a giant cyclone. Both ships have identical mids and lows, so why not the Tier3 BS when the obviously follow the same pattern? Where has it been stated that no battleship ship must have more midslots than the Raven, a Tier2 battleship?
The same applies to Command Ships too btw.
TEAM MINMATAR FORUMS - In Rust We Trust - |

dabster
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 20:18:00 -
[46]
Edited by: dabster on 25/07/2006 20:20:08 more like mining :-P
edit; omg i gotta learn to stay docked while i whorumfore ___________________________ Brutors Rule! My Eve-vids; Click. |

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 20:20:00 -
[47]
Originally by: steveid With the bonus' and slot layouts of this ship you can basically tank sentry guns in low sec solo forever. I find that very worrying personally. Add onto that the possibility of ecm and you've got yourself a kick ass solo pwnmobile. Looks to me horribly horribly overpowered. I'm glad for minnie as they suck, but tbh they need better low end ships as the bs's aren't to bad at all.
Well, minmatar ships might not be the win button like caldari/gallente ones, but they are a challenge and quite fun to fly. And yeah, this ship will be a really good tank with decent dps on top, but lacking speed. It will probably feel alot like a big Raven but with guns.
--- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 20:21:00 -
[48]
Originally by: dabster Edited by: dabster on 25/07/2006 20:20:08 more like mining :-P
edit; omg i gotta learn to stay docked while i whorumfore
What, you dont like the new ship?
--- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |

Necrologic
Sniggerdly
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 20:23:00 -
[49]
Edited by: Necrologic on 25/07/2006 20:23:08 Why does this thing have rof and not damage? Its alpha strike with artillery is only half a turret stronger than the tempests with bs 5, assuming the tempest has nothing in its other highs. That's crap. This thing needs to have damage not rof imo, unless its only supposed to be an auto boat (but it's gonna be sloooow)
|

Tachy
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 20:25:00 -
[50]
Try hitting a small moon without massive tracking support. Slow and heavy and shield tank. Will it allow for a full set of 1400 without totally having to miss out on damage mods because of the needed fitting mods? And there was no word of any drone bay.
It can't use nos without losing out to the Tempest. When it is nossed the shield boost bonus is as useless as a nossed Cyclone's shield boost bonus. Rating: Not hot on the first look at the stats. --*=*=*--
Even with nougat, you can have a perfect moment. |
|

Quarantine
Federation of Synthetic Persons YouWhat
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 20:25:00 -
[51]
Originally by: Nafri Tempest for Fleets Typhoon for ganks Meal for Carebearing
Why would you want a temp over the maelstorm for fleets? The latter should do more dps and has more burst damage. And if it even has more med slots, as shield tanking bonus suggests, that's even better.
|

Swiftness
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 20:29:00 -
[52]
It better have a F***ing huge cargo hold
|

xeom
Obsidian Sins
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 20:29:00 -
[53]
Edited by: xeom on 25/07/2006 20:29:41 dumb alt >.< ^^^ (kria algox)
CCP where are our t2 shield power relays? | Join[..SIN] |

Kria Algox
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 20:29:00 -
[54]
If it gets only 6 slots it will be passable,but needs 7.But i would still rather train for a raven if only 6.
Sure great tank but you're going to be so slow and using all those slots for tanking,a raven just out does you becuase it can hit at any distance.
IE im talking about a 3xinvi 1xXL-booster 1xAmp 1xCap Booster.
The only thing is the minmatar one will have a built in Amp so i guess you could slap a mwd on there instead of the amp.
|

Tachy
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 20:34:00 -
[55]
Originally by: Swiftness It better have a F***ing huge cargo hold
On a Minmatar ship that isn't named Probe? --*=*=*--
Even with nougat, you can have a perfect moment. |

Vera Nosfyu
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 20:37:00 -
[56]
I like this ship. It has "bait" written all over it. ^_^ -----------------------------------------------------------
"Violence solves all problems, no man, no problem." --Josef Stalin |

Frezik
Celtic Anarchy
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 20:38:00 -
[57]
Originally by: Kael D'mende Edited by: Kael D''mende on 25/07/2006 19:29:53 Wondering how accurate this info is ?
http://evegames.hostingbig.com/eve/data/Ships/Battleships/Tier3@~32;Minmtar.xml
OT: I wish people would stop linking to the database information on ships/modules that aren't officially in game. There's lots of junk in there that the devs just forgot to remove before releasing the final version. Much of it is overpowered and poorly tested. What's worse is when people assume that a database entry on a preliminary item is a "promise" from the devs that the final version will look that that, or even that the item will be released at all.
That said, looking for hidden stuff the devs forgot to take out is a time-honored gamer tradition dating back to at least the orginal Metroid. ---- "Well in this case, he's being flamed, and rightly so, for whinning about a game mechanic that doesn't actually exist." -Lorth |

EL TITAN
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 20:44:00 -
[58]
needs big cargohold indeed _________________________________________________ <3 hi |

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 20:50:00 -
[59]
Edited by: Jim McGregor on 25/07/2006 20:49:56
Originally by: Zyrtan Keb'Lektar at least caldari now finaly got a mining bs 
Best sniper in the game too.
--- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |

Valea Silpha
Cereal Killerz Chimaera Pact
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 20:51:00 -
[60]
I gotta say it:
The maelstrom lets me down in every way. I wanted a big stabber with a rack of AC's and caution being thrown to the wind.
We have ended up with the bastard child of the raven and the cyclone. Theres no specific reason to use it with arty over the tempest, and assuming its as slow as it probably will be, its not worth using with AC over the tempest either.
If it has 7 meds it will tank pretty well, but thats never been the minmatar strength. If it has 6 meds and 6 lows, then we get an ECM + resonable armor tank boat.
Neither of that are anything like the minmatar i know and love.
<Hammerhead> TomB is doing the nerfing <Hammerhead> I just stand behind him, look at his monitor and shake my head |
|

Naughty Boy
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 20:56:00 -
[61]
... my feelings exactly, unfortunately.
NB.
|

kessah
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 20:57:00 -
[62]
Edited by: kessah on 25/07/2006 20:57:33 A shield booster bonus is completly absured for a matari ship, its being limited and that is not cool for matari!
They need and i stress this NEED to be versatile. Its a really bad idea to limit them to shield tanking.
better to have a similar bonus to the Hyperon with the mwd than the tank, seriously not happy with it being forced *and it is really* to shield tank 
Im really hoping the dev's read this --------------------------------------------------------
Forever Pirate |

Sarmaul
0utbreak
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 20:59:00 -
[63]
Originally by: Valea Silpha I gotta say it:
The maelstrom lets me down in every way. I wanted a big stabber with a rack of AC's and caution being thrown to the wind.
Shame, I wanted a dedicated missile boat with target painter bonuses.
Originally by: Valea Silpha We have ended up with the bastard child of the raven and the cyclone.
No, we have ended up with a giant cyclone. Last time I checked, the Raven had either a shield boost bonus not a projectile rof bonus.
Originally by: Valea Silpha Theres no specific reason to use it with arty over the tempest
Execpt of course, both the alpha strike and DPS will be higher on the Maelstrom.
Originally by: Valea Silpha and assuming its as slow as it probably will be, its not worth using with AC over the tempest either.
You nearly had a point there. Congrats \o/
Originally by: Valea Silpha If it has 7 meds it will tank pretty well, but thats never been the minmatar strength.
Please take a look at the Sleipnir and tell me it Minmatar don't tank well. If we're going to do something, we do it properly :).
Originally by: Valea Silpha If it has 6 meds and 6 lows, then we get an ECM + resonable armor tank boat.
OK I agree with you on that one, which is why I'm trying to get support for 8/7/4-5
Originally by: Valea Silpha Neither of that are anything like the minmatar i know and love.
Christ knows what Minmatar ships you've been loving then.
TEAM MINMATAR FORUMS - In Rust We Trust - |

Valea Silpha
Cereal Killerz Chimaera Pact
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 21:00:00 -
[64]
Edited by: Valea Silpha on 25/07/2006 21:05:46 Man if we were getting the hyperions bonuses it would causes thousands of pairs of minmatar panties to moisten.
Edit
In responce to Sarmael:
Minmatar to me are all about speed and terrible slot layouts. I haven't flown a cyclone in months because although it has a nice big shiled boost bonus its limited meds leave it open to all sorts of problems. Aside from anything else, without cap, you can't use the bonus. Slap on an MWD and you loose a shed load of cap to start with. Then add some hostile NOS on top of that. Thats NOS we can't use back, because loosing a slot to use it detracts from the already middling damage.
<Hammerhead> TomB is doing the nerfing <Hammerhead> I just stand behind him, look at his monitor and shake my head |

kessah
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 21:03:00 -
[65]
Totally agree with Valea Silpha on this one!
5% velocity bonus and 5% to Large proj dmg or rof per lvl
Shield bonus on this is totally bogus! all the other races imho are right on the money, why is it matari always gets shafted. Now ive matari spec myself im really starting to feel for all those times i flicked past the matari whines.
PLEASE CCP CHANGE THE SHIELD BOOST BONUS! --------------------------------------------------------
Forever Pirate |

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 21:03:00 -
[66]
Originally by: Valea Silpha I gotta say it:
The maelstrom lets me down in every way. I wanted a big stabber with a rack of AC's and caution being thrown to the wind.
We have ended up with the bastard child of the raven and the cyclone. Theres no specific reason to use it with arty over the tempest, and assuming its as slow as it probably will be, its not worth using with AC over the tempest either.
If it has 7 meds it will tank pretty well, but thats never been the minmatar strength. If it has 6 meds and 6 lows, then we get an ECM + resonable armor tank boat.
Neither of that are anything like the minmatar i know and love.
Speed on a battleship seems useless to me... if it had been a speed bonus and no shield boosting bonus, it would die horribly to gallente ships up close. A speed bonus with such a slow base speed wont make any difference, its a wasted bonus imo. Try outrunning a megathron/hyperion... you simply wont.
I think the shield bonus is quite useful, even though i admit its very caldari-like.
--- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |

Sarmaul
0utbreak
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 21:05:00 -
[67]
Originally by: Valea Silpha Man if we were getting the hyperions bonuses it would causes thousands of pairs of minmatar panties to moisten.
If it gets 8/7/4-5 we get enough slots to tackle, a 3-4 slot tank (cap booster takes up 1) and the ability to fit crap loads of damage mods. Don't forget about the built-in Dread Guristas Boost Amp/LG Crystal Set.
TEAM MINMATAR FORUMS - In Rust We Trust - |

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 21:09:00 -
[68]
Originally by: kessah Totally agree with Valea Silpha on this one!
5% velocity bonus and 5% to Large proj dmg or rof per lvl
Shield bonus on this is totally bogus! all the other races imho are right on the money, why is it matari always gets shafted. Now ive matari spec myself im really starting to feel for all those times i flicked past the matari whines.
PLEASE CCP CHANGE THE SHIELD BOOST BONUS!
Lol, have you read the other races threads? Every one has a similar amount of whine. Go check it out for yourself. :)
--- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |

kessah
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 21:11:00 -
[69]
Sarmaul seriously how can u welcome a Shield boost bonus, matari are ment to be versatile especially at the Battleship lvl.
Its so contricting, i fly the cyclone and i still armour tank it and i fly the raven and armour tank it, But like the cyclone u might aswell use a ferox imho and with the Maelstrom having a wasted bonus *imho* as if i used it i use it as a cyclone which sucks. --------------------------------------------------------
Forever Pirate |

Sarmaul
0utbreak
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 21:12:00 -
[70]
Originally by: kessah Sarmaul seriously how can u welcome a Shield boost bonus, matari are ment to be versatile especially at the Battleship lvl.
Its so contricting, i fly the cyclone and i still armour tank it and i fly the raven and armour tank it, But like the cyclone u might aswell use a ferox imho and with the Maelstrom having a wasted bonus *imho* as if i used it i use it as a cyclone which sucks.
Nobody is forcing you to shield tank it.
TBH, I am absolutely loving the shield boost bonus but only if it gets 7 mids, otherwise it will end up being fitted like a tempest with another multispec.
TEAM MINMATAR FORUMS - In Rust We Trust - |
|

Valea Silpha
Cereal Killerz Chimaera Pact
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 21:12:00 -
[71]
If it gets 8/7/4 then thats fine and dandy. But when did we ever get it that easy ?
Plus if its slow, it breaks minni design philosophy. I pride myself on being not just faster than the opposition, but SO SO much faster than the opposition. My stabber is twice as fast on MWD than all those Rax's and mallers who are after my blood, and thats how it should be. Even my ruppie *kicks it* is a good couple hundred m/s faster than them.
To me, the essence of minmatar is not being as tanky, not being as ganky but sure as hell being able to get away if it goes **** up.
<Hammerhead> TomB is doing the nerfing <Hammerhead> I just stand behind him, look at his monitor and shake my head |

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 21:15:00 -
[72]
Edited by: Jim McGregor on 25/07/2006 21:22:02
Originally by: Sarmaul
Originally by: kessah Sarmaul seriously how can u welcome a Shield boost bonus, matari are ment to be versatile especially at the Battleship lvl.
Its so contricting, i fly the cyclone and i still armour tank it and i fly the raven and armour tank it, But like the cyclone u might aswell use a ferox imho and with the Maelstrom having a wasted bonus *imho* as if i used it i use it as a cyclone which sucks.
Nobody is forcing you to shield tank it.
TBH, I am absolutely loving the shield boost bonus but only if it gets 7 mids, otherwise it will end up being fitted like a tempest with another multispec.
Even with 6 meds, it will be like having a built-in shield amp, which is too good to pass up with a gist shield booster. This thing will boost more than 1000 shield per cycle easily using 1 slot for amp. 
--- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |

Valea Silpha
Cereal Killerz Chimaera Pact
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 21:15:00 -
[73]
Originally by: Sarmaul
Originally by: kessah Sarmaul seriously how can u welcome a Shield boost bonus, matari are ment to be versatile especially at the Battleship lvl.
Its so contricting, i fly the cyclone and i still armour tank it and i fly the raven and armour tank it, But like the cyclone u might aswell use a ferox imho and with the Maelstrom having a wasted bonus *imho* as if i used it i use it as a cyclone which sucks.
Nobody is forcing you to shield tank it.
TBH, I am absolutely loving the shield boost bonus but only if it gets 7 mids, otherwise it will end up being fitted like a tempest with another multispec.
If it gets 7 meds , 4 lows and a shield boost bonus, what other option are we being left ? Enough meds for a load of structure reps maybe 
<Hammerhead> TomB is doing the nerfing <Hammerhead> I just stand behind him, look at his monitor and shake my head |

Naughty Boy
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 21:16:00 -
[74]
Edited by: Naughty Boy on 25/07/2006 21:16:45
Originally by: Sarmaul TBH, I am absolutely loving the shield boost bonus but only if it gets 7 mids
* Naughty Boy adds a candle. 
NB.
|

kessah
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 21:22:00 -
[75]
Bah the only restriction i like to have on matari ships is the weapons it uses.
Tanking, EWAR i like to be creative with them, it just makes them to conformant.
Id just prefer a secondary bonus to its weapon systems or a velocity bonus MWD or like the vaga\stabber makes things alot more fun  --------------------------------------------------------
Forever Pirate |

Sarmaul
0utbreak
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 21:25:00 -
[76]
There's always tier 4 ;)
TEAM MINMATAR FORUMS - In Rust We Trust - |

Dr Tetrahydrocannabinol
Imperium Technologies Firmus Ixion
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 21:28:00 -
[77]
im gonna be honest with you not sure why anyone would fly a Tempest over a Melstrom. Same DPS, better tanking, one more slot :\
Caldari - BS idea |

Dr Tetrahydrocannabinol
Imperium Technologies Firmus Ixion
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 21:28:00 -
[78]
im gonna be honest with you not sure why anyone would fly a Tempest over a Melstrom. Same DPS better tanking one more slot :\
Caldari - BS idea |

Dr Tetrahydrocannabinol
Imperium Technologies Firmus Ixion
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 21:28:00 -
[79]
im gonna be honest with you not sure why anyone would fly a Tempest over a Melstrom. Same DPSm better tanking one more slot :\
Caldari - BS idea |

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 21:29:00 -
[80]
Edited by: Jim McGregor on 25/07/2006 21:29:20
Originally by: Dr Tetrahydrocannabinol im gonna be honest with you not sure why anyone would fly a Tempest over a Melstrom. Same DPS better tanking one more slot :\
Graphs please.
Edit: And it takes some elite skills to triple post...  --- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |
|

Locke Ateid
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 21:44:00 -
[81]
Edited by: Locke Ateid on 25/07/2006 21:52:09 My hate for Tuxford is now complete.
-He destroyed the purpose of the Breacher.
Forgivable do to it's lack of use, but it WAS still better than a Kestrel in many ways IMO.
-He toke away our speed bonus for frigates.
Unexpected and uncalled for, but he made up for it by giving the Rifter a third med slot.
-Gave the Cyclones a shield bonus.
An unspeakable act against Min ships and philosophy, who always been about speed, versatility, and heavy firepower. The first clear sign that he was out to destroy Mins as a whole by gimping both they're firepower and versatility.
-Now by forcing shield bonuses onto all new Min ships.
Words cannot express how I feel about this beyond HATE and SCORN.
I hope the hamsters that power Eve's server get a taste for blood and eat him alive during feeding time.
|

Frezik
Celtic Anarchy
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 21:48:00 -
[82]
Originally by: Valea Silpha Plus if its slow, it breaks minni design philosophy.
I think departing from traditional designs is exactly where CCP is taking the Minnies. Notice that the Minnie carriers don't have a lot of exposed structure, and the released mockup art for the Maelstrom is similar. Also see the models for the Sabre and Minnie command ships.
All of it points to Minnies who no longer throw some duct tape over some chicken wire and call it a ship. ---- "Well in this case, he's being flamed, and rightly so, for whinning about a game mechanic that doesn't actually exist." -Lorth |

Jezala
Mom 'n' Pop Ammo Shoppe Axiom Empire
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 21:49:00 -
[83]
Did I read Tux's description of the Maelstorm correctly in that the Maelstorm will have a better alpha-strike but poorer damage-over-time in comparasion to the Tempest?
...and yes, we do sell and deliver ammo. 425 Express Delivery is available upon request, please see Hans Gates and Marcus Grisbius regarding this option. |

Valea Silpha
Cereal Killerz Chimaera Pact
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 21:53:00 -
[84]
Originally by: Dr Tetrahydrocannabinol im gonna be honest with you not sure why anyone would fly a Tempest over a Melstrom. Same DPS, better tanking, one more slot :\
It has marginally more DPS, assmuming you don't fit anything damage dealing in the tempests other highslots, or fit nos in any of the maelstroms. Oh and that they have the same size drone bay.
The reason top of my agenda is 'speed'. Battleships are not noted for being fast. The blog specifically states that this one will be 'slow'. That does pretty much remove the option of AC's. On a practical level, you have to either move the ship into range of the enemy or stay out of the enemies range, depending on what your fighting. Being slow does cause problems with this.
<Hammerhead> TomB is doing the nerfing <Hammerhead> I just stand behind him, look at his monitor and shake my head |

Lydia Brightlance
Gallente
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 21:58:00 -
[85]
It's a lovely ship.....
Except that it stole it's name from my Alliance....
|

babylonstew
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 22:03:00 -
[86]
so all these people whining the raven can tank and gank with 6/5 slots is actually over powered, but a min ship with say 6/5 and a built in shield boost amp, so basically 7/5 for example, isnt up to scratch tanking wise?, what have i missed? either ravens tank/gank isnt actually over powered at all, or your after a super tank with 8 turrets?
Forum advice Linkage |

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 22:07:00 -
[87]
Edited by: Jim McGregor on 25/07/2006 22:08:11
Originally by: babylonstew so all these people whining the raven can tank and gank with 6/5 slots is actually over powered, but a min ship with say 6/5 and a built in shield boost amp, so basically 7/5 for example, isnt up to scratch tanking wise?, what have i missed? either ravens tank/gank isnt actually over powered at all, or your after a super tank with 8 turrets?
People seem to think it will be either 8/7/5 or 8/6/6 to make a total of 20 slots. If it gets 7 medium slots, its tanking will be excellent. Personally i like this ship if it gets 7 mediums. 
--- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |

Sarmaul
0utbreak
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 22:18:00 -
[88]
The complaint is that it can tank and gank and never miss.
TEAM MINMATAR FORUMS - In Rust We Trust - |

babylonstew
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 22:21:00 -
[89]
Originally by: Sarmaul The complaint is that it can tank and gank and never miss.
ok, thats a fair point, but even with 6 meds, the new min bs will in fact out tank said raven wont it? so you will in fact have for example, an extra invul field 30% more resists, or an extra boost amp, ungodly boost ammounts, or anything you like really, i just dont see its that bad if it 'only' has 6 meds, i really think 7 would make it slightly over powered in the tanking department. personal opinion not flame ^^^
Forum advice Linkage |

Pesadel0
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 22:26:00 -
[90]
The dream has endead ....What a sucky ship
|
|

Sarmaul
0utbreak
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 22:26:00 -
[91]
Originally by: babylonstew
Originally by: Sarmaul The complaint is that it can tank and gank and never miss.
ok, thats a fair point, but even with 6 meds, the new min bs will in fact out tank said raven wont it? so you will in fact have for example, an extra invul field 30% more resists, or an extra boost amp, ungodly boost ammounts, or anything you like really, i just dont see its that bad if it 'only' has 6 meds, i really think 7 would make it slightly over powered in the tanking department. personal opinion not flame ^^^
And the Rokh with 7 midslots will also out-tank the raven due to it's 25% resistance bonus. The devs have stated that the Minny tier3 is designed to run the biggest tank of them all, and the only way that's going to happen is if it gets 7 midslots. As has been stated by other people, give it 6 and you'll end up with an armour tank + ewar, thus wasting the bonus.
MWD (1) Scrambler (2) Web (3) Cap Booster (4) XL Booster (5)
Leaves it 1 slot for tanking unless you remove one of the needed modules (and as it is going to be quite sluggish it will definatly need that web, with no nos the tank won't hold without the cap booster, it needs some form of speed mod to get into range and the scrambler is self explanitory. By going 8/7/4 you force it to shield tank (the purpose of the ship) and put an end to it running a ****-poor armour tank as it won't have any slots for damage modules.
If the Minny t1/t2 battlecruisers can have the same amount of midslots as the Caldari ones, the tier3 BS damn well better have the same amount too.
TEAM MINMATAR FORUMS - In Rust We Trust - |

Eximius Josari
Citizens of E.A.R.T.H. E.A.R.T.H. Federation
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 22:29:00 -
[92]
Edited by: Eximius Josari on 25/07/2006 22:33:06 Edited by: Eximius Josari on 25/07/2006 22:30:20
Originally by: Matsuo Masato can someone caluclate what the stats one the best faction x-large booster with one boost amp and max skills?
2028.148 hp every 4 seconds with a full set of top Crystals, and the currently mythical X-Type Gist XL Booster and Gist Boost Amp.
2568.397 hp every 4 seconds with Pith X-Type XL Booster and Pith X-Type Amp.
You can run the numbers for boost calcs on a Cyclone, same boost bonus.
EDIT: One minute, running the numbers on Pith X-Type.
|

Sarmaul
0utbreak
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 22:38:00 -
[93]
Are any of the X-Type shield mods besides the Large Shield Booster actually in game yet?
TEAM MINMATAR FORUMS - In Rust We Trust - |

Matsuo Masato
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 22:42:00 -
[94]
gist b-type xlarge shield booster with one t1 shield boost amp and bs lvl 5 1030 hp every 4 secs if you ad a HG crystal set to that OMG
|

Nafri
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 22:43:00 -
[95]
Originally by: babylonstew
Originally by: Sarmaul The complaint is that it can tank and gank and never miss.
ok, thats a fair point, but even with 6 meds, the new min bs will in fact out tank said raven wont it? so you will in fact have for example, an extra invul field 30% more resists, or an extra boost amp, ungodly boost ammounts, or anything you like really, i just dont see its that bad if it 'only' has 6 meds, i really think 7 would make it slightly over powered in the tanking department. personal opinion not flame ^^^
No, the new Battleship wont be able to outtank the raven
for a gunship you need a tracking computer, or you wont do ****. Also a raven can decide range very easily and suffers no tracking problems.
Ever tried to hit something with howitzers from under 40km?
From Dusk till Dawn Sig removed, e-mail us if you'd like to know why. -ReverendM ([email protected]) |

Nafri
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 22:47:00 -
[96]
My point of view:
Crappy attempt to give matari a mission running ship.
Shield boosters are hardly fitted in PvP anyway, every bonus to them is quite wasted. Since they buffed large shield extenders, its all about passive tanks and EW for midslots.
Tempest is still better for most purposes, it needs less ammo, will be cheaper to fit (nice for fleets) and its faster (AC setups), also you will fit armor plates for fleets, so the shield boost bonus is sooooo wasted.
unless you want to carebaer around, there is no need to fly that ship. I really hoped for a double ROF bonus, making it a good DPS ship.
at least slotlayout must be 8/7/5
From Dusk till Dawn Sig removed, e-mail us if you'd like to know why. -ReverendM ([email protected]) |

pennzoil
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 22:48:00 -
[97]
I think we are losing sight of what the minmatar are all about from the story line point of view. I started my eve life as a caldari due to ignorance but quickly switch to flying Minmatar ships as they embraced everything I love in a ship. Fast, Versatile, and pieced together.
I thought Minmatar ships were for living on the darker side of the law to pirates, smugglers and peddlers or illeagel goods. Also being enemies of Amarr I'm surprised we would choose to start specializing in shield tanking. Wouldn't slaves that are good with mechanics choose armor tanking some of the times. Check out Minmatars backstory sometime.
Also I don't think they would give use 7 mid slots as that would make to much sense.
What I would like to see 5% velocity 5% ROF or 5% dam some sort of active armor tank bonus (I don't want to be forced into shield tanking all the time as we weren't locked into shield tanking when I started training minmatar ships)
|

Sarmaul
0utbreak
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 22:52:00 -
[98]
It's supposed to be ironic - the minmatar use shield technology when their racial enemy do mostly EM damage, while Amarr use armour technology when their racial enemy do mostly explosive damage :)
TEAM MINMATAR FORUMS - In Rust We Trust - |

Hllaxiu
Shiva Morsus Mihi
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 22:57:00 -
[99]
Originally by: Sarmaul It's supposed to be ironic - the minmatar use shield technology when their racial enemy do mostly EM damage, while Amarr use armour technology when their racial enemy do mostly explosive damage :)
Of course theres tech 2 ships, where the amarr can't really damage the minmatar and the minmatar say "oh, ok, phased plasma ftw" --- Our greatest glory is not in never failing, but in rising up every time we fail. - Emerson |

Severa Crest
Railgun Voodoo II
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 23:04:00 -
[100]
slow minnie ships 4TL, I hope this heap gets changed.
PS - any other minnie pilots worried about the Hyperion?
|
|

Sarmaul
0utbreak
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 23:05:00 -
[101]
Originally by: Severa Crest Any other minnie pilots worried about the Hyperion?
I'm only worried if it gets into range or lands 0.0km away from me, as I should be.
TEAM MINMATAR FORUMS - In Rust We Trust - |

Andrea Jaruwalski
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 23:06:00 -
[102]
Originally by: Sarmaul
Originally by: Severa Crest Any other minnie pilots worried about the Hyperion?
I'm only worried if it gets into range or lands 0.0km away from me, as I should be.
The only reason i see myself flying the hyperion, is all... about the slot layout and armor HP, speed and so on.
Otherwise, it's just a crappy megathron with less dronebay, less tracking and a 5th midslot, oh a Crappy vindicator!
|

Severa Crest
Railgun Voodoo II
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 23:07:00 -
[103]
Originally by: Sarmaul
Originally by: Severa Crest Any other minnie pilots worried about the Hyperion?
I'm only worried if it gets into range or lands 0.0km away from me, as I should be.
Well if its lighter than the megathron, its likely it'll be lighter than the tempest - probably more in line with the phoon. And its faster than the Mega. And then arm it with Null ammo.
|

Nafri
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 23:07:00 -
[104]
Originally by: Severa Crest
slow minnie ships 4TL, I hope this heap gets changed.
PS - any other minnie pilots worried about the Hyperion?
Well, Im as worried as I only have gallente BS lvl4, think around christmas I will have 3 Bs lvl5 and 2 guns specs maxed out 
From Dusk till Dawn Sig removed, e-mail us if you'd like to know why. -ReverendM ([email protected]) |

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 23:10:00 -
[105]
Edited by: Jim McGregor on 25/07/2006 23:11:35
Quote:
2028.148 hp every 4 seconds with a full set of top Crystals, and the currently mythical X-Type Gist XL Booster and Gist Boost Amp.
2568.397 hp every 4 seconds with Pith X-Type XL Booster and Pith X-Type Amp.
You can run the numbers for boost calcs on a Cyclone, same boost bonus.
Pointless numbers really. How many people will have a full set of crystals...and even if they did, to take that into pvp... would require someone mad. Im not sure what the cost of a complete crystal set is, but isnt it like 3 billion or something?
Isnt a gist b-type shield booster like 584 hp/4 seconds? With minmatar bs at level 5, that would make it 803 hp every 4s with no amp. With a 30% standard amp, it becomes 1043 hp every 4s. And thats with a gist booster that cost 400 million isk.
Im not sure if my math is completely right, but i think it ends up at like 1000 hp per 4 seconds... the 2500 hp for 4 seconds is for the very rich. Thats unbeatable without nossing. 
--- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |

Nafri
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 23:12:00 -
[106]
Originally by: Jim McGregor Edited by: Jim McGregor on 25/07/2006 23:11:35
Quote:
2028.148 hp every 4 seconds with a full set of top Crystals, and the currently mythical X-Type Gist XL Booster and Gist Boost Amp.
2568.397 hp every 4 seconds with Pith X-Type XL Booster and Pith X-Type Amp.
You can run the numbers for boost calcs on a Cyclone, same boost bonus.
Pointless numbers really. How many people will have a full set of crystals...and even if they did, to take that into pvp... would require someone mad. Im not sure what the cost of a complete crystal set is, but isnt it like 3 billion or something?
Isnt a gist b-type shield booster like 584 hp/4 seconds? With minmatar bs at level 5, that would make it 803 hp every 4s with no amp. With a 30% standard amp, it becomes 1043 hp every 4s. And thats with a gist booster that cost 400 million isk.
Im not sure if my math is completely right, but i think it ends up at like 1000 hp per 4 seconds... the 2500 hp for 4 seconds is for the very rich. Thats unbeatable without nossing. 
its just a mission running BS nothing else.
Honestly, who will fit an active tank on a battleship?
From Dusk till Dawn Sig removed, e-mail us if you'd like to know why. -ReverendM ([email protected]) |

Sarmaul
0utbreak
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 23:12:00 -
[107]
With a Cap Booster it's pretty much unbeatable until you run out of charges :P
TEAM MINMATAR FORUMS - In Rust We Trust - |

Aramendel
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 23:13:00 -
[108]
Just one thing about the people complaining about this BS being a shieldtanker and how it is removing flexibility:
Look at the minnie frigates and cruisers. Some are more suited to shieldtanks, some more suited to armortanks. Not with BSs, though. The Typhoon is an armortank. The Tempest can do both (although is usually used as armortank). From that viewpoint it's only logical, especially considering that flexibility is one of the strong points of minnie ships, that the tier 3 will be an shieldtank. Being able to choose between an armortanking BS, a hybrid and a shieldtanking BS seems to me way more flexible than being able to choose between 2 armortanking BS and a hybrid.
|

Nafri
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 23:14:00 -
[109]
Originally by: Aramendel Just one thing about the people complaining about this BS being a shieldtanker and how it is removing flexibility:
Look at the minnie frigates and cruisers. Some are more suited to shieldtanks, some more suited to armortanks. Not with BSs, though. The Typhoon is an armortank. The Tempest can do both (although is usually used as armortank). From that viewpoint it's only logical, especially considering that flexibility is one of the strong points of minnie ships, that the tier 3 will be an shieldtank. Being able to choose between an armortanking BS, a hybrid and a shieldtanking BS seems to me way more flexible than being able to choose between 2 armortanking BS and a hybrid.
Minmatar ships may have sometimes a decent ammount of midslots, but you dont shieldtank them
From Dusk till Dawn Sig removed, e-mail us if you'd like to know why. -ReverendM ([email protected]) |

Severa Crest
Railgun Voodoo II
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 23:15:00 -
[110]
Edited by: Severa Crest on 25/07/2006 23:15:28
Originally by: Sarmaul With a Cap Booster it's pretty much unbeatable until you run out of charges :P
With the five slot tank, and a cap booster - leaves 1 slot for what exactly?
Edit - thats IF it gets 7 mids.
will be crap with arty, and crap with autos.
|
|

Sarmaul
0utbreak
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 23:15:00 -
[111]
Originally by: Nafri Honestly, who will fit an active tank on a battleship?
Are you honestly telling me nobody fits active tanks on battleships? 
TEAM MINMATAR FORUMS - In Rust We Trust - |

Valea Silpha
Cereal Killerz Chimaera Pact
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 23:23:00 -
[112]
The problem im seeing more than anything else (now im over it not being fast and autocannony) is that you can't kill a damn thing just by tanking it. And for that matter not being the best tank on the market. It all looks pretty good on paper, but its just not what we're about. It will run missions just fine. But i would never give up my tempy for one of these. I like that i can choose to armor or shield tank. I like that i can choose to be snipey or MWD of doom. I like that i get a double dose of damage bonus.
Line the maeltrom up against the Rokh, for example. The rokh will out tank it, there is no denying it. The rokh will also have range beyond anything achieveable by anything else. Now lets compare it to the Hyperion. The hyperion is a nasty piece of work, essentially a faster blasterthron, which will smoke our new chappy. Next against the abaddon... which is a choice between uber tank or uber gank. Im damned if the bloody ammar have a more versatile ship than we do.
<Hammerhead> TomB is doing the nerfing <Hammerhead> I just stand behind him, look at his monitor and shake my head |

Aramendel
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 23:24:00 -
[113]
Edited by: Aramendel on 25/07/2006 23:26:00
Originally by: Nafri you fit an active tank on a vagabound?
And since when is a shieldtank automatically an active one?
On the Maelstrom it will be, mind you, but so what? Cyclones work just splendidly with an active tank.
Originally by: Valea Silpha ...Next against the abaddon... which is a choice between uber tank or uber gank. Im damned if the bloody ammar have a more versatile ship than we do.
The only way you will be able to use an Abaddon as uber tank is if you use projectiles on it. It won't be able to shoot and tank if it uses lasers.
|

Valea Silpha
Cereal Killerz Chimaera Pact
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 23:25:00 -
[114]
Originally by: Aramendel
Originally by: Nafri you fit an active tank on a vagabound?
And since when is a shieldtank automatically an active one?
On the Maelstrom it will be, mind you, but so what? Cyclones work just splendidly with an active tank.
I think 'splendidly' is a bit of a stretch. They work pretty well, if you happen to have a shed load of nos.
<Hammerhead> TomB is doing the nerfing <Hammerhead> I just stand behind him, look at his monitor and shake my head |

Nafri
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 23:25:00 -
[115]
Originally by: Aramendel
Originally by: Nafri you fit an active tank on a vagabound?
And since when is a shieldtank automatically an active one?
On the Maelstrom it will be, mind you, but so what? Cyclones work just splendidly with an active tank.
since I started talking about active shield tanks, somewhere in this thread
From Dusk till Dawn Sig removed, e-mail us if you'd like to know why. -ReverendM ([email protected]) |

Nafri
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 23:27:00 -
[116]
Originally by: Valea Silpha
Originally by: Aramendel
Originally by: Nafri you fit an active tank on a vagabound?
And since when is a shieldtank automatically an active one?
On the Maelstrom it will be, mind you, but so what? Cyclones work just splendidly with an active tank.
I think 'splendidly' is a bit of a stretch. They work pretty well, if you happen to have a shed load of nos.
cyclone works splendid in PvP? I have to see that.
From Dusk till Dawn Sig removed, e-mail us if you'd like to know why. -ReverendM ([email protected]) |

Nafri
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 23:27:00 -
[117]
Originally by: Valea Silpha The problem im seeing more than anything else (now im over it not being fast and autocannony) is that you can't kill a damn thing just by tanking it. And for that matter not being the best tank on the market. It all looks pretty good on paper, but its just not what we're about. It will run missions just fine. But i would never give up my tempy for one of these. I like that i can choose to armor or shield tank. I like that i can choose to be snipey or MWD of doom. I like that i get a double dose of damage bonus.
Line the maeltrom up against the Rokh, for example. The rokh will out tank it, there is no denying it. The rokh will also have range beyond anything achieveable by anything else. Now lets compare it to the Hyperion. The hyperion is a nasty piece of work, essentially a faster blasterthron, which will smoke our new chappy. Next against the abaddon... which is a choice between uber tank or uber gank. Im damned if the bloody ammar have a more versatile ship than we do.
excactly
the tempest is better for shortrange, thats for sure. The ability to use cap neutralizers on your enemy is just devasting. The mealstrom has no ulility slots, it needs 2 more turrets to achieve what the tempest can.
From Dusk till Dawn Sig removed, e-mail us if you'd like to know why. -ReverendM ([email protected]) |

Severa Crest
Railgun Voodoo II
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 23:28:00 -
[118]
Originally by: Aramendel Edited by: Aramendel on 25/07/2006 23:26:00
Originally by: Nafri you fit an active tank on a vagabound?
And since when is a shieldtank automatically an active one?
On the Maelstrom it will be, mind you, but so what? Cyclones work just splendidly with an active tank.
Originally by: Valea Silpha ...Next against the abaddon... which is a choice between uber tank or uber gank. Im damned if the bloody ammar have a more versatile ship than we do.
The only way you will be able to use an Abaddon as uber tank is if you use projectiles on it. It won't be able to shoot and tank if it uses lasers.
Cyclone is the lightest and fastest ship in its class....
|

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 23:28:00 -
[119]
Originally by: Valea Silpha The problem im seeing more than anything else (now im over it not being fast and autocannony) is that you can't kill a damn thing just by tanking it. And for that matter not being the best tank on the market. It all looks pretty good on paper, but its just not what we're about. It will run missions just fine. But i would never give up my tempy for one of these. I like that i can choose to armor or shield tank. I like that i can choose to be snipey or MWD of doom. I like that i get a double dose of damage bonus.
Line the maeltrom up against the Rokh, for example. The rokh will out tank it, there is no denying it. The rokh will also have range beyond anything achieveable by anything else. Now lets compare it to the Hyperion. The hyperion is a nasty piece of work, essentially a faster blasterthron, which will smoke our new chappy. Next against the abaddon... which is a choice between uber tank or uber gank. Im damned if the bloody ammar have a more versatile ship than we do.
Not giving up the tempy was exacly what the devs tried to do here. They didnt want to replace current ships. And they havent. All the older ships are still better at some things. We will just have more choices now.
--- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |

Aramendel
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 23:28:00 -
[120]
Edited by: Aramendel on 25/07/2006 23:31:23
Originally by: Nafri since I started talking about active shield tanks, somewhere in this thread
Which I did not mention with one single word. Read what other people write, not only what you write.
Originally by: Nafri cyclone works splendid in PvP? I have to see that.
Try the EVE TV of several tournament matches.
No "real PvP", I know, since no EW allowed. But you won't have "real PvP" by the time those ships will be released, too. Because ECM is next on Tux "to be looked at" list.
|
|

Nafri
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 23:29:00 -
[121]
Originally by: Aramendel
Originally by: Nafri since I started talking about active shield tanks, somewhere in this thread
Which I did not mention with one single word. Read what other people write, not only what you write.
you started to quote me, not the other way around. So what should I have read?
From Dusk till Dawn Sig removed, e-mail us if you'd like to know why. -ReverendM ([email protected]) |

Nafri
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 23:30:00 -
[122]
Edited by: Nafri on 25/07/2006 23:32:08
Originally by: Severa Crest
Originally by: Aramendel Edited by: Aramendel on 25/07/2006 23:26:00
Originally by: Nafri you fit an active tank on a vagabound?
And since when is a shieldtank automatically an active one?
On the Maelstrom it will be, mind you, but so what? Cyclones work just splendidly with an active tank.
Originally by: Valea Silpha ...Next against the abaddon... which is a choice between uber tank or uber gank. Im damned if the bloody ammar have a more versatile ship than we do.
The only way you will be able to use an Abaddon as uber tank is if you use projectiles on it. It won't be able to shoot and tank if it uses lasers.
Cyclone is the lightest and fastest ship in its class....
in a class which is kinda pointless. There is no real need for Battlecruisers for PvP.
If I want to be fast, I will take a stabber or a rupture. Rupture does the same damage, so the only good thing the cyclone has are the 5 midslots. But then again, typhoon is not much slower and much better.
From Dusk till Dawn Sig removed, e-mail us if you'd like to know why. -ReverendM ([email protected]) |

Valea Silpha
Cereal Killerz Chimaera Pact
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 23:31:00 -
[123]
Originally by: Jim McGregor
Originally by: Valea Silpha The problem im seeing more than anything else (now im over it not being fast and autocannony) is that you can't kill a damn thing just by tanking it. And for that matter not being the best tank on the market. It all looks pretty good on paper, but its just not what we're about. It will run missions just fine. But i would never give up my tempy for one of these. I like that i can choose to armor or shield tank. I like that i can choose to be snipey or MWD of doom. I like that i get a double dose of damage bonus.
Line the maeltrom up against the Rokh, for example. The rokh will out tank it, there is no denying it. The rokh will also have range beyond anything achieveable by anything else. Now lets compare it to the Hyperion. The hyperion is a nasty piece of work, essentially a faster blasterthron, which will smoke our new chappy. Next against the abaddon... which is a choice between uber tank or uber gank. Im damned if the bloody ammar have a more versatile ship than we do.
Not giving up the tempy was exacly what the devs tried to do here. They didnt want to replace current ships. And they havent. All the older ships are still better at some things. We will just have more choices now.
This is like a choice between eating McDonalds and eating your own spleen. McDonalds isn't that fabulous, but compared to the alternative...
Seriously... theres some arty potential MAYBE. It out damages the tempest by half a gun. However, if it has fewer lows and similar grid, it'll mean fewer gyros...
<Hammerhead> TomB is doing the nerfing <Hammerhead> I just stand behind him, look at his monitor and shake my head |

Severa Crest
Railgun Voodoo II
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 23:31:00 -
[124]
Heres a quick thought. Give the pest another mid, 8 turret slots, and boost its stats up a bit and make it the tier 3. Then make a new tier 2, or promote the phoon and make a new tier 1. Something with some SPEED.
|

arbitrary
Bad luck Clover Inc.
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 23:31:00 -
[125]
I agree with Nafri on the subject.
My largest grievance is stating what a minnie ship aught to do, rather then give us choices on the matter; so please don't make it a mission runner 
___ Arbi all I want is for you to smile. |

Valea Silpha
Cereal Killerz Chimaera Pact
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 23:33:00 -
[126]
Originally by: Severa Crest
Heres a quick thought. Give the pest another mid, 8 turret slots, and boost its stats up a bit and make it the tier 3. Then make a new tier 2, or promote the phoon and make a new tier 1. Something with some SPEED.
By crickey i think this one has the idea

<Hammerhead> TomB is doing the nerfing <Hammerhead> I just stand behind him, look at his monitor and shake my head |

Severa Crest
Railgun Voodoo II
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 23:34:00 -
[127]
Originally by: Nafri
Originally by: Severa Crest
Originally by: Aramendel Edited by: Aramendel on 25/07/2006 23:26:00
Originally by: Nafri you fit an active tank on a vagabound?
And since when is a shieldtank automatically an active one?
On the Maelstrom it will be, mind you, but so what? Cyclones work just splendidly with an active tank.
Originally by: Valea Silpha ...Next against the abaddon... which is a choice between uber tank or uber gank. Im damned if the bloody ammar have a more versatile ship than we do.
The only way you will be able to use an Abaddon as uber tank is if you use projectiles on it. It won't be able to shoot and tank if it uses lasers.
Cyclone is the lightest and fastest ship in its class....
in a class which is kinda pointless. There is no real need for Battlecruisers for PvP
I agree, I was just pointing out how much less useful the Mael would be. The comparisons to the Cyclone make no sense when the Mael has such a big ass.
|

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 23:35:00 -
[128]
Edited by: Jim McGregor on 25/07/2006 23:35:29
Originally by: Valea Silpha
Seriously... theres some arty potential MAYBE. It out damages the tempest by half a gun. However, if it has fewer lows and similar grid, it'll mean fewer gyros...
Im willing to bet it also out-tanks any other minmatar battleship. Also the alpha strike damage with artillery will be very high i think. Some goonfleet member ran some numbers and came up with 3500 damage or something if i remember it correctly.  --- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |

Aramendel
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 23:35:00 -
[129]
Originally by: Nafri you started to quote me, not the other way around. So what should I have read?
Yes, with Minmatar ships may have sometimes a decent ammount of midslots, but you dont shieldtank them. Where, again, you did not mention "active tanking" at all. Is one required to read all your posts in the thread or whole subforum to find out what the difference is between what you write and what you in fact are trying to say?
|

Valea Silpha
Cereal Killerz Chimaera Pact
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 23:38:00 -
[130]
Originally by: Jim McGregor
Originally by: Valea Silpha
Seriously... theres some arty potential MAYBE. It out damages the tempest by half a gun. However, if it has fewer lows and similar grid, it'll mean fewer gyros...
Im willing to bet it also out-tanks any other minmatar ship. Also the alpha strike damage with artillery will be very high i think. Some goonfleet member ran some numbers and came up with 3500 damage or something if i remember it correctly. 
Its really not that much higher than a tempest in alphastrike, and as i say if it has to mount less gyros to shoehorn the guns on (remember it needs to get eight of them on) then the differance goes down. And it'll outtank the rest of the minmatar for sure. Becuase we aren't a tanktastic race. We're the speedyones, remember ?
<Hammerhead> TomB is doing the nerfing <Hammerhead> I just stand behind him, look at his monitor and shake my head |
|

Eximius Josari
Citizens of E.A.R.T.H. E.A.R.T.H. Federation
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 23:39:00 -
[131]
Originally by: Jim McGregor Edited by: Jim McGregor on 25/07/2006 23:11:35
Quote:
2028.148 hp every 4 seconds with a full set of top Crystals, and the currently mythical X-Type Gist XL Booster and Gist Boost Amp.
2568.397 hp every 4 seconds with Pith X-Type XL Booster and Pith X-Type Amp.
You can run the numbers for boost calcs on a Cyclone, same boost bonus.
Pointless numbers really. How many people will have a full set of crystals...and even if they did, to take that into pvp... would require someone mad. Im not sure what the cost of a complete crystal set is, but isnt it like 3 billion or something?
Isnt a gist b-type shield booster like 584 hp/4 seconds? With minmatar bs at level 5, that would make it 803 hp every 4s with no amp. With a 30% standard amp, it becomes 1043 hp every 4s. And thats with a gist booster that cost 400 million isk.
Im not sure if my math is completely right, but i think it ends up at like 1000 hp per 4 seconds... the 2500 hp for 4 seconds is for the very rich. Thats unbeatable without nossing. 
1072.5 hp every 4 seconds with XLSB II and one Shield Amp I.
|

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 23:46:00 -
[132]
Originally by: Valea Silpha
Its really not that much higher than a tempest in alphastrike, and as i say if it has to mount less gyros to shoehorn the guns on (remember it needs to get eight of them on) then the differance goes down. And it'll outtank the rest of the minmatar for sure. Becuase we aren't a tanktastic race. We're the speedyones, remember ?
Well, personally i dont think a speed bonus on a slow battleship makes much of a difference. Minnie frigates/cruisers are great fun with their speed, but once we get to battleships, you cant really rely on speed to survive unless the speed bonus is massive. Try keeping a t2 blaster mega out of range and still within range of web disruptors. Cant be done. 
--- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 23:47:00 -
[133]
Originally by: Eximius Josari
1072.5 hp every 4 seconds with XLSB II and one Shield Amp I.
Yeah, and thats just standard stuff. Leaving 5 more med slots.. maybe put 4 hardeners and a cap injector on there. It will take quite some effort to bring this baby down, and the dps is not that shabby with the rof bonus.
But yeah, you need tacklers to make full use of a shield tank. Just like with Raven.
--- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 23:47:00 -
[134]
Edited by: Jim McGregor on 25/07/2006 23:47:46
--- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |

Nafri
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 23:49:00 -
[135]
Edited by: Nafri on 25/07/2006 23:50:42
Originally by: Aramendel Edited by: Aramendel on 25/07/2006 23:39:34
Originally by: Nafri you started to quote me, not the other way around. So what should I have read?
Actually you quoted me first, but that is beside the point. I answered you to your Minmatar ships may have sometimes a decent ammount of midslots, but you dont shieldtank them reply of my first post. Where, again, you did not mention "active tanking" at all. Is one required to read all your posts in the thread or whole subforum to find out what the difference is between what you write and what you in fact are trying to say?
Originally by: Nafri in a class which is kinda pointless. There is no real need for Battlecruisers for PvP.
If I want to be fast, I will take a stabber or a rupture. Rupture does the same damage, so the only good thing the cyclone has are the 5 midslots. But then again, typhoon is not much slower and much better.
Which is a BC issue and no "active tanking" issues. Besides. BC agility, is also one thing which will be hopefully fixed soon.
1) Yes, actually it is. But generally you can assure that my point is valid anyway.
2) Well, it has really nothing to do with active tanking. But you said that the cyclone is the lightest and fastest ship in its class. Basicly my point that the Cyclone is a bad PvP ship is still valid and somehow got supported by you now. If the cyclone is excellent in a crappy class, it doesnt make it good at all, especially if its best points are the main problems in the class. Also the tournament showed the use of the Sleipnir, that weren Cyclones. Sleipnir is great cause it has awesome resistances. And as you said, the alliance tournament was no PvP, it was a boring showoff of implants, tanking and remote repping. The final was 30 mins where one side didnt even fired a single round of ammo, that should tell everything about the tournament.
From Dusk till Dawn Sig removed, e-mail us if you'd like to know why. -ReverendM ([email protected]) |

Valea Silpha
Cereal Killerz Chimaera Pact
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 23:49:00 -
[136]
Originally by: Jim McGregor
Originally by: Valea Silpha
Its really not that much higher than a tempest in alphastrike, and as i say if it has to mount less gyros to shoehorn the guns on (remember it needs to get eight of them on) then the differance goes down. And it'll outtank the rest of the minmatar for sure. Becuase we aren't a tanktastic race. We're the speedyones, remember ?
Well, personally i dont think a speed bonus on a slow battleship makes much of a difference. Minnie frigates/cruisers are great fun with their speed, but once we get to battleships, you cant really rely on speed to survive unless the speed bonus is massive. Try keeping a t2 blaster mega out of range and still within range of web disruptors. Cant be done. 
I can't really at the moment, and as the gallente get a new , faster, shinier blasterthron its even less likely it can be. Thats what i was hoping we'd get. A shiney, racing striped speed demon that can dictate range and compete against such things.
<Hammerhead> TomB is doing the nerfing <Hammerhead> I just stand behind him, look at his monitor and shake my head |

Nafri
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 23:50:00 -
[137]
Originally by: Valea Silpha
Originally by: Jim McGregor
Originally by: Valea Silpha
Its really not that much higher than a tempest in alphastrike, and as i say if it has to mount less gyros to shoehorn the guns on (remember it needs to get eight of them on) then the differance goes down. And it'll outtank the rest of the minmatar for sure. Becuase we aren't a tanktastic race. We're the speedyones, remember ?
Well, personally i dont think a speed bonus on a slow battleship makes much of a difference. Minnie frigates/cruisers are great fun with their speed, but once we get to battleships, you cant really rely on speed to survive unless the speed bonus is massive. Try keeping a t2 blaster mega out of range and still within range of web disruptors. Cant be done. 
I can't really at the moment, and as the gallente get a new , faster, shinier blasterthron its even less likely it can be. Thats what i was hoping we'd get. A shiney, racing striped speed demon that can dictate range and compete against such things.
I would have prefered an armor tanking missle boat or a double ROF DPS monster
From Dusk till Dawn Sig removed, e-mail us if you'd like to know why. -ReverendM ([email protected]) |

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 23:51:00 -
[138]
Originally by: Valea Silpha
I can't really at the moment, and as the gallente get a new , faster, shinier blasterthron its even less likely it can be. Thats what i was hoping we'd get. A shiney, racing striped speed demon that can dictate range and compete against such things.
That would have been nice, yeah. Maybe next time. Damn, now i have to go to bed, my eyes are bleeding and its way past bedtime here. 
--- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |

Severa Crest
Railgun Voodoo II
|
Posted - 2006.07.25 23:55:00 -
[139]
Originally by: Nafri
Originally by: Valea Silpha
Originally by: Jim McGregor
Originally by: Valea Silpha
Its really not that much higher than a tempest in alphastrike, and as i say if it has to mount less gyros to shoehorn the guns on (remember it needs to get eight of them on) then the differance goes down. And it'll outtank the rest of the minmatar for sure. Becuase we aren't a tanktastic race. We're the speedyones, remember ?
Well, personally i dont think a speed bonus on a slow battleship makes much of a difference. Minnie frigates/cruisers are great fun with their speed, but once we get to battleships, you cant really rely on speed to survive unless the speed bonus is massive. Try keeping a t2 blaster mega out of range and still within range of web disruptors. Cant be done. 
I can't really at the moment, and as the gallente get a new , faster, shinier blasterthron its even less likely it can be. Thats what i was hoping we'd get. A shiney, racing striped speed demon that can dictate range and compete against such things.
I would have prefered an armor tanking missle boat or a double ROF DPS monster
Indeed something different would be nice instead of just making bigger versions of the same ship.
|

Valea Silpha
Cereal Killerz Chimaera Pact
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 00:00:00 -
[140]
Originally by: Severa Crest
Originally by: Nafri
Originally by: Valea Silpha
Originally by: Jim McGregor
Originally by: Valea Silpha
Its really not that much higher than a tempest in alphastrike, and as i say if it has to mount less gyros to shoehorn the guns on (remember it needs to get eight of them on) then the differance goes down. And it'll outtank the rest of the minmatar for sure. Becuase we aren't a tanktastic race. We're the speedyones, remember ?
Well, personally i dont think a speed bonus on a slow battleship makes much of a difference. Minnie frigates/cruisers are great fun with their speed, but once we get to battleships, you cant really rely on speed to survive unless the speed bonus is massive. Try keeping a t2 blaster mega out of range and still within range of web disruptors. Cant be done. 
I can't really at the moment, and as the gallente get a new , faster, shinier blasterthron its even less likely it can be. Thats what i was hoping we'd get. A shiney, racing striped speed demon that can dictate range and compete against such things.
I would have prefered an armor tanking missle boat or a double ROF DPS monster
Indeed something different would be nice instead of just making bigger versions of the same ship.
No no ... a big stabber would be good. A big belicose and a big cyclone are not.
<Hammerhead> TomB is doing the nerfing <Hammerhead> I just stand behind him, look at his monitor and shake my head |
|

Eximius Josari
Citizens of E.A.R.T.H. E.A.R.T.H. Federation
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 00:16:00 -
[141]
Originally by: Valea Silpha
Originally by: Severa Crest
Originally by: Nafri
Originally by: Valea Silpha
Originally by: Jim McGregor
Originally by: Valea Silpha
Its really not that much higher than a tempest in alphastrike, and as i say if it has to mount less gyros to shoehorn the guns on (remember it needs to get eight of them on) then the differance goes down. And it'll outtank the rest of the minmatar for sure. Becuase we aren't a tanktastic race. We're the speedyones, remember ?
Well, personally i dont think a speed bonus on a slow battleship makes much of a difference. Minnie frigates/cruisers are great fun with their speed, but once we get to battleships, you cant really rely on speed to survive unless the speed bonus is massive. Try keeping a t2 blaster mega out of range and still within range of web disruptors. Cant be done. 
I can't really at the moment, and as the gallente get a new , faster, shinier blasterthron its even less likely it can be. Thats what i was hoping we'd get. A shiney, racing striped speed demon that can dictate range and compete against such things.
I would have prefered an armor tanking missle boat or a double ROF DPS monster
Indeed something different would be nice instead of just making bigger versions of the same ship.
No no ... a big stabber would be good. A big belicose and a big cyclone are not.
8/6/6 with 10% Velocity bonus and 160 m/s base speed?
|

Valea Silpha
Cereal Killerz Chimaera Pact
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 00:28:00 -
[142]
Give this man a cookie. He has the right idea.
<Hammerhead> TomB is doing the nerfing <Hammerhead> I just stand behind him, look at his monitor and shake my head |

Kael D'mende
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 00:35:00 -
[143]
Originally by: Eximius Josari
Originally by: Valea Silpha
Originally by: Severa Crest
Originally by: Nafri
Originally by: Valea Silpha
Originally by: Jim McGregor
Originally by: Valea Silpha
Its really not that much higher than a tempest in alphastrike, and as i say if it has to mount less gyros to shoehorn the guns on (remember it needs to get eight of them on) then the differance goes down. And it'll outtank the rest of the minmatar for sure. Becuase we aren't a tanktastic race. We're the speedyones, remember ?
Well, personally i dont think a speed bonus on a slow battleship makes much of a difference. Minnie frigates/cruisers are great fun with their speed, but once we get to battleships, you cant really rely on speed to survive unless the speed bonus is massive. Try keeping a t2 blaster mega out of range and still within range of web disruptors. Cant be done. 
I can't really at the moment, and as the gallente get a new , faster, shinier blasterthron its even less likely it can be. Thats what i was hoping we'd get. A shiney, racing striped speed demon that can dictate range and compete against such things.
I would have prefered an armor tanking missle boat or a double ROF DPS monster
Indeed something different would be nice instead of just making bigger versions of the same ship.
No no ... a big stabber would be good. A big belicose and a big cyclone are not.
8/6/6 with 10% Velocity bonus and 160 m/s base speed?
thats a total of 200m/s with lvl5, not that usefull imo, unless its made of air so it responds fast, and get that much better increase from any speed mods.. but doubt it :O)
Regards. /Kael |

Blind Man
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 00:36:00 -
[144]
this ship will own, so badly... 8/7/4 and.... JUST DO IT AND NEVER TOUCH IT AGAIN 
|

Valea Silpha
Cereal Killerz Chimaera Pact
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 00:44:00 -
[145]
Originally by: Kael D'mende
Originally by: Eximius Josari
Originally by: Valea Silpha
Originally by: Severa Crest
Originally by: Nafri
Originally by: Valea Silpha
Originally by: Jim McGregor
Originally by: Valea Silpha
Its really not that much higher than a tempest in alphastrike, and as i say if it has to mount less gyros to shoehorn the guns on (remember it needs to get eight of them on) then the differance goes down. And it'll outtank the rest of the minmatar for sure. Becuase we aren't a tanktastic race. We're the speedyones, remember ?
Well, personally i dont think a speed bonus on a slow battleship makes much of a difference. Minnie frigates/cruisers are great fun with their speed, but once we get to battleships, you cant really rely on speed to survive unless the speed bonus is massive. Try keeping a t2 blaster mega out of range and still within range of web disruptors. Cant be done. 
I can't really at the moment, and as the gallente get a new , faster, shinier blasterthron its even less likely it can be. Thats what i was hoping we'd get. A shiney, racing striped speed demon that can dictate range and compete against such things.
I would have prefered an armor tanking missle boat or a double ROF DPS monster
Indeed something different would be nice instead of just making bigger versions of the same ship.
No no ... a big stabber would be good. A big belicose and a big cyclone are not.
8/6/6 with 10% Velocity bonus and 160 m/s base speed?
thats a total of 200m/s with lvl5, not that usefull imo, unless its made of air so it responds fast, and get that much better increase from any speed mods.. but doubt it :O)
50% of 160 is 80. 80 + 160 = 240. Thats before skills...
That means without adding snakes or navigation over 1km/s on MWD. With jsut skills taken into account, your looking at 1.5-1.8 km/s.
That'll do nicely.
<Hammerhead> TomB is doing the nerfing <Hammerhead> I just stand behind him, look at his monitor and shake my head |

Pan Crastus
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 00:55:00 -
[146]
*sigh* ...
best fitting:
hi: 8 x Miner II med: tank for belt spawns lo: 2 x mining laser upgrade, rest cargo expanders ...
|

Ath Amon
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 01:00:00 -
[147]
i think 8/7/5, but how about an 8/8/4 ?
it will need a good amount of mids to take best advantage of its bonus
|

Matrices Sunbound
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 01:18:00 -
[148]
This ship as proposed will be worthless. You cannot shield tank and tackle at the same time against a ship in the same class. The armor tanker has 7 or 8 lows for tank plus 1 mid slot for cap injector to help with the tank usually. The shield tanker immediately wastes 4 slots on tackle + injector. Three slots is not a tank. And no, more gyrostabilizers in the lows won't compensate enough.
This is just a big Cyclone, which means a much worse Cyclone, and the original is already worthless for tank + tackle. Best bet with this thing will be to lug it around in small gangs, fit all guns and tank and hope you somehow land in range of some targets. But who flies BS in small gangs anyway. Not impressed.
|

babylonstew
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 01:39:00 -
[149]
Originally by: Matrices Sunbound This ship as proposed will be worthless. You cannot shield tank and tackle at the same time against a ship in the same class. The armor tanker has 7 or 8 lows for tank plus 1 mid slot for cap injector to help with the tank usually. The shield tanker immediately wastes 4 slots on tackle + injector. Three slots is not a tank. And no, more gyrostabilizers in the lows won't compensate enough.
This is just a big Cyclone, which means a much worse Cyclone, and the original is already worthless for tank + tackle. Best bet with this thing will be to lug it around in small gangs, fit all guns and tank and hope you somehow land in range of some targets. But who flies BS in small gangs anyway. Not impressed.
well to the it can do everything world of the raven, or maybe tackle or bring friends, just like a raven needs to do
Forum advice Linkage |

Foulis
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 01:53:00 -
[150]
Originally by: Nafri
Originally by: Valea Silpha
Originally by: Aramendel
Originally by: Nafri you fit an active tank on a vagabound?
And since when is a shieldtank automatically an active one?
On the Maelstrom it will be, mind you, but so what? Cyclones work just splendidly with an active tank.
I think 'splendidly' is a bit of a stretch. They work pretty well, if you happen to have a shed load of nos.
cyclone works splendid in PvP? I have to see that.
What you mean a ship that can fit a good tank, nos, guns, and still fill its lowslots with damage mods? ----
Cake > Pie - Imaran
Originally by: CCP Hammer Boobies
|
|

Locke Ateid
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 02:00:00 -
[151]
Originally by: Foulis
Originally by: Nafri
Originally by: Valea Silpha
Originally by: Aramendel
Originally by: Nafri you fit an active tank on a vagabound?
And since when is a shieldtank automatically an active one?
On the Maelstrom it will be, mind you, but so what? Cyclones work just splendidly with an active tank.
I think 'splendidly' is a bit of a stretch. They work pretty well, if you happen to have a shed load of nos.
cyclone works splendid in PvP? I have to see that.
What you mean a ship that can fit a good tank, nos, guns, and still fill its lowslots with damage mods?
Is that before or after you've already used two of your med slots (Propolsion mod and scrambler)?
|

Magelu
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 02:01:00 -
[152]
Originally by: Valea Silpha
Originally by: Kael D'mende
Originally by: Eximius Josari
Originally by: Valea Silpha
Originally by: Severa Crest
Originally by: Nafri
Originally by: Valea Silpha
Originally by: Jim McGregor
Originally by: Valea Silpha
Its really not that much higher than a tempest in alphastrike, and as i say if it has to mount less gyros to shoehorn the guns on (remember it needs to get eight of them on) then the differance goes down. And it'll outtank the rest of the minmatar for sure. Becuase we aren't a tanktastic race. We're the speedyones, remember ?
Well, personally i dont think a speed bonus on a slow battleship makes much of a difference. Minnie frigates/cruisers are great fun with their speed, but once we get to battleships, you cant really rely on speed to survive unless the speed bonus is massive. Try keeping a t2 blaster mega out of range and still within range of web disruptors. Cant be done. 
I can't really at the moment, and as the gallente get a new , faster, shinier blasterthron its even less likely it can be. Thats what i was hoping we'd get. A shiney, racing striped speed demon that can dictate range and compete against such things.
I would have prefered an armor tanking missle boat or a double ROF DPS monster
Indeed something different would be nice instead of just making bigger versions of the same ship.
No no ... a big stabber would be good. A big belicose and a big cyclone are not.
8/6/6 with 10% Velocity bonus and 160 m/s base speed?
thats a total of 200m/s with lvl5, not that usefull imo, unless its made of air so it responds fast, and get that much better increase from any speed mods.. but doubt it :O)
50% of 160 is 80. 80 + 160 = 240. Thats before skills...
That means without adding snakes or navigation over 1km/s on MWD. With jsut skills taken into account, your looking at 1.5-1.8 km/s.
That'll do nicely.
|

Mochunk
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 02:01:00 -
[153]
:/
|

welsh wizard
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 02:07:00 -
[154]
7 mid slots with a shield tank bonus and 8 turrets with a damage bonus.
May aswell ditch everything else now. 
|

Wrayeth
PAX Interstellar Services Veritas Immortalis
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 02:12:00 -
[155]
Originally by: Nafri
for a gunship you need a tracking computer, or you wont do ****. Also a raven can decide range very easily and suffers no tracking problems.
You don't really need a tracking computer with autocannons. As for deciding range, how's that again? I don't see very many ravens with MWD fitted, and I also fly the suckers. -Wrayeth
"Look, pa! I just contributed absolutely nothing to this thread!"
|

Frezik
Celtic Anarchy
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 02:15:00 -
[156]
Originally by: Matrices Sunbound This ship as proposed will be worthless. You cannot shield tank and tackle at the same time against a ship in the same class. The armor tanker has 7 or 8 lows for tank plus 1 mid slot for cap injector to help with the tank usually. The shield tanker immediately wastes 4 slots on tackle + injector. Three slots is not a tank. And no, more gyrostabilizers in the lows won't compensate enough.
This is just a big Cyclone, which means a much worse Cyclone, and the original is already worthless for tank + tackle. Best bet with this thing will be to lug it around in small gangs, fit all guns and tank and hope you somehow land in range of some targets. But who flies BS in small gangs anyway. Not impressed.
Look through the post for Raven setups. Notice how many setups have even one mid slot dedicated to any sort of tackling. And then realize that we'll probably have an extra mid slot over them, plus a shield booster for free. So assuming we get 7 mids (admittedly conjecture at this point), we'll be able to have the same tank as a Raven with 2 mids to spare.
Also, I don't like the idea of battleships tackling in general. Tackling is what you have friends in Stilletos for. ---- "Well in this case, he's being flamed, and rightly so, for whinning about a game mechanic that doesn't actually exist." -Lorth |

Wrayeth
PAX Interstellar Services Veritas Immortalis
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 02:27:00 -
[157]
Edited by: Wrayeth on 26/07/2006 02:29:34 I agree with everyone else that the ship needs an 8-7-4 (or 8-7-5) layout.
Here's a 5-slot tank that will work well in the mids (this is what I use on my torp raven, + 1 20km scrambler):
1 XL C5L shield booster (or tech II, if the maelstrom has the CPU for it - the torp raven does not) 1 shield boost amp 2 invulnerability field II 1 heavy electrochemical cap injector.
With the maelstrom's boost bonus, you could scrap the boost amp, leaving you three slots for MWD, web, and scrambler. Of course, this ship won't have the ability to maintain range due to its lack of speed, and may still be outdamaged by the blasterthron and the hyperion, so it's iffy as to how useful it would actually be against any of the Gallente battleships. -Wrayeth
"Look, pa! I just contributed absolutely nothing to this thread!"
|

Foulis
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 02:52:00 -
[158]
Originally by: Locke Ateid
Originally by: Foulis What you mean a ship that can fit a good tank, nos, guns, and still fill its lowslots with damage mods?
Is that before or after you've already used two of your med slots (Propolsion mod and scrambler)?
Yup, 5x 220mm, 3x med nos, ab/disruptor, large booster, 2x invuln and the rest is gyro IIs. The bs will be like this, except with 2 more slots to tank and 1 more for gyros =D. ----
Cake > Pie - Imaran
Originally by: CCP Hammer Boobies
|

Taizu Lilith
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 03:08:00 -
[159]
Originally by: kessah Edited by: kessah on 25/07/2006 20:57:33 A shield booster bonus is completly absured for a matari ship, its being limited and that is not cool for matari!
They need and i stress this NEED to be versatile. Its a really bad idea to limit them to shield tanking.
better to have a similar bonus to the Hyperon with the mwd than the tank, seriously not happy with it being forced *and it is really* to shield tank 
Im really hoping the dev's read this
And it doesn't even allow a passive shield tank. It is active shield tank or ignore the bonus.
|

Dixon
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 03:33:00 -
[160]
Originally by: kessah Edited by: kessah on 25/07/2006 20:57:33 A shield booster bonus is completly absured for a matari ship, its being limited and that is not cool for matari!
They need and i stress this NEED to be versatile. Its a really bad idea to limit them to shield tanking.
better to have a similar bonus to the Hyperon with the mwd than the tank, seriously not happy with it being forced *and it is really* to shield tank 
Im really hoping the dev's read this
I'd think minmatar pilots would welcome a ship that can actually tank. Talk about versatility, you have the fast BS (phoon) which is also the semi-missile BS and you have the AC-pwner (pest) which can also be a pretty mean sniper.
Now you're getting the tanker that can also be a great sniper or a mediocre AC platform. That's three ships who all look like great options for many different roles... but hey, I don't fly minmatar so I don't know. Maybe you all hate it... I just think it's a nice addition to an already decent rack of ships.
|
|

Frezik
Celtic Anarchy
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 04:07:00 -
[161]
Gack, what's with this thread? A 8-7-4/5 layout would mean a ship that can tank, gank, AND EWar fairly effectively. What's with the complaining? ---- "Well in this case, he's being flamed, and rightly so, for whinning about a game mechanic that doesn't actually exist." -Lorth |

arbitrary
Bad luck Clover Inc.
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 04:27:00 -
[162]
Edited by: arbitrary on 26/07/2006 04:29:10
Originally by: Frezik Gack, what's with this thread? A 8-7-4/5 layout would mean a ship that can tank, gank, AND EWar fairly effectively. What's with the complaining?
I think people fear 6 midslots, I've not seen 7 mentioned by the devs anywhere, but I might be wrong.
Anyway the old reason: People have dreamt of a ship, their ship, that was destroyed by giving us THE ship; not everyone dreamt of a buff slow shield tank (for sure) -, and many are indeed annoyed that their dream didn't make it.
Mine was a AC BS derived from the Stabber, or a dedicated missile platform; getting the oposite is not kind on ones dreams, so one grows annoyed thinking about it.
As for the end result, getting the exact layout for the ship might change anyones mind more or less, depending on just how slow it is, what can we fit to it, and perhaps mostly how many mids do it get? Some might change theirs when they fly it, while some will hate it forever ever.
Then we have those whole love the unwanted and flies the phoon or forgotten t1 frigs etc, so it will please someone, but here the vocal majority rules, and most ain't happy campers a good day anyway.
[EDITED, to broaden what in thoery might like to see]
___ Arbi all I want is for you to smile. |

Wrayeth
PAX Interstellar Services Veritas Immortalis
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 04:33:00 -
[163]
I could live with 6 mids if it had a huge drone bay so I could field 5 heavy web drones. Otherwise, it needs 7 mids. -Wrayeth
"Look, pa! I just contributed absolutely nothing to this thread!"
|

arbitrary
Bad luck Clover Inc.
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 04:45:00 -
[164]
Originally by: Wrayeth I could live with 6 mids if it had a huge drone bay so I could field 5 heavy web drones. Otherwise, it needs 7 mids.
yeah, that goes for anything that balances the ship out, like a really nasty combo of good cap & shield might be worth the lost mid, adding other possible solutions as well.
I'm just going to wait some more until we get some more info 
___ Arbi all I want is for you to smile. |

Valea Silpha
Cereal Killerz Chimaera Pact
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 04:49:00 -
[165]
The problem is not with an uber shield tanking BS. The problem is not with the ewar potential. The problem is with having them on a minmatar ship. All we've been given here is a move away for minmatar as a racial philosophy in favor of and over-blown attempt at balance.
The other races get a bs thats exactly what their races do. The caldari one gets an uber shield tank and snipey rails. The ammar one gets a big big armor tank. The ammar whiners say its not got enough cap, but sod them thats their problem. The ship has no other issues. The gallente gets a big phat blaster boat of pure sppedy pwn. What the hell do we get ? I sense it was a rejected design for a future caldari ship.
Its not down to the cyclones bonuses being a bit rubbish. Its not down to it being unbalanced. Its down to the ship being totally out of character for the minmatar. What is the one thing we got going for us ? Speed. Now we took that our racial ewar is worthless to us. We accepted that our mortal enemies got the ewar that would effect us the least, but would be of worth to us most. Then we get given this. Its slow, its actively shield tanked, its damage isn't that good, it can't effectively use AC's and worst of all theres not a damn thing you can do to change it. Not enough lows to attempt an armor tank, and should you be foolhardy enough to give it a go you loose half your ship bonus in one go. Not a lot you can do to make it fast enough to work with AC's. It doesn't do that much more damage with arties over the tempest, and as i've said earlier, if you need grid mods to fit 8x 1400mm II , which is pretty likely, you will start having problems getting more than a 10% greater alpha strike than the tempest.
Heres some numbers: Tempest has 6 guns plus a 25% damage bonus = 7.5 guns unmodified. Maelstrom has 8 guns base.
Thats a differance of about 6.2% or if you like, the tempest does 15/16ths of the new things damaage on alphastrike.
Adding gyros (assuming you get 26% from three stacked gyroIIs as eve-geek tells me)
Tempests 7.5 guns become 9.45 guns Malestroms 8 guns become 10.08 guns
Thats a damage differance on alphastrike of about 7%.
If my math is borked its because its nearly 6am local time and i've not slept, but it looks right to me, so you never know eh ? I would plug in some damage mods and so forth, but frankly i can't be bothered at this point.
<Hammerhead> TomB is doing the nerfing <Hammerhead> I just stand behind him, look at his monitor and shake my head |

Ath Amon
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 04:50:00 -
[166]
i'm not quite happy looking at it on paper but in the end we have probably to try it before to judge.
what probably upset me the most is that many many times minnie supposed strenght is throw out of window.
minnies should have fast big hitters and now we get a slow cumbersome ship that can't dictate range (essential for ACs) while galliente will probably get the fastest/more maneuverable BS.
is not minmatar to stand still shoting at enemies that fight in their optimal and outmaneuver our ship.
the minnie "tank" should be more about low sig resolution, giving bad tracking and to fight in our optimal diminuishing damage we get from enemies.
maybe the ship will be good and we will be happy about it... but by how it was described it doesn't feel like a minnie ship.
|

xeom
Obsidian Sins
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 05:47:00 -
[167]
Originally by: Ath Amon i'm not quite happy looking at it on paper but in the end we have probably to try it before to judge.
what probably upset me the most is that many many times minnie supposed strenght is throw out of window.
minnies should have fast big hitters and now we get a slow cumbersome ship that can't dictate range (essential for ACs) while galliente will probably get the fastest/more maneuverable BS.
is not minmatar to stand still shoting at enemies that fight in their optimal and outmaneuver our ship.
the minnie "tank" should be more about low sig resolution, giving bad tracking and to fight in our optimal diminuishing damage we get from enemies.
maybe the ship will be good and we will be happy about it... but by how it was described it doesn't feel like a minnie ship.
They dev's will be damned if that have to make minmatar stick to only one thing.O well back to my plans of training a raven after CS is done.
CCP where are our t2 shield power relays? | Join[..SIN] |

Tachy
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 06:00:00 -
[168]
Okay, I slept over this for a night. There was no mention of missile slots, so I will assume is has none. Same for the drones. I guess 40m¦ ...
It is a sorry excuse of a mission running ship, well maybe it will be even okayish. Or a sniper, but we have no info about fitting at this time.
With the 'new' missions completely going the 'beat the living brown and yellow stuff out of the mission runner' way, Minmatar pilots need a ship suited to that as the changes to the Typhoon moved it sidewards instead of forwards. To bad it got no 'utility slots' to keep the tank runnning long enough for missions. --*=*=*--
Even with nougat, you can have a perfect moment. |

Wizie
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 06:15:00 -
[169]
I don't know what the slot layout will be like.
But judging by how the Cyclone works, I don't forsee 7 mids for the Malestorm.
6 seems more likely.
I HATE THAT.
A Raven has a hard time shield tanking with 6 slots and tackling.
A shield tanking turret boat requires slots to close/keep range, mwd/ab and web. And tackling.
2x invul, 1 dmg control and xl shield booster II sounds good. Judging again by the way CCP designs Minmatar ships, EXPECT to fit ATLEAST 1 CPU mod to be able to fit
invuls, gyros, xl boosters, mwd and tackling.
----------------- Sig removed by some noob |

Tachy
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 06:17:00 -
[170]
Originally by: Wizie I don't know what the slot layout will be like.
But judging by how the Cyclone works, I don't forsee 7 mids for the Malestorm.
6 seems more likely.
I HATE THAT.
A Raven has a hard time shield tanking with 6 slots and tackling.
A shield tanking turret boat requires slots to close/keep range, mwd/ab and web. And tackling.
2x invul, 1 dmg control and xl shield booster II sounds good. Judging again by the way CCP designs Minmatar ships, EXPECT to fit ATLEAST 1 CPU mod to be able to fit
invuls, gyros, xl boosters, mwd and tackling.
You forgot the little tracking assistants. --*=*=*--
Even with nougat, you can have a perfect moment. |
|

Rindis
Veto.
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 06:41:00 -
[171]
I'm curious as to why people are complaining about a change of pace in ship design affecting the perceived roleplay and history of the race. The whole Speedy Gonzales approach is great, but at the same time you're talking about a group which fought its way out of slavery and then proceeded to build ships out of scrap to field anything it could. Last I checked, scrap didn't afford much tankability, so speed would be the obvious choice at the time. Add to this the fact the Minmatar use anything and everything (within reason) varying with the ship in question, and it stands to reason that the Republic is anything but stagnant in its warfare developments.
Any newly realized nation which has established itself as a world power and risen above the level of rebel militia will, through common logic, seek to expand and refine its capabilities on the battlefield. I'm outright ecstatic that the Minnies are getting something with some meat on its bones, but then again, the people who whine about this 'change of philosophy' are the same ones whining about a perceived lack of rust on the new ship concept imagery.
(Disclaimer: My unnecessary retort doesn't, of course, have anything to do with the coded mechanics or balance of the game; I'm just tired of people trying to typecast one of the more dynamic racial concepts in the EVE universe.) 
|

Sarmaul
0utbreak
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 06:56:00 -
[172]
Originally by: Nafri
Originally by: Sarmaul
Originally by: Nafri Honestly, who will fit an active tank on a battleship?
Are you honestly telling me nobody fits active tanks on battleships? 
Tell me any decent active shield tanking setup.
Everysetup you come up with, ECM will be a better choice.
Ah spoken like a true former member of G 
Cyclones, Sleipnirs and Claymores for a start, and funnily enough those are the ships the Tier3 is based from.
TEAM MINMATAR FORUMS - In Rust We Trust - |

Sarmaul
0utbreak
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 06:59:00 -
[173]
Originally by: Severa Crest OK fair point...
mids could be - mwd, xl boost, 2 x inv, cap booster, web scram (if 7 mids)
That's pretty much what I had in mind, with a full rack of gyrostabs, a damage control and if it gets +1 slot a PDU or something similar (heh maybe even a nanofibre).
We don't know how slow it's going to be yet, so stop worrying. Also, has anyone entertained the possability that this ship could make an awesome artillery tank platform providing it had enough powergrid?
TEAM MINMATAR FORUMS - In Rust We Trust - |

Sarmaul
0utbreak
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 07:03:00 -
[174]
Edited by: Sarmaul on 26/07/2006 07:03:45 And finally, where did this "you need to have loads of tracking computers to be able to fight at close range?" crap come from? Last time I checked the Tempest has no tracking bonus and no slots spare for tracking mods. Unless you are somehow fitting them up your arse I fail to see the point being made.
And Nafri, if you want an armour tanked missile ship or a turret based ship with a double bonus, use the Phoon and Tempest.
Edit: Ok I probably should've merged this all into one post :P
TEAM MINMATAR FORUMS - In Rust We Trust - |

turnschuh
Eye of God
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 07:08:00 -
[175]
considering pve, I wonder if the damage output is better then a raven or a typhoon with 4xac 4xcruise 5xheavy drones? anyone can do the math?
|

Wizie
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 07:08:00 -
[176]
Sarm, in all honesty, I wouldn't consider the phoons bonii as a double dmg bonus.
I like the shield tank bonus idea for the tier 3, however, with 6 mids, an autopest with shield tank will work in groups, and even there it would do better fitting 1400s.
6 mids on a turret boat don't really work that well if you are playing the close range shield tank game.
----------------- Sig removed by some noob |

Sarmaul
0utbreak
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 07:14:00 -
[177]
Originally by: Wizie Sarm, in all honesty, I wouldn't consider the phoons bonii as a double dmg bonus.
I like the shield tank bonus idea for the tier 3, however, with 6 mids, an autopest with shield tank will work in groups, and even there it would do better fitting 1400s.
6 mids on a turret boat don't really work that well if you are playing the close range shield tank game.
I meant for the armour tanking & missiles :)
And as I've stated all along, this ship will only rock if it gets 7 midslots.
TEAM MINMATAR FORUMS - In Rust We Trust - |

Jenny Spitfire
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 07:21:00 -
[178]
Edited by: Jenny Spitfire on 26/07/2006 07:21:16
Originally by: Jim McGregor Edited by: Jim McGregor on 25/07/2006 22:08:11
Originally by: babylonstew so all these people whining the raven can tank and gank with 6/5 slots is actually over powered, but a min ship with say 6/5 and a built in shield boost amp, so basically 7/5 for example, isnt up to scratch tanking wise?, what have i missed? either ravens tank/gank isnt actually over powered at all, or your after a super tank with 8 turrets?
People seem to think it will be either 8/7/5 or 8/6/6 to make a total of 20 slots. If it gets 7 medium slots, its tanking will be excellent. Personally i like this ship if it gets 7 mediums. 
If Maelstorm gets 8/7/5 and not 8/6/6, I will start whinning every day to get Caldari ship slots reassigned. A quick preview of my whine would be
Moa - 6/5/3 Eagle - 6/6/3 Raven - 8/7/4
 ---------------- RecruitMe@NOINT!
|

Wizie
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 07:23:00 -
[179]
Originally by: Jenny Spitfire Edited by: Jenny Spitfire on 26/07/2006 07:21:16
Originally by: Jim McGregor Edited by: Jim McGregor on 25/07/2006 22:08:11
Originally by: babylonstew so all these people whining the raven can tank and gank with 6/5 slots is actually over powered, but a min ship with say 6/5 and a built in shield boost amp, so basically 7/5 for example, isnt up to scratch tanking wise?, what have i missed? either ravens tank/gank isnt actually over powered at all, or your after a super tank with 8 turrets?
People seem to think it will be either 8/7/5 or 8/6/6 to make a total of 20 slots. If it gets 7 medium slots, its tanking will be excellent. Personally i like this ship if it gets 7 mediums. 
If Maelstorm gets 8/7/5 and not 8/6/6, I will start whinning every day to get Caldari ship slots reassigned. A quick preview of my whine would be
Moa - 6/5/3 Eagle - 6/6/3 Raven - 8/7/4

The difference is that unlike a missile boat, the Maelstrom cannot use all its mid slots for shield tanks.
Quite frankly, 2 of those mids will be dedicated to fitting a speed mod and a tackling mod (web/scram)
----------------- Sig removed by some noob |

Jenny Spitfire
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 07:24:00 -
[180]
Originally by: Sarmaul Edited by: Sarmaul on 25/07/2006 20:17:29
Originally by: Jenny Spitfire Edited by: Jenny Spitfire on 25/07/2006 20:07:22
Originally by: Jim McGregor
Originally by: M00dy
Imagine the whinage. 8/6/6 would be so... bleh.
I want 7 medium slots. It would be so much fun to no longer fear Ravens.
DIE RAVENS DIE!
Nope. You think it is easy to shield tank with 6 slots, huh? At least you know how hard the Raven is tanking with 6 slots. 
/me tries hard to imagine something as huge as a BS that can MWD and orbit at 20km shooting blasters. 
Oh get off your high horse.
The Rokh is a giant Ferox (optimal range + shield resistance bonus) while the Maelstrom is a giant cyclone. Both ships have identical mids and lows, so why not the Tier3 BS when the obviously follow the same pattern? Where has it been stated that no battleship ship must have more midslots than the Raven, a Tier2 battleship?
The same applies to Command Ships too btw.
Caldari is a mid-slot specialist. Maelstorm is tier 3 but the mids should be at par with Raven and not more than Raven, I guess. ---------------- RecruitMe@NOINT!
|
|

Sarmaul
0utbreak
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 07:26:00 -
[181]
Originally by: Jenny Spitfire
Originally by: Jim McGregor Edited by: Jim McGregor on 25/07/2006 22:08:11
Originally by: babylonstew so all these people whining the raven can tank and gank with 6/5 slots is actually over powered, but a min ship with say 6/5 and a built in shield boost amp, so basically 7/5 for example, isnt up to scratch tanking wise?, what have i missed? either ravens tank/gank isnt actually over powered at all, or your after a super tank with 8 turrets?
People seem to think it will be either 8/7/5 or 8/6/6 to make a total of 20 slots. If it gets 7 medium slots, its tanking will be excellent. Personally i like this ship if it gets 7 mediums. 
If Maelstorm gets 8/7/5 and not 8/6/6, I will start whinning every day to get Caldari ship slots reassigned. A quick preview of my whine would be
Moa - 6/5/3 Eagle - 6/6/3 or 6/5/4 Raven - 8/7/4

That's some pretty crappy reasoning tbh. Where is this strange logic coming from that no ship can have more midslots than the Raven?
As far as I see it, the Maelstrom needs 7 mids to prevent it from turning into a poorly armour tanked ewar boat. MWD, Web, 20km, Cap Booster, XL Booster, Twin Invul for the mids or else it's tank won't survive 2 seconds, it's cap won't survive 2 seconds, it won't be able to keep traversal down or stop the target from warping away. The Raven need not worry about traversal so it doesn't need the web.
Now, in case you hadn't noticed the Rokh is a giant Ferox and the Maelstrom is a giant Cyclone. If they can have the same amount of midslots at the battlecruiser level, why not at the battleship level?
TEAM MINMATAR FORUMS - In Rust We Trust - |

Jenny Spitfire
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 07:26:00 -
[182]
Originally by: Wizie
Originally by: Jenny Spitfire Edited by: Jenny Spitfire on 26/07/2006 07:21:16
Originally by: Jim McGregor Edited by: Jim McGregor on 25/07/2006 22:08:11
Originally by: babylonstew so all these people whining the raven can tank and gank with 6/5 slots is actually over powered, but a min ship with say 6/5 and a built in shield boost amp, so basically 7/5 for example, isnt up to scratch tanking wise?, what have i missed? either ravens tank/gank isnt actually over powered at all, or your after a super tank with 8 turrets?
People seem to think it will be either 8/7/5 or 8/6/6 to make a total of 20 slots. If it gets 7 medium slots, its tanking will be excellent. Personally i like this ship if it gets 7 mediums. 
If Maelstorm gets 8/7/5 and not 8/6/6, I will start whinning every day to get Caldari ship slots reassigned. A quick preview of my whine would be
Moa - 6/5/3 Eagle - 6/6/3 Raven - 8/7/4

The difference is that unlike a missile boat, the Maelstrom cannot use all its mid slots for shield tanks.
Quite frankly, 2 of those mids will be dedicated to fitting a speed mod and a tackling mod (web/scram)
So you guys want a solopwnmobile? Gank, tackle/debuff and tank? ---------------- RecruitMe@NOINT!
|

Jenny Spitfire
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 07:35:00 -
[183]
Edited by: Jenny Spitfire on 26/07/2006 07:42:47
Originally by: Sarmaul
Originally by: Jenny Spitfire
If Maelstorm gets 8/7/5 and not 8/6/6, I will start whinning every day to get Caldari ship slots reassigned. A quick preview of my whine would be
Moa - 6/5/3 Eagle - 6/6/3 or 6/5/4 Raven - 8/7/4

That's some pretty crappy reasoning tbh. Where is this strange logic coming from that no ship can have more midslots than the Raven?
As far as I see it, the Maelstrom needs 7 mids to prevent it from turning into a poorly armour tanked ewar boat. MWD, Web, 20km, Cap Booster, XL Booster, Twin Invul for the mids or else it's tank won't survive 2 seconds, it's cap won't survive 2 seconds, it won't be able to keep traversal down or stop the target from warping away. The Raven need not worry about traversal so it doesn't need the web.
Now, in case you hadn't noticed the Rokh is a giant Ferox and the Maelstrom is a giant Cyclone. If they can have the same amount of midslots at the battlecruiser level, why not at the battleship level?
The reasoning is very simple. Honestly, if Caldari are shield specialists and some ships have really illogical slot layouts then I dont see why not other race who can shield tank but not really specialises in it must shield tank properly.
I am saying it is really an insult to Raven, Moa and may be Eagle that they are shield tankers and they dont have enough slots to really do a nice tank. What I am saying is, ppl really need at least 5 slots to tank shields or armour i.e. 5 mids or 5 lows. In current form of the game, Moa and Raven has a problem to tank. But you will all deny it because they are supposed to be snipers, 100% hit, yaddas.
Bleh, Minmatar players just want best ships for their race, really. EvE is really balanced. 
Ferox - 4/5/7 Cyclone - 4/5/8
Quick, nerf Minmatars!!! Waa waaa waaaa, they have one more slot than me. ---------------- RecruitMe@NOINT!
|

Kaleeb
Celestial Apocalypse
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 07:35:00 -
[184]
I`m so glad i`m training min if this beauty gets 7 mids 
 |

Sarmaul
0utbreak
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 07:40:00 -
[185]
Hate to break it to you, but it looks like the devs are turning Minmatar into awesome shield tankers too :). Read Tux's description of the Maelstrom - this ship is designed for tankage which isn't going to happen without those 7 slots.
Also, do you see people here *****ing that the Cyclone can't tank with only 5 mids (quiet at the back!). The Eagle and Moa, with the resistance bonuses, are far better off loading up a passive tank that lets then take a beating from range while they snipe off frigates.
TEAM MINMATAR FORUMS - In Rust We Trust - |

Lenaria
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 07:42:00 -
[186]
There is a big difference betweern mids on missile boats and mids on close range gunboats: Raven dont need MWD. It hit nicely from 0 to 100+. Granted, at 100km the damage will be much dealayed, but at 20km it will be almost instant. Raven dont need WEB. For obvious reason, it can hit other BS and even cruisers nicely in web range or outside it.
These 2 modules are almost required for any gunboat if they wants to hit anything. Thats mean 2 less midslots for whatever. Thats why Ravens are so great even with 6 mids, and Maelstorm will be so gimpy wih 6 slots and even with 7 slots in PvP.
|

Jenny Spitfire
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 07:46:00 -
[187]
Edited by: Jenny Spitfire on 26/07/2006 07:46:53
Originally by: Sarmaul Hate to break it to you, but it looks like the devs are turning Minmatar into awesome shield tankers too :). Read Tux's description of the Maelstrom - this ship is designed for tankage which isn't going to happen without those 7 slots.
Also, do you see people here *****ing that the Cyclone can't tank with only 5 mids (quiet at the back!). The Eagle and Moa, with the resistance bonuses, are far better off loading up a passive tank that lets then take a beating from range while they snipe off frigates.
Cyclone is very balanced. They have one more slot extra than Caldari, Amarr, Gallente. Soon to be, Minmatar race will be very balanced. 
Ferox nobody whines much because they have a shield bonus i.e. implicit one mid-slot. Maelstorm has a shield bonus and 7 mid-slots are really 8 and not 7. ---------------- RecruitMe@NOINT!
|

Wizie
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 07:49:00 -
[188]
Originally by: Jenny Spitfire
Originally by: Wizie
Originally by: Jenny Spitfire Edited by: Jenny Spitfire on 26/07/2006 07:21:16
Originally by: Jim McGregor Edited by: Jim McGregor on 25/07/2006 22:08:11
Originally by: babylonstew so all these people whining the raven can tank and gank with 6/5 slots is actually over powered, but a min ship with say 6/5 and a built in shield boost amp, so basically 7/5 for example, isnt up to scratch tanking wise?, what have i missed? either ravens tank/gank isnt actually over powered at all, or your after a super tank with 8 turrets?
People seem to think it will be either 8/7/5 or 8/6/6 to make a total of 20 slots. If it gets 7 medium slots, its tanking will be excellent. Personally i like this ship if it gets 7 mediums. 
If Maelstorm gets 8/7/5 and not 8/6/6, I will start whinning every day to get Caldari ship slots reassigned. A quick preview of my whine would be
Moa - 6/5/3 Eagle - 6/6/3 Raven - 8/7/4

The difference is that unlike a missile boat, the Maelstrom cannot use all its mid slots for shield tanks.
Quite frankly, 2 of those mids will be dedicated to fitting a speed mod and a tackling mod (web/scram)
So you guys want a solopwnmobile? Gank, tackle/debuff and tank?
Hmm lets see. A ship designed with shield tank in mind, if going close would need speed mods (not everyone has the I-Win missile option). If going close and fighting targets at that range, would need tackling mods (web, not everyone has the I-Win missile option).
----------------- Sig removed by some noob |

Koth Krakenworth
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 07:50:00 -
[189]
Originally by: Jenny Spitfire The reasoning is very simple. Honestly, if Caldari are shield specialists and some ships have really illogical slot layouts then I dont see why not other race who can shield tank but not really specialises in it must shield tank properly. .
So you're basicly saying that it is also wrong that caldari will get a T3 BS that will be the best midrange railgun (which, last time I checked, was gallente's main weaponry), and that it should be nerfed so that it absolutely can't do the same thing as the gallente railboats?
T3 BS doesn't follow much logic tbh. I really expected minmatar to get a fast, 8 turretslot highdamage AC boat with a speed bonus, but instead we got the best tanker in the game. No sure if if I should be happy or not, but if CCP gives us a ship that doens't follow the normal pattern for the race (minmatar were never very good tankers), then they'd better make it good so that you use the ship instead of just training an other race. Or something like that. It is odd, but if you limit the minmatar BS, then you will have to take a look at the other abnormalities in the other race's T3 bs's also.
Signature: Complete Image
|

Jenny Spitfire
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 07:51:00 -
[190]
Originally by: Wizie
Originally by: Jenny Spitfire
Originally by: Wizie
Originally by: Jenny Spitfire Edited by: Jenny Spitfire on 26/07/2006 07:21:16
Originally by: Jim McGregor Edited by: Jim McGregor on 25/07/2006 22:08:11
Originally by: babylonstew so all these people whining the raven can tank and gank with 6/5 slots is actually over powered, but a min ship with say 6/5 and a built in shield boost amp, so basically 7/5 for example, isnt up to scratch tanking wise?, what have i missed? either ravens tank/gank isnt actually over powered at all, or your after a super tank with 8 turrets?
People seem to think it will be either 8/7/5 or 8/6/6 to make a total of 20 slots. If it gets 7 medium slots, its tanking will be excellent. Personally i like this ship if it gets 7 mediums. 
If Maelstorm gets 8/7/5 and not 8/6/6, I will start whinning every day to get Caldari ship slots reassigned. A quick preview of my whine would be
Moa - 6/5/3 Eagle - 6/6/3 Raven - 8/7/4

The difference is that unlike a missile boat, the Maelstrom cannot use all its mid slots for shield tanks.
Quite frankly, 2 of those mids will be dedicated to fitting a speed mod and a tackling mod (web/scram)
So you guys want a solopwnmobile? Gank, tackle/debuff and tank?
Hmm lets see. A ship designed with shield tank in mind, if going close would need speed mods (not everyone has the I-Win missile option). If going close and fighting targets at that range, would need tackling mods (web, not everyone has the I-Win missile option).
I win missiles cant spam and tackle at the same time you know. Bah, I leave this whinning. You all are looking for solopwnmobiles. ---------------- RecruitMe@NOINT!
|
|

Sarmaul
0utbreak
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 07:52:00 -
[191]
Edited by: Sarmaul on 26/07/2006 07:53:06
Originally by: Jenny Spitfire Cyclone is very balanced. They have one more slot extra than Caldari, Amarr, Gallente. 
The Cyclone should've had a low removed when it got the mid, I'll happily agree with you there.
Quote: Ferox nobody whines much because they have a shield bonus i.e. implicit one mid-slot. Maelstorm has a shield bonus and 7 mid-slots are really 8 and not 7.
By that reasoning, the Moa and Eagle have more than enough slots to tank with as they all have a built-in shield bonus \o/. The Rokh can also be kept gimped on midslots as well as it gets a shield bonus too.
As for the "what do you want - a solo pwnmobile" remarks
1) It needs to fill all it's highs with turrets to get any form of good damage, so no nos
2) It's going to be slow, which really isn't helpful when attempting to solo
Remind me again why you think Caldari are allowed to Gank + Tank yet Minmatar aren't? Oh right, because Caldari are shield specialists dispite a lot of minmatar ships having more shield HP than armour HP, our battlecruisers being monster shield tankers and our T2 resists have "shield tank" written all over them. Oh yes, caldari are now "midslot specialists" 
Seems like you're clutching at straws tbh.
Edit: OMG you left NI o_O
TEAM MINMATAR FORUMS - In Rust We Trust - |

Wizie
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 07:53:00 -
[192]
Originally by: Jenny Spitfire
Originally by: Wizie
Originally by: Jenny Spitfire
Originally by: Wizie
Originally by: Jenny Spitfire Edited by: Jenny Spitfire on 26/07/2006 07:21:16
Originally by: Jim McGregor Edited by: Jim McGregor on 25/07/2006 22:08:11
Originally by: babylonstew so all these people whining the raven can tank and gank with 6/5 slots is actually over powered, but a min ship with say 6/5 and a built in shield boost amp, so basically 7/5 for example, isnt up to scratch tanking wise?, what have i missed? either ravens tank/gank isnt actually over powered at all, or your after a super tank with 8 turrets?
People seem to think it will be either 8/7/5 or 8/6/6 to make a total of 20 slots. If it gets 7 medium slots, its tanking will be excellent. Personally i like this ship if it gets 7 mediums. 
If Maelstorm gets 8/7/5 and not 8/6/6, I will start whinning every day to get Caldari ship slots reassigned. A quick preview of my whine would be
Moa - 6/5/3 Eagle - 6/6/3 Raven - 8/7/4

The difference is that unlike a missile boat, the Maelstrom cannot use all its mid slots for shield tanks.
Quite frankly, 2 of those mids will be dedicated to fitting a speed mod and a tackling mod (web/scram)
So you guys want a solopwnmobile? Gank, tackle/debuff and tank?
Hmm lets see. A ship designed with shield tank in mind, if going close would need speed mods (not everyone has the I-Win missile option). If going close and fighting targets at that range, would need tackling mods (web, not everyone has the I-Win missile option).
I win missiles cant spam and tackle at the same time you know. Bah, I leave this whinning. You all are looking for solopwnmobiles.
Leave out the tackling bit.
Ignore the scrambler
Consider only 2 mids REQUIRED for a close range turret ship.
MWD/AB
Web
Raven DOES NOT need those.
----------------- Sig removed by some noob |

Nordvargr
GoonWaffe GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 08:06:00 -
[193]
Well if you look past the cyclones overbuff I see some cause for concern with the bonus. The brutix is terrible at tanking and while the cyclone can fit a solid tank it does not compare to the prophecy or ferox, not even close. The 7.5% bonus to boost/rep amount bonuses just aren't as good as the 5% bonus to resistances for battlecruisers, and it will be no different on battleships. The caldari and amarr tier3 will have incredible tanking abilities and the maelstrom will fall short.
I don't think I'll find much use for this ship. I never bother tanking in PVP, it just isn't my style, and for PVE things just get weird. Think about how much grid will goto waste with an autocannon setup. Autocannons use very little grid, shield tanks use almost no grid at all, and there isn't anything else that can be used to take advantage of all that spare powergrid.
|

Sarmaul
0utbreak
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 08:09:00 -
[194]
Maybe it will have very little grid and loads of CPU? ;)
And the Cyclone and the Brutix are probably the best PVP battlecruisers around.
TEAM MINMATAR FORUMS - In Rust We Trust - |

Nafri
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 08:10:00 -
[195]
Originally by: Sarmaul
Originally by: Nafri
Originally by: Sarmaul
Originally by: Nafri Honestly, who will fit an active tank on a battleship?
Are you honestly telling me nobody fits active tanks on battleships? 
Tell me any decent active shield tanking setup.
Everysetup you come up with, ECM will be a better choice.
Ah spoken like a true former member of G 
Cyclones, Sleipnirs and Claymores for a start, and funnily enough those are the ships the Tier3 is based from.
Sarmaul, funny that you posted excactly what I wrote.
The shildtank on Sleipniers and Claymores work only cause of their nice resistances. Cyclone is a worthless PvP ship, outclassed by other minmatar ships.
And dont come me with your "omg, Im in a PvP corp now, I can bash some Alliance noobs"
Im former Member Of Naginata, Reikkoku, Tundragon, Teddybears
From Dusk till Dawn Sig removed, e-mail us if you'd like to know why. -ReverendM ([email protected]) |

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 08:18:00 -
[196]
Originally by: turnschuh considering pve, I wonder if the damage output is better then a raven or a typhoon with 4xac 4xcruise 5xheavy drones? anyone can do the math?
With autocannons, I think it will be. Not with artillery. But thats just me guessing. Going to try and add the ships to naughtyboys spread sheet...
--- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |

Sarmaul
0utbreak
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 08:19:00 -
[197]
Edited by: Sarmaul on 26/07/2006 08:19:21
Originally by: Nafri And dont come me with your "omg, Im in a PvP corp now, I can bash some Alliance noobs"
Im former Member Of Naginata, Reikkoku, Tundragon, Teddybears
I wasn't insulting G's credability as an alliance nor their PVP ability, I was poking fun at their slight fondness of ECM :)
TEAM MINMATAR FORUMS - In Rust We Trust - |

Nordvargr
GoonWaffe GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 08:20:00 -
[198]
Originally by: Sarmaul
I wasn't insulting G's credability as an alliance nor their PVP ability, I was poking fun at their slight fondness of ECM :)
Soon you will see them in cap injected dual LAR autocannon Maelstroms using all their spare mids for ECM.
|

Nafri
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 08:22:00 -
[199]
Originally by: Sarmaul Edited by: Sarmaul on 26/07/2006 08:19:21
Originally by: Nafri And dont come me with your "omg, Im in a PvP corp now, I can bash some Alliance noobs"
Im former Member Of Naginata, Reikkoku, Tundragon, Teddybears
I wasn't insulting G's credability as an alliance nor their PVP ability, I was poking fun at their slight fondness of ECM :)
ECM isnt their focus, its focus of 6million SP of mine  Basicyl its all about the team, whenever a gangmate of me will tank and not fit ECM in his mids, im going to slap him for this.
ECM = helping the team tank = not helping the team
And even 5 BS do soo much damage, its just pointless trying to tank them, especially without insane resistances.
From Dusk till Dawn Sig removed, e-mail us if you'd like to know why. -ReverendM ([email protected]) |

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 08:24:00 -
[200]
Originally by: Nafri
Originally by: Sarmaul Edited by: Sarmaul on 26/07/2006 08:19:21
Originally by: Nafri And dont come me with your "omg, Im in a PvP corp now, I can bash some Alliance noobs"
Im former Member Of Naginata, Reikkoku, Tundragon, Teddybears
I wasn't insulting G's credability as an alliance nor their PVP ability, I was poking fun at their slight fondness of ECM :)
ECM isnt their focus, its focus of 6million SP of mine  Basicyl its all about the team, whenever a gangmate of me will tank and not fit ECM in his mids, im going to slap him for this.
ECM = helping the team tank = not helping the team
And even 5 BS do soo much damage, its just pointless trying to tank them, especially without insane resistances.
With 7 med slots and someone else tackling, this ship might be able to actually pull off both ecm AND tanking. It will be a fantastic ship. I have no idea why you dont see the possibilities with it with all that pvp experience you have.
--- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |
|

Pesadel0
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 08:25:00 -
[201]
I want to see this Ship layout,one thing i am sure this ship has some potential but i was one of the ones hoping for the staber big brother i almost "cryed" when i saw the bonus.
I almost thought about putting in a painter bonus (yeah i know ) and a missile bonus 
I fail to see how can this behemoth is going to be able to fit a MWD and slowly crawl alive until it reaches another BS to kill it .
If anything else fails my fist mailstorm will be used to mine alone in some backwater 0.0 ...
|

Nafri
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 08:28:00 -
[202]
Originally by: Jim McGregor
Originally by: Nafri
Originally by: Sarmaul Edited by: Sarmaul on 26/07/2006 08:19:21
Originally by: Nafri And dont come me with your "omg, Im in a PvP corp now, I can bash some Alliance noobs"
Im former Member Of Naginata, Reikkoku, Tundragon, Teddybears
I wasn't insulting G's credability as an alliance nor their PVP ability, I was poking fun at their slight fondness of ECM :)
ECM isnt their focus, its focus of 6million SP of mine  Basicyl its all about the team, whenever a gangmate of me will tank and not fit ECM in his mids, im going to slap him for this.
ECM = helping the team tank = not helping the team
And even 5 BS do soo much damage, its just pointless trying to tank them, especially without insane resistances.
With 7 med slots and someone else tackling, this ship might be able to actually pull off both ecm AND tanking. It will be a fantastic ship. I have no idea why you dont see the possibilities with it with all that pvp experience you have.
Cause it will have 6 midslots? Forget that with the 7 midslots, the Devs know why they cant implent that.
Caldari whinage is always bad, its 70% of their mission running playerbase. 7 midslots just afk for ECM abuse, which will be the best about such a ship anyway.
I copied a post of mine from another thread, explaining some of the problems I have with the mealstrom:
Mealstrom is a pointless PvE ship.
Already discussed it in corp, has probably no use for fleets. Only cause problems for hardly an advantage.
Things you need to consider for fighting in fleets:
-Shield tanking doesnt matter -Alphastrike works best with high damage modifier, you often fire only 3-4 guns on a ship, then it goes pop -its all about your armor, you will fit armor plates, midslots are for tracking comps and sensor boosters -passive tanks, Eve lags soo much, active tanks are hardly usable when there are more than 20 people in a fight
its also not really great for smaller scaled fights:
-It has bad DPS, its better to bring a typhoon -It will be slow, for AC the tempest will be better -It has a useless bonus, you will fit EW in midslots anyway
As you can see, the Mealstrom is outclassed in PvP by both of its brothers.
Solution:
Switch the shield boost bonus for a second ROF bonus, the mealstrom would become quite a nice artillery platform.
The whole idea of giving minmatar shield boost boni is kinda flawed. It works on the sleipnir, but only cause the sleipnir has insanly nice shield resistances. So you just need 2 modules to run a decent tank on it. Without the restistances, people would armor tank the sleipnir like every other minmatar ship or just fit a passive tank. The cyclone is the most boring minmatar ship ingame. Its slow, it has a uselss bonus and its ugly, no need to implent a bigger brother for it. Whenever I have flown one, I just armored tanked it, there was just no point in a shieldtank.
From Dusk till Dawn Sig removed, e-mail us if you'd like to know why. -ReverendM ([email protected]) |

Nafri
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 08:29:00 -
[203]
Originally by: Pesadel0 I want to see this Ship layout,one thing i am sure this ship has some potential but i was one of the ones hoping for the staber big brother i almost "cryed" when i saw the bonus.
I almost thought about putting in a painter bonus (yeah i know ) and a missile bonus 
I fail to see how can this behemoth is going to be able to fit a MWD and slowly crawl alive until it reaches another BS to kill it .
If anything else fails my fist mailstorm will be used to mine alone in some backwater 0.0 ...
The problem is, its slow and it does ****ty damage
From Dusk till Dawn Sig removed, e-mail us if you'd like to know why. -ReverendM ([email protected]) |

Uther Doull
Shinra Lotka Volterra
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 08:29:00 -
[204]
god... imagine autocannons with a rate of fire bonus... a maelstrom in your ammo hold :P
|

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 08:38:00 -
[205]
Originally by: Uther Doull god... imagine autocannons with a rate of fire bonus... a maelstrom in your ammo hold :P
Thats so true. 
--- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |

Nordvargr
GoonWaffe GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 08:39:00 -
[206]
Originally by: Uther Doull god... imagine autocannons with a rate of fire bonus... a maelstrom in your ammo hold :P
And worse yet, 8 of them running at once, and because you shield tank you may have not only 3 but perhaps even 4 gyros! (if only because I'd feel retarded fitting PDUs to help out my shield tank when they also give even more grid that an AC maelstrom just can't use)
|

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 08:46:00 -
[207]
Edited by: Jim McGregor on 26/07/2006 08:46:45
Originally by: Nafri
Cause it will have 6 midslots? Forget that with the 7 midslots, the Devs know why they cant implent that.
Caldari whinage is always bad, its 70% of their mission running playerbase. 7 midslots just afk for ECM abuse, which will be the best about such a ship anyway.
I copied a post of mine from another thread, explaining some of the problems I have with the mealstrom:
Mealstrom is a pointless PvE ship.
Already discussed it in corp, has probably no use for fleets. Only cause problems for hardly an advantage.
Things you need to consider for fighting in fleets:
-Shield tanking doesnt matter -Alphastrike works best with high damage modifier, you often fire only 3-4 guns on a ship, then it goes pop -its all about your armor, you will fit armor plates, midslots are for tracking comps and sensor boosters -passive tanks, Eve lags soo much, active tanks are hardly usable when there are more than 20 people in a fight
its also not really great for smaller scaled fights:
-It has bad DPS, its better to bring a typhoon -It will be slow, for AC the tempest will be better -It has a useless bonus, you will fit EW in midslots anyway
As you can see, the Mealstrom is outclassed in PvP by both of its brothers.
Solution:
Switch the shield boost bonus for a second ROF bonus, the mealstrom would become quite a nice artillery platform.
The whole idea of giving minmatar shield boost boni is kinda flawed. It works on the sleipnir, but only cause the sleipnir has insanly nice shield resistances. So you just need 2 modules to run a decent tank on it. Without the restistances, people would armor tank the sleipnir like every other minmatar ship or just fit a passive tank. The cyclone is the most boring minmatar ship ingame. Its slow, it has a uselss bonus and its ugly, no need to implent a bigger brother for it. Whenever I have flown one, I just armored tanked it, there was just no point in a shieldtank.
I read that post in the other thread. Dont really agree with it. Without 7 medium slots, the ship will NOT be the best tanker, which was stated by Tuxford that it will be. So 7 medium slots is pretty much a given here. But alright, if we assume a 8/6/6, it will be a armor tanker with mean ecm capabilities. Damage, dps and ecm on top. I wouldnt mind, but i feel thats overpowered, and also the bonus should be to armor tanking with 6 low slots.
Yes, it will be slow but it will have good tanking abilities instead, just like the Raven. I dont see anyone complaining that Raven sucks for group/solo pvp. Why should this ship? With 8 slots, it might have higher dps than the Raven with autocannons, but lower range. Sounds good to me.
The ships are not intended to replace tier 1/2. If you want high dps, bring Typhoon. If you want the best autocannon ship, bring the Tempest. This ship will serve its role as uber tanking/ecm in the minmatar fleet.
I want rof and damage on this ship too, but i think it would be overpowered. Just accept that we didnt get what we wanted, but try to see the other options with this ship.
--- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |

Nafri
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 08:50:00 -
[208]
I want double ROF on this ship, no bigger alphastrike, but finally DPS comparable to other Battleships, Im sick off that my 1400 II Tempest gets tanked by other BS easily.
Raven is good, well cause Torps work from 0km-60km, you dont have problems of getting in range, you have EW in midslots. A nice ship for small groups.
Autocannons need you to stay within 4-20km, or you cant hit, a Raven can just slowly fly away from you and lower your damage, it can also just warp on 50km on you and start pounding you. The Mealstrom is a very bad AC plattform, and as Artillery Platform it doesnt provide enough DPS compared to other Battleships.
From Dusk till Dawn Sig removed, e-mail us if you'd like to know why. -ReverendM ([email protected]) |

Aloysius Knight
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 08:55:00 -
[209]
any i the only minmatar here that likes to armour tank?
i hate the bonis on this thing will all my might im beeing forced to shield tank it
is this how we are going to go, turn into the bastard step child of the caldarie?
id rather fly my typhoon then this pos why can't we have a real AC boat ffs! nether the tempest of the typhoon can really be classed as a ac boat
**** THE BONIS!
|

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 08:57:00 -
[210]
Originally by: Nafri I want double ROF on this ship, no bigger alphastrike, but finally DPS comparable to other Battleships, Im sick off that my 1400 II Tempest gets tanked by other BS easily.
Raven is good, well cause Torps work from 0km-60km, you dont have problems of getting in range, you have EW in midslots. A nice ship for small groups.
Autocannons need you to stay within 4-20km, or you cant hit, a Raven can just slowly fly away from you and lower your damage, it can also just warp on 50km on you and start pounding you. The Mealstrom is a very bad AC plattform, and as Artillery Platform it doesnt provide enough DPS compared to other Battleships.
You are right about autocannons not working very well with a slow ship... we'll see how slow this ship really becomes.
Imagine a artillery platform with rof + damage bonuses, 8/7/5 or 8/6/6... it would be the ultimate dream ship and i wouldnt fly anything else ever. And because it sounds so good, i fear it would be overpowered. Just warp in at range, have fantastic, instant damage with no cap use. Whats not to love? But overpowered. 
By the way, thats what the amarr bs will do with projectiles mounted... im a little worried. 
--- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |
|

Nafri
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 09:00:00 -
[211]
Originally by: Jim McGregor
Originally by: Nafri I want double ROF on this ship, no bigger alphastrike, but finally DPS comparable to other Battleships, Im sick off that my 1400 II Tempest gets tanked by other BS easily.
Raven is good, well cause Torps work from 0km-60km, you dont have problems of getting in range, you have EW in midslots. A nice ship for small groups.
Autocannons need you to stay within 4-20km, or you cant hit, a Raven can just slowly fly away from you and lower your damage, it can also just warp on 50km on you and start pounding you. The Mealstrom is a very bad AC plattform, and as Artillery Platform it doesnt provide enough DPS compared to other Battleships.
You are right about autocannons not working very well with a slow ship... we'll see how slow this ship really becomes.
Imagine a artillery platform with rof + damage bonuses, 8/7/5 or 8/6/6... it would be the ultimate dream ship and i wouldnt fly anything else ever. And because it sounds so good, i fear it would be overpowered. Just warp in at range, have fantastic, instant damage with no cap use. Whats not to love? But overpowered. 
Not with a double ROF bonus, you could even just give it 7 turrets, but at least it would have some DPS
By the way, thats what the amarr bs will do with projectiles mounted... im a little worried. 
From Dusk till Dawn Sig removed, e-mail us if you'd like to know why. -ReverendM ([email protected]) |

pennzoil
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 09:02:00 -
[212]
Cause it will have 6 midslots?Forget that with the 7 midslots, the Devs know why they cant implent that.
Caldari whinage is always bad, its 70% of their mission running playerbase. 7 midslots just afk for ECM abuse, which will be the best about such a ship anyway.
I copied a post of mine from another thread, explaining some of the problems I have with the mealstrom:
Mealstrom is a pointless PvE ship. Already discussed it in corp, has probably no use for fleets. Only cause problems for hardly an advantage.
Things you need to consider for fighting in fleets:
-Shield tanking doesnt matter -Alphastrike works best with high damage modifier, you often fire only 3-4 guns on a ship, then it goes pop -its all about your armor, you will fit armor plates, midslots are for tracking comps and sensor boosters -passive tanks, Eve lags soo much, active tanks are hardly usable when there are more than 20 people in a fight
its also not really great for smaller scaled fights:
-It has bad DPS, its better to bring a typhoon -It will be slow, for AC the tempest will be better -It has a useless bonus, you will fit EW in midslots anyway As you can see, the Mealstrom is outclassed in PvP by both of its brothers. Solution:
Switch the shield boost bonus for a second ROF bonus, the mealstrom would become quite a nice artillery platform.
The whole idea of giving minmatar shield boost boni is kinda flawed. It works on the sleipnir, but only cause the sleipnir has insanly nice shield resistances. So you just need 2 modules to run a decent tank on it. Without the restistances, people would armor tank the sleipnir like every other minmatar ship or just fit a passive tank. The cyclone is the most boring minmatar ship ingame. Its slow, it has a uselss bonus and its ugly, no need to implent a bigger brother for it.Whenever I have flown one, I just armored tanked it, there was just no point in a shieldtank.
Nice post Nafri!!! I agree totally!!!
|

Pesadel0
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 09:08:00 -
[213]
Originally by: Jim McGregor Edited by: Jim McGregor on 26/07/2006 08:46:45
Originally by: Nafri
Cause it will have 6 midslots? Forget that with the 7 midslots, the Devs know why they cant implent that.
Caldari whinage is always bad, its 70% of their mission running playerbase. 7 midslots just afk for ECM abuse, which will be the best about such a ship anyway.
I copied a post of mine from another thread, explaining some of the problems I have with the mealstrom:
Mealstrom is a pointless PvE ship.
Already discussed it in corp, has probably no use for fleets. Only cause problems for hardly an advantage.
Things you need to consider for fighting in fleets:
-Shield tanking doesnt matter -Alphastrike works best with high damage modifier, you often fire only 3-4 guns on a ship, then it goes pop -its all about your armor, you will fit armor plates, midslots are for tracking comps and sensor boosters -passive tanks, Eve lags soo much, active tanks are hardly usable when there are more than 20 people in a fight
its also not really great for smaller scaled fights:
-It has bad DPS, its better to bring a typhoon -It will be slow, for AC the tempest will be better -It has a useless bonus, you will fit EW in midslots anyway
As you can see, the Mealstrom is outclassed in PvP by both of its brothers.
Solution:
Switch the shield boost bonus for a second ROF bonus, the mealstrom would become quite a nice artillery platform.
The whole idea of giving minmatar shield boost boni is kinda flawed. It works on the sleipnir, but only cause the sleipnir has insanly nice shield resistances. So you just need 2 modules to run a decent tank on it. Without the restistances, people would armor tank the sleipnir like every other minmatar ship or just fit a passive tank. The cyclone is the most boring minmatar ship ingame. Its slow, it has a uselss bonus and its ugly, no need to implent a bigger brother for it. Whenever I have flown one, I just armored tanked it, there was just no point in a shieldtank.
I read that post in the other thread. Dont really agree with it. Without 7 medium slots, the ship will NOT be the best tanker, which was stated by Tuxford that it will be. So 7 medium slots is pretty much a given here. But alright, if we assume a 8/6/6, it will be a armor tanker with mean ecm capabilities. Damage, dps and ecm on top. I wouldnt mind, but i feel thats overpowered, and also the bonus should be to armor tanking with 6 low slots.
Yes, it will be slow but it will have good tanking abilities instead, just like the Raven. I dont see anyone complaining that Raven sucks for group/solo pvp. Why should this ship? With 8 slots, it might have higher dps than the Raven with autocannons, but lower range. Sounds good to me.
The ships are not intended to replace tier 1/2. If you want high dps, bring Typhoon. If you want the best autocannon ship, bring the Tempest. This ship will serve its role as uber tanking/ecm in the minmatar fleet.
I want rof and damage on this ship too, but i think it would be overpowered. Just accept that we didnt get what we wanted, but try to see the other options with this ship.
Yeah it is fine and dandy until the ECM balance patch .And then you will have a Super sized Cyclone with sucky damage with autocannos.
The caldaris dont complain about the raven because a raven doesnt need to worry about tracking/optimal/transversal etc.I fail to see from the description of this ship how we are going to reach another ship and warpscarmble ,web and put necessary DPS to kill it.
But maybe your right and people were especting the staber big brother,this ship has potencial,we need to test it .
Oh well we can always wait for the BS Tier 4 then we will get the super fast,super minie BS we always dream about 
|

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 09:17:00 -
[214]
Originally by: Pesadel0
Yeah it is fine and dandy until the ECM balance patch .And then you will have a Super sized Cyclone with sucky damage with autocannos.
The caldaris dont complain about the raven because a raven doesnt need to worry about tracking/optimal/transversal etc.I fail to see from the description of this ship how we are going to reach another ship and warpscarmble ,web and put necessary DPS to kill it.
Yep, it might be a hard ship to use with autocannons. We'll see how slow it is and if it can be fixed with a nanofiber in the lows. Otherwise, i think it should make for a pretty nice artillery ship. It will have a slightly higher alpha strike than the tempest and will have more medium slots too.
--- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |

Aloysius Knight
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 09:21:00 -
[215]
yay for crappy and unrace backstroy bonis
|

Sarmaul
0utbreak
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 09:23:00 -
[216]
Originally by: Pesadel0 Oh well we can always wait for the BS Tier 4 then we will get the super fast,super minie BS we always dream about 
TBH seeing as the Maelstrom will out-DPS the tempest with artillery, I would rather the pest itself was changed into a superfast ac ship.
TEAM MINMATAR FORUMS - In Rust We Trust - |

Pesadel0
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 09:28:00 -
[217]
Originally by: Sarmaul
Originally by: Pesadel0 Oh well we can always wait for the BS Tier 4 then we will get the super fast,super minie BS we always dream about 
TBH seeing as the Maelstrom will out-DPS the tempest with artillery, I would rather the pest itself was changed into a superfast ac ship.
I dunno i would rather change the maelstorm ,but that is just me ;)
Quote: yay for crappy and unrace backstroy bonis
 A new era is coming in witch matari shield tanks and goes missile,and yes i will feel dirty using this ship 
|

Sarmaul
0utbreak
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 09:48:00 -
[218]
Edited by: Sarmaul on 26/07/2006 09:48:24 Minny ships with equal or more shield than armour hp:
Assault Ships (1/2) Jaguar
Covert Ops (0/2) -
Frigates (3/6) Breacher Rifter Vigil (equal)
Interceptors (0/2) -
----------------
Destroyers (1/1) Thrasher
Interdictors (1/1) Sabre
----------------
Cruisers (3/4) Bellicose Scythe (equal) Stabber
HAC (1/2) Vagabond
Logistics (0/1) -
Recon Ships (2/2) Huginn Rapier
----------------
Battlecruisers (1/1) Cyclone
Command Ships (2/2) Claymore Sleipnir
----------------
Battleships (2/2) Tempest Typhoon
----------------
Freighters (0/1) -
Industrials (0/3) -
Transport Ships (2/2) Mastodon Prowler
----------------
Carriers (1/2) Hel (equal)
Dreadnoughts (1/1) Naglfar (equal)
Titans (1/1) Ragnarok (equal)
----------------
Shuttles (1/1) Minmatar Shuttle
So that's 23 ships out of 38 that have higher shield than armour. Our transport ships get bonuses to shield boosting. Our battlecruisers get bonuses to shield boosting. Our command ships get bonuses to shield boosting. Our T2 resistances might as well say "Look, I shield tank".
How is making another Minmatar shield tanker going against the backstory and "unminmatar"?
TEAM MINMATAR FORUMS - In Rust We Trust - |

Aloysius Knight
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 10:01:00 -
[219]
do that again with slot layout factored in
|

Sarmaul
0utbreak
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 10:02:00 -
[220]
Originally by: Aloysius Knight do that again with slot layout factored in
Do it yourself :P
TEAM MINMATAR FORUMS - In Rust We Trust - |
|

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 10:03:00 -
[221]
I love the minnie race tbh. The ships are so unpredictable and allows anyone to field something very unexpected. And yes, unfortunantly most of the ships are shield tankers, but the most popular solo pvp ships are usually set up to armor tank.
Personally i prefer armor tanking, and usually its possible to pull off on minnie ships.
--- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |

Aloysius Knight
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 10:12:00 -
[222]
Originally by: Sarmaul
Originally by: Aloysius Knight do that again with slot layout factored in
Do it yourself :P
ohhh commmmon, you know you want to, pleeeeaseeee * does puppy eyes*
|

Pesadel0
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 10:16:00 -
[223]
Originally by: Sarmaul Edited by: Sarmaul on 26/07/2006 09:48:24 Minny ships with equal or more shield than armour hp:
Assault Ships (1/2) Jaguar
Covert Ops (0/2) -
Frigates (3/6) Breacher Rifter Vigil (equal)
Interceptors (0/2) -
----------------
Destroyers (1/1) Thrasher
Interdictors (1/1) Sabre
----------------
Cruisers (3/4) Bellicose Scythe (equal) Stabber
HAC (1/2) Vagabond
Logistics (0/1) -
Recon Ships (2/2) Huginn Rapier
----------------
Battlecruisers (1/1) Cyclone
Command Ships (2/2) Claymore Sleipnir
----------------
Battleships (2/2) Tempest Typhoon
----------------
Freighters (0/1) -
Industrials (0/3) -
Transport Ships (2/2) Mastodon Prowler
----------------
Carriers (1/2) Hel (equal)
Dreadnoughts (1/1) Naglfar (equal)
Titans (1/1) Ragnarok (equal)
----------------
Shuttles (1/1) Minmatar Shuttle
So that's 23 ships out of 38 that have higher shield than armour. Our transport ships get bonuses to shield boosting. Our battlecruisers get bonuses to shield boosting. Our command ships get bonuses to shield boosting. Our T2 resistances might as well say "Look, I shield tank".
How is making another Minmatar shield tanker going against the backstory and "unminmatar"?
And that proves what?Doenst slot layout mean anything?
|

Sarmaul
0utbreak
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 10:20:00 -
[224]
Originally by: Pesadel0 And that proves what? Doenst slot layout mean anything?
It proves that dispite us having some stupidly gimped slot layouts CCP envisions minmatar as having good shield technology.
The vagabond is a good shield tanker and has 4 mids 5 lows.
TEAM MINMATAR FORUMS - In Rust We Trust - |

kessah
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 10:34:00 -
[225]
i in total agreeance with nafri atm, reading throuugh the last 4 pages on this.
I personally think lighten it increase its base speed to 180\~185ms, bonuses 5% velocity 5% rof or dmg and give it lower hitpoints and a slow cap recharge. Lets have our own little blaster ship.
7 mids would be cool but i find with the ecm nerf soonish it should still create a player base that do not use ecm in its mid slots.
I really think the Maelstrom is better off going down the hyperon route and leave the best two races at tanking to do what they do best, better. The matari and gallente prefer speed where gallente get there super damage and matari have there versitility.
Its hows it been most matari users hate it sumtimes, but it works and the best thing matari are good at is being able to do generally everything 2nd best, which creates alot of options.
According to RP aspect that say matari are now in the process or having ships that need abit of meat on em? well i say why change what works?
Thats it for me, 8\7\5 setup would be sweet i dont think it would be overpowered unless ECM isnt nerf'ed when they are brought out and i want it hit with a nerf bat so hard it'll make players heads spin, the single ecm multispec's been abused too long.
BTW i can vouch for nafri being very pvp experienced Jim, he know's his matari very well. --------------------------------------------------------
Forever Pirate |

kessah
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 10:39:00 -
[226]
Originally by: Sarmaul Edited by: Sarmaul on 26/07/2006 09:48:24 Minny ships with equal or more shield than armour hp:
Assault Ships (1/2) Jaguar
Covert Ops (0/2) -
Frigates (3/6) Breacher Rifter Vigil (equal)
Interceptors (0/2) -
----------------
Destroyers (1/1) Thrasher
Interdictors (1/1) Sabre
----------------
Cruisers (3/4) Bellicose Scythe (equal) Stabber
HAC (1/2) Vagabond
Logistics (0/1) -
Recon Ships (2/2) Huginn Rapier
----------------
Battlecruisers (1/1) Cyclone
Command Ships (2/2) Claymore Sleipnir
----------------
Battleships (2/2) Tempest Typhoon
----------------
Freighters (0/1) -
Industrials (0/3) -
Transport Ships (2/2) Mastodon Prowler
----------------
Carriers (1/2) Hel (equal)
Dreadnoughts (1/1) Naglfar (equal)
Titans (1/1) Ragnarok (equal)
----------------
Shuttles (1/1) Minmatar Shuttle
So that's 23 ships out of 38 that have higher shield than armour. Our transport ships get bonuses to shield boosting. Our battlecruisers get bonuses to shield boosting. Our command ships get bonuses to shield boosting. Our T2 resistances might as well say "Look, I shield tank".
How is making another Minmatar shield tanker going against the backstory and "unminmatar"?
Its not the point man, its being versitile. i want options not a bonus that pretty much dictates what i should fit and having a mass disadvantage if i do not.
Armour shield it doesnt really matter, just dont have a bonus that effects it. --------------------------------------------------------
Forever Pirate |

Jim'ard Stone
Amarr
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 10:42:00 -
[227]
u know what else is bad having a sheild boost bonus, its limiting you double time.
first u have to shield tank
and secondly you really have to active shield tank.
Amarr's ship is crappy too tho :(
|

Omatje
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 10:44:00 -
[228]
I don't see any use for this ship in pvp (except some oddbal 1-1's) to prefer over Tempest or Typhoon.
It will be ship of choice for pve over the raven but that's about it.
For the alphastrike you might as well use an Apoc since that will cheaper, but at lvl5 BS Tempest does more alpha, the only gain you have is boosting shields which in any size fight over 10 BS is pretty much useless. And no, i am not considering the ewar possibilities with a lot of midslots since ewar will hopefully change in the near future.
Ah well at least we will see more minnie ships in the future since every mission runner wants one
All the other tier 3 proposed ships will have a a variety of roles in pvp, but this one pretty much won't except in some specific scenarios.
hmm...
|

Auron Shadowbane
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 10:58:00 -
[229]
if you want to make the mael a tank, plz dont touch versatility.
remove the shield boost amonth bonus with a cap reacharge (or even cap amounth for more reserve and equal recharge/s) bonus, so we can decide either for shield or armor tank.
a 8/6/6 setup will then be ok and everyone would be happy since you won't touch the sacred 6mid raven...
another option would be a +10% shield hp bonus with a 6/6 setup for a passive tank. well it would have an insane 11k base HP but if compared to a +1/4 dmg or rof bonus its not that powerfull.
|

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 11:01:00 -
[230]
Edited by: Jim McGregor on 26/07/2006 11:02:50
Originally by: Omatje
It will be ship of choice for pve over the raven but that's about it.
Ah well at least we will see more minnie ships in the future since every mission runner wants one
Actually missiles will still be superior to projectiles in missions i think. The ability to pick damage type and to hit for full damage of that type is pretty amazing. I will try this ship for missions though, mostly because its nice with a change and instant damage is nice.
With autocannons you might be able to sit and soak up damage while kicking ass around you, but the ammo consumtion will create a ... maelstrom in the cargo hold.  --- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |
|

Tiuwaz
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 11:07:00 -
[231]
well this ship has great potential to be... utter crap 
i am really afraid we'll get 6/6 instead 7/5(or 4)
fleet pvp: ( slightly better for the newer players without BS 5), i'd still probably favour the tempest, the 2 missile slots are great for antitackler defense IF it has 7 medslots AND ecm wont be nerfed till then, then some might use it as ew hoe also depending on pg tempest could still outdamage maelstrom by simply being able to fit more dmg mods
gang pvp: so its gonna be slow, no utility slots, same dmg as tempest, higher ammo use (33,3%) [this IS actually an issue if you ever have flown minni ac ships], and a better tank 
typhoon or tempy >> mael in most cases
you could ew ***** again and armour tank but then you give up on half of the bonuses, besides a caldari ship would do that way better
pve: oh great so they gonna make missions harder and give us a ship thats able to tank that , ravens will still rule over mael here simply because they use missiles
gamebreaking stuff: crystal sets, faction stuff, some will totally outpimp the mael and make it into a monster everyone will call overpowered and the rest of the 95% minni pilots without3 billions to blow on implants and mods will have a 2nd class raven for mission running
I gotta agree mostly with Nafri
Well we dont know all stats yet, so i will remain hopeful it will turn out a lil better than the pile of crap i fear it might be.
Originally by: Oveur This is not the conspiracy you are looking for.
|

Sarmaul
0utbreak
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 11:09:00 -
[232]
Tbh my phoon rules for npcing and that won't be changing anytime soon :)
TEAM MINMATAR FORUMS - In Rust We Trust - |

Omatje
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 11:18:00 -
[233]
Originally by: Jim McGregor Edited by: Jim McGregor on 26/07/2006 11:02:50
Originally by: Omatje
It will be ship of choice for pve over the raven but that's about it.
Ah well at least we will see more minnie ships in the future since every mission runner wants one
Actually missiles will still be superior to projectiles in missions i think. The ability to pick damage type and to hit for full damage of that type is pretty amazing. I will try this ship for missions though, mostly because its nice with a change and instant damage is nice.
With autocannons you might be able to sit and soak up damage while kicking ass around you, but the ammo consumtion will create a ... maelstrom in the cargo hold. 
Yeah you need autocannons, but with dual 650's and ab you can still score most hits on cruisers keeping an eye on transversal.
The only ammo type you can't fit at high dammage is kinetic, the others are pretty well represented.
hmm...
|

Winter Star
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 11:25:00 -
[234]
I think the best thing about this ship is how versatile the name seems to be - in this thread alone we've had:
Malestorm Mailstrom Mealstrom
lol
|

Tar om
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 11:26:00 -
[235]
Originally by: Pan Crastus *sigh* ...
best fitting:
hi: 8 x Miner II med: tank for belt spawns lo: 2 x mining laser upgrade, rest cargo expanders ...
QFT :( -- We are the Octavian Vanguard www.octavianvanguard.net
"The belief in the possibility of a short decisive war appears to be one of the most ancient and dangerous of human illusions." |

Melkor Bloodaxe
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 11:27:00 -
[236]
Originally by: Winter Star I think the best thing about this ship is how versatile the name seems to be - in this thread alone we've had:
Malestorm Mailstrom Mealstrom
lol
And then the Caldari are complaining about the Rokh/Rook 
Originally by: HippoKing Since when is justified killing more fun than random killing?
TEAM Minmatar |

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 11:28:00 -
[237]
Edited by: Jim McGregor on 26/07/2006 11:28:22
Originally by: Melkor Bloodaxe
Originally by: Winter Star I think the best thing about this ship is how versatile the name seems to be - in this thread alone we've had:
Malestorm Mailstrom Mealstrom
lol
And then the Caldari are complaining about the Rokh/Rook 
And the abaddon will be called ab for short... or addon...
--- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |

erpy esa
Rage of Angels Morsus Mihi
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 11:29:00 -
[238]
Can't help but be disapointed with the shield bonus, i mean what ships do i shield tank? Vaga ... jag maybe and tempest for carebear duty thus i have very lame shield skills compared to my armor.
I'll still buy it though just have a play around, who wouldn't?
I'm also in agreement with nafri, make her a dev?   
To the miner laser quote .. i hope this ship doesn't become a miner apoc type ship, it prob will.
|

Melkor Bloodaxe
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 11:30:00 -
[239]
Originally by: Jim McGregor Edited by: Jim McGregor on 26/07/2006 11:28:22
Originally by: Melkor Bloodaxe
Originally by: Winter Star I think the best thing about this ship is how versatile the name seems to be - in this thread alone we've had:
Malestorm Mailstrom Mealstrom
lol
And then the Caldari are complaining about the Rokh/Rook 
And the abaddon will be called ab for short... or addon...
or ABBA
Originally by: HippoKing Since when is justified killing more fun than random killing?
TEAM Minmatar |

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 11:31:00 -
[240]
Originally by: erpy esa Can't help but be disapointed with the shield bonus, i mean what ships do i shield tank? Vaga ... jag maybe and tempest for carebear duty thus i have very lame shield skills compared to my armor.
I'll still buy it though just have a play around, who wouldn't?
I'm also in agreement with nafri, make her a dev?   
To the miner laser quote .. i hope this ship doesn't become a miner apoc type ship, it prob will.
Meh, who wouldnt be... with rof + damage bonus, this ship would pwn all.
--- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |
|

Mjnari
Empyreum
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 11:35:00 -
[241]
Hmm, thought about it some during the night:
An attempt at pre-factional warfare balancing?
|

Omega Bloodstone
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 11:41:00 -
[242]
Okay, so its cool that a DEV popped in the tier 3 Caldari BS discussion and advised "rails". This means that half the game(being that half the game is Caldari by race) know what to train. I wish I had that Luxurie. Can we get an idea on the Minnie one DEVS???
|

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 11:43:00 -
[243]
Originally by: Omega Bloodstone Okay, so its cool that a DEV popped in the tier 3 Caldari BS discussion and advised "rails". This means that half the game(being that half the game is Caldari by race) know what to train. I wish I had that Luxurie. Can we get an idea on the Minnie one DEVS???

It will have 8 turrets. Of course its going to be projectiles. Did you read the blog in General Discussions?
--- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |

RoMUF
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 11:53:00 -
[244]
Why didn't minmatar get an EW boat? Where's my target painter bunus HUH?
6 to 7 med slots allows plenty of room for target painters!
|

Wrayeth
PAX Interstellar Services Veritas Immortalis
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 12:26:00 -
[245]
Originally by: Jenny Spitfire
I win missiles cant spam and tackle at the same time you know. Bah, I leave this whinning. You all are looking for solopwnmobiles.
Um...Jenny, not to burst your bubble or anything, but please look at the following raven setup and tell me it doesn't have all the bases covered:
6 siege II 2 medium ghoul, E50, or diminishing nos
1 XL C5L booster 1 faint 20km scrambler 1 heavy electrochemical cap injector 1 shield boost amp 2 invulnerability field II
3 ballistic control II 1 RCU II 1 coprocessor II
3 heavy web drones
You'll note that is has full tackling capability and can tank, too. The difference with the maelstrom is that it's a turret boat and will need to approach targets, so it needs an extra slot for a MWD.
Oh, and yes - this setup works quite well in PvP. I've been using it since just after Cold War and the missile changes, with a couple refinements ultimately leading up to what I posted above.
Frankly, if they removed a low from the raven and added a mid, I'd be up in arms - I'd have to lose a ballistic control for no real gain! -Wrayeth
"Look, pa! I just contributed absolutely nothing to this thread!"
|

Wrayeth
PAX Interstellar Services Veritas Immortalis
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 12:36:00 -
[246]
In regards to the slow speed of the maelstrom, I'm pretty sure Tux is defining "slow" as "the same speed as the other races' battleships - 143m/s base with nav 5". Despite that "slow" speed, blasterthrons seem to do quite well, so I don't expect it to be too much of an issue.
However....
What will be an issue, as someone else already mentioned, is ammo consumption of 8 large autocannons with a rate of fire bonus. Even on the tempest it's hard to carry enough ammo for sustained operations far from home as you burn through it at an alarming rate, at the same time needing most of your cargo space for cap booster charges.
I see two solutions to the ammo issue. The first is just to give the maelstrom an unusually large cargo hold - something on the order of 700-750m3. The second would require a rework of autocannons to be slower firing but more heavily damaging. Frankly, I could care less which is implemented, as long as one of the two is. -Wrayeth
"Look, pa! I just contributed absolutely nothing to this thread!"
|

Turiel Demon
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 12:38:00 -
[247]
Guys, I'm sorry but we realy shouldn't hope for more than 5 mids. If it has more than 5 it might actualy be able to make use of its bonus, and then it's gonna infringe on the Raven's territory.
Besides from that, this ship is already pre-gimped. It's too slow to use AC's, and anyway it can't possibly have the cargo hold for 8 turrets with a ROF bonus, plus cap boosters which it will almost certainly need to run an active tank with the new and improved longer-lasting combat.
No way is it going to have the PG to fit 8 1400mm II's without gridmods, and it's going to have too limited CPU to fit a 3/4 mod shieldtank. Added to that that it will have either an abysmal cap amount, or severely slow recharge (please be recharge), so it won't actualy be able to run a shield booster for more than 20-30 secconds anyway.
If it has any of those things, it's going to be unballanced in the eyes of the other races, at least and especialy the caldari, yet it needs all of them (7 mids, high PG, high CPU, largish cargo hold, decent cap) to be a viable ship that outperforms the tempest or typhoon at ANYTHING. ----
nothing to see here, move along nicely now, is that a pink dread out there. aaww you just missed it -eris It's not an Eidolon with 5 Basic Miner's on it, that's for certain.(FF04) ~kieron No love for me? :'( - Wrangler If you can't beat Eris, join her, hmmm that sounded so much better in my head - Cortes Cuddles Eeyore. He's soooo cute and doesn't play EVE. perfect -eris Eve-online Forum mods arn't Pokemon, you don't need to collect them all - Ductoris Here's my autograph - now do I get some groupie lub? Jacques' Don't be greedy :P -Capsicum ORLY - O |

SengH
Black Omega Security E.R.A
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 12:43:00 -
[248]
so i guess CCP finally figured it out
"old minnie" = ARMOR tank "new minnie" = SHIELD tank (are we supposed to shield tank the naggy? most ppl ive seen armor tank it tho) "next gen minnie" = HULL tank????
|

Ath Amon
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 12:43:00 -
[249]
/put on the AC whine cap
i really hope in a rework to ACs to make them more similar to arties...
so something like 7x dmg (maybe even more) on 800mm t2 and according speed to keep the DPS similar as it is now.
it will not be a big problem as in close range is not easy to hit orbiting cruiser or frigs (so no probs of instapops)
it will help big time with PvE
and will make them a bit more balanced compared to blasters that have both more alpha and dps, similar traking and with t2 ammo range is not a big issue.
|

Severa Crest
Railgun Voodoo II
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 12:47:00 -
[250]
Edited by: Severa Crest on 26/07/2006 12:48:10
Originally by: Wrayeth In regards to the slow speed of the maelstrom, I'm pretty sure Tux is defining "slow" as "the same speed as the other races' battleships - 143m/s base with nav 5". Despite that "slow" speed, blasterthrons seem to do quite well, so I don't expect it to be too much of an issue.
The rupture is described as slow and heavy for a minmatar ship, but it is still faster than any other race cruiser. The Mael however will be heavier than a tempest, therefore heavier than a blasterthron, and hence slower with a MWD. The whole point of having speed and the the versatility of autos was to get close to the amarrians to gimp their tracking, outrange the Gallente blasters etc etc. For this reason we had crappy dps. But now we have crappy dps and we are slower and less agile.
|
|

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 12:48:00 -
[251]
Originally by: Wrayeth In regards to the slow speed of the maelstrom, I'm pretty sure Tux is defining "slow" as "the same speed as the other races' battleships - 143m/s base with nav 5". Despite that "slow" speed, blasterthrons seem to do quite well, so I don't expect it to be too much of an issue.
However....
What will be an issue, as someone else already mentioned, is ammo consumption of 8 large autocannons with a rate of fire bonus. Even on the tempest it's hard to carry enough ammo for sustained operations far from home as you burn through it at an alarming rate, at the same time needing most of your cargo space for cap booster charges.
I see two solutions to the ammo issue. The first is just to give the maelstrom an unusually large cargo hold - something on the order of 700-750m3. The second would require a rework of autocannons to be slower firing but more heavily damaging. Frankly, I could care less which is implemented, as long as one of the two is.
I fully agree. The rate at which autocannons eat ammo is almost silly. You can go out there with a full hold and come back empty an hour later.
Now that we have a 8 turret ship, something needs to be done about the crazy ammo consumption. I love the fast rate of fire, and increasing the cargo hold would only give benefits to this specific ship.
So it would be better to just make autocannon ammo take up half as much space in the cargo.
--- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |

Wrayeth
PAX Interstellar Services Veritas Immortalis
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 12:48:00 -
[252]
Edited by: Wrayeth on 26/07/2006 12:49:05
Originally by: Turiel Demon Guys, I'm sorry but we realy shouldn't hope for more than 5 mids. If it has more than 5 it might actualy be able to make use of its bonus, and then it's gonna infringe on the Raven's territory.
Actually, it won't. The raven does not hold the role of the ultimate shield tanker - in fact, it gets absolutely no bonus to shield tanking. It just has a slot and hitpoint layout that one could say massively favors shield tanking.
The rokh is going to have shield resistance bonuses. The relationship between the rokh and the maelstrom will be like the Ferox and the Cyclone.
Quote: Besides from that, this ship is already pre-gimped. It's too slow to use AC's, and anyway it can't possibly have the cargo hold for 8 turrets with a ROF bonus, plus cap boosters which it will almost certainly need to run an active tank with the new and improved longer-lasting combat.
Well, I don't think the maelstrom is going to be any slower than the other races' battleships. As for the cargo hold issue, you may have a point, but we don't yet know how much space it will have.
In regards to being intended as an artillery boat, I sincerely hope not. The blasterthron already outclasses the AC tempest quite handily, and now the hyperion will do the same, even moreso. At least one could try to maintain range against a blasterthron (usually unsuccessfully if the blasterthron pilot knew what he was doing), but that won't be possible against the hyperion - it will be faster and more cap efficient than the blasterthron.
I fear that the AC tempest will be completely outmoded once the hyperion enters the game. That being the case, my only hope for my beloved autocannons will devolve to the maelstrom, as the typhoon can't fill the role properly due to lack of grid and CPU.
-Wrayeth
"Look, pa! I just contributed absolutely nothing to this thread!"
|

Wrayeth
PAX Interstellar Services Veritas Immortalis
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 12:50:00 -
[253]
Originally by: Jim McGregor So it would be better to just make autocannon ammo take up half as much space in the cargo.
Better idea than either of mine.  -Wrayeth
"Look, pa! I just contributed absolutely nothing to this thread!"
|

Severa Crest
Railgun Voodoo II
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 12:50:00 -
[254]
Originally by: Wrayeth Edited by: Wrayeth on 26/07/2006 12:49:05
Originally by: Turiel Demon Guys, I'm sorry but we realy shouldn't hope for more than 5 mids. If it has more than 5 it might actualy be able to make use of its bonus, and then it's gonna infringe on the Raven's territory.
Actually, it won't. The raven does not hold the role of the ultimate shield tanker - in fact, it gets absolutely no bonus to shield tanking. It just has a slot and hitpoint layout that one could say massively favors shield tanking.
The rokh is going to have shield resistance bonuses. The relationship between the rokh and the maelstrom will be like the Ferox and the Cyclone.
Quote: Besides from that, this ship is already pre-gimped. It's too slow to use AC's, and anyway it can't possibly have the cargo hold for 8 turrets with a ROF bonus, plus cap boosters which it will almost certainly need to run an active tank with the new and improved longer-lasting combat.
Well, I don't think the maelstrom is going to be any slower than the other races' battleships. As for the cargo hold issue, you may have a point, but we don't yet know how much space it will have.
In regards to being intended as an artillery boat, I sincerely hope not. The blasterthron already outclasses the AC tempest quite handily, and now the hyperion will do the same, even moreso. At least one could try to maintain range against a blasterthron (usually unsuccessfully if the blasterthron pilot knew what he was doing), but that won't be possible against the hyperion - it will be faster and more cap efficient than the blasterthron.
I fear that the AC tempest will be completely outmoded once the hyperion enters the game. That being the case, my only hope for my beloved autocannons will devolve to the maelstrom, as the typhoon can't fill the role properly due to lack of grid and CPU.
This balance between Minnie and Gallente, autos and blasters is what worries me most about these new ships.
|

Blind Man
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 12:51:00 -
[255]
rofl, you people complaining seriously need to fly a sleipnir and then say how much a shield boost bonus sucks.
|

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 12:53:00 -
[256]
Originally by: Severa Crest
This balance between Minnie and Gallente, autos and blasters is what worries me most about these new ships.
Me too. Specially with the speed nerf on hail and also no way to keep out of range for the blaster boats, im a bit worried. At least this ship can fit a really good tank... hopefully people will good skills will test these things on the test server before released.
--- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |

Severa Crest
Railgun Voodoo II
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 12:58:00 -
[257]
Originally by: Blind Man rofl, you people complaining seriously need to fly a sleipnir and then say how much a shield boost bonus sucks.
No problem with shield tanking.
Just imagine command ships are much more common than they are now, then make the Astarte lighter and faster than the Sleipnir then you have my problem.
I guess its not only an issue with the Mael though, it's the Hyperion too.
|

Melkor Bloodaxe
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 12:58:00 -
[258]
Edited by: Melkor Bloodaxe on 26/07/2006 13:03:51
Originally by: Blind Man rofl, you people complaining seriously need to fly a sleipnir and then say how much a shield boost bonus sucks.
don't forget Sleipnir has shield resistances of 62EM/60Exp/40Kin/50Therm. Which makes a huge difference.
And when the hell are they gonna fix the forum? can't barely edit my own post...  ____ "Since when is justified killing more fun than random killing?" -HippoKing-
TEAM MINMATAR - In Rust We Trust - |

Wilfan Ret'nub
Omega Corp
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 12:59:00 -
[259]
Originally by: Winter Star I think the best thing about this ship is how versatile the name seems to be - in this thread alone we've had:
Malestorm
That's the MGRL faction ship.
|

SengH
Black Omega Security E.R.A
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 13:01:00 -
[260]
Edited by: SengH on 26/07/2006 13:03:37
Originally by: Melkor Bloodaxe
Originally by: Blind Man rofl, you people complaining seriously need to fly a sleipnir and then say how much a shield boost bonus sucks.
don't forget Sleipnir has shield resistances of 62EM/62Exp/40Kin/50Therm. Which makes a huge difference
Slepnir also has 1 free slot for nos. For the mael, your gonna last as long as you cap charges (hope youve got enough) along with alot of ammo. Or if its the IWIN domi your pretty ******.
|
|

Wrayeth
PAX Interstellar Services Veritas Immortalis
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 13:03:00 -
[261]
Originally by: Wilfan Ret'nub
Originally by: Winter Star I think the best thing about this ship is how versatile the name seems to be - in this thread alone we've had:
Malestorm
That's the MGRL faction ship.
LMFAO -Wrayeth
"Look, pa! I just contributed absolutely nothing to this thread!"
|

Sumayyah
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 13:15:00 -
[262]
If the new BS gets 7 mids like you people want this BS could be the New PvE ship for those that have good gunnary skill \o/ Plus that would make it a pretty ubber solo ship imo. I think it would be great to give us 7 mids but come one we are minmatar and CCP hates us 
|

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 13:16:00 -
[263]
Edited by: Jim McGregor on 26/07/2006 13:18:41
Originally by: Sumayyah If the new BS gets 7 mids like you people want this BS could be the New PvE ship for those that have good gunnary skill \o/ Plus that would make it a pretty ubber solo ship imo. I think it would be great to give us 7 mids but come one we are minmatar and CCP hates us 
One med slot will disappear with MWD, because unlike Raven, we cant just sit still and hit anything from 0-150km with no tracking. 
Besides, Caldari now has a uber sniper which might be even better than Raven for mission sniping.
--- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |

SengH
Black Omega Security E.R.A
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 13:17:00 -
[264]
Originally by: Sumayyah If the new BS gets 7 mids like you people want this BS could be the New PvE ship for those that have good gunnary skill \o/ Plus that would make it a pretty ubber solo ship imo. I think it would be great to give us 7 mids but come one we are minmatar and CCP hates us 
I think Hammer is the only pro minnie on the CCP dev team lol. Esp after he gave all artys a 25% tracking boost a while back (VERY long long time ago).
|

Turiel Demon
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 13:17:00 -
[265]
Originally by: Wrayeth Edited by: Wrayeth on 26/07/2006 12:49:05
Originally by: Turiel Demon Guys, I'm sorry but we realy shouldn't hope for more than 5 mids. If it has more than 5 it might actualy be able to make use of its bonus, and then it's gonna infringe on the Raven's territory.
Actually, it won't. The raven does not hold the role of the ultimate shield tanker - in fact, it gets absolutely no bonus to shield tanking. It just has a slot and hitpoint layout that one could say massively favors shield tanking.
The rokh is going to have shield resistance bonuses. The relationship between the rokh and the maelstrom will be like the Ferox and the Cyclone.
Actualy that was meant as a bit of humour linked to the 'raven/caldari > everything' thing we've got going on, only the rest was serious 
Originally by: Wrayeth
Quote: Besides from that, this ship is already pre-gimped. It's too slow to use AC's, and anyway it can't possibly have the cargo hold for 8 turrets with a ROF bonus, plus cap boosters which it will almost certainly need to run an active tank with the new and improved longer-lasting combat.
Well, I don't think the maelstrom is going to be any slower than the other races' battleships. As for the cargo hold issue, you may have a point, but we don't yet know how much space it will have.
In regards to being intended as an artillery boat, I sincerely hope not. The blasterthron already outclasses the AC tempest quite handily, and now the hyperion will do the same, even moreso. At least one could try to maintain range against a blasterthron (usually unsuccessfully if the blasterthron pilot knew what he was doing), but that won't be possible against the hyperion - it will be faster and more cap efficient than the blasterthron.
I fear that the AC tempest will be completely outmoded once the hyperion enters the game. That being the case, my only hope for my beloved autocannons will devolve to the maelstrom, as the typhoon can't fill the role properly due to lack of grid and CPU.
I realy don't think the Mael will have the slightest chance as an AC boat. It'll easily fit it gridwise yeah, but tha ammo carrying issue will just be too gimping because of it's need for cap injector.
I don't think we can seriously consider a passive cap recharge option as it will need MWD.
We can already say with certainty that an AC temp will not be able to take on a Hyperion without ECM, which is hopefully going to be utterly destroyed by the upcoming reballancing...
So how is a ship which will be slowER and less maneuverable, have maybe equal damage but effectively 2 less highslots, have the ammo efficiency of a bottomless pit, and be utterly cap reliant for an active tank supposed to hold up?
And that's assuming it has the midslots and CPU for a decent tank, which STILL won't last long as it's going to be relying on charges.
Even then what damage output are we looking at? maybe 700 with hail (meaning you stand still with 8 turrets)? Yeah, looks great  ----
nothing to see here, move along nicely now, is that a pink dread out there. aaww you just missed it -eris It's not an Eidolon with 5 Basic Miner's on it, that's for certain.(FF04) ~kieron No love for me? :'( - Wrangler If you can't beat Eris, join her, hmmm that sounded so much better in my head - Cortes Cuddles Eeyore. He's soooo cute and doesn't play EVE. perfect -eris Eve-online Forum mods arn't Pokemon, you don't need to collect them all - Ductoris Here's my autograph - now do I get some groupie lub? Jacques' Don't be greedy :P -Capsicum ORLY - O |

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 13:20:00 -
[266]
Originally by: SengH
Originally by: Sumayyah If the new BS gets 7 mids like you people want this BS could be the New PvE ship for those that have good gunnary skill \o/ Plus that would make it a pretty ubber solo ship imo. I think it would be great to give us 7 mids but come one we are minmatar and CCP hates us 
I think Hammer is the only pro minnie on the CCP dev team lol. Esp after he gave all artys a 25% tracking boost a while back (VERY long long time ago).
Well, i personally think most of them are gallente. 
--- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 13:22:00 -
[267]
Originally by: Turiel Demon
Even then what damage output are we looking at? maybe 700 with hail (meaning you stand still with 8 turrets)? Yeah, looks great 
Yeah, i think the speed penalty should be removed on this ammo. It doesnt make any sense that we have a ammo that is good but we cant really use it unless we want to sit still and tank. Most minnie ships arent good at tanking, except this one. But i doubt it will be able to sit close to a blastership without dying in the end, even with these bonuses.
--- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |

Wrayeth
PAX Interstellar Services Veritas Immortalis
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 13:24:00 -
[268]
Originally by: Jim McGregor Yeah, i think the speed penalty should be removed on this ammo. It doesnt make any sense that we have a ammo that is good but we cant really use it unless we want to sit still and tank. Most minnie ships arent good at tanking, except this one. But i doubt it will be able to sit close to a blastership without dying in the end, even with these bonuses.
That's about what I expect, as well, though one can always hope. Blasters, autocannons, and the ships that use them need a balance pass on the battleship level big time. -Wrayeth
"Look, pa! I just contributed absolutely nothing to this thread!"
|

Ath Amon
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 13:30:00 -
[269]
Originally by: Turiel Demon I realy don't think the Mael will have the slightest chance as an AC boat. It'll easily fit it gridwise yeah, but tha ammo carrying issue will just be too gimping because of it's need for cap injector.
I don't think we can seriously consider a passive cap recharge option as it will need MWD.
We can already say with certainty that an AC temp will not be able to take on a Hyperion without ECM, which is hopefully going to be utterly destroyed by the upcoming reballancing...
So how is a ship which will be slowER and less maneuverable, have maybe equal damage but effectively 2 less highslots, have the ammo efficiency of a bottomless pit, and be utterly cap reliant for an active tank supposed to hold up?
And that's assuming it has the midslots and CPU for a decent tank, which STILL won't last long as it's going to be relying on charges.
Even then what damage output are we looking at? maybe 700 with hail (meaning you stand still with 8 turrets)? Yeah, looks great 
i mostly agree, this ship seem to be quite vulnerable to nos and dps are not that great... it seem more suited as an arty ship even if in fleet its bonus becomes a bit useless :/
for close range i fear it will become another sort of nos ship (depends by drone bay) or how about a big tanked tackler? 
|

booh
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 13:32:00 -
[270]
Blah. Expected. Atleast it doesnt't have a smartbomb bonus.
Since it has no gun bonuses, you can fit whatever you want. Nanos on low, big ass tank and MWD on med, 720s on highs... + snake implants... roaming with frigs 4tw

Oh well atleast i hope it will have 7 meds. And the argument with raven having less doesn't cound - minmatar are weird.
|
|

Wrayeth
PAX Interstellar Services Veritas Immortalis
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 13:33:00 -
[271]
Originally by: booh Blah. Expected. Atleast it doesnt't have a smartbomb bonus.
Since it has no gun bonuses, you can fit whatever you want. Nanos on low, big ass tank and MWD on med, 720s on highs... + snake implants... roaming with frigs 4tw

Oh well atleast i hope it will have 7 meds. And the argument with raven having less doesn't cound - minmatar are weird.
Um. Actually...it's got a rate of fire bonus to projectiles. -Wrayeth
"Look, pa! I just contributed absolutely nothing to this thread!"
|

Sarmaul
0utbreak
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 13:33:00 -
[272]
Erm lol? Rof bonus...
TEAM MINMATAR FORUMS - In Rust We Trust - |

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 13:34:00 -
[273]
Edited by: Jim McGregor on 26/07/2006 13:34:35
Originally by: Ath Amon
for close range i fear it will become another sort of nos ship (depends by drone bay) or how about a big tanked tackler? 
Dont think you will put out enough damage with it if you start putting nos in the slots. Otherwise it would be fun with 8 nos, 2 warp disruptors, webber, 4 multispectral jammers and armor repairers/hardeners in the lows.  --- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |

Turiel Demon
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 13:49:00 -
[274]
Originally by: Ath Amon
Originally by: Turiel Demon I realy don't think the Mael will have the slightest chance as an AC boat. It'll easily fit it gridwise yeah, but tha ammo carrying issue will just be too gimping because of it's need for cap injector.
I don't think we can seriously consider a passive cap recharge option as it will need MWD.
We can already say with certainty that an AC temp will not be able to take on a Hyperion without ECM, which is hopefully going to be utterly destroyed by the upcoming reballancing...
So how is a ship which will be slowER and less maneuverable, have maybe equal damage but effectively 2 less highslots, have the ammo efficiency of a bottomless pit, and be utterly cap reliant for an active tank supposed to hold up?
And that's assuming it has the midslots and CPU for a decent tank, which STILL won't last long as it's going to be relying on charges.
Even then what damage output are we looking at? maybe 700 with hail (meaning you stand still with 8 turrets)? Yeah, looks great 
i mostly agree, this ship seem to be quite vulnerable to nos and dps are not that great... it seem more suited as an arty ship even if in fleet its bonus becomes a bit useless :/
for close range i fear it will become another sort of nos ship (depends by drone bay) or how about a big tanked tackler? 
BRILIANT  
Replace the gun bonus with interdiction sphere use!
Think about it! The RoF bonus is crap anyway, it gimps it as much as it helps for AC's, as for art, meh, it's getting outdamaged by most things already, including it's little brother T, so who cares?
This way you get a ship that can A: drop bubbles, but can also B: actualy SURVIVE to get nearby with MWD and nanos, and after that may not be able to get away, but with it's uber (though shortish lasting) tank can actualy hold out a little while during which time the fleet does its thing 
It's a T1 ship so the cost of loss is going to be on par with the cost of a decently fitted Sabre anyway!
P.S.
/me goes and scribles on the wall in his heavily padded room ----
nothing to see here, move along nicely now, is that a pink dread out there. aaww you just missed it -eris It's not an Eidolon with 5 Basic Miner's on it, that's for certain.(FF04) ~kieron No love for me? :'( - Wrangler If you can't beat Eris, join her, hmmm that sounded so much better in my head - Cortes Cuddles Eeyore. He's soooo cute and doesn't play EVE. perfect -eris Eve-online Forum mods arn't Pokemon, you don't need to collect them all - Ductoris Here's my autograph - now do I get some groupie lub? Jacques' Don't be greedy :P -Capsicum ORLY - O |

Omega Bloodstone
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 13:50:00 -
[275]
Originally by: Jim McGregor
Originally by: Omega Bloodstone Okay, so its cool that a DEV popped in the tier 3 Caldari BS discussion and advised "rails". This means that half the game(being that half the game is Caldari by race) know what to train. I wish I had that Luxurie. Can we get an idea on the Minnie one DEVS???

It will have 8 turrets. Of course its going to be projectiles. Did you read the blog in General Discussions?
I looked all over the forums and could not find any true statistics. I looked under general discussion and was unable to locate it as well. Might be that its early as hell and my mind has not finished the morning boot-up. If you'll drop a link to it I would be very appriciative. Thanks Jim!
|

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 13:53:00 -
[276]
Edited by: Jim McGregor on 26/07/2006 13:56:10 Edited by: Jim McGregor on 26/07/2006 13:55:17
Originally by: Omega Bloodstone
Originally by: Jim McGregor
Originally by: Omega Bloodstone Okay, so its cool that a DEV popped in the tier 3 Caldari BS discussion and advised "rails". This means that half the game(being that half the game is Caldari by race) know what to train. I wish I had that Luxurie. Can we get an idea on the Minnie one DEVS???

It will have 8 turrets. Of course its going to be projectiles. Did you read the blog in General Discussions?
I looked all over the forums and could not find any true statistics. I looked under general discussion and was unable to locate it as well. Might be that its early as hell and my mind has not finished the morning boot-up. If you'll drop a link to it I would be very appriciative. Thanks Jim!
Blog about new battleships
Im not sure what you are after though. Hopefully the dev blog has it.. thats all the info we have at the moment. Waiting for some cool screenshots by Tuxford when he gets around to it. 
Edit: Now that I read it again, i didnt see Tux mention anything about 8 turrets on the hyperion. He mentions it for the other ships though, so i just assume hyperion will also have it. 
--- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |

Turiel Demon
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 13:58:00 -
[277]
If it doesn't even have 8 turrets and only a RoF bonus then that will mitagate the crappyness of RoF on AC's, but it will reduce the DPS of it's prime weapon system to 625max with daft ammo (hail)... which is just silly. ----
nothing to see here, move along nicely now, is that a pink dread out there. aaww you just missed it -eris It's not an Eidolon with 5 Basic Miner's on it, that's for certain.(FF04) ~kieron No love for me? :'( - Wrangler If you can't beat Eris, join her, hmmm that sounded so much better in my head - Cortes Cuddles Eeyore. He's soooo cute and doesn't play EVE. perfect -eris Eve-online Forum mods arn't Pokemon, you don't need to collect them all - Ductoris Here's my autograph - now do I get some groupie lub? Jacques' Don't be greedy :P -Capsicum ORLY - O |

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 13:59:00 -
[278]
Originally by: Turiel Demon If it doesn't even have 8 turrets and only a RoF bonus then that will mitagate the crappyness of RoF on AC's, but it will reduce the DPS of it's prime weapon system to 625max with daft ammo (hail)... which is just silly.
I typed it wrong the first time, then edited. The maelstrom does have 8 guns.  --- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |

Omega Bloodstone
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 14:35:00 -
[279]
Originally by: Jim McGregor Edited by: Jim McGregor on 26/07/2006 13:56:10 Edited by: Jim McGregor on 26/07/2006 13:55:17
Originally by: Omega Bloodstone
Originally by: Jim McGregor
Originally by: Omega Bloodstone Okay, so its cool that a DEV popped in the tier 3 Caldari BS discussion and advised "rails". This means that half the game(being that half the game is Caldari by race) know what to train. I wish I had that Luxurie. Can we get an idea on the Minnie one DEVS???

It will have 8 turrets. Of course its going to be projectiles. Did you read the blog in General Discussions?
I looked all over the forums and could not find any true statistics. I looked under general discussion and was unable to locate it as well. Might be that its early as hell and my mind has not finished the morning boot-up. If you'll drop a link to it I would be very appriciative. Thanks Jim!
Blog about new battleships
Im not sure what you are after though. Hopefully the dev blog has it.. thats all the info we have at the moment. Waiting for some cool screenshots by Tuxford when he gets around to it. 
Edit: Now that I read it again, i didnt see Tux mention anything about 8 turrets on the hyperion. He mentions it for the other ships though, so i just assume hyperion will also have it. 
Cool...Thanks!
|

Valea Silpha
Cereal Killerz Chimaera Pact
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 14:36:00 -
[280]
I dunno why people are worshipping this ship as a BS sized Sleipnir. The sleipnir starts with some awesome resists, is faster than the astarte and weighs less. The maelstrom will be very slow, have base resists and no room for nos. It will only be able to boost as long as its cap charges hold out, and that to me is a significant problem.
Everything that needs to be said has been to be honest. We are supremely unlikely to get seven meds. Nothing personal against the devs, but they do have a habbit of giving the minnies a kick when they are down, and i think seven meds is a lil on the too good side. Its not significantly better than a tempest for fleet work, with the added bonus of wasting half its bonus as lag will pwn your tank for you.
The only reason the cyclone (or at least my cyclone) works is because i have 3 med nos on it to run the bloody shield booster anyway. The new thing does not get that luxury.
As you can't successfully strap autocannons to it, i submit to all and sundry its not a minmatar ship.
<Hammerhead> TomB is doing the nerfing <Hammerhead> I just stand behind him, look at his monitor and shake my head |
|

Kaylana Syi
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 14:44:00 -
[281]
Originally by: Wrayeth I fear that the AC tempest will be completely outmoded once the hyperion enters the game. That being the case, my only hope for my beloved autocannons will devolve to the maelstrom, as the typhoon can't fill the role properly due to lack of grid and CPU.
Do you even fly Minmatar? Because the Typhoon certainly does have the power and cpu to field ACs and torps with a good tank AND tons of damage. Train get a clue to lvl 5 plz.
Team Minmatar Carriers need Clone Vats
|

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 14:46:00 -
[282]
Originally by: Valea Silpha I dunno why people are worshipping this ship as a BS sized Sleipnir. The sleipnir starts with some awesome resists, is faster than the astarte and weighs less. The maelstrom will be very slow, have base resists and no room for nos. It will only be able to boost as long as its cap charges hold out, and that to me is a significant problem.
Everything that needs to be said has been to be honest. We are supremely unlikely to get seven meds. Nothing personal against the devs, but they do have a habbit of giving the minnies a kick when they are down, and i think seven meds is a lil on the too good side. Its not significantly better than a tempest for fleet work, with the added bonus of wasting half its bonus as lag will pwn your tank for you.
The only reason the cyclone (or at least my cyclone) works is because i have 3 med nos on it to run the bloody shield booster anyway. The new thing does not get that luxury.
As you can't successfully strap autocannons to it, i submit to all and sundry its not a minmatar ship.
Even with 8/6/6 it will pwn. I personally wont shield tank it though, but instead use ecm/eccm and fit a good armor tank on top of that. Possibly with a few nos... I dont see why its such a bad idea. Heavy nos are quite powerful, and the decrease in damage isnt so bad when you consider the enemy will have to use cap boosters to survive. 
--- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |

Omega Bloodstone
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 14:49:00 -
[283]
Originally by: Kaylana Syi
Originally by: Wrayeth I fear that the AC tempest will be completely outmoded once the hyperion enters the game. That being the case, my only hope for my beloved autocannons will devolve to the maelstrom, as the typhoon can't fill the role properly due to lack of grid and CPU.
Do you even fly Minmatar? Because the Typhoon certainly does have the power and cpu to field ACs and torps with a good tank AND tons of damage. Train get a clue to lvl 5 plz.
Very true...you can have 4 arbalist siege launchers and 4 650 II's and in the low still do a decent dual repair tank with hardeners and a plate.
|

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 14:54:00 -
[284]
Originally by: Omega Bloodstone
Originally by: Kaylana Syi
Originally by: Wrayeth I fear that the AC tempest will be completely outmoded once the hyperion enters the game. That being the case, my only hope for my beloved autocannons will devolve to the maelstrom, as the typhoon can't fill the role properly due to lack of grid and CPU.
Do you even fly Minmatar? Because the Typhoon certainly does have the power and cpu to field ACs and torps with a good tank AND tons of damage. Train get a clue to lvl 5 plz.
Very true...you can have 4 arbalist siege launchers and 4 650 II's and in the low still do a decent dual repair tank with hardeners and a plate.
Now if only they would remove the speed penalty on hail, it would have a good chance to stand up to the blasterthron. Keeping out of range with that ammo is just out of the question (when its loaded) right now, but the mega can blast away...
--- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |

Valea Silpha
Cereal Killerz Chimaera Pact
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 15:07:00 -
[285]
Originally by: Jim McGregor
Originally by: Valea Silpha I dunno why people are worshipping this ship as a BS sized Sleipnir. The sleipnir starts with some awesome resists, is faster than the astarte and weighs less. The maelstrom will be very slow, have base resists and no room for nos. It will only be able to boost as long as its cap charges hold out, and that to me is a significant problem.
Everything that needs to be said has been to be honest. We are supremely unlikely to get seven meds. Nothing personal against the devs, but they do have a habbit of giving the minnies a kick when they are down, and i think seven meds is a lil on the too good side. Its not significantly better than a tempest for fleet work, with the added bonus of wasting half its bonus as lag will pwn your tank for you.
The only reason the cyclone (or at least my cyclone) works is because i have 3 med nos on it to run the bloody shield booster anyway. The new thing does not get that luxury.
As you can't successfully strap autocannons to it, i submit to all and sundry its not a minmatar ship.
Even with 8/6/6 it will pwn. I personally wont shield tank it though, but instead use ecm/eccm and fit a good armor tank on top of that. Possibly with a few nos... I dont see why its such a bad idea. Heavy nos are quite powerful, and the decrease in damage isnt so bad when you consider the enemy will have to use cap boosters to survive. 
And therein lies another problem. A minmatar nos/ecm/tank platform. Well whoop de doo. I thought CCP was trying to move away from them tbh...
<Hammerhead> TomB is doing the nerfing <Hammerhead> I just stand behind him, look at his monitor and shake my head |

xeom
Obsidian Sins
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 15:18:00 -
[286]
The only real question left is,Will it be able to pull in more ore then my medium mining barge?
CCP where are our t2 shield power relays? | Join[..SIN] |

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 15:20:00 -
[287]
Originally by: Valea Silpha
And therein lies another problem. A minmatar nos/ecm/tank platform. Well whoop de doo. I thought CCP was trying to move away from them tbh...
So let me get this straight...minnie shouldnt get a 7 medium slot shield tank because then they are too good tankers. And if the ship gets a 8/6/6 layout, they shouldnt use nos/ecm/tank because its kind of lame.
What are we supposed to do - die? 
--- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |

Nafri
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 15:21:00 -
[288]
Well, Im not so worried about the new gallente blastership.
Its worser than the dominix, I fit 2x neuts on my closerange tempest anyway (when I fly one) and you can easily try to outcap it.
From Dusk till Dawn Sig removed, e-mail us if you'd like to know why. -ReverendM ([email protected]) |

Kaylana Syi
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 15:22:00 -
[289]
Originally by: Jim McGregor
Originally by: Omega Bloodstone
Originally by: Kaylana Syi
Originally by: Wrayeth I fear that the AC tempest will be completely outmoded once the hyperion enters the game. That being the case, my only hope for my beloved autocannons will devolve to the maelstrom, as the typhoon can't fill the role properly due to lack of grid and CPU.
Do you even fly Minmatar? Because the Typhoon certainly does have the power and cpu to field ACs and torps with a good tank AND tons of damage. Train get a clue to lvl 5 plz.
Very true...you can have 4 arbalist siege launchers and 4 650 II's and in the low still do a decent dual repair tank with hardeners and a plate.
Now if only they would remove the speed penalty on hail, it would have a good chance to stand up to the blasterthron. Keeping out of range with that ammo is just out of the question (when its loaded) right now, but the mega can blast away...
It already has a good chance to stand up to the blasterthron... and it uses barrage, torps and drones to do it on just 1 armor repair II.
Team Minmatar Carriers need Clone Vats
|

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 15:26:00 -
[290]
Originally by: Kaylana Syi
It already has a good chance to stand up to the blasterthron... and it uses barrage, torps and drones to do it on just 1 armor repair II.
I remember a setup you shown me before.. maybe you are talking about that one. But yeah, using barrage is basicly a must. So when is a good idea to use Hail?
--- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |
|

Kaylana Syi
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 15:51:00 -
[291]
Originally by: Jim McGregor
Originally by: Kaylana Syi
It already has a good chance to stand up to the blasterthron... and it uses barrage, torps and drones to do it on just 1 armor repair II.
I remember a setup you shown me before.. maybe you are talking about that one. But yeah, using barrage is basicly a must. So when is a good idea to use Hail?
On tempests.
Team Minmatar Carriers need Clone Vats
|

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 15:53:00 -
[292]
Originally by: Kaylana Syi
Originally by: Jim McGregor
Originally by: Kaylana Syi
It already has a good chance to stand up to the blasterthron... and it uses barrage, torps and drones to do it on just 1 armor repair II.
I remember a setup you shown me before.. maybe you are talking about that one. But yeah, using barrage is basicly a must. So when is a good idea to use Hail?
On tempests.
So you are going to tank a megathron in the tempest using hail then?
--- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |

Apertotes
Nuevos Horizontes
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 15:54:00 -
[293]
Originally by: Valea Silpha
The only reason the cyclone (or at least my cyclone) works is because i have 3 med nos on it to run the bloody shield booster anyway. The new thing does not get that luxury.
so, what's stopping you from fitting 1, 2 or even 3 heavy nos on the new BS? oh yes, that you have 8 turret hard points... so the cyclone is better cause it only has 5 and lets you room to fit nos? so if, for example, tux went nuts and gave the cyclone 8 turret hardpoints, it would be a worse ship than it is now?
Apertotes, the Guybrush Threepwood of New Eve |

xeom
Obsidian Sins
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 15:55:00 -
[294]
quoting my self from the other post.
Originally by: xeom Edited by: xeom on 26/07/2006 15:49:07 Errm,really 7 mid slots is overpowered guys.
3xInvifield 1x-XLbooster 1xCap booster
That already beats any raven's tank.Hell it is the best shield tank ingame(non-cap). Now the next slot could simply have a MWD to get into AC range.
Disrupter and web you say?
Welcome to the world of shield tanking guys.From the few times ive flown the tempest ive never had any trouble hitting anything battleship size.Anything smaller then that yea you are going to need a web yea.So you should have to sacrifice a mid slot,a battleship is not a solo pwn mobile.And should have some support flying around with it,even more so when its a shield tank.
8/6/6 or 5 is the only real option.You should get 7 mid slots just so you don't have to deal with the problems every other shield tanker has to deal with.Yes the raven can hit any target and never miss at great ranges but so what?
Its so stupidly slow who wants to take one on a OP.And if they remove instas it should be even worse.I personaly am not gana wait for a ship that goes 140 m/s as we are trying to hunt.And fitting a MWD and tank on it really is not possible.
But even with 6 slots the Maelstrom will be able to do that.
BTW i fly pure minmatar.And am training up for the sliepnir,but even i know this thing is overpowered with 7 slots.
CCP where are our t2 shield power relays? | Join[..SIN] |

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 15:58:00 -
[295]
Originally by: xeom i think maelstrom should not have 7 meds
Read this thread for the reasons. Its not overpowered. Personally i would like 8/6/6 with a armor tanking bonus, but 8/7/5 is just fine too.
--- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |

xeom
Obsidian Sins
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 16:04:00 -
[296]
Originally by: Jim McGregor
Originally by: xeom i think maelstrom should not have 7 meds
Read this thread for the reasons. Its not overpowered. Personally i would like 8/6/6 with a armor tanking bonus, but 8/7/5 is just fine too.
Jim if you can shield tank(the best) and still have room for a MWD and scrabler or web its overpowered.Its something every shield tanker suffers from,just becuase you got it doesnt not exempt you from it.
CCP where are our t2 shield power relays? | Join[..SIN] |

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 16:06:00 -
[297]
Originally by: xeom
Jim if you can shield tank(the best) and still have room for a MWD and scrabler or web its overpowered.Its something every shield tanker suffers from,just becuase you got it doesnt not exempt you from it.
I think you are comparing the maelstrom to tier 1/2 ships. If you compare it to the tier 3 ships, you will see my reasoning i think. 
--- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |

Ath Amon
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 16:11:00 -
[298]
Originally by: Apertotes
so, what's stopping you from fitting 1, 2 or even 3 heavy nos on the new BS? oh yes, that you have 8 turret hard points... so the cyclone is better cause it only has 5 and lets you room to fit nos? so if, for example, tux went nuts and gave the cyclone 8 turret hardpoints, it would be a worse ship than it is now?
nothing but a tempest do basically the same damage with just 6 guns or if you prefer 6 guns 2 nos, it will also be faster and more maneuverable... so why to use the new BS if i have alredy the tempest?
yes the new ship will have more shield tankage but the tempest will balance that with dps, signature, agility and speed and also can chose to go on the armor tank route and fit ecm (ebil!!!) in mid slots
|

xeom
Obsidian Sins
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 16:12:00 -
[299]
Originally by: Jim McGregor Edited by: Jim McGregor on 26/07/2006 16:09:32
Originally by: xeom
Jim if you can shield tank(the best) and still have room for a MWD and scrabler or web its overpowered.Its something every shield tanker suffers from,just becuase you got it doesnt not exempt you from it.
I think you are comparing the maelstrom to tier 1/2 ships. If you compare it to the tier 3 ships, you will see my reasoning i think. 
Edit: By the way, just read this as well. I think we need MORE med slots... 
I guess you're assuming the rokh will have 7 mid slots also? Which i think will goto waste on a sniper boat per say.But yes if the rokh does in fact get 7 mid slots the Maelstrom might be up for 7 too.
CCP where are our t2 shield power relays? | Join[..SIN] |

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 16:14:00 -
[300]
Originally by: xeom stuff
Check the link and tell me what you think...
--- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |
|

Sarmaul
0utbreak
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 16:17:00 -
[301]
Originally by: xeom Jim if you can shield tank(the best) and still have room for a MWD and scrabler or web its overpowered.Its something every shield tanker suffers from,just becuase you got it doesnt not exempt you from it.
Bull**** tbh.
TEAM MINMATAR FORUMS - In Rust We Trust - |

xeom
Obsidian Sins
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 16:19:00 -
[302]
Originally by: Sarmaul
Originally by: xeom Jim if you can shield tank(the best) and still have room for a MWD and scrabler or web its overpowered.Its something every shield tanker suffers from,just becuase you got it doesnt not exempt you from it.
Bull**** tbh.
Please show me any shield tanker t1 that can tank and mwd/scramb. A real shield tank please.
If you do i will submit and agree that it infact needs 7 mid slots.
CCP where are our t2 shield power relays? | Join[..SIN] |

Wrayeth
PAX Interstellar Services Veritas Immortalis
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 16:20:00 -
[303]
Edited by: Wrayeth on 26/07/2006 16:22:12
Originally by: xeom Jim if you can shield tank(the best) and still have room for a MWD and scrabler or web its overpowered.Its something every shield tanker suffers from,just becuase you got it doesnt not exempt you from it.
I'm not Jim, but you couldn't be more wrong. See, you're forgetting something: the other shield tankers are MISSILE BOATS. Yes, that's right - MISSILE BOATS. You know, the guys who don't need to worry about MWD to get into range, or webs to hit their target in the first place? I should know - I have Caldari freakin' battleship 5.
Turret boats need a MWD and web in addition to the scrambler (missile boat shield tanks can generally spare 1 slot for a scrambler, even the raven). -Wrayeth
"Look, pa! I just contributed absolutely nothing to this thread!"
|

xeom
Obsidian Sins
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 16:22:00 -
[304]
All i see on that page jim is talk about the Hyperion.What part are you talking about?
CCP where are our t2 shield power relays? | Join[..SIN] |

Sarmaul
0utbreak
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 16:23:00 -
[305]
Edited by: Sarmaul on 26/07/2006 16:24:31 Edited by: Sarmaul on 26/07/2006 16:23:41
Originally by: xeom
Originally by: Sarmaul
Originally by: xeom Jim if you can shield tank(the best) and still have room for a MWD and scrabler or web its overpowered.Its something every shield tanker suffers from,just becuase you got it doesnt not exempt you from it.
Bull**** tbh.
Please show me any shield tanker t1 that can tank and mwd/scramb. A real shield tank please.
If you do i will submit and agree that it infact needs 7 mid slots.
What is a "real shield tank"?
Edit: Btw, Cyclone. In fact, seeing as the Maelstrom is based of the Cyclone, it should be a shield tanking mwd tacking thingy.
TEAM MINMATAR FORUMS - In Rust We Trust - |

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 16:24:00 -
[306]
Edited by: Jim McGregor on 26/07/2006 16:24:29
--- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |

Tyler Lowe
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 16:25:00 -
[307]
I was so looking forward to this tier 3 ship, and now that I see it's a shield tanking Apoc with projectiles, it does nothing much for me. I don't doubt it'll have it's uses, probably mostly sitting on gates popping passersby while it permatanks gate guns.
I had hoped for a toned down Marchariel, but instead we get an oversized Cyclone. The 8 turrets are nice, we'll see if it has the grid to actually fit 8 1400mm or if the next batch of whine threads will be on how you can only fit 7 guns, and the Tempest is therefore outdamaging this slow, ponderous addition to the lineup. As far as the rate of fire bonus goes, I've said it before, and I'll repeat it here, if the ship uses projectiles, and it's "damage" bonus is rate of fire, it needs a built in tracking mod.
I'm not condemning the ship before seeing final stats, but it's not really in line, from what little we've been told (subject to change at that) with what I had hoped to see. J.A.F.O.
|

Wrayeth
PAX Interstellar Services Veritas Immortalis
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 16:25:00 -
[308]
Originally by: xeom
Please show me any shield tanker t1 that can tank and mwd/scramb. A real shield tank please.
If you do i will submit and agree that it infact needs 7 mid slots.
Shield tankers do not need a MWD. They're always in range. Short range turret ships are not.
However, here's a raven with a scrambler that can wtfpwn anything from HACs to assault frigs to other battleships:
6 siege II 2 medium nos (ghoul or better, for CPU)
1 XL C5L shield booster 1 faint 20km scrambler 1 heavy electrochem cap injector 1 shield boost amp 2 invuln field II
3 ballistic control II 1 RCU II 1 coprocessor II -Wrayeth
"Look, pa! I just contributed absolutely nothing to this thread!"
|

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 16:28:00 -
[309]
Originally by: xeom All i see on that page jim is talk about the Hyperion.What part are you talking about?
Actually it doesnt really matter. One goonfleet member have made a excel sheet you can download which shows that Maelstrom is only good at tanking, while the rest of the ships are dps monsters.
Later in the thread DigitalCommunist says he feels Maelstrom is the only balanced ship of the 4 new ones, and that Rokh and Abaddon are horribly overpowered and Hyperion is useless.
Im not saying they are right, but if they are, you are picking on the wrong ship here mate. 
--- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |

xeom
Obsidian Sins
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 16:33:00 -
[310]
Originally by: Wrayeth Edited by: Wrayeth on 26/07/2006 16:22:12
Originally by: xeom Jim if you can shield tank(the best) and still have room for a MWD and scrabler or web its overpowered.Its something every shield tanker suffers from,just becuase you got it doesnt not exempt you from it.
I'm not Jim, but you couldn't be more wrong. See, you're forgetting something: the other shield tankers are MISSILE BOATS. Yes, that's right - MISSILE BOATS. You know, the guys who don't need to worry about MWD to get into range, or webs to hit their target in the first place? I should know - I have Caldari freakin' battleship 5.
Turret boats need a MWD and web in addition to the scrambler (missile boat shield tanks can generally spare 1 slot for a scrambler, even the raven).
Considering a 3xInvi 1xBooster-XL 1xAmp 1xCap booster
Which i believe is the best tank a raven can ever hope to fit.You would have to drop the amp to fit a scrambler.Fine i made a sacrifice and now can hold my target down.
So why shouldn't the minmatar one have to make some sacrifices?Lets take a closer look.
3xInvi field 1xBooster-XL 1xCap booster 1xMWD (better then the raven,built in faction amp remeber) Bam right there you should have a fine ship.Able to take on most battleships.And it really shouldn't have a problem hitting anything its own size.
Now you say you wan't to hold you targets down,and hit smaller targets targets like cruisers and mabye even a frigate.
Again you must do a trade of and drop a invi field.Sure you will have less tank but it balances out just like with the raven.And that my friends is what we like to call balance.
CCP where are our t2 shield power relays? | Join[..SIN] |
|

Sarmaul
0utbreak
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 16:35:00 -
[311]
Edited by: Sarmaul on 26/07/2006 16:36:14 The big difference is that a close range battleship needs a web. The Raven can switch to Javelin torps and own the majority of ships smaller. Where is the high tracking projectile ammo with a turret sig radius reduction?
Oh yeah, there isn't one.
TEAM MINMATAR FORUMS - In Rust We Trust - |

Apertotes
Nuevos Horizontes
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 16:46:00 -
[312]
Originally by: xeom
Originally by: Wrayeth Edited by: Wrayeth on 26/07/2006 16:22:12
Originally by: xeom Jim if you can shield tank(the best) and still have room for a MWD and scrabler or web its overpowered.Its something every shield tanker suffers from,just becuase you got it doesnt not exempt you from it.
I'm not Jim, but you couldn't be more wrong. See, you're forgetting something: the other shield tankers are MISSILE BOATS. Yes, that's right - MISSILE BOATS. You know, the guys who don't need to worry about MWD to get into range, or webs to hit their target in the first place? I should know - I have Caldari freakin' battleship 5.
Turret boats need a MWD and web in addition to the scrambler (missile boat shield tanks can generally spare 1 slot for a scrambler, even the raven).
Considering a 3xInvi 1xBooster-XL 1xAmp 1xCap booster
Which i believe is the best tank a raven can ever hope to fit.You would have to drop the amp to fit a scrambler.Fine i made a sacrifice and now can hold my target down.
So why shouldn't the minmatar one have to make some sacrifices?Lets take a closer look.
3xInvi field 1xBooster-XL 1xCap booster 1xMWD (better then the raven,built in faction amp remeber) Bam right there you should have a fine ship.Able to take on most battleships.And it really shouldn't have a problem hitting anything its own size.
Now you say you wan't to hold you targets down,and hit smaller targets targets like cruisers and mabye even a frigate.
Again you must do a trade of and drop a invi field.Sure you will have less tank but it balances out just like with the raven.And that my friends is what we like to call balance.
the raven, although suited for shield tank, is not a dedicated shield tanker. its bonuses apply to missiles, and it only has one less low slot than med slot, so it can be armor tanked.
on the other hand, both the rokh and the maelstrom are dedicated shield tankers, just as much as the ferox and the cyclone, and that is why they need 7 medium slots, because given their bonus, they can not choose to armor tank like the raven (or at least, they can not do it without negating one of the bonuses).
so stop all that cr*p about "OH NOES, THE MAELSTROM WILL HAVE A BETTER TANK THAN MY DEAR RAVEN!!!!!!NERFNERFNERFNERF!!!!" yes, it will, get over it. the raven is not a tank ship.
Apertotes, the Guybrush Threepwood of New Eve |

xeom
Obsidian Sins
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 16:47:00 -
[313]
Originally by: Sarmaul Edited by: Sarmaul on 26/07/2006 16:36:14 The big difference is that a close range battleship needs a web. The Raven can switch to Javelin torps and own the majority of ships smaller. Where is the high tracking projectile ammo with a turret sig radius reduction?
Oh yeah, there isn't one.
and a pvp ship needs a disrupter? Whats you're point exchange one think for the other.Better tank or holding onto targets/shooting smaller ones.
CCP where are our t2 shield power relays? | Join[..SIN] |

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 16:50:00 -
[314]
Edited by: Jim McGregor on 26/07/2006 16:50:46 I fully expect this ship to die to all the others on the test server. Not sure what it is about tanking that attracts attention, while the huge dps numbers of the other ships isnt as interesting.
Maybe you feel this ship can tank the dps from the other new battleships...well. We'll see.
--- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |

arbitrary
Bad luck Clover Inc.
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 16:51:00 -
[315]
Originally by: xeom
:Xeom's raven: 3xInvi 1xBooster-XL 1xAmp 1xCap booster
:Xeom's maelstrom: 3xInvi field 1xBooster-XL 1xCap booster 1xMWD
:words:
Again you must do a trade of and drop a invi field.Sure you will have less tank but it balances out just like with the raven.And that my friends is what we like to call balance.
As Sarmaul pointed out the raven loads javelins and would be done with it. besides being able to shoot at any range, without tracking problems and being a cheaper ship.
not to mention the tracking mods you would need for arties.
___ Arbi all I want is for you to smile. |

xeom
Obsidian Sins
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 16:51:00 -
[316]
Edited by: xeom on 26/07/2006 16:51:46 try not to freak out to much Apertotes.
Considering the highest caldarie skill i have is frigate lvl 3,its not becuase i don't wan't "my" raven to be nerfed.
I just think 7 slots would be to much.I mean if it goes threw cool a new ship to camp gates with(should be deady easy).
CCP where are our t2 shield power relays? | Join[..SIN] |

Wrayeth
PAX Interstellar Services Veritas Immortalis
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 16:53:00 -
[317]
Originally by: xeom
Considering a 3xInvi 1xBooster-XL 1xAmp 1xCap booster
Which i believe is the best tank a raven can ever hope to fit.You would have to drop the amp to fit a scrambler.Fine i made a sacrifice and now can hold my target down.
Why in the world would you drop the boost amp for the scrambler? The shield resist increase you're getting from teh third invulnerability field isn't enough to warrant fitting it in the first place - you'd be better off going with 2 invulns and a photon scattering in addition to the amp, if anything. Even assuming that, you'd be better off dropping the photon scattering than the boost amp, because you'd only be lowering your tank vs. EM damage as opposed to reducing your tanking ability vs. all damage types.
Your basic premise is invalid - if you drop anything, you would need to drop the third invulnerability field (which should've been a photon scattering field, anyway). Of course, that was exactly what was listed in my setup.
Quote: So why shouldn't the minmatar one have to make some sacrifices?Lets take a closer look.
3xInvi field 1xBooster-XL 1xCap booster 1xMWD (better then the raven,built in faction amp remeber) Bam right there you should have a fine ship.Able to take on most battleships.And it really shouldn't have a problem hitting anything its own size.
Have you ever fired a turret? At all? I guarantee you it can't hit unwebbed battleships orbiting at 2500m or closer worth a damn, maybe even 5000m or closer. And hitting smaller ships? That's a total and complete joke, without a web.
MISS MISS MISS MISS
Wait...you're telling me that my battleship shouldn't be able to hit the smaller stuff at all in the first place? Tell that to the raven, or the blasterthron (which has the slots for a web, scrambler, MWD, and cap injector, plus an armor tank) or the 'geddon (which has the slots for web, scrambler, and cap injector, and doesn't need a MWD in the first place).
And, again, you put on a third invulnerability field instead of a scrambler. If you PvP at all--which it looks like you do not--you'd realize that there's no point in even trying if you can't keep your target from warping off.
Quote: Now you say you wan't to hold you targets down,and hit smaller targets targets like cruisers and mabye even a frigate.
Again you must do a trade of and drop a invi field.Sure you will have less tank but it balances out just like with the raven.And that my friends is what we like to call balance.
No, it doesn't, because then you're fitting a web and no scrambler, and your target warps off. You need both the web AND the scrambler, otherwise you might as well attack CONCORD, because the results will be the same - you losing. The same with the MWD - you need it to get in range to hit in the first place. -Wrayeth
"Look, pa! I just contributed absolutely nothing to this thread!"
|

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 16:53:00 -
[318]
Originally by: xeom
I just think 7 slots would be to much.I mean if it goes threw cool a new ship to camp gates with(should be deady easy).
Yeah, while the rest of the ships snipe the gates. Not really a big difference, is it. Besides, i think people will use this ship to snipe as well. Its just so much better than tanking sentries.
--- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |

Sarmaul
0utbreak
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 16:54:00 -
[319]
You know, I haven't yet heard one good argument as to who it shouldn't get 8/7/4 other than the typical "meh meh meh it's not caldari so it can't have a good tank, dispite the devs saying that's the point of the ship".
TEAM MINMATAR FORUMS - In Rust We Trust - |

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 16:56:00 -
[320]
Originally by: Sarmaul You know, I haven't yet heard one good argument as to who it shouldn't get 8/7/4 other than the typical "meh meh meh it's not caldari so it can't have a good tank, dispite the devs saying that's the point of the ship".
It becomes 8/7/5 if its supposed to have 20 slots.
--- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |
|

Double TaP
The Establishment
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 16:58:00 -
[321]
Originally by: Sarmaul You know, I haven't yet heard one good argument as to who it shouldn't get 8/7/4 other than the typical "meh meh meh it's not caldari so it can't have a good tank, dispite the devs saying that's the point of the ship".
I think it should. The ship race doesnt matter, if its a shield tanker its a shield tanker, but I also think the raven needs a 7th mid.
|

Wrayeth
PAX Interstellar Services Veritas Immortalis
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 16:59:00 -
[322]
Originally by: Sarmaul You know, I haven't yet heard one good argument as to who it shouldn't get 8/7/4 other than the typical "meh meh meh it's not caldari so it can't have a good tank, dispite the devs saying that's the point of the ship".
True, that. The funny thing is, I'm Caldari and I have no problem with this--I even have Caldari battleship 5, own a siege launcher II BPO, etc. -Wrayeth
"Look, pa! I just contributed absolutely nothing to this thread!"
|

Double TaP
The Establishment
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 17:00:00 -
[323]
Originally by: Wrayeth
His point is that you need BOTH the web and the scrambler. And, of course, you also need a MWD to get in range in the first place.
Yes, this is true. But these things dont affect your tank at all. The mid slots are where all the utilities that you need go, yet Caldari have to put their tank there as well. So like i posted in the other maelstrom thread about slots, its really not right that you have to hurt your tank because you HAVE to fit a scrambler. heaven forbid you need something like a target painter, a web, or an ab/mwd.
|

Wrayeth
PAX Interstellar Services Veritas Immortalis
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 17:00:00 -
[324]
Originally by: Double TaP
I think it should. The ship race doesnt matter, if its a shield tanker its a shield tanker, but I also think the raven needs a 7th mid.
Yeah, a 7th mid would be nice, for sure, but only if you didn't lose a low for it. Or if you lost the low but gained enough CPU or grid that it didn't screw over the worthwhile torp setups. -Wrayeth
"Look, pa! I just contributed absolutely nothing to this thread!"
|

xeom
Obsidian Sins
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 17:01:00 -
[325]
Wrayeth on the whole part about tanking the raven ill take you're word for it.Ive never flown a raven so i would have no idea.Just mounted what looked best to me at the time.
Personaly i think nerf the raven and megas ablilty to hit smaller targets.
CCP where are our t2 shield power relays? | Join[..SIN] |

Double TaP
The Establishment
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 17:02:00 -
[326]
Originally by: Wrayeth
Originally by: Double TaP
I think it should. The ship race doesnt matter, if its a shield tanker its a shield tanker, but I also think the raven needs a 7th mid.
Yeah, a 7th mid would be nice, for sure, but only if you didn't lose a low for it. Or if you lost the low but gained enough CPU or grid that it didn't screw over the worthwhile torp setups.
QFT. I wouldn't even mind it losing low, although I wouldnt see why it would be necessary at all because it wouldn't give it anything special.
|

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 17:03:00 -
[327]
Yeah, and i think this ship needs 7 lows too... for damage. The dps on this ship sucks so we need more low slots. 
--- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |

Sarmaul
0utbreak
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 17:04:00 -
[328]
Originally by: Wrayeth own a siege launcher II BPO, etc.
Cheap rates for forum *****s? Torps 5 finishes tomorrow 
TEAM MINMATAR FORUMS - In Rust We Trust - |

Wrayeth
PAX Interstellar Services Veritas Immortalis
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 17:04:00 -
[329]
Originally by: xeom Wrayeth on the whole part about tanking the raven ill take you're word for it.Ive never flown a raven so i would have no idea.Just mounted what looked best to me at the time.
Personaly i think nerf the raven and megas ablilty to hit smaller targets.
You would also need to nerf the ability of the typhoon, the tempest, the scorpion, the dominix, the 'geddon, and the apoc, because all of them can fit a good tank and still have the required midslot modules for short range fighting. Basically, you're saying nerf every battleship because they shouldn't be able to hit smaller targets at all. -Wrayeth
"Look, pa! I just contributed absolutely nothing to this thread!"
|

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 17:06:00 -
[330]
Tuxford hasnt even posted today... he said he would. He is probably just shaking his head at all this rabble rabble rabble going on.
I wouldnt want his job.
--- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |
|

zoturi
Karjala Inc.
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 17:09:00 -
[331]
post which makes all "happy", aint easy to write..
|

Wrayeth
PAX Interstellar Services Veritas Immortalis
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 17:09:00 -
[332]
Originally by: Jim McGregor
Tuxford hasnt even posted today... he said he would. He is probably just shaking his head at all this rabble rabble rabble going on.
I wouldnt want his job.
Yeah. I feel for the man; the weight of the nerf bat must really drag him down at times. -Wrayeth
"Look, pa! I just contributed absolutely nothing to this thread!"
|

arbitrary
Bad luck Clover Inc.
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 17:10:00 -
[333]
Originally by: Jim McGregor
Tuxford hasnt even posted today... he said he would. He is probably just shaking his head at all this rabble rabble rabble going on.
I wouldnt want his job.
Agreed.
I do hope he expected whinage, but all the personal insults and threats some people are throwing around towards him are just too low 
___ Arbi all I want is for you to smile. |

arbitrary
Bad luck Clover Inc.
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 17:13:00 -
[334]
Originally by: zoturi post which makes all "happy", aint easy to write..
I do not want to be the man that grows angry from "I love all of you, group hug!"
but yeah I think those are around as well 
___ Arbi all I want is for you to smile. |

SengH
Black Omega Security E.R.A
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 17:14:00 -
[335]
Originally by: arbitrary
Originally by: Jim McGregor
Tuxford hasnt even posted today... he said he would. He is probably just shaking his head at all this rabble rabble rabble going on.
I wouldnt want his job.
Agreed.
I do hope he expected whinage, but all the personal insults and threats some people are throwing around towards him are just too low 
nah this is nothing compared to what happened when he announced the drone changes.
|

Ath Amon
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 17:20:00 -
[336]
yup i agree
i'm very critical about the mael (and acs :P) and for sure i try to express my criticism bringing my (subjective) reasons
but people that started to insult him and his work are really taking this too much over the good sense, you can't insult a guy because it doesn't do the ship you want and i really hope Tux will consider these guys and their threats as they are...
i said i'm critique but i still appreciate Tux work and, even if i think some things should be a bit different, i have max respect for him... and so i think (and hope) is the same for the big part of guys that try to bring constructive criticism
|

Zanarkand
Gallente
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 17:49:00 -
[337]
Edited by: Zanarkand on 26/07/2006 17:56:28 Raven: 2 t2 invul, shield boost amp, cap booster, xl booster, 20km disruptor
Maelstorm, 2 t2 invul, shield boost amp, cap booster, xl booster, 20km disruptor, built in faction boost amp, mwd, web
MWD and web aren't there only "due to the nature of ACs" They have plenty of other uses such as getting to scramble range/controlling range/keeping the enemy in scramble range/running away etc. For example any close range BS with mwd can just swim out of the scramble range and just warp off from the shieldtanked Ravens.
|

gu o
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 18:16:00 -
[338]
What happened?!?!
This ship is all too neat and orderly for mini..were did my crazy crash-into battle style go?
I meen mini can best be summed up as: "Minmatar are like going down a flight of stairs on an office chair shooting a uzi"
Big, scary, sharp teeth (insert scary, angry bear here)like that. I must be the scarriest carebear ever... |

JaxxFunk
Soul Collectors
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 18:19:00 -
[339]
You guys need to get girlfriends. You'd soon realise that this stuff really has no significance in life and there's much more to worry about in life than the fictional performance of spaceships in an online computer game.
Rant over.
That said, I wish the Maelstrom was a fast bs...
|

Double TaP
The Establishment
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 18:22:00 -
[340]
Originally by: JaxxFunk You guys need to get girlfriends. You'd soon realise that this stuff really has no significance in life and there's much more to worry about in life than the fictional performance of spaceships in an online computer game.
Rant over.
That said, I wish the Maelstrom was a fast bs...
shutup
|
|

Valea Silpha
Cereal Killerz Chimaera Pact
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 18:23:00 -
[341]
Originally by: JaxxFunk You guys need to get girlfriends. You'd soon realise that this stuff really has no significance in life and there's much more to worry about in life than the fictional performance of spaceships in an online computer game.
Rant over.
That said, I wish the Maelstrom was a fast bs...
I have a fiance 
That being said i would marry tux if he gave us a big stabber 
<Hammerhead> TomB is doing the nerfing <Hammerhead> I just stand behind him, look at his monitor and shake my head |

Valea Silpha
Cereal Killerz Chimaera Pact
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 18:24:00 -
[342]
Edited by: Valea Silpha on 26/07/2006 18:24:02 double post
<Hammerhead> TomB is doing the nerfing <Hammerhead> I just stand behind him, look at his monitor and shake my head |

arbitrary
Bad luck Clover Inc.
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 19:15:00 -
[343]
Edited by: arbitrary on 26/07/2006 19:15:32
Originally by: gu o This ship is all too neat and orderly for mini..were did my crazy crash-into battle style go?
I somewhat miss this as well, and like so many others it seems, hoped for a stabber version 
good desciption on how minmatar should be by the way, I need to keep that one around. 
___ Arbi all I want is for you to smile. |

Jet Collins
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 19:21:00 -
[344]
I also feel that this ship does not flow with the minmatar style not being light/fast. But it will be nice to see what the slot lay out is for the shield tank. and the 8 turrents will be interesting. I always wanted one, just wish it had more alpha stike.
Now this forum has mostly been about the mid and low slot I would like to Add what is it getting for a drone bay. Well since it is big and slow and big drone back hopfully?
IE at least 200m3 so it can fit at least 4 larges to be inline with the cyclones 4 mediums.
anyway thats all Tux has enough to ready 
|

Ath Amon
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 19:41:00 -
[345]
Edited by: Ath Amon on 26/07/2006 19:41:43 i think the drone bay will be the same of the tempest, possibly even smaller.
all these ships seem to have quite a poor drone bay also tux stated that tempest with 6 guns is lower dps while tempest with 6g+missiles will outdps it
it have not mentioned drones (as he have done comparing mega and hype dps) so i assume they are pretty the same
|

Raider Zero
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 20:46:00 -
[346]
Ladies and gentlemen, I give you.....the Minmatar PvE boat!
It tanks like crazy, but doesn't do a hell of a lot of damage. Sounds like a great ship for PvE so that people will maybe use something other than a Raven once in a while for missions.
One could also look at it as a Scorp on 'roids. It will make a capable sniper boat too. Also a good miner, but not as good as the new Gallente mining ship-the Hyperion. (lol)
|

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 22:36:00 -
[347]
Edited by: Jim McGregor on 26/07/2006 22:39:05
Originally by: Raider Zero Ladies and gentlemen, I give you.....the Minmatar PvE boat!
It tanks like crazy, but doesn't do a hell of a lot of damage. Sounds like a great ship for PvE so that people will maybe use something other than a Raven once in a while for missions.
One could also look at it as a Scorp on 'roids. It will make a capable sniper boat too. Also a good miner, but not as good as the new Gallente mining ship-the Hyperion. (lol)
I like to think of it as the Punching Bag. People will punch themself tired on it and hopefully this ship with outlast them. Thats the hope i have for it in pvp. It will be slow, so its probably meant more like a artillery shield tanker. Excellent gate camper probably too.
As for using it in missions instead of a raven.. well, maybe. The 8 turrets can have a combination of short range/long range projectiles and the many medium slots will allow it to tank alot of damage while also having a afterburner. The only concern here is the massive amount of autocannon ammo this ship will use. 
--- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |

Isonkon Serikain
Gallente
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 22:48:00 -
[348]
Real smart of minmatars to shield tank... Works great against lasers... And making a slow close combat ship, wow, the devs, I mean minmatar engineers must have been high when they conceived this one... Ison's notches more notches |

VeNT
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 22:48:00 -
[349]
Originally by: Jim McGregor Edited by: Jim McGregor on 26/07/2006 22:39:05
Originally by: Raider Zero Ladies and gentlemen, I give you.....the Minmatar PvE boat!
It tanks like crazy, but doesn't do a hell of a lot of damage. Sounds like a great ship for PvE so that people will maybe use something other than a Raven once in a while for missions.
One could also look at it as a Scorp on 'roids. It will make a capable sniper boat too. Also a good miner, but not as good as the new Gallente mining ship-the Hyperion. (lol)
I like to think of it as the Punching Bag. People will punch themself tired on it and hopefully this ship with outlast them. Thats the hope i have for it in pvp. It will be slow, so its probably meant more like a artillery shield tanker. Excellent gate camper probably too.
As for using it in missions instead of a raven.. well, maybe. The 8 turrets can have a combination of short range/long range projectiles and the many medium slots will allow it to tank alot of damage while also having a afterburner. The only concern here is the massive amount of autocannon ammo this ship will use. 
nothing wrong with using LOADS of large projectile ammo! keeps those people who make ammo in the black doesn't it?
-------------------- Selena 001 > has VeNT left system? its gone really quiet! |

Pesadel0
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 22:50:00 -
[350]
Edited by: Pesadel0 on 26/07/2006 22:50:38
Originally by: Isonkon Serikain Real smart of minmatars to shield tank... Works great against lasers... And making a slow close combat ship, wow, the devs, I mean minmatar engineers must have been high when they conceived this one...
LOL the amar whining about our resistances did have some effect lol.
|
|

ProphetGuru
Gallente
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 23:01:00 -
[351]
As someone who has flown minnie bs since beta, all I can say so far about this ship is meh...
It has definate possibilities, however untill I see the actual numbers on it's; Slot layout grid cpu mass speed targeting range hp (shield armor hull) cap amount cap recharge cargo hold
I think I'll just have to take a wait and see attitude about it. I am somewhat disappointed that Tux is, after 1 1/2 years of armor tanking focus on min battleships, going in a direction that places a training burden on a racial ship type that already commands a far more intensive skill set then other races. I can accept it if it is worth it, but having a slave set clone for nagalfars and a crystal set clone for a bs makes me frown.
The 8/7/4-5 sounds good, but I have a bad feeling about it actually happening.
If we get 8-6-6 as many are suggesting, I'd like to see them split the tanking bonus to apply to both armor or shield tanking, but I don't see that happening either to be honest.
In closing... meh
Evolution..... Just when you thought you were winning.
|

Vera Nosfyu
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 23:02:00 -
[352]
I just hope that they get their explosive crystal the same time we get our new BS. That'll learn 'em to whine too much. -----------------------------------------------------------
"Violence solves all problems, no man, no problem." --Josef Stalin |

RoMUF
|
Posted - 2006.07.26 23:45:00 -
[353]
hmm if it could fit 1200mm's with a bit of a shield tank or ew.. could be a nice fleet ship.
guess it all dpends on the pg/cpu
|

Boris2k
Elite United Corp Antigo Dominion
|
Posted - 2006.07.27 08:17:00 -
[354]
what about these custom "rigs" u will be able to attach.. what effect would that have?
|

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.27 08:49:00 -
[355]
Originally by: Boris2k what about these custom "rigs" u will be able to attach.. what effect would that have?
No idea yet. And those are not race specific as far as I know. They can be used on all ships. So doesnt really have anything to do with this ship.
Anyway, I can see some purpose for this ship, but its a damn shame to see gallente get the fast, agile battleship with uber damage. I think something that powerful should be slow.
But I guess people will see on the test server... i cant really fly any battleships good, im going for the Vaga. At least the hyperion wont catch that one.
--- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |

Boris2k
Elite United Corp Antigo Dominion
|
Posted - 2006.07.27 09:23:00 -
[356]
i meant could you use them to make this thing something uber?
|

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.27 09:25:00 -
[357]
Originally by: Boris2k i meant could you use them to make this thing something uber?
Not really. Even if you equip a rig with 5% extra shield boost, someone else will have a rig with 5% extra damage. I dont expect rigs to give uber advantages. Maybe just a few percent to something.
--- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |

Winter Star
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.27 09:28:00 -
[358]
Have you read the Hyperion thread? Just as many whiners in there as in here.....
it's got bad tracking the cap bonus is useless no drones omg!!11
are some of the things falling out of the sky in that thread 
Greener grass......?
|

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.27 09:30:00 -
[359]
Originally by: Winter Star Have you read the Hyperion thread? Just as many whiners in there as in here.....
it's got bad tracking the cap bonus is useless no drones omg!!11
are some of the things falling out of the sky in that thread 
Greener grass......?
Tracking doesnt matter when target is webbed. Cap bonus doesnt matter because everyone will use a cap injector anyway. No idea what they are going on about.
--- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |

Rafein
Eye of God Axiom Empire
|
Posted - 2006.07.27 10:14:00 -
[360]
Hmm, I wonder if it is possible to make the ship absorb more damage the the gallente can do?
I mean, 2 Pith Shield BOost Amplifiers and an Crystal Set, with Minnie BS 5, your getting close to what, 125% shield boost? Through in a Pith-X X-large shield boost, it's 840 for 400 cap (360 with compensation), every 4 seconds, so your looking at near 1900 boost every 4 seconds. With only 3 mids used, even 3 invuln fields and a Damage control in a low, should get you close to 60% resists vs. all. Then siple add Power Diags in the lows for cap recharge, and to boost shield and shield recharge at same time, and well, can any non-capital kill this thing without NOS?
|
|

Rafein
Eye of God Axiom Empire
|
Posted - 2006.07.27 10:14:00 -
[361]
Hmm, I wonder if it is possible to make the ship absorb more damage the the gallente can do?
I mean, 2 Pith Shield BOost Amplifiers and an Crystal Set, with Minnie BS 5, your getting close to what, 125% shield boost? Through in a Pith-X X-large shield boost, it's 840 for 400 cap (360 with compensation), every 4 seconds, so your looking at near 1900 boost every 4 seconds. With only 3 mids used, even 3 invuln fields and a Damage control in a low, should get you close to 60% resists vs. all. Then siple add Power Diags in the lows for cap recharge, and to boost shield and shield recharge at same time, and well, can any non-capital kill this thing without NOS?
|

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.27 10:18:00 -
[362]
Originally by: Rafein Hmm, I wonder if it is possible to make the ship absorb more damage the the gallente can do?
I mean, 2 Pith Shield BOost Amplifiers and an Crystal Set, with Minnie BS 5, your getting close to what, 125% shield boost? Through in a Pith-X X-large shield boost, it's 840 for 400 cap (360 with compensation), every 4 seconds, so your looking at near 1900 boost every 4 seconds. With only 3 mids used, even 3 invuln fields and a Damage control in a low, should get you close to 60% resists vs. all. Then siple add Power Diags in the lows for cap recharge, and to boost shield and shield recharge at same time, and well, can any non-capital kill this thing without NOS?
Yeah, the 0.0000001% of pilots using that will have a really good ship. And they lose about 5 billion or so when they get killed and podded, right? Alrighty then.  --- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |

Rafein
Eye of God Axiom Empire
|
Posted - 2006.07.27 10:34:00 -
[363]
yeah, but even without going all rare drop out, with 2 Boost Amplifiers, you'll be gettin nearly double the shield boost from tech 2's. Throw on any kinda resists and cap recharge, and your gonna be hard to pop
|

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.27 10:43:00 -
[364]
Yep. This ship seems to be built to outlast the others instead of doing good dps. But as soon as someone nosses it, its going to go down fast.
--- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |

Cerberal
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.07.27 11:28:00 -
[365]
Woa, 8/6/6, its like a fleet tempest for less or something =D
Highs: 8x 425mm II's
Meds: Xlarge boost, 2x Invuln IIs, shield amp, heavy injector, Warp disruptor.
Lows: 3x gyro II's, and 3x PDU II's (provided i have all the cpu for that, if not ill just put a CPU enhancer on)
Dronebay: 90m3? 3x webbers and 3x lights plz.
God what a sexy ship.
|

Aloysius Knight
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.07.27 11:38:00 -
[366]
make it 8-7-4 or 5 and i may will be happy with it
|

Omega Bloodstone
|
Posted - 2006.07.27 12:02:00 -
[367]
I see this ship as a champ! It supposedly can boost more than any ship that is non capital. Thats pretty serious. That would mean a likely resistence tank as opposed to passive. NOS, as mentioned before, would be the undoing of this ship. So, if you manage to find a way to counter the NOS attack then you may be unbreakable. Especially if a support ship or something else is pooring cap into it.
I do think its wierd that the Galante BS recieved a speed based boost, but thats okay because imho the Galante need an exciting ship. Don't get me wrong, Galante have great ships, but its hard to say that 1 Galante ship is as fun as my Vagabond.
I like the approach of the new Minnie ship. One thing that jerks me is that people are stating that this ship will require alot of training. Well, if you fly a Tempest with any skill than I cant see why this ship requires more. Shield should have already been trained because of the Jag, Cyclone, ect. If you are minnie and have not got projectiles trained up you dont even need to be in a Tempest. This ship is not nearly as skill needy as the new Phoon, meaning that someone could prolly be better i this faster than the Phoon.
|

SengH
Black Omega Security E.R.A
|
Posted - 2006.07.27 12:17:00 -
[368]
Edited by: SengH on 27/07/2006 12:18:19 going by chirrba's leaked stats here
3 max locked targets WTF? 460m sig radius LOL 115m/s (Same speed as raven) Want me to get out and push? 21 points ladar strenghth (Got jammed?) 90nm scan res (So much for being able to lock first)
Rokh has 7 mid slots and MORE SHIELD.
Yay for balanced ships.........
|

Aloysius Knight
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.07.27 12:23:00 -
[369]
Originally by: SengH Edited by: SengH on 27/07/2006 12:18:19 going by chirrba's leaked stats here
3 max locked targets WTF? 460m sig radius LOL 115m/s (Same speed as raven) Want me to get out and push? 21 points ladar strenghth (Got jammed?) 90nm scan res (So much for being able to lock first)
Rokh has 7 mid slots and MORE SHIELD.
Yay for balanced ships.........
hey there just catering to the whims of the whining caldari mass's 
|

Lonectzn
Pelennor Swarm Knights Of the Southerncross
|
Posted - 2006.07.27 12:38:00 -
[370]
For the record I was hoping on a vagapest, 8/6/6.
A little disappointed with what looks like a great ratting ship. Sounds like the best it will do will be to replace my Raven for plexes. Suppose that's not a bad thing however, not liking having to fly caldari 
-----------------
|
|

SengH
Black Omega Security E.R.A
|
Posted - 2006.07.27 12:48:00 -
[371]
hey all CCP needs to do is to give it a 4/4 t/l setup and call it the phoon mk2. Now it sucks twice as bad as the old phoon!
|

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.27 12:49:00 -
[372]
Originally by: Lonectzn For the record I was hoping on a vagapest, 8/6/6.
Its called Hyperion and its Gallente.
--- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |

Lenaria
|
Posted - 2006.07.27 13:06:00 -
[373]
6/6... Well, it will be semi-good NPC hunting ship and thats it. Still vastly inferior to Raven. Still inferior to Tempest as AC platform. Only equal to Tempest as arty platform... What role it have? Suck big time. And the funniest thing, its bonus and so-called "tank" is useless as arty platform - you need mids for SB and tracking. Weird, weird design. Now i can understand why Minmatars was slaves for so long.
|

Nafri
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.27 13:06:00 -
[374]
Originally by: Aloysius Knight
Originally by: SengH Edited by: SengH on 27/07/2006 12:18:19 going by chirrba's leaked stats here
3 max locked targets WTF? 460m sig radius LOL 115m/s (Same speed as raven) Want me to get out and push? 21 points ladar strenghth (Got jammed?) 90nm scan res (So much for being able to lock first)
Rokh has 7 mid slots and MORE SHIELD.
Yay for balanced ships.........
hey there just catering to the whims of the whining caldari mass's 
which is relly increadible:
125.000.000 vs 130.000.000
and that on the left is the minmatar ship.
From Dusk till Dawn Sig removed, e-mail us if you'd like to know why. -ReverendM ([email protected]) |

Jet Collins
|
Posted - 2006.07.27 13:08:00 -
[375]
Edited by: Jet Collins on 27/07/2006 13:13:39
Originally by: SengH Edited by: SengH on 27/07/2006 12:18:19 going by chirrba's leaked stats here
3 max locked targets WTF? 460m sig radius LOL 115m/s (Same speed as raven) Want me to get out and push? 21 points ladar strenghth (Got jammed?) 90nm scan res (So much for being able to lock first)
Rokh has 7 mid slots and MORE SHIELD.
Yay for balanced ships.........
# max targets is pretty weird so I would guess this is not final . How ever i think the stats are pretty good, in come cases.
Sig is large very large but I guess all the tier 3 are large accourding to that. Speed they said it would be slow so yes that sucks ladar streanght tempest has 19 I though higher was better? But heck I don;t use Ecm so what do i know.
Scanuing resolution yes sucks.
Shield HP more the the Tempest but not near what the fleet tempest as but this is probably because they want the active tank not a passive tank and if you have a good active tank you don't need all the HP. Plus the Capacitor is pretty large which should help run the active tank.
A few more things according to the the cargo compasity is less than the tempest which I think is really bad, espcailly if you need alot of ammo and possibly an injector.
I am happy with the drone bay though one more than the Tempest I will tank it 5 med and 2 webbers . or more damage with 4 t2 large .
Think thats all I have interesting stats though but I would not take them literly. As they said changes still will be made.
Ohh!!! also according to that its PG looks good should be able to fit 8 1400 with out to many Rcu's 
I remember Tux saying he was going to change a ship one way but when it got on the sever it was change a totaly different way Tux never mentioned so we just have to wait... a little longer only I hope.
|

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.27 13:09:00 -
[376]
Edited by: Jim McGregor on 27/07/2006 13:09:23
Originally by: Nafri
Originally by: Aloysius Knight
Originally by: SengH Edited by: SengH on 27/07/2006 12:18:19 going by chirrba's leaked stats here
3 max locked targets WTF? 460m sig radius LOL 115m/s (Same speed as raven) Want me to get out and push? 21 points ladar strenghth (Got jammed?) 90nm scan res (So much for being able to lock first)
Rokh has 7 mid slots and MORE SHIELD.
Yay for balanced ships.........
hey there just catering to the whims of the whining caldari mass's 
which is relly increadible:
125.000.000 vs 130.000.000
and that on the left is the minmatar ship.
About the mass, Hyperion has only 100.000.000, which actually beats the Tempests 102.500.000. Gallente got some good engineers it seems. The base speed of Hyperion is 130 too, faster than any other tier 3 battleship. Tempest has 140 still though, but have one less med slot compared to Hyperion.
--- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |

Leandro Salazar
Aeon Industries
|
Posted - 2006.07.27 13:20:00 -
[377]
Edited by: Leandro Salazar on 27/07/2006 13:24:52 8/6/6 kills the ship on both Hyperion and Maelstrom imho. Mael needs 7 mids and Hype needs 7 lows. Even if that means the other is only 4. --------- ZOMG my sig was concordokkened! Link removed due to bad language on remote site. -wystler
|

Nafri
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.27 13:23:00 -
[378]
for me it loooks like the hyperion will be a very nice longrange fleetship
it has damage, it has armor, it has midslots and it can even use a mwd easily.
From Dusk till Dawn Sig removed, e-mail us if you'd like to know why. -ReverendM ([email protected]) |

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.27 13:27:00 -
[379]
Edited by: Jim McGregor on 27/07/2006 13:27:39
Originally by: Nafri for me it loooks like the hyperion will be a very nice longrange fleetship
it has damage, it has armor, it has midslots and it can even use a mwd easily.
Its supposed to have a really crappy targeting range though. The Caldari Rokh is probably better for that purpose, specially since you get range bonuses and 7 med slots on it.
--- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |

Exiled One
Amarr
|
Posted - 2006.07.27 13:39:00 -
[380]
CCP has done it again, ****** it up once more. Maybe it's intensional, but why the **** would you post such stats to the public 
|
|

Nafri
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.27 13:41:00 -
[381]
Originally by: Jim McGregor Edited by: Jim McGregor on 27/07/2006 13:27:39
Originally by: Nafri for me it loooks like the hyperion will be a very nice longrange fleetship
it has damage, it has armor, it has midslots and it can even use a mwd easily.
Its supposed to have a really crappy targeting range though. The Caldari Rokh is probably better for that purpose, specially since you get range bonuses and 7 med slots on it.
it has 50km for now, enough to fight in 90% of the fleetfights, and it does really nice damage.
Perfect for gallente who wants to fight around 100km
From Dusk till Dawn Sig removed, e-mail us if you'd like to know why. -ReverendM ([email protected]) |

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.27 13:43:00 -
[382]
Originally by: Nafri
Originally by: Jim McGregor Edited by: Jim McGregor on 27/07/2006 13:27:39
Originally by: Nafri for me it loooks like the hyperion will be a very nice longrange fleetship
it has damage, it has armor, it has midslots and it can even use a mwd easily.
Its supposed to have a really crappy targeting range though. The Caldari Rokh is probably better for that purpose, specially since you get range bonuses and 7 med slots on it.
it has 50km for now, enough to fight in 90% of the fleetfights, and it does really nice damage.
Perfect for gallente who wants to fight around 100km
I think the Caldari ship can outdamage you at 100km since it can use better ammo with the range bonuses it gets. But im not 100%. Its probably close though.
--- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |

SengH
Black Omega Security E.R.A
|
Posted - 2006.07.27 13:44:00 -
[383]
Originally by: Jim McGregor
Originally by: Nafri
Originally by: Jim McGregor Edited by: Jim McGregor on 27/07/2006 13:27:39
Originally by: Nafri for me it loooks like the hyperion will be a very nice longrange fleetship
it has damage, it has armor, it has midslots and it can even use a mwd easily.
Its supposed to have a really crappy targeting range though. The Caldari Rokh is probably better for that purpose, specially since you get range bonuses and 7 med slots on it.
it has 50km for now, enough to fight in 90% of the fleetfights, and it does really nice damage.
Perfect for gallente who wants to fight around 100km
I think the Caldari ship can outdamage you at 100km since it can use better ammo with the range bonuses it gets. But im not 100%. Its probably close though.
Yeah they can hit using antimatter @ 100km
|

Nafri
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.27 13:49:00 -
[384]
Originally by: Jim McGregor
Originally by: Nafri
Originally by: Jim McGregor Edited by: Jim McGregor on 27/07/2006 13:27:39
Originally by: Nafri for me it loooks like the hyperion will be a very nice longrange fleetship
it has damage, it has armor, it has midslots and it can even use a mwd easily.
Its supposed to have a really crappy targeting range though. The Caldari Rokh is probably better for that purpose, specially since you get range bonuses and 7 med slots on it.
it has 50km for now, enough to fight in 90% of the fleetfights, and it does really nice damage.
Perfect for gallente who wants to fight around 100km
I think the Caldari ship can outdamage you at 100km since it can use better ammo with the range bonuses it gets. But im not 100%. Its probably close though.
But that doesnt matter, all what matters is whether you can outdamage the megathron or now
From Dusk till Dawn Sig removed, e-mail us if you'd like to know why. -ReverendM ([email protected]) |

Exiled One
Amarr
|
Posted - 2006.07.27 14:08:00 -
[385]
    minmatar tier 3 bs -- http://www.eve-online.com/itemdatabase/ships/cruisers/minmatar/630.asp     
Could be a missile platform.
|

Omega Bloodstone
|
Posted - 2006.07.27 14:08:00 -
[386]
Everyone, I know some folks are upset at the Minnie tier 3 at the moment. But one thing I have thought about is the combination of shield amps with Minnie BS lvl 5. I mean damn!!!! It will rep shield hard. So, based on a possible 6 mid slot option you could go:
XL shield booster named or tech II, em shield hardener II because its tier 1 and EM will need compensation for, tech II inv. field x's 2, a shield amp (CCP put the tech II version out now for this ship please!!!), and then a large extender II. Combine this with the 37.5% shield boost at BS level 5(note the amp adds 30%!!! to this for 67.5% total boost)and WOW!!! likely the best shield tank in the game with only 6 slots. (though I wish there was 7). Its actually prolly gonna be a damn good ship if not for the tank alone.
|

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.27 14:18:00 -
[387]
Edited by: Jim McGregor on 27/07/2006 14:20:24
Originally by: Omega Bloodstone Everyone, I know some folks are upset at the Minnie tier 3 at the moment. But one thing I have thought about is the combination of shield amps with Minnie BS lvl 5. I mean damn!!!! It will rep shield hard. So, based on a possible 6 mid slot option you could go:
XL shield booster named or tech II, em shield hardener II because its tier 1 and EM will need compensation for, tech II inv. field x's 2, a shield amp (CCP put the tech II version out now for this ship please!!!), and then a large extender II. Combine this with the 37.5% shield boost at BS level 5(note the amp adds 30%!!! to this for 67.5% total boost)and WOW!!! likely the best shield tank in the game with only 6 slots. (though I wish there was 7). Its actually prolly gonna be a damn good ship if not for the tank alone.
Its just a free shield boost amplifier. If Rokh puts in a extra one of those, he has 6 medium slots remaining just like this ship. Also he has a invulnerability field built in the ship (5% to all resists per level). And the Rokh has more base shield to start with too. And it has a range bonus, which means he can use better ammo than anyone else at a given range. DigitalCommunist calculated it to mean about 11% more damage.
So I dont know what the purpose of this ship is. Im still going to go with the theory that its supposed to be a good alpha damage ship, but then it would be better off with a damage bonus instead of rof.
--- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |

Lenaria
|
Posted - 2006.07.27 14:26:00 -
[388]
Heh, Gallente got exellent blasterboat and exellent fleet ship - Hyperion will excel in both roles. 1 extra mid with SB will offset short targeting range, and damage of that baby is better than Mega. Caldary got... well, you know that. Ammar got a ship which is better Apoc than Apoc and better Arma than Arma in the same time... enouth said. And minmatars got an victim of abortion again. Shield boosting bonus on something whats look like mediocre arty platform - which is only _slightly_ better than Tempest to begin with ... ergh. Not even resistance bonus which at least could be marginally usefull in that role. Great design, yea.
|

Exiled One
Amarr
|
Posted - 2006.07.27 14:28:00 -
[389]
Originally by: Lenaria Heh, Gallente got exellent blasterboat and exellent fleet ship - Hyperion will excel in both roles. 1 extra mid with SB will offset short targeting range, and damage of that baby is better than Mega. Caldary got... well, you know that. Ammar got a ship which is better Apoc than Apoc and better Arma than Arma in the same time... enouth said. And minmatars got an victim of abortion again. Shield boosting bonus on something whats look like mediocre arty platform - which is only _slightly_ better than Tempest to begin with ... ergh. Not even resistance bonus which at least could be marginally usefull in that role. Great design, yea.
ENOUGH SAID, ENOUGH SAID/?? Go out and die. You guns will chew 3000 cap per MINUTE alone while firing. Idiot
|

Omega Bloodstone
|
Posted - 2006.07.27 14:29:00 -
[390]
Originally by: Jim McGregor Edited by: Jim McGregor on 27/07/2006 14:20:24
Originally by: Omega Bloodstone Everyone, I know some folks are upset at the Minnie tier 3 at the moment. But one thing I have thought about is the combination of shield amps with Minnie BS lvl 5. I mean damn!!!! It will rep shield hard. So, based on a possible 6 mid slot option you could go:
XL shield booster named or tech II, em shield hardener II because its tier 1 and EM will need compensation for, tech II inv. field x's 2, a shield amp (CCP put the tech II version out now for this ship please!!!), and then a large extender II. Combine this with the 37.5% shield boost at BS level 5(note the amp adds 30%!!! to this for 67.5% total boost)and WOW!!! likely the best shield tank in the game with only 6 slots. (though I wish there was 7). Its actually prolly gonna be a damn good ship if not for the tank alone.
Its just a free shield boost amplifier. If Rokh puts in a extra one of those, he has 6 medium slots remaining just like this ship. Also he has a invulnerability field built in the ship (5% to all resists per level). And the Rokh has more base shield to start with too. And it has a range bonus, which means he can use better ammo than anyone else at a given range. DigitalCommunist calculated it to mean about 11% more damage.
So I dont know what the purpose of this ship is. Im still going to go with the theory that its supposed to be a good alpha damage ship, but then it would be better off with a damage bonus instead of rof.
Damn you Jim lol. You are right totally. Beating up my post, but when making a comparison I have to agree. There would only be a 7% boosting difference but the Caldari one would pwn the Minnie's ones resistences making the Caldari superior. But if they gave the Minnie one a 7 mid as well I think that would be a decent balance giving a boost advantage back to the Minnie tier 3. Good post Jim, very valid point.
|
|

Omega Bloodstone
|
Posted - 2006.07.27 14:31:00 -
[391]
Edited by: Omega Bloodstone on 27/07/2006 14:35:11 Edited by: Omega Bloodstone on 27/07/2006 14:33:53
Originally by: Exiled One
Originally by: Lenaria Heh, Gallente got exellent blasterboat and exellent fleet ship - Hyperion will excel in both roles. 1 extra mid with SB will offset short targeting range, and damage of that baby is better than Mega. Caldary got... well, you know that. Ammar got a ship which is better Apoc than Apoc and better Arma than Arma in the same time... enouth said. And minmatars got an victim of abortion again. Shield boosting bonus on something whats look like mediocre arty platform - which is only _slightly_ better than Tempest to begin with ... ergh. Not even resistance bonus which at least could be marginally usefull in that role. Great design, yea.
ENOUGH SAID, ENOUGH SAID/?? Go out and die. You guns will chew 3000 cap per MINUTE alone while firing. Idiot
You stated that the tier 3 is a slightly better artillery platform than the Tempest. Na, because the Tempest 6 1400 II's plus 2 large launchers(while killing your grid) is more dps than the 8 1400 II's because remeber the tier 3 does not have the damage bonus the Tempest does.
Edit: 6 1400 II's with BS lvl 5 on a Tempest is 25% more damage. This almost makes the dps the same as the 8 1400 II's. But the Tempest has 2 more high slots open
|

Tervaga
|
Posted - 2006.07.27 14:40:00 -
[392]
Originally by: Omega Bloodstone
Originally by: Jim McGregor Its just a free shield boost amplifier. If Rokh puts in a extra one of those, he has 6 medium slots remaining just like this ship. Also he has a invulnerability field built in the ship (5% to all resists per level). And the Rokh has more base shield to start with too. And it has a range bonus, which means he can use better ammo than anyone else at a given range. DigitalCommunist calculated it to mean about 11% more damage.
So I dont know what the purpose of this ship is. Im still going to go with the theory that its supposed to be a good alpha damage ship, but then it would be better off with a damage bonus instead of rof.
Damn you Jim lol. You are right totally. Beating up my post, but when making a comparison I have to agree. There would only be a 7% boosting difference but the Caldari one would pwn the Minnie's ones resistences making the Caldari superior. But if they gave the Minnie one a 7 mid as well I think that would be a decent balance giving a boost advantage back to the Minnie tier 3. Good post Jim, very valid point.
What happens when you factor in the Mael's recharge rate at the optimal point, with a semi-passive tank (probably need PDUs or cap flux coils in lows, to not destroy the boosting)? I'd do some playing around myself, but I'm not particularly great at math and it'd take a while :\
|

Wizie
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.07.27 14:41:00 -
[393]
I was certain it would be a crappy 8/6/6 layout.
Thanks for nothing CCP.
----------------- Sig removed by some noob |

Exiled One
Amarr
|
Posted - 2006.07.27 14:52:00 -
[394]
Originally by: Wizie I was certain it would be a crappy 8/6/6 layout.
Thanks for nothing CCP.
Sadly, me being amarr, i still fly minmatar. I have to agree with you, slave; guess faction wars will have to wait, we now must figure out what CCP is thinking and if there's a point in keeping on training for the iwin, wasting your time, your money and if there's a future for eve, because i know that past was awesome..
|

Ath Amon
|
Posted - 2006.07.27 15:38:00 -
[395]
Edited by: Ath Amon on 27/07/2006 15:40:21 mah i hope the stats posted on the forum are wrong or... lol
the mael is a very crappy ship
slow, cumbersome, 460 signature!, and 8/6/6 will not be enought to make a good tank even with its "fantastic" 7.5 to shield recharger
as AC platform i foubt it will work... probably people will armor tank it and use mids for ew
as an arty platform again it will probably not take advantage of its bonus... the tempest can do mostly the same things for a lower cost.
still i see the tempest as better suited for that role with better speed/maneuverability, same damage and 2 nos at the cost of a midslot
the hyperion instead seem to be a veeeery good ship... and 50km is a very gimped targetting range? the phoon have a 60km base and not many problems to reach 200km... i think it will replace the mega as a rail platform while with that stats i don't think will replace the blasterthorn
|

Tiuwaz
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.07.27 15:40:00 -
[396]
I wrote this already in another thread, but seeing this thread is specifically about maelstrom, i'll repost it:
i am close to tears here 
maelstrom as a closerangeboat is dead
Why?:
8/6/6 layout, too few midslots for a gunneryboat to shield tank Mass/speed: 125.000.000 mass /115m/s in comparison: tempest has 102.500.000 mass / 140m/s, raven 110.000.000 mass / 115m/s (it will handle worse than a ******* raven) Sig radius: 460sig (in comparison tempest has 340 sig) has to use all 8 highslots for guns, so no Nos small cargobay: 550m3 (tempest has 600 m3) and this while using 33% more ammo than tempest the only minor plus is a 100m3 dronebay compared to 75m3 on tempest
take all this and maelstrom is dead as acboat
oke it seems then its designed to be a pure artillery boat, fair enough, but lets look at it then under that perspective whats wrong
7,5% to shieldboost amount per level, who in his right mind actively tanks a sniper BS in fleetfights?
7,5% to shieldboost amount per level, we got a crazy guy who actively tanks a sniper BS, HELLO, i need sensorboosters and trackingcomps, if you have ever shot something with artillery you know how important tracking mods are, so what 2sensorboosters, 2 tracking mods, and 2 slots left shield tank? (optimal is rather bad on arties so 1 tracking comp and 2 enhancers wont cut it imo, need 2 tracking comps and 1 enhancer)
max locked targets 3, WTF?? why, this hurts this ship alot if its designed to be a specialized sniper
sensor strenght 21 (tempest 19) well this is in line but again i would have thought a specialized sniper would be less vulnerable to ecm
scan resolution 90mm (tempest 100mm, raven 85mm), whatever 
lower dmg modifier: i try to explain this, tempest has a higher dmg modifier per gun due to the dmg bonus, this way a single gun of the tempest does more dmg than one of the maelstrom. How is that important? Simple, Ships often die before you can send a full volley, or lag only lets you activate a few guns (thopse with fleet experience now, what I am talking about) you switch between targets often without having fired full volleys
if you factor in this wasted unfired shots, then you get more dmg out of a tempest than a mealstrom, practically making the tempest the more damaging sniper, despite the maelstrom having an extra 0,75 turret over the tempest
in addition to that the tempest has 2 free slots to use for antitacklerdefense or cruise missiles (only fitting 1 cruise missile launcher already gives you a higher nominal dps)
My fazit: The maelstrom utterly fails in every aspect, the only thing it might be good is as a pve ship only, and even there it will be still outclassed by missile ships or the rokh (which has better initial tracking and 1 more mid slot for tanking)
fellow Minmatars prepare to bend over, they are coming to you, hard and without lube
Originally by: Oveur This is not the conspiracy you are looking for.
|

Testy Mctest
|
Posted - 2006.07.27 15:45:00 -
[397]
Originally by: Jim McGregor Also he has a invulnerability field built in the ship (5% to all resists per level). And the Rokh has more base shield to start with too.
It has an Invuln field that is unaffected by stacking penalty built in.
As I said elsewhere, I dont mind the Rokh having a better bonus, as long as the ships as a whole are balanced - which with these stats, they arent.
Originally by: Lord Violent EvE is slowly becoming a game for the stupid being catered to by devs, as they lack ability to kill/survive anything.
|

Ath Amon
|
Posted - 2006.07.27 15:45:00 -
[398]
lol  
i saw just now... max targets 3
  
this ship was designed by amarrians to make minnie lose the war  
|

Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.27 15:50:00 -
[399]
Originally by: Testy Mctest
It has an Invuln field that is unaffected by stacking penalty built in.
As I said elsewhere, I dont mind the Rokh having a better bonus, as long as the ships as a whole are balanced - which with these stats, they arent.
Yeah, you are right. Even better for the Caldari. Im so happy.
Im wondering if this ship is supposed to make new players capable of competing with the old players faster? There must be some point to this obvious overpowering. Maybe there will be some new player offer where they get a free Rokh or something.
--- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |

Sarmaul
0utbreak
|
Posted - 2006.07.27 22:10:00 -
[400]
BTW ignore those placeholder stats as they are very very old
TEAM MINMATAR FORUMS - In Rust We Trust - |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 .. 14 :: [one page] |